The Truth of John 1:1-4

There I was, having just started a new article about ‘God and Science’, which amazingly led me into this article, in as much that the new discoveries that I had made in my research for that article, forced me to drop everything regarding that article and focus on this one.

So what is The Truth of John 1:1-4? To answer that we must first copy and paste the relevant Holy Scriptures here, so that we can see all that’s going on in these verses and, rest assured, for here we will find yet more mistranslations and corruptions within The KJV, and which will be revealed for all to see:

John 1:1-4 (KJV) In the beginning was The Word, and The Word was with God, and The Word was God. 2 The same (Word) was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In Him was life; and The Life was The Light of men. (Brackets mine)

Now what is the mainstream Christian (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion’s) teaching regarding these verses? Answer: They think it proves their mickey mouse Trinity, when it does no such thing. Perhaps, what I should have said, is what was my understanding of these verses? for I was once just as deceived as they are on this crucial passage of Holy Scripture.

Moreover, as we progress, we’ll discover some strong similarities with my unravelling of The Trinity deception (see link No. 1 below). We will also learn some more crucial Truth to support Yashua Messiah’s teaching re The Duality Godhead, and The Truth that The Holy Spirit is an ‘it’ and not a ‘he’ or a ‘him’, that is, the LIVING POWER or LIVING FORCE of The Godhead, so not a personage of a non-existent Trinity.

OK, so let’s now write out the Greek Transliteral version of this same passage of Holy Scripture to firm up this Truth:

John 1:1-4 (Greek Transliteral) In original was The Saying and The Saying was TOWARD The God(Placer) and The God(Placer) was The Saying. 2 This was in original TOWARD The God(Placer) 3 All through IT became and apart from IT became not yet one which has become 4 in IT Life was and The Life was The Light of men.

In the beginning, here termed the original, was The Saying and The Saying was TOWARD God(placer) that is, facing The Godhead or was/is near to The Godhead, so we’re dealing with something that was very close to The Godhead and yet it says The Godhead was The Saying. How does this work? Read on:

Notice verse three: All things through IT came into being and apart from IT not one thing came into being. So what does this mean, when I have ALWAYS believed that The Word or The Saying or The Logos was Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), but how can that be? for He is definitely not an IT!! He is a Spiritual Being, so what is this IT? Answer: It’s The Holy Spirit which is The Saying or The Word or The Logos which is the LIVING POWER or LIVING FORCE of The Godhead and brings things into being through ITS immense supernatural POWER or FORCE. As confirmed for us here:

All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a Force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this Force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.

— Professor Max Planck, the father of quantum physics.

An Image of The Atom

Here we have explained to us, in scientific terminology, The Holy Spirit in ACTION and how IT brings the particles of the atom, by virtue of vibrations, and through those vibrations IT holds the particles of the atom together. Now what are these vibrations? Easy, they are the vibrations of The Sayings and/or the vibrations of the spoken Word of the Godhead. This is confirmed for us in Psalms:

Psalms 33:6 (KJV) By The Word (The Saying – vibrations) of The Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by The Breath of His mouth. (Brackets mine)

We then have the term: ‘The Breath of His mouth’. What is this a direct reference to? Again, that’s easy:

John 20:21-22 (MCV) Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. 22 And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye The Holy Spirit:

So from and through Yashua Messiah’s breath the Twelve Learners received the gift of the Holy Spirit and from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

Old Testament Hebrew:

H7307 – Spirit – רוּחrûwach, roo’-akh; – from H7306; wind; by resemblance breath, i.e. a sensible (or even violent) exhalation; figuratively, life, anger, unsubstantiality; by extension, a region of the sky; by resemblance spirit, but only of a rational being (including its expression and functions):—air, anger, blast, breath, × cool, courage, mind, × quarter, × side, spirit(-ual), tempest, × vain, (whirl-) wind(-y).

New Testament Greek:

G4151 – Spirit/Ghostπνεῦμα pneûma, pnyoo’-mah; – from G4154; a current of air, i.e. breath (blast) or a breeze; by analogy or figuratively, a spirit, i.e. (human) the rational soul, (by implication) vital principle, mental disposition, etc., or (superhuman) an angel, demon, or (divine) God, Christ’s spirit, the Holy Spirit:—ghost, life, spirit(-ual, -ually), mind. Compare G5590.

OK, so far so good, but what of this statement in John 1:2 The same (Word) or same (Saying) was in the beginning with God. Quite simply, the Saying was toward God or IT was close to God or IT was facing God, but IT was never God, for IT, that is, Yashua Messiah’s Saying, was His POWER or His ‘breath’ which carried the Godhead’s Sayings and actioned those same sayings.

Numbers 14:35 (KJV) I The Lord have said (The Saying), I will surely do it unto all this evil congregation, that are gathered together against me: in this wilderness they shall be consumed, and there they shall die.

Isaiah 14:24 (KJV) The Lord of hosts hath sworn, saying (The Saying), Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand:

Ezekiel 24:14 (KJV) I The Lord have spoken it (The Saying): it shall come to pass, and I will do it; I will not go back, neither will I spare, neither will I repent; according to thy ways, and according to thy doings, shall they judge thee, saith the Lord God.

Next we have verse 4: In Him was life; and The Life was The Light of men, and once again from the Greek Transliteral verse 4: in IT Life was and The Life was The Light of men.

Notice how this PROVES that The Holy Spirit is an IT and is LIFE, that is, a LIVING FORCE which gives Life to all things. So now we know that The Holy Spirit is The Word (The Saying) and goes forth from The Father and from Yashua Messiah in order to exercise Their will throughout Their Creation.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing The Trinity Lie:

The Vile Satanic Curse Of RELIGION….

.And a word that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was never recorded as having uttered!

Now here’s a thing, a HUGE THING. The WHOLE WORLD, to a greater extent, has gone after one religion or another, and if we were to add up all those people that do have a religion, of one kind or another, I bet those left would only amount to a very small minority – which would also include followers of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Even those who profess to be atheists worship other things in place of an organised religion or deity, namely themselves in the mirror (narcissists), the creation, that is, the green eco-nutters (Extinction Rebellion morons), their families, (yes there is such a thing as ‘family worship’), their pets, wealth, careers, their cars, their boats, sun-worshipping holidays, science, technology, art, music, or even football teams. All of these things, however we cut it, can be, and are, objects of their RELIGION, that is, idolatry and, whether they like to hear it or not. So you see, dear people, in Truth there is NO ESCAPE from RELIGION – it’s all enveloping and encompassing and across the whole world.

However the reason for this article is not for the atheist lost and unsaved, although they are welcome to read and learn from it, IF the Father is calling them. No, the reason for this article is to rebuke and admonish in agape love, those who profess to be Christians, and yet waste their time and money on the wretched pursuit of religion, delusionally thinking that they are doing Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) will.

And now for the proof and evidence from The Holy Scriptures that show us that ALL RELIGION is of Satan the Devil and not of God. But before I do that here is a foundational aside: the word ‘RELIGION’ is derived from the multi-faceted demon called LEGION, whom Yashua Messiah cast into The Gadarene Swine. All the swine died as they plunged over the cliff edge, but LEGION did not, for spirits cannot die. This means that LEGION had a make-over and re-invented himself as RE-LEGION, and there you have it = the multi-faceted evil spirit (demon) that pervades ALL RELIGIONS, whether it be Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Bahaism, Confucianism and, of course, not forgetting the most important one, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion which at the moment doesn’t have an ‘ism’. Perhaps I should invent one! LOL

OK, here are ALL the verses from the New Testament that mention the word RELIGION, followed by the word RELIGIOUS, and you will immediately notice that NONE OF THEM are from the Four Gospels, which means Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He instruct His learners in the ways of RELIGION for He did not have a RELIGION – GOD HAS NO RELIGION:

Acts 26:5 (KJV) Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our RELIGION (G2356) I lived a Pharisee.

In this first offering we get an inkling of what RELIGION really is, that is, ‘a straitest sect’, as Paul accurately calls it, so from this we can immediately deduce that this is a very legalistic set up, and, of course, we already know that, because we know that The Serpent Seed Pharisee Jews were satanic Judaisers and very ritualistic. This means they dotted every ‘i’ and crossed every ‘t’ of The Mosaic Law in an attempt to pathetically save themselves. This, in turn, resulted in Yashua Messiah mocking them with the remark: “The ‘healthy’ have no need of The Physician!”

So straight off, the first example of the word RELIGION is a negative one.

Galatians 1:13 (KJV) For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454), how that beyond measure I persecuted The Church of God, and wasted it:

In this verse, our first negative verse above is confirmed for us once again by Paul with an even more negative example. Here he beefs it up by calling it the (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION and how, in the name of that VILE SATANIC RELIGION, he persecuted the Church of God and wasted it.

‘Wasted’ here meaning to destroy and overthrow or to make havock, and from Strong’s Concordance we get:

Wasted – G4199: πορθέω πορθέω: imperfect ἐπόρθουν; 1 aorist participle πορθήσας; (πέρθω, πεπορθα, to lay waste); from Homer down; to destroy, to overthrow (R. V. uniformly to make havock): τινα, Acts 9:21; τήν ἐκκλησίαν, Galatians 1:13; τήν πίστιν, ibid. 23.

So clearly we can now see what an evil thing the Jews’ RELIGION is, that is, Judaism, and please keep this in mind as we analyse the three remaining verses.

Galatians 1:14 (KJV) And profited in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454) above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

Here Paul reveals how he ‘profited’ or progressed in The (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION, and left his contemporaries way behind, so zealous was he for this evil satanic cult and its dogma. We MUST fully understand that Saul was a ruthless cold blooded murderer before Yashua Messiah gave him the shock of his life on the road to Damascus.

Next, we have two very interesting verses that seem to go against everything Paul has revealed and taught us about his past involvement with RELIGION, and how evil it was/is. We therefore have what some misguided people use as an example of sending up RELIGION, and let’s be clear, for these are the ONLY VERSES in the whole Bible that appear to paint RELIGION in a positive light, but do they?

In order to answer this question we will need Strong’s Concordance once more for there are several Greek words at play here. The first is G2356 and the second is G2454 and here are the definitions:

Religion – G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah; – from a derivative of G2357; ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.

Religion – G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; from G2450; “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.

Religion – G2357threskos thrace’-kos probably – from the base of 2360; ceremonious in worship (as demonstrative), i.e. pious:–religious.

Religion – G2450Ioudaizo ee-oo-dah-id’-zo from 2453; to become a Judaean, i.e. “Judaize”:– live as the Jews.

James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain.

James 1:27 (KJV) PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

Right, now we get down to some very devious and deceptive nonsense going on here, for in Acts 26:5 we get the G2356 reference to Paul speaking of his previous religious life which is exactly the same religion as mentioned in Galatians 1:13-14 and yet the translators have given it a new number, that is, G2454. So what’s going on? Has Paul’s past religion changed from being, and I quote: G2356 ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.” to G2454 “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.” Or are they just one and the same, but dressed up differently in the G2356 definition.

Do you see what’s happening here? With the use of G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah they are attempting to paint Paul’s old religion in a benign oh so loving, compassionate and kind, kind of way, that is, people who generally wouldn’t hurt a fly, and then with the use of the next word: G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; we’re then dealing with murdering psychopaths namely, Saul, and his fellow Pharisee criminals, and yet we’re definitely talking about the same RELIGION. The irony here being that the KJV translators have got this right by using the word RELIGION for both Greek words.

OK, so it looks like a load of shenanigans has taken place with the Greek manuscripts, proving that they, too, are liable to little corruptions, as with Matthew 28-19, which I unravelled in my article: “Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? – Part 1” (See link No. 1 below).

So let’s now move on to James and analyse what he’s up to and I’ll repost the two troublesome verses below:

James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain 27 PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

So straight away we have use of that deceptive G2356 definition which, as we have already ascertained really means the same as G2454 – Saul’s and the Pharisee Jews’ satanic Judaising religion. But why is James rambling on about religion anyway? Well it’s obvious, isn’t it? Look at the opening statement: If any man among you seem to be religious.” What does he mean by this remark? Let’s copy and paste the Concordant Literal Version for a better understanding:

James 1:26-27 (CLV) If anyone is seeming to be a ritualist, not bridling his tongue, but seducing his heart, the ritual of this one is vain, 27 for ritual clean and undefiled with God the Father is this: to be visiting the bereaved and widowed in their affliction, to be keeping oneself unspotted from the world.”

Why would anyone in the Church of God be hanging on to old religious ritualistic customs, that is, the ways of the world? When all of this was done away, with Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection. Why would this wretch want to be seen as someone who was still into meaningless rituals and religion?

So here’s a further pertinent question or two: 1) Since when did visiting the bereaved and widowed become ritualistic or religious? Answer: It never has. 2) In what way is visiting the bereaved and widowed a ritualistic or religious activity? Answer: It’s not, nor has it ever been, so what’s James on about?

Easy, he’s mocking the whole idea sarcastically. James 1:26-27 is all about exposing this fraud (whoever he or she might be) and possibly doesn’t exist at all, but he’s using this possible scenario, as an example, so that anyone within his congregation that still fancies himself as religious or hankers after the old Pharisaical ways, had better shape up and get with the New Covenant and repent of his old Pharisaical Religious ways or else. (See link No.2 below)

So there we have it, RELIGION fully revealed and exposed from The Holy Scriptures for the fraud that it is, and NOW is the time for ALL true Christians to set themselves free from it:

Revelation 18:4 (KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse and Baptism Is Not Into The Trinity:

Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity. Eastern (Russian and Greek) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity. Protestantism is NOT Christianity.

2. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 3

For parts 1 and 2 see links 4 and 5 below.

Would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) stand at the window with the Pope at the Vatican sharing the adulation? As I wrote this I had to have a little laugh, just because of the whole farcical idea, it is just so hilariously preposterous and ridiculous – I think I will consider a new career as a comedian – only joking of course!

Can you imagine the above scenario? Well perhaps you can and, if you can, here is another question for you: Which Pope would it be? ‘cos there’s been an estimated 266 of ‘em, which includes the even more hilarious idea that Peter The Messenger (apostle) was the first one, ROTFL! (see link No. 1 below). So which one would share this platform – the one who drew the shortest straw? Oh boy, this stuff just cracks me up. Let’s face it, they’re all going to be in heaven aren’t they? Well no, they won’t, as no hu-man being, or man or woman of mankind is going to heaven, but that’s another story for another article. (See link No. 2 below)

However, what we need to ask ourselves is this: where in the Holy Scriptures does it say that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) needs a leading representative on earth to stand on a platform anywhere on His behalf? Nowhere!! Yashua Messiah has us – His Elect, those called and chosen by The Father to His Son, The Saints, and He needs no one else. We are The Ecclesia, not some snake in the grass appointee of other snakes in the grass, that is, the demonic creatures and/or counterfeiters of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

OK, so let’s stop and think about this, what entities or bodies have representatives? Governments, corporations and businesses do and, of course, low and behold, we are dealing with the largest government/corporation on this earth – the Babylonian Mystery Religion Corporation, with Catholicism in the west and Orthodoxy in the east. Not forgetting, of course, all their Protestant denominational subsidiaries – the demon-inations. I said this false effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ was big business, didn’t I? and here is the evidence. Not only that, but some of them with Swiss Bank accounts too, to keep things neat, tidy and oh so very unaccountable and secretive. I wonder if Peter and the other Messengers had Swiss bank accounts? Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle.

Here is the Truth, when Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) returns to this earth He is going to take His throne. A throne that will be given to Him by His Father, but which throne is that and where will it be located?And take note, for He will not be sharing His Throne with anyone else. In turn, He will give thrones to the Twelve Messengers (Apostles) for they will judge the Twelve Tribes of Israel….

Matthew 19:28 (MCV) And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration (through being born again) and whenever the Son of man shall sit in The Throne of His Glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging (evaluating) The Twelve Tribes of Israel.

….but He will sit alone upon His Throne, a Throne above all others here on this earth, not in heaven. Only the Father’s Throne is in heaven.

Luke 22:30 (MCV) That ye may eat and drink at my table in my Kingdom, and sit on thrones judging (evaluating) The Twelve Tribes of Israel.

Jeremiah 14:21 (KJV) Do not abhor us, for thy name’s sake, do not disgrace The Throne of Thy Glory: remember, break not thy covenant with us.

Matthew 25:31 (KJV) When the Son of man shall come in His Glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then shall He sit upon The Throne of His Glory:

Luke 1:32 (KJV) He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of The Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto Him The Throne of His father David:

Jeremiah 3:17 (KJV) At that time they shall call Jerusalem The Throne of the LORD; and all the nations shall be gathered unto it, to the name of the LORD, to Jerusalem: neither shall they walk any more after the imagination of their evil heart.

By the sound of these Holy Scriptures they seem to be alluding to the fact that The Throne already exists on earth and, of course, it does.It is King David’s throne and it is The Throne of Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) glory. Notice, there is no mention here of a ‘throne resurrection’, first, that is, the creation of a new throne, before The Lord Jesus takes it as His own, so this is more evidence that this throne already exists on earth. Notice too, it is not in Rome and it is not a counterfeit religious throne, but a true Royal Monarchical throne, a Kingly throne with a line directly back to King David.

Jeremiah 33:17 (KJV) For thus saith the LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon The Throne of the House of Israel;

The word ‘want’ here means ‘cut off’, so King David will never be cut off from a man (or woman), that is, a successor by Divine right, through the Royal blood line of Judah (Pharez and Zarah), to sit upon his throne. This Royal Throne is occupied to this day by a genuine Royal Monarch – God’s Anointed, not a scam-mongering fraud and impostor who heads up a money making, money laundering cult or global corporation in Babylon (Rome). Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) will be King of kings and Lord of lords, not a king of religious blaspheming phonys, illegitimates and impostors.

So where is this Royal Monarchical throne that can trace its beginnings back to King David, located? That very same throne that Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) will take upon His return to this earth? There is only one place it can be and that is Great Britain – True Israel. (See link No. 3 below).

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II sits on King David’s’s throne and if she is still alive when Yashua Messiah returns she will give it up to Yashua Messiah. She, like her ancestors, knows that she is God’s anointed and should be ruling by Divine right, but that arrangement came to an end in 1649 with the assassination of King Charles I by the Jews. Hence, even in its neutered constitutional form, it is a throne that is continually under threat of extinction, from The Rothschild Jews also, who were behind the assassination of The Czar and his beautiful family in Russia. All this, plus the increasing threat of treacherous republicanism – even from her own disloyal government ministers who are just appointees of The Rothschilds. This threat is just another identifying sign that points to Yashua Messiah’s imminent return to rescue and secure The Throne of His Glory for all eternity.

So here is that question again, only this time, I have put the false Jesus into the picture. So would this effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ share a platform with the Pope(s) in order to get some adulation? Of course he would, he is metaphorically in their employ as their marketing tool – their flunky and their lackey. To prove it, they carry around crucifixes with a little statue of their wimp ‘Jesus’ dead on a cross, and that’s where they want him, DEAD and lifeless, and not raised from the dead, all powerful, ready and waiting to return to this earth in POWER AND GLORY.

Think about it, with His all powerful arrival and return to this earth they will be defunct, surplus to requirements, unemployable, USELESS!!! Fit only for road sweeping or cleaning toilets, if that!

Moreover, what about Yashua Messiah, the real Lord Jesus Christ, what will He be doing while this wimp impostor is sharing a platform in the Vatican? He will be very busy crushing and pulverising all those representations of their religious idolatry into chaff on His worldwide threshing floor. The remains of this threshing, that is, the chaff, will immediately be carried away on the wind never to be seen nor heard of again – gone forever – Hallelujah!!

Daniel 2:35 (MCV) Then was the iron (Rome), the clay (The Jews), the brass (Ancient Greece), the silver (Persia), and the gold (Babylon), broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the Stone that smote the image (and all other images) became a Great Mountain (Great Kingdom), and filled the whole earth.

In Daniel 2:35 we can see the demise of the Babylonian image of King Nebuchadnezzar, (it’s all about images folks – false images) this image being the representation of five Satanic empires (if we include The Jew’s Money Empire). These empires stretch through time from King Nebuchadnezzar unto this day, that is, Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome + Clay. All religion is represented by Satan’s Babylonian Mystery Religion which The Stone – the Chief Cornerstone – Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) destroys completely and utterly when He returns to this earth. The smashed and pulverised remains of this image being like chaff carried away on the wind. The Stone cut without hands – Jesus Christ, notice, becomes a great mountain metaphor for a Great Kingdom that fills the whole earth. Here we can see Yashua Messiah (the real Lord Jesus Christ) in action – The Powerful ‘He-man’ Jesus Christ, not some feeble ineffectual pathetic effeminate wimp with long hair.

I will be publishing a full length series of articles on Nebuchadnezzar’s image very soon. This Biblical prophecy is crucial in identifying the Whore of Babylon which rides The Beast of Revelation – The Rothschild’s Worldwide Money Empire.

OK, that’s about it for this article, next up, that emotive issue of slavery (correct name: “Involuntary Servitude”), well it is for some and, of course, the effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ loves this subject. In the meantime, have no fear, for all will be revealed, and so will Yashua Messiah’s view on this, the most favoured hand wringing subject of wretched, do-gooding, guilt ladened, self-flagellating, liberal thinking ‘men’. A more pathetic group of people you would be hard pressed to find; in fact, on reflection, I am sure you would not find a more wretched and pathetic group of people – anywhere!!

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Was Peter The First Pope – The Truth of Matthew 16 Revealed:

2. Are Christians Going To Heaven?:

3. The True Israelites are White Europeans, Jews Admit It, Blacks Deny and Hate It!:

https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-true-israelites-are-white-europeans-jews-admit-it-blacks-deny-and-hate-it_YV623JNaZ7Gy5IK.html

4. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? Part 1:

5. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 2:

Was Yahsua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 2

For Part 1 please see link No. 4 below.

Before I press on with answering the questions I listed in Part 1, I will quote some Scriptures that are very much linked to this subject of the false images of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). In fact The Lord warns us about a time when these deceivers will come on the world scene and lead many, or multitudes, astray. We are talking big numbers here, not just a few, and these deceivers were already at it before the end of the first century.

Matthew 24:5 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Mark 13:6 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Luke 21:8 (MCV) And He said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

A great number will come in The Lord’s name,but how will they come? Why, with all their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious paraphernalia, (see link No. 1 below) that’s how. With all their self aggrandising ‘church’ buildings, their love of money, their fancy robes, their silly Dagon fish hats, and even sillier meaningless relics, their insulting icons, statues, paintings, and all accompanied with their non-gospel of the bad news, or salvation by works, the whole satanic marketing package.

Do not be deceived, this is big business – religious big business and they dress up for the part too. Furthermore, do not be deceived by those who will attempt to explain the above verses away. They will do this by saying that The Lord was warning us only about those people who would say they “actually are Jesus Christ”, that is, impostors, and those who would be deranged and unhinged. Yes, there will be examples of these weird whacky people too, including the Papacy. Let’s not forget, Popes believe they stand in the place of Christ, and they are false Christs, but they, fortunately, will only be very few in numbers. To support The Truth and expose their false interpretations of these verses we only have to check out the Greek rendering:

Matthew 24:5 (Greek Transliteral) Many shall be coming on the name of me saying that I am and many they shall be straying.

Here we can see that many will be coming saying that ‘Christ is’ or ‘preaching a Christ’, a false Christ and not saying that they actually are Christ.

OK, on with those questions.

Would Jesus Christ have stood up for your human rights? Now I was going to answer this question here, but because the topic invites such a large amount of information to reveal it for what it is, it will need an article all of its own, so I will press on with next question.

Would Jesus Christ have given His blessing on multiculturalism? Before I continue with answering this question, we first need to know what it is, just what, exactly, is multiculturalism? Well it’s more than one culture isn’t it? No it isn’t and that’s the demonic lie and deceptiveness built into this word and in turn in its manipulative use. A person can be multicultural, that is, able to mix in easily and adapt to several cultures and that would be down to that man or woman’s individual desire, tastes, likes and societal abilities, but do we all have that desire and those abilities? NO!

Furthermore, is it a sin not to have them? No. So if being a multiculturalist is not multiculturalism, what is multiculturalism!? Multiculturalism is an unachievable societal system invented and orchestrated by the Canaanite Jews, those in real authority, who are now dictating, via their political puppets, how we ought to behave and live. This is a draconian, Pharisaical, legalistic, self-righteous, pseudo religious system of governance. Instead of being free to decide whether or not we want to be multicultural, we are now told we must be multicultural, this is multiculturalism. If we have no desire to be multicultural we are then branded as bigots, haters, racists, xenophobes, and even heretics. Now there is only one outcome to the attempted enforcement of this issue = VIOLENCE, and that is just what (((those))) in power want, so that they can introduce Martial Law.

Moreover, it will, and already does involve state control and manipulation over your lives. How? How, because we, in the west, now live in democracies or better, DeMon-oCracies which in abbreviated form spells D.M.C. or Domination, Manipulation and Control. You think you are free under this system, but in reality you are deceived and conned and are thereby enslaved and held captive to it. The Truth is, we in the west live in bondage to a system that controls, manipulates and enslaves us and the real power-brokers are the heads of the global corporations, including the Vatican, and the global bankers (The Rothschild Banking Cartel) more commonly known as the New World Order or The Deep State. Politicians are just cloned lackeys, ‘jokers’, puppets and front men for these real sources of power. Whatever these power-broker people say, goes and there are no arguments.

This multiculturalism thing is a classic example of how D.M.C. works. All (((they))) do (they, as already described, being the real authorities (The Jews) behind the politicians) is deliberately create an unworkable societal mould. They then make those, that is, the majority, who wish to have no part in multiculturalism feel guilty (a bogus guilt created by them for manipulative purposes), when there is no reason to feel guilty at all. Now they do this through subtle, and at times not so subtle, propaganda, which amounts to a form of guilt layering, emotional blackmail and through it, coercion. This is victimisation through false accusations of the majority or host nation culture, and is achieved by mental harassment, via the media (also under their control). The host nation’s culture, who have done nothing wrong by wanting to maintain and keep their own culture intact, are made to feel guilty and responsible, via this blatant emotional manipulation, for not ‘doing more’ for those whose cultures are not their own. All this, when all the while it should be the responsibility of those with the foreign cultures to adapt to the host nation’s culture – not the other way round. This, in a world of true justice would not be unreasonable.

The evil wickedness of multiculturalism then creates animosity, bitterness, resentfulness and hatred between peoples and drives a wedge between the people of different cultures, instead of helping them assimilate into the host nation’s culture – not that this is possible for it clearly isn’t. This is how we end up with ghettos.

What we, the indigenous population or host culture are supposed to do, in a practical sense, to bring about this multicultural society no one has yet explained to any of us, nor are they likely to – hence the Commie traitor Merkel has begrudgingly admitted that it is a failure. This is because, in reality, there is nothing we can do and they, the criminal orchestrators, know it, it has all been done deliberately to cause unrest and division. This though, is not the only issue, as far these authority figures are concerned. All of this is of no matter to them, because all they are interested in is the deliberate brow beating and victimisation of their fellow countrymen. This is massive treachery on a national scale, it is nothing but treason and do not be surprised by it. This is not a fanciful idea; it is the Truth and spelled out quite clearly in the Holy Scriptures:

2 Timothy 3:1 (MCV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, (narcissistic politicians obsessed with their own images and their imaginary ‘legacies’, and nothing else) covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, (not listening to wise counsel from their parents and elders) unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection (no compassion), truce-breakers, (breakers of treaties) false accusers, incontinent, (without self control) fierce, (savage) despisers of those that are good, (passing legislation that is a blasphemy to God and an affront to the Godly) 4 Traitors, (the selling out and betrayal of their own people and nation) heady (rash and impetuous), high-minded, (inflated with conceit) lovers of pleasures (debauched and licentious) more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof (followers of and believers in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and not Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ): from such turn away.

As you read the above passage of Scripture, just think of how many of these labels you could easily hang around the necks of your ‘church’ leaders and criminal political ‘leaders’!!??

I have digressed a little above, so getting back to the thread again here is another Truth. ‘Isms’ divide and segregate, they never unite. An ‘ism’ and ‘isms’ tend mostly to be divisive and negative, elitist or they are cultish and clannish in make up. They invariably drive a wedge through societies and automatically create an ‘us and them’ arrangement. Here are some examples: Bolshevism, Communism, Socialism, Cultural Jew Marxism, Conservatism, Judaism, Islamism, Methodism, Protestantism, Catholicism, Liberalism, Elitism, Hinduism and Multiculturalism. There are many more that could be added to this list, but I’m sure you get the picture. ‘Isms’ antagonise, divide and cause jealousy; hate and friction, they do not unite and bring peace, only a God given new heart in men and freedom under Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) Grace can do that.

Having said all that, would Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) give His blessing on multiculturalism? I think I have already answered that one, don’t you? A better question would be: What has The Light and/or The Way got to do with darkness or the evil manipulative treacherous schemes of men? Answer: NOTHING!

Again, here’s the question we have to ask: Would the effeminate long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ bless multiculturalism? Of course he would, he already does through all those mainstream ‘Christians’ of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who buy into multiculturalism think there is nothing wrong with it. The Jewish Cultural Marxist Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby being a perfect example. He and they love multiculturalism; they actually think it is part and parcel of The Kingdom of God being built by them now, here on this earth.

So here we have so called Christians absorbing into their beliefs the misguided evil ideas of carnal minded unbelieving hu-man beings = ATHEISTS! – unbelievable! Their delusion is complete. Many of these so called Christians call themselves ‘Progressive Christians’. (See link Nos. 1 and 2 below)

Re Justin Welby I think you will find via his website that what I have said regarding his faith in multiculturalism is true. Welby as a worldly contaminated Laodicean and a firm believer in the long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ he would be, wouldn’t he, so no surprises there then?

No surprises perhaps, but there may be some surprises in the following articles, so please stay with me on this important exposure of their false image based religious scam – The Cainite-Judeo-Christain Religion.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

2. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

3. Progressive or Libertine Christianity Versus Fundamental Christianity:

4. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp Part 1:?

Are You Fearful of Being Born of God (Born Again)?

And does the whole idea frighten the life out of you, if so, why? Yashua Messiah (Our Lord Jesus Christ) said these very words:

John 3:3 (KJV) Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot see The Kingdom of God. (Emphasis mine)

The words ‘born again’ are not really an accurate translation of the original Greek MSS. In one of my Interlinear Greek/English New Testaments it states it as “born from above” and in the other an even better translation “receives birth from above.” In 1 John 3:9 it describes it more directly as being ‘born of God’:

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His Seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Notice, too, that once we’re born of God we become sinless in His sight – perfect. So as we can see, we are talking about a superlative gift from God and we are talking about a re-birth – a brand new start – a new life – as a new man or new woman – a new creation, and the beginning of a new life that will last for all eternity. A life free from all real worries and insecurities that we have known in the past. Yes, life can, and will, continue to be difficult with all its trials and tribulations, but after being born of God (born again) all these difficulties of life will be seen in a different Light; a new Light – His Light. This is literally a new beginning for any and all of us fortunate enough to be chosen for this high calling, for a calling is what it is:

John 6:44 (KJV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day. (Brackets mine)

John 6:65 (KJV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

1 Corinthians 1:26-28 (MCV) For ye see your CALLING, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are CALLED: 27 But God hath CHOSEN the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath CHOSEN the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God CHOSEN, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought (zero) things that are:

Moreover, to receive this “birth from God” is a most wondrous and uplifting thing, the most wondrous thing that can happen to a man or woman, and is, quite plainly, a miracle. Please note, too, that we do not initiate this miracle, it has nothing to do with us; the Father God calls and we answer, and that’s it.

Always be wary of people who say they have “accepted Jesus Christ” (not possible) or they have “found Jesus Christ.” (not possible) or “made a decision for Christ.” (Also not possible, see link No. 1 below)

Let us now return to the story in John 3; Nicodemus, a Pharisee, a ruler of the Judean Israelites and Canaanite Jews, comes to The Lord at night, so this was obviously a private meeting, some might say clandestine. He openly confesses to The Lord that he believes He is a teacher from God and that God is with Him (see verse 2).

Not many people understand the significance of Nicodemus’ admissions here, first of all he says ‘we’ so he speaks for some of his fellow Pharisees as well, but from then on the conversation with Our Lord becomes very close to the heart for Nicodemus. These admissions and the fact that he has taken the trouble to enquire of The Lord at unsociable hours are the first signs of Nicodemus’ calling. My guess (and it is only mine) is that Nicodemus came to Jesus more for his own benefit than for that of his colleagues and quite right too. The parable of the pearl of great price teaches this very same principle.

OK, now all of this is very fine and I will return to the story line later, but the question most of you will probably want answering is: “What about me! How do I know if I am being called and born from above?” These are very good questions and the only answer I can give is this: it’s different for every one of us, for we are all unique and no two birthing experiences are the same, for they are tailor made for each of us, but there can be some common factors in most Spiritual births.

1. In many cases The Father uses life situations or life crises to bring us to His Son; we have to have a need for Him and many converts are often in a state of brokenness when they become receptive to The Father’s call. Others are not so, and don’t need so much persuasion. Many will look around them and see the wretchedness and breakdown of their society around them. Their fellow man becoming colder and less compassionate, the paedophilia, the violence, the debauchery, the thieving and murders on our streets, children and young people out of control, the drugs, the increase in sexually transmitted diseases, rampant drunkenness and alcohol abuse, abortions (200,000 per year in Britain alone and counting), family breakdown and the wicked corruption of traitors in high places – our corrupt so called leaders who dispense injustice, rather than justice.

Many will see all these problems and know deep down within themselves that man has completely lost his way and is without any answers. Once born of God (born again), though, we then understand we have a powerful Father God who is fully aware of ALL these problems that man has brought upon himself. As born of God (born again) sons and daughters we learn that The Father and His Son are the ones who will eventually sort ALL the problems out, and we do not have to fret or worry ourselves about them.

2. Once we start to believe, many issues, concerns and problems or cares of this world that used to weigh us down, especially guilt, disappear completely with the realisation that we are now truly forgiven. This forms part of what is known as the ‘peace that passeth all understanding’. There is a certain kind of elation that kicks in here and stays with a believer always. It may wane at times but it always returns to lift us up.

