The DUALITY GODHEAD

The Duality Godhead? What Godhead is that, I hear you ask? Well I’ll tell you straight, right away, They are not a mickey mouse triune godhead, They’re not a Unitarian/Judaic/Islamic monotheistic godhead and They are not a Binatarian godhead either, if that’s what you were thinking.

Now what is a Binatarian godhead? I’ve never heard of such a thing, again I hear you say. OK, so let me explain, a Binatarian godhead is a half-truth so that means it’s a lie just like the monotheistic godhead and the trinity godhead.

Binatarianism is belief in a Duality Godhead that has been corrupted with Triunism and turned into yet another lying hu-man magical construct. This means that instead of a mythical godhead that is one in three and three in one they have constructed a godhead that, like the trinity, it is one in two and two in one – total fallacious religious nonsense. We therefore need to understand that The Godhead consists of TWO DISTINCT Spiritual Beings who are NEVER at anytime one solitary being.

This means that The Duality Godhead are very simple to understand for we are told about Them right at the beginning in Genesis Chapter 1:

Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God (‘Elohim’ – plural) created the heaven and the earth.

There They are, in the very first verse of the Holy Scriptures ‘ELOHIM’ and ‘Elohim’ is the plural of ‘Eloah’, so if the Godhead was ONE GOD, it would have read: “In the beginning God (‘Eloah’ – singular) created the heaven and the earth.” But it DOES NOT SAY THAT it says ‘ELOHIM’ – PLURAL! MORE THAN ONE GOD – THE GODHEAD! Please excuse the shouting folks, but shouting is very necessary for some stiff necked duped people out there who love to hang onto their nonsensical Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious myths = monotheism and/or triunism.

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – H430
אלהים
‘ĕlôhı̂ym
el-o-heem’
Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.

Now pay attention to what Strong is doing here, for he is following a satanic monothesitic agenda and explaining away The Truth by introducing his own irrelevant intellectual nonsense into his definition of ‘Elohim’“but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God;”

Moreover, ignoring his intellectual waffle, ask yourself this very pertinent question: Would a Bible scholar of Strong’s immense calibre, with his excellent knowledge of the Hebrew language, have not known of the word ‘Eloah’ and known its SINGULAR meaning and also have known that ‘Elohim’ was the plural of that singular word? I will leave you all to answer that no brainer question for yourselves.

OK, so we have established from the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that the Godhead is more than one god and this is further confirmed for us in Genesis again:

Genesis 1:26 (first part) (KJV) And God said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness: (Emphasis mine)

Right, now is this claimed solitary mono-god speaking to himself? If not, who is he speaking to – the angels? No way, for I’ll tell you straight, the angels never created anything, and man is definitely not created in the image of angels. This means that if we take the “God is one” nonsense, seriously, it must mean that their god needs certifying, for he is hallucinating and seeing someone in his head that he is now attempting to hold a conversation with. Hilarious or what!?

Having said all that, I can now see all the monotheists jumping up and down, frothing at the mouth, and renting their clothes in true Moloch and Baal worshipping style as they did in Elijah’s day when their mono-god failed to bring down fire to ignite the wet wood, such is their delusional thinking. Not only that, but when I have finished this article the trinity dupes will no doubt have joined them in their manic frenzy. Who said being a follower of Yashua Messiah – The Way was not good fun? LOL

Moving on I will now quote a segment from one of my earlier articles which covers the prime and/or premier “identity of God verse in Deuteronomy”, and we all know it, don’t we? This verse is the verse that nearly all monotheists quote in an attempt to support their erroneous satanic claims:

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Please note, as I disect this verse it will be, in part, a repeat of what I have said above.

“Hear, O Israel” – or better translated “Hear you Israel” or “Listen up you Israelites”, for I, your Lord, have something important to tell you:

“The Lord our God” – properly translated from the Hebrew; The Lord = The Eternal or The Self-Existing. Our God = Our ‘Elohim’ (plural); the Godhead that has always self-existed before time began and was/is always a plural Duality Godhead.

