Revelation 22-19 (KJV) And If Any Man Shall Take Away From The Words of The Book of This Prophecy….

….God shall take away his part out of The Book of Life, and out of The Holy City, and from the things which are written in this Book.

The same verse from the Greek Transliteral:

Revelation 22:19 (Greek Transliteral) And if-ever any-one should-be-eliminating from The Sayings of-the scrolled of-the before-averment (Prophecy) this shall-be-eliminating the God placer the part of-him from the Wood (Tree) of-the Life and out of-the city the holy of-the ones-having-been-written in the scrolled this. (Brackets mine)

Now this verse has always troubled me due to the fact that I have found so many corruptions, omissions and religious agenda driven translator changes elsewhere in the KJV Bible. This means, when it comes to Revelation I tread VERY carefully when interpreting it. In fact I seldom work on Revelation at all due to this severe warning verse hanging over it.

We then have an additional dimension to this verse, for there are satanic blind guide numbskulls, out there, that apply this verse to the WHOLE of The Bible when it applies to Revelation ONLY. This is the kind of blasphemous stupidity and ignorance I deal with regularly on social media platforms when confronting fakestream Bible scholars.

However, when it comes to, what appears to be, a contradiction in the pages of Revelation, it cannot be ignored. Furthermore, how do we know that words have not already been taken away from this book, or added, or changed by the 16th and 17th century translators, or even the writers of the Greek Manuscripts for that matter!? We don’t!

So without further ado let’s take a look at the suspect verses, and I will use the KJV as I have not yet worked on my MCV version of Revelation as yet.

Revelation 19:11-14 (KJV) And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and He that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself. 13 And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and ‘his’? name is called The Word of God. 14 And the armies which were in heaven followed Him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

Now the first thing that hits us is this horse, upon which Yashua Messiah is sat, and this horse is referred to as a HIM!!! Now who refers to animals as ‘hims’ and ‘hers’? (unless they’re your pets) when the usual term here would be ‘IT’.

This word ‘him’ is translated from the Greek word ‘autos’, pronounced ‘ow-tos’. In my Greek Interlinear is uses ‘auton’, but they also use ‘autou’ as well. This Greek word seems to be very flexible, for it can mean ‘him’, ‘himself’ ‘her’ ‘his’ ‘itself’ or ‘it’ etc. etc..

In addition to this, my Greek Interlinear has two renderings of Revelation 19:11 with one saying ‘him’ and the other saying ‘it’ using the Greek word ‘auton’. This means we know that the Greek word ‘auton’ can mean either ‘it’ or ‘him’ and all determined by the whims of the translators or perhaps I should say by the agenda of the translators.

OK, I will now deviate from this article, for a while, and draw your attention to my earlier article entitled: “The Truth of John 1:1-4” (see link No. 1 below). In that article I prove that The Word otherwise called The Saying, in the Greek MSS, is The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit (aka The Holy Spirit in religious jargon terminology) and not Yashua Messiah at all. Yes The Saying (The Word) emanates from Yashua Messiah, from His Breath but, in and of itself, The Saying (The Word) is not Yashua Messiah – The Saying (The Word), or the POWER of The Saying (The Word), is the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit.

So back to these verses in Revelation and I will copy The Greek Transliteral version of these verses here:

Revelation 19:11-14 (Greek Transliteral) And I-perceived the heaven having-been-up-opened and you-be-perceiving horse white and the One-sitting on it believing being-called and truthful and in just-togetherness (righteousness) he-is-judging and battling 12 the yet viewers (the eyes) of-Him blaze-of-fire and on the head of-him diadems many having names having-been-written which not-yet-one has-perceived (which no one has seen nor is aware of) if no Himself 13 And having-been-about-cast cloak having-been-dipped to-blood has-been-called the name of-it The Saying of-the God placer 14 and the war-troops in the heaven followed to-Him on horses white having-been-in-slipped cotton (cambric) white and clean. (Brackets mine)

I will now rewrite Revelation as it should be:

Revelation 19:11-14 (MCV) And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and He that sat upon it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself. 13 And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and its name is called The Saying of Yah. 14 And the armies which were in heaven followed Him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

Notice this crucial difference from the KJV, and you might say, but that now makes no sense at all, as it is written, and you’re right, but what that says to me is that there is something wrong with the words that precede it. This also says to me that verse 13 is spurious by addition due to three things: 1) Elsewhere in The Greek MSS, in numerous places, the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit is referred to as an ‘it’ and not a ‘he’ or a ‘him’ (see link Nos. 1 & 2 below). 2) We have a contradiction in that only Yashua Messiah knows His name in verse 12 and then we’re told His name is The Word of God in verse 13. 3) If we join verse 12 to verse 14 leaving out verse 13 what do we have?

Lets take a look:

Revelation 19:12, 14 (MCV) His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself. 14 And the armies which were in heaven followed Him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

See that? Beautiful text continuum!! making verse 13 a load of irrelevant and erroneous nonsense. However, I am not going to remove it, as I do not wish to risk my name being removed from The Book of Life, but when I get to Revelation in my MCV Bible, I will certainly highlight this verse and expose it for what it is.

