The Truth is The True Gospel Message of the coming Kingdom of God and Salvation under His Glorious Grace and KNOWING The Duality Godhead of The Father and The Son – The ONLY Godhead. And always remember that The Truth (Yashua Messiah) is the enemy of The State. Below is the Lion of Judah (not the Jews). Please scroll down for the selected article.
At last, we have reached the last chapter of this forger’s deceptions, although in this chapter most of the verses look like they are plagiarised straight from Paul’s writings, so the MCV will return with just few alterations.
1 (KJV) I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;
2 Timothy 4:1 (KJV) I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;
2 Timothy 4:1 Notes: I have made mention of this term: “charge” or “I charge thee”, before, and it can be found 8 times in these Pastoral Epistles. What is more interesting is that it can only be found one other time in 1 Thessalonians, where Paul uses it, but even that is suspicious for it talks about swearing oaths. It can be found nowhere else in Paul’s writings. This means it’s very peculiar to our forger ‘friend’ and just to let us know that it wasn’t Paul using it:
Matthew 5:33-37 (MCV) Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not swear falsely, but shalt perform unto The Yahavah thine oaths: 34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is Yah’s throne: 35 Nor by the earth; for it is His footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. 36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. 37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
These epistles are also repetitively dictatorial, as though our Messenger friend Paul has become a tyrannical despot, and a Nicolaitan! Fear not my friends, for this is just more proof that these epistles are authored by a plagiarising forger. Think about this, if his followers need a dictatorship and a tyrant for a leader there must be something seriously wrong with their spirituality.
However, we now have the following verses, that are somewhat of a mixed bag. Some being genuine Pauline Scripture and others being embellished with meaningless religious terminology like ‘doctrine’ as in the next two verses.
2-4(KJV) Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine. 3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
2 Timothy 4:4 (KJV) And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
2 Timothy 4:4 Notes: You see, here is another example of that about face conundrum that we have running through these epistles. We think from this, that true believers are going to be led astray by fables, when he is the creature with the ‘doctrine of fables’. The fable of Salvation is not until The Resurrection! Make no mistake, everything is back-to-front as far as this forger’s writings are concerned, making you think that it’s Paul speaking, when nothing could be further than The Truth.
We then have genuine verses of Scripture, and most certainly from Paul’s hand, and obviously taken from an original manuscript:
5 (MCV) But be cautious in all matters, suffer trials and persecutions, do the work of a herald of the Gospel of The Kingdom, and accomplish your service completely.
5 (KJV) But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.
6 (MCV) For I am already a liquid offering, and the season of my dissolution is imminent.
6(KJV) For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.
7 (MCV) I have fought the ideal contest, and I have finished my course in The Faith:
7 (KJV) I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith:
8 (MCV) Henceforth there is a reward of a crown of sovereignty that awaits me, which The Yahavah, the just evaluator, will be awarding me in that day.
8 (KJV) Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.
9 (MCV) Endeavour to come to me quickly:
9 (KJV) Do thy diligence to come shortly unto me:
10 (MCV) For Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present world more than Yashua Messiah, and has departed unto Thessalonica. Crescens to Galatia. Titus unto Dalmatia.
10 (KJV) For Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present world, and is departed unto Thessalonica; Crescens to Galatia, Titus unto Dalmatia.
10 (MCV) Only Luke is with me. Take Mark, and bring him with thee: for he is useful to me for service.
11(KJV) Only Luke is with me. Take Mark, and bring him with thee: for he is profitable to me for the ministry.
11 (MCV) And Tychicus I have sent to Ephesus
12 (KJV) And Tychicus have I sent to Ephesus.
13 (MCV) The cloak that I left at Troas with Carpas, when you come, bring with thee, and the scrolls, especially the parchments.
13 (KJV) The cloke that I left at Troas with Carpus, when thou comest, bring with thee, and the books, but especially the parchments.
14-15 (MCV) Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil: The Yahavah reward him according to his works 15 Of whom be you aware also; for he hath greatly withstood our words.
14-15 (KJV) Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil: the Lord reward him according to his works: 15 Of whom be thou ware also; for he hath greatly withstood our words.
2 Timothy 4:14-15 (KJV) Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil: the Lord reward him according to his works:
2 Timothy 4:14-15 Notes — (a): Now this Alexander the coppersmith has to be a different Alexander from the one in 1 Timothy 1:20, for we are now using Paul’s words in these genuine Scriptures. Alexander was a very common name in the first and second centuries. Here, this Alexander, is known by his profession, whereas the one in 1 Timothy is not. This tells me the coppersmith was, at one time involved in supporting the Assembly, but betrayed Paul and his brethren.
2 Timothy 4:14-15 Notes — (b): Notice, too, that this Alexander the coppersmith withstood Paul’s words, but then Paul didn’t teach that The Resurrection was the day of our Salvation! So if these are genuine Pauline Scriptures, which I believe they are, then this must be another Alexander.
16 (MCV) At my first defence no man stood with me, but all deserted me: I pray that Yah will not hold that against them.
16(KJV) At my first answer no man stood with me, but all men forsook me: I pray God that it may not be laid to their charge.
17 (MCV) Yet The Yahavah stood beside me, and He invigorates and strengthens me; that by and through me the declaring of The Gospel may be fully known, and that all the Adamic Nations should hear; and I am rescued out of the mouth the lion.
17 (KJV) Notwithstanding the Lord stood with me, and strengthened me; that by me the preaching might be fully known, and that all the Gentiles might hear: and I was delivered out of the mouth of the lion.
18 (MCV) And The Yahavah shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto His heavenly Kingdom on this earth: to whom be Glory for ever and ever. Amen!
18 (KJV) And the Lord shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom: to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
19 (MCV) Greet Prisca and Aquila, and the household of Onesiphorus.
19 (KJV) Salute Prisca and Aquila, and the household of Onesiphorus.
20 (MCV) Erastus abode at Corinth: but Trophimus have I left at Miletum sick.
20 (KJV) Erastus abode at Corinth: but Trophimus have I left at Miletum sick.
21 (MCV) Endeavour to come before Winter. Eubulus greets you, and Pudens, and Linus, and Claudia, and all the brethren.
21 Do thy diligence to come before winter. Eubulus greeteth thee, and Pudens, and Linus, and Claudia, and all the brethren.
22 (MCV) The Yahavah Yashua Messiah be with thy spirit. Grace be with you. Amen.
22 (KJV) The Lord Jesus Christ be with thy spirit. Grace be with you. Amen.
OK, that’s it for 1 and 2 Timothy, and I will be editing these wretched pages of so-called Scripture in the future, as they do need finishing off with a few details, but suffice it to say they are a good base from which to work, that is, with the major Hellenised Religious flaws exposed.
This chapter looks like it is going to be more of same, and I am wondering whether there’s any point to an MCV version of these Epistles at all!
Chapter 3
(KJV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 Timothy 3:1 (KJV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 Timothy 3:1 Notes: Now here’s a thing – John, in his first epistle, makes it plain that those living in the first century were living in the last days:
1 John 2:18 (MCV) My dear novices in The Faith, it is the last hour (days): and as ye have heard that anti-Christ shall come, even now are there many anti-Christs; whereby we know that it is the last hour (days).
Now our forger seems to be most assured of when the last days begin, but he makes no effort to explain himself, and make that known. He speaks most assuredly of them being future, and not applicable to the times he, and his duped followers, were living in, as John makes plain to his followers. So why would this be? Did he know something that John didn’t?
The first century Assemblies of Yah definitely believed that Yashua Messiah’s return was imminent, especially when the Romans sacked Jerusalem and destroyed The Temple. And so each generation of Christians since then has, at some time or other, believed in the imminent return of our Messiah. However, our forger is certain that it is a future event, and not for the present.
I do not doubt for one second that perilous times will come, but what is interesting about this is the thinking behind it. As I said, the first century believers definitely believed The Messiah’s return was imminent, but by the time of our forger’s writing in circa 150 AC, it was no longer considered an issue or a valid opinion, especially with those building a counterfeit, religious, Hellenised edifice, like the author.
We then have three verses which could easily be of Paul’s hand, as well as those of the forger, so I will leave them be.
2-4 (KJV) For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
However, we get the usual religious clanger that always crops up when we drop our guard in terms of monitoring carefully what our forger is saying:
5 (KJV) Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
2 Timothy 3:5 (KJV) Having a form of godliness = piety, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
2 Timothy 3:5 Notes: So we return to the sanctimonious word GODLINESS = PIETY, which immediately makes me feel nauseous, due to The Truth that it is the complete opposite of what he thinks it means. And who would want a: ‘form of Godliness’? It beggars belief!
Not only that, but having a ‘form of Godliness’ and denying the power thereof! What imaginary power could that be, I wonder?
6 (KJV) For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
2 Timothy 3:6 (KJV) For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
2 Timothy 3:6 Notes: Here our forger is explaining to us what the celibate priests of his counterfeit church will be doing in the future, that is, leading gullible women astray with their diverse lusts. I won’t expound on the details, but the confessional led to far more than just hearing about these ladies sins and mistakes!
We then revert to more genuine sounding verses, which I still believe are of the forger’s hand, because they are based upon error:
7 (KJV) Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
2 Timothy 3:7 (KJV) Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
2 Timothy 3:7 Notes: Now there is much irony in this verse, for our author should be looking in a mirror and reading this to himself, especially re his whacky ideas of The Resurrection being the day of our Salvation! He, therefore, is the one for ever learning but never coming to a knowledge of The Truth.
8-9(KJV) Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as their’s also was.
2 Timothy 3:8-9 (KJV) Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.
2 Timothy 3:8-9 Notes: Here he applies the rebellion of Jannes and Jambres to Hymenaeus and Philetus, but as we have ascertained, these two fellas were on the right track, and our forger ‘friend’ was way off the mark with a reprobate corrupt mind.
So we must read the following verses in same Light, but remembering that he uses genuine Scriptures to give his writings a ring of authenticity, especially when passing himself off as Paul – see verse 11. Keep in mind that these epistles were written circa 150 AC, and long after the death of Paul, so plagiarising was very much the order of the day when it comes to these so-called Pastoral Epistles.
The next verses 10-14 are fairly sound, if they are Paul’s writings as in verses 11 and 12, but the rest possibly not, so you must deal with them as if they are the forgers handiwork. I will leave you to decide, but I know what I think.
10-14 (KJV) But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, charity, patience, 11 Persecutions, afflictions, which came unto me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra; what persecutions I endured: but out of them all the Lord delivered me. 12 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. 13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. 14 But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
15 (KJV) And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
2 Timothy 3:15 (KJV) And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
2 Timothy 3:15 Notes: From this verse I suppose he is referring to Timothy who it appears knew The Set Apart Scriptures that were able to make him wise UNTO SALVATION!!! So what is he giving away here? Well we know don’t we, he’s confirming for us his blasphemous beliefs in The Resurrection being the day of our Salvation, and that Timothy, although already Baptised and gifted with the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, was being made wise and being made ready for Salvation, for in our forger’s eyes he had not as yet gained Salvation!!! Make sure you understand the blasphemous nature of these epistles!
16-17 (KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 (KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 Notes: Again, these last verses are a mixed bag, but I think they reek of a judgemental attitude on the part of our forger ‘friend’. This spirit runs right through these epistles with what amounts to a load of people who are obviously not repentant, and I strongly suspect of not being called by The Father. This means they are secular carnal minded people who have been invited to join matey’s Hellenising outfit posing as a church!
This chapter starts off well with it possibly being of Paul’s hand, but by verse 5 we have the forger latching on to 1 Corinthians 9:24-27, which I expose as spurious, or at least suspect in many ways (see link No. 1 below). He may be the author of the above passage, as well, and was placing this connecting verse in 2 Timothy 2 in order to link his forgery to Paul’s work. Remember that these Epistles were written circa 150 AC, not in the first century.
This chapter will not contain many MCV verses, because like the previous chapter there is so much religious drivel herein that it would have been a waste of my time attempting to correct it – you cannot make a silk purse out of sow’s ear!
Chapter 2
1 (MCV) Thou therefore, my son in The Faith, be strong in The Grace that is in Messiah Yashuah.
(KJV) Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus.
2 (MCV) And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to Faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.
(KJV) And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.
3 (MCV) Thou therefore endure trials and afflictions, as a good soldier of Yashua Messiah.
(KJV) Thou therefore endure hardness, as a good soldier of Jesus Christ.
4 (MCV) No man that wars for Yashua Messiah entangles himself with the affairs of this life or the ways of this world; that he may please The Father who hath chosen him to be a soldier.
(KJV) No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier.
Verse 5 is bogus so I have deleted from my MCV! (See link No. 1 below)
5 (KJV) And if a man also strive for masteries, yet is he not crowned, except he strive lawfully.
Verses 6-9 are passable so I have left them in with some corrections, but by verse 10 the chapter disintegrates into so much erroneous blasphemous nonsense.
6 (MCV) The husbandman or farmer that labours must be first partaker of the fruits.
(KJV) The husbandman that laboureth must be first partaker of the fruits.
7 (MCV) Consider what I say; and The Yahavah give thee understanding in all things that are essential.
(KJV) Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things.
8 (MCV) Remember that Yashua Messiah of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to the Gospel of the Kingdom that I teach:
(KJV) Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to my gospel:
9 (MCV) Wherein I suffer trouble, and labelled an evil doer, even unto bonds; but The Sayings of Yah are not bound. (See link No. 2 below).
(KJV) Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer, even unto bonds; but the word of God is not bound.
10 (MCV) Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sakes, that have obtained salvation which is in Messiah Yashua with Eternal Glory.
(KJV) Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
The MCV ends here and begins again in chapter 3.
This is an anti-Baptism blind guide at work in the pages of the KJV! There is no other way of putting it, no matter what your misguided protestations may be! This means we cannot trust the words he writes thereafter – HE’S A MAN OF THE HELLENISED, HU-MAN MADE, CAINITE-JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RELIGION, THAT WAS A FORERUNNER OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, FOUNDED AT NICEA IN 325 AC – 100%.(See link Nos. 3 and 4 below).
2 Timothy 2:10 (KJV) Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
2 Timothy 2:10 Notes — (a) You see, here we have solid gold proof that we are dealing with an impostor, and a forger, WHO HAS NO UNDERSTANDING OF SALVATION, or when that occurs!!! He literally doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He is talking FUTURE here, that is, that we MAY ALSO OBTAIN THE SALVATION! And he’s not talking to unsaved people, for he is also talking to Timothy, and we know he is already BAPTISED and SAVED! So we know that he is speaking of Salvation as some mythical future event, namely the day of our RESURRECTION – WHICH IS NOT THE DAY OF OUR SALVATION!!
This is also proof that Hymenaeus and Philetus were not teaching another Gospel! (See notes below).
(KJV) It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him.
2 Timothy 2:11 (KJV) It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him:
2 Timothy 2:11 Notes: Notice how the obfuscation continues with no expounding of HOW WE DIE WITH HIM, and how we are raised as new beings from the watery grave! This is because he doesn’t want us to know, other than misleading us into thinking that salvation is not until The Resurrection = a heinous blasphemy.
Again, if this is Paul has he suffered a serious memory lapse?:
Romans 6:4 (MCV) Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism (full immersion) into death: that like as The Messiah – The Anointed was raised up from the dead by The Glory of The Father, even so we also should walk in newness of Life as Spirit indwelled new men and women.
(KJV) If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us:
2 Timothy 2:12 (KJV) If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us:
2 Timothy 2:12 Notes: To whom is he speaking here? If they are born of Yah Christians, are they about to deny Yashua Messiah, and is suffering all that is required to be entitled to reign with Him? Yet again no mention of Baptism, and what of Christians who don’t suffer? Are they excluded!?
(KJV) If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.
2 Timothy 2:13 (KJV) If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.
2 Timothy 2:13 Notes: Why would we: “believe not?” What’s this nonsense all about? Again, who is he speaking to, and why would Yashua Messiah ever have a need to deny Himself? If someone doesn’t believe it means The Father hasn’t called them to Yashua Messiah, and He’s not going to lose any sleep over them, He’s only interested in those The Father has called!:
Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And the Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the hidden ways of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN.
(KJV) Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers.
2 Timothy 2:14 (KJV) Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers.
2 Timothy 2:14 Notes: Here we go again, what’s it all about with all these words? Are these words all about confusing The Resurrection with Salvation, that we have already exposed him of doing?
(KJV) Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV) Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
2 Timothy 2:15 Notes: So what have we got going on here: looks like we’re WORKING to show ourselves approved unto Yah, so that we need not feel ashamed! I wonder what happened to Grace?
And ‘rightly dividing’ The Sayings of Yah! I’d no idea that Yah’s Sayings needed dividing, unless one had a forked tongue, and it was one’s mission to deceive! But then that’s just what the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion has got, and does do, for it is a stranger to The Truth.
(KJV) But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
2 Timothy 2:16 (KJV) But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
2 Timothy 2:16 Notes: Do not be deceived, for this forger is the creature of vain babblings and profanities, and he uses his favourite word: godliness = piety to let us know where he is coming from, only with an ‘un’ prefix to disguise it = un-piety or un-piousness. From his perspective, this word has nothing to do with wickedness, it means un-religious, and a definite no no in his book, for his sanctimonious religion must be maintained at all times.
(KJV) And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; 18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
2 Timothy 2:17-18 (KJV) and their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; 18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
2 Timothy 2:17-18 Notes: Now here is a serious test for you: 1) We have already ascertained that this author is a forger and blasphemer and 2) he refers to our RESURRECTION as the day of our Salvation, so 3) what if Hymenaeus and Philetus were saying that the day of our Salvation is past already, that is, the day of our Baptism and gifting of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit,and not that The Resurrection was past already?
THINK ABOUT IT! How on earth could our Resurrections be already past? How do you pass yourself off as a Resurrected Spirit Being when you’re still a flesh and blood being, and still bleed, and can die? You can’t; it’s a nonsense, hence we have our forger gaslighting those he has accused!
They were most likely countering this forger’s heresy by saying that Salvation was already passed if Baptism and gifting of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit had taken place. So our Salvation could easily be past IF we believed in Baptism and gifting of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, as a standard requirement for Salvation! Which we can confidently presume our forger didn’t believe in!
He then falsely accuses them of saying the day of our Resurrection has already passed because that’s what HE erroneously believes.
This probably proves that infant water sprinkling was now the order of the day in his budding Hellenised fake church!
To sum up and, by default, we have our liar and forger claiming that the day of our Resurrection is our day of Salvation, so he makes the catastrophic error of miss-labelling what Hymenaeus, Alexander and Philetus were saying in order to paint himself in the right, and they in the wrong.
(KJV) Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
2 Timothy 2:19 (KJV) Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
2 Timothy 2:19 Notes: He then goes into self-righteous defence and overdrive mode by claiming that he is one of chosen ones, when nothing could be further from The Truth. He then lets it be known that Hymenaeus and Philetus were using Yashuah Messiah’s name in what they were declaring, so what does that tell us!? Quite simply that they were declaring The Truth, and our forger was the liar and deceiver!
(KJV) But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth; and some to honour, and some to dishonour.
2 Timothy 2:20 (KJV) But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth; and some to honour, and some to dishonour.
2 Timothy 2:20 Notes: Now I have always been suspicious of this verse, that’s long before I knew what I know now. So what is this ‘great house’ that our forger is attempting to reveal to us here? What does it refer to? Well it may come as no surprise that there is only one other verse that mentions a ‘great house’ in the KJV:
Amos 6:11 (MCV) For, behold, The Yahavah commandeth, and He will smite the ‘great house’ with breaches, and the little house with clefts.
So it doesn’t look too good for this ‘great house’ does it? Would it be because our forger has a Basilica, in his mind’s eye, planned for the future, in Rome!? Not only that, but with gold and silver for the occupants and, of course, the riff raff left with the earth and some wood = “You will own nothing, and be happy!”
(KJV) If a man therefore purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the master’s use, and prepared unto every good work.
2 Timothy 2:21 (KJV) If a man therefore purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the master’s use, and prepared unto every good work.
2 Timothy 2:21 Notes: Oh yes, you can’t beat a good bit of SELF motivated PURGING, and all of the SELF to make him a vessel unto ‘honour’! I wonder if he invited Yashua Messiah along, with His Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, to enjoy the spectacle.
(KJV) Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.
2 Timothy 2:22 (KJV) Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.
2 Timothy 2:22 Notes: What kind of a heart does a born of Yah Christian have, but a pure heart?:
1 John 3:3 (MCV) And every man THAT HATH THIS HOPE IN HIM purifieth himself, even as HE IS PURE.
How pure do you want your heart to be!
(KJV) But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes.
2 Timothy 2:23 (KJV) But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes.
2 Timothy 2:23 Notes: Make sure your questions are not dumb questions, for this elitist man of the Hellenised Religion has no time or patience for pertinent questions that will most likely expose his religious fraud.
(KJV) And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,
2 Timothy 2:24 (KJV) And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,
2 Timothy 2:24 Notes: Notice how he manipulates his budding cult followers by invoking The Yahavah’s name, by making them compliant (gentle), and not troublesome with naturally inquisitive questions. The Truth fears no searching questions! So what has he got to hide!?
(KJV) In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
2 Timothy 2:25 (KJV) In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
2 Timothy 2:25 Notes: Ah here’s a sneaky move: they’re now opposing themselves, are they? just because they declare The Truth that Salvation is past, if they’re Baptised and gifted with the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit. He then invokes Yah’s name to compound his deception.
(KJV) And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.
2 Timothy 2:26 (KJV) And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.
2 Timothy 2:26 Notes: Ha ha, he then fakes his concern for them by hoping they will believe his Hellenising Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious bogus non-Gospel and escape the snare of The Adversary, when it is he that is laying the snare with his Resurrection is Salvation blasphemous nonsense.
On to 2 Timothy 3:
In Yashua Messiah’s Set Apart name
Messenger Charles
1. 1 Corinthians 9:24-27 Did The Messenger Paul Bring His Body Into Subjection?
Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity; Eastern (Russian & Greek) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity; AngliCAINism is NOT Christianity; PROTESTantism is NOT Christianity.
3. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
We have made it to 2 Timothy, after much revelation of 1 Timothy which, unsurprisingly, deteriorated as we progressed through it! The forger showing his religious hand more clumsily as we worked through, but with 2 Timothy we seem to have changed tactics, with what sounds like Paul’s hand being employed!
Now 2 Timothy chapter 1 is probably a part of a genuine manuscript, and actually written by Paul, so I will not knock it, for I believe it to be genuine, and will leave it be. I will also include my MCV version of this chapter.
Chapter 1
1 (MCV) Paul, a Messenger of Yashuah Messiah by the will of Yah, according to the promise of life which is in Messiah Yashuah,
(KJV) Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, according to the promise of life which is in Christ Jesus,
2 (MCV) To Timothy, my dearly beloved son in The Faith: Grace, Mercy, and Peace, from Yah the Father and Messiah Yashuah our Yahavah.
(KJV) To Timothy, my dearly beloved son: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord.
3 (MCV) I thank Yah, whom I serve from my forefathers with pure conscience, that without ceasing I have remembrance of thee in my prayers night and day;
(KJV) I thank God, whom I serve from my forefathers with pure conscience, that without ceasing I have remembrance of thee in my prayers night and day;
2 Timothy 1:3 (KJV) I thank God, whom I serve from my forefathers with pure conscience, that without ceasing I have remembrance of thee in my prayers night and day;
2 Timothy 1:3 Notes: Although this chapter is OK, I have some doubts about this verse, for here we have our hero of the Gospel with what looks like a serious memory lapse:
Adam Clarke has it thus (edited):
Being born an Israelite (so not a Jew), I was carefully educated in the knowledge of the true Yah, and the proper manner of worshipping Him, ever aiming to please Him, even in the time when through ignorance I persecuted the church!
Yet Yashuah Messiah said this to Nicodemus, who was a Pharisee colleague of Paul’s:
John 3:9-12 (MCV) Nicodemus answered and said unto Him, How can these things be? 10 Jesus answered and said unto him, Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things? 11 Truly, truly, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness. (no ignorance, just wilful rebelliousness) 12 If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?
Was Paul a Master of Israel? Was he guiltless when he persecuted the Ecclesia and put them to death? If he was ignorant was he excused and needed no forgiveness!? In contrast, he called himself the worst of sinners! I will leave you all to ponder on the significance of this TRUTH, and to wonder if the forger embellished this verse, or whether it was corrupted by the translators!
4 (MCV) Greatly desiring to see thee, being mindful of thy tears, that I may be filled with joy;
(KJV) Greatly desiring to see thee, being mindful of thy tears, that I may be filled with joy;
5 (MCV) When I call to remembrance the unfeigned Faith that is in thee, which dwelt first in thy grandmother Lois, and thy mother Eunice; and I am persuaded that in thee also.
(KJV) When I call to remembrance the unfeigned faith that is in thee, which dwelt first in thy grandmother Lois, and thy mother Eunice; and I am persuaded that in thee also.
6 (MCV) Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the gift of Yah, which is in thee by the laying on of my hands at the time of thy Baptisms.
(KJV) Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the gift of God, which is in thee by the putting on of my hands.
7 (MCV) For Yah hath not given us the spirit of fear; but the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit of Power, and of agape Love, and of a sound mind.
(KJV) For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
8 (MCV) Be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of our Yahavah, nor of me His prisoner: but be thou partaker of the afflictions of The Gospel of the Kingdom, according to the Power of Yah;
(KJV) Be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me his prisoner: but be thou partaker of the afflictions of the gospel according to the power of God;
9 (MCV) Who hath saved us, and called us with an Set Apart ExclusiveCalling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and Grace, which was given us in Messiah Yashuah before the world began, (see link No. 1 below),
(KJV) Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began,
10 (MCV) But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Yashuah Messiah, who hath abolished and conquered death, and hath brought Eternal Life to Light through the Gospel of the Kingdom of Yah:
(KJV) But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel:
11 (MCV) Whereunto I am appointed a teacher, and a Messenger, and a declarer of The Truth to the Adamic Nations (see link No. 3 below).
(KJV) Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.
12 (MCV) For this reason I also suffer these things: nevertheless I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that Yashuah Messiah is able to keep that which I have committed unto Him against that day.
(KJV) For the which cause I also suffer these things: nevertheless I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.
13 (MCV) Hold fast The Sayings of sound words, which thou hast heard of me, in Faith and agape Love which is in Messiah Yashuah. (See link No 2 below)
(KJV) Hold fast the form of sound words, which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.
14 (MCV) That good thing which was committed unto thee keep by the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit which dwelleth in us.
(KJV) That good thing which was committed unto thee keep by the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in us.
15 (MCV) This thou knowest, that some of those, which are in Asia be turned away from me; of whom are Phygellus and Hermogenes.
(KJV) This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me; of whom are Phygellus and Hermogenes.
16 (MCV) The Yahavah give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my imprisonment:
(KJV) The Lord give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain:
17 (MCV) But, when he was in Rome, he sought me out very diligently, and found me.
(KJV) But, when he was in Rome, he sought me out very diligently, and found me.
18 (MCV) The Yahavah grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Yahavah in that day: and in how many things he ministered unto me at Ephesus, thou knowest very well.
(KJV) The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day: and in how many things he ministered unto me at Ephesus, thou knowest very well.
1. Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah?:
Now this last chapter of 1 Timothy reverts to genuine sounding Scripture, but do not be deceived, for it is still of a forger’s hand, and not of Paul’s hand. How do you know that? I hear you ask! EASY! Because the give away words ‘GODLINESS’, ‘DOCTRINE’ and ‘POTENTATE’ are in their muddying the waters. These meaningless religious words, alone, tell you it was written by a Hellenising philosopher, a creature of satanic RELIGION, and not a man indwelt of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit’ and a born of Yah Christian like Paul!
It is also addressed to a body of people of questionable character. There may be some true believers amongst them, but in the main they are suspect with them being plagued with wealth and all the sins that go with it.
These are the issues we have to consider:
1) Due to the three dreaded words, as mentioned, we cannot rely upon them as being bona-fide Scriptures.
2) We cannot see them as speaking for us, as True followers of Yashua Messiah, for this author is a usurper and a subversive; faking his Christianity!
3) This means we are dealing with an agent who is speaking for a counterfeit concept and bogus Hellenised religious body, who is actively giving true believers a bad name – see verses 3 – 6;
4) He then changes the thrust of his message by sounding sincere with his sickly pious words – see verses 7 – 8. Godliness (wretched piety) being the give away. There is no such Christian concept as GODLINESS = PIETY!
5) He then compounds his error by his judgemental admission that regenerated Christians are capable of various nefarious sins: “But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.” verses 9 – 10.
How many true Christians do you know that are rich? Is it common policy for The Father to call wealthy sons and daughters, only for them to be ensnared by the temptations of filthy lucre and hurtful lusts? What happened to: “Deliver us from evil!” NO! So what is he on about? Answer: His new religion, whereby there will be members who are filthy rich and will succumb to myriad temptations and hurtful lusts, because they are counterfeiters!
6) We then get three verses of what seem to be sound verses – verses 10, 11 and 12, but I am not convinced, and none the more for that will leave them be –see notes.
7) Verses 13 and 14 are not words that I would use, but I suppose they make him look good.
8) Verse 15 – Potentate? What kind of a word is that? It sounds ROMAN CATHOLIC to me! And I am right, but what is it doing in an English Bible? See notes.
9) In verse 16 we have a the usual misunderstanding about The Light. Whether this is a translator error, or a forger error, I have no idea, but knowing the forger’s track record I know where I would place my money, if I were a gambler! See notes.
10) Then in verse 17 we get a CHARGE = A COMMAND! He likes to chuck his weight around this forger, instead of merely instructing and teaching his learners. See notes.
11) In verses 18 and 19 we have a religious verses posing as a genuine verses!
12) Followed by more proof that he was writing to a bunch of counterfeiters in verses 20 and 21.
Chapter 6
There will be no MCV verses for this chapter, as I see it as a pointless exercise.
1 Timothy 6:1-2 (KJV) Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honour, that the name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed. 2 And they that have believing masters, let them not despise them, because they are brethren; but rather do them service, because they are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things teach and exhort.
1 Timothy 6:1-2 Notes: Interesting how we have blessings referred to as benefits, as if some gift of government! And no mention of obtaining your freedom if at all possible!
1 Timothy 6:3 (KJV) If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;
1 Timothy 6:3 Notes: Who’s wholesome words? And then he has the effrontery of saying they’re Yashua Messiah’s Sayings, according to GODLINESS, which is an insult, for it is religious mumbo jumbo and cannot be Yashua Messiah’s words!
1 Timothy 6:4 (KJV) He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,
1 Timothy 6:4 Notes: He then goes into a tirade of accusations that apply to him and his reprobate followers! for there can be no questions asked of suspect words like GODLINESS = religious gobbledegook. No Berean attitudes allowed in this church! Ask yourself this: if he was preaching the Sayings of Yah would there be any questions at all.
1 Timothy 6:5 (KJV) Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.
1 Timothy 6:5 Notes: He then goes into another tirade of accusing them of being seekers of GODLINESS through gain! Why would anyone seek ‘PIETY through gain’ unless they were as counterfeit as him! Who has allowed these religious wretches into their group?
1 Timothy 6:6 (KJV) But godliness with contentment is great gain.
1 Timothy 6:6 Notes: Get a load of this for confirmation! “But religious piety with self-satisfied contentment is great gain” Oh really, is that so!? A self-righteous charter if ever heard one.
1 Timothy 6:7-8 (KJV) For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. 8 And having food and raiment let us be therewith content.
1 Timothy 6:7-8 Notes: These are verses with some semblance of Truth, but the agenda behind them is still that of RELIGION, and him building his Hellenised edifice! (See link No. 1 below).
1 Timothy 6:9 (KJV) But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.
1 Timothy 6:9 Notes: My question here is this: what are they doing in this group IF they are professing to be True Christians, yet at the same time rolling in filthy lucre? Does this wretch not know that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of needle than for a wealthy man to enter The Kingdom of Yah:
Matthew 19:24 (MCV) And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into The Kingdom of Yah.
1 Timothy 6:10 (KJV) For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
1 Timothy 6:10 Notes: Here he opens with a Truth, but one wonders what he’s talking about when he has so many filthy lucre loving members in his group. He’s obviously one of those who speaks out of both sides of his mouth at the same time! Down crying the numerous members with money, who are funding his money making church, and at the same time accusing them of behaving as any wealthy man would behave!
1 Timothy 6:11 (KJV) But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.
1 Timothy 6:11 Notes: Then he tries to hoodwink us with trite words, but with an unhealthy dollop of…………you guessed it! GODLINESS!! = Piety!!
1 Timothy 6:12-13 (KJV) Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses. 13 I give thee charge in the sight of God, who quickeneth all things, and before Christ Jesus, who before Pontius Pilate witnessed a good confession;
1 Timothy 6:12-13 Notes: Here he tries to redeem himself with more feigned sincerity. He does this with yet more fine words that you might consider genuine and Truthful, but you would 100% wrong. You see, he uses generalised statements like: “who quickeneth all things,” when Yah does no such thing, He only quickens those that He is calling!
1 Timothy 6:14 (KJV) That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ:
1 Timothy 6:14 Notes: Now he’s into writing new commandments, as he sees fit, as you do when you’re building a mickey mouse religion. All this, of course, is all based upon Graceless Commandment obeying; (see link No. 2 below).
1 Timothy 6:15 (KJV) Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;
1 Timothy 6:15 Notes: Now what have we got here: a Mr Potentate, no less? Which means Yashuah Messiah now has a Roman Catholic position of authority, and it looks like it precedes that of ROYALTY and Kingliness! WHO COULD THAT BE I WONDER! From the Etymology online dictionary:
“POTENTATE c. 1400, potentat, “a ruler, lord, prince, monarch; person who possesses independent power or sway,” from Old French potentat and directly from Late Latin potentatus “a ruler,” also “political power,” from Latin potentatus “might, power, rule, dominion,” from potentem (nominative potens) “powerful,” from potis “powerful, able, capable; possible;” of persons, “better, preferable; chief, principal; strongest, foremost,” from PIE root *poti- “powerful; lord.”
1 Timothy 6:16 (KJV) Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.
1 Timothy 6:16 Notes: Notice the gargantuan gaff in this verse: Yashua Messiah is THE LIGHT, so He doesn’t dwell in the light, as if it was coming from somewhere or someone else, as our forger would no doubt like us to believe.
1 Timothy 6:17 (KJV) Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy;
1 Timothy 6:17 Notes: Here we go again with him ‘charging’ or ‘commanding’ those who are filthy rich, and who put their trust in said riches. Well what does he expect when Yashuah Messiah Himself drew the analogy about camels and eyes of needles!
1 Timothy 6:18-19 (KJV) That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate; 19 Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life.
1 Timothy 6:18-19Notes: What born of Yah Christian doesn’t do good works? What born of Yah Christian has not already laid hold of Eternal Life? It looks like we’re earning Eternal Life, too. There also seems to be a very strong emphasis on financial gain in this chapter which makes me very suspicious of the motives behind it.
1 Timothy 6:20-21 (KJV) O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
1 Timothy 6:20-21 Notes: All the vain Hellenised religious babblings are his! Then he compounds his dissembling by yet more deflections of accusations against those challenging his religious nonsense!
That’s it for this wretched book – the expose continues in 2 Timothy.
I do hope that you are enjoying your journey of discovery regarding these Epistles, for it has been very challenging, to say the least, especially if you were, like me in the past, one who was delusionally very sure of their genuineness.
So without further ado let’s press on, for this chapter is even more tricky than the preceding chapters, in that it needs to be looked at from both angles, to see if it works from a genuine perspective or a forger’s perspective.
Like these people here:
1 (MCV) Now the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit speaks distinctly, that in the last days some shall depart from The Faith, giving heed to the seducing spirits of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with their teachings of The Adversary;
2 (MCV) Speaking lies in hypocrisy (those of The Synagogue of Satan); having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
John 6:65-68 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that revelation many of His Learners went back, and walked no more with Him.
1 Timothy 4:1-2 (KJV) Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from The Faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; 2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
1 Timothy 4:1-2 Notes — (a) Now what do we have here? For if this forger is a Hellenising philosopher, (and I think we can be fairly sure of that, based upon all the proof I have provided in my notes on 1 Timothy chapters 1, 2 and 3), then we cannot take these verses as written, and apply them as if written about The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit (The Holy Spirit). Therefore, by default, we’re dealing with another spirit. So let’s take a closer look:
1) We have a Spirit, but not called The Set Apart Exclusive (Holy) Spirit which: “speaks expressly,” this word should be ‘distinctly’; 2) and this term ‘speaks expressly’ can be found nowhere else in The KJV Bible; 3) To whom is this spirit speaking? Is it supposed to be Timothy? for we know from my article: “Exposing The Trinity Lie” (see link No. 1 below) that Yashua Messiah is the Comforter and that HE speaks to us through His Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, so it’s never the Set Apart Exclusive speaking of its own volition. So this verse is telling us that the forger is also a Trinitarian, which Paul was not – so no surprises there then (see link No. 2 below).