Straight away in this short phrase of Holy Scripture we are told by the use of this word ‘Elohim’ (the plural of ‘Eloah’) that we are dealing with more than one God. Look folks, there is no getting away from this Truth, and we need to get it through our heads that the Hebrew word ‘Eloah’ (singular) would have been in use here, not ‘Elohim’, IF God was one. OK, so we have now ascertained that The Godhead is more than one, and yet it says:

“Is One Lord” – so what’s going on here and what does this mean? The Hebrew word here for ‘one’ is ‘Echad’ which means ‘united’ or ‘in unity’ in one sense, and ‘number one’ the prime number in the other sense, that is, no one higher or no one above – The Most High as wriiten elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures.

One – H259
אחד
‘echâd
ekh-awd’
A numeral from H258; properly united, that is, (as) one; or (as an ordinal) first: – a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any (-thing), apiece, a certain [dai-] ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.

OK, as we can see the word ONE does not mean solitary or one god or a mono-god, for it means UNITED AS ONE, that is, in agreement in thought, word and deed, yet still distinct and separate as Two Spiritual Beings.

A Numeral – H258
אחד
‘âchad
aw-khad’
Perhaps a primitive root; to unify, that is, (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts): – go one way or other.

The primitive root word then confirms this for us – TO UNIFY!! And again this, in turn, means They are not one being, for being united or unified is always an arrangement whereby a number of beings are at one with each other or unanimous in their thoughts, aims and ideals, as in a football team. Newcastle United is a team of individuals united in one aim – to win, but they are not one being, they are eleven distinct beings. This is how it is with the Godhead; they are Two Spiritual Beings, united as one in thought, mind and deed – totally likeminded – united!

This, too, is why The Lord, through Paul, exhorts the Congregations of God to be like the Godhead in their relationships one with another:

Romans 15:5-6 (KJV) Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: 6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even The Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. [Two distinct beings] (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Take note, the Congregations of God were not ONE BEING, but they were exhorted by Paul to be of ONE MIND just like The Father and The Son and like the Godhead of God with God in the beginning who said: “Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness:”

If we now move on to the New Testament we have a new word for the Godhead and that word is the Greek word ‘Theos’ instead of the Hebrew word ‘Elohim’. However we need to be clear that just because a Greek word is now used instead of a Hebrew word doesn’t mean that the nature and make-up of the Duality Godhead has changed. In fact the Greek word ‘theos’ is very useful for this topic for, generally, it means a DEITY and in the Greek sense that means gods plural, for the Greeks were polytheists – they, like the ancient Egyptians, had many gods. As far as I know they did not have a word in their language to describe a monotheistic god. It was only the Jews that worshipped such a deity and they worshipped that deity in error and in ignorance when they knew very well that God ‘Elohim’ was a plural Godhead.

God – G2316
θεός
theos
theh’-os
Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

So there we have it: ‘Theos’ = a deity and in Ancient Greece that would mean more than one god, not a mono-god. Not only that, but because ‘Theos’ is such a general all encompassing word in terms of objects of worship, it means it can be interpreted any way you like, if you have a monotheistic or triunistic agenda to fulfil. Moreover, notice that within this very definition we can see Strong doing just that with all his figurative nonsense regarding ‘magistrates’. With regard to ‘magistrates’ I will leave a link below for additional reading regarding this satanic subject.

Furthermore, because we know that the Godhead does not cause confusion re their identity we can definitely know for sure that plural ‘Theos’ in the NT means exactly the same a plural ‘Elohim’ in the OT – The Duality Godhead with The Holy Spirit as their LIVING POWER.

One last Holy Scripture:

Galatians 3:20 (KJV) Now a mediator is not [a mediator] of one, but God is one.

Now does this verse make any sense? First of all, who is The Mediator that this verse is refering to? Answer: Yashua Messiah. And was Yashua Messiah God come in the flesh? Answer: Yes, hence it states quite plainly that a mediator is not of one, so there has to be more than one in order for one to mediate to the other and yet it then says: “God is one!” So what’s going on here?

