APARTHEID Is The Kingdom of God!

How about that to get all those self-hating, guilt ridden, anti-white liberal fake Christians going, eh? I don’t think there could be a more tormenting or provocative statement or ‘meme’ (as they like to call it today) that one could present to these treacherous satanic evil disgusting wretches.

So how can the Kingdom of God be an Apartheid Kingdom? Quite easily, and Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Himself made it very clear:

Matthew 25:32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a Shepherd divideth His sheep from the goats: (Emphasis mine)

There it is folks – APARTHEID and/or segregation as in the American South, and whether we like it or not!! The nations will be separated or all ethnic groups divided and separated from one another so that they will all live together with their own kind – White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes with White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes, Germans with Germans, Russians with Russians, Slavs with Slavs, Spaniards with Spaniards, Arabs with Arabs, Indians with Indians, Japanese with Japanese and Ethiopians with Ethiopians. They will then remain racially pure with no Jewish encouraged inbreeding, no Jewish encouraged miscegenation, no Jewish encouraged satanic diversity, no Jewish encouraged satanic enriching, and no Jewish encouraged satanic multiculturalism.

However, Yashua Messiah also says: “Like a Shepherd divideth His Sheep from the goats,” so He is giving us this parallel, but what parallel, and who are the goats? because they are not the previously mentioned Nations. The Nations are Mankind and the Sheep are the White Caucasian Israelites, amongst those Mankind Nations, but the goats are not. The goats are a different group altogether; they are a hu-man sub-species and not of Mankind at all, so who are these goats?

Easy, they are the The Serpent Seed Canaanites – Satan’s people – his offspring, that is, The Jews, African blacks, the Turks, the Italians, the Red Indians, the Chinese, the Mongols and the Koreans, to name the principal Canaanite tribes.

Now obviously this state of affairs is not going to sit well with many liberal fake Christians; those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Christians that are really Cultural Jew Marxists (liberals) posing as Christians, and they will no doubt create a huge fuss and protest, accusing Yashua Messiah of being a HATER! a BIGOT! and a RACIST! So how do you think Yashua Messiah is going to deal with these rebellious vile evil people? Like this:

Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, (The Canaanite Jews and their shabbos goy duped Marxist slaves) which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. (Brackets mine)

So there is their sticky end, so lets hope that they repent and are quick about it! Lord hurry that day!

For those wondering who the White Caucasian Israelites are, here is my quick run down and exposé on that topic:

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
Levi – The Priesthood,
Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, British Royalty and Nobility,
Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AC and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

Caucasians = White Israelites

https://www.bitchute.com/video/KqN4I0wCOL2f/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/H9x0S9ngUhx1/

In Yashua Messiah’s name – Brother Charles

Advertisements

Did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Say: I AM NOT GOOD and I AM NOT GOD?

The short, but very substantial, story of the Wealthy Young Ruler.

Now this subject is yet another of those ‘pain in the neck’ subjects that blaspheming Judaisers and satanic gnat strainers, alike, try to spiritually garrote me with, but, I hasten to add, they always fail. So let’s copy and paste here the Holy Scriptures that they then pollute with their perverted reasoning and satanic Judaising nonsense:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto Him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Mark 10:17-18 (KJV) And when He was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit Eternal Life? 18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

Luke 18:18-19 (KJV) And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit Eternal Life? 19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.

Now the first issue that these mongrel dogs will attempt to make mileage out of is the monotheism BS value that they think these verses possess. They think these verses PROVE that God is ONE and that Yashua Messiah was clearly stating that He was was not God, but is this TRUE? NO a thousand times NO!!! But hang on Yashua Messiah said: “none is good, save one, that is, God.” So how do you get around that, I hear you say? Quite easily is the answer to that and it all depends upon your understanding of the word ‘GOD’ in the New Testament.

However, in order to understand the word ‘God’ in the New Testament we have to understand the word ‘God’ in the Old Testament FIRST, for the Godhead never changes. We also have the issue of the Greek language of the New Testament, for it is too vague in its description of God, unlike the Hebrew definition of the Old Testament. Therefore from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

God – H430
אלהים – elohym – el-o-heemPlural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God[head]; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty. (Square brackets mine)

god – H433
אלהּ אלוהּ
‘ĕlôahh ‘ĕlôahh – el-o’-ah, el-o’-ah (The second form is rare); probably prolonged (emphatically) from H410; a deity or the deity: – god. See H430.

This ‘eloah’ singular deity would be used when describing Satan, who is the only solitary god (‘eloah’) of this world.

So from this proof we now know for sure that the Godhead is two distinct Spiritual beings, not one, other than their being number one with none above.

Moreover, if we now move onto The New Testament we have a Greek word being used for the word ‘God’ and not a Hebrew word. However, does that mean the nature of the Godhead changes? Do they become a different Godhead just because a new word is in use? No way, so what gives? The word ‘theos’ is what gives instead of ‘eloheem’ or ‘elohim’ but the plural nature of the Godhead remains the same. From Strong’s Concordance once more:

God – G2316
θεός – theos – theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

In ancient Greece there were only ‘gods’ ‘plural’ because the Greeks were polytheists and worshipped many gods, not two alone. However, there was no need for a singular Greek word for a god because there was no singular god in polytheistic Greek worship. This means the Greek word ‘theos’ did the job just fine when describing the true Duality Godhead = more than one!!

Matthew 1:23 (KJV) Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. (Emphasis mine)

OK, so here we can plainly see that Yashua Messiah is described as being: “God with us”, that is, in the flesh so, in turn, the Old Testament plural Duality Godhead ‘Elohim’ is also still with us with The Father in heaven and The Son on earth in the flesh and, therefore, still Two God’s.

So this brings us to our little conundrum of: “there is none good but one, that is, God:”

Now what was Yashua Messiah actually saying here? For we know for sure that He wasn’t saying God is one; He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t God and He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t good either, even though most will mistakenly think He was saying that. So what was He really saying? Well, first of all, He was telling us plainly, and those there present, that He was God in the flesh as part of the Godhead, but without them realising it. This is due to The Truth that the Godhead is a Duality Godhead and always was a Duality Godhead with Him now standing there amongst them as God, so how could He say that He was not good or tell His questioner not to call Him good? What was Yashua Messiah doing by saying that?

The answer to that my friends is very simple. This unsaved and lost wealthy young ruler was trying to win favour with Yashua Messiah by calling Him good. This was plain and simple flattery which got him nowhere with Yashua Messiah who quickly rebuked him with the question: Why callest thou me good? This was nothing to do with Yashua Messiah not being good. Of course He was good, He was God in the flesh so He had to be good – He could be nothing else.

However, just for the benefit of the wealthy young ruler He adds these two riders: “There is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.”

Now, as already shown, Yashua Messiah was God in the flesh so was stating clearly that He was good, but without anyone there realising it and yet at the same time giving Glory to His Father in heaven as being good as the other half of the Godhead.

With the second rider we have Yashua Messiah saying: “But if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.” In J B Phillips’ translation he has it better: “But if you WANT TO enter into [that] Life you must KEEP The Commandments.”

So first things first. Yashua Messiah is saying: “If you WANT TO enter into Life? So does this wealthy young ruler want to or not? Furthermore, where is The Law in this arrangement? It’s nowhere in it at all, so clearly Yashua Messiah is teaching the wealthy young ruler that this is about a FREE CONSCIOUS DECISION on his part and not a commandment issue = no Law. Second, we have this word ‘KEEP’ which everyone, and his dog, mistakenly thinks means OBEY when it mean what it says, that is, to keep – to protect – to hold onto as precious – internalised and have them written on our hearts so NOTHING to do with obedience at all. (Please see my article “When Did The Biblical Word KEEP Become OBEY?” – Link below.)

This is what Yashua Messiah was REALLY saying to the wealthy young man that came forward gushing and fawning all over Yashua Messiah in his initial, over the top, flattering enthusiasm.

Now don’t get me wrong on this, for later on I believe that this young man WAS saved. How do I know this? Easy, because Yashua Messiah loved him, so that means He knew the young man’s heart deep down and knew he was sincere. He also knew The Father was calling him, and KNEW that eventually he would repent and love his neighbour by giving up his wealth and then FOLLOWING Yashua Messiah. The same, in a different way, applied to Nicodemus but I won’t go into that subject now.

Furthermore we then have the issue of the wealthy young ruler’s question: “What good thing shall I DO, that I may have Eternal Life?” OK, I have made my point quite obvious here by emphasising the words ‘I DO’. Moreover, so what could this young man DO in order to inherit Eternal Life? NOTHING! absolutely nothing is the answer to that question. How do we know that? Quite simply because he was asking the question within the backdrop of the Ten Commandments of which he boasted in being a fautless observer. This means he was asking Yashua Messiah what other Commandment he should be observing or doing that he may have missed. His mission in questioning Yashua Messiah was solely Law based and understandably so because The Law was still in force at that time, even for the faithful.

However, The Lord then stuns him with His reply which immediately introduces the SPIRITUAL DIMENSION or SPIRITUAL THRUST of The Commandments = LOVE!! Not the feeble letter of The Law of The Commandments = legalistic Pharisaism and its close companion hypocrisy.

So the wealthy young ruler is challenged with Yashua Messiah’s charge to go sell all his possessions and give the proceeds to those in need and THEN to follow Him. Now mark this point and mark it well for the gifting of his wealth will not save him, but the act of gifting his wealth will prove that he is being called by The Father to Yashua Messiah and also prove that he is saved. Salvation is ALWAYS an undeserved free gift and our good works will follow as a result or as evidence that we are saved, not because we are trying to be saved or trying to earn our salvation.

Finally,Yashua Messiah in saying these tough things to the wealthy young ruler was in turn challenging his commitment to Him. Was he prepared to give up his Law/Commandment based life and comfortable wealthy lifestyle and put his sole trust and faith in Him? These are the points and questions that Yashua Messiah was getting across to the wealthy young ruler.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/when-did-the-biblical-word-keep-become-obey/

The DUALITY GODHEAD

The Duality Godhead? What Godhead is that, I hear you ask? Well I’ll tell you straight, right away, They are not a mickey mouse triune godhead, They’re not a Unitarian/Judaic/Islamic monotheistic godhead and They are not a Binatarian godhead either, if that’s what you were thinking.

Now what is a Binatarian godhead? I’ve never heard of such a thing, again I hear you say. OK, so let me explain, a Binatarian godhead is a half-truth so that means it’s a lie just like the monotheistic godhead and the trinity godhead.

Binatarianism is belief in a Duality Godhead that has been corrupted with Triunism and turned into yet another lying hu-man magical construct. This means that instead of a mythical godhead that is one in three and three in one they have constructed a godhead that, like the trinity, it is one in two and two in one – total fallacious religious nonsense. We therefore need to understand that The Godhead consists of TWO DISTINCT Spiritual Beings who are NEVER at anytime one solitary being.

This means that The Duality Godhead are very simple to understand for we are told about Them right at the beginning in Genesis Chapter 1:

Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God (‘Elohim’ – plural) created the heaven and the earth.

There They are, in the very first verse of the Holy Scriptures ‘ELOHIM’ and ‘Elohim’ is the plural of ‘Eloah’, so if the Godhead was ONE GOD, it would have read: “In the beginning God (‘Eloah’ – singular) created the heaven and the earth.” But it DOES NOT SAY THAT it says ‘ELOHIM’ – PLURAL! MORE THAN ONE GOD – THE GODHEAD! Please excuse the shouting folks, but shouting is very necessary for some stiff necked duped people out there who love to hang onto their nonsensical Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious myths = monotheism and/or triunism.

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – H430
אלהים
‘ĕlôhı̂ym
el-o-heem’
Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.

Now pay attention to what Strong is doing here, for he is following a satanic monothesitic agenda and explaining away The Truth by introducing his own irrelevant intellectual nonsense into his definition of ‘Elohim’“but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God;”

Moreover, ignoring his intellectual waffle, ask yourself this very pertinent question: Would a Bible scholar of Strong’s immense calibre, with his excellent knowledge of the Hebrew language, have not known of the word ‘Eloah’ and known its SINGULAR meaning and also have known that ‘Elohim’ was the plural of that singular word? I will leave you all to answer that no brainer question for yourselves.

OK, so we have established from the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that the Godhead is more than one god and this is further confirmed for us in Genesis again:

Genesis 1:26 (first part) (KJV) And God said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness: (Emphasis mine)

Right, now is this claimed solitary mono-god speaking to himself? If not, who is he speaking to – the angels? No way, for I’ll tell you straight, the angels never created anything, and man is definitely not created in the image of angels. This means that if we take the “God is one” nonsense, seriously, it must mean that their god needs certifying, for he is hallucinating and seeing someone in his head that he is now attempting to hold a conversation with. Hilarious or what!?

