Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 4

For Parts 1, 2 and 3 see link No’s. 5, 6 and 7 below.

Welcome back to this series of articles. In part one I reported that as I was writing this article in 2007 a number of people were gathering in South London to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the British Abolition of Slavery, and I asked the question:

Would Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) have joined in?

Since reporting that event there has been considerable press coverage with images that I found to be the most wretched, disgusting, gut-wrenching, phoney and pathetic I have ever witnessed in my life! Young and not so young white creatures (I won’t call them men) with fake chains and shackles around their legs, necks and wrists wearing T shirts with ‘So Sorry’ emblazoned across the front of them, parading themselves like spineless emasculated wimps for all to see. Here are two images of their vile treachery:

Sell Out Traitors To Their Own Kind!
Disgusting Treacherous Wretches Who Have Their ‘Rewards’ Awaiting Them!

As you can see, some of them were even down on their knees grovelling on the ground. (The origins of ‘bending the knee’ anyone?) Now to all you satanic Cultural Jew Marxists in our midst I am sure this will appear to you as OK, even all very fine, but in reality what does it say about them and you? (See link No. 4 below) Not only that, but what does it say about modern Britain (I tend to leave the word ‘Great’ out these days). Furthermore, what does it prove? Has their wretched grovelling proved anything? No! Has it changed anything? No! Has their stupid, irresponsible, infantile emotional unthinking behaviour changed history? No! Will their vile behaviour make them ‘feel better’? No! because it’s the permanent guilt that ‘keeps ‘em going’; it’s the guilt that makes them ‘feel good’ and feel ‘righteous’. This is how wretchedly rotten they are, for their minds are calcified and cancerous. Has this behaviour made a positive impression on the black people of South London? I very much doubt it, and if I were a black person I would consider it a patronising insult and treat the whole phony episode with contempt.

So what’s it all about, and would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) have joined them in their little self-righteous parade of false remorse and false humility for the cameras? I don’t think so, in fact, I know so. The only anniversaries Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) will be interested in, if any, will be the future anniversaries of the commencement of His Kingdom here on this earth when He returns. None of man’s activities in this age will be remembered, nor commemorated, by way of an anniversary in God’s Kingdom, if anything The Lord will want them all forgotten! Well let’s hope He does.

The question now is this: how can I be so sure Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not join in with this celebration? To answer that we need to understand the origins of ‘slavery’ (the accurate name being Involuntary Servitude) and ask ourselves why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) allowed it to take place at all? The answer to that question can be found in Genesis 9 where we read of Yashua Messiah’s curse on Canaan. This curse, pronounced by Yashua Messiah through Noah, came, because of Ham’s sin with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife). Noah’s son Ham, Canaan’s father, “saw his father Noah’s nakedness” which in Biblical language can only be interpreted that he had sexual intercourse with his mother, whilst his father was in a drunken sleep:

Genesis 9:20-22 (KJV) And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

OK, am I saying that some of Canaan’s descendants were and are black? Yes. How do I know that? Easy, Cush, Canaan’s half-brother was black; the name Cush literally means ‘black’ and all olive, swarthy, dark and brown skinned people are descended from Ham. OK, back to this curse of Yashua Messiah’s, through Noah, upon Canaan and here are the verses:

Genesis 9:24 (KJV) And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

The word ‘servant’ here means a ‘bond-man’ or a man in bondage – a sold-man – sold into involuntary servitude. Canaan and his descendants were to be bonded and even worse than that, bonded to those already bonded. Notice too, that they were also to be in servitude to the descendants of Shem (white people) and bonded serfs of the descendants of Japheth (yellow people, who are now colonising Africa and fulfilling that prophecy), that is, they were also to become serfs of serfs. Many serf masters promoted certain numbers of their serfs to the positions of overseers and managers on their plantations, and that meant they had authority over their fellow serfs – Canaan’s black descendants became serfs of serfs.

Here is another truth; Black Africans were sold to Jewish slave traders who literally ran the black slave trade, but by whom? Other Africans, black people sold their own kind into slavery. Captains or commanders of slave ships (many owned by Jews) didn’t capture the Africans they took on board their ships, they had already been captured by other black Africans who worked for the Jews. This was big business, and a lucrative business for all concerned, not just the ship’s masters and Jewish ship owners. These facts are, of course, conveniently forgotten, deliberately played down and airbrushed from history, or just ignored by Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooders (propagandists) in the west. This especially applies within the whoring media, who seem to want to continually beat themselves, and us, up about a time in our history that we can do nothing about, nor change. The point we have to take from this is that blacks were as guilty as the Jews, and whites to a lesser degree, in this whole episode of history. Any other view is evil, treacherous, western liberal, manipulation of The Truth.

Here is another question; if we were to replace the sin of involuntary servitude, with the sin of murder and celebrate its abolition, would it make any sense? If these people in South London had been celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of murder, do you think Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would have joined in with that? Do you think He would have joined in, when black yoofs, in drug gang wars, are regularly being gunned down and murdered on the very same streets of (in allegedly gun abolished) South London? Can you see the blatant hypocrisy of it all? Which in turn means can you also see the Jews operating in the background driving this anti-white, white genocide satanic activity? That is, blacks with guns and whites unarmed!

We need to understand that involuntary servitude, on this earth, has never gone away – it still goes on – especially where The Jews are living and also in the Arab countries of the Middle East. Involuntary servitude is also rife in the Jewish run porn industry – many white girls are abducted in the Ukraine and Russia. The British abolishing involuntary servitude in 1807 didn’t bring it to an end. In fact the so-called British abolition of involuntary servitude (slavery) was an act of mere window dressing – a facade.

Here is a further question: Is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) interested in man’s ‘achievements’, that is, all those things that man can do, and does do, under his own strength? Well yes, up to a point, but then again no, because Yashua Messiah created man in the first place. He was, therefore, and is, perfectly well aware of what His creation is capable of ‘achieving’, including the past; the present, and what they could be capable of in the future.

When man fell in the Garden of Eden he acquired the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil through ‘eating the fruit of the tree’ he was commanded not to eat (See link No. 2 below).Now becauseman has acquired the knowledge of good and evil he is, therefore, quite capable of doing both things. This, in turn, can depend very much upon outside influences, his mood swings, his general disposition and/or his motives. His motives for ‘doing good’ or what we call ‘do-gooding’do not come from the Godhead; they come from the fallen man himself, that is, Satan’s will.Man, therefore, is very able at doing evil, that is, enslaving people and also very able at do-gooding, that is, abolishing slavery. All this ‘slavery’ or ‘abolition of slavery’ amounts to is an active demonstration of man’s behaviour in his fallen condition, nothing else. I hope you can now see why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not be celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of slavery. It is wholly a celebration of man’s ‘achievements’. Slavery and its abolition have got nothing to do with Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Now here is some information for mainstream Christians who have been sucked into this deceptive worldly liberal phenomenon called “Permanent guilt over slavery.” You see, they haven’t a clue about what Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) actually said about slavery? So let’s go to Ephesians now to find out and thereby set the record straight:

Ephesians 6:5 (KJV) Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;

In the above verse we can see another example of translators tinkering with the Word of God. In the Greek, the word for ‘servants’ is ‘doulos’ which means slaves. So here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, saying to those in involuntary servitude “be good obedient serfs” not rebellious: “I want my freedom” serfs. In verse 9, verse 5 it is then supported with:

Ephesians 6:9 (KJV) And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with Him.

Here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, telling serf masters to be equitable and just toward their serfs. Notice, there is neither one jot nor an inkling of the suggestion that the status quo of the serf/master master/serf arrangement should be changed nor rebelled against, especially with regard to Canaanites (the Jews and blacks).

Here above is concrete evidence that Yashua Messiah did not come to change this world, nor did He leave any instructions with His Messengers (apostles) to do so either. That also means that we, as Christians, are not to get involved in this world’s political systems, even if they look good and righteous on the outside.

Would Jesus Christ have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid?

To answer this and affirm what I have said above, what we have to understand is that Yashua Messiah did not come the first time, that is, in the first century to change this world or this age, nor its systems of governance, nor in fact, people’s sinful lifestyles. He came to take away all the sins of mankind, conquer death, and allow The Father time to draw (drag) those He had predestined, to His Son, that is, the gift of Grace filled Salvation to those He would call and choose, and to no one else.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

However, Apartheid was another of man’s systems of governance, but this time based upon God’s plan for the coming Kingdom, and the impetus to change it or abolish it, was from hu-man beings and/or from Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooding white men, that is, shabbos goy self-righteous treacherous white men = serfs of The Jews. The misguided issue of ‘hu-man rights’ is also tied up in this Apartheid system as well, (See link No. 3 below) but I will not go into that here. Here, too, is another Truth, the Roman Empire was far more evil, ruthless and cruel than the Apartheid governments of South Africa, and yet Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not say a word nor lift a finger against it, but He did tell Pontius Pilate that this world/age was not His kingdom.

Moreover, what many mainstream Christians, those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, also forget is the Barabbas character in the account of Yashua Messiah’s criminal show trial. He is mentioned in God’s Word for good reason, for Barabbas was big on regime change, he was a zealot of zealots, a first century terrorist – a real terrorist, and he wanted the Romans out of Judea!! He wanted ‘freedom’ and ‘independence’ for the Jews.

Had he been alive during the Apartheid era he, too, would have been a Cultural Jew Marxist and big on regime change in South Africa. He would have fought tooth and nail to get the white man out of power in South Africa, and he would definitely have been big on useless ‘hu-man rights’ for blacks too.

Back to the trial of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), and we know the story, don’t we? The crowd (being the Jews) called out for Barabbas to be released, not Yashua Messiah. Barabbas was a man after their own reptile hearts, a man with whom they had much in common, and a man they could relate to. Barabbas was their hero – a ‘freedom’ fighter. Yashua Messiah was a ‘nobody’ when compared with Barabbas. Yashua Messiah might as well have been a foreign invader from a planet, such was their hatred for Him.

OK, so Barabbas was big on regime change, but was Yashua Messiah big on regime change? No, He wasn’t, not then, but He will be in the future when He returns to shepherd and segregate the nations of this earth with a rod of iron (tough love) – the biggest regime change you will ever see. (See link

No. 1 below)

Finally, did Barabbas win in his zeal to remove the Romans from Judea? Not a chance, for in 70 AC, less than 40 years later, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem completely – they razed it to the ground, including Herod’s Temple.

Moreover, it will be very interesting to see what becomes of South Africa over the next thirty years or so. If Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) is anything to go by, I don’t hold out much hope for it. Keep your eyes on the news folks and witness all the end time results of the white man’s self-righteous and delusional do-gooding, all on behalf of the Cultural Marxist Jews!!

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

So would Yashua Messiah have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid, no way? Will Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) bring an end to involuntary servitude (because it still goes on today, even in 2007 and 2021)? Oh yes, but not until He returns to take His Throne as King of kings and Lord of lords, and all of man’s ways, his systems, his governments and futile ideas are brought to an end. Yashua Messiah please hurry that day! Not long now folks so stay strong in The Faith.

As a PS, you maybe curious as to why I use the term “involuntary servitude” instead of “slavery” and the answer to that is quite simple. In pre-civil war USA white men were free and blacks were in involuntary servitude. After that war was was lost to the Federal Government, (the so-called Civil War was a war by the Federal Government on ALL The States) both white men and blacks became CITIZEN SLAVES of the Federal Government, and it’s been downhill for the whites of America ever since. The so-called Union Soldiers were just useful idiots for the Federal Government. Just a little true history to enlighten your day.

Oh and one thing I did forget: Would the fop fake long haired ‘Jesus’ have taken part in all this guff and garbage? Yes, of course he would, but then you knew that already, didn’t you? LOL

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. APARTHEID is The Kingdom Of God:

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

3. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

4. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

5.Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 1:

6. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 2:

7. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 3:

The Vile Satanic Curse Of RELIGION….

.And a word that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was never recorded as having uttered!

Now here’s a thing, a HUGE THING. The WHOLE WORLD, to a greater extent, has gone after one religion or another, and if we were to add up all those people that do have a religion, of one kind or another, I bet those left would only amount to a very small minority – which would also include followers of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Even those who profess to be atheists worship other things in place of an organised religion or deity, namely themselves in the mirror (narcissists), the creation, that is, the green eco-nutters (Extinction Rebellion morons), their families, (yes there is such a thing as ‘family worship’), their pets, wealth, careers, their cars, their boats, sun-worshipping holidays, science, technology, art, music, or even football teams. All of these things, however we cut it, can be, and are, objects of their RELIGION, that is, idolatry and, whether they like to hear it or not. So you see, dear people, in Truth there is NO ESCAPE from RELIGION – it’s all enveloping and encompassing and across the whole world.

However the reason for this article is not for the atheist lost and unsaved, although they are welcome to read and learn from it, IF the Father is calling them. No, the reason for this article is to rebuke and admonish in agape love, those who profess to be Christians, and yet waste their time and money on the wretched pursuit of religion, delusionally thinking that they are doing Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) will.

And now for the proof and evidence from The Holy Scriptures that show us that ALL RELIGION is of Satan the Devil and not of God. But before I do that here is a foundational aside: the word ‘RELIGION’ is derived from the multi-faceted demon called LEGION, whom Yashua Messiah cast into The Gadarene Swine. All the swine died as they plunged over the cliff edge, but LEGION did not, for spirits cannot die. This means that LEGION had a make-over and re-invented himself as RE-LEGION, and there you have it = the multi-faceted evil spirit (demon) that pervades ALL RELIGIONS, whether it be Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Bahaism, Confucianism and, of course, not forgetting the most important one, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion which at the moment doesn’t have an ‘ism’. Perhaps I should invent one! LOL

OK, here are ALL the verses from the New Testament that mention the word RELIGION, followed by the word RELIGIOUS, and you will immediately notice that NONE OF THEM are from the Four Gospels, which means Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He instruct His learners in the ways of RELIGION for He did not have a RELIGION – GOD HAS NO RELIGION:

Acts 26:5 (KJV) Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our RELIGION (G2356) I lived a Pharisee.

In this first offering we get an inkling of what RELIGION really is, that is, ‘a straitest sect’, as Paul accurately calls it, so from this we can immediately deduce that this is a very legalistic set up, and, of course, we already know that, because we know that The Serpent Seed Pharisee Jews were satanic Judaisers and very ritualistic. This means they dotted every ‘i’ and crossed every ‘t’ of The Mosaic Law in an attempt to pathetically save themselves. This, in turn, resulted in Yashua Messiah mocking them with the remark: “The ‘healthy’ have no need of The Physician!”

So straight off, the first example of the word RELIGION is a negative one.

Galatians 1:13 (KJV) For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454), how that beyond measure I persecuted The Church of God, and wasted it:

In this verse, our first negative verse above is confirmed for us once again by Paul with an even more negative example. Here he beefs it up by calling it the (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION and how, in the name of that VILE SATANIC RELIGION, he persecuted the Church of God and wasted it.

‘Wasted’ here meaning to destroy and overthrow or to make havock, and from Strong’s Concordance we get:

Wasted – G4199: πορθέω πορθέω: imperfect ἐπόρθουν; 1 aorist participle πορθήσας; (πέρθω, πεπορθα, to lay waste); from Homer down; to destroy, to overthrow (R. V. uniformly to make havock): τινα, Acts 9:21; τήν ἐκκλησίαν, Galatians 1:13; τήν πίστιν, ibid. 23.

So clearly we can now see what an evil thing the Jews’ RELIGION is, that is, Judaism, and please keep this in mind as we analyse the three remaining verses.

Galatians 1:14 (KJV) And profited in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454) above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

Here Paul reveals how he ‘profited’ or progressed in The (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION, and left his contemporaries way behind, so zealous was he for this evil satanic cult and its dogma. We MUST fully understand that Saul was a ruthless cold blooded murderer before Yashua Messiah gave him the shock of his life on the road to Damascus.

Next, we have two very interesting verses that seem to go against everything Paul has revealed and taught us about his past involvement with RELIGION, and how evil it was/is. We therefore have what some misguided people use as an example of sending up RELIGION, and let’s be clear, for these are the ONLY VERSES in the whole Bible that appear to paint RELIGION in a positive light, but do they?

In order to answer this question we will need Strong’s Concordance once more for there are several Greek words at play here. The first is G2356 and the second is G2454 and here are the definitions:

Religion – G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah; – from a derivative of G2357; ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.

Religion – G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; from G2450; “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.

Religion – G2357threskos thrace’-kos probably – from the base of 2360; ceremonious in worship (as demonstrative), i.e. pious:–religious.

Religion – G2450Ioudaizo ee-oo-dah-id’-zo from 2453; to become a Judaean, i.e. “Judaize”:– live as the Jews.

James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain.

James 1:27 (KJV) PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

Right, now we get down to some very devious and deceptive nonsense going on here, for in Acts 26:5 we get the G2356 reference to Paul speaking of his previous religious life which is exactly the same religion as mentioned in Galatians 1:13-14 and yet the translators have given it a new number, that is, G2454. So what’s going on? Has Paul’s past religion changed from being, and I quote: G2356 ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.” to G2454 “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.” Or are they just one and the same, but dressed up differently in the G2356 definition.

Do you see what’s happening here? With the use of G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah they are attempting to paint Paul’s old religion in a benign oh so loving, compassionate and kind, kind of way, that is, people who generally wouldn’t hurt a fly, and then with the use of the next word: G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; we’re then dealing with murdering psychopaths namely, Saul, and his fellow Pharisee criminals, and yet we’re definitely talking about the same RELIGION. The irony here being that the KJV translators have got this right by using the word RELIGION for both Greek words.

OK, so it looks like a load of shenanigans has taken place with the Greek manuscripts, proving that they, too, are liable to little corruptions, as with Matthew 28-19, which I unravelled in my article: “Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? – Part 1” (See link No. 1 below).

So let’s now move on to James and analyse what he’s up to and I’ll repost the two troublesome verses below:

James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain 27 PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

So straight away we have use of that deceptive G2356 definition which, as we have already ascertained really means the same as G2454 – Saul’s and the Pharisee Jews’ satanic Judaising religion. But why is James rambling on about religion anyway? Well it’s obvious, isn’t it? Look at the opening statement: If any man among you seem to be religious.” What does he mean by this remark? Let’s copy and paste the Concordant Literal Version for a better understanding:

James 1:26-27 (CLV) If anyone is seeming to be a ritualist, not bridling his tongue, but seducing his heart, the ritual of this one is vain, 27 for ritual clean and undefiled with God the Father is this: to be visiting the bereaved and widowed in their affliction, to be keeping oneself unspotted from the world.”

Why would anyone in the Church of God be hanging on to old religious ritualistic customs, that is, the ways of the world? When all of this was done away, with Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection. Why would this wretch want to be seen as someone who was still into meaningless rituals and religion?

So here’s a further pertinent question or two: 1) Since when did visiting the bereaved and widowed become ritualistic or religious? Answer: It never has. 2) In what way is visiting the bereaved and widowed a ritualistic or religious activity? Answer: It’s not, nor has it ever been, so what’s James on about?

Easy, he’s mocking the whole idea sarcastically. James 1:26-27 is all about exposing this fraud (whoever he or she might be) and possibly doesn’t exist at all, but he’s using this possible scenario, as an example, so that anyone within his congregation that still fancies himself as religious or hankers after the old Pharisaical ways, had better shape up and get with the New Covenant and repent of his old Pharisaical Religious ways or else. (See link No.2 below)

So there we have it, RELIGION fully revealed and exposed from The Holy Scriptures for the fraud that it is, and NOW is the time for ALL true Christians to set themselves free from it:

Revelation 18:4 (KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse and Baptism Is Not Into The Trinity:

Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity. Eastern (Russian and Greek) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity. Protestantism is NOT Christianity.

2. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Was Yahsua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 2

For Part 1 please see link No. 4 below.

Before I press on with answering the questions I listed in Part 1, I will quote some Scriptures that are very much linked to this subject of the false images of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). In fact The Lord warns us about a time when these deceivers will come on the world scene and lead many, or multitudes, astray. We are talking big numbers here, not just a few, and these deceivers were already at it before the end of the first century.

Matthew 24:5 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Mark 13:6 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Luke 21:8 (MCV) And He said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

A great number will come in The Lord’s name,but how will they come? Why, with all their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious paraphernalia, (see link No. 1 below) that’s how. With all their self aggrandising ‘church’ buildings, their love of money, their fancy robes, their silly Dagon fish hats, and even sillier meaningless relics, their insulting icons, statues, paintings, and all accompanied with their non-gospel of the bad news, or salvation by works, the whole satanic marketing package.

Do not be deceived, this is big business – religious big business and they dress up for the part too. Furthermore, do not be deceived by those who will attempt to explain the above verses away. They will do this by saying that The Lord was warning us only about those people who would say they “actually are Jesus Christ”, that is, impostors, and those who would be deranged and unhinged. Yes, there will be examples of these weird whacky people too, including the Papacy. Let’s not forget, Popes believe they stand in the place of Christ, and they are false Christs, but they, fortunately, will only be very few in numbers. To support The Truth and expose their false interpretations of these verses we only have to check out the Greek rendering:

Matthew 24:5 (Greek Transliteral) Many shall be coming on the name of me saying that I am and many they shall be straying.

Here we can see that many will be coming saying that ‘Christ is’ or ‘preaching a Christ’, a false Christ and not saying that they actually are Christ.

OK, on with those questions.

Would Jesus Christ have stood up for your human rights? Now I was going to answer this question here, but because the topic invites such a large amount of information to reveal it for what it is, it will need an article all of its own, so I will press on with next question.

Would Jesus Christ have given His blessing on multiculturalism? Before I continue with answering this question, we first need to know what it is, just what, exactly, is multiculturalism? Well it’s more than one culture isn’t it? No it isn’t and that’s the demonic lie and deceptiveness built into this word and in turn in its manipulative use. A person can be multicultural, that is, able to mix in easily and adapt to several cultures and that would be down to that man or woman’s individual desire, tastes, likes and societal abilities, but do we all have that desire and those abilities? NO!

Furthermore, is it a sin not to have them? No. So if being a multiculturalist is not multiculturalism, what is multiculturalism!? Multiculturalism is an unachievable societal system invented and orchestrated by the Canaanite Jews, those in real authority, who are now dictating, via their political puppets, how we ought to behave and live. This is a draconian, Pharisaical, legalistic, self-righteous, pseudo religious system of governance. Instead of being free to decide whether or not we want to be multicultural, we are now told we must be multicultural, this is multiculturalism. If we have no desire to be multicultural we are then branded as bigots, haters, racists, xenophobes, and even heretics. Now there is only one outcome to the attempted enforcement of this issue = VIOLENCE, and that is just what (((those))) in power want, so that they can introduce Martial Law.

