Genesis 4:1 Did EVE Really Say: “I have Gotten a MAN From The Lord?”

Introduction:

Now this article should really be Part 5 of my series of articles: “Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil, Or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?” (See link No.1 below), so I will be adding it to that page, whilst leaving this article as a stand alone article. Moreover, I have dealt with this subject within that series of articles, but due to my having discovered more proof and evidence, this week commencing 13th February 2022, that shows that Genesis 4:1 in its KJV rendering is 100% bunkum and hogwash. It therefore behoved me to share this additional Truth about the damnable translation of this verse.

Here is the bogus verse in question, as written in the KJV:

Genesis 4:1 (KJV) And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from The Lord.

OK, so let me make this known first of all, for this will be mostly the work of a man by the name of Clifton A. Emahiser who was knowledgable in THE SEEDLINE DOCTRINE, as it is known by some, but not by me, I call it The Two Seeds Truth. Moreover, he wasn’t correct in all his teaching, which I will reveal in another article. So here are his opening remarks on Genesis 4:1:

THE PROBLEM WITH GENESIS 4:1

Many may reply, “I didn’t know there was a question concerning that verse.” Unless one understands that the Hebrew is badly corrupted on this passage, he will, like most everyone else who has ever read it, arrive at a mistaken conclusion. Before we start an evaluation to discover the ramifications, let’s read it according to the KJV: “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.

Genesis 4:1 is probably one of the most misunderstood verses in the Bible. This is really an understatement of fact to say the least. On the understanding of this verse, lies the entire theme of the Bible. Actually Genesis 3:15 is the main theme of the Bible, but without a correct understanding of Genesis 4:1, the theme becomes muddled and confused! Therefore it is of the utmost importance that one gain an understanding of this verse or the entire Bible will remain a mystery! It is with this thought, that the object of this Bible study is to completely master this passage so that the story of the Bible can be opened up to us in all of its splendour and brilliance.”

Later, he then goes on to say:

It would appear, if this were the only verse in the Bible that had anything to say about this matter of the birth of Cain, and if the King James version of the Bible were the only version of the Bible we had, that we would have to accept the fact that Adam was the father of Cain. You see, here is the problem, Adam was not the father of Cain! Not only are the “Jews” of today not of Adam, but they know themselves they are descended from Cain. Let’s see who the “Jew” admits himself to be. In the “Jewish” publication Liberal Judaism, January, 1949, there is an article entitled, “Liberal Judaism and Israel” written by one of their greatest and most renowned Rabbis, Dr. Abba Hillel Silver. Dr. Silver, writing about the then new State of Israel says:

{“’ … the third commonwealth of the Jewish Nation is thus an accomplished fact. The State of Israel exists.

{“’As a result the concept of the wandering Jew is bound eventually to disappear along with the term (galut) exile. All nations send forth immigrants to all parts of the world. People are continually moving from one country to another, and change their citizenship, but they are not regarded as exiles.

{“’This fact alone – the end of national exile for the Jewish people, as such —is destined to affect favourably the psyche of the Jew throughout the world. It will endow the Jew, wherever he lives, with a self respect and a sense of security, a normal tone, long-wanting in Jewish experience. For the curse of Cain, the curse of being an outcast and a “wanderer” over the face of the earth has been removed …’”}

So here, Emahiser, in using this quote from Rabbi Silver, has proven to us that the Jews KNOW WHO THEY ARE, and that they definitely KNOW who they are descended from, and, just as they knew in the first century, when they lied to Yashua Messiah our future King, when they claimed that: “They were not born of fornication”.

John 8:40-41 (MCV) But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you The Truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to Him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

Notice, that they did not say they have Abraham as their father, they went straight to The Garden event claiming to be sons of Adam – a part of God’s creation, and thereby denied (they lied) that they were the Devil’s sons through Cain.

For further evidence, we now go to the immense work called “The Interpreter’s Bible”, which I only learned of at the commencement of this study. The Interpreter’s Bible, is a twelve volume work of 36 editors who worked together in order to produce it. It is available online at this web address:

Here it says this:

Cain seems originally to have been the ancestor of the Kenites … The meaning of the name is ‘metalworker’ or ‘smith’; here, however, it is represented as a derivation of a word meaning ‘acquire’, ‘get’ — one of the popular etymologies frequent in Genesis — hence the mother’s words I have gotten a man. ‘From the Lord’ (KJV) is a rendering, following the Septuagint (LXX) and Vulgate., of ’eth Yahweh, which is literally, ‘with Yahweh’, and so unintelligible here (the help of [RSV] is not in the Hebrew). It seems probable that ’eth should be ’oth — so, ‘the mark of Yahweh’ — and that the words are a gloss …”

Did you notice that? As Genesis 4:1 is written in the KJV it is taken from the Hebrew term ‘Eth Yahweh’ meaning ‘with Yahweh’ or better ‘laying with Yahweh in order to conceive’ which, as they have correctly said, is unintelligible or utter nonsense, and it is from this very same nonsense that they conjured up the erroneous term: “I have gotten a man from the Lord.”

This can be firmed up from The Geneva Bible where it states:

Genesis 4:1 (Geneva Bible) Afterward the man knew Eve his wife, which conceived and bare Cain, and said, I have obtained a man by the LORD.

This interpretation clearly leads us to believe that Eve lay with The Lord in order to conceive, which has already been declared here as preposterous. However, at the same time, it is also telling us that Eve definitely conceived by someone other than Adam!

If we now go to the other writings that I used to support The Truth in my original article, and post them here, we’ll see how they make even more sense now that I have revealed Emahiser’s findings:

First from the Aramaic Targums:

Genesis 4:1 And the woman saw Sammael, the angel of death, and she was afraid and knew that the tree was good for food, and that it was a remedy for the enlightenment of the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise. She took of its fruit and ate and also gave (it) to her husband and he ate.”

Second from the Aramaic Targum, pseudo-Jonathan:

Genesis 4:1 Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the Angel (of death) and she became pregnant and bore Cain. And he was like those on high and not like those below. And she said: ‘I have got a man from the angel of the LORD’.”

Third from the Targum Onkelos: THE TARGUM OF PALESTINE IV:

Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Hava (Eve) his wife, who had desired (lusted after) the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Kain; and she said, I have acquired a man, (from) the angel of the Lord. And she added to bear from her husband Adam his twin, (superfetation) even Habel (Abel). And Habel was a shepherd of the flock, but Kain was a man working in the earth. (All brackets mine)

Fourth from the Rabbinic work of Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer: (See link below.)

Genesis 4:1 And she saw that his likeness was not of earthly beings, but of the heavenly beings, and she prophesied and said: I have gotten a man from the Lord.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirkei_De-Rabbi_Eliezer

So there we have it, Eve NEVER said “I have gotten a man from the Lord” but rather: “I have gotten a man from the angel of death – The Serpent Creature!!”

I will add further articles to this series as I am sure more evidence will reveal itself.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

Some complimentary reading to the above:

2. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

3. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

4. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

5. Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:

6. The Jews are The Tares fit only for burning – a real Holocaust!:

7: Salvation Is Of The Jews. Oh really, Is That So!?:

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 8 – The Blacks and Their Satanic Perversions of The Holy Scriptures Exposed

Before I start this crucial part of this series of blog posts we need to address this skin colour issue with regards to the writing of The Holy Scriptures and the reason why skin pigmentation does not appear to be of any importance to God or His authors. Why Is that? Quite simply because the black races were still in Africa and those that were in Mesopotamia, today called the Middle East, were there as slaves and/or eunuch slaves and were not deemed as people of any significance – they were non-entities. Did “Black lives matter”? Not at all. This means that The Holy Scriptures were written for white Israelite people and only white Israelite people because they were God’s chosen white Israelite people.

Is God, by Freudian Marxist Pharisee PC liberal standards, a RACIST!!!???? You bet.

We need to understand this basic, The Holy Scriptures are about Israel and then Israel and then Israel. Other nations and peoples only feature as and when they interact with???????? You got it, Israel and the Israelites who I will now prove were and still are WHITE!!!!!!!