Having said all that, I can now see all the monotheists jumping up and down, frothing at the mouth, and renting their clothes in true Moloch and Baal worshipping style as they did in Elijah’s day when their mono-god failed to bring down fire to ignite the wet wood, such is their delusional thinking. Not only that, but when I have finished this article the trinity dupes will no doubt have joined them in their manic frenzy. Who said being a follower of Yashua Messiah – The Way was not good fun? LOL

Moving on I will now quote a segment from one of my earlier articles which covers the prime and/or premier “identity of God verse in Deuteronomy”, and we all know it, don’t we? This verse is the verse that nearly all monotheists quote in an attempt to support their erroneous satanic claims:

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Please note, as I disect this verse it will be, in part, a repeat of what I have said above.

“Hear, O Israel” – or better translated “Hear you Israel” or “Listen up you Israelites”, for I, your Lord, have something important to tell you:

“The Lord our God” – properly translated from the Hebrew; The Lord = The Eternal or The Self-Existing. Our God = Our ‘Elohim’ (plural); the Godhead that has always self-existed before time began and was/is always a plural Duality Godhead.

Straight away in this short phrase of Holy Scripture we are told by the use of this word ‘Elohim’ (the plural of ‘Eloah’) that we are dealing with more than one God. Look folks, there is no getting away from this Truth, and we need to get it through our heads that the Hebrew word ‘Eloah’ (singular) would have been in use here, not ‘Elohim’, IF God was one. OK, so we have now ascertained that The Godhead is more than one, and yet it says:

“Is One Lord” – so what’s going on here and what does this mean? The Hebrew word here for ‘one’ is ‘Echad’ which means ‘united’ or ‘in unity’ in one sense, and ‘number one’ the prime number in the other sense, that is, no one higher or no one above – The Most High as wriiten elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures.

One – H259
אחד
‘echâd
ekh-awd’
A numeral from H258; properly united, that is, (as) one; or (as an ordinal) first: – a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any (-thing), apiece, a certain [dai-] ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.

OK, as we can see the word ONE does not mean solitary or one god or a mono-god, for it means UNITED AS ONE, that is, in agreement in thought, word and deed, yet still distinct and separate as Two Spiritual Beings.

A Numeral – H258
אחד
‘âchad
aw-khad’
Perhaps a primitive root; to unify, that is, (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts): – go one way or other.

The primitive root word then confirms this for us – TO UNIFY!! And again this, in turn, means They are not one being, for being united or unified is always an arrangement whereby a number of beings are at one with each other or unanimous in their thoughts, aims and ideals, as in a football team. Newcastle United is a team of individuals united in one aim – to win, but they are not one being, they are eleven distinct beings. This is how it is with the Godhead; they are Two Spiritual Beings, united as one in thought, mind and deed – totally likeminded – united!

This, too, is why The Lord, through Paul, exhorts the Congregations of God to be like the Godhead in their relationships one with another:

Romans 15:5-6 (KJV) Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: 6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even The Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. [Two distinct beings] (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Take note, the Congregations of God were not ONE BEING, but they were exhorted by Paul to be of ONE MIND just like The Father and The Son and like the Godhead of God with God in the beginning who said: “Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness:”

If we now move on to the New Testament we have a new word for the Godhead and that word is the Greek word ‘Theos’ instead of the Hebrew word ‘Elohim’. However we need to be clear that just because a Greek word is now used instead of a Hebrew word doesn’t mean that the nature and make-up of the Duality Godhead has changed. In fact the Greek word ‘theos’ is very useful for this topic for, generally, it means a DEITY and in the Greek sense that means gods plural, for the Greeks were polytheists – they, like the ancient Egyptians, had many gods. As far as I know they did not have a word in their language to describe a monotheistic god. It was only the Jews that worshipped such a deity and they worshipped that deity in error and in ignorance when they knew very well that God ‘Elohim’ was a plural Godhead.

God – G2316
θεός
theos
theh’-os
Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

So there we have it: ‘Theos’ = a deity and in Ancient Greece that would mean more than one god, not a mono-god. Not only that, but because ‘Theos’ is such a general all encompassing word in terms of objects of worship, it means it can be interpreted any way you like, if you have a monotheistic or triunistic agenda to fulfil. Moreover, notice that within this very definition we can see Strong doing just that with all his figurative nonsense regarding ‘magistrates’. With regard to ‘magistrates’ I will leave a link below for additional reading regarding this satanic subject.