3. As stated in point 2, the affairs of treacherous men (politics) or “cares of this world” as Yashua Messiah refers to them, will begin to look insignificant and of little importance, because these things or ‘cares’ are ‘of this world’ and His Kingdom which is not ‘of this world’ is now all that interests us. We are still “in the world” but we are no longer “of the world.” We are now witnesses, which simply means we watch or witness. Contrary to what you may hear from assorted pulpits, witnessing is not shooting off our big mouths trying to force people or blackmail people into believing through fear tactics but, rather, letting our lights shine. How, by growing in Grace and Faith which those around you will witness? Please note, we are still free to speak out against the wickedness we see around us, and it will depend very much on how much faith we have in determining how bold we are. This boldness comes over a period of time, as we grow, but it is not for us to join political parties in order to do so. We should speak for Yashua Messiah and no one else, but as free agents, not ‘party members’.

4. This one is a sure sign; you will feel an overwhelming desire to share your new found love of Yashua Messiah with all your family and friends and very quickly will discover that they are not the least bit interested in your new found love for Him. This will probably be your first (and only, I hope) round of rejection experiences, and don’t worry because you are now learning that they are ‘rejecting’ Him, not you. He who now lives in you via The Holy Spirit is being ‘rejected’, although it does feel like we are being rejected personally. Once they know you believe, it’s best to keep your counsel and only discuss the subject again if they ask. Again please note, this ‘rejection’ of Yashua Messiah is not real rejection, as they can do nothing but ‘reject’ Him. (See link No. 2 below).

5. You will probably have a desire to read The Holy Scriptures; possibly for the first time. Now here is another miracle; if you have read The Holy Scriptures in the past and have found it impossible to make sense of them, with all their supposed contradictions you will now begin to make sense of them, and here’s why:

1 John 2:27 (KJV) “But The Anointing which ye have received of Him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same Anointing teacheth you of all things, and is Truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him.” (Emphasis mine)

6. Here is another good sign; He calls the low and base things of this world in order to confound the worldly wise or ‘clever people’. Mankind’s trust and faith in the high intellect is one of mankind’s greatest stumbling blocks and/or weaknesses; man’s vanity, pride and arrogance are his major flaws. To eventually be put in his place by the likes of those he has always looked down upon; the poor and poorly educated. This will be a great shock to him, so if you fit the categories of Low and Base you could be in line for a ‘Heavenly phone call’ and you won’t need a mobile/cell phone to receive it!!

7. You will also have a desire to meet up with fellow believers and this may prove more difficult than you at first thought. There are dozens of demon-inations (denominations = divisions)) out there, but very few that are Grace filled, so you must exercise great caution as to where you choose to attend. If you’re like me you will not attend anywhere, because finding a congregation of True Believers is like looking for a proverbial needle in a haystack – some might say a hen’s tooth. Needless-to-say I wish you well with your search.

Now I have given you a lot of information, but is there anything in it to be fearful of? No, a thousand times no. This birthing is nothing to be fearful of as it will cause the recipient no harm whatsoever, but it will involve the removing of what is known metaphorically as ‘the scales coming from our eyes’ to enable us to see; to see what? Now notice, the last part of John 3:3 – The Kingdom of God. How do we see the Kingdom of God? Easy, first of all we realise the Kingdom of God is in us and because it is in us we long for the return of Yashua Messiah to set up His Kingdom in its fullness here on this earth. We also ‘see it’ in our imaginations, we develop a mental picture of it or of what it will be like. If we picture a beautiful place we have seen here on earth and then imagine it a hundred times more beautiful (if that’s humanly possible – probably not) we then begin to get a feel for it. I hope to be writing another article on the Kingdom of God, but in the meantime we need to understand some important factors, that is, what Our Lord says about one or three things on His free gift to us:

1. “No one who having put his hands to the plough and then looks back is fit for The Kingdom of God.” Which means, don’t go back or turn away after you have started, that is, commitment – stick with it – onwards and upwards and finish the mission. You don’t have to compete, but you do have to finish it, and The Lord will help you to finish.

2. “Take up your cross and follow me” This means there is a price to following Him and this price does involve suffering for Him through trials, including being hated by those not chosen, but He will not let you suffer more than you can bear:

1 Corinthians 10:13 (MCV) There hath no temptation trial or testing taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer allow you to be tempted tested or tried above that ye are able; but will, with the temptation testing and trying, also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.

For God is Love, Mercy and Forgiveness and He has promised never to leave you nor forsake you, come what may.

3 “Take my yoke upon you for it is light” In support of what I have said above Yashua Messiah also tells us to carry His yoke, for it is light and easy to carry, unlike the burdens we have grown used to in our worldly lives. Here is a warning too, don’t let any man or woman in a pulpit make that yoke heavy with false teaching. You will know immediately, because they will lay guilt upon you and will make you feel down trodden and discouraged – they will also be big on rules and regulations (The Ten Commandments), teaching you that your salvation is down to you, when it is not – it’s a free gift. Through these experiences you will learn and know if you have joined the right fellowship or not. Whatever you do, once you understand that the teaching is false you must leave immediately – do not hesitate for you owe them NOTHING. See link Nos. 3 and 4 below).

Right, let’s return to the story line of John 3 in verse 4 to see how we are born again or born of God. Nicodemus saith unto Him, how can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? Here Nicodemus shows his lack of Spiritual understanding taking Our Lord’s words literally. Our Lord answers him in verse 5: Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into The Kingdom of God.

Here Our Lord is giving instructions to Nicodemus that unless he is Baptised and has hands laid on him to receive The Holy Spirit he cannot enter The Kingdom of God. Our Lord then goes on to explain in verses 6-7.

John 3:6-7 (KJV) That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of The Spirit is Spirit. 7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

Here Our Lord is explaining that those who believe and are Baptised and receive The Holy Spirit are now new Spiritual beings and not born of the flesh, even though they are still in the flesh, that is, flesh that died in the watery grave of Baptism.

Now this teaching is seldom understood today, but it must mean that, in order for scriptures like….

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

….to make sense, and because we are now gifted with The Holy Spirit, and now abide in Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) we don’t sin, but those who don’t abide in Him and do not know Him, by default, continue in sin. To support this we then read:

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His (Yashua Messiah’s) seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

For the born of God (born again) believerit is our bodies of sin that sin, but we are no longer of the flesh, of our bodies, we are now of The Holy Spirit and because of that indwelling, our new man cannot sin.

Taking all this Truth on board takes time, and we can now see there is nothing to fear in the process of being born from above. If The Father is calling you to His Son what is there to fear? Nothing! All you have to say when The Father calls is: “Here am I”. Just like Samuel:

1 Samuel 3:4 That the LORD called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah (Yashua Anointed):

2. What is True Rejection of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ)?:

3. The Glorious Saving Grace of Yashua Messiah:

4. For by GRACE are Ye Saved Through FAITH; AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is The Gift of God – Ephesians 2:8:

Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed…

…Are you a man of mankind: a son of Adam; or a hu-man being and not of mankind: not a son of Adam?

Or perhaps another way of saying it could be: are you a son of Adam, or a son of The Devil through Cain, and does this whole idea shock you? (See link No. 1 below). Most likely, if you are new to this Truth, it will shock you. In turn, I make no apologies for that, for The Truth MUST be made known, whether you take offence or not. And let’s be clear, offence can only be taken, not given, and lovers of The Truth (Yashua Messiah) will definitely NOT be offended by this Truthful article.

So what are we are dealing with here? For this subject can, and will, be deemed by libtard Cultural Jew Marxists as the ultimate form of RACISM! Ooh! and we can’t have that can we? What will all those lilly livered, limp-wristed, spineless, progressive, fake Christians say? No doubt they will rent their clothes and have apoplexy, and all this, instead of realising that Yashua Messiah Himself, BY THEIR EVIL STANDARDS, would, and will be classified as a RACIST! (See link No. 2 below). So much for the fake hoax concept known as RACISM!:

“”RACIST” A made up word by the Jew Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) in 1927 and used to browbeat all dissenters of the Jewish Bolshevik Marxist/Communist ideology, and still used today to keep white people walking on egg shells regarding other races. Only whites are racists according to these traitor whoresons, that is, evil wretches like John Mann, UK Labour MP.”

— Brother Charles

“”Racism” as an accusation, was shaped by Trotskyists and then sharpened politically by Magnus Hirschfeld, before being fully launched as an anti-white weapon by ethnic others in the American academic system.”

— John Piggot

OK, so with the short preamble over and a couple of educational quotes chucked in for good measure, let’s move on to the meat of this article: HU – who or what is ‘HU’? What kind of a word is ‘HU’? I’ve never heard of it I hear you say. Well its origin may surprise, for it is an ancient Welsh word, and ancient Welsh is from the even more ancient runic Hebrew tongue.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Welsh are The Levites, with The Druids of Cornwall and Wales who are descended from The Levitical Priesthood who administered life in Ancient Israel. This included responsibility for all religious, educational, financial and commercial activities in Ancient Israel – they administered The Tithe – a tax of ten percent on the people’s INCREASE, not the principal, so there was no Tithe/Tax on wages. Israel, during, and after, Joshua’s leadership at the time of The Judges, was a free Theocracy under God, that is, before it became a Kingdom under Saul, David and Solomon and their tax slavery began.

So immediately we have a Scriptural/Biblical connection going all the way back to the Patriarchs of Ancient Israel, that is, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, who were the Patriarchal forefathers of the Anglo-Saxon (Isaac’s sons = the Saacae or Saacsons), Celtic, Welsh, Dutch, Flemish, Gallic, Swiss and Nordic peoples, but not The Jews. (See links Nos. 3 and 4 below).

So who, or what exactly, is HU?

From The Serpent of Life and Wisdom web page:

The Caduceus is one of the most ancient of symbols:

You might best know this symbol as the DNA structure and healing used by the medical profession. Since ancient Mesopotamia The Caduceus presented two serpents intertwined (the central nervous system) around a staff (the spinal column) with the wings (the “swan”) on either side (the two hemispheres of the brain, with the circle in the centre representing the pineal gland, or the central sun and psychic center within). It also symbolized the kundalini energy.

“This was originally the symbol for the Anunnaki-Sirian creator god, EA, or EN.KI (who has become an Archetype), was the chief of the magicians, “the one who knows,” and infamous for being The Serpent of the Garden of Eden, who created lifeforms in test tubes half a million years ago with his half-sister Ninharsag, at the suggestion of his son, Marduk, to create hu-mans to be the workers for the gods. (The symbol is also based upon the winged globe for the planet Nibiru, the symbol of the royal Anunnaki family.)

Biblical writers called The Healing Serpent Ne-HU-shtan. The Hebrew word for serpent is “nahash.” The root of the word are the Hebrew letters Nun, Het and Shin, which means “to guess.” This was translated into other languages as “Satan,” which some say mean “enemy,” or “adversary.””

So from this we learn: 1) that the medical profession is 100% satanic with its Caduceus twin serpent logo and 2) I don’t know about you, but ‘test tubes’ half a million years ago, LOL, is total nonsense. However, what we do have here is our first reference to ‘Hu’ as Satan the Devil, and that’s all that matters from this little piece.

From Simon, on the “Followers of YHWH” Forum:

“Their temples wherein the sacred fire was preserved were generally situate on eminences and in dense groves of oak (see back slidden Ancient Israel), because a circle was the emblem of the universe; oval, in allusion to the mundane egg, from which issued, according to the traditions of many nations, the universe, or, according to others our first parents; serpentine, because a serpent was the symbol of HU, the Druidic Osiris; cruciform because a cross is an emblem of regeneration; or winged, to represent the motion of the divine spirit.”

From The Freemasons:

“The Druids had a high veneration for The Serpent. Their great god, Hu, was typified by that reptile; and he is represented by the Bards as ‘the wonderful chief Dragon, the sovereign of heaven’.

“The Serpent is universally esteemed a legitimate symbol of Freemasonry.”

– George Oliver, Freemason, Signs and Symbols, New York, Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, 1906, p. 36

So here we learn that the back slidden Ancient Israelites (our forefathers) had a ‘high veneration’ for Hu, The Serpent, and for one reason and one reason only, and that reason was their satanic incorporation of Molech worship (child sacrifice) into their beliefs. These evil satanic practises they copied from the Serpent Seed Canaanites who still practice these evil abominations to this day.

Hu The Serpent Entwined Around The Egg

From the Eden Saga Web Page, The Serpent People:

The ancient god of the British Isles, called Hu, was the master of the dragon world.”

From the Covenant of Rhiannon web page:

It is believed that Druidism was founded by Gwyddon Ganhebon, supposedly Seth of the Mosaic genealogy, in Asia and was brought to Britain by Hu Gadarn a contemporarydescendant of the Patriarch Abraham.

“Hu Gadarn originally came with the tribe of the Cymry (The Welsh, The Levites) to the Britannic Isles. They came from the Country of Summer, which is called Defrobani… They crossed the Misty Ocean (Tawch) and arrived in the Britannic Isles and Armorica, where they settled.”

Just to summarise, we now know that ‘Hu’ means ‘Serpent’ and the word ‘Hu-man’ means ‘Serpent-Man’, so in other words, hu-man beings are Canaanites – descendants of The Devil through Eve in The Garden.

Adam declared Eve as THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING, that is, both MANKIND and hu-mankind. Adam was NOT THE FATHER OF ALL LIVING, just the father of Mankind.

Genesis 3:20 (KJV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living. (Abel and Cain, both mankind and hu-mankind – Abel later replaced by Seth).

Now for those of you who think you are ‘quick on the draw’ and say: “Oh yeah, but all Cain’s descendants died in the flood, so you’re talking nonsense!” and I will retort with: “All his descendants bar ONE!” Namely Noah’s ‘Mrs’, whose name was Naamah, and she was the sister of Tubal-Cain. Hey! But it says Noah was perfect in ALL his generations from Adam, and that’s True, but his Mrs wasn’t perfect at all in her generations. However, that’s not important, because Noah carried the Adamic bloodline, which he passed onto his three sons, and they took their lineage from Noah, not their mother, who was of Cain.

Genesis 6:9-10 (KJV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

OK, so all this was just fine and dandy until the flood waters subsided and Noah started his new farming and agricultural (husbandry) lifestyle, which included the planting of a vineyard. We are then fast forwarded to the scene of Noah having harvested his grapes and bottled up his wine, so he thinks he’ll have a good old wine tasting evening. Unfortunately, he gets a bit carried away with the tasting of the wine and ends up blotto. No doubt the rest of his family were also partakers of this first year’s growth celebration and were a bit tipsy.

Moreover, whilst all the celebrating is going on Noah crashes out and Ham, his second son, gets into a strange incestuous relationship with his mother and, presumably whilst under the influence of Noah’s wine, he lies with her = he saw his father’s nakedness:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Now the outcome of this illicit evil union is the birth of Canaan, whom Noah curses. Now why did Noah curse the brat Canaan, and not his debauched son, Ham, and/or his wayward slutty wife, wouldn’t that have made more sense? Yes to our carnal minds it would have made more sense, but not to God who sees things very differently from us, hence He sees strange flesh from incest as an abomination and likewise any inbred offspring from such an incestuous union as anathema.

Furthermore, it’s crucial that we understand what has happened here. In the births of his three sons, Noah’s bloodline only, counted, but in this evil incestuous affair it was Naamah’s Cainite bloodline that counted in Canaan and not Ham’s Adamic blood. This means that with the birth of Canaan, Cain’s bloodline was re-kindled post-flood through Naamah his mother – the line of Cain was reborn and it’s still with us today in the shape of the Canaanite Jews, African Blacks, the Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans, the Turks and the Italians.

Another interesting twist to this is The Truth that the Canaanite Jews take their lineage from their mothers. Jewish society is a MATRIARCHAL society, not a Patriarchal society. So any claims or assertions that they make to a descendancy from Abraham or Judah is a lie. (See link No. 5 re the Jews’ false claims).

So there you have it, solid gold proof that (((THEY))) LIVE! (Have you seen that film?) If not, I recommend it.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Racist – The Canaanite Woman He Called a Dog!:

3. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

4. Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

5. I Know That Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!:

To ‘Gain’ or ‘Win’ People For Christ or To ‘Save’ People For Christ? – 1 Corinthians 9:19-22

1 Corinthians 9:19-22 (KJV) For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. 20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under The Law; 21 To them that are without Law, as without Law, (being not without Law to God, but under the Law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without Law. 22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means SAVE some.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Gain – G2770κερδαίνω kerdaínō, ker-dah’-ee-no; – from G2771; to gain (literally or figuratively):—(get) gain, win.

Save – G4982σώζω sṓzō, sode’-zo; – from a primary σῶς sōs (contraction for obsolete σάος sáos, “safe”); to save, i.e. deliver or protect (literally or figuratively):—heal, preserve, save (self), do well, be (make) whole.

Now I have always found this passage of Scripture somewhat testing and difficult to understand, for we NEVER hear of the other Messengers employing such tactics when preaching the good news of The Kingdom of God. This, therefore, seems to be a speciality of Paul’s, and no one else’s. Furthermore, how do we square these verses in 1 Corinthians, with these verses in John’s Gospel and also, more importantly from Paul himself in Galatians 3:1-13?:

Galatians 3:1-13 (MCV) O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not attentively hearken to The Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye The Holy Spirit by the works of The Law, or by the Hearing of Faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in The Holy Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5 He therefore that bestows to you The Holy Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth He it by the works of The Law, or by the Hearing of Faith? 6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of Faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And The Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through Faith, preached before The Gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of Faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10 For as many as are of the works of The Law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in The Book of The Law to do them. 11 But that no man is justified by The Law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by Faith. 12 And The Law is not of Faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of The Law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drag (draw) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Draw – G1670 helkyo, hel-koo’-o; probably akin to G138; to drag (literally or figuratively):- draw. Compare G1667.

John 6:45 (KJV) It is written in The Prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of The Father, cometh unto me.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

So what is Paul talking about in 1 Corinthians 9:19-22? and let’s be clear, for Peter, Paul and the other Messengers NEVER saved anyone – period! – full stop! – end of! In their travels they preached the Kingdom of God Gospel Message and those that The Father was calling responded positively to that message and those that He was not calling (the majority) rejected it out of hand. Now Paul knew all this, for he was taught by Yashua Messiah Himself; he also admitted it:

Romans 8:7 (KJV) Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to The Law of God, neither indeed can be.

Here we get further confirmation:

Acts 13:45-48 (MCV) But when the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming. 46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that The Word of God should first have been spoken to you Canaanite Jews (posing and masquerading as God’s chosen people): but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles lost Israelite Nations and Nations of Mankind. 47 For so hath The Lord commanded us, saying, I have set thee to be a Light of the Lost Tribes of Israel and Nations of Mankind, that thou shouldest be for salvation unto the ends of the earth. 48 And when those Gentiles of the Lost Tribes of Israel and Nations of Mankind heard this, they were glad, and glorified The Word of The Lord: and as many as were appointed (called and chosen by The Father) to eternal life, believed. (See link No. 1 below)

OK so what we MUST deduce from all this Scriptural proof and evidence is that Paul did not mean he was attempting to gain anyone or win anyone to Yashua Messiah in a Spiritual sense or a regeneration sense, especially the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews and yet he says he became as a Jew in order to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ them. So what did he mean by that?

From The Forerunner Commentary:

What Paul means in this passage becomes clear when we understand the sense and usage of two Greek words, those translated as “win” and “save.” In the evangelical (Mainstream Christian) world, both of them have taken on lives of their own, but with just a little digging, we will see that no contradiction lies between this passage and the numerous other clear statements.

The word translated as “win” is kerdaino (Strong’s #2770), and its basic meaning is “gain,” which is how it is typically translated. It means “to acquire by effort or investment.” It can mean “to earn” or “to make a profit.” The flipside is that it can also mean “to cause a loss not to occur.”” (Brackets mine)

Right, so from this we learn that Paul was attempting to come alongside these people in order to not offend them and alienate them clumsily or deliberately through over zealous teaching or preaching. To interpret it another way, “We can even be wrong when we’re right” if you get my drift. However, this was not an attempt by Paul to convert these people, for he knew that only The Father had the power to do that, and if he experience hostile opposition from them he would endeavour to meet them where they were at, in order to keep them alongside as best he could and not part as outright enemies.

Having cleared up that little niggle, we can now move on to a more controversial issue, that of Paul’s entering The Temple with the four vow takers and allegedly purifying himself ACCORDING TO THE LAW!!! as recorded in Acts 21:

Acts 21:18-20 (MCV) And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles The Lost Tribes of Israel and the Nations of Mankind by his ministry.

20 And when they heard it, they glorified The Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of The Law:

Now what’s going on here? for it looks like a little egotistic boasting is going on = my mission in Jerusalem is just as big as yours, so there! Does it not look as if James is salivating over all these Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, who allegedly believe, and are still zealous of The Law! How does that work?

The other question that immediately comes to mind is how infiltrated the Church in Jerusalem had become by these Judaising mongrel dogs of the circumcision? It looks to me as if the Church no longer existed in Jerusalem, hence Paul was told by The Holy Spirit TWICE! NOT TO GO THERE!

Acts 21:4 (TAB) After looking up the disciples [in Tyre], we stayed there [with them] seven days; and they kept telling Paul through the [Holy] Spirit [a]not to set foot in Jerusalem.

Yet he stubbornly refuses, again, how does that work? In contrast, elsewhere in Acts, when The Holy Spirit guided they all followed, that is, not going on deeper into Asia. To me these are inconsistencies in terms of what we know about Paul from his letters.

We then get into all the nonsense of Paul’s purification in The Temple! WHAT!!? Is this what he meant by being all things to all people – especially appeasing the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? I find all this very hard to believe and yet it’s there in Acts allegedly! So let’s get some Scripture:

Acts 21:21 (KJV) And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs.

So these Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews already know what Paul teaches.

Now from the Amplified Bible to get a clearer understanding of what’s been written in the KJV.

Acts 21:21-24 (TAB) Now they have been told about you, that you are teaching all the Jews who are living among the Gentiles to turn away from [the Law of] Moses, advising them not to circumcise their children or to live according to the [Mosaic] customs. 22 What then should be done? They will certainly hear that you have arrived. 23 Therefore do just what we tell you. We have four men who have taken a vow; 24 take these men and purify yourself along with them, and pay their expenses [for the temple offerings] so that they may shave their heads. Then everyone will know that there is nothing to the things they have been told about you, but that you yourself also follow and keep The Law.

So what do we have here? If this account is true, do I spy politicking? Do I spy lies, deceit and deception going on here? Oh let’s paint a false picture in order to placate these satanic Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews. How about Paul and his brothers doing a swift exit out of Jerusalem as fast their legs could carry them? why was that not suggested, or for them to go into hiding until the baying mob had gone home. Oh no we have to go through all these meaningless lying theatricals in order to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ some – NOT!

Acts 21:27 (TAB) When the seven days [required to complete the ritual] were almost over, [some] Jews from [the province of] Asia [Minor], caught sight of him in The Temple, and began to stir up the crowd, and they seized him,

What is Paul doing in The Temple when he knows full well that his presence their will be an act of provocation? What’s happened to the policy of gaining and winning some? Then we get confirmation of what I said to be correct:

Acts 21:30 (TAB) Then the whole city was provoked and confused, and the people rushed together. They seized Paul and dragged him out of the temple, and immediately the gates were closed.

Here’s another thing: Did Paul have a death wish? for he clearly stated that he had no fear of going up to Jerusalem, even if it meant death:

Acts 21:13 (TAB) Then Paul replied, “What are you doing, weeping and breaking my heart [like this]? For I am ready not only to be bound and imprisoned, but even to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.”

Then we get more confirmation:

Acts 21:27 (TAB) When the seven days [required to complete the ritual] were almost over, [some] Jews from [the province of] Asia [Minor], caught sight of him in the temple, and began to stir up the crowd, and they seized him,

So the stupid ritual was not even completed (an act of God IMO) before the Serpent Seed Jews caught sight of him in The Temple AGAIN! And grabbed him. How many acts of provocation was that? None of this makes any sense unless he deliberately wanted death at their hands.

Acts 21:28-29 (TAB) shouting, “Men of Israel, help us! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against our people and The Law and this place. And besides, he has brought Greeks into The Temple and has defiled this holy place.” 29 For they had previously seen Trophimus the Ephesian in the city with Paul, and they assumed that he had brought the man into the temple [beyond the court of the Gentiles].

So not only does he provoke them by being there himself, he also brings a Greek brother along to Jerusalem as well, as you do when you’re aiming to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ a few Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews – much sarcasm here by the author. We therefore have yet more examples of blatant provocation on the part of Paul, and we can only assume that these were deliberate acts of provocation in order to bring about his untimely end. I cannot see this any other way unless you, my readers, have any other ideas.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

PS Message for Thomas Howard: I trust this answers your silly comment about Paul’s (non-existent) fear of the Jews.

1. What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?:

Obadiah; Esau; The Edomites; Idumea; Turkey

Obadiah or Obdias, as he is known in the Greek Septuagint Old Testament, is the author of the smallest Book of the Old Testament, that is, a Scriptural Book just twenty one verses long, yet it contains some very important information for us in the last days of last days in the 21st century. His name means ‘Serving Jah’ or ‘Serving The Lord’.

Obadiah is said to have lived in the 6th to 5th century BC at the time of the captivity of The House of Judah (The Southern Kingdom of what was once a divided Israel) by the Babylonians so he was a contemporary of Jeremiah. The Northern Kingdom of The House of Israel was taken captive in 740-725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans). Now because Edom was complicit in Judah’s downfall, Obadiah calls for God’s punishment upon Edom with its total destruction – just a little background info and history.

Before I continue, I will add this caveat to inform you that I am NOT a prophet, nor do I have the Holy Spiritual gift of prophecy, so some things I say in this article should not be taken as 100% Truth (therefore you must do your own research to verify what I am saying is The Truth, or not The Truth). However, what I will say re the modern day identity of Esau/Edom (the Edomites) and the Idumeans (the later name of the Edomites, especially in the first century) you can take as solid gold Truth.

OK, so here we go, and I will start with verse nine of Obadiah, not verse one, for verse nine leads us directly into the genealogies of Esau/Edom, which are crucial to the understanding of the true identity of The Edomites, and I’ll tell you straight, right now, it ain’t The Jews and NEVER listen to any lying dogs that tell you the Edomites are Jews!

This means I’m gonna be ruthlessly blunt, because if you are a deluded brainwashed follower of the blasphemers Bertrand Comparet, the ex-con Jew liar, William (Bill) Finck of Christogenea disinformation infamy, and/or James P. Wickstrom, now deceased, you had better be ready to get educated, or otherwise you can take a hike, for there are no half-way houses or half measures with this crucial knowledge. It’s all very clearly defined, and those blasphemers are WRONG! VERY WRONG! This is big time errors I am speaking of here, not mistakes, for with the above mentioned people there will be an evil agenda in there somewhere. (See link No. 1 below.) So you have been warned. Now back to the topic at hand:

Obadiah 1:9 (KJV) And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount (the nation) of Esau may be cut off by slaughter. (Brackets mine)

Here in this verse we have an Edomite by the name of Teman and from his name comes the name Ottoman and the Ottomans were Turks (Ottoman is also known in the Arabic form as Uthman, from Osman). The Turkish Empire, which lasted from 1301 until 1923 AC, was known as The Ottoman Empire and consisted of Seljuk Turks, and please pay attention to this name “Seljuk Turks” for it will feature again.

From “The Ottoman Empire” by Larry Gormley:

In the 13th century, the region of Anatolia (most of the Asian part of present day Turkey) was controlled by the Byzantine Empire in the northwest and the Seljuk Turks in the south-west. Around 1290, Osman I (1258-1324), a Muslim warrior and leader of a small principality inside Seljuk Turk territory, declared his independence from the Seljuk sultan. The Ottoman Empire was founded. (Ottoman is derived from Uthman, the Arabic form of Osman.)”

Now Teman is mentioned eleven times in The Holy Scriptures, the first of which is in Genesis 36:11:

Genesis 36:11 (KJV) And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz.

And who was Eliphaz? From Genesis again:

Genesis 36:4 (KJV) And Adah (the Canaanitess) bare to Esau Eliphaz; and Bashemath bare Reuel; (Brackets mine)

So here we can see that Teman was a direct descendant of Esau/Edom, through Esau’s son Eliphaz. Now if we go to Genesis 36:1-2 we glean more crucial information:

Genesis 36:1-2 (KJV) Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom. 2 Esau took his wives of the daughters of Canaan; Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite.

Here we learn that Esau was also named Edom and he took two Canaanites for wives, which cost him his Abrahamic birthright inheritance from his father Isaac. The fact that he became a race mixer and/or a miscegenator is what grieved his parents, Isaac and Rebecca the most, as disclosed here:

Genesis 27:46 (KJV) And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth (Canaanite Hittites): if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?

This verse tells us exactly what Esau/Edom had done in marrying a Hittite and Hivite Canaanite, he had grieved his mother intensely, making her question even the purpose of her life, so in turn she made sure Esau/Edom’s inheritance went to Jacob/Israel his younger twin brother. Notice, too, how these Canaanite daughters, like their forefather Cain, were ‘daughters of the land’ which means any sacrifice would have been crops of the land, not the BLOOD of a lamb as offered up by Abel. Some important background information. (See link No. 4 below)

OK, moving on, and back to the subject of The Turks being from Esau/Edom and not the Jews. So let’s start at the best place = The Beginning:

Genesis 25:23 (KJV) And the Lord said unto her (Rebecca), Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. (Esau/Edom was the elder and Jacob/Israel the younger)

So if the descendants of Esau/Edom are The Jews, since when did they serve anyone? Since when have the non-Jews not been servants of the Jews through their MONEY POWER AND USURY = The CROWN – The Rothschild WORLDWIDE Banking Cartel!? (Take note that Jacob/Israel was not the forefather of the Jews – see links 2 and 3 below)

So here we also learn that two nations would stem from Esau/Edom and Jacob/Israel which then makes these two men Patriarchs.

From “Turkey In Prophecy” by Herman L. Hoeh

Esau’s descendants play a vital part in world affairs today! Where are his descendants?

Notice some of the sons of Esau: Teman, Omar, Amalek (Genesis 25:11). These are not Jewish names! Yet some claim that the Jews are the children of Esau. Nothing could be further from the truth – as we shall presently see.

Esau, or Edom, as he is also called, lived south-east of Palestine near Petra. Arab Bedouins live there now. Then where have Esau’s children gone?

From the days of Nebuchadnezzar, who carried them captive, they disappear for 1000 years from history. Then suddenly we find Amalek the name of a city in Turkestan in Central Asia (from Paul Herrmann’s SIEBEN VORBEI UND ACHT VERWEHT, p.451). The Egyptians used to call the Amalekites the Amu. In Turkestan is the River Amu today! In Bible times the Edomites inhabited Mt. Seir (Genesis 32:4). In Turkestan is the Syr Darya – the River of Syr or Seir.

The leading Turkish tribe is the Ottoman. The prophecies referring to Edom or Esau mention Teman as the leading tribe in these latter days (Obadiah 9). The conclusion is inescapable. The Ottoman Turks are the sons of Teman. Merely the vowels in spelling have been changed over these past millenniums. From Central Asia the Turks or Edomites moved into Asia Minor. That is where Esau’s children live today! Turkey controls the “crossway” of the nations — the Dardanelles (Obadiah 14).

How clear, ESAU OR EDOM IS TURKEY today!”

Obadiah 1:14 (KJV) Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.

Right, now I am going to shoot off at a bit of a tangent and change the thrust of this article considerably and yet it will still be based upon Obadiah in verse 4:

Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.

Now quite few people make the silly mistake of linking this ‘Eagle’ with The USA and its national emblem, the Bald Eagle, but that is totally erroneous, for this ‘Eagle’ has a very different symbolic meaning altogether, and it also ties us to The Turks in a very surreptitious way. I will therefore copy and paste here some interesting pieces of information from the Masonic Dictionary.

Here is the opening paragraph from their website:

Here is the type of article that makes glad the heart of an editor. With its lack of guesswork and with its wide-sweeping learning, it may well serve as a model and an inspiration to budding (Freemason) students….” (Brackets mine)

So from this opening statement we can be fairly sure of the provenance of the information I am about to reveal and share.

OK, more from their website:

“….Brother Parker has recently completed an eight hundred page work on archaeology; when it is published we shall hope to review it in THE BUILDER. For some strange reason the two-headed eagle, for all its symbolical appeal, has seldomly attracted the attention of Masonic scholars.”

Here we can see mention of this symbolic two-headed eagle which will be crucial in our understanding of this Edomite/Turkey connection.

The most able treatment of it thus far has been the chapter in The Migration of Symbols by Count Goblet d’Alviela of Belgium; Brother Parker’s own article loses nothing by comparison with that chapter. Indeed, it carries the symbolism back to a far earlier time, and embodies more recent information. A student who may care to launch out upon researches of his own will find, along with the present article, that the references in the Encyclopedia Britannica, are valuable; consult the index volume under Double-headed Eagle; also see the articles on Heraldry and Hittites. For a reliable but rapid survey of what is known of the Hittites see Jastrow’s chapter on the subject in Exploration in Bible Lands, by Hilprecht (1903). See also Mackey’s Encyclopedia, Vol. I., page 225; and Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, Vol. III, page 104.”

WHAM No. 1!! there we have our first connection – The Double-Headed Eagle and its Hittite heraldic origins, and who did Esau/Edom marry? A HITTITE Canaanite!

Moving on:

THERE IS SCARCELY a symbol in any of the philosophical or chivalric degrees of the Scottish Rite so striking in design and import as that of the double-headed eagle. The Tau Cross and (The) Serpent of the Twenty-fifth Degree, the sun of the Twenty-eighth Degree, and the cross of St. Andrew in the Twenty-ninth Degree are indeed fraught with deep meaning, both historic and esoteric, but none can claim a more romantic or significant history than that of the Thirtieth Degree, that of the Grand Elect Knight Kadosh, or Knight of the Black and White Eagle. As an emblem this eagle is the epitome of religious andsymbolic historyand to trace the winding flight of the double-headed bird is to survey the whole course of civilization, from its grey dawn north of the Persian gulf to this modern World.…..”

That will be the symbolic history of the Edomite Canaanites via Esau’s Hittite wife. Take note, for ALL Canaanites are Serpent Seed miscegenated inbreeds from The Garden = Satan’s offspring through Eve. (See link No. 5 below)

When our ancient brethren, the holy Crusaders, passed through Byzantium on their way to the tomb of the Saviour, the Double-Headed Eagle which they saw embroidered in gold on heavy banners of silk, borne aloft by the Seljuk Turks, had been four thousand years on its way.”

WHAM No. 2!! The Seljuk Turks (Edomites) and their Double-Headed Eagle held high on gold embroidered banners as they went into battle. So let’s paste Obadiah verse 4 again just to remind ourselves:

Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.