Moreover, it will, and already does involve state control and manipulation over your lives. How? How, because we, in the west, now live in democracies or better, DeMon-oCracies which in abbreviated form spells D.M.C. or Domination, Manipulation and Control. You think you are free under this system, but in reality you are deceived and conned and are thereby enslaved and held captive to it. The Truth is, we in the west live in bondage to a system that controls, manipulates and enslaves us and the real power-brokers are the heads of the global corporations, including the Vatican, and the global bankers (The Rothschild Banking Cartel) more commonly known as the New World Order or The Deep State. Politicians are just cloned lackeys, ‘jokers’, puppets and front men for these real sources of power. Whatever these power-broker people say, goes and there are no arguments.

This multiculturalism thing is a classic example of how D.M.C. works. All (((they))) do (they, as already described, being the real authorities (The Jews) behind the politicians) is deliberately create an unworkable societal mould. They then make those, that is, the majority, who wish to have no part in multiculturalism feel guilty (a bogus guilt created by them for manipulative purposes), when there is no reason to feel guilty at all. Now they do this through subtle, and at times not so subtle, propaganda, which amounts to a form of guilt layering, emotional blackmail and through it, coercion. This is victimisation through false accusations of the majority or host nation culture, and is achieved by mental harassment, via the media (also under their control). The host nation’s culture, who have done nothing wrong by wanting to maintain and keep their own culture intact, are made to feel guilty and responsible, via this blatant emotional manipulation, for not ‘doing more’ for those whose cultures are not their own. All this, when all the while it should be the responsibility of those with the foreign cultures to adapt to the host nation’s culture – not the other way round. This, in a world of true justice would not be unreasonable.

The evil wickedness of multiculturalism then creates animosity, bitterness, resentfulness and hatred between peoples and drives a wedge between the people of different cultures, instead of helping them assimilate into the host nation’s culture – not that this is possible for it clearly isn’t. This is how we end up with ghettos.

What we, the indigenous population or host culture are supposed to do, in a practical sense, to bring about this multicultural society no one has yet explained to any of us, nor are they likely to – hence the Commie traitor Merkel has begrudgingly admitted that it is a failure. This is because, in reality, there is nothing we can do and they, the criminal orchestrators, know it, it has all been done deliberately to cause unrest and division. This though, is not the only issue, as far these authority figures are concerned. All of this is of no matter to them, because all they are interested in is the deliberate brow beating and victimisation of their fellow countrymen. This is massive treachery on a national scale, it is nothing but treason and do not be surprised by it. This is not a fanciful idea; it is the Truth and spelled out quite clearly in the Holy Scriptures:

2 Timothy 3:1 (MCV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, (narcissistic politicians obsessed with their own images and their imaginary ‘legacies’, and nothing else) covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, (not listening to wise counsel from their parents and elders) unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection (no compassion), truce-breakers, (breakers of treaties) false accusers, incontinent, (without self control) fierce, (savage) despisers of those that are good, (passing legislation that is a blasphemy to God and an affront to the Godly) 4 Traitors, (the selling out and betrayal of their own people and nation) heady (rash and impetuous), high-minded, (inflated with conceit) lovers of pleasures (debauched and licentious) more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof (followers of and believers in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and not Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ): from such turn away.

As you read the above passage of Scripture, just think of how many of these labels you could easily hang around the necks of your ‘church’ leaders and criminal political ‘leaders’!!??

I have digressed a little above, so getting back to the thread again here is another Truth. ‘Isms’ divide and segregate, they never unite. An ‘ism’ and ‘isms’ tend mostly to be divisive and negative, elitist or they are cultish and clannish in make up. They invariably drive a wedge through societies and automatically create an ‘us and them’ arrangement. Here are some examples: Bolshevism, Communism, Socialism, Cultural Jew Marxism, Conservatism, Judaism, Islamism, Methodism, Protestantism, Catholicism, Liberalism, Elitism, Hinduism and Multiculturalism. There are many more that could be added to this list, but I’m sure you get the picture. ‘Isms’ antagonise, divide and cause jealousy; hate and friction, they do not unite and bring peace, only a God given new heart in men and freedom under Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) Grace can do that.

Having said all that, would Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) give His blessing on multiculturalism? I think I have already answered that one, don’t you? A better question would be: What has The Light and/or The Way got to do with darkness or the evil manipulative treacherous schemes of men? Answer: NOTHING!

Again, here’s the question we have to ask: Would the effeminate long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ bless multiculturalism? Of course he would, he already does through all those mainstream ‘Christians’ of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who buy into multiculturalism think there is nothing wrong with it. The Jewish Cultural Marxist Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby being a perfect example. He and they love multiculturalism; they actually think it is part and parcel of The Kingdom of God being built by them now, here on this earth.

So here we have so called Christians absorbing into their beliefs the misguided evil ideas of carnal minded unbelieving hu-man beings = ATHEISTS! – unbelievable! Their delusion is complete. Many of these so called Christians call themselves ‘Progressive Christians’. (See link Nos. 1 and 2 below)

Re Justin Welby I think you will find via his website that what I have said regarding his faith in multiculturalism is true. Welby as a worldly contaminated Laodicean and a firm believer in the long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ he would be, wouldn’t he, so no surprises there then?

No surprises perhaps, but there may be some surprises in the following articles, so please stay with me on this important exposure of their false image based religious scam – The Cainite-Judeo-Christain Religion.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

2. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

3. Progressive or Libertine Christianity Versus Fundamental Christianity:

4. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp Part 1:?

Are You a Cultural Jew Marxist or a Christian?….

.All About The Satanic Malevolent Curse of Progressive Cultural Jew Marxist Liberalism (Cloaked Bolshevism) in So-Called ‘Christian Churches’, that is, The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

So how would you know if you are Cultural Jew Marxist or not? For I will tell you straight that many people wander around these days, whether they be Christians or secular bots, parroting Cultural Jew Marxist slogans left, right and centre. Here is my short list of these slogans, for it is by no means exhaustive:

HATER! – XENOPHOBE! – LITTLE ENGLANDER! – NAZI! – RACIST! – SEXIST! – FASCIST! – HOMOPHOBE! – BIGOT! – HATE SPEECH! – WHITE SUPREMACIST! – RED NECK! – ANTI-SEMITE! – WHITE PRIVILEGE!

There they are and if you’re someone who uses these slogans when pointing your judgemental accusatory finger at your fellow white neighbour, then you can consider yourself as a Cultural Jew Marxist and certainly not a Christian. You’re also a brainwashed and indoctrinated, unthinking moron, who has never had an original thought of your own in the whole of your useless life. This is because some other satanic useless piece of flesh has been doing all your thinking for you, namely the evil lying scum on your TV = Tell-aLie-Vision.

Now I know all this will sound very hard hitting, but at the same time it’s very necessary in the hope that it will wake some of you deluded people up. Moreover, if your thinking is so perverted and degenerate as to use these spiteful, satanic, politicised slogans, against your fellow man, and without any forethought, proof or foundation, you are more despicable than a hardened criminal, and need to be treated as such.

However, you may want to know why I use the term ‘Cultural Jew Marxist’ and not ‘Cultural Marxist’ as the majority in the Alternative Media do. The first reason is because I am not controlled opposition as are most of those in the Alternative Media, and I name and expose the Jews at every opportunity I can. The second reason is because Cultural Marxism is wholly a creation of The Jews and is phase two of their plan to take over the democracies of The West. Phase one was their failed attempt at Bolshevising The West after WW2. None the more for that, there was ALWAYS a Jewish PLAN to see their Communist mission through as shown here:

“When we get ready to take the United States, we will not take it under the labels of Communism; we will not take it under the label of Socialism. These labels are unpleasant to the American people, and have been speared too much. We will take the United States under labels we have made very lovable; we will take it under liberalism, under progressivism, under democracy. But, take it, we will.”

— The Jew, Alexander Trachtenberg (1885-1966) at the National Convention of Communist Parties, Madison Square Garden, 1944 – source: Bella Dodd (1904-1966)

Now here is where I will introduce you to The Jewish Frankfurt School:

The Frankfurt School – Critical Theory – Cultural Marxism = Social Justice – Feminism – Neo-Progressivism – Post-Colonialism – all born out of Critical Theory and come under the umbrella of Cultural (Jew) Marxism….(Brackets mine)

The Frankfurt School – Critical Theory – Cultural Marxism.

Founders:

Felix Weil – Jew

Erich Fromm – Jew

Herbert Marcuse – Jew

Max Horkheimer – Jew

Walter Benjamin – Jew

Theodor Adorno – half-Jew, Catholic mother

Georg Lukacs – Jew

Claude Levi-Strauss – Jew

Jurgen Habermas – German?

Be it gender, sexual orientation, family, race, culture or religion every aspect of a person’s identity is to be questioned. Every norm or standard in society challenged and ideally altered to benefit supposedly oppressed groups.

Thorium explains this socio-political philosophy that was designed to bring down Western Civilization and the white race that created it…

Classical Marxism vs Cultural Marxism

“Classical Marxism saw conflict as occurring between the bourgeoisie and proletariat, between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots.’ Cultural Marxism used such a conflict as existing between the oppressed and the oppressors, between those with privilege and those without it. The ‘Working Class’ has been replaced by ‘Minorities’.

“Majority Groups are defined as ‘privileged’ and ‘oppressive’, with minority groups accordingly labelled as ‘under-privileged’ and ‘oppressed’. Heterosexuals are deemed ‘oppressive’, cisgender people are ‘oppressive’, whites are ‘oppressive’ especially white men, Christians are ‘oppressive’. Those who do not fit into those groups are considered ‘oppressed’. It stands to reason therefore that if heterosexuals are oppressors the solution is to encourage other forms of sexuality. (From Jewpedea: Cisgender (sometimes cissexual, or shortened to cis) describes a person whose gender identity matches their sex assigned at birth.)

“If whites are oppressors the solution is racial diversity. If cisgender people are oppressors the solution is to encourage transgenderism. If Christians are oppressors the solution is to propagate Islam.

“The half-Jew Theodor Adorno and an original founder of The Frankfurt School wrote in his book: “The Authoritarian Personality” in which he defines parenthood, pride in one’s family, Christianity, adherence to traditional gender roles and attitudes towards sex and the love of one’s own country as a pathological phenomena, (that is, a destructiveness against others).

“This tendency to pathologise opinions and life patterns which are not in accordance with his own political ends is characteristic of Cultural Marxism (the Jew and his hypocrisy). Differing views are thus described as irrational fears and phobias. For example, a person who feels uncomfortable living as a minority in an area dominated by Muslim migrants will be decried as an Islamaphobe, since living amongst those culturally and ethnically similar to one’s self is considered sick and phobic.

“When Pakistani Muslims, living in Britain by contrast, show in-group preference converting entire sections of a town or a city into a mini-Pakistan there is no sickness, no phobia, only multiculturalism.

A popular and propagandist manifestation of Cultural Marxism is Political Correctness in which media channels and social scientists make it a mandatory exercise to do the following: 1) Question common language: Illegal immigrants for example are to be referred to as ‘undocumented migrants’ while ethnic discrimination is referred to as ‘affirmative action’. Their ambition to define and redefine words can be seen as a means of controlling the discourse and altering cultural norms.

“Racism and Sexism have been redefined as a product of prejudice plus power which leads to such ridiculous statements as: ‘There is no such thing as sexism against men. That’s because sexism is prejudice plus power. Men are the predominant gender with power in society’ And ‘I an ethnic minority woman, cannot be racist or sexist towards white men’. 2) Maintain an unwaveringly favourable view of the ‘oppressed’. ‘Black Lives Matter’ is a peaceful legitimate protest movement; Feminism is only about equality and so forth.

“No deviation from the aforementioned narrative will be entertained – EVER!! Nor will criticism.

End Goal:

While Communism, as Marx envisioned it, offered the resolution of class conflict in a utopian social system all that Cutural Marxism offers is a desolate form of eternal warfare between ever more narrowly defined groups of offended minorities. The only meaningful consequence that this wide application could possibly ever have is the marginalisation (and destruction through race mixing) of traditional European cultures.”

– Thorium

So here we can see graphically explained to us what Cultural JEW Marxism is, and that to call it Cultural Marxism, only, is missing the point entirely, for it immediately lets the Jew originators of this satanic conspiratorial plot off the hook completely, and gives us a false impression, and thereby no one to hold directly as accountable – which is what (((they))) want.

This is why we end up with BS obfuscations like: ‘The Elites’; ‘The Powers That Be’; ‘The Establishment’; ‘The Deep State’, when all the while it’s THE JEWS, led by the ‘KINGS’ OF THE JEWS – THE ROTHSCHILDS. (See link No. 1 below)

We can also add into the mix The Jesuits and The Vatican, but ultimately he who pays The Piper calls the tune, and The Rothschilds are definitely the payers of The Piper, with The Rothschild funded Vatican controlled by money laundering P2 Freemasons, and dancing to The Rothschild’s Money Empire tune.

However, I digress, so back to the subject at hand and how this cancerous scourge of a political dogma known as ‘Progressivism’ has infiltrated the so-called ‘Christian’ churches, aka The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and in particular The Anglican (AngliCAIN) Communion led by the Canaanite Jew, Justin Welby – a kosher archbishop eh? How does that work? Well for Cultural Jew Marxists it works very well, but that’s all – God centred Christians, followers of The Way, can take a hike. No wonder the Anglican Communion is on its last legs with an average age of 65 for its attendees, and I jest not.

OK, let’s begin, and I will use just one example of this satanic Cultural Jew Marxist dogma, namely ‘Progressive Christianity dot org’ which is, no doubt, atypical of the evil dross you will find on any progressive ‘Christian’ web page. To be honest it pains me greatly to use the word ‘Christian’ when referring to these debauched, apostate reprobates, and as I will graphically show.

Moreover, on this page we will be introduced to a Cultural Jew Marxist wretch who goes by the handle: ‘Reverend Jim Burklo’. Now how worthy of reverence you deem him to be I will leave to you to decide, dear readers, for I would give him none at all, and once I have revealed what he stands for I trust and hope your views will be much the same as mine.

Rev. James Burklo – A Progressive Cultural Jew Marxist Posing As A Christian.

This page starts off with a woman, here called Susan, who has been a member of The Assemblies of God denomination (demon-ination) for fifteen years and I will copy and paste her opening words here:

I have been an on and off member of a Assemblies of God church 15 years – the pastor is more liberal in his style of message giving. They can’t and don’t speak to the issues of gayness and they would say that Jesus is the only way to God.”

Right, so from this we already get an inkling of her dissolute perverted thinking, and we also get a picture that the Assemblies of God do have something going for them, but I will not let them off the hook, because they are still a demon-ination of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. However, you will note that she has never been a committed member of this demon-ination anyway, so that tells us straight away that she’s looking for a ‘church’ moulded in her image, not God’s image.

Now here’s a thing, as I work my way through Burklo’s satanic diatribe, as a True Christian, you will notice some crucial elements of being a Christian missing. These illegitimates just write out ANYTHING that offends them and remodel everything to THEIR own liking; Yashua Messiah and His Word can go do the other thing.

So what do we have revealed to us here within this short paragraph? Three crucial things 1) She’s actually questioning The Truth that Yashua Messiah is the ONLY way to The Father. 2) She’s also making an issue of sodomy as being a valid way of life for a Christian and 3) The word ‘repentance’ is non-existent in her vocabulary, and all this when on the first Pentecost Peter made it VERY CLEAR:

Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, REPENT, (change your ways) and be Baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

From The Blue Letter Bible:

Repentto change one’s mind, that is, to repent to change one’s mind for better, heartily to amend with abhorrence of one’s past sins.

From Strong’s Concordance – first part:

Repent – G3340μετανοέω, μετάνω; future μετανοήσω; 1 aorist μετενόησα; from (Antiphon), Xenophon down; the Sept. several times for נִחַם; to change one’s mind, that is, to repent (to feel sorry that one has done this or that, Jonah 3:9, of having offended someone…..

So what we MUST deduce from this is the fact that she sees sodomy as not a sin and repentance is not a requirement for being a Christian. Boy! Can you actually believe this satanic garbage?

Moving on with her nonsense:

“This pastor has meant so much to me. He introduced me to the person of Jesus…”

Here, she is oblivious to The Truth that Yashua Messiah was/is NOT a person, and there was no way that Burklo was going to point that out to her, for no doubt he thinks his fake ‘Jesus’ is a ‘person’ too. (See link No. 2 below)

Here is the rest of her blurb:

….which has led to my graduate studies in theology. Problem is, I am much more progressive than they are. I’ve had a troubled childhood, so my journey to God has been fraught with questions, which theology school is helping me to investigate.

Oh dear, “graduate studies in theology” and: “Problem is, I am much more progressive than they are.” So at least she admits she is more satanic than they are. She then admits she’s had a troubled childhood which says to me a good shrink would be more useful to her than a bumbling useless theology school that will pump her mind with more satanic error.

“I also have a child who dislikes Sunday school at this church, which makes me sad. I want her to feel excited about knowing God, but the language they use sometimes is a bit unapproachable – even reading the Bible to a kid with words like “righteous” means nothing – even to me.

Oh yes whatever you do guard your brat from The Truth and don’t teach her what ‘righteous’ means. This is most likely because she doesn’t know what it means either. LOL

“I was going to try the Universalist Unitarian church, but it seems to denounce God and lessen Jesus. I want to be a Christian and I want to show my daughter who God is and can be, but I’m at a loss. Do I stay where I am or do I join a less Christian church? Either way I will feel like an outsider.”

Right, first off, her comments about this monotheist Unitarian group means she’s a Trinitarian, so therefore is as lost as lost can be, not that I am saying Universalist Unitarians are right, with their blasphemous monotheism. (See link Nos. 3, 4 and 5 below)

She then says she wants to be a Christian, well she doesn’t sound very humble to me in order to be a Christian and then talks about designing a god into a god that can be to her brat’s liking. How about that for prideful audacity? She then wonders why she feels like an outsider!

That is the end of her communication to this Commie ‘Reverend’ Burklo and I will give one or three lines of his reply to her before I move on to his itemised points of recommendation to help her choose a fake satanic church:

“Dear Susan,

“You are in excellent company in your quandary, and in your quest to find your way into a faith community that serves the souls of you and your dear daughter.

Excellent company eh? The delusion is VERY strong with these people, for he refers to a faith ‘community’, not a faith fellowship, or faith congregation, or a faith Church. Why Community? Cultural Jew Marxist Communitarianism is why. We MUST understand what we’re dealing with here, for these evil wretches are not Christians, they’re evil political animals driven by a satanic, secular, atheist, libtard, Marxist agenda, which they have inveigled into the Christian religion in order to usurp it and take it over. This is a standard Cultural Jew Marxist modus-operandi.

He goes on to say:

“Good news! In your area there are many wonderful progressive Christian churches: open-hearted, open-minded, Jesus-loving communities.”

‘Open hearted and open minded’ meaning: “we will accept any form of licentious behaviour and debauched degenerate lifestyles, and any alien satanic religious beliefs without a shred of repentance in sight anywhere.

Now to Burklo’s response points:

1. Can I make great new friends there?

Notice, he doesn’t say can I meet likeminded souls in the True Faith there, or likeminded souls who will be iron sharpening iron? Notice also that it all sounds like seeking membership of a secular club, which of course is what it is.

2. Does it have meaningful worship?

Whatever that is.

3. Does it offer Bible study?

To what end would they want Bible Study? when they disagree with much of what Yashua Messiah says and rewrite it to suit their own satanic worldly Cultural Jew Marxist agenda. Here’s a couple of good examples:

Romans 1:24 (MCV) Wherefore God also gave them, (that is, sodomites and lesbians) up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour (pollute) their own bodies between themselves:

Romans 1:26-28 (MCV) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature (depraved): 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error (HIV and all manner of other vile diseases) which was meet (appropriate). 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate (degenerate) mind, to do those things which are not convenient (forbidden and shameful);

4. Will it help me grow in my relationship with Jesus?

This will be a non-existent relationship with a fake ‘Jesus’ of their own pro-sodomite agenda and creation.

5. Does it practice meditative prayer?

Ah yes, now we’re getting to it, that good old New Age meditation, just what Christians need, NOT!

6. Can it help to get me involved in activism for service and social justice?

And now even more getting to it, with worldly Cultural Jew Marxist political activism, and social justice, just what a Christian needs (like a hole in the head), and with Yashua Messiah nowhere to be seen in any of it – Barrabas the political zealot must be jumping with joy in his grave. I wonder if they snort lines of cocaine before setting off on their Communist activities – atheist bank robber Uncle Joe Stalin would be really proud of ‘em.

7. Do its members take the Bible seriously without having to take it literally?

Oh no! Whatever you do don’t take The Holy Scriptures literally, otherwise you’ll have to admit that Yashua Messiah was literally crucified by The Jews (using the Romans as their proxies), and buried in His tomb, and three days and three nights later was raised from the dead (resurrected), and a further 40 days later ascended into heaven to be with His Father.

8. Does it take scientific and intellectual exploration seriously – for example, does it accept the validity of the theory of evolution?

LOL look at this for a load of faithless garbage: ‘Scientific and intellectual exploration and the theory of evolution’? I will post one Holy Scripture in order to rebut this worldly BS:

Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

9. Are women given the same opportunities for leadership positions in the church as men?

Again I will post just one Holy Scripture to rebut this satanic Cultural Jew Marxist crap:

Isaiah 3:12 (MCV) As for my people, children are their oppressors (infantile Cultural Jew Marxists), and women (Cultural Jew Marxist feminists) rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

10. Does it fully affirm LGBTQI sexuality, and celebrate same-sex marriage?

Of course, we must allow ALL vile sexual perversions, including gender bender lunatics, pederasts and paedophiles, and why not child sacrificing to their Canaanite god Moloch, for ‘good’ measure – why hold back eh? Can you believe this stuff? You had better, for it’s near the mark in their filthy debauched apostate minds.

11. Does it teach that how we treat others is the true test of our faith, rather than belief in a fixed doctrine?

Now here’s a devious satanic loaded question if ever I saw one, by ‘treating others’ he really means tolerating people of any demonic religious beliefs and faiths, and accepting them as equivalents to the non-religious Christian Way. This is a blasphemy of blasphemies. Theirs are the satanic religions, for God has no religion, and they are ALL DECEIVED by their RELIGIONS, of which Satan is the author! Furthermore, you will NOT find the word ‘RELIGION’ in the Four Gospels, so that means Yashua Messiah NEVER UTTERED THE WORD ‘RELIGION’, nor gave any instructions to his Learners to go off and start a RELIGION!