Furthermore, because we know that the Godhead does not cause confusion re their identity we can definitely know for sure that plural ‘Theos’ in the NT means exactly the same a plural ‘Elohim’ in the OT – The Duality Godhead with The Holy Spirit as their LIVING POWER.

One last Holy Scripture:

Galatians 3:20 (KJV) Now a mediator is not [a mediator] of one, but God is one.

Now does this verse make any sense? First of all, who is The Mediator that this verse is refering to? Answer: Yashua Messiah. And was Yashua Messiah God come in the flesh? Answer: Yes, hence it states quite plainly that a mediator is not of one, so there has to be more than one in order for one to mediate to the other and yet it then says: “God is one!” So what’s going on here?

Easy, God = ‘Theos’ = ‘Elohim’ = more than one, for the Godhead does not change:

Malachi 3:6 (KJV) For I am The LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. (Emphasis mine)

Here we have Yashua Messiah speaking on behalf of the Godhead, for no one has ever seen or heard The Father:

John 1:18 (KJV) No man hath seen God (The Father) at any time; The Only Begotten Son, which is in the bosom of The Father, He hath declared Him. (Brackets and Emphasis mine)

John 5:37 (KJV) And The Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. YE HAVE NEITHER HEARD HIS VOICE AT ANY TIME, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE. (Emphasis mine)

So there it is folks, NO ONE has ever seen or heard The Father at any time so that must mean that Yashua Messiah was The God of the Old Testament who spoke on behalf of Himself and/or The Father = The Duality Godhead.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-the-mystery-of-mystery-babylon-the-great/

Brother Charles

Are YOU a Heretic and What is Heresy?

If you are a Christian, or even not a Christian at all and with no interest in Christianity, have you ever wondered about these two words and what they mean? for they get banded about with great regularity by those of the satanic Roman Catholic Cult, which is a part of the equally satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Moreover, when you hear these words, do they resonate a positive vibe with you or a negative vibe? For me, they have always resonated a negative vibe, because they have always sounded accusatory and judgemental. Now don’t get me wrong, for there are some people that deserve to be labelled a heretic, that’s IF the word heretic actually means what people believe it to mean, that is, a blasphemer or an apostate, and again, that is, someone who has turned his back on Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and walked away as did these wretched people here:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

However, I have learned just recently that the words heretic and heresy from a Holy Scriptural sense are not what they seem when compared to the erroneous Roman Catholic religious interpretations. In fact, they do not mean what I have described above at all. They have been mistranslated from the Greek manuscripts, and more on that later, but first let’s look at some secular dictionary definitions for the words in question.

From Dictionary.com:

Heretic

1) A professed believer who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church or rejects doctrines prescribed by that church.

2) Roman Catholic Church – a baptized Roman Catholic who willfully and persistently rejects any article of faith.

3) Anyone who does not conform to an established attitude, doctrine, or principle.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heretic

1) Religion: a person who differs in opinion from established religious dogma; especially: a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church who refuses to acknowledge or accept a revealed truth the church regards them as heretics.

2) One who differs in opinion from an accepted belief or doctrine – a nonconformist.

From Dictionary.com:

Heresy

1. Opinion or doctrine at variance with the orthodox or accepted doctrine, especially of a church or religious system.

2. The maintaining of such an opinion or doctrine.

3. Roman Catholic Church. the willful and persistent rejection of any article of faith by a baptized member of the church.

4. Any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs, customs, etc.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heresy

1a:  adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma (see dogma 2) They were accused of heresy.

1b: denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church

1c :  an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

2a: dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice – to disagree with the party leadership was heresy.

2b: an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards

So there we have it from the secular perspective and notice how the Roman Catholic Cult features prominently in these definitions giving it a strong association with these two negative words.

Notice, too, in 2a how they now apply it to those that reject rigid political dogma as well. Rejection of Bolshevik Marxist Political Correctness (Cultural Marxism) anyone? Do I also sense the spirit of the legalistic satanic Pharisees here in the application of these two words? You bet your life!

OK, so what’s your point I hear you ask? confusion and some I would answer and to unravel that confusion let’s go now to the Holy Scriptures for The Truth regarding these two misused words:

First and foremost, the word heretic cannot be found in the KJV Bible at all – it ain’t there folks, so that tells you just how important this subject is to Yashua Messiah. However, it is VERY important to those Roman Catholic judgemental mongrel dogs who like to accuse people of being heretics, that is, those who have rumbled their money making, money laundering scam called a church and have started to voice their truthful opinions.