Turkish Dirilis Ertugral

To these same Crusaders this emblem was an honoured one, and though the enemy displayed it, yet they would fight to death for its possession and in triumph bear it, dripping with blood, to their encampments on the Levantine shore. It was from this Eastern Empire that the knights took this banner to adorn the courts of Charlemagne, and as a sacred relic hung it in the great cathedrals, whose architects and masons had so often been honoured by this Emperor of the West.”

Here above we can see how this Hittite Canaanite heraldic symbol wormed its way into the west.

From whence came this two-headed eagle, and how came it to be associated with Scottish Rite Masonry? The last part of this question is easier to answer than the first, for there is direct testimony that Frederick of Prussia supplied this crest during the formative stages of the Rite, but neither Frederick nor indeed Prussia could claim the exclusive right the use or to bestow it. It is the imperial emblem of Russia, Austria, Serbia and other portions of the disrupted Holy Roman Empire, and Prussia adopted the emblem long after it had flown over Byzantium as the royal arms of the “Emperors of the East and West.”

In Germany we find the Double-Headed Eagle used as the seal of the Count of Wurzburg in 1202; it was the coat of arms of Henricus de Rode in 1276; while Philip of Saxony bore it upon his shield in 1278. It was also the seal of the Bishop of Cologne, who no doubt adopted it from the city arms.

As the arms of towns and cities in England, this emblem appears upon the official seals of Salisbury, Perth, (Perthshire), Airedale and Lamark. In Holland and France there are also numerous instances of its use.

As the badge of royal orders we find the two-headed bird upon the emblems of the Austrian Order of the Iron Crown; in Russia upon the emblems of the Order of St. Andrew, founded by Peter the Great in 1689; in Poland upon the emblem of the Order of Military Merit, (founded May 24, 1792). As late as 1883, the King of Serbia adopted it as the emblem of the Order of the Double-Headed Eagle, commemorative of the restoration of the Serbian kingdom.

In these paragraphs we can see how Satan beguiled many western nations with their incorporation of the Double-Headed Eagle into their own heraldry – especially the Germanic nations.

But the double-headed eagle is not European in origin for its use depends upon the contact of Europe with Asia Minor, and indeed with trade or warfare with the Turks.

The Turkish name for this conspicuous emblem is HAMCA, and by this name they call it when they see it carved upon the walls of ancient castles, upon time worn coins or emblazoned upon frayed silken banners in ancient palaces.”

WHAM No. 3!! Now notice what we have here: 1) Further confirmation the origins of this Double-Headed Eagle are of Turkish/Edomite origins. 2) And the Turkish name for this image is HAMCA! WOW! = HAMitic CAnaanites!! So the Double-Headed Eagle is the incestuous Canaan’s heraldic emblem.

Travellers in Asia Minor, indeed, are surprised by the frequency of the double-headed eagle sculptures upon the castles of the Seljukian Turks, and upon the more ancient monuments of the Hittites, whose civilization was at its height when the Hebrews were wild tribesmen upon the Arabian plains.”

First off, pay no attention to the blasphemous mention of the Hebrews as wild tribesmen. The Hebrews were always husbandmen with their flocks and herds of animals not wild men, however Esau/Edom WAS a wild man and ferocious in battle. He and his clans were warriors of warriors, and this is yet another characteristic that does NOT FIT THE JEWS. Edomites were NEVER JEWS.

My last paste from the Masonic Dictionary webpage and here is their address: http://www.masonicdictionary.com/doubleeagle.html

I would advise you go there, for there is much more historic information.

OK, that’s it for this article and I hope you found it rewarding and enlightening.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing The Lying Blasphemer Bertrand Comparet Parts 1 and 2:

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

3. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

4. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

5. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE? – Part 1

.Or perhaps a better title would have been: The Satanic Curses of Judaism and Islam – Is God One?

Introduction

Now this article has been up on Ezine Articles since 2009, so it’s obviously long overdue for a little revising and editing, because my knowledge has greatly increased since 2009. In turn, it must be said that it’s a crucial support article for my other articles: “Exposing The Trinity Lie – Parts 1 through 5”; “Do YOU Worship and Ogre god? – Parts 1 through 4”; “Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs? and “The Duality Godhead”, (See link Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 below.) This means, also, that it’s long overdue for a place on my blog. Still, better late than never, eh?

So, to my question, IS HE ONE, that is, is God ONE!? for the phrase “God is one” can only be found three times in the whole King James Bible – THREE TIMES ONLY! Now here’s a thing, for all of my regular readers will, by now, be aware of a little conundrum that we have going on here, that is, within the confines of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. That conundrum, of course, is this mysterious habit they have of majoring in the minors. It seems to be a common practice of theirs to make big theological determinations with very little Scriptural proof for backing up those determinations. The silly Trinity dogma being a very good example of it, with two references, only, to the Trinity, again, in the whole of the King James Bible (see link No. 1 below). Not only that but no mention of it by the name, the Trinity. However, having said all that, MANY people still believe that their god is one and in the case of believers in the Trinity, for them it’s three in ONE!

So back to the thread, and to prove it, here’s another thing: All the Jews and all the Muslims on this earth believe their god or their Allah is one. There he is, up there in his ‘heavenly domain’, all alone, that is, a single solitary god, who is the object of their worship and of their deification (chuckle, chuckle, chuckle).

The thing is, is their worship of this deity all in vain? and is it just a massive deception on the part of the god of this world, Satan the Devil? We must be clear about this, for he is most definitely a god, that is, the god of this world, or the god of this age, or the god of this world’s system, or even the god of The Matrix, to use the modern vernacular. If you have any doubts about this arrangement, then you must refer to the Holy Scriptures for the proof, and thereby assuage those doubts:

2 Corinthians 4:4 (MCV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image (one in whom the likeness of anyone is seen) of God, should shine unto them.

As an aside, notice, the minds of the lost and unsaved who don’t believe are completely blinded to The Gospel of Yashua Messiah, which is yet more solid gold proof that no man or woman can accept a ‘Jesus’ as their saviour of their own volition or own initiation, for only The Father can remove the scales from our eyes.

Ephesians 2:2 (MCV) Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to The Prince of The Power of The Air, the evil spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience (and unbelief):

OK, now all this is very straight forward, because we know that the lost and unsaved do not believe, and the above verses explain clearly why they don’t believe. Moreover, what about the Jews and the Muslims, for they do believe and, boy, do they believe? Let’s face it, we could never doubt their zeal and their fervour, especially the Muslims, so what gives? Is their belief in vain, for we know that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) does not feature in The Jew’s beliefs at all. The Jews have their imaginary satanic Talmudic ‘god’, and the Muslims have their ‘Allah’, but Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) as God with God is not included in either of these blasphemous belief systems.

However, Islam does acknowledge a ‘Jesus’ as a prophet, but this imaginary ‘Jesus’ is not revered any higher than their prophet Mohammed which, in itself, is an evil blasphemy. (For the origins of Islam see link No. 5 below.)

So to briefly sum up, we have at least two religions that believe in gods that are one, that is, alone and solitary. Now some of you may say well so what, we’re Christians, and we believe that God is one, too? Yes, quite so, but is that true and who told you that God is one? And if God IS ONE what separates your god from the heathen god of the Jews and Muslims, for he is one too? Answer: NOTHING! Oh come on, there are loads of Holy Scriptures that say God is one, I hear you say, and yes there are some that appear to say that, but do they really say it? Well, there is only one way to find out using these examples:

In Mark 12:29 the Lord Jesus Christ quotes Deuteronomy 6:4 which He voices aloud:

Mark 12:29 (KJV) And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

Now this statement is a word for word exact copy of what Moses wrote down in Deuteronomy 6:4. You can check it for yourselves if you do not believe me.

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our GOD is one LORD.

OK, let’s analyse this Scripture in detail, from the Hebrew, as it predates Mark’s Gospel by approximately fifteen hundred years:

Hear, O Israel:

1) The Lord The Jehovah or The Eternal our God (Elohim) who has always self-existed.

2) Our God now the word ‘God’ or ‘Elohim’ in Hebrew means God plural – more than one. The Hebrew word ‘Eloha’ or Eloah is the singular word for Elohim. Now if God is one, a singular solitary God, then ‘Eloha’ is the word that would have been used here, not Elohim – more than one. This evidence alone, and in one fell swoop, disproves monotheism or Judaism, for the Elohim Godhead is more than one being.

3) Is oneOK, God = Elohim = plural beings, which in turn means we have the Elohim (plural) Godhead of more than one being, being described as ‘one’, but is that one being? and how can plural beings be one? In Hebrew the word for ONE is ‘Echad’ which means unified or united or in unity or at one and it also means number one; first and none above, the prime number. This means that The Elohim (plural) Godhead is united – completely likeminded and in unison, that is, in total agreement.

A football team is united as in Newcastle United, and they are united as one team with one goal – to win, but they are also a team of eleven individuals. The Godhead is one team of two Spiritualbeings who have plans to add to their number by calling sons and daughters/brothers and sisters, not close themselves off in isolation in a closed trinity. The number 3 is God’s number for finality and if anything comes in threes with God that’s it – fini – kaput – the end, nothing more, just like the three woes in Revelation. The thing is, there is nothing final in God’s plan for us His future family! Plus all of mankind, eventually, in the Kingdom of God!!

4) LordEternal or self-existent.

So there we have it, and if we were to ask the question is God one? we can reply and affirmative yes to that, for the expounded question should read as: IS THE GODHEAD UNITED AS ONE? that is, a Godhead of two individuals who have always self-existed, a God with God who later became The Father and The Son, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and then a Godhead in heaven with Yashua Messiah at The Father’s right hand.

Here, alone, we have enough proof and evidence to disprove monotheism or the worship of one god. The Godhead has always been two who are unified or united or at one with themselves, with each other, or in oneness of mind, word and deed, that is, in complete and total agreement and totally likeminded – yet distinct Spiritual beings; this is the True nature of the Duality Godhead.

Hopefully, too, you will have noticed that the Holy Spirit is nowhere mentioned in Deuteronomy 6:4, nor in Mark 12:29 in the description of The Duality of the nature of the Godhead. Am I denying the existence of The Holy Spirit? no way, for The Holy Spirit is the Godhead’s living POWER, but not a personage of a mickey mouse Trinity. (See link No. 1 below)

Moreover, we now have a full understanding of Deuteronomy 6:4 of which Mark 12:29 is a direct copy. Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently quoted Old Testament Holy Scriptures (from The Septuagint) when preaching. So what is the point I am making here? The point I am making is this: Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12:29 are identical and yet they are taught differently, due to the change of language or misinterpretation of same, that is, from Hebrew into Greek.

If we copy out Mark 12:29 from the Greek you will see what I mean:

Mark 12:29 (Greek Transliteral) Answered the Jesus that before-most is (foremost) be hearing (be you hearing) Israel Master (Lord) the God of us Master (Lord) one is.

OK, if we concordance the word ‘God’ we will find a subtle change has taken place:

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – G2316 theos theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

Notice; a deity, not the deities. God in the Old Testament was Elohim – plural, not Eloha = not singular, but look at what has happened here. God has become a singular god – a deity, not the deities of The Elohim who are ‘at one’ or who are ‘unified as one’ and in ‘perfect likemindedness’ – two united beings thinking as one. And all this when The Greeks were polytheists = more than one god.

This deliberate language corruption is what causes all the trouble and confusion within the pages of the New Testament and deceives millions of people within mainstream Christianity. Look folks, the Godhead does not change, they have never changed and that is why THEY SAID in Genesis 1:26; “let us make man in OUR IMAGE and OUR LIKENESS; they were always the two beings of the Godhead. This, therefore, means that what was written in Deuteronomy 6:4 should have been copied exactly into Mark 12:29 with same OT meaning, for the Lord Himself uttered the very same words. This also means that because the word ‘God’ now has a different meaning, a singular meaning, not a unified plural meaning, a translator’s corruption has most definitely occurred. Well just fancy that!!??


Moving on, if we now take a look at a few Holy Scriptures that allude to their claim that ‘God is one’, we will then gain a better understanding of what the evil translators of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion have done to God’s Holy Word, and what better example than the following verses from Matthew’s Gospel, for there are corruptions galore in these two verses:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

And from the Greek Transliteral, and supported by The Concordant Literal Version:

Matthew 19:16 (Greek Transliteral) And be-perceiving (lo!) one toward-coming (coming to) to-Him (Him) said Teacher! Any (what) good I-shall-be-doing that I-should-be-having life eonian?

Matthew 19:6 (CLV) And lo! one coming to Him said, “Teacher, what good shall I be doing that I should be having life eonian?

OK, so what have we got going on here? Hmm, well, as we can see, this verse is revealing that Matthew 19:16-17 is not quite as good as we may have, at first, thought (like the pun?). The operative word here, of course, being ‘good’. Notice, the man in the Greek original does not call Yashua Messiah ‘Good Master’. The word ‘good’ has been thrown in gratuitously by the devious translators, but why? Well that’s easy to answer; in order to corrupt the whole passage and give it a different focus and a blasphemous, phony new emphasis. Not only that, but we have the assertion that The Father God is the ONLY ONE that is good, so there it is, the ugly perversion of Jewish monotheism slithering in like a snake by the back door, so to speak.

As it happens, this has always been a passage of Holy Scripture that I have never been comfortable with and, now, as I examine the original Greek rendering I fully understand why I have always felt uncomfortable with it. Notice the crucial element to this missing word ‘good’. If Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) is not the ‘Good Master’ and is only the Master or Teacher as in the original Greek, then by default it makes a mockery of what Yashua Messiah was supposed to have said to the man, that is, “Why callest thou me good?” For as we can see the man said no such thing, but what he did refer to was what one good thing must he do in order to have Eternal Life, so what’s going on?

Back to the Greek Transliteral for the answer:

Matthew 19:17 (Greek Transliteral) The yet He-said to-him any (why) me you-are-asking about (concerning) the good one [thing] is the good if yet you-are-willing into the life to-be-into-coming keep (keep-you) the directions (precepts) [Square brackets mine]

Straight away, it is crucial that we realise there is no reference to God in this verse at all especially the nonsense phrase: “there is none good but one”, and we now know, too, that the phrase: “Why callest thou me good?” is also bogus. What this means in Truth, is that there is not an inkling of any suggestion within this passage to suggest that God, in anyway, shape or form is here alluded to as one. Unless, of course, you have a demonic evil agenda and your desire is to classify Yashua Messiah as not being ‘good’ which, of course, is what the blasphemous KJV does – DELIBERATELY in my view.

First, though, lets finish analysing the Greek version of verse 17. The verse opens with the Lord answering the man’s question and notice, for the emphasis is purely on the subject of the man’s question and nothing else. What the Lord is asking him here is this: “Why are you asking me about this one good thing that you think you should be doing in order to enter Eternal Life, when you should know that the only good thing you can do is to keep (hold Spiritually dear) the commandments and love God?” OK, having cleared that up, let’s return to the blasphemous KJV and I will re-copy it here for your convenience:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Right, we know from the Greek rendering the man did not say ‘Good Master’, so this must mean that the Lord had no need to reply with that spurious man made question, and nor did He, for it is not there in the Greek. To confirm, if we check once more in the Greek version of verse 17 we also have the proof that the Lord did not ask the man that question: “Why callest thou me good?” So all this wickedness and deceit is added by the translators – WHY? Why, because through this verse in the KJV it is scandalously trying to tell us that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not see Himself as good and, in turn, by doing that making us think that He was not God. If He was not good, then how could He be God in the flesh?

Now this truly is an evil heresy we have unravelled here! It’s also constitutes a heresy with them trying to fool us into thinking that there is only one God. As stated, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was God in the flesh, so how could He be anything but good? Obviously, the Lord cannot be anything but good, but to those in the blasphemous Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, they want us to think that only the Father God is good. What kind of diabolical evil is this? I’ll tell you, it’s Jerome’s and Erasmus’ diabolical evil and whoever else had their filthy Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translator’s mitts on God’s Holy Word when they wrote their King James Bible.

Furthermore, if you think Matthew’s account is a one off and Mark’s account says otherwise you would be wrong and I will keep this brief for I wish to move on to the next misunderstood verse:

Mark 10:17 (KJV) And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?

Again from the Greek Transliteral:

Mark 10:17 (Greek Transliteral) And of-out-going (of-going-out) of-Him into way (road) toward-running one and knee-falling (falling-on-his-knees) him inquired-of Him Teacher! good any (what) I-shall-be-doing that life eonian I-should-be-tenanting (I-should-be-enjoying-the-allotment-of).

Here again we can see that the translators have chosen to place the word ‘good’ before ‘Teacher’ or ‘Master’ instead of correctly attaching it to the subject at hand after the word ‘Master’, that is, what good thing should this man be doing in order to enter into Eternal Life? Notice, too, that the word ‘good’ only appears once so, by default, it must apply to the ‘thing’ and not to Yashua Messiah. Why is that I hear you say? It’s that, because in the Matthew account we learnt that the second ‘good’ was gratuitously thrown in by the translators.

In part two I will expose more translator corruptions.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing the Trinity Lie!:

2. Do You Worship an Ogre god – Parts 1- 4:

3. Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?:

4. The Duality Godhead:

5. The Islamic-Vatican Connection by Prof. Walter Veith:

https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-islamic-vatican-connection-by-prof-walter-veith_gM5BHdgLIIc6zZr.html

Did Paul Circumcise Timothy For The ‘Believing’ Jews? – Acts 16:3-5

Now, as I am sometimes want to do, I am going to challenge my readers, yet again, with what I deem to be a very dodgy piece of Scripture. I won’t say Holy Scripture, because I believe it to be satanic, and not Holy at all.

You see, since I discovered that Romans 13:1-7 was a corruption by addition to Paul’s Letter to the Romans (seven whole verses – see the link below), that is, completely bogus, I have started checking one or three other places in the Freemason-Canaanite-Judaic King James Bible to see what else I can find that would merit my scrutiny. Now what do you think I found? low and behold, Acts 16:3-5 jumped right out at me, just as my good wife and I were studying The Holy Scriptures, this very day – the 8th June 2014.

As usual, I went online to see what most commentators were parroting, and it was all the usual guff about Paul being all things to all men in order to gain some of them for Christ. However, I could not rationalise this sweeping generalisation in order to apply it to what Paul was supposed to have done regarding Timothy and HIS member – not Paul’s member, if you get my drift. If we stop and think about this issue for a minute or two, we must ask ourselves who the blazes was Paul to take it upon himself to order a brother in Yashua Messiah, or a brother in The Faith under His Glorious Grace, to give him the authority to maim and mutilate Timothy’s body, that is, The Temple of The Holy Spirit? Just what is supposed to be going on here? Were Paul and Timothy under The Law, or under Yashua Messiah’s Saving Grace?

Let’s be clear, Paul had no rank or authority over Timothy, other than Timothy was Paul’s charge as a Learner (disciple) of Paul, a student, and therefore in Paul’s care on behalf of Yashua Messiah, and that was a great responsibility. Moreover, was Paul about to insult and blaspheme against Yashua Messiah and His sacrifice and go back on his own words as well?:

Galatians 1:6-7 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

“But there be some that trouble you.” Who were those troubling the brothers and sisters in Galatia? The very same types of people that we’re told Paul kowtowed to in Derbe and Lystra, so what is this all about? Are you suspicious yet? If not, I will copy this verse for you:

Galatians 2:21 (KJV) I do not frustrate The Grace of God: for if righteousness come by The Law, (circumcision) then Christ is dead in vain. (Brackets mine)

Is that simple enough to understand or are we going to explain it away with intellectual, philosophical, religious sophistry and clap trap?

And this verse:

Philippians 3:2 (KJV) Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the CONCISION. (Emphasis mine)

BEWARE OF THE CIRCUMSION!!!

Come on peeps, what are we dealing with here in Acts 16:3? I will copy it here for your information:

Acts 16:3 (MCV) Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Canaanite Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek.

Are we being asked to believe that Paul did a 180 degree U-turn and went back on all he had learnt from Yashua Messiah, and he himself taught elsewhere just to pander to a few Canaanite Judaising dogs of the circumcision? Well, if we read the King James Bible as it stands, and believe like lemmings that it has no errors, nor any Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious agenda, then yes YOU are being asked to believe it, and unfortunately probably do.

However, before you make your decision to carry on blindly believing this verse in Acts, as written, you might want to consider the story of Paul and Peter, and Peter’s refusal to eat with non-Israelite foreigners. Did Paul rebuke and admonish Peter severely for pandering to the religious whims of the Concision – the circumcised Jews? You bet your life he did. So are we now being asked to accept that Paul is now a hypocrite? Yes you are, because that’s how the translators of The KJV have polluted this chapter of Acts: 1) to discredit the character of Paul, 2) to cause confusion and 3) to get silly blind believers in the ‘inerrant KJV’ making all kinds of excuses on Paul’s behalf in order to explain this satanic verse away.

So did Paul circumcise Timothy? Not on your life and to prove it I will use the same method that I used to prove that Romans 13:1-7 is a satanic corruption of the Holy Scriptures. So let’s copy Acts 16 from verse 1 through to verse 8:

Acts 16:1-2 (MCV) Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, who was a Jewess, Judean Israelite and believed; but his father was a Greek: 2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium.

The first thing we must understand about these opening eight verses is that they are primarily an itinerary of Paul’s travels in this part of the world, that’s all. This is the primary focus of these verses and later on I will write them as they would have been written before they were corrupted by this satanic addition.

Acts 16:3 (MCV) Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek.

If Timothy was well received and well reported of, why the need for circumcision? or indeed, how did they know he wasn’t circumcised? Does that make any sense!!?? Furthermore, if his father was a Greek, that is a heathen, even more reason for him not to be circumcised, because heathen converts to The Faith did not have to fulfil the demands of The Law. Yet, conversely, with Timothy having a Judahite Israelite mother (not a Jewess), one would have expected him to have been circumcised when he was eight days old.

Acts 16:4 (KJV) And as they went through the cities, they delivered them the decrees for to keep, that were ordained of the apostles and elders which were at Jerusalem.

Here is the same verse as written in The Amplified Version:

Acts 16:4 (TAV) As they went on their way from town to town, they delivered over [to the assemblies] for their observance the regulations decided upon by the apostles and elders who were at Jerusalem.

Now what do we have here? Does this verse also sound all a bit legalistic and hierarchical (the system of the Nicolaitans that Yashua Messiah hates) with Jerusalem being the HQ like an early type of Rome dishing out its Papal Bulls and directives!!?? Again, if it doesn’t to you, then I suggest you have a rethink or perhaps you can point out The Grace within that verse.

Acts 16:5 (KJV) And so were the churches established in The Faith, and increased in number daily.

This verse as we read it sounds benign enough, but to me it has a propaganda ring to it, making you think that hundreds of people came flocking. How great were these numbers that were added when Paul, later on in Athens, after speaking in the Auditorium with 100’s, possibly 1,000’s in attendance, gathered two named people and certain men. ‘Certain men’ sounds very specific doesn’t it? small in number without doubt.

Acts 17:34 (KJV) Howbeit certain men clave unto him, and believed: among the which was Dionysius the Areopagite, and a woman named Damaris, and others with them.

Who were these others? Were they genuinely interested or just curious? We’re not told. However, this verse is not crucial to the point I am making here about Acts 16:3-4, which are definitely spurious. If we then look at verses 6-8, we can see the continuum issue that I raised in Romans 13:1-7 cropping up again, where the story flow gets interrupted with lies and nonsense and then reverts back the relevant subject of Paul’s itinerary:

Acts 16:6-8 (KJV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.

So let’s post this same passage as I believe it should be written without verses 3 and 4:

Acts 16:1-8 (MCV) Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess Judean Israelite, and believed; but his father was a Greek: 2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium. 5 And so were the churches established in the faith, and increased in number daily. 6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden by Yashua Messiah through the Holy Spirit to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but Yashua Messiah via The Holy Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.

There it is folks, as it was truly written – no Jewess mother, no circumcision of Timothy and no nonsense about KGB rules and regulations coming from ‘Papal Jerusalem’, or even of thousands flocking to Paul.

Matthew 22:14 Many are called, FEW are chosen.

Matthew 7:13-14 (MCV) Enter ye in at the strait (narrow and difficult) gate: for wide (easy) is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, (Spiritual ruin) and MANY there be which go in thereat: 14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and FEW there be that find it.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Brother Charles

Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons and Daughters of God Have To Obey Secular or Religious Authorities?:

Should Christians be Baptised into The Lord Jesus Christ’s Name Alone? – Part 2 – Cessationism.

[Link to Part 1 below]

OK, I think I know what many of you are going to ask here – what is Cessationism? Others of you will already know what it is and hold differing views on it. Some of you will not be sure about it one way or the other, in turn, some will be wholly against it and others wholly persuaded and for it.

However, before we press on with the pros and cons, another essential question arises out of this very important subject, and that question is: what has Cessationism got to do with being Baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone? I believe it’s everything to do with it, and it fully explains why we have the issue of Cessationism in the first place, and people who consequently believe in it. Equally, we must not discount those who do not believe it, because at the same time they are believing in something that I believe is totally false, as well, and I will return to this aspect of it later. Needless-to-say, it’s no coincidence that this phenomenon is just a copy of the scenario we have with Libertine (Progressive) Christianity versus Fundamental Christianity, for both parties are wrong. (Please see link No. 2 below). Both pro and anti Cessationism people are deceived. How can that be I hear you ask? Well, the answer to that is all tied up in the error of Baptism into The Trinity (See link No. 3 below) and I will now explain.

First, I will deal with the Cessationists and their false ideas. Cessationists believe that the Spiritual gifts and wonderful miracles performed by Our Lord Yashua Messiah and The Messengers (apostles), in the first century, were a one off. As far as they’re concerned, they were solely for Yashua Messiah and The Messengers (apostles), that is, for their time only and not for anyone else who was born of God (born again) after their generation. This means they believe that for one thousand nine hundred and seventy years, no one in the Church of God has been blessed with these amazing Spiritual Gifts.

Now for me this has always been a very sweeping or generalised statement and one that cannot be proven one way or the other, so this alone makes it ridiculous. Furthermore, and to be perfectly frank, this is a topic that I had shelved in the back of my mind several years ago. I was one of those people in the middle and that was simply because I didn’t know whether Cessationists were right or wrong. As it happened, I didn’t think it was crucial to our salvation anyway, so considered it a minor issue, but of course when we take on board the subject of the validity or, rather, the invalidity of our Baptism this throws a giant spanner into the works of our previous understanding.

You probably know what I am going to say here, but for those who may need some extra help, let me throw this in the air and see if any of you are willing to catch it. My belief and understanding now is that my original Baptism is invalid. This is due to the fact I was not Baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone but, rather, into the name of The Trinity as allegedly ‘commanded’ in Matthew 28:19, which in part one I proved was false, due to the verse being partly spurious. This means, not just my Baptism, but all those in mainstream Christianity down through the ages, (apart from the few who are baptised into His Name) are invalid. Like me, they are, or were, not Baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone, so this tells us much about how the erroneous concept of Cessationism came into being.

If we think about it for a while it’s obvious isn’t it? How can we expect to see the gifts of The Holy Spirit and the wonderful miracles if we have not been properly Baptised. All The Learners (disciples) were Baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone, and after the Lord’s ascension into Heaven were baptised with The Holy Spirit in the upper room when tongues of fire were seen to descend upon their heads. The Messengers (apostles) were not Baptised into the Roman Catholic Trinity for it was not conjured up by Tertullian until circa 200 AC. If they had been there would have been no visible displays of The Holy Spirit in action at all, that is, speaking in tongues, prophecies and/or miracles.

I hope you can now see how the Cessationist movement sprang up. They knew, and still know, the huge majority of mainstream Christians couldn’t do, and still can’t do, the things The Messengers (apostles) did so looked for a reason why and called it Cessationism. To compound it they even used Holy Scriptures to support their views, but in reality this is just twisting the meaning of certain verses in order to try and prove their case and I will quote a few here just to expose their errors.

1 Corinthians 13:8-12 (KJV) Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. 9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. 10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. 11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. 12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

Here in this passage of Holy Scripture, which they use to support their ideas, we can see what they believe to be an end of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, which they then apply retrospectively to the end of the first century. Is this true or is it correct? Notice, in verse 8 we can see an end of knowledge mentioned here too, but there has never been an end to knowledge and as we know man has more knowledge now than he’s ever had before. What these verses are referring to is a time yet to come in the future when knowledge will “vanish away”, when prophecies will fail and tongues shall cease – why? Easy, because there will be no need of them in the Kingdom of God, when we are powerful Spirit beings. Notice how Paul refers to it as looking through a glass darkly; as believers we know those days will come, but we do not yet understand what they will be like for it is a mystery, but one thing we do know, charity (love) will be there, for it never fails. This passage of Holy Scriptures has nothing to do with cessation of the Spiritual gifts in this age, and Cessationists have completely misapplied and misunderstood these verses.

Right, let’s have a look at another passage of Holy Scripture:

1 Corinthians 12:7-11 (KJV) But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. 8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; 9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; 10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues: 11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he it will.

Notice, there is no time limit attached to the apportionment of the gifts. Paul doesn’t say after verse 11: “And after us – The Messengers, these gifts and the benefits they give will cease when we die” This is what Paul would have said if cessation was to be the case, but of course it was not. Let’s look at these verses again, if the greater gifts were to disappear or cease, that is, healings, miracles, prophesies and tongues at the end of the first century, why didn’t the lesser gifts – the gifts of discerning of spirits, knowledge and wisdom? I will correct myself here: that’s if we can actually say the gifts of discerning of spirits, knowledge and wisdom are lesser gifts – most likely not.

Moving on, here is something from a Cessationist paper written by a Thomas Edgar:

History indicates that tongues did cease. Tongues are not mentioned at all by the Post-Apostolic Fathers. Other writers such as Justin Martyr, Origen, Chrysostom, and Augustine considered tongues something that happened only in the earliest days of the Church.”

Here is living proof that invalid baptisms were already having their negative effect because the above mentioned counterfeiters, otherwise known as ‘Post-Apostolic Fathers’ didn’t have the gifts, and now we know why, don’t we? They were not Baptised into Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) but, rather, into the heathen satanic Trinity of Matthew 28:19.

Finally, there is a view that Matthew 28:19 represents Godly authority only and I have copied here what could easily be the consensus of mainstream Christian thinking on this subject.

Christian baptism is also in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19). Being baptized in this manner simply means we are identifying ourselves with the Trinity.”

Right, there it is, by their own admission, the fact that they are identifying themselves with The Trinity, a blasphemous false Roman Catholic satanic addition to Holy Scripture and in direct opposition to what Yashua Messiah really taught through His Messengers (apostles).

We belong to the Father, are saved by the Son, and indwelt by the Spirit”

No, we do not belong to the Father, we belong to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and we are saved by His Sacrifice, His Blood and His Grace, for He is in us through THE POWER of The Holy Spirit.

Mark 9:41 (KJV) For whosoever shall give you a cup of water to drink in my name, because ye belong to Christ, verily I say unto you, he shall not lose his reward.

We have access to the Father through The Lord’s Sacrifice.

This is similar to how we pray in Jesus’ name (John 14:13)”

No it’s not, John 14:13 states quite clearly that whatever we ask in The Lord’s name – not The Trinity’s name, He will do and that the Father may be glorified in The Son. In turn because of what we have asked in The Lord’s name first. We are asking for nothing in The Father’s name.

If we pray in the name of Jesus, we are praying with His authority and asking God the Father to act upon our prayers because we come in the name of His Son Jesus”

This sentence is true, but it does not mean we should be Baptised in the Father’s name or in the Holy Spirit’s name. What he is saying here is that prayers should be prayed in the Lord’s name and no other, which, if we are consistent, also points to our being Baptised solely into His name too.

So there we have it, but what about these people who are Baptised into the name of The Trinity who profess to have Spiritual Gifts? You know; the Charismatics or that group of people who have adherents who say that if we haven’t got the gift of tongues we are not properly birthed in Christ or, even, we’re not born of God (born again) at all. How’s that for blasphemous arrogant effrontery and self-righteousness? I have known worldly businessmen with less!

OK, so what’s all this about? Easy, it’s about genuine gifts of The Holy Spirit and whether these people have them or if they’re just servants of the Devil with false tongues. I have been in their company, on more than one occasion, when they’ve been uttering noises along the lines of: bab, bab, bab, bab, bab, bab, bab, and on it goes in never ending vain repetition, and at the same time supposedly all for my edification and upliftment. Well I’ve news for them, it did no such thing and just gave me a laugh at their expense. Another trick of these people is to lie on the floor and bark like dogs – unbelievable? No, it’s the truth, I’ve witnessed it, but where does all this stuff and nonsense come from? Well it certainly isn’t Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) I’ll tell you that.

I am pleased to inform you all that my wife and I have now been re-baptised into Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) name alone. Have we since experienced tongues and have we prophesied? Yes, I have the Gifts of Tongues, Knowledge and Spiritual Discernment and my wife the Gifts of Faith and Wisdom. As for the Gifts of Healings and Miracles no, but that does not mean we won’t be blessed with them in the future, as the need arises, and if we add to it the fact that Baptism into The Trinity is false, we felt it too big a risk to take the chance and leave it undone.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? Part 1:

2. Progressive or Libertine Christianity Versus Fundamental Christianity:

3. Exposing the Trinity Lie!:

Faith….

.Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find Faith on the earth? Luke 18:8b

But what kind of Faith? and will Yashua Messiah find the right kind of Faith on the earth when He returns? This question arises out of one of Yashua Messiah’s Parables; recorded in Luke 18:1-8:

Luke 18:1-8 (KJV) And He spake a Parable unto them to this end, that men ought always to pray, and not to faint (not to give up); 2 Saying, There was in a city a judge, which feared not God, neither regarded man: 3 And there was a widow in that city; and she came unto him, saying, Avenge me of mine adversary. 4 And he would not for a while: but afterward he said within himself, Though I fear not God, nor regard man; 5 Yet because this widow troubleth me, I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me. 6 And the Lord said, Hear what the unjust judge saith. 7 And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them? 8 I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find Faith on the earth? (Brackets mine)

Luke 18:1-8 (Concordant Literal Version) 1 Now He told them a parable also, so that they must always be praying and not be despondent, 2 saying, “A certain judge was in a certain city, who did not fear God and did not respect man.” 3 Now there was a widow in that city, and she came to him, saying, ‘Avenge me from my plaintiff.'” 4 And for a time he would not. Yet, after this, he said in himself, ‘Even if I am not fearing God nor respecting man, 5 surely, because of the weariness this widow is affording me, I shall be avenging her, lest she, coming, may belabor me into a consummation.'” 6 Now the Lord said, “Hear what the unjust judge is saying.” 7 Yet should not God by all means be doing the avenging of His chosen ones, who are imploring Him day and night? And He is patient with them.” 8 I am saying to you that He will be doing the avenging of them swiftly. Moreover, consequently, at the coming of the Son of Mankind, will He be finding The Faith on the earth?

Luke 18:1-8 (The Amplified Bible) Now Jesus was telling The Disciples a Parable to make the point that at all times they ought to pray and not give up and lose heart, 2 saying, “In a certain city there was a judge who did not fear God and had no respect for man. 3 There was a [desperate] widow in that city and she kept coming to him and saying, ‘Give me justice and legal protection from my adversary.’ 4 For a time he would not; but later he said to himself, ‘Even though I do not fear God nor respect man, 5 yet because this widow continues to bother me, I will give her justice and legal protection; otherwise by continually coming she [will be an intolerable annoyance and she] will wear me out.’” 6 Then the Lord said, “Listen to what the unjust judge says! 7 And will not [our just] God defend and avenge His elect [His chosen ones] who cry out to Him day and night? Will He delay [in providing justice] on their behalf? 8 I tell you that He will defend and avenge them quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes, will He find [this kind of persistent] Faith on the earth?”

Now I have included three versions of the same passage, as the second and third versions highlight points that I wish to raise.

Moreover, here we have, what appears to be, a somewhat troubling verse of Holy Scripture, but troubling for whom? Well certainly not for those who are truly born of God (born again), for they will be exercising their Faith everyday of their lives, so that when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth HE WILL definitely find Faith on the earth.

However, this is not the issue I wish to raise, for my good lady wife reminded me of some advice she received from a fellow believer many years ago. This advice went like this: “If you pray to The Father and ask Him for something or for Him to do something, then ask only ONCE and THANK HIM for hearing you, and KNOWING IN FAITH that He will answer you, whether positively, or negatively, and/or not straight away.” This is powerful Faith in action.

Now the widow in this Parable had no faith in the judge, and for good reason, she knew she would have to keep on badgering him until he did his job. Did she know how The System worked? I think so, but we’re not told. However, one thing is for sure, we know that the judge was a bent and corrupt judge, because he tells us so:

Notice, from the KJV: Though I fear not God, nor regard man.” Then from the CLV: “Even if I am not fearing God nor respecting man”, and once more from The Amplified: “Even though I do not fear God nor respect man”. Furthermore, not only this, but we are also told by Yashua Messiah Himself (KJV): “There was in a city a judge, which feared not God, neither regarded man”. (CLV): “A certain judge was in a certain city, who did not fear God and did not respect man.” Finally, The Amplified: “In a certain city there was a judge who did not fear God and had no respect for man”.

We therefore have, in this very short story, a crucial point raised for our attention – TWICE! and when Yashua Messiah tells us something TWICE! we need to sit up and take notice, that is, IF we know what’s good for us.

Here are two more examples of this duality teaching that Yashua Messiah employed:

1) John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

2) John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

1) John 8:32 (KJV) And ye shall know The Truth, and The Truth shall make you free.

2) John 8:36 (KJV) If The Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

So, in like fashion, He let’s us know TWICE! that this judge had no fear of God in his heart, nor any respect or regard for man. Now why would Yashua Messiah draw our attention to that? and what makes this issue so significant that He should highlight it TWICE! in this very short Parable? That’s easy to answer, because it’s all tied in with His miracle of walking on The Sea, and His non-respect of PERSONS (See links 1, 2 and 3 below for ALL the background knowledge to this subject)

OK, so if you have now read the other articles you’ll be up to speed and will know that if the WOMAN had been a PERSON, the judge would have immediately taken her seriously, but as she was there as a flesh and blood WOMAN – a widow, and not a PERSON, the judge did not consider her as even existing, so treated her with utter contempt. Therefore, she was a non-entity to be ignored, or treated with no respect or regard at all, for she was completely invisible to this criminal corrupt judge.

However, because she was so determined to get justice she became like a dog with a bone and sank her metaphorical teeth into his butt and would not let go until he did the honourable thing and gave her justice.

If we then add in the fact that this judge was a blasphemous, Godless, secular, criminal wretch, it all begins to make sense, for his god was Satan, and only Satan’s servants, that is, his fellows, would be seen and heard favourably in his court. Their treatment would have been the exact opposite of what the widow received. In today’s language they would most likely be fellow Freemasons.

OK, so having cleared up that crucial element to this Parable, we then move on to the subject of Faith and what instruction Yashua Messiah gave us within these few verses. Namely, should we bother The Father with repetitive prayers like the widow bothered the criminal judge with her repetitive demands and requests? No way, is the answer to that. As already stated regarding the advice my wife received from a fellow believer – ONE request is enough. Our Father is not deaf, nor is He forgetful or cold, heartless and indifferent toward us, like the criminal judge was toward the widow, so do not treat Him as if He were. If we make our one-off requests, fully trusting, that, will then be us displaying the real Faith His Son Yashua Messiah wants to find when He returns.

As for praying, yes by all means, and keep on praying, but make sure your prayers are not boring and repetitive. You can also pray in tongues, if you have that gift, and don’t know what to pray about – that also displays Faith.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

1. For There is No Respect of Persons With God – Romans 2:11 – But What is a Person? – Parts 1 & 2:

2. Why Did Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) Walk on The Sea – Part 1 of 2:

3. Why Did Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) Walk on The Sea – Part 2 of 2:

The Corrupting Embellishment and Mythical Fantasy of Matthew 27:52-53

OK, so here we go again, with yet more corruptions by addition to The King James Bible. This one, I have to admit, has always bugged me, due to its sensationalist nature. It really does read as if it was faked, that is, first century fake news. Moreover, it reads as if it was written by a BBC or CNN lying media whore, so crass and stupid is it.

Matthew 27:52-53 (KJV) And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 53 And came out of the graves after His resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

The same passage including the previous and following verses:

Matthew 27:50-54 (KJV) Jesus, when He had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up The Ghost (Spirit). 51 And, behold, the veil of The Temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; 52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 53 And came out of the graves after His resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. 54 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.

So let’s see what one or two commentators have to say about it, starting with Adam Clarke and he says:

It is difficult to account for the transaction mentioned Mat 27:52, Mat 27:53. Some have thought that these two verses have been introduced into the text of Matthew from the gospel of the Nazarenes….”

He goes on to say:

“….by the earthquake several bodies that had been buried were thrown up and exposed to view, and continued above ground until Christ’s Resurrection.

For me that would mean dead bodies lying around for three days and three nights! Does that sound like something The Father would do?

From the https://fdocc.ucoz.com/ Web Page. The specific web page address is: https://fdocc.ucoz.com/index/forgery_mt_27_52b_53/0-79

THE FORGERY OF MATTHEW 27:52b AND 53

[Excerpts taken from: Daniel L. McConaughy (Seventh Way Corps), Early Patristic Evidence For The Forgery Of Matthew 27:52b And 53, GMIR (from Aramaic gmr – “to perfect”, presenting the necessary documentation to get back the original, God-inspired Word, by believing on 2 Tim. 2:15), The Way Magazine, May-June 1982]”

According to Daniel L. McConaughy only the second part of Matthew 52 is deemed a forgery, so it’s the part that reads: “And the graves were opened” and is OK as far as he’s concerned. However, I would question that, too, with the question: WHY!? Why would The Father open some graves through the earthquake unless it was to resurrect the occupants of those graves? To expose them just for sake of it would be meaningless, especially as Yashua Messiah has just died and is about to be put in His tomb, not resurrected from it.

Next we have this from E. W. Allen, author of: St. Matthew, The International Critical Commentary”, from which he states:

“This passage (Matthew 27:52-53) probably comes from… Palestinian traditions… If Christ was the first-fruits of them that slept [as 1 Cor. 15:22-23 declares *], how could His resurrection have been preceded by that of these saints? Under the influence of such idea, the editor adds the caution, “after His resurrection” [which in its previous tampered form seems to have been “after their resurrection”] (Allen, W.C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary of the Gospel According to Matthew, 3rd ed. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1912, p. 296).”

I know nothing about ‘Palestinian Traditions’, but as we can see this spurious two verse addition has created its own can of worms over which Biblical scholars have salivated – as they are want to do. However, if it’s for the right reasons and Truth is their agenda, then all kudos to them.

Moreover, the evidence revealed to us here from the above experts renders these verses very dodgy indeed, to say the least, but there is one crucial point that they have all missed, and it’s in the second part of the opening phrase. Did YOU see it? I hope so, but if not, don’t worry, for I will explain: “and many bodies of the saints which slept, arose.”

So what makes a saint, a saint? Being born of God (born again) makes a saint, and what takes place in order for a man or woman to become a saint? Repentance, confession of sins or admission to being a sinner and in need of The Father’s forgiveness, baptism and the gifting of The Holy Spirit. Now who were the first recipients of these tremendous blessings? Yashua Messiah’s twelve Learners (disciples) were the first recipients, in the upper room, and were any of them in their graves when Yashua Messiah died? No, not a single one, so how could there have been any saints in their graves at the time of Yashua Messiah’s crucifixion and death?

You see, dear brothers and sisters, these frauds always shoot themselves in the foot and betray themselves through their ignorance of The Truth. In this example it’s ignorance of what constitutes being A SAINT! This means we know that some Hellenising, religious fantasist was responsible for the penning of these two bogus verses.

OK, so let’s prove the point and write these Holy Scriptures as they should be written in order to reveal The Truth:

Matthew 27:50-52 (KJV) Jesus, when He had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up The Ghost (Spirit). 51 And, behold, the veil of The Temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; 52 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.

Interesting how it makes good sense with those bogus verses removed eh?

This proves, too, that the bogus verses were gratuitous sensationalist irrelevant religious mumbo jumbo, from the same spiritual mind sets that would later add Mary worship, fake fraudulent saints and transubstantiation to their satanic religious belief system – namely The Roman Cult.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

Why Did Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) Walk on The Sea? – Part 2 of 2

Here is the link to Part 1. Please read first before continuing:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/why-did-yashua-anointed-the-lord-jesus-christ-walk-on-the-sea/

At the end of part one I left it with another passage from Matthew’s Gospel namely verses 24-27 from chapter 17 which reads as follows:

Matthew 17:24-27 (KJV) And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your Master pay tribute? 25 He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? 26 Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free? 27 Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to THE SEA, and CAST AN HOOK, and TAKE UP THE FISH THAT FIRST COMETH UP; and WHEN THOU HAST OPENED HIS MOUTH, thou shalt find A PIECE OF MONEY: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.

In this article I will show you how Yashua Messiah walked on ‘the sea’ in the Spiritual sense, that He demonstrated in the literal sense in Matthew 14:22-33. This means that the actual walking on the sea was purely a representation of what He taught His Learners (disciples) later in Matthew 17 above.

So let’s set the scene and explain what’s going on here:

First we have a Roman tax collector who approaches Peter with the question: Doth not your Master pay tribute? In other words, does your Master pay His taxes? Peter answers in the affirmative, that is, Yes! However, Yashua Messiah takes him on one side and asks him a pertinent question, namely: “What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children or of strangers?” Peter answers Him by saying: “strangers”. Yashua Messiah then responds with: “Then are the children free?” That is, are the children free from levy? The answer to this is a resounding YES!

This then beggars the question, who are these ‘children’, and who or what do they represent? Well Yashua Messiah tells you who they are, they are flesh and blood free men and free women – sentient beings, not slaves, or subjects, or citizens, or strangers, or serfs, or fictional persons (masks) (see link No. 1 below)

However, what does Yashua Messiah then go on to say: “Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to THE SEA”.

Now this could also be interpreted as His desire for His Learners to remain in honour, so that no one could point any fingers at them for being tax dodgers and not ‘paying-their-way’ under Roman Civil Law, hence He says: “Lest that we should offend them.”

Now this is where it gets interesting – VERY INTERESTING, for this is what Yashua Messiah says next:

Go thou to THE SEA, and CAST AN HOOK, and TAKE UP THE FISH THAT FIRST COMETH UP; and WHEN THOU HAST OPENED HIS MOUTH, thou shalt find A PIECE OF MONEY: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.”

Now pay close attention, for He says: “Go thou to ‘the sea’.” So what is He saying? Easy, go to The Beast System, for ‘The Sea’ is The Beast System, and use it for your own advantageand cast an hook. By casting a hook He meant to ensnare them using THEIR system against them, but at the same time remaining in honour and meeting their tax demands.

He then says: “Take up the fish, that first commeth up” which means when they make their first demand upon you, you accept that as a presentment and a money offer, for in a National Bankruptcy there is no money, so any demand made upon you is the money. As this presentment is actually money you then “Accept it for Value” and return it as set-off for the alleged debt. This is the “piece of money” that Yashua Messiah is referring to in the fishes’ mouth.

What He is actually revealing here is for our age today, for the ‘fishes mouth’ is a direct reference to The VATICAN where they wear their Dagon Fish Hats.

In turn, this means you are requesting that The Vatican honours the National Bankruptcy, that they have orchestrated, and are in breach of by making dishonourable financial demands upon you as a flesh and blood sentient being – a free man and/or a free woman.

Moreover, the ‘piece-of-money’ in the fishes’ mouth could be better described as a specie-of-money or a financial instrument that commercial institutions use every day. Things like ‘promissory notes’ and/or ‘bills of exchange’.

The ‘money’ in your wallet is a ‘promissory note’ or a ‘promise-to-pay’, it’s just an I.O.U. = a debt instrument, a ‘minus instrument’, not a ‘plus instrument’. This means that every time we use these Pound Notes or Federal Reserve Notes we add to the National Debt, by default. Hence they use the word ‘purchase’, for to purchase means to use leverage in order to acquire things, rather than buy them. Truthfully speaking we cannot BUY anything with debt notes, but we can purchase things or leverage things into our possession, but we have not paid for them.

Everything financial today, due to the National Bankruptcy, is like looking in a mirror – it’s all back to front. The cash receipt you receive after having purchased something, is actually the REAL MONEY, that’s how crazy it has become. However, as I have already made plain we can use this craziness to our advantage and set-off our debts completely by accepting their presentments or offers for value and return them (see the A4V link below).

As before, if you have any questions feel free to ask, but no arguments, thank you.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

1. For There is No Respect of Persons With God – Romans 2:11 – But What is a Person? – Parts 1 & 2: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/for-there-is-no-respect-of-persons-with-god-romans-211-but-what-is-a-person-parts-1-2/

A little information on the Accept for Value process.

HELL

Introduction

So, 1) What is hell? 2) Where is hell? 3) Does hell exist? 4) Is hell just symbolism for something Spiritual? 5) Is hell this earth, in the here and now, under Satan’s rule? 6) Why is there a place called hell? 7) Who goes there, or who will be sent there? 8) Where does the word come from? 9) How many hells are there? 10) Is there a fiery hell? 11) Is it just the grave – a hole in the ground? 12) Is the Roman Catholic take on hell, true, that is, Purgatory? 13) Why all the confusion about this word hell? 14) Can we rely on the ‘experts’ for their interpretations of this word, even Mr Strong in his Concordance? 15) Why all the comical jokes and cartoons about, what would seem to be, such a serious subject?

There are over three quarters of a million words in the King James Bible, that’s 770,430 words to be precise, but with the word ‘hell’ mentioned only 54 times, in 54 verses, in the whole Bible, and that equates to a miniscule 0.007009073%. So what’s the big deal about this little place or concept of a place called hell? Hopefully all will be revealed in this series of articles.

Before I start, let’s deal with the etymology of the word ‘hell’ (that’s question No. 8 in my introduction list) in order to build our foundation, for it may turn out that just the use of this word hell’ is itself a gross deception:

From The Online Etymology Dictionary:

Hell (noun):

Also Hell, Old English hel, helle, “nether world, abode of the dead, infernal regions, place of torment for the wicked after death,” from Proto-Germanic *haljō “the underworld” (source also of Old Frisian helle, Old Saxon hellia, Dutch hel, Old Norse hel, German Hölle, Gothic halja “hell”). Literally “concealed place” (compare Old Norse hellir “cave, cavern”), from PIE root *kel- (1) “to cover, conceal, save.”

The English word may be in part from Old Norse mythological Hel (from Proto-Germanic *halija “one who covers up or hides something”), in Norse mythology the name of Loki’s daughter who rules over the evil dead in Niflheim, the lowest of all worlds (nifl “mist”). A pagan concept and word fitted to a Christian idiom. In Middle English, also of the Limbus Patrum, place where the Patriarchs, Prophets, etc. awaited the Atonement. Used in the KJV for Old Testament Hebrew Sheol and New Testament Greek Hades, Gehenna. Used figuratively for “state of misery, any bad experience” at least since late 14c. As an expression of disgust, etc., first recorded 1670s.”

As we can see, we’re straight into (Greek) mythology with words like ‘nether world’, ‘infernal regions’ and/or ‘places of torment’ and, with some of it starting as late as the 14th century. This is not really that old when compared to Old Testament times, where we have the Hebrew word ‘sheol’ being the only word in use for describing ‘hell’. However, notice how it’s referred to as: “A pagan concept and word fitted to a Christian idiom.” This alone tells us much, in that ‘hell’, in and of itself, is already a loaded, pagan, religious agenda driven word. I wonder who could be responsible for such a thing? Much mocking sarcasm here from the author.

Archetypal Image of the Mythological Hades (Hell)

Another interesting point is the Norse ‘mythological’ reference to ‘Niflheim’, which seems to have an uncanny resemblance to the Biblical Hebrew word ‘Nephilim’. This, in turn, raises two more interesting points, in that we have 1) a reference to the Norse people, who were one of the Israelite Tribes, namely Benjamin, and who had this Scriptural knowledge of the ‘Nephilim’, albeit cloaked in Norse mythology. And 2) that they believed there was a place of imprisonment for these fallen spirit beings ‘Niflheim’ or ‘Nephilim’, again, as made plain in the Holy Scriptures:

Jude 6 (KJV) And the angels (‘Nephilim’) which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, He hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of The Great Day.

Now this says to me that the real meaning of the word ‘hell’ is the place of imprisonment of the demons (nephilim) where Yashua Messiah cast them at the time of The Flood, and where they remain to this day. Therefore this word ‘hell’ has been miss-used in English Bibles to describe something that it’s plainly not and the Hebrew word for ‘hell’, that is ‘sheol’, should have been incorporated into the English language, so that there was no ambiguity.

Moreover, let’s answer the first question second: What is hell from the Biblical perspective? If we go straight to the Old Testament we get the word ‘hell’ mentioned 31 times, and in every case it is translated from the Hebrew word ‘sheol’and from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

Hell H7585shᵉʼôwl, sheh-ole’; or שְׁאֹל shᵉʼôl; – from H7592; hades or the world of the dead (as if a subterranean retreat), including its accessories and inmates:—grave, hell, pit.

H7592sha’al shaw-al’ or shael {shaw-ale’}; – a primitive root; to inquire; by implication, to request; by extension, to demand:–ask (counsel, on), beg, borrow, lay to charge, consult, demand, desire, X earnestly, enquire, + greet, obtain leave, lend, pray, request, require, + salute, X straitly, X surely, wish.

Now notice what’s going on here, for immediately we have gratuitous erroneous embellishments being added with the Greek word ‘hades’ being utilised and introduced. Hades’ is straight out of Greek mythology, so it doesn’t exist – ‘hades’ is a LIE! So why have silly duped and deluded people included it into their ‘Christian’ belief systems, and why has Mr Strong dropped this huge clanger? He says that H7592 refers to: “hades or a world of the dead – a subterranean retreat,” when it says no such thing – see definition H7592 above.

I will therefore return to one of my other introduction questions, question No. 14: Can we rely on the ‘experts’ for their interpretations of this word, even Mr Strong in his Concordance? So in this first instance can we rely upon Mr Strong with his inclusion of the Greek mythological word ‘hades’ into his definition? NO! is the resounding answer to that.

Getting back to The Truth and reality, the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that uses the word ‘hell’ is Deuteronomy 32:22 and I will copy it here:

Deuteronomy 32:22 (KJV) For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell (H7585), and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.

In this first usage of the word ‘hell’ it can only mean ‘pit’, as in a lowest point on the earth, when The Lord’s anger will be displayed with fire and shall burn even unto this low point on the earth. This is not a designated place and/or the realm of a permanent fiery place, as we are led to believe from the pages of the New Testament by blind guides, because in this case the whole earth is consumed by this fire.

Let’s now look at an associated word, ‘grave’, in order to get a better understanding of this word ‘hell’, and that word is used for the first time in Genesis 37:

Genesis 37:35 (KJV) And all his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted; and he said, For I will go down into the grave (H7585) unto my son mourning. Thus his father wept for him. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Now pay special attention, for we have the same Hebrew word in play here, that is, ‘sheol’, for the word grave’. So does this prove that ‘hell’ and the ‘grave’ are one and the same thing? You betcha.

OK, so we have now ascertained some interesting points: 1) There is no fiery hell mentioned in the Old Testament. 2) Hell sheol’ in the Old Testament means only one thing – the GRAVE sheol’ or a hole in the ground where dead people are buried, so where is this fiery hell and did it not apply to Old Testament people? Were they not evil sinners when they died? Was there any chance of redemption/salvation for them? NO! So what’s going on?

Moreover, if we take this subject a step further we need to discuss the reality of death’, if only that it makes sense to do so. I say this because people in general have some very whacky ideas, not only about ‘hell’, but also about ‘death’. So let’s clarify this subject before we move on with our discussion about ‘hell’.

So what is death? Death is the cessation of life, kaput, fini, end of. The wages of sin! Life ceases totally and this is made very clear in the Holy Scriptures:

Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV) For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.

Psalm 115:17 (KJV) The dead praise not the LORD, neither any that go down into silence.

Psalm 6:5 (KJV) For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?

There we have it, the dead know not anything, they go down into the ground in silence, a state of oblivion, or if you prefer, just as we were before we were born – nothingness – no breath of life – no existence – no conscious awareness of anything – NOTHING! If you’re hung up and deceived by the papist immortal soul nonsense, then see the first crucial link below.

Where were we? Ah yes, ‘hell’ and the Old Testament and what it proves for us, namely, that there is no fiery hell mentioned. Does this create a problem? Well it certainly looks like it, if we believe what we’re told by blind guides. The New Testament beckons.

In the New Testament the word ‘hell’ is mentioned 23 times and interestingly the Biblical number 23 means death, so that’s very appropriate, is it not? Just a little aside. In the New Testament the first verse in which we find the word ‘hell’ is in Matthew 5:22, but before we go there we need first to list all the hells of the NT, and their definitions – answer to question No. 9:

Hell – G1067geena gheh’-en-nahof Hebrew origin (1516 and 2011); valley of (the son of) Hinnom; ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom), a valley of Jerusalem, used (figuratively) as a name for the place (or state) of everlasting punishment:–hell.

H1516gay’ gah’-ee or (shortened) gay {gah’-ee}; – probably (by transmutation) from the same root as 1466 (abbreviated); a gorge (from its lofty sides; hence, narrow, but not a gully or winter-torrent):–valley.

H2011Hinnom hin-nome’ probably of foreign origin; Hinnom, apparently a Jebusite – a Canaanite:–Hinnom.

Hell – G86haides hah’-dace – from 1 (as negative particle) and 1492; properly, unseen, i.e. “Hades” or the place (state) of departed souls:–grave, hell.

Hell – G5020tartaroo tar-tar-o’-o – from Tartaros (the deepest abyss of Hades); to incarcerate in eternal torment:–cast down to hell.

Now I find this conundrum very interesting, because after 3 BC with the arrival of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) on this earth, we now have three definitions for the word ‘hell’, not just one, as in the Old Testament. So what’s changed and what’s going on – has dying been remodelled or reformed? ROTFL! In the blink of an eye, are their now more places or destinations for dead people to go?

The spirit of this conundrum seems to have strong similarities to the mythical changed nature of God from being a Duality Godhead, that is, God with God (The Elohim) from before beginning, into a mythical triune godhead deity that doesn’t exist. Do I hear first and second century Hellenising religious gobbledegook alarm bells ringing here? Yes of course I do, for there can be no other explanation for the introduction of this mythical garbage into The Holy Scriptures. I speak here of the mythical non-existent ‘hades’.

However, on a more serious note, we do have Yashua Messiah introducing some severe warnings to rebellious wicked people, in general, and this includes those that will be cast into ‘outer darkness’. So not only do we have three types of ‘hell’ in play in the NT, but also this place called ‘outer darkness’. Which again is not mentioned in the Old Testament.

Outer – G1857exoteros ex-o’-ter-os – comparative of 1854; exterior:–outer.

Darkness – G4655skotos skot’-os – from the base of 4639; shadiness, i.e. obscurity (literally or figuratively):–darkness.

Notice, that we have a place where certain people will end up and they will be alive, or will be conscious, but they will be kept in the background, in the shade so to speak, or in obscurity, so initially will have no part in The Kingdom of God – whether this is a permanent arrangement or not I don’t know. It could be a place where they have to learn some hard lessons. Some interpret this as being totally cut off from Yashua Messiah, when all the while in this life, they professed to be His followers, that is, these people here:

Matthew 7:21-23 (KJV) Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into The Kingdom of God; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 MANY will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Moreover, this makes plain that there is an after death place of punishment, not involving fire, where these punishments will be meted out. When I say after death, I mean post the first resurrection, for we all die the first death and we’re all placed in HELL, that is, ‘sheol’ or the grave. This is with one exception, for those alive at Yashua Messiah’s return will die and, in an instant, in the twinkling of an eye, be immediately resurrected to life, and this is answer to question No. 7:

Luke 12:45-49 (KJV) But and if that servant say in his heart, My Lord delayeth His coming; and shall begin to beat the menservants and maidens, and to eat and drink, and to be drunken; 46 The Lord of that servant will come in a day when he looketh not for Him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in sunder, and will appoint him his portion with the unbelievers. 47 And that servant, which knew his Lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more. 49 I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?

First of all, take special note of these verses, for we are not dealing primarily with the lost and unsaved but, rather, so-called Christians. These are believers, that is, alleged servants of Yashua Messiah who start thinking that Yashua Messiah is not coming, so they start beating up on their fellow men and women, in their employ, and over indulging in food and booze, on a regular basis. These ‘believers’ Yashua Messiah cuts off from entering into The Kingdom and demotes them to the status of the lost and unsaved and gives what they would have inherited to the lost and unsaved. However, this is not the end of them, for they will still be in the resurrection and be beaten with many stripes, whilst the lost and unsaved will be beaten with few stripes, because they knew no better.

Secondly, notice how the fire will be sent on the earth in general, not people being deposited into a fiery pit of hell. This fits in with The Lord’s words in Deuteronomy, which I quoted in the beginning and will fulfil His prophesy.

However, in spite of all this, ALL of MANkind will be resurrected, albeit not at the same time, but at two different times in the future – either in the First Resurrection, when Yashua Messiah returns, or in the Second Resurrection at the end of The Millennium, a thousand years later. See the second link below for the details.

1 Timothy 2:4 (MCV) Who will have (desires) all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of The Truth.

Returning to where I was above, another interesting point is that this term ‘outer darkness’ can only be found three times in the NT and all three are in Matthew’s Gospel. Does this mean that Matthew only was privy to this Truth, or is it written differently in the other Gospels? At this stage I don’t know, but I will by the time I have finished this study!

I will copy all three passages here:

Matthew 8:11-12 (MCV) And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in The Kingdom of God. 12 But the children of The Kingdom shall be cast out into OUTER DARKNESS: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Now the above passage of Scripture throws up an interesting turn of phrase, namely ‘The Children of The Kingdom’. Who were these Children of The Kingdom (‘Sons of the Kingdom’ would be a better translation)? Well in Truth they were not really sons at all, for this is yet another dig by Yashua Messiah at the Pharisee Jews, who THOUGHT they were the sons of The Kingdom, when they were no such thing. However, He plays up to their delusional thinking and let’s them know, fair and square, what their destination will be, as opposed to the salvation granted to the faithful non-Jew Roman centurion – see Matthew 8:5-10.

Matthew 22:11-13 (KJV) And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: 12 And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. 13 Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into OUTER DARKNESS, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

In the above passage we have a reference to the saints dressed in the white robes of Revelation:

Revelation 6:11 (KJV) And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.

So the fella in this parable was obviously not dressed in metaphorical white robes, that is, he was not called and chosen by The Father, and he was not Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone, and not gifted with The Holy Spirit. So clearly he was not born of God, and yet obviously thought he was a Christian as many in the counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion do.

Let this be a warning to all you fakes out there who erroneously think you can accept a ‘Jesus’ as your saviour and not acknowledge your Fatherly call. Repent NOW whilst you still have the time. See link No. 4 below.

Matthew 25:26-30 (KJV) His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: 27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. 28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. 29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. 30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into OUTER DARKNESS: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

In the above passage we have a faithless Christian who couldn’t even be bothered to put his talents in a bank to gain some interest, so his punishment is outer darkness. Moreover, notice how this outer darkness place is not called hell, nor is there any mention of fire within it, and yet it is definitely a very unpleasant place of punishment, because those destined to go there weep and gnash their teeth in mental torment and agony. In other places it says, wailing and the gnashing of teeth – a pretty sorry state for these hapless people, to say the least. So let’s take a look at all the other places, seven in all, where this weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth occurs.

Likewise I will copy all seven passages here:

Matthew 13:40-42 (KJV) As therefore The Tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. 41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. See the third link below.

A crucial point to register here is that those burned with fire here, that is, The Jews, will be burned at the point of Yashua Messiah’s return at the end of this world, so we’re definitely not dealing with a permanent hell fire location or even a place of torment as offered to us by certain religious snake-oil salesmen. Here, the fire at the time Yashua Messiah’s return is called a ‘furnace’ of fire. Likewise in this passage:

Matthew 13:4750 (KJV) Again, The Kingdom of Heaven (God) is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of EVERY KIND: 48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away. 49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Once more: “Again, The Kingdom of Heaven (God) is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of EVERY KIND:” “EVERY KIND” here is a direct reference to all the ethnic groups of hu-man kind and mankind across the world. Look what happens next: “Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good (mankind) into vessels, but cast the bad (inbred Canaanite hu-man kind) away.” These words are nothing to do with sinners or sinning in general, that is, bad people as opposed to good people, that is, sinners and non-sinners, for no one is good and all have fallen short so there are no non-sinners, apart from the saints. Not only that, but Yashua Messiah has dealt with ALL sin and it’s just a matter of calling the slumbering masses in the Second Resurrection, in order for them to be saved after they have been evaluated at the Great White Throne Tribunal.

These words, and their intended meaning, that is, the differing sea creatures, are just the same as those in the Parable of The Wheat and Tares, and we’re dealing with a separation of The Wheat from The Tares, and we know who (((The Tares))) are don’t we? Yes, the Serpent Seed Canaanites. Again see link No. 3 below for all the details.

Matthew 24:48-51 (KJV) But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; 49 And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken; 50 The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, 51 And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

This one I have covered above in Luke 12.

Luke 13:25-28 (KJV) When once The Master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and He shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are: 26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets. 27 But He shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. 28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in The Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.

Furthermore, what is the common denominator in all of these passages of Holy Scripture, apart from all the weeping, wailing and the gnashing of teeth? The secret is in the words of these verses and who they were/are aimed at: “when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in The Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.” Namely, The Pharisee Jews, who were the leaders of all the Jews and spoke for all the Jews. Today’s rabbis are direct descendants of those Pharisees. This means that this whole topic of ‘hell’ in the NT has taken on a distinctly Serpent Seed racial or ethnic flavour – hence the necessity of a fiery hell or fiery punishment instead of just the Old Testament ‘Sheol’ – the grave.

I think I will call that the end of Part 1.

HELL – Part 2

Before we move on with the ‘hell’ word, we also need to suss out the ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’ words, for not all is what it seems with these words ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’, and there are even more definitions of the word ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’ than the word ‘hell’. Would you believe it!? I will list these as they appear in the New Testament, starting in Matthew:

Fire – G4442pur poor – a primary word; “fire” (literally or figuratively, specially, lightning):–fiery, fire.

Fire – G5457phos foce – from an obsolete phao (to shine or make manifest, especially by rays; compare 5316, 5346); luminousness (in the widest application, natural or artificial, abstract or concrete, literal or figurative):–fire, light.

Fire (of coals) – G439anthrakia anth-rak-ee-ah’ – from 440; a bed of burning coals:–fire of coals.

Fire – G4443pura poo-rah’ from 4442; a fire (concretely):–fire.

Fire – G5394phlogizo flog-id’-zo – from 5395; to cause a blaze, i.e. ignite (figuratively, to inflame with passion):–set on fire.

Fire or Fiery – G4448puroo poo-ro’-o – from 4442; to kindle, i.e. (passively) to be ignited, glow (literally), be refined (by implication), or (figuratively) to be inflamed (with anger, grief, lust):–burn, fiery, be on fire, try.

Fire – G4447purinos poo’-ree-nos – from 4443; fiery, i.e. (by implication) flaming:–of fire.

Fiery – G4451purosis poo’-ro-sis – from 4448; ignition, i.e. (specially), smelting (figuratively, conflagration, calamity as a test):–burning, trial.

So there they are, all 8 definitions of the words ‘fire’ and ‘fiery’ being used in the New Testament, and all these definitions are found amongst the 83 uses of the word ‘fire’ in 79 verses. 32 times in the Four Gospels; 6 times in Acts; 9 times in Paul’s Epistles; 10 times in the General Epistles and 26 times in Revelation. Plus 3 uses of the word ‘fiery’ found in 3 verses.

Right, let’s have a closer look at these definitions and see what we can find. The first thing that sticks out is the number of times the first definition is used, that is, G4442 and it’s used 73 times out of the 83. But lets look at the lesser used definitions first, for that will reveal much for us when we come the more common G4442 definition. OK, first Scripture using G5457:

Mark 14:54 (KJV) And Peter followed Him afar off, even into the palace of the High Priest: and he sat with the servants, and warmed himself at the fire. (G5457)

In this verse we definitely have reference to an ordinary fire, that is, the sort we would have in our houses, if we had open fire places, or the sort of fire we would light at the bottom of our gardens for burning leaves and/or garden waste = a fire!

Luke 22:56 (KJV) But a certain maid beheld him as he sat by the fire, (G5457) and earnestly looked upon him, and said, This man was also with him.

Here we have confirmation of the same definition of an ordinary fire in Luke.

Elsewhere in John it is called a ‘fire of coals’:

John 18:18 (KJV) And the servants and officers stood there, who had made a fire (G439) of coals; for it was cold: and they warmed themselves: and Peter stood with them, and warmed himself.