1 Timothy 4:1-2 Notes — (b) We then have him talking about people leaving The Faith! but what faith is he alluding to? For if it’s his bogus religious faith, that is, his faith in his Hellenising Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION, the people he will be referring to as ‘leavers’ are True Believers, who have sussed out his religious humbug and are leaving in order to protect themselves from his doctrines of devils.
However, if genuine, these verses are prophetically true if we’re speaking of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, and not another spirit, so they could be Paul’s plagiarised words, and used by the forger to give his work some validity, so this passage could be taken either way.
3 (MCV) Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from certain foods, which Yah hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know The Truth.
4 (MCV) For every creature of Yah is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
5 (MCV) For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
1 Timothy 4:3-5 (KJV) Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know The Truth. 4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: 5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
1 Timothy 4:3–5 Notes — (a) Then we have a dig at the future Roman Cult with their enforced celibacy for their fake priests, followed by a dig at the Canaanite Jews with their Judaising, law obeying, dietary rituals. So these verses could be from Paul’s hand and used by the forger for his own ends.
6 (MCV) If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good servant of Yashua Messiah, nourished up in The Sayings of Faith and of sound teaching, whereunto thou hast progressed.
1 Timothy 4:6 (KJV) If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained.
1 Timothy 4:6 Notes — (a) I have no issues with verse 6, and I have edited it for my MCV version.
7 (MCV) But refuse heathen and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness.
8 (MCV) For bodily exercise profiteth little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.
1 Timothy 4:7-8 (KJV) But refuse profane and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness. 8 For bodily exercise profiteth little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.
1 Timothy 4:7-8 Notes — (a) Here we get another dig at the Canaanite Jews: “With their Talmud being stuffed full of the most ridiculous and profane fables that ever disgraced the human intellect.” – Adam Clarke’s Commentary.
1 Timothy 4:7-8 Notes — (b) We then have use of that wretched religious word ‘godliness = piety’ once more, which I dealt with earlier – please revise if you’re not sure. I have therefore removed it from my MCV Bible as it is just irrelevant religious nonsense.
9 (MCV) This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation.
1 Timothy 4:9 (KJV) This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation.
1 Timothy 4:9 Notes — (a) Is this verse referring to the preceding verses or those that follow? If it’s the preceding verses I would refer you to my comments above for your consideration.
1 Timothy 4:9 Notes — (b) If it’s referring to the verses that follow, then I will refer you to my article: “Why Are There Two Resurrections?” (see link No. 3 below).
10 (MCV) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living Yahavah Yashua Messiah, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe, (again see link No. 3 below).
11 (MCV) These things instruct and teach.
1 Timothy 4:10-11 (KJV) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. 11 These things command and teach.
1 Timothy 4:10-11 Notes — (a) Again, these verses are fine, but always remembering that they are referring to the forger’s future plans of building a counterfeit religious edifice known as the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion and not Yashua Messiah’s true Ecclesia. This is one of those numerous occasions where his narrative fits both scenarios – the genuine and the fake.
12 (MCV) Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example to the believers, in sayings, in behaviour, in agape Love, in the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, in Faith, in sexual purity.
13 (MCV) Till I come, give attendance to vain book learning, to piteous begging and to doctrinal nonsense.
14 (MCV) Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy (nonsense), with the laying on of the hands (no mention of baptism) of the presbytery (the Nicolaitan court – religious hierarchies).
15 (MCV) Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them; that thy profiting may appear to all.
16 (MCV) Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.
1 Timothy 4:12-16 (KJV) Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity. 13 Till I come, give attendance to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine. 14 Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery. 15 Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them; that thy profiting may appear to all. 16 Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.
1 Timothy 4:12-16 Notes — (a) OK, I have lumped these last five verses together due to the fact that they’re all Hellenising religious hogwash verses – they are nothing but religious humbug!
They start off with Paul allegedly advising Timothy who, again allegedly, is a youth, when earlier Paul was alleged to have said “DO NOT MAKE A NOVICE A DEACON”!!! So what kind of inconsistency and duplicity is this? if we’re expected to believe that Timothy, as a youth, was appointed to be a messenger along side Paul!? Then we get supposed exhortations from Paul to Timothy telling him how to behave? I mean, come on!! Is this fella a born of Yah Christian or not? or is Paul now telling him to observe the basics as if he is a novice and knows NOTHING!!
1 Timothy 4:12-16 Notes — (b) Oh yes, then we get a religious jargon humdinger: “give attendance to reading” Oh yeah? reading what? I might ask. Easy, his favourite Hellenising philosopher. If this was supposed to be an instruction to read The Scriptures, Paul would have said that, and would have been specific, but he wasn’t! However, it wasn’t Paul for he didn’t write this religious philosophical garbage.
1 Timothy 4:12-16 Notes — (c) “Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery.” Given thee BY WHAT!? Take note: The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit is given to us by The Yahhead, either by The Father or Yashua Messiah, not by prophecy. This event may have been prophesied, but that is not the determining factor. Baptism comes FIRST and then the laying on of hands, and they are the determining factors. Oh and how do we neglect the gift that is in us? Who is in charge here? I won’t event bother mentioning the word ‘presbytery’ for that silly religious word speaks for itself.
1 Timothy 4:12-16 Notes — (d) in verse 15 we get use of the word ‘meditation’ but they forgot the Yoga!! LOL. OK I’m being deliberately facetious here, but I am sure you get my drift. Finally in verse 16 we then get the coffin nail give away: “for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.”
Hey guys, we now have nothing to worry about, for WE ARE saving ourselves, and those that hear us!! Boy! I had no idea that we were that powerful! – NOT!
Ever heard of such a creature? And where did this meaningless term come from? for It has to be as moronic as ‘Holocaust Denier’, yet another of their meaningless cretinous oxymorons and slogans!
So the answer is: Straight out of the bottomless pit of ignorance, for there is no such creature as a ‘fake Jew’, just as there were never any Khazarian Jews (but that’s a topic for another day).
So where does it come from, and what alleged reference point do these numbskulls use in order to make their dumb erroneous claims and assertions?
Right here:
Revelation 2:9 (KJV) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Here from this verse in the KJV we can see how and where they make their catastrophic ignorant blunder, for they think that The Israelites are Canaanite Jews and The Canaanite Jews are The Israelites, that is, one ethnic group, when all the while they are two different ethnic groups entirely. (See link No. 8 below) So, because, in their ignorant minds, they only have one ethnic group, they have to explain away what Yashua Messiah is saying in Revelation, by inventing a fictitious ethnic group that they call ‘fake Jews’ who, in Truth, do not exist. Please continue reading for the REAL explanation of what’s going on here.
First, here is a more revealing rendering of the same verse:
Revelation 2:9 (MCV) I know thy efforts and hard work, the pressure (tribulation) and the poverty you are under, but you are rich, and I know the satanic blasphemy (the calumny, that is, a false statement maliciously made to injure another’s reputation.) of them who say that they are Judean Israelites, but are NOT, for they are the Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews of The Synagogue of Satan.
And here:
Revelation 3:9 (KJV) Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
And again a more revealing rendering of the same verse
Revelation 3:9 (MCV) Behold, I will make them, that is, the Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews, that are of The Synagogue of Satan, who claim that they are Judean Israelites, but are NOT, but do LIE!; Behold I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, that they may know that I agape Love you.
OK, I hope you found that interesting and revealing, but having read thus far, you may now have some questions like: Who are these Judean Israelites, if they are not The Jews? and are you saying that The Jews are nothing to do with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel? Or are you saying that Yashua Messiah was not a Jew, and that salvation is not of the Jews? For the answer to the last three questions see link Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 below.
Moreover, in answer to the first question, who were these non-Jewish Judean Israelites, that lived in Judea in the first century? Quite simply, they were a minority of descendants of the remnant of The Israelites who returned from the Babylonian captivity circa 515 BC. However, the majority of the people of those tribes that came out of Babylon joined their Israelite brothers and sisters in Media and Parthia, and then later in their westward migrations into Europe, where we will still find them today, for they never returned to Judea.
This means that in Judea, in the first century, we find a small number of Royal Judahites (Joseph and Mariam and Joseph of Arimathea) amongst others, plus some Levites (John the Baptist and his family and possibly Nicodemus), amongst others, and some Benjaminites (the Messenger Paul) amongst others, with one or two from the other tribes – Peter being one, but in the main, The Twelve Tribes still remained in the Caucasus region north of the Euphrates river or had already started in their migrations into Europe travelling north of The Black Sea and well away from The Romans.
Flavius Josephus tells us this much:
“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond (the river) Euphrates (South of the Caucasus mountains) till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.” (brackets mine and he should have said three tribes subject to the Romans)
— Flavius Josephus
As an aside, The Three Kings, otherwise called the Three Wise Men, that visited Yashua Messiah from The East, when He was an infant, are alleged to have been three Israelite Kings from The Ten Tribes who were located in the East.
So from this we learn that The Ten Tribes were never lost physically and/or ethnically, just Spiritually, and that in the first century, that is, more than seven hundred years after their captivity by The Assyrians (The Ancestors of The Germans), they were now a great multitude of people. Yet we get lying, mouthy, know-nothing ‘experts’ telling us that The Ten Tribes were lost for all time and had vanished from the face of the earth. I wonder if these mouthy so-called ‘experts’ are lying Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews!!??
Furthermore, this, too, is yet more proof and evidence that The Israelites were not Jews, for The Jews have NEVER been a great multitude. Even today the Jews are estimated to be only 22 million souls.
They will claim that they are only 15 million today, but they were that numerous in 1945. They claim that they were only 11 million in 1945, due to The Holohoax, but The World Almanac clearly states that they were 15 million, and that between the years 1939 – 1949 their numbers actually grew by approximately 340,000, so there never was a 6 million loss, (see video link A below).
Needless-to-say these World Almanac figures were doctored by the lying Canaanite Jews after the war in order to paint and build their Holohoax picture and money making scam.
“Hitler killed six million Jews who never existed, in gas chambers which nobody ever saw.”
— Jewish scholar Prof. Roger Dommergue
“The Holocaust never happened, it’s totally made up. The Jews are damned liars. There is not a shred of Truth to this holocaust.”
— The half-Jew, Bobby Fischer, 11th world chess champion.
“I deny the Holocaust because, as constituted, exploited and enforced, the Holocaust narrative is a false and abusive god.”
— Jewish writer Paul Eisen
“Indeed the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud.”
— The Jew, Dr Norman Finkelstein
“I became a (history) Revisionist in August 1945 in a camp in Cumnock, Ayrshire, Scotland. We were forced to watch the infamous Hollywood propaganda film about “gas chambers” in Buchenwald and Dachau. We saw huge piles of dead bodies being cremated on pyres, allegedly at Buchenwald. Comrades from Dresden recognized the area and loudly protested that this was certainly not Buchenwald, but the city of Dresden!” (the day after the allied carpet bombing of that residential city – an evil war crime.) (Brackets mine)
— Neuschwabisch = New Swabian
From these Truthful quotes, from The Jews themselves, and one German, we can blatantly see that there is not a shred of Truth to the Holocaust!
OK, so now we need some proof and evidence as to whom these Israelites are today: and here I will post my “Identity of The Israelites Screed” that will show you who the modern day Israelites are, and NONE OF THEM, I hasten to add, are Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews who, as The Tares, are fit only for burning!:
OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!
The Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews are from Judah and his first wife – Bathshuah the Adullamite Canaanitess, (see Genesis 38 and link No. 8 below)) which makes Jews Canaanites and not from Adam, not from Noah, not from Shem, so not Semites; not Israelites, and not Judahites from Judah. Furthermore, The Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews are a Matriarchal ethnic group and always claim their lineage on the female side so therefore void any descent from Judah, Jacob/Israel, Isaac, Abraham and Shem (Noah’s white son).
“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”
— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.
I will firm this Truth up by stating that The Hebrews were never Jewish.
White Caucasians are The True Israelites – God’s Chosen Race (NOT THE JEWS). The Israelites were placed in the Caucasus region, north of the Euphrates River, circa 740-725 BC by the Assyrians (the forefathers of the Germans) when Assyria invaded the Northern Kingdom of Israel and took them away as captives. From there they migrated west into Europe – the rest is history.
Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:
These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.
Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
Levi – The Priesthood and administrators of Ancient Israel,
Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,
Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, (Reuben’s uncle and Jacob’s twin brother), lost the Birthright Inheritance,
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.
Joseph = Ephraim = Birthright Inheritor = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and South Africa (Now stolen by black Canaanites).
Joseph = Manasseh = Birthright Inheritor = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)
Simeon = Scotland = The Scythians and Scottish descendants everywhere.
Levi = Wales = The Valis = The Cymry from the Hebrew kimriyr. – (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AC) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.
Judah = Northern Ireland = The Red Hand Flag of Zarah = The Jutes from Pharez, not the Canaanite Jews, plus Scotland, some dispersed in England and with some still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria). Wherever the Rampant Lion is displayed in the heraldry there you will find Royal Judahites from Judah.
Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark = The Vikings.
Dan = Southern Ireland (The Tuatha de Danaan = Tribe of Dan) and Irish descendants everywhere.
Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.
Zebulon = The Netherlands pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Rotterdam + (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.
Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.
Issachar = Switzerland.
Naphtali = Finland.
Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.
13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting and becoming tribes.
“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond (the river) Euphrates (South of the Caucasus mountains) till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”
— Flavius Josephus
Apply this verse to the Jews, if you can:
Isaiah 27:6 (KJV) He shall cause them that come of Jacob to take root: Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit.
Try and apply this verse to the Jews – Yah’s promise to Abraham:
Genesis 13:16 (MCV) And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.
From Pope Vitalian 667 AC to Saxon King Oswy of Northumbria:
“To the most excellent lord, our son, Oswy, king of the Saxons, Vitalian, bishop, servant of the servants of God. We have received to our comfort your Excellency’s letters; by reading whereof we are acquainted with your most pious devotion and fervent love of the blessed life; and know that by the protecting hand of God you have been converted to the true and Apostolic faith, in hope that even as you reign in your own nation, so you may hereafter reign with Christ. Blessed be the nation, therefore, that has been found worthy to have as its king one so wise and a worshipper of God; forasmuch as he is not himself alone a worshipper of God, but also studies day and night the conversion of all his subjects to the Catholic and Apostolic faith, to the redemption of his own soul. Who would not rejoice at hearing such glad tidings? Who would not exult and be joyful at these good works? <b>For your nation has believed in Christ the Almighty God, according to the words of the Divine prophets, as it is written in Isaiah, ‘In that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek.’ And again, ‘Listen, O isles, unto me, and hearken ye people from far.’ And a little after, ‘It is a light thing that thou shouldst be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the outcast of Israel. I have given thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayst be my salvation unto the end of the earth.'</b> And again, ‘ Kings shall see, princes also shall arise and worship.’ And immediately after, ‘I have given thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, and possess the scattered heritages; that thou mayest say to the prisoners, Go forth; to them that are in darkness, Show yourselves.’ And again, ‘I the Lord have called thee in righteousness, and have held thine hand, and have kept thee, and have given thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the Gentiles; to open the blind eyes, to bring out the prisoner from the prison, and them that sit in darkness from the prison-house.
“Behold, most excellent son, how it is plain as day that it was prophesied not only of you, but also of all the nations, that they should believe in Christ, the Creator of all things. Wherefore it behoves your Highness, as being a member of Christ, in all things continually to follow the pious rule of the chief of the Apostles, in celebrating Easter, and in all things delivered by the holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, whose doctrine daily enlightens the hearts of believers, even as the two lights of heaven illumine the world.”
From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:
“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules (Gibraltar), and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”
Daniel 9:7 (MCV) O Yahavah, righteousness belongs unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.
The British Isles are home to five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Levi = Wales and Cornwall; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.
The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.
“Saynt Hierome also translated the Bible into his mother tongue [that is, the Latin Vulgate]. “Why maye not we also? They wyll saye, it can not be translated in to our tongue, it is so rude. It is not so rude as they are false lyers. For the Greke tongue agreeth more with the englyshe, than with the latyne.
“In the case of Hebrew, scholars have noted that Tyndale was right in sensing the superiority of English to Latin in matters of rendering Hebrew syntax. One scholar has noted that Hebrew and English have similar word orders and that in his English translation, Tyndale masterfully rendered the syntax of the original Hebrew into a fluid and rhythmical English prose that in turn influenced English writers.”
— Religious Studies Centre
Tyndale later re-quoted Saynt Hierome:
“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”
– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.
The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = Saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 740-725 BC.
The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area, that is, Scythia, between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.
Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knew, as does Charles III.
Joshua 1:3 (MCV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.
The Mayflower carrying the American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.
The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew ‘Berith’ = ‘Covenant’ and Hebrew ‘Ish’ = ‘man’, so ‘British’ means ‘Covenant Man’.
‘Engl-land’ again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means ‘bullock’ = Igl-landtherefore England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as Yah’s young bullock, Yah’s firstlings, and His fair child.
Deuteronomy 33:17 (MCV) His Glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns (the rhinoceros): with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth (The British Empire): and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh (The USA).
Ireland was originally known as Ebernia, and later (H)ibernia, from Abraham’s forefather Eber, from whence comes the Hebrew tongue (Eberew) and the race collectively known as the Hebrews = Eber’s descendants. The Hebrews were not Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews! This is why you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first eleven books of The KJV Bible.
The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations, who was the twin brother of Pharez, who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar. Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth, that is, the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and still on its national flag to this day.
The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.
The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.
The first Christian Assemblies planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AC and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These Assemblies were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain in the first century and long before that in Ireland. British Assemblies pre-date the Assembly at Antioch.
“The apostles passed beyond the ocean to the isles called the Britannic Isles.”
— Eusebius, Greek historian of Christianity, circa 260-340 AC (Demonstratio Evangelica or Proof of the Gospel, book 3, chap. 7)
“After this, sometimes our countrymen, sometimes the enemy, won the field, to the end that our Lord might this land try after his accustomed manner these his Israelites, whether they loved him or not, until the year of the siege of Bath-hill, when took place also the last almost, though not the least slaughter of our cruel foes, which was (as I am sure) forty-four years and one month after the landing of the Saxons, and also the time of my own nativity.”
— Gildas The Wise, from his book “On The Ruin of Britain.”
“We certainly know that Christ, the true Son, afforded His light, the knowledge of His precepts, to our Island in the last year of Tiberius Caesar” (Tiberius died in 37 AC)
— Gildas the Wise, circa 550 AC (De Excidio Britanniae or On the Ruin of Britain)
There is only one serious error in this video in that they think The Jews are a Tribe of Israel when they are not. Jews are Hamitic Canaanites, not Semitic Israelites.
“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”
— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3. (I will firm this Truth up by stating that The Hebrews were never Jewish.)
So now you know what Yashua Messiah was REALLY saying in Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9 to The Assemblies in Asia and He certainly wasn’t teaching us about mythical non-existent fake Jews but, rather, He was revealing the difference between the Chosen People of Israel – The Israelites and the satanic Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews.
….God shall take away his part out of The Book of Life, and out of The Holy City, and from the things which are written in this Book.
The same verse from the Greek Transliteral:
Revelation 22:19 (Greek Transliteral) And if-ever any-one should-be-eliminating from The Sayings of-the scrolled of-the before-averment (Prophecy) this shall-be-eliminating the God placer the part of-him from the Wood (Tree) of-the Life and out of-the city the holy of-the ones-having-been-written in the scrolled this. (Brackets mine)
Now this verse has always troubled me due to the fact that I have found so many corruptions, omissions and religious agenda driven translator changes elsewhere in the KJV Bible. This means, when it comes to Revelation I tread VERY carefully when interpreting it. In fact I seldom work on Revelation at all due to this severe warning verse hanging over it.
We then have an additional dimension to this verse, for there are satanic blind guide numbskulls, out there, that apply this verse to the WHOLE of The Bible when it applies to Revelation ONLY. This is the kind of blasphemous stupidity and ignorance I deal with regularly on social media platforms when confronting fakestream Bible scholars.
However, when it comes to, what appears to be, a contradiction in the pages of Revelation, it cannot be ignored. Furthermore, how do we know that words have not already been taken away from this book, or added, or changed by the 16th and 17th century translators, or even the writers of the Greek Manuscripts for that matter!? We don’t!
So without further ado let’s take a look at the suspect verses, and I will use the KJV as I have not yet worked on my MCV version of Revelation as yet.
Revelation 19:11-14 (KJV) And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and He that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself. 13 And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and ‘his’? name is called The Word of God. 14 And the armies which were in heaven followed Him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
Now the first thing that hits us is this horse, upon which Yashua Messiah is sat, and this horse is referred to as a HIM!!! Now who refers to animals as ‘hims’ and ‘hers’? (unless they’re your pets) when the usual term here would be ‘IT’.
This word ‘him’ is translated from the Greek word ‘autos’, pronounced ‘ow-tos’. In my Greek Interlinear is uses ‘auton’, but they also use ‘autou’ as well. This Greek word seems to be very flexible, for it can mean ‘him’, ‘himself’ ‘her’ ‘his’ ‘itself’ or ‘it’ etc. etc..
In addition to this, my Greek Interlinear has two renderings of Revelation 19:11 with one saying ‘him’ and the other saying ‘it’ using the Greek word ‘auton’. This means we know that the Greek word ‘auton’ can mean either ‘it’ or ‘him’ and all determined by the whims of the translators or perhaps I should say by the agenda of the translators.
OK, I will now deviate from this article, for a while, and draw your attention to my earlier article entitled: “The Truth of John 1:1-4” (see link No. 1 below). In that article I prove that The Word otherwise called The Saying, in the Greek MSS, is The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit (aka The Holy Spirit in religious jargon terminology) and not Yashua Messiah at all. Yes The Saying (The Word) emanates from Yashua Messiah, from His Breath but, in and of itself, The Saying (The Word) is not Yashua Messiah – The Saying (The Word), or the POWER of The Saying (The Word), is the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit.
So back to these verses in Revelation and I will copy The Greek Transliteral version of these verses here:
Revelation 19:11-14 (Greek Transliteral) And I-perceived the heaven having-been-up-opened and you-be-perceiving horse white and the One-sitting on it believing being-called and truthful and in just-togetherness (righteousness) he-is-judging and battling 12 the yet viewers (the eyes) of-Him blaze-of-fire and on the head of-him diadems many having names having-been-written which not-yet-one has-perceived (which no one has seen nor is aware of) if no Himself 13 And having-been-about-cast cloak having-been-dipped to-blood has-been-called the name of-it The Saying of-the God placer 14 and the war-troops in the heaven followed to-Him on horses white having-been-in-slipped cotton (cambric) white and clean. (Brackets mine)
I will now rewrite Revelation as it should be:
Revelation 19:11-14 (MCV) And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and He that sat upon it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself. 13 And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and its name is called The Saying of Yah. 14 And the armies which were in heaven followed Him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
Notice this crucial difference from the KJV, and you might say, but that now makes no sense at all, as it is written, and you’re right, but what that says to me is that there is something wrong with the words that precede it. This also says to me that verse 13 is spurious by addition due to three things: 1) Elsewhere in The Greek MSS, in numerous places, the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit is referred to as an ‘it’ and not a ‘he’ or a ‘him’ (see link Nos. 1 & 2 below). 2) We have a contradiction in that only Yashua Messiah knows His name in verse 12 and then we’re told His name is The Word of God in verse 13. 3) If we join verse 12 to verse 14 leaving out verse 13 what do we have?
Lets take a look:
Revelation 19:12, 14 (MCV) His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself. 14 And the armies which were in heaven followed Him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
See that? Beautiful text continuum!! making verse 13 a load of irrelevant and erroneous nonsense. However, I am not going to remove it, as I do not wish to risk my name being removed from The Book of Life, but when I get to Revelation in my MCV Bible, I will certainly highlight this verse and expose it for what it is.
Moreover, I will also draw a parallel with a verse I discovered in 1 Corinthians 15, that is, verse 29, which is also spurious, and this spuriousness has caused a lot of trouble amongst believing Christians for centuries, with them arguing over it non-stop and getting nowhere (see link No. 3 below). Likewise with this verse we get believing Christians going at it hammer and tong over whether the alleged cloak of Yashua Messiah was dipped in His Blood or the blood from the battle field.
Finally, and to sum up, what do we have? This: that Yashua Messiah is NOT The Word of Yah but, rather, The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, thereby making verse 13 a lie! Plus we have this contradiction of His name only being known by Him and no one else, and in the next verse we’re told His name is The Word of Yah!!!! Ding! Ding! Hello!! Excuse me!
So there we have it, yet more solid gold proof that The Word or, better, The Saying is the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit and it’s an ‘IT’ not a ‘he’ or ‘him’, so therefore cannot be Yashua Messiah as claimed in verse 13, but it is The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit which emanates from Yashua Messiah and The Father.
Now this is going to be a very interesting article, and one that I had not been planning, for the subject matter only came to light a few days ago on the 14thNovember 2022. My earlier view on it was that the origins of The Adversarywere just as Genesis 3:1 has it, that is, that The Serpent Creature was the most crafty, devious and cunningBeast of The Field that The Yahavah Yahhad made, but as it turns out, I was duped by yet another corruption in the KJV Bible.
OK, so let’s get the crucial Scripture written here:
Genesis 3:1 (MCV) Now The Serpent Creature was more devious, cunning and crafty than any [Beast of The Field] which The Yahavah Yah (The Elohim) HAD MADE. And he said unto the woman (Eve), Yea, hath Yah said, Ye shall not eat of every ‘Tree’ of The Garden?
There we have it, or should I say there we have their gross deception, and how did I come to the conclusion that it is a gross deception? With GREAT difficulty, I can tell you that, for I have been working on this topic for several days solid, and without let up, because each and every way I turned I was stone walled when trying to make sense of the whole idea that this Serpent Creature was formed from the ground a physical living breathing creature, and yet at the same time supposed to be a spiritual creature with the ability to reason, walk upright and talk, that is, the Devil, and as we read in Revelation:
Revelation 20:1-2 (MCV) And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having The Key of The Bottomless Pit and a great chain in his hand. 2 And he laid hold on The Dragon, that Old Serpent, which is The Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years.
However, this past several days has not been wasted, for I have learned one or two other things, along the way, as you do, once you start Biblical word searches and studies. So the first thing I learned was that the word ‘Satan’ can nowhere be found in the Hebrew Masoretic Texts of the Old Testament. Each and every time it’s found in the English translations it has been mistranslated from the word ‘Adversary’, so Adversary is the word that should be written there, not Satan. I now believe there’s question mark over this word ‘Satan’ too, but that’s a subject for another day.
Moving on, I was next confronted in my searches online, by numerous sites ranting and raving about a pre-Adamic beast species, allegedly Negroids, that is, based on the erroneous ideas that: 1) the beasts of the field were two legged humanoid upright creatures, half hu-man and half animal, and not natural quadruped animals, and 2) that Genesis chapter 1 was a first creation, and Genesis chapter 2, with Adam and Eve, as a second creation – all 100% bogus, I might add. How do I know it’s bogus? Easy, and I’ll post just two verses here in order to prove my point:
Genesis 1:27 (MCV) So The Yahavah Yah (The Elohim) created man (Hebrew ‘aw-dawm’ – Adam) in Their own image, in the image of Yah created He him; male and female created He them.
Genesis 2:7 (MCV) And The Yahavah Yah formed man (Hebrew ‘aw-dawm’ – Adam) of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath (the spirit) of life; and man became a living soul – a living creature.
So were there two Adams and two Eves? Furthermore, if Eve was the mother of ALL living, that is mankind and hu-mankind, what progeny did these other Adam’s and Eve’s produce? (See link No. 1 below)
Genesis 3:20 (MCV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living (Mankind and hu-mankind).
The next problem I had was that of understanding how a brute beast of the field could scheme, talk to and seduce (beguile) a woman (see link No. 2 below). Some say that The Adversary entered or possessed a serpent creature thereby enabling it to talk and to carry out The Adversary’s dastardly deed, but that would mean The Adversary had not actually done it, and the beast was just a proxy. And let’s be clear, for The Adversary wanted his genes and DNA impregnated into Eve, not those of some dumb beast. So that rules out the demonic possession nonsense.
I then had the issue of The Yahavah Yah declaring His creation as good and very good, so how could it be declared as such if there was an evil beast of the field, as a part of that very same creation, roaming around like a roaring lion looking for innocent victims to devour?
Genesis 1:18 (MCV) And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and Yah saw that it was good.
Genesis 1:31 (MCV) And Yah saw every thing that He had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
On top of this I also had this verse in the mix:
Revelation 13:8 (MCV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (The Adversary), whose names are not written in The Book of Life of THE LAMB SLAIN FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD.
OK, so let me explain. If Yashua Messiah was The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, that meant that sin and evil HAD TO enter into the world or into the creation in order for this prophetic statement of Yashua Messiah’s to be true, and to come true. So when did evil and sin enter into the world or the creation? Answer: as soon as The Serpent Creature entered The Garden and seduced Eve = The Original Sin.
However, notice this important point. The Garden event didn’t occur until AFTER the creation was finished, and The Spiritual Serpent Creature had been made before the creation, so was not a part of it.
So, at this point, I began getting suspicious, and having already proven that Genesis 4:1 is a corrupted spurious verse (see link No. 3 below), why not Genesis 3:1 as well. OK, I am fairly sure that this is just a coincidence, but you never know.
Today, (17th November 2022) I came across a web page that proposed the idea that the heavenly Four Beasts (Living Creatures) of Revelation 4 had once been Five Beasts (Living Creatures) with The Adversary being the fifth, as one with the head of a Serpent, but who left his first estate in order to play around being a hu-man, as did the so-called ‘sons’ of Yah in Genesis 6.
Now this made sense to me, as he would not have been a part of the physical creation, so thereby not tarnishing it by being a part of it, and leaving the creation clear to be classified as good and very good by The Yahavah Yah. Let’s face it, as a heavenly beast he would have been a usurper from outside and not a part of the physical creation.
This now left me with the task of rewording the verse, so that it made sense and here it is:
Genesis 3:1 (MCV) Now The Serpent Creature was more devious, cunning and crafty than any Beast of Heaven which The Yahavah Yah (The Elohim) HAD MADE. And he said unto the woman (Eve), Yea, hath Yah said, Ye shall not eat of every ‘Tree’ of The Garden?
Another thing that didn’t sit right with me was the use of the two words ‘HAD MADE’ when referring to a ‘beast of the field’, when it should have read ‘had been formed from the ground’. ‘HAD MADE’ sounded a far more appropriate term in reference to the making of angels, when beasts of the earth were formed from the ground.
So there you have it, that Old Serpent was ALWAYS a spirit being and MADE crafty, devious and cunning by The Yahavah Yah, hence he left his first estate in order to pursue his evil career, but with the added ability to become physical and seduce Eve.
If any of you has a problem with the idea of The Yahavah Yah creating things evil, then Scripture will bear me out (see link No. 4 below):
Proverbs 16:4 (MCV) The Yahavah hath made all things for Himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.
In Yashua Messiah’s name
Messenger Charles
1. Hu; Hu-mans; Cainites; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:
As is my want, let’s post the passage of Holy Scripture in question from the KJV:
Matthew 22:1-14 (KJV) And Jesus answered and spake unto them again by Parables, and said, 2 The Kingdom of Yah (God/heaven) is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son, 3 And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come. 4 Again, he sent forth other servants, saying, Tell them which are bidden, Behold, I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and my fatlings are killed, and all things are ready: come unto the marriage. 5 But they made light of it, and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise: 6 And the remnant took his servants, and entreated them spitefully, and slew them. 7 But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city. 8 Then saith he to his servants, The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. 9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage. 10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests. 11 And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: 12 And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. 13 Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 14 For MANY are called, but few are chosen. (All emphasis mine)
As we can see, this is a Parable, as spoken by Yashua Messiah, and aimed at anyone who could hear and understand it’s message, as made plain here:
Matthew 13:10-11; 16 (MCV) And the Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in Parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of The Kingdom of Yah (God), BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN. 16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
This means it was only for a very small audience. First and foremost it was for His Learners (disciples), and second it was for the unbelieving Serpent Seed Pharisee and Sadducee Jews, and who, to their chagrin, also understood.
However, this Parable takes the form of a little history lesson, with it going back to The House of Judah’s past, combined with a warning for the future – the city mentioned here being Jerusalem. It also strongly alludes to The Prophets who were sent by Yashua Messiah (Yah [God] of the Old Testament) in order to welcome the inhabitants of Judea and Jerusalem to The Father’s wedding feast that He had arranged for His Son. These inhabitants constituted both rebellious Israelites and Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, who rudely and contemptuously declined The Father’s amazing offer, by mistreating and slaying His Prophets.
We then get this word ‘Remnant’, used in verse six, which again points us to The Remnant that returned from Babylonian captivity circa 515 BC, so we’re dealing with that era that led up to Yashua Messiah’s first coming. The Prophets that came to that remnant during those years were either treated brutally, or killed outright by them.
In verse seven we’re told that the king is furious with these people for having murdered his servants (The Prophets), so he sends his military forces to destroy their city. Now this could be a reference to Babylon’s invasion of The House of Judah circa 585 BC, with destruction of Jerusalem, and the future invasion and destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AC by The Romans (New Babylon) = one of Yah’s many Scriptural dualities.
The king then says: “The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy.” This is definitely a reference to The Israelites (Yah’s Chosen People) and The Canaanite Jews, who claimed to be descendants of Abraham. So much so they dressed themselves up as such, that is, the Pharisees and Sadducees, but were no such thing (see link Nos. 1 and 2 below), so naturally they despised their wedding feast invitation, and were not worthy.
If we add in The Israelites, who were always in rebellion against their Yah (God), unfortunately they, too, despised the wedding invitation. No doubt many being led astray by the Serpent Seed Jewish Pharisees and Sadducees.
Now the next verse I find a bit of a challenge: Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage. So who were these servants going to find in the highways? Obviously they were not going to find any more Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, but very likely they would find some teachable Israelites, and of course plenty of non-Israelites, both good and bad.
Moreover, what does it mean when Yashua Messiah called them the good and the bad, who were these people? Well that’s easy, they were the lost and unsaved of Mankind, sinners made up of Israelites and non-Israelites alike. Take note, that I DO NOT CALL THEM GENTILES!! (See link No. 3 below). Also take note that none of these people would be RELIGIOUS people, so they would have nothing to unlearn.
Next, this Parable takes an unexpected twist with the king spotting a guest who is not wearing a wedding garment, and this event is symbolic of quite a few things, not just one. When the king confronts him with his serious error he’s speechless or dumbfounded as has no reply at all.
So let’s look at some of the things this lack of a wedding garment could represent:
1. We’re dealing with a crucial robe here, that this fella didn’t have on, so what kind of robe could this be and what, in turn, could this robe actually represent. Let’s take a look at The Holy Scriptures for our answer:
Revelation 7:9 (KJV) After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before The Throne, and before The Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands;
Revelation 7:13-14 (KJV) And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they? 14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of Great Tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of The Lamb.
OK, so this obviously beggars the next question: How do we, as Christians, obtain a white robe, and wash them in the blood of Yashua Messiah, The Lamb?
Quite simply, through Baptism (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name alone (not into the trinity), followed swiftly by the Gift of The Holy Spirit. That’s it, we now have spotless white robes, as a free gift, that have been washed in Yashua Messiah’s blood. OK, we cannot see them, but rest assured The Father and Yashua Messiah can, along with the angelic host.
Romans 6:3-4 (KJV) Know ye not, that so many of us as were Baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into His death? 4 Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by The Glory of The Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Now this is what this wretched man lacked, and there are MANY like him in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION (Mainstream Christianity = Churchianity) today, who say that Baptism is unnecessary, and they are headed for outer darkness, unless they repent of their wicked ways forthwith.
2. It could also represent Graceless Judaism and the lack of a wedding robe a representation of NO GRACE in this man’s life, just like the five unwise virgins who had no oil (No Grace) for their lamps. These people think that they can save themselves by and through obedience to The Commandments and The Law – futility personified!
3. Another meaning could be religion, for Yah (God) has no religion and, this man could have been dressed as a religious priest, a Pharisee perhaps, thinking he was all dressed up for the part, hence he was stunned and speechless when confronted by the king.
When reading the stories of Yashua Messiah’s conversations with the demonic lawyers and Pharisees, have you noticed how many times He silences them – frequently they were left SPEECHLESS! And so it was for this wretched individual.
4. Yet another representation could be the intellect and this man was an intellectual philosopher or theologian, who would later Hellenise the so-called church, turning the Word of Yah (God) into meaningless gobbledegook and religious drivel – forever reasoning, but NEVER coming to an understanding of The Truth.
Now of these four representations I believe the first is the most likely but at the same time the others could also apply.
Finally, Yashua Messiah ends His Parable by stating: MANY ARE CALLED, FEW ARE CHOSEN! So I do hope that you are one of The Few.
1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
“You ignored the topic of imputation, which I brought up. Because our sins are imputed to Jesus is it not necessary for us to be actually sinless:”
Here we can see that he has actually explained what imputation achieves for us, that is, that it makes us sinless, for ALL our sins were imputed to Yashua Messiah who took them to the stake with Himself.
He then quotes 1 Peter 2:24:
“1 Peter 2:24: He himself bore our sins in his body on the cross, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed.”
Here, he hasn’t even taken in what’s written: So that we might die to sins and live for righteousness! How does a sinner live for righteousness!? Surely only a sinless man/woman can live for righteousness.
“And the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us, with the result that God has given us the righteousness we need:”
Then he admits that we are sinless, because he states that Yashua Messiah’s righteousness is imputed to us. I mean was Yashua Messiah sinless or not and if His righteousness is imputed to us, does that not make us just like Him? And just as John made clear:
1 John 3:2-3 (MCV) Beloved, now are we the sons of Yah (God), and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when He shall appear, we shall be like Him; for we shall see Him as He is. And every man THAT HATH THIS HOPE IN HIM purifieth himself, EVEN AS HE IS PURE.
Now, if we are as pure as Yashua Messiah, through hope and belief in Him, are we not sinless? Or am I missing something!? I don’t think so.
One last piece of nonsense from this blind guide:
“Man does not need to reach a sinless state because God has taken care of the sin problem. That’s what Scripture teaches, so I reject your doctrine.”
See the contradiction in this mind boggling ignorant sentence? We as Christians do not need to reach a sinless state!!! How then does he think that he will enter The Kingdom of Yah (God), for Holy Scripture clearly states that sinners will remain outside The Kingdom, and will not be allowed in under any circumstances.
Galatians 5:19-21 (MCV) Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit The Kingdom of Yah (God).
Therefore I will put it to him that unless we do “REACH A SINLESS STATE” (his words not mine) we will NEVER enter The Kingdom of Yah (God) – period – full stop – end of.
OK, with that necessary example of Spiritual blindness over, let’s press on with the article and learn what imputing means. So for a born of Yah (God) Christian, what doesimputing mean? Well to find out we’ll need ALL the relevant New Testament Holy Scriptures, so let’s copy and paste them here.
First, the word imputed – 4 verses:
Romans 4:11 (MCV) And he (Abram) received The Sign of Circumcision, a Seal of The Righteousness of The Faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be The Patriarch of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:
Romans 4:22-24 (KJV) And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness. 23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; 24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on Him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;
Romans 5:13 (KJV) For until The Law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no Law.
James 2:23 (MCV) And The Scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of Yah (God).
Second, the word impute – 1 verse:
Romans 4:8 (KJV) Blessed is the man to whom The Lord will not impute sin.
Third, the word imputing – 1 verse:
2 Corinthians 5:19 (KJV) To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us The Word of reconciliation.
Next up we have the definition(s) of Imputed:
1. to reckon, count, compute, calculate, count over
2. to take into account, to make an account of
3. metaphysical – to pass to one’s account, to impute
4. a thing is reckoned as or to be something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to
5. something, as having the like force and weight
6. to number among, reckon with
7. to reckon or account
8. to reckon inward, count up or weigh the reasons, to deliberate
9. by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer
10. to consider, take into account, weigh, meditate on
11. to suppose, deem, judge
12. to determine, purpose, decide
Right, so there they are, all six verses, and the twelve definitions, and what do they tell us? and crucially, do they support Yashua Messiah’s teaching that once we’re born of God, we are then sinless and cannot sin, as made plain for us in 1 John 3 verses 6 and 9:
1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.
1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His Seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
So let’s take the first verse that makes this clear:
Notice at the end of Romans 4:11 Yashua Messiah, through Paul, says: that righteousness might be imputed unto them also.
How can righteousness be imputed to someone who still sins? And, as an aside, here’s another question: How could The Holy Spirit reside within the body of a sinner, or the body of someone who still sins? that is, he has living sin, active and operational, not dead sin. I trust you all know that Baptism (full immersion) means we die with Yashua Messiah in watery grave, and are then raised anew to be indwelled by The Holy Spirit! If not, see link No. 1 below.
Romans 6:3-4 (MCV) Know ye not, that so many of us as were Baptised into Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) were Baptised into His death? 4 Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism into death: that like as Yashua Messiah was raised up from the dead by The Glory of The Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
So does this “newness of life” in which regenerated Christians walk, include sinning? If so, then they must be frauds and counterfeiters, and they are still walking in their old ways, and have no newness of life.
In Romans 4:11 Paul is saying that non-Israelite mankind (the uncircumcised) could receive the same blessings as The Children of Israel, IF they’re called by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah. Paul then firms it up in verses 22-24.
The next verse I will repost here:
Romans 5:13 (KJV) For until The Law, sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no Law.
Sin is not imputed when there is no Law! Hello!? Excuse me! So when is there no Law? When a son or daughter of Yah (God) is fully under His Grace. And when is a son or daughter of Yah (God) fully under His Grace? As soon as they are Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone, and gifted with The Holy Spirit.
Moreover, sin cannot be imputed to anyone that is no longer under The Law and condemned by The Law:
Romans 8:1 (MCV) There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Yashua Messiah (Christ Jesus).
So does this also mean that anyone who is no longer under condemnation must be a sinless new creation? I reckon.
Now let’s get a measure of this by this example:
Luke 1:5 (MCV) There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth. 6 And they were both RIGHTEOUS before Yah (God), walking in all The Commandments and Ordinances of The Lord blameless.
So here we have two honourable people from The Tribe of Levi, with one a Levitical Priest, who were both unregenerated, so they were NOT born of Yah (God) and not indwelled by The Holy Spirit, and yet they were blameless = sinless, for they kept all the Commandments and Ordinances of The Lord.
Now, if an unregenerated man and woman can: “REACH A SINLESS STATE,” (to use buddy-boys slogan) how much more a called Christian that has been Baptised and Gifted with The Holy Spirit?
To back this up, Paul then says in Romans 4:8 Blessed is the man to whom The Lord will not impute sin.
Now why will Yashua Messiah not impute sin to a blessed man? That’s easy, because this blessed man is now a regenerated new man, indwelled by The Holy Spirit, so is Yashua Messiah going to impute sin to The Holy Spirit!!!!???? TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE!!!
However, the new man still has a DEAD BODY OF SIN – the occasional sins of which are not his sins anyway, hence The Father cannot see them, and these sins are covered by Yashua Messiah’s Grace. This is all belt and braces stuff we have going for us here, folks, for we cannot fail, unless we, horror of horrors, decide to walk away from Him completely, highly unlikely if we are True Christians, and as Peter made very plain:
John 6:65-68 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His ‘learners’ went back, and walked no more with Him. 67 Then said Jesus unto The Twelve, will ye also go away? 68 Then Simon Peter answered Him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast The Words of Eternal Life.
I trust you now have a good grasp of this imputing of sins topic. Any questions please leave a comment.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse, and Baptism Is Not Into The Trinity.
Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiahs (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone?:
Now this article should really be Part 5 of my series of articles: “Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil, Or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?” (See link No.1 below), so I will be adding it to that page, whilst leaving this article as a stand alone article. Moreover, I have dealt with this subject within that series of articles, but due to my having discovered more proof and evidence, this week commencing 13th February 2022, that shows that Genesis 4:1 in its KJV rendering is 100% bunkum and hogwash. It therefore behoved me to share this additional Truth about the damnable translation of this verse.
Here is the bogus verse in question, as written in the KJV:
Genesis 4:1 (KJV) And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from The Lord.
OK, so let me make this known first of all, for this will be mostly the work of a man by the name of Clifton A. Emahiser who was knowledgable in THE SEEDLINE DOCTRINE, as it is known by some, but not by me, I call it The Two Seeds Truth. Moreover, he wasn’t correct in all his teaching, which I will reveal in another article. So here are his opening remarks on Genesis 4:1:
“THE PROBLEM WITH GENESIS 4:1
“Many may reply, “I didn’t know there was a question concerning that verse.” Unless one understands that the Hebrew is badly corrupted on this passage, he will, like most everyone else who has ever read it, arrive at a mistaken conclusion. Before we start an evaluation to discover the ramifications, let’s read it according to the KJV: “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
“Genesis 4:1 is probably one of the most misunderstood verses in the Bible. This is really an understatement of fact to say the least. On the understanding of this verse, lies the entire theme of the Bible. Actually Genesis 3:15 is the main theme of the Bible, but without a correct understanding of Genesis 4:1, the theme becomes muddled and confused!Therefore it is of the utmost importance that one gain an understanding of this verse or the entire Bible will remain a mystery! It is with this thought, that the object of this Bible study is to completely master this passage so that the story of the Bible can be opened up to us in all of its splendour and brilliance.”
Later, he then goes on to say:
“It would appear, if this were the only verse in the Bible that had anything to say about this matter of the birth of Cain, and if the King James version of the Bible were the only version of the Bible we had, that we would have to accept the fact that Adam was the father of Cain. You see, here is the problem, Adam was not the father of Cain! Not only are the “Jews” of today not of Adam, but they know themselves they are descended from Cain. Let’s see who the “Jew” admits himself to be. In the “Jewish” publication Liberal Judaism, January, 1949, there is an article entitled, “Liberal Judaism and Israel” written by one of their greatest and most renowned Rabbis, Dr. Abba Hillel Silver. Dr. Silver, writing about the then new State of Israel says:
{“’ … the third commonwealth of the Jewish Nation is thus an accomplished fact. The State of Israel exists.
{“’As a result the concept of the wandering Jew is bound eventually to disappear along with the term (galut) exile. All nations send forth immigrants to all parts of the world. People are continually moving from one country to another, and change their citizenship, but they are not regarded as exiles.
{“’This fact alone – the end of national exile for the Jewish people, as such —is destined to affect favourably the psyche of the Jew throughout the world. It will endow the Jew, wherever he lives, with a self respect and a sense of security, a normal tone, long-wanting in Jewish experience. For the curse of Cain, the curse of being an outcast and a “wanderer” over the face of the earth has been removed …’”}
So here, Emahiser, in using this quote from Rabbi Silver, has proven to us that the Jews KNOW WHO THEY ARE, and that they definitely KNOW who they are descended from, and, just as they knew in the first century, when they lied to Yashua Messiah our future King, when they claimed that: “They were not born of fornication”.
John 8:40-41 (MCV) But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you The Truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to Him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
Notice, that they did not say they have Abraham as their father, they went straight to The Garden event claiming to be sons of Adam – a part of God’s creation, and thereby denied (they lied) that they were the Devil’s sons through Cain.
For further evidence, we now go to the immense work called “The Interpreter’s Bible”, which I only learned of at the commencement of this study. The Interpreter’s Bible, is a twelve volume work of 36 editors who worked together in order to produce it. It is available online at this web address:
“Cain seems originally to have been the ancestor of the Kenites … The meaning of the name is ‘metalworker’ or ‘smith’; here, however, it is represented as a derivation of a word meaning ‘acquire’, ‘get’ — one of the popular etymologies frequent in Genesis — hence the mother’s words I have gotten a man. ‘From the Lord’ (KJV) is a rendering, following the Septuagint (LXX) and Vulgate., of ’eth Yahweh, which is literally, ‘with Yahweh’, and so unintelligible here (the help of [RSV] is not in the Hebrew). It seems probable that ’eth should be ’oth — so, ‘the mark of Yahweh’ — and that the words are a gloss …”
Did you notice that? As Genesis 4:1 is written in the KJV it is taken from the Hebrew term ‘Eth Yahweh’ meaning ‘with Yahweh’ or better ‘laying with Yahweh in order to conceive’ which, as they have correctly said, is unintelligible or utter nonsense, and it is from this very same nonsense that they conjured up the erroneous term: “I have gotten a man from the Lord.”
This can be firmed up from The Geneva Bible where it states:
Genesis 4:1 (Geneva Bible) Afterward the man knew Eve his wife, which conceived and bare Cain, and said, I have obtained a man by the LORD.
This interpretation clearly leads us to believe that Eve lay with The Lord in order to conceive, which has already been declared here as preposterous. However, at the same time, it is also telling us that Eve definitely conceived by someone other than Adam!
If we now go to the other writings that I used to support The Truth in my original article, and post them here, we’ll see how they make even more sense now that I have revealed Emahiser’s findings:
First from the Aramaic Targums:
“Genesis 4:1 And the woman saw Sammael, the angel of death, and she was afraid and knew that the tree was good for food, and that it was a remedy for the enlightenment of the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise. She took of its fruit and ate and also gave (it) to her husband and he ate.”
Second from the Aramaic Targum,pseudo-Jonathan:
“Genesis 4:1 Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the Angel (of death) and she became pregnant and bore Cain. And he was like those on high and not like those below. And she said: ‘I have got a man from the angel of the LORD’.”
Third fromthe Targum Onkelos: THE TARGUM OF PALESTINE IV:
“Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Hava (Eve) his wife, who had desired (lusted after) the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Kain; and she said, I have acquired a man, (from) the angel of the Lord. And she added to bear from her husband Adam his twin, (superfetation) even Habel (Abel). And Habel was a shepherd of the flock, but Kain was a man working in the earth. (All brackets mine)
Fourth from the Rabbinic work of Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer: (See link below.)
“Genesis 4:1 And she saw that his likeness was not of earthly beings, but of the heavenly beings, and she prophesied and said: I have gotten a man from the Lord.”
So there we have it, Eve NEVER said “I have gotten a man from the Lord” but rather: “I have gotten a man from the angel of death – The Serpent Creature!!”
I will add further articles to this series as I am sure more evidence will reveal itself.
In Yashua Messiah’s Set Apart name
Messenger Charles
1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
OK, now the first issue that arises out of this title is who were these Jews? for until we ascertain who they really were, we’re not going to fully understand this question, or this issue. We then have to see the word ‘synagogue’ in The Light of the Holy Scriptures for, again, unless we know for sure what ‘synagogues’ represent, we’ll flounder in the dark.
So let’s get this second point firmly set in our minds and onto our hearts of Truth, because there is NOTHING positive about synagogues, and the only synagogue mentioned by name in the Holy Scriptures is this one here, and it’s mentioned twice! just so we get it!
Revelation 2:9 (KJV) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are The Synagogue of Satan.
Revelation 3:9 (KJV) Behold, I will make them of The Synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
These verses tell us, without any ambiguity, that there’s only one kind of synagogue – SATAN’S SYNAGOGUE, for there is no other.
Right, so who were these ‘Jews’ that said they were Jews, but were lying? Now here we have the usual type of translator’s error that we find so often in the pages of the KJV, and which I reveal in so many of my articles. So let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some insight:
Jews – G2453 – Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:—Jew(-ess), of Judæa.
OK, the first thing we must understand here is The Truth that the word ‘Jew’, as used in the KJV, is 100% a misnomer, for it is automatically and deceptively leading us to believe that the word ‘Jew’ is referring to the Hebrew Israelites, The Chosen People of God, when NOTHING could be further from The Truth.
This means that these Jews were Jews who thought they were Judeans, but were not Judeans at all, for Judeans were Semitic Hebrew Israelites, and these ‘Jews’ claimed, falsely, that they were Judeans. These impostors, known as ‘Jews’, were/are, in Truth, Hamitic Canaanites from Bathshuah the Canaanitess, through her son Shelah, as recorded in Genesis 38, so they were NOT Judean Semitic Israelites at all. These days they openly admit it!:
“We are a chosen people. Most Jews do not like to admit it but our god is Lucifer and we Jews are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”
— The Jew, Harold W. Rosenthal
“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”
— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.
This is why I call the Jews The Serpent Seed from The Garden (see link Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 below for all the historical proof and evidence that the Jews are nothing to do with The Chosen People – The Twelve Tribes of Israel).
So moving on, we have now learned that these Jews were not Semitic Israelites, so who were these Judeans? The Judeans were descendants of a remnant of the three Tribes of The House of Judah that returned from the Babylonian captivity, namely Royal Judahites, Levites (The Priesthood) and Benjaminites. As examples we had Mary Mariam and Joseph who were Royal Judahites, John the Baptist and his family who were Levites, and The Messenger Paul who was a Benjaminite. Joseph of Arimathea was likewise a Royal Judahite, and no doubt Nicodemus was also a Levite. However, NONE of these crucial Biblical characters were Jews!
All this information now brings us to the thorny issue of whether or not Paul REASONED with the Jews if, by ‘Jews’, Holy Scripture is referring to the Canaanite Jews. If that was the case and the people present in the synagogue were Canaanite Jews then there would have been no reasoning with them at all. Paul would have preached and declared The Gospel of The Kingdom of God and the Jews would have argued with Paul and sent him packing or, worse, attempted to have him arrested and after a rigged trial had him put to death, most likely stoning him to death. This is how much the Jews hated The Gospel Message and thereby making any reasoning totally impossible.
However, if there had been Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites there present with these Canaanite Jews, then some kind of reasoning could have been possible, but always keeping in mind that unless The Father was calling these Judeans, they would also have been non-receptive to The Kingdom Gospel Message.
Moreover, all of you who have read my articles on “Theology and Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals” (see link Nos. 6 and 7 below), will know my views and be aware of the compelling evidence I have gathered that proves them to be next to useless when it comes to matters Holy Spiritual and Scriptural. If you have not read them, I thoroughly recommend them to you now for, without the knowledge contained therein you are, and will always be, vulnerable to their deceitful and deceptive ways. Make no mistake these so called experts will lead you astray if you give them, not even, half a chance.
Back to the title question; well did he? Did Paul ‘reason’ with the Canaanite Jews in the Synagogues? In fact, as already stated, did Paul ‘reason’ with anyone? What if he did or he did not, what does it matter? It matters greatly for, if he didn’t, why is the word ‘reasoned’ in the Holy Scriptures at all?
Let’s deal with the question.
Did Paul reason with the Jews?
Well the KJV of The Holy Bible says he did so that must be it, yes? Actually, no is the plain and simple answer to that. To help us with this study I will list the relevant Holy Scriptures here:
Please take note that the word ‘reasoned’ cannot be found in any of Paul’s letters, nor in Hebrews. So this tells us that it’s a word that only Luke uses in Acts which immediately puts a question mark over it.
Acts 17:1-2 (KJV)Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews: And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.
Acts 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.
Acts 18:19And he came to Ephesus, and left them there: but he himself entered into the synagogue, and reasoned with the Jews.
Acts 24:25 And as he reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come, Felix trembled, and answered, Go thy way for this time; when I have a convenient season, I will call for thee.
There we are, four Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals and theologians love, especially Roman Catholic Bible intellectuals. Why do they love these Holy Scriptures? because they think that Paul was just like them, a debating, pontificating Bible intellectual or theologian, when nothing could be further from The Truth, and The Truth is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).
OK, let’s print Strong’s definition of this word:
Reasoned – G1256 – διαλέγομαι dialegomai dee-al-eg’-om-ahee. Middle voice from G1223 and G3004; to say thoroughly, that is, discuss (in argument or exhortation): – dispute, preach (unto), reason (with), speak.
Now here in Strong’s definition we can see some confusion through his contradictory remarks:
On one hand he says ‘dialegomai’ means: “To say thoroughly”; “To preach (unto)”; “To speak”; “To exhort.” Then on the other hand he says it means: “To discuss”; “To argue”; “To dispute”; “To reason.”
Now which is it, for it cannot be both?
In 2 Corinthians 12:20 Paul states quite clearly what he thinks of debating, reasoning and arguing:
2 Corinthians 12:20 (MCV) For I fear, lest, when I come, I shall not find you such as I would, and that I shall be found unto you such as ye would not: lest there be debates,(reasoning) envyings, wraths, strifes, (arguments) backbitings, whisperings, swellings, (haughtiness through puffed up meaningless intellectual vanity) tumults.
Is Paul a hypocrite? Is he giving advice and warnings to those he is teaching whilst he himself does the opposite!! Is this an example of the worldly norm of: “Don’t do as I do, just do as I tell you?” Is that what it’s all about – is that what Paul was saying here? I don’t think so, in fact I know so and we all know so, don’t we? if The Truth is in us.
Here is the bottom line: “Saying thoroughly”; “preaching unto”; “speaking and exhorting” is a one way street. These activities do not invite debate, unless you are opposed to the aforementioned declarations. We need to understand The Word of God is not up for debate, nor up for discussion, nor up for reasoning on for hours and hours. It is preached and either received or rejected; there is no half way house.
Paul went into the synagogues and preached and there stated his case (he said thoroughly) for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). Now there would have been some there that received Paul’s message joyfully, and others that would not have done so. Those who received it joyfully would have questioned Paul further initially being curious and then hungry for The Word of God, and wanting to know more. No doubt those who did not receive his message would have given him much opposition. This opposition would have come from the men of religion, but he would not have argued and reasoned with them. He would have said the same things to them as Yashua Messiah said to the Pharisee Canaanite Jews of His day. Hypocrites; whited sepulchres; nests of vipers etc. etc. The mindset that is opposed God – the carnal hu-man mindset cannot be reasoned with, it’s impossible and Paul knew this. See link No. 8 below)
Let’s not forget he was once one of them himself, a Pharisee, so he knew exactly how their minds worked. That’s why he stated this in Romans 8:6-7
Romans 8:6-7 (KJV) For to be carnally minded is death; but to be Spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
So there we have it; it’s either one or the other, called or not called.
Let’s now take a closer look at those Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals use to support their right to foolishly reason and pontificate on The Holy Word of God, something they are not Spiritually qualified to do.
1) “And three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.”
What does this tell us? It tells us the opposite of The Truth. It says Paul reasoned with them for three Sabbath days, which means every Sabbath, for three consecutive weeks Paul went to this synagogue to preach The Word of God out of The Holy Scriptures. He didn’t reason out of the Holy Scriptures, for it is impossible for a Spirit born son of God to do so. Therefore to ‘say thoroughly’ is just another way of saying he spoke with confidence and authority; he taught, preached to or exhorted those present he didn’t reason. One only reasons with people who are in disagreement. If, as True Believers, we reason with the argumentative, we automatically give credence to their view. If someone was disagreeing with the Messenger Paul, whose servant do you think this trouble maker was? Only one chance for the right answer folks and no prizes for getting it right!
2) “And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.”
Here we go again; he ‘reasoned’ and persuaded the Jews Judeans and Greeks. No he didn’t, he ‘said thoroughly’ what the Holy Scriptures said and then they were persuaded. They were convinced by what they heard. How?
John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
This is how it works folks: The Father God calls a man or a woman to His Son and this is made possible by The Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has not yet indwelled this convert yet, but he or she is receiving special attention from The Father through His Spirit. After this miraculous event, and a called person hears The Word of God preached or ‘said thoroughly’ by a messenger from God, he or she will respond positively, they can do nothing else. This is how these Israelite Judeans and Greeks were able to be ‘convinced’. The Father God was calling them and Paul was His messenger bringing them the Good News.
If we look at Strong’s definition for ‘persuaded’ it’s not the best word choice for this situation:
Persuaded – G3982 – πείθω peithō pi’-tho A primary verb; to convince (by argument, true or false); by analogy to pacify or conciliate (by other fair means); reflexively or passively to assent (to evidence or authority), to rely (by inward certainty): – agree, assure, believe, have confidence, be (wax) content, make friend, obey, persuade, trust, yield.
In order to satisfy The Truth of John 6:44 we need something better than ‘persuaded’ because to be ‘persuaded’ means a choice has been made and that is not the case at all as being saved is not up to us, it’s not our decision. Let’s assess this miracle properly: “To passively assent to”; “to trust and rely on with an inward certainty”; “to trust and be in agreement with”; “to have no doubts and total confidence that what we and they are hearing is The Truth.” All of the above is only possible through The Father making it possible through The Holy Spirit and Yashua Messiah with us for, where else would this inward certainty originate – from ourselves!!??
When Samuel the Prophet was called The Father God did not reason with him, He just called his name and Samuel replied: “Here am I.”
1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the LORD called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.
Have you noticed two things missing here – reasoning and persuasion, well, would you believe it? I do hope so, because the words ‘reasoned’ and ‘persuaded’ are the additions of Bible intellectuals, who over time have contaminated The Word of God through their personal religious agendas, and thereby reflected them in the pages of The Holy Bible.
As a final point, you could ‘argue’ that I am ‘reasoning’ with you to ‘persuade’ you with this article, right this minute, but again that would not be true unless The Father were already calling you to His Son. If that is the case you will need no reasoning or persuading, and I will certainly not have to argue with you. I am only the sower and the seed is The Word of God and you are either fertile soil or stony ground. Furthermore, I cannot tell you whether you are fertile soil or not, only you can answer this question for yourself, for you will either agree with me or disagree with me.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
This is my third article on this contentious issue, and I recently received some objections to my teaching on it via e-mail. This complainant was very agitated and vociferous, with all his e-mails written in block capitals. Why do people shout when they are in error? Do they think people are going to take more notice of what they are saying if they shout? I suppose they must, but is this the case? I don’t think so, in fact I know so, because all it does is makes them sound and look foolish, combined with The Truth that text written in all-caps is harder to read than upper/lower text, and the writer thereby self-defeated.
So what were his objections? His objections were based on Old Testament Holy Scriptures where it states, and I will quote:
Leviticus 22:18 (MCV) Speak unto Aaron, and to his sons, and unto all The Children of Israel, and say unto them, Whatsoever he be of The House of Israel, or of the strangers in Israel, that will offer his oblation for all his vows, and for all his freewill offerings, which they will offer unto The Yahavah for a burnt offering.
OK, the pesky word is written there, but does it change anything that I have not already covered in my previous two articles? Let’s return to some of my teaching just to clarify. Man is a fallen being, a lost being, an unsaved being and that is his overall condition, into which he is born, and he cannot be rescued from that condition until he is called by The Father Yah to His Son Yashua Messiah, and regenerated through water Baptism (full immersion), and the gifting of The Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit.
Genesis 3:5 (KJV) For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Genesis 3:22 (MCV) And The Yahavah Yah said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil.
Here is the fallen condition, and notice what Yah says: “He is become as one of us,” that is, to know ‘good’ and to know evil, to have the knowledge of these two ways of behaving or living. This means from that moment in time (when Adam and Eve fell) man knew about being ‘good’ and about being evil. It also meant he would now be capable of both actions, good, kind or generous actions, even loving actions, or evil, cruel and spiteful actions.
Now if we transfer this reality of The Truth of man’s overall fallen condition to so called ‘freewill offerings’, does this mean that man has had freewill all along and the fall of man in the Garden of Eden didn’t take place. For, make no mistake, this is what it means. It also means man had free will after he fell. For if we say we have free will, it means the fall of man never took place, and we are all free from the bondage of sin and are therefore free, so, by default, we must have free will and we are free to choose. The other issue, and far more important, being that there would been no need for Yashua Messiah to come and die for us.
This, though, flies in the face of The Truth, for in the fallen condition we are slaves to sin, we are lost, so how can we be free. OK, so we are slaves to sin, so what does that mean in terms of will, because we now know it’s not free will that we possess, for we are slaves and slaves have no freedom whatsoever. We have will, certainly, but it’s not free. As mankind we can only have one of two wills, either it’s The Adversary’s will, or it’s the Father Yah’s will, we certainly don’t have any will of our own, and this is what it means to be fallen or lost.
How can that be I hear you ask? Quite simply because Yah is in charge, but so, in a lesser way, is the other god – the god of this world – The Adversary. The difference being, the god of this world or this age is soon to lose all his power, but at this moment in time he is still the god of this world and people of this world do his will – period – full stop – end of.
So what is his will? His will is that people believe his lies and that they do it continually, just as they did from day one in The Garden. People love to be lied to, and that’s why they vote for politicians; why they think politicians are on their side; it’s why they go to ‘church’; it’s why they follow religions of all descriptions. It’s all lies and deceptions of The Adversary and people love them!! These are nothing but outward displays of the lost, fallen condition and man can behave in no other way – he’s fallen. Paul confirms this for us:
Romans 8:7 (MCV) Because the carnal mind is enmity (open hostility) against Yah: for it is not subject to The Law of Yah, neither indeed can be.
Apart from that, it is also The Adversary’s will that man behaves in accordance with the knowledge he acquired when he fell in the Garden of Eden. This issue is of paramount importance when we deal with issue of ‘freewill’ offerings, and it also confirms that The Adversary maintains his deception through people doing ‘good’ as well as doing evil. If he got people to do evil and only evil his cover would soon be blown, and all people would see him for what he is. No, he is the arch-deceiver and he deceives the whole world, apart from one group of people – The Assemblies of Yah, otherwise known as The Ecclesia, those set apart called and chosen out of this world by The Father.
Freewill offerings – H5071 – nᵉdâbâh, ned-aw-baw’; from H5068; properly (abstractly) spontaneity, or (adjectively) spontaneous; also (concretely) a spontaneous or (by inference, in plural) abundant gift:—free(-will) offering, freely, plentiful, voluntary(-ily, offering), willing(-ly), offering).
So to press on, there are seventeen verses in the OT where we will find the word ‘freewill’ and the above verse from Leviticus is one of them. The first problem we have with the usage of this word is the usual one of translation error, for if we look in the Hebrew version of the OT we find the word ‘voluntary’ is used. In other words it’s voluntary offerings, not freewill offerings, and there is a subtle difference between these two words. Mr Strong in his concordance gives it as ‘spontaneous’ but has any of this shown that man has free will? No, not at all. Therefore the use of the word ‘freewill’ is definitely misleading, and it is definitely a translator’s choice, so therefore gratuitous, when the word ‘spontaneous’ would work far better and not mislead. These voluntary offerings were a display of ‘good’ works, the ‘good’ part of the ‘good’ and evil make up of fallen man, and sometimes they were offerings that were given for a reason – there was a motive or an agenda.
In Ezra we find voluntary offerings being given towards helping with the construction of the Temple:
Ezra 1:4 (MCV) And whosoever remaineth in any place where he sojourneth, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods, and with beasts, beside the freewill offering for The House of Yah that is in Jerusalem.
As I have already stated, all these acts of generosity were acts of ‘goodness’ and therefore fall under the umbrella of the fallen condition, for man has the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil. This means these acts of giving offerings were not ‘freewill offerings’ they were fallen condition offerings, ‘spontaneous’ acts of ‘goodness’ within that fallen condition.
To decide between doing ‘good’ or evil is all part of The Adversary’s deception, so that people like my complainant think free will is involved when deciding whether to do ‘good’ or not. Which ever thing we decide to do, the things we are doing are still The Adversary’s will, not our own will, for it is all part and parcel of the fallen condition. There is no escape from it until we are born of Yah (born again).
John 8:32 (MCV) And ye shall know The Truth (Yashua Messiah), and The Truth (Yashua Messiah) shall make you free
John 8:36 (MCV) If The Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
We need to get these verses into our heads, and written on our hearts, for they tell us plainly and simply that only Faith and belief in Yashua Messiah can set us free, and thereby give us free will. And who gives us the ability to believe – Yashua Messiah Himself through The Father’s call, His will, not our will.
John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
In addition to all I have said thus far, another excellent example of this ‘good’ issue is the British liberal reformers of the nineteenth century. They did all manner of what they thought were ‘good works’ and kind deeds and some of them were, indeed, good and kind works. They were kindly, well meaning people, and they ‘chose’ to do these ‘good deeds’, but unless they were born of Yah (born again) these people’s actions and choices were still only do-gooding acts within the lost and fallen condition, just like the ‘spontaneous’ offerings in Leviticus.
If these reformers were not born of Yah (born again), their motive for doing ‘good’ was not for Yah’s Glory but, rather, for their own glory, and for the benefit of mankind. Yah was not in the picture, and that means His will was not in the picture either. So if Yah’s will was not involved in these do-gooding acts of kindness, whose will was it? Why, it was The Adversary’s will via man’s ‘choices’ within the fallen condition, so it could not be a free will decision, any more than the so called free will offerings in Leviticus were.
These were acts of ‘good’ emanating from men who had the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil – the fallen condition. Whatever man does, whether it be ‘good’ or evil, he is still a slave, a slave to sin, until he is born of Yah (born again) and he has no free will until that happens.
Ever heard the expression: “Only the good die young!?” Is it true? Well it’s my belief that if fallen people are too good in The Adversary’s eyes, he takes them out, because he hates them doing all their good deeds – or he hates them if they have a kind disposition and they love their neighbours on a daily basis. To The Adversary this is not the right kind of behaviour for someone in the fallen condition, for only the right kind of do-gooding is allowed = self-centred do-gooding, not selfless do-gooding.
I trust this will help you all (including my complainant) to come to a clearer understanding of the issue of fallen man’s ‘will’ for it is most definitely not free.
This is a three part series of articles, with Parts 1 and 2 here, that I wrote several years ago, in April 2008, to be precise, and now edited and tweaked to bring them into line with my added knowledge. However, what I will say is that they needed very little in the way of tweaking in order to improve them, and bring them up to date, so what you see here is pretty much the same as I wrote 14 years ago.
So to the question: well does he? because most of fakestream Christianity, that is, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, (see link No. 6 below) and certainly those outside of ‘Christianity’ thinks he does? It’s one of those numerous blanket issues, both within and without, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Which means both the secular and religious are very fond of this idea, and takes it for granted without question.Sadly, nearly everything they believe is based on the traditions of hu-man beings and men, or the teachings of the hu-man beings and men of religion – Hellenising philosophers and Judaisers alike, so it’s no wonder they don’t understand.
Mark 7:9 (MCV) And He said unto them, Full well ye reject The Commandment of Yah, that ye may keep your own tradition.
So does fallen mankind have free will? Did he ever have free will? Did Adam and Eve, before they fell, have free will? Now these are very interesting questions, are they not? There are also some other questions that come out of these first questions: If Adam and Eve did have free will, did The Yahhead take bets from the angels on which way they would turn, if so, where did They lay their bets off!!?? (OK only joking) Furthermore, did the Yahhead take a big risk and leave it all to chance, or was it an accidental flaw in their plans of the creation of Adam and Eve – a calamitous mistake?? If They did take a big risk or make a big mistake, we have to imagine They had a plan B or even a plan C, that They would quickly implement, in a state of panic, as a rear guard defensive manoeuvre in order to prop things up. Was that the case? LOL
Was the fall of Adam and Eve something that took the Yahhead by surprise? Was it a grand game of pot luck or lucky dip, or was it a case of: Did the Yahhead plan to ‘fail’, for want of a better expression? Perhaps a better way of putting it would be: Did The Yahhead create Adam and Eve knowing, in advance and full well, that they would fall at their first hurdle? Or, in other words, did the Yahhead plan it the way it happened? OK, let’s see if we can answer these questions?
Genesis 2:7 (MCV) And The YAHAVAH Yah formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. (See link No. 1 below)
Take note, for the question of ‘free will’ is answered right here in this first Set Apart (Holy) Scripture. It’s so simple, I cannot understand where this idea of man’s free will came from, unless it’s through non-belief in the whole Bible, brought about by the “New Testament Only” people. These are so-called Christians that think that the Old Testament should be deleted from what they call The Canon of Scripture, thus taking away Scriptures like the above that upset them.
Now as we can see, man was not asked if he would like to be created, he was not invited to a business meeting and his opinion and agreement sought!! Believe it or not, though, this is the very basis upon which many ‘Christians’ build their lives as ‘believers’, that is, Yah needs our co-operation in order to be a success!! LOL. This is why they say: “There is no way I can be saved unless ‘I’ accept a Jesus as my saviour,” never mind John 6:44:
John 6:44 (MCV) “NO MANcan come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drawdrag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.”
John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Look what Isaiah had to say on this matter:
Isaiah 29:16 (MCV) Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay: for shall the work say of Him that made it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of Him that framed it, He had no understanding?
Isaiah 64:8 (MCV) But now, O YAHAVAH, thou art our Father; we are the clay, and thou our Potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.
We are the clay, The Yahavah Yah (Yashua Messiah) is The Potter, and we are the work of The Yahavah’s hand, how unambiguous is that!!?? Just where does mankind’s will, free or otherwise, fit in to this scenario or arrangement? As we can plainly see, it doesn’t.
OK, the Garden of Eden scene is nearly complete, just one more character to add: enter The Serpent Creature otherwise known as the Destroyer, or the Author of Ruin and the Author of Lies. He is also known as the Author of Confusion (miscegenation or mixed bloods – see link No. 2 below), The Adversary, the Devil; so many names but with only one purpose – to destroy or wipe mankind, especially non-Jewish White Semitic Israel, from the face of the earth, if he possibly can.
Why is he like that? Easy, Yah (Yashua Messiah) made him that way. If The Yahhead had already planned for Adam and Eve to fall, how were They going to bring it about?
Genesis 3:1 (MCV)Now The Serpent Creature was more subtle (devious, cunning or crafty) than any beast of heavenwhich The YAHAVAHYah HAD MADE.And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath Yah said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? (See link No. 7 below)
There he is folks, that old serpent – The Adversary whom Yah made. Now, should this revelation (apologies to those of you who already know this Truth) shock us? Well yes it should, if, like me in the past, you have always believed what men of religion have taught you, without questioning it. Make no mistake, I came from that very same fold, too, until Yashua Messiah set me free into His Glorious Light and Truth and under His Glorious Grace. So yes it should shock us, but then again, after a further study of His Word, shock turns quickly to: Well I’ll be…..!! How did I ever miss that??
By ‘missing that’, I mean the sons of perdition like the Pharaoh who confronted Moses, and Judas Iscariot who betrayed Yashua Messiah. In both cases the Yahhead hardened the Pharaoh’s heart and Judas’ heart, not The Adversary’s heart. OK, The Adversary played his part in leading Judas astray, but that act of betrayal had to happen and someone had to do it in order for The Scriptures to be fulfilled. Notice, too, that Yashua Messiah was prophesied to fulfil His missionbefore the foundation of the world.
Revelation 13:8 (MCV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, (The Adversary) whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
Exodus 7:2 (MCV) Thou shalt speak all that I command thee: and Aaron thy brother shall speak unto Pharaoh, that he send The Children of Israel out of his land. 3 And I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and multiply my signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt.
John 17:12 (MCV) While I was with them in this age (in the world), I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but The Son of Perdition (Judas); that The Scripture might be fulfilled.
Even before Adam and Eve were created The Yahavah was The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. This means He and the Father Yah knew what was going to happen in the Garden of Eden before it happened. It had to happen the way it did in order that The Scriptures be fulfilled, Yah be glorified and Yashua Messiah become the first and only begotten of The Father – Yah come in the flesh.
Here is an analogy that I now use to great effect: Mankind is like a prisoner and a prisoner can ‘choose’ to be a ‘good’ prisoner and win favour with the prison staff, or he can ‘choose’ to be an evil nasty prisoner, but either way he is still a prisoner with no freedom, so his ‘choices’ are a fantasy and, therefore, so is his imagined free will.
OK, so if man doesn’t have free will, what will does he have? Again that’s easy, he has rebellious will, stubborn will, a carnal will, but none of these wills are free, they’re controlled and manipulated by the one who led our parents astray in the first place – The Serpent Creature – The Adversary.
Therefore, Mankind can either do Yah’s will – but only after The Father has called him/her to His Son Yashua Messiah, or The Adversary’s will. Mankind can have no other wills but these, and one will is imprisonment, bondage, slavery and captivity to sin, and the other is total freedom from sin and death under His Glorious Grace.
It’s no good a man or woman saying “I don’t believe in The Adversary – it’s all hogwash,” as that is all part of The Adversary’s armoury anyway. To get people to think and say he doesn’t exist suits him just fine, and that viewpoint doesn’t make him go away and leave us alone, in fact it encourages him. This world (age) is his world (age) and he is the god of it, but not for much longer.
2 Corinthians 4:4 (MCV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of The Glorious Gospel of The Messiah – The Anointed, who is the image of Yah, should shine unto them.
So there we have it; mankind has no free will other than in his vain imaginations and fantasies.
Part 2 coming right up:
In Yashua Messiah’s name
Messenger Charles
FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It? – Further Proof and Evidence That He Doesn’t.
For those of you who were not convinced or persuaded by my first article on this subject, I thought I would add to it with more proof and evidence. If you haven’t done so, it will help if you read my first article above “Free will – Does Fallen Mankind Have It” before this one. Thank you.
As it happens, someone e-mailed me recently questioning my ‘claims’ that mankind does not have free will. As always, I will remind readers that The Truth is not something that is claimed, it is always something that is declared in confidence or announced as news – the Good News, and then either accepted or rejected. Now this man made his remarks based upon the idea that Paul reasoned with the Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews in the synagogues. Which he did not, please see my soon coming article: “Did The Apostle Paul Reason With The Jews In The Synagogues?” He then went on to say:
“You claimed to refute the idea that Paul reasoned with the Jews, and implied that logical reasoning is evil and worldly. But I ask to you: if reason is evil, then why can Christians use it so effectively to minister to atheists?
Now here he is missing the point or points completely, because there is nothing wrong with reasoning, if it’s accompanied and guided by the indwelling of the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit, but in too many cases it isn’t, and that includes the head knowledge men who translated The Word of Yah into the English of the King James Bible. Now this head knowledge carnal reasoning is the problem, and yes it is evil if it’s applied to The Word of God without the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit. Finally he said:
“However, I do believe that God can use the faculties He has given us to lead us to Himself.”
Here again, we see the fakestream Christian inability or the trinity blindness causing them to be unable to see the Father and The Son as two supreme beings, (see link No. 3 below) not one being, and this is precisely the issue. It’s the Father that leads us, not to Himself, but to His Son – Yashua Messiah and no man or woman can come to Yashua Messiah unless The Father calls us:
John 6:44 (MCV) “No man can come to me, except The Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.”
By this, too, I trust you all understand that the act of salvation is not in the hands of man, but, rather, in the hands of The Father Yah alone and no one else. This is why the fakestream Christian slogans “I have found Jesus” or “I have made a decision for Jesus” or “I have accepted Jesus as my saviour” are not true, they’re just delusional lies. When The Father calls, the answer can only be as it was for Samuel and Jeremiah. In Samuel’s case it was a simple answer “Here am I”.
1 Samuel 3:4 (MCV) That The Yahavah called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.
In Jeremiah’s case it was showing us how predestination works – Jeremiah was always going to be Jeremiah the prophet, come what may, so where was Jeremiah’s free will in this arrangement! It wasn’t, it wasn’t there at all, because Jeremiah didn’t have free will!
Jeremiah 1:4 (MCV) Then the word of The Yahavah came unto me, saying, 5 before I formed thee in the wombI knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb Iset thee apart and sanctified thee; and I bestowed upon thee the honour of being a prophet unto the nations.
He further said:
“I know that you’re probably thinking that those people can’t see your truth because they are incapable of doing so. However, this denies the freewill that is the core of what it is to be human. After all, God “created man in His own image.” If we are created in God’s image (which I am sure you believe) and we lack free will, then that implies that God doesn’t have free will either.
Yes we were created in the image of the Yahhead, but unfortunately this man has forgotten one catastrophic event – man’s fall from the benefits that came with being created in Yah’s image. As you know, man chose (and chose for the last time) to believe a liar instead of his Creator, who told him The Truth, always. Once man fell he lost any freedom he once had, and became a slaveto sin, and fell under the curse of death, as a servant of The Adversary. Again, as you must know slaves and servants just do as they are told, they have no freedom and certainly no freedom to choose, so they have no free will. We have to be set free in order to have free will.
The fallen and lost have a will, yes, but it’s not free, because the only will they can perform is The Adversary’s will, for he is the god of this world (age or its systems) and he deceives the whole world. Carnal Man is in a rebellious frame of mind, continually, against his Creator. Even if man does ‘good’, he is still in the overall fallen condition, for he has the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil within that fallen condition. This means he will sometimes do ‘good’ and sometimes do evil, but he is still fallen and in slavery and/or in bondage to sin = no free will.
John 8:32 (MCV) And ye shall know The Truth, and The Truth shall make you free.
Freedom only comes with being born of Yah (born again). Anyone not born of Yah (born again) is not free, so therefore has no free will. If we say we have free will, what is this real freedom The Yahavah is referring to? Freedom is freedom you cannot have categories or stages of freedom, it’s either freedom or slavery to sin.
I do not make any claims, for The Truth is not something we claim, it is something we declare. Either we have The Truth, or do not have The Truth, so we tell it like it is, that is, through the indwelling of the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit in order for Yashua Messiah to make His home with us. Once this has occurred we can only speak The Truth. Claims are only for Hellenising philosophers, Bible intellectuals, Bible seminary graduates and theologians who do not have the indwelling of the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit.
Moreover, fake Christians can minister to atheists until they are blue in the face, but unless The Father is calling those atheists they will remain atheists.
He further added:
“At the end of your article, you said that those who claim that you were using reason to convince them of reason’s evil were in essence wrong, because they were using reasoning to do so. In doing so, you created a circular logic that comes across as “the only reasoning that is true is that which I declare to be true”–something that has turned many intelligent nonbelievers away from the Lord.”
My ‘reasoning’, as he calls it, only appears circular because reasoning without the indwelling of the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit can only be circular. This was the problem the first century Assemblies of Yah (The Ecclesia) had with Hellenising intellectuals with their philosophers who infiltrated The Assemblies – The Ecclesia and corrupted it with their non-gospel. Once born of Yah (born again) His Set Apart Exclusive Spirit joins our spirit and all our reasoning then points in a straight line to Him and is no longer circular.
Romans 8:16 (MCV) The set apart Exclusive Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the sons and daughters of Yah: (Notice that the set apart Exclusive Spirit is an IT! Not a ‘he’ or a ‘him’.)
It’s a Spiritual thing not a reason based logical thing, and this is where so many go wrong within fakestream Christianity (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion).
He then says: “the only reasoning that is true is that which I declare to be true”–something that has turned many intelligent nonbelievers away from the Lord.”
Well this is clearly not true, for The Truth could never turn away anyone The Father is calling to His Son Yashua Messiah, and the response from a genuine newbie would be the complete opposite of what he is describing. This then tells us that the intellect in man is often a stumbling block, just like riches are usually a stumbling block for wealthy men. In fact the intellect is a form of riches.
He came back again:
“Dear Messenger Charles,
Thank you for taking the time for e-mailing me back. While I still do not completely agree with you, especially on the point that persons without Christ do not have free will (if our will is not free, then God determines who will be saved and who won’t, which is against His plan for us, for “it is not God’s will that any should perish.”), it is good to know that you are not one of those people who considers himself above responding to people with honest questions.”
I thanked him for his reply and pointed out that, in part, he had answered his own queries.
He was right, it is not Yah’s will that any man should perish and that is precisely what will happen – Yah’s will, will happen. (See link No. 4 below) Is Yah all powerful or not!? Yah’s will is not our will, for His ways are not our ways (unless we are born of Yah (born again) which, if it is Yah’s will that is being done, it proves that our will is not in the picture – free or otherwise.
Yashua Messiah came and conquered death, so if any man dies and remains dead, that is, has not been a part of any resurrection, then He and the Father will have failed. Nothing is conquered completely if any fraction of it remains unconquered. Yashua Messiah did not come to this earth to partly conquer sin and death, He came to conquer it all completely, and He did!
With regards to his point about our ‘free will’ he had not understood the issue that it’s only being born of Yah (born again) that gives us free will. Adam and Eve lost their ‘free will’ – the first Adam. We are under the Grace of The Second Adam and have been restored to an even better position than the first Adam before he fell. We are, in effect, more free than the first Adam, so we have free will, if we are born of Yah, but the lost and unsaved do not have free will, for they are not born of Yah, and they can only do The Adversary’s will – that is the fallen condition.
If we believe that the lost and unsaved have free will then by default we are saying that they have a say in whether they are saved or not. By default, you are saying man’s decision overrides or overrules The Father’s decision, and man has the power to control Yah’s will – ridiculous!
This is a tail wagging the dog scenario of cataclysmic proportions that he is describing here, whichever way you look at it, and makes Yah look powerless and ineffective. This, too, is the foundational flaw in all fakestream Christian denominational teaching, and it renders all adherents to it as believers in a non-gospel – which is not a gospel at all, as Paul graphically pointed out:
Galatians 1:6-7 (MCV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of The Messiah – The Anointed unto another gospel: 7 Which is not a Gospel at all!; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert The Gospel of The Messiah – The Anointed.
You see, once we embark upon a spiritual journey of salvation based upon man’s decisions, or upon man’s authority, which, if it is our decision, then it must be based upon our authority, we then have a spiritual journey of Spiritual insecurity. This is why fakestream Christians are always questioning the validity of their salvation and, in turn, why they live lives of worry, fear, guilt and doubt about their place in The Messiah – The Anointed (see link No. 5 below). Why? I will tell you why, because it all started on a sandy foundation of their decision; based upon the myth of their free will; when all the while it is not their decision at all but, rather, The Father’s decision alone to call them and save them = 100% Spiritual security.
Philippians 1:6 (MCV) Being confident of this very thing, that He which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Yashua Messiah’s return:
Hebrews 12:2 (MCV) Looking unto Yashua Messiah the author and finisher of Faith; who for the joy that was set before Him endured the stake, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of The Throne of His Father.
I told him, I hoped it would help him in his understanding and we parted on good terms, with him saying he thought I made some very interesting points. He said he would have to think long and hard on this subject. He thanked me again for being willing to sacrifice my precious time, so it was refreshing and encouraging to part amicably.
In Yashua Messiah’s name
Messenger Charles
1. What is Soul Sleep and Do The Holy Scriptures Disprove It? (The Myth of The Immortal Soul) – Part 1 of 2:
Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity; Eastern (Russian) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity; Anglicanism is NOT Christianity; Protestantism is NOT Christianity.
6. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
Isaiah 45:7 (MCV) I Yashua Messiah form The Light, and create darkness: I make peace, AND CREATE EVIL: I The Eternal do all these [things].
Isaiah 45:7 (Septuagint Interlinear) I (Yashua Messiah) [am] The One carefully preparing light, and I made darkness; and The One making peace, and [The One] creating bad [things]. I [am] [the] Lord God, The One doing all these [things]. (Round brackets mine)
Isaiah 45:7 (Septuagint Brenton) I (Yashua Messiah) am He that prepared light, and formed darkness; who make peace, and create evil; I am the Lord God, that does all these things. (Brackets mine)
I have included the two Septuagint translations, just to firm up the narrative and to remove any doubts you may have regarding the Masoretic Hebrew text.
Now this is a very controversial subject for some, that is, liberal luvvy-duvvy Cultural Jew Marxists that, in these last days, pose as Christians and proliferate mainstream Christianity (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion) in their thousands. These politically driven, deluded, liberal imposters get very upset when the subject matter of this verse gets aired, for it goes against much of what they stand for and believe.
Now this is because it doesn’t sit well with their preconceived ideas of who The Father is, or who Yashua Messiah is. You see, they don’t really know The Godhead at all, nor do they know what They are about. They therefore know nothing about The Godhead’s real plans, that is, what things they originally brought about, or put into being, in order that Their plans should be and would be accomplished and brought to fruition.
Moreover, this is a verse that gets their explaining away engines working flat out and doing much over time, to make sure that their liberal lemming followers are not offended or upset. This means we get guff like this from the ‘Got Questions?” web page:
“God did not create evil, but He does allow evil. If God had not allowed for the possibility of evil, both mankind and angels would be serving God out of obligation, not choice. He did not want “robots” that simply did what He wanted them to do because of their “programming.” God allowed for the possibility of evil so that we could genuinely have a free will and choose whether or not we wanted to serve Him.”
In this short paragraph we can see how they are immediately offended by the idea that God does create evil, and has created evil, and He did that so that evil entered into the world, so that Yashua Messiah would be crucified and killed for us, so that we could have Eternal Life and reside with Him forever in The Kingdom of God. This means they never stop and ask this simple question – If there was no evil in the world how could Yashua Messiah have been crucified and murdered?
Notice, too, the old ‘free will’ nutmeg that they always stumble over when explaining The Truth away, as in the above paragraph.
Ephesians 1:3-4 (MCV) Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all Spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: 4 According AS HE HATH CHOSEN US IN HIM BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, that we should be Holy (separate) and without blame (sinless) before Him in love:
He did not want robots! he says. LOL. Well that’s exactly what we are or were = Satan’s Robots!!! Until The Father intervened in our lives and called us to His Son.
Revelation 13:8 (KJV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (Satan), whose names are not written in The Book of Life of THE LAMB SLAIN FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD.
Furthermore, if we, as lost and fallen creatures, have free will, why would The Father have chosen us from before the foundation of the world? What say do we have in this scenario? I’ll tell you, NONE! ZILCH! ZERO!
So back to the paragraph and his idea that: “God ALLOWED for the POSSIBILITY of EVIL!” Really!? So it was all a game of ‘Hit and Miss’ was it? How does anyone ever believe this satanic gumpf? Well, He has sent them STRONG DELUSION so this must be a perfect example of it, for these duped fake Christians do believe it.
From the CARM web page:
“Does God create evil? Isaiah 45:7 and Amos 3:6. No, God does not create ontological evil. He creates calamity which is sometimes translated as ‘evil.’”
Amos 3:6 (KJV) Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it?
Now with this joker we can see a pathetic attempt at trying to counter Isaiah 45:7 by using Amos 3:6, when these are two very different cases using the word ‘evil’. Isaiah 45:7 is no way referring to a calamitous event, for it opens with the subject matter of ‘light and darkness’ and any believer half switched on will know exactly what is being inferred here. If you’re still in the dark (like the pun?) let’s shed some light on it.
1 Peter 2:9 (MCV) But ye are a Chosen Offspring, a Royal Priesthood, an Holy Nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of Him who hath called you out of darkness into His marvellous light.
This is the light and darkness that Isaiah is referring to, so we’re dealing with the subject of sin and wickedness, not calamitous events and it is God Himself that created it. So how did He create it? Let’s go to Genesis to find out:
Genesis 3:1 (MCV) (First Part) Now The Serpent was more subtil (sly, devious and crafty) than any beast of the field which The Eternal HAD MADE.
Genesis 3:1 (Septuagint Interlinear) (First part) But The Serpent was most skilled {read into that negatively what you will} of all the wild beasts of the ones upon the earth whom [made [the] Lord God.]
Genesis 3:1 (Septuagint Brenton) (First part) Now The Serpent was the most crafty of all the brutes on the earth, which the Lord God made.
And there we have it – Yashua Messiah created evil in The Serpent from the beginning. Satan was never a fallen angel, nor a cherub, (see link Nos. 1 and 2 below). He was a beast of the field, albeit with certain spiritual powers, created evil by Yashua Messiah, from the beginning, and placed in The Garden.
This is how sin entered into the world and all as a part of the Godhead’s plan = no hit and miss, no uncertainty and definitely NO FREE WILL!!
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
OK, so here we go again with yet another controversial subject, well it’s controversial for some, but not for those well founded in Faith in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), because hopefully they will have entered into His Eternal Sabbath Rest.
So what makes it controversial for some? Easy, their continued desire for living under The Law and stubbornly refusing to live under Yashua Messiah’s Glorious Grace. They are like those Israelites who became embittered and fell in the wilderness. They began their rebellion when ten of the Israelite spies came back with a faithless negative spineless report to Moses, claiming that it was an impossible task for the Israelites to overcome in order for them to enter into the Promised Land and to defeat the Canaanite occupants = they hardened their hearts and THEY FAILED TO ENTER THROUGH UNBELIEF!!
Hebrews 3:15 (KJV) While it is said, To day if ye will hear His voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation.
These rebellious Israelites hardened their hearts towards God and so, too, do these modern day GRACELESS Commandment obeying Pharisees and Judaisers, thinking that they can enter The Kingdom of God by striving to OBEY The Ten Commandments which, of course, includes regulated Sabbath keeping. If they slip up and fail here and there with their obedience endeavours, not to worry, ‘cos God knows how hard they’re struggling to OBEY, and He will always be merciful towards them – at least that’s what they erroneously think. (See link No.s 1 and 2 below). Moreover, this means, metaphorically, they want to remain in Egypt with their garlic, cucumbers and melons, whilst delusionally thinking that they will enter The Kingdom of God in the resurrection – the Eternal Promised Land.
Hebrews 3:16-19 (MCV) For some, when they had heard, did provoke: howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses. 17 But with whom was He grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness? 18 And to whom sware He that they should not enter into His Rest, but to them that believed not? 19 So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief.
Now have YOU made the same catastrophic error by refusing to enter into His Eternal Sabbath Rest from YOUR WORKS!!?? Or do YOU continue in trying to EARN YOUR SALVATION through OBEDIENCE TO THE LAW – The Ten Commandments!? (See link No. 4 below).
Hebrews 4:1 (MCV) Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into His Eternal Rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.
Have YOU come short of it by refusing to live FULLY under His Glorious SAVING Grace?
Hebrews 4:2 (MCV) For unto us was The Kingdom Gospel preached, as well as unto them: but The Word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with Faith in them that heard it.
The Word preached DID NOT PROFIT THEM! Why did it not profit them? because they wanted to remain faithless under the curse of The Law:
Galatians 3:13 (KJV) Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of The Law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
So listen up all you regulated Sabbath keepers out there, whether it be Saturday or Sunday Sabbaths, (see link No. 1 below) and examine yourselves through the power of the Holy Spirit, and ask yourselves this question: Is this TRUTH registering deep within me, and are your hearts pricked? I do hope so, for any form of Commandment obeying is a trampling all over Yashua Messiah’s sacrifice. I jest not when I say that it is that serious and your eternal future RESTS upon it (pun intended). (See link No. 2 below)
Hebrews 4:3 (MCV) For we which have believed do enter into rest, as He said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
A better interpretation from The Living Bible:
Hebrews 4:3 (TLB) For only we who believe God can enter into HIS PLACE OF REST. He has said, “I have sworn in my anger that those who don’t believe me will never get in,” even though He has been ready and waiting for them since the world began.
Here we have explained to us that only through BELIEF and FAITH and TRUST in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) FOR EVERYTHING! can we enter into His Eternal Sabbath Rest. So what the author is telling us is that once we’re Called and Chosen, Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit, THAT’S IT!!! we have entered into His Eternal Sabbath Rest, our names are written in The Book of Life and EVERY DAY IS NOW A SABBATH DAY! This means, in the modern vernacular, that if you want a day off from your labours or even a few days off, then take ‘em, and if you want to make one Holy to The Lord Yashua Messiah then do so, but DON’T make in binding on yourself, or on others.
Here on in from The Amplified Bible:
Hebrews 4:4-7 (TAB) For somewhere [in Scripture] He has said this about the seventh day: “And God rested on the seventh day from all His works”; 5 and again in this, “They shall not enter My rest.” 6 Therefore, since the promise remains for some to enter His rest, and those who formerly had The Good News preached to them failed to [grasp it and did not] enter because of [their unbelief evidenced by] disobedience, 7 He again sets a definite day, [a new] “Today,” [providing another opportunity to enter that rest by] saying through David after so long a time, just as has been said before [in the words already quoted], “Today if you hear His voice, Do not harden your hearts.”
But what do the 21st century Pharisees do? Answer: they do exactly that, they harden their hearts and crawl back under the bondage of The Law, and by doing so fail to enter into His Eternal Sabbath Rest, and at the same time kill His Glorious Saving Grace for themselves – hence I call ‘em Grace Killers – how wretched can that be?
Hebrews 4:8-9 (TAB) [This mention of a rest was not a reference to their entering into Canaan.] For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not speak about another day [of opportunity] after that. 9 So there remains a [full and complete] Sabbath rest for the people of God.
There it is folks: A FULL AND COMPLETE SABBATH REST FOR THE PEOPLE OF GOD. How plain and simple is that? The wondrous simplicity that is in Christ – 2 Corinthians 11:3.
Hebrews 4:10 (TAB) For the one who has once entered His rest has also rested from [the weariness and pain of] his [human] labors, just as God rested from [those labors uniquely] His own. 11 Let us therefore make every effort to enter that rest [of God, to know and experience it for ourselves], so that no one will fall by following the same example of disobedience [as those who died in the wilderness].
So there we have it dear regulated Sabbath keepers, for I know from personal experience that many of you are devout and sincere people, especially SDAs (Seventh Day Adventists) and the people of the Worldwide Church of God splinter groups, but repentance is the only way forward for you and to shake off that curse of The Law.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Should Christians Keep The Old Covenant Commandments?:
In a word, neither and I know this remark will stir up all kinds of negative emotions in cult followers and their opponents in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, alike (see link No. 1 below).
Let’s be clear, many cult followers love to promote their Hebrew/Judaic brand of ‘Christianity’ by observing the Hebrew Sabbath (which btw is not a Jewish Sabbath, see link No.s 2 and 3 below), with many of them observing it from sunset on Friday to sunset on Saturday. I know this to be true, because I used to observe it this way myself, when I was a member of Armstrong’s Worldwide Church of God or, better, his ‘three tithes’ money grabbing, criminal, scam organisation.
Proper little Pharisees we were, complete with our superiority complexes, looking down on all those inferior satanic mainstream Christians, keeping their blasphemous Roman Cult (first day of the week) Sunday Sabbath. How proud and self-righteous we were, citing our knowledge of Scripture and ancient history. You know, all about the events that took place at The Council of Nicea in 325 AC, where the Christian Religious, Hellenising dogs and counterfeiters changed the Sabbath from the seventh day of the week to the first day of the week. (Again, see link No. 1 below).
Let me explain here, for this ‘correct’ Sabbath day keeping issue was crucial to Armstrong’s belief system, because he made the claim that “seventh day Sabbath keeping” was the pivotal identifying sign that his church was the true Church of God – all the other ‘churches’ and demon-inations (divisions) keeping a Sunday Sabbath were apostate Romanised churches. It, too, was my anchor to that claim as well, so, likewise, I believed as Armstrong did, such was my delusion.
Now all this is very interesting, because here, within this concept, we have a double whammy of error, or a compounding of error(s) by these deluded people. The problems with these ideas, that is, for the counterfeiters, were two fold: 1) there was the New Covenant Biblical Truth that regulated Sabbath keeping had been nailed to the cross with the rest of The Law and which these men of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion did not understand, and still don’t to this day, (see link No. 4 below). 2) Now if the first point is true, and it is, why were they going to the trouble of changing the day the Sabbath was held on, what difference did it make, and who were these people that were obviously, bringing pressure to bear with their seventh day Sabbath keeping, and influencing their ideas to change it? Who were these people that troubled the counterfeiters at Nicea? They must have considered them a threat or they would not have behaved in such a way. Why did the Nicea attendees wish to distance themselves from these Judaising Sabbath observers? Easy, through what we call today, anti-Semitism. These early Roman Catholics blamed the Jews for the death of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), which was true, and so began the so-called persecution of Jews by counterfeit Hellenising Religious Christians. From here on in, anything that they deemed to be Judaic was frowned upon as blasphemous and, after Nicea, was classified as heretical. Take note, this is in the literal sense, not a Spiritual sense, for Spiritually we all killed Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ), for we are all born into this world as sinners. However, Yashua Messiah had to come and take all the sins of mankind with Him to the cross.
OK, so Rome versus Jewry, Jewry versus Rome is nothing new, nor is there anything revelatory in what I have said on this subject, but what about these Judaic ‘Christians’, in the first, second and third centuries, that were such a thorn in the flesh of the men of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion? Were they, for instance, only Jews that were members of this sect? No, they had Israelite and non-Israelite adherents too, but were they True Believers? Were they the real thing or the real Church as opposed to the counterfeiters at Nicea? No, if anything, they were worse, but who were they, does Holy Scripture make mention of them and what made them worse than the counterfeiters? In answer to the first questions; no they were not the real thing and nor were they true believers whilst they remained deceived by this evil teaching. In answer to the third question, yes, of course the Holy Scriptures mentions them and we find them in the book of Galatians where Paul refers to them as fools:
Galatians 3:1 (MCV) O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not attentively hearken to The Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?
In addition to the above verse, why were they fools and what made them worse than the Christian Religious counterfeiters? Well, if we go to Galatians once more, we will find out:
Galatians 1:6 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Now straight away we can see why they are fools, they have been ‘removed’ from Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), that is, removed from belief solely in Him, and swiftly. That means they didn’t hang around, so stupid were they. This means, also, that no sooner were they baptised into Yashua Messiah they had upped sticks and transferred their faith to another gospel, and rejected Yashua Messiah’s Grace at the same time. How dumb is that? I’ll tell you, it’s very dumb indeed, because I’ve been there and done it myself, although I had not been birthed into The Truth prior to my membership of the cult, I was a greenhorn, so I hadn’t deserted Yashua Messiah in order to join, I had gone straight into error from the get-go. Never-the-less, please take it from me, and don’t be dumb and foolish by falling for any Judaiser’s non-Gospel poison.
Next we have Paul declaring that this ‘gospel’ isn’t a gospel at all, it’s evil bad news, not The Good News:
Galatians 1:7 (KJV) Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert The Gospel of Christ.
And Armstrong was such a man:
“You have probably heard that you are saved by Grace – Oh my friends what poppycock.”
— Herbert W. Armstrong
Furthermore, we can also see that in the first century there were some who would and did pervert The Lord’s Gospel message. Who were these people, and how did they pervert the Gospel? Paul, in Galatians, tells us who they were, they were evil creatures who infiltrated the church to spy on the brethren and witness the freedom they were experiencing and enjoying under His Grace:
Galatians 2:4 (KJV) And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty freedom which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage. (Strike-through mine)
Notice, that they might bring us into bondage – the bondage of what? Why, the bondage of creatures of the circumcision, and what did circumcision represent, or what did it symbolise? Easy, the whole Mosaic Law, summarised by the Ten Commandments, with all its minor rules and regulations as written down in the book of Leviticus, which included The Law of keeping the seventh day Sabbath. Sabbath keeping is law keeping which ever way we cut this folks and especially if we make it binding on other people.
Philippians 3:2 (MCV) Beware of Judaising mongrel dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the circumcision.
Moreover, the Holy Scriptures are very definite about keeping days Holy and how we should go about observing them, if we wish. Basically its about freedom and voluntary agreement between brothers and sisters and about when they decide which day they wish to keep Holy to The Lord. Individually we can keep any day we like, or none at all, if that’s what we want to do.
Colossians 2:16 (KJV) Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an Holy Day, or of the new moon, or of the Sabbath [days]:
There we are: let no man judge you, which means let no man determine or dictate which days you keep. We are now free to decide for ourselves under His Grace which days we keep and, if none at all, then so be it.
Colossians 2:13-14 (KJV) And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath He quickened (made Spiritual) together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses; 14 Blotting out The Handwriting of Ordinances (THE WHOLE LAW) that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to His cross. (Brackets mine)
The above verses are telling us straight! regulated Sabbath keeping on Saturday (the seventh day of the week) or any other day of the week, and made binding on believers, is Old Covenant legalism (PHARISAICAL JUDAISM), and not required under the New Covenant Law of GRACE!!
Can we now see why these Christian Religious counterfeiters of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion wished to separate themselves from the Judaisers?
Yet that didn’t make ‘em right, because they still wanted their own form of legalism and religion, with all the rules and regulations that went with it.
However, they didn’t want to be seen as a branch of Judaism, due to their prejudice and self-righteousness. So, in order to not be outdone they moved the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday where it has remained to this day. As you can now see this is just one satanic religion versus another satanic religion, proving that the Devil is not divided, and has nothing to do with living under Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) glorious Saving Grace.
I therefore hope and trust you can now see the futility and blasphemy of any form of regulated and religiously imposed Sabbath keeping.
Watch out for my latest follow-on article: Have YOU Entered Into Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) ETERNAL SABBATH REST?….
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
This article is an important postscript to part one which is essential reading before reading this article so please take time out to read that first (see link below – thank you).
Now having compiled the first article, I was soon drawn by Yashua Messiah to another Holy Scripture in Revelation. This, whilst doing some study on The End Times, and the soon coming return of Yashua Messiah to commence rule over His Kingdom as King of kings and Lord of lords, on King David’s Throne, on this earth. Moreover, this End Times subject will involve another article, or series of articles, over which I have been cogitating for many years, and I jest not.
However, what of these Holy Scriptures in Revelation? I’ll copy and paste them here:
Revelation 19:11-13 (KJV) And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and He that sat upon him IT was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself. 13 And He was clothed with a vesture (cloak or garment) dipped in blood: and his‘autos’ ITS name is called The Word of God. (Strike through, brackets and emphasis mine)
Revelation 19:11-13 (Greek Transliteral) And I perceived the heaven having-been-up-opened and (you)-be-perceiving horse white and the one-sitting on IT believing being-called and Truthful and in just-togetherness He-is-judging and is-battling 12 The yet viewers of-Him blaze of-fire and on the head of-Him diadems many having names having-been-written which not-yet-one has-perceived if no He 13 and having-been-about-cast cloak having-been-dipped to-blood and has-been-called the name [Him] ‘autos’ of-IT The Saying of-the God(placer).
Here in Revelation 19:13 we see some differences between the Greek Transliteral and the KJV (well would you believe it!? – the usual mirth here for the author) Here in verse twelve we have a ‘name’ whereas in the Greek Transliteral we have ‘names’ plural. Then we have what seems to be a translators whimsical driven choice of ‘HIM’ rather than ‘IT’ when referring to the horse. I won’t say agenda driven here because in this instance I am not sure that it is an agenda driven issue. Moreover, let me draw your attention to verse eleven to set the precedent where it says: “and behold a white horse; and He that sat upon him IT was called Faithful and True.”
Now in this verse we have the same Greek word ‘autos’ which can mean ‘it’; ‘he’; ‘him’; ‘himself’ and in the KJV the horse is definitely referred to as a ‘him’ and yet the Greek MSS has it as an ‘IT’, so the translators chose ‘autos’ as ‘HIM’ instead of ‘IT’ just as we would normally refer to an animal, unless we’re into humanising animals, as many people do today and would refer to it as a him.
From Strong’s Concordance:
Him; Himself; He; It – G846 – αὐτός autós, ow-tos’; – from the particle αὖ aû (perhaps akin to the base of G109through the idea of a baffling wind) (backward); the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:—her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-, thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, – by, -in, -into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very, which. Compare G848.
How does a baffling wind become a ‘he’ or a ‘him’? Perhaps it’s best that we don’t even go there. OK, so we’ve set the precedent, which needs now to be applied in verse thirteen. Confused? Don’t worry, for all will be explained.
In verse thirteen in the KJV we are led to believe that: “and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself” and then straight away in13 “And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and His name is called The Word of God”.
Have you noticed this before? In one breath it’s a name written that that no man knew apart from Yashua Messiah Himself, and in the next breath it’s: “His name is called The Word of God!” Hello! Excuse me! How does that work? Easy, for this is how it works:
Verse thirteen once more: And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and [His] ITS name is called The Word (The Saying) of God (Please refer to part one if you haven’t already done so).
OK so what am I saying here? Quite simply I am saying that Yashua Messiah is clothed (cloaked as in the Greek MSS) in The Holy Spirit. The Cloak is representative of The Holy Spirit and The Cloak or Garment is dipped in blood. How do you know that, I hear you ask? and well you should ask, for it took a little searching out and it led me to some new understanding, which I always love.
Luke 24:49 (KJV) And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be ENDUED with power from on high.
From Strong’s Concordance:
Endued – G1746 – ἐνδύω endýō, en-doo’-o; from G1722 and G1416(in the sense of sinking into a garment); to invest with clothing (literally or figuratively):—array, clothe (with), endue, have (put) on.
So here we have graphically explained to us how The Holy Spirit is likened to a garment or a cloak or clothing in which we sink into, and that is exactly what is being described to us, by John, in Revelation 19:13. This, too, as I proved in part one, is yet more proof that The Holy Spirit was TOWARD God (as in the Greek MSS) or close to God and VERY near to God, as in this wonderful picture of our Saviour sinking into His Holy Spirit like an enveloping garment or cloak = an IT, not a ‘he’ or ‘him’.