Moreover, I will also draw a parallel with a verse I discovered in 1 Corinthians 15, that is, verse 29, which is also spurious, and this spuriousness has caused a lot of trouble amongst believing Christians for centuries, with them arguing over it non-stop and getting nowhere (see link No. 3 below). Likewise with this verse we get believing Christians going at it hammer and tong over whether the alleged cloak of Yashua Messiah was dipped in His Blood or the blood from the battle field.

Finally, and to sum up, what do we have? This: that Yashua Messiah is NOT The Word of Yah but, rather, The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, thereby making verse 13 a lie! Plus we have this contradiction of His name only being known by Him and no one else, and in the next verse we’re told His name is The Word of Yah!!!! Ding! Ding! Hello!! Excuse me!

So there we have it, yet more solid gold proof that The Word or, better, The Saying is the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit and it’s an ‘IT’ not a ‘he’ or ‘him’, so therefore cannot be Yashua Messiah as claimed in verse 13, but it is The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit which emanates from Yashua Messiah and The Father.

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: I am currently publishing my version of The Set Apart Scriptures – The MCV Bible, link here: https://thetruthnotdoctrine.wordpress.com

In Yashua Messiah’s Set Apart name

Messenger Charles

1. The Truth of John 1:1-4:

The Truth of John 1:1-4 – Part 1 of 2

2. Exposing the Trinity Lie!:

Exposing The Trinity Lie – Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5

3. Is 1 Corinthians 15:29 a Spurious Verse?:

Is 1 Corinthians 15:29 a Spurious Verse?

Is 1 Corinthians 15:29 a Spurious Verse?

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: I am currently publishing my version of The Set Apart Scriptures – The MCV Bible, link here: https://thetruthnotdoctrine.wordpress.com

Introduction

Now this verse in 1 Corinthians 15 is very interesting, but not for reasons that you might at first imagine for, in my opinion, this is not a Scripture at all, and yet there it is in the penultimate chapter of 1 Corinthians. This is a bogus verse, having already caused many, many, many hours of wasted time for Bible scholars of all denominations (demon-inations), who have spent those hours trying to explain it, but failing every time, NEVER coming to a satisfactory conclusion. Quite a few of them refer to it as the most perplexing and difficult verse to understand in all the writings of Paul, even in the whole of the New Testament. So when I read these views in their papers my Spiritual antennae went into overdrive, and they flashed their helpful warning lights at me.

This means that I immediately ceased doing by own research on this nonsensical verse, resulting in only three or four hours of wasted time. However, it was still three of four hours of precious time that I could have used more productively, now that I am embroiled in writing my own version of the Set Apart Scriptures, which, as you can imagine, is a mammoth task, even with the assistance of computer technology.

So, as is my want, let’s copy and paste the culprit verse here from one or seven Bible Versions; starting with my version – The MCV, followed by the KJV, The Greek Transliteral, The Scriptures 2009, The Good News Bible, The Phillips NT and The Amplified Bible:

1 Corinthians 15:29 (MCV) Else what shall they do, that is, those which are Baptised for the Spiritually dead, if the dead rise not at all? And why are they then Baptised for their sake?

1 Corinthians 15:29 (KJV) Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?

1 Corinthians 15:29 (The Greek Transliteral) Else (any) what? They-shall-be-doing the ones-being-baptised for-sake-of dead-ones if absolutely (wholly) dead-ones not are-being-roused why also they-are-being baptised for-sake-of them.

1 Corinthians 15:29 (The Scriptures 2009) Otherwise, what shall they do who are immersed for the dead, if the dead are not raised at all? Why indeed are they immersed for the dead?

1 Corinthians 15:29 (Good News Bible) Now, what about those people who are baptized for the dead? What do they hope to accomplish? If it is true, as some claim, that the dead are not raised to life, why are those people being baptized for the dead?

1 Corinthians 15:29 (The Phillips NT) Further, you should consider this, that if there is to be no resurrection what is the point of some of you being baptised for the dead by proxy? Why should you be baptised for dead bodies?

1 Corinthians 15:29 (The Amplified Bible) Otherwise, what will those do who are being baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people even baptized for them?

Right, first question! What is this satanic drivel all about? Answer: Baptism for the sake of the dead, whether they are Spiritually dead, or completely dead, is what it’s all about!

How is that even a thing? How is it Scriptural? And why is Paul even mentioning it? when it’s not Scriptural, for NO ONE can be Baptised for the sake of another man or woman, whether they are Spiritually dead or completely dead. The whole thing is ludicrous, and 100% erroneous, so why is this verse in 1 Corinthians 15? And why has Paul not exposed it for what it is?

In the previous verses we have this:

1 Corinthians 15:23-28 But each man in his own order: The Messiah – The Anointed being the first-fruits; afterwards they that are The Messiah’s – The Anointed’s at His coming to be near at hand. 24 Then cometh the end, when He shall have delivered up The Kingdom to Yah The Father; when He shall have neutered, and rendered useless, all ruling principalities, and all authorities and power structures on this earth. 25 For He must Reign and rule His Kingdom with a Royal Sceptre of iron, till He hath put all His enemies under His feet. 26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 27 For The Father hath put all things under His Son’s feet. But when The Father says: “All things have been put into subjection under my Son,” it is clear that The Father, who put all things in subjection under Him, is excepted, because The Father is not in subjection to His own Son. 28 And when all things shall be subjected unto The Son, then shall The Son also Himself be subject unto The Father that put all things under Him, that Yah The Father may be all in all.

Notice how verse 29 starts, for it reads as if it is a continuation of what’s been written before in the previous verse….else what shall they do?…. Yet this short opening phrase bears no relation to verse 28 at all!

Notice also the subject matter of the whole passage, for it has NOTHING to do with Baptism, let alone Baptism for the sake of others, so what’s going on? This thing has echoes of the other examples of spurious additions to the KJV I have revealed in the past: (see link Nos. 1, 2 & 3 below).

OK, so let’s see one or two examples of what these Bible scholars say:

From the: “For What Saith The Scriptures” web page, which I do not recommend:

“This is probably the most mysterious verse in all of the Pauline epistles—yea, in all the Bible. I doubt there is a person on earth who could fully explain it.”

He’s probably right, and that’s why it’s in there. For me, this verse stinks of sabotage and subversion by satanic Hellenising religious philosophers of the late first century and early second century AC, who wanted to mock Baptism. Plus to generally confuse believers on a huge scale and bog them down in endless research, studies and debates.

Look folks, I’ll tell you straight, just web search this verse and witness the number of web sites all attempting their silly meaningless explanations, when all the while no explanation exists, and is totally impossible to unravel – it’s a trap, or what they call today, in the modern vernacular, a ‘sting operation’! It can also be likened to an ‘Alice in Wonderland’ or ‘Through The Looking Glass’ blind rabbit hole, which leads us nowhere = the obvious intention of the saboteurs from the start!

Needless to say The Mormons (The Church of Latter Day Saints) are big on this verse and practise Baptism for the dead.

So were there any examples of this phenomenon in The Assemblies of Yah in Paul’s day? No, of course not, but certain pagan heathen water rituals were not unheard of.

From Wikipedia we get this:

“Baptism for the dead is mentioned in 1 Corinthians 15:29 as proof of a physical resurrection, though the exact meaning of the phrase is an open question among scholars. The plainest reading of the Greek text suggests vicarious baptisms performed by the living on behalf of the deceased, but some scholars dispute whether Paul approved of the practice or whether the verse truly refers to an actual physical practice among early Christians. Early heresiologists Epiphanius of Salamis (Panarion 28) and Chrysostom (Homilies 40) attributed the practice respectively to the Cerinthians and to the Marcionites, whom they identified as heretical “Gnostic” groups, while Ambrosiaster and Tertullian affirmed that the practice was legitimate and found among the New Testament Christians (though Tertullian later recanted his original beliefs in his later life as he became associated with Montanism)”

In this little piece we can see another reason for this satanic verse, that is, they have used it in a pathetic attempt to try and prove their blasphemous PHYSICAL resurrection garbage, when The Resurrection is a SPIRITUAL resurrection (see link No. 4 below). We then get a connection to Marcion and the Gnostics, who, apparently, practised this satanic ritual.

Next we have this Cerinthus creature who was a Serpent Seed Canaanite Jew, and active in the apostate Hellenised church…. (see link No. 5 below):

Cerinthus:

“One of a sect of early heretics, followers of Cerinthus, a Jew believed to have been born before the crucifixion, and one of the first heresiarchs in the (counterfeit) church. (Brackets mine)

“One of an ancient religious sect, so called from Cerinthus, a Jew, who attempted to unite the doctrines of Christ with the opinions of the Jews and Gnostics.”

….along with, the religious criminal Tertullian who, surprise surprise, also practised this blasphemous ritual – he seems to pop up everywhere, and always where there are evil shenanigans going on. My file on this reprobate is growing considerably, and I might even have enough evidence for an article on him alone. Watch this space.

OK I think that just about wraps it up. If you want to do more research on it, feel free, and also leave a comment, but I have wasted too much time on it already, and will happily strike it through when I publish 1 Corinthians in my MCV version.

In Yashua Messiah’s Set Apart name

Messenger Charles

1. Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons and Daughters of Yah Have To Obey Secular or Religious Authorities?:

Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons and Daughters of God HAVE TO OBEY SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS AUTHORITIES?

2. Can Born of Yah Christians Grieve The Holy Spirit?:

Can Born of Yah Christians Grieve The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit?

3. Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone?:

Should Christians be BAPTISED into YASHUA MESSIAH’S (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) NAME ALONE? – Part 1

4. Why Are There Two Resurrections?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/08/13/why-are-there-two-resurrections-part-1/

Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity; Eastern (Russian & Greek) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity; AngliCAINism is NOT Christianity; PROTESTantism is NOT Christianity.

5. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion