Should Christians be BAPTISED into YASHUA MESSIAH’S (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) NAME ALONE? – Part 1

Many of you will already know, through reading my series of articles “Exposing The Trinity Lie Parts 1 through 5” and “Do YOU Worship an Ogre god Parts 1 through 4”, (see links No’s 1 & 2 below) that the Trinity Doctrine is, and was, a Hellenised and then Roman Catholic generated lie, conjured up by a son of the Devil counterfeiter by the name of Tertullian, circa 200 AC. You will also know that in those articles I proved, by giving sound evidence, that 1 John 5:7-8, again, represents another Roman Catholic contamination of the Holy Word of God. So with all this in mind, let’s now turn to another dodgy verse in the King James Bible, that is, Matthew 28:19 and we all know it don’t we?

Matthew 28:19-20 (KJV) Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

This passage of Holy Scripture, commonly known as The Great Commission by many in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, has a large question mark hanging over it. In fact, the question mark is so huge and heavy, I can see the Trinity part of this verse disappearing into a quagmire pool of mud where it belongs. Please note, I am not alone in holding this view for, there are more than a few Bible scholars that correctly teach that this verse is yet another early Hellenised corruption of The Holy Scriptures and later enthusiastically embraced by the counterfeit Roman Catholic Church.

Now in order to prove that this contamination is a contamination we have to consider something that looks like being an obstacle to the challenge of substantiating The Truth. This is an obstacle we cannot simply ignore, because the Greek Manuscripts for Matthew 28:19 ‘exist’, as if to prove this is not a contamination by the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. The Greek Manuscripts, on the surface, do support this verse, but does this supposed evidence make it true?

OK, so if, in fact it is in the Greek MSS, how can we still prove this verse is a blasphemous contamination by addition? Easy, by countering it numerous times with genuine Holy Scriptures that disagree with it and/or directly oppose it, and this is very simple. Look, folks, if we have one verse that goes counter to several other verses, and we know that there are no contradictions in the Holy Word of God, then something has to give. Something is wrong and we cannot ignore it, nor can we try to explain it away with intellectual dissembling and sophistry, nor with Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious theological Trinity gobbledegook.

Furthermore, neither can we walk away and say: “Oh never mind there are always going to be anomalies in writings as old as The Holy Bible, so just accept it for what it is, forget it and move on, but is this attitude acceptable? No way, and, as I said, something is seriously wrong and it behoves us as Holy Spirit filled sons and daughters of God to search for The Truth. Again, as I said, something has to give so, in order for something to give, we have to analyse the weakest link first, if only to make life easier for ourselves or to use our common sense.

As already made plain in my “Exposing The Trinity Lie” and “Ogre god” series of articles, 1 John 5:7-8 is false or, to put it another way, a Roman Catholic addition via Tertullian circa 200 AC who conjured it up and Jerome circa 390 AC who added it to his Latin Vulgate Bible.

1 John 5:7-8: (KJV) For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one. (Emphasis mine)

Here, from his Commentary, is Adam Clarke’s proof and evidence regarding the spurious nature of this so-called passage of Holy Scripture:

“But it is likely this verse is not genuine. It is wanting in every MS. of this epistle written before the invention of printing, one excepted, the Codex Montfortii, in Trinity College, Dublin: the others which omit this verse amount to one hundred and twelve.”

Now this corrupt (by addition) passage of Scripture proves three things: 1) We cannot believe the Trinity Doctrine as being Biblical and 2) in certain places, not even the Greek Manuscripts can be wholly relied upon as perfect Truth and 3) we can easily ascertain that an agenda of the creatures of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion is very much at work here in our English translated Bibles – especially in the KJV. Moreover, if we now look at Matthew 28:19 in this new Light then the so-called command to Baptise people in the name of the Father, The Son and the Holy Spirit has automatically been revealed as suspect or at least compromised. I won’t use stronger terminology at this stage until I have provided additional evidence, so please stay with it.