Furthermore, I will confound their stupid non-arguments before I even expose one of their many infantile blasphemous errors and satanic misinterpretations and gross distortions of The Holy Scriptures by quoting one or three Holy Scriptures of my own and with some Strong’s definitions to back them up, but first things first – Adam and Eve:

Were they white or were they brown or were they – horror of horrors – black!!!???? From Strong’s Concordance:

Adam – H119 – ‘âdam – aw-dam’ – To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

OK, there it is folks – Adam flushed red in his face and was of a ruddy complexion, just like his descendant King David:

1 Samuel 17:42 (KJV) And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and RUDDY, and of a fair countenance. (Emphasis mine)

Now I don’t know about you, but I have NEVER heard of blacks being refered to as people of a fair countenance or that are beautiful or handsome or pleasing to the eye to look at. Moreover notice that David, like Adam, was RUDDY in complexion and from Strongs, once more, we get:

Ruddy – H132 – ad-mo-nee’, – ad-mo-nee’ – From H119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion): – red, ruddy.

Moving on we then find this gem of a verse which I believe says it all and it leaves the blacks and their black Israelite insulting whacky ideas stone dead in the water:

Lamentations 4:7 (KJV) Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire: (Emphasis mine)

Let’s also be clear, Nazerites are ISRAELITES and these Nazerites, that were residing in the Southern Kingdom of Judah when it was invaded by the Babylonians, are described as having skin that was purer than snow and whiter than milk. Now how white do Israelites have to be before these brainwashed blacks get the picture? In the next verse it states:

Lamentations 4:8 (KJV) Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick. (Emphasis mine)

Now if you get this verse thrown at you by these silly people just point out that white skin turns darker as starvation takes its toll. These people definitely died of starvation due to the seige of their city by the Babylonians.

From Answers.Com – Why do people turn black when they die?….

“As body begins purification, the skin will take on a greenish tone as sulfurous gasses break down the red blood cells. Intestinal gasses flood into the body tissues producing first green then dark coloration.”

OK, having laid the foundation that Israelites were and are white, I will now deal with a list of Holy Scriptures that these silly blacks use in the most pathetic ways in order to make their ludicrous and laughable claims – starting with:

2 Kings 5:27 (KJV) The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow.

Now here they use the recording of this event as proof that this Israelite man was black in order for the leprosy to contrast as white as snow with his black skin or to be recorded as the leprosy being a representation of a change of his skin colour. However if we do our research what do you think we will find? This:

As we can see brown skinned people do not produce leprosy that is as white a snow but rather leprosy that is the same colour as their brown or black skin. Here is a further image:

They then use Leviticus 13:2-6 in the same way with regard to leprosy but still making the same false claims:

Leviticus 13:4 (KJV) If the bright spot be white in the skin of his flesh, and in sight be not deeper than the skin, and the hair thereof be not turned white; then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague seven days:

Let’s be clear folks white people have white leprosy and blacks have black leprosy:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/leprosy?sort=mostpopular&excludenudity=true&mediatype=photography&phrase=leprosy

Next up we have Acts 21:37-38, but for this exposé I have included verse 39:

Acts 21:37-39 (KJV) And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek? 38 Art not thou that Egyptian (a Canaanite Jew inhabitant of Egypt), which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers? 39 But Paul said, I am a man which am [not a Jew] a Judean of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Before I press on dear people you also need to know that these duped black people believe that the Egyptians were black also. Egyptians were olive or swarthy, not black. So through using this passage they think that they can prove that Paul was black as the Roman captain thought he was an Egyptian. How bizarre can this weird concept get?

So what colour was this alleged Egyptian and what would an Egyptian be doing leading an insurrection of 4,000 murderers? Who were the biggest trouble makers and murderers that the Romans had to deal with in these parts of the Roman Empire? I will give you one guess. Yes that’s right – the Canaanite Jews – The Zealots who looked white even though they were, and are, not white and do not claim to be white.