We then have this issue of blood and the garment or cloak (The Holy Spirit) having been dipped or more accurately soaked in blood, where does this blood come from? Once again that’s easy, for John tells us in verse eleven: “and in righteousness He doth judge and make war.” And how will Yashua Messiah on His horse make war? Through the immense POWER of His Holy Spirit and in that war the Holy Spirit will be drenched in the blood of Yashua Messiah’s enemies. This is described for us in Isaiah:
Isaiah 63:1-4 (KJV) Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? this that is glorious in His (Holy Spiritual) apparel, travelling in the greatness of His strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save. 2 Wherefore art thou red in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth in the winefat 3 I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment. 4 For the day of vengeance is in mine heart, and the year of my redeemed is come.
As a final point, does this mean that even though as born of God (born again) Christians we’re indwelled with The Holy Spirit, that The Holy Spirit still comes upon us as a cloak or garment? Hmm I am not so sure about that. I know for sure that those The Father is calling certainly get regular visits from The Holy Spirit, if not permanent protection, until they’re Baptised and indwelled, but I would need Scriptural proof that those already indwelled get the same visits when The Holy Spirit is already within them.
There I was, having just started a new article about ‘God and Science’, which amazingly led me into this article, in as much that the new discoveries that I had made in my research for that article, forced me to drop everything regarding that article and focus on this one.
So what is The Truth of John 1:1-4? To answer that we must first copy and paste the relevant Holy Scriptures here, so that we can see all that’s going on in these verses and, rest assured, for here we will find yet more mistranslations and corruptions within The KJV, and which will be revealed for all to see:
John 1:1-4 (KJV) In the beginning was The Word, and The Word was with God, and The Word was God. 2 The same (Word) was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In Him was life; and The Life was The Light of men. (Brackets mine)
Now what is the mainstream Christian (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion’s) teaching regarding these verses? Answer: They think it proves their mickey mouse Trinity, when it does no such thing. Perhaps, what I should have said, is what was my understanding of these verses? for I was once just as deceived as they are on this crucial passage of Holy Scripture.
Moreover, as we progress, we’ll discover some strong similarities with my unravelling of The Trinity deception (see link No. 1 below). We will also learn some more crucial Truth to support Yashua Messiah’s teaching re The Duality Godhead, and The Truth that The Holy Spirit is an ‘it’ and not a ‘he’ or a ‘him’, that is, the LIVING POWER or LIVING FORCE of The Godhead, so not a personage of a non-existent Trinity.
OK, so let’s now write out the Greek Transliteral version of this same passage of Holy Scripture to firm up this Truth:
John 1:1-4 (Greek Transliteral) In original was The Saying and The Saying was TOWARD The God(Placer) and The God(Placer) was The Saying. 2 This was in original TOWARD The God(Placer) 3 All through IT became and apart from IT became not yet one which has become 4 in IT Life was and The Life was The Light of men.
In the beginning, here termed the original, was The Saying and The Saying was TOWARD God(placer) that is, facing The Godhead or was/is near to The Godhead, so we’re dealing with something that was very close to The Godhead and yet it says The Godhead was The Saying. How does this work? Read on:
Notice verse three: All things through IT came into being and apart from IT not one thing came into being. So what does this mean, when I have ALWAYS believed that The Word or The Saying or The Logos was Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), but how can that be? for He is definitely not an IT!! He is a Spiritual Being, so what is this IT? Answer: It’s The Holy Spirit which is The Saying or The Word or The Logos which is the LIVING POWER or LIVING FORCE of The Godhead and brings things into being through ITS immense supernatural POWER or FORCE. As confirmed for us here:
“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a Force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this Force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.“
— Professor Max Planck, the father of quantum physics.
An Image of The Atom
Here we have explained to us, in scientific terminology, The Holy Spirit in ACTION and how IT brings the particles of the atom, by virtue of vibrations, and through those vibrations IT holds the particles of the atom together. Now what are these vibrations? Easy, they are the vibrations of The Sayings and/or the vibrations of the spoken Word of the Godhead. This is confirmed for us in Psalms:
Psalms 33:6 (KJV) By The Word (The Saying – vibrations) of The Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by The Breath of His mouth. (Brackets mine)
We then have the term: ‘The Breath of His mouth’. What is this a direct reference to? Again, that’s easy:
John 20:21-22 (MCV) Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. 22 And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye The Holy Spirit:
So from and through Yashua Messiah’s breath the Twelve Learners received the gift of the Holy Spirit and from Strong’s Concordance we get this:
Old Testament Hebrew:
H7307 – Spirit – רוּחrûwach, roo’-akh; – from H7306; wind; by resemblancebreath, i.e. a sensible (or even violent) exhalation; figuratively, life, anger, unsubstantiality; by extension, a region of the sky; by resemblance spirit, but only of a rational being (including its expression and functions):—air, anger, blast, breath, × cool, courage, mind, × quarter, × side, spirit(-ual), tempest, × vain, (whirl-) wind(-y).
New Testament Greek:
G4151 – Spirit/Ghost – πνεῦμα pneûma, pnyoo’-mah; – from G4154; a current of air, i.e. breath (blast) or a breeze; by analogy or figuratively, a spirit, i.e. (human) the rational soul, (by implication) vital principle, mental disposition, etc., or (superhuman) an angel, demon, or (divine) God, Christ’s spirit, the Holy Spirit:—ghost, life, spirit(-ual, -ually), mind. Compare G5590.
OK, so far so good, but what of this statement in John 1:2 The same (Word) or same (Saying) was in the beginning with God. Quite simply, the Saying was toward God or IT was close to God or IT was facing God, but IT was never God, for IT, that is, Yashua Messiah’s Saying, was His POWER or His ‘breath’ which carried the Godhead’s Sayings and actioned those same sayings.
Numbers 14:35 (KJV) I The Lord have said (The Saying), I will surely do it unto all this evil congregation, that are gathered together against me: in this wilderness they shall be consumed, and there they shall die.
Isaiah 14:24 (KJV) The Lord of hosts hath sworn, saying (The Saying), Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand:
Ezekiel 24:14 (KJV) I The Lord have spoken it (The Saying): it shall come to pass, and I will do it; I will not go back, neither will I spare, neither will I repent; according to thy ways, and according to thy doings, shall they judge thee, saith the Lord God.
Next we have verse 4: In Him was life; and The Life was The Light of men, and once again from the Greek Transliteral verse 4: in IT Life was and The Life was The Light of men.
Notice how this PROVES that The Holy Spirit is an IT and is LIFE, that is, a LIVING FORCE which gives Life to all things. So now we know that The Holy Spirit is The Word (The Saying) and goes forth from The Father and from Yashua Messiah in order to exercise Their will throughout Their Creation.
….And a word that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was never recorded as having uttered!
Now here’s a thing, a HUGE THING. The WHOLE WORLD, to a greater extent, has gone after one religion or another, and if we were to add up all those people that do have a religion, of one kind or another, I bet those left would only amount to a very small minority – which would also include followers of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).
Even those who profess to be atheists worship other things in place of an organised religion or deity, namely themselves in the mirror (narcissists), the creation, that is, the green eco-nutters (Extinction Rebellion morons), their families, (yes there is such a thing as ‘family worship’), their pets, wealth, careers, their cars, their boats, sun-worshipping holidays, science, technology, art, music, or even football teams. All of these things, however we cut it, can be, and are, objects of their RELIGION, that is, idolatry and, whether they like to hear it or not. So you see, dear people, in Truth there is NO ESCAPE from RELIGION – it’s all enveloping and encompassing and across the whole world.
However the reason for this article is not for the atheist lost and unsaved, although they are welcome to read and learn from it, IF the Father is calling them. No, the reason for this article is to rebuke and admonish in agape love, those who profess to be Christians, and yet waste their time and money on the wretched pursuit of religion, delusionally thinking that they are doing Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) will.
And now for the proof and evidence from The Holy Scriptures that show us that ALL RELIGION is of Satan the Devil and not of God. But before I do that here is a foundational aside: the word ‘RELIGION’ is derived from the multi-faceted demon called LEGION, whom Yashua Messiah cast into The Gadarene Swine. All the swine died as they plunged over the cliff edge, but LEGION did not, for spirits cannot die. This means that LEGION had a make-over and re-invented himself as RE-LEGION, and there you have it = the multi-faceted evil spirit (demon) that pervades ALL RELIGIONS, whether it be Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Bahaism, Confucianism and, of course, not forgetting the most important one, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion which at the moment doesn’t have an ‘ism’. Perhaps I should invent one! LOL
OK, here are ALL the verses from the New Testament that mention the word RELIGION, followed by the word RELIGIOUS, and you will immediately notice that NONE OF THEM are from the Four Gospels, which means Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He instruct His learners in the ways of RELIGION for He did not have a RELIGION – GOD HAS NO RELIGION:
Acts 26:5 (KJV) Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our RELIGION (G2356) I lived a Pharisee.
In this first offering we get an inkling of what RELIGION really is, that is, ‘a straitest sect’, as Paul accurately calls it, so from this we can immediately deduce that this is a very legalistic set up, and, of course, we already know that, because we know that The Serpent Seed Pharisee Jews were satanic Judaisers and very ritualistic. This means they dotted every ‘i’ and crossed every ‘t’ of The Mosaic Law in an attempt to pathetically save themselves. This, in turn, resulted in Yashua Messiah mocking them with the remark: “The ‘healthy’ have no need of The Physician!”
So straight off, the first example of the word RELIGION is a negative one.
Galatians 1:13 (KJV) For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454), how that beyond measure I persecuted The Church of God, and wasted it:
In this verse, our first negative verse above is confirmed for us once again by Paul with an even more negative example. Here he beefs it up by calling it the (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION and how, in the name of that VILE SATANIC RELIGION, he persecuted the Church of God and wasted it.
‘Wasted’ here meaning to destroy and overthrow or to make havock, and from Strong’s Concordance we get:
Wasted – G4199:πορθέω πορθέω: imperfect ἐπόρθουν; 1 aorist participle πορθήσας; (πέρθω, πεπορθα, to lay waste); from Homer down; to destroy, to overthrow (R. V. uniformly to make havock): τινα, Acts 9:21; τήν ἐκκλησίαν, Galatians 1:13; τήν πίστιν, ibid. 23.
So clearly we can now see what an evil thing the Jews’ RELIGION is, that is, Judaism, and please keep this in mind as we analyse the three remaining verses.
Galatians 1:14 (KJV) And profited in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454) above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.
Here Paul reveals how he ‘profited’ or progressed in The (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION, and left his contemporaries way behind, so zealous was he for this evil satanic cult and its dogma. We MUST fully understand that Saul was a ruthless cold blooded murderer before Yashua Messiah gave him the shock of his life on the road to Damascus.
Next, we have two very interesting verses that seem to go against everything Paul has revealed and taught us about his past involvement with RELIGION, and how evil it was/is. We therefore have what some misguided people use as an example of sending up RELIGION, and let’s be clear, for these are the ONLY VERSES in the whole Bible that appear to paint RELIGION in a positive light, but do they?
In order to answer this question we will need Strong’s Concordance once more for there are several Greek words at play here. The first is G2356 and the second is G2454 and here are the definitions:
Religion – G2356θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah; – from a derivative of G2357; ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.
Religion – G2454Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; from G2450; “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.
Religion – G2357 – threskos thrace’-kos probably – from the base of 2360; ceremonious in worship (as demonstrative), i.e. pious:–religious.
Religion – G2450 – Ioudaizo ee-oo-dah-id’-zo from 2453; to become a Judaean, i.e. “Judaize”:– live as the Jews.
James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain.
James 1:27 (KJV) PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
Right, now we get down to some very devious and deceptive nonsense going on here, for in Acts 26:5 we get the G2356 reference to Paul speaking of his previous religious life which is exactly the same religion as mentioned in Galatians 1:13-14 and yet the translators have given it a new number, that is, G2454. So what’s going on? Has Paul’s past religion changed from being, and I quote: “G2356 ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.” to “G2454 “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.” Or are they just one and the same, but dressed up differently in the G2356 definition.
Do you see what’s happening here? With the use of G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah they are attempting to paint Paul’s old religion in a benign oh so loving, compassionate and kind, kind of way, that is, people who generally wouldn’t hurt a fly, and then with the use of the next word: G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; we’re then dealing with murdering psychopaths namely, Saul, and his fellow Pharisee criminals, and yet we’re definitely talking about the same RELIGION. The irony here being that the KJV translators have got this right by using the word RELIGION for both Greek words.
OK, so it looks like a load of shenanigans has taken place with the Greek manuscripts, proving that they, too, are liable to little corruptions, as with Matthew 28-19, which I unravelled in my article: “Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? – Part 1” (See link No. 1 below).
So let’s now move on to James and analyse what he’s up to and I’ll repost the two troublesome verses below:
James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain 27 PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
So straight away we have use of that deceptive G2356 definition which, as we have already ascertained really means the same as G2454 – Saul’s and the Pharisee Jews’ satanic Judaising religion. But why is James rambling on about religion anyway? Well it’s obvious, isn’t it? Look at the opening statement: “If any man among you seem to be religious.” What does he mean by this remark? Let’s copy and paste the Concordant Literal Version for a better understanding:
James 1:26-27 (CLV) If anyone is seeming to be a ritualist, not bridling his tongue, but seducing his heart, the ritual of this one is vain, 27 for ritual clean and undefiled with God the Father is this: to be visiting the bereaved and widowed in their affliction, to be keeping oneself unspotted from the world.”
Why would anyone in the Church of God be hanging on to old religious ritualistic customs, that is, the ways of the world? When all of this was done away, with Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection. Why would this wretch want to be seen as someone who was still into meaningless rituals and religion?
So here’s a further pertinent question or two: 1) Since when did visiting the bereaved and widowed become ritualistic or religious? Answer: It never has. 2) In what way is visiting the bereaved and widowed a ritualistic or religious activity? Answer: It’s not, nor has it ever been, so what’s James on about?
Easy, he’s mocking the whole idea sarcastically. James 1:26-27 is all about exposing this fraud (whoever he or she might be) and possibly doesn’t exist at all, but he’s using this possible scenario, as an example, so that anyone within his congregation that still fancies himself as religious or hankers after the old Pharisaical ways, had better shape up and get with the New Covenant and repent of his old Pharisaical Religious ways or else. (See link No.2 below)
So there we have it, RELIGION fully revealed and exposed from The Holy Scriptures for the fraud that it is, and NOW is the time for ALL true Christians to set themselves free from it:
Revelation 18:4 (KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse and Baptism Is Not Into The Trinity:
Would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) stand at the window with the Pope at the Vatican sharing the adulation? As I wrote this I had to have a little laugh, just because of the whole farcical idea, it is just so hilariously preposterous and ridiculous – I think I will consider a new career as a comedian – only joking of course!
Can you imagine the above scenario? Well perhaps you can and, if you can, here is another question for you: Which Pope would it be? ‘cos there’s been an estimated 266 of ‘em, which includes the even more hilarious idea that Peter The Messenger (apostle) was the first one, ROTFL! (see link No. 1 below). So which one would share this platform – the one who drew the shortest straw? Oh boy, this stuff just cracks me up. Let’s face it, they’re all going to be in heaven aren’t they? Well no, they won’t, as no hu-man being, or man or woman of mankind is going to heaven, but that’s another story for another article. (See link No. 2 below)
However, what we need to ask ourselves is this: where in the Holy Scriptures does it say that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) needs a leading representative on earth to stand on a platform anywhere on His behalf? Nowhere!! Yashua Messiah has us – His Elect, those called and chosen by The Father to His Son, The Saints, and He needs no one else. We are The Ecclesia, not some snake in the grass appointee of other snakes in the grass, that is, the demonic creatures and/or counterfeiters of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.
OK, so let’s stop and think about this, what entities or bodies have representatives? Governments, corporations and businesses do and, of course, low and behold, we are dealing with the largest government/corporation on this earth – the Babylonian Mystery Religion Corporation, with Catholicism in the west and Orthodoxy in the east. Not forgetting, of course, all their Protestant denominational subsidiaries – the demon-inations. I said this false effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ was big business, didn’t I? and here is the evidence. Not only that, but some of them with Swiss Bank accounts too, to keep things neat, tidy and oh so very unaccountable and secretive. I wonder if Peter and the other Messengers had Swiss bank accounts? Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle.
Here is the Truth, when Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) returns to this earth He is going to take His throne. A throne that will be given to Him by His Father, but which throne is that and where will it be located?And take note, for He will not be sharing His Throne with anyone else. In turn, He will give thrones to the Twelve Messengers (Apostles) for they will judge the Twelve Tribes of Israel….
Matthew 19:28 (MCV) And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration (through being born again) and whenever the Son of man shall sit in The Throne of His Glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging (evaluating) The Twelve Tribes of Israel.
….but He will sit alone upon His Throne, a Throne above all others here on this earth, not in heaven. Only the Father’s Throne is in heaven.
Luke 22:30 (MCV) That ye may eat and drink at my table in my Kingdom, and sit on thrones judging (evaluating) The Twelve Tribes of Israel.
Jeremiah 14:21 (KJV) Do not abhor us, for thy name’s sake, do not disgrace The Throne of Thy Glory: remember, break not thy covenant with us.
Matthew 25:31 (KJV) When the Son of man shall come in His Glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then shall He sit upon The Throne of His Glory:
Luke 1:32 (KJV) He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of The Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto Him The Throne of His father David:
Jeremiah 3:17 (KJV) At that time they shall call Jerusalem The Throne of the LORD;and all the nations shall be gathered unto it, to the name of the LORD, to Jerusalem: neither shall they walk any more after the imagination of their evil heart.
By the sound of these Holy Scriptures they seem to be alluding to the fact that The Throne already exists on earth and, of course, it does.It is King David’s throne and it is The Throne of Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) glory. Notice, there is no mention here of a ‘throne resurrection’, first, that is, the creation of a new throne, before The Lord Jesus takes it as His own, so this is more evidence that this throne already exists on earth. Notice too, it is not in Rome and it is not a counterfeit religious throne, but a true Royal Monarchical throne, a Kingly throne with a line directly back to King David.
Jeremiah 33:17 (KJV) For thus saith the LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon The Throne of the House of Israel;
The word ‘want’ here means ‘cut off’, so King David will never be cut off from a man (or woman), that is, a successor by Divine right, through the Royal blood line of Judah (Pharez and Zarah), to sit upon his throne. This Royal Throne is occupied to this day by a genuine Royal Monarch – God’s Anointed, not a scam-mongering fraud and impostor who heads up a money making, money laundering cult or global corporation in Babylon (Rome). Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) will be King of kings and Lord of lords, not a king of religious blaspheming phonys, illegitimates and impostors.
So where is this Royal Monarchical throne that can trace its beginnings back to King David, located? That very same throne that Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) will take upon His return to this earth? There is only one place it can be and that is Great Britain – True Israel. (See link No. 3 below).
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II sits on King David’s’s throne and if she is still alive when Yashua Messiah returns she will give it up to Yashua Messiah. She, like her ancestors, knows that she is God’s anointed and should be ruling by Divine right, but that arrangement came to an end in 1649 with the assassination of King Charles I by the Jews. Hence, even in its neutered constitutional form, it is a throne that is continually under threat of extinction, from The Rothschild Jews also, who were behind the assassination of The Czar and his beautiful family in Russia. All this, plus the increasing threat of treacherous republicanism – even from her own disloyal government ministers who are just appointees of The Rothschilds. This threat is just another identifying sign that points to Yashua Messiah’s imminent return to rescue and secure The Throne of His Glory for all eternity.
So here is that question again, only this time, I have put the false Jesus into the picture. So would this effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ share a platform with the Pope(s) in order to get some adulation? Of course he would, he is metaphorically in their employ as their marketing tool – their flunky and their lackey. To prove it, they carry around crucifixes with a little statue of their wimp ‘Jesus’ dead on a cross, and that’s where they want him, DEAD and lifeless, and not raised from the dead, all powerful, ready and waiting to return to this earth in POWER AND GLORY.
Think about it, with His all powerful arrival and return to this earth they will be defunct, surplus to requirements, unemployable, USELESS!!! Fit only for road sweeping or cleaning toilets, if that!
Moreover, what about Yashua Messiah, the real Lord Jesus Christ, what will He be doing while this wimp impostor is sharing a platform in the Vatican? He will be very busy crushing and pulverising all those representations of their religious idolatry into chaff on His worldwide threshing floor. The remains of this threshing, that is, the chaff, will immediately be carried away on the wind never to be seen nor heard of again – gone forever – Hallelujah!!
Daniel 2:35 (MCV) Then was the iron (Rome), the clay (The Jews), the brass (Ancient Greece), the silver (Persia), and the gold (Babylon), broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the Stone that smote the image (and all other images) became a Great Mountain (Great Kingdom), and filled the whole earth.
In Daniel 2:35 we can see the demise of the Babylonian image of King Nebuchadnezzar, (it’s all about images folks – false images) this image being the representation of five Satanic empires (if we include The Jew’s Money Empire). These empires stretch through time from King Nebuchadnezzar unto this day, that is, Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome + Clay. All religion is represented by Satan’s Babylonian Mystery Religion which The Stone – the Chief Cornerstone – Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) destroys completely and utterly when He returns to this earth. The smashed and pulverised remains of this image being like chaff carried away on the wind. The Stone cut without hands – Jesus Christ, notice, becomes a great mountain metaphor for a Great Kingdom that fills the whole earth. Here we can see Yashua Messiah (the real Lord Jesus Christ) in action – The Powerful ‘He-man’ Jesus Christ, not some feeble ineffectual pathetic effeminate wimp with long hair.
I will be publishing a full length series of articles on Nebuchadnezzar’s image very soon. This Biblical prophecy is crucial in identifying the Whore of Babylon which rides The Beast of Revelation – The Rothschild’s Worldwide Money Empire.
OK, that’s about it for this article, next up, that emotive issue of slavery (correct name: “Involuntary Servitude”), well it is for some and, of course, the effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ loves this subject. In the meantime, have no fear, for all will be revealed, and so will Yashua Messiah’s view on this, the most favoured hand wringing subject of wretched, do-gooding, guilt ladened, self-flagellating, liberal thinking ‘men’. A more pathetic group of people you would be hard pressed to find; in fact, on reflection, I am sure you would not find a more wretched and pathetic group of people – anywhere!!
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Was Peter The First Pope – The Truth of Matthew 16 Revealed:
Before I press on with answering the questions I listed in Part 1, I will quote some Scriptures that are very much linked to this subject of the false images of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). In fact The Lord warns us about a time when these deceivers will come on the world scene and lead many, or multitudes, astray. We are talking big numbers here, not just a few, and these deceivers were already at it before the end of the first century.
Matthew 24:5 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
Mark 13:6 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
Luke 21:8 (MCV) And He said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.
A great number will comein The Lord’s name,but how will they come? Why, with all their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious paraphernalia, (see link No. 1 below) that’s how. With all their self aggrandising ‘church’ buildings, their love of money, their fancy robes, their silly Dagon fish hats, and even sillier meaningless relics, their insulting icons, statues, paintings, and all accompanied with their non-gospel of the bad news, or salvation by works, the whole satanic marketing package.
Do not be deceived, this is big business – religious big business and they dress up for the part too. Furthermore, do not be deceived by those who will attempt to explain the above verses away. They will do this by saying that The Lord was warning us only about those people who would say they “actually are Jesus Christ”, that is, impostors, and those who would be deranged and unhinged. Yes, there will be examples of these weird whacky people too, including the Papacy. Let’s not forget, Popes believe they stand in the place of Christ, and they are false Christs, but they, fortunately, will only be very few in numbers. To support The Truth and expose their false interpretations of these verses we only have to check out the Greek rendering:
Matthew 24:5 (Greek Transliteral) Many shall be coming on the name of me saying that I am and many they shall be straying.
Here we can see that many will be coming saying that ‘Christ is’ or ‘preaching a Christ’, a false Christ and not saying that they actually are Christ.
OK, on with those questions.
Would Jesus Christ have stood up for your human rights? Now I was going to answer this question here, but because the topic invites such a large amount of information to reveal it for what it is, it will need an article all of its own, so I will press on with next question.
Would Jesus Christ have given His blessing on multiculturalism? Before I continue with answering this question, we first need to know what it is, just what, exactly, is multiculturalism? Well it’s more than one culture isn’t it? No it isn’t and that’s the demonic lie and deceptiveness built into this word and in turn in its manipulative use. A person can be multicultural, that is, able to mix in easily and adapt to several cultures and that would be down to that man or woman’s individual desire, tastes, likes and societal abilities, but do we all have that desire and those abilities? NO!
Furthermore, is it a sin not to have them? No. So if being a multiculturalist is not multiculturalism, what is multiculturalism!? Multiculturalism is an unachievable societal system invented and orchestrated by the Canaanite Jews, those in real authority, who are now dictating, via their political puppets, how we ought to behave and live. This is a draconian, Pharisaical, legalistic, self-righteous, pseudo religious system of governance. Instead of being free to decide whether or not we want to be multicultural, we are now told we must be multicultural, this is multiculturalism. If we have no desire to be multicultural we are then branded as bigots, haters, racists, xenophobes, and even heretics. Now there is only one outcome to the attempted enforcement of this issue = VIOLENCE, and that is just what (((those))) in power want, so that they can introduce Martial Law.
Moreover, it will, and already does involve state control and manipulation over your lives. How? How, because we, in the west, now live in democracies or better, DeMon-oCracies which in abbreviated form spells D.M.C. or Domination, Manipulation and Control. You think you are free under this system, but in reality you are deceived and conned and are thereby enslaved and held captive to it. The Truth is, we in the west live in bondage to a system that controls, manipulates and enslaves us and the real power-brokers are the heads of the global corporations, including the Vatican, and the global bankers (The Rothschild Banking Cartel) more commonly known as the New World Order or The Deep State. Politicians are just cloned lackeys, ‘jokers’, puppets and front men for these real sources of power. Whatever these power-broker people say, goes and there are no arguments.
This multiculturalism thing is a classic example of how D.M.C. works. All (((they))) do (they, as already described, being the real authorities (The Jews) behind the politicians) is deliberately create an unworkable societal mould. They then make those, that is, the majority, who wish to have no part in multiculturalism feel guilty (a bogus guilt created by them for manipulative purposes), when there is no reason to feel guilty at all. Now they do this through subtle, and at times not so subtle, propaganda, which amounts to a form of guilt layering, emotional blackmail and through it, coercion. This is victimisation through false accusations of the majority or host nation culture, and is achieved by mental harassment, via the media (also under their control). The host nation’s culture, who have done nothing wrong by wanting to maintain and keep their own culture intact, are made to feel guilty and responsible, via this blatant emotional manipulation, for not ‘doing more’ for those whose cultures are not their own. All this, when all the while it should be the responsibility of those with the foreign cultures to adapt to the host nation’s culture – not the other way round. This, in a world of true justice would not be unreasonable.
The evil wickedness of multiculturalism then creates animosity, bitterness, resentfulness and hatred between peoples and drives a wedge between the people of different cultures, instead of helping them assimilate into the host nation’s culture – not that this is possible for it clearly isn’t. This is how we end up with ghettos.
What we, the indigenous population or host culture are supposed to do, in a practical sense, to bring about this multicultural society no one has yet explained to any of us, nor are they likely to – hence the Commie traitor Merkel has begrudgingly admitted that it is a failure. This is because, in reality, there is nothing we can do and they, the criminal orchestrators, know it, it has all been done deliberately to cause unrest and division. This though, is not the only issue, as far these authority figures are concerned. All of this is of no matter to them, because all they are interested in is the deliberate brow beating and victimisation of their fellow countrymen. This is massive treachery on a national scale, it is nothing but treason and do not be surprised by it. This is not a fanciful idea; it is the Truth and spelled out quite clearly in the Holy Scriptures:
2 Timothy 3:1 (MCV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, (narcissistic politicians obsessed with their own images and their imaginary ‘legacies’, and nothing else) covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, (not listening to wise counsel from their parents and elders) unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection (no compassion), truce-breakers, (breakers of treaties) false accusers, incontinent, (without self control) fierce, (savage) despisers of those that are good, (passing legislation that is a blasphemy to God and an affront to the Godly) 4 Traitors, (the selling out and betrayal of their own people and nation) heady (rash and impetuous), high-minded, (inflated with conceit) lovers of pleasures (debauched and licentious) more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof (followers of and believers in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and not Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ): from such turn away.
As you read the above passage of Scripture, just think of how many of these labels you could easily hang around the necks of your ‘church’ leaders and criminal political ‘leaders’!!??
I have digressed a little above, so getting back to the thread again here is another Truth. ‘Isms’ divide and segregate, they never unite. An ‘ism’ and ‘isms’ tend mostly to be divisive and negative, elitist or they are cultish and clannish in make up. They invariably drive a wedge through societies and automatically create an ‘us and them’ arrangement. Here are some examples: Bolshevism, Communism, Socialism, Cultural Jew Marxism, Conservatism, Judaism, Islamism, Methodism, Protestantism, Catholicism, Liberalism, Elitism, Hinduism and Multiculturalism. There are many more that could be added to this list, but I’m sure you get the picture. ‘Isms’ antagonise, divide and cause jealousy; hate and friction, they do not unite and bring peace, only a God given new heart in men and freedom under Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) Grace can do that.
Having said all that, would Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) give His blessing on multiculturalism? I think I have already answered that one, don’t you? A better question would be: What has The Light and/or The Way got to do with darkness or the evil manipulative treacherous schemes of men? Answer: NOTHING!
Again, here’s the question we have to ask: Would the effeminate long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ bless multiculturalism? Of course he would, he already does through all those mainstream ‘Christians’ of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who buy into multiculturalism think there is nothing wrong with it. The Jewish Cultural Marxist Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby being a perfect example. He and they love multiculturalism; they actually think it is part and parcel of The Kingdom of God being built by them now, here on this earth.
So here we have so called Christians absorbing into their beliefs the misguided evil ideas of carnal minded unbelieving hu-man beings = ATHEISTS! – unbelievable! Their delusion is complete. Many of these so called Christians call themselves ‘Progressive Christians’. (See link Nos. 1 and 2 below)
Re Justin Welby I think you will find via his website that what I have said regarding his faith in multiculturalism is true. Welby as a worldly contaminated Laodicean and a firm believer in the long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ he would be, wouldn’t he, so no surprises there then?
No surprises perhaps, but there may be some surprises in the following articles, so please stay with me on this important exposure of their false image based religious scam – The Cainite-Judeo-Christain Religion.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
And does the whole idea frighten the life out of you, if so, why? Yashua Messiah (Our Lord Jesus Christ) said these very words:
John 3:3 (KJV) Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot see The Kingdom of God. (Emphasis mine)
The words ‘born again’ are not really an accurate translation of the original Greek MSS. In one of my Interlinear Greek/English New Testaments it states it as “born from above” and in the other an even better translation “receives birth from above.” In 1 John 3:9 it describes it more directly as being ‘born of God’:
1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His Seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
Notice, too, that once we’re born of God we become sinless in His sight – perfect. So as we can see, we are talking about a superlative gift from God and we are talking about a re-birth – a brand new start – a new life – as a new man or new woman – a new creation, and the beginning of a new life that will last for all eternity. A life free from all real worries and insecurities that we have known in the past. Yes, life can, and will, continue to be difficult with all its trials and tribulations, but after being born of God (born again) all these difficulties of life will be seen in a different Light; a new Light – His Light. This is literally a new beginning for any and all of us fortunate enough to be chosen for this high calling, for a calling is what it is:
John 6:44 (KJV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day. (Brackets mine)
John 6:65 (KJV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
1 Corinthians 1:26-28 (MCV) For ye see your CALLING, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are CALLED: 27 But God hath CHOSEN the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath CHOSEN the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God CHOSEN, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought (zero) things that are:
Moreover, to receive this “birth from God” is a most wondrous and uplifting thing, the most wondrous thing that can happen to a man or woman, and is, quite plainly, a miracle. Please note, too, that we do not initiate this miracle, it has nothing to do with us; the Father God calls and we answer, and that’s it.
Always be wary of people who say they have “accepted Jesus Christ” (not possible) or they have “found Jesus Christ.” (not possible) or “made a decision for Christ.” (Also not possible, see link No. 1 below)
Let us now return to the story in John 3; Nicodemus, a Pharisee, a ruler of the Judean Israelites and Canaanite Jews, comes to The Lord at night, so this was obviously a private meeting, some might say clandestine. He openly confesses to The Lord that he believes He is a teacher from God and that God is with Him (see verse 2).
Not many people understand the significance of Nicodemus’ admissions here, first of all he says ‘we’ so he speaks for some of his fellow Pharisees as well, but from then on the conversation with Our Lord becomes very close to the heart for Nicodemus. These admissions and the fact that he has taken the trouble to enquire of The Lord at unsociable hours are the first signs of Nicodemus’ calling. My guess (and it is only mine) is that Nicodemus came to Jesus more for his own benefit than for that of his colleagues and quite right too. The parable of the pearl of great price teaches this very same principle.
OK, now all of this is very fine and I will return to the story line later, but the question most of you will probably want answering is: “What about me! How do Iknow if I am being called and born from above?” These are very good questions and the only answer I can give is this: it’s different for every one of us, for we are all unique and no two birthing experiences are the same, for they are tailor made for each of us, but there can be some common factors in most Spiritual births.
1. In many cases The Father uses life situations or life crises to bring us to His Son; we have to have a need for Him and many converts are often in a state of brokenness when they become receptive to The Father’s call. Others are not so, and don’t need so much persuasion. Many will look around them and see the wretchedness and breakdown of their society around them. Their fellow man becoming colder and less compassionate, the paedophilia, the violence, the debauchery, the thieving and murders on our streets, children and young people out of control, the drugs, the increase in sexually transmitted diseases, rampant drunkenness and alcohol abuse, abortions (200,000 per year in Britain alone and counting), family breakdown and the wicked corruption of traitors in high places – our corrupt so called leaders who dispense injustice, rather than justice.
Many will see all these problems and know deep down within themselves that man has completely lost his way and is without any answers. Once born of God (born again), though, we then understand we have a powerful Father God who is fully aware of ALL these problems that man has brought upon himself. As born of God (born again) sons and daughters we learn that The Father and His Son are the ones who will eventually sort ALL the problems out, and we do not have to fret or worry ourselves about them.
2. Once we start to believe, many issues, concerns and problems or cares of this world that used to weigh us down, especially guilt, disappear completely with the realisation that we are now truly forgiven. This forms part of what is known as the ‘peace that passeth all understanding’. There is a certain kind of elation that kicks in here and stays with a believer always. It may wane at times but it always returns to lift us up.
3. As stated in point 2, the affairs of treacherous men (politics) or “cares of this world” as Yashua Messiah refers to them, will begin to look insignificant and of little importance, because these things or ‘cares’ are ‘of this world’ and His Kingdom which is not ‘of this world’ is now all that interests us. We are still “in the world” but we are no longer “of the world.” We are now witnesses, which simply means we watch or witness. Contrary to what you may hear from assorted pulpits, witnessing is not shooting off our big mouths trying to force people or blackmail people into believing through fear tactics but, rather, letting our lights shine. How, by growing in Grace and Faith which those around you will witness? Please note, we are still free to speak out against the wickedness we see around us, and it will depend very much on how much faith we have in determining how bold we are. This boldness comes over a period of time, as we grow, but it is not for us to join political parties in order to do so. We should speak for Yashua Messiah and no one else, but as free agents, not ‘party members’.
4. This one is a sure sign; you will feel an overwhelming desire to share your new found love of Yashua Messiah with all your family and friends and very quickly will discover that they are not the least bit interested in your new found love for Him. This will probably be your first (and only, I hope) round of rejection experiences, and don’t worry because you are now learning that they are ‘rejecting’ Him, not you. He who now lives in you via The Holy Spirit is being ‘rejected’, although it does feel like we are being rejected personally. Once they know you believe, it’s best to keep your counsel and only discuss the subject again if they ask. Again please note, this ‘rejection’ of Yashua Messiah is not real rejection, as they can do nothing but ‘reject’ Him. (See link No. 2 below).
5. You will probably have a desire to read The Holy Scriptures; possibly for the first time. Now here is another miracle; if you have read The Holy Scriptures in the past and have found it impossible to make sense of them, with all their supposed contradictions you will now begin to make sense of them, and here’s why:
1 John 2:27 (KJV) “But The Anointing which ye have received of Him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same Anointing teacheth you of all things, and is Truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him.” (Emphasis mine)
6. Here is another good sign; He calls the low and base things of this world in order to confound the worldly wise or ‘clever people’. Mankind’s trust and faith in the high intellect is one of mankind’s greatest stumbling blocks and/or weaknesses; man’s vanity, pride and arrogance are his major flaws. To eventually be put in his place by the likes of those he has always looked down upon; the poor and poorly educated. This will be a great shock to him, so if you fit the categories of Low and Base you could be in line for a ‘Heavenly phone call’ and you won’t need a mobile/cell phone to receive it!!