Easy, God = ‘Theos’ = ‘Elohim’ = more than one, for the Godhead does not change:

Malachi 3:6 (KJV) For I am The LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. (Emphasis mine)

Here we have Yashua Messiah speaking on behalf of the Godhead, for no one has ever seen or heard The Father:

John 1:18 (KJV) No man hath seen God (The Father) at any time; The Only Begotten Son, which is in the bosom of The Father, He hath declared Him. (Brackets and Emphasis mine)

John 5:37 (KJV) And The Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. YE HAVE NEITHER HEARD HIS VOICE AT ANY TIME, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE. (Emphasis mine)

So there it is folks, NO ONE has ever seen or heard The Father at any time so that must mean that Yashua Messiah was The God of the Old Testament who spoke on behalf of Himself and/or The Father = The Duality Godhead.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-the-mystery-of-mystery-babylon-the-great/

Brother Charles

Advertisements

Are YOU a Heretic and What is Heresy?

If you are a Christian, or even not a Christian at all and with no interest in Christianity, have you ever wondered about these two words and what they mean? for they get banded about with great regularity by those of the satanic Roman Catholic Cult, which is a part of the equally satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Moreover, when you hear these words, do they resonate a positive vibe with you or a negative vibe? For me, they have always resonated a negative vibe, because they have always sounded accusatory and judgemental. Now don’t get me wrong, for there are some people that deserve to be labelled a heretic, that’s IF the word heretic actually means what people believe it to mean, that is, a blasphemer or an apostate, and again, that is, someone who has turned his back on Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and walked away as did these wretched people here:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

However, I have learned just recently that the words heretic and heresy from a Holy Scriptural sense are not what they seem when compared to the erroneous Roman Catholic religious interpretations. In fact, they do not mean what I have described above at all. They have been mistranslated from the Greek manuscripts, and more on that later, but first let’s look at some secular dictionary definitions for the words in question.

From Dictionary.com:

Heretic

1) A professed believer who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church or rejects doctrines prescribed by that church.

2) Roman Catholic Church – a baptized Roman Catholic who willfully and persistently rejects any article of faith.

3) Anyone who does not conform to an established attitude, doctrine, or principle.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heretic

1) Religion: a person who differs in opinion from established religious dogma; especially: a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church who refuses to acknowledge or accept a revealed truth the church regards them as heretics.

2) One who differs in opinion from an accepted belief or doctrine – a nonconformist.

From Dictionary.com:

Heresy

1. Opinion or doctrine at variance with the orthodox or accepted doctrine, especially of a church or religious system.

2. The maintaining of such an opinion or doctrine.

3. Roman Catholic Church. the willful and persistent rejection of any article of faith by a baptized member of the church.

4. Any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs, customs, etc.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heresy

1a:  adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma (see dogma 2) They were accused of heresy.

1b: denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church

1c :  an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

2a: dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice – to disagree with the party leadership was heresy.

2b: an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards

So there we have it from the secular perspective and notice how the Roman Catholic Cult features prominently in these definitions giving it a strong association with these two negative words.

Notice, too, in 2a how they now apply it to those that reject rigid political dogma as well. Rejection of Bolshevik Marxist Political Correctness (Cultural Marxism) anyone? Do I also sense the spirit of the legalistic satanic Pharisees here in the application of these two words? You bet your life!

OK, so what’s your point I hear you ask? confusion and some I would answer and to unravel that confusion let’s go now to the Holy Scriptures for The Truth regarding these two misused words:

First and foremost, the word heretic cannot be found in the KJV Bible at all – it ain’t there folks, so that tells you just how important this subject is to Yashua Messiah. However, it is VERY important to those Roman Catholic judgemental mongrel dogs who like to accuse people of being heretics, that is, those who have rumbled their money making, money laundering scam called a church and have started to voice their truthful opinions.

Second, and just as crucial, the word heresy can only be found once in the KJV Bible and here is the verse with its only use:

Acts 24:14 (KJV) But this I confess unto thee, that after The Way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in The Law and in The Prophets: (Emphasis mine)

So here we have some very interesting things being said by Paul. First of all, Paul let’s it be known that following Yashua Messiah was known by the followers of Yashua Messiah as The Way, for He is The Way – The ONLY Way to The Kingdom of God and Eternal Life and NO RELIGION required!