In verse 39 we read Paul declaring that HE WAS A MAN!!! Now why would he make such a strange declaration? Did he think the chief captain was blind or even stupid? No, not at all, Paul was making it clear that he was not a hu-man, not a snake-man – not a viper man – not a serpent man from The Garden and Canaan post flood – not a Canaanite Jew.

Make sure you understand, folks, that Paul was a white Semitic Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin – fair skinned, not a Canaanite Jew or a black Canaanite. Modern day Benjaminites are the Nordic Nations of Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/Israel%20Not%20Captiv%20%5BA%5D.htm

Please note, the information in the above link, although very helpful, is not 100% accurate, especially when speaking of the Canaanite Jews. Canaanite Jews were NOT Edomites.

OK what do we have next?

Numbers 6:5 (KJV) All the days of the vow of his separation there shall no razor come upon his head: until the days be fulfilled, in the which he separateth himself unto the LORD, he shall be holy, and shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow. (Emphasis mine)

Now I presume these dolts read ‘blacks with their dreadlocks’ into this verse. LOL. Oh yeah marn – pass dat weed marn. Where’s Bob Marley when you need him? Absolutely hilarious.

As shown above, Nazerites were WHITE Israelites that decided to set themselves apart from the rest of Israelite society and make the Nazerite vow in the early days of Ancient Israel. This meant they would not shave their hair and allow it to grow, nor drink any alchohol or fruit of the vine, nor touch a dead body. You can read all the other details in Numbers chapter 6, but rest assured it has nothing to do with blacks and their dreadlocks. LOL

Next up and even more laughable, Jeremiah 8:21

Jeremiah 8:21 (KJV) For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me. (Emphasis mine)

Now believe it or not they actually construe this as a reference to skin colour. Unbelievable or what? In Truth this idea is beyond laughable and brings shame upon black people in general through the dumb ignorance of such a distorted and false interpretation.

In these verses from Jeremiah 8 we are getting a description of his reactions of what he is witnessing, that is, the seige and sacking of Jerusalem by the Babylonians with no signs of any repentance displayed by the Israelite occupants of that city. Jeremiah is stunned, traumatised, astonished, shocked and dismayed beyond anything we can begin to imagine or measure. He is hurt to his heart which is filled with a dark foreboding – a spiritual blackness and his countenance shows it through a metaphorical darkening of his face through mourning. No doubt he would have looked distraught, pale and drawn, devoid of expression. Strong’s describes it as ashen. Rest assured, though, and, as I have already proven above, Jeremiah, being an Israelite, was not a black man.

OK next verse, Hebrews 1:3:

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV) Who being the brightness of His Glory, and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by The Word of His Power, when he had by Himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of The Majesty on high.

Now this one has me beat so if any of you can make a connection between this verse and blacks I will be very interested to hear it, if only for humour value.

Next verse, Ezekiel 8:3:

Ezekiel 8:3 (KJV) And he put forth the form of an hand, and took me by a lock of mine head; and The Spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the inner gate that looketh toward the north; where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy.

I presume here that we are back to the dreadlocks nonsense and is if white people do not have locks of hair on their heads. Curiouser and curiouser ‘Cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English).’

Next verse, Genesis 2:7:

Genesis 2:7 (KJV) And The LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Now this one is even more surreal, because these blacks presume that Adam and Eve were brown instead of white. Through their wishful thinking they reason that because the dust MUST HAVE BEEN BROWN, Adam and Eve were therefore brown or worse, black!!!

Interestingly I challenged one of these idiots on social media comments by stating for the record that here in the UK, in Cornwall, we have white clay or white dust and I put it to him that there must have been white clay or dust in The Garden in order that Adam and Eve be created WHITE in order for him to blush and I will post from Strong’s again:

Adam: H119 – ‘âdam – aw-dam’: To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

Now I don’t know about you, but I don’t EVER remember seeing a black man turn rosy or flush red in the face. Perhaps they go from from one shade of black to another shade of black that no one would ever notice.

And with that I will call it a cut and continue with more of their laughable interpretations in part 9.