7. You will also have a desire to meet up with fellow believers and this may prove more difficult than you at first thought. There are dozens of demon-inations (denominations = divisions)) out there, but very few that are Grace filled, so you must exercise great caution as to where you choose to attend. If you’re like me you will not attend anywhere, because finding a congregation of True Believers is like looking for a proverbial needle in a haystack – some might say a hen’s tooth. Needless-to-say I wish you well with your search.
Now I have given you a lot of information, but is there anything in it to be fearful of? No, a thousand times no. This birthing is nothing to be fearful of as it will cause the recipient no harm whatsoever, but it will involve the removing of what is known metaphorically as ‘the scales coming from our eyes’ to enable us to see; to see what? Now notice, the last part of John 3:3 – The Kingdom of God. How do we see the Kingdom of God? Easy, first of all we realise the Kingdom of God is in us and because it is in us we long for the return of Yashua Messiah to set up His Kingdom in its fullness here on this earth. We also ‘see it’ in our imaginations, we develop a mental picture of it or of what it will be like. If we picture a beautiful place we have seen here on earth and then imagine it a hundred times more beautiful (if that’s humanly possible – probably not) we then begin to get a feel for it. I hope to be writing another article on the Kingdom of God, but in the meantime we need to understand some important factors, that is, what Our Lord says about one or three things on His free gift to us:
1. “No one who having put his hands to the plough and then looks back is fit for The Kingdom of God.” Which means, don’t go back or turn away after you have started, that is, commitment – stick with it – onwards and upwards and finish the mission. You don’t have to compete, but you do have to finish it, and The Lord will help you to finish.
2. “Take up your cross and follow me” This means there is a price to following Him and this price does involve suffering for Him through trials, including being hated by those not chosen, but He will not let you suffer more than you can bear:
1 Corinthians 10:13 (MCV) There hath no temptation trial or testing taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer allow you to be tempted tested or tried above that ye are able; but will, with the temptation testing and trying, also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.
For God is Love, Mercy and Forgiveness and He has promised never to leave you nor forsake you, come what may.
3 “Take my yoke upon you for it is light” In support of what I have said above Yashua Messiah also tells us to carry His yoke, for it is light and easy to carry, unlike the burdens we have grown used to in our worldly lives. Here is a warning too, don’t let any man or woman in a pulpit make that yoke heavy with false teaching. You will know immediately, because they will lay guilt upon you and will make you feel down trodden and discouraged – they will also be big on rules and regulations (The Ten Commandments), teaching you that your salvation is down to you, when it is not – it’s a free gift. Through these experiences you will learn and know if you have joined the right fellowship or not. Whatever you do, once you understand that the teaching is false you must leave immediately – do not hesitate for you owe them NOTHING. See link Nos. 3 and 4 below).
Right, let’s return to the story line of John 3 in verse 4 to see how we are born again or born of God. Nicodemus saith unto Him, how can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? Here Nicodemus shows his lack of Spiritual understanding taking Our Lord’s words literally. Our Lord answers him in verse 5: Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into The Kingdom of God.
Here Our Lord is giving instructions to Nicodemus that unless he is Baptised and has hands laid on him to receive The Holy Spirit he cannot enter The Kingdom of God. Our Lord then goes on to explain in verses 6-7.
John 3:6-7 (KJV) That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of The Spirit is Spirit. 7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
Here Our Lord is explaining that those who believe and are Baptised and receive The Holy Spirit are now new Spiritual beings and not born of the flesh, even though they are still in the flesh, that is, flesh that died in the watery grave of Baptism.
Now this teaching is seldom understood today, but it must mean that, in order for scriptures like….
1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.
….to make sense, and because we are now gifted with The Holy Spirit, and now abide in Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) we don’t sin, but those who don’t abide in Him and do not know Him, by default, continue in sin. To support this we then read:
1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His (Yashua Messiah’s) seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
For the born of God (born again) believerit is our bodies of sin that sin, but we are no longer of the flesh, of our bodies, we are now of The Holy Spirit and because of that indwelling, our new man cannot sin.
Taking all this Truth on board takes time, and we can now see there is nothing to fear in the process of being born from above. If The Father is calling you to His Son what is there to fear? Nothing! All you have to say when The Father calls is: “Here am I”. Just like Samuel:
1 Samuel 3:4 That the LORD called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah (Yashua Anointed):
Are you a man of mankind, a son of Adam, or a hu-man being and not of mankind, so not a son of Adam?
Or perhaps another way of saying it could be: are you a son of Adam, or a literal son of The Serpent Creature, The Adversary,through Cain, and does this whole idea shock you? (See link Nos. 1, 2 & 3 below). Most likely, if you are new to this Truth, it will shock you. In turn, I make no apologies for that, for The Truth MUST be made known, whether you take offence or not. And let’s be clear, offence can only be taken, not given, and lovers of The Truth (Yashua Messiah) will definitely NOT be offended by this Truthful article.
So what are we are dealing with here? For this subject can, and will, be deemed, that is, by libtard Cultural Jew Marxists, as the ultimate form of RACISM! Ooh! and we can’t have that can we? What will all those lilly livered, limp-wristed, spineless, progressive, fake Christians say? No doubt they will rent their clothes and have apoplexy, and all this, instead of realising that Yashua Messiah Himself, BY THEIR EVIL STANDARDS, would, and will be classified as a RACIST! (See link No. 4 below). So much for the fake hoax concept known as RACISM!:
“”RACIST” A made up word by the Jew Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) in 1927 and used to browbeat all dissenters of the Jewish Bolshevik Marxist/Communist ideology, and still used today to keep white people walking on egg shells regarding other races. Only whites are racists according to these traitor whoresons, that is, evil wretches like John Mann, UK Labour MP.”
— Brother Charles
“”Racism” as an accusation, was shaped by Trotskyists and then sharpened politically by Magnus Hirschfeld, before being fully launched as an anti-white weapon by ethnic others in the American academic system.”
— John Piggot
OK, so with the short introductory preamble over and a couple of educational quotes chucked in for good measure, let’s move on to the meat of this article: HU – who or what is ‘HU’? What kind of a word is ‘HU’? I’ve never heard of it I hear you say. Well its origin may surprise, for it is an ancient Welsh word, and ancient Welsh is from the even more ancient runic Hebrew tongue.
“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”
– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.
The Welsh are The Levites, through The Druids of Cornwall and Wales who are descended from The Levitical Priesthood who administered life in Ancient Israel. This included responsibility for all religious, educational, financial and commercial activities in Ancient Israel – they administered The Tithe – a tax of ten percent on the people’s INCREASE, not the principal, so there was no Tithe/Tax on wages. (See video links 1 and 2 below)
Israel, during, and after, Joshua’s leadership at the time of The Judges, was a free Theocracy under Yah, that is, before it became a Kingdom under Saul, David and Solomon and their tax slavery began.
So, immediately, we have a Scriptural/Biblical connection going all the way back to the Patriarchs of Ancient Israel, that is, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, who were the Patriarchal forefathers of the Anglo-Saxon (Isaac’s sons = the Saacae or Saacsons), Celtic, Welsh, Dutch, Flemish, Gallic, Swiss and Nordic peoples, but not The Canaanite Jews. (See links Nos. 5 and 6 below).
“So who, or what exactly, is HU?
From The Serpent of Life and Wisdom web page:
“The Caduceus is one of the most ancient of symbols:
“You might best know this symbol as the DNA structure and healing used by the medical profession. Since ancient Mesopotamia The Caduceus presented two serpents intertwined (the central nervous system) around a staff (the spinal column) with the wings (the “swan”) on either side (the two hemispheres of the brain, with the circle in the centre representing the pineal gland, or the central sun and psychic center within). It also symbolized the kundalini energy.
“This was originally the symbol for the Anunnaki-Sirian creator god, EA, or EN.KI (who has become an Archetype), was the chief of the magicians, “the one who knows,” and infamous for being The Serpent of the Garden of Eden, who created lifeforms in test tubes half a million years ago with his half-sister Ninharsag, at the suggestion of his son, Marduk, to create hu-mans to be the workers for the gods. (The symbol is also based upon the winged globe for the planet Nibiru, the symbol of the royal Anunnaki family.)
“Biblical writers called The Healing Serpent Ne-HU-shtan. The Hebrew word for serpent is “nahash.” The root of the word are the Hebrew letters Nun, Het and Shin, which means “to guess.” This was translated into other languages as “Satan,” which some say mean “enemy,” or “adversary.””
So from this we learn: 1) that the medical profession is 100% satanic with its Caduceus twin serpent logo and 2) I don’t know about you, but ‘test tubes’ half a million years ago, LOL, is total nonsense. However, what we do have here is our first reference to ‘Hu’ as The Adversary, and that’s all that matters from this little piece.
From Simon, on the “Followers of YHWH” Forum:
“Their temples wherein the sacred fire was preserved were generally situate on eminences and in dense groves of oak (see back slidden Ancient Israel), because a circle was the emblem of the universe; oval, in allusion to the mundane egg, from which issued, according to the traditions of many nations, the universe, or, according to others our first parents; serpentine,because a serpent was the symbol of HU, the Druidic Osiris; cruciform because a cross is an emblem of regeneration; or winged, to represent the motion of the divine spirit.”
From The Freemasons:
“The Druids had a high veneration for The Serpent. Their great god, Hu, was typified by that reptile; and he is represented by the Bards as ‘the wonderful chief Dragon, the sovereign of heaven’.
“The Serpent is universally esteemed a legitimate symbol of Freemasonry.”
– George Oliver, Freemason, Signs and Symbols, New York, Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, 1906, p. 36
So here we learn that the back slidden Ancient Israelites (our forefathers) had a ‘high veneration’ for Hu, The Serpent, and for one reason and one reason only, and that reason was their satanic incorporation of Molech worship (child sacrifice) into their beliefs. These evil satanic practises they copied from the Serpent Seed Canaanites who still practice these evil abominations to this day.
Hu The Serpent Entwined Around The Egg
From the Eden Saga Web Page, The Serpent People:
“The ancient god of the British Isles, called Hu, was the master of the dragon world.”
From the Covenant of Rhiannon web page:
“It is believed that Druidism was founded by Gwyddon Ganhebon, supposedly Seth of the Mosaic genealogy, in Asia and was brought to Britain by Hu Gadarn a contemporarydescendant of the Patriarch Abraham.
“Hu Gadarn originally came with the tribe of the Cymry (The Welsh, The Levites) to the Britannic Isles. They came from the Country of Summer, which is called Defrobani… They crossed the Misty Ocean (Tawch) and arrived in the Britannic Isles and Armorica, where they settled.”
Finally, we have Ballantine’s Law Dictionary, as used by The US Congress, which states that a ‘hu-man being’ is a monster:
“Human being See MONSTER. – Ballentine’s Law Dictionary (1930)
“Monster – A human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land.”
– Ballentine’s Law Dictionary (1930)
Just to summarise, we now know that ‘Hu’ means ‘Serpent’ and the word ‘Hu-man’ means ‘Serpent-Man’, so in other words, hu-man beings are Canaanites – descendants of The Serpent Creature, through Eve, in The Garden of Eden.
Adam declared Eve as THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING, that is, both MANKIND and hu-mankind. Adam was NOT THE FATHER OF ALL LIVING, just the father of Mankind.
Genesis 3:20 (MCV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living, that is Abel and Cain, both mankind and hu-mankind – Abel later replaced by Seth.
Now for those of you who think you are ‘quick on the draw’ and say: “Oh yeah, but all Cain’s descendants died in the flood, so you’re talking nonsense!” and I will retort with: “All his descendants bar ONE!” Namely Noah’s ‘Mrs’, whose name was Naamah, and she was the sister of Tubal-Cain. Hey! But it says Noah was perfect in ALL his generations from Adam, and that’s True, but his Mrs wasn’t perfect at all in her generations. However, that’s not important, because Noah carried the Adamic bloodline, which he passed onto his three sons, and they took their lineage from Noah, not their mother, who was of Cain.
Genesis 6:9-10 (MCV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with Yah. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
OK, so all this was just fine and dandy until the flood waters subsided and Noah started his new farming and agricultural (husbandry) lifestyle, which included the planting of a vineyard. We are then fast forwarded to the scene of Noah having harvested his grapes and bottled up his wine, so he thinks he’ll have a good old wine tasting evening. Unfortunately, he gets a bit carried away with the tasting of the wine and ends up blotto. No doubt the rest of his family were also partakers of this first year’s growth celebration and were a bit tipsy.
Moreover, whilst all the celebrating is going on Noah crashes out and Ham, his second son, gets into a strange incestuous relationship with his mother and, presumably whilst under the influence of Noah’s wine, he lies with her = he saw his father’s nakedness:
Leviticus 18:8 (MCV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.
Leviticus 20:11 (MCV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Now the outcome of this illicit evil union is the birth of Canaan, whom Noah curses. Now why did Noah curse the brat Canaan, and not his debauched son, Ham, and/or his wayward slutty wife, wouldn’t that have made more sense? Yes to our carnal minds it would have made more sense, but not to Yah who sees things very differently from us, hence He sees strange flesh born from incest as an abomination, and likewise any inbred offspring from such an incestuous union as anathema.
Furthermore, it’s crucial that we understand what has happened here. In the births of his three sons, Noah’s bloodline only, counted. However, in this evil incestuous affair it was Naamah’s Cainite bloodline that counted in Canaan and not Ham’s Adamic blood. This means that with the birth of Canaan, Cain’s bloodline was re-kindled post-flood through Naamah his mother. Therefore, the line of Cain was reborn and it’s still with us today in the shape of the Canaanite Jews, African Blacks, the Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans, the Turks and the Italians, to name just a few.
Another interesting twist to this is The Truth that the Canaanite Jews take their lineage from their mothers. Canaanite Jewish society is a MATRIARCHAL society, not a Patriarchal society. So any claims or assertions that they make to a descendancy from Abraham or Judah is a lie. (See link No. 5 re the Jews’ false claims).
So there you have it, solid gold proof that (((THEY))) LIVE! (Have you seen that film?) If not, I recommend it.
In Yashua Messiah’s name
Messenger Charles
1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
1 Corinthians 9:19-22 (KJV) For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. 20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under The Law; 21 To them that are without Law, as without Law, (being not without Law to God, but under the Law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without Law. 22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means SAVE some.
From Strong’s Concordance:
Gain – G2770 – κερδαίνω kerdaínō, ker-dah’-ee-no; – from G2771; to gain (literally or figuratively):—(get) gain, win.
Save – G4982 – σώζω sṓzō, sode’-zo; – from a primary σῶς sōs (contraction for obsolete σάος sáos, “safe”); to save, i.e. deliver or protect (literally or figuratively):—heal, preserve, save (self), do well, be (make) whole.
Now I have always found this passage of Scripture somewhat testing and difficult to understand, for we NEVER hear of the other Messengers employing such tactics when preaching the good news of The Kingdom of God. This, therefore, seems to be a speciality of Paul’s, and no one else’s. Furthermore, how do we square these verses in 1 Corinthians, with these verses in John’s Gospel and also, more importantly from Paul himself in Galatians 3:1-13?:
Galatians 3:1-13 (MCV) O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not attentively hearken to The Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye The Holy Spirit by the works of The Law, or by the Hearing of Faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in The Holy Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5 He therefore that bestows to you The Holy Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth He it by the works of The Law, or by the Hearing of Faith? 6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of Faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And The Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through Faith, preached before The Gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of Faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10 For as many as are of the works of The Law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in The Book of The Law to do them. 11 But that no man is justified by The Law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by Faith. 12 And The Law is not of Faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of The Law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drag (draw) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Draw – G1670 helkyo, hel-koo’-o; probably akin to G138; to drag (literally or figuratively):- draw. Compare G1667.
John 6:45 (KJV) It is written in The Prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of The Father, cometh unto me.
John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
So what is Paul talking about in 1 Corinthians 9:19-22? and let’s be clear, for Peter, Paul and the other Messengers NEVER saved anyone – period! – full stop! – end of! In their travels they preached the Kingdom of God Gospel Message and those that The Father was calling responded positively to that message and those that He was not calling (the majority) rejected it out of hand. Now Paul knew all this, for he was taught by Yashua Messiah Himself; he also admitted it:
Romans 8:7 (KJV) Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to The Law of God, neither indeed can be.
Here we get further confirmation:
Acts 13:45-48 (MCV) But when the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming. 46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that The Word of God should first have been spoken to you Canaanite Jews (posing and masquerading as God’s chosen people): but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles lost Israelite Nations and Nations of Mankind. 47 For so hath The Lord commanded us, saying, I have set thee to be a Light of the Lost Tribes of Israel and Nations of Mankind, that thou shouldest be for salvation unto the ends of the earth. 48 And when those Gentiles of the Lost Tribes of Israel and Nations of Mankind heard this, they were glad, and glorified The Word of The Lord: and as many as were appointed (called and chosen by The Father) to eternal life, believed. (See link No. 1 below)
OK so what we MUST deduce from all this Scriptural proof and evidence is that Paul did not mean he was attempting to gain anyone or win anyone to Yashua Messiah in a Spiritual sense or a regeneration sense, especially the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews and yet he says he became as a Jew in order to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ them. So what did he mean by that?
From The Forerunner Commentary:
“What Paul means in this passage becomes clear when we understand the sense and usage of two Greek words, those translated as “win” and “save.” In the evangelical (Mainstream Christian) world, both of them have taken on lives of their own, but with just a little digging, we will see that no contradiction lies between this passage and the numerous other clear statements.
“The word translated as “win” is kerdaino (Strong’s #2770), and its basic meaning is “gain,” which is how it is typically translated. It means “to acquire by effort or investment.” It can mean “to earn” or “to make a profit.” The flipside is that it can also mean “to cause a loss not to occur.”” (Brackets mine)
Right, so from this we learn that Paul was attempting to come alongside these people in order to not offend them and alienate them clumsily or deliberately through over zealous teaching or preaching. To interpret it another way, “We can even be wrong when we’re right” if you get my drift. However, this was not an attempt by Paul to convert these people, for he knew that only The Father had the power to do that, and if he experience hostile opposition from them he would endeavour to meet them where they were at, in order to keep them alongside as best he could and not part as outright enemies.
Having cleared up that little niggle, we can now move on to a more controversial issue, that of Paul’s entering The Temple with the four vow takers and allegedly purifying himself ACCORDING TO THE LAW!!! as recorded in Acts 21:
Acts 21:18-20 (MCV) And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles The Lost Tribes of Israel and the Nations of Mankind by his ministry.
20 And when they heard it, they glorified The Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of The Law:
Now what’s going on here? for it looks like a little egotistic boasting is going on = my mission in Jerusalem is just as big as yours, so there! Does it not look as if James is salivating over all these Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, who allegedly believe, and are still zealous of The Law! How does that work?
The other question that immediately comes to mind is how infiltrated the Church in Jerusalem had become by these Judaising mongrel dogs of the circumcision? It looks to me as if the Church no longer existed in Jerusalem, hence Paul was told by The Holy Spirit TWICE! NOT TO GO THERE!
Acts 21:4 (TAB) After looking up the disciples [in Tyre], we stayed there [with them] seven days; and they kept telling Paul through the [Holy] Spirit [a]not to set foot in Jerusalem.
Yet he stubbornly refuses, again, how does that work? In contrast, elsewhere in Acts, when The Holy Spirit guided they all followed, that is, not going on deeper into Asia. To me these are inconsistencies in terms of what we know about Paul from his letters.
We then get into all the nonsense of Paul’s purification in The Temple! WHAT!!? Is this what he meant by being all things to all people – especially appeasing the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? I find all this very hard to believe and yet it’s there in Acts allegedly! So let’s get some Scripture:
Acts 21:21 (KJV) And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs.
So these Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews already know what Paul teaches.
Now from the Amplified Bible to get a clearer understanding of what’s been written in the KJV.
Acts 21:21-24 (TAB) Now they have been told about you, that you are teaching all the Jews who are living among the Gentiles to turn away from [the Law of] Moses, advising them not to circumcise their children or to live according to the [Mosaic] customs. 22 What then should be done? They will certainly hear that you have arrived. 23 Therefore do just what we tell you. We have four men who have taken a vow; 24 take these men and purify yourself along with them, and pay their expenses [for the temple offerings] so that they may shave their heads. Then everyone will know that there is nothing to the things they have been told about you, but that you yourself also follow and keep The Law.
So what do we have here? If this account is true, do I spy politicking? Do I spy lies, deceit and deception going on here? Oh let’s paint a false picture in order to placate these satanic Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews. How about Paul and his brothers doing a swift exit out of Jerusalem as fast their legs could carry them? why was that not suggested, or for them to go into hiding until the baying mob had gone home. Oh no we have to go through all these meaningless lying theatricals in order to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ some – NOT!
Acts 21:27 (TAB) When the seven days [required to complete the ritual] were almost over, [some] Jews from [the province of] Asia [Minor], caught sight of him in The Temple, and began to stir up the crowd, and they seized him,
What is Paul doing in The Temple when he knows full well that his presence their will be an act of provocation? What’s happened to the policy of gaining and winning some? Then we get confirmation of what I said to be correct:
Acts 21:30 (TAB) Then the whole city was provoked and confused, and the people rushed together. They seized Paul and dragged him out of the temple, and immediately the gates were closed.
Here’s another thing: Did Paul have a death wish? for he clearly stated that he had no fear of going up to Jerusalem, even if it meant death:
Acts 21:13 (TAB) Then Paul replied, “What are you doing, weeping and breaking my heart [like this]? For I am ready not only to be bound and imprisoned, but even to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.”
Then we get more confirmation:
Acts 21:27 (TAB) When the seven days [required to complete the ritual] were almost over, [some] Jews from [the province of] Asia [Minor], caught sight of him in the temple, and began to stir up the crowd, and they seized him,
So the stupid ritual was not even completed (an act of God IMO) before the Serpent Seed Jews caught sight of him in The Temple AGAIN! And grabbed him. How many acts of provocation was that? None of this makes any sense unless he deliberately wanted death at their hands.
Acts 21:28-29 (TAB) shouting, “Men of Israel, help us! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against our people and The Law and this place. And besides, he has brought Greeks into The Temple and has defiled this holy place.” 29 For they had previously seen Trophimus the Ephesian in the city with Paul, and they assumed that he had brought the man into the temple [beyond the court of the Gentiles].
So not only does he provoke them by being there himself, he also brings a Greek brother along to Jerusalem as well, as you do when you’re aiming to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ a few Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews – much sarcasm here by the author. We therefore have yet more examples of blatant provocation on the part of Paul, and we can only assume that these were deliberate acts of provocation in order to bring about his untimely end. I cannot see this any other way unless you, my readers, have any other ideas.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
PS Message for Thomas Howard: I trust this answers your silly comment about Paul’s (non-existent) fear of the Jews.
1. What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?:
Obadiah or Obdias, as he is known in the Greek Septuagint Old Testament, is the author of the smallest Book of the Old Testament, that is, a Scriptural Book just twenty one verses long, yet it contains some very important information for us in the last days of last days in the 21st century. His name means ‘Serving Jah’ or ‘Serving The Lord’.
Obadiah is said to have lived in the 6th to 5th century BC at the time of the captivity of The House of Judah (The Southern Kingdom of what was once a divided Israel) by the Babylonians so he was a contemporary of Jeremiah. The Northern Kingdom of The House of Israel was taken captive in 740-725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans). Now because Edom was complicit in Judah’s downfall, Obadiah calls for God’s punishment upon Edom with its total destruction – just a little background info and history.
Before I continue, I will add this caveat to inform you that I am NOT a prophet, nor do I have the Holy Spiritual gift of prophecy, so some things I say in this article should not be taken as 100% Truth (therefore you must do your own research to verify what I am saying is The Truth, or not The Truth). However, what I will say re the modern day identity of Esau/Edom (the Edomites) and the Idumeans (the later name of the Edomites, especially in the first century) you can take as solid gold Truth.
OK, so here we go, and I will start with verse nine of Obadiah, not verse one, for verse nine leads us directly into the genealogies of Esau/Edom, which are crucial to the understanding of the true identity of The Edomites, and I’ll tell you straight, right now, it ain’t The Jews and NEVER listen to any lying dogs that tell you the Edomites are Jews!
This means I’m gonna be ruthlessly blunt, because if you are a deluded brainwashed follower of the blasphemers Bertrand Comparet, the ex-con Jew liar, William (Bill) Finck of Christogenea disinformation infamy, and/or James P. Wickstrom, now deceased, you had better be ready to get educated, or otherwise you can take a hike, for there are no half-way houses or half measures with this crucial knowledge. It’s all very clearly defined, and those blasphemers are WRONG! VERY WRONG! This is big time errors I am speaking of here, not mistakes, for with the above mentioned people there will be an evil agenda in there somewhere. (See link No. 1 below.) So you have been warned. Now back to the topic at hand:
Obadiah 1:9 (KJV) And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount (the nation) of Esau may be cut off by slaughter. (Brackets mine)
Here in this verse we have an Edomite by the name of Teman and from his name comes the name Ottoman and the Ottomans were Turks (Ottoman is also known in the Arabic form as Uthman, from Osman). The Turkish Empire, which lasted from 1301 until 1923 AC, was known as The Ottoman Empire and consisted of Seljuk Turks, and please pay attention to this name “Seljuk Turks” for it will feature again.
From “The Ottoman Empire” by Larry Gormley:
“In the 13th century, the region of Anatolia (most of the Asian part of present day Turkey) was controlled by the Byzantine Empire in the northwest and the Seljuk Turks in the south-west. Around 1290, Osman I (1258-1324), a Muslim warrior and leader of a small principality inside Seljuk Turk territory, declared his independence from the Seljuk sultan. The Ottoman Empire was founded. (Ottoman is derived from Uthman, the Arabic form of Osman.)”
Now Teman is mentioned eleven times in The Holy Scriptures, the first of which is in Genesis 36:11:
Genesis 36:11 (KJV) And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz.
And who was Eliphaz? From Genesis again:
Genesis 36:4 (KJV) And Adah (the Canaanitess) bare to Esau Eliphaz; and Bashemath bare Reuel; (Brackets mine)
So here we can see that Teman was a direct descendant of Esau/Edom, through Esau’s son Eliphaz. Now if we go to Genesis 36:1-2 we glean more crucial information:
Genesis 36:1-2 (KJV) Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom.2 Esau took his wives of the daughters of Canaan; Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite.
Here we learn that Esau was also named Edom and he took two Canaanites for wives, which cost him his Abrahamic birthright inheritance from his father Isaac. The fact that he became a race mixer and/or a miscegenator is what grieved his parents, Isaac and Rebecca the most, as disclosed here:
Genesis 27:46 (KJV) And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth (Canaanite Hittites): if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?
This verse tells us exactly what Esau/Edom had done in marrying a Hittite and Hivite Canaanite, he had grieved his mother intensely, making her question even the purpose of her life, so in turn she made sure Esau/Edom’s inheritance went to Jacob/Israel his younger twin brother. Notice, too, how these Canaanite daughters, like their forefather Cain, were ‘daughters of the land’ which means any sacrifice would have been crops of the land, not the BLOOD of a lamb as offered up by Abel. Some important background information. (See link No. 4 below)
OK, moving on, and back to the subject of The Turks being from Esau/Edom and not the Jews. So let’s start at the best place = The Beginning:
Genesis 25:23 (KJV) And the Lord said unto her (Rebecca), Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. (Esau/Edom was the elder and Jacob/Israel the younger)
So if the descendants of Esau/Edom are The Jews, since when did they serve anyone? Since when have the non-Jews not been servants of the Jews through their MONEY POWER AND USURY = The CROWN – The Rothschild WORLDWIDE Banking Cartel!? (Take note that Jacob/Israel was not the forefather of the Jews – see links 2 and 3 below)
So here we also learn that two nations would stem from Esau/Edom and Jacob/Israel which then makes these two men Patriarchs.
From “Turkey In Prophecy” by Herman L. Hoeh
“Esau’s descendants play a vital part in world affairs today! Where are his descendants?
“Notice some of the sons of Esau: Teman, Omar, Amalek (Genesis 25:11). These are not Jewish names! Yet some claim that the Jews are the children of Esau. Nothing could be further from the truth – as we shall presently see.
“Esau, or Edom, as he is also called, lived south-east of Palestine near Petra. Arab Bedouins live there now. Then where have Esau’s children gone?
“From the days of Nebuchadnezzar, who carried them captive, they disappear for 1000 years from history. Then suddenly we find Amalek the name of a city in Turkestan in Central Asia (from Paul Herrmann’s SIEBEN VORBEI UND ACHT VERWEHT, p.451). The Egyptians used to call the Amalekites the Amu. In Turkestan is the River Amu today! In Bible times the Edomites inhabited Mt. Seir (Genesis 32:4). In Turkestan is the Syr Darya – the River of Syr or Seir.
“The leading Turkish tribe is the Ottoman. The prophecies referring to Edom or Esau mention Teman as the leading tribe in these latter days (Obadiah 9). The conclusion is inescapable. The Ottoman Turks are the sons of Teman. Merely the vowels in spelling have been changed over these past millenniums. From Central Asia the Turks or Edomites moved into Asia Minor. That is where Esau’s children live today! Turkey controls the “crossway” of the nations — the Dardanelles (Obadiah 14).
How clear, ESAU OR EDOM IS TURKEY today!”
Obadiah 1:14 (KJV) Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.
Right, now I am going to shoot off at a bit of a tangent and change the thrust of this article considerably and yet it will still be based upon Obadiah in verse 4:
Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.
Now quite few people make the silly mistake of linking this ‘Eagle’ with The USA and its national emblem, the Bald Eagle, but that is totally erroneous, for this ‘Eagle’ has a very different symbolic meaning altogether, and it also ties us to The Turks in a very surreptitious way. I will therefore copy and paste here some interesting pieces of information from the Masonic Dictionary.
Here is the opening paragraph from their website:
“Here is the type of article that makes glad the heart of an editor. With its lack of guesswork and with its wide-sweeping learning, it may well serve as a model and an inspiration to budding (Freemason) students….” (Brackets mine)
So from this opening statement we can be fairly sure of the provenance of the information I am about to reveal and share.
OK, more from their website:
“….Brother Parker has recently completed an eight hundred page work on archaeology; when it is published we shall hope to review it in THE BUILDER. For some strange reason the two-headed eagle, for all its symbolical appeal, has seldomly attracted the attention of Masonic scholars.”
Here we can see mention of this symbolic two-headed eagle which will be crucial in our understanding of this Edomite/Turkey connection.
“The most able treatment of it thus far has been the chapter in The Migration of Symbols by Count Goblet d’Alviela of Belgium; Brother Parker’s own article loses nothing by comparison with that chapter. Indeed, it carries the symbolism back to a far earlier time, and embodies more recent information. A student who may care to launch out upon researches of his own will find, along with the present article, that the references in the Encyclopedia Britannica, are valuable; consult the index volume under Double-headed Eagle; also see the articles on Heraldry and Hittites. For a reliable but rapid survey of what is known of the Hittites see Jastrow’s chapter on the subject in Exploration in Bible Lands, by Hilprecht (1903). See also Mackey’s Encyclopedia, Vol. I., page 225; and Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, Vol. III, page 104.”
WHAM No. 1!! there we have our first connection – The Double-Headed Eagle and its Hittite heraldic origins, and who did Esau/Edom marry? A HITTITE Canaanite!
Moving on:
“THERE IS SCARCELY a symbol in any of the philosophical or chivalric degrees of the Scottish Rite so striking in design and import as that of the double-headed eagle. The Tau Cross and (The) Serpent of the Twenty-fifth Degree, the sun of the Twenty-eighth Degree, and the cross of St. Andrew in the Twenty-ninth Degree are indeed fraught with deep meaning, both historic and esoteric, but none can claim a more romantic or significant history than that of the Thirtieth Degree, that of the Grand Elect Knight Kadosh, or Knight of the Black and White Eagle. As an emblem this eagle is the epitome of religious andsymbolic historyand to trace the winding flight of the double-headed bird is to survey the whole course of civilization, from its grey dawn north of the Persian gulf to this modern World.…..”
That will be the symbolic history of the Edomite Canaanites via Esau’s Hittite wife. Take note, for ALL Canaanites are Serpent Seed miscegenated inbreeds from The Garden = Satan’s offspring through Eve. (See link No. 5 below)
“When our ancient brethren, the holy Crusaders, passed through Byzantium on their way to the tomb of the Saviour, the Double-Headed Eagle which they saw embroidered in gold on heavy banners of silk, borne aloft by the Seljuk Turks, had been four thousand years on its way.”
WHAM No. 2!! The Seljuk Turks (Edomites) and their Double-Headed Eagle held high on gold embroidered banners as they went into battle. So let’s paste Obadiah verse 4 again just to remind ourselves:
Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.
Turkish Dirilis Ertugral
“To these same Crusaders this emblem was an honoured one, and though the enemy displayed it, yet they would fight to death for its possession and in triumph bear it, dripping with blood, to their encampments on the Levantine shore. It was from this Eastern Empire that the knights took this banner to adorn the courts of Charlemagne, and as a sacred relic hung it in the great cathedrals, whose architects and masons had so often been honoured by this Emperor of the West.”
Here above we can see how this Hittite Canaanite heraldic symbol wormed its way into the west.
“From whence came this two-headed eagle, and how came it to be associated with Scottish Rite Masonry? The last part of this question is easier to answer than the first, for there is direct testimony that Frederick of Prussia supplied this crest during the formative stages of the Rite, but neither Frederick nor indeed Prussia could claim the exclusive right the use or to bestow it. It is the imperial emblem of Russia, Austria, Serbia and other portions of the disrupted Holy Roman Empire, and Prussia adopted the emblem long after it had flown over Byzantium as the royal arms of the “Emperors of the East and West.”
“In Germany we find the Double-Headed Eagle used as the seal of the Count of Wurzburg in 1202; it was the coat of arms of Henricus de Rode in 1276; while Philip of Saxony bore it upon his shield in 1278. It was also the seal of the Bishop of Cologne, who no doubt adopted it from the city arms.
“As the arms of towns and cities in England, this emblem appears upon the official seals of Salisbury, Perth, (Perthshire), Airedale and Lamark. In Holland and France there are also numerous instances of its use.
“As the badge of royal orders we find the two-headed bird upon the emblems of the Austrian Order of the Iron Crown; in Russia upon the emblems of the Order of St. Andrew, founded by Peter the Great in 1689; in Poland upon the emblem of the Order of Military Merit, (founded May 24, 1792). As late as 1883, the King of Serbia adopted it as the emblem of the Order of the Double-Headed Eagle, commemorative of the restoration of the Serbian kingdom.
In these paragraphs we can see how Satan beguiled many western nations with their incorporation of the Double-Headed Eagle into their own heraldry – especially the Germanic nations.
“But the double-headed eagle is not European in origin for its use depends upon the contact of Europe with Asia Minor, and indeed with trade or warfare with the Turks.
The Turkish name for this conspicuous emblem is HAMCA, and by this name they call it when they see it carved upon the walls of ancient castles, upon time worn coins or emblazoned upon frayed silken banners in ancient palaces.”
WHAM No. 3!! Now notice what we have here: 1) Further confirmation the origins of this Double-Headed Eagle are of Turkish/Edomite origins. 2) And the Turkish name for this image is HAMCA! WOW! = HAMitic CAnaanites!! So the Double-Headed Eagle is the incestuous Canaan’s heraldic emblem.
“Travellers in Asia Minor, indeed, are surprised by the frequency of the double-headed eagle sculptures upon the castles of the Seljukian Turks, and upon the more ancient monuments of the Hittites, whose civilization was at its height when the Hebrews were wild tribesmen upon the Arabian plains.”
First off, pay no attention to the blasphemous mention of the Hebrews as wild tribesmen. The Hebrews were always husbandmen with their flocks and herds of animals not wild men, however Esau/Edom WAS a wild man and ferocious in battle. He and his clans were warriors of warriors, and this is yet another characteristic that does NOT FIT THE JEWS. Edomites were NEVER JEWS.
….Or perhaps a better title would have been: The Satanic Curses of Judaism and Islam – Is God One?
Introduction
Now this article has been up on Ezine Articles since 2009, so it’s obviously long overdue for a little revising and editing, because my knowledge has greatly increased since 2009. In turn, it must be said that it’s a crucial support article for my other articles: “Exposing The Trinity Lie – Parts 1 through 5”; “Do YOU Worship and Ogre god? – Parts 1 through 4”; “Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs? and “The Duality Godhead”, (See link Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 below.) This means, also, that it’s long overdue for a place on my blog. Still, better late than never, eh?