12. Does it respect and celebrate other faiths? Does it teach that other religions might be as good for others as Christianity is for us?

This question just confirms what I have said above and reveals just how evil this illegitimate is. I bet the wretched Prince of Wales loves him – the future defender OF FAITHS! May Yashua Messiah help us and save us from this insanity.

13. Does it teach that because God is love, nobody is going to hell?

I am not even going to bother answering this dumb question and assertion, because no doubt this numbskull has no idea what Hell is. (See link No. 6 below).

OK, that just about wraps it up. However, there is more on his error filled blasphemous cesspit of a site, but there’s only so much filthy excrement one can deal with in a single day, before one starts feeling queasy. Moreover, I will therefore return with a Part 2, for there is too much error there that cannot be left unanswered and also needs rebutting. (For additional reading see link No. 7 below.)

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. The CROWN Corporation:

https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-crown corporation_nWKoHh7GzxS2UNS.html

2. For There is No Respect of Persons With God – Romans 2:11 – But What is a Person? – Parts 1 & 2:

3. The Duality Godhead:

4. Exposing the Trinity Lie!:

5. The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE?:

6. Hell:

7. Progressive or Libertine Christianity Versus Fundamental Christianity:

Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed…

…Are you a man of mankind: a son of Adam; or a hu-man being and not of mankind: not a son of Adam?

Or perhaps another way of saying it could be: are you a son of Adam, or a son of The Devil through Cain, and does this whole idea shock you? (See link No. 1 below). Most likely, if you are new to this Truth, it will shock you. In turn, I make no apologies for that, for The Truth MUST be made known, whether you take offence or not. And let’s be clear, offence can only be taken, not given, and lovers of The Truth (Yashua Messiah) will definitely NOT be offended by this Truthful article.

So what are we are dealing with here? For this subject can, and will, be deemed by libtard Cultural Jew Marxists as the ultimate form of RACISM! Ooh! and we can’t have that can we? What will all those lilly livered, limp-wristed, spineless, progressive, fake Christians say? No doubt they will rent their clothes and have apoplexy, and all this, instead of realising that Yashua Messiah Himself, BY THEIR EVIL STANDARDS, would, and will be classified as a RACIST! (See link No. 2 below). So much for the fake hoax concept known as RACISM!:

“”RACIST” A made up word by the Jew Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) in 1927 and used to browbeat all dissenters of the Jewish Bolshevik Marxist/Communist ideology, and still used today to keep white people walking on egg shells regarding other races. Only whites are racists according to these traitor whoresons, that is, evil wretches like John Mann, UK Labour MP.”

— Brother Charles

“”Racism” as an accusation, was shaped by Trotskyists and then sharpened politically by Magnus Hirschfeld, before being fully launched as an anti-white weapon by ethnic others in the American academic system.”

— John Piggot

OK, so with the short preamble over and a couple of educational quotes chucked in for good measure, let’s move on to the meat of this article: HU – who or what is ‘HU’? What kind of a word is ‘HU’? I’ve never heard of it I hear you say. Well its origin may surprise, for it is an ancient Welsh word, and ancient Welsh is from the even more ancient runic Hebrew tongue.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Welsh are The Levites, with The Druids of Cornwall and Wales who are descended from The Levitical Priesthood who administered life in Ancient Israel. This included responsibility for all religious, educational, financial and commercial activities in Ancient Israel – they administered The Tithe – a tax of ten percent on the people’s INCREASE, not the principal, so there was no Tithe/Tax on wages. Israel, during, and after, Joshua’s leadership at the time of The Judges, was a free Theocracy under God, that is, before it became a Kingdom under Saul, David and Solomon and their tax slavery began.

So immediately we have a Scriptural/Biblical connection going all the way back to the Patriarchs of Ancient Israel, that is, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, who were the Patriarchal forefathers of the Anglo-Saxon (Isaac’s sons = the Saacae or Saacsons), Celtic, Welsh, Dutch, Flemish, Gallic, Swiss and Nordic peoples, but not The Jews. (See links Nos. 3 and 4 below).

So who, or what exactly, is HU?

From The Serpent of Life and Wisdom web page:

The Caduceus is one of the most ancient of symbols:

You might best know this symbol as the DNA structure and healing used by the medical profession. Since ancient Mesopotamia The Caduceus presented two serpents intertwined (the central nervous system) around a staff (the spinal column) with the wings (the “swan”) on either side (the two hemispheres of the brain, with the circle in the centre representing the pineal gland, or the central sun and psychic center within). It also symbolized the kundalini energy.

“This was originally the symbol for the Anunnaki-Sirian creator god, EA, or EN.KI (who has become an Archetype), was the chief of the magicians, “the one who knows,” and infamous for being The Serpent of the Garden of Eden, who created lifeforms in test tubes half a million years ago with his half-sister Ninharsag, at the suggestion of his son, Marduk, to create hu-mans to be the workers for the gods. (The symbol is also based upon the winged globe for the planet Nibiru, the symbol of the royal Anunnaki family.)

Biblical writers called The Healing Serpent Ne-HU-shtan. The Hebrew word for serpent is “nahash.” The root of the word are the Hebrew letters Nun, Het and Shin, which means “to guess.” This was translated into other languages as “Satan,” which some say mean “enemy,” or “adversary.””

So from this we learn: 1) that the medical profession is 100% satanic with its Caduceus twin serpent logo and 2) I don’t know about you, but ‘test tubes’ half a million years ago, LOL, is total nonsense. However, what we do have here is our first reference to ‘Hu’ as Satan the Devil, and that’s all that matters from this little piece.

From Simon, on the “Followers of YHWH” Forum:

“Their temples wherein the sacred fire was preserved were generally situate on eminences and in dense groves of oak (see back slidden Ancient Israel), because a circle was the emblem of the universe; oval, in allusion to the mundane egg, from which issued, according to the traditions of many nations, the universe, or, according to others our first parents; serpentine, because a serpent was the symbol of HU, the Druidic Osiris; cruciform because a cross is an emblem of regeneration; or winged, to represent the motion of the divine spirit.”

From The Freemasons:

“The Druids had a high veneration for The Serpent. Their great god, Hu, was typified by that reptile; and he is represented by the Bards as ‘the wonderful chief Dragon, the sovereign of heaven’.

“The Serpent is universally esteemed a legitimate symbol of Freemasonry.”

– George Oliver, Freemason, Signs and Symbols, New York, Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, 1906, p. 36

So here we learn that the back slidden Ancient Israelites (our forefathers) had a ‘high veneration’ for Hu, The Serpent, and for one reason and one reason only, and that reason was their satanic incorporation of Molech worship (child sacrifice) into their beliefs. These evil satanic practises they copied from the Serpent Seed Canaanites who still practice these evil abominations to this day.

Hu The Serpent Entwined Around The Egg

From the Eden Saga Web Page, The Serpent People:

The ancient god of the British Isles, called Hu, was the master of the dragon world.”

From the Covenant of Rhiannon web page:

It is believed that Druidism was founded by Gwyddon Ganhebon, supposedly Seth of the Mosaic genealogy, in Asia and was brought to Britain by Hu Gadarn a contemporarydescendant of the Patriarch Abraham.

“Hu Gadarn originally came with the tribe of the Cymry (The Welsh, The Levites) to the Britannic Isles. They came from the Country of Summer, which is called Defrobani… They crossed the Misty Ocean (Tawch) and arrived in the Britannic Isles and Armorica, where they settled.”

Just to summarise, we now know that ‘Hu’ means ‘Serpent’ and the word ‘Hu-man’ means ‘Serpent-Man’, so in other words, hu-man beings are Canaanites – descendants of The Devil through Eve in The Garden.

Adam declared Eve as THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING, that is, both MANKIND and hu-mankind. Adam was NOT THE FATHER OF ALL LIVING, just the father of Mankind.

Genesis 3:20 (KJV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living. (Abel and Cain, both mankind and hu-mankind – Abel later replaced by Seth).

Now for those of you who think you are ‘quick on the draw’ and say: “Oh yeah, but all Cain’s descendants died in the flood, so you’re talking nonsense!” and I will retort with: “All his descendants bar ONE!” Namely Noah’s ‘Mrs’, whose name was Naamah, and she was the sister of Tubal-Cain. Hey! But it says Noah was perfect in ALL his generations from Adam, and that’s True, but his Mrs wasn’t perfect at all in her generations. However, that’s not important, because Noah carried the Adamic bloodline, which he passed onto his three sons, and they took their lineage from Noah, not their mother, who was of Cain.

Genesis 6:9-10 (KJV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

OK, so all this was just fine and dandy until the flood waters subsided and Noah started his new farming and agricultural (husbandry) lifestyle, which included the planting of a vineyard. We are then fast forwarded to the scene of Noah having harvested his grapes and bottled up his wine, so he thinks he’ll have a good old wine tasting evening. Unfortunately, he gets a bit carried away with the tasting of the wine and ends up blotto. No doubt the rest of his family were also partakers of this first year’s growth celebration and were a bit tipsy.

Moreover, whilst all the celebrating is going on Noah crashes out and Ham, his second son, gets into a strange incestuous relationship with his mother and, presumably whilst under the influence of Noah’s wine, he lies with her = he saw his father’s nakedness:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Now the outcome of this illicit evil union is the birth of Canaan, whom Noah curses. Now why did Noah curse the brat Canaan, and not his debauched son, Ham, and/or his wayward slutty wife, wouldn’t that have made more sense? Yes to our carnal minds it would have made more sense, but not to God who sees things very differently from us, hence He sees strange flesh from incest as an abomination and likewise any inbred offspring from such an incestuous union as anathema.

Furthermore, it’s crucial that we understand what has happened here. In the births of his three sons, Noah’s bloodline only, counted, but in this evil incestuous affair it was Naamah’s Cainite bloodline that counted in Canaan and not Ham’s Adamic blood. This means that with the birth of Canaan, Cain’s bloodline was re-kindled post-flood through Naamah his mother – the line of Cain was reborn and it’s still with us today in the shape of the Canaanite Jews, African Blacks, the Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans, the Turks and the Italians.

Another interesting twist to this is The Truth that the Canaanite Jews take their lineage from their mothers. Jewish society is a MATRIARCHAL society, not a Patriarchal society. So any claims or assertions that they make to a descendancy from Abraham or Judah is a lie. (See link No. 5 re the Jews’ false claims).

So there you have it, solid gold proof that (((THEY))) LIVE! (Have you seen that film?) If not, I recommend it.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Racist – The Canaanite Woman He Called a Dog!:

3. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

4. Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

5. I Know That Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!:

To ‘Gain’ or ‘Win’ People For Christ or To ‘Save’ People For Christ? – 1 Corinthians 9:19-22

1 Corinthians 9:19-22 (KJV) For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. 20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under The Law; 21 To them that are without Law, as without Law, (being not without Law to God, but under the Law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without Law. 22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means SAVE some.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Gain – G2770κερδαίνω kerdaínō, ker-dah’-ee-no; – from G2771; to gain (literally or figuratively):—(get) gain, win.

Save – G4982σώζω sṓzō, sode’-zo; – from a primary σῶς sōs (contraction for obsolete σάος sáos, “safe”); to save, i.e. deliver or protect (literally or figuratively):—heal, preserve, save (self), do well, be (make) whole.

Now I have always found this passage of Scripture somewhat testing and difficult to understand, for we NEVER hear of the other Messengers employing such tactics when preaching the good news of The Kingdom of God. This, therefore, seems to be a speciality of Paul’s, and no one else’s. Furthermore, how do we square these verses in 1 Corinthians, with these verses in John’s Gospel and also, more importantly from Paul himself in Galatians 3:1-13?:

Galatians 3:1-13 (MCV) O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not attentively hearken to The Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye The Holy Spirit by the works of The Law, or by the Hearing of Faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in The Holy Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5 He therefore that bestows to you The Holy Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth He it by the works of The Law, or by the Hearing of Faith? 6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of Faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And The Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through Faith, preached before The Gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of Faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10 For as many as are of the works of The Law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in The Book of The Law to do them. 11 But that no man is justified by The Law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by Faith. 12 And The Law is not of Faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of The Law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drag (draw) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Draw – G1670 helkyo, hel-koo’-o; probably akin to G138; to drag (literally or figuratively):- draw. Compare G1667.

John 6:45 (KJV) It is written in The Prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of The Father, cometh unto me.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

So what is Paul talking about in 1 Corinthians 9:19-22? and let’s be clear, for Peter, Paul and the other Messengers NEVER saved anyone – period! – full stop! – end of! In their travels they preached the Kingdom of God Gospel Message and those that The Father was calling responded positively to that message and those that He was not calling (the majority) rejected it out of hand. Now Paul knew all this, for he was taught by Yashua Messiah Himself; he also admitted it:

Romans 8:7 (KJV) Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to The Law of God, neither indeed can be.

Here we get further confirmation:

Acts 13:45-48 (MCV) But when the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming. 46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that The Word of God should first have been spoken to you Canaanite Jews (posing and masquerading as God’s chosen people): but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles lost Israelite Nations and Nations of Mankind. 47 For so hath The Lord commanded us, saying, I have set thee to be a Light of the Lost Tribes of Israel and Nations of Mankind, that thou shouldest be for salvation unto the ends of the earth. 48 And when those Gentiles of the Lost Tribes of Israel and Nations of Mankind heard this, they were glad, and glorified The Word of The Lord: and as many as were appointed (called and chosen by The Father) to eternal life, believed. (See link No. 1 below)

OK so what we MUST deduce from all this Scriptural proof and evidence is that Paul did not mean he was attempting to gain anyone or win anyone to Yashua Messiah in a Spiritual sense or a regeneration sense, especially the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews and yet he says he became as a Jew in order to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ them. So what did he mean by that?

From The Forerunner Commentary:

What Paul means in this passage becomes clear when we understand the sense and usage of two Greek words, those translated as “win” and “save.” In the evangelical (Mainstream Christian) world, both of them have taken on lives of their own, but with just a little digging, we will see that no contradiction lies between this passage and the numerous other clear statements.

The word translated as “win” is kerdaino (Strong’s #2770), and its basic meaning is “gain,” which is how it is typically translated. It means “to acquire by effort or investment.” It can mean “to earn” or “to make a profit.” The flipside is that it can also mean “to cause a loss not to occur.”” (Brackets mine)

Right, so from this we learn that Paul was attempting to come alongside these people in order to not offend them and alienate them clumsily or deliberately through over zealous teaching or preaching. To interpret it another way, “We can even be wrong when we’re right” if you get my drift. However, this was not an attempt by Paul to convert these people, for he knew that only The Father had the power to do that, and if he experience hostile opposition from them he would endeavour to meet them where they were at, in order to keep them alongside as best he could and not part as outright enemies.

Having cleared up that little niggle, we can now move on to a more controversial issue, that of Paul’s entering The Temple with the four vow takers and allegedly purifying himself ACCORDING TO THE LAW!!! as recorded in Acts 21:

Acts 21:18-20 (MCV) And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles The Lost Tribes of Israel and the Nations of Mankind by his ministry.

20 And when they heard it, they glorified The Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of The Law:

Now what’s going on here? for it looks like a little egotistic boasting is going on = my mission in Jerusalem is just as big as yours, so there! Does it not look as if James is salivating over all these Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, who allegedly believe, and are still zealous of The Law! How does that work?

The other question that immediately comes to mind is how infiltrated the Church in Jerusalem had become by these Judaising mongrel dogs of the circumcision? It looks to me as if the Church no longer existed in Jerusalem, hence Paul was told by The Holy Spirit TWICE! NOT TO GO THERE!

Acts 21:4 (TAB) After looking up the disciples [in Tyre], we stayed there [with them] seven days; and they kept telling Paul through the [Holy] Spirit [a]not to set foot in Jerusalem.

Yet he stubbornly refuses, again, how does that work? In contrast, elsewhere in Acts, when The Holy Spirit guided they all followed, that is, not going on deeper into Asia. To me these are inconsistencies in terms of what we know about Paul from his letters.

We then get into all the nonsense of Paul’s purification in The Temple! WHAT!!? Is this what he meant by being all things to all people – especially appeasing the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? I find all this very hard to believe and yet it’s there in Acts allegedly! So let’s get some Scripture:

Acts 21:21 (KJV) And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs.

So these Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews already know what Paul teaches.

Now from the Amplified Bible to get a clearer understanding of what’s been written in the KJV.

Acts 21:21-24 (TAB) Now they have been told about you, that you are teaching all the Jews who are living among the Gentiles to turn away from [the Law of] Moses, advising them not to circumcise their children or to live according to the [Mosaic] customs. 22 What then should be done? They will certainly hear that you have arrived. 23 Therefore do just what we tell you. We have four men who have taken a vow; 24 take these men and purify yourself along with them, and pay their expenses [for the temple offerings] so that they may shave their heads. Then everyone will know that there is nothing to the things they have been told about you, but that you yourself also follow and keep The Law.

So what do we have here? If this account is true, do I spy politicking? Do I spy lies, deceit and deception going on here? Oh let’s paint a false picture in order to placate these satanic Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews. How about Paul and his brothers doing a swift exit out of Jerusalem as fast their legs could carry them? why was that not suggested, or for them to go into hiding until the baying mob had gone home. Oh no we have to go through all these meaningless lying theatricals in order to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ some – NOT!

Acts 21:27 (TAB) When the seven days [required to complete the ritual] were almost over, [some] Jews from [the province of] Asia [Minor], caught sight of him in The Temple, and began to stir up the crowd, and they seized him,

What is Paul doing in The Temple when he knows full well that his presence their will be an act of provocation? What’s happened to the policy of gaining and winning some? Then we get confirmation of what I said to be correct:

Acts 21:30 (TAB) Then the whole city was provoked and confused, and the people rushed together. They seized Paul and dragged him out of the temple, and immediately the gates were closed.

Here’s another thing: Did Paul have a death wish? for he clearly stated that he had no fear of going up to Jerusalem, even if it meant death:

Acts 21:13 (TAB) Then Paul replied, “What are you doing, weeping and breaking my heart [like this]? For I am ready not only to be bound and imprisoned, but even to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.”

Then we get more confirmation:

Acts 21:27 (TAB) When the seven days [required to complete the ritual] were almost over, [some] Jews from [the province of] Asia [Minor], caught sight of him in the temple, and began to stir up the crowd, and they seized him,

So the stupid ritual was not even completed (an act of God IMO) before the Serpent Seed Jews caught sight of him in The Temple AGAIN! And grabbed him. How many acts of provocation was that? None of this makes any sense unless he deliberately wanted death at their hands.

Acts 21:28-29 (TAB) shouting, “Men of Israel, help us! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against our people and The Law and this place. And besides, he has brought Greeks into The Temple and has defiled this holy place.” 29 For they had previously seen Trophimus the Ephesian in the city with Paul, and they assumed that he had brought the man into the temple [beyond the court of the Gentiles].

So not only does he provoke them by being there himself, he also brings a Greek brother along to Jerusalem as well, as you do when you’re aiming to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ a few Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews – much sarcasm here by the author. We therefore have yet more examples of blatant provocation on the part of Paul, and we can only assume that these were deliberate acts of provocation in order to bring about his untimely end. I cannot see this any other way unless you, my readers, have any other ideas.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

PS Message for Thomas Howard: I trust this answers your silly comment about Paul’s (non-existent) fear of the Jews.

1. What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?:

Obadiah; Esau; The Edomites; Idumea; Turkey

Obadiah or Obdias, as he is known in the Greek Septuagint Old Testament, is the author of the smallest Book of the Old Testament, that is, a Scriptural Book just twenty one verses long, yet it contains some very important information for us in the last days of last days in the 21st century. His name means ‘Serving Jah’ or ‘Serving The Lord’.

Obadiah is said to have lived in the 6th to 5th century BC at the time of the captivity of The House of Judah (The Southern Kingdom of what was once a divided Israel) by the Babylonians so he was a contemporary of Jeremiah. The Northern Kingdom of The House of Israel was taken captive in 740-725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans). Now because Edom was complicit in Judah’s downfall, Obadiah calls for God’s punishment upon Edom with its total destruction – just a little background info and history.

Before I continue, I will add this caveat to inform you that I am NOT a prophet, nor do I have the Holy Spiritual gift of prophecy, so some things I say in this article should not be taken as 100% Truth (therefore you must do your own research to verify what I am saying is The Truth, or not The Truth). However, what I will say re the modern day identity of Esau/Edom (the Edomites) and the Idumeans (the later name of the Edomites, especially in the first century) you can take as solid gold Truth.

OK, so here we go, and I will start with verse nine of Obadiah, not verse one, for verse nine leads us directly into the genealogies of Esau/Edom, which are crucial to the understanding of the true identity of The Edomites, and I’ll tell you straight, right now, it ain’t The Jews and NEVER listen to any lying dogs that tell you the Edomites are Jews!

This means I’m gonna be ruthlessly blunt, because if you are a deluded brainwashed follower of the blasphemers Bertrand Comparet, the ex-con Jew liar, William (Bill) Finck of Christogenea disinformation infamy, and/or James P. Wickstrom, now deceased, you had better be ready to get educated, or otherwise you can take a hike, for there are no half-way houses or half measures with this crucial knowledge. It’s all very clearly defined, and those blasphemers are WRONG! VERY WRONG! This is big time errors I am speaking of here, not mistakes, for with the above mentioned people there will be an evil agenda in there somewhere. (See link No. 1 below.) So you have been warned. Now back to the topic at hand:

Obadiah 1:9 (KJV) And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount (the nation) of Esau may be cut off by slaughter. (Brackets mine)

Here in this verse we have an Edomite by the name of Teman and from his name comes the name Ottoman and the Ottomans were Turks (Ottoman is also known in the Arabic form as Uthman, from Osman). The Turkish Empire, which lasted from 1301 until 1923 AC, was known as The Ottoman Empire and consisted of Seljuk Turks, and please pay attention to this name “Seljuk Turks” for it will feature again.

From “The Ottoman Empire” by Larry Gormley:

In the 13th century, the region of Anatolia (most of the Asian part of present day Turkey) was controlled by the Byzantine Empire in the northwest and the Seljuk Turks in the south-west. Around 1290, Osman I (1258-1324), a Muslim warrior and leader of a small principality inside Seljuk Turk territory, declared his independence from the Seljuk sultan. The Ottoman Empire was founded. (Ottoman is derived from Uthman, the Arabic form of Osman.)”

