HELL

Introduction

So, 1) What is hell? 2) Where is hell? 3) Does hell exist? 4) Is hell just symbolism for something Spiritual? 5) Is hell this earth, in the here and now, under Satan’s rule? 6) Why is there a place called hell? 7) Who goes there, or who will be sent there? 8) Where does the word come from? 9) How many hells are there? 10) Is there a fiery hell? 11) Is it just the grave – a hole in the ground? 12) Is the Roman Catholic take on hell, true, that is, Purgatory? 13) Why all the confusion about this word hell? 14) Can we rely on the ‘experts’ for their interpretations of this word, even Mr Strong in his Concordance? 15) Why all the comical jokes and cartoons about, what would seem to be, such a serious subject?

There are over three quarters of a million words in the King James Bible, that’s 770,430 words to be precise, but with the word ‘hell’ mentioned only 54 times, in 54 verses, in the whole Bible, and that equates to a miniscule 0.007009073%. So what’s the big deal about this little place or concept of a place called hell? Hopefully all will be revealed in this series of articles.

Before I start, let’s deal with the etymology of the word ‘hell’ (that’s question No. 8 in my introduction list) in order to build our foundation, for it may turn out that just the use of this word hell’ is itself a gross deception:

From The Online Etymology Dictionary:

Hell (noun):

Also Hell, Old English hel, helle, “nether world, abode of the dead, infernal regions, place of torment for the wicked after death,” from Proto-Germanic *haljō “the underworld” (source also of Old Frisian helle, Old Saxon hellia, Dutch hel, Old Norse hel, German Hölle, Gothic halja “hell”). Literally “concealed place” (compare Old Norse hellir “cave, cavern”), from PIE root *kel- (1) “to cover, conceal, save.”

The English word may be in part from Old Norse mythological Hel (from Proto-Germanic *halija “one who covers up or hides something”), in Norse mythology the name of Loki’s daughter who rules over the evil dead in Niflheim, the lowest of all worlds (nifl “mist”). A pagan concept and word fitted to a Christian idiom. In Middle English, also of the Limbus Patrum, place where the Patriarchs, Prophets, etc. awaited the Atonement. Used in the KJV for Old Testament Hebrew Sheol and New Testament Greek Hades, Gehenna. Used figuratively for “state of misery, any bad experience” at least since late 14c. As an expression of disgust, etc., first recorded 1670s.”

As we can see, we’re straight into (Greek) mythology with words like ‘nether world’, ‘infernal regions’ and/or ‘places of torment’ and, with some of it starting as late as the 14th century. This is not really that old when compared to Old Testament times, where we have the Hebrew word ‘sheol’ being the only word in use for describing ‘hell’. However, notice how it’s referred to as: “A pagan concept and word fitted to a Christian idiom.” This alone tells us much, in that ‘hell’, in and of itself, is already a loaded, pagan, religious agenda driven word. I wonder who could be responsible for such a thing? Much mocking sarcasm here from the author.

Archetypal Image of the Mythological Hades (Hell)

Another interesting point is the Norse ‘mythological’ reference to ‘Niflheim’, which seems to have an uncanny resemblance to the Biblical Hebrew word ‘Nephilim’. This, in turn, raises two more interesting points, in that we have 1) a reference to the Norse people, who were one of the Israelite Tribes, namely Benjamin, and who had this Scriptural knowledge of the ‘Nephilim’, albeit cloaked in Norse mythology. And 2) that they believed there was a place of imprisonment for these fallen spirit beings ‘Niflheim’ or ‘Nephilim’, again, as made plain in the Holy Scriptures:

Jude 6 (KJV) And the angels (‘Nephilim’) which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, He hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of The Great Day.

Now this says to me that the real meaning of the word ‘hell’ is the place of imprisonment of the demons (nephilim) where Yashua Messiah cast them at the time of The Flood, and where they remain to this day. Therefore this word ‘hell’ has been miss-used in English Bibles to describe something that it’s plainly not and the Hebrew word for ‘hell’, that is ‘sheol’, should have been incorporated into the English language, so that there was no ambiguity.

Moreover, let’s answer the first question second: What is hell from the Biblical perspective? If we go straight to the Old Testament we get the word ‘hell’ mentioned 31 times, and in every case it is translated from the Hebrew word ‘sheol’and from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

Hell H7585shᵉʼôwl, sheh-ole’; or שְׁאֹל shᵉʼôl; – from H7592; hades or the world of the dead (as if a subterranean retreat), including its accessories and inmates:—grave, hell, pit.

H7592sha’al shaw-al’ or shael {shaw-ale’}; – a primitive root; to inquire; by implication, to request; by extension, to demand:–ask (counsel, on), beg, borrow, lay to charge, consult, demand, desire, X earnestly, enquire, + greet, obtain leave, lend, pray, request, require, + salute, X straitly, X surely, wish.

Now notice what’s going on here, for immediately we have gratuitous erroneous embellishments being added with the Greek word ‘hades’ being utilised and introduced. Hades’ is straight out of Greek mythology, so it doesn’t exist – ‘hades’ is a LIE! So why have silly duped and deluded people included it into their ‘Christian’ belief systems, and why has Mr Strong dropped this huge clanger? He says that H7592 refers to: “hades or a world of the dead – a subterranean retreat,” when it says no such thing – see definition H7592 above.

I will therefore return to one of my other introduction questions, question No. 14: Can we rely on the ‘experts’ for their interpretations of this word, even Mr Strong in his Concordance? So in this first instance can we rely upon Mr Strong with his inclusion of the Greek mythological word ‘hades’ into his definition? NO! is the resounding answer to that.

Getting back to The Truth and reality, the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that uses the word ‘hell’ is Deuteronomy 32:22 and I will copy it here:

Deuteronomy 32:22 (KJV) For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell (H7585), and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.

In this first usage of the word ‘hell’ it can only mean ‘pit’, as in a lowest point on the earth, when The Lord’s anger will be displayed with fire and shall burn even unto this low point on the earth. This is not a designated place and/or the realm of a permanent fiery place, as we are led to believe from the pages of the New Testament by blind guides, because in this case the whole earth is consumed by this fire.

Let’s now look at an associated word, ‘grave’, in order to get a better understanding of this word ‘hell’, and that word is used for the first time in Genesis 37:

Genesis 37:35 (KJV) And all his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted; and he said, For I will go down into the grave (H7585) unto my son mourning. Thus his father wept for him. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Now pay special attention, for we have the same Hebrew word in play here, that is, ‘sheol’, for the word grave’. So does this prove that ‘hell’ and the ‘grave’ are one and the same thing? You betcha.

OK, so we have now ascertained some interesting points: 1) There is no fiery hell mentioned in the Old Testament. 2) Hell sheol’ in the Old Testament means only one thing – the GRAVE sheol’ or a hole in the ground where dead people are buried, so where is this fiery hell and did it not apply to Old Testament people? Were they not evil sinners when they died? Was there any chance of redemption/salvation for them? NO! So what’s going on?

Moreover, if we take this subject a step further we need to discuss the reality of death’, if only that it makes sense to do so. I say this because people in general have some very whacky ideas, not only about ‘hell’, but also about ‘death’. So let’s clarify this subject before we move on with our discussion about ‘hell’.

So what is death? Death is the cessation of life, kaput, fini, end of. The wages of sin! Life ceases totally and this is made very clear in the Holy Scriptures:

Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV) For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.

Psalm 115:17 (KJV) The dead praise not the LORD, neither any that go down into silence.

Psalm 6:5 (KJV) For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?

There we have it, the dead know not anything, they go down into the ground in silence, a state of oblivion, or if you prefer, just as we were before we were born – nothingness – no breath of life – no existence – no conscious awareness of anything – NOTHING! If you’re hung up and deceived by the papist immortal soul nonsense, then see the first crucial link below.

Where were we? Ah yes, ‘hell’ and the Old Testament and what it proves for us, namely, that there is no fiery hell mentioned. Does this create a problem? Well it certainly looks like it, if we believe what we’re told by blind guides. The New Testament beckons.

In the New Testament the word ‘hell’ is mentioned 23 times and interestingly the Biblical number 23 means death, so that’s very appropriate, is it not? Just a little aside. In the New Testament the first verse in which we find the word ‘hell’ is in Matthew 5:22, but before we go there we need first to list all the hells of the NT, and their definitions – answer to question No. 9:

Hell – G1067geena gheh’-en-nahof Hebrew origin (1516 and 2011); valley of (the son of) Hinnom; ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom), a valley of Jerusalem, used (figuratively) as a name for the place (or state) of everlasting punishment:–hell.

H1516gay’ gah’-ee or (shortened) gay {gah’-ee}; – probably (by transmutation) from the same root as 1466 (abbreviated); a gorge (from its lofty sides; hence, narrow, but not a gully or winter-torrent):–valley.

H2011Hinnom hin-nome’ probably of foreign origin; Hinnom, apparently a Jebusite – a Canaanite:–Hinnom.

Hell – G86haides hah’-dace – from 1 (as negative particle) and 1492; properly, unseen, i.e. “Hades” or the place (state) of departed souls:–grave, hell.

Hell – G5020tartaroo tar-tar-o’-o – from Tartaros (the deepest abyss of Hades); to incarcerate in eternal torment:–cast down to hell.

Now I find this conundrum very interesting, because after 3 BC with the arrival of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) on this earth, we now have three definitions for the word ‘hell’, not just one, as in the Old Testament. So what’s changed and what’s going on – has dying been remodelled or reformed? ROTFL! In the blink of an eye, are their now more places or destinations for dead people to go?

The spirit of this conundrum seems to have strong similarities to the mythical changed nature of God from being a Duality Godhead, that is, God with God (The Elohim) from before beginning, into a mythical triune godhead deity that doesn’t exist. Do I hear first and second century Hellenising religious gobbledegook alarm bells ringing here? Yes of course I do, for there can be no other explanation for the introduction of this mythical garbage into The Holy Scriptures. I speak here of the mythical non-existent ‘hades’.

However, on a more serious note, we do have Yashua Messiah introducing some severe warnings to rebellious wicked people, in general, and this includes those that will be cast into ‘outer darkness’. So not only do we have three types of ‘hell’ in play in the NT, but also this place called ‘outer darkness’. Which again is not mentioned in the Old Testament.

Outer – G1857exoteros ex-o’-ter-os – comparative of 1854; exterior:–outer.

Darkness – G4655skotos skot’-os – from the base of 4639; shadiness, i.e. obscurity (literally or figuratively):–darkness.

Notice, that we have a place where certain people will end up and they will be alive, or will be conscious, but they will be kept in the background, in the shade so to speak, or in obscurity, so initially will have no part in The Kingdom of God – whether this is a permanent arrangement or not I don’t know. It could be a place where they have to learn some hard lessons. Some interpret this as being totally cut off from Yashua Messiah, when all the while in this life, they professed to be His followers, that is, these people here:

Matthew 7:21-23 (KJV) Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into The Kingdom of God; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 MANY will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Moreover, this makes plain that there is an after death place of punishment, not involving fire, where these punishments will be meted out. When I say after death, I mean post the first resurrection, for we all die the first death and we’re all placed in HELL, that is, ‘sheol’ or the grave. This is with one exception, for those alive at Yashua Messiah’s return will die and, in an instant, in the twinkling of an eye, be immediately resurrected to life, and this is answer to question No. 7:

Luke 12:45-49 (KJV) But and if that servant say in his heart, My Lord delayeth His coming; and shall begin to beat the menservants and maidens, and to eat and drink, and to be drunken; 46 The Lord of that servant will come in a day when he looketh not for Him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in sunder, and will appoint him his portion with the unbelievers. 47 And that servant, which knew his Lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more. 49 I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?

First of all, take special note of these verses, for we are not dealing primarily with the lost and unsaved but, rather, so-called Christians. These are believers, that is, alleged servants of Yashua Messiah who start thinking that Yashua Messiah is not coming, so they start beating up on their fellow men and women, in their employ, and over indulging in food and booze, on a regular basis. These ‘believers’ Yashua Messiah cuts off from entering into The Kingdom and demotes them to the status of the lost and unsaved and gives what they would have inherited to the lost and unsaved. However, this is not the end of them, for they will still be in the resurrection and be beaten with many stripes, whilst the lost and unsaved will be beaten with few stripes, because they knew no better.

Secondly, notice how the fire will be sent on the earth in general, not people being deposited into a fiery pit of hell. This fits in with The Lord’s words in Deuteronomy, which I quoted in the beginning and will fulfil His prophesy.

However, in spite of all this, ALL of MANkind will be resurrected, albeit not at the same time, but at two different times in the future – either in the First Resurrection, when Yashua Messiah returns, or in the Second Resurrection at the end of The Millennium, a thousand years later. See the second link below for the details.

1 Timothy 2:4 (MCV) Who will have (desires) all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of The Truth.

Returning to where I was above, another interesting point is that this term ‘outer darkness’ can only be found three times in the NT and all three are in Matthew’s Gospel. Does this mean that Matthew only was privy to this Truth, or is it written differently in the other Gospels? At this stage I don’t know, but I will by the time I have finished this study!

I will copy all three passages here:

Matthew 8:11-12 (MCV) And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in The Kingdom of God. 12 But the children of The Kingdom shall be cast out into OUTER DARKNESS: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Now the above passage of Scripture throws up an interesting turn of phrase, namely ‘The Children of The Kingdom’. Who were these Children of The Kingdom (‘Sons of the Kingdom’ would be a better translation)? Well in Truth they were not really sons at all, for this is yet another dig by Yashua Messiah at the Pharisee Jews, who THOUGHT they were the sons of The Kingdom, when they were no such thing. However, He plays up to their delusional thinking and let’s them know, fair and square, what their destination will be, as opposed to the salvation granted to the faithful non-Jew Roman centurion – see Matthew 8:5-10.

Matthew 22:11-13 (KJV) And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: 12 And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. 13 Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into OUTER DARKNESS, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

In the above passage we have a reference to the saints dressed in the white robes of Revelation:

Revelation 6:11 (KJV) And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.

So the fella in this parable was obviously not dressed in metaphorical white robes, that is, he was not called and chosen by The Father, and he was not Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone, and not gifted with The Holy Spirit. So clearly he was not born of God, and yet obviously thought he was a Christian as many in the counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion do.

Let this be a warning to all you fakes out there who erroneously think you can accept a ‘Jesus’ as your saviour and not acknowledge your Fatherly call. Repent NOW whilst you still have the time. See link No. 4 below.

Matthew 25:26-30 (KJV) His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: 27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. 28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. 29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. 30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into OUTER DARKNESS: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

In the above passage we have a faithless Christian who couldn’t even be bothered to put his talents in a bank to gain some interest, so his punishment is outer darkness. Moreover, notice how this outer darkness place is not called hell, nor is there any mention of fire within it, and yet it is definitely a very unpleasant place of punishment, because those destined to go there weep and gnash their teeth in mental torment and agony. In other places it says, wailing and the gnashing of teeth – a pretty sorry state for these hapless people, to say the least. So let’s take a look at all the other places, seven in all, where this weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth occurs.

Likewise I will copy all seven passages here:

Matthew 13:40-42 (KJV) As therefore The Tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. 41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. See the third link below.

A crucial point to register here is that those burned with fire here, that is, The Jews, will be burned at the point of Yashua Messiah’s return at the end of this world, so we’re definitely not dealing with a permanent hell fire location or even a place of torment as offered to us by certain religious snake-oil salesmen. Here, the fire at the time Yashua Messiah’s return is called a ‘furnace’ of fire. Likewise in this passage:

Matthew 13:4750 (KJV) Again, The Kingdom of Heaven (God) is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of EVERY KIND: 48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away. 49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Once more: “Again, The Kingdom of Heaven (God) is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of EVERY KIND:” “EVERY KIND” here is a direct reference to all the ethnic groups of hu-man kind and mankind across the world. Look what happens next: “Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good (mankind) into vessels, but cast the bad (inbred Canaanite hu-man kind) away.” These words are nothing to do with sinners or sinning in general, that is, bad people as opposed to good people, that is, sinners and non-sinners, for no one is good and all have fallen short so there are no non-sinners, apart from the saints. Not only that, but Yashua Messiah has dealt with ALL sin and it’s just a matter of calling the slumbering masses in the Second Resurrection, in order for them to be saved after they have been evaluated at the Great White Throne Tribunal.

These words, and their intended meaning, that is, the differing sea creatures, are just the same as those in the Parable of The Wheat and Tares, and we’re dealing with a separation of The Wheat from The Tares, and we know who (((The Tares))) are don’t we? Yes, the Serpent Seed Canaanites. Again see link No. 3 below for all the details.

Matthew 24:48-51 (KJV) But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; 49 And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken; 50 The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, 51 And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

This one I have covered above in Luke 12.

Luke 13:25-28 (KJV) When once The Master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and He shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are: 26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets. 27 But He shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. 28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in The Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.

Furthermore, what is the common denominator in all of these passages of Holy Scripture, apart from all the weeping, wailing and the gnashing of teeth? The secret is in the words of these verses and who they were/are aimed at: “when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in The Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.” Namely, The Pharisee Jews, who were the leaders of all the Jews and spoke for all the Jews. Today’s rabbis are direct descendants of those Pharisees. This means that this whole topic of ‘hell’ in the NT has taken on a distinctly Serpent Seed racial or ethnic flavour – hence the necessity of a fiery hell or fiery punishment instead of just the Old Testament ‘Sheol’ – the grave.

I think I will call that the end of Part 1.

HELL – Part 2

Before we move on with the ‘hell’ word, we also need to suss out the ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’ words, for not all is what it seems with these words ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’, and there are even more definitions of the word ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’ than the word ‘hell’. Would you believe it!? I will list these as they appear in the New Testament, starting in Matthew:

Fire – G4442pur poor – a primary word; “fire” (literally or figuratively, specially, lightning):–fiery, fire.

Fire – G5457phos foce – from an obsolete phao (to shine or make manifest, especially by rays; compare 5316, 5346); luminousness (in the widest application, natural or artificial, abstract or concrete, literal or figurative):–fire, light.

Fire (of coals) – G439anthrakia anth-rak-ee-ah’ – from 440; a bed of burning coals:–fire of coals.

Fire – G4443pura poo-rah’ from 4442; a fire (concretely):–fire.

Fire – G5394phlogizo flog-id’-zo – from 5395; to cause a blaze, i.e. ignite (figuratively, to inflame with passion):–set on fire.

Fire or Fiery – G4448puroo poo-ro’-o – from 4442; to kindle, i.e. (passively) to be ignited, glow (literally), be refined (by implication), or (figuratively) to be inflamed (with anger, grief, lust):–burn, fiery, be on fire, try.

Fire – G4447purinos poo’-ree-nos – from 4443; fiery, i.e. (by implication) flaming:–of fire.

Fiery – G4451purosis poo’-ro-sis – from 4448; ignition, i.e. (specially), smelting (figuratively, conflagration, calamity as a test):–burning, trial.

So there they are, all 8 definitions of the words ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’ being used in the New Testament, and all these definitions are found amongst the 83 uses of the word ‘fire’ in 79 verses. 32 times in the Four Gospels; 6 times in Acts; 9 times in Paul’s Epistles; 10 times in the General Epistles and 26 times in Revelation. Plus 3 uses of the word ‘fiery’ found in 3 verses.

Right, let’s have a closer look at these definitions and see what we can find. The first thing that sticks out is the number of times the first definition is used, that is, G4442 and it’s used 73 times out of the 83. But lets look at the lesser used definitions first, for that will reveal much for us when we come the more common G4442 definition. OK, first Scripture using G5457:

Mark 14:54 (KJV) And Peter followed Him afar off, even into the palace of the High Priest: and he sat with the servants, and warmed himself at the fire. (G5457)

In this verse we definitely have reference to an ordinary fire, that is, the sort we would have in our houses, if we had open fire places, or the sort of fire we would light at the bottom of our gardens for burning leaves and/or garden waste = a fire!

Luke 22:56 (KJV) But a certain maid beheld him as he sat by the fire, (G5457) and earnestly looked upon him, and said, This man was also with him.

Here we have confirmation of the same definition of an ordinary fire in Luke.

Elsewhere in John it is called a ‘fire of coals’:

John 18:18 (KJV) And the servants and officers stood there, who had made a fire (G439) of coals; for it was cold: and they warmed themselves: and Peter stood with them, and warmed himself.

But still it’s an ordinary fire as in G5457.

However, as soon as we get to the G4442 definition things change dramatically – here are some examples:

Matthew 3:11 (MCV) I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but He that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: He shall baptize you with the Holy Spirit, and with fire: (G4442)

That is no ordinary fire! Nor is this:

Revelation 10:1 (KJV) And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire: (G4442)

So are we dealing with symbolism here and/or things manifesting themselves as ‘fiery’ in order for Yashua Messiah to make a strong impression in our minds. You will have noticed that this G4442 definition also includes ‘lightning’ as part of its description, so it’s definitely not fire in the ordinary sense of fire.

In our next verse it takes on a new form and we also include the word ‘hell’ in with ‘fire’:

Matthew 5:22 (MCV) But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca = empty, (without a cause) shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, (without a cause) shall be in danger of hell (G1067 Gehenna)fire (G4442).

I have added the words ‘without a cause’ two more times because Paul called many people fools and I am sure he will not be in danger of Gehenna Fire.

Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

So what is this Gehenna Fire? I will repost from above:

Hell – G1067geena gheh’-en-nah – of Hebrew origin (1516 and 2011); valley of (the son of) Hinnom; ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom), a valley of Jerusalem, used (figuratively) as a name for the place (or state) of everlasting punishment:- -hell.

H1516gay’ gah’-ee or (shortened) gay {gah’-ee}; – probably (by transmutation) from the same root as 1466 (abbreviated); a gorge (from its lofty sides; hence, narrow, but not a gully or winter-torrent):–valley.

H2011Hinnom hin-nome’ probably of foreign origin; Hinnom, apparently a Jebusite:–Hinnom.

Gehenna Fire has its origins from the Hebrew Old Testament where it is not referred to as hell’ but, rather, the Valley of Hinnom just outside Jerusalem. This is where the wicked Israelites passed their children through the fire as sacrifices to the Canaanite god Moloch or Molech. This wicked satanic practice, along with the more evil satanic idolatry that went with it, was the main reason for Yashua Messiah (God of The Old Testament) bringing the Assyrians and later the Babylonians to carry both Kingdoms off into captivity. The House of Israel from 740-725 BC and The House of Judah circa 585 BC.

Later on this valley became the dump for Jerusalem’s refuse where all the carcases from the sacrifices were deposited and left to either burn and/or rot.

However, we can see how this name is carried over into the New Testament through the Greek word Gehenna = ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom). ‘Ge’ meaning gorge or valley and Hinnom the name of a Jebusite, that is, a Canaanite. So Gehhena literally means the Gorge of Hinnom the Canaanite where garbage was continuously thrown and burned.

So how many people will be thrown literally into the Gorge of Hinnom? None is the answer to that, for the Gorge of Hinnom (Gehenna) is pure symbolism for unquenchable fire, that is, as long as more combustible stuff is added to it. Cease adding to it and it will go out and so it is with God’s unquenchable fire. It will burn for as long as is needed and once all The Tares and things that offend are consumed it will go out.

Matthew 3:12 (KJV) Whose fan is in His hand, and He will throughly purge His floor, and gather His wheat into the garner; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.

This verse, once more, is a parallel verse to that of The Wheat and The Tares and is an end time event when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth. John the Baptist is letting The Pharisees know, with no punches pulled, what their end will be in the resurrection and confirmed for us here:

Matthew 13:40 (KJV) As therefore The Tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.

However, there is another Gehenna Fire that is everlasting and we see it illustrated here:

Matthew 18:8-9 (KJV) Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire (G4442). 9 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell (G1067 Gehenna) fire (G4442).

So what is this telling us? Well first of all we have this G4442 fire which is no ordinary fire, and that it’s everlasting, that is, it’s perpetual, from the past and into the future, never ending, eternal. So it sounds like this G4442 ‘fire’ has a Spiritual aura about it as well, a supernatural fire for want of a better description.

Is this ‘fire’ one and the same as the Lake of Fire as described in Revelation? I think so, for this message in Matthew 18 is being delivered to those under The Law. No one was born of God and indwelled by The Holy Spirit whilst Yashua Messiah was alive on this earth. Yes a minority of people, including the twelve learners, were being called, but none were saved until after Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection.

Moreover, Yashua Messiah made the comparison between the days before The Flood and these last days, except these last days will culminate in worldwide fire, not a worldwide flooding of water, but it will be worldwide, and there will be no hiding places for the wicked Jews and their shabbos goy servants – all will perish. The same for the False Prophet (The Pope) and all his sycophant slave followers, their satanic idolatrous religion will not save them.

Matthew 24:37-39 (MCV) But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be. 38 For as in the days that were before The Flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into The Ark, 39 And knew not until The Flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be.

So shall the coming of The Son of Man be, only this time with WORLDWIDE FIRE! not worldwide water:

2 Peter 3:6-7 (The Amplified Bible) Through which the world at that time was destroyed by being flooded with water. 7 But by His Word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly people.

Revelation 16:8 (KJV) And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire (G4442).

Moreover, the above event is not the Lake of Fire or Gehenna Fire, which I think are one and the same thing, for both are everlasting fire. The Lake of Fire also burns with the aid of brimstone. However, this brimstone seems to be a very special kind of brimstone and different from that which was discovered at the sites of Sodom and Gomorrah (85% pure Sulphur). We will therefore use Strong’s Concordance to assist us:

Old Testament:

H1614 – Brimstone – gophrîyth, gof-reeth’; – Probably feminine of H1613; properly, cypress-resin; by analogy, sulphur (as equally inflammable):—brimstone.

New Testament:

Brimstone – G2303theionthi’-on – probably neuter of 2304 (in its original sense of flashing); sulphur:–brimstone.

G2304theios thi’-os from 2316; Godlike (neuter as noun, divinity): – divine, Godhead.

G2316theostheh’-os – of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with 3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively, a magistrate; by Hebraism, very:–X exceeding, God, god(-ly, -ward).

Do you now see how the G2303 brimstone is different from the H1614 Old Testament brimstone, for the G2303 brimstone has a very Godly or Divine dimension to it, and it is capable of flashing. Notice how this also fits in with the G4442 fire with its lightning. So we now have a fire that is no ordinary fire and a brimstone that is Godlike or Divine, hence it is able to burn for eternity.

Revelation 20:10 (MCV) And The Devil that deceived them was cast into The Lake of Fire (G4442) and Brimstone (G2303), where The Beast and The False Prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

Notice that this brimstone will not kill The Beast (The Rothschilds and their Jewish criminal empire) and The False Prophet (The Popes and their Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with their deceived and deluded followers), but it will torment them day and night forever. This is how we know that the two brimstones and fires are very different, for the Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone destroyed the cities completely, even the stone walls and buildings, such was the intensity of the heat. However, this Lake of Fire (G4442) and Brimstone does not destroy, but torments forever.

So who gets sent to this Gehenna Lake of Fire for eternal punishment. Well at this moment in time all we know for sure are the characters listed above, but no doubt there will be quite few Canaanite Serpent Seed people to keep them company.

So let’s recap what we have ascertained:

1) Hell is definitely the grave, or the Hebrew ‘Sheol’, the punishment for the wages of sin, as of Adam and Eve’s first transgression into which we are born – the fallen sinful condition and for which the penalty is a cessation of life. This is a crucial point that many-so called Christians forget, when they are busy foaming at the mouth over those that they accuse of rejecting Yashua Messiah, that is, the lost and unsaved in this life. We’re all punished by death for that first misdemeanour of our original parents, whether we’re saved or not – there is no escape from the punishment of death – the first death.

2) We ascertained what death is, and what it is not. At the same time we exposed the mythological ‘Hades’ concept and exposed it for the religious bunkum that it is.

3) We learned that: a) there are different types of ‘fire’ alluded to in the New Testament, and: b) that the end time fire, that will come upon the earth, in general, is not the Gehenna Fire of Revelation, that is, the Lake of Fire, which certain individuals will be thrown into.

4) We now know that there is a place, or a concept, or condition known as Outer Darkness, as mentioned in Matthew’s Gospel. However, it is NOT known or referred to as hell, nor as a fiery hell, as no fire is mentioned in relation to this place – if it is a place at all. It may just be a mental condition, an experience, or a state of being, whereby certain people are definitely conscious, and will be experiencing an existence cut off from Yashua Messiah’s presence. All this, when they that are cut off, were/are expecting to spend their eternal lives with Him. What a great shock this will be for these hapless people. Furthermore, is this a permanent arrangement for these wretched people? This point is not made known to us in the Holy Scriptures, apart from The Truth that God does NOT remain angry forever – that much we do know.

5) Along with the ‘fire’ we learned that there are two kinds of brimstone to accompany these two kinds of fire.

Finally, we come to The Second Resurrection and The Last Great Day which follows the end of The Millennium. The Millennium being the 1,000 year reign of Yashua Messiah on this earth as King of kings and Lord of lords. This event is otherwise known as The Great White Throne Judgement Tribunal, when all the rest of the dead will be evaluated. These are those that were not a part of the First Resurrection = the great majority of mankind, and I cover this topic in detail in my article entitled: “Why Are There Two Resurrections?” see link No. 2 below, and with that I’ll call it a cut!

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name,

Messenger Charles

1) What is Soul Sleep and Do The Holy Scriptures Disprove It? (The Myth of The Immortal Soul) – Part 1 of 2:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-soul-sleep-and-do-the-holy-scriptures-disprove-it-the-myth-of-the-immortal-soul-part-1-of-2/

2) Why Are There Two Resurrections?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/08/13/why-are-there-two-resurrections-part-1/

3) The Jews are The Tares:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

4) Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah (Anointed):

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-the-father-calling-you-to-his-son-yashua-anointed/

Understanding YOUR Christian CALLING

Matthew 22:14 (KJV) For MANY Are CALLED, but FEW Are CHOSEN.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65-66 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From THAT many of His learners went back, and walked no more with Him.

1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the Lord called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

Jeremiah 1:5 (KJV) Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

John 4:23 (KJV) But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship The Father in Spirit and in Truth: for The Father seeketh such to worship him.

John 6:37 All that The Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

John 6:70 (KJV) Jesus answered them, Have not I CHOSEN you twelve, and one of you is a devil?

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not CHOSEN me, but I have CHOSEN you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of The Father in my name, He may give it you.

Above are the most important Holy Scriptures that deal with and explain the Christian calling, and if you are paying attention, you will notice that NONE of them mention the ‘acceptance’ of a ‘Jesus’ as your saviour – a blasphemous satanic idea conjured up by fake Christians of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with their fake Jesus.

Now this article has come about due to an argumentative so and so, on Youtube comments, who claimed that Yashua Messiah does the calling and choosing as well as the Father, and he cited John 6:70 as his reason for this belief. He argued that Judas was also called and chosen even though Yashua Messiah made it plain that Judas was a devil and a son of perdition. One wonders what’s going on in their addled brains.

However, was he correct in making these claims? and why is it that these lying creatures love to create contradictions. All this when Yashua Messiah also made it very plain, that NO MAN can come to Him unless The Father draws or, better, DRAGS them to Him? John 6:44 is the gold standard precedent for this whole Christian calling topic. Any other Scriptures that are subject related to it MUST be treated as complimentary Scriptures, not manipulated into contradictory Scriptures. A favourite pastime of these ignorant evil people.

OK, so what have we got? In John 6:44 we have The Father doing the calling and choosing, and then we get Yashua Messiah ‘choosing’ The Twelve Learners, including Judas. However, the last part of John 6:44 says this: “And I will raise him up at the last day.” So will Judas be raised up at the last day? Not a chance, so this ‘choosing’ of Yashua Messiah’s must be a different kind of choosing from The Father’s calling and choosing in John 6:44. And would you believe it, when we look at the Greek Manuscripts what do you think we will find? Answer: TWO WORDS with slightly different meanings.

For the word ‘chosen’ in Matthew 22:14 we get ‘eklektos’ (G1588) and for the word ‘chosen’ in John 6:70 we get ‘eklegomai’ (G1586) and here are Strong’s definitions:

Chosen – G1588 – ἐκλεκτός eklektós, ek-lek-tos’; from G1586; select; by implication, favorite:—chosen, elect.

Chosen – G1586 – κλέγομαι eklégomai, ek-leg’-om-ahee; middle voice from G1537 and G3004 (in its primary sense); to select:—make choice, choose (out), chosen.

You will notice that the second definition lacks the word ‘elect’, which means that we’re dealing with two kinds of choosing here. It also means that when Yashua Messiah ‘chose’ his Twelve Learners, the Father had already called them previously by visiting them through His Holy Spirit. How do we know this? Easy, just read these Holy Scriptures:

John 6:45 (KJV) It is written in The Prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of The Father, cometh unto me.

A slightly better rendering from The Concordant Literal Translation:

John 6:45 (CLV) It is written in The Prophets: And they shall all be taught of God. Everyone, then, who hears from The Father and is learning The Truth, is coming to Me.

Matthew 4:18-19 (MCV) And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishermen. 19 And He saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.

Matthew 8:21-23 (MCV) And another of His learners said unto Him, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father. 22 But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead. 23 And when He was entered into a ship, His learners followed Him.

Notice, first, in John 6:45 how The Father teaches us and makes us receptive to hearing The Truth, and so it would have been for the twelve learners before they even met Yashua Messiah.

Notice, second, how these young men followed without a word, without any objections and without a single question or protest or argument. It was an instantaneous “YES SIR!” even from the one who felt the need to bury his father first. They all dropped what they were doing and willingly followed Him.

Now if we refer back to John 6:44 we find that The Father’s call involves drawing (dragging) people to Yashua Messiah, which must mean that when The Father initially called Peter, Andrew and the others there must have been some resistance, perhaps even strong resistance, active and operational in their minds. Peter, especially, whom we know was wilfully strong minded, and yet when Yashua Messiah turns up at the lake side and says stop your fishing and come follow me, both brothers do so without a murmer – not a single word of objection. This tells us that it was not the first divine intervention in their lives. They must have had some communication from The Father prior to Yashua Messiah turning up. This means Yashua Messiah’s arrival at the lake side and His subsequent instruction for them to follow Him was a mere formality – inwardly they had been expecting Him.

Moreover, if we return to the subject of the two Greek words ‘eklektos’ and eklegomai’ we can now see why they are used, for they have two slightly different meanings. One is the overarching ‘chosen’ as in the calling and choosing of all the Elect, who will be raised up at the last day, and the other, a more personalised ‘choosing’ of the Twelve Learners (who had already been called by The Father) by Yashua Messiah, including one who was a devil. With regards to Judas we must take on board that he was never called and chosen, he received a calling only, by The Father, for he will not be raised up at the last day.

As a penultimate point I will draw your attention to John 15:16:

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not CHOSEN me, but I have CHOSEN you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of The Father in my name, He may give it you.

The word ‘chosen’ used here, is again, ‘eklegomai’ and not ‘eklektos’. This confirms what I have already said about these as being second personal callings from Yashua Messiah in addition to The Father’s earlier call. However, the crucial part to all of this is that NONE of the twelve ACCEPTED Yashua Messiah as their saviour – ALL were CALLED and CHOSEN with the exception of Judas who was called only.

Finally I will post some Holy Scriptures from Paul’s letters where he emphasises our being CHOSEN and our CALLING in numerous places:

Romans 9:11 (MCV) (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election (having been chosen) might stand, not of works, but of Him (The Father) that CALLETH;

1 Corinthians 1:26-28 (MCV) For ye see your CALLING, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are CALLED: 27 But God hath CHOSEN the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath CHOSEN the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God CHOSEN, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought (zero) things that are:

Ephesians 1:18 (MCV) The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of His CALLING, and what the riches of The Glory of His inheritance in the saints,

Ephesians 4:1 (MCV) I therefore, the captive of The Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the CALLING wherewith ye are CALLED,

Ephesians 4:4 (MCV) There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are CALLED in one hope of your CALLING;

2 Timothy 1:9 (MCV) Who hath saved us, AND CALLED US with an HOLY CALLING, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and Grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles

Who Is ‘The’ Anti-Christ?…

…or better, what constitutes an anti-Christ? for I’ll tell you straight, if you’re of the mainstream Christian thinking on this subject (the Cainite-Judaeo-Christian Religion), or even mainstream secular thinking, anti-Christ is not what you have been given to understand, that is, ‘he’ is some kind of big time bogey-man that will mysteriously appear out of the aether and take us all by surprise.

So let’s set the record straight on this illusive “anti-Christ” subject, and, just like assembling an Ikea flat pack, if all else fails, let’s have a look at the book of instructions. “You know it makes sense – Rodders” as Del Boy in “Only Fools and Horses” would have said to his younger brother.

Here are the ONLY Holy Scriptures, four in all, that make mention of the term anti-Christ, and you will note that the word is not hyphenated and Christ is not capitalised within it, as written in the KJV:

1 John 2:18 (KJV) Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

1 John 2:22 (KJV) Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

1 John 4:3 (KJV) And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

2 John 1:7 (KJV) For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

OK, now the first thing we learn from these Scriptures is that the Last Days were already under way in the first century, so this means that the last two thousand years are to be considered as The Last Days, with today being the last days of The Last Days. Moreover, I believe Yashua Messiah’s return is imminent, with all the signs staring us in the face, IF we can see, that is, IF we are awake and called and chosen by The Father.

The second thing we learn is that the word ‘THE’ is not present when describing the word anti-Christ. “Antichrist shall come” it says, NOT “THE ANTI-CHRIST” shall come. And do not pass this off as semantics, for it is not semantics. It’s deep, and it’s spiritual, and crucial for you to understand, for anti-Christ is a spirit, an all pervasive spirit, polluting and corrupting the minds of the secular and religious alike all across the world.

From 1 John 2:22 the third thing we learn from John is the fact that we’re dealing with LIARS – plural, not the lies of an alleged singular bogey-man anti-Christ. Now these liars, especially The Jews, are very busy denying that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) is the Christ, that is denying that He is The Messiah. They are also very busy denying The Father and Son Godhead – A Duality Godhead, not a trinity godhead or a monotheist god. (See links below)

In 1 John 4:3 John narrows it down somewhat when he refers to those that have a satanic spirit who refuse to declare that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) HAS COME IN THE FLESH! What did he mean by this statement? If Yashua Messiah was just a mere man sent by God the Father, what other way could He come, but in the flesh!!??

So why did John use this very specific expression: “And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God”

If not in the flesh, what other way could He have come? Spirit? Letting us know that He was God (Spirit) come in the flesh, which many blasphemously deny, claiming that He was just a mere man, or a created being, or just another prophet in the order of Isaiah, Ezekiel and Jeremiah “and this is that spirit of antichrist.”

Philippians 2:6 (KJV) Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

Here we have John making his case, loud and clear, as to what an anti-Christ is, that is, 1) someone or anyone who denies that Yashua Messiah is God come in the flesh and 2) anyone who denies The Duality Godhead of Father and Son (Trinitarians and Monotheists) Notice, too, that John emphasises that anti-Christ is a spirit, not a singular physical bogey-man.

If you want bogey-men then look no further than The False Prophet (the Pope) and The Son of Perdition (a Rothschild = Wrathschild = Judas) and, of course, The Beast System, full of anti-Christs, otherwise known as The Military Industrial Complex, headed up by The Rothschilds (Financial) and The Vatican (Religion) with their puppets in the Pentagon, Washington DC (Military).

In 2 John 1:7 we have John confirming for us that MANY deceivers have entered into the world, also denying that Yashua Messiah is God come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an anti-Christ, and there are millions of ‘em, not one singular bogey-man mythical anti-Christ.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles

Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

The Duality Godhead:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

Exposing the Trinity Lie!:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

Are YOU a Brainwashed, Coronavirus, Duped Numbskull?….

….and if so, will you compound your wretched, deluded, mental condition and fall for their JEWISH (SNAKE OIL SALESMAN) SORCERIES (VACCINES)!!!????

Now this will be an unashamed and unabashed rant, with no pulled punches, so be forewarned.

With regard to my article title and its extension, if you are a Christian, or profess to be a Christian, then I very much hope not, and will not! For to be so, makes you 100% deceived and no better than the dumbed down morons walking around with nappies (diapers) over their stupid zombified morbid faces and will soon be queuing up for their toxic poisonous vaccines.

sheeple-masks

As I write, (27th July 2020) a certain supermarket chain here in the UK is attempting to force people to wear these stupid face coverings, by denying them entry to their stores, if they’re not wearing one. Great way to attract business eh? Proving that the health of their bottom lines is neither here nor there to these corporate criminals. So what’s it all about? More on that later.

So what’s the point of my article you may well be wondering? For I seldom address worldly or political issues here on my blog and certainly not medical issues. However, the need immediately arose when I watched a Bitchute video, yesterday, by someone who calls himself Brother Hebert, and that is Hebert, not Herbert. In this video he made an interesting connection to modern medicine via The Book of Revelation, where it uses the word SORCERIES, that is, as in the ordinary sense, MAGIC and WITCHCRAFT – all of which are DEMONIC SATANIC practises. However, one could easily say to that, so what? What’s sorcery, magic and witchcraft got to do with the Coronavirus Hoax, or Cov-Yid 19 as I like to call it?

Revelation 9:21 (KJV) Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their SORCERIES, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts. (Emphasis mine)

Revelation 18:23 (KJV) And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth (The Rothschilds, Soros, Fauci, Bill Gates and Co); for by thy SORCERIES were all nations deceived. (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Right, let’s go now to see what dear old Mr Strong has to say about sorceries!:

Sorceries – G5331φαρμακεία φαρμακεία – pharmakeia – pronounced fär-mä-ka’-ä –

a. the use or the administering of drugs (Xenophon, mem. 4, 2, 17).
b. poisoning (Plato, Polybius, others): Revelation 9:21 (here WH text Tr marginal reading φαρμακῶν; many interpretations refer the passage to the next entry).
c. sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it:

WOW!! How about that for a REVELATION, and straight out of REVELATION no less – the use or the administering of drugs. Pharmakeia or, as we say today, Pharmacology, or better, BIG PHARMA or, better still, THE THIEVING SNAKE OIL SALESMAN MEDICAL MAFIA, who own, lock, stock and two smoking barrels, nearly all of the corrupt medical practitioners across the globe. Your so-called local doctor is a disease manager, not a healer or curer of your ailments and illnesses – he or she will TREAT YOU with poisonous drugs, NOT HEAL YOU! If you actually get better using their poisonous potions then consider yourself extremely lucky.

We then get confirmation, that is, POISON, and what does the word VIRUS mean in Latin? you got it, POISON!, and I’ll tell you straight, you cannot catch a poison!

Notice, too, how Revelation prophecies that ALL NATIONS shall be deceived by these same satanic lying, quack, sorcerer con-men. 100% fulfilment of prophecy.

Then finally we have sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it:

So what is this, or to whom is this a reference? Why, none other than your criminal political leaders whom you were dumb enough to elect into office (idolatry). They say jump and you deluded dim wits then ask HOW HIGH? They say wear a mask here, and no need for a mask there, and for no logical reason, and you follow their stupid instructions like so many dumbed down unthinking sheep.

To confirm this, I also read about a big clothes store, which also sells food in their food halls, and a has in-store cafés. Masks had to be worn in the food hall, but no need for them in the adjacent café, and all separated by an open four foot wide barrier zone. You couldn’t make it up, but these corrupt corporate moron jerks have done just that, and the lemmings blindly obey without question!

At the same time we have professional footballers all puffing and panting over one another, as if the virus has an aversion to physical sports and disappears as soon as these overpaid fairies enter their stadiums. This is how laughable it all is, and yet the majority appears not to be questioning any of it. This is deep psycho babble bull**** taking place here folks with dullards lapping it up.

Hosea 4:6 (KJV) My people are destroyed through lack of knowledge!

OK, so what KNOWLEDGE are the unthinking plebs and proles lacking? Quite simply that viruses do not exist. YOU WHAT!? Yes, it’s true, viruses do not exist. Furthermore, virology is a quack pseudo-science set up by the SORCERERS – BIG PHARMA, and financed by them to create imaginary diseases, for which toxic vaccines must be produced to combat the non-existent virus. Problem, reaction, solution, oh what a crackerjack Hegelian Dialectic, scam eh? We are talking £ billions and £ billions in profits, for these thieving psychopathic criminals. And I do not say thieving psychopathic criminals lightly.

Here is a transcript from Robert Kennedy Jr. on the activities of Bill Gates:

“From #RobertFKennedyJr’s Instagram post today, April 9th 2020:

“#Vaccines, for #Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including #Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him a dictatorial control over global health policy – The spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.

Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fuelled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.

Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India’s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 Polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame Gates’ campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain Polio epidemic that paralysed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialled back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously.

In 2017, the World Health Organisation reluctantly admitted that the global Polio explosion is predominantly vaccine-strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines.

In 2014 #GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Klein and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying the parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.

During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained: “We are guinea pigs for drug makers.”

Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economics Professor Patrick Bond, descibes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless” and “immoral”.

In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO (RevContent InArticle SOLO) promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilising millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.

After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.

Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.

Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.

Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.

They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe!

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.

In his recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunityto force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.”

— Robert F Kennedy Jr.

Now with all due respect, Kennedy doesn’t know that viruses do not exist, having not done the research, but it’s good that he has exposed the psychopath Jew con-man Bill Gates who, incidentally, has not a single medical qualification to his name. Just who you want in charge when producing toxic vaccines.

So, how do I know that viruses do not exist? Well it’s quite a long story, for back in March of this year, I knew NOTHING about what purports to be ‘medical science’ in the western ‘civilised’ world, and to be precise I still know very little. However, I now know enough, because if we FOLLOW THE MONEY, most things fall into place, and we can then come to a very sound conclusion in a very short time.

The basics for this VIRUS minefield con-trick are founded upon what is known as The Victorian Germ Theory. Am I saying that modern so-called virology is based on something as antiquated as a Victorian medical theory and an UNPROVEN medical theory at that? Yes I am, for it’s true.

The Germ Theory was a pet theory of the Frenchman Louis Pasteur, a mere chemist, not a scientist, and not invented by him, so he was a plagiariser as well. Here is a little snippet about Pasteur:

“What you forgot to mention is Pasteur attended schooling at Lycée Saint-Louis (a former Jansenist school but had then been covertly run by the Jesuits). Pasteur, being the mediocre student that he was, failed at numerous entrance exams to the prestigious École normale supérieure in Paris. But after he enrolled and trained at Lycée Saint-Louis school, the trajectory of his career just magically shot to the roof. He magically passed the entrance exam, he previously failed, with flying colors, getting academic awards left and right. His fraudulent scientific method covered up by the scientific community up until 1993. I suspect he was secretly controlled and tutored by the Jesuits, to serve as the scientific mouthpiece of the Vatican (Jesuits). Think about it. What Pasteur discovered is nothing new. His theory is the exactly same as the Catholic (Graeco-Roman pagan superstition) promulgated/taught by the Vatican for centuries now, but packaged under a new name ‘virus’.”

– NOAHIDE LAWS – Dr. Lorraine Day

So with this dodgy background, the Pasteur picture is beginning to take shape quite nicely. If we then add in another Frenchman by the name of Antoine Beauchamps, a real scientist, Pasteur’s shaky credentials and theories are then toast, for Beauchamps exposes Pasteur and his bogus Germ Theory for what it is – 100% BS. Here is a good link that gives the details:

https://vexmansthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/04/22/what-is-wrong-with-the-germ-theory/

We then have another clever Frenchman who said this:

“The terrain is everything, the germ is nothing.” – Claude Bernard, French physiologist.

Bernard Cohen of Harvard University called Bernard “One of the greatest of all men of science”.

Further to, I would recommend a video by Dr Stefan Lanka, a German virologist who made an incredible discovery re the alleged Measles Virus:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hTETvlWL-Wg/

He bet anyone $100,000 that they could not prove that Measles was a virus. No one has succeeded, even taking him to the German Supreme Court and losing.

For further study I would also recommend Doctors Andrew Kaufman, Sherri Tenpenny, and Lorraine Day.

Here is a transcript from an English heroine who knew the score even in Victorian times:

“Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes, like cats and dogs, but conditions growing out of one another.

Is it not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases as we do now, as separate entities, which must exist, like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our control; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves?

I was brought up to believe that smallpox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs) and that smallpox would not begin itself, any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.

Since then I have seen with my own eyes and smelled with my own nose smallpox growing up in first specimens, either in closed rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been ‘caught’, but must have begun.

I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and pass into one another. Now, dogs do not pass into cats.

I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut.

Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon disease in this light (for diseases, as all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun-substantives):

— True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows, with unremitting attention to the patient, are the only defence a true nurse either asks or needs.

— Wise and humane management of the patient is the best safeguard against infection. The greater part of nursing consists of preserving cleanliness.

The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”

— Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, 1820-1910.

With regard to the Coronavirus Hoax all you need to know are these seven golden facts:

1) The so-called Covid 19 virus has NEVER been filtered and isolated. Filtering and isolating is standard practice in good scientific research.

2) The so-called test doesn’t work and was declared incapable of being reliable by the scientist who created it.

3) Numerous verifiable experiments were carried out in 1918 with regard to the so-called Spanish Flu which proved that it wasn’t contagious.

4) Mortality rates are no different this year and are well within the range of deaths for the previous five years.

5) In the USA there has been a miraculous drop in deaths due to heart attacks, for this year only, whilst the numbers of Covid 19 deaths have appeared from out of the blue to replace them. LOL

6) In Tanzania they tested a paw paw for Covid 19 and it proved positive – even more hilarious.

7) Viruses are Exosomes that are mistakenly identified as viruses. Exosomes are created by the cells of our bodies to deal with toxic insults – they are cleansing solvents or agents. (See Dr Andrew Kaufman.)

Brave Whistleblower Nurse – They Are Murdering Patients for Covid 19 Statistics: https://www.minds.com/media/1104486567915880448

A Compelling Video Linking 5G to the Corona Virus: Hoax! https://www.minds.com/media/1095634460119138304

TOM BARNETT – YOUR GOVERNMENT IS LYING – YOU CANNOT CATCH CORONA-VIRUS – Part 1: https://www.minds.com/media/1091786088018579456

TOM BARNETT – YOUR GOVERNMENT IS LYING – YOU CANNOT CATCH CORONA-VIRUS – Part 2 https://www.minds.com/media/1094165921306025984

Corona Virus!!?? Is One Big Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake! https://www.minds.com/media/1091057889233416192

Please note I will post links here to further videos in the next few days.

Dr Andrew Kaufman – Covid 19 Tests Are Scientifically Meaningless: https://www.minds.com/media/1141342317405364224

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

Salvation is of The Jews! Oh Really, Is That So!? – John 4:22

Oh yes, is that so? and how many of you are deceived and brainwashed by this wickedly satanic corruption of the King James Bible? Furthermore, did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) actually say “the Jews”, or was He referring to a different ethnic group of people altogether?

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of The Jews The Judaean Israelites.

Right, let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some Light on this illegitimate KJV verse:

Jews – G2453 Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; – from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

So first off, for the word ‘Jews’ we have Judaean’ and ‘belonging to Jehudah’ (Judah). Now let’s get this firmly fixed in our minds, for Judaeans (the occupants and residents of Judaea) were not necessarily Jews, and Jews most definitely did not belong to Jehudah (Judah) (see link below).

In Judaea, in the first century, there were Royal Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites, who, in turn, were descended from the Israelite Tribes that made up the post Babylonian captivity House of Judah, that is, a remnant of those three tribes who returned to Judaea circa 515 BC. In fact, in a strict ethnic sense, Jews were not Judaeans at all. They were always alien usurpers, hijackers and parasitical subversive invaders, who inveigled their way into Israelite society, just as they do today in Britain, America and most civilised western nations.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I will firm up the Jewish Almanac quote by stating, for the record, that Jews were NEVER Hebrews, nor were they Israelites, hence you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first eleven books of The KJV Bible.

Juda – G2448Iouda ee-oo-dah’ of Hebrew origin (3063 or perhaps 3194); Judah (i.e. Jehudah or Juttah), a part of (or place in) Palestine:–Judah.

In this definition we have confirmed for us that Juda or Judah is of Hebrew origin so, therefore, nothing to do with The Jews.

Judas – G2455Ἰούδας Ioúdas, ee-oo-das’; – of Hebrew origin (H3063); Judas (i.e. Jehudah), the name of ten Israelites; also of the posterity of one of them and its region:—Juda(-h, -s); Jude.

Again, in this definition, we are told that the name Judas is of Hebrew origin, which when applied to Israelites would be correct. Hence we get this:

Matthew 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (Judah) and his brethren;

And this:

Matthew 13:55 (KJV) Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and His brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas (Judah)?

Judah – H3063Yhuwdah yeh-hoo-daw’ – from 3034; celebrated; Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five Israelites; also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory:–Judah.

Even in the Old Testament Mr Strong makes no reference to Jews, just Judahite Israelites.

However, Jews are very fond of hiding their Shelahite, Hamitic Canaanite, Serpent Seed identity by using names common to their host nation. This a favourite Jew trick, and this is why I am fairly certain that Judas Iscarriot, the betrayer of Yashua Messiah, was a Jew, and not an Israelite. Betrayal is a standard characteristic of the Jews, as evidenced by a past President of The US:

“The Jews are all through government, and we have got to get in those areas. The government is full of Jews, second, most Jews are disloyal. You can’t trust the bastards. They turn on you.”

President Richard M. Nixon, Nixon Tapes, July 3rd 1971.

In support of the above I will use this example, for we have Paul, later, professing his Israelite Hebrew ethnic identity:

Philippians 3:4-5 (KJV) Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching The Law, a Pharisee;

The first thing you will notice or, at least you SHOULD notice, is that he, at no time, professes himself as a Jew. So what does this mean? It means that erroneous ‘JEWISHNESS’ is read into these Holy Scriptures by ignorant uneducated people with a satanic agenda:

1) He was circumcised on the eighth day, as all Israelites were.

2) He was of the stock of Israel = a white Semite, so not a Jew.

3) The Israelite Tribe of Benjamin, so not a Jew.

4) An Hebrew of the Hebrews, so not a Jew.

5) Touching The Law, A Pharisee, and not all Pharisees were Jews. Nicodemus being another example of a non-Jew Pharisee.

Here is more solid gold evidence of who the Jews are, and Israelites they are definitely NOT!:

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Jews were easily identifiable for their rabid lusting for the death of Yashua Messiah and then claimed responsibility:

Matthew 27:25 (MCV) Then answered all the the Jews, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING; by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Having read all of the above quotes from the very lips of Yashua Messiah and John the Baptist, how on earth can salvation be of the Serpent Seed Jews = the spawn of the Devil himself, both literally and spiritually?

Essential reading for understanding the TRUE ORIGINS of the Serpent Seed Jews:

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

For more Light on this dark subject please read these articles here:

Salvation Is Of The Jews. Oh really, Is That So!?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/25/salvation-is-of-the-jews-oh-really-is-that-so-john-422/

The Jews are The Tares:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

And Pilate Wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/20/and-pilate-wrote-jesus-of-nazareth-the-king-of-the-jews/

I Know That (Ye Say) Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/john-837-i-know-that-ye-are-abrahams-seed-but-ye-seek-to-kill-me/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/what-is-the-word-gentile-doing-in-the-bible-part-1/

And Pilate wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS

The title for this article is from John 19:19 (KJV) and here is the complete verse:

John 19:19 (KJV) And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross (stake). And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Now elsewhere, here on my blog, I have already written an article entitled “Was Jesus Christ a Jew?” (see link below) where I prove, without a shadow of doubt, that Yashua Messiah was NOT a Jew.

However, this episode, at the end of Yashua Messiah’s life, and as horrendous as it was, is very much misunderstood by almost everybody. When I say to misinformed people that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew, their first port of call, or reference point, is this verse, which they ignorantly use in order to try and make their erroneous case for Him being a Jew.

They will say things like: “So are you saying that Pontius Pilate didn’t know what he was doing when he had the sign made?” And I reply: “Oh yes he knew EXACTLY what he was doing when he made that sign, but I bet it’s not what you’re thinking.”

The other the verse they will ignorantly use is this one:

John 4:22 (KJV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

I will cover this in a new article soon and rest assured that salvation is DEFINITELY NOT OF THE SERPENT SEED JEWS.

However, I have digressed somewhat. So, what was Pilate doing, and thinking, at that time when he made that sign? To answer this correctly requires some critical thinking which, generally, is very much in short supply these days. For the dumbed down masses it is much easier to allow others to do their thinking for them. They certainly cannot think for themselves, that’s for sure. This means they will NEVER question ANYTHING and accept, as a given, that Pilate did do the right thing when he made his sign for Yashua Messiah’s cross. The idea that it was a deliberate political wind up, on the part of Pilate, to the Talmudic Canaanite Jew Pharisees and their racial brethren in Jerusalem, would probably never enter into their dumbed down minds. And yet we have the evidence that this is exactly what Pilate did:

John 19:21 (KJV) Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.

Now this verse raises some interesting points:

1) We can see straight away that the Jews did not want Roman recognition or, possibly, universal non-Jewish recognition that they, The Jews, had crucified a king, whether He was allegedly their king or anyone else’s king.

2) Notice that the Jews accuse Yashua Messiah of claiming to be their king when He did no such thing. All He admitted to Pilate was the Truth that He was sent to be a King, but without any mention of whose King. So The Jews, in their arrogant vanity and conceit, jumped to the erroneous conclusion that Yashua Messiah had declared that He was their king when nothing could be further from The Truth.

3) He claimed to have come for His People – The Israelites, not the Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews who were, and are, the offspring, both literally and spiritually, of Satan the Devil. (see link below)

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I could and can assure him that the first Hebrews were definitely not Jews. The word ‘Jew’ cannot be found in the first eleven books of the Bible. (See links below)

4) Scripturally He was known as The Son of man (Adam) to let us know quite clearly He was NOT a son of anyone else. Eighty nine times the phrase “the Son of man” is used in the New Testament, just so that we get it through our thick heads who, exactly, Yashua Messiah was, and why it is was so important that we learned this fundamental TRUTH!! TWO SEEDS came out of The Garden and Yashua Messiah was descended from only one of those seeds, that is, Adam’s seed, and not the other. (see link below)

From Strong’s Concordance:

MAN – H120‘adam aw-dawm’ – from 119; ruddy i.e. a human being mankind (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.):–X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.

5) OK, so let’s be clear about this and build the backdrop to this event. The Jews were an unrelenting thorn in the flesh of The Romans and were always causing insurrections, rebellions and troubles. There were numerous Jewish zealots (terrorists as we would call them today) in Jerusalem and Judea who would attack Roman supply lines and infrastructure often killing Roman soldiers. Barabbas, whom the baying Jewish mob called out for and chose instead of Yashua Messiah, was a renowned zealot and murderer of Romans. So from these known facts, it’s not difficult to imagine Pilate’s opinions and feelings toward these renegade troublesome Jews. Here’s a quote from those times:

“The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force, one knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

— Marcus Tullius Cicero – 106 BC – 43 BC, Governor of the Roman province of Cilicia in the Roman Empire.

We then have the torment and guilt created in Pilate’s mind by these Jews, and their unrelenting demands upon him to find Yashua Messiah guilty of their evil trumped up charges. In turn, his own wife warns him to have nothing to do with Yashua Messiah, calling Him a righteous man. So we must assume that Pilate was troubled in mind when knowing he must give the order, under Jewish political pressure, to execute an innocent man. Therefore is it so hard to imagine that he would get his own back on these despicable Jews, by winding them up, with his provocative title “Jesus of Nazareth King of The Jews”.

Rest assured Pilate had no idea whether Yashua Messiah was the King of The Jews or not, and I doubt that he was really that interested either way, but one thing is for sure, he wanted revenge on the Jews and got it with his title.

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

The Jews are The Tares:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

The Prophetic Parable Of Lazarus And The Rich Man – Part 1

Introduction

This article could and perhaps should have been entitled: When Christians Die, Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord”? – Part 3, (see link below for parts 1 & 2), but that, to some degree, would be missing the point. The question of whether this passage of Holy Scripture proves or does not prove that we ‘go to be with The Lord’ when we die is really only a side issue. Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) intended theme and Spiritual thrust of this story has a different purpose altogether. Needless to say, this theme is totally missed or ignored by the Bible ‘experts’. Moreover, this parable is so well known, and so much discussed, it had to be used as the title of this article. You will therefore notice that I have deliberately referred to this passage of Holy Scripture as a Prophetic Parable, for that is what it is.

Now calling it a Prophetic Parable will upset many in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (mainstream Christianity), because it is one of their ‘golden nugget’ sections of the New Testament, which they misuse. This is because they use it to support their mythical ideas that they: 1) instantaneously ‘Go to be with the Lord’ when they die, that is, they go straight to heaven when they die (yet another lie) and 2) ‘sinners’ go straight to a fiery hell; otherwise known as Purgatory by deluded ignorant Papists.

However, unfortunately for them, the parable of Lazarus and the rich man is just that – a parable, and not a factual literal description of what happens when we die. It’s a Spiritual analogy, as are all of Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) parables.

The Rich Man and Lazarus

The Parable of Lazarus and The Rich Man

The Prophetic Parable

Luke 16:19 (KJV) There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day: 20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, 21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. 22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; 23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 And he cried and said, father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. 25 But Abraham said, son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. 26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. 27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father’s house: 28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment. 29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. 30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. 31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. (All emphasis mine)

Some interesting points before I move on. This parable can only be found in Luke’s Gospel and Lazarus is named, but the rich man remains anonymous. And don’t forget that it is mostly prophetic – for the future, that is, the near future, post Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection and the distant future at Yashua Messiah’s second coming – both events are involved in this parable.

The Explanation

So how do we know this story is a parable? Easy, the opening verse tells us straight away, because Yashua Messiah makes special reference to the colour of the rich man’s robes – PURPLE. Now this may seem, at first glance, all very trivial and insignificant, but nothing could be further from The Truth. Purple raiment is always synonymous with God, royalty, the priesthood and the counterfeit priesthood of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

FakeChurch-1-380x230

Two Fake Christians With One in Purple, and Wearing a Heathen Dagon Fish Hat

Exodus 26:1 (KJV) Moreover thou shalt make the tabernacle with ten curtains of fine twined linen, and blue, and purple, and scarlet: with cherubims of cunning work shalt thou make them.

Numbers 4:13 (KJV) And they shall take away the ashes from the altar, and spread a purple cloth thereon:

John 19:5 (KJV) Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And Pilate saith unto them, Behold the man!

Revelation 17:4 (KJV) And the woman (the mother of harlots) was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication.

In these four Scriptures we can see various connotations associated with purple cloth, but they have some things in common: God, Royalty, the Priesthood, and the counterfeit priesthood in Revelation 17. So, this rich man, dressed in fine purple linen, is symbolically a priest or a representative of the counterfeit priesthood and/or The Sanhedrin as it was known in the first century.

Now this parable is another of those parables that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently used in order to attack the hypocrisy of the Jewish Pharisee and Sadducee religious leaders. There they were, all dressed up for the part, but in reality they were “whited sepulchres” or “whited walls”, cold, ruthless and hollow and empty within – lacking any love or Spiritual substance. They were Spiritually dead with “throats like open graves”. Notice, too, this man lived it up everyday, well he was loaded with money and therefore a lover of filthy lucre, as were the Pharisee Jews, so why not eat, drink and be merry, eh?

Moving on, and as always, keeping it in the Spiritual dimension, we then have poor Lazarus who represents all those who are desirous and hungry, nay starving, for lack of Spiritual food, for lack of even just a few crumbs of Spiritual Truth and/or the Word of God. In the early first century that meant Moses and The Prophets, but in the prophetic future sense it is highlighting Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and His glorious message taught by His Messengers, that is, The Good News of Grace, Salvation and Eternal Life in the coming Kingdom of God.

On top of this poor Lazarus’ malnourished Spiritual condition is compounded by the trials of this life – his sores. As a Spiritual babe he is even tormented and spiritually attacked by dogs or spiritual prostitutes – or those of the circumcision, as described by Paul in Galatians – legalists and Grace killers.

Philippians 3:2 (MCV) Beware of Judaising mongrel dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the circumcision.

In Strong’s Concordance the Old Testament definition for ‘dogs’ is male prostitutes – sodomites:

Dog – H3611 – keleb – keh’-leb – From an unused root meaning to yelp, or else to attack; a dog; hence (by euphemism) a male prostitute: – dog.

Have you yet noticed the picture that is developing here? no man, unless he is being drawn to The Son by The Father, can be desirous for Spiritual food, so this means Lazarus represents those The Father is calling and has chosen! Notice, too, how we also have purple garments and spiritual prostitution in association – one with the other – the the purple robed dogs of the meaningless, vain Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

The next thing we must understand is that Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ), on numerous occasions said The Kingdom of God is at hand. What did He mean by that turn of phrase? Quite simply, He was referring to a time in the very near future or the time directly after His death and resurrection when Salvation would be made available to all those The Father would be calling and choosing through hearing the Messenger’s (apostles’) preaching.

Now keeping this Truth in mind we now continue with the parable, and next we have the death of Lazarus, here called a beggar, which means he is hungering and thirsting after mercy and righteousness plus justice and justification:

Matthew 5:6 (KJV) Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.

Notice here, too, that Lazarus is desirous to be fed the Spiritual scraps, not to mention the literal scraps of food, that fell from this selfish self-indulgent purple clothed minister’s table.

OK, so now we have Lazarus crying out for The Word of God – The Good News of The Kingdom, salvation and righteousness (justice and justification). However, what happens? he dies, but what kind of death is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) really referring to here, apart from a physical death?

Lazarus’ death here is symbolic of the watery grave of Baptism – the old Lazarus dies and then what happens – he is lifted up by the angels into Abraham’s bosom and his name is written in the Book of Life. This means he is lifted up a new man – born of God (born again) into Abraham’s bosom. How does that work? Who and what does Abraham represent? Easy, he represents faith and the faithful – he is the elder of the faithful and the man that the men dressed in purple fine linen thought they were descended from, and were supposed to represent, that is, the Spirit of The Law, not the letter of The Law.

Don’t forget, too, this message is being delivered by Yashua Messiah under the Old Covenant and Abraham’s Bosom is a forerunner or type of the Kingdom of God to be ruled by Yashua Messiah. Please note, Lazarus’ physical death, as with all those who are born of God (born again), has no hold over him, as his place in the Kingdom of God at Yashua Messiah’s return is assured. Make sure you understand that there is no resurrection of the dead for ANYONE until Yashua Messiah returns, and that includes Enoch and Elijah. (Future articles on this pesky subject coming soon)

1 Corinthians 15:36 (KJV) Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:

Colossians 2:12 (KJV) Buried with Him in Baptism, wherein also ye are risen with Him through the Faith (Abraham’s Bosom) of the operation of God, who hath raised Him from the dead.

Romans 6:4 (KJV) Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by The Glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. (All emphasis and brackets mine)

Now, notice, Lazarus is comforted in Abraham’s bosom and in the not too distant future, after The Lord’s death and resurrection, those called and chosen would also be comforted just like Lazarus. Comforted by whom? why, by Yashua Messiah of course. This proves that Yashua Messiah is using Abraham’s bosom here as a type for Himself in His Kingdom.

John 14:18 (KJV) I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.

In part two I will explain the meanings of the tormented sufferings or ordeals of the rich man.

The Parable Of Lazarus And The Rich Man – Part 2.

The Explanation continued

Now what of the rich man? He dies and is buried and comes to a place called hell. How does this work? because we know that the dead are dead and know nothing? (Please see link below to my article “Are Christians going to heaven?”) Yet this rich man is conscious and can see Lazarus in Abraham’s bosom and Abraham, too, is alive and can see him. So what is this all about and at what point in time is all this taking place?

First of all, it’s all about mental and spiritual torment, not physical torment. Secondly, the time is just after that time when the rich man, (representative of the Jews and counterfeit religious priesthood), will have been resurrected with all those who were called and chosen. This is the time of the return of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) to this earth and the First Resurrection. The rich man is like the five foolish virgins who ran out of oil. Here though, The Lord has taken the scenario one step further and placed the rich man in a metaphorical place of torment. This ‘hell’ is a point in time in the future where all the unrepentant men in purple robes will realise it’s too late, like the unwise virgins who discovered their purchased oil was useless. If we refer to the end of that parable, the unwise virgins are not allowed into the wedding feast and Yashua Messiah informs them that He does not know them even though they were given oil (Grace) in the first place. In this instance Yashua Messiah does not elaborate on their reaction to this horrendous news.

However, in this parable, we are told about the rich man’s ordeals and/or his reaction to the news that he has been excluded from the Kingdom of God – Abraham’s bosom – Salvation. He, like the unwise virgins at the beginning, was given oil – Grace or here referred to as the ‘good things’ – the Spiritual Law of Moses and the Prophets – The Gracious gifts of God to the priesthood. This rich man, like modern mainstream Christian ministers of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, had all the benefits the knowledge of God can bestow upon a man. His, (the rich man) and their wickedness, has resulted in the Children of God, that is, those they were, and are, responsible for, and supposed to look after (shepherd) were/are starving through lack of Spiritual food. So here he is, as a result, in wretched mental torment for his just reward:

Matthew 8:11 (KJV) And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven (God). 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (Wretched fearful mental torment and/or emotional ordeals).

Luke 13:28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in the Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out. (Wretched fearful mental torment and/or emotional ordeals).

Make no mistake, this rich man represents a “child of the kingdom” as are all those who are called into the ministry, but many run out of oil – Grace, and turn to religious form and legalism as a blasphemous replacement. Turning or making The Word of God to none effect. This parable was given as a warning to them and, notice, they understood The Lord’s parables so were, without excuse.

Luke 16:14 (KJV) And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.

Now in order to respond in this way, these men must have understood what Yashua Messiah was talking about. Only the Learners (disciples), after The Lord had explained to them the meaning, were privy to this understanding, that is, apart from these satanic men of religion.

Moreover, we now move on to where the rich man, in his ‘burning tormented’ condition catches sight of Abraham with Lazarus in his bosom and he cries out, but what is he crying out for? Just a drop of water from the tip of Lazarus’ finger. The thing is, if the rich man is in a real burning cauldron how is a drop of water on the end of Lazarus’ finger going to bring him any relief, how will it quench his thirst? Well, quite plainly it won’t, so what does this water represent? Again we return to the Spiritual Truth of Yashua Messiah:

Just One Drop of Water

Whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life

John 4:13 Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: 14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life. 15 The woman saith unto him, Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw.

Wow!! I think this is one of the most emotional and uplifting passages of Holy Scripture in The Bible. Here we can see the amazing God given wisdom of the woman, by the well, who longed to have her thirst quenched, once and for all time, by The Lord’s metaphorical Holy Spiritual water. Indeed, we can now see the water the rich man was crying out and pleading for, in a new Light. He knew what kind of water would be on Lazarus’ finger tip and he also knew that just one single drop would be enough to rescue him from his mental anguish and torment – a well of water springing up into everlasting life and him, being comforted by Yashua Messiah (Abraham’s bosom) in The Kingdom of God.

Furthermore, we then learn that there is a gulf between the rich man and Lazarus in Abraham’s bosom, a gulf that cannot be bridged from either direction. This gulf is the same gulf that denied the five unwise virgins a share of the oil from the five wise virgin’s lamps. This is a ‘never the twain shall meet’ situation. This situation can be likened to the sheep and goats, with one; the sheep on God’s right hand and the other; the goats, on His left – the sheep inherit and the goats do not. (see link below)

This is the future point in time that the rich man has reached and he vainly requests that Abraham send Lazarus from the dead to his five brethren who, again, remind us of the five unwise virgins. It was too late for them and it’s too late for the rich man’s brethren, the Grace has gone out of their lives.

We then get the killer verse. Verse 31 And He said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. Here in this verse Yashua Messiah is referring to Himself as the “one rose from the dead” and look at what He is saying. This verse not only covers the Jewish religious leaders of the first century, but brings us loud and clear into the last days which commenced on the first Pentecost AD 31. We are talking about so called men of God here, now in this age – ‘teachers’ and ‘preachers’, not the unsaved. Even though Yashua Messiah came and died to take all of mankind’s sins, was resurrected to give us new lives in Him or in ‘Abraham’s bosom’ and give us His glorious Grace, there are still those rich men who stand in their pulpits each week and ‘teach’ the same Pharisaical message against it – those men dressed in their fine purple linen – both metaphorically and/or literally!

Finally, and to end on a more positive note, we must also understand that the rich man’s punishment is only for a season – albeit a thousand year season, but eventually he will be part of the second resurrection as described in Revelation 20. The Father God does not remain angry forever, but vengeance is always His, and all the Lazarus’s of this world must be avenged.

“No one who has been martyred by the Jews should remain unknown. And no one who has been martyred by the Jews will remain unavenged.”

— Eustace Mullins

When Christians Die Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord”? – Parts 1 and 2:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/when-christians-die-do-they-instantly-go-to-be-with-the-lord-part-1/

Are Christians going to Heaven?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-christians-going-to-heaven/

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – 1 Timothy 3 – Part 6

Before reading this article I recommend that you read “Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Parts 1-4 and 5” first, to gain a full understanding of where I am coming from on this exposé of these highly suspect epistles. (see links below)

Now chapter 3 of 1 Timothy is a dead giveaway for satanic religiosity, with it being full of Nicolaitan hierarchical nonsense, with bishops here and deacons there; all lusting after their positions of POWER and AUTHORITY – as you do NOT, if you’re a real Christian and part of the egalitarian Church of God!!

OK, so let’s get straight on with the first two verses of 1 Timothy 3:

1 Timothy 3:1-2 (KJV) This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. 2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach.

1 Timothy 3:1-2 Notes Part 1: “This is a true saying.” he says, but is it a true saying? We shall see. If a man desire the office of a bishop! So let’s have a look at what the Greek MSS says about offices and bishops:

1 Timothy 3:1 (Greek Transliteral) Believing the saying if any-one of-on-noting (supervision) is craving of-ideal work he-is-on-feeling (desiring).

Now why would a humble Christian be craving an alleged position of supervision (authority), in a supposed church? Does this phoney creature fancy his chances of being ‘king of the heap’ in this congregation, or see himself as lording it over his brothers and sisters, whom, he perhaps feels are in need of a good whipping into shape? You betcha!

Is ‘supervision’ the right word, or would ‘overseer’ be a better word? I speak here as if giving the benefit of the doubt to most of the verses of 1 Timothy 3, that is, verses 1 through 13, as being genuine Pauline verses which, in truth, I will prove are not.

So what policy or agenda were the KJV translators trying to impart here, and promote, with this word ‘office’? Well obviously it’s administrative and GOVERNMENTAL, is it not? and nothing to do with egalitarian Christian brotherly and sisterly love and fellowship at all. This is the modus operandi of the pecking order system of the Nicolaitans which is being promulgated here – plain and simple.

We then get this 100% religious BS term ‘BISHOP’, translated from the Greek word ‘episkope’, which means an ‘overseer’, that is, someone who keeps a watchful eye, as a protector and guardian, over the flocks, and who, no doubt, was selected by the elders of the congregation as someone fit for the job, not some upstart who fancied himself as a big shot in his so-called local church and desired, that is, most likely lusted after the position.

1 Timothy 3:1-2 Notes Part 2: Not only that, but this religious, 100% mythical, lustful Hellenising bishop must be blameless, eh? That’s a tough call to say the least. Where do you find a blameless counterfeit Christian who fancies himself as a bishop? Nowhere! And vanity, not repented of, must be the first blot on the list with regard to the character of this would-be so-called ‘bishop’.

And then we get, and wait for it! ‘The husband of one wife’!! Wow!! What’s going on here? This suggests to me, that in these Hellenising congregations there were a few bods with MORE THAN ONE WIFE! Was this permissible in the first century congregations of God? I have no idea, but here’s something on it:

http://www.liquisearch.com/polygamy_in_christianity/early_church_period&p=6&pos=6

Either way, I am not really interested, other than in what went on in the true Congregations of God, and I doubt very much that polygamy was something practised by them, so, yet again, bringing into doubt the provenance of these so-called Pastoral Epistles.

After the ‘only one wife’ hoo ha we get: ‘vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach’. I find this totally hilarious! What kind of so-called Christians are we dealing with here? If the laity are prone to being a load of inhospitable, yobbish boozers who lack the character quality of vigilance, what’s going on? Are we having described for us here a load of reprobates or Christians?

Then we get ‘apt to teach’. So are these bishop candidates gifted with the Spiritual gift of teaching or not? I would say that if someone who fancies himself as a bishop, is NOT gifted with the Spiritual gift of teaching, he’s next to useless for the job.

1 Corinthians 12:28 (MCV) And God hath placed some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, pilotage or guides, diversities of tongues.

Notice how the list of gifted abilities above does not include governors, administrators, bosses, leaders or tin pot dictators.

I will leave it there and move on:

1 Timothy 3:3 (KJV) Not given to wine, no striker (no quarrelsome bruiser), not greedy of filthy lucre (not a lover of money); but patient (lenient), not a brawler (peace loving), not covetous; (Brackets mine)

1 Timothy 3:3 Notes: The comedy continues…and in the same vein as verse 2 we have all these worldly characteristics being highlighted, as if we were dealing with lost and unsaved reprobates. Unrepentant sinners no less, who, if truly under Paul’s stewardship and guidance, would have been severely reprimanded or admonished and possibly threatened with expulsion from The Church. Furthermore, what would such people be doing in a Christian fellowship at all, let alone stand to be considered as a candidate for a bishop overseer!? I trust you can see the ignorant nonsense message these verses portray.

1 Timothy 3:4-5 (KJV) One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; 5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)

1 Timothy 3:4-5 Notes: OK, this one could be taken as somewhat ambiguous: ‘one that RULETH well his own house’! Does this mean that the same rigid dictatorial mindset that operates in his household is then transferred to his local congregation? For it then says: ‘having his children in subjection with all gravity;’ so we have to assume that this transfer of strict ruler-ship is what the forger means by this, and then classifies it by adding in the gratuitous: (‘For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?’). ‘Taking care’ meaning ruling the roost? Still at least he got the name of The Church right.

Now don’t get me wrong, for a certain amount of no-nonsense discipline is definitely required when bringing up children properly, but, should this Victorian sounding, parent-child, disciplinary regime be transferred to the Church? Let’s be clear, sound informative Gospel teaching is all that is required when dealing with Christian adults, not a big stick pseudo-tyranny. My verdict, therefore, on these two verses is take from them what you will and for what they are worth, and use much wisdom. Always bearing in mind that the agenda being served here in these epistles is not a Christian agenda, but, rather, the Hellenising Religious agenda of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

1 Timothy 3:6 (KJV) not a new convert, lest having been puffed up he may fall to a judgment of The Devil;

1 Timothy 3:6 Notes: Now this sounds like don’t give the keys to your Ferrari and the booze cabinet to your 18 year old son, whilst you’re away for the weekend. The only thing I’ll add is this: Would the elders of genuine congregation of God be giving the position of overseer, with all the great responsibilities that that entails, to a boy or a novice new convert to the faith and to the fellowship? Not a chance!

1 Timothy 3:7 (KJV) and it behoveth him also to have a good testimony from those without, that he may not fall into reproach and a snare of The Devil.

1 Timothy 3:7 Notes Part 1: Now get a load of this! ‘and it behoveth him also to have a good testimony from those without’. YOU WHAT!!?? So are we to believe that Paul would have written this irrelevant worldly garbage? Are select members of God’s church now chosen based upon the so-called ‘good reports’ of worldly sinners or the lost and unsaved!? What business do the Spiritually dead and/or unregenerated have with The Church of God other than to be recipients of Christian good works? NONE! ZILCH! ZERO!

1 Timothy 3:7 Notes Part 2: ‘that he may not fall into reproach and a snare of The Devil’.

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

“Lest he fall into reproach, for his former scandalous life. And the snare of the devil. Snares and temptations, such as he fell in and fell by before. This is called the snare of the devil; for, as he well knows the constitution of such persons, and what is most likely to prevail, he infers that what was effectual before to their transgressing may be so still;”

Looks like repentance and forgiveness was non-existent in these illegitimate Hellenising fake churches, and in contrast, judging was a full time occupation. Let’s be clear about this, real Christians repent before they are Baptised. That means they TURN from their old ways, they give up their old lives and bury them in the watery grave of Yashua Messiah’s death/sacrifice. They then rise out of the water a new creation – a new man or new woman, not capable of sin; once gifted with The Holy Spirit. This means that if our former scandalous life is still held against us by certain people within this so-called church, then we have an untenable situation and those enforcing such a policy are judgemental, spiritual renegades and apostates, who do need dealing with.

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Rest assured, the clown who penned 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus hadn’t a clue about Christian regeneration.

1 Timothy 3:8 (KJV) Likewise must the deacons be grave, not double-tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre;

1 Timothy 3:8 Notes: Again, as before, what kind of Christians are we dealing with here, if they’re double tongued boozers and money grabbers? It would be hilarious if not so serious. It looks like matey, the second century author of these epistles, hasn’t a clue about regenerated Christians and Christianity.

1 Timothy 3:9 (KJV) Holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience.

1 Timothy 3:9 Notes: You what? What is he rambling on about? ‘mystery of the faith’? what mystery? how is SIMPLE faith in Yashua Messiah mysterious? is it not all very straight forward. Paul confirms it for us, doesn’t he?

2 Corinthians 11:3 (KJV) But I fear, lest by any means, as The Serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

If someone or something is simple to understand, where is the mystery? There is no mystery, but there’s plenty of mystery in the Cainite Babylonian MYSTERY Religion otherwise known as the Cainite-Judaeo-Christian Religion. (see links below)

He then, almost gratuitously, throws in ‘in a pure conscience’. Answer me this, dear readers, what kind of conscience does a regenerated Christian have, if it’s not pure? Does this author creature have any understanding at all? Is a Christian completely forgiven or not – is he or she beyond reproach or not, that is, beyond condemnation?

1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man that hath his hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.

Romans 8:1 (MCV) There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus.

1 Timothy 3:10-13 (KJV) And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office of a deacon, being found blameless. 11 Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things. 12 Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. 13 For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.

1 Timothy 3:10-13 Notes Part 1: Much of this is just a repeat of the nonsense that applied to their so-called bishops, however, there are one or two other issues within these verses: “Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things”. I will highlight once more, what kind of Christians are we dealing with here? Are they regenerated or not? Are they being led by the Spirit or not? All I see in these verses are the characteristics of the heathen, not born of God Christians.

1 Timothy 3:10-13 Notes Part 2: “For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.”

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

Verse 13. ‘That have used the office of a deacon well’ They who, having been tried or proved, 1Ti 3:10, have shown by their steadiness, activity, and zeal, that they might be raised to a higher office, are here said to have purchased to themselves a good degree.

Here we can graphically see explained for us by Adam Clarke the pecking order system of the Nicolaitans, that this forger is promoting. “If you do well then the sky is the limit and one day you could be a pope” This is the spirit that’s at work here – advancement as if an employee in a large corporation, which is exactly what the Cainite-Judaeo-Christian Religion is.

1 Timothy 3:14-16 (KJV) These things write I unto thee, hoping to come unto thee shortly: 15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth. 16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes – Part 1: Now the above last verses of 1 Timothy 3 are 50/50 in terms of Truth and religious hogwash. Verse 14 is irrelevant to the subject matter at hand, as the forger is quite obviously attempting to pass himself off as Paul. However, this statement is true, if the message is figurative: “how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the Truth.” If it’s not figurative, and the forger is referring to a literal CHURCH BUILDING, made with man’s hands, then he gives himself away in no uncertain terms. In fact it could carry a dual meaning, as we know how their grandiose church buildings and cathedrals would feature in the future, and then be referred to a house of God.

1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes – Part 2: “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness.” Once more we have this religious bunkum word ‘godliness’ which I previously unravelled in my earlier writings on 1 Timothy 2. (see link below).

1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes – Part 3: Finally we get this: “God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.”

“God was manifest in the flesh” I have no problem with that, but “justified in The Spirit” I am not so sure about. Did the only begotten Son of God need to be justified? And “believed on in the world”. Is this speaking generally or referring to a select few that He met on His travels? Not very clear is it?

Now also notice, how there is no mention of who Yashua Messiah really came for, so let me refresh your memories:

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

He also gave The Twelve disciples Learners explicit instructions:

Matthew 10:5-6 (KJV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Please take note: I am not referring to the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews when mentioning The Twelve Tribes of Israel.

To summarise, these last verses are probably the best verses in the whole chapter, but still leave a lot to be desired and certainly don’t let the Hellenising religious forger off the hook. 1 Timothy 4 coming up.

Unravelling the So-Called Pastoral Epistles – 1 Timothy 1 & 2 – Parts 1-4:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-pastoral-epistles-parts-1-2/

Unravelling the So-Called Pastoral Epistles – 1 Timothy 1 & 2 – Part 5:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/09/14/unravelling-the-so-called-pastoral-epistles-part-5-1-timothy-2/

What Is The MYSTERY of Mystery Babylon The Great?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-the-mystery-of-mystery-babylon-the-great/

The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/05/26/the-cainite-judeo-christian-religion/

Why Are There Two Resurrections? – Parts 1 & 2

Or perhaps I should say: What Are The Two Resurrections? For most people, that is, those deceived by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, haven’t a clue about the Two Resurrections. Most of them are fooled into believing their mickey mouse Rapture nonsense, which I expose for the fraud that it is in my article entitled: “Unravelling The Satanic Rapture Deception parts 1 & 2.” (See link below)

So why are there Two Resurrections? simply put, so that all Mankind (but NOT Serpent Seed hu-mankind) can be saved and have Eternal Life in the Kingdom of God: (See link below entitled: “The Jews are The Tares”)

John 3:16-17 (MCV) For God so loved the world The Creation, that He gave His Only Begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have Everlasting Life. 17 For God sent not His Son into the world The Creation to condemn the world The Creation but that the world The Creation through Him might shall be saved.

From Strong’s Concordance:

The World – G2889 – κόσμος – kosmos – kos’-mos – Probably from the base of G2865; the orderly arrangement, that is, decoration; by implication the world (in a wide or narrow sense, including its inhabitants, literally or figuratively [morally]): – adorning, world.

Now I can hear all those Evangelists (so-called) and Fundamentalist ‘Christians’, otherwise known as ‘Fundies’ for short, howling and screaming in disbelief. I can even see some of them jumping up and down and renting their clothes in their pain and anguish at hearing this ‘dreadful news’ – not a pretty sight, I might add!:

“Oh no! Oh no! What are we going to do now, now that we can’t send all those evil sinners to our fiery hell!!?? Doesn’t this messenger Charles character realise how much of an adrenaline kick we get out of telling all those ‘wicked wretches’ they’re going to burn in torment for eternity in our hell fire and brimstone? Who does he think he is, spoiling our party, spoiling our self-righteous parade, spoiling all our psychopathic fun, and rendering us useless and surplus to requirements? We’ll have nothing to do now we can’t threaten, abuse, bully, browbeat and blackmail the dissolute masses through the fear and intimidation of the wrath of our tyrannical Trinity and Monotheistic Ogre gods!” (See links below)

Well all I can say to you mongrel dogs is TOUGH! And now you can start working on your own repentance forthwith, ‘cos if you don’t, it’ll be you who feels the ‘fire and brimstone’, not the lost and the unsaved.

Moreover, as we can see from the above information, we have one of the foundational building blocks of the bad news message of Fundamentalist ‘Christianity’, that is, FEAR, the FEAR FACTOR, the fear of a permanently wrathful and tyrannical ogre god. They are literally attempting to ‘save’ people through severe pressure and fear tactics and/or blackmail. Do they ever stop and think about what they are saying and/or doing? No, not all. Do they ever read what The Holy Scriptures actually say? NO, not a chance!

Therefore, bearing all that in mind, and without further ado I will deal with The Second Resurrection, FIRST. Hey! hang on a minute, what do you mean – The Second Resurrection, there’s no such thing, I hear you say? Well clearly there is because The First Resurrection is definitely mentioned in the Holy Scriptures and if a First Resurrection is mentioned then, by default, there must be a Second Resurrection, otherwise why call it The First Resurrection!?

Revelation 20:4-5 (MCV) And I saw Thrones, and they (the saints) sat upon them, and judgement was given unto them: and I saw the souls spirits of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for The Word of God, and which had not worshipped The Beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is The First Resurrection.

So here we have explained to us The First Resurrection where those who are part of that First Resurrection reign in power, ON THIS EARTH, with Yashua Messiah for one thousand years – The Millennium.

Now take note of verse 5: BUT THE REST OF THE DEAD LIVED NOT AGAIN UNTIL THE THOUSAND YEARS WERE FINISHED! This is the First Resurrection! Right, once more, if we have a First Resurrection then it MUST follow that there is a Second Resurrection otherwise these people referred to as the “rest of the dead” will remain dead and will not live again!

Revelation 20:6 (MCV) Blessed and Holy is he that hath part in The First Resurrection: on such The Second Death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.

We then have The First Resurrection confirmed in verse 6 along with The Second Death which I will go into later. Also, notice, that The Second Death has no power over those who are part of The First Resurrection and if there is a Second Death then, again, by default their MUST be a Second Resurrection.

So what other evidence do we have for this Second Resurrection? Right here:

Ezekiel 37:1-14 (MCV) The hand of The LORD was upon me, and carried me out in The Spirit of The LORD, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones, 2 And caused me to pass by them round about: and, behold, there were very many in the open valley; and, lo, they were very dry. 3 And He said unto me, Son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord GOD, thou knowest. 4 Again He said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear The Word of The LORD. 5 Thus saith The Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live: 6 And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am The LORD. 7 So I prophesied as I was commanded: and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and behold a shaking, and the bones came together, bone to his bone. 8 And when I beheld, lo, the sinews and the flesh came up upon them, and the skin covered them above: but there was no breath in them. 9 Then said He unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith The Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live. 10 So I prophesied as He commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army. 11 Then He said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole House of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts. 12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. 13 And ye shall know that I am The LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves, 14 And shall put my Spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I The LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith The LORD.

These incredible prophetic verses from Ezekiel confirm two things for us:

1) The Second Resurrection is a physical resurrection, unlike The First Resurrection which is a Spiritual Eternal Resurrection, and a far superior resurrection. Hence John says: “Blessed and Holy is he that hath part in The First Resurrection.”

Here is The First Resurrection:

1 Corinthians 15:40-44 (MCV) There are also celestial heavenly bodies, and bodies terrestrial earthly: but the glory of the celestial heavenly is one, and the glory of the terrestrial earthly is another. 41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. 42 So also is The Resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption (capable of decay and death); it is raised in incorruption (incapable of decay and death – Eternal): 43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in POWER: 44 It is sown a natural (flesh) body; it is raised a Spiritual (eternal) body. There is a natural (flesh) body, and there is a Spiritual (eternal) body.

2) What Paul said in Romans:

Romans 11:26 (MCV) And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion The Deliverer, and shall turn away irreverence and disrespect towards God from Jacob.