Let’s now list the verses of Holy Scripture that oppose and counter Matthew 28:19 in its KJV form and remember that Matthew 28:19 is the only verse in the New Testament that commands Baptism into The Trinity:

Acts 2:38 (KJV) Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost (Spirit). (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Acts 8:15-17 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Spirit: 16 (For as yet it was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.) 17 Then laid they hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit. (Emphasis mine)

Acts 19:5-6 (KJV) When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied. (Emphasis mine)

Romans 6:3 (KJV) Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? (Emphasis mine)

Gal 3:27 (KJV) For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. (Emphasis mine)

OK, THERE THEY ARE, ALL SIX VERSES!! Here above we can see all the proof and evidence we need to prove that real Baptism has to be in Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) NAME ALONE and not into the name of a hu-man made fabrication called The Trinity.

If we stop and think about this we know it makes sense, don’t we? Why would we need to be Baptised into The Father’s name when Baptism into Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) gives us access to The Father anyway. When Yashua Messiah died on the stake (cross) the veil in The Temple was rent in two to tell us that we now have access to the Holy of Holies, to The Father Himself no less. Furthermore, we are Baptised into a death – who’s death – The Father’s death or the Holy Spirit’s death? Of course not, for only Yashua Messiah died. The Father didn’t die, nor did The Holy Spirit, so how can we be Baptised into their names or their deaths, when they never died? No, this idea of being Baptised into a Trinity is utter nonsense – in Truth it’s insulting to our intelligence, no matter what level of IQ we may have!

So when did this stupid corruption (nonsensical rubbish) get into the Holy Word of God? Well, obviously, it’s difficult to ascertain accurately, but we do know some vital facts and with some of them from history and I will list them here:

1) We know that the Roman savage Diocletian destroyed nearly all early writings, including many Greek manuscripts in an act of gross demonic heathen vandalism. In February 303 AC Diocletian’s first: “Edict against the Christians” was published. This ordered the destruction of The Holy Scriptures and places of worship across the Roman Empire, whilst at the same time prohibiting Christians from assembly to worship. (4th century Covid 1984 BS anyone?)

2) We know that Hellenising philosophers and students of Philo (two-bit intellectuals) infiltrated The Assemblies of God during and towards the end of the first century, and thereby rendered the Word of God to none effect. Please see my series of articles on Theology and Theologians and Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals for a full explanation. (See links No’s. 3 and 4 below)

3) The Hebrew version of Matthew’s Gospel does not include ‘The Trinity’ words as written in chapter 28 verse 19 of the KJV. It reads thus:

Matthew 28:19-20 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations: 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

4) From the Tertullian and Jerome addition of 1 John 5:7-8 we know The Trinity is a fabrication and the agenda of the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion and not of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) – The Truth, nor was it even known in the first century churches.

5) The Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics says regarding Matthew 28:19: “That it is central to the traditional view” (That is, the traditions of the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion – the traditions of hu-man beings). It also says: “if it were not challenged, its validity would be decisive, but its trustworthiness is rendered unreliable on the basis of textual criticism, literary criticism and historical criticism.” (Brackets mine)

6) Let’s be clear, The Trinity wording of Matthew 28:19 is found in all the Greek texts, but It must be understood, too, that there are no surviving manuscripts that were written in the first, second, or third centuries. What we read today in our Bibles are copies of copies. On top of that we have a three hundred year written textual vacuum in between the original writing of Matthew and the manuscripts that contain The Trinity or Triune names in Matthew 28:19.

7) It is also crucial that we realise that no single manuscript is free from textual error. Some have errors special to themselves, and others have whole related groups of manuscripts that have the same errors. I have already revealed a good example of this in my article: “Do Born Again Sons of God Have to Obey and/or Learn Obedience?” (see link No. 5 below)

8) Eusebius of Caesarea; born circa 270 AC; died circa 340 AC lived in times of gross spiritual darkness, due to the fact he lived in the time of the vacuum I mentioned in point 6. This was the period when the philosophers and Hellenisers had, by then, usurped the Assemblies of God driving them underground through persecution. Nevertheless, Eusebius in his writings quotes Matthew 28:19 as:

“Go ye and make disciples of all the nations in my name, teaching them to observe all things, whatsoever I commanded you.”

There are at least eighteen citations of Matthew 28:19 in his writings written this way. We also need to know that Eusebius was a Trinitarian so how and/or why did he omit The Trinity wording from Matthew 28:19 in his writings? It can only be because he still had in his possession some of the original manuscripts that had not been destroyed by Diocletian and did not contain Tertullian’s satanic Trinity contamination.

9) In the Britannica Encyclopaedia 11th edition, volume 3, page 365 it states that Baptism was changed from the name of Jesus to the words Father, Son and Holy Ghost in the 2nd century. (The era of Tertullian)

10) In the Canney Encyclopaedia Of Religion, page 53: The early church baptized in the name of The Lord Jesus until the 2nd century.

11) In the Hastings Encyclopaedia Of Religion, volume 2: Christian baptism was administered using the words, “in the name of Jesus.” Page 377; Baptism was always in the name of Jesus until the time of Justin Martyr, page 389.

12) Schaff Herzog Religious Encyclopaedia Volume 1, page 435. The New Testament knows only the Baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus.

13) Catholic Encyclopaedia, Volume 2, page 263 Here the Roman Catholic authors acknowledged that the baptismal formula was changed by their organisation.

OK, that’s the solid gold proof and evidence, and when we add to it the Holy Scriptural evidence of the verses I quoted above, The Trinity version of Matthew 28:19 begins to look very shaky indeed. The other point we must ask ourselves is this: If Matthew 28:19 in its KJV form is correct why did Peter and Paul ignore it when they Baptised in Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone? The answer is they didn’t, because in the original writings it never existed. All Baptisms were carried out in the name of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) and in His name alone.

Now did this mean my original ‘Baptism’ into The Trinity was an invalid Baptism? Yes it did and I was stunned to find this out, so my wife and I Baptised each other into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone.

In part two I will deal with Cessationist’s views in relation to this the most important and serious of subjects. Link here: Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? – Part 2 – Cessationism.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2021/07/30/should-christians-be-baptised-into-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-2-cessationism/

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing The Trinity Lie!: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

2. Do You Worship An Ogre god? – Parts 1- 4: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/do-you-worship-an-ogre-god-part-1/

3. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Parts 1, 2 & 3: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/theology-theologians-or-bible-intellectualism-and-bible-intellectuals-part-1/

4. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Part 4 – ‘The Church Fathers’: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/as-born-of-god-christians-do-we-need-theology-and-theologians-part-4-the-church-fathers/

5. Do Born of God Christians Have to Obey or Learn Obedience?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/do-born-of-god-christians-have-to-obey-or-learn-obedience-part-1/

65 thoughts on “Should Christians be BAPTISED into YASHUA MESSIAH’S (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) NAME ALONE? – Part 1

  1. Greetings Charles, I am so saddened to say I was erroneously baptized many years ago, and have received recent confirmation from the church I left several years ago. I am in desperate need of correct baptism, but know only one spirit-filled man…you. However, I am in the states. If the best you can offer me is your prayer to send me a Phillip, I covet your prayer. Thank you for all your diligence. The simplicity of Christ Yashua to you and your family. Gavin

    • Hi Brother Gavin,

      No need to be saddened, because He accepts us where we are at and with the knowledge and understanding we have at that time. Even whilst I was in Armstrong’s WCG He was looking after me all the time. It was all part of my journey to The Truth – Yashua Messiah.

      Consider your prayer done and I am sure Yashua Messiah will open the door to someone.

      Many thanks for your kind words and feel free to e-mail me at thetruthnotdoctrineATprotonmail.com please replace AT with @.