Now Teman is mentioned eleven times in The Holy Scriptures, the first of which is in Genesis 36:11:

Genesis 36:11 (KJV) And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz.

And who was Eliphaz? From Genesis again:

Genesis 36:4 (KJV) And Adah (the Canaanitess) bare to Esau Eliphaz; and Bashemath bare Reuel; (Brackets mine)

So here we can see that Teman was a direct descendant of Esau/Edom, through Esau’s son Eliphaz. Now if we go to Genesis 36:1-2 we glean more crucial information:

Genesis 36:1-2 (KJV) Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom. 2 Esau took his wives of the daughters of Canaan; Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite.

Here we learn that Esau was also named Edom and he took two Canaanites for wives, which cost him his Abrahamic birthright inheritance from his father Isaac. The fact that he became a race mixer and/or a miscegenator is what grieved his parents, Isaac and Rebecca the most, as disclosed here:

Genesis 27:46 (KJV) And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth (Canaanite Hittites): if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?

This verse tells us exactly what Esau/Edom had done in marrying a Hittite and Hivite Canaanite, he had grieved his mother intensely, making her question even the purpose of her life, so in turn she made sure Esau/Edom’s inheritance went to Jacob/Israel his younger twin brother. Notice, too, how these Canaanite daughters, like their forefather Cain, were ‘daughters of the land’ which means any sacrifice would have been crops of the land, not the BLOOD of a lamb as offered up by Abel. Some important background information. (See link No. 4 below)

OK, moving on, and back to the subject of The Turks being from Esau/Edom and not the Jews. So let’s start at the best place = The Beginning:

Genesis 25:23 (KJV) And the Lord said unto her (Rebecca), Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. (Esau/Edom was the elder and Jacob/Israel the younger)

So if the descendants of Esau/Edom are The Jews, since when did they serve anyone? Since when have the non-Jews not been servants of the Jews through their MONEY POWER AND USURY = The CROWN – The Rothschild WORLDWIDE Banking Cartel!? (Take note that Jacob/Israel was not the forefather of the Jews – see links 2 and 3 below)

So here we also learn that two nations would stem from Esau/Edom and Jacob/Israel which then makes these two men Patriarchs.

From “Turkey In Prophecy” by Herman L. Hoeh

Esau’s descendants play a vital part in world affairs today! Where are his descendants?

Notice some of the sons of Esau: Teman, Omar, Amalek (Genesis 25:11). These are not Jewish names! Yet some claim that the Jews are the children of Esau. Nothing could be further from the truth – as we shall presently see.

Esau, or Edom, as he is also called, lived south-east of Palestine near Petra. Arab Bedouins live there now. Then where have Esau’s children gone?

From the days of Nebuchadnezzar, who carried them captive, they disappear for 1000 years from history. Then suddenly we find Amalek the name of a city in Turkestan in Central Asia (from Paul Herrmann’s SIEBEN VORBEI UND ACHT VERWEHT, p.451). The Egyptians used to call the Amalekites the Amu. In Turkestan is the River Amu today! In Bible times the Edomites inhabited Mt. Seir (Genesis 32:4). In Turkestan is the Syr Darya – the River of Syr or Seir.

The leading Turkish tribe is the Ottoman. The prophecies referring to Edom or Esau mention Teman as the leading tribe in these latter days (Obadiah 9). The conclusion is inescapable. The Ottoman Turks are the sons of Teman. Merely the vowels in spelling have been changed over these past millenniums. From Central Asia the Turks or Edomites moved into Asia Minor. That is where Esau’s children live today! Turkey controls the “crossway” of the nations — the Dardanelles (Obadiah 14).

How clear, ESAU OR EDOM IS TURKEY today!”

Obadiah 1:14 (KJV) Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.

Right, now I am going to shoot off at a bit of a tangent and change the thrust of this article considerably and yet it will still be based upon Obadiah in verse 4:

Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.

Now quite few people make the silly mistake of linking this ‘Eagle’ with The USA and its national emblem, the Bald Eagle, but that is totally erroneous, for this ‘Eagle’ has a very different symbolic meaning altogether, and it also ties us to The Turks in a very surreptitious way. I will therefore copy and paste here some interesting pieces of information from the Masonic Dictionary.

Here is the opening paragraph from their website:

Here is the type of article that makes glad the heart of an editor. With its lack of guesswork and with its wide-sweeping learning, it may well serve as a model and an inspiration to budding (Freemason) students….” (Brackets mine)

So from this opening statement we can be fairly sure of the provenance of the information I am about to reveal and share.

OK, more from their website:

“….Brother Parker has recently completed an eight hundred page work on archaeology; when it is published we shall hope to review it in THE BUILDER. For some strange reason the two-headed eagle, for all its symbolical appeal, has seldomly attracted the attention of Masonic scholars.”

Here we can see mention of this symbolic two-headed eagle which will be crucial in our understanding of this Edomite/Turkey connection.

The most able treatment of it thus far has been the chapter in The Migration of Symbols by Count Goblet d’Alviela of Belgium; Brother Parker’s own article loses nothing by comparison with that chapter. Indeed, it carries the symbolism back to a far earlier time, and embodies more recent information. A student who may care to launch out upon researches of his own will find, along with the present article, that the references in the Encyclopedia Britannica, are valuable; consult the index volume under Double-headed Eagle; also see the articles on Heraldry and Hittites. For a reliable but rapid survey of what is known of the Hittites see Jastrow’s chapter on the subject in Exploration in Bible Lands, by Hilprecht (1903). See also Mackey’s Encyclopedia, Vol. I., page 225; and Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, Vol. III, page 104.”

WHAM No. 1!! there we have our first connection – The Double-Headed Eagle and its Hittite heraldic origins, and who did Esau/Edom marry? A HITTITE Canaanite!

Moving on:

THERE IS SCARCELY a symbol in any of the philosophical or chivalric degrees of the Scottish Rite so striking in design and import as that of the double-headed eagle. The Tau Cross and (The) Serpent of the Twenty-fifth Degree, the sun of the Twenty-eighth Degree, and the cross of St. Andrew in the Twenty-ninth Degree are indeed fraught with deep meaning, both historic and esoteric, but none can claim a more romantic or significant history than that of the Thirtieth Degree, that of the Grand Elect Knight Kadosh, or Knight of the Black and White Eagle. As an emblem this eagle is the epitome of religious andsymbolic historyand to trace the winding flight of the double-headed bird is to survey the whole course of civilization, from its grey dawn north of the Persian gulf to this modern World.…..”

That will be the symbolic history of the Edomite Canaanites via Esau’s Hittite wife. Take note, for ALL Canaanites are Serpent Seed miscegenated inbreeds from The Garden = Satan’s offspring through Eve. (See link No. 5 below)

When our ancient brethren, the holy Crusaders, passed through Byzantium on their way to the tomb of the Saviour, the Double-Headed Eagle which they saw embroidered in gold on heavy banners of silk, borne aloft by the Seljuk Turks, had been four thousand years on its way.”

WHAM No. 2!! The Seljuk Turks (Edomites) and their Double-Headed Eagle held high on gold embroidered banners as they went into battle. So let’s paste Obadiah verse 4 again just to remind ourselves:

Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.

Turkish Dirilis Ertugral

To these same Crusaders this emblem was an honoured one, and though the enemy displayed it, yet they would fight to death for its possession and in triumph bear it, dripping with blood, to their encampments on the Levantine shore. It was from this Eastern Empire that the knights took this banner to adorn the courts of Charlemagne, and as a sacred relic hung it in the great cathedrals, whose architects and masons had so often been honoured by this Emperor of the West.”

Here above we can see how this Hittite Canaanite heraldic symbol wormed its way into the west.

From whence came this two-headed eagle, and how came it to be associated with Scottish Rite Masonry? The last part of this question is easier to answer than the first, for there is direct testimony that Frederick of Prussia supplied this crest during the formative stages of the Rite, but neither Frederick nor indeed Prussia could claim the exclusive right the use or to bestow it. It is the imperial emblem of Russia, Austria, Serbia and other portions of the disrupted Holy Roman Empire, and Prussia adopted the emblem long after it had flown over Byzantium as the royal arms of the “Emperors of the East and West.”

In Germany we find the Double-Headed Eagle used as the seal of the Count of Wurzburg in 1202; it was the coat of arms of Henricus de Rode in 1276; while Philip of Saxony bore it upon his shield in 1278. It was also the seal of the Bishop of Cologne, who no doubt adopted it from the city arms.

As the arms of towns and cities in England, this emblem appears upon the official seals of Salisbury, Perth, (Perthshire), Airedale and Lamark. In Holland and France there are also numerous instances of its use.

As the badge of royal orders we find the two-headed bird upon the emblems of the Austrian Order of the Iron Crown; in Russia upon the emblems of the Order of St. Andrew, founded by Peter the Great in 1689; in Poland upon the emblem of the Order of Military Merit, (founded May 24, 1792). As late as 1883, the King of Serbia adopted it as the emblem of the Order of the Double-Headed Eagle, commemorative of the restoration of the Serbian kingdom.

In these paragraphs we can see how Satan beguiled many western nations with their incorporation of the Double-Headed Eagle into their own heraldry – especially the Germanic nations.

But the double-headed eagle is not European in origin for its use depends upon the contact of Europe with Asia Minor, and indeed with trade or warfare with the Turks.

The Turkish name for this conspicuous emblem is HAMCA, and by this name they call it when they see it carved upon the walls of ancient castles, upon time worn coins or emblazoned upon frayed silken banners in ancient palaces.”

WHAM No. 3!! Now notice what we have here: 1) Further confirmation the origins of this Double-Headed Eagle are of Turkish/Edomite origins. 2) And the Turkish name for this image is HAMCA! WOW! = HAMitic CAnaanites!! So the Double-Headed Eagle is the incestuous Canaan’s heraldic emblem.

Travellers in Asia Minor, indeed, are surprised by the frequency of the double-headed eagle sculptures upon the castles of the Seljukian Turks, and upon the more ancient monuments of the Hittites, whose civilization was at its height when the Hebrews were wild tribesmen upon the Arabian plains.”

First off, pay no attention to the blasphemous mention of the Hebrews as wild tribesmen. The Hebrews were always husbandmen with their flocks and herds of animals not wild men, however Esau/Edom WAS a wild man and ferocious in battle. He and his clans were warriors of warriors, and this is yet another characteristic that does NOT FIT THE JEWS. Edomites were NEVER JEWS.

My last paste from the Masonic Dictionary webpage and here is their address: http://www.masonicdictionary.com/doubleeagle.html

I would advise you go there, for there is much more historic information.

OK, that’s it for this article and I hope you found it rewarding and enlightening.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing The Lying Blasphemer Bertrand Comparet Parts 1 and 2:

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

3. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

4. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

5. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE?

This article of mine has been up on Ezine Articles since 2009, so it’s obviously long overdue for a little editing. It must be said that it’s a crucial support article for my other articles: “Exposing The Trinity Lie – Parts 1 through 5”; “Do YOU Worship and Ogre god? – Parts 1 through 4”; “Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs? and “The Duality Godhead”, (See links to all four articles below.) This means that it’s also long overdue for a place on my blog. Still, better late than never, eh?

So, to my question, IS HE ONE, that is, is God ONE!? for many believe that He is one? All the Jews and all the Islamics on this earth believe their god or Allah is one. There he is, up there in his ‘heavenly domain’ (chuckle, chuckle, chuckle), all alone, that is, a single solitary god, who is the object of their worship and of their deification. The thing is, is their worship of this deity all in vain, and is it just a massive deception on the part of the god of this world, Satan the Devil? We must be clear about this, for he is most definitely a god, that is, the god of this world, or god of this age, or the god of this world’s system, or even the god of The Matrix, to use the modern vernacular. If you have any doubts about this arrangement then you must refer to the Holy Scriptures for the proof and thereby assuage those doubts:

2 Corinthians 4:4 (MCV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image (one in whom the likeness of anyone is seen) of God, should shine unto them.

Ephesians 2:2 (MCV) Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according toThe Prince of The Power of The Air, the evil spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience (and unbelief): (Brackets and emphasis mine)

OK, now all this is very straight forward, because we know that the lost and unsaved do not believe and the above verses explain, clearly, why they don’t believe, but what about the Jews and the Islamics, for they do believe and, boy, do they believe? Let’s face it, we could never doubt their zeal and their fervour, especially the Muslims, so what gives? Is their belief in vain, for we know that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) does not feature in their beliefs. The Jews have their imaginary Talmudic ‘god’, and the Islamics have their ‘Allah’, but Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) as God with God is not included in either of these belief systems. Islam does acknowledge a ‘Jesus’ as a prophet, but he is not revered any higher than their prophet Mohammed which, in itself, is an evil blasphemy. (For the origins of Islam see video link below.)

So to briefly sum up, we have two religions that believe in gods that are one – alone and solitary. Now some of you may say well so what, we’re Christians, and we believe that God is one, too? Yes, quite so, but is that true and who told you that God is one? And if God IS ONE what separates your god from their heathen god? NOTHING! Oh come on, there are loads of Holy Scriptures that say God is one, I hear you say, and yes there are some that appear to say that, but do they really say it? Well, there is only one way to find out using these examples:

In Mark 12:29 the Lord Jesus Christ quotes Deuteronomy 6:4 which He voices aloud:

Mark 12:29 (KJV) And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

Now this statement is a word for word exact copy of what Moses wrote down in Deuteronomy 6:4. You can check it for yourselves if you do not believe me.

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our GOD is one LORD.

OK, let’s analyse this Scripture in detail, from the Hebrew, as it predates Mark’s Gospel by approximately fifteen hundred years:

Hear, O Israel:

1) The Lord The Jehovah or The Eternal our God (Elohim) who has always self-existed.

2) Our God now the word ‘God’ or ‘Elohim’ in Hebrew means God plural – more than one. The Hebrew word ‘Eloha’ or Eloah is the singular word for Elohim. Now if God is one, a singular solitary God, then ‘Eloha’ is the word that would have been used here, not Elohim – more than one. This evidence alone disproves monotheism or Judaism, for the Godhead is more than one being.

3) Is one – OK, God = Elohim = plural beings, or more than one being are one. How can plural beings be one? In Hebrew the word for one is ‘Echad’ which means unified or united or in unity or at one and it also means number one; first and none above, the prime number. The Godhead is united – completely likeminded and in unison – in total agreement. A football team is united as in Newcastle United, and they are united as one team with one goal – to win, but they are also a team of eleven individuals. The Godhead is one team of two individuals who have plans to add to their number by calling sons and daughters, not close themselves off in isolation in a closed trinity. Three is God’s number for finality and if anything comes in threes with God that’s it – fini – kaput – the end, nothing more, just like the three woes in Revelation. The thing is, there is nothing final in God’s plan for us His future family! Plus all of mankind, eventually, in the Kingdom of God!!

4) Lord Eternal or self-existent.

So there we have it, a Godhead of two individuals who have always self-existed, that is, God with God who became The Father and The Son, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). Here, alone, we have enough evidence to disprove monotheism or the worship of one god. The Godhead has always been two who are unified or united or at one with themselves, with each other, or in oneness of mind – in complete and total agreement and totally likeminded – yet individuals; this is the True nature of the Duality Godhead.

No doubt, too, you will have noticed that the Holy Spirit is nowhere mentioned in Deuteronomy 6:4, nor in Mark 12:29 in the description of the duality of the nature of the Godhead. Am I denying the existence of The Holy Spirit? no way, for The Holy Spirit is the Godhead’s living POWER but not a personage of a mickey mouse Trinity.

Moreover, we now have a full understanding of Deuteronomy 6:4 of which Mark 12:29 is a direct copy. Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently quoted Old Testament Holy Scriptures (from The Septuagint) when preaching. So what is the point I am making here? The point I am making is this: Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12:29 are identical and yet they are taught differently due to the change of language or misinterpretation of same, that is, from Hebrew into Greek.

If we copy out Mark 12:29 from the Greek you will see what I mean:

Mark 12:29 (Greek Transliteral) Answered the Jesus that before-most is (foremost) be hearing (be you hearing) Israel Master (Lord) the God of us Master (Lord) one is.

OK, if we concordance the word ‘God’ we will find a subtle change has taken place; from Strong’s Concordance:

God – G2316 – theos theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

Notice; a deity, not the deities. God in the Old Testament was Elohim – plural, not Eloha = not singular, but look at what has happened here. God has become a singular god – a deity, not the deities of The Elohim who are at one or who are unified as one and in perfect likemindedness – two united beings thinking as one. And all this when The Greeks were polytheists = more than one god.

This deliberate language corruption is what causes all the trouble and confusion within the pages of the New Testament and deceives millions of people within mainstream Christianity. Look folks, the Godhead does not change, they have never changed and that is why THEY SAID in Genesis 1:26; “let us make man in OUR IMAGE; they were always the two beings of the Godhead. This, therefore, means that what was written in Deuteronomy 6:4 should have been copied exactly into Mark 12:29, for the Lord Himself uttered the very same words. This also means that because the word ‘God’ now has a different meaning, a singular meaning, not a unified plural meaning, a translator’s corruption has most definitely occurred. Well just fancy that!!??

Moving on, if we now take a look at a few New Testament Holy Scriptures that include the three words ‘God is one’, and not necessarily in that order, we will then gain a better understanding of what the evil translators of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion have done to God’s Holy Word, and what better example than the following verses from Matthew’s Gospel, for there are corruptions galore in these two verses:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

And from the Greek Transliteral, and supported by The Concordant Literal Version:

Matthew 19:16 (Greek Transliteral) And be-perceiving (lo!) one toward-coming (coming to) to-Him (Him) said Teacher! Any (what) good I-shall-be-doing that I-should-be-having life eonian?

Matthew 19:16 (CLV) And lo! one coming to Him said, “Teacher, what good shall I be doing that I should be having life eonian?

OK, so what have we got going on here? Hmm, well, as we can see, this verse is revealing that Matthew 19:16-17 is not quite as ‘good’ as we may have, at first, thought (like the pun?). The operative word here, of course, being ‘good’. Notice, the man in the Greek original does not call Yashua Messiah ‘Good Master’. The word ‘good’ has been thrown in gratuitously by the devious translators, but why? Well that’s easy to answer; in order to corrupt the whole passage and give it a different focus and a blasphemous, phony new emphasis. Not only that, but we have the assertion that The Father God is the ONLY ONE that is good, so there it is, the ugly perversion of Jewish monotheism slithering in like a snake by the back door, so to speak.

As it happens, this has always been a passage of Holy Scripture that I have never been comfortable with and, now, as I examine the original Greek rendering I fully understand why I have always felt uncomfortable with it. Notice the crucial element to this missing word ‘good’. If Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) is not the ‘Good Master’ and is only the Master or Teacher as in the original Greek, then by default it makes a mockery of what Yashua Messiah was supposed to have said to the man, that is, “Why callest thou me good?” For as we can see the man said no such thing, but what he did refer to was what one good thing must he do in order to have Eternal Life, so what’s going on?

Back to the Greek Transliteral for the answer:

Matthew 19:17 (Greek Transliteral) The yet He-said to-him any (why) me you-are-asking about (concerning) the good one [thing] is the good if yet you-are-willing into the life to-be-into-coming keep (keep-you) the directions (precepts) [Square brackets mine]

Straight away, it is crucial that we realise there is no reference to God in this verse at all, and we now know, too, that the phrase: “Why callest thou me good?” is bogus. What this means in Truth, is that there is not an inkling of any suggestion within this passage to suggest that God, in anyway, shape or form is here alluded to. Unless, of course, you have a demonic evil agenda and your desire is to classify Yashua Messiah as not being ‘good’ which, of course, is what the blasphemous KJV does – DELIBERATELY in my view.

First, though, lets finish analysing the Greek version of verse 17. The verse opens with the Lord answering the man’s question and notice, for the emphasis is purely on the subject of the man’s question and nothing else. What the Lord is asking him here is this: “Why are you asking me about this one good thing that you think you should be doing in order to enter Eternal Life, when you should know that the only good thing you can do is to keep (hold Spiritually dear) the commandments?” OK, having cleared that up, let’s return to the blasphemous KJV and I will re-copy it here for your convenience:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Right, we know from the Greek rendering the man did not say ‘Good Master’, so this must mean that the Lord had no need to reply with that spurious man made question, and nor did He, for it is not there in the Greek. To confirm, if we check once more in the Greek version of verse 17 we also have the proof that the Lord did not ask the man that question: “Why callest thou me good?” So all this wickedness and deceit is added by the translators – WHY? Why, because through this verse in the KJV it is scandalously trying to tell us that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not see Himself as good and, in turn, by doing that making us think that He was not God. If He was not good, then how could He be God in the flesh?

Now this truly is an evil heresy we have unravelled here! It’s also constitutes a heresy with them trying to fool us into thinking that there is only one God. As stated, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was God in the flesh, so how could He be anything but good? Obviously, the Lord cannot be anything but good, but to those in the blasphemous Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, they want us to think that only the Father God is good. What kind of diabolical evil is this? I’ll tell you, it’s Jerome’s and Erasmus’ diabolical evil and whoever else had their filthy Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translator’s mitts on God’s Holy Word when they wrote their King James Bible.

Furthermore, if you think Matthew’s account is a one off and Mark’s account says otherwise you would be wrong and I will keep this brief for I wish to move on to the next misunderstood verse:

Mark 10:17 (KJV) And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?

Again from the Greek Transliteral:

Mark 10:17 (Greek Transliteral) And of-out-going (of-going-out) of-Him into way (road) toward-running one and knee-falling (falling-on-his-knees) him inquired-of Him Teacher! good any (what) I-shall-be-doing that life eonian I-should-be-tenanting (I-should-be-enjoying-the-allotment-of).

Here again we can see that the translators have chosen to place the word ‘good’ before ‘Teacher’ or ‘Master’ instead of correctly attaching it to the subject at hand after the word ‘Master’, that is, what good thing should this man be doing in order to enter into Eternal Life? Notice, too, that the word ‘good’ only appears once so, by default, it must apply to the ‘thing’ and not to Yashua Messiah. Why is that I hear you say? It’s that, because in the Matthew account we learnt that the second ‘good’ was gratuitously thrown in by the translators.

To sum up we now know for sure that God is NOT one, and Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) is definitely GOOD!! So with that second expose of a corruption of God’s Holy Word I will bring this article to a close.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing the Trinity Lie!:

2. Do You Worship an Ogre god – Parts 1- 4:

3. Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?:

4. The Duality Godhead:

5. The Islamic-Vatican Connection by Prof. Walter Veith: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-islamic-vatican-connection-by-prof-walter-veith_gM5BHdgLIIc6zZr.html

Did Paul Circumcise Timothy For The ‘Believing’ Jews? – Acts 16:3-5

Now, as I am sometimes want to do, I am going to challenge my readers, yet again, with what I deem to be a very dodgy piece of Scripture. I won’t say Holy Scripture, because I believe it to be satanic, and not Holy at all.