Now mark this and mark it well, for Paul says ALL ISRAEL, not just some Israelites, but ALL OF THEM, that is, from Jacob/Israel, his Twelve Patriarch sons and ALL their descendants, onwards and up unto this day and into the future – millions, upon millions, upon millions of them, and 98% of them (I’m probably being generous here) UNREGENERATED SINNERS who died IN THEIR SINS and yet they will ALL BE SAVED! So WHEN and HOW will this miraculous event be achieved? Read on for the answer, but first you need to know who the Israelites are!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans/tribes that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,

Benjamin the youngest son,

Simeon

Levi – The Priesthood,

Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,

Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,

Issachar,

Zeebulon,

Gad,

Asher,

Dan,

Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD), Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah = The Jutes, not the Jews = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond (the river) Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

— Flavius Josephus, first century historian.

If you think I am wrong, try and apply this verse to the Jews – God’s promises to Abraham:

Genesis 13:16 (MCV) And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules, (Gibraltar) and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

So as we can see there will be millions upon millions of resurrected Israelites in the future Second Resurrection and ALL given brand new super physical bodies.

However, here’s a question for all you wretched ‘Fundies’ and ‘Evangelists’ out there. If The Father and Yashua Messiah are going to go to all this trouble of giving the Children of Israel super new healthy youthful physical bodies, only to then throw them straight into the Lake of Fire, where is the sense in that? Is the Godhead a Godhead of failure? Is the Godhead that wasteful? Are They into irresponsible behaviour and futile actions? Why not just leave them dead in their graves never to see the light of day again? I will therefore state this for the record: If this is what you think the Godhead are capable of doing, and willing to do, then the godhead you believe in are a pair of merciless vengeful tyrants, and not an ALL POWERFUL Godhead at all. In direct contrast the ALL POWERFUL Godhead I worship is Love, Mercy, Forgiveness, and administer JUSTICE at all times, not mindless injustice and/or psychopathic revenge!! Yes, They punish and will punish SEVERELY, make no mistake, but ALWAYS FOR GOOD REASON! As demonstrated here:

Luke 12:47-48 (MCV) And that (regenerated) servant (one who was, or is, called), which knew his Lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more

Here in these prophetic verses, full of foreboding for certain self-righteous people who think they are saved, we can see who will be more severely punished, AND TAKE NOTE, IT ISN’T THE LOST AND UNSAVED!! Make sure you register this TRUTH in your minds IF you’re one of those self-righteous ‘Evangelicals’ or ‘Fundies’ who goes round judging and condemning the lost and unsaved to hell fire and brimstone in the Lake of Fire – YOU have been warned in agape love.

Revelation 20:11-15 (KJV) And I saw a Great White Throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Strong’s Concordance:

Judged – G2919 – κρίνω – krinō – kree’-no – Properly to distinguish, that is, decide (mentally or judicially); by implication to try, condemn, punish: – avenge, conclude, condemn, damn, decree, determine, esteem, judge, go to (sue at the) law, ordain, call in question, sentence to, think.

So here we can see that The Second Resurrection is NOT about summary mass execution but, rather, judging or evaluating what these people did in their first lives, here in this age, as lost souls. Now pay very close attention to what the Holy Scriptures are saying and refrain from using any close minded thought processes or those erroneous ideas indoctrinated into your minds by satanic ravening wolves from their ‘hell fire and brimstone’ lecterns and pulpits. So what are the Holy Scriptures saying? Well to answer that, here is the non-judgmental Truthful version of that same passage of Holy Scripture:

Revelation 20:11-15 (MCV) And I saw a Great White Throne, and Him (Yashua Messiah) that sat on it, from whose face (countenance or presence) the earth and the heaven atmosphere fled away; and there was found no place for them (forever moving through the aether). 12 And I saw the Spiritually dead, small and great, stand before God; and The Books were opened: and another Book was opened, which is The Book of Life: and the Spiritually dead were judged evaluated, or matters were determined out of those things which were written in The Books, according to their works. 13 And The Sea gave up the Spiritually dead which were in it; and Death and Hell delivered up the Spiritually dead which were in them: and they were judged evaluated, or matters were determined, regarding every man and woman, according to their works.14 And Death and Hell were cast into The Lake of Fire. This is The Second Death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in The Book of Life was cast into The Lake of Fire.

Now make sure you understand this crucial point, for here we can see that the ‘DEAD’ are not dead at all, because they are standing before Yashua Messiah’s Great White Throne, so the word ‘dead’ is referring to another type of death, that is, SPIRITUAL DEATH! This means we have billions of Spiritually unregenerated dead people, standing before Yashua Messiah’s throne. I will also remind you that at this stage they have been resurrected into superb new physical bodies. Now just stop and think about that for a while and endeavour to picture this awesome scene.

OK, so let’s do it, let us picture the scene, there they all are, awaiting their evaluation and, notice, it’s all according to their works in this life, and we know that no one can be saved according to their works, so why is Yashua Messiah evaluating them according to their works when works cannot save them? In fact, why is Yashua Messiah evaluating them at all if He’s going to throw them all, unceremoniously, into the Lake of Fire anyway? Furthermore, we know that they are all sinners, because they are all Spiritually dead, so, again, why not just throw them all into The Lake of Fire, job done!? Why bother with a tribunal!? Are they not already condemned!? Yes they are and THAT is why they were DEAD IN THEIR GRAVES!! Through dying they have paid the penalty for their sinful lives in this life!

John 3:18-19 (MCV) He that believeth on Him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of The Only Begotten Son of God.19 And this is the condemnation, that Light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than Light, because their deeds were evil. (Yashua Messiah is The Light)

Are YOU beginning to see The Light? I do hope so.

Furthermore, here’s a more pertinent point: If Yashua Messiah has taken the trouble to resurrect all these billions of people, given them brand new super physical bodies, just imagine the Spiritual Power and energy involved in doing that. Now imagine the planning and organisational skills involved in this awesome event, not to mention the generation allocations to be made for each era:

1 Corinthians 15:22-23 (MCV) For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23 But every man IN HIS OWN ORDER: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at His coming.

Order – G5001 – τάγμα – tagma – tag’-mah – From G5021; something orderly in arrangement (a troop), that is, (figuratively) a series or succession: – order.

So with these huge events and Truths in mind, is Yashua Messiah then going waste all His Spiritual Power and energy and that of His saints and angels, after having evaluated these people, by throwing them all into The Lake of Fire? Now stop and think (and I know this will be hard and painful for some) and ask yourself if this scenario is realistic and if it makes any sense? Of course it makes no sense, because The Second Resurrection is all about giving these people their FIRST CHANCE for salvation. First chance!!?? I hear you say. Yes their FIRST CHANCE! How do you work that out? I also hear you say. Quite easily as it happens:

The PARABLE of The PARABLES!

Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And the disciples Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in Parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN. 12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13 THEREFORE I SPEAK TO THEM IN PARABLES: because they seeing, see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross (has grown fat, congealed and lazy), and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM. 16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

Now please read the above passage of Holy Scripture and endeavour to understand what’s going on here. Read it several times, if necessary, because this passage is crucial to gaining full understanding of the reason for Yashua Messiah’s mission to this earth. Now pay careful attention for He tells us some critical fundamental Truths. 1) First and foremost, He tells us plainly that His Gospel Message was only for a select few – His Learners (disciples). 2) He tells us that He uses parables in order to CONCEAL The Truth from the majority. 3) He also tells us that He does that in order to protect that same majority from the Power of His Word as they are not ready, not equipped, nor able to receive it. 4) He tells us that He has deliberately blinded them and made them deaf, so that they are incapable of seeing and hearing. 5) Yet at the same time it is their fault and not His, for their hearts have hardened towards their God, as prophesied by Isaiah. 6) So here we have this massive conundrum in that Yashua Messiah is deliberately withholding His Truth from them, whilst blessing only a select few, but at the same time blaming them for not being receptive. 7) Does this make Yashua Messiah grossly unjust? 8) Yes it does APPEAR TO, but only grossly unjust, IF we ignorantly think THIS LIFE is, or THIS AGE is, the only opportunity for salvation. 9) And that is the rub of this conundrum, which, in Truth, is not a conundrum at all, as THIS AGE is clearly NOT THE ONLY OPPORTUNITY for salvation.

Right! After having read the above for as many times as is necessary, you should now understand WHY all these billions of Spiritually dead people will be standing before Yashua Messiah’s Throne on The Last Great Day ready to receive the gift of another life and the opportunity of salvation. So make no mistake, for this Great Day will be the greatest day in mankind’s history, and it will be the very day when Yashua Messiah’s prophecy is fulfilled:

John 12:32 (MCV) And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, I will draw drag all men unto me.

Now most of the wretches in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion will tell you that this verse is referring to that period of time which commenced with Yashua Messiah’s death and Resurrection and His subsequent Ascension into heaven in the first century, but nothing could be further from The Truth, because Yashua Messiah has not drawn (dragged) ANYONE to Himself —- YET! In this age. Take note, The Father does ALL the drawing (dragging) to His Son Yashua Messiah in this age:

John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

Strong’s Concordance:

Draw – G1670 – ἑλκύω, ἕλκω – helkuō helkō – hel-koo’-o, hel’-ko – Probably akin to G138; to drag (literally or figuratively): – draw. Compare G1667.

Having got this far I KNOW there will be many scoffers and stiff necked rebels out there who will maintain that people DO have a chance for salvation, in this life, but reject it, and I would rebut that nonsense and tell them to read the above Holy Scriptures (Matthew 13:10-16) and keep reading them until The Truth has registered in their minds and onto their hearts or see my article: What is True Rejection of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ)? for complimentary reading. (See link below.)

OK, that’s about it for this opening article and I know there are many other side issues attached to it, which I will cover in future articles, so stay with it.

Unravelling The Satanic Rapture Deception parts 1 & 2.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-satanic-rapture-deception-parts-1-and-2/

The Jews are The Tares – fit only for burning!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

Do You Worship an Ogre god – Parts 1- 4
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/do-you-worship-an-ogre-god-part-1/

What is True Rejection of Jesus Christ?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-true-rejection-of-yashua-anointed-the-lord-jesus-christ/

Why Are There Two Resurrections? – Part 2

In part one I covered the foundational basics of The Two Resurrections, and from that foundational knowledge many interesting points and questions spring.

However, before I deal with those questions we must return to the subject of The First Resurrection in order to set the scene for The Second Resurrection, which does not occur until the end of The Millennium, that is, at the end of Yashua Messiah’s 1000 year reign on this earth (NOT IN HEAVEN) as King of kings and Lord of lords.

So what constitutes The First Resurrection, what’s it all about? Training for the resurrected saints is what it’s all about, along with training for the people under their rule. So who are these people that will be under their rule?

These people:

Revelation 7:4-8 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Children of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Napthali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Joseph (Ephraim) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

And these people:

Revelation 7:9 (KJV) After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before The Throne (of King David), and before The Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands. (Brackets mine)

And who are all these people that are made up of both Israelites and non-Israelites?:

Revelation 7:13-14 (KJV) And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they? And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of (the) Great Tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of The Lamb.

OK, so the first thing we learn about these two great numbers of people is the fact that they have survived The Great Tribulation, they have lived through it and survived, and now stand before Yashua Messiah’s Throne on this earth. That is, The 144,000 of Israel (The Israelites, NOT JEWS and see part one if you’re confused) along with a great multitude of other ethnic groups OF MANKIND – not hu-man kind!

First and foremost, these people are not resurrected saints, they are the people that The Father and Yashua Messiah have chosen and sealed in their foreheads, that is, set aside as special people to populate The Kingdom of God, just as They did with the EIGHT in Noah’s day, hence Yashua Messiah likened the end times events to those of Noah’s time:

Matthew 24:37-38 (MCV) But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be. 38 For as in the days that were before The Flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into The Ark.

Here we also see these same people likened unto virgins:

Revelation 14:1-5 (MCV) And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on The Mount Sion, and with Him an hundred forty and four thousand, having His Father’s name written in their foreheads. 2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: 3 And they sung as it were a new song before The Throne, and before The Four Beasts Living Creatures, and The Elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were REDEEMED (‘agorazo’) from the earth. 4 THESE ARE THEY WHICH WERE NOT DEFILED WITH WOMEN; FOR THEY ARE VIRGINS. These are they which follow The Lamb whithersoever He goeth. These were REDEEMED from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to The Lamb. 5 And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before The Throne of God.

Now from Strong’s Concordance we get this. Now NOTICE, first, the word REDEEMED which is from the Greek word ‘agorazō’:

Redeemed – G59 – ἀγοράζω – agorazō – ag-or-ad’-zo – From G58; properly to go to market, that is, (by implication) to purchase; specifically to redeem: – buy, redeem.

So all these people have been purchased as if from a market place, that is, purchased as slaves in chains like goods and chattels in a market place and set free.

Now here’s a question or two that stem from these verses: 1) Are the 144,000 men only? for it says that they are undefiled with or by women, and furthermore, 2) Are these people literally virgins in the sexual sense? NO a thousand times NO in answer to both questions. So if that’s the case, who are these WOMEN that both the men and the women of the 144,000 are not defiled by? Answer COUNTERFEIT CHURCHES – Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism and Protestantism – all whoring religious prostitute ‘churches’ of The Devil.

This means that the 144,000 will be those from the secular world who have not been contaminated by the vile Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. It also means that they will not have heads full of religious garbage that would need unlearning and disinfecting, first, before they begin to learn The Truth; their hearts and minds will therefore be more ready to receive The Truth, and all uncluttered by satanic religious nonsense – they are and will be SPIRITUAL VIRGINS!

OK, moving on. Now pay special attention, for NONE of these people are Serpent Seed Canaanites, that is, no Jews, no Turks (Edomites), no black Africans and no Chinese, to name the principle hordes descended from Cain/Canaan. Yes, there are other Canaanite tribes, but not of importance for this article.

So what ethnic groups will make up this great multitude, I hear you ask? Quite simply they that constitute the rest of MANkind, who are not specifically of Israel, but are distant relations through Noah and his three sons. Some are more closely related to the Israelites, because they will be of Shem (White). For example The Assyrians (The Germans), Slavs, Poles and Russians, but others less so, if they are descended from Japheth (yellow Orientals), The Japanese and Ham (Spaniards, Ethiopians and Indians, and olive swarthy browns). However, the main issue here is that they are ALL OF MANKIND – ALL are from Adam and Eve, via Noah and his sons, and none will be of Cain/Canaan – The Serpent Seed from Ham’s incestuous relationship with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife).

Having said that many Canaanites will also survive The Great Tribulation, but will not inherit The Kingdom of God as described here:

Matthew 25:31-34 (MCV) When The Son of Man shall come in His Glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then shall He sit upon The Throne of His Glory (King David’s Throne here on this earth): 32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: 33 And He shall set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then shall The King say unto them on His right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit The Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

NOTICE first how these verses are dealing with NATIONS! This passage of Scripture is dealing solely with ethnicities and only those ethnic groups on His right hand (the Sheep) will inherit The Kingdom, NOT those ethnic groups on His left (The Goats).

So are you saying that no inbred Canaanites will enter The Kingdom of God? As far as I see and with what information The Holy Scriptures give us, the answer to that question is a RESOUNDING YES! (See link below)

Matthew 13:41-42 (KJV) The Son of Man shall send forth His angels, and they shall gather out of His Kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Now when does this event occur? Well it tells you, doesn’t it? Yashua Messiah’s Kingdom has now arrived and yet there are still people doing iniquitous things, so who could these people be? Why, none other than The Goats with their satanic Serpent Seed inbred blood. Inbred blood which is offensive to Yashua Messiah, which no doubt includes their accompanying diabolical satanic unrepentant behaviour. Hence Luke’s Gospel tells us what Yashua Messiah will do to those with this degenerate rebellious unrepentant mind set:

Luke 19:27 (MCV) But those mine enemies, (the Serpent Seed Jews and other Serpent Seed Canaanites) which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

So there we have it. ALL those not prepared to be ruled over by Yashua Messiah as King of kings and Lord of lords in His Kingdom will be for the chop.

However, what else does this verse tell us? Quite simply that these inbred wretches are PHYSICAL BEINGS, not resurrected SPIRITUAL BEINGS. How do you know that, I hear you say? Easy, because they can be slain and will be slain before Yashua Messiah on His Throne and only physical beings can be slain, not spiritual beings – justice will be done. This event, therefore, proves that physical beings will be present in The Kingdom of God, not just the resurrected spiritual saints who will be ruling with Yashua Messiah as His kings and royal priests.

OK, that just about rounds up the basics of The Two Resurrections, in part three I will go into some of those spring off questions.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

 

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 1

Introduction

This series of articles will set about unravelling one of the biggest deceptions in the King James Bible – the word ‘Gentiles’. This will be no easy task due to the ignorance or deliberate deceiving intentions of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translators of the KJV Bible – the principal culprit being the papist philosopher and humanist Desiderius Erasmus who put together the first Greek New Testament in 1512; this with a humanist agenda and associated philosophy(s) in play and no doubt, influencing his work. ‘Improved’ editions followed the 1512 edition. The martyr William Tyndale (1491?-1536), a contemporary of Erasmus, used Erasmus’ Greek New Testament when translating his English version. These earlier translations were then used by the translators of The KJV (1604-1611) along with The Great Bible (1539).

So why am I asking this question, it’s all very straight forward, isn’t it? Gentiles are non-Jews, aren’t they? Well that’s what we’re led to believe by the satanic blanket use of this, one-size-fits-all, infernal word, but is it True? What if the word ‘Gentiles’ means something else, something entirely different? Where will we be then? apart from being very confused and even upset and angry that we have been so deceptively and easily deceived. Some would say brainwashed, and completely duped; conned no less. To compound the problem the wretched word ‘Gentiles’ can be found throughout the King James Bible in both Old and New Testaments; 129 times in all, in 121 verses and here is its first usage in Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Gentiles (H1471) divided in their lands; every one after his own tongue, after their families, in their nations (H1471).

Now take note, for here we have the first use of this misleading word ‘Gentiles’ and with the same Strong’s reference number for both words in this verse. This occurs very early on in the Genesis historical account of Noah and his sons Ham, Shem and Japheth, and their families, before any Chosen Israelites or Canaanite Jews were even born:

Genesis 10:1 (MCV) Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.

No Israelites or Jews, so therefore no non-Israelites and no non-Jews, that is, alleged ‘Gentiles’ so why is the word already in use?

Furthermore, and as an aside, you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first 11 Books of The Bible and yet, here we have this deceptive word ‘Gentile’ in use where there is no way it can be referring to people or tribes of people who can be classified as non-Jews, as there were no Jews present at that time. So what’s it all about and, again, why is the word there at all?

Well let’s see what the word ‘Gentile’ really means so that we can begin to unravel this evil corrupting conundrum. First the etymology:

From the Online Etymology Dictionary:

Gentile – “From Late Latin noun use of Latin gentilis; “of the same family or clan, of or belonging to a Roman gens,” from gens (genitive gentis) “race, clan,” from PIE root *gene- “give birth, beget,” with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.”

From Wikipedia:

Gens – In ancient Rome, a gens (/ˈɡɛns/ or /ˈdʒɛnz/), plural gentes, was a family consisting of all those individuals who shared the same nomen and who claimed descent from a common ancestor.

Then we have the Biblical definition from the Hebrew in Strong’s Concordance:

Gentiles – H1471 – גֹּי גּוֹי – gôy gôy – go’ee, go’-ee – Apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts: – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

And then from Strong’s again with the Greek definition from the New Testament:

Gentiles – G1484 – ἔθνος – ethnos – eth’-nos – Probably from G1486; a race (as of the same habit), that is, a tribe; specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

Notice how the word has allegedly changed in its meaning from an OT usage to a NT usage!! No mention of Jews and non-Jews in the OT definition but, hey presto, surprise surprise, in the NT, all of a sudden, it does mean non-Jews!! Who decided to give it this new meaning!!?? The plot thickens, does it not?

So there we have it, the main definitions and NONE referring to Jews or non-Jews apart from Strong’s meaningless, peer pressure implied corrupting afterthought in brackets. The etymology plainly tells us that a ‘Gentile’ is from the Latin ‘gentilis’ and means someone who is not a Roman or not a Roman citizen and is nothing to do with people being either Jews and/or non-Jews.

We then get the Hebrew definition for ‘Gentile’ which clearly states ‘goy’ or a ‘foreign nation’ or, better, an Abrahamic or Israelite ‘nation’, so if we re-paste Genesis 10:5 we can more accurately translate it:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Goyim or nations (H1471 – Gentiles) divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.

In support I will include the Septuagint Greek Transliteral OT for Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (Septuagint Greek Transliteral) From out of these separated islands of the nations (Hebrew Goyim) in their land each according to tongue among their tribes and among their nations. (Brackets mine)

As stated earlier the above verse does not refer to Jews or non-Jews, it clearly applies to Noah and his family only, that is, before any Israelites or Jews had been born. This also means that Semites from Shem were also classified as Goyim or Nations as can be supported by this proof, that of God speaking to Abram:

Genesis 12:2 (MCV) And I will make of thee a great Goy (H1471 – Goy – Nation), and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

And again with The Lord speaking to Isaac’s wife Rebekah:

Genesis 25:23 (MCV) And the LORD said unto her, Two nations (H1471 – Goy – Nation) are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.

OK, so the word ‘Gentiles’ is not being used here in this verse, but the word ‘Nations’ is being used, and yet it is translated from the same Hebrew word H1471 Goy or Goyim. So we have the Semitic Hebrews Isaac and Rebekah with twins in her womb being referred to as GOY!!

So how come this same Hebrew word ‘Goy’ is here translated as ‘Nation’, a Hebrew Semitic nation no less, and elsewhere it’s translated as ‘Gentile’ with the translator’s intended meaning being that of a foreign nation? And who is the foreign nation foreign to? Which of these nations is not foreign, they’re all descendants of Noah aren’t they? Are you beginning to see the picture? What a ‘flexible’ and ‘useful’ word this ‘Gentiles’ word is (much sarcasm by the author and the accompanying mirth)!

So, with regard to all the other usages, who has made these translation determinations? Who has decided what kind of nation? Now we’re getting to it, and the answer? the agenda driven religious dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who had to preserve their pro-Jewish agenda deception, no matter what the cost to The Truth of the Holy Scriptures. Confusion and chaos was definitely the order of the day with these deceivers.

From “WHO ARE THE GENTILES?” by Bertrand L. Comparet and taken from “Your Heritage.”

“You may be surprised to know that there is no such word (as Gentile) in the Bible, in its original language. Oh yes, I know that you are now riffling through the pages of your King James Bible, looking for some of the many places you will find Gentile in it. However, I said that there was no such word in the original languages. The word was put into it by translators, who changed the wording of the Bible centuries after the last book of the Bible was written.”

And again from Comparet:

“The word Gentile is not once used in any Hebrew manuscript of the Old Testament. There is a very good reason for this, there is no such word in Hebrew, nor any word that corresponds to it. Everywhere you find the word Gentile used in the Old Testament, it is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word goi (goy), which means nation, the plural form of it is goyim. Since it means nation, why didn’t they translate it correctly? Sometimes they did, but for the most part they translated it to fit the official doctrines of the church of their day. It didn’t matter what violence that did to the true meaning of the word.”