  2. I was thinking the same thing, i was recently baptized using the corrupted version n of the trinity. This very subject has always weighed heavy on my heart and this article removed the confusion. I will speak with my wife and “Lord Wiling” do the same as you did. SO I don’t need a spirit filled person to baptize me and lay hands on me? That is my only concern…..

    You know you should touch on or counter the argument about baptizing not being needed because if it is needed then it becomes an action on the individual’s part. I have read numerous articles in regard to this particular subject. Making baptism a symbolic gesture and nothing more.

    • Hi Jason,

      If you are already Baptised, even though it’s into the trinity, I am sure Yashua Messiah recognises it until we come to a better understanding. It’s what’s written on our hearts that matters and our desire to put things straight once we realise we have made a mistake. So yes go right ahead and Baptise each other. You Baptise your wife first and then lay hands upon her head and pray that Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) will send The Holy Spirit to her. She can then Baptise you.

      I think I have countered the no need for Baptism people with reference to the Alpha Course where they have a Holy Spirit weekend without Baptism and those who think the Cornelius event was a precedent for Holy Spirit gifting without Baptism. They are all blind guides.

      Yes MANY minimise the importance of Baptism and will one day be punished for their wickedness.

      Thanks for your contribution.

  3. Hi Charles,

    I am very new to your website and have read several of your articles.

    I have not been baptized by water or by any means, but I know and accept in my heart Christ Jesus as my Lord and Savior.

    I am wondering, and will go back to this to read again, how I can be baptized? I don’t know anyone like you have said, and I suppose it’s all of “being baptized by water.”

    I know that your knowledge far surpasses mine, and ask in humility what you would say.

    Thank you for your time and may God continue to bless you in your online and cyber space ministry.

    • Hi Chris,

      You MUST be born of water AND THE SPIRIT.

      John 3:5 (KJV) Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of The Spirit, he cannot enter into The Kingdom of God.

      Water Baptism alone is insufficient. If you remember the Learners (disciples) were Baptised by John but that was an incomplete Baptism with the finishing of their Baptism taking place in the upper room when the Holy Spirit came upon them in the shape of tongues of fire. This was a special case just for them.

      For the rest of us it is not so graphic as hands are laid upon us as we come up out of the water in order to receive The Holy Spirit.

      What you need to do is find a group that will Baptise you into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone as The Holy Scriptures instruct. This, I must admit, will be a challenge for you, but with Yashua Messiah’s help and guidance I am sure you will succeed. It will also be an opportunity for you to teach others.

      Let me know your thoughts.

      Charles

    • A Baptism, if officiated properly by the Baptizer, will be an open admission that the Baptizee has confessed all his or her sins to The Father in their prayers prior to their Baptism. Anyone not prepared to admit that they are sinners in need of Yashua Messiah’s sacrifice and resurrection should not even get into the water.

      No, you should NEVER confess the details of your sins with another unless you TRUST them implicitly. Personally I would never do this. My sins are all forgiven now so why would I confess sins to another that The Father has already forgiven through His Son’s sacrifice?

      Study this article here:

      https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-repetitive-confession-of-sins-scriptural/

      Thanks for your question.

      Brother Charles

  4. Wow. That John 5: 7-8 just screams of Paganism!

    So true Charles, there NO contradictions in the word of God!

    Charles, what is the best way to print off these articles? Do I just open them and print them off as I like, or do you have a pdf zip you can send out? Don’t take this the wrong way, having this stuff online is ok but sometimes I think I’d like to take it to bed with me for a happy sleep!

  5. PS. I am submitting John 10:9 as an instruction for baptism. Though it doesn’t use the specific instruction to baptise it does reiterate what has elsewhere been commanded:

    “I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out and find pasture.”

    Cheers.

    • Act 8:15  Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost: 
      Here is a better example:

      Act 8:16  (For as yet it was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.) 
      Act 8:17  Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost. 