You see, since I discovered that Romans 13:1-7 was a corruption by addition to Paul’s Letter to the Romans (seven whole verses – see the link below), that is, completely bogus, I have started checking one or three other places in the Freemason-Canaanite-Judaic King James Bible to see what else I can find that would merit my scrutiny. Now what do you think I found? low and behold, Acts 16:3-5 jumped right out at me, just as my good wife and I were studying The Holy Scriptures, this very day – the 8th June 2014.

As usual, I went online to see what most commentators were parroting, and it was all the usual guff about Paul being all things to all men in order to gain some of them for Christ. However, I could not rationalise this sweeping generalisation in order to apply it to what Paul was supposed to have done regarding Timothy and HIS member – not Paul’s member, if you get my drift. If we stop and think about this issue for a minute or two, we must ask ourselves who the blazes was Paul to take it upon himself to order a brother in Yashua Messiah, or a brother in The Faith under His Glorious Grace, to give him the authority to maim and mutilate Timothy’s body, that is, The Temple of The Holy Spirit? Just what is supposed to be going on here? Were Paul and Timothy under The Law, or under Yashua Messiah’s Saving Grace?

Let’s be clear, Paul had no rank or authority over Timothy, other than Timothy was Paul’s charge as a Learner (disciple) of Paul, a student, and therefore in Paul’s care on behalf of Yashua Messiah, and that was a great responsibility. Moreover, was Paul about to insult and blaspheme against Yashua Messiah and His sacrifice and go back on his own words as well?:

Galatians 1:6-7 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

“But there be some that trouble you.” Who were those troubling the brothers and sisters in Galatia? The very same types of people that we’re told Paul kowtowed to in Derbe and Lystra, so what is this all about? Are you suspicious yet? If not, I will copy this verse for you:

Galatians 2:21 (KJV) I do not frustrate The Grace of God: for if righteousness come by The Law, (circumcision) then Christ is dead in vain. (Brackets mine)

Is that simple enough to understand or are we going to explain it away with intellectual, philosophical, religious sophistry and clap trap?

And this verse:

Philippians 3:2 (KJV) Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the CONCISION. (Emphasis mine)

BEWARE OF THE CIRCUMSION!!!

Come on peeps, what are we dealing with here in Acts 16:3? I will copy it here for your information:

Acts 16:3 (MCV) Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Canaanite Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek.

Are we being asked to believe that Paul did a 180 degree U-turn and went back on all he had learnt from Yashua Messiah, and he himself taught elsewhere just to pander to a few Canaanite Judaising dogs of the circumcision? Well, if we read the King James Bible as it stands, and believe like lemmings that it has no errors, nor any Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious agenda, then yes YOU are being asked to believe it, and unfortunately probably do.

However, before you make your decision to carry on blindly believing this verse in Acts, as written, you might want to consider the story of Paul and Peter, and Peter’s refusal to eat with non-Israelite foreigners. Did Paul rebuke and admonish Peter severely for pandering to the religious whims of the Concision – the circumcised Jews? You bet your life he did. So are we now being asked to accept that Paul is now a hypocrite? Yes you are, because that’s how the translators of The KJV have polluted this chapter of Acts: 1) to discredit the character of Paul, 2) to cause confusion and 3) to get silly blind believers in the ‘inerrant KJV’ making all kinds of excuses on Paul’s behalf in order to explain this satanic verse away.

So did Paul circumcise Timothy? Not on your life and to prove it I will use the same method that I used to prove that Romans 13:1-7 is a satanic corruption of the Holy Scriptures. So let’s copy Acts 16 from verse 1 through to verse 8:

Acts 16:1-2 (MCV) Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, who was a Jewess, Judean Israelite and believed; but his father was a Greek: 2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium.

The first thing we must understand about these opening eight verses is that they are primarily an itinerary of Paul’s travels in this part of the world, that’s all. This is the primary focus of these verses and later on I will write them as they would have been written before they were corrupted by this satanic addition.

Acts 16:3 (MCV) Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek.

If Timothy was well received and well reported of, why the need for circumcision? or indeed, how did they know he wasn’t circumcised? Does that make any sense!!?? Furthermore, if his father was a Greek, that is a heathen, even more reason for him not to be circumcised, because heathen converts to The Faith did not have to fulfil the demands of The Law. Yet, conversely, with Timothy having a Judahite Israelite mother (not a Jewess), one would have expected him to have been circumcised when he was eight days old.

Acts 16:4 (KJV) And as they went through the cities, they delivered them the decrees for to keep, that were ordained of the apostles and elders which were at Jerusalem.

Here is the same verse as written in The Amplified Version:

Acts 16:4 (TAV) As they went on their way from town to town, they delivered over [to the assemblies] for their observance the regulations decided upon by the apostles and elders who were at Jerusalem.

Now what do we have here? Does this verse also sound all a bit legalistic and hierarchical (the system of the Nicolaitans that Yashua Messiah hates) with Jerusalem being the HQ like an early type of Rome dishing out its Papal Bulls and directives!!?? Again, if it doesn’t to you, then I suggest you have a rethink or perhaps you can point out The Grace within that verse.

Acts 16:5 (KJV) And so were the churches established in The Faith, and increased in number daily.

This verse as we read it sounds benign enough, but to me it has a propaganda ring to it, making you think that hundreds of people came flocking. How great were these numbers that were added when Paul, later on in Athens, after speaking in the Auditorium with 100’s, possibly 1,000’s in attendance, gathered two named people and certain men. ‘Certain men’ sounds very specific doesn’t it? small in number without doubt.

Acts 17:34 (KJV) Howbeit certain men clave unto him, and believed: among the which was Dionysius the Areopagite, and a woman named Damaris, and others with them.

Who were these others? Were they genuinely interested or just curious? We’re not told. However, this verse is not crucial to the point I am making here about Acts 16:3-4, which are definitely spurious. If we then look at verses 6-8, we can see the continuum issue that I raised in Romans 13:1-7 cropping up again, where the story flow gets interrupted with lies and nonsense and then reverts back the relevant subject of Paul’s itinerary:

Acts 16:6-8 (KJV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.

So let’s post this same passage as I believe it should be written without verses 3 and 4:

Acts 16:1-8 (MCV) Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess Judean Israelite, and believed; but his father was a Greek: 2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium. 5 And so were the churches established in the faith, and increased in number daily. 6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden by Yashua Messiah through the Holy Spirit to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but Yashua Messiah via The Holy Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.

There it is folks, as it was truly written – no Jewess mother, no circumcision of Timothy and no nonsense about KGB rules and regulations coming from ‘Papal Jerusalem’, or even of thousands flocking to Paul.

Matthew 22:14 Many are called, FEW are chosen.

Matthew 7:13-14 (MCV) Enter ye in at the strait (narrow and difficult) gate: for wide (easy) is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, (Spiritual ruin) and MANY there be which go in thereat: 14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and FEW there be that find it.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Brother Charles

Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons and Daughters of God Have To Obey Secular or Religious Authorities?:

Are YOU a Brainwashed, Coronavirus, Duped Numbskull?….

….and if so, will you compound your wretched, deluded, mental condition and fall for their JEWISH (SNAKE OIL SALESMAN) SORCERIES (VACCINES)!!!????

Now this will be an unashamed and unabashed rant, with no pulled punches, so be forewarned.

With regard to my article title and its extension, if you are a Christian, or profess to be a Christian, then I very much hope not, and will not! For to be so, makes you 100% deceived and no better than the dumbed down morons walking around with nappies (diapers) over their stupid zombified morbid faces and will soon be queuing up for their toxic poisonous vaccines.

sheeple-masks

As I write, (27th July 2020) a certain supermarket chain here in the UK is attempting to force people to wear these stupid face coverings, by denying them entry to their stores, if they’re not wearing one. Great way to attract business eh? Proving that the health of their bottom lines is neither here nor there to these corporate criminals. So what’s it all about? More on that later.

So what’s the point of my article you may well be wondering? For I seldom address worldly or political issues here on my blog and certainly not medical issues. However, the need immediately arose when I watched a Bitchute video, yesterday, by someone who calls himself Brother Hebert, and that is Hebert, not Herbert. In this video he made an interesting connection to modern medicine via The Book of Revelation, where it uses the word SORCERIES, that is, as in the ordinary sense, MAGIC and WITCHCRAFT – all of which are DEMONIC SATANIC practises. However, one could easily say to that, so what? What’s sorcery, magic and witchcraft got to do with the Coronavirus Hoax, or Cov-Yid 19 as I like to call it?

Revelation 9:21 (KJV) Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their SORCERIES, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts. (Emphasis mine)

Revelation 18:23 (KJV) And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth (The Rothschilds, Soros, Fauci, Bill Gates and Co); for by thy SORCERIES were all nations deceived. (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Right, let’s go now to see what dear old Mr Strong has to say about sorceries!:

Sorceries – G5331φαρμακεία φαρμακεία – pharmakeia – pronounced fär-mä-ka’-ä –

a. the use or the administering of drugs (Xenophon, mem. 4, 2, 17).
b. poisoning (Plato, Polybius, others): Revelation 9:21 (here WH text Tr marginal reading φαρμακῶν; many interpretations refer the passage to the next entry).
c. sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it:

WOW!! How about that for a REVELATION, and straight out of REVELATION no less – the use or the administering of drugs. Pharmakeia or, as we say today, Pharmacology, or better, BIG PHARMA or, better still, THE THIEVING SNAKE OIL SALESMAN MEDICAL MAFIA, who own, lock, stock and two smoking barrels, nearly all of the corrupt medical practitioners across the globe. Your so-called local doctor is a disease manager, not a healer or curer of your ailments and illnesses – he or she will TREAT YOU with poisonous drugs, NOT HEAL YOU! If you actually get better using their poisonous potions then consider yourself extremely lucky.

We then get confirmation, that is, POISON, and what does the word VIRUS mean in Latin? you got it, POISON!, and I’ll tell you straight, you cannot catch a poison!

Notice, too, how Revelation prophecies that ALL NATIONS shall be deceived by these same satanic lying, quack, sorcerer con-men. 100% fulfilment of prophecy.

Then finally we have sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it:

So what is this, or to whom is this a reference? Why, none other than your criminal political leaders whom you were dumb enough to elect into office (idolatry). They say jump and you deluded dim wits then ask HOW HIGH? They say wear a mask here, and no need for a mask there, and for no logical reason, and you follow their stupid instructions like so many dumbed down unthinking sheep.

To confirm this, I also read about a big clothes store, which also sells food in their food halls, and a has in-store cafés. Masks had to be worn in the food hall, but no need for them in the adjacent café, and all separated by an open four foot wide barrier zone. You couldn’t make it up, but these corrupt corporate moron jerks have done just that, and the lemmings blindly obey without question!

At the same time we have professional footballers all puffing and panting over one another, as if the virus has an aversion to physical sports and disappears as soon as these overpaid fairies enter their stadiums. This is how laughable it all is, and yet the majority appears not to be questioning any of it. This is deep psycho babble bull**** taking place here folks with dullards lapping it up.

Hosea 4:6 (KJV) My people are destroyed through lack of knowledge!

OK, so what KNOWLEDGE are the unthinking plebs and proles lacking? Quite simply that viruses do not exist. YOU WHAT!? Yes, it’s true, viruses do not exist. Furthermore, virology is a quack pseudo-science set up by the SORCERERS – BIG PHARMA, and financed by them to create imaginary diseases, for which toxic vaccines must be produced to combat the non-existent virus. Problem, reaction, solution, oh what a crackerjack Hegelian Dialectic, scam eh? We are talking £ billions and £ billions in profits, for these thieving psychopathic criminals. And I do not say thieving psychopathic criminals lightly.

Here is a transcript from Robert Kennedy Jr. on the activities of Bill Gates:

“From #RobertFKennedyJr’s Instagram post today, April 9th 2020:

“#Vaccines, for #Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including #Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him a dictatorial control over global health policy – The spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.

Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fuelled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.

Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India’s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 Polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame Gates’ campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain Polio epidemic that paralysed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialled back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously.

In 2017, the World Health Organisation reluctantly admitted that the global Polio explosion is predominantly vaccine-strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines.

In 2014 #GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Klein and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying the parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.

During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained: “We are guinea pigs for drug makers.”

Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economics Professor Patrick Bond, descibes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless” and “immoral”.

In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO (RevContent InArticle SOLO) promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilising millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.

After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.

Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.

Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.

Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.

They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe!

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.

In his recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunityto force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.”

— Robert F Kennedy Jr.

Now with all due respect, Kennedy doesn’t know that viruses do not exist, having not done the research, but it’s good that he has exposed the psychopath Jew con-man Bill Gates who, incidentally, has not a single medical qualification to his name. Just who you want in charge when producing toxic vaccines.

So, how do I know that viruses do not exist? Well it’s quite a long story, for back in March of this year, I knew NOTHING about what purports to be ‘medical science’ in the western ‘civilised’ world, and to be precise I still know very little. However, I now know enough, because if we FOLLOW THE MONEY, most things fall into place, and we can then come to a very sound conclusion in a very short time.

The basics for this VIRUS minefield con-trick are founded upon what is known as The Victorian Germ Theory. Am I saying that modern so-called virology is based on something as antiquated as a Victorian medical theory and an UNPROVEN medical theory at that? Yes I am, for it’s true.

The Germ Theory was a pet theory of the Frenchman Louis Pasteur, a mere chemist, not a scientist, and not invented by him, so he was a plagiariser as well. Here is a little snippet about Pasteur:

“What you forgot to mention is Pasteur attended schooling at Lycée Saint-Louis (a former Jansenist school but had then been covertly run by the Jesuits). Pasteur, being the mediocre student that he was, failed at numerous entrance exams to the prestigious École normale supérieure in Paris. But after he enrolled and trained at Lycée Saint-Louis school, the trajectory of his career just magically shot to the roof. He magically passed the entrance exam, he previously failed, with flying colors, getting academic awards left and right. His fraudulent scientific method covered up by the scientific community up until 1993. I suspect he was secretly controlled and tutored by the Jesuits, to serve as the scientific mouthpiece of the Vatican (Jesuits). Think about it. What Pasteur discovered is nothing new. His theory is the exactly same as the Catholic (Graeco-Roman pagan superstition) promulgated/taught by the Vatican for centuries now, but packaged under a new name ‘virus’.”

– NOAHIDE LAWS – Dr. Lorraine Day

So with this dodgy background, the Pasteur picture is beginning to take shape quite nicely. If we then add in another Frenchman by the name of Antoine Beauchamps, a real scientist, Pasteur’s shaky credentials and theories are then toast, for Beauchamps exposes Pasteur and his bogus Germ Theory for what it is – 100% BS. Here is a good link that gives the details:

https://vexmansthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/04/22/what-is-wrong-with-the-germ-theory/

We then have another clever Frenchman who said this:

“The terrain is everything, the germ is nothing.” – Claude Bernard, French physiologist.

Bernard Cohen of Harvard University called Bernard “One of the greatest of all men of science”.

Further to, I would recommend a video by Dr Stefan Lanka, a German virologist who made an incredible discovery re the alleged Measles Virus:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hTETvlWL-Wg/

He bet anyone $100,000 that they could not prove that Measles was a virus. No one has succeeded, even taking him to the German Supreme Court and losing.

For further study I would also recommend Doctors Andrew Kaufman, Sherri Tenpenny, and Lorraine Day.

Here is a transcript from an English heroine who knew the score even in Victorian times:

“Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes, like cats and dogs, but conditions growing out of one another.

Is it not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases as we do now, as separate entities, which must exist, like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our control; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves?

I was brought up to believe that smallpox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs) and that smallpox would not begin itself, any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.

Since then I have seen with my own eyes and smelled with my own nose smallpox growing up in first specimens, either in closed rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been ‘caught’, but must have begun.

I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and pass into one another. Now, dogs do not pass into cats.

I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut.

Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon disease in this light (for diseases, as all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun-substantives):

— True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows, with unremitting attention to the patient, are the only defence a true nurse either asks or needs.

— Wise and humane management of the patient is the best safeguard against infection. The greater part of nursing consists of preserving cleanliness.

The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”

— Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, 1820-1910.

With regard to the Coronavirus Hoax all you need to know are these seven golden facts:

1) The so-called Covid 19 virus has NEVER been filtered and isolated. Filtering and isolating is standard practice in good scientific research.

2) The so-called test doesn’t work and was declared incapable of being reliable by the scientist who created it.

3) Numerous verifiable experiments were carried out in 1918 with regard to the so-called Spanish Flu which proved that it wasn’t contagious.

4) Mortality rates are no different this year and are well within the range of deaths for the previous five years.

5) In the USA there has been a miraculous drop in deaths due to heart attacks, for this year only, whilst the numbers of Covid 19 deaths have appeared from out of the blue to replace them. LOL

6) In Tanzania they tested a paw paw for Covid 19 and it proved positive – even more hilarious.

7) Viruses are Exosomes that are mistakenly identified as viruses. Exosomes are created by the cells of our bodies to deal with toxic insults – they are cleansing solvents or agents. (See Dr Andrew Kaufman.)

Brave Whistleblower Nurse – They Are Murdering Patients for Covid 19 Statistics: https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/oNIuhX4Q8CBlf1U

A Compelling Video Linking 5G to The CoronaHoax: https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/cov-yid-1984-history-reminders-2-compelling-video-linking-5g-to-the-corona-hoax_ig3cOwgF7oRINdz.html

TOM BARNETT – YOUR GOVERNMENT IS LYING – YOU CANNOT CATCH CORONA-VIRUS – Part 1: https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/egc9mWvyL8tWhXn

TOM BARNETT – YOUR GOVERNMENT IS LYING – YOU CANNOT CATCH CORONA-VIRUS – Part 2: https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/1HYfs4NqZ93duP5

Corona Virus!!?? Is One Big Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake! https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/cov-yid-1984-history-reminders-5-coronavirus-is-it-all-being-faked_wTKwIEEmVhzEIfU.html

Please note I will post links here to further videos in the next few days.

Dr Andrew Kaufman – Covid 19 Tests Are Scientifically Meaningless:

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

Salvation is of The Jews! Oh Really, Is That So!? – John 4:22

Oh yes, is that so? and how many of you are deceived and brainwashed by this wickedly satanic corruption of the King James Bible? Furthermore, did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) actually say “the Jews”, or was He referring to a different ethnic group of people altogether?

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of The Jews The Judaean Israelites.

Right, let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some Light on this illegitimate KJV verse:

Jews – G2453 Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; – from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

So first off, for the word ‘Jews’ we have Judaean’ and ‘belonging to Jehudah’ (Judah). Now let’s get this firmly fixed in our minds, for Judaeans (the occupants and residents of Judaea) were not necessarily Jews, and Jews most definitely did not belong to Jehudah (Judah) (see link below).

In Judaea, in the first century, there were Royal Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites, who, in turn, were descended from the Israelite Tribes that made up the post Babylonian captivity House of Judah, that is, a remnant of those three tribes who returned to Judaea circa 515 BC. In fact, in a strict ethnic sense, Jews were not Judaeans at all. They were always alien usurpers, hijackers and parasitical subversive invaders, who inveigled their way into Israelite society, just as they do today in Britain, America and most civilised western nations.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I will firm up the Jewish Almanac quote by stating, for the record, that Jews were NEVER Hebrews, nor were they Israelites, hence you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first eleven books of The KJV Bible.

Juda – G2448Iouda ee-oo-dah’ of Hebrew origin (3063 or perhaps 3194); Judah (i.e. Jehudah or Juttah), a part of (or place in) Palestine:–Judah.

In this definition we have confirmed for us that Juda or Judah is of Hebrew origin so, therefore, nothing to do with The Jews.

Judas – G2455Ἰούδας Ioúdas, ee-oo-das’; – of Hebrew origin (H3063); Judas (i.e. Jehudah), the name of ten Israelites; also of the posterity of one of them and its region:—Juda(-h, -s); Jude.

Again, in this definition, we are told that the name Judas is of Hebrew origin, which when applied to Israelites would be correct. Hence we get this:

Matthew 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (Judah) and his brethren;

And this:

Matthew 13:55 (KJV) Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and His brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas (Judah)?

Judah – H3063Yhuwdah yeh-hoo-daw’ – from 3034; celebrated; Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five Israelites; also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory:–Judah.

Even in the Old Testament Mr Strong makes no reference to Jews, just Judahite Israelites.

However, Jews are very fond of hiding their Shelahite, Hamitic Canaanite, Serpent Seed identity by using names common to their host nation. This a favourite Jew trick, and this is why I am fairly certain that Judas Iscarriot, the betrayer of Yashua Messiah, was a Jew, and not an Israelite. Betrayal is a standard characteristic of the Jews, as evidenced by a past President of The US:

“The Jews are all through government, and we have got to get in those areas. The government is full of Jews, second, most Jews are disloyal. You can’t trust the bastards. They turn on you.”

President Richard M. Nixon, Nixon Tapes, July 3rd 1971.

In support of the above I will use this example, for we have Paul, later, professing his Israelite Hebrew ethnic identity:

Philippians 3:4-5 (KJV) Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching The Law, a Pharisee;

The first thing you will notice or, at least you SHOULD notice, is that he, at no time, professes himself as a Jew. So what does this mean? It means that erroneous ‘JEWISHNESS’ is read into these Holy Scriptures by ignorant uneducated people with a satanic agenda:

1) He was circumcised on the eighth day, as all Israelites were.

2) He was of the stock of Israel = a white Semite, so not a Jew.

3) The Israelite Tribe of Benjamin, so not a Jew.

4) An Hebrew of the Hebrews, so not a Jew.

5) Touching The Law, A Pharisee, and not all Pharisees were Jews. Nicodemus being another example of a non-Jew Pharisee.

Here is more solid gold evidence of who the Jews are, and Israelites they are definitely NOT!:

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Jews were easily identifiable for their rabid lusting for the death of Yashua Messiah and then claimed responsibility:

Matthew 27:25 (MCV) Then answered all the the Jews, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING; by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Having read all of the above quotes from the very lips of Yashua Messiah and John the Baptist, how on earth can salvation be of the Serpent Seed Jews = the spawn of the Devil himself, both literally and spiritually?