So, to my question, IS HE ONE, that is, is God ONE!? for the phrase “God is one” can only be found three times in the whole King James Bible – THREE TIMES ONLY! Now here’s a thing, for all of my regular readers will, by now, be aware of a little conundrum that we have going on here, that is, within the confines of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. That conundrum, of course, is this mysterious habit they have of majoring in the minors. It seems to be a common practice of theirs to make big theological determinations with very little Scriptural proof for backing up those determinations. The silly Trinity dogma being a very good example of it, with two references, only, to the Trinity, again, in the whole of the King James Bible (see link No. 1 below). Not only that but no mention of it by the name, the Trinity. However, having said all that, MANY people still believe that their god is one and in the case of believers in the Trinity, for them it’s three in ONE!
So back to the thread, and to prove it, here’s another thing: All the Jews and all the Muslims on this earth believe their god or their Allah is one. There he is, up there in his ‘heavenly domain’, all alone, that is, a single solitary god, who is the object of their worship and of their deification (chuckle, chuckle, chuckle).
The thing is, is their worship of this deity all in vain? and is it just a massive deception on the part of the god of this world, Satan the Devil? We must be clear about this, for he is most definitely a god, that is, the god of this world, or the god of this age, or the god of this world’s system, or even the god of The Matrix, to use the modern vernacular. If you have any doubts about this arrangement, then you must refer to the Holy Scriptures for the proof, and thereby assuage those doubts:
2 Corinthians 4:4 (MCV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image (one in whom the likeness of anyone is seen) of God, should shine unto them.
As an aside, notice, the minds of the lost and unsaved who don’t believe are completely blinded to The Gospel of Yashua Messiah, which is yet more solid gold proof that no man or woman can accept a ‘Jesus’ as their saviour of their own volition or own initiation, for only The Father can remove the scales from our eyes.
Ephesians 2:2 (MCV) Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to The Prince of The Power of The Air, the evil spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience (and unbelief):
OK, now all this is very straight forward, because we know that the lost and unsaved do not believe, and the above verses explain clearly why they don’t believe. Moreover, what about the Jews and the Muslims, for they do believe and, boy, do they believe? Let’s face it, we could never doubt their zeal and their fervour, especially the Muslims, so what gives? Is their belief in vain, for we know that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) does not feature in The Jew’s beliefs at all. The Jews have their imaginary satanic Talmudic ‘god’, and the Muslims have their ‘Allah’, but Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) as God with God is not included in either of these blasphemous belief systems.
However, Islam does acknowledge a ‘Jesus’ as a prophet, but this imaginary ‘Jesus’ is not revered any higher than their prophet Mohammed which, in itself, is an evil blasphemy. (For the origins of Islam see link No. 5 below.)
So to briefly sum up, we have at least two religions that believe in gods that are one, that is, alone and solitary. Now some of you may say well so what, we’re Christians, and we believe that God is one, too? Yes, quite so, but is that true and who told you that God is one? And if God IS ONE what separates your god from the heathen god of the Jews and Muslims, for he is one too? Answer: NOTHING! Oh come on, there are loads of Holy Scriptures that say God is one, I hear you say, and yes there are some that appear to say that, but do they really say it? Well, there is only one way to find out using these examples:
In Mark 12:29 the Lord Jesus Christ quotes Deuteronomy 6:4 which He voices aloud:
Mark 12:29 (KJV) And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
Now this statement is a word for word exact copy of what Moses wrote down in Deuteronomy 6:4. You can check it for yourselves if you do not believe me.
Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our GOD is one LORD.
OK, let’s analyse this Scripture in detail, from the Hebrew, as it predates Mark’s Gospel by approximately fifteen hundred years:
Hear, O Israel:
1) The Lord – The Jehovah or The Eternal our God (Elohim) who has always self-existed.
2) Our God – now the word ‘God’ or ‘Elohim’ in Hebrew means God plural – more than one. The Hebrew word ‘Eloha’ or Eloah is the singular word for Elohim. Now if God is one, a singular solitary God, then ‘Eloha’ is the word that would have been used here, not Elohim – more than one. This evidence alone, and in one fell swoop, disproves monotheism or Judaism, for the Elohim Godhead is more than one being.
3) Is one – OK, God = Elohim = plural beings, which in turn means we have the Elohim (plural) Godhead of more than one being, being described as ‘one’, but is that one being? and how can plural beings be one? In Hebrew the word for ONE is ‘Echad’ which means unified or united or in unity or at one and it also means number one; first and none above, the prime number. This means that The Elohim (plural) Godhead is united – completely likeminded and in unison, that is, in total agreement.
A football team is united as in Newcastle United, and they are united as one team with one goal – to win, but they are also a team of eleven individuals. The Godhead is one team of two Spiritualbeings who have plans to add to their number by calling sons and daughters/brothers and sisters, not close themselves off in isolation in a closed trinity. The number 3 is God’s number for finality and if anything comes in threes with God that’s it – fini – kaput – the end, nothing more, just like the three woes in Revelation. The thing is, there is nothing final in God’s plan for us His future family! Plus all of mankind, eventually, in the Kingdom of God!!
4) Lord– Eternal or self-existent.
So there we have it, and if we were to ask the question is God one? we can reply and affirmative yes to that, for the expounded question should read as: IS THE GODHEAD UNITED AS ONE? that is, a Godhead of two individuals who have always self-existed, a God with God who later became The Father and The Son, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and then a Godhead in heaven with Yashua Messiah at The Father’s right hand.
Here, alone, we have enough proof and evidence to disprove monotheism or the worship of one god. The Godhead has always been two who are unified or united or at one with themselves, with each other, or in oneness of mind, word and deed, that is, in complete and total agreement and totally likeminded – yet distinct Spiritual beings; this is the True nature of the Duality Godhead.
Hopefully, too, you will have noticed that the Holy Spirit is nowhere mentioned in Deuteronomy 6:4, nor in Mark 12:29 in the description of The Duality of the nature of the Godhead. Am I denying the existence of The Holy Spirit? no way, for The Holy Spirit is the Godhead’s living POWER, but not a personage of a mickey mouse Trinity. (See link No. 1 below)
Moreover, we now have a full understanding of Deuteronomy 6:4 of which Mark 12:29 is a direct copy. Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently quoted Old Testament Holy Scriptures (from The Septuagint) when preaching. So what is the point I am making here? The point I am making is this: Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12:29 are identical and yet they are taught differently, due to the change of language or misinterpretation of same, that is, from Hebrew into Greek.
If we copy out Mark 12:29 from the Greek you will see what I mean:
Mark 12:29 (Greek Transliteral) Answered the Jesus that before-most is (foremost) be hearing (be you hearing) Israel Master (Lord) the God of us Master (Lord) one is.
OK, if we concordance the word ‘God’ we will find a subtle change has taken place:
From Strong’s Concordance:
God – G2316 – theos theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].
Notice; a deity, not the deities. God in the Old Testament was Elohim – plural, not Eloha = not singular, but look at what has happened here. God has become a singular god – a deity, not the deities of The Elohim who are ‘at one’ or who are ‘unified as one’ and in ‘perfect likemindedness’ – two united beings thinking as one. And all this when The Greeks were polytheists = more than one god.
This deliberate language corruption is what causes all the trouble and confusion within the pages of the New Testament and deceives millions of people within mainstream Christianity. Look folks, the Godhead does not change, they have never changed and that is why THEY SAID in Genesis 1:26; “let us make man in OUR IMAGE and OUR LIKENESS; they were always the two beings of the Godhead. This, therefore, means that what was written in Deuteronomy 6:4 should have been copied exactly into Mark 12:29 with same OT meaning, for the Lord Himself uttered the very same words. This also means that because the word ‘God’ now has a different meaning, a singular meaning, not a unified plural meaning, a translator’s corruption has most definitely occurred. Well just fancy that!!??
Moving on, if we now take a look at a few Holy Scriptures that allude to their claim that ‘God is one’, we will then gain a better understanding of what the evil translators of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion have done to God’s Holy Word, and what better example than the following verses from Matthew’s Gospel, for there are corruptions galore in these two verses:
Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good?there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
And from the Greek Transliteral, and supported by The Concordant Literal Version:
Matthew 19:16 (Greek Transliteral) And be-perceiving (lo!) one toward-coming (coming to) to-Him (Him) said Teacher! Any (what) good I-shall-be-doing that I-should-be-having life eonian?
Matthew 19:6 (CLV) And lo! one coming to Him said, “Teacher, what good shall I be doing that I should be having life eonian?
OK, so what have we got going on here? Hmm, well, as we can see, this verse is revealing that Matthew 19:16-17 is not quite as ‘good‘ as we may have, at first, thought (like the pun?). The operative word here, of course, being ‘good’. Notice, the man in the Greek original does not call Yashua Messiah ‘Good Master’. The word ‘good’ has been thrown in gratuitously by the devious translators, but why? Well that’s easy to answer; in order to corrupt the whole passage and give it a different focus and a blasphemous, phony new emphasis. Not only that, but we have the assertion that The Father God is the ONLY ONE that is good, so there it is, the ugly perversion of Jewish monotheism slithering in like a snake by the back door, so to speak.
As it happens, this has always been a passage of Holy Scripture that I have never been comfortable with and, now, as I examine the original Greek rendering I fully understand why I have always felt uncomfortable with it. Notice the crucial element to this missing word ‘good’. If Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) is not the ‘Good Master’ and is only the Master or Teacher as in the original Greek, then by default it makes a mockery of what Yashua Messiah was supposed to have said to the man, that is, “Why callest thou me good?” For as we can see the man said no such thing, but what he did refer to was what one good thing must he do in order to have Eternal Life, so what’s going on?
Back to the Greek Transliteral for the answer:
Matthew 19:17 (Greek Transliteral) The yet He-said to-him any (why) me you-are-asking about (concerning) the good one [thing] is the good if yet you-are-willing into the life to-be-into-coming keep (keep-you) the directions (precepts) [Square brackets mine]
Straight away, it is crucial that we realise there is no reference to God in this verse at all especially the nonsense phrase: “there is none good but one”, and we now know, too, that the phrase: “Why callest thou me good?” is also bogus. What this means in Truth, is that there is not an inkling of any suggestion within this passage to suggest that God, in anyway, shape or form is here alluded to as one. Unless, of course, you have a demonic evil agenda and your desire is to classify Yashua Messiah as not being ‘good’ which, of course, is what the blasphemous KJV does – DELIBERATELY in my view.
First, though, lets finish analysing the Greek version of verse 17. The verse opens with the Lord answering the man’s question and notice, for the emphasis is purely on the subject of the man’s question and nothing else. What the Lord is asking him here is this: “Why are you asking me about this one good thing that you think you should be doing in order to enter Eternal Life, when you should know that the only good thing you can do is to keep (hold Spiritually dear) the commandments and love God?” OK, having cleared that up, let’s return to the blasphemous KJV and I will re-copy it here for your convenience:
Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
Right, we know from the Greek rendering the man did not say ‘Good Master’, so this must mean that the Lord had no need to reply with that spurious man made question, and nor did He, for it is not there in the Greek. To confirm, if we check once more in the Greek version of verse 17 we also have the proof that the Lord did not ask the man that question: “Why callest thou me good?” So all this wickedness and deceit is added by the translators – WHY? Why, because through this verse in the KJV it is scandalously trying to tell us that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not see Himself as good and, in turn, by doing that making us think that He was not God. If He was not good, then how could He be God in the flesh?
Now this truly is an evil heresy we have unravelled here! It’s also constitutes a heresy with them trying to fool us into thinking that there is only one God. As stated, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was God in the flesh, so how could He be anything but good? Obviously, the Lord cannot be anything but good, but to those in the blasphemous Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, they want us to think that only the Father God is good. What kind of diabolical evil is this? I’ll tell you, it’s Jerome’s and Erasmus’ diabolical evil and whoever else had their filthy Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translator’s mitts on God’s Holy Word when they wrote their King James Bible.
Furthermore, if you think Matthew’s account is a one off and Mark’s account says otherwise you would be wrong and I will keep this brief for I wish to move on to the next misunderstood verse:
Mark 10:17 (KJV) And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?
Again from the Greek Transliteral:
Mark 10:17 (Greek Transliteral) And of-out-going (of-going-out) of-Him into way (road) toward-running one and knee-falling (falling-on-his-knees) him inquired-of Him Teacher! good any (what) I-shall-be-doing that life eonian I-should-be-tenanting (I-should-be-enjoying-the-allotment-of).
Here again we can see that the translators have chosen to place the word ‘good’ before ‘Teacher’ or ‘Master’ instead of correctly attaching it to the subject at hand after the word ‘Master’, that is, what good thing should this man be doing in order to enter into Eternal Life? Notice, too, that the word ‘good’ only appears once so, by default, it must apply to the ‘thing’ and not to Yashua Messiah. Why is that I hear you say? It’s that, because in the Matthew account we learnt that the second ‘good’ was gratuitously thrown in by the translators.
In part two I will expose more translator corruptions.
Now, as I am sometimes want to do, I am going to challenge my readers, yet again, with what I deem to be a very dodgy piece of Scripture. I won’t say Holy Scripture, because I believe it to be satanic, and not Holy at all.
You see, since I discovered that Romans 13:1-7 was a corruption by addition to Paul’s Letter to the Romans (seven whole verses – see the link below), that is, completely bogus, I have started checking one or three other places in the Freemason-Canaanite-Judaic King James Bible to see what else I can find that would merit my scrutiny. Now what do you think I found? low and behold, Acts 16:3-5 jumped right out at me, just as my good wife and I were studying The Holy Scriptures, this very day – the 8th June 2014.
As usual, I went online to see what most commentators were parroting, and it was all the usual guff about Paul being all things to all men in order to gain some of them for Christ. However, I could not rationalise this sweeping generalisation in order to apply it to what Paul was supposed to have done regarding Timothy and HIS member – not Paul’s member, if you get my drift. If we stop and think about this issue for a minute or two, we must ask ourselves who the blazes was Paul to take it upon himself to order a brother in Yashua Messiah, or a brother in The Faith under His Glorious Grace, to give him the authority to maim and mutilate Timothy’s body, that is, The Temple of The Holy Spirit? Just what is supposed to be going on here? Were Paul and Timothy under The Law, or under Yashua Messiah’s Saving Grace?
Let’s be clear, Paul had no rank or authority over Timothy, other than Timothy was Paul’s charge as a Learner (disciple) of Paul, a student, and therefore in Paul’s care on behalf of Yashua Messiah, and that was a great responsibility. Moreover, was Paul about to insult and blaspheme against Yashua Messiah and His sacrifice and go back on his own words as well?:
Galatians 1:6-7 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
“But there be some that trouble you.” Who were those troubling the brothers and sisters in Galatia? The very same types of people that we’re told Paul kowtowed to in Derbe and Lystra, so what is this all about? Are you suspicious yet? If not, I will copy this verse for you:
Galatians 2:21 (KJV) I do not frustrate The Grace of God: for if righteousness come by The Law, (circumcision) then Christ is dead in vain. (Brackets mine)
Is that simple enough to understand or are we going to explain it away with intellectual, philosophical, religious sophistry and clap trap?
And this verse:
Philippians 3:2 (KJV) Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the CONCISION. (Emphasis mine)
BEWARE OF THE CIRCUMSION!!!
Come on peeps, what are we dealing with here in Acts 16:3? I will copy it here for your information:
Acts 16:3 (MCV) Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Canaanite Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek.
Are we being asked to believe that Paul did a 180 degree U-turn and went back on all he had learnt from Yashua Messiah, and he himself taught elsewhere just to pander to a few Canaanite Judaising dogs of the circumcision? Well, if we read the King James Bible as it stands, and believe like lemmings that it has no errors, nor any Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious agenda, then yes YOU are being asked to believe it, and unfortunately probably do.
However, before you make your decision to carry on blindly believing this verse in Acts, as written, you might want to consider the story of Paul and Peter, and Peter’s refusal to eat with non-Israelite foreigners. Did Paul rebuke and admonish Peter severely for pandering to the religious whims of the Concision – the circumcised Jews? You bet your life he did. So are we now being asked to accept that Paul is now a hypocrite? Yes you are, because that’s how the translators of The KJV have polluted this chapter of Acts: 1) to discredit the character of Paul, 2) to cause confusion and 3) to get silly blind believers in the ‘inerrant KJV’ making all kinds of excuses on Paul’s behalf in order to explain this satanic verse away.
So did Paul circumcise Timothy? Not on your life and to prove it I will use the same method that I used to prove that Romans 13:1-7 is a satanic corruption of the Holy Scriptures. So let’s copy Acts 16 from verse 1 through to verse 8:
Acts 16:1-2 (MCV) Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, who was a Jewess, Judean Israelite and believed; but his father was a Greek: 2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium.
The first thing we must understand about these opening eight verses is that they are primarily an itinerary of Paul’s travels in this part of the world, that’s all. This is the primary focus of these verses and later on I will write them as they would have been written before they were corrupted by this satanic addition.
Acts 16:3 (MCV) Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek.
If Timothy was well received and well reported of, why the need for circumcision? or indeed, how did they know he wasn’t circumcised? Does that make any sense!!?? Furthermore, if his father was a Greek, that is a heathen, even more reason for him not to be circumcised, because heathen converts to The Faith did not have to fulfil the demands of The Law. Yet, conversely, with Timothy having a Judahite Israelite mother (not a Jewess), one would have expected him to have been circumcised when he was eight days old.
Acts 16:4 (KJV) And as they went through the cities, they delivered them the decrees for to keep, that were ordained of the apostles and elders which were at Jerusalem.
Here is the same verse as written in The Amplified Version:
Acts 16:4 (TAV) As they went on their way from town to town, they delivered over [to the assemblies] for their observance the regulations decided upon by the apostles and elders who were at Jerusalem.
Now what do we have here? Does this verse also sound all a bit legalistic and hierarchical (the system of the Nicolaitans that Yashua Messiah hates) with Jerusalem being the HQ like an early type of Rome dishing out its Papal Bulls and directives!!?? Again, if it doesn’t to you, then I suggest you have a rethink or perhaps you can point out The Grace within that verse.
Acts 16:5 (KJV) And so were the churches established in The Faith, and increased in number daily.
This verse as we read it sounds benign enough, but to me it has a propaganda ring to it, making you think that hundreds of people came flocking. How great were these numbers that were added when Paul, later on in Athens, after speaking in the Auditorium with 100’s, possibly 1,000’s in attendance, gathered two named people and certain men. ‘Certain men’ sounds very specific doesn’t it? small in number without doubt.
Acts 17:34 (KJV) Howbeit certain men clave unto him, and believed: among the which was Dionysius the Areopagite, and a woman named Damaris, and others with them.
Who were these others? Were they genuinely interested or just curious? We’re not told. However, this verse is not crucial to the point I am making here about Acts 16:3-4, which are definitely spurious. If we then look at verses 6-8, we can see the continuum issue that I raised in Romans 13:1-7 cropping up again, where the story flow gets interrupted with lies and nonsense and then reverts back the relevant subject of Paul’s itinerary:
Acts 16:6-8 (KJV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.
So let’s post this same passage as I believe it should be written without verses 3 and 4:
Acts 16:1-8 (MCV) Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess Judean Israelite, and believed; but his father was a Greek: 2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium. 5 And so were the churches established in the faith, and increased in number daily. 6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden by Yashua Messiah through the Holy Spirit to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but Yashua Messiah via The Holy Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.
There it is folks, as it was truly written – no Jewess mother, no circumcision of Timothy and no nonsense about KGB rules and regulations coming from ‘Papal Jerusalem’, or even of thousands flocking to Paul.
Matthew 22:14 Many are called, FEW are chosen.
Matthew 7:13-14 (MCV) Enter ye in at the strait (narrow and difficult) gate: for wide (easy) is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, (Spiritual ruin) and MANY there be which go in thereat: 14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and FEW there be that find it.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Brother Charles
Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons and Daughters of God Have To Obey Secular or Religious Authorities?:
OK, I think I know what many of you are going to ask here – what is Cessationism? Others of you will already know what it is and hold differing views on it. Some of you will not be sure about it one way or the other, in turn, some will be wholly against it and others wholly persuaded and for it.
However, before we press on with the pros and cons, another essential question arises out of this very important subject, and that question is: what has Cessationism got to do with being Baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone? I believe it’s everything to do with it, and it fully explains why we have the issue of Cessationism in the first place, and people who consequently believe in it. Equally, we must not discount those who do not believe it, because at the same time they are believing in something that I believe is totally false, as well, and I will return to this aspect of it later. Needless-to-say, it’s no coincidence that this phenomenon is just a copy of the scenario we have with Libertine (Progressive) Christianity versus Fundamental Christianity, for both parties are wrong. (Please see link No. 2 below). Both pro and anti Cessationism people are deceived. How can that be I hear you ask? Well, the answer to that is all tied up in the error of Baptism into The Trinity (See link No. 3 below) and I will now explain.
First, I will deal with the Cessationists and their false ideas. Cessationists believe that the Spiritual gifts and wonderful miracles performed by Our Lord Yashua Messiah and The Messengers (apostles), in the first century, were a one off. As far as they’re concerned, they were solely for Yashua Messiah and The Messengers (apostles), that is, for their time only and not for anyone else who was born of God (born again) after their generation. This means they believe that for one thousand nine hundred and seventy years, no one in the Church of God has been blessed with these amazing Spiritual Gifts.
Now for me this has always been a very sweeping or generalised statement and one that cannot be proven one way or the other, so this alone makes it ridiculous. Furthermore, and to be perfectly frank, this is a topic that I had shelved in the back of my mind several years ago. I was one of those people in the middle and that was simply because I didn’t know whether Cessationists were right or wrong. As it happened, I didn’t think it was crucial to our salvation anyway, so considered it a minor issue, but of course when we take on board the subject of the validity or, rather, the invalidity of our Baptism this throws a giant spanner into the works of our previous understanding.
You probably know what I am going to say here, but for those who may need some extra help, let me throw this in the air and see if any of you are willing to catch it. My belief and understanding now is that my original Baptism is invalid. This is due to the fact I was not Baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone but, rather, into the name of The Trinity as allegedly ‘commanded’ in Matthew 28:19, which in part one I proved was false, due to the verse being partly spurious. This means, not just my Baptism, but all those in mainstream Christianity down through the ages, (apart from the few who are baptised into His Name) are invalid. Like me, they are, or were, not Baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone, so this tells us much about how the erroneous concept of Cessationism came into being.
If we think about it for a while it’s obvious isn’t it? How can we expect to see the gifts of The Holy Spirit and the wonderful miracles if we have not been properly Baptised. All The Learners (disciples) were Baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone, and after the Lord’s ascension into Heaven were baptised with The Holy Spirit in the upper room when tongues of fire were seen to descend upon their heads. The Messengers (apostles) were not Baptised into the Roman Catholic Trinity for it was not conjured up by Tertullian until circa 200 AC. If they had been there would have been no visible displays of The Holy Spirit in action at all, that is, speaking in tongues, prophecies and/or miracles.
I hope you can now see how the Cessationist movement sprang up. They knew, and still know, the huge majority of mainstream Christians couldn’t do, and still can’t do, the things The Messengers (apostles) did so looked for a reason why and called it Cessationism. To compound it they even used Holy Scriptures to support their views, but in reality this is just twisting the meaning of certain verses in order to try and prove their case and I will quote a few here just to expose their errors.
1 Corinthians 13:8-12 (KJV) Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail;whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. 9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. 10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. 11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. 12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
Here in this passage of Holy Scripture, which they use to support their ideas, we can see what they believe to be an end of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, which they then apply retrospectively to the end of the first century. Is this true or is it correct? Notice, in verse 8 we can see an end of knowledge mentioned here too, but there has never been an end to knowledge and as we know man has more knowledge now than he’s ever had before. What these verses are referring to is a time yet to come in the future when knowledge will “vanish away”, when prophecies will fail and tongues shall cease – why? Easy, because there will be no need of them in the Kingdom of God, when we are powerful Spirit beings. Notice how Paul refers to it as looking through a glass darkly; as believers we know those days will come, but we do not yet understand what they will be like for it is a mystery, but one thing we do know, charity (love) will be there, for it never fails. This passage of Holy Scriptures has nothing to do with cessation of the Spiritual gifts in this age, and Cessationists have completely misapplied and misunderstood these verses.
Right, let’s have a look at another passage of Holy Scripture:
1 Corinthians 12:7-11 (KJV) But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. 8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; 9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; 10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues: 11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he it will.
Notice, there is no time limit attached to the apportionment of the gifts. Paul doesn’t say after verse 11: “And after us – The Messengers, these gifts and the benefits they give will cease when we die” This is what Paul would have said if cessation was to be the case, but of course it was not. Let’s look at these verses again, if the greater gifts were to disappear or cease, that is, healings, miracles, prophesies and tongues at the end of the first century, why didn’t the lesser gifts – the gifts of discerning of spirits, knowledge and wisdom? I will correct myself here: that’s if we can actually say the gifts of discerning of spirits, knowledge and wisdom are lesser gifts – most likely not.
Moving on, here is something from a Cessationist paper written by a Thomas Edgar:
“History indicates that tongues did cease. Tongues are not mentioned at all by the Post-Apostolic Fathers. Other writers such as Justin Martyr, Origen, Chrysostom, and Augustine considered tongues something that happened only in the earliest days of the Church.”
Here is living proof that invalid baptisms were already having their negative effect because the above mentioned counterfeiters, otherwise known as ‘Post-Apostolic Fathers’ didn’t have the gifts, and now we know why, don’t we? They were not Baptised into Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) but, rather, into the heathen satanic Trinity of Matthew 28:19.
Finally, there is a view that Matthew 28:19 represents Godly authority only and I have copied here what could easily be the consensus of mainstream Christian thinking on this subject.
“Christian baptism is also in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19). Being baptized in this manner simply means we are identifying ourselves with the Trinity.”
Right, there it is, by their own admission, the fact that they are identifying themselves with The Trinity, a blasphemous false Roman Catholic satanic addition to Holy Scripture and in direct opposition to what Yashua Messiah really taught through His Messengers (apostles).
“We belong to the Father, are saved by the Son, and indwelt by the Spirit”
No, we do not belong to the Father, we belong to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and we are saved by His Sacrifice, His Blood and His Grace, for He is in us through THE POWER of The Holy Spirit.
Mark 9:41 (KJV) For whosoever shall give you a cup of water to drink in my name, because ye belong to Christ, verily I say unto you, he shall not lose his reward.
We have access to the Father through The Lord’s Sacrifice.
“This is similar to how we pray in Jesus’ name (John 14:13)”
No it’s not, John 14:13 states quite clearly that whatever we ask in The Lord’s name – not The Trinity’s name, He will do and that the Father may be glorified in The Son. In turn because of what we have asked in The Lord’s name first. We are asking for nothing in The Father’s name.
“If we pray in the name of Jesus, we are praying with His authority and asking God the Father to act upon our prayers because we come in the name of His Son Jesus”
This sentence is true, but it does not mean we should be Baptised in the Father’s name or in the Holy Spirit’s name. What he is saying here is that prayers should be prayed in the Lord’s name and no other, which, if we are consistent, also points to our being Baptised solely into His name too.
So there we have it, but what about these people who are Baptised into the name of The Trinity who profess to have Spiritual Gifts? You know; the Charismatics or that group of people who have adherents who say that if we haven’t got the gift of tongues we are not properly birthed in Christ or, even, we’re not born of God (born again) at all. How’s that for blasphemous arrogant effrontery and self-righteousness? I have known worldly businessmen with less!
OK, so what’s all this about? Easy, it’s about genuine gifts of The Holy Spirit and whether these people have them or if they’re just servants of the Devil with false tongues. I have been in their company, on more than one occasion, when they’ve been uttering noises along the lines of: bab, bab, bab, bab, bab, bab, bab, and on it goes in never ending vain repetition, and at the same time supposedly all for my edification and upliftment. Well I’ve news for them, it did no such thing and just gave me a laugh at their expense. Another trick of these people is to lie on the floor and bark like dogs – unbelievable? No, it’s the truth, I’ve witnessed it, but where does all this stuff and nonsense come from? Well it certainly isn’t Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) I’ll tell you that.
I am pleased to inform you all that my wife and I have now been re-baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone. Have we since experienced tongues and have we prophesied? Yes, I have the Gifts of Tongues, Knowledge and Spiritual Discernment and my wife the Gifts of Faith and Wisdom. As for the Gifts of Healings and Miracles no, but that does not mean we won’t be blessed with them in the future, as the need arises, and if we add to it the fact that Baptism into The Trinity is false, we felt it too big a risk to take the chance and leave it undone.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? Part 1:
….Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find Faith on the earth? Luke 18:8b
But what kind of Faith? and will Yashua Messiah find the right kind of Faith on the earth when He returns? This question arises out of one of Yashua Messiah’s Parables; recorded in Luke 18:1-8:
Luke 18:1-8 (KJV) And He spake a Parable unto them to this end, that men ought always to pray, and not to faint (not to give up); 2 Saying, There was in a city a judge, which feared not God, neither regarded man: 3 And there was a widow in that city; and she came unto him, saying, Avenge me of mine adversary. 4 And he would not for a while: but afterward he said within himself, Though I fear not God, nor regard man; 5 Yet because this widow troubleth me, I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me. 6 And the Lord said, Hear what the unjust judge saith. 7 And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them? 8 I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find Faith on the earth? (Brackets mine)
Luke 18:1-8 (Concordant Literal Version) 1 Now He told them a parable also, so that they must always be praying and not be despondent, 2 saying, “A certain judge was in a certain city, who did not fear God and did not respect man.” 3 Now there was a widow in that city, and she came to him, saying, ‘Avenge me from my plaintiff.'” 4 And for a time he would not. Yet, after this, he said in himself, ‘Even if I am not fearing God nor respecting man, 5 surely, because of the weariness this widow is affording me, I shall be avenging her, lest she, coming, may belabor me into a consummation.'” 6 Now the Lord said, “Hear what the unjust judge is saying.” 7 Yet should not God by all means be doing the avenging of His chosen ones, who are imploring Him day and night? And He is patient with them.” 8 I am saying to you that He will be doing the avenging of them swiftly. Moreover, consequently, at the coming of the Son of Mankind, will He be finding The Faith on the earth?
Luke 18:1-8 (The Amplified Bible) Now Jesus was telling The Disciples a Parable to make the point that at all times they ought to pray and not give up and lose heart, 2 saying, “In a certain city there was a judge who did not fear God and had no respect for man. 3 There was a [desperate] widow in that city and she kept coming to him and saying, ‘Give me justice and legal protection from my adversary.’ 4 For a time he would not; but later he said to himself, ‘Even though I do not fear God nor respect man, 5 yet because this widow continues to bother me, I will give her justice and legal protection; otherwise by continually coming she [will be an intolerable annoyance and she] will wear me out.’” 6 Then the Lord said, “Listen to what the unjust judge says! 7 And will not [our just] God defend and avenge His elect [His chosen ones] who cry out to Him day and night? Will He delay [in providing justice] on their behalf? 8 I tell you that He will defend and avenge them quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes, will He find [this kind of persistent] Faith on the earth?”
Now I have included three versions of the same passage, as the second and third versions highlight points that I wish to raise.
Moreover, here we have, what appears to be, a somewhat troubling verse of Holy Scripture, but troubling for whom? Well certainly not for those who are truly born of God (born again), for they will be exercising their Faith everyday of their lives, so that when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth HE WILL definitely find Faith on the earth.
However, this is not the issue I wish to raise, for my good lady wife reminded me of some advice she received from a fellow believer many years ago. This advice went like this: “If you pray to The Father and ask Him for something or for Him to do something, then ask only ONCE and THANK HIM for hearing you, and KNOWING IN FAITH that He will answer you, whether positively, or negatively, and/or not straight away.” This is powerful Faith in action.
Now the widow in this Parable had no faith in the judge, and for good reason, she knew she would have to keep on badgering him until he did his job. Did she know how The System worked? I think so, but we’re not told. However, one thing is for sure, we know that the judge was a bent and corrupt judge, because he tells us so:
Notice, from the KJV: “Though I fear not God, nor regard man.” Then from the CLV: “Even if I am not fearing God nor respecting man”, and once more from The Amplified: “Even though I do not fear God nor respect man”. Furthermore, not only this, but we are also told by Yashua Messiah Himself (KJV): “There was in a city a judge, which feared not God, neither regarded man”. (CLV): “A certain judge was in a certain city, who did not fear God and did not respect man.” Finally, The Amplified: “In a certain city there was a judge who did not fear God and had no respect for man”.
We therefore have, in this very short story, a crucial point raised for our attention – TWICE! and when Yashua Messiah tells us something TWICE! we need to sit up and take notice, that is, IF we know what’s good for us.
Here are two more examples of this duality teaching that Yashua Messiah employed:
1) John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
2) John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
1) John 8:32 (KJV) And ye shall know The Truth, and The Truth shall make you free.
2) John 8:36 (KJV) If The Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
So, in like fashion, He let’s us know TWICE! that this judge had no fear of God in his heart, nor any respect or regard for man. Now why would Yashua Messiah draw our attention to that? and what makes this issue so significant that He should highlight it TWICE! in this very short Parable? That’s easy to answer, because it’s all tied in with His miracle of walking on The Sea, and His non-respect of PERSONS (See links 1, 2 and 3 below for ALL the background knowledge to this subject)
OK, so if you have now read the other articles you’ll be up to speed and will know that if the WOMAN had been a PERSON, the judge would have immediately taken her seriously, but as she was there as a flesh and blood WOMAN – a widow, and not a PERSON, the judge did not consider her as even existing, so treated her with utter contempt. Therefore, she was a non-entity to be ignored, or treated with no respect or regard at all, for she was completely invisible to this criminal corrupt judge.
However, because she was so determined to get justice she became like a dog with a bone and sank her metaphorical teeth into his butt and would not let go until he did the honourable thing and gave her justice.
If we then add in the fact that this judge was a blasphemous, Godless, secular, criminal wretch, it all begins to make sense, for his god was Satan, and only Satan’s servants, that is, his fellows, would be seen and heard favourably in his court. Their treatment would have been the exact opposite of what the widow received. In today’s language they would most likely be fellow Freemasons.
OK, so having cleared up that crucial element to this Parable, we then move on to the subject of Faith and what instruction Yashua Messiah gave us within these few verses. Namely, should we bother The Father with repetitive prayers like the widow bothered the criminal judge with her repetitive demands and requests? No way, is the answer to that. As already stated regarding the advice my wife received from a fellow believer – ONE request is enough. Our Father is not deaf, nor is He forgetful or cold, heartless and indifferent toward us, like the criminal judge was toward the widow, so do not treat Him as if He were. If we make our one-off requests, fully trusting, that, will then be us displaying the real Faith His Son Yashua Messiah wants to find when He returns.
As for praying, yes by all means, and keep on praying, but make sure your prayers are not boring and repetitive. You can also pray in tongues, if you have that gift, and don’t know what to pray about – that also displays Faith.
In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles
1. For There is No Respect of Persons With God – Romans 2:11 – But What is a Person? – Parts 1 & 2:
OK, so here we go again, with yet more corruptions by addition to The King James Bible. This one, I have to admit, has always bugged me, due to its sensationalist nature. It really does read as if it was faked, that is, first century fake news. Moreover, it reads as if it was written by a BBC or CNN lying media whore, so crass and stupid is it.
Matthew 27:52-53 (KJV) And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 53 And came out of the graves after His resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.
The same passage including the previous and following verses:
Matthew 27:50-54 (KJV) Jesus, when He had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up The Ghost (Spirit). 51 And, behold, the veil of The Temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; 52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 53 And came out of the graves after His resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. 54 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.
So let’s see what one or two commentators have to say about it, starting with Adam Clarke and he says:
“It is difficult to account for the transaction mentioned Mat 27:52, Mat 27:53.Some have thought that these two verses have been introduced into the text of Matthew from the gospel of the Nazarenes….”
He goes on to say:
“….by the earthquake several bodies that had been buried were thrown up and exposed to view, and continued above ground until Christ’s Resurrection.
For me that would mean dead bodies lying around for three days and three nights! Does that sound like something The Father would do?