      • By all means. Pile them high and shout them from the rooftops. Amen.

  6. Pingback: Should Christians be Baptised into The Lord Jesus Christ’s Name Alone? – Part 2 – Cessationism. | Is The Father Calling YOU to His Son, Yashua Messiah?

  7. Pingback: The Vile Satanic Curse Of RELIGION…. | Is The Father Calling YOU to His Son, Yashua Messiah?

    • Dear Brother Edward,

      Hallelujah, and all praise to The Father and Yashua Messiah. Congratulations (if that’s the right word) on your entering into the Kingdom of God and having your name written into The Book of Life.

      Unfortunately the camera veered off to the right, so I did not see you immersed in the water. Not to worry though for I could see you were wet from head to toe. LOL

      Many thanks for sending me the video.

      Brother Charles

      PS do you mind the video being made public? if so I will delete it.

      • Thanks be to you Charles for a life saved! No worries you can make it public. However, I have another video source I have lost a connecting cable for so it will take me another week or so to get that and then perhaps I can fix the immersion angle? Indeed I was fully immersed. My worry was he only had one hand on my head! However I have to say I do feel a changed man. I’m not really even sure what to do anymore lol

        Once I sort out the other video source (and the immersion if possible) I will add it to my YT page and promote it elsewhere. I think I’ll put an ad out now offering non-religious baptism too.

      • Thank you, I really appreciate that, but no, all thanks and praise must be to The Father and Yashua Messiah, for I would still be lost and wretched without them, and could have helped no one, but I am now very glad to be able to call you my brother.

        Yes, baptism really needs two people – one on each side in order to lower and lift the baptisee more easily and safely, and to watch out for those naughty feet which have the annoying habit of popping up out of the water as the baptizee is dipped, so have to be pushed back under the water.

        If you can get another video I would really appreciate that.

        Oh yes, I am sure you do feel a changed man, and as for what you do now, just carry on with what you were doing, and pray for guidance, as I am sure new doors will open as the Holy Spirit leads you, as and when.

        I like the idea of putting an ad out for offering True Baptism, but I hope you realise that they must become your Learner(s) or disciple(s), first, before you Baptise them. It will be your responsibility to teach them and ground them in The Truth and in The Faith, which I am sure you’re more than able to do and that you’re up to that task.

        Good to hear from you.

      • Well, you are still owed thanks because while it is true you would be wretched without them, The Father called and you answered and when Brother Edward was all over you like a bad rash you didn’t quit! LOL You should get a good two weeks vacation for that alone! With room service, massage and all the trimmings!

        I will keep you posted on the video updates (I just put that together quickly to share it with you).

        Also, I’ve been thinking alot about this entering His sabbath rest but I wanted to ask you which of you artciles discusses that please?

      • “You should get a good two weeks vacation for that alone! With room service, massage and all the trimmings!”

        Would that be in the sun in Brisbane? Yeah, I’ll take some of that! With the Mrs as a chaperone! LOL

        The Eternal Sabbath Rest article I have not yet written, but it’s on my to-do’s list. I do have a Sabbath article which I am about to publish, so keep a look out for that.

        OK back to dreaming about that Brisbane beach. LOL

      • Brisbane? Mate, you need to upgrade your understanding of Aussie beaches and vacation spots; there are far better places for you and the Mrs!

        By the by ol’ Brisbane I beleive is heading into a full-tilt boogie lockdown starting Jan 10 (?), for a two week (?) refresher course on freedom. This country is going down.

        Meantime I’ll keep my eyes out for those articles thanks.

        Here is the updated baptism video:

      • Thanks for the video – excellent. You remind me of Josh Groban the singer, only your hair is much lighter. In the other video were those two youngsters your offspring? They looked nice kids.

        LOL my knowledge of Oz is very poor other than I know it gets very hot in Brisbane and most homes have swimming pools.

        Sorry to hear about the lock-downs, there seems to be no let-up to their criminality.