But still it’s an ordinary fire as in G5457.

However, as soon as we get to the G4442 definition things change dramatically – here are some examples:

Matthew 3:11 (MCV) I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but He that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: He shall baptize you with the Holy Spirit, and with fire: (G4442)

That is no ordinary fire! Nor is this:

Revelation 10:1 (KJV) And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire: (G4442)

So are we dealing with symbolism here and/or things manifesting themselves as ‘fiery’ in order for Yashua Messiah to make a strong impression in our minds. You will have noticed that this G4442 definition also includes ‘lightning’ as part of its description, so it’s definitely not fire in the ordinary sense of fire.

In our next verse it takes on a new form and we also include the word ‘hell’ in with ‘fire’:

Matthew 5:22 (MCV) But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca = empty, (without a cause) shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, (without a cause) shall be in danger of hell (G1067 Gehenna)fire (G4442).

I have added the words ‘without a cause’ two more times because Paul called many people fools and I am sure he will not be in danger of Gehenna Fire.

Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

So what is this Gehenna Fire? I will repost from above:

Hell – G1067geena gheh’-en-nah – of Hebrew origin (1516 and 2011); valley of (the son of) Hinnom; ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom), a valley of Jerusalem, used (figuratively) as a name for the place (or state) of everlasting punishment:- -hell.

H1516gay’ gah’-ee or (shortened) gay {gah’-ee}; – probably (by transmutation) from the same root as 1466 (abbreviated); a gorge (from its lofty sides; hence, narrow, but not a gully or winter-torrent):–valley.

H2011Hinnom hin-nome’ probably of foreign origin; Hinnom, apparently a Jebusite:–Hinnom.

Gehenna Fire has its origins from the Hebrew Old Testament where it is not referred to as hell’ but, rather, the Valley of Hinnom just outside Jerusalem. This is where the wicked Israelites passed their children through the fire as sacrifices to the Canaanite god Moloch or Molech. This wicked satanic practice, along with the more evil satanic idolatry that went with it, was the main reason for Yashua Messiah (God of The Old Testament) bringing the Assyrians and later the Babylonians to carry both Kingdoms off into captivity. The House of Israel from 740-725 BC and The House of Judah circa 585 BC.

Later on this valley became the dump for Jerusalem’s refuse where all the carcases from the sacrifices were deposited and left to either burn and/or rot.

However, we can see how this name is carried over into the New Testament through the Greek word Gehenna = ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom). ‘Ge’ meaning gorge or valley and Hinnom the name of a Jebusite, that is, a Canaanite. So Gehhena literally means the Gorge of Hinnom the Canaanite where garbage was continuously thrown and burned.

So how many people will be thrown literally into the Gorge of Hinnom? None is the answer to that, for the Gorge of Hinnom (Gehenna) is pure symbolism for unquenchable fire, that is, as long as more combustible stuff is added to it. Cease adding to it and it will go out and so it is with God’s unquenchable fire. It will burn for as long as is needed and once all The Tares and things that offend are consumed it will go out.

Matthew 3:12 (KJV) Whose fan is in His hand, and He will throughly purge His floor, and gather His wheat into the garner; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.

This verse, once more, is a parallel verse to that of The Wheat and The Tares and is an end time event when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth. John the Baptist is letting The Pharisees know, with no punches pulled, what their end will be in the resurrection and confirmed for us here:

Matthew 13:40 (KJV) As therefore The Tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.

However, there is another Gehenna Fire that is everlasting and we see it illustrated here:

Matthew 18:8-9 (KJV) Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire (G4442). 9 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell (G1067 Gehenna) fire (G4442).

So what is this telling us? Well first of all we have this G4442 fire which is no ordinary fire, and that it’s everlasting, that is, it’s perpetual, from the past and into the future, never ending, eternal. So it sounds like this G4442 ‘fire’ has a Spiritual aura about it as well, a supernatural fire for want of a better description.

Is this ‘fire’ one and the same as the Lake of Fire as described in Revelation? I think so, for this message in Matthew 18 is being delivered to those under The Law. No one was born of God and indwelled by The Holy Spirit whilst Yashua Messiah was alive on this earth. Yes a minority of people, including the twelve learners, were being called, but none were saved until after Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection.

Moreover, Yashua Messiah made the comparison between the days before The Flood and these last days, except these last days will culminate in worldwide fire, not a worldwide flooding of water, but it will be worldwide, and there will be no hiding places for the wicked Jews and their shabbos goy servants – all will perish. The same for the False Prophet (The Pope) and all his sycophant slave followers, their satanic idolatrous religion will not save them.

Matthew 24:37-39 (MCV) But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be. 38 For as in the days that were before The Flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into The Ark, 39 And knew not until The Flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be.

So shall the coming of The Son of Man be, only this time with WORLDWIDE FIRE! not worldwide water:

2 Peter 3:6-7 (The Amplified Bible) Through which the world at that time was destroyed by being flooded with water. 7 But by His Word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly people.

Revelation 16:8 (KJV) And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire (G4442).

Moreover, the above event is not the Lake of Fire or Gehenna Fire, which I think are one and the same thing, for both are everlasting fire. The Lake of Fire also burns with the aid of brimstone. However, this brimstone seems to be a very special kind of brimstone and different from that which was discovered at the sites of Sodom and Gomorrah (85% pure Sulphur). We will therefore use Strong’s Concordance to assist us:

Old Testament:

H1614 – Brimstone – gophrîyth, gof-reeth’; – Probably feminine of H1613; properly, cypress-resin; by analogy, sulphur (as equally inflammable):—brimstone.

New Testament:

Brimstone – G2303theionthi’-on – probably neuter of 2304 (in its original sense of flashing); sulphur:–brimstone.

G2304theios thi’-os from 2316; Godlike (neuter as noun, divinity): – divine, Godhead.

G2316theostheh’-os – of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with 3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively, a magistrate; by Hebraism, very:–X exceeding, God, god(-ly, -ward).

Do you now see how the G2303 brimstone is different from the H1614 Old Testament brimstone, for the G2303 brimstone has a very Godly or Divine dimension to it, and it is capable of flashing. Notice how this also fits in with the G4442 fire with its lightning. So we now have a fire that is no ordinary fire and a brimstone that is Godlike or Divine, hence it is able to burn for eternity.

Revelation 20:10 (MCV) And The Devil that deceived them was cast into The Lake of Fire (G4442) and Brimstone (G2303), where The Beast and The False Prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

Notice that this brimstone will not kill The Beast (The Rothschilds and their Jewish criminal empire) and The False Prophet (The Popes and their Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with their deceived and deluded followers), but it will torment them day and night forever. This is how we know that the two brimstones and fires are very different, for the Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone destroyed the cities completely, even the stone walls and buildings, such was the intensity of the heat. However, this Lake of Fire (G4442) and Brimstone does not destroy, but torments forever.

So who gets sent to this Gehenna Lake of Fire for eternal punishment. Well at this moment in time all we know for sure are the characters listed above, but no doubt there will be quite few Canaanite Serpent Seed people to keep them company.

So let’s recap what we have ascertained:

1) Hell is definitely the grave, or the Hebrew ‘Sheol’, the punishment for the wages of sin, as of Adam and Eve’s first transgression into which we are born – the fallen sinful condition and for which the penalty is a cessation of life. This is a crucial point that many-so called Christians forget, when they are busy foaming at the mouth over those that they accuse of rejecting Yashua Messiah, that is, the lost and unsaved in this life. We’re all punished by death for that first misdemeanour of our original parents, whether we’re saved or not – there is no escape from the punishment of death – the first death.

2) We ascertained what death is, and what it is not. At the same time we exposed the mythological ‘Hades’ concept and exposed it for the religious bunkum that it is.

3) We learned that: a) there are different types of ‘fire’ alluded to in the New Testament, and: b) that the end time fire, that will come upon the earth, in general, is not the Gehenna Fire of Revelation, that is, the Lake of Fire, which certain individuals will be thrown into.

4) We now know that there is a place, or a concept, or condition known as Outer Darkness, as mentioned in Matthew’s Gospel. However, it is NOT known or referred to as hell, nor as a fiery hell, as no fire is mentioned in relation to this place – if it is a place at all. It may just be a mental condition, an experience, or a state of being, whereby certain people are definitely conscious, and will be experiencing an existence cut off from Yashua Messiah’s presence. All this, when they that are cut off, were/are expecting to spend their eternal lives with Him. What a great shock this will be for these hapless people. Furthermore, is this a permanent arrangement for these wretched people? This point is not made known to us in the Holy Scriptures, apart from The Truth that God does NOT remain angry forever – that much we do know.

5) Along with the ‘fire’ we learned that there are two kinds of brimstone to accompany these two kinds of fire.

Finally, we come to The Second Resurrection and The Last Great Day which follows the end of The Millennium. The Millennium being the 1,000 year reign of Yashua Messiah on this earth as King of kings and Lord of lords. This event is otherwise known as The Great White Throne Judgement Tribunal, when all the rest of the dead will be evaluated. These are those that were not a part of the First Resurrection = the great majority of mankind, and I cover this topic in detail in my article entitled: “Why Are There Two Resurrections?” see link No. 2 below, and with that I’ll call it a cut!

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name,

Messenger Charles

1) What is Soul Sleep and Do The Holy Scriptures Disprove It? (The Myth of The Immortal Soul) – Part 1 of 2:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-soul-sleep-and-do-the-holy-scriptures-disprove-it-the-myth-of-the-immortal-soul-part-1-of-2/

2) Why Are There Two Resurrections?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/08/13/why-are-there-two-resurrections-part-1/

3) The Jews are The Tares:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

4) Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah (Anointed):

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-the-father-calling-you-to-his-son-yashua-anointed/

Understanding YOUR Christian CALLING

Matthew 22:14 (KJV) For MANY Are CALLED, but FEW Are CHOSEN.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65-66 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From THAT many of His learners went back, and walked no more with Him.

1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the Lord called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

Jeremiah 1:5 (KJV) Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

John 4:23 (KJV) But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship The Father in Spirit and in Truth: for The Father seeketh such to worship him.

John 6:37 All that The Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

John 6:70 (KJV) Jesus answered them, Have not I CHOSEN you twelve, and one of you is a devil?

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not CHOSEN me, but I have CHOSEN you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of The Father in my name, He may give it you.

Above are the most important Holy Scriptures that deal with and explain the Christian calling, and if you are paying attention, you will notice that NONE of them mention the ‘acceptance’ of a ‘Jesus’ as your saviour – a blasphemous satanic idea conjured up by fake Christians of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with their fake Jesus.

Now this article has come about due to an argumentative so and so, on Youtube comments, who claimed that Yashua Messiah does the calling and choosing as well as the Father, and he cited John 6:70 as his reason for this belief. He argued that Judas was also called and chosen even though Yashua Messiah made it plain that Judas was a devil and a son of perdition. One wonders what’s going on in their addled brains.

However, was he correct in making these claims? and why is it that these lying creatures love to create contradictions. All this when Yashua Messiah also made it very plain, that NO MAN can come to Him unless The Father draws or, better, DRAGS them to Him? John 6:44 is the gold standard precedent for this whole Christian calling topic. Any other Scriptures that are subject related to it MUST be treated as complimentary Scriptures, not manipulated into contradictory Scriptures. A favourite pastime of these ignorant evil people.

OK, so what have we got? In John 6:44 we have The Father doing the calling and choosing, and then we get Yashua Messiah ‘choosing’ The Twelve Learners, including Judas. However, the last part of John 6:44 says this: “And I will raise him up at the last day.” So will Judas be raised up at the last day? Not a chance, so this ‘choosing’ of Yashua Messiah’s must be a different kind of choosing from The Father’s calling and choosing in John 6:44. And would you believe it, when we look at the Greek Manuscripts what do you think we will find? Answer: TWO WORDS with slightly different meanings.

For the word ‘chosen’ in Matthew 22:14 we get ‘eklektos’ (G1588) and for the word ‘chosen’ in John 6:70 we get ‘eklegomai’ (G1586) and here are Strong’s definitions:

Chosen – G1588 – ἐκλεκτός eklektós, ek-lek-tos’; from G1586; select; by implication, favorite:—chosen, elect.

Chosen – G1586 – κλέγομαι eklégomai, ek-leg’-om-ahee; middle voice from G1537 and G3004 (in its primary sense); to select:—make choice, choose (out), chosen.

You will notice that the second definition lacks the word ‘elect’, which means that we’re dealing with two kinds of choosing here. It also means that when Yashua Messiah ‘chose’ his Twelve Learners, the Father had already called them previously by visiting them through His Holy Spirit. How do we know this? Easy, just read these Holy Scriptures:

John 6:45 (KJV) It is written in The Prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of The Father, cometh unto me.

A slightly better rendering from The Concordant Literal Translation:

John 6:45 (CLV) It is written in The Prophets: And they shall all be taught of God. Everyone, then, who hears from The Father and is learning The Truth, is coming to Me.

Matthew 4:18-19 (MCV) And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishermen. 19 And He saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.

Matthew 8:21-23 (MCV) And another of His learners said unto Him, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father. 22 But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead. 23 And when He was entered into a ship, His learners followed Him.

Notice, first, in John 6:45 how The Father teaches us and makes us receptive to hearing The Truth, and so it would have been for the twelve learners before they even met Yashua Messiah.

Notice, second, how these young men followed without a word, without any objections and without a single question or protest or argument. It was an instantaneous “YES SIR!” even from the one who felt the need to bury his father first. They all dropped what they were doing and willingly followed Him.

Now if we refer back to John 6:44 we find that The Father’s call involves drawing (dragging) people to Yashua Messiah, which must mean that when The Father initially called Peter, Andrew and the others there must have been some resistance, perhaps even strong resistance, active and operational in their minds. Peter, especially, whom we know was wilfully strong minded, and yet when Yashua Messiah turns up at the lake side and says stop your fishing and come follow me, both brothers do so without a murmer – not a single word of objection. This tells us that it was not the first divine intervention in their lives. They must have had some communication from The Father prior to Yashua Messiah turning up. This means Yashua Messiah’s arrival at the lake side and His subsequent instruction for them to follow Him was a mere formality – inwardly they had been expecting Him.

Moreover, if we return to the subject of the two Greek words ‘eklektos’ and eklegomai’ we can now see why they are used, for they have two slightly different meanings. One is the overarching ‘chosen’ as in the calling and choosing of all the Elect, who will be raised up at the last day, and the other, a more personalised ‘choosing’ of the Twelve Learners (who had already been called by The Father) by Yashua Messiah, including one who was a devil. With regards to Judas we must take on board that he was never called and chosen, he received a calling only, by The Father, for he will not be raised up at the last day.

As a penultimate point I will draw your attention to John 15:16:

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not CHOSEN me, but I have CHOSEN you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of The Father in my name, He may give it you.

The word ‘chosen’ used here, is again, ‘eklegomai’ and not ‘eklektos’. This confirms what I have already said about these as being second personal callings from Yashua Messiah in addition to The Father’s earlier call. However, the crucial part to all of this is that NONE of the twelve ACCEPTED Yashua Messiah as their saviour – ALL were CALLED and CHOSEN with the exception of Judas who was called only.

Finally I will post some Holy Scriptures from Paul’s letters where he emphasises our being CHOSEN and our CALLING in numerous places:

Romans 9:11 (MCV) (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election (having been chosen) might stand, not of works, but of Him (The Father) that CALLETH;

1 Corinthians 1:26-28 (MCV) For ye see your CALLING, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are CALLED: 27 But God hath CHOSEN the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath CHOSEN the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God CHOSEN, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought (zero) things that are:

Ephesians 1:18 (MCV) The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of His CALLING, and what the riches of The Glory of His inheritance in the saints,

Ephesians 4:1 (MCV) I therefore, the captive of The Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the CALLING wherewith ye are CALLED,

Ephesians 4:4 (MCV) There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are CALLED in one hope of your CALLING;

2 Timothy 1:9 (MCV) Who hath saved us, AND CALLED US with an HOLY CALLING, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and Grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles

Who Is ‘The’ Anti-Christ?…

…or better, what constitutes an anti-Christ? for I’ll tell you straight, if you’re of the mainstream Christian thinking on this subject (the Cainite-Judaeo-Christian Religion), or even mainstream secular thinking, anti-Christ is not what you have been given to understand, that is, ‘he’ is some kind of big time bogey-man that will mysteriously appear out of the aether and take us all by surprise.

So let’s set the record straight on this illusive “anti-Christ” subject, and, just like assembling an Ikea flat pack, if all else fails, let’s have a look at the book of instructions. “You know it makes sense – Rodders” as Del Boy in “Only Fools and Horses” would have said to his younger brother.

Here are the ONLY Holy Scriptures, four in all, that make mention of the term anti-Christ, and you will note that the word is not hyphenated and Christ is not capitalised within it, as written in the KJV:

1 John 2:18 (KJV) Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

1 John 2:22 (KJV) Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

1 John 4:3 (KJV) And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

2 John 1:7 (KJV) For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

OK, now the first thing we learn from these Scriptures is that the Last Days were already under way in the first century, so this means that the last two thousand years are to be considered as The Last Days, with today being the last days of The Last Days. Moreover, I believe Yashua Messiah’s return is imminent, with all the signs staring us in the face, IF we can see, that is, IF we are awake and called and chosen by The Father.

The second thing we learn is that the word ‘THE’ is not present when describing the word anti-Christ. “Antichrist shall come” it says, NOT “THE ANTI-CHRIST” shall come. And do not pass this off as semantics, for it is not semantics. It’s deep, and it’s spiritual, and crucial for you to understand, for anti-Christ is a spirit, an all pervasive spirit, polluting and corrupting the minds of the secular and religious alike all across the world.

From 1 John 2:22 the third thing we learn from John is the fact that we’re dealing with LIARS – plural, not the lies of an alleged singular bogey-man anti-Christ. Now these liars, especially The Jews, are very busy denying that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) is the Christ, that is denying that He is The Messiah. They are also very busy denying The Father and Son Godhead – A Duality Godhead, not a trinity godhead or a monotheist god. (See links below)

In 1 John 4:3 John narrows it down somewhat when he refers to those that have a satanic spirit who refuse to declare that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) HAS COME IN THE FLESH! What did he mean by this statement? If Yashua Messiah was just a mere man sent by God the Father, what other way could He come, but in the flesh!!??

So why did John use this very specific expression: “And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God”

If not in the flesh, what other way could He have come? Spirit? Letting us know that He was God (Spirit) come in the flesh, which many blasphemously deny, claiming that He was just a mere man, or a created being, or just another prophet in the order of Isaiah, Ezekiel and Jeremiah “and this is that spirit of antichrist.”

Philippians 2:6 (KJV) Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

Here we have John making his case, loud and clear, as to what an anti-Christ is, that is, 1) someone or anyone who denies that Yashua Messiah is God come in the flesh and 2) anyone who denies The Duality Godhead of Father and Son (Trinitarians and Monotheists) Notice, too, that John emphasises that anti-Christ is a spirit, not a singular physical bogey-man.

If you want bogey-men then look no further than The False Prophet (the Pope) and The Son of Perdition (a Rothschild = Wrathschild = Judas) and, of course, The Beast System, full of anti-Christs, otherwise known as The Military Industrial Complex, headed up by The Rothschilds (Financial) and The Vatican (Religion) with their puppets in the Pentagon, Washington DC (Military).

In 2 John 1:7 we have John confirming for us that MANY deceivers have entered into the world, also denying that Yashua Messiah is God come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an anti-Christ, and there are millions of ‘em, not one singular bogey-man mythical anti-Christ.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles

Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

The Duality Godhead:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

Exposing the Trinity Lie!:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

Are YOU a Brainwashed, Coronavirus, Duped Numbskull?….

.and if so, will you compound your wretched, deluded, mental condition and fall for their JEWISH (SNAKE OIL SALESMAN) SORCERIES (VACCINES)!!!????

Now this will be an unashamed and unabashed rant, with no pulled punches, so be forewarned.

With regard to my article title and its extension, if you are a Christian, or profess to be a Christian, then I very much hope not, and will not! For to be so, makes you 100% deceived and no better than the dumbed down morons walking around with nappies (diapers) over their stupid zombified morbid faces, and will soon be queuing up for their toxic poisonous vaccines.

sheeple-masks

As I write, (27th July 2020) a certain supermarket chain here in the UK is attempting to coerce people to wear these stupid face coverings, by denying them entry to their stores, if they’re not wearing one. Great way to attract business eh? Proving that the health of their bottom lines is neither here nor there to these corporate criminals. So what’s it all about? More on that later.

So what’s the point of my article you may well be wondering? For I seldom address worldly or political issues here on my blog and certainly not medical issues. However, the need immediately arose when I watched a Bitchute video, yesterday, by someone who calls himself Brother Hebert, and that is Hebert, not Herbert. In this video he made an interesting connection to modern medicine via The Book of Revelation, where it uses the word SORCERIES, that is, as in the ordinary sense, MAGIC and WITCHCRAFT – all of which are DEMONIC SATANIC practises. However, one could easily say to that, so what? What’s sorcery, magic and witchcraft got to do with the Coronavirus Hoax, or Cov-Yid 19 as I like to call it?

Revelation 9:21 (KJV) Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their SORCERIES, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts. (Emphasis mine)

Revelation 18:23 (KJV) And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth (The Rothschilds, The Pope, The Rockefellers, Kissinger, Soros, Fauci, Bill Gates and Co); for by thy SORCERIES were all nations deceived. (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Right, let’s go now to see what dear old Mr Strong has to say about sorceries!:

Sorceries – G5331φαρμακεία φαρμακεία – pharmakeiapronounced fär-mä-ka’-ä

a. the use or the administering of drugs (Xenophon, mem. 4, 2, 17).

b. poisoning (Plato, Polybius, others): Revelation 9:21 (here WH text Tr marginal reading φαρμακῶν; many interpretations refer the passage to the next entry).
c. sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it:

WOW!! How about that for a REVELATION, and straight out of The Book of REVELATION no less – the use or the administering of drugs. Pharmakeia or as we say today Pharmacology, or better, BIG PHARMA or, better still, THE THIEVING SNAKE OIL SALESMAN MEDICAL MAFIA, who own and control, lock, stock and two smoking barrels, nearly all of the corrupt medical practitioners across the globe. Your so-called local doctor is a disease manager, not a healer or curer of your ailments – he or she will TREAT YOU with poisonous drugs, NOT HEAL YOU! If you actually get better using their poisonous potions then consider yourself extremely lucky.

We then get confirmation, that is, POISONING and what does the word VIRUS mean in Latin? you got it, POISON!, and I’ll tell you straight, you cannot catch a poison!

Notice, too, how Revelation prophecies that ALL NATIONS shall be deceived by these same satanic lying quack sorcerer con-men. 100% fulfilment of prophecy.

Then finally we have sorcery, magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it:

So what is this, or to whom is this a reference? Why, none other than your criminal political leaders whom you were dumb enough to elect into office, that is, idolatry. They say jump and you deluded dim wits then ask HOW HIGH? They say wear a mask here, and no need for a mask there, and for no logical reason, and you follow their stupid instructions like so many dumbed down unthinking sheep.

To confirm this, I also read about a big clothes store, which also sells food in their food halls, and a has in-store cafés. Masks have to be worn in the food hall, but no need for them in the adjacent café, and all ‘separated’ by an open four foot wide barrier zone. You couldn’t make it up, but these corrupt corporate moron jerks have done just that, and the mask wearing lemmings blindly obey without a question!

At the same time we have professional footballers all puffing and panting over one another, as if the virus has an aversion to physical sports and disappears as soon as these overpaid fairies enter their stadiums. This is how laughable it all is, and yet the majority appears not to be questioning it. This is deep psycho babble bull**** taking place here folks, with the dullards lapping it up.

Hosea 4:6 (KJV) My people are destroyed through lack of knowledge!

OK, so what KNOWLEDGE are the unthinking plebs and proles lacking? Quite simply, that viruses as contagions do not exist. YOU WHAT!? Yes, it’s true, viruses as contagions do not exist. Furthermore, virology is a quack pseudo-science set up by the SORCERERS – BIG PHARMA, and financed by them to create imaginary diseases, for which toxic vaccines must be produced to combat the non-existent virus. Problem, reaction, solution, oh what a cracker-jack Hegelian Dialectic scam eh? We are talking £ billions and £ billions in profits, for these thieving psychopathic criminals. And I do not say thieving psychopathic criminals lightly.

Here is a transcript from Robert Kennedy Jr on the activities of Bill Gates:

From #RobertFKennedyJr’s Instagram post today, April 9th 2020:

“#Vaccines, for #Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including #Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him a dictatorial control over global health policy – The spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.

Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.

Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India’s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 Polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame Gates’ campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain Polio epidemic that paralysed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously.

In 2017, the World Health Organisation reluctantly admitted that the global Polio explosion is predominantly vaccine-strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines.

In 2014 #GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Klein and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying the parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.

During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained: “We are guinea pigs for drug makers.”

Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economics Professor Patrick Bond, descibes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless” and “immoral”.

In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO (RevContent InArticle SOLO) promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilising millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.

After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.

Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.

Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.

Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.

They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe!

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.

In his recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunityto force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.”

— Robert F Kennedy Jr.

See RFK’s latest video (November 2021) below:

Now with all due respect, Kennedy doesn’t know that viruses do not exist, having not done the research, but it’s good that he has exposed the psychopath Jew con-man Bill Gates who, incidentally, has not a single medical qualification to his name. Just who you want in charge when producing toxic vaccines. LOL

So, how do I know that viruses do not exist? Well it’s quite a long story, for back in March of this year, I knew NOTHING about what purports to be ‘medical science’ in the western ‘civilised’ world, and to be precise I still know very little. However, I now know enough, because if we FOLLOW THE MONEY, most things fall into place, and we can then come to a very sound conclusion in a very short time.

The basics for this VIRUS minefield con-trick are founded upon what is known as The Victorian Germ Theory. Am I saying that modern so-called virology is based on something as antiquated as a Victorian medical theory and an UNPROVEN medical theory at that? Yes I am, for it’s true.

The Germ Theory was a pet theory of the Frenchman Louis Pasteur, a mere chemist, not a scientist, and not invented by him, so he was a plagiariser as well. Here is a little snippet about Pasteur:

“What you forgot to mention is Pasteur attended schooling at Lycée Saint-Louis (a former Jansenist school but had then been covertly run by the Jesuits). Pasteur, being a mediocre student that he was, failed at numerous entrance exams to the prestigious École normale supérieure in Paris. But after he enrolled and trained at Lycée Saint-Louis school, the trajectory of his career just magically shot to the roof. He magically passed the entrance exam he previously failed with flying colors, getting academic awards left and right. His fraudulent scientific method covered up by the scientific community up until 1993. I suspect he was secretly controlled and tutored by the Jesuits, to serve as the scientific mouthpiece of the Vatican (Jesuits). Think about it. What Pasteur discovered is nothing new. His theory is the exactly same as the Catholic (Graeco-Roman pagan superstition) promulgated/taught by the Vatican for centuries now, but packaged under a new name ‘virus’.”

– NOAHIDE LAWS – Dr. Lorraine Day

So with this dodgy background, the picture is beginning to take shape quite nicely. If we then add in another Frenchman by the name of Antoine Beauchamps, a real scientist, Pasteur’s shaky credentials are then toast, for Beauchamps exposes Pasteur and his bogus Germ Theory for what it is – 100% BS. Here is a good link that gives the details:

https://vexmansthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/04/22/what-is-wrong-with-the-germ-theory/

We then have another clever Frenchman who said this:

“The terrain is everything, the germ is nothing.” – Claude Bernard, French physiologist.

Bernard Cohen of Harvard University called Bernard “One of the greatest of all men of science”.

Further to, I would recommend a video by Dr Stefan Lanka, a ex-German virologist who made an incredible discovery re the alleged Polio Virus:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hTETvlWL-Wg/

He bet anyone 100,000 Euros that they could not prove that Polio was a virus. No one has succeeded, even taking him to the German Supreme Court and losing.

For further study I would also recommend Doctors Andrew Kaufman, Sherri Tenpenny, and Lorraine Day.

Here is a transcript from an English heroine who knew the score:

“Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes, like cats and dogs, but conditions growing out of one another.

Is it not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases as we do now, as separate entities, which must exist, like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our control; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves?

I was brought up to believe that smallpox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs) and that smallpox would not begin itself, any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.

Since then I have seen with my own eyes and smelled with my own nose smallpox growing up in first specimens, either in closed rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been ‘caught’, but must have begun.

I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and pass into one another. Now, dogs do not pass into cats.

I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut.

Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon disease in this light (for diseases, as all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun-substantives):

— True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows, with unremitting attention to the patient, are the only defence a true nurse either asks or needs.

— Wise and humane management of the patient is the best safeguard against infection. The greater part of nursing consists of preserving cleanliness.

The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”

— Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, 1820-1910.

With regard to the Coronavirus Hoax all you need to know are these seven things:

1) The so-called Covid 19 (SARs Cov2) virus has NEVER been filtered/purified and isolated. Filtering/purification and isolation is standard practice in genuine scientific research.

2) The so-called PCR test doesn’t work and was declared incapable of being reliable for identifying Cov-Yid 19 by Kary Mullis the scientist who created it.

3) Numerous verifiable experiments were carried out in 1918 with regard to the so-called Spanish Flu which proved that it wasn’t contagious.

4) Mortality rates are no different this year and are well within the range of deaths for the previous five years.

5) In the USA there has been a miraculous drop in deaths due to heart attacks, for this year (40%), whilst the numbers of Covid 19 deaths have appeared from out of the blue to replace them. LOL

6) Even more hilarious: In Tanzania they tested a pawpaw for Covid 19 and it proved positive:                                                                      https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/cov-yid-1984-history-reminders-6-tanzanian-president-quot-a-paw-paw-tests-positive-quot_IAlqmMarh1bWYVs.html

7) Viruses are Exosomes that are mistakenly identified as viruses. Exosomes are created by the cells of our bodies to deal with toxic insults – they are cleansing solvents and agents.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

Tom Barnett – Your Government Is Lying – You Cannot Catch Corona-Virus – Part 1: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/egc9mWvyL8tWhXn

Tom Barnett – Your Government Is Lying – You Cannot Catch Corona-Virus – Part 2: https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/1HYfs4NqZ93duP5

Brave Whistleblower Nurse – They Are Murdering Patients for Covid 19 Statistics: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/cov-yid-1984-history-reminders-1-brave-whistleblower-nurse-they-are-murdering-patients-for-covid-19_oNIuhX4Q8CBlf1U.html

A Compelling Video Linking 5G to The CoronaHoax:    https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/cov-yid-1984-history-reminders-2-compelling-video-linking-5g-to-the-corona-hoax_ig3cOwgF7oRINdz.html

Corona Virus!!?? Is One Big Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!: https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/cov-yid-1984-history-reminders-5-coronavirus-is-it-all-being-faked_wTKwIEEmVhzEIfU.html

Robert Kennedy Jr. Discusses New Book on Fauci and Gates with The Jew Tucker Carlson: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/robert-kennedy-jr-discusses-new-book-on-fauci-with-kike-tucker-carlson_5VQDhruleOOx5z8.html

The Final Rebuttal of Virology – Dr. Stefan Lanka: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-final-rebuttal-of-virology-dr-stefan-lanka-english-translation_689TA4hcDABKBHa.html

Salvation is of The Jews! Oh Really, Is That So!? – John 4:22

Oh yes, is that so? and how many of you are deceived and brainwashed by this wickedly satanic corruption of the King James Bible? Furthermore, did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) actually say “the Jews”, or was He referring to a different ethnic group of people altogether?

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of The Jews The Judaean Israelites.

Right, let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some Light on this illegitimate KJV verse:

Jews – G2453 Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; – from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

So first off, for the word ‘Jews’ we have Judaean’ and ‘belonging to Jehudah’ (Judah). Now let’s get this firmly fixed in our minds, for Judaeans (the occupants and residents of Judaea) were not necessarily Jews, and Jews most definitely did not belong to Jehudah (Judah) (see link below).

In Judaea, in the first century, there were Royal Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites, who, in turn, were descended from the Israelite Tribes that made up the post Babylonian captivity House of Judah, that is, a remnant of those three tribes who returned to Judaea circa 515 BC. In fact, in a strict ethnic sense, Jews were not Judaeans at all. They were always alien usurpers, hijackers and parasitical subversive invaders, who inveigled their way into Israelite society, just as they do today in Britain, America and most civilised western nations.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I will firm up the Jewish Almanac quote by stating, for the record, that Jews were NEVER Hebrews, nor were they Israelites, hence you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first eleven books of The KJV Bible.

Juda – G2448Iouda ee-oo-dah’ of Hebrew origin (3063 or perhaps 3194); Judah (i.e. Jehudah or Juttah), a part of (or place in) Palestine:–Judah.

In this definition we have confirmed for us that Juda or Judah is of Hebrew origin so, therefore, nothing to do with The Jews.

Judas – G2455Ἰούδας Ioúdas, ee-oo-das’; – of Hebrew origin (H3063); Judas (i.e. Jehudah), the name of ten Israelites; also of the posterity of one of them and its region:—Juda(-h, -s); Jude.

Again, in this definition, we are told that the name Judas is of Hebrew origin, which when applied to Israelites would be correct. Hence we get this:

Matthew 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (Judah) and his brethren;

And this:

Matthew 13:55 (KJV) Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and His brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas (Judah)?

Judah – H3063Yhuwdah yeh-hoo-daw’ – from 3034; celebrated; Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five Israelites; also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory:–Judah.

Even in the Old Testament Mr Strong makes no reference to Jews, just Judahite Israelites.

However, Jews are very fond of hiding their Shelahite, Hamitic Canaanite, Serpent Seed identity by using names common to their host nation. This a favourite Jew trick, and this is why I am fairly certain that Judas Iscarriot, the betrayer of Yashua Messiah, was a Jew, and not an Israelite. Betrayal is a standard characteristic of the Jews, as evidenced by a past President of The US:

“The Jews are all through government, and we have got to get in those areas. The government is full of Jews, second, most Jews are disloyal. You can’t trust the bastards. They turn on you.”

President Richard M. Nixon, Nixon Tapes, July 3rd 1971.

In support of the above I will use this example, for we have Paul, later, professing his Israelite Hebrew ethnic identity:

Philippians 3:4-5 (KJV) Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching The Law, a Pharisee;

The first thing you will notice or, at least you SHOULD notice, is that he, at no time, professes himself as a Jew. So what does this mean? It means that erroneous ‘JEWISHNESS’ is read into these Holy Scriptures by ignorant uneducated people with a satanic agenda:

1) He was circumcised on the eighth day, as all Israelites were.