Always good to get confirmation, eh? Please note that I am not a disciple of Comparet’s.

Moving on, and to firm up what I have already said, I will now quote Genesis again in reference to Jacob/Israel and his two grandsons Ephraim and Manasseh (Joseph’s sons), whom Jacob declared as being true Israelites even though their mother was Egyptian:

Genesis 48:17-19 (MCV) And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father’s hand, to remove it from Ephraim’s head unto Manasseh’s head. 18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head. 19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he (Manasseh) also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother (Ephraim) shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations (H1471 – Goyim).

So what do we have going on here!? Let’s be clear, for here we have two Hebrew Israelite lads being blessed by their Hebrew Israelite grandfather, Jacob/Israel, who is saying that one of them, along with his descendants, shall be a great goy (nation) and the other who shall become a great company, or commonwealth, or multitude of goyim (nations). This means we have Hebrew Israelites being called goy and goyim – WHAT!!!!??? This is enough to give the Jews apoplexy!! LOL. Just as well then that the Jews are not Israelites, so they are an irrelevance, until we get to the NT where we see them in their true Serpent Seed Canaanite light as the Christ killers. (See the links below for the true identity of the Jews and their origins)

However, where does this leave us with regard to this word ‘Gentile’ which we now know is a gross deception and means GOY (singular) and GOYIM (plural) and in turn means Israelite NATION or NATIONS! It also leaves us with the bigger problem of checking out every use of the word ‘Gentile’ but, more importantly, learning what is meant by the use of the word in that particular context. Is it being applied to Israelites, to non-Israelites, to Canaanites, to Greeks, to heathen barbarians/pagans, and, especially in erroneous association with the Jews? What are the Holy Scriptures REALLY alluding to in these differing cases?

As an aside, for those of you not aware, the words ‘goy’ and ‘goyim’ are frequently used by the Jews when describing non-Jews in an elitist put-down and derogatory manner. Other times they will call us ‘cattle’ such is their ignorant, arrogant, evil contempt for all other ethnic groups. Here are some examples:

“The differences between Jews and gentiles are not religious, historical, cultural or political. They are, rather, racial, genetic and scientifically unalterable. The one group (Gentiles) is at its very root and by natural constitution “Totally Evil”, while the other (Jews) is “Totally Good.””

— Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut by Rabbi Saadyi Grama

“A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from Holiness.”

— The Chabad-Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson

“We have to recognise that Jewish blood and the blood of the goy are not the same thing. Every law that is based on equating goys and Jews is completely unacceptable.”

— Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

How about that for satanic belligerence and arrogance!? This also tells us that Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, apart from being rabid racists, are not the sharpest tools in the box, having not studied The Holy Scriptures, and, despite all the BS we hear about their mythical cleverness and high intellect.

OK, just one more point from Genesis 48:19 where it refers to Manasseh as being ‘a people’ and from Strong’s, once more, we get:

People – H5971- עַם – ‛am – am – From H6004; a people (as a congregated unit); specifically a tribe (as those of Israel); hence (collectively) troops or attendants; figuratively a flock: – folk, men, nation, people.

As we can see, the Israelites descended from the Patriarch Manasseh were to become a great people, a tribe, or a troop, or a flock and/or a great nation, that is, a great goy.

Any the wiser? I hope so, if not, then press on to Part 2 for all will be revealed.

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 2 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites and The Canaanite Jews

So how do we discern what is really meant by the word ‘Gentile’? Well, first and foremost we have to learn who the Israelites were in Biblical history and, of course, who the Israelites are today, because without this crucial foundational knowledge you’re always going to flounder in your understanding like those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,

Benjamin the youngest son,

Simeon – The Scythians – The Scots

Levi – The Priesthood,

Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,

Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,

Issachar,

Zeebulon,

Gad,

Asher,

Dan,

Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes not the Jews) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules (The Strait of Gibraltar), and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.” (Brackets mine)

For further knowledge about True Israel see link below entitled: “The Jews are The Tares”

OK, so now that you know who The Israelites are, I will go straight to the last book of The Bible as the starting point of this study, for this is where it all has to culminate or climax. Six thousand years of Israel’s and mankind’s history are focused here, that is, just prior to Yashua Messiah’s return to this earth. From this starting point we can then go back and work our way through a few relevant Scriptures to make the case for a ‘Gentile’ free Bible. This will then show you, so that you fully understand, the evil deception that has taken place, that is, through the use of this useless and deceptive word ‘Gentiles’:

Revelation 7:4-8 (MCV) And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Sons and Daughters of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Napthali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Joseph (Ephraim) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

Now here is the question I always ask of those that worship and suck up to the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews as the chosen people, that is, satanic ‘Christian’ Zionists and those of their satanic ilk: “If the Jews are the chosen people, then tell me who these twelve tribes or nations of people are today – identify them if you can?” To date I have never had an answer from any of these wretched deluded people. And why is that? Simply, because the Jews are just one ethnic group – one tribe, not twelve tribes, and a tribe that is not even Semitic, they’re not Hebrews, nor are they of Israel! In fact, the Jews truly are the Gentiles or the Goy, if we were to use their words with their intended meanings. However, we’re not using their disingenuous words, so who are the Jews? The Jews are Shelahite Hamitic Canaanites, The Serpent Seed from The Garden, not Semitic Israelites. (Please see Genesis chapter 38 and the links below for all the details about the True Israelites and identity of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews).

So where are we now? for we have taken the Jews out of the equation completely and we’re now dealing with a totally different ethnic group, namely the True Israelites who became 12 modern nations or 12 modern goys. But what about the non-Israelites, how do we identify them? Answer, we don’t when confronted with this accursed word ‘Gentile’, but what we do learn is that The Holy Scriptures are mostly about the nation or goy of Israel and the Israelites and not about foreign nations at all, other than when they are specifically mentioned, come into contact with, and interrelate with the nation of Israel. This applies equally to the NT as it does the OT. Examples of the other nations in the OT being the tribes of Canaanites (the Hittites Jebusites, Kenites etc.) the Moabites, The Amorites, the Philistines, the Egyptians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians and the Persians etc. In the NT we get the Romans, the Greeks, the Samaritans, the Edomites (Herod) and the Canaanite Jews to name a few.

This means we’re left with three principal ethnic groups of people, those from the nations of Israel, the Adamic/Noahide mankind nations not of Israel and then the foreign heathen nations of the Serpent Seed, headed up by the Jews, namely the Canaanites. The Canaanites and/or the alien foreign nations, are hu-man kind and the Israelites, plus the other nations, are mankind. ‘Hu’ from the British Gaelic and Old English tongues means ‘serpent’ so a ‘hu-man’ is a serpent man, not a man. With these truthful elements in mind we will now unravel the infuriating use of this word ‘Gentile’.

Now here’s a thing. In the OT, ‘Gentile’ means Goy or nation – any nation, and ‘Gentile’, in the NT, means ‘Ethnos’ which must also mean ‘Goy’ or any other nation, if only to keep the continuity going. OK, in Strong’s NT definition it doesn’t say Goy, but when it came to identifying the differing peoples, nothing changed from OT times to NT times, the same ethnic groups were still around. It would, therefore, be foolishness to surmise that the pesky word ‘Gentile’ had changed from its OT Hebrew meaning when using the NT Greek word ‘Ethnos’. Moreover, this must mean that ‘Gentile’ (‘Ethnos’) is nothing to do with being a non-Israelite or a non-Jew unless the context of the verse determines it.

Having said all that I trust that you’re still with me, for I do know that it’s a very complex and confusing subject and we must understand that this confusion has been sown, either through ignorance or to serve a subversive pro-Jewish agenda in order to conceal the true identity of The Serpent Seed Jews and, of course, the True identity of the Twelve Tribes of Israelite peoples – The Goy and/or The Nations.

The other agenda at play here is that of the Papists who have always maintained their counterfeit claim to being ‘spiritual’ Israel, that is, the satanic Roman Cult Church having replaced the Abrahamic Covenant True Israel. Laughable or what?

So let’s copy and paste a few verses here that use the word ‘Gentile’ and expound on them to reveal their true meaning:

3 John 1:7 (MCV) Because that for His name’s sake they went forth, taking nothing of the Gentiles (G1484 – Ethnos)

Now in this verse we have the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ in the context of Messenger John’s epistles, but to whom are his epistles addressed? Many Bible ‘scholars’ say that they are to non-Israelite potential converts and non-Israelite Christians at Ephesus. Others say that John was living in Ephesus at that time and the epistles were written to the congregations at Corinth. However, are either of these stories true? Maybe, but a more likely narrative is that of Augustine of Hippo who stated that John’s epistles were written to The Parthians north of the Euphrates river. Now who resided there in the first century? Why, none other than the Ten Tribes of Israel, which means we have John fulfilling Yashua Messiah’s command to His Twelve Learners to go the lost Tribes of Israel ONLY!

Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These twelve Yashua sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles (Canaanite Jews and other non-Israelites), and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He (Yashua Messiah) answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Therefore this means that in 3 John 1:7 they took nothing of their fellow Israelites – Ethnos – Goyim – Nations.

Moving on with more evidence:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

Right, once again, who was Peter speaking to? for unless we know that, we will be stumbling in the dark and not be able to work out who these ‘Gentiles’ are. So let’s copy and paste the first verse of 1 Peter 1:

1 Peter 1:1 (MCV) Peter, a messenger of Jesus Christ, to the STRANGERS scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

From Strong’s Concordance:

Strangers – G3927 – παρεπίδημος – parepidēmos – par-ep-id’-ay-mos From G3844 and the base of G1927; an alien alongside, that is, a resident foreigner: – pilgrim, stranger.

So who were these ‘strangers’ or ‘resident foreigners’ that Peter was speaking to? See Matthew 10:5-6 above.

Moreover, if Peter was sent to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (and he was) and he is addressing people here called ‘strangers’, who could these ‘strangers’ be other that lost Israelites? here called ‘aliens alongside’, ‘resident foreigners’ and/or ‘pilgrims’? Sojourners might be a another name we could call them, that is, settled, but only temporarily settled for they were still in the process of migrating west into Europe and eventually into Britain.

However, we also need to understand that the places listed, that is, Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, that Peter was sent to are in Northern Asia (northern modern Turkey) where Paul was restrained by the Holy Spirit from venturing into. The reason for that being that Paul was the messenger to the non-Israelite peoples of mankind, that is, non-Israelite Semites and Hamites. Here is the Scripture to confirm what I have said:

Acts 16:6 (MCV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Spirit to preach The Word in Asia.

As an aside and just to let you know that it was Yashua Messiah restraining Paul through The Holy Spirit and not The Holy Spirit operating of itself. (Please see my articles below re The Trinity Blasphemy and The Duality Godhead)

Now why was Paul forbidden entry into Northern Asia? Easy, because that was Peter’s manor – Peter’s territory, where some of The Lost Tribes were residing and they were NOT ‘Gentiles’ as in the word’s intended erroneous meaning – they were Israelites. However Peter is making the comparison between these ‘stranger’ Israelites residing in a foreign land and the ‘Gentiles’ and I’ll post the verse again:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

So who are these ‘Gentiles’ that Peter is allegedly referring to? Well plainly they were heathen non-Israelites, so not God’s chosen people and they could have been of any of the other ethnicities whether of Noahide mankind or Canaan’s hu-man kind (Canaanites). Here, Peter is teaching his Israelite audience that their previous heathen ways of behaving (Gentile behaviour) were not good or helpful to God’s chosen people. Especially if The Father was calling any of them. This is an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ being used in its traditional sense.

Moving on once more we have this verse:

1 Timothy 3:16 (MCV) And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was made apparent in the flesh, justified in The Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into Glory.

So who did Yashua Messiah preach to? Who did He come for?

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (The Ten Tribes).

So here, yet again, we see the deceptive use of this erroneous word ‘Gentiles’ which is translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’ which means ‘Goyim’ and in turn means ‘Nations’, but which nations? Easy, in this case it must be the Israelite Nations because that is who Yashua Messiah declared He was sent to – NOT the heathen foreigners.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 (MCV) For ye, brethren, became followers of the Ecclesia of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen (fellow-tribes-men – Israelites), even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles Ethnos/Goyim/Nations that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the uttermost.

OK, so what do we have revealed to us here? First and foremost Paul is speaking to his fellow-tribes-men, for he refers to them as‘brethren’ who had become followers of Yashua Messiah. He then goes on to make it plain that they had suffered at the hands of their own fellow-tribes-men (Israelites) non-believers, who also had suffered at the hands of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, even though these fellow Israelites were not called and members of the Ecclesia. Sound familiar? We then have Paul stating that they, the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, both killed Yashua Messiah and the Prophets of Old Testament times. Furthermore he says that they tried to stop Paul from preaching to the GENTILES!!!

Now who are these ‘Gentiles’, because we already have the Israelites mentioned as ‘brethren’ to Paul and as fellow-tribes-men? Well that makes it plain, does it not? for here, again, we have the word ‘Gentiles’ meaning non-Israelites.

Here is another example:

Ephesians 4:17 (MCV) This I say therefore, and testify in The Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,

So to whom is Paul speaking? Non-Israelites is the answer. How do we know this? Easy, because no Israelites were resident in Ephesus. They were living in Northern Asia = Peter’s territory, not southern Asia where Ephesus was situated – Paul’s territory. Therefore we have Paul behooving these Ephesian non-Israelite believers to henceforth not behave in the same way as their fellows who were lost and degenerate non-Israelite Ephesians.

Matthew 10:17-18 (MCV) But beware of men Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; 18 And ye shall be brought before governors and kings (shabbos goy Jew pawns) for my sake, for a testimony against them, the Gentiles (Ethnos – Goyim – Israelite Nations and Foreign Nations).

Here we have an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ covering a multitude of sins, for it does not mean just non-Israelites, it also means Israelites as well. If, in the future, we are arrested for Yashua Messiah’s sake and brought before the criminals in power, we will be a testimony to all people, including our fellow Israelites. That means this word ‘Gentiles’ (‘Ethnos’ or ‘Goyim’) is being used in an all encompassing fashion for both Israelites and non-Israelites alike. Which, in turn, equates to its Old Testament usage where we saw Abram and his Israelite descendants referred to as ‘Goyim’‘Gentiles’‘Nations’. This, in turn, makes a total mockery of the translator’s intended meaning, that is, solely for the describing of heathen non-Jews.

Romans 1:13 (MCV) Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

So to whom is Paul speaking? Take note, so that you fully understand what is going on here. First of all Paul is addressing fellow tribes men (Israelite brethren) NOT fellow Christian brethren, because he adds the rider: “That I might have some fruit among you also!” So as he writes they are not yet regenerated brothers of Paul (Christians) and yet he calls them BRETHREN! Now notice how the translators have written it as “even as among OTHER GENTILES” This means that according to the translators we have Paul referring to unregenerated Israelites as ‘Gentiles’! How confusing is that?

Moreover, don’t forget that ‘Gentiles’ means ‘Ethnos’ or ‘Nations’ or ‘Goy’ so Paul could easily be referring to dispersed Israelites living amongst other nations.

OK, that’s it for part two, more revelations in part three.

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Exposing The Trinity Lie
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

The Duality Godhead
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 3 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites, The Canaanite Jews and Now The Greeks

In parts one and two I have revealed some, but not all, of the problems created by the use of the wretched word ‘Gentiles’. In the third part of this article we move on to another word which compounds and makes the word ‘Gentiles’ even more confusing than it already is.

OK, so let’s move on to the word ‘Greeks’ and why use the word ‘Greeks’ and not ‘Gentiles’. Why use two different words to describe the same thing? Greeks are ‘Gentiles’ aren’t they? that’s if we stick to their erroneous use of this irritating word, yes of course they are, so what’s going on? Well could it be that nearly all the uses of the word ‘Gentiles’ are referring to The Lost Ten Tribes of Israel (The Nations) and not to non-Israelites at all. This means that when non-Israelites was the intended meaning they used the word ‘Greeks’.

Here’s the first example:

John 7:35 (KJV) Then said the Jews among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles?

Correct translation:

John 7:35 (MCV) Then said the Jews Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, (not the Israelites), among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed (The Lost Israelites, that is, The Diaspora) among the Gentiles Greeks and teach the Gentiles Greeks.

So what have we here? Quite simply yet another deceptive variation on the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ where it is mistranslated from the Greek word ‘Hellen’ pronounced ‘Hellane’, and the Hellens were most likely the Greek speaking non-Israelite peoples. However, some of these Greek speakers may well have been migrating Israelites as well, although most would have been ethnically Greeks. However, we’re still left with the conundrum of why did they use the word ‘Gentiles’ when it should have been ‘Greeks’?

Moving on and just to set the scene, here is yet another anomaly to prove my case:

Romans 2:9-10 (MCV) Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also of the Gentile Greek 10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also to the Gentile Greek.

Once again, the word ‘Gentile’ here is translated from the NT Greek word ‘Hellen’ (Strong’s reference G1672) pronounced ‘Hellane’ and yet it is written as ‘Gentile’ and not ‘Greek’. In this case ‘Gentiles’ is not translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’. How confusing is that? Where is the consistency? These translators of the KJV were supposed to be learned men, so what were they up to?

For confirmation we get:

Mark 7:26 (MCV) The woman was a Greek, a Syrophoenician by nation; and she besought Him that He would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Greek – G1674 – Ἑλληνίς – Hellēnis – hel-lay-nis’ Feminine of G1672; a Grecian (that is, non-Jewish) woman: – Greek.

Here we can see a woman, who was known as a Syrophoenician by nation, in the Gospel of Mark, and yet is called a Greek when in truth she was a Canaanite and is called a Canaanite in the Matthew rendering of this account:

Matthew 15:22 (KJV) And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto Him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

“The woman was a Greek – Rosenmuller has well observed, that all heathens or idolaters were called Ἑλληνες, Greeks, by the Jews; whether they were Parthians, Medes, Arabs, Indians, or Ethiopians. Jews and Greeks divided the whole world at this period.”

Notice here that the Parthians and Medes were here called Greeks by the Canaanite Jews, when it is well known that the Parthians and Medes at that time were dispersed Israelites of The Ten Tribes. The lands of the Medes and Parthians north of the Euphrates river is where The Assyrians deposited the Israelites after they had taken them captive in 740-725 BC.

Josephus, the first century historian, is a witness to this fact:

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

So here we have solid gold proof that the Israelites, here erroneously labelled as Greeks, and therefore as Gentiles in the eyes of the Canaanite Jews, were alive and well and were a great multitude of people prospering in an alien land as strangers or sojourners.

OK, the above is a little digression, but an essential digression in order to build a bigger and more accurate overall historical picture, and to show what an evil deception this word ‘Gentiles’ is, so back to the thread of Jews, Greeks and Gentiles.

Right, let’s take a look a the word ‘Jew’ in the NT and let’s use a very deceptive verse as an example:

Galatians 3:28-29 (MCV) There is neither Jew Judean Israelite nor Greek non-Israelite, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

In first century Judea (not Jewdea) there was a remnant of the three Tribes of the Southern Kingdom of The House of Judah as opposed to the Northern Kingdom of the House of Israel – The Ten Tribes. These three tribes consisted of Judah, Levi and Benjamin who weren’t Jews. They were descendants of the small minority of Israelites who returned from the Babylonian captivity circa 515 BC. However, many at that time did not return, but joined up with their Northern Kingdom brethren living in alien lands abroad and never returned home to Judea.

Moreover, the Shelahite Canaanite Jews (The Serpent Seed) lived along side these Israelites as parasitical usurpers having stolen their language, their customs and their religion. The Sanhedrin with its ‘high priest’ consisted mostly of these satanic inbred Jewish impostors – the rare exception to this rule, that we know of, are John the Baptist and his family, Mary, Joseph, The Lord Yashua Messiah and His half siblings, The Twelve Learners, Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea and Saul, who later became Paul. Obviously there were many others, not named, but these are the principal New Testament characters who were Semitic Israelites, but not Serpent Seed Hamitic Canaanite Jews.

OK, so just to recap, here in the above Scripture we have Jews and Greeks mentioned, not Jews and Gentiles, why is that? when one would have thought ‘Gentiles’ was the ‘right word’! In the Greek MSS it uses the word ‘Hellen’, pronounced ‘Hellane’, which would suggest Greek pagans and heathens. However, it could also have a contrasting Spiritual meaning and be referring to Judeans as chosen people of the non-religious Truth and the Greeks as those of the pagan heathen religious persuasion, those of a religious mind set, just as Paul highlights here:

Acts 17:22 (MCV) Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ Hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious, that is, preoccupied with idolatrous religions.

Here is another interesting passage of Scripture that needs explaining, for here we find ‘Jews’, ‘Greeks’ and ‘Gentiles’ all mentioned, but all is not what it seems:

Acts 14:1-2 (MCV) And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both, that is, Paul and Barnabas together into the synagogue of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews Israelite Judeans and also of the Greeks believed. 2 But the unbelieving Canaanite Jews stirred up the Gentiles those of other Nations and made their minds evil affected against the brethren.

So what’s this all about? Well first and foremost we have Paul and Barnabas going into a synagogue, as was their want until, unsurprisingly, they eventually gave up on the satanic Canaanite Jews altogether. Later on we get Paul, Silas and Timothy having to confront the Jewish demons:

Acts 18:5-6 (MCV) And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the Spirit (laboured more intensely) and testified to the Canaanite Jews that Jesus was Christ. 6 Now at their resisting and blaspheming, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles Israelite Nations.

This was the general state of affairs that Paul and his companions had to continually deal with, so in Acts 14:1-2 we have a similar situation in that we have Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews rejecting Paul’s message. In contrast, Judean Israelites, plus Greeks, who were being called received The Word readily. However, this doesn’t stop here, for the Canaanite Jews then stir up the Judean Israelites and the Greeks, here called Nations, and poisoned their minds, turning them against Paul and the brethren.

Now here is a humdinger misunderstood verse:

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews Israelite Judeans.

What did Yashua Messiah really mean by this statement to the woman by the well? Easy, He was referring to Himself as a descendant of the Royal Judahite Israelites. The use of the word ‘Jew’ here by the ignorant translators is an abomination! Salvation was NEVER through or of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, nor could it ever be! Salvation was through Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) as a descendant of Abraham and Sarah to Isaac, to Jacob/Israel and to Judah via Tamar = Royal Judahites, not Judah and Bathshuah the Adullamite Canaanite inbreed who sired the first Canaanite Jews, Er, Onan (both struck down by The Lord) and Shelah.

Next verse:

Acts 11:19-20 (MCV) Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews Judean Israelites only. 20 And some of them were men of Cyprus and Cyrene, which, when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians, preaching the Lord Jesus.

Right, so who would have been the ones persecuted after Stephen was wickedly executed by the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? Quite simply, it was Judean Israelites of the three tribes resident in Judea who had been called and saved. They had obviously fled Jerusalem travelling as far as Phenice on the island of Crete, Cyprus and Antioch. Notice that some of these Judean Israelites were already residents of Cyprus and Cyrene and when they arrived at Antioch on their way home preached to some Greeks about Yashua Messiah. Mark it well, for none of these kindly people were Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews.