Essential reading for understanding the TRUE ORIGINS of the Serpent Seed Jews:

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

For more Light on this dark subject please read these articles here:

Salvation Is Of The Jews. Oh really, Is That So!?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/25/salvation-is-of-the-jews-oh-really-is-that-so-john-422/

The Jews are The Tares: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

And Pilate Wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/20/and-pilate-wrote-jesus-of-nazareth-the-king-of-the-jews/

I Know That (Ye Say) Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me! https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/john-837-i-know-that-ye-are-abrahams-seed-but-ye-seek-to-kill-me/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/what-is-the-word-gentile-doing-in-the-bible-part-1/

And Pilate wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS

The title for this article is from John 19:19 (KJV) and here is the complete verse:

John 19:19 (KJV) And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross (stake). And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Now elsewhere, here on my blog, I have already written an article entitled “Was Jesus Christ a Jew?” (see link No. 1 below) where I prove, without a shadow of doubt, that Yashua Messiah was NOT a Jew.

However, this episode, at the end of Yashua Messiah’s life, and as horrendous as it was, is very much misunderstood by almost everybody. When I say to misinformed people that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew, their first port of call, or reference point, is this verse, which they ignorantly use in order to try and make their erroneous case for Him being a Jew.

They will say things like: “So are you saying that Pontius Pilate didn’t know what he was doing when he had the sign made?” And I reply: “Oh yes he knew EXACTLY what he was doing when he made that sign, but I bet it’s not what you’re thinking.”

The other the verse they will ignorantly use is this one:

John 4:22 (KJV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

I will cover this in a new article soon and rest assured that salvation is DEFINITELY NOT OF THE SERPENT SEED JEWS.

However, I have digressed somewhat. So, what was Pilate doing, and thinking, at that time when he made that sign? To answer this correctly requires some critical thinking which, generally, is very much in short supply these days. For the dumbed down masses it is much easier to allow others to do their thinking for them. They certainly cannot think for themselves, that’s for sure. This means they will NEVER question ANYTHING and accept, as a given, that Pilate did do the right thing when he made his sign for Yashua Messiah’s cross. The idea that it was a deliberate political wind up, on the part of Pilate, to the Talmudic Canaanite Jew Pharisees and their racial brethren in Jerusalem, would probably never enter into their dumbed down minds. And yet we have the evidence that this is exactly what Pilate did:

John 19:21 (KJV) Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.

Now this verse raises some interesting points:

1) We can see straight away that the Jews did not want Roman recognition or, possibly, universal non-Jewish recognition that they, The Jews, had crucified a king, whether He was allegedly their king, or anyone else’s king.

2) Notice that the Jews accuse Yashua Messiah of claiming to be their king when He did no such thing. All He admitted to Pilate was the Truth that He was sent to be a King, but without any mention of whose King. So The Jews, in their arrogant vanity and conceit, jumped to the erroneous conclusion that Yashua Messiah had declared that He was their king when nothing could be further from The Truth.

3) He claimed to have come for His People – The Israelites, not the Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews who were, and are, the offspring, both literally and spiritually of Satan the Devil. (see link No. 2 below)

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I could and can assure him that the first Hebrews were definitely not Jews. The word ‘Jew’ cannot be found in the first eleven books of the Bible. (See link No.s 4 and 5 below)

4) Scripturally He was known as The Son of man (Adam) to let us know quite clearly He was NOT a son of anyone else. Eighty nine times the phrase “the Son of man” is used in the New Testament, just so that we get it through our thick heads who, exactly, Yashua Messiah was, and why it is/was so important that we learned this fundamental TRUTH!! TWO SEEDS came out of The Garden and Yashua Messiah was descended from only one of those seeds, that is, Adam’s seed, and not the other. (see link No. 2 below)

From Strong’s Concordance:

MAN – H120‘adam aw-dawm’ – from 119; ruddy i.e. a human being mankind (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.):–X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.

OK, so let’s be clear about this and build the backdrop to this event. The Jews were an unrelenting thorn in the flesh of The Romans and were always causing insurrections, rebellions and troubles. There were numerous Jewish zealots (terrorists as we would call them today) in Jerusalem and Judea who would attack Roman supply lines and infrastructure often killing Roman soldiers. Barabbas, whom the baying Jewish mob called out for and chose instead of Yashua Messiah, was a renowned zealot and murderer of Romans. So from these known facts, it’s not difficult to imagine Pilate’s opinions and feelings toward these renegade troublesome Jews. Here’s a quote from those times:

“The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force, one knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

— Marcus Tullius Cicero – 106 BC – 43 BC, Governor of the Roman province of Cilicia in the Roman Empire.

We then have the torment and guilt created in Pilate’s mind by these Jews, and their unrelenting demands upon him to find Yashua Messiah guilty of their evil trumped up charges. In turn, his own wife warns him to have nothing to do with Yashua Messiah, calling Him a righteous man.

Matthew 27:19 (KJV) When he (Pilate) was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of Him.

So, after this, we must assume that Pilate, like his wife, was troubled in mind when knowing he must give the order, albeit, under Jewish political pressure, to execute an innocent man. Therefore is it so hard to imagine that he would get his own back on these despicable Jews, by winding them up, with his provocative title “JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS”.

Rest assured Pilate had no idea whether Yashua Messiah was the King of The Jews or not, and I doubt that he was really that interested, either way, but one thing is for sure, he wanted revenge on the troublesome Jews and got it with the use of his provocative political title.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

1 Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

2 Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

3 The Jews are The Tares: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

4 Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

5 Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 1

Introduction

This series of articles will set about unravelling one of the biggest deceptions in the King James Bible – the word ‘Gentiles’. This will be no easy task due to the ignorance or deliberate deceiving intentions of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translators of the KJV Bible – the principal culprit being the papist philosopher and humanist Desiderius Erasmus who put together the first Greek New Testament in 1512; this with a humanist agenda and associated philosophy(s) in play and no doubt, influencing his work. ‘Improved’ editions followed the 1512 edition. The martyr William Tyndale (1491?-1536), a contemporary of Erasmus, used Erasmus’ Greek New Testament when translating his English version. These earlier translations were then used by the translators of The KJV (1604-1611) along with The Great Bible (1539).

So why am I asking this question, it’s all very straight forward, isn’t it? Gentiles are non-Jews, aren’t they? Well that’s what we’re led to believe by the satanic blanket use of this, one-size-fits-all, infernal word, but is it True? What if the word ‘Gentiles’ means something else, something entirely different? Where will we be then? apart from being very confused and even upset and angry that we have been so deceptively and easily deceived. Some would say brainwashed, and completely duped; conned no less. To compound the problem the wretched word ‘Gentiles’ can be found throughout the King James Bible in both Old and New Testaments; 129 times in all, in 121 verses and here is its first usage in Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Gentiles (H1471) divided in their lands; every one after his own tongue, after their families, in their nations (H1471).

Now take note, for here we have the first use of this misleading word ‘Gentiles’ and with the same Strong’s reference number for both words in this verse. This occurs very early on in the Genesis historical account of Noah and his sons Ham, Shem and Japheth, and their families, before any Chosen Israelites or Canaanite Jews were even born:

Genesis 10:1 (MCV) Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.

No Israelites or Jews, so therefore no non-Israelites and no non-Jews, that is, alleged ‘Gentiles’ so why is the word already in use?

Furthermore, and as an aside, you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first 11 Books of The Bible and yet, here we have this deceptive word ‘Gentile’ in use where there is no way it can be referring to people or tribes of people who can be classified as non-Jews, as there were no Jews present at that time. So what’s it all about and, again, why is the word there at all?

Well let’s see what the word ‘Gentile’ really means so that we can begin to unravel this evil corrupting conundrum. First the etymology:

From the Online Etymology Dictionary:

Gentile – “From Late Latin noun use of Latin gentilis; “of the same family or clan, of or belonging to a Roman gens,” from gens (genitive gentis) “race, clan,” from PIE root *gene- “give birth, beget,” with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.”

From Wikipedia:

Gens – In ancient Rome, a gens (/ˈɡɛns/ or /ˈdʒɛnz/), plural gentes, was a family consisting of all those individuals who shared the same nomen and who claimed descent from a common ancestor.

Then we have the Biblical definition from the Hebrew in Strong’s Concordance:

Gentiles – H1471 – גֹּי גּוֹי – gôy gôy – go’ee, go’-ee – Apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts: – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

And then from Strong’s again with the Greek definition from the New Testament:

Gentiles – G1484 – ἔθνος – ethnos – eth’-nos – Probably from G1486; a race (as of the same habit), that is, a tribe; specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

Notice how the word has allegedly changed in its meaning from an OT usage to a NT usage!! No mention of Jews and non-Jews in the OT definition but, hey presto, surprise surprise, in the NT, all of a sudden, it does mean non-Jews!! Who decided to give it this new meaning!!?? The plot thickens, does it not?

So there we have it, the main definitions and NONE referring to Jews or non-Jews apart from Strong’s meaningless, peer pressure implied corrupting afterthought in brackets. The etymology plainly tells us that a ‘Gentile’ is from the Latin ‘gentilis’ and means someone who is not a Roman or not a Roman citizen and is nothing to do with people being either Jews and/or non-Jews.

We then get the Hebrew definition for ‘Gentile’ which clearly states ‘goy’ or a ‘foreign nation’ or, better, an Abrahamic or Israelite ‘nation’, so if we re-paste Genesis 10:5 we can more accurately translate it:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Goyim or nations (H1471 – Gentiles) divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.

In support I will include the Septuagint Greek Transliteral OT for Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (Septuagint Greek Transliteral) From out of these separated islands of the nations (Hebrew Goyim) in their land each according to tongue among their tribes and among their nations. (Brackets mine)

As stated earlier the above verse does not refer to Jews or non-Jews, it clearly applies to Noah and his family only, that is, before any Israelites or Jews had been born. This also means that Semites from Shem were also classified as Goyim or Nations as can be supported by this proof, that of God speaking to Abram:

Genesis 12:2 (MCV) And I will make of thee a great Goy (H1471 – Goy – Nation), and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

And again with The Lord speaking to Isaac’s wife Rebekah:

Genesis 25:23 (MCV) And the LORD said unto her, Two nations (H1471 – Goy – Nation) are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.

OK, so the word ‘Gentiles’ is not being used here in this verse, but the word ‘Nations’ is being used, and yet it is translated from the same Hebrew word H1471 Goy or Goyim. So we have the Semitic Hebrews Isaac and Rebekah with twins in her womb being referred to as GOY!!

So how come this same Hebrew word ‘Goy’ is here translated as ‘Nation’, a Hebrew Semitic nation no less, and elsewhere it’s translated as ‘Gentile’ with the translator’s intended meaning being that of a foreign nation? And who is the foreign nation foreign to? Which of these nations is not foreign, they’re all descendants of Noah aren’t they? Are you beginning to see the picture? What a ‘flexible’ and ‘useful’ word this ‘Gentiles’ word is (much sarcasm by the author and the accompanying mirth)!

So, with regard to all the other usages, who has made these translation determinations? Who has decided what kind of nation? Now we’re getting to it, and the answer? the agenda driven religious dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who had to preserve their pro-Jewish agenda deception, no matter what the cost to The Truth of the Holy Scriptures. Confusion and chaos was definitely the order of the day with these deceivers.

From “WHO ARE THE GENTILES?” by Bertrand L. Comparet and taken from “Your Heritage.”

“You may be surprised to know that there is no such word (as Gentile) in the Bible, in its original language. Oh yes, I know that you are now riffling through the pages of your King James Bible, looking for some of the many places you will find Gentile in it. However, I said that there was no such word in the original languages. The word was put into it by translators, who changed the wording of the Bible centuries after the last book of the Bible was written.”

And again from Comparet:

“The word Gentile is not once used in any Hebrew manuscript of the Old Testament. There is a very good reason for this, there is no such word in Hebrew, nor any word that corresponds to it. Everywhere you find the word Gentile used in the Old Testament, it is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word goi (goy), which means nation, the plural form of it is goyim. Since it means nation, why didn’t they translate it correctly? Sometimes they did, but for the most part they translated it to fit the official doctrines of the church of their day. It didn’t matter what violence that did to the true meaning of the word.”

Always good to get confirmation, eh? Please note that I am not a disciple of Comparet’s.

Moving on, and to firm up what I have already said, I will now quote Genesis again in reference to Jacob/Israel and his two grandsons Ephraim and Manasseh (Joseph’s sons), whom Jacob declared as being true Israelites even though their mother was Egyptian:

Genesis 48:17-19 (MCV) And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father’s hand, to remove it from Ephraim’s head unto Manasseh’s head. 18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head. 19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he (Manasseh) also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother (Ephraim) shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations (H1471 – Goyim).

So what do we have going on here!? Let’s be clear, for here we have two Hebrew Israelite lads being blessed by their Hebrew Israelite grandfather, Jacob/Israel, who is saying that one of them, along with his descendants, shall be a great goy (nation) and the other who shall become a great company, or commonwealth, or multitude of goyim (nations). This means we have Hebrew Israelites being called goy and goyim – WHAT!!!!??? This is enough to give the Jews apoplexy!! LOL. Just as well then that the Jews are not Israelites, so they are an irrelevance, until we get to the NT where we see them in their true Serpent Seed Canaanite light as the Christ killers. (See the links below for the true identity of the Jews and their origins)

However, where does this leave us with regard to this word ‘Gentile’ which we now know is a gross deception and means GOY (singular) and GOYIM (plural) and in turn means Israelite NATION or NATIONS! It also leaves us with the bigger problem of checking out every use of the word ‘Gentile’ but, more importantly, learning what is meant by the use of the word in that particular context. Is it being applied to Israelites, to non-Israelites, to Canaanites, to Greeks, to heathen barbarians/pagans, and, especially in erroneous association with the Jews? What are the Holy Scriptures REALLY alluding to in these differing cases?

As an aside, for those of you not aware, the words ‘goy’ and ‘goyim’ are frequently used by the Jews when describing non-Jews in an elitist put-down and derogatory manner. Other times they will call us ‘cattle’ such is their ignorant, arrogant, evil contempt for all other ethnic groups. Here are some examples:

“The differences between Jews and gentiles are not religious, historical, cultural or political. They are, rather, racial, genetic and scientifically unalterable. The one group (Gentiles) is at its very root and by natural constitution “Totally Evil”, while the other (Jews) is “Totally Good.””

— Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut by Rabbi Saadyi Grama

“A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from Holiness.”

— The Chabad-Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson

“We have to recognise that Jewish blood and the blood of the goy are not the same thing. Every law that is based on equating goys and Jews is completely unacceptable.”

— Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

How about that for satanic belligerence and arrogance!? This also tells us that Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, apart from being rabid racists, are not the sharpest tools in the box, having not studied The Holy Scriptures, and, despite all the BS we hear about their mythical cleverness and high intellect.

OK, just one more point from Genesis 48:19 where it refers to Manasseh as being ‘a people’ and from Strong’s, once more, we get:

People – H5971- עַם – ‛am – am – From H6004; a people (as a congregated unit); specifically a tribe (as those of Israel); hence (collectively) troops or attendants; figuratively a flock: – folk, men, nation, people.

As we can see, the Israelites descended from the Patriarch Manasseh were to become a great people, a tribe, or a troop, or a flock and/or a great nation, that is, a great goy.

Any the wiser? I hope so, if not, then press on to Part 2 for all will be revealed.

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 2 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites and The Canaanite Jews

So how do we discern what is really meant by the word ‘Gentile’? Well, first and foremost we have to learn who the Israelites were in Biblical history and, of course, who the Israelites are today, because without this crucial foundational knowledge you’re always going to flounder in your understanding like those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,

Benjamin the youngest son,

Simeon – The Scythians – The Scots

Levi – The Priesthood,

Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,

Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,

Issachar,

Zeebulon,

Gad,

Asher,

Dan,

Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes not the Jews) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules (The Strait of Gibraltar), and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.” (Brackets mine)

For further knowledge about True Israel see link below entitled: “The Jews are The Tares”

OK, so now that you know who The Israelites are, I will go straight to the last book of The Bible as the starting point of this study, for this is where it all has to culminate or climax. Six thousand years of Israel’s and mankind’s history are focused here, that is, just prior to Yashua Messiah’s return to this earth. From this starting point we can then go back and work our way through a few relevant Scriptures to make the case for a ‘Gentile’ free Bible. This will then show you, so that you fully understand, the evil deception that has taken place, that is, through the use of this useless and deceptive word ‘Gentiles’:

Revelation 7:4-8 (MCV) And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Sons and Daughters of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Napthali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Joseph (Ephraim) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

Now here is the question I always ask of those that worship and suck up to the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews as the chosen people, that is, satanic ‘Christian’ Zionists and those of their satanic ilk: “If the Jews are the chosen people, then tell me who these twelve tribes or nations of people are today – identify them if you can?” To date I have never had an answer from any of these wretched deluded people. And why is that? Simply, because the Jews are just one ethnic group – one tribe, not twelve tribes, and a tribe that is not even Semitic, they’re not Hebrews, nor are they of Israel! In fact, the Jews truly are the Gentiles or the Goy, if we were to use their words with their intended meanings. However, we’re not using their disingenuous words, so who are the Jews? The Jews are Shelahite Hamitic Canaanites, The Serpent Seed from The Garden, not Semitic Israelites. (Please see Genesis chapter 38 and the links below for all the details about the True Israelites and identity of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews).

So where are we now? for we have taken the Jews out of the equation completely and we’re now dealing with a totally different ethnic group, namely the True Israelites who became 12 modern nations or 12 modern goys. But what about the non-Israelites, how do we identify them? Answer, we don’t when confronted with this accursed word ‘Gentile’, but what we do learn is that The Holy Scriptures are mostly about the nation or goy of Israel and the Israelites and not about foreign nations at all, other than when they are specifically mentioned, come into contact with, and interrelate with the nation of Israel. This applies equally to the NT as it does the OT. Examples of the other nations in the OT being the tribes of Canaanites (the Hittites Jebusites, Kenites etc.) the Moabites, The Amorites, the Philistines, the Egyptians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians and the Persians etc. In the NT we get the Romans, the Greeks, the Samaritans, the Edomites (Herod) and the Canaanite Jews to name a few.

This means we’re left with three principal ethnic groups of people, those from the nations of Israel, the Adamic/Noahide mankind nations not of Israel and then the foreign heathen nations of the Serpent Seed, headed up by the Jews, namely the Canaanites. The Canaanites and/or the alien foreign nations, are hu-man kind and the Israelites, plus the other nations, are mankind. ‘Hu’ from the British Gaelic and Old English tongues means ‘serpent’ so a ‘hu-man’ is a serpent man, not a man. With these truthful elements in mind we will now unravel the infuriating use of this word ‘Gentile’.

Now here’s a thing. In the OT, ‘Gentile’ means Goy or nation – any nation, and ‘Gentile’, in the NT, means ‘Ethnos’ which must also mean ‘Goy’ or any other nation, if only to keep the continuity going. OK, in Strong’s NT definition it doesn’t say Goy, but when it came to identifying the differing peoples, nothing changed from OT times to NT times, the same ethnic groups were still around. It would, therefore, be foolishness to surmise that the pesky word ‘Gentile’ had changed from its OT Hebrew meaning when using the NT Greek word ‘Ethnos’. Moreover, this must mean that ‘Gentile’ (‘Ethnos’) is nothing to do with being a non-Israelite or a non-Jew unless the context of the verse determines it.

Having said all that I trust that you’re still with me, for I do know that it’s a very complex and confusing subject and we must understand that this confusion has been sown, either through ignorance or to serve a subversive pro-Jewish agenda in order to conceal the true identity of The Serpent Seed Jews and, of course, the True identity of the Twelve Tribes of Israelite peoples – The Goy and/or The Nations.

The other agenda at play here is that of the Papists who have always maintained their counterfeit claim to being ‘spiritual’ Israel, that is, the satanic Roman Cult Church having replaced the Abrahamic Covenant True Israel. Laughable or what?

So let’s copy and paste a few verses here that use the word ‘Gentile’ and expound on them to reveal their true meaning:

3 John 1:7 (MCV) Because that for His name’s sake they went forth, taking nothing of the Gentiles (G1484 – Ethnos)

Now in this verse we have the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ in the context of Messenger John’s epistles, but to whom are his epistles addressed? Many Bible ‘scholars’ say that they are to non-Israelite potential converts and non-Israelite Christians at Ephesus. Others say that John was living in Ephesus at that time and the epistles were written to the congregations at Corinth. However, are either of these stories true? Maybe, but a more likely narrative is that of Augustine of Hippo who stated that John’s epistles were written to The Parthians north of the Euphrates river. Now who resided there in the first century? Why, none other than the Ten Tribes of Israel, which means we have John fulfilling Yashua Messiah’s command to His Twelve Learners to go the lost Tribes of Israel ONLY!

Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These twelve Yashua sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles (Canaanite Jews and other non-Israelites), and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He (Yashua Messiah) answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Therefore this means that in 3 John 1:7 they took nothing of their fellow Israelites – Ethnos – Goyim – Nations.

Moving on with more evidence:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

Right, once again, who was Peter speaking to? for unless we know that, we will be stumbling in the dark and not be able to work out who these ‘Gentiles’ are. So let’s copy and paste the first verse of 1 Peter 1:

1 Peter 1:1 (MCV) Peter, a messenger of Jesus Christ, to the STRANGERS scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

From Strong’s Concordance:

Strangers – G3927 – παρεπίδημος – parepidēmos – par-ep-id’-ay-mos From G3844 and the base of G1927; an alien alongside, that is, a resident foreigner: – pilgrim, stranger.

So who were these ‘strangers’ or ‘resident foreigners’ that Peter was speaking to? See Matthew 10:5-6 above.

Moreover, if Peter was sent to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (and he was) and he is addressing people here called ‘strangers’, who could these ‘strangers’ be other that lost Israelites? here called ‘aliens alongside’, ‘resident foreigners’ and/or ‘pilgrims’? Sojourners might be a another name we could call them, that is, settled, but only temporarily settled for they were still in the process of migrating west into Europe and eventually into Britain.

However, we also need to understand that the places listed, that is, Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, that Peter was sent to are in Northern Asia (northern modern Turkey) where Paul was restrained by the Holy Spirit from venturing into. The reason for that being that Paul was the messenger to the non-Israelite peoples of mankind, that is, non-Israelite Semites and Hamites. Here is the Scripture to confirm what I have said:

Acts 16:6 (MCV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Spirit to preach The Word in Asia.