        You might find this interesting: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/diana-lenska-this-is-what-they-have-planned-for-you-in-2025-to-2028_1cw3bfHalkyqQgR.html

      • Not sure which two you saw in those videos but yes mine were there with two others from a friend we take an annual vacation with.

        Mate it is just generally hot hot hot anywhere in Australia; northern hemisphere folks have no idea what heat is. Thankfully this year the global cooling has us enjoying a cool wet summer, almost like Canada actually. The heat here gets oppressive. Sydney was actually a great climate to live in, but now we live closer to the QLD border and it is more humid and hot here. However, we mved to a litle town that has a nice micro-climate; cooler with quite steady and sometimes significant wind.

        Not familiar with Josh Groban; Robert Plant was my guy.

      • How did your youngsters and your good lady take your Baptism? Did they react to it in anyway? Positive, negative or indifferent?

        Yes I do know how hot Australia is, as I have visited France in August – far hotter than Spain, and oppressively humid with temperatures well over 40 Celsius. Took us completely by surprise. We were on our way to Spain/Portugal and were glad to get there with their dry 30 Celsius temperatures.

        Glad you have found a better place to live.

        Josh Groban: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6oyV-h1ux4

      • The youngsters worked the video cameras. I’m not sure what they made of it as it is all a bit much for 10 year olds, neither did their mates seem to mind nor say much, life goes on. It may be the kind of thing that comes back in some time?

        As for my wife, she has a very accepting attitude of things but in some ways this doesn’t help as she tends to trivialize things or slot them away as: “That’s what you believe.” She is basically lost in a world of feminist liberalism so she finds definitive declarations to be hard to deal with because she is always trying to consider everybody’s ideas as equally legit. The trap she is in is that she doesn’t really know what she believes. Ultimately she is like her hippy mother which believes in just be good and love and moonbeams. On a more challenging note she was given “The Happiest Man on Earth” by a students mom. It’s another holocaust survivor story about how you can turn tragedy to hope. She can’t understand why people would lie about something like that so she is pretty in the soup. I’m not sure where it is all going to go because the Jab police will be back no doubt this year and I’m worried she will just cave and get a booster because she defers to liberal pacifist ideas and throws her hands up. Not exactly the fighter I once thought she might be.

      • Oh dear, re your wife, I am sorry to hear all that, and I do not envy your situation one little bit. I see it as a severe trial for you – much prayer required.

        Re the jabs, are your children jabbed, and what is your wife’s view on that?

        You do know that mandates are not laws.

      • Well, all that said, I have discovered that other angles are more effective. As far as jabs go no our girls are not jabbed and we are both on the same page against that. We are aware mandates are not laws. the problem for my wife was last year the state government issued an order for vaccination and my wife coudn;t find a way around that and was double jabbed. She doesn’t want another so we’re looking into options but the main problem is loss of income if there are work complications while legal games are played.

      • Unfortunately, as it’s now too late, but that ‘order’ was unlawful. Always remember that they have no laws, just rules and regulations of The Australian Corporation that apply only to employees of The Australian Corporation, not to free men and women.

        Have you served the Australian ‘Government’ with a Notice of Intent and Claim of Right? If not then I would consider it.

        Is there anything your wife can do in terms of self-employment?

      • Firstly, the trouble with my wife is probably going to be resolved by bringing her understanding around as can be done and that may actually start with that brilliant Tom Cowan video you posted “Slaying the School Monster”. I say this because my thinking has been to plan for living the pioneer settler lifestyle circa 1800. This means getting my wife’s thinking around to realising what the school system is really about and why she is being used despite her great and sincere abilities in K-6, which of course she absolutely loves, and gives her purpose and she has after many years worked hard to get to a place etc etc etc. So, to get her to move out may well depend upon getting her to see that the future of our whole civilisation is not going to be what it was when she was young and that for our daughters staying in school past Grade 6 may well be a total waste of time; that there are other paths to producing happy healthy educated strong girls. She herself has admitted to me she now feels we are living in a totalitarian state so next conclusion to be reached is here comes the biometric track and trace future and let’s recalibrate the reality the girls (and us) are actually looking at and go from there.