2) He was of the stock of Israel = a white Semite, so not a Jew.

3) The Israelite Tribe of Benjamin, so not a Jew.

4) An Hebrew of the Hebrews, so not a Jew.

5) Touching The Law, A Pharisee, and not all Pharisees were Jews. Nicodemus being another example of a non-Jew Pharisee.

Here is more solid gold evidence of who the Jews are, and Israelites they are definitely NOT!:

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Jews were easily identifiable for their rabid lusting for the death of Yashua Messiah and then claimed responsibility:

Matthew 27:25 (MCV) Then answered all the the Jews, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING; by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Having read all of the above quotes from the very lips of Yashua Messiah and John the Baptist, how on earth can salvation be of the Serpent Seed Jews = the spawn of the Devil himself, both literally and spiritually?

Essential reading for understanding the TRUE ORIGINS of the Serpent Seed Jews:

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

For more Light on this dark subject please read these articles here:

Salvation Is Of The Jews. Oh really, Is That So!?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/25/salvation-is-of-the-jews-oh-really-is-that-so-john-422/

The Jews are The Tares: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

And Pilate Wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/20/and-pilate-wrote-jesus-of-nazareth-the-king-of-the-jews/

I Know That (Ye Say) Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me! https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/john-837-i-know-that-ye-are-abrahams-seed-but-ye-seek-to-kill-me/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/what-is-the-word-gentile-doing-in-the-bible-part-1/

And Pilate wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS

The title for this article is from John 19:19 (KJV) and here is the complete verse:

John 19:19 (KJV) And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross (stake). And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Now elsewhere, here on my blog, I have already written an article entitled “Was Jesus Christ a Jew?” (see link No. 1 below) where I prove, without a shadow of doubt, that Yashua Messiah was NOT a Jew.

However, this episode, at the end of Yashua Messiah’s life, and as horrendous as it was, is very much misunderstood by almost everybody. When I say to misinformed people that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew, their first port of call, or reference point, is this verse, which they ignorantly use in order to try and make their erroneous case for Him being a Jew.

They will say things like: “So are you saying that Pontius Pilate didn’t know what he was doing when he had the sign made?” And I reply: “Oh yes he knew EXACTLY what he was doing when he made that sign, but I bet it’s not what you’re thinking.”

The other the verse they will ignorantly use is this one:

John 4:22 (KJV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

I will cover this in a new article soon and rest assured that salvation is DEFINITELY NOT OF THE SERPENT SEED JEWS.

However, I have digressed somewhat. So, what was Pilate doing, and thinking, at that time when he made that sign? To answer this correctly requires some critical thinking which, generally, is very much in short supply these days. For the dumbed down masses it is much easier to allow others to do their thinking for them. They certainly cannot think for themselves, that’s for sure. This means they will NEVER question ANYTHING and accept, as a given, that Pilate did do the right thing when he made his sign for Yashua Messiah’s cross. The idea that it was a deliberate political wind up, on the part of Pilate, to the Talmudic Canaanite Jew Pharisees and their racial brethren in Jerusalem, would probably never enter into their dumbed down minds. And yet we have the evidence that this is exactly what Pilate did:

John 19:21 (KJV) Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.

Now this verse raises some interesting points:

1) We can see straight away that the Jews did not want Roman recognition or, possibly, universal non-Jewish recognition that they, The Jews, had crucified a king, whether He was allegedly their king, or anyone else’s king.

2) Notice that the Jews accuse Yashua Messiah of claiming to be their king when He did no such thing. All He admitted to Pilate was the Truth that He was sent to be a King, but without any mention of whose King. So The Jews, in their arrogant vanity and conceit, jumped to the erroneous conclusion that Yashua Messiah had declared that He was their king when nothing could be further from The Truth.

3) He claimed to have come for His People – The Israelites, not the Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews who were, and are, the offspring, both literally and spiritually of Satan the Devil. (see link No. 2 below)

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I could and can assure him that the first Hebrews were definitely not Jews. The word ‘Jew’ cannot be found in the first eleven books of the Bible. (See link No.s 4 and 5 below)

4) Scripturally He was known as The Son of man (Adam) to let us know quite clearly He was NOT a son of anyone else. Eighty nine times the phrase “the Son of man” is used in the New Testament, just so that we get it through our thick heads who, exactly, Yashua Messiah was, and why it is/was so important that we learned this fundamental TRUTH!! TWO SEEDS came out of The Garden and Yashua Messiah was descended from only one of those seeds, that is, Adam’s seed, and not the other. (see link No. 2 below)

From Strong’s Concordance:

MAN – H120‘adam aw-dawm’ – from 119; ruddy i.e. a human being mankind (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.):–X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.

OK, so let’s be clear about this and build the backdrop to this event. The Jews were an unrelenting thorn in the flesh of The Romans and were always causing insurrections, rebellions and troubles. There were numerous Jewish zealots (terrorists as we would call them today) in Jerusalem and Judea who would attack Roman supply lines and infrastructure often killing Roman soldiers. Barabbas, whom the baying Jewish mob called out for and chose instead of Yashua Messiah, was a renowned zealot and murderer of Romans. So from these known facts, it’s not difficult to imagine Pilate’s opinions and feelings toward these renegade troublesome Jews. Here’s a quote from those times:

“The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force, one knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

— Marcus Tullius Cicero – 106 BC – 43 BC, Governor of the Roman province of Cilicia in the Roman Empire.

We then have the torment and guilt created in Pilate’s mind by these Jews, and their unrelenting demands upon him to find Yashua Messiah guilty of their evil trumped up charges. In turn, his own wife warns him to have nothing to do with Yashua Messiah, calling Him a righteous man.

Matthew 27:19 (KJV) When he (Pilate) was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of Him.

So, after this, we must assume that Pilate, like his wife, was troubled in mind when knowing he must give the order, albeit, under Jewish political pressure, to execute an innocent man. Therefore is it so hard to imagine that he would get his own back on these despicable Jews, by winding them up, with his provocative title “JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS”.

Rest assured Pilate had no idea whether Yashua Messiah was the King of The Jews or not, and I doubt that he was really that interested, either way, but one thing is for sure, he wanted revenge on the troublesome Jews and got it with the use of his provocative political title.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

1 Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

2 Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

3 The Jews are The Tares: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

4 Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

5 Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

The Prophetic Parable Of Lazarus And The Rich Man – Part 1

Introduction

This article could and perhaps should have been entitled: When Christians Die, Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord”? – Part 3, (see link below for parts 1 & 2), but that, to some degree, would be missing the point. The question of whether this passage of Holy Scripture proves or does not prove that we ‘go to be with The Lord’ when we die is really only a side issue. Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) intended theme and Spiritual thrust of this story has a different purpose altogether. Needless to say, this theme is totally missed or ignored by the Bible ‘experts’. Moreover, this parable is so well known, and so much discussed, it had to be used as the title of this article. You will therefore notice that I have deliberately referred to this passage of Holy Scripture as a Prophetic Parable, for that is what it is.

Now calling it a Prophetic Parable will upset many in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (mainstream Christianity), because it is one of their ‘golden nugget’ sections of the New Testament, which they misuse. This is because they use it to support their mythical ideas that they: 1) instantaneously ‘Go to be with the Lord’ when they die, that is, they go straight to heaven when they die (yet another lie) and 2) ‘sinners’ go straight to a fiery hell; otherwise known as Purgatory by deluded ignorant Papists.

However, unfortunately for them, the parable of Lazarus and the rich man is just that – a parable, and not a factual literal description of what happens when we die. It’s a Spiritual analogy, as are all of Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) parables.

The Rich Man and Lazarus

The Parable of Lazarus and The Rich Man

The Prophetic Parable

Luke 16:19 (KJV) There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day: 20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, 21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. 22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; 23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 And he cried and said, father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. 25 But Abraham said, son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. 26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. 27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father’s house: 28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment. 29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. 30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. 31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. (All emphasis mine)

Some interesting points before I move on. This parable can only be found in Luke’s Gospel and Lazarus is named, but the rich man remains anonymous. And don’t forget that it is mostly prophetic – for the future, that is, the near future, post Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection and the distant future at Yashua Messiah’s second coming – both events are involved in this parable.

The Explanation

So how do we know this story is a parable? Easy, the opening verse tells us straight away, because Yashua Messiah makes special reference to the colour of the rich man’s robes – PURPLE. Now this may seem, at first glance, all very trivial and insignificant, but nothing could be further from The Truth. Purple raiment is always synonymous with God, royalty, the priesthood and the counterfeit priesthood of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

FakeChurch-1-380x230

Two Fake Christians With One in Purple, and Wearing a Heathen Dagon Fish Hat

Exodus 26:1 (KJV) Moreover thou shalt make the tabernacle with ten curtains of fine twined linen, and blue, and purple, and scarlet: with cherubims of cunning work shalt thou make them.

Numbers 4:13 (KJV) And they shall take away the ashes from the altar, and spread a purple cloth thereon:

John 19:5 (KJV) Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And Pilate saith unto them, Behold the man!

Revelation 17:4 (KJV) And the woman (the mother of harlots) was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication.

In these four Scriptures we can see various connotations associated with purple cloth, but they have some things in common: God, Royalty, the Priesthood, and the counterfeit priesthood in Revelation 17. So, this rich man, dressed in fine purple linen, is symbolically a priest or a representative of the counterfeit priesthood and/or The Sanhedrin as it was known in the first century.

Now this parable is another of those parables that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently used in order to attack the hypocrisy of the Jewish Pharisee and Sadducee religious leaders. There they were, all dressed up for the part, but in reality they were “whited sepulchres” or “whited walls”, cold, ruthless and hollow and empty within – lacking any love or Spiritual substance. They were Spiritually dead with “throats like open graves”. Notice, too, this man lived it up everyday, well he was loaded with money and therefore a lover of filthy lucre, as were the Pharisee Jews, so why not eat, drink and be merry, eh?

Moving on, and as always, keeping it in the Spiritual dimension, we then have poor Lazarus who represents all those who are desirous and hungry, nay starving, for lack of Spiritual food, for lack of even just a few crumbs of Spiritual Truth and/or the Word of God. In the early first century that meant Moses and The Prophets, but in the prophetic future sense it is highlighting Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and His glorious message taught by His Messengers, that is, The Good News of Grace, Salvation and Eternal Life in the coming Kingdom of God.

On top of this poor Lazarus’ malnourished Spiritual condition is compounded by the trials of this life – his sores. As a Spiritual babe he is even tormented and spiritually attacked by dogs or spiritual prostitutes – or those of the circumcision, as described by Paul in Galatians – legalists and Grace killers.

Philippians 3:2 (MCV) Beware of Judaising mongrel dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the circumcision.

In Strong’s Concordance the Old Testament definition for ‘dogs’ is male prostitutes – sodomites:

Dog – H3611 – keleb – keh’-leb – From an unused root meaning to yelp, or else to attack; a dog; hence (by euphemism) a male prostitute: – dog.

Have you yet noticed the picture that is developing here? no man, unless he is being drawn to The Son by The Father, can be desirous for Spiritual food, so this means Lazarus represents those The Father is calling and has chosen! Notice, too, how we also have purple garments and spiritual prostitution in association – one with the other – the the purple robed dogs of the meaningless, vain Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

The next thing we must understand is that Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ), on numerous occasions said The Kingdom of God is at hand. What did He mean by that turn of phrase? Quite simply, He was referring to a time in the very near future or the time directly after His death and resurrection when Salvation would be made available to all those The Father would be calling and choosing through hearing the Messenger’s (apostles’) preaching.

Now keeping this Truth in mind we now continue with the parable, and next we have the death of Lazarus, here called a beggar, which means he is hungering and thirsting after mercy and righteousness plus justice and justification:

Matthew 5:6 (KJV) Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.

Notice here, too, that Lazarus is desirous to be fed the Spiritual scraps, not to mention the literal scraps of food, that fell from this selfish self-indulgent purple clothed minister’s table.

OK, so now we have Lazarus crying out for The Word of God – The Good News of The Kingdom, salvation and righteousness (justice and justification). However, what happens? he dies, but what kind of death is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) really referring to here, apart from a physical death?

Lazarus’ death here is symbolic of the watery grave of Baptism – the old Lazarus dies and then what happens – he is lifted up by the angels into Abraham’s bosom and his name is written in the Book of Life. This means he is lifted up a new man – born of God (born again) into Abraham’s bosom. How does that work? Who and what does Abraham represent? Easy, he represents faith and the faithful – he is the elder of the faithful and the man that the men dressed in purple fine linen thought they were descended from, and were supposed to represent, that is, the Spirit of The Law, not the letter of The Law.

Don’t forget, too, this message is being delivered by Yashua Messiah under the Old Covenant and Abraham’s Bosom is a forerunner or type of the Kingdom of God to be ruled by Yashua Messiah. Please note, Lazarus’ physical death, as with all those who are born of God (born again), has no hold over him, as his place in the Kingdom of God at Yashua Messiah’s return is assured. Make sure you understand that there is no resurrection of the dead for ANYONE until Yashua Messiah returns, and that includes Enoch and Elijah. (Future articles on this pesky subject coming soon)

1 Corinthians 15:36 (KJV) Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:

Colossians 2:12 (KJV) Buried with Him in Baptism, wherein also ye are risen with Him through the Faith (Abraham’s Bosom) of the operation of God, who hath raised Him from the dead.

Romans 6:4 (KJV) Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by The Glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. (All emphasis and brackets mine)

Now, notice, Lazarus is comforted in Abraham’s bosom and in the not too distant future, after The Lord’s death and resurrection, those called and chosen would also be comforted just like Lazarus. Comforted by whom? why, by Yashua Messiah of course. This proves that Yashua Messiah is using Abraham’s bosom here as a type for Himself in His Kingdom.

John 14:18 (KJV) I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.

In part two I will explain the meanings of the tormented sufferings or ordeals of the rich man.

The Parable Of Lazarus And The Rich Man – Part 2.

The Explanation continued

Now what of the rich man? He dies and is buried and comes to a place called hell. How does this work? because we know that the dead are dead and know nothing? (Please see link below to my article “Are Christians going to heaven?”) Yet this rich man is conscious and can see Lazarus in Abraham’s bosom and Abraham, too, is alive and can see him. So what is this all about and at what point in time is all this taking place?

First of all, it’s all about mental and spiritual torment, not physical torment. Secondly, the time is just after that time when the rich man, (representative of the Jews and counterfeit religious priesthood), will have been resurrected with all those who were called and chosen. This is the time of the return of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) to this earth and the First Resurrection. The rich man is like the five foolish virgins who ran out of oil. Here though, The Lord has taken the scenario one step further and placed the rich man in a metaphorical place of torment. This ‘hell’ is a point in time in the future where all the unrepentant men in purple robes will realise it’s too late, like the unwise virgins who discovered their purchased oil was useless. If we refer to the end of that parable, the unwise virgins are not allowed into the wedding feast and Yashua Messiah informs them that He does not know them even though they were given oil (Grace) in the first place. In this instance Yashua Messiah does not elaborate on their reaction to this horrendous news.

However, in this parable, we are told about the rich man’s ordeals and/or his reaction to the news that he has been excluded from the Kingdom of God – Abraham’s bosom – Salvation. He, like the unwise virgins at the beginning, was given oil – Grace or here referred to as the ‘good things’ – the Spiritual Law of Moses and the Prophets – The Gracious gifts of God to the priesthood. This rich man, like modern mainstream Christian ministers of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, had all the benefits the knowledge of God can bestow upon a man. His, (the rich man) and their wickedness, has resulted in the Children of God, that is, those they were, and are, responsible for, and supposed to look after (shepherd) were/are starving through lack of Spiritual food. So here he is, as a result, in wretched mental torment for his just reward:

Matthew 8:11 (KJV) And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven (God). 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (Wretched fearful mental torment and/or emotional ordeals).

Luke 13:28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in the Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out. (Wretched fearful mental torment and/or emotional ordeals).

Make no mistake, this rich man represents a “child of the kingdom” as are all those who are called into the ministry, but many run out of oil – Grace, and turn to religious form and legalism as a blasphemous replacement. Turning or making The Word of God to none effect. This parable was given as a warning to them and, notice, they understood The Lord’s parables so were, without excuse.

Luke 16:14 (KJV) And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.

Now in order to respond in this way, these men must have understood what Yashua Messiah was talking about. Only the Learners (disciples), after The Lord had explained to them the meaning, were privy to this understanding, that is, apart from these satanic men of religion.

Moreover, we now move on to where the rich man, in his ‘burning tormented’ condition catches sight of Abraham with Lazarus in his bosom and he cries out, but what is he crying out for? Just a drop of water from the tip of Lazarus’ finger. The thing is, if the rich man is in a real burning cauldron how is a drop of water on the end of Lazarus’ finger going to bring him any relief, how will it quench his thirst? Well, quite plainly it won’t, so what does this water represent? Again we return to the Spiritual Truth of Yashua Messiah:

Just One Drop of Water

Whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life

John 4:13 Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: 14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life. 15 The woman saith unto him, Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw.

Wow!! I think this is one of the most emotional and uplifting passages of Holy Scripture in The Bible. Here we can see the amazing God given wisdom of the woman, by the well, who longed to have her thirst quenched, once and for all time, by The Lord’s metaphorical Holy Spiritual water. Indeed, we can now see the water the rich man was crying out and pleading for, in a new Light. He knew what kind of water would be on Lazarus’ finger tip and he also knew that just one single drop would be enough to rescue him from his mental anguish and torment – a well of water springing up into everlasting life and him, being comforted by Yashua Messiah (Abraham’s bosom) in The Kingdom of God.

Furthermore, we then learn that there is a gulf between the rich man and Lazarus in Abraham’s bosom, a gulf that cannot be bridged from either direction. This gulf is the same gulf that denied the five unwise virgins a share of the oil from the five wise virgin’s lamps. This is a ‘never the twain shall meet’ situation. This situation can be likened to the sheep and goats, with one; the sheep on God’s right hand and the other; the goats, on His left – the sheep inherit and the goats do not. (see link below)

This is the future point in time that the rich man has reached and he vainly requests that Abraham send Lazarus from the dead to his five brethren who, again, remind us of the five unwise virgins. It was too late for them and it’s too late for the rich man’s brethren, the Grace has gone out of their lives.

We then get the killer verse. Verse 31 And He said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. Here in this verse Yashua Messiah is referring to Himself as the “one rose from the dead” and look at what He is saying. This verse not only covers the Jewish religious leaders of the first century, but brings us loud and clear into the last days which commenced on the first Pentecost AD 31. We are talking about so called men of God here, now in this age – ‘teachers’ and ‘preachers’, not the unsaved. Even though Yashua Messiah came and died to take all of mankind’s sins, was resurrected to give us new lives in Him or in ‘Abraham’s bosom’ and give us His glorious Grace, there are still those rich men who stand in their pulpits each week and ‘teach’ the same Pharisaical message against it – those men dressed in their fine purple linen – both metaphorically and/or literally!

Finally, and to end on a more positive note, we must also understand that the rich man’s punishment is only for a season – albeit a thousand year season, but eventually he will be part of the second resurrection as described in Revelation 20. The Father God does not remain angry forever, but vengeance is always His, and all the Lazarus’s of this world must be avenged.

“No one who has been martyred by the Jews should remain unknown. And no one who has been martyred by the Jews will remain unavenged.”

— Eustace Mullins

When Christians Die Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord”? – Parts 1 and 2:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/when-christians-die-do-they-instantly-go-to-be-with-the-lord-part-1/

Are Christians going to Heaven?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-christians-going-to-heaven/

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – 1 Timothy 3 – Part 6

Before reading this article I recommend that you read “Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Parts 1-4 and 5” first, to gain a full understanding of where I am coming from on this exposé of these highly suspect epistles. (see links below)

Now chapter 3 of 1 Timothy is a dead giveaway for satanic religiosity, with it being full of Nicolaitan hierarchical nonsense, with bishops here and deacons there; all lusting after their positions of POWER and AUTHORITY – as you do NOT, if you’re a real Christian and part of the egalitarian Church of God!!

OK, so let’s get straight on with the first two verses of 1 Timothy 3:

1 Timothy 3:1-2 (KJV) This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. 2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach.

1 Timothy 3:1-2 Notes Part 1: “This is a true saying.” he says, but is it a true saying? We shall see. If a man desire the office of a bishop! So let’s have a look at what the Greek MSS says about offices and bishops:

1 Timothy 3:1 (Greek Transliteral) Believing the saying if any-one of-on-noting (supervision) is craving of-ideal work he-is-on-feeling (desiring).

Now why would a humble Christian be craving an alleged position of supervision (authority), in a supposed church? Does this phoney creature fancy his chances of being ‘king of the heap’ in this congregation, or see himself as lording it over his brothers and sisters, whom, he perhaps feels are in need of a good whipping into shape? You betcha!

Is ‘supervision’ the right word, or would ‘overseer’ be a better word? I speak here as if giving the benefit of the doubt to most of the verses of 1 Timothy 3, that is, verses 1 through 13, as being genuine Pauline verses which, in truth, I will prove are not.

So what policy or agenda were the KJV translators trying to impart here, and promote, with this word ‘office’? Well obviously it’s administrative and GOVERNMENTAL, is it not? and nothing to do with egalitarian Christian brotherly and sisterly love and fellowship at all. This is the modus operandi of the pecking order system of the Nicolaitans which is being promulgated here – plain and simple.

We then get this 100% religious BS term ‘BISHOP’, translated from the Greek word ‘episkope’, which means an ‘overseer’, that is, someone who keeps a watchful eye, as a protector and guardian, over the flocks, and who, no doubt, was selected by the elders of the congregation as someone fit for the job, not some upstart who fancied himself as a big shot in his so-called local church and desired, that is, most likely lusted after the position.

1 Timothy 3:1-2 Notes Part 2: Not only that, but this religious, 100% mythical, lustful Hellenising bishop must be blameless, eh? That’s a tough call to say the least. Where do you find a blameless counterfeit Christian who fancies himself as a bishop? Nowhere! And vanity, not repented of, must be the first blot on the list with regard to the character of this would-be so-called ‘bishop’.

And then we get, and wait for it! ‘The husband of one wife’!! Wow!! What’s going on here? This suggests to me, that in these Hellenising congregations there were a few bods with MORE THAN ONE WIFE! Was this permissible in the first century congregations of God? I have no idea, but here’s something on it:

http://www.liquisearch.com/polygamy_in_christianity/early_church_period&p=6&pos=6

Either way, I am not really interested, other than in what went on in the true Congregations of God, and I doubt very much that polygamy was something practised by them, so, yet again, bringing into doubt the provenance of these so-called Pastoral Epistles.

After the ‘only one wife’ hoo ha we get: ‘vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach’. I find this totally hilarious! What kind of so-called Christians are we dealing with here? If the laity are prone to being a load of inhospitable, yobbish boozers who lack the character quality of vigilance, what’s going on? Are we having described for us here a load of reprobates or Christians?

Then we get ‘apt to teach’. So are these bishop candidates gifted with the Spiritual gift of teaching or not? I would say that if someone who fancies himself as a bishop, is NOT gifted with the Spiritual gift of teaching, he’s next to useless for the job.

1 Corinthians 12:28 (MCV) And God hath placed some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, pilotage or guides, diversities of tongues.

Notice how the list of gifted abilities above does not include governors, administrators, bosses, leaders or tin pot dictators.

I will leave it there and move on:

1 Timothy 3:3 (KJV) Not given to wine, no striker (no quarrelsome bruiser), not greedy of filthy lucre (not a lover of money); but patient (lenient), not a brawler (peace loving), not covetous; (Brackets mine)

1 Timothy 3:3 Notes: The comedy continues…and in the same vein as verse 2 we have all these worldly characteristics being highlighted, as if we were dealing with lost and unsaved reprobates. Unrepentant sinners no less, who, if truly under Paul’s stewardship and guidance, would have been severely reprimanded or admonished and possibly threatened with expulsion from The Church. Furthermore, what would such people be doing in a Christian fellowship at all, let alone stand to be considered as a candidate for a bishop overseer!? I trust you can see the ignorant nonsense message these verses portray.

1 Timothy 3:4-5 (KJV) One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; 5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)

1 Timothy 3:4-5 Notes: OK, this one could be taken as somewhat ambiguous: ‘one that RULETH well his own house’! Does this mean that the same rigid dictatorial mindset that operates in his household is then transferred to his local congregation? For it then says: ‘having his children in subjection with all gravity;’ so we have to assume that this transfer of strict ruler-ship is what the forger means by this, and then classifies it by adding in the gratuitous: (‘For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?’). ‘Taking care’ meaning ruling the roost? Still at least he got the name of The Church right.

Now don’t get me wrong, for a certain amount of no-nonsense discipline is definitely required when bringing up children properly, but, should this Victorian sounding, parent-child, disciplinary regime be transferred to the Church? Let’s be clear, sound informative Gospel teaching is all that is required when dealing with Christian adults, not a big stick pseudo-tyranny. My verdict, therefore, on these two verses is take from them what you will and for what they are worth, and use much wisdom. Always bearing in mind that the agenda being served here in these epistles is not a Christian agenda, but, rather, the Hellenising Religious agenda of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

1 Timothy 3:6 (KJV) not a new convert, lest having been puffed up he may fall to a judgment of The Devil;

1 Timothy 3:6 Notes: Now this sounds like don’t give the keys to your Ferrari and the booze cabinet to your 18 year old son, whilst you’re away for the weekend. The only thing I’ll add is this: Would the elders of genuine congregation of God be giving the position of overseer, with all the great responsibilities that that entails, to a boy or a novice new convert to the faith and to the fellowship? Not a chance!

1 Timothy 3:7 (KJV) and it behoveth him also to have a good testimony from those without, that he may not fall into reproach and a snare of The Devil.

1 Timothy 3:7 Notes Part 1: Now get a load of this! ‘and it behoveth him also to have a good testimony from those without’. YOU WHAT!!?? So are we to believe that Paul would have written this irrelevant worldly garbage? Are select members of God’s church now chosen based upon the so-called ‘good reports’ of worldly sinners or the lost and unsaved!? What business do the Spiritually dead and/or unregenerated have with The Church of God other than to be recipients of Christian good works? NONE! ZILCH! ZERO!

1 Timothy 3:7 Notes Part 2: ‘that he may not fall into reproach and a snare of The Devil’.

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

“Lest he fall into reproach, for his former scandalous life. And the snare of the devil. Snares and temptations, such as he fell in and fell by before. This is called the snare of the devil; for, as he well knows the constitution of such persons, and what is most likely to prevail, he infers that what was effectual before to their transgressing may be so still;”

Looks like repentance and forgiveness was non-existent in these illegitimate Hellenising fake churches, and in contrast, judging was a full time occupation. Let’s be clear about this, real Christians repent before they are Baptised. That means they TURN from their old ways, they give up their old lives and bury them in the watery grave of Yashua Messiah’s death/sacrifice. They then rise out of the water a new creation – a new man or new woman, not capable of sin; once gifted with The Holy Spirit. This means that if our former scandalous life is still held against us by certain people within this so-called church, then we have an untenable situation and those enforcing such a policy are judgemental, spiritual renegades and apostates, who do need dealing with.

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Rest assured, the clown who penned 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus hadn’t a clue about Christian regeneration.

1 Timothy 3:8 (KJV) Likewise must the deacons be grave, not double-tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre;

1 Timothy 3:8 Notes: Again, as before, what kind of Christians are we dealing with here, if they’re double tongued boozers and money grabbers? It would be hilarious if not so serious. It looks like matey, the second century author of these epistles, hasn’t a clue about regenerated Christians and Christianity.

1 Timothy 3:9 (KJV) Holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience.

1 Timothy 3:9 Notes: You what? What is he rambling on about? ‘mystery of the faith’? what mystery? how is SIMPLE faith in Yashua Messiah mysterious? is it not all very straight forward. Paul confirms it for us, doesn’t he?

2 Corinthians 11:3 (KJV) But I fear, lest by any means, as The Serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

If someone or something is simple to understand, where is the mystery? There is no mystery, but there’s plenty of mystery in the Cainite Babylonian MYSTERY Religion otherwise known as the Cainite-Judaeo-Christian Religion. (see links below)

He then, almost gratuitously, throws in ‘in a pure conscience’. Answer me this, dear readers, what kind of conscience does a regenerated Christian have, if it’s not pure? Does this author creature have any understanding at all? Is a Christian completely forgiven or not – is he or she beyond reproach or not, that is, beyond condemnation?

1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man that hath his hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.

Romans 8:1 (MCV) There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus.

1 Timothy 3:10-13 (KJV) And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office of a deacon, being found blameless. 11 Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things. 12 Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. 13 For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.

1 Timothy 3:10-13 Notes Part 1: Much of this is just a repeat of the nonsense that applied to their so-called bishops, however, there are one or two other issues within these verses: “Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things”. I will highlight once more, what kind of Christians are we dealing with here? Are they regenerated or not? Are they being led by the Spirit or not? All I see in these verses are the characteristics of the heathen, not born of God Christians.

1 Timothy 3:10-13 Notes Part 2: “For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.”

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

Verse 13. ‘That have used the office of a deacon well’ They who, having been tried or proved, 1Ti 3:10, have shown by their steadiness, activity, and zeal, that they might be raised to a higher office, are here said to have purchased to themselves a good degree.

Here we can graphically see explained for us by Adam Clarke the pecking order system of the Nicolaitans, that this forger is promoting. “If you do well then the sky is the limit and one day you could be a pope” This is the spirit that’s at work here – advancement as if an employee in a large corporation, which is exactly what the Cainite-Judaeo-Christian Religion is.

1 Timothy 3:14-16 (KJV) These things write I unto thee, hoping to come unto thee shortly: 15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth. 16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes – Part 1: Now the above last verses of 1 Timothy 3 are 50/50 in terms of Truth and religious hogwash. Verse 14 is irrelevant to the subject matter at hand, as the forger is quite obviously attempting to pass himself off as Paul. However, this statement is true, if the message is figurative: “how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the Truth.” If it’s not figurative, and the forger is referring to a literal CHURCH BUILDING, made with man’s hands, then he gives himself away in no uncertain terms. In fact it could carry a dual meaning, as we know how their grandiose church buildings and cathedrals would feature in the future, and then be referred to a house of God.

1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes – Part 2: “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness.” Once more we have this religious bunkum word ‘godliness’ which I previously unravelled in my earlier writings on 1 Timothy 2. (see link below).

1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes – Part 3: Finally we get this: “God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.”

“God was manifest in the flesh” I have no problem with that, but “justified in The Spirit” I am not so sure about. Did the only begotten Son of God need to be justified? And “believed on in the world”. Is this speaking generally or referring to a select few that He met on His travels? Not very clear is it?

Now also notice, how there is no mention of who Yashua Messiah really came for, so let me refresh your memories:

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

He also gave The Twelve disciples Learners explicit instructions:

Matthew 10:5-6 (KJV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Please take note: I am not referring to the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews when mentioning The Twelve Tribes of Israel.

To summarise, these last verses are probably the best verses in the whole chapter, but still leave a lot to be desired and certainly don’t let the Hellenising religious forger off the hook. 1 Timothy 4 coming up.

Unravelling the So-Called Pastoral Epistles – 1 Timothy 1 & 2 – Parts 1-4:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-pastoral-epistles-parts-1-2/

Unravelling the So-Called Pastoral Epistles – 1 Timothy 1 & 2 – Part 5:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/09/14/unravelling-the-so-called-pastoral-epistles-part-5-1-timothy-2/

What Is The MYSTERY of Mystery Babylon The Great?:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-the-mystery-of-mystery-babylon-the-great/

The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/05/26/the-cainite-judeo-christian-religion/

Why Are There Two Resurrections? – Parts 1 & 2

Or perhaps I should say: What Are The Two Resurrections? For most people, that is, those deceived by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, haven’t a clue about the Two Resurrections. Most of them are fooled into believing their mickey mouse Rapture nonsense, which I expose for the fraud that it is in my article entitled: “Unravelling The Satanic Rapture Deception parts 1 & 2.” (See link below)

So why are there Two Resurrections? simply put, so that all Mankind (but NOT Serpent Seed hu-mankind) can be saved and have Eternal Life in the Kingdom of God: (See link below entitled: “The Jews are The Tares”)

John 3:16-17 (MCV) For God so loved the world The Creation, that He gave His Only Begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have Everlasting Life. 17 For God sent not His Son into the world The Creation to condemn the world The Creation but that the world The Creation through Him might shall be saved.

From Strong’s Concordance:

The World – G2889 – κόσμος – kosmos – kos’-mos – Probably from the base of G2865; the orderly arrangement, that is, decoration; by implication the world (in a wide or narrow sense, including its inhabitants, literally or figuratively [morally]): – adorning, world.

Now I can hear all those Evangelists (so-called) and Fundamentalist ‘Christians’, otherwise known as ‘Fundies’ for short, howling and screaming in disbelief. I can even see some of them jumping up and down and renting their clothes in their pain and anguish at hearing this ‘dreadful news’ – not a pretty sight, I might add!:

“Oh no! Oh no! What are we going to do now, now that we can’t send all those evil sinners to our fiery hell!!?? Doesn’t this messenger Charles character realise how much of an adrenaline kick we get out of telling all those ‘wicked wretches’ they’re going to burn in torment for eternity in our hell fire and brimstone? Who does he think he is, spoiling our party, spoiling our self-righteous parade, spoiling all our psychopathic fun, and rendering us useless and surplus to requirements? We’ll have nothing to do now we can’t threaten, abuse, bully, browbeat and blackmail the dissolute masses through the fear and intimidation of the wrath of our tyrannical Trinity and Monotheistic Ogre gods!” (See links below)

Well all I can say to you mongrel dogs is TOUGH! And now you can start working on your own repentance forthwith, ‘cos if you don’t, it’ll be you who feels the ‘fire and brimstone’, not the lost and the unsaved.

Moreover, as we can see from the above information, we have one of the foundational building blocks of the bad news message of Fundamentalist ‘Christianity’, that is, FEAR, the FEAR FACTOR, the fear of a permanently wrathful and tyrannical ogre god. They are literally attempting to ‘save’ people through severe pressure and fear tactics and/or blackmail. Do they ever stop and think about what they are saying and/or doing? No, not all. Do they ever read what The Holy Scriptures actually say? NO, not a chance!