As an aside and just to let you know that it was Yashua Messiah restraining Paul through The Holy Spirit and not The Holy Spirit operating of itself. (Please see my articles below re The Trinity Blasphemy and The Duality Godhead)

Now why was Paul forbidden entry into Northern Asia? Easy, because that was Peter’s manor – Peter’s territory, where some of The Lost Tribes were residing and they were NOT ‘Gentiles’ as in the word’s intended erroneous meaning – they were Israelites. However Peter is making the comparison between these ‘stranger’ Israelites residing in a foreign land and the ‘Gentiles’ and I’ll post the verse again:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

So who are these ‘Gentiles’ that Peter is allegedly referring to? Well plainly they were heathen non-Israelites, so not God’s chosen people and they could have been of any of the other ethnicities whether of Noahide mankind or Canaan’s hu-man kind (Canaanites). Here, Peter is teaching his Israelite audience that their previous heathen ways of behaving (Gentile behaviour) were not good or helpful to God’s chosen people. Especially if The Father was calling any of them. This is an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ being used in its traditional sense.

Moving on once more we have this verse:

1 Timothy 3:16 (MCV) And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was made apparent in the flesh, justified in The Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into Glory.

So who did Yashua Messiah preach to? Who did He come for?

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (The Ten Tribes).

So here, yet again, we see the deceptive use of this erroneous word ‘Gentiles’ which is translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’ which means ‘Goyim’ and in turn means ‘Nations’, but which nations? Easy, in this case it must be the Israelite Nations because that is who Yashua Messiah declared He was sent to – NOT the heathen foreigners.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 (MCV) For ye, brethren, became followers of the Ecclesia of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen (fellow-tribes-men – Israelites), even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles Ethnos/Goyim/Nations that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the uttermost.

OK, so what do we have revealed to us here? First and foremost Paul is speaking to his fellow-tribes-men, for he refers to them as‘brethren’ who had become followers of Yashua Messiah. He then goes on to make it plain that they had suffered at the hands of their own fellow-tribes-men (Israelites) non-believers, who also had suffered at the hands of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, even though these fellow Israelites were not called and members of the Ecclesia. Sound familiar? We then have Paul stating that they, the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, both killed Yashua Messiah and the Prophets of Old Testament times. Furthermore he says that they tried to stop Paul from preaching to the GENTILES!!!

Now who are these ‘Gentiles’, because we already have the Israelites mentioned as ‘brethren’ to Paul and as fellow-tribes-men? Well that makes it plain, does it not? for here, again, we have the word ‘Gentiles’ meaning non-Israelites.

Here is another example:

Ephesians 4:17 (MCV) This I say therefore, and testify in The Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,

So to whom is Paul speaking? Non-Israelites is the answer. How do we know this? Easy, because no Israelites were resident in Ephesus. They were living in Northern Asia = Peter’s territory, not southern Asia where Ephesus was situated – Paul’s territory. Therefore we have Paul behooving these Ephesian non-Israelite believers to henceforth not behave in the same way as their fellows who were lost and degenerate non-Israelite Ephesians.

Matthew 10:17-18 (MCV) But beware of men Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; 18 And ye shall be brought before governors and kings (shabbos goy Jew pawns) for my sake, for a testimony against them, the Gentiles (Ethnos – Goyim – Israelite Nations and Foreign Nations).

Here we have an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ covering a multitude of sins, for it does not mean just non-Israelites, it also means Israelites as well. If, in the future, we are arrested for Yashua Messiah’s sake and brought before the criminals in power, we will be a testimony to all people, including our fellow Israelites. That means this word ‘Gentiles’ (‘Ethnos’ or ‘Goyim’) is being used in an all encompassing fashion for both Israelites and non-Israelites alike. Which, in turn, equates to its Old Testament usage where we saw Abram and his Israelite descendants referred to as ‘Goyim’‘Gentiles’‘Nations’. This, in turn, makes a total mockery of the translator’s intended meaning, that is, solely for the describing of heathen non-Jews.

Romans 1:13 (MCV) Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

So to whom is Paul speaking? Take note, so that you fully understand what is going on here. First of all Paul is addressing fellow tribes men (Israelite brethren) NOT fellow Christian brethren, because he adds the rider: “That I might have some fruit among you also!” So as he writes they are not yet regenerated brothers of Paul (Christians) and yet he calls them BRETHREN! Now notice how the translators have written it as “even as among OTHER GENTILES” This means that according to the translators we have Paul referring to unregenerated Israelites as ‘Gentiles’! How confusing is that?

Moreover, don’t forget that ‘Gentiles’ means ‘Ethnos’ or ‘Nations’ or ‘Goy’ so Paul could easily be referring to dispersed Israelites living amongst other nations.

OK, that’s it for part two, more revelations in part three.

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Exposing The Trinity Lie
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

The Duality Godhead
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 3 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites, The Canaanite Jews and Now The Greeks

In parts one and two I have revealed some, but not all, of the problems created by the use of the wretched word ‘Gentiles’. In the third part of this article we move on to another word which compounds and makes the word ‘Gentiles’ even more confusing than it already is.

OK, so let’s move on to the word ‘Greeks’ and why use the word ‘Greeks’ and not ‘Gentiles’. Why use two different words to describe the same thing? Greeks are ‘Gentiles’ aren’t they? that’s if we stick to their erroneous use of this irritating word, yes of course they are, so what’s going on? Well could it be that nearly all the uses of the word ‘Gentiles’ are referring to The Lost Ten Tribes of Israel (The Nations) and not to non-Israelites at all. This means that when non-Israelites was the intended meaning they used the word ‘Greeks’.

Here’s the first example:

John 7:35 (KJV) Then said the Jews among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles?

Correct translation:

John 7:35 (MCV) Then said the Jews Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, (not the Israelites), among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed (The Lost Israelites, that is, The Diaspora) among the Gentiles Greeks and teach the Gentiles Greeks.

So what have we here? Quite simply yet another deceptive variation on the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ where it is mistranslated from the Greek word ‘Hellen’ pronounced ‘Hellane’, and the Hellens were most likely the Greek speaking non-Israelite peoples. However, some of these Greek speakers may well have been migrating Israelites as well, although most would have been ethnically Greeks. However, we’re still left with the conundrum of why did they use the word ‘Gentiles’ when it should have been ‘Greeks’?

Moving on and just to set the scene, here is yet another anomaly to prove my case:

Romans 2:9-10 (MCV) Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also of the Gentile Greek 10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also to the Gentile Greek.

Once again, the word ‘Gentile’ here is translated from the NT Greek word ‘Hellen’ (Strong’s reference G1672) pronounced ‘Hellane’ and yet it is written as ‘Gentile’ and not ‘Greek’. In this case ‘Gentiles’ is not translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’. How confusing is that? Where is the consistency? These translators of the KJV were supposed to be learned men, so what were they up to?

For confirmation we get:

Mark 7:26 (MCV) The woman was a Greek, a Syrophoenician by nation; and she besought Him that He would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Greek – G1674 – Ἑλληνίς – Hellēnis – hel-lay-nis’ Feminine of G1672; a Grecian (that is, non-Jewish) woman: – Greek.

Here we can see a woman, who was known as a Syrophoenician by nation, in the Gospel of Mark, and yet is called a Greek when in truth she was a Canaanite and is called a Canaanite in the Matthew rendering of this account:

Matthew 15:22 (KJV) And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto Him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

“The woman was a Greek – Rosenmuller has well observed, that all heathens or idolaters were called Ἑλληνες, Greeks, by the Jews; whether they were Parthians, Medes, Arabs, Indians, or Ethiopians. Jews and Greeks divided the whole world at this period.”

Notice here that the Parthians and Medes were here called Greeks by the Canaanite Jews, when it is well known that the Parthians and Medes at that time were dispersed Israelites of The Ten Tribes. The lands of the Medes and Parthians north of the Euphrates river is where The Assyrians deposited the Israelites after they had taken them captive in 740-725 BC.

Josephus, the first century historian, is a witness to this fact:

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

So here we have solid gold proof that the Israelites, here erroneously labelled as Greeks, and therefore as Gentiles in the eyes of the Canaanite Jews, were alive and well and were a great multitude of people prospering in an alien land as strangers or sojourners.

OK, the above is a little digression, but an essential digression in order to build a bigger and more accurate overall historical picture, and to show what an evil deception this word ‘Gentiles’ is, so back to the thread of Jews, Greeks and Gentiles.

Right, let’s take a look a the word ‘Jew’ in the NT and let’s use a very deceptive verse as an example:

Galatians 3:28-29 (MCV) There is neither Jew Judean Israelite nor Greek non-Israelite, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

In first century Judea (not Jewdea) there was a remnant of the three Tribes of the Southern Kingdom of The House of Judah as opposed to the Northern Kingdom of the House of Israel – The Ten Tribes. These three tribes consisted of Judah, Levi and Benjamin who weren’t Jews. They were descendants of the small minority of Israelites who returned from the Babylonian captivity circa 515 BC. However, many at that time did not return, but joined up with their Northern Kingdom brethren living in alien lands abroad and never returned home to Judea.

Moreover, the Shelahite Canaanite Jews (The Serpent Seed) lived along side these Israelites as parasitical usurpers having stolen their language, their customs and their religion. The Sanhedrin with its ‘high priest’ consisted mostly of these satanic inbred Jewish impostors – the rare exception to this rule, that we know of, are John the Baptist and his family, Mary, Joseph, The Lord Yashua Messiah and His half siblings, The Twelve Learners, Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea and Saul, who later became Paul. Obviously there were many others, not named, but these are the principal New Testament characters who were Semitic Israelites, but not Serpent Seed Hamitic Canaanite Jews.

OK, so just to recap, here in the above Scripture we have Jews and Greeks mentioned, not Jews and Gentiles, why is that? when one would have thought ‘Gentiles’ was the ‘right word’! In the Greek MSS it uses the word ‘Hellen’, pronounced ‘Hellane’, which would suggest Greek pagans and heathens. However, it could also have a contrasting Spiritual meaning and be referring to Judeans as chosen people of the non-religious Truth and the Greeks as those of the pagan heathen religious persuasion, those of a religious mind set, just as Paul highlights here:

Acts 17:22 (MCV) Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ Hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious, that is, preoccupied with idolatrous religions.

Here is another interesting passage of Scripture that needs explaining, for here we find ‘Jews’, ‘Greeks’ and ‘Gentiles’ all mentioned, but all is not what it seems:

Acts 14:1-2 (MCV) And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both, that is, Paul and Barnabas together into the synagogue of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews Israelite Judeans and also of the Greeks believed. 2 But the unbelieving Canaanite Jews stirred up the Gentiles those of other Nations and made their minds evil affected against the brethren.

So what’s this all about? Well first and foremost we have Paul and Barnabas going into a synagogue, as was their want until, unsurprisingly, they eventually gave up on the satanic Canaanite Jews altogether. Later on we get Paul, Silas and Timothy having to confront the Jewish demons:

Acts 18:5-6 (MCV) And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the Spirit (laboured more intensely) and testified to the Canaanite Jews that Jesus was Christ. 6 Now at their resisting and blaspheming, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles Israelite Nations.

This was the general state of affairs that Paul and his companions had to continually deal with, so in Acts 14:1-2 we have a similar situation in that we have Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews rejecting Paul’s message. In contrast, Judean Israelites, plus Greeks, who were being called received The Word readily. However, this doesn’t stop here, for the Canaanite Jews then stir up the Judean Israelites and the Greeks, here called Nations, and poisoned their minds, turning them against Paul and the brethren.

Now here is a humdinger misunderstood verse:

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews Israelite Judeans.

What did Yashua Messiah really mean by this statement to the woman by the well? Easy, He was referring to Himself as a descendant of the Royal Judahite Israelites. The use of the word ‘Jew’ here by the ignorant translators is an abomination! Salvation was NEVER through or of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, nor could it ever be! Salvation was through Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) as a descendant of Abraham and Sarah to Isaac, to Jacob/Israel and to Judah via Tamar = Royal Judahites, not Judah and Bathshuah the Adullamite Canaanite inbreed who sired the first Canaanite Jews, Er, Onan (both struck down by The Lord) and Shelah.

Next verse:

Acts 11:19-20 (MCV) Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews Judean Israelites only. 20 And some of them were men of Cyprus and Cyrene, which, when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians, preaching the Lord Jesus.

Right, so who would have been the ones persecuted after Stephen was wickedly executed by the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? Quite simply, it was Judean Israelites of the three tribes resident in Judea who had been called and saved. They had obviously fled Jerusalem travelling as far as Phenice on the island of Crete, Cyprus and Antioch. Notice that some of these Judean Israelites were already residents of Cyprus and Cyrene and when they arrived at Antioch on their way home preached to some Greeks about Yashua Messiah. Mark it well, for none of these kindly people were Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews.

With that, I think we can call this a job done. However, if there are any other verses that you think need explaining then leave a comment and quoting the verse you need explained.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles.

 

THE PAIN IN THE BUTT That Is The Story of CORNELIUS! – Acts 10

OK, straight away, let me make it very clear that, in and of itself, this story is FINE!!! So I will state for the record that it’s a valid Biblical account of a very interesting and informative topic. So what makes it a Pain In The Butt, I hear you ask? Members of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion or blind and deluded mainstream Christians are what make this uplifting story a Pain in the Butt! Pretty much like they do everything else from The Holy Scriptures with their perverted, satanic, blind guide misinterpretations, and this Cornelius story is a classic example of how they satanically misuse it to annul water Baptism. More on that later.

So how do they make this story a Pain in The Butt, I also hear you ask? Well in order to discover that, let’s copy and paste the Biblical narrative here, first, so that we are fully aware of what went on:

Acts 10:1-2 (MCV) There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band, 2 A sincere man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.

So here we have an Italian Roman Centurion which, would make him a Canaanite, for Italians are descended from the Babylonian Hittites, who were Canaanites. Romans were not Italians, so were not Canaanites. Notice that he feared God, so he and his household were Old Covenant believers, not New Covenant believers, so no Grace.

Now racially, to a chosen Israelite like Peter, who was NOT A JEW (Take note, Israelites are not Jews – see links below), this man would have been the lowest of the low. Again, racially, he would have been sub-species scum to Peter. We need to get this very real life scenario firmly fixed in our minds, so that we understand what’s going on here. No slimy, libtard, multicultural Cultural Jew Marxism is this society, as in our Jewified, dissolute, degenerate society today.

Don’t believe we are Jewified? Then believe it from one of their own:

“We have corrupted the blood of all the races of Europe — perhaps we have infected them today.

“Everything is Jewified.

“Our thinking is in everything living, our spirit rules the world.

“We are the masters, for everything that has power today is the child of our spirit.

“One may hate us, one may drive us away, our enemies may triumph over our physical weakness, but we are no longer to be gotten rid of.

“We have conquered peoples, conquered the races, defiled them, broken their strength, made everything rotten, lazy and corrupt with our stale culture, our spirit can no longer be exterminated.”

— Dr. Kurt Munzer, Jewish novelist, “The Way To Zion”

Moving on, we are also told that Cornelius is sincere in his belief, as are his household, which means they are all being called by The Father. We know this for they are all praying and giving alms. Next we have Cornelius seeing a vision:

Acts 10:3-4 (KJV) He saw in a vision, evidently about the ninth hour of the day, an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius. 4 And when he looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God.

Right, here we can see further confirmation that The Father has begun to call Cornelius for he has been praying and doing good deeds. These activities are an open sign that Cornelius has been called by The Father, otherwise he would not have been doing these things, especially praying. He then sees an angel of God in a vision, so this is a man that The Father has a specific job for.

Here the angel gives Cornelius his first instructions:

Acts 10:5-6 (KJV) And now send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon, whose surname is Peter: 6 He lodgeth with one Simon a tanner, whose house is by the sea side: he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do.

Cornelius follows the angel’s instructions:

Acts 10:7-8 (KJV) And when the angel which spake unto Cornelius was departed, he called two of his household servants, and a devout soldier of them that waited on him continually; 8 And when he had declared all these things unto them, he sent them to Joppa.

Next we jump to Peter who also sees a vision:

Acts 10:9-16 (KJV) On the morrow, as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour: 10 And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance, 11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth: 12 Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. 13 And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. 14 But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. 16 This was done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven.

Here in these verses we see the THRUST and CORE of the subject matter and the REAL REASON for this story = Peter’s OLD COVENANT mind set and his racial and religious aloofness re non-Israelites and how he had refused to eat and socialise with them as brothers and sisters in the Faith.

Peter is curious about the vision and wonders what it could mean whilst the messengers from Cornelius turn up at Peter’s lodgings:

Acts 10:17-18 (KJV) Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon’s house, and stood before the gate, 18 And called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there.

Peter dwells on the vision and then Yashua Messiah speaks to him through His Spirit and tells Peter what to do – not doubting. Peter meets and greets his visitors.

Acts 10:19 (MCV) While Peter thought on the vision, Yashua Messiah, through His Holy Spirit, said unto him, Behold, three men seek thee. 20 Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I, Yashua Messiah, have sent them. 21 Then Peter went down to the men which were sent unto him from Cornelius; and said, Behold, I am he whom ye seek: what is the cause wherefore ye are come?

The visitors tell Peter about Cornelius their master and of his good standing with the Judean people:

Acts 10:22 (MCV) And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Judeans (Israelites – not Jews), was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.

Peter lodges his visitors for the night and the following day journeyed with them to Caesarea taking some brethren from Joppa with them:

Acts 10:23 (KJV) Then called he them in, and lodged them. And on the morrow Peter went away with them, and certain brethren from Joppa accompanied him.

Cornelius is waiting for them:

Acts 10:24 (KJV) And the morrow after they entered into Caesarea. And Cornelius waited for them, and had called together his kinsmen and near friends.

Cornelius meets Peter and bows to the ground to worship him and Peter immediately lifts him up and corrects him:

Acts 10:25 (KJV) And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him. 26 But Peter took him up, saying, Stand up; I myself also am a man.

Peter shows that he has understood the vision that Yashua Messiah sent to him and explains the Old Covenant Law to Cornelius and how he (Peter) had been wrong:

Acts 10:27-29 (MCV) And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together. 28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is an Israelite to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. 29 Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent ye have sent for me?

Cornelius recites to Peter what he had experienced:

Acts 10:30-33 (KJV) And Cornelius said, Four days ago I was fasting until this hour; and at the ninth hour I prayed in my house, and, behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing, 31 And said, Cornelius, thy prayer is heard, and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God. 32 Send therefore to Joppa, and call hither Simon, whose surname is Peter; he is lodged in the house of one Simon a tanner by the sea side: who, when he cometh, shall speak unto thee. 33 Immediately therefore I sent to thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God.

Cornelius and his household and friends hear the Good News from Peter:

Acts 10:34-43 (MCV) Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that the Godhead is no respecter of persons fictions or masks: 35 But in every nation he that feareth Them, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with Them. 36 The word which The Father sent unto The Children of Israel, preaching peace by Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ): (he is Lord of all:)
37 That word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the Baptism which John preached; 38 How The Father anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with Power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of The Devil; for The Father was with Him. 39 And we are witnesses of all things which He did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: 40 Him The Father raised up the third day, and shewed Him openly; 41 Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of The Father, even to us, who did eat and drink with Him after He rose from the dead. 42 And He commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is He which was ordained of The Father to be the Evaluator of the Spiritually alive and the Spiritually dead. 43 To Him give all The Prophets witness, that through His name whosoever believeth in Him shall receive remission of sins.

The Holy Spirit falls on the non-Israelites:

Acts 10:44-48 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word. 45 And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out the gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, 47 CAN ANY MAN FORBID WATER, THAT THESE SHOULD NOT BE BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 And he commanded them to be Baptised in the name of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

Right, there it is, the full account of Peter and his encounter with Cornelius the non-Israelite Canaanite Italian and the tough lesson that Peter had to learn. This is the reason why this account is in the Book of Acts and no other and YET!!?? What do you think the gnat straining blasphemers of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion use this passage of Scripture to pathetically try and make a case for?

Answer: NON-BAPTISM CONVERSION OR REGENERATION!!! THAT IS, THE INDWELLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT WITHOUT BAPTISM!!!

And where do they get this idea from? Here:

Acts 10:45-46 (MCV) And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out The Gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.

Yet what happens next:

Acts 10:47 (MCV) Can any man forbid WATER, that these should not be BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 AND HE COMMANDED THEM TO BE BAPTISED IN THE NAME OF YASHUA MESSIAH (JESUS CHRIST).

Now why did this event take place when the norm for regeneration was and is repentance, confession of sins, Baptism and the Gifting of the Holy Spirit and as commanded by Peter at the very beginning of his work for Yashua Messiah:

Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, REPENT, and BE BAPTIZED EVERY ONE OF YOU in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

We’re also told the same by Yashua Messiah Himself:

John 3:3-5 (MCV) Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again (born of God), he cannot see The Kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto Him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be BORN OF WATER (BAPTISM) and of The Holy Spirit, HE CANNOT ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD!!

There it is folks, for all to see, and yet these demonic mongrel dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (so-called mainstream Christians) want to change all that and make regeneration meaningless and, more importantly, POWERLESS with their no-Baptism non-conversion, and this, all based on one misunderstood verse of Holy Scripture, which took place for totally different reasons than they try and make out.

So why did the Holy Spirit fall on Cornelius and SOME of his fellows before they were Baptised? Was it for their benefit or Peter’s and his fellow Israelite brothers benefit, who were present? You see, once we lose sight of the reason for this event we can then drift off into any old make believe, fairy land ideas or cuckoo land myths and fables, which is what non-baptism conversion is – a satanic lie – a myth and a fable.

This event took place in order to convince Peter and his brothers that select non-Israelites were now acceptable to the Godhead, and I did say SELECT! Make sure you notice this:

Acts 10:44 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word.

ALL THEM WHICH HEARD THE WORD!! So what is this telling us? The Holy Spirit only fell on those which HEARD THE WORD! This is informing us that there were some there that didn’t hear The Word and The Holy Spirit did not fall upon them.

As a final warning do not let any evil mongrel dog, blind guide, lead you astray on this most crucial part of your Spiritual journey with Yashua Messiah. Repentance, confession of sins and Baptism MUST precede the Gifting of The Holy Spirit.

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Did eve have sex with the devil or did she just eat some fruit?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Royal Judahites and the Canaanite Jews explained.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

APARTHEID Is The Kingdom of God!

How about that to get all those self-hating, guilt ridden, anti-white liberal fake Christians going, eh? I don’t think there could be a more tormenting or provocative statement or ‘meme’ (as they like to call it today) that one could present to these treacherous satanic evil disgusting wretches.