        I have not served the Australian government weith either of those but I don;t know they would achieve other than formally declining to be a part of their commercial enterprise?

        We know and knew the order was unlawful but my wife saw no way around it but through doing what others did and leave their work and we aren’t independently wealthy. Howevere, with the endless ‘booster’ campaign looming I think she is becoming more freaked out and realising their is a line she just cannot cross?

      • Well here’s hoping that you can bring her around to your way of thinking. I will pray you well with that.

        The Notice of Intent and Claim of Right once served on your Government ministers is something that you can present to any bogus official who thinks he/she has jurisdiction over you. In Law they are then without any excuse if they think they can start chucking their criminal weight around.

      • Where does one find such a form or how does one start such a procedure?

        I think alot of it has to do with getting her to understand the rebellion her parents are in; no faith in God and faith they can save the world = they take the climate scam the same way they take Covid i.e. they essentially put their faith and trust in Tony Blair, Obama eyc to solve problems and be their ‘salvation’ so they believe what they say. Deification of leaders.

        The other problem is that her mom is not just a kook (which drives my wife batty), but has fed her lots of women’s lib crp her whole life. many illusions potentially crumbling and thus I too pray The Father He can help her.

      • Full title is “Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right.” Or NUICOR

        Here’s a template which you could use as a guide and you must edit it to make it your own – this one is very long and could be reduced:

        Click to access NOICR-IRF.pdf

        Here is another:
        https://officiallcourttemplatesuk.blogspot.com/2012/10/notice-of-understanding-and-intent-and.html

        Make sure you get two witnesses when you sign and they sign as witnesses.

        Just study it up so that you’re comfortable with it and so that you know what you’re doing.

        Her parents sound like a nightmare, how do you manage to keep your counsel when in their company? I presume that’s what you do if only to keep the peace.

      • Her parents are actually very relaxed and easy going. They’re just too laid back and lost basically, though my father-in-law seems to notice a few things here and there. Mother-in-law means well but is a stress case. I think I actually owe them or Him a debt of grattitude for them because it was by observing them I was able to come to understand many errors i.e. like most modern lost faithless indiduals they end up putting their faith in political leaders and cultural heroes. I don’t say much most times and try to leave them be but every once in a while I might make a comment my father-in-law will get.

      • Well, what else can I do but politely bide my time and if there is a chance to jog their delusions do so? I am grateful as I said in my baptism that it was being dragged here that I got my face rubbed in it and they have given me somethign to watch and observe and thus understand.

      • As I said, I think you handle the situation very wisely. Some might be more vocal and rock the boat, but you have chosen the right way IMO.

      • Thank you for the links. So much legal research! So little time…

      • At the rate things are going here it’s like that bad 80s song “The Final Countdown”… is today the day all manner of madness is going to break out????

      • With much of it I think this advice is sound:

        Isaiah 26:20 (KJV) Come, my people, enter thou into thy chambers, and shut thy doors about thee: hide thyself as it were for a little moment, until the indignation be overpast.

        And don’t forget much of their BS is fear porn bluff.

      • Fear porn bluff indeed. On that note, Dr Tom Cowan has put out a little booklet “Breaking The Spell” I’ve cribbed it down from 45 pages to 5 so I can pass it to a people I know who are beginning to ask the right questions and are getting fed up.

      • In my praxis and study journey of almost 35 years his idea of health generally fits with mine. It’s a nice resource for those which can grasp the material but funnily enough at the bottom he recommends some health products, which seem uneccesary to me but as always with so many of these guys they seem to still wind up falling for the whole ancient knowledge/gnostic egypt thing.