Second, and just as crucial, the word heresy can only be found once in the KJV Bible and here is the verse with its only use:

Acts 24:14 (KJV) But this I confess unto thee, that after The Way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in The Law and in The Prophets: (Emphasis mine)

So here we have some very interesting things being said by Paul. First of all, Paul let’s it be known that following Yashua Messiah was known by the followers of Yashua Messiah as The Way, for He is The Way – The ONLY Way to The Kingdom of God and Eternal Life and NO RELIGION required!

Second, the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION called those who were followers of The Way (Yashua Messiah), HERETICS!!! and their beliefs and Faith solely in Yashua Messiah – HERESY!!! How blasphemous is that?

Not only that, if we look up the word in the Greek MSS what do you think we will find? Answer, this from Strong’s Concordance:

Heresy – G139 – αἵρεσις – hairesis – hah’ee-res-is
From G138; properly a choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion. (“heresy” is the Greek word itself.): – heresy [which is the Greek word itself], sect.

Look what we have here: 1) a choice; 2) a party in disunion; 3) a sect. So what does this tell us? Well far from being negative, the word heresy looks like it is something very positive, that is, the separating of those who follow Yashua Messiah (The Way) from satanic religious illegitimates. In the first century that would have been primarily the Pharisees and Sadducees who were later usurped by the so called Hellenising philosophers known as the ‘church fathers’, that is, the counterfeit founders of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Be sure you understand that religion is a spirit called Legion and Satan presents this phenomena in a myriad of ways whether it be Jews or Fundie ‘Christians’ with their Judaising Law based religion or Papists with their Babylonian Mystery Religion.

Furthermore, today, whilst the Pope is traipsing here, there and everywhere around the world promoting his mickey mouse satanic multi-faith unity BS, Paul was and is teaching the exact opposite – now there’s a surprise and is that hilarious or what?

Moreover what’s more interesting is the way this Greek word hairesis has taken on a dual meaning in some people’s eyes for we find it used elsewhere:

Acts 28:22 (KJV) But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect (hairesis), we know that every where it is spoken against.
(Brackets and emphasis mine)

In this verse we can see the word hairesis used more accurately, in it being translated as sect and not heresy, but, either way, neither translations of this word point to the evil and distorted and satanic interpretations of The Devil’s Roman Catholic Cult who misuse, twist and pervert it to accuse those of The Truth and/or The Way of being heretics which, in reality, is a compliment to us, not an insult.

This means dear brothers and sisters that in the future if some evil papist calls you a heretic, just thank him or her as sarcastically as you can and be encouraged by their plug ignorance.

Brother Charles.

As a PS I would add that the word heresies can also be found three times which again should be translated as sects and which I will deal with here at a later date.

Was JESUS CHRIST a JEW?…

…Or better, Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a JEW?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38.

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Canaanite Jews were and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (KJV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (KJV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Matthew 23:33 (KJV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially a viper or a reptile and therefore against Himself – IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, that’s what these Canaanite Jew people were and still are in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurous thieves and, worst of all, genocidal psychopathic cold blooded murderers, as in the so called Russian Revolution as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

“A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

– Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten God, for they had never known God at all and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them straight:

John 8:44 (KJV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (Brackets mine)

The Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of God, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the God of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so called African-American blacks.

However I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s parents. In Matthew we have Joseph’s lineage who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father but his step-father and in Luke we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (KJV) The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (JUDAH) and his brethren; 3 And Judas (JUDAH) begat Phares (PHAREZ) and Zara (ZARAH) of Thamar (TAMAR); and Phares (PHAREZ) begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam (REHOBOAM); and Roboam (REHOBOAM) begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
Mat 1:15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI. (Emphasis mine)

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (KJV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So did Joseph have two fathers or is this a contradiction or just an expression of of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still refered to as his father and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was Heli’s son.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon through Solomon’s son Rehoboam and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David, We therefore have Yashua Messiah who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (KJV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH).

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (KJV) The Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah nor his descendants until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However I can here the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another wife named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Lord for disobeying their father Judah and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consumation of their marriage to Tamar and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the first Canaanite Jews and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside and in turn this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews via their mothers and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father.

So to sum up we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Israelites; 3) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah, for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Canaanite Jew.

For further reading and understanding of the origins of the white Semitic Israelites and Canaanite Jews please see my two articles below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/