With that, I think we can call this a job done. However, if there are any other verses that you think need explaining then leave a comment and quoting the verse you need explained.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles.

 

The Parable of THE SOWER and The Parable of THE PARABLES

Now this is a long overdue article and the reason for that is Yashua Messiah’s restraining hand upon me, for He had not yet formulated all my thoughts on this most crucial of parables and, I might add, Yashua Messiah’s parables in general.

You see, it’s ALL about the foundational Holy Scriptures and when expounding on The Parables we MUST get our foundation laid first or otherwise we go off, shooting off our big mouths, with nothing but satanic error pouring forth from them. This is a very difficult tightrope that we walk with immense responsibility and one misplaced step can lead us to a very sticky end if we stubbornly persist in these errors and refuse to repent. Example: The rebellious Israelites in the wilderness who did not enter into His Promised Land (The Kingdom of God).

OK, so let’s get The Parable of The Sower copied here. I will copy Yashua Messiah’s explanation of it later which also needs expounding on.

The Parable of The Sower

Matthew 13:3-9 (MCV) And He spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow; 4 And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up: 5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away. 7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them: 8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Now notice! What is the most important verse in this short passage of Holy Scripture? Answer: The last verse, verse 9 – WHO HATH EARS TO HEAR, let him hear.

This now brings us onto The Parable of The Parables, which must be understood before we attempt to unravel ANY of Yashua Messiah’s other parables and again NOTICE, for the last verse is, once more, the crucial verse:

The Parable of The Parables

Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And the Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto YOU to know the mysteries of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN. 12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13 THEREFORE I SPEAK TO THEM IN PARABLES: because they seeing, see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross (has grown fat and lazy), and their ears are dull (incapable) of hearing (they are deaf), and their eyes they have closed (they are blind); lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM. 16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

Look at what Yashua Messiah is telling us in this narrative:

1) The ‘mysteries’, or the Spiritual dimension of knowledge and understanding regarding The Kingdom of God, are not given to the majority of people. (Now let all you blasphemous mainstream Christians fully understand this basic TRUTH! as you go around trying to convert all and sundry and threatening them with fiery hell if they fail to heed your nonsense)

2) Therefore, because the Spiritual dimension was/is NOT given to all, Yashua Messiah spoke to them in parables in order to conceal The Spiritual Truth from them – deliberately and intentionally.

3) This left them in a condition whereby they could listen, but not hear, they were Spiritually deaf. They could see, but not perceive – they were Spiritually blind. However, make sure that you fully comprehend what was going on here. This was/is Yashua Messiah’s doing, and not their doing, but at the same time it was their doing, and is today, still their doing, due to their indolence and laziness = their hearts had ‘waxed gross’ and are still ‘waxed gross’. It was/is not their fault, yet was/is their fault!! (More on this Godly Spiritual conundrum later).

4) Penultimately, Yashua Messiah confirms by stating: “Lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM.”

5) Finally, we get Yashua Messiah telling His Learners (disciples) that they are BLESSED, because their eyes SEE and their ears HEAR = both Fatherly Gifts from heaven and NOTHING to do with them and their abilities.

Now pay attention all you “I have accepted a ‘Jesus’ as my saviour” delusional dupes. The Father calls and Yashua Messiah converts and heals. Salvation and conversion is 100% in THEIR HANDS, not ours!!

So having laid the foundation to The Parables and to whom they were and are aimed, we can now move onto The Parable of The Sower, but always keeping in mind the above crucial knowledge. I will therefore copy it here again followed by Yashua Messiah’s explanation:

Matthew 13:3-9 (MCV) And He spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow; 4 And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up: 5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away. 7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them: 8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Yashua Messiah’s explanation of The Parable of The Sower

Matthew 13:18-23 (MCV) Hear ye therefore The Parable of The Sower. 9 When any one heareth The Word of The Kingdom of God, and understandeth it not, then cometh The Wicked One (Satan), and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side. 20 But he that received the seed into stony places (stony hearts), the same is he that heareth The Word, and anon with joy receiveth it; 21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended. 22 He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth The Word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke The Word, and he becometh unfruitful. 23 But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth The Word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

Once more, and before I continue, make sure you understand that this parable is for those who have been called. This parable is for CHRISTIANS, FAKE OR REAL, and/or those who profess some kind of belief in Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). It is for those who are Spiritually aware, NOT FOR THE LOST AND UNSAVED – IT’S A PARABLE – a Spiritual coded message!!!

So let’s begin first with the parable verses and then followed by Yashua Messiah’s explanation:

Matthew 13:4 (MCV) And when He sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up:

Matthew 13:19 (MCV) When any one heareth the word of The Kingdom of God, that is, The Good News message, and understandeth it not, then cometh The Wicked One, (Satan) and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side.

Right, we now know that Yashua Messiah’s parables are aimed at the Spiritually aware or Spiritually awakened, not the lost and unsaved. This means those that have been called, for, notice, some Truth is sown in their hearts, so they know what’s what. This could not happen to anyone that is lost and unsaved. So these people are called and then attend what they think is a church and are quickly subsumed into it and the fowls (ravening wolves) of The Wicked One in their pulpits of this church quickly devour any Truth initially learned.

Matthew 13:5-6 (MCV) Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

Matthew 13:20-21 (MCV) But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth The Word, and anon with joy receiveth it; 21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of The Word, by and by he is offended.

Again we have so-called Christians only this time with stony hearts that receive The Word with joy, so they are keen and eager and full of enthusiasm and charismatic luvvy duvviness, but what happens? for they seem to run out of steam. Well, first of all, because they have stony hearts (stony ground) they can only have head knowledge, not heart knowledge, for they do not have hearts of flesh!

Ezekiel 11:19 (MCV) And I will give them one heart, and I will put a New Spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh. (This only occurs with those planted in deep soil.)

Now here’s the rub, these fakes are not planted (not earthed in deep soil) in Yashua Messiah, otherwise they would endure and persevere. They would be strong and tough and able to weather any storm thrown at them – any persecution or any trial.

Moreover, this points to not being gifted with The Holy Spirit, thinking that Baptism is unnecessary and some even kid themselves that they can receive The Holy Spirit without Baptism – a catastrophic error made by such groups as the satanic Alpha Course. (see the link to my Cornelius article below). Look folks, this is a crucial issue and not one to be swept under the carpet.

Notice, too, that they are offended and who today is the most easily offended group of people? Why, it’s Cultural Jew Marxist liberals – otherwise known as ‘soy boys’ and ‘snowflakes’ or those that need their ‘safe spaces’, that are so easily offended. Many so-called Christians have adopted these worldly satanic political ideologies into their ‘Christian’ beliefs. These liberal ‘Christians’, if confronted with the True Gospel Message, are very easily offended, especially if the Truth about The Jews is presented to them. (again see all the links below) Not only that, they are even offended by certain points of Holy Scripture when asked to explain why the Israelites under Joshua butchered whole cities and towns of Serpent Seed Canaanites – men, women and children. This proves that they are pusillanimous liberals and not Christians!

Matthew 13:7 (MCV) And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them:

Matthew 13:22 (MCV) He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth The Word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.

The Care of This World? What did Yashua Messiah mean by this curious phrase? Quite simply he was prophesying that in the future there would be so-called Christians thinking that THEY are here to set up the Kingdom of God, that is, before Yashua Messiah returns to do that VERY THING! This means that they believe they are on some kind of do-gooding liberal mission to rescue mankind from themselves and to change the world.

“Let’s bring an end to poverty” they wail and with ministries here and ministries there, usually in some wretched Canaanite African back water = “Telescopic philanthropy” as Charles Dickens used to call it. “Kingdom Building” is another of their delusional chants, when Yashua Messiah left no instruction of the kind before His ascension. Go and make Learners (disciples) primarily of the Israelites and bear fruit were His only instructions.

Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These Twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the non-Israelites, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel – The Twelve Tribes (see list below)

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.

Matthew 10:7 (MCV) And as ye go, preach, saying, The Kingdom of God is at hand (within reach).

Matthew 28:19 (MCV) Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone. (see link below)

Finally for this thorny category we get: “deceitfulness of riches” which is partly the “health, wealth and prosperity non-gospel” preached by many false ministers and pastors today.

However, the biggest share of this group goes to the intellectual, theological and philosophical members of these ‘churches’ for riches can also be intellectual riches. Just like financial riches, intellectual riches puff up the ego and increase the pride and vanity. With this vain intellectual approach they make The Word of God to none effect through their over-complications and by adding their useless embellishments to their vain interpretations of The Holy Scriptures. The Trinity doctrine is a perfect example of this evil practise and it’s these satanic lying thorns choke the The Truth out of them.

Matthew 13:8-9 (MCV) But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Matthew 13:23 (MCV) But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth The Word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

In these two verses Yashua Messiah emphasises by repeating the fruits that will be forthcoming from The Word (Seed) sown in the deep rich and fertile soil of those The Father has predestined, called and chosen.

Links:

THE PAIN IN THE BUTT That Is The Story of CORNELIUS! – Acts 10
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/09/25/the-pain-in-the-butt-that-is-the-story-of-cornelius-acts-10/

The Jews are The Tares!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Racist and The Canaanite Woman He Called a Dog!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/was-the-lord-jesus-christ-a-racist-yashua-anointed-and-a-canaanite-woman-he-called-a-dog/

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/should-christians-be-baptised-into-yashua-messiahs-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-1/

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

*Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,*
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
*Levi – The Priesthood,*
*Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,*
*Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,*
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

Try and apply this verse to the Jews – God’s promise to Abraham:

Genesis 13:16 (MCV) *And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.*

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

*“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”*

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AD and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

“The apostles passed beyond the ocean to the isles called the Britannic Isles”

— Eusebius ( Demonstratio Evangelica or Proof of the Gospel , book 3, chap. 7)

“We certainly know that Christ, the true Son, afforded His light, the knowledge of His precepts, to our Island in the last year of Tiberius Caesar” (Tiberius died in 37 AC)

— Gildas the Wise, circa 550 AC (De Excidio Britanniae or On the Ruin of Britain )

Caucasians = White Israelites, White Caucasians are The True Israelites (NOT JEWS). They were placed in the Caucasus region circa 725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans) when Assyria invaded the Northern Kingdom of Israel and took them away as captives. From there they migrated west into Europe – the rest is history.

Our Ancestors Forgot Who We Are!
https://www.minds.com/media/902215686757830656

https://www.minds.com/media/902249474722271232
https://www.minds.com/media/902893671965282304
https://www.minds.com/media/902905549734813696

THE PAIN IN THE BUTT That Is The Story of CORNELIUS! – Acts 10

OK, straight away, let me make it very clear that, in and of itself, this story is FINE!!! So I will state for the record that it’s a valid Biblical account of a very interesting and informative topic. So what makes it a Pain In The Butt, I hear you ask? Members of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion or blind and deluded mainstream Christians are what make this uplifting story a Pain in the Butt! Pretty much like they do everything else from The Holy Scriptures with their perverted, satanic, blind guide misinterpretations, and this Cornelius story is a classic example of how they satanically misuse it to annul water Baptism. More on that later.

So how do they make this story a Pain in The Butt, I also hear you ask? Well in order to discover that, let’s copy and paste the Biblical narrative here, first, so that we are fully aware of what went on:

Acts 10:1-2 (MCV) There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band, 2 A sincere man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.

So here we have an Italian Roman Centurion which, would make him a Canaanite, for Italians are descended from the Babylonian Hittites, who were Canaanites. Romans were not Italians, so were not Canaanites. Notice that he feared God, so he and his household were Old Covenant believers, not New Covenant believers, so no Grace.

Now racially, to a chosen Israelite like Peter, who was NOT A JEW (Take note, Israelites are not Jews – see links below), this man would have been the lowest of the low. Again, racially, he would have been sub-species scum to Peter. We need to get this very real life scenario firmly fixed in our minds, so that we understand what’s going on here. No slimy, libtard, multicultural Cultural Jew Marxism is this society, as in our Jewified, dissolute, degenerate society today.

Don’t believe we are Jewified? Then believe it from one of their own:

“We have corrupted the blood of all the races of Europe — perhaps we have infected them today.

“Everything is Jewified.

“Our thinking is in everything living, our spirit rules the world.

“We are the masters, for everything that has power today is the child of our spirit.

“One may hate us, one may drive us away, our enemies may triumph over our physical weakness, but we are no longer to be gotten rid of.

“We have conquered peoples, conquered the races, defiled them, broken their strength, made everything rotten, lazy and corrupt with our stale culture, our spirit can no longer be exterminated.”

— Dr. Kurt Munzer, Jewish novelist, “The Way To Zion”

Moving on, we are also told that Cornelius is sincere in his belief, as are his household, which means they are all being called by The Father. We know this for they are all praying and giving alms. Next we have Cornelius seeing a vision:

Acts 10:3-4 (KJV) He saw in a vision, evidently about the ninth hour of the day, an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius. 4 And when he looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God.

Right, here we can see further confirmation that The Father has begun to call Cornelius for he has been praying and doing good deeds. These activities are an open sign that Cornelius has been called by The Father, otherwise he would not have been doing these things, especially praying. He then sees an angel of God in a vision, so this is a man that The Father has a specific job for.

Here the angel gives Cornelius his first instructions:

Acts 10:5-6 (KJV) And now send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon, whose surname is Peter: 6 He lodgeth with one Simon a tanner, whose house is by the sea side: he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do.

Cornelius follows the angel’s instructions:

Acts 10:7-8 (KJV) And when the angel which spake unto Cornelius was departed, he called two of his household servants, and a devout soldier of them that waited on him continually; 8 And when he had declared all these things unto them, he sent them to Joppa.

Next we jump to Peter who also sees a vision:

Acts 10:9-16 (KJV) On the morrow, as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour: 10 And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance, 11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth: 12 Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. 13 And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. 14 But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. 16 This was done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven.

Here in these verses we see the THRUST and CORE of the subject matter and the REAL REASON for this story = Peter’s OLD COVENANT mind set and his racial and religious aloofness re non-Israelites and how he had refused to eat and socialise with them as brothers and sisters in the Faith.

Peter is curious about the vision and wonders what it could mean whilst the messengers from Cornelius turn up at Peter’s lodgings:

Acts 10:17-18 (KJV) Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon’s house, and stood before the gate, 18 And called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there.

Peter dwells on the vision and then Yashua Messiah speaks to him through His Spirit and tells Peter what to do – not doubting. Peter meets and greets his visitors.

Acts 10:19 (MCV) While Peter thought on the vision, Yashua Messiah, through His Holy Spirit, said unto him, Behold, three men seek thee. 20 Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I, Yashua Messiah, have sent them. 21 Then Peter went down to the men which were sent unto him from Cornelius; and said, Behold, I am he whom ye seek: what is the cause wherefore ye are come?

The visitors tell Peter about Cornelius their master and of his good standing with the Judean people:

Acts 10:22 (MCV) And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Judeans (Israelites – not Jews), was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.

Peter lodges his visitors for the night and the following day journeyed with them to Caesarea taking some brethren from Joppa with them:

Acts 10:23 (KJV) Then called he them in, and lodged them. And on the morrow Peter went away with them, and certain brethren from Joppa accompanied him.

Cornelius is waiting for them:

Acts 10:24 (KJV) And the morrow after they entered into Caesarea. And Cornelius waited for them, and had called together his kinsmen and near friends.

Cornelius meets Peter and bows to the ground to worship him and Peter immediately lifts him up and corrects him:

Acts 10:25 (KJV) And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him. 26 But Peter took him up, saying, Stand up; I myself also am a man.

Peter shows that he has understood the vision that Yashua Messiah sent to him and explains the Old Covenant Law to Cornelius and how he (Peter) had been wrong:

Acts 10:27-29 (MCV) And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together. 28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is an Israelite to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. 29 Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent ye have sent for me?

Cornelius recites to Peter what he had experienced:

Acts 10:30-33 (KJV) And Cornelius said, Four days ago I was fasting until this hour; and at the ninth hour I prayed in my house, and, behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing, 31 And said, Cornelius, thy prayer is heard, and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God. 32 Send therefore to Joppa, and call hither Simon, whose surname is Peter; he is lodged in the house of one Simon a tanner by the sea side: who, when he cometh, shall speak unto thee. 33 Immediately therefore I sent to thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God.

Cornelius and his household and friends hear the Good News from Peter:

Acts 10:34-43 (MCV) Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that the Godhead is no respecter of persons fictions or masks: 35 But in every nation he that feareth Them, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with Them. 36 The word which The Father sent unto The Children of Israel, preaching peace by Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ): (he is Lord of all:)
37 That word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the Baptism which John preached; 38 How The Father anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with Power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of The Devil; for The Father was with Him. 39 And we are witnesses of all things which He did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: 40 Him The Father raised up the third day, and shewed Him openly; 41 Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of The Father, even to us, who did eat and drink with Him after He rose from the dead. 42 And He commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is He which was ordained of The Father to be the Evaluator of the Spiritually alive and the Spiritually dead. 43 To Him give all The Prophets witness, that through His name whosoever believeth in Him shall receive remission of sins.

The Holy Spirit falls on the non-Israelites:

Acts 10:44-48 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word. 45 And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out the gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, 47 CAN ANY MAN FORBID WATER, THAT THESE SHOULD NOT BE BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 And he commanded them to be Baptised in the name of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

Right, there it is, the full account of Peter and his encounter with Cornelius the non-Israelite Canaanite Italian and the tough lesson that Peter had to learn. This is the reason why this account is in the Book of Acts and no other and YET!!?? What do you think the gnat straining blasphemers of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion use this passage of Scripture to pathetically try and make a case for?

Answer: NON-BAPTISM CONVERSION OR REGENERATION!!! THAT IS, THE INDWELLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT WITHOUT BAPTISM!!!

And where do they get this idea from? Here:

Acts 10:45-46 (MCV) And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out The Gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.

Yet what happens next:

Acts 10:47 (MCV) Can any man forbid WATER, that these should not be BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 AND HE COMMANDED THEM TO BE BAPTISED IN THE NAME OF YASHUA MESSIAH (JESUS CHRIST).

Now why did this event take place when the norm for regeneration was and is repentance, confession of sins, Baptism and the Gifting of the Holy Spirit and as commanded by Peter at the very beginning of his work for Yashua Messiah:

Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, REPENT, and BE BAPTIZED EVERY ONE OF YOU in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

We’re also told the same by Yashua Messiah Himself:

John 3:3-5 (MCV) Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again (born of God), he cannot see The Kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto Him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be BORN OF WATER (BAPTISM) and of The Holy Spirit, HE CANNOT ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD!!

There it is folks, for all to see, and yet these demonic mongrel dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (so-called mainstream Christians) want to change all that and make regeneration meaningless and, more importantly, POWERLESS with their no-Baptism non-conversion, and this, all based on one misunderstood verse of Holy Scripture, which took place for totally different reasons than they try and make out.

So why did the Holy Spirit fall on Cornelius and SOME of his fellows before they were Baptised? Was it for their benefit or Peter’s and his fellow Israelite brothers benefit, who were present? You see, once we lose sight of the reason for this event we can then drift off into any old make believe, fairy land ideas or cuckoo land myths and fables, which is what non-baptism conversion is – a satanic lie – a myth and a fable.

This event took place in order to convince Peter and his brothers that select non-Israelites were now acceptable to the Godhead, and I did say SELECT! Make sure you notice this:

Acts 10:44 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word.

ALL THEM WHICH HEARD THE WORD!! So what is this telling us? The Holy Spirit only fell on those which HEARD THE WORD! This is informing us that there were some there that didn’t hear The Word and The Holy Spirit did not fall upon them.

As a final warning do not let any evil mongrel dog, blind guide, lead you astray on this most crucial part of your Spiritual journey with Yashua Messiah. Repentance, confession of sins and Baptism MUST precede the Gifting of The Holy Spirit.

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Did eve have sex with the devil or did she just eat some fruit?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Royal Judahites and the Canaanite Jews explained.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

APARTHEID Is The Kingdom of God!

How about that to get all those self-hating, guilt ridden, anti-white liberal fake Christians going, eh? I don’t think there could be a more tormenting or provocative statement or ‘meme’ (as they like to call it today) that one could present to these treacherous satanic evil disgusting wretches.

So how can the Kingdom of God be an Apartheid Kingdom? Quite easily, and Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Himself made it very clear:

Matthew 25:32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a Shepherd divideth His sheep from the goats: (Emphasis mine)

There it is folks – APARTHEID and/or segregation as in the American South, and whether we like it or not!! The nations will be separated or all ethnic groups divided and separated from one another so that they will all live together with their own kind – White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes with White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes, Germans with Germans, Russians with Russians, Slavs with Slavs, Spaniards with Spaniards, Arabs with Arabs, Indians with Indians, Japanese with Japanese and Ethiopians with Ethiopians. They will then remain racially pure with no Jewish encouraged inbreeding, no Jewish encouraged miscegenation, no Jewish encouraged satanic diversity, no Jewish encouraged satanic enriching, and no Jewish encouraged satanic multiculturalism.

However, Yashua Messiah also says: “Like a Shepherd divideth His Sheep from the goats,” so He is giving us this parallel, but what parallel, and who are the goats? because they are not the previously mentioned Nations. The Nations are Mankind and the Sheep are the White Caucasian Israelites, amongst those Mankind Nations, but the goats are not. The goats are a different group altogether; they are a hu-man sub-species and not of Mankind at all, so who are these goats?

Easy, they are the The Serpent Seed Canaanites – Satan’s people – his offspring, that is, The Jews, African blacks, the Turks, the Italians, the Red Indians, the Chinese, the Mongols and the Koreans, to name the principal Canaanite tribes.

Now obviously this state of affairs is not going to sit well with many liberal fake Christians; those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Christians that are really Cultural Jew Marxists (liberals) posing as Christians, and they will no doubt create a huge fuss and protest, accusing Yashua Messiah of being a HATER! a BIGOT! and a RACIST! So how do you think Yashua Messiah is going to deal with these rebellious vile evil people? Like this:

Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, (The Canaanite Jews and their shabbos goy duped Marxist slaves) which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. (Brackets mine)

So there is their sticky end, so lets hope that they repent and are quick about it! Lord hurry that day!

For those wondering who the White Caucasian Israelites are, here is my quick run down and exposé on that topic:

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
Levi – The Priesthood,
Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, British Royalty and Nobility,
Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AC and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

Caucasians = White Israelites

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rgLD2NtGRpUf/

https://www.minds.com/media/902217401290674176

In Yashua Messiah’s name – Brother Charles

Did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Say: I AM NOT GOOD and I AM NOT GOD?

The short, but very substantial, story of the Wealthy Young Ruler.

Now this subject is yet another of those ‘pain in the neck’ subjects that blaspheming Judaisers and satanic gnat strainers, alike, try to spiritually garrote me with, but, I hasten to add, they always fail. So let’s copy and paste here the Holy Scriptures that they then pollute with their perverted reasoning and satanic Judaising nonsense:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto Him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Mark 10:17-18 (KJV) And when He was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit Eternal Life? 18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

Luke 18:18-19 (KJV) And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit Eternal Life? 19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.