      • It’s amazing but it has made me realize that his error is essentially that he doesn’t just take it straight back to the God, which created us, Yashua. These guys always get right up to the edge of the spiritual stuiff and then the go off half-cocked back into the cosmic gobbldeygook. It’s actually so logical too what he is saying because if you look at Genesis account of creation the water is what everything comes out of The Spirit being over it. Therefore what he is saying about a basic health model based upon a water structure and the role of intention and energy is entirely sound.

      • Yes, it’s like those flaming swords that barred re-entry into The Garden – there’s no way in other than through The Father and The Son.

      • Well, it is interesting perhaps now that I am a brother of Yashua (still trying to wrap my head around that but anyway), I find I know now that the old fellow is gone and I really don’t care about any number of things, including the fact that I can no longer or do no longer get the anxiety from all the things I was coming to understand about the Baal system. Gone. All behind. Just busy scratching my head on how to pray now and mostly trying to keep away from things so I can ride that peace.

      • Glad that you’re experiencing that peace that passeth all understanding! That is priceless, so savour and enjoy.

        Pray as the Holy Spirit prompts you to pray, that is, anything that pricks you deep inside and you need to off-load, or it might be something that’s bugging you or an explanation of some Scripture. Plus there is always giving Him thanks and praise for all that He’s done and is doing around us – keeping a tight rein on Satan for example.

      • Fear Porn Bluff. I think there’s a title for something there? Or maybe some court jester band to stick it in their eye?

      • Charles I just had a chat with Dawn Kelly and she asked if I had unincorporated my name yet. I replied I hadn’t. She said she’d done the Common Law thing but she was actually getting real results with this because she has bought back from the government the corporate fiction entity created through the birth certificate. A penny dropped when she said that. Do you see any conflict between NUICOR and this process or would they be complimentary?

      • No, no conflict at all, belt and braces is fine, it makes it more secure and solid and most importantly helps the man/woman know where THEY ARE NOW STANDING (on the land), that is, not floating around on THE SEA of Admiralty Jurisdiction with no STANDING.

      • Charles, I’ve looked at these documents. The one from Canada was long long long! I have to admit my eyes went a bit glossy while reading it and I couldn;t figure out the point of it all. That said, I have recently come across this video:

        Having watched as well, a 2hr video from Dawn Kelly’s friend Keith Charles where he discusses the corporate fiction and his own use of Biblical Law, I know wonder if the whole point of such a NIUICOR is to essentially say: “Hey folks, I have caught on to your legal fraud that was negotiated by deception and I am now pronoucning it to be null and void.”?

      • Yes that’s it in a nutshell, but you write yours so that it’s applicable solely to you and you put in as many clauses or as few as you want. Does your friend Dawn produce a template?

      • No. Dawn is not necessarily a friend either. She is in my estimation selling Satanic delusion; on the one hand “coming out of her” stuff about unincorporting the name but on the other she sells ascended spiritual master stuff i.e. more eat from the tree and become your own type of God stuff. I see her as spiritually lost but legally exploring silly buggers between jurisdictions. She seems to be having some success but she last said to me: “Unincorporate your name and then I’ll help you.” Translation: “Just jump off the bridge and I’ll show up half way down to help you figure out how to land.”

        Her mate Keith has more legal knowledge at any rate but he is spiritually lost too. So, I just take what is useful and leave the rest.

        At the end of the day all of their silly buggers with Law is not salvation but they perhaps think it is?

      • Yes just use her to help you write the Notice, that’s all you need, for once the ‘government’ have been notified your intent, in Law, they are then without any excuses. Don’t forget that THEY are UNDER THE LAW and are behaving lawlessly.

  8. So, what is the ultimate point of doing this? I don’t want to be their debt whore when the casino crashes, but I’m not fussed about a certain amount of using the system for it’s benefits from a pragmatic point of view.

    • As I said, to serve them Notice that you know who you are and primarily that your wife, children, your home and car(s) are your private property, thereby revoking and rebutting any government titles, certificates and fraudulent contracts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s