Second, the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION called those who were followers of The Way (Yashua Messiah), HERETICS!!! and their beliefs and Faith solely in Yashua Messiah – HERESY!!! How blasphemous is that?

Not only that, if we look up the word in the Greek MSS what do you think we will find? Answer, this from Strong’s Concordance:

Heresy – G139 – αἵρεσις – hairesis – hah’ee-res-is
From G138; properly a choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion. (“heresy” is the Greek word itself.): – heresy [which is the Greek word itself], sect.

Look what we have here: 1) a choice; 2) a party in disunion; 3) a sect. So what does this tell us? Well far from being negative, the word heresy looks like it is something very positive, that is, the separating of those who follow Yashua Messiah (The Way) from satanic religious illegitimates. In the first century that would have been primarily the Pharisees and Sadducees who were later usurped by the so called Hellenising philosophers known as the ‘church fathers’, that is, the counterfeit founders of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Be sure you understand that religion is a spirit called Legion and Satan presents this phenomena in a myriad of ways whether it be Jews or Fundie ‘Christians’ with their Judaising Law based religion or Papists with their Babylonian Mystery Religion.

Furthermore, today, whilst the Pope is traipsing here, there and everywhere around the world promoting his mickey mouse satanic multi-faith unity BS, Paul was and is teaching the exact opposite – now there’s a surprise and is that hilarious or what?

Moreover what’s more interesting is the way this Greek word hairesis has taken on a dual meaning in some people’s eyes for we find it used elsewhere:

Acts 28:22 (KJV) But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect (hairesis), we know that every where it is spoken against.
(Brackets and emphasis mine)

In this verse we can see the word hairesis used more accurately, in it being translated as sect and not heresy, but, either way, neither translations of this word point to the evil and distorted and satanic interpretations of The Devil’s Roman Catholic Cult who misuse, twist and pervert it to accuse those of The Truth and/or The Way of being heretics which, in reality, is a compliment to us, not an insult.

This means dear brothers and sisters that in the future if some evil papist calls you a heretic, just thank him or her as sarcastically as you can and be encouraged by their plug ignorance.

Brother Charles.

As a PS I would add that the word heresies can also be found three times which again should be translated as sects and which I will deal with here at a later date.

Was JESUS CHRIST a JEW?…

…Or better, Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a JEW?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38.

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Canaanite Jews were and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (KJV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (KJV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Matthew 23:33 (KJV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially a viper or a reptile and therefore against Himself – IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, that’s what these Canaanite Jew people were and still are in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurous thieves and, worst of all, genocidal psychopathic cold blooded murderers, as in the so called Russian Revolution as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

“A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

– Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten God, for they had never known God at all and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them straight:

John 8:44 (KJV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (Brackets mine)

The Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of God, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the God of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so called African-American blacks.

However I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s parents. In Matthew we have Joseph’s lineage who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father but his step-father and in Luke we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (KJV) The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (JUDAH) and his brethren; 3 And Judas (JUDAH) begat Phares (PHAREZ) and Zara (ZARAH) of Thamar (TAMAR); and Phares (PHAREZ) begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam (REHOBOAM); and Roboam (REHOBOAM) begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
Mat 1:15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI. (Emphasis mine)

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (KJV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So did Joseph have two fathers or is this a contradiction or just an expression of of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still refered to as his father and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was Heli’s son.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon through Solomon’s son Rehoboam and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David, We therefore have Yashua Messiah who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (KJV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH).

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (KJV) The Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah nor his descendants until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However I can here the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another wife named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Lord for disobeying their father Judah and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consumation of their marriage to Tamar and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the first Canaanite Jews and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside and in turn this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews via their mothers and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father.

So to sum up we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Israelites; 3) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah, for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Canaanite Jew.

For further reading and understanding of the origins of the white Semitic Israelites and Canaanite Jews please see my two articles below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/