Now the first issue that these mongrel dogs will attempt to make mileage out of is the monotheism BS value that they think these verses possess. They think these verses PROVE that God is ONE and that Yashua Messiah was clearly stating that He was was not God, but is this TRUE? NO a thousand times NO!!! But hang on Yashua Messiah said: “none is good, save one, that is, God.” So how do you get around that, I hear you say? Quite easily is the answer to that and it all depends upon your understanding of the word ‘GOD’ in the New Testament.

However, in order to understand the word ‘God’ in the New Testament we have to understand the word ‘God’ in the Old Testament FIRST, for the Godhead never changes. We also have the issue of the Greek language of the New Testament, for it is too vague in its description of God, unlike the Hebrew definition of the Old Testament. Therefore from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

God – H430
אלהים – elohym – el-o-heemPlural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God[head]; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty. (Square brackets mine)

god – H433
אלהּ אלוהּ
‘ĕlôahh ‘ĕlôahh – el-o’-ah, el-o’-ah (The second form is rare); probably prolonged (emphatically) from H410; a deity or the deity: – god. See H430.

This ‘eloah’ singular deity would be used when describing Satan, who is the only solitary god (‘eloah’) of this world.

So from this proof we now know for sure that the Godhead is two distinct Spiritual beings, not one, other than their being number one with none above.

Moreover, if we now move onto The New Testament we have a Greek word being used for the word ‘God’ and not a Hebrew word. However, does that mean the nature of the Godhead changes? Do they become a different Godhead just because a new word is in use? No way, so what gives? The word ‘theos’ is what gives instead of ‘eloheem’ or ‘elohim’ but the plural nature of the Godhead remains the same. From Strong’s Concordance once more:

God – G2316
θεός – theos – theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

In ancient Greece there were only ‘gods’ ‘plural’ because the Greeks were polytheists and worshipped many gods, not two alone. However, there was no need for a singular Greek word for a god because there was no singular god in polytheistic Greek worship. This means the Greek word ‘theos’ did the job just fine when describing the true Duality Godhead = more than one!!

Matthew 1:23 (KJV) Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. (Emphasis mine)

OK, so here we can plainly see that Yashua Messiah is described as being: “God with us”, that is, in the flesh so, in turn, the Old Testament plural Duality Godhead ‘Elohim’ is also still with us with The Father in heaven and The Son on earth in the flesh and, therefore, still Two God’s.

So this brings us to our little conundrum of: “there is none good but one, that is, God:”

Now what was Yashua Messiah actually saying here? For we know for sure that He wasn’t saying God is one; He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t God and He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t good either, even though most will mistakenly think He was saying that. So what was He really saying? Well, first of all, He was telling us plainly, and those there present, that He was God in the flesh as part of the Godhead, but without them realising it. This is due to The Truth that the Godhead is a Duality Godhead and always was a Duality Godhead with Him now standing there amongst them as God, so how could He say that He was not good or tell His questioner not to call Him good? What was Yashua Messiah doing by saying that?

The answer to that my friends is very simple. This unsaved and lost wealthy young ruler was trying to win favour with Yashua Messiah by calling Him good. This was plain and simple flattery which got him nowhere with Yashua Messiah who quickly rebuked him with the question: Why callest thou me good? This was nothing to do with Yashua Messiah not being good. Of course He was good, He was God in the flesh so He had to be good – He could be nothing else.

However, just for the benefit of the wealthy young ruler He adds these two riders: “There is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.”

Now, as already shown, Yashua Messiah was God in the flesh so was stating clearly that He was good, but without anyone there realising it and yet at the same time giving Glory to His Father in heaven as being good as the other half of the Godhead.

With the second rider we have Yashua Messiah saying: “But if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.” In J B Phillips’ translation he has it better: “But if you WANT TO enter into [that] Life you must KEEP The Commandments.”

So first things first. Yashua Messiah is saying: “If you WANT TO enter into Life? So does this wealthy young ruler want to or not? Furthermore, where is The Law in this arrangement? It’s nowhere in it at all, so clearly Yashua Messiah is teaching the wealthy young ruler that this is about a FREE CONSCIOUS DECISION on his part and not a commandment issue = no Law. Second, we have this word ‘KEEP’ which everyone, and his dog, mistakenly thinks means OBEY when it mean what it says, that is, to keep – to protect – to hold onto as precious – internalised and have them written on our hearts so NOTHING to do with obedience at all. (Please see my article “When Did The Biblical Word KEEP Become OBEY?” – Link below.)

This is what Yashua Messiah was REALLY saying to the wealthy young man that came forward gushing and fawning all over Yashua Messiah in his initial, over the top, flattering enthusiasm.

Now don’t get me wrong on this, for later on I believe that this young man WAS saved. How do I know this? Easy, because Yashua Messiah loved him, so that means He knew the young man’s heart deep down and knew he was sincere. He also knew The Father was calling him, and KNEW that eventually he would repent and love his neighbour by giving up his wealth and then FOLLOWING Yashua Messiah. The same, in a different way, applied to Nicodemus but I won’t go into that subject now.

Furthermore we then have the issue of the wealthy young ruler’s question: “What good thing shall I DO, that I may have Eternal Life?” OK, I have made my point quite obvious here by emphasising the words ‘I DO’. Moreover, so what could this young man DO in order to inherit Eternal Life? NOTHING! absolutely nothing is the answer to that question. How do we know that? Quite simply because he was asking the question within the backdrop of the Ten Commandments of which he boasted in being a fautless observer. This means he was asking Yashua Messiah what other Commandment he should be observing or doing that he may have missed. His mission in questioning Yashua Messiah was solely Law based and understandably so because The Law was still in force at that time, even for the faithful.

However, The Lord then stuns him with His reply which immediately introduces the SPIRITUAL DIMENSION or SPIRITUAL THRUST of The Commandments = LOVE!! Not the feeble letter of The Law of The Commandments = legalistic Pharisaism and its close companion hypocrisy.

So the wealthy young ruler is challenged with Yashua Messiah’s charge to go sell all his possessions and give the proceeds to those in need and THEN to follow Him. Now mark this point and mark it well for the gifting of his wealth will not save him, but the act of gifting his wealth will prove that he is being called by The Father to Yashua Messiah and also prove that he is saved. Salvation is ALWAYS an undeserved free gift and our good works will follow as a result or as evidence that we are saved, not because we are trying to be saved or trying to earn our salvation.

Finally,Yashua Messiah in saying these tough things to the wealthy young ruler was in turn challenging his commitment to Him. Was he prepared to give up his Law/Commandment based life and comfortable wealthy lifestyle and put his sole trust and faith in Him? These are the points and questions that Yashua Messiah was getting across to the wealthy young ruler.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/when-did-the-biblical-word-keep-become-obey/

The DUALITY GODHEAD

The Duality Godhead? What Godhead is that, I hear you ask? Well I’ll tell you straight, right away, They are not a mickey mouse triune godhead, They’re not a Unitarian/Judaic/Islamic monotheistic godhead and They are not a Binatarian godhead either, if that’s what you were thinking.

Now what is a Binatarian godhead? I’ve never heard of such a thing, again I hear you say. OK, so let me explain, a Binatarian godhead is a half-truth so that means it’s a lie just like the monotheistic godhead and the trinity godhead.

Binatarianism is belief in a Duality Godhead that has been corrupted with Triunism and turned into yet another lying hu-man magical construct. This means that instead of a mythical godhead that is one in three and three in one they have constructed a godhead that, like the trinity, it is one in two and two in one – total fallacious religious nonsense. We therefore need to understand that The Godhead consists of TWO DISTINCT Spiritual Beings who are NEVER at anytime one solitary being.

This means that The Duality Godhead are very simple to understand for we are told about Them right at the beginning in Genesis Chapter 1:

Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God (‘Elohim’ – plural) created the heaven and the earth.

There They are, in the very first verse of the Holy Scriptures ‘ELOHIM’ and ‘Elohim’ is the plural of ‘Eloah’, so if the Godhead was ONE GOD, it would have read: “In the beginning God (‘Eloah’ – singular) created the heaven and the earth.” But it DOES NOT SAY THAT it says ‘ELOHIM’ – PLURAL! MORE THAN ONE GOD – THE GODHEAD! Please excuse the shouting folks, but shouting is very necessary for some stiff necked duped people out there who love to hang onto their nonsensical Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious myths = monotheism and/or triunism.

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – H430
אלהים
‘ĕlôhı̂ym
el-o-heem’
Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.

Now pay attention to what Strong is doing here, for he is following a satanic monothesitic agenda and explaining away The Truth by introducing his own irrelevant intellectual nonsense into his definition of ‘Elohim’“but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God;”

Moreover, ignoring his intellectual waffle, ask yourself this very pertinent question: Would a Bible scholar of Strong’s immense calibre, with his excellent knowledge of the Hebrew language, have not known of the word ‘Eloah’ and known its SINGULAR meaning and also have known that ‘Elohim’ was the plural of that singular word? I will leave you all to answer that no brainer question for yourselves.

OK, so we have established from the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that the Godhead is more than one god and this is further confirmed for us in Genesis again:

Genesis 1:26 (first part) (KJV) And God said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness: (Emphasis mine)

Right, now is this claimed solitary mono-god speaking to himself? If not, who is he speaking to – the angels? No way, for I’ll tell you straight, the angels never created anything, and man is definitely not created in the image of angels. This means that if we take the “God is one” nonsense, seriously, it must mean that their god needs certifying, for he is hallucinating and seeing someone in his head that he is now attempting to hold a conversation with. Hilarious or what!?

Having said all that, I can now see all the monotheists jumping up and down, frothing at the mouth, and renting their clothes in true Moloch and Baal worshipping style as they did in Elijah’s day when their mono-god failed to bring down fire to ignite the wet wood, such is their delusional thinking. Not only that, but when I have finished this article the trinity dupes will no doubt have joined them in their manic frenzy. Who said being a follower of Yashua Messiah – The Way was not good fun? LOL

Moving on I will now quote a segment from one of my earlier articles which covers the prime and/or premier “identity of God verse in Deuteronomy”, and we all know it, don’t we? This verse is the verse that nearly all monotheists quote in an attempt to support their erroneous satanic claims:

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Please note, as I disect this verse it will be, in part, a repeat of what I have said above.

“Hear, O Israel” – or better translated “Hear you Israel” or “Listen up you Israelites”, for I, your Lord, have something important to tell you:

“The Lord our God” – properly translated from the Hebrew; The Lord = The Eternal or The Self-Existing. Our God = Our ‘Elohim’ (plural); the Godhead that has always self-existed before time began and was/is always a plural Duality Godhead.

Straight away in this short phrase of Holy Scripture we are told by the use of this word ‘Elohim’ (the plural of ‘Eloah’) that we are dealing with more than one God. Look folks, there is no getting away from this Truth, and we need to get it through our heads that the Hebrew word ‘Eloah’ (singular) would have been in use here, not ‘Elohim’, IF God was one. OK, so we have now ascertained that The Godhead is more than one, and yet it says:

“Is One Lord” – so what’s going on here and what does this mean? The Hebrew word here for ‘one’ is ‘Echad’ which means ‘united’ or ‘in unity’ in one sense, and ‘number one’ the prime number in the other sense, that is, no one higher or no one above – The Most High as wriiten elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures.

One – H259
אחד
‘echâd
ekh-awd’
A numeral from H258; properly united, that is, (as) one; or (as an ordinal) first: – a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any (-thing), apiece, a certain [dai-] ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.

OK, as we can see the word ONE does not mean solitary or one god or a mono-god, for it means UNITED AS ONE, that is, in agreement in thought, word and deed, yet still distinct and separate as Two Spiritual Beings.

A Numeral – H258
אחד
‘âchad
aw-khad’
Perhaps a primitive root; to unify, that is, (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts): – go one way or other.

The primitive root word then confirms this for us – TO UNIFY!! And again this, in turn, means They are not one being, for being united or unified is always an arrangement whereby a number of beings are at one with each other or unanimous in their thoughts, aims and ideals, as in a football team. Newcastle United is a team of individuals united in one aim – to win, but they are not one being, they are eleven distinct beings. This is how it is with the Godhead; they are Two Spiritual Beings, united as one in thought, mind and deed – totally likeminded – united!

This, too, is why The Lord, through Paul, exhorts the Congregations of God to be like the Godhead in their relationships one with another:

Romans 15:5-6 (KJV) Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: 6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even The Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. [Two distinct beings] (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Take note, the Congregations of God were not ONE BEING, but they were exhorted by Paul to be of ONE MIND just like The Father and The Son and like the Godhead of God with God in the beginning who said: “Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness:”

If we now move on to the New Testament we have a new word for the Godhead and that word is the Greek word ‘Theos’ instead of the Hebrew word ‘Elohim’. However we need to be clear that just because a Greek word is now used instead of a Hebrew word doesn’t mean that the nature and make-up of the Duality Godhead has changed. In fact the Greek word ‘theos’ is very useful for this topic for, generally, it means a DEITY and in the Greek sense that means gods plural, for the Greeks were polytheists – they, like the ancient Egyptians, had many gods. As far as I know they did not have a word in their language to describe a monotheistic god. It was only the Jews that worshipped such a deity and they worshipped that deity in error and in ignorance when they knew very well that God ‘Elohim’ was a plural Godhead.

God – G2316
θεός
theos
theh’-os
Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

So there we have it: ‘Theos’ = a deity and in Ancient Greece that would mean more than one god, not a mono-god. Not only that, but because ‘Theos’ is such a general all encompassing word in terms of objects of worship, it means it can be interpreted any way you like, if you have a monotheistic or triunistic agenda to fulfil. Moreover, notice that within this very definition we can see Strong doing just that with all his figurative nonsense regarding ‘magistrates’. With regard to ‘magistrates’ I will leave a link below for additional reading regarding this satanic subject.

Furthermore, because we know that the Godhead does not cause confusion re their identity we can definitely know for sure that plural ‘Theos’ in the NT means exactly the same a plural ‘Elohim’ in the OT – The Duality Godhead with The Holy Spirit as their LIVING POWER.

One last Holy Scripture:

Galatians 3:20 (KJV) Now a mediator is not [a mediator] of one, but God is one.

Now does this verse make any sense? First of all, who is The Mediator that this verse is refering to? Answer: Yashua Messiah. And was Yashua Messiah God come in the flesh? Answer: Yes, hence it states quite plainly that a mediator is not of one, so there has to be more than one in order for one to mediate to the other and yet it then says: “God is one!” So what’s going on here?

Easy, God = ‘Theos’ = ‘Elohim’ = more than one, for the Godhead does not change:

Malachi 3:6 (KJV) For I am The LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. (Emphasis mine)

Here we have Yashua Messiah speaking on behalf of the Godhead, for no one has ever seen or heard The Father:

John 1:18 (KJV) No man hath seen God (The Father) at any time; The Only Begotten Son, which is in the bosom of The Father, He hath declared Him. (Brackets and Emphasis mine)

John 5:37 (KJV) And The Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. YE HAVE NEITHER HEARD HIS VOICE AT ANY TIME, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE. (Emphasis mine)

So there it is folks, NO ONE has ever seen or heard The Father at any time so that must mean that Yashua Messiah was The God of the Old Testament who spoke on behalf of Himself and/or The Father = The Duality Godhead.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-the-mystery-of-mystery-babylon-the-great/

Brother Charles

Are YOU a Heretic and What is Heresy?

If you are a Christian, or even not a Christian at all and with no interest in Christianity, have you ever wondered about these two words and what they mean? for they get banded about with great regularity by those of the satanic Roman Catholic Cult, which is a part of the equally satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Moreover, when you hear these words, do they resonate a positive vibe with you or a negative vibe? For me, they have always resonated a negative vibe, because they have always sounded accusatory and judgemental. Now don’t get me wrong, for there are some people that deserve to be labelled a heretic, that’s IF the word heretic actually means what people believe it to mean, that is, a blasphemer or an apostate, and again, that is, someone who has turned his back on Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and walked away as did these wretched people here:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

However, I have learned just recently that the words heretic and heresy from a Holy Scriptural sense are not what they seem when compared to the erroneous Roman Catholic religious interpretations. In fact, they do not mean what I have described above at all. They have been mistranslated from the Greek manuscripts, and more on that later, but first let’s look at some secular dictionary definitions for the words in question.

From Dictionary.com:

Heretic

1) A professed believer who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church or rejects doctrines prescribed by that church.

2) Roman Catholic Church – a baptized Roman Catholic who willfully and persistently rejects any article of faith.

3) Anyone who does not conform to an established attitude, doctrine, or principle.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heretic

1) Religion: a person who differs in opinion from established religious dogma; especially: a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church who refuses to acknowledge or accept a revealed truth the church regards them as heretics.

2) One who differs in opinion from an accepted belief or doctrine – a nonconformist.

From Dictionary.com:

Heresy

1. Opinion or doctrine at variance with the orthodox or accepted doctrine, especially of a church or religious system.

2. The maintaining of such an opinion or doctrine.

3. Roman Catholic Church. the willful and persistent rejection of any article of faith by a baptized member of the church.

4. Any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs, customs, etc.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heresy

1a:  adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma (see dogma 2) They were accused of heresy.

1b: denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church

1c :  an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

2a: dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice – to disagree with the party leadership was heresy.

2b: an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards

So there we have it from the secular perspective and notice how the Roman Catholic Cult features prominently in these definitions giving it a strong association with these two negative words.

Notice, too, in 2a how they now apply it to those that reject rigid political dogma as well. Rejection of Bolshevik Marxist Political Correctness (Cultural Marxism) anyone? Do I also sense the spirit of the legalistic satanic Pharisees here in the application of these two words? You bet your life!

OK, so what’s your point I hear you ask? confusion and some I would answer and to unravel that confusion let’s go now to the Holy Scriptures for The Truth regarding these two misused words:

First and foremost, the word heretic cannot be found in the KJV Bible at all – it ain’t there folks, so that tells you just how important this subject is to Yashua Messiah. However, it is VERY important to those Roman Catholic judgemental mongrel dogs who like to accuse people of being heretics, that is, those who have rumbled their money making, money laundering scam called a church and have started to voice their truthful opinions.

Second, and just as crucial, the word heresy can only be found once in the KJV Bible and here is the verse with its only use:

Acts 24:14 (KJV) But this I confess unto thee, that after The Way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in The Law and in The Prophets: (Emphasis mine)

So here we have some very interesting things being said by Paul. First of all, Paul let’s it be known that following Yashua Messiah was known by the followers of Yashua Messiah as The Way, for He is The Way – The ONLY Way to The Kingdom of God and Eternal Life and NO RELIGION required!

Second, the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION called those who were followers of The Way (Yashua Messiah), HERETICS!!! and their beliefs and Faith solely in Yashua Messiah – HERESY!!! How blasphemous is that?

Not only that, if we look up the word in the Greek MSS what do you think we will find? Answer, this from Strong’s Concordance:

Heresy – G139 – αἵρεσις – hairesis – hah’ee-res-is
From G138; properly a choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion. (“heresy” is the Greek word itself.): – heresy [which is the Greek word itself], sect.

Look what we have here: 1) a choice; 2) a party in disunion; 3) a sect. So what does this tell us? Well far from being negative, the word heresy looks like it is something very positive, that is, the separating of those who follow Yashua Messiah (The Way) from satanic religious illegitimates. In the first century that would have been primarily the Pharisees and Sadducees who were later usurped by the so called Hellenising philosophers known as the ‘church fathers’, that is, the counterfeit founders of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Be sure you understand that religion is a spirit called Legion and Satan presents this phenomena in a myriad of ways whether it be Jews or Fundie ‘Christians’ with their Judaising Law based religion or Papists with their Babylonian Mystery Religion.

Furthermore, today, whilst the Pope is traipsing here, there and everywhere around the world promoting his mickey mouse satanic multi-faith unity BS, Paul was and is teaching the exact opposite – now there’s a surprise and is that hilarious or what?

Moreover what’s more interesting is the way this Greek word hairesis has taken on a dual meaning in some people’s eyes for we find it used elsewhere:

Acts 28:22 (KJV) But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect (hairesis), we know that every where it is spoken against.
(Brackets and emphasis mine)

In this verse we can see the word hairesis used more accurately, in it being translated as sect and not heresy, but, either way, neither translations of this word point to the evil and distorted and satanic interpretations of The Devil’s Roman Catholic Cult who misuse, twist and pervert it to accuse those of The Truth and/or The Way of being heretics which, in reality, is a compliment to us, not an insult.

This means dear brothers and sisters that in the future if some evil papist calls you a heretic, just thank him or her as sarcastically as you can and be encouraged by their plug ignorance.

Brother Charles.

As a PS I would add that the word heresies can also be found three times which again should be translated as sects and which I will deal with here at a later date.

Was JESUS CHRIST a JEW?…

…Or Better Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a JEW?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38. (See the first 3 links below)

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Canaanite Jews were, and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

From Strong’s Concordance:

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING – by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially or ethnically a viper or a reptile and therefore against Himself! – IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, this is what these Canaanite Jew people were and still are today in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurious thieves and, worst of all, genocidal psychopathic cold blooded murderers, as exemplified in the so called Russian Revolution; as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

“A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten God, for they had never known God at all, and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them straight:

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of God, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the God of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a severe punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so-called African-American blacks.

However, I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand, and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) parents. In Matthew we have Joseph’s lineage who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father, but his step-father, and in Luke we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (KJV) The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (JUDAH) and his brethren; 3 And Judas (JUDAH) begat Phares (PHAREZ) and Zara (ZARAH) of Thamar (TAMAR); and Phares (PHAREZ) begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam (REHOBOAM); and Roboam (REHOBOAM) begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; 15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary (Miriam), of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? Easy, because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI. (Emphasis mine)

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (KJV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So did Joseph have two fathers, or is this a contradiction, or just an expression of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still referred to as his father and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was called Heli’s son.

From the Concordant Literal Translation:

Luke 3:23 (CLV) And He, Jesus, when beginning, was about thirty years old, being a son (as to the law) of Joseph, of Eli,

From The Greek Transliteral:

Luke 3:23 (Greek Transliteral) And He was the Jesus as-if of-years thirty beginning as was lawlized (was legalised) son of-Joseph of-the Heli.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon, through Solomon’s son Rehoboam, and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David, We therefore have Yashua Messiah, who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (KJV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH).

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his twin brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (KJV) The (ROYAL) Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah, nor his descendants, until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK, so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low, because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However, I can hear the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” AH, BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this ignorant empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar, who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another woman, his first woman, named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites, and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Lord for disobeying their father Judah, and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consummation of their marriage to Tamar and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband, but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime, Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the original parents of the first Canaanite Jews and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside, this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews, via their mothers, and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father, but he was a Freemason and did have a Jewish wife.

So to sum up, we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Israelites; 3) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Canaanite Jew. (See link 4 below)

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/