“[Excerpts taken from: Daniel L. McConaughy (Seventh Way Corps), Early Patristic Evidence For The Forgery Of Matthew 27:52b And 53, GMIR (from Aramaic gmr – “to perfect”, presenting the necessary documentation to get back the original, God-inspired Word, by believing on 2 Tim. 2:15), The Way Magazine, May-June 1982]”
According to Daniel L. McConaughy only the second part of Matthew 52 is deemed a forgery, so it’s the part that reads: “And the graves were opened” and is OK as far as he’s concerned. However, I would question that, too, with the question: WHY!? Why would The Father open some graves through the earthquake unless it was to resurrect the occupants of those graves? To expose them just for sake of it would be meaningless, especially as Yashua Messiah has just died and is about to be put in His tomb, not resurrected from it.
Next we have this from E. W. Allen, author of: “St. Matthew, The International Critical Commentary”, from which he states:
“This passage (Matthew 27:52-53) probably comes from… Palestinian traditions… If Christ was the first-fruits of them that slept [as 1 Cor. 15:22-23 declares *], how could His resurrection have been preceded by that of these saints? Under the influence of such idea, the editor adds the caution, “after His resurrection” [which in its previous tampered form seems to have been “after their resurrection”] (Allen, W.C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary of the Gospel According to Matthew, 3rd ed. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1912, p. 296).”
I know nothing about ‘Palestinian Traditions’, but as we can see this spurious two verse addition has created its own can of worms over which Biblical scholars have salivated – as they are want to do. However, if it’s for the right reasons and Truth is their agenda, then all kudos to them.
Moreover, the evidence revealed to us here from the above experts renders these verses very dodgy indeed, to say the least, but there is one crucial point that they have all missed, and it’s in the second part of the opening phrase. Did YOU see it? I hope so, but if not, don’t worry, for I will explain: “and many bodies of the saints which slept, arose.”
So what makes a saint, a saint? Being born of God (born again) makes a saint, and what takes place in order for a man or woman to become a saint? Repentance, confession of sins or admission to being a sinner and in need of The Father’s forgiveness, baptism and the gifting of The Holy Spirit. Now who were the first recipients of these tremendous blessings? Yashua Messiah’s twelve Learners (disciples) were the first recipients, in the upper room, and were any of them in their graves when Yashua Messiah died? No, not a single one, so how could there have been any saints in their graves at the time of Yashua Messiah’s crucifixion and death?
You see, dear brothers and sisters, these frauds always shoot themselves in the foot and betray themselves through their ignorance of The Truth. In this example it’s ignorance of what constitutes being A SAINT! This means we know that some Hellenising, religious fantasist was responsible for the penning of these two bogus verses.
OK, so let’s prove the point and write these Holy Scriptures as they should be written in order to reveal The Truth:
Matthew 27:50-52 (KJV) Jesus, when He had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up The Ghost (Spirit). 51 And, behold, the veil of The Temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; 52 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.
Interesting how it makes good sense with those bogus verses removed eh?
This proves, too, that the bogus verses were gratuitous sensationalist irrelevant religious mumbo jumbo, from the same spiritual mind sets that would later add Mary worship, fake fraudulent saints and transubstantiation to their satanic religious belief system – namely The Roman Cult.
At the end of part one I left it with another passage from Matthew’s Gospel namely verses 24-27 from chapter 17 which reads as follows:
Matthew 17:24-27 (KJV) And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your Master pay tribute? 25 He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? 26 Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free? 27 Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to THE SEA, and CAST AN HOOK, and TAKE UP THE FISH THAT FIRST COMETH UP; and WHEN THOU HAST OPENED HIS MOUTH, thou shalt find A PIECE OF MONEY: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.
In this article I will show you how Yashua Messiah walked on ‘the sea’ in the Spiritual sense, that He demonstrated in the literal sense in Matthew 14:22-33. This means that the actual walking on the sea was purely a representation of what He taught His Learners (disciples) later in Matthew 17 above.
So let’s set the scene and explain what’s going on here:
First we have a Roman tax collector who approaches Peter with the question: Doth not your Master pay tribute? In other words, does your Master pay His taxes? Peter answers in the affirmative, that is, Yes! However, Yashua Messiah takes him on one side and asks him a pertinent question, namely: “What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children or of strangers?” Peter answers Him by saying: “strangers”. Yashua Messiah then responds with: “Then are the children free?” That is, are the children free from levy? The answer to this is a resounding YES!
This then beggars the question, who are these ‘children’, and who or what do they represent? Well Yashua Messiah tells you who they are, they are flesh and blood free men and free women – sentient beings, not slaves, or subjects, or citizens, or strangers, or serfs, or fictional persons (masks) (see link No. 1 below)
However, what does Yashua Messiah then go on to say: “Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to THE SEA”.
Now this could also be interpreted as His desire for His Learners to remain in honour, so that no one could point any fingers at them for being tax dodgers and not ‘paying-their-way’ under Roman Civil Law, hence He says: “Lest that we should offend them.”
Now this is where it gets interesting – VERY INTERESTING, for this is what Yashua Messiah says next:
“Go thou to THE SEA, and CAST AN HOOK, and TAKE UP THE FISH THAT FIRST COMETH UP; and WHEN THOU HAST OPENED HIS MOUTH, thou shalt find A PIECE OF MONEY: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.”
Now pay close attention, for He says: “Go thou to ‘the sea’.” So what is He saying? Easy, go to The Beast System, for ‘The Sea’ is The Beast System, and use it for your own advantageand cast an hook. By casting a hook He meant to ensnare them using THEIR system against them, but at the same time remaining in honour and meeting their tax demands.
He then says: “Take up the fish, that first commeth up” which means when they make their first demand upon you, you accept that as a presentment and a money offer, for in a National Bankruptcy there is no money, so any demand made upon you is the money. As this presentment is actually money you then “Accept it for Value” and return it as set-off for the alleged debt. This is the “piece of money” that Yashua Messiah is referring to in the fishes’ mouth.
What He is actually revealing here is for our age today, for the ‘fishes mouth’ is a direct reference to The VATICAN where they wear their Dagon Fish Hats.
In turn, this means you are requesting that The Vatican honours the National Bankruptcy, that they have orchestrated, and are in breach of by making dishonourable financial demands upon you as a flesh and blood sentient being – a free man and/or a free woman.
Moreover, the ‘piece-of-money’ in the fishes’ mouth could be better described as a specie-of-money or a financial instrument that commercial institutions use every day. Things like ‘promissory notes’ and/or ‘bills of exchange’.
The ‘money’ in your wallet is a ‘promissory note’ or a ‘promise-to-pay’, it’s just an I.O.U. = a debt instrument, a ‘minus instrument’, not a ‘plus instrument’. This means that every time we use these Pound Notes or Federal Reserve Notes we add to the National Debt, by default. Hence they use the word ‘purchase’, for to purchase means to use leverage in order to acquire things, rather than buy them. Truthfully speaking we cannot BUY anything with debt notes, but we can purchase things or leverage things into our possession, but we have not paid for them.
Everything financial today, due to the National Bankruptcy, is like looking in a mirror – it’s all back to front. The cash receipt you receive after having purchased something, is actually the REAL MONEY, that’s how crazy it has become. However, as I have already made plain we can use this craziness to our advantage and set-off our debts completely by accepting their presentments or offers for value and return them (see the A4V link below).
As before, if you have any questions feel free to ask, but no arguments, thank you.
So, 1) What is hell? 2) Where is hell? 3) Does hell exist? 4) Is hell just symbolism for something Spiritual? 5) Is hell this earth, in the here and now, under Satan’s rule? 6) Why is there a place called hell? 7) Who goes there, or who will be sent there? 8) Where does the word come from? 9) How many hells are there? 10) Is there a fiery hell? 11) Is it just the grave – a hole in the ground? 12) Is the Roman Catholic take on hell, true, that is, Purgatory? 13) Why all the confusion about this word hell? 14) Can we rely on the ‘experts’ for their interpretations of this word, even Mr Strong in his Concordance? 15) Why all the comical jokes and cartoons about, what would seem to be, such a serious subject?
There are over three quarters of a million words in the King James Bible, that’s 770,430 words to be precise, but with the word ‘hell’ mentioned only 54 times, in 54 verses, in the whole Bible, and that equates to a miniscule 0.007009073%. So what’s the big deal about this little place or concept of a place called hell? Hopefully all will be revealed in this series of articles.
Before I start, let’s deal with the etymology of the word ‘hell’ (that’s question No. 8 in my introduction list) in order to build our foundation, for it may turn out that just the use of this word ‘hell’ is itself a gross deception:
From The Online Etymology Dictionary:
Hell (noun):
“Also Hell, Old English hel, helle, “nether world, abode of the dead, infernal regions, place of torment for the wicked after death,” from Proto-Germanic *haljō “the underworld” (source also of Old Frisian helle, Old Saxon hellia, Dutch hel, Old Norse hel, German Hölle, Gothic halja “hell”). Literally “concealed place” (compare Old Norse hellir “cave, cavern”), from PIE root *kel- (1) “to cover, conceal, save.”
“The English word may be in part from Old Norse mythological Hel (from Proto-Germanic *halija “one who covers up or hides something”), in Norse mythology the name of Loki’s daughter who rules over the evil dead in Niflheim, the lowest of all worlds (nifl “mist”).A pagan concept and word fitted to a Christian idiom. In Middle English, also of the Limbus Patrum, place where the Patriarchs, Prophets, etc. awaited the Atonement. Used in the KJV for Old Testament Hebrew Sheol and New Testament Greek Hades, Gehenna. Used figuratively for “state of misery, any bad experience” at least since late 14c. As an expression of disgust, etc., first recorded 1670s.”
As we can see, we’re straight into (Greek) mythology with words like ‘nether world’, ‘infernal regions’ and/or ‘places of torment’ and, with some of it starting as late as the 14th century. This is not really that old when compared to Old Testament times, where we have the Hebrew word ‘sheol’ being the only word in use for describing ‘hell’. However, notice how it’s referred to as: “A pagan concept and word fitted to a Christian idiom.” This alone tells us much, in that ‘hell’, in and of itself, is already a loaded, pagan, religious agenda driven word. I wonder who could be responsible for such a thing? Much mocking sarcasm here from the author.
Archetypal Image of the Mythological Hades (Hell)
Another interesting point is the Norse ‘mythological’ reference to ‘Niflheim’, which seems to have an uncanny resemblance to the Biblical Hebrew word ‘Nephilim’. This, in turn, raises two more interesting points, in that we have 1) a reference to the Norse people, who were one of the Israelite Tribes, namely Benjamin, and who had this Scriptural knowledge of the ‘Nephilim’, albeit cloaked in Norse mythology. And 2) that they believed there was a place of imprisonment for these fallen spirit beings ‘Niflheim’ or ‘Nephilim’, again, as made plain in the Holy Scriptures:
Jude 6 (KJV) And the angels (‘Nephilim’) which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, He hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of The Great Day.
Now this says to me that the real meaning of the word ‘hell’ is the place of imprisonment of the demons (nephilim) where Yashua Messiah cast them at the time of The Flood, and where they remain to this day. Therefore this word ‘hell’ has been miss-used in English Bibles to describe something that it’s plainly not and the Hebrew word for ‘hell’, that is ‘sheol’, should have been incorporated into the English language, so that there was no ambiguity.
Moreover, let’s answer the first question second: What is hell from the Biblical perspective? If we go straight to the Old Testament we get the word ‘hell’ mentioned 31 times, and in every case it is translated from the Hebrew word ‘sheol’and from Strong’s Concordance we get this:
Hell–H7585 – shᵉʼôwl, sheh-ole’; or שְׁאֹל shᵉʼôl; – from H7592; hades or the world of the dead (as if a subterranean retreat), including its accessories and inmates:—grave, hell, pit.
H7592 – sha’al shaw-al’ or shael {shaw-ale’}; – a primitive root; to inquire; by implication, to request; by extension, to demand:–ask (counsel, on), beg, borrow, lay to charge, consult, demand, desire, X earnestly, enquire, + greet, obtain leave, lend, pray, request, require, + salute, X straitly, X surely, wish.
Now notice what’s going on here, for immediately we have gratuitous erroneous embellishments being added with the Greek word ‘hades’ being utilised and introduced. Hades’ is straight out of Greek mythology, so it doesn’t exist – ‘hades’ is a LIE! So why have silly duped and deluded people included it into their ‘Christian’ belief systems, and why has Mr Strong dropped this huge clanger? He says that H7592 refers to: “hades or a world of the dead – a subterranean retreat,” when it says no such thing – see definition H7592 above.
I will therefore return to one of my other introduction questions, question No. 14: Can we rely on the ‘experts’ for their interpretations of this word, even Mr Strong in his Concordance? So in this first instance can we rely upon Mr Strong with his inclusion of the Greek mythological word ‘hades’ into his definition? NO! is the resounding answer to that.
Getting back to The Truth and reality, the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that uses the word ‘hell’ is Deuteronomy 32:22 and I will copy it here:
Deuteronomy 32:22 (KJV) For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell (H7585), and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.
In this first usage of the word ‘hell’ it can only mean ‘pit’, as in a lowest point on the earth, when The Lord’s anger will be displayed with fire and shall burn even unto this low point on the earth. This is not a designated place and/or the realm of a permanent fiery place, as we are led to believe from the pages of the New Testament by blind guides, because in this case the whole earth is consumed by this fire.
Let’s now look at an associated word, ‘grave’, in order to get a better understanding of this word ‘hell’, and that word is used for the first time in Genesis 37:
Genesis 37:35 (KJV) And all his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted; and he said, For I will go down into the grave (H7585) unto my son mourning. Thus his father wept for him. (Brackets and emphasis mine)
Now pay special attention, for we have the same Hebrew word in play here, that is, ‘sheol’, for the word ‘grave’. So does this prove that ‘hell’ and the ‘grave’ are one and the same thing? You betcha.
OK, so we have now ascertained some interesting points: 1) There is no fiery hell mentioned in the Old Testament. 2) Hell ‘sheol’ in the Old Testament means only one thing – the GRAVE ‘sheol’ or a hole in the ground where dead people are buried, so where is this fiery hell and did it not apply to Old Testament people? Were they not evil sinners when they died? Was there any chance of redemption/salvation for them? NO! So what’s going on?
Moreover, if we take this subject a step further we need to discuss the reality of ‘death’, if only that it makes sense to do so. I say this because people in general have some very whacky ideas, not only about ‘hell’, but also about ‘death’. So let’s clarify this subject before we move on with our discussion about ‘hell’.
So what is death? Death is the cessation of life, kaput, fini, end of. The wages of sin! Life ceases totally and this is made very clear in the Holy Scriptures:
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV) For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.
Psalm 115:17 (KJV) The dead praise not the LORD, neither any that go down into silence.
Psalm 6:5 (KJV) For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?
There we have it, the dead know not anything, they go down into the ground in silence, a state of oblivion, or if you prefer, just as we were before we were born – nothingness – no breath of life – no existence – no conscious awareness of anything – NOTHING! If you’re hung up and deceived by the papist immortal soul nonsense, then see the first crucial link below.
Where were we? Ah yes, ‘hell’ and the Old Testament and what it proves for us, namely, that there is no fiery hell mentioned. Does this create a problem? Well it certainly looks like it, if we believe what we’re told by blind guides. The New Testament beckons.
In the New Testament the word ‘hell’ is mentioned 23 times and interestingly the Biblical number 23 means death, so that’s very appropriate, is it not? Just a little aside. In the New Testament the first verse in which we find the word ‘hell’ is in Matthew 5:22, but before we go there we need first to list all the hells of the NT, and their definitions – answer to question No. 9:
Hell – G1067 – geena gheh’-en-nah – of Hebrew origin (1516 and 2011); valley of (the son of) Hinnom; ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom), a valley of Jerusalem, used (figuratively) as a name for the place (or state) of everlasting punishment:–hell.
H1516 – gay’ gah’-ee or (shortened) gay {gah’-ee}; – probably (by transmutation) from the same root as 1466 (abbreviated); a gorge (from its lofty sides; hence, narrow, but not a gully or winter-torrent):–valley.
H2011 – Hinnom hin-nome’ probably of foreign origin; Hinnom, apparently a Jebusite – a Canaanite:–Hinnom.
Hell – G86 – haides hah’-dace – from 1 (as negative particle) and 1492; properly, unseen, i.e. “Hades” or the place (state) of departed souls:–grave, hell.
Hell – G5020 – tartarootar-tar-o’-o – from Tartaros (the deepest abyss of Hades); to incarcerate in eternal torment:–cast down to hell.
Now I find this conundrum very interesting, because after 3 BC with the arrival of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) on this earth, we now have three definitions for the word ‘hell’, not just one, as in the Old Testament. So what’s changed and what’s going on – has dying been remodelled or reformed? ROTFL! In the blink of an eye, are their now more places or destinations for dead people to go?
The spirit of this conundrum seems to have strong similarities to the mythical changed nature of God from being a Duality Godhead, that is, God with God (The Elohim) from before beginning, into a mythical triune godhead deity that doesn’t exist. Do I hear first and second century Hellenising religious gobbledegook alarm bells ringing here? Yes of course I do, for there can be no other explanation for the introduction of this mythical garbage into The Holy Scriptures. I speak here of the mythical non-existent ‘hades’.
However, on a more serious note, we do have Yashua Messiah introducing some severe warnings to rebellious wicked people, in general, and this includes those that will be cast into ‘outer darkness’. So not only do we have three types of ‘hell’ in play in the NT, but also this place called ‘outer darkness’. Which again is not mentioned in the Old Testament.
Darkness– G4655 – skotos skot’-os – from the base of 4639; shadiness, i.e. obscurity (literally or figuratively):–darkness.
Notice, that we have a place where certain people will end up and they will be alive, or will be conscious, but they will be kept in the background, in the shade so to speak, or in obscurity, so initially will have no part in The Kingdom of God – whether this is a permanent arrangement or not I don’t know. It could be a place where they have to learn some hard lessons. Some interpret this as being totally cut off from Yashua Messiah, when all the while in this life, they professed to be His followers, that is, these people here:
Matthew 7:21-23 (KJV) Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into The Kingdom of God; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 MANY will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Moreover, this makes plain that there is an after death place of punishment, not involving fire, where these punishments will be meted out. When I say after death, I mean post the first resurrection, for we all die the first death and we’re all placed in HELL, that is, ‘sheol’ or the grave. This is with one exception, for those alive at Yashua Messiah’s return will die and, in an instant, in the twinkling of an eye, be immediately resurrected to life, and this is answer to question No. 7:
Luke 12:45-49 (KJV) But and if that servant say in his heart, My Lord delayeth His coming; and shall begin to beat the menservants and maidens, and to eat and drink, and to be drunken; 46 The Lord of that servant will come in a day when he looketh not for Him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in sunder, and will appoint him his portion with the unbelievers. 47 And that servant, which knew his Lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more. 49 I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?
First of all, take special note of these verses, for we are not dealing primarily with the lost and unsaved but, rather, so-called Christians. These are believers, that is, alleged servants of Yashua Messiah who start thinking that Yashua Messiah is not coming, so they start beating up on their fellow men and women, in their employ, and over indulging in food and booze, on a regular basis. These ‘believers’ Yashua Messiah cuts off from entering into The Kingdom and demotes them to the status of the lost and unsaved and gives what they would have inherited to the lost and unsaved. However, this is not the end of them, for they will still be in the resurrection and be beaten with many stripes, whilst the lost and unsaved will be beaten with few stripes, because they knew no better.
Secondly, notice how the fire will be sent on the earth in general, not people being deposited into a fiery pit of hell. This fits in with The Lord’s words in Deuteronomy, which I quoted in the beginning and will fulfil His prophesy.
However, in spite of all this, ALL of MANkind will be resurrected, albeit not at the same time, but at two different times in the future – either in the First Resurrection, when Yashua Messiah returns, or in the Second Resurrection at the end of The Millennium, a thousand years later. See the second link below for the details.
1 Timothy 2:4 (MCV) Who will have (desires) all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of The Truth.
Returning to where I was above, another interesting point is that this term ‘outer darkness’ can only be found three times in the NT and all three are in Matthew’s Gospel. Does this mean that Matthew only was privy to this Truth, or is it written differently in the other Gospels? At this stage I don’t know, but I will by the time I have finished this study!
I will copy all three passages here:
Matthew 8:11-12 (MCV) And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in The Kingdom of God. 12 But the children of The Kingdom shall be cast out intoOUTER DARKNESS: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Now the above passage of Scripture throws up an interesting turn of phrase, namely ‘The Children of The Kingdom’. Who were these Children of The Kingdom (‘Sons of the Kingdom’ would be a better translation)? Well in Truth they were not really sons at all, for this is yet another dig by Yashua Messiah at the Pharisee Jews, who THOUGHT they were the sons of The Kingdom, when they were no such thing. However, He plays up to their delusional thinking and let’s them know, fair and square, what their destination will be, as opposed to the salvation granted to the faithful non-Jew Roman centurion – see Matthew 8:5-10.
Matthew 22:11-13 (KJV) And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: 12 And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. 13 Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into OUTER DARKNESS, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
In the above passage we have a reference to the saints dressed in the white robes of Revelation:
Revelation 6:11 (KJV) And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.
So the fella in this parable was obviously not dressed in metaphorical white robes, that is, he was not called and chosen by The Father, and he was not Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone, and not gifted with The Holy Spirit. So clearly he was not born of God, and yet obviously thought he was a Christian as many in the counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion do.
Let this be a warning to all you fakes out there who erroneously think you can accept a ‘Jesus’ as your saviour and not acknowledge your Fatherly call. Repent NOW whilst you still have the time. See link No. 4 below.
Matthew 25:26-30 (KJV) His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: 27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. 28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. 29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. 30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant intoOUTER DARKNESS: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
In the above passage we have a faithless Christian who couldn’t even be bothered to put his talents in a bank to gain some interest, so his punishment is outer darkness. Moreover, notice how this outer darkness place is not called hell, nor is there any mention of fire within it, and yet it is definitely a very unpleasant place of punishment, because those destined to go there weep and gnash their teeth in mental torment and agony. In other places it says, wailing and the gnashing of teeth – a pretty sorry state for these hapless people, to say the least. So let’s take a look at all the other places, seven in all, where this weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth occurs.
Likewise I will copy all seven passages here:
Matthew 13:40-42 (KJV) As therefore The Tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. 41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. See the third link below.
A crucial point to register here is that those burned with fire here, that is, The Jews, will be burned at the point of Yashua Messiah’s return at the end of this world, so we’re definitely not dealing with a permanent hell fire location or even a place of torment as offered to us by certain religious snake-oil salesmen. Here, the fire at the time Yashua Messiah’s return is called a ‘furnace’ of fire. Likewise in this passage:
Matthew 13:47–50 (KJV) Again, The Kingdom of Heaven (God) is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of EVERY KIND: 48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away. 49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Once more: “Again, The Kingdom of Heaven (God) is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of EVERY KIND:” “EVERY KIND” here is a direct reference to all the ethnic groups of hu-man kind and mankind across the world. Look what happens next: “Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good (mankind) into vessels, but cast the bad (inbred Canaanite hu-man kind) away.” These words are nothing to do with sinners or sinning in general, that is, bad people as opposed to good people, that is, sinners and non-sinners, for no one is good and all have fallen short so there are no non-sinners, apart from the saints. Not only that, but Yashua Messiah has dealt with ALL sin and it’s just a matter of calling the slumbering masses in the Second Resurrection, in order for them to be saved after they have been evaluated at the Great White Throne Tribunal.
These words, and their intended meaning, that is, the differing sea creatures, are just the same as those in the Parable of The Wheat and Tares, and we’re dealing with a separation of The Wheat from The Tares, and we know who (((The Tares))) are don’t we? Yes, the Serpent Seed Canaanites. Again see link No. 3 below for all the details.
Matthew 24:48-51 (KJV) But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; 49 And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken; 50 The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, 51 And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
This one I have covered above in Luke 12.
Luke 13:25-28 (KJV) When once The Master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and He shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are: 26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets. 27 But He shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. 28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in The Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.
Furthermore, what is the common denominator in all of these passages of Holy Scripture, apart from all the weeping, wailing and the gnashing of teeth? The secret is in the words of these verses and who they were/are aimed at: “when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in The Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.” Namely, The Pharisee Jews, who were the leaders of all the Jews and spoke for all the Jews. Today’s rabbis are direct descendants of those Pharisees. This means that this whole topic of ‘hell’ in the NT has taken on a distinctly Serpent Seed racial or ethnic flavour – hence the necessity of a fiery hell or fiery punishment instead of just the Old Testament ‘Sheol’ – the grave.
I think I will call that the end of Part 1.
HELL – Part 2
Before we move on with the ‘hell’ word, we also need to suss out the ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’ words, for not all is what it seems with these words ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’, and there are even more definitions of the word ‘fire’and ‘fiery’ than the word ‘hell’. Would you believe it!? I will list these as they appear in the New Testament, starting in Matthew:
Fire – G4442 – pur poor – a primary word; “fire” (literally or figuratively, specially, lightning):–fiery, fire.
Fire – G5457 – phos foce – from an obsolete phao (to shine or make manifest, especially by rays; compare 5316, 5346); luminousness (in the widest application, natural or artificial, abstract or concrete, literal or figurative):–fire, light.
Fire (of coals) – G439 – anthrakia anth-rak-ee-ah’ – from 440; a bed of burning coals:–fire of coals.
Fire – G4443 – pura poo-rah’ – from 4442; a fire (concretely):–fire.
Fire – G5394 – phlogizoflog-id’-zo – from 5395; to cause a blaze, i.e. ignite (figuratively, to inflame with passion):–set on fire.
Fire or Fiery – G4448 – puroopoo-ro’-o – from 4442; to kindle, i.e. (passively) to be ignited, glow (literally), be refined (by implication), or (figuratively) to be inflamed (with anger, grief, lust):–burn, fiery, be on fire, try.
Fire – G4447 – purinospoo’-ree-nos – from 4443; fiery, i.e. (by implication) flaming:–of fire.
Fiery – G4451 – purosispoo’-ro-sis – from 4448; ignition, i.e. (specially), smelting (figuratively, conflagration, calamity as a test):–burning, trial.
So there they are, all 8 definitions of the words ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’ being used in the New Testament, and all these definitions are found amongst the 83 uses of the word ‘fire’ in 79 verses. 32 times in the Four Gospels; 6 times in Acts; 9 times in Paul’s Epistles; 10 times in the General Epistles and 26 times in Revelation. Plus 3 uses of the word ‘fiery’ found in 3 verses.
Right, let’s have a closer look at these definitions and see what we can find. The first thing that sticks out is the number of times the first definition is used, that is, G4442 and it’s used 73 times out of the 83. But lets look at the lesser used definitions first, for that will reveal much for us when we come the more common G4442 definition. OK, first Scripture using G5457:
Mark 14:54 (KJV) And Peter followed Him afar off, even into the palace of the High Priest: and he sat with the servants, and warmed himself at the fire. (G5457)
In this verse we definitely have reference to an ordinary fire, that is, the sort we would have in our houses, if we had open fire places, or the sort of fire we would light at the bottom of our gardens for burning leaves and/or garden waste = a fire!
Luke 22:56 (KJV) But a certain maid beheld him as he sat by the fire, (G5457) and earnestly looked upon him, and said, This man was also with him.
Here we have confirmation of the same definition of an ordinary fire in Luke.
Elsewhere in John it is called a ‘fire of coals’:
John 18:18 (KJV) And the servants and officers stood there, who had made a fire (G439) of coals; for it was cold: and they warmed themselves: and Peter stood with them, and warmed himself.
But still it’s an ordinary fire as in G5457.
However, as soon as we get to the G4442 definition things change dramatically – here are some examples:
Matthew 3:11 (MCV) I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but He that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: He shall baptize you with the Holy Spirit, and with fire: (G4442)
That is no ordinary fire! Nor is this:
Revelation 10:1 (KJV) And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire: (G4442)
So are we dealing with symbolism here and/or things manifesting themselves as ‘fiery’ in order for Yashua Messiah to make a strong impression in our minds. You will have noticed that this G4442 definition also includes ‘lightning’ as part of its description, so it’s definitely not fire in the ordinary sense of fire.
In our next verse it takes on a new form and we also include the word ‘hell’ in with ‘fire’:
Matthew 5:22 (MCV) But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca = empty, (without a cause) shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, (without a cause) shall be in danger of hell (G1067 Gehenna)fire (G4442).
I have added the words ‘without a cause’ two more times because Paul called many people fools and I am sure he will not be in danger of Gehenna Fire.
Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
So what is this Gehenna Fire? I will repost from above:
Hell – G1067 – geena gheh’-en-nah – of Hebrew origin (1516 and 2011); valley of (the son of) Hinnom; ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom), a valley of Jerusalem, used (figuratively) as a name for the place (or state) of everlasting punishment:- -hell.
H1516 – gay’ gah’-ee or (shortened) gay {gah’-ee}; – probably (by transmutation) from the same root as 1466 (abbreviated); a gorge (from its lofty sides; hence, narrow, but not a gully or winter-torrent):–valley.
H2011 – Hinnom hin-nome’ probably of foreign origin; Hinnom, apparently a Jebusite:–Hinnom.
Gehenna Fire has its origins from the Hebrew Old Testament where it is not referred to as ‘hell’ but, rather, the Valley of Hinnom just outside Jerusalem. This is where the wicked Israelites passed their children through the fire as sacrifices to the Canaanite god Moloch or Molech. This wicked satanic practice, along with the more evil satanic idolatry that went with it, was the main reason for Yashua Messiah (God of The Old Testament) bringing the Assyrians and later the Babylonians to carry both Kingdoms off into captivity. The House of Israel from 740-725 BC and The House of Judah circa 585 BC.
Later on this valley became the dump for Jerusalem’s refuse where all the carcases from the sacrifices were deposited and left to either burn and/or rot.
However, we can see how this name is carried over into the New Testament through the Greek word Gehenna = ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom). ‘Ge’ meaning gorge or valley and Hinnom the name of a Jebusite, that is, a Canaanite. So Gehhena literally means the Gorge of Hinnom the Canaanite where garbage was continuously thrown and burned.
So how many people will be thrown literally into the Gorge of Hinnom? None is the answer to that, for the Gorge of Hinnom (Gehenna) is pure symbolism for unquenchable fire, that is, as long as more combustible stuff is added to it. Cease adding to it and it will go out and so it is with God’s unquenchable fire. It will burn for as long as is needed and once all The Tares and things that offend are consumed it will go out.
Matthew 3:12 (KJV) Whose fan is in His hand, and He will throughly purge His floor, and gather His wheat into the garner; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.
This verse, once more, is a parallel verse to that of The Wheat and The Tares and is an end time event when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth. John the Baptist is letting The Pharisees know, with no punches pulled, what their end will be in the resurrection and confirmed for us here:
Matthew 13:40 (KJV) As therefore The Tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
However, there is another Gehenna Fire that is everlasting and we see it illustrated here:
Matthew 18:8-9 (KJV) Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire (G4442). 9 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell (G1067 Gehenna) fire (G4442).
So what is this telling us? Well first of all we have this G4442 fire which is no ordinary fire, and that it’s everlasting, that is, it’s perpetual, from the past and into the future, never ending, eternal. So it sounds like this G4442 ‘fire’ has a Spiritual aura about it as well, a supernatural fire for want of a better description.
Is this ‘fire’ one and the same as the Lake of Fire as described in Revelation? I think so, for this message in Matthew 18 is being delivered to those under The Law. No one was born of God and indwelled by The Holy Spirit whilst Yashua Messiah was alive on this earth. Yes a minority of people, including the twelve learners, were being called, but none were saved until after Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection.
Moreover, Yashua Messiah made the comparison between the days before The Flood and these last days, except these last days will culminate in worldwide fire, not a worldwide flooding of water, but it will be worldwide, and there will be no hiding places for the wicked Jews and their shabbos goy servants – all will perish. The same for the False Prophet (The Pope) and all his sycophant slave followers, their satanic idolatrous religion will not save them.
Matthew 24:37-39 (MCV) But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be. 38 For as in the days that were before The Flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into The Ark, 39 And knew not until The Flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be.
So shall the coming of The Son of Man be, only this time with WORLDWIDE FIRE! not worldwide water:
2 Peter 3:6-7 (The Amplified Bible) Through which the world at that time was destroyed by being flooded with water. 7 But by His Word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly people.
Revelation 16:8 (KJV) And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire (G4442).
Moreover, the above event is not the Lake of Fire or Gehenna Fire, which I think are one and the same thing, for both are everlasting fire. The Lake of Fire also burns with the aid of brimstone. However, this brimstone seems to be a very special kind of brimstone and different from that which was discovered at the sites of Sodom and Gomorrah (85% pure Sulphur). We will therefore use Strong’s Concordance to assist us:
Old Testament:
H1614 – Brimstone – gophrîyth, gof-reeth’; – Probably feminine of H1613; properly, cypress-resin; by analogy, sulphur (as equally inflammable):—brimstone.
New Testament:
Brimstone – G2303 – theionthi’-on – probably neuter of 2304 (in its original sense of flashing); sulphur:–brimstone.
G2304 – theiosthi’-os from 2316; Godlike (neuter as noun, divinity): – divine, Godhead.
G2316 – theostheh’-os – of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with 3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively, a magistrate; by Hebraism, very:–X exceeding, God, god(-ly, -ward).
Do you now see how the G2303 brimstone is different from the H1614 Old Testament brimstone, for the G2303 brimstone has a very Godly or Divine dimension to it, and it is capable of flashing. Notice how this also fits in with the G4442 fire with its lightning. So we now have a fire that is no ordinary fire and a brimstone that is Godlike or Divine, hence it is able to burn for eternity.
Revelation 20:10 (MCV) And The Devil that deceived them was cast into The Lake of Fire (G4442) and Brimstone (G2303), where The Beast and The False Prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
Notice that this brimstone will not kill The Beast (The Rothschilds and their Jewish criminal empire) and The False Prophet (The Popes and their Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with their deceived and deluded followers), but it will torment them day and night forever. This is how we know that the two brimstones and fires are very different, for the Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone destroyed the cities completely, even the stone walls and buildings, such was the intensity of the heat. However, this Lake of Fire (G4442) and Brimstone does not destroy, but torments forever.
So who gets sent to this Gehenna Lake of Fire for eternal punishment. Well at this moment in time all we know for sure are the characters listed above, but no doubt there will be quite few Canaanite Serpent Seed people to keep them company.
So let’s recap what we have ascertained:
1) Hell is definitely the grave, or the Hebrew ‘Sheol’, the punishment for the wages of sin, as of Adam and Eve’s first transgression into which we are born – the fallen sinful condition and for which the penalty is a cessation of life. This is a crucial point that many-so called Christians forget, when they are busy foaming at the mouth over those that they accuse of rejecting Yashua Messiah, that is, the lost and unsaved in this life. We’re all punished by death for that first misdemeanour of our original parents, whether we’re saved or not – there is no escape from the punishment of death – the first death.
2) We ascertained what death is, and what it is not. At the same time we exposed the mythological ‘Hades’ concept and exposed it for the religious bunkum that it is.
3) We learned that: a) there are different types of ‘fire’ alluded to in the New Testament, and: b) that the end time fire, that will come upon the earth, in general, is not the Gehenna Fire of Revelation, that is, the Lake of Fire, which certain individuals will be thrown into.
4) We now know that there is a place, or a concept, or condition known as Outer Darkness, as mentioned in Matthew’s Gospel. However, it is NOT known or referred to as hell, nor as a fiery hell, as no fire is mentioned in relation to this place – if it is a place at all. It may just be a mental condition, an experience, or a state of being, whereby certain people are definitely conscious, and will be experiencing an existence cut off from Yashua Messiah’s presence. All this, when they that are cut off, were/are expecting to spend their eternal lives with Him. What a great shock this will be for these hapless people. Furthermore, is this a permanent arrangement for these wretched people? This point is not made known to us in the Holy Scriptures, apart from The Truth that God does NOT remain angry forever – that much we do know.
5) Along with the ‘fire’ we learned that there are two kinds of brimstone to accompany these two kinds of fire.
Finally, we come to The Second Resurrection and The Last Great Day which follows the end of The Millennium. The Millennium being the 1,000 year reign of Yashua Messiah on this earth as King of kings and Lord of lords. This event is otherwise known as The Great White Throne Judgement Tribunal, when all the rest of the dead will be evaluated. These are those that were not a part of the First Resurrection = the great majority of mankind, and I cover this topic in detail in my article entitled: “Why Are There Two Resurrections?” see link No. 2 below, and with that I’ll call it a cut!
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name,
Messenger Charles
1) What is Soul Sleep and Do The Holy Scriptures Disprove It? (The Myth of The Immortal Soul) – Part 1 of 2:
Is The Father Calling YOU to His Son, Yashua Messiah? 