Therefore, bearing all that in mind, and without further ado I will deal with The Second Resurrection, FIRST. Hey! hang on a minute, what do you mean – The Second Resurrection, there’s no such thing, I hear you say? Well clearly there is because The First Resurrection is definitely mentioned in the Holy Scriptures and if a First Resurrection is mentioned then, by default, there must be a Second Resurrection, otherwise why call it The First Resurrection!?

Revelation 20:4-5 (MCV) And I saw Thrones, and they (the saints) sat upon them, and judgement was given unto them: and I saw the souls spirits of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for The Word of God, and which had not worshipped The Beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is The First Resurrection.

So here we have explained to us The First Resurrection where those who are part of that First Resurrection reign in power, ON THIS EARTH, with Yashua Messiah for one thousand years – The Millennium.

Now take note of verse 5: BUT THE REST OF THE DEAD LIVED NOT AGAIN UNTIL THE THOUSAND YEARS WERE FINISHED! This is the First Resurrection! Right, once more, if we have a First Resurrection then it MUST follow that there is a Second Resurrection otherwise these people referred to as the “rest of the dead” will remain dead and will not live again!

Revelation 20:6 (MCV) Blessed and Holy is he that hath part in The First Resurrection: on such The Second Death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.

We then have The First Resurrection confirmed in verse 6 along with The Second Death which I will go into later. Also, notice, that The Second Death has no power over those who are part of The First Resurrection and if there is a Second Death then, again, by default their MUST be a Second Resurrection.

So what other evidence do we have for this Second Resurrection? Right here:

Ezekiel 37:1-14 (MCV) The hand of The LORD was upon me, and carried me out in The Spirit of The LORD, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones, 2 And caused me to pass by them round about: and, behold, there were very many in the open valley; and, lo, they were very dry. 3 And He said unto me, Son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord GOD, thou knowest. 4 Again He said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear The Word of The LORD. 5 Thus saith The Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live: 6 And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am The LORD. 7 So I prophesied as I was commanded: and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and behold a shaking, and the bones came together, bone to his bone. 8 And when I beheld, lo, the sinews and the flesh came up upon them, and the skin covered them above: but there was no breath in them. 9 Then said He unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith The Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live. 10 So I prophesied as He commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army. 11 Then He said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole House of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts. 12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. 13 And ye shall know that I am The LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves, 14 And shall put my Spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I The LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith The LORD.

These incredible prophetic verses from Ezekiel confirm two things for us:

1) The Second Resurrection is a physical resurrection, unlike The First Resurrection which is a Spiritual Eternal Resurrection, and a far superior resurrection. Hence John says: “Blessed and Holy is he that hath part in The First Resurrection.”

Here is The First Resurrection:

1 Corinthians 15:40-44 (MCV) There are also celestial heavenly bodies, and bodies terrestrial earthly: but the glory of the celestial heavenly is one, and the glory of the terrestrial earthly is another. 41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. 42 So also is The Resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption (capable of decay and death); it is raised in incorruption (incapable of decay and death – Eternal): 43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in POWER: 44 It is sown a natural (flesh) body; it is raised a Spiritual (eternal) body. There is a natural (flesh) body, and there is a Spiritual (eternal) body.

2) What Paul said in Romans:

Romans 11:26 (MCV) And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion The Deliverer, and shall turn away irreverence and disrespect towards God from Jacob.

Now mark this and mark it well, for Paul says ALL ISRAEL, not just some Israelites, but ALL OF THEM, that is, from Jacob/Israel, his Twelve Patriarch sons and ALL their descendants, onwards and up unto this day and into the future – millions, upon millions, upon millions of them, and 98% of them (I’m probably being generous here) UNREGENERATED SINNERS who died IN THEIR SINS and yet they will ALL BE SAVED! So WHEN and HOW will this miraculous event be achieved? Read on for the answer, but first you need to know who the Israelites are!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans/tribes that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,

Benjamin the youngest son,

Simeon

Levi – The Priesthood,

Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,

Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,

Issachar,

Zeebulon,

Gad,

Asher,

Dan,

Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD), Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah = The Jutes, not the Jews = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond (the river) Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

— Flavius Josephus, first century historian.

If you think I am wrong, try and apply this verse to the Jews – God’s promises to Abraham:

Genesis 13:16 (MCV) And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules, (Gibraltar) and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

So as we can see there will be millions upon millions of resurrected Israelites in the future Second Resurrection and ALL given brand new super physical bodies.

However, here’s a question for all you wretched ‘Fundies’ and ‘Evangelists’ out there. If The Father and Yashua Messiah are going to go to all this trouble of giving the Children of Israel super new healthy youthful physical bodies, only to then throw them straight into the Lake of Fire, where is the sense in that? Is the Godhead a Godhead of failure? Is the Godhead that wasteful? Are They into irresponsible behaviour and futile actions? Why not just leave them dead in their graves never to see the light of day again? I will therefore state this for the record: If this is what you think the Godhead are capable of doing, and willing to do, then the godhead you believe in are a pair of merciless vengeful tyrants, and not an ALL POWERFUL Godhead at all. In direct contrast the ALL POWERFUL Godhead I worship is Love, Mercy, Forgiveness, and administer JUSTICE at all times, not mindless injustice and/or psychopathic revenge!! Yes, They punish and will punish SEVERELY, make no mistake, but ALWAYS FOR GOOD REASON! As demonstrated here:

Luke 12:47-48 (MCV) And that (regenerated) servant (one who was, or is, called), which knew his Lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more

Here in these prophetic verses, full of foreboding for certain self-righteous people who think they are saved, we can see who will be more severely punished, AND TAKE NOTE, IT ISN’T THE LOST AND UNSAVED!! Make sure you register this TRUTH in your minds IF you’re one of those self-righteous ‘Evangelicals’ or ‘Fundies’ who goes round judging and condemning the lost and unsaved to hell fire and brimstone in the Lake of Fire – YOU have been warned in agape love.

Revelation 20:11-15 (KJV) And I saw a Great White Throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Strong’s Concordance:

Judged – G2919 – κρίνω – krinō – kree’-no – Properly to distinguish, that is, decide (mentally or judicially); by implication to try, condemn, punish: – avenge, conclude, condemn, damn, decree, determine, esteem, judge, go to (sue at the) law, ordain, call in question, sentence to, think.

So here we can see that The Second Resurrection is NOT about summary mass execution but, rather, judging or evaluating what these people did in their first lives, here in this age, as lost souls. Now pay very close attention to what the Holy Scriptures are saying and refrain from using any close minded thought processes or those erroneous ideas indoctrinated into your minds by satanic ravening wolves from their ‘hell fire and brimstone’ lecterns and pulpits. So what are the Holy Scriptures saying? Well to answer that, here is the non-judgmental Truthful version of that same passage of Holy Scripture:

Revelation 20:11-15 (MCV) And I saw a Great White Throne, and Him (Yashua Messiah) that sat on it, from whose face (countenance or presence) the earth and the heaven atmosphere fled away; and there was found no place for them (forever moving through the aether). 12 And I saw the Spiritually dead, small and great, stand before God; and The Books were opened: and another Book was opened, which is The Book of Life: and the Spiritually dead were judged evaluated, or matters were determined out of those things which were written in The Books, according to their works. 13 And The Sea gave up the Spiritually dead which were in it; and Death and Hell delivered up the Spiritually dead which were in them: and they were judged evaluated, or matters were determined, regarding every man and woman, according to their works.14 And Death and Hell were cast into The Lake of Fire. This is The Second Death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in The Book of Life was cast into The Lake of Fire.

Now make sure you understand this crucial point, for here we can see that the ‘DEAD’ are not dead at all, because they are standing before Yashua Messiah’s Great White Throne, so the word ‘dead’ is referring to another type of death, that is, SPIRITUAL DEATH! This means we have billions of Spiritually unregenerated dead people, standing before Yashua Messiah’s throne. I will also remind you that at this stage they have been resurrected into superb new physical bodies. Now just stop and think about that for a while and endeavour to picture this awesome scene.

OK, so let’s do it, let us picture the scene, there they all are, awaiting their evaluation and, notice, it’s all according to their works in this life, and we know that no one can be saved according to their works, so why is Yashua Messiah evaluating them according to their works when works cannot save them? In fact, why is Yashua Messiah evaluating them at all if He’s going to throw them all, unceremoniously, into the Lake of Fire anyway? Furthermore, we know that they are all sinners, because they are all Spiritually dead, so, again, why not just throw them all into The Lake of Fire, job done!? Why bother with a tribunal!? Are they not already condemned!? Yes they are and THAT is why they were DEAD IN THEIR GRAVES!! Through dying they have paid the penalty for their sinful lives in this life!

John 3:18-19 (MCV) He that believeth on Him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of The Only Begotten Son of God.19 And this is the condemnation, that Light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than Light, because their deeds were evil. (Yashua Messiah is The Light)

Are YOU beginning to see The Light? I do hope so.

Furthermore, here’s a more pertinent point: If Yashua Messiah has taken the trouble to resurrect all these billions of people, given them brand new super physical bodies, just imagine the Spiritual Power and energy involved in doing that. Now imagine the planning and organisational skills involved in this awesome event, not to mention the generation allocations to be made for each era:

1 Corinthians 15:22-23 (MCV) For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23 But every man IN HIS OWN ORDER: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at His coming.

Order – G5001 – τάγμα – tagma – tag’-mah – From G5021; something orderly in arrangement (a troop), that is, (figuratively) a series or succession: – order.

So with these huge events and Truths in mind, is Yashua Messiah then going waste all His Spiritual Power and energy and that of His saints and angels, after having evaluated these people, by throwing them all into The Lake of Fire? Now stop and think (and I know this will be hard and painful for some) and ask yourself if this scenario is realistic and if it makes any sense? Of course it makes no sense, because The Second Resurrection is all about giving these people their FIRST CHANCE for salvation. First chance!!?? I hear you say. Yes their FIRST CHANCE! How do you work that out? I also hear you say. Quite easily as it happens:

The PARABLE of The PARABLES!

Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And the disciples Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in Parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN. 12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13 THEREFORE I SPEAK TO THEM IN PARABLES: because they seeing, see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross (has grown fat, congealed and lazy), and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM. 16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

Now please read the above passage of Holy Scripture and endeavour to understand what’s going on here. Read it several times, if necessary, because this passage is crucial to gaining full understanding of the reason for Yashua Messiah’s mission to this earth. Now pay careful attention for He tells us some critical fundamental Truths. 1) First and foremost, He tells us plainly that His Gospel Message was only for a select few – His Learners (disciples). 2) He tells us that He uses parables in order to CONCEAL The Truth from the majority. 3) He also tells us that He does that in order to protect that same majority from the Power of His Word as they are not ready, not equipped, nor able to receive it. 4) He tells us that He has deliberately blinded them and made them deaf, so that they are incapable of seeing and hearing. 5) Yet at the same time it is their fault and not His, for their hearts have hardened towards their God, as prophesied by Isaiah. 6) So here we have this massive conundrum in that Yashua Messiah is deliberately withholding His Truth from them, whilst blessing only a select few, but at the same time blaming them for not being receptive. 7) Does this make Yashua Messiah grossly unjust? 8) Yes it does APPEAR TO, but only grossly unjust, IF we ignorantly think THIS LIFE is, or THIS AGE is, the only opportunity for salvation. 9) And that is the rub of this conundrum, which, in Truth, is not a conundrum at all, as THIS AGE is clearly NOT THE ONLY OPPORTUNITY for salvation.

Right! After having read the above for as many times as is necessary, you should now understand WHY all these billions of Spiritually dead people will be standing before Yashua Messiah’s Throne on The Last Great Day ready to receive the gift of another life and the opportunity of salvation. So make no mistake, for this Great Day will be the greatest day in mankind’s history, and it will be the very day when Yashua Messiah’s prophecy is fulfilled:

John 12:32 (MCV) And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, I will draw drag all men unto me.

Now most of the wretches in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion will tell you that this verse is referring to that period of time which commenced with Yashua Messiah’s death and Resurrection and His subsequent Ascension into heaven in the first century, but nothing could be further from The Truth, because Yashua Messiah has not drawn (dragged) ANYONE to Himself —- YET! In this age. Take note, The Father does ALL the drawing (dragging) to His Son Yashua Messiah in this age:

John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

Strong’s Concordance:

Draw – G1670 – ἑλκύω, ἕλκω – helkuō helkō – hel-koo’-o, hel’-ko – Probably akin to G138; to drag (literally or figuratively): – draw. Compare G1667.

Having got this far I KNOW there will be many scoffers and stiff necked rebels out there who will maintain that people DO have a chance for salvation, in this life, but reject it, and I would rebut that nonsense and tell them to read the above Holy Scriptures (Matthew 13:10-16) and keep reading them until The Truth has registered in their minds and onto their hearts or see my article: What is True Rejection of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ)? for complimentary reading. (See link below.)

OK, that’s about it for this opening article and I know there are many other side issues attached to it, which I will cover in future articles, so stay with it.

Unravelling The Satanic Rapture Deception parts 1 & 2.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-satanic-rapture-deception-parts-1-and-2/

The Jews are The Tares – fit only for burning!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

Do You Worship an Ogre god – Parts 1- 4
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/do-you-worship-an-ogre-god-part-1/

What is True Rejection of Jesus Christ?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-true-rejection-of-yashua-anointed-the-lord-jesus-christ/

Why Are There Two Resurrections? – Part 2

In part one I covered the foundational basics of The Two Resurrections, and from that foundational knowledge many interesting points and questions spring.

However, before I deal with those questions we must return to the subject of The First Resurrection in order to set the scene for The Second Resurrection, which does not occur until the end of The Millennium, that is, at the end of Yashua Messiah’s 1000 year reign on this earth (NOT IN HEAVEN) as King of kings and Lord of lords.

So what constitutes The First Resurrection, what’s it all about? Training for the resurrected saints is what it’s all about, along with training for the people under their rule. So who are these people that will be under their rule?

These people:

Revelation 7:4-8 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Children of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Napthali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Joseph (Ephraim) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

And these people:

Revelation 7:9 (KJV) After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before The Throne (of King David), and before The Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands. (Brackets mine)

And who are all these people that are made up of both Israelites and non-Israelites?:

Revelation 7:13-14 (KJV) And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they? And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of (the) Great Tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of The Lamb.

OK, so the first thing we learn about these two great numbers of people is the fact that they have survived The Great Tribulation, they have lived through it and survived, and now stand before Yashua Messiah’s Throne on this earth. That is, The 144,000 of Israel (The Israelites, NOT JEWS and see part one if you’re confused) along with a great multitude of other ethnic groups OF MANKIND – not hu-man kind!

First and foremost, these people are not resurrected saints, they are the people that The Father and Yashua Messiah have chosen and sealed in their foreheads, that is, set aside as special people to populate The Kingdom of God, just as They did with the EIGHT in Noah’s day, hence Yashua Messiah likened the end times events to those of Noah’s time:

Matthew 24:37-38 (MCV) But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be. 38 For as in the days that were before The Flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into The Ark.

Here we also see these same people likened unto virgins:

Revelation 14:1-5 (MCV) And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on The Mount Sion, and with Him an hundred forty and four thousand, having His Father’s name written in their foreheads. 2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: 3 And they sung as it were a new song before The Throne, and before The Four Beasts Living Creatures, and The Elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were REDEEMED (‘agorazo’) from the earth. 4 THESE ARE THEY WHICH WERE NOT DEFILED WITH WOMEN; FOR THEY ARE VIRGINS. These are they which follow The Lamb whithersoever He goeth. These were REDEEMED from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to The Lamb. 5 And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before The Throne of God.

Now from Strong’s Concordance we get this. Now NOTICE, first, the word REDEEMED which is from the Greek word ‘agorazō’:

Redeemed – G59 – ἀγοράζω – agorazō – ag-or-ad’-zo – From G58; properly to go to market, that is, (by implication) to purchase; specifically to redeem: – buy, redeem.

So all these people have been purchased as if from a market place, that is, purchased as slaves in chains like goods and chattels in a market place and set free.

Now here’s a question or two that stem from these verses: 1) Are the 144,000 men only? for it says that they are undefiled with or by women, and furthermore, 2) Are these people literally virgins in the sexual sense? NO a thousand times NO in answer to both questions. So if that’s the case, who are these WOMEN that both the men and the women of the 144,000 are not defiled by? Answer COUNTERFEIT CHURCHES – Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism and Protestantism – all whoring religious prostitute ‘churches’ of The Devil.

This means that the 144,000 will be those from the secular world who have not been contaminated by the vile Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. It also means that they will not have heads full of religious garbage that would need unlearning and disinfecting, first, before they begin to learn The Truth; their hearts and minds will therefore be more ready to receive The Truth, and all uncluttered by satanic religious nonsense – they are and will be SPIRITUAL VIRGINS!

OK, moving on. Now pay special attention, for NONE of these people are Serpent Seed Canaanites, that is, no Jews, no Turks (Edomites), no black Africans and no Chinese, to name the principle hordes descended from Cain/Canaan. Yes, there are other Canaanite tribes, but not of importance for this article.

So what ethnic groups will make up this great multitude, I hear you ask? Quite simply they that constitute the rest of MANkind, who are not specifically of Israel, but are distant relations through Noah and his three sons. Some are more closely related to the Israelites, because they will be of Shem (White). For example The Assyrians (The Germans), Slavs, Poles and Russians, but others less so, if they are descended from Japheth (yellow Orientals), The Japanese and Ham (Spaniards, Ethiopians and Indians, and olive swarthy browns). However, the main issue here is that they are ALL OF MANKIND – ALL are from Adam and Eve, via Noah and his sons, and none will be of Cain/Canaan – The Serpent Seed from Ham’s incestuous relationship with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife).

Having said that many Canaanites will also survive The Great Tribulation, but will not inherit The Kingdom of God as described here:

Matthew 25:31-34 (MCV) When The Son of Man shall come in His Glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then shall He sit upon The Throne of His Glory (King David’s Throne here on this earth): 32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: 33 And He shall set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then shall The King say unto them on His right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit The Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

NOTICE first how these verses are dealing with NATIONS! This passage of Scripture is dealing solely with ethnicities and only those ethnic groups on His right hand (the Sheep) will inherit The Kingdom, NOT those ethnic groups on His left (The Goats).

So are you saying that no inbred Canaanites will enter The Kingdom of God? As far as I see and with what information The Holy Scriptures give us, the answer to that question is a RESOUNDING YES! (See link below)

Matthew 13:41-42 (KJV) The Son of Man shall send forth His angels, and they shall gather out of His Kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Now when does this event occur? Well it tells you, doesn’t it? Yashua Messiah’s Kingdom has now arrived and yet there are still people doing iniquitous things, so who could these people be? Why, none other than The Goats with their satanic Serpent Seed inbred blood. Inbred blood which is offensive to Yashua Messiah, which no doubt includes their accompanying diabolical satanic unrepentant behaviour. Hence Luke’s Gospel tells us what Yashua Messiah will do to those with this degenerate rebellious unrepentant mind set:

Luke 19:27 (MCV) But those mine enemies, (the Serpent Seed Jews and other Serpent Seed Canaanites) which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

So there we have it. ALL those not prepared to be ruled over by Yashua Messiah as King of kings and Lord of lords in His Kingdom will be for the chop.

However, what else does this verse tell us? Quite simply that these inbred wretches are PHYSICAL BEINGS, not resurrected SPIRITUAL BEINGS. How do you know that, I hear you say? Easy, because they can be slain and will be slain before Yashua Messiah on His Throne and only physical beings can be slain, not spiritual beings – justice will be done. This event, therefore, proves that physical beings will be present in The Kingdom of God, not just the resurrected spiritual saints who will be ruling with Yashua Messiah as His kings and royal priests.

OK, that just about rounds up the basics of The Two Resurrections, in part three I will go into some of those spring off questions.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

 

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 1

Introduction

This series of articles will set about unravelling one of the biggest deceptions in the King James Bible – the word ‘Gentiles’. This will be no easy task due to the ignorance or deliberate deceiving intentions of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translators of the KJV Bible – the principal culprit being the papist philosopher and humanist Desiderius Erasmus who put together the first Greek New Testament in 1512; this with a humanist agenda and associated philosophy(s) in play and no doubt, influencing his work. ‘Improved’ editions followed the 1512 edition. The martyr William Tyndale (1491?-1536), a contemporary of Erasmus, used Erasmus’ Greek New Testament when translating his English version. These earlier translations were then used by the translators of The KJV (1604-1611) along with The Great Bible (1539).

So why am I asking this question, it’s all very straight forward, isn’t it? Gentiles are non-Jews, aren’t they? Well that’s what we’re led to believe by the satanic blanket use of this, one-size-fits-all, infernal word, but is it True? What if the word ‘Gentiles’ means something else, something entirely different? Where will we be then? apart from being very confused and even upset and angry that we have been so deceptively and easily deceived. Some would say brainwashed, and completely duped; conned no less. To compound the problem the wretched word ‘Gentiles’ can be found throughout the King James Bible in both Old and New Testaments; 129 times in all, in 121 verses and here is its first usage in Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Gentiles (H1471) divided in their lands; every one after his own tongue, after their families, in their nations (H1471).

Now take note, for here we have the first use of this misleading word ‘Gentiles’ and with the same Strong’s reference number for both words in this verse. This occurs very early on in the Genesis historical account of Noah and his sons Ham, Shem and Japheth, and their families, before any Chosen Israelites or Canaanite Jews were even born:

Genesis 10:1 (MCV) Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.

No Israelites or Jews, so therefore no non-Israelites and no non-Jews, that is, alleged ‘Gentiles’ so why is the word already in use?

Furthermore, and as an aside, you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first 11 Books of The Bible and yet, here we have this deceptive word ‘Gentile’ in use where there is no way it can be referring to people or tribes of people who can be classified as non-Jews, as there were no Jews present at that time. So what’s it all about and, again, why is the word there at all?

Well let’s see what the word ‘Gentile’ really means so that we can begin to unravel this evil corrupting conundrum. First the etymology:

From the Online Etymology Dictionary:

Gentile – “From Late Latin noun use of Latin gentilis; “of the same family or clan, of or belonging to a Roman gens,” from gens (genitive gentis) “race, clan,” from PIE root *gene- “give birth, beget,” with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.”

From Wikipedia:

Gens – In ancient Rome, a gens (/ˈɡɛns/ or /ˈdʒɛnz/), plural gentes, was a family consisting of all those individuals who shared the same nomen and who claimed descent from a common ancestor.

Then we have the Biblical definition from the Hebrew in Strong’s Concordance:

Gentiles – H1471 – גֹּי גּוֹי – gôy gôy – go’ee, go’-ee – Apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts: – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

And then from Strong’s again with the Greek definition from the New Testament:

Gentiles – G1484 – ἔθνος – ethnos – eth’-nos – Probably from G1486; a race (as of the same habit), that is, a tribe; specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

Notice how the word has allegedly changed in its meaning from an OT usage to a NT usage!! No mention of Jews and non-Jews in the OT definition but, hey presto, surprise surprise, in the NT, all of a sudden, it does mean non-Jews!! Who decided to give it this new meaning!!?? The plot thickens, does it not?

So there we have it, the main definitions and NONE referring to Jews or non-Jews apart from Strong’s meaningless, peer pressure implied corrupting afterthought in brackets. The etymology plainly tells us that a ‘Gentile’ is from the Latin ‘gentilis’ and means someone who is not a Roman or not a Roman citizen and is nothing to do with people being either Jews and/or non-Jews.

We then get the Hebrew definition for ‘Gentile’ which clearly states ‘goy’ or a ‘foreign nation’ or, better, an Abrahamic or Israelite ‘nation’, so if we re-paste Genesis 10:5 we can more accurately translate it:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Goyim or nations (H1471 – Gentiles) divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.

In support I will include the Septuagint Greek Transliteral OT for Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (Septuagint Greek Transliteral) From out of these separated islands of the nations (Hebrew Goyim) in their land each according to tongue among their tribes and among their nations. (Brackets mine)

As stated earlier the above verse does not refer to Jews or non-Jews, it clearly applies to Noah and his family only, that is, before any Israelites or Jews had been born. This also means that Semites from Shem were also classified as Goyim or Nations as can be supported by this proof, that of God speaking to Abram:

Genesis 12:2 (MCV) And I will make of thee a great Goy (H1471 – Goy – Nation), and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

And again with The Lord speaking to Isaac’s wife Rebekah:

Genesis 25:23 (MCV) And the LORD said unto her, Two nations (H1471 – Goy – Nation) are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.

OK, so the word ‘Gentiles’ is not being used here in this verse, but the word ‘Nations’ is being used, and yet it is translated from the same Hebrew word H1471 Goy or Goyim. So we have the Semitic Hebrews Isaac and Rebekah with twins in her womb being referred to as GOY!!

So how come this same Hebrew word ‘Goy’ is here translated as ‘Nation’, a Hebrew Semitic nation no less, and elsewhere it’s translated as ‘Gentile’ with the translator’s intended meaning being that of a foreign nation? And who is the foreign nation foreign to? Which of these nations is not foreign, they’re all descendants of Noah aren’t they? Are you beginning to see the picture? What a ‘flexible’ and ‘useful’ word this ‘Gentiles’ word is (much sarcasm by the author and the accompanying mirth)!

So, with regard to all the other usages, who has made these translation determinations? Who has decided what kind of nation? Now we’re getting to it, and the answer? the agenda driven religious dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who had to preserve their pro-Jewish agenda deception, no matter what the cost to The Truth of the Holy Scriptures. Confusion and chaos was definitely the order of the day with these deceivers.

From “WHO ARE THE GENTILES?” by Bertrand L. Comparet and taken from “Your Heritage.”

“You may be surprised to know that there is no such word (as Gentile) in the Bible, in its original language. Oh yes, I know that you are now riffling through the pages of your King James Bible, looking for some of the many places you will find Gentile in it. However, I said that there was no such word in the original languages. The word was put into it by translators, who changed the wording of the Bible centuries after the last book of the Bible was written.”

And again from Comparet:

“The word Gentile is not once used in any Hebrew manuscript of the Old Testament. There is a very good reason for this, there is no such word in Hebrew, nor any word that corresponds to it. Everywhere you find the word Gentile used in the Old Testament, it is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word goi (goy), which means nation, the plural form of it is goyim. Since it means nation, why didn’t they translate it correctly? Sometimes they did, but for the most part they translated it to fit the official doctrines of the church of their day. It didn’t matter what violence that did to the true meaning of the word.”

Always good to get confirmation, eh? Please note that I am not a disciple of Comparet’s.

Moving on, and to firm up what I have already said, I will now quote Genesis again in reference to Jacob/Israel and his two grandsons Ephraim and Manasseh (Joseph’s sons), whom Jacob declared as being true Israelites even though their mother was Egyptian:

Genesis 48:17-19 (MCV) And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father’s hand, to remove it from Ephraim’s head unto Manasseh’s head. 18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head. 19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he (Manasseh) also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother (Ephraim) shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations (H1471 – Goyim).

So what do we have going on here!? Let’s be clear, for here we have two Hebrew Israelite lads being blessed by their Hebrew Israelite grandfather, Jacob/Israel, who is saying that one of them, along with his descendants, shall be a great goy (nation) and the other who shall become a great company, or commonwealth, or multitude of goyim (nations). This means we have Hebrew Israelites being called goy and goyim – WHAT!!!!??? This is enough to give the Jews apoplexy!! LOL. Just as well then that the Jews are not Israelites, so they are an irrelevance, until we get to the NT where we see them in their true Serpent Seed Canaanite light as the Christ killers. (See the links below for the true identity of the Jews and their origins)

However, where does this leave us with regard to this word ‘Gentile’ which we now know is a gross deception and means GOY (singular) and GOYIM (plural) and in turn means Israelite NATION or NATIONS! It also leaves us with the bigger problem of checking out every use of the word ‘Gentile’ but, more importantly, learning what is meant by the use of the word in that particular context. Is it being applied to Israelites, to non-Israelites, to Canaanites, to Greeks, to heathen barbarians/pagans, and, especially in erroneous association with the Jews? What are the Holy Scriptures REALLY alluding to in these differing cases?

As an aside, for those of you not aware, the words ‘goy’ and ‘goyim’ are frequently used by the Jews when describing non-Jews in an elitist put-down and derogatory manner. Other times they will call us ‘cattle’ such is their ignorant, arrogant, evil contempt for all other ethnic groups. Here are some examples:

“The differences between Jews and gentiles are not religious, historical, cultural or political. They are, rather, racial, genetic and scientifically unalterable. The one group (Gentiles) is at its very root and by natural constitution “Totally Evil”, while the other (Jews) is “Totally Good.””

— Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut by Rabbi Saadyi Grama

“A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from Holiness.”

— The Chabad-Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson

“We have to recognise that Jewish blood and the blood of the goy are not the same thing. Every law that is based on equating goys and Jews is completely unacceptable.”

— Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

How about that for satanic belligerence and arrogance!? This also tells us that Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, apart from being rabid racists, are not the sharpest tools in the box, having not studied The Holy Scriptures, and, despite all the BS we hear about their mythical cleverness and high intellect.

OK, just one more point from Genesis 48:19 where it refers to Manasseh as being ‘a people’ and from Strong’s, once more, we get:

People – H5971- עַם – ‛am – am – From H6004; a people (as a congregated unit); specifically a tribe (as those of Israel); hence (collectively) troops or attendants; figuratively a flock: – folk, men, nation, people.

As we can see, the Israelites descended from the Patriarch Manasseh were to become a great people, a tribe, or a troop, or a flock and/or a great nation, that is, a great goy.

Any the wiser? I hope so, if not, then press on to Part 2 for all will be revealed.

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 2 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites and The Canaanite Jews

So how do we discern what is really meant by the word ‘Gentile’? Well, first and foremost we have to learn who the Israelites were in Biblical history and, of course, who the Israelites are today, because without this crucial foundational knowledge you’re always going to flounder in your understanding like those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,

Benjamin the youngest son,

Simeon – The Scythians – The Scots

Levi – The Priesthood,

Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,

Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,

Issachar,

Zeebulon,

Gad,

Asher,

Dan,

Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes not the Jews) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules (The Strait of Gibraltar), and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.” (Brackets mine)

For further knowledge about True Israel see link below entitled: “The Jews are The Tares”

OK, so now that you know who The Israelites are, I will go straight to the last book of The Bible as the starting point of this study, for this is where it all has to culminate or climax. Six thousand years of Israel’s and mankind’s history are focused here, that is, just prior to Yashua Messiah’s return to this earth. From this starting point we can then go back and work our way through a few relevant Scriptures to make the case for a ‘Gentile’ free Bible. This will then show you, so that you fully understand, the evil deception that has taken place, that is, through the use of this useless and deceptive word ‘Gentiles’:

Revelation 7:4-8 (MCV) And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Sons and Daughters of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Napthali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Joseph (Ephraim) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

Now here is the question I always ask of those that worship and suck up to the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews as the chosen people, that is, satanic ‘Christian’ Zionists and those of their satanic ilk: “If the Jews are the chosen people, then tell me who these twelve tribes or nations of people are today – identify them if you can?” To date I have never had an answer from any of these wretched deluded people. And why is that? Simply, because the Jews are just one ethnic group – one tribe, not twelve tribes, and a tribe that is not even Semitic, they’re not Hebrews, nor are they of Israel! In fact, the Jews truly are the Gentiles or the Goy, if we were to use their words with their intended meanings. However, we’re not using their disingenuous words, so who are the Jews? The Jews are Shelahite Hamitic Canaanites, The Serpent Seed from The Garden, not Semitic Israelites. (Please see Genesis chapter 38 and the links below for all the details about the True Israelites and identity of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews).

So where are we now? for we have taken the Jews out of the equation completely and we’re now dealing with a totally different ethnic group, namely the True Israelites who became 12 modern nations or 12 modern goys. But what about the non-Israelites, how do we identify them? Answer, we don’t when confronted with this accursed word ‘Gentile’, but what we do learn is that The Holy Scriptures are mostly about the nation or goy of Israel and the Israelites and not about foreign nations at all, other than when they are specifically mentioned, come into contact with, and interrelate with the nation of Israel. This applies equally to the NT as it does the OT. Examples of the other nations in the OT being the tribes of Canaanites (the Hittites Jebusites, Kenites etc.) the Moabites, The Amorites, the Philistines, the Egyptians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians and the Persians etc. In the NT we get the Romans, the Greeks, the Samaritans, the Edomites (Herod) and the Canaanite Jews to name a few.

This means we’re left with three principal ethnic groups of people, those from the nations of Israel, the Adamic/Noahide mankind nations not of Israel and then the foreign heathen nations of the Serpent Seed, headed up by the Jews, namely the Canaanites. The Canaanites and/or the alien foreign nations, are hu-man kind and the Israelites, plus the other nations, are mankind. ‘Hu’ from the British Gaelic and Old English tongues means ‘serpent’ so a ‘hu-man’ is a serpent man, not a man. With these truthful elements in mind we will now unravel the infuriating use of this word ‘Gentile’.

Now here’s a thing. In the OT, ‘Gentile’ means Goy or nation – any nation, and ‘Gentile’, in the NT, means ‘Ethnos’ which must also mean ‘Goy’ or any other nation, if only to keep the continuity going. OK, in Strong’s NT definition it doesn’t say Goy, but when it came to identifying the differing peoples, nothing changed from OT times to NT times, the same ethnic groups were still around. It would, therefore, be foolishness to surmise that the pesky word ‘Gentile’ had changed from its OT Hebrew meaning when using the NT Greek word ‘Ethnos’. Moreover, this must mean that ‘Gentile’ (‘Ethnos’) is nothing to do with being a non-Israelite or a non-Jew unless the context of the verse determines it.

Having said all that I trust that you’re still with me, for I do know that it’s a very complex and confusing subject and we must understand that this confusion has been sown, either through ignorance or to serve a subversive pro-Jewish agenda in order to conceal the true identity of The Serpent Seed Jews and, of course, the True identity of the Twelve Tribes of Israelite peoples – The Goy and/or The Nations.

The other agenda at play here is that of the Papists who have always maintained their counterfeit claim to being ‘spiritual’ Israel, that is, the satanic Roman Cult Church having replaced the Abrahamic Covenant True Israel. Laughable or what?

So let’s copy and paste a few verses here that use the word ‘Gentile’ and expound on them to reveal their true meaning:

3 John 1:7 (MCV) Because that for His name’s sake they went forth, taking nothing of the Gentiles (G1484 – Ethnos)

Now in this verse we have the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ in the context of Messenger John’s epistles, but to whom are his epistles addressed? Many Bible ‘scholars’ say that they are to non-Israelite potential converts and non-Israelite Christians at Ephesus. Others say that John was living in Ephesus at that time and the epistles were written to the congregations at Corinth. However, are either of these stories true? Maybe, but a more likely narrative is that of Augustine of Hippo who stated that John’s epistles were written to The Parthians north of the Euphrates river. Now who resided there in the first century? Why, none other than the Ten Tribes of Israel, which means we have John fulfilling Yashua Messiah’s command to His Twelve Learners to go the lost Tribes of Israel ONLY!

Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These twelve Yashua sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles (Canaanite Jews and other non-Israelites), and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He (Yashua Messiah) answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Therefore this means that in 3 John 1:7 they took nothing of their fellow Israelites – Ethnos – Goyim – Nations.

Moving on with more evidence:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

Right, once again, who was Peter speaking to? for unless we know that, we will be stumbling in the dark and not be able to work out who these ‘Gentiles’ are. So let’s copy and paste the first verse of 1 Peter 1:

1 Peter 1:1 (MCV) Peter, a messenger of Jesus Christ, to the STRANGERS scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

From Strong’s Concordance:

Strangers – G3927 – παρεπίδημος – parepidēmos – par-ep-id’-ay-mos From G3844 and the base of G1927; an alien alongside, that is, a resident foreigner: – pilgrim, stranger.

So who were these ‘strangers’ or ‘resident foreigners’ that Peter was speaking to? See Matthew 10:5-6 above.

Moreover, if Peter was sent to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (and he was) and he is addressing people here called ‘strangers’, who could these ‘strangers’ be other that lost Israelites? here called ‘aliens alongside’, ‘resident foreigners’ and/or ‘pilgrims’? Sojourners might be a another name we could call them, that is, settled, but only temporarily settled for they were still in the process of migrating west into Europe and eventually into Britain.

However, we also need to understand that the places listed, that is, Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, that Peter was sent to are in Northern Asia (northern modern Turkey) where Paul was restrained by the Holy Spirit from venturing into. The reason for that being that Paul was the messenger to the non-Israelite peoples of mankind, that is, non-Israelite Semites and Hamites. Here is the Scripture to confirm what I have said:

Acts 16:6 (MCV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Spirit to preach The Word in Asia.

As an aside and just to let you know that it was Yashua Messiah restraining Paul through The Holy Spirit and not The Holy Spirit operating of itself. (Please see my articles below re The Trinity Blasphemy and The Duality Godhead)

Now why was Paul forbidden entry into Northern Asia? Easy, because that was Peter’s manor – Peter’s territory, where some of The Lost Tribes were residing and they were NOT ‘Gentiles’ as in the word’s intended erroneous meaning – they were Israelites. However Peter is making the comparison between these ‘stranger’ Israelites residing in a foreign land and the ‘Gentiles’ and I’ll post the verse again:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

So who are these ‘Gentiles’ that Peter is allegedly referring to? Well plainly they were heathen non-Israelites, so not God’s chosen people and they could have been of any of the other ethnicities whether of Noahide mankind or Canaan’s hu-man kind (Canaanites). Here, Peter is teaching his Israelite audience that their previous heathen ways of behaving (Gentile behaviour) were not good or helpful to God’s chosen people. Especially if The Father was calling any of them. This is an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ being used in its traditional sense.

Moving on once more we have this verse:

1 Timothy 3:16 (MCV) And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was made apparent in the flesh, justified in The Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into Glory.

So who did Yashua Messiah preach to? Who did He come for?

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (The Ten Tribes).

So here, yet again, we see the deceptive use of this erroneous word ‘Gentiles’ which is translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’ which means ‘Goyim’ and in turn means ‘Nations’, but which nations? Easy, in this case it must be the Israelite Nations because that is who Yashua Messiah declared He was sent to – NOT the heathen foreigners.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 (MCV) For ye, brethren, became followers of the Ecclesia of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen (fellow-tribes-men – Israelites), even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles Ethnos/Goyim/Nations that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the uttermost.

OK, so what do we have revealed to us here? First and foremost Paul is speaking to his fellow-tribes-men, for he refers to them as‘brethren’ who had become followers of Yashua Messiah. He then goes on to make it plain that they had suffered at the hands of their own fellow-tribes-men (Israelites) non-believers, who also had suffered at the hands of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, even though these fellow Israelites were not called and members of the Ecclesia. Sound familiar? We then have Paul stating that they, the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, both killed Yashua Messiah and the Prophets of Old Testament times. Furthermore he says that they tried to stop Paul from preaching to the GENTILES!!!

Now who are these ‘Gentiles’, because we already have the Israelites mentioned as ‘brethren’ to Paul and as fellow-tribes-men? Well that makes it plain, does it not? for here, again, we have the word ‘Gentiles’ meaning non-Israelites.

Here is another example:

Ephesians 4:17 (MCV) This I say therefore, and testify in The Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,

So to whom is Paul speaking? Non-Israelites is the answer. How do we know this? Easy, because no Israelites were resident in Ephesus. They were living in Northern Asia = Peter’s territory, not southern Asia where Ephesus was situated – Paul’s territory. Therefore we have Paul behooving these Ephesian non-Israelite believers to henceforth not behave in the same way as their fellows who were lost and degenerate non-Israelite Ephesians.

Matthew 10:17-18 (MCV) But beware of men Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; 18 And ye shall be brought before governors and kings (shabbos goy Jew pawns) for my sake, for a testimony against them, the Gentiles (Ethnos – Goyim – Israelite Nations and Foreign Nations).

Here we have an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ covering a multitude of sins, for it does not mean just non-Israelites, it also means Israelites as well. If, in the future, we are arrested for Yashua Messiah’s sake and brought before the criminals in power, we will be a testimony to all people, including our fellow Israelites. That means this word ‘Gentiles’ (‘Ethnos’ or ‘Goyim’) is being used in an all encompassing fashion for both Israelites and non-Israelites alike. Which, in turn, equates to its Old Testament usage where we saw Abram and his Israelite descendants referred to as ‘Goyim’‘Gentiles’‘Nations’. This, in turn, makes a total mockery of the translator’s intended meaning, that is, solely for the describing of heathen non-Jews.

Romans 1:13 (MCV) Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

So to whom is Paul speaking? Take note, so that you fully understand what is going on here. First of all Paul is addressing fellow tribes men (Israelite brethren) NOT fellow Christian brethren, because he adds the rider: “That I might have some fruit among you also!” So as he writes they are not yet regenerated brothers of Paul (Christians) and yet he calls them BRETHREN! Now notice how the translators have written it as “even as among OTHER GENTILES” This means that according to the translators we have Paul referring to unregenerated Israelites as ‘Gentiles’! How confusing is that?

Moreover, don’t forget that ‘Gentiles’ means ‘Ethnos’ or ‘Nations’ or ‘Goy’ so Paul could easily be referring to dispersed Israelites living amongst other nations.

OK, that’s it for part two, more revelations in part three.

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Exposing The Trinity Lie
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

The Duality Godhead
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 3 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites, The Canaanite Jews and Now The Greeks

In parts one and two I have revealed some, but not all, of the problems created by the use of the wretched word ‘Gentiles’. In the third part of this article we move on to another word which compounds and makes the word ‘Gentiles’ even more confusing than it already is.

OK, so let’s move on to the word ‘Greeks’ and why use the word ‘Greeks’ and not ‘Gentiles’. Why use two different words to describe the same thing? Greeks are ‘Gentiles’ aren’t they? that’s if we stick to their erroneous use of this irritating word, yes of course they are, so what’s going on? Well could it be that nearly all the uses of the word ‘Gentiles’ are referring to The Lost Ten Tribes of Israel (The Nations) and not to non-Israelites at all. This means that when non-Israelites was the intended meaning they used the word ‘Greeks’.

Here’s the first example:

John 7:35 (KJV) Then said the Jews among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles?

Correct translation:

John 7:35 (MCV) Then said the Jews Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, (not the Israelites), among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed (The Lost Israelites, that is, The Diaspora) among the Gentiles Greeks and teach the Gentiles Greeks.

So what have we here? Quite simply yet another deceptive variation on the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ where it is mistranslated from the Greek word ‘Hellen’ pronounced ‘Hellane’, and the Hellens were most likely the Greek speaking non-Israelite peoples. However, some of these Greek speakers may well have been migrating Israelites as well, although most would have been ethnically Greeks. However, we’re still left with the conundrum of why did they use the word ‘Gentiles’ when it should have been ‘Greeks’?

Moving on and just to set the scene, here is yet another anomaly to prove my case:

Romans 2:9-10 (MCV) Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also of the Gentile Greek 10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also to the Gentile Greek.

Once again, the word ‘Gentile’ here is translated from the NT Greek word ‘Hellen’ (Strong’s reference G1672) pronounced ‘Hellane’ and yet it is written as ‘Gentile’ and not ‘Greek’. In this case ‘Gentiles’ is not translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’. How confusing is that? Where is the consistency? These translators of the KJV were supposed to be learned men, so what were they up to?

For confirmation we get:

Mark 7:26 (MCV) The woman was a Greek, a Syrophoenician by nation; and she besought Him that He would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Greek – G1674 – Ἑλληνίς – Hellēnis – hel-lay-nis’ Feminine of G1672; a Grecian (that is, non-Jewish) woman: – Greek.

Here we can see a woman, who was known as a Syrophoenician by nation, in the Gospel of Mark, and yet is called a Greek when in truth she was a Canaanite and is called a Canaanite in the Matthew rendering of this account:

Matthew 15:22 (KJV) And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto Him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

“The woman was a Greek – Rosenmuller has well observed, that all heathens or idolaters were called Ἑλληνες, Greeks, by the Jews; whether they were Parthians, Medes, Arabs, Indians, or Ethiopians. Jews and Greeks divided the whole world at this period.”

Notice here that the Parthians and Medes were here called Greeks by the Canaanite Jews, when it is well known that the Parthians and Medes at that time were dispersed Israelites of The Ten Tribes. The lands of the Medes and Parthians north of the Euphrates river is where The Assyrians deposited the Israelites after they had taken them captive in 740-725 BC.

Josephus, the first century historian, is a witness to this fact:

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

So here we have solid gold proof that the Israelites, here erroneously labelled as Greeks, and therefore as Gentiles in the eyes of the Canaanite Jews, were alive and well and were a great multitude of people prospering in an alien land as strangers or sojourners.

OK, the above is a little digression, but an essential digression in order to build a bigger and more accurate overall historical picture, and to show what an evil deception this word ‘Gentiles’ is, so back to the thread of Jews, Greeks and Gentiles.

Right, let’s take a look a the word ‘Jew’ in the NT and let’s use a very deceptive verse as an example:

Galatians 3:28-29 (MCV) There is neither Jew Judean Israelite nor Greek non-Israelite, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

In first century Judea (not Jewdea) there was a remnant of the three Tribes of the Southern Kingdom of The House of Judah as opposed to the Northern Kingdom of the House of Israel – The Ten Tribes. These three tribes consisted of Judah, Levi and Benjamin who weren’t Jews. They were descendants of the small minority of Israelites who returned from the Babylonian captivity circa 515 BC. However, many at that time did not return, but joined up with their Northern Kingdom brethren living in alien lands abroad and never returned home to Judea.

Moreover, the Shelahite Canaanite Jews (The Serpent Seed) lived along side these Israelites as parasitical usurpers having stolen their language, their customs and their religion. The Sanhedrin with its ‘high priest’ consisted mostly of these satanic inbred Jewish impostors – the rare exception to this rule, that we know of, are John the Baptist and his family, Mary, Joseph, The Lord Yashua Messiah and His half siblings, The Twelve Learners, Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea and Saul, who later became Paul. Obviously there were many others, not named, but these are the principal New Testament characters who were Semitic Israelites, but not Serpent Seed Hamitic Canaanite Jews.

OK, so just to recap, here in the above Scripture we have Jews and Greeks mentioned, not Jews and Gentiles, why is that? when one would have thought ‘Gentiles’ was the ‘right word’! In the Greek MSS it uses the word ‘Hellen’, pronounced ‘Hellane’, which would suggest Greek pagans and heathens. However, it could also have a contrasting Spiritual meaning and be referring to Judeans as chosen people of the non-religious Truth and the Greeks as those of the pagan heathen religious persuasion, those of a religious mind set, just as Paul highlights here:

Acts 17:22 (MCV) Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ Hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious, that is, preoccupied with idolatrous religions.

Here is another interesting passage of Scripture that needs explaining, for here we find ‘Jews’, ‘Greeks’ and ‘Gentiles’ all mentioned, but all is not what it seems:

Acts 14:1-2 (MCV) And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both, that is, Paul and Barnabas together into the synagogue of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews Israelite Judeans and also of the Greeks believed. 2 But the unbelieving Canaanite Jews stirred up the Gentiles those of other Nations and made their minds evil affected against the brethren.

So what’s this all about? Well first and foremost we have Paul and Barnabas going into a synagogue, as was their want until, unsurprisingly, they eventually gave up on the satanic Canaanite Jews altogether. Later on we get Paul, Silas and Timothy having to confront the Jewish demons:

Acts 18:5-6 (MCV) And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the Spirit (laboured more intensely) and testified to the Canaanite Jews that Jesus was Christ. 6 Now at their resisting and blaspheming, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles Israelite Nations.

This was the general state of affairs that Paul and his companions had to continually deal with, so in Acts 14:1-2 we have a similar situation in that we have Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews rejecting Paul’s message. In contrast, Judean Israelites, plus Greeks, who were being called received The Word readily. However, this doesn’t stop here, for the Canaanite Jews then stir up the Judean Israelites and the Greeks, here called Nations, and poisoned their minds, turning them against Paul and the brethren.

Now here is a humdinger misunderstood verse:

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews Israelite Judeans.

What did Yashua Messiah really mean by this statement to the woman by the well? Easy, He was referring to Himself as a descendant of the Royal Judahite Israelites. The use of the word ‘Jew’ here by the ignorant translators is an abomination! Salvation was NEVER through or of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, nor could it ever be! Salvation was through Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) as a descendant of Abraham and Sarah to Isaac, to Jacob/Israel and to Judah via Tamar = Royal Judahites, not Judah and Bathshuah the Adullamite Canaanite inbreed who sired the first Canaanite Jews, Er, Onan (both struck down by The Lord) and Shelah.

Next verse:

Acts 11:19-20 (MCV) Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews Judean Israelites only. 20 And some of them were men of Cyprus and Cyrene, which, when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians, preaching the Lord Jesus.

Right, so who would have been the ones persecuted after Stephen was wickedly executed by the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? Quite simply, it was Judean Israelites of the three tribes resident in Judea who had been called and saved. They had obviously fled Jerusalem travelling as far as Phenice on the island of Crete, Cyprus and Antioch. Notice that some of these Judean Israelites were already residents of Cyprus and Cyrene and when they arrived at Antioch on their way home preached to some Greeks about Yashua Messiah. Mark it well, for none of these kindly people were Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews.

With that, I think we can call this a job done. However, if there are any other verses that you think need explaining then leave a comment and quoting the verse you need explained.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles.

 

The Parable of THE SOWER and The Parable of THE PARABLES

Now this is a long overdue article and the reason for that is Yashua Messiah’s restraining hand upon me, for He had not yet formulated all my thoughts on this most crucial of parables and, I might add, Yashua Messiah’s parables in general.

You see, it’s ALL about the foundational Holy Scriptures and when expounding on The Parables we MUST get our foundation laid first or otherwise we go off, shooting off our big mouths, with nothing but satanic error pouring forth from them. This is a very difficult tightrope that we walk with immense responsibility and one misplaced step can lead us to a very sticky end if we stubbornly persist in these errors and refuse to repent. Example: The rebellious Israelites in the wilderness who did not enter into His Promised Land (The Kingdom of God).

OK, so let’s get The Parable of The Sower copied here. I will copy Yashua Messiah’s explanation of it later which also needs expounding on.

The Parable of The Sower

Matthew 13:3-9 (MCV) And He spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow; 4 And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up: 5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away. 7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them: 8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Now notice! What is the most important verse in this short passage of Holy Scripture? Answer: The last verse, verse 9 – WHO HATH EARS TO HEAR, let him hear.

This now brings us onto The Parable of The Parables, which must be understood before we attempt to unravel ANY of Yashua Messiah’s other parables and again NOTICE, for the last verse is, once more, the crucial verse:

The Parable of The Parables

Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And the Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto YOU to know the mysteries of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN. 12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13 THEREFORE I SPEAK TO THEM IN PARABLES: because they seeing, see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross (has grown fat and lazy), and their ears are dull (incapable) of hearing (they are deaf), and their eyes they have closed (they are blind); lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM. 16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

Look at what Yashua Messiah is telling us in this narrative:

1) The ‘mysteries’, or the Spiritual dimension of knowledge and understanding regarding The Kingdom of God, are not given to the majority of people. (Now let all you blasphemous mainstream Christians fully understand this basic TRUTH! as you go around trying to convert all and sundry and threatening them with fiery hell if they fail to heed your nonsense)

2) Therefore, because the Spiritual dimension was/is NOT given to all, Yashua Messiah spoke to them in parables in order to conceal The Spiritual Truth from them – deliberately and intentionally.

3) This left them in a condition whereby they could listen, but not hear, they were Spiritually deaf. They could see, but not perceive – they were Spiritually blind. However, make sure that you fully comprehend what was going on here. This was/is Yashua Messiah’s doing, and not their doing, but at the same time it was their doing, and is today, still their doing, due to their indolence and laziness = their hearts had ‘waxed gross’ and are still ‘waxed gross’. It was/is not their fault, yet was/is their fault!! (More on this Godly Spiritual conundrum later).

4) Penultimately, Yashua Messiah confirms by stating: “Lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM.”

5) Finally, we get Yashua Messiah telling His Learners (disciples) that they are BLESSED, because their eyes SEE and their ears HEAR = both Fatherly Gifts from heaven and NOTHING to do with them and their abilities.

Now pay attention all you “I have accepted a ‘Jesus’ as my saviour” delusional dupes. The Father calls and Yashua Messiah converts and heals. Salvation and conversion is 100% in THEIR HANDS, not ours!!

So having laid the foundation to The Parables and to whom they were and are aimed, we can now move onto The Parable of The Sower, but always keeping in mind the above crucial knowledge. I will therefore copy it here again followed by Yashua Messiah’s explanation:

Matthew 13:3-9 (MCV) And He spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow; 4 And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up: 5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away. 7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them: 8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Yashua Messiah’s explanation of The Parable of The Sower

Matthew 13:18-23 (MCV) Hear ye therefore The Parable of The Sower. 9 When any one heareth The Word of The Kingdom of God, and understandeth it not, then cometh The Wicked One (Satan), and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side. 20 But he that received the seed into stony places (stony hearts), the same is he that heareth The Word, and anon with joy receiveth it; 21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended. 22 He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth The Word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke The Word, and he becometh unfruitful. 23 But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth The Word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

Once more, and before I continue, make sure you understand that this parable is for those who have been called. This parable is for CHRISTIANS, FAKE OR REAL, and/or those who profess some kind of belief in Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). It is for those who are Spiritually aware, NOT FOR THE LOST AND UNSAVED – IT’S A PARABLE – a Spiritual coded message!!!

So let’s begin first with the parable verses and then followed by Yashua Messiah’s explanation:

Matthew 13:4 (MCV) And when He sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up:

Matthew 13:19 (MCV) When any one heareth the word of The Kingdom of God, that is, The Good News message, and understandeth it not, then cometh The Wicked One, (Satan) and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side.

Right, we now know that Yashua Messiah’s parables are aimed at the Spiritually aware or Spiritually awakened, not the lost and unsaved. This means those that have been called, for, notice, some Truth is sown in their hearts, so they know what’s what. This could not happen to anyone that is lost and unsaved. So these people are called and then attend what they think is a church and are quickly subsumed into it and the fowls (ravening wolves) of The Wicked One in their pulpits of this church quickly devour any Truth initially learned.

Matthew 13:5-6 (MCV) Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

Matthew 13:20-21 (MCV) But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth The Word, and anon with joy receiveth it; 21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of The Word, by and by he is offended.

Again we have so-called Christians only this time with stony hearts that receive The Word with joy, so they are keen and eager and full of enthusiasm and charismatic luvvy duvviness, but what happens? for they seem to run out of steam. Well, first of all, because they have stony hearts (stony ground) they can only have head knowledge, not heart knowledge, for they do not have hearts of flesh!

Ezekiel 11:19 (MCV) And I will give them one heart, and I will put a New Spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh. (This only occurs with those planted in deep soil.)

Now here’s the rub, these fakes are not planted (not earthed in deep soil) in Yashua Messiah, otherwise they would endure and persevere. They would be strong and tough and able to weather any storm thrown at them – any persecution or any trial.

Moreover, this points to not being gifted with The Holy Spirit, thinking that Baptism is unnecessary and some even kid themselves that they can receive The Holy Spirit without Baptism – a catastrophic error made by such groups as the satanic Alpha Course. (see the link to my Cornelius article below). Look folks, this is a crucial issue and not one to be swept under the carpet.

Notice, too, that they are offended and who today is the most easily offended group of people? Why, it’s Cultural Jew Marxist liberals – otherwise known as ‘soy boys’ and ‘snowflakes’ or those that need their ‘safe spaces’, that are so easily offended. Many so-called Christians have adopted these worldly satanic political ideologies into their ‘Christian’ beliefs. These liberal ‘Christians’, if confronted with the True Gospel Message, are very easily offended, especially if the Truth about The Jews is presented to them. (again see all the links below) Not only that, they are even offended by certain points of Holy Scripture when asked to explain why the Israelites under Joshua butchered whole cities and towns of Serpent Seed Canaanites – men, women and children. This proves that they are pusillanimous liberals and not Christians!

Matthew 13:7 (MCV) And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them:

Matthew 13:22 (MCV) He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth The Word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.

The Care of This World? What did Yashua Messiah mean by this curious phrase? Quite simply he was prophesying that in the future there would be so-called Christians thinking that THEY are here to set up the Kingdom of God, that is, before Yashua Messiah returns to do that VERY THING! This means that they believe they are on some kind of do-gooding liberal mission to rescue mankind from themselves and to change the world.

“Let’s bring an end to poverty” they wail and with ministries here and ministries there, usually in some wretched Canaanite African back water = “Telescopic philanthropy” as Charles Dickens used to call it. “Kingdom Building” is another of their delusional chants, when Yashua Messiah left no instruction of the kind before His ascension. Go and make Learners (disciples) primarily of the Israelites and bear fruit were His only instructions.

Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These Twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the non-Israelites, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel – The Twelve Tribes (see list below)

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.

Matthew 10:7 (MCV) And as ye go, preach, saying, The Kingdom of God is at hand (within reach).

Matthew 28:19 (MCV) Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone. (see link below)

Finally for this thorny category we get: “deceitfulness of riches” which is partly the “health, wealth and prosperity non-gospel” preached by many false ministers and pastors today.

However, the biggest share of this group goes to the intellectual, theological and philosophical members of these ‘churches’ for riches can also be intellectual riches. Just like financial riches, intellectual riches puff up the ego and increase the pride and vanity. With this vain intellectual approach they make The Word of God to none effect through their over-complications and by adding their useless embellishments to their vain interpretations of The Holy Scriptures. The Trinity doctrine is a perfect example of this evil practise and it’s these satanic lying thorns choke the The Truth out of them.

Matthew 13:8-9 (MCV) But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Matthew 13:23 (MCV) But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth The Word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

In these two verses Yashua Messiah emphasises by repeating the fruits that will be forthcoming from The Word (Seed) sown in the deep rich and fertile soil of those The Father has predestined, called and chosen.

Links:

THE PAIN IN THE BUTT That Is The Story of CORNELIUS! – Acts 10
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/09/25/the-pain-in-the-butt-that-is-the-story-of-cornelius-acts-10/

The Jews are The Tares!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Racist and The Canaanite Woman He Called a Dog!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/was-the-lord-jesus-christ-a-racist-yashua-anointed-and-a-canaanite-woman-he-called-a-dog/

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/should-christians-be-baptised-into-yashua-messiahs-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-1/

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

*Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,*
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
*Levi – The Priesthood,*
*Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,*
*Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,*
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

Try and apply this verse to the Jews – God’s promise to Abraham:

Genesis 13:16 (MCV) *And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.*

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

*“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”*

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AD and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

“The apostles passed beyond the ocean to the isles called the Britannic Isles”

— Eusebius ( Demonstratio Evangelica or Proof of the Gospel , book 3, chap. 7)

“We certainly know that Christ, the true Son, afforded His light, the knowledge of His precepts, to our Island in the last year of Tiberius Caesar” (Tiberius died in 37 AC)

— Gildas the Wise, circa 550 AC (De Excidio Britanniae or On the Ruin of Britain )

Caucasians = White Israelites, White Caucasians are The True Israelites (NOT JEWS). They were placed in the Caucasus region circa 725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans) when Assyria invaded the Northern Kingdom of Israel and took them away as captives. From there they migrated west into Europe – the rest is history.

Our Ancestors Forgot Who We Are!
https://www.minds.com/media/902215686757830656

https://www.minds.com/media/902249474722271232
https://www.minds.com/media/902893671965282304
https://www.minds.com/media/902905549734813696

THE PAIN IN THE BUTT That Is The Story of CORNELIUS! – Acts 10

OK, straight away, let me make it very clear that, in and of itself, this story is FINE!!! So I will state for the record that it’s a valid Biblical account of a very interesting and informative topic. So what makes it a Pain In The Butt, I hear you ask? Members of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion or blind and deluded mainstream Christians are what make this uplifting story a Pain in the Butt! Pretty much like they do everything else from The Holy Scriptures with their perverted, satanic, blind guide misinterpretations, and this Cornelius story is a classic example of how they satanically misuse it to annul water Baptism. More on that later.

So how do they make this story a Pain in The Butt, I also hear you ask? Well in order to discover that, let’s copy and paste the Biblical narrative here, first, so that we are fully aware of what went on:

Acts 10:1-2 (MCV) There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band, 2 A sincere man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.

So here we have an Italian Roman Centurion which, would make him a Canaanite, for Italians are descended from the Babylonian Hittites, who were Canaanites. Romans were not Italians, so were not Canaanites. Notice that he feared God, so he and his household were Old Covenant believers, not New Covenant believers, so no Grace.

Now racially, to a chosen Israelite like Peter, who was NOT A JEW (Take note, Israelites are not Jews – see links below), this man would have been the lowest of the low. Again, racially, he would have been sub-species scum to Peter. We need to get this very real life scenario firmly fixed in our minds, so that we understand what’s going on here. No slimy, libtard, multicultural Cultural Jew Marxism is this society, as in our Jewified, dissolute, degenerate society today.

Don’t believe we are Jewified? Then believe it from one of their own:

“We have corrupted the blood of all the races of Europe — perhaps we have infected them today.

“Everything is Jewified.

“Our thinking is in everything living, our spirit rules the world.

“We are the masters, for everything that has power today is the child of our spirit.

“One may hate us, one may drive us away, our enemies may triumph over our physical weakness, but we are no longer to be gotten rid of.

“We have conquered peoples, conquered the races, defiled them, broken their strength, made everything rotten, lazy and corrupt with our stale culture, our spirit can no longer be exterminated.”

— Dr. Kurt Munzer, Jewish novelist, “The Way To Zion”

Moving on, we are also told that Cornelius is sincere in his belief, as are his household, which means they are all being called by The Father. We know this for they are all praying and giving alms. Next we have Cornelius seeing a vision:

Acts 10:3-4 (KJV) He saw in a vision, evidently about the ninth hour of the day, an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius. 4 And when he looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God.

Right, here we can see further confirmation that The Father has begun to call Cornelius for he has been praying and doing good deeds. These activities are an open sign that Cornelius has been called by The Father, otherwise he would not have been doing these things, especially praying. He then sees an angel of God in a vision, so this is a man that The Father has a specific job for.

Here the angel gives Cornelius his first instructions:

Acts 10:5-6 (KJV) And now send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon, whose surname is Peter: 6 He lodgeth with one Simon a tanner, whose house is by the sea side: he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do.

Cornelius follows the angel’s instructions:

Acts 10:7-8 (KJV) And when the angel which spake unto Cornelius was departed, he called two of his household servants, and a devout soldier of them that waited on him continually; 8 And when he had declared all these things unto them, he sent them to Joppa.

Next we jump to Peter who also sees a vision:

Acts 10:9-16 (KJV) On the morrow, as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour: 10 And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance, 11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth: 12 Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. 13 And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. 14 But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. 16 This was done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven.

Here in these verses we see the THRUST and CORE of the subject matter and the REAL REASON for this story = Peter’s OLD COVENANT mind set and his racial and religious aloofness re non-Israelites and how he had refused to eat and socialise with them as brothers and sisters in the Faith.

Peter is curious about the vision and wonders what it could mean whilst the messengers from Cornelius turn up at Peter’s lodgings:

Acts 10:17-18 (KJV) Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon’s house, and stood before the gate, 18 And called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there.

Peter dwells on the vision and then Yashua Messiah speaks to him through His Spirit and tells Peter what to do – not doubting. Peter meets and greets his visitors.

Acts 10:19 (MCV) While Peter thought on the vision, Yashua Messiah, through His Holy Spirit, said unto him, Behold, three men seek thee. 20 Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I, Yashua Messiah, have sent them. 21 Then Peter went down to the men which were sent unto him from Cornelius; and said, Behold, I am he whom ye seek: what is the cause wherefore ye are come?

The visitors tell Peter about Cornelius their master and of his good standing with the Judean people:

Acts 10:22 (MCV) And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Judeans (Israelites – not Jews), was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.

Peter lodges his visitors for the night and the following day journeyed with them to Caesarea taking some brethren from Joppa with them:

Acts 10:23 (KJV) Then called he them in, and lodged them. And on the morrow Peter went away with them, and certain brethren from Joppa accompanied him.

Cornelius is waiting for them:

Acts 10:24 (KJV) And the morrow after they entered into Caesarea. And Cornelius waited for them, and had called together his kinsmen and near friends.

Cornelius meets Peter and bows to the ground to worship him and Peter immediately lifts him up and corrects him:

Acts 10:25 (KJV) And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him. 26 But Peter took him up, saying, Stand up; I myself also am a man.

Peter shows that he has understood the vision that Yashua Messiah sent to him and explains the Old Covenant Law to Cornelius and how he (Peter) had been wrong:

Acts 10:27-29 (MCV) And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together. 28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is an Israelite to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. 29 Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent ye have sent for me?

Cornelius recites to Peter what he had experienced:

Acts 10:30-33 (KJV) And Cornelius said, Four days ago I was fasting until this hour; and at the ninth hour I prayed in my house, and, behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing, 31 And said, Cornelius, thy prayer is heard, and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God. 32 Send therefore to Joppa, and call hither Simon, whose surname is Peter; he is lodged in the house of one Simon a tanner by the sea side: who, when he cometh, shall speak unto thee. 33 Immediately therefore I sent to thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God.

Cornelius and his household and friends hear the Good News from Peter:

Acts 10:34-43 (MCV) Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that the Godhead is no respecter of persons fictions or masks: 35 But in every nation he that feareth Them, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with Them. 36 The word which The Father sent unto The Children of Israel, preaching peace by Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ): (he is Lord of all:)
37 That word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the Baptism which John preached; 38 How The Father anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with Power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of The Devil; for The Father was with Him. 39 And we are witnesses of all things which He did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: 40 Him The Father raised up the third day, and shewed Him openly; 41 Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of The Father, even to us, who did eat and drink with Him after He rose from the dead. 42 And He commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is He which was ordained of The Father to be the Evaluator of the Spiritually alive and the Spiritually dead. 43 To Him give all The Prophets witness, that through His name whosoever believeth in Him shall receive remission of sins.

The Holy Spirit falls on the non-Israelites:

Acts 10:44-48 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word. 45 And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out the gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, 47 CAN ANY MAN FORBID WATER, THAT THESE SHOULD NOT BE BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 And he commanded them to be Baptised in the name of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

Right, there it is, the full account of Peter and his encounter with Cornelius the non-Israelite Canaanite Italian and the tough lesson that Peter had to learn. This is the reason why this account is in the Book of Acts and no other and YET!!?? What do you think the gnat straining blasphemers of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion use this passage of Scripture to pathetically try and make a case for?

Answer: NON-BAPTISM CONVERSION OR REGENERATION!!! THAT IS, THE INDWELLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT WITHOUT BAPTISM!!!

And where do they get this idea from? Here:

Acts 10:45-46 (MCV) And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out The Gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.

Yet what happens next:

Acts 10:47 (MCV) Can any man forbid WATER, that these should not be BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 AND HE COMMANDED THEM TO BE BAPTISED IN THE NAME OF YASHUA MESSIAH (JESUS CHRIST).

Now why did this event take place when the norm for regeneration was and is repentance, confession of sins, Baptism and the Gifting of the Holy Spirit and as commanded by Peter at the very beginning of his work for Yashua Messiah:

Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, REPENT, and BE BAPTIZED EVERY ONE OF YOU in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

We’re also told the same by Yashua Messiah Himself:

John 3:3-5 (MCV) Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again (born of God), he cannot see The Kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto Him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be BORN OF WATER (BAPTISM) and of The Holy Spirit, HE CANNOT ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD!!

There it is folks, for all to see, and yet these demonic mongrel dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (so-called mainstream Christians) want to change all that and make regeneration meaningless and, more importantly, POWERLESS with their no-Baptism non-conversion, and this, all based on one misunderstood verse of Holy Scripture, which took place for totally different reasons than they try and make out.

So why did the Holy Spirit fall on Cornelius and SOME of his fellows before they were Baptised? Was it for their benefit or Peter’s and his fellow Israelite brothers benefit, who were present? You see, once we lose sight of the reason for this event we can then drift off into any old make believe, fairy land ideas or cuckoo land myths and fables, which is what non-baptism conversion is – a satanic lie – a myth and a fable.

This event took place in order to convince Peter and his brothers that select non-Israelites were now acceptable to the Godhead, and I did say SELECT! Make sure you notice this:

Acts 10:44 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word.

ALL THEM WHICH HEARD THE WORD!! So what is this telling us? The Holy Spirit only fell on those which HEARD THE WORD! This is informing us that there were some there that didn’t hear The Word and The Holy Spirit did not fall upon them.

As a final warning do not let any evil mongrel dog, blind guide, lead you astray on this most crucial part of your Spiritual journey with Yashua Messiah. Repentance, confession of sins and Baptism MUST precede the Gifting of The Holy Spirit.

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Did eve have sex with the devil or did she just eat some fruit?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Royal Judahites and the Canaanite Jews explained.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

APARTHEID Is The Kingdom of God!

How about that to get all those self-hating, guilt ridden, anti-white