So how can the Kingdom of God be an Apartheid Kingdom? Quite easily, and Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Himself made it very clear:

Matthew 25:32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a Shepherd divideth His sheep from the goats: (Emphasis mine)

There it is folks – APARTHEID and/or segregation as in the American South, and whether we like it or not!! The nations will be separated or all ethnic groups divided and separated from one another so that they will all live together with their own kind – White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes with White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes, Germans with Germans, Russians with Russians, Slavs with Slavs, Spaniards with Spaniards, Arabs with Arabs, Indians with Indians, Japanese with Japanese and Ethiopians with Ethiopians. They will then remain racially pure with no Jewish encouraged inbreeding, no Jewish encouraged miscegenation, no Jewish encouraged satanic diversity, no Jewish encouraged satanic enriching, and no Jewish encouraged satanic multiculturalism.

However, Yashua Messiah also says: “Like a Shepherd divideth His Sheep from the goats,” so He is giving us this parallel, but what parallel, and who are the goats? because they are not the previously mentioned Nations. The Nations are Mankind and the Sheep are the White Caucasian Israelites, amongst those Mankind Nations, but the goats are not. The goats are a different group altogether; they are a hu-man sub-species and not of Mankind at all, so who are these goats?

Easy, they are the The Serpent Seed Canaanites – Satan’s people – his offspring, that is, The Jews, African blacks, the Turks, the Italians, the Red Indians, the Chinese, the Mongols and the Koreans, to name the principal Canaanite tribes.

Now obviously this state of affairs is not going to sit well with many liberal fake Christians; those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Christians that are really Cultural Jew Marxists (liberals) posing as Christians, and they will no doubt create a huge fuss and protest, accusing Yashua Messiah of being a HATER! a BIGOT! and a RACIST! So how do you think Yashua Messiah is going to deal with these rebellious vile evil people? Like this:

Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, (The Canaanite Jews and their shabbos goy duped Marxist slaves) which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. (Brackets mine)

So there is their sticky end, so lets hope that they repent and are quick about it! Lord hurry that day!

For those wondering who the White Caucasian Israelites are, here is my quick run down and exposé on that topic:

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
Levi – The Priesthood,
Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, British Royalty and Nobility,
Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AC and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

Caucasians = White Israelites

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rgLD2NtGRpUf/

https://www.minds.com/media/902217401290674176

In Yashua Messiah’s name – Brother Charles

The JEWS are The TARES!

The Parable of The Wheat and The Tares

The Tares are The Jews!!!!??? How on earth did you work that out, I hear you say? Quite easily, because once you know what a Tare is, you will then know it can only apply to The Jews and to no other race or ethnic group on the face of this earth!

So first things first, and let’s copy the relevant Holy Scriptures here:

Matthew 13:24-30 (MCV) Another parable put He forth unto them, saying, The Kingdom of God is likened unto a man which sowed good seed (White Caucasian Israelites) in his field: 25 But while men (White Caucasian Israelites) slept, his enemy (Satan) came and sowed Tares (The Jews) among The Wheat, (White Caucasian Israelites) and went his way. 26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit (White Caucasian Israelite offspring), then appeared The Tares (The Jews) also. 27 So the servants (Those AWAKE) of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed (White Caucasian Israelites) in thy field? from whence then hath it Tares (Jews)? 28 He said unto them, An enemy (Satan) hath done this. The servants (those AWAKE) said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? 29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up The Tares (The Jews), ye root up also The Wheat (The White Caucasian Israelites) with them. 30 Let both grow together until THE HARVEST: and IN THE TIME OF HARVEST I will say to the reapers (The Angels), Gather ye together first The Tares (The Jews), and bind them in bundles to BURN THEM (A REAL HOLOCAUST): but gather The Wheat (The White Caucasian Israelites) into my barn.

Above, you can see the True version of Matthew 13:24-30 hence I call it the MCV version or Messenger Charles’ Version, for, and on behalf of, Yashua Messiah.

Right, now for second things second. What is a Tare? for we need to know what it is before we go blazing forth in exuberant error as so many do! A Tare is a weed, but not an ordinary kind of weed, for that would make it very easy to spot and it would stand out like a dollop of mud on an otherwise spotless white suit, that is, the field of White Wheat. So take note, these devious tricky Tares were only visible amongst The Wheat to those who were able to spot them, that is, the awakened servants of The Farmer.

OK, so what kind of weed were these Tares? Easy, they were a counterfeit type of wheat otherwise known as ‘bearded darnels’. And from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

Tare – G2215 – ζιζάνιον – zizanion – dziz-an’-ee-on – Of uncertain origin; darnel or false grain: – tares.

Wheat and Tares 2

In the Latin it is known as: ‘Lolium temulentum’ and it is POISONOUS. From Wiki: “Lolium temulentum, typically known as darnel, poison darnel, darnel rye-grass or cockle,” – how appropriate IS THAT!!?? (See link below.)

wheat-and-tares-1

So here we have a very deceptive weed (a false grain or fake wheat) that looks very much like The WHITE Wheat amongst which it is sown and yet it is no such thing and it’s highly poisonous as well. So what does this tell us? An interesting point is the similarity between the origins of the words ‘white’ and ‘wheat’ and from The Philipendium web page we get this:

“The word “white” is from the Old English hwīt. The modern Norwegian word is hvit, nearly identical to the Old English. The modern Dutch word — wit — is also quite similar. In English there is a striking similarity between the words “white” and “wheat” — the latter of which is derived from the Old English hwǣte. The words “white” and “wheat” are in fact related, because “wheat” is derived from a proto-Germanic word that literally meant “that which is white.””

So here we have graphically revealed to us The TRUTH that The Wheat is White and the fake wheat, The Tares, are not white because they are not wheat. It also tell us that The Jews, like the Tares, look like wheat (bearded darnels), that is, they look white but are, in Truth, not Wheat, that is, not white and nor do they see themselves as white, even though they look white, and as (((they))) confirm for us here:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

index

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

— Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

OIP.k5VUQ-2zXs9DkbVuo1_kEgHaE8

“You’re on the endangered list [White people]. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving. In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won’t be any more white people around.”  — The Jew, Tim Wise

Arthur Sulzberger Jr.

“If white men were not complaining, it would be an indication we weren’t succeeding and making the inroads that we are.”

— Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Jew owner of The New York Times.

ignatiev

“The goal of abolishing the white race is, on its face, so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed WHITE SUPREMACISTS….Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed.”

– Noel Ignatiev, Jewish Harvard professor and co-founder of ‘Race Traitor’ magazine.

“Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity. The key to solving the problems of our age is to abolish the white race, the abolishment of the privileges of the white skin”

– Noel Ignatiev, Jewish Harvard professor and co-founder of ‘Race Traitor’ magazine.

https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/the-jew-is-the-problem_y69wHABSi3MQZL9.html

As we can see from the five nasty HATE FILLED quotes above, Jews do not consider themselves to be a part of The White Caucasian Israelite Race – Semites, nor of any other white Semitic race, for example the Assyrian Germans – Semites, and wish to see its total demise and/or annihilation. Not only that, but from this we can easily deduce that Anti-Semitism re the Jews is just a lying scam, and it has ALWAYS been a lying scam. The Jews are Hamitic Canaanites and carry the brown skin genes of Ham; Naamah (Noah’s Cainite wife) and the incestuously conceived Canaan, and not the white skin gene of Adam, Noah and Shem = JEWS ARE NOT SEMITES!!

OK, finally we have Yashua Messiah explaining the Parable of The Wheat and The Tares to His Learners (disciples):

Matthew 13:36-43 (MCV) Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and His disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of The Tares of The Field. 37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth The Good Seed (White Caucasian Israelites) is The Son of Man (Yashua Messiah); 38 The field is the world; The Good Seed are The Children of The Kingdom (White Caucasian Israelites and others of Mankind); but The Tares are The Children of The Wicked One (Satan’s offspring The Jews, and all other Canaanites – hu-man kind, not Mankind); 39 The enemy that sowed them is The Devil; The Harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. 40 As therefore The Tares are gathered and burned in the fire (A REAL HOLOCAUST); so shall it be in the end of this world. 41 The Son of Man shall send forth His angels, and they shall gather out of His Kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in The Kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolium_temulentum

Companion reading to the above article:

Did Eve have sex with The Devil producing Cain – The Serpent Seed?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel Jews?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

The Jews are Hamitic Canaanites not Semitic Israelites, nor are they Royal Judahites!: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was NOT A JEW!! https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Israelites are Anglo-Saxon and Celtic White Caucasians:

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
Levi – The Priesthood,
Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,
Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,*
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

Try and apply this verse to the Jews – God’s promise to Abraham:

Genesis 13:16 (MCV) *And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.*

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AD and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

“The apostles passed beyond the ocean to the isles called the Britannic Isles”

— Eusebius ( Demonstratio Evangelica or Proof of the Gospel , book 3, chap. 7)

“We certainly know that Christ, the true Son, afforded His light, the knowledge of His precepts, to our Island in the last year of Tiberius Caesar” (Tiberius died in 37 AC)

— Gildas the Wise, circa 550 AC (De Excidio Britanniae or On the Ruin of Britain )

Caucasians = White Israelites, White Caucasians are The True Israelites (NOT JEWS). They were placed in the Caucasus region circa 725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans) when Assyria invaded the Northern Kingdom of Israel and took them away as captives. From there they migrated west into Europe – the rest is history.

Our Ancestors Forgot Who We Are:
https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-true-israelites-are-white-europeans-jews-admit-it-blacks-deny-and-hate-it_YV623JNaZ7Gy5IK.html

The Germans are descended from The Assyrians: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-german-city-of-trier-founded-by-the-assyrian-prince-trebeta-a-city-much-older-than-rome_ZRT5sFpFd72bIW7.html

https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/germany-039-s-biblical-identity-in-90-seconds_oWvGYtEnfJMtjV5.html

Anti-Semitism – It’s a Trick! We Always Use It!: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/anti-semitism-it-039-s-a-trick-we-always-use-it_WWRM8VPbIxHQHdd.html

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 2 – The Historical Foundation

The Historical Foundation…

…but first, The Unwritten Historical Foundation to The Historical Foundation and the revealing of the ‘certain race’.

Before I press on there are two CRUCIAL things that MUST BE clarified, for these are issues that are NEVER raised in these discussions about blacks in involuntary servitude (erroneously called slavery), whether in The Caribbean or The Americas, and the first issue is the MIGHT IS RIGHT issue which always gets conveniently ignored.

Let’s be honest, (and leaving aside the issue of whether it is right or wrong under might is right), a hu-man being in neck braces and ankle chains has no rights at all – none whatsoever. He is totally at the mercy of his owner. How he is treated is totally dependent upon the kindness and benevolence of the owner or the ruthless cruelty of the owner. The servant cannot complain, he has no hu-man rights and if he was a black serf in Brazil or in a Spanish American colony his life expectancy was three years – tops. Some might say they were the lucky ones. In the American Plantations and Caribbean things were better.

However, as a contrast and comparison, I will now introduce the Orthodox Christian Russians who, in 1917 and the years that followed, were captured in their hundreds of thousands, leading to millions, and either executed on the spot or sent to the Gulags and deliberately worked to death by the Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jews (the certain race). Did these white Russian people have any hu-man rights? Did they have a Liberation Theology Movement that was allowed by the Soviet Government to speak up for them? Did ANYONE speak up for them and demand that they be set free?

Was there a Civil Rights Movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, 1930s, 40’s and 50’s demanding equality and compensation for the families of those that had lost loved ones? Was anyone charged with genocide or crimes against humanity as with the comparatively innocent Nazis at Nuremberg (ALL tortured for their ‘confessions’)? Was anyone made to feel guilty for their wicked evil genocidal RACIST past? Not on your life – not a whisper was heard – all was swept under the carpet and forgotten by the new Glasnost ‘friendly’ Russian authorities and the slimey duplicitous hypocritical Cultural Jew Marxist leftie, Socialist, Commie, liberal west, including the scum at the satanic cesspit known as The UN.

So what point am I making here? Well, quite obviously, it’s the bizarre idea that Anglo-Saxons, Celts and those of Nordic descent – The Israelites of America and Britain have to be permanently reminded of their ‘wicked ancestor’s’ past activities and behaviour and as if THEY were the only ones. So what kind of two faced double standards are being applied here?

This weird hypocritic phenomenon is then compounded by spineless white acquiescence and in some cases, guilt ridden shameful grovelling with these treacherous white wretches walking around with: “I am so sorry” placards hanging round their vile necks!!!

When was the last time you saw a Canaanite Jew even admit to the genocide of the appropriately named White Russians, let alone apologise for their satanic blood lust psychopathic murderous behaviour? Answer: You haven’t, nor will you ever until this verminous viper race is standing before Yashua Messiah’s Throne – His Judgement Seat – then you will see some real grovelling.

I would advise you dear readers to do your research into the Jews and their all encompassing involvement in the Bolshevik Marxist Revolution which was financed out of The City of London (The Rothschilds) and Wall Street.

OK that is the first crucial thing never mentioned and the second is the Canaanite Jews and their actual HANDS ON involvement with the Black Slave Trade with many of the slave ships being Jewish owned, which obviously included their modification and adaptation to carry hu-man cargo.

We then have many Canaanite Jews who changed their names to Spanish and other European sounding names in order to hide their true nationality. They organised the capture of slaves in Africa. They organised the slave auctions in the Caribbean and the Americas and they were into supplies and provisions to the plantations. In other words wherever a fast buck was to be made within this inhuman trafficking of blacks, the Canaanite Jew was in there. OY VEY!!!

For more in depth information on this subject please web search Professor of Black History, Tony Martin (now deceased) for all the details.

From Wiki: Martin died unexpectedly on January 17, 2013, aged 70, at Westshore Medical Hospital, Cocorite, Trinidad.

Strange how that always seems to happen to people of The Truth.

Right, having laid down the Unwritten Historical Foundation, I will attempt to lay down the The Historical Foundation.

First, some history on American Blacks and their ambitions for equality with American Whites and, in particular, with American Anglo-Saxon Israelites – The Tribe of Manasseh. Here is what two famous white Americans had to say on the subject:

“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about, in any way, the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not, nor ever have been in favour of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must the position of superior and inferior. And I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

– Abraham Lincoln, in his fourth debate with Stephen Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18th 1858

“Segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen.”

– Woodrow Wilson, addressing a delegation of black professionals led by Monroe Trotter, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Harvard and Boston newspaper editor, when they appeared at the White House to protest Wilson’s new policies of segregation.

“During Wilson’s first term in office the House passed a law making racial intermarriage a felony in the District of Columbia.”

– Wilson – A Portrait, The Public Broadcasting Service, African-Americans

So, as we can see, this was the racial status quo re white/black relations in the 19th and early 20th centuries out of which grew the racial tensions of the 1950s and 60s and the so called Civil Rights Movement.

However, there were other twists and turns to what I will call The Black Rebellion that more recently came out of something known as South American Liberation Theology or Latin American Liberation Theology and led to Black Theology. Black Theology then led to The Black Rebellion and a movement known as The Black Liberation Theology Movement.

Here are some of the black people, some with their ‘everything and everyone is black’ whacky ideas, who were involved in this anti-white Black Rebellion. Obviously you can do more research of your own into these characters if you wish:

Nat Turner (1800-1831) was the most notorious slave preacher who ever lived on American soil. Turner’s hatred of slavery propelled him to seek freedom by violence. Indeed, Turner killed nearly sixty white people before being captured and hanged in September, 1831. This violent revolt marked the beginning of the black struggle for liberation.

Marcus Garvey (1887-1940) is regarded by many as “the apostle of black theology in the United States of America.”[9] Martin Luther King, Jr., said Garvey “was the first man on a mass scale and level to give millions of Negroes a sense of dignity and destiny, and make the Negro feel he is somebody.”[10] Garvey was one of the first to speak of seeing God through black “spectacles.”

– From the: “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

William Saunders Crowdy (1847-1908) who founded in 1896 one of the first groups of Black Israelites known as the Church of God and Saints of Christ.

“He claimed to have a divine revelation from God that told him that America’s recently emancipated slaves were God’s chosen people, the true Hebrews. According to Black Judaism doctrine, when the Kingdom of Israel was destroyed, the Israelites were first scattered across the African continent and then selectively targeted by enemy African tribes who captured and sold them to European slave traders for bondage in the New World.

“It’s a common myth that slaves were randomly shackled up and carried off to slavery,” “General Yahanna,” leader of the present-day Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge, told the Intelligence Report. Actually, “Slave traders sailed for months and days to get to specific pickup points. They knew what people they were taking — specifically, the lost tribes of Israel.”

– From: “Understanding God’s Word Ministry” Web Page, “False Doctrine – Black Hebrew Israelite Movement”

“Howard Thurman (1899-1981), in his book Jesus and the Disinherited (1949), saw black life paralleling Jesus’ life because His poverty identified Him with the poor masses. Thurman also noted that Jesus was a member of a minority group (the Jews) in the midst of a larger and controlling dominant group (the Romans). Thurman thus drew many applications for the black experience from the life of Jesus.”

– Again from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

More in part three:

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 1

Introduction

Now, dear readers, surprisingly, I am somewhat stunned, and I am stunned that I am actually stunned because, usually, nothing much these days stuns me at all, but this one is an absolute cracker! After 35 years study, this has to be one of the most weird, whacky subjects I have ever encountered, as a Bible scholar and Kingdom of God Gospel messenger for Yashua Messiah who, for the record, was WHITE, as were Adam and Eve – but more on that later.

Moreover, this “Alice in Wonderland” subject, with all its rabbit holes, will take some unravelling, and the reason for that is that it had never before even entered into my mind, that the principal Bible characters were black, until I discovered it recently on YouTube – need I say more? A little chuckle here for the author. However, please stay with it as it will arm you with all the knowledge you will need to counter the satanic ideas of these duped foolish black people.

Having said that, I will say that I had heard of the minor, and misunderstood, issue of the “Black (Canaanite) Jews” in Africa – another sensationalised and over blown topic of little importance, but that was all. This subject, though, is another ball game altogether and far more corrosive to The Truth, due to its saturated evil coverage on YouTube (only the even more whacky and stupid CIA “flat earth” rubbish beats it).

I will also state for the record that due to the insulting anti-white nature of this topic it means, by default, that those of a ‘certain tribe or ethnicity’, or some people of a ‘certain Canaanite race’, have been very busy, putting in overtime, on this racially motivated and divisive anti-white evilness. It also means, that this isn’t just the handiwork of ignorant deceived blacks. In fact, I would classify the blacks involved as brainwashed deluded dupes or pawns and useful idiots for this ‘certain Canaanite race’.

Furthermore, and whilst keeping the ‘certain Canaanite race’ in the background for the moment and whom I will expose, this whole nasty satanic subversive business is compounded by the obsessive fanatical nature and the arrogant belligerent attitudes of the blacks who are promulgating this anti-white garbage across cyberspace, and, as if there is no tomorrow.

Moreover, most, if not all of these blacks, are Spiritually dead and totally incapable of discerning and understanding the Holy Scriptures – Bible scholars they are definitely not!! This, therefore, gives the whole unbelievable thing a surreal and perverted black humour value – pun intentional, due to their Scriptural ignorance. Let me be clear: “YOU WHAT!!!???” or “YOU MUST BE JOKING!!!!” doesn’t even come near with this unbelievable stuff.

OK, so where do we begin in our unravelling of this demonic mayhem? Make no mistake, for this satanic disinformation and/or misinformation did not materialise overnight and the idea wasn’t discovered at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet. Furthermore, as white Semitic people (primarily Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Dutch, Nordics, Gallics, Franks, Germanics and other white Europeans) we need to know who is behind it and what their aims are. Added to which, does this issue form part of a bigger anti-white genocidal conspiracy? Yes, absolutely.

Now you, if you are a PC, Cultural Marxist, Social Justice Warrior (SJW) may say: “Oh yeah, here we go again, yet another dumb delusional conspiracy theory.” And I would say yes, most, if not all conspiracies start out as theories until they are investigated and researched and once proven to be Conspiracies then the word ‘theory’ vanishes like the early morning mist, unless, of course, you are fearful, weak, lazy, cowardly, cognitively dissonant and emotionally unbalanced (an SJW) – a far more serious problem – for you.

“Conspiracy Theorist – a derogatory put-down term dreamt up by the CIA to discredit those who questioned the official narrative of the JFK assassination.”

— David Icke

“Conspiracy Theorist – someone who questions the statements of known liars.”

– Unknown

“Social Justice Warrior – someone who believes the statements of known liars and votes for them.”

– Brother Charles

“A conspiracy theory will remain forever a conspiracy theory until it is met with obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies from government(s) at which point the conspiracy theory defaults automatically to a conspiracy. E.g. the lying bullshit that is the NIST Report on 9/11.”

— Brother Charles

Right! Here we go, The BLACK JESUS and also The BLACK DISCIPLES and The BLACK APOSTLES and The BLACK KING DAVID and The BLACK JACOB/ISRAEL and, of course, the obligatory BLACK ISRAELITES and last but not least how BLACKS INVENTED EVERYTHING!!! = WOW! how amazing is that!!!???? How have we missed these incredible ‘historical truths’??? It’s all looking very BLACK indeed, isn’t it? I fear that us whites have a very DARK future ahead of us. LOL

Now hilarious as all this ridiculous gumpf is, there is even a more mirth filled element to it. According to these black ‘geniuses’ Jacob/Israel was black, but his twin brother Esau was white, red and hairy, as described in the Holy Scriptures and, of course, it’s also claimed by these daft blacks that he’s the forefather of all those ‘wicked’ Confederate Red Necks, just to give this whole subject a very convenient anti-white Southern USA slant or flavour. Clever eh?

Genesis 25:24-25 (KJV) And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her (Rebecca’s) womb. 25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Needless-to-say there is no mention here in The Holy Scriptures of Jacob being black.

So, as already stated, where do we begin? Well the obvious place to start, as with all these things, is with the agenda(s) and to pin point whose agenda and what kind of agenda, for there is ALWAYS AN AGENDA, folks, and it’s always bubbling away somewhere in the background. It NEVER fails.

This, therefore, leads us to ask some very basic questions like, is this strange Black Jesus phenomenon motivated by: 1) religious zeal, 2) politics, 3) hatred (oh how the ‘certain race’ loves that word) on solely anti-white racial grounds, 4) for revenge, 5) or just simple racial jealousy? From my research, thus far, I would say that all these factors come into play, accompanied by the associated and obligatory unhinged emotions. Added to which, all the elements are being deviously and deliberately stirred up by the ‘certain race’ for their anti-white genocidal programme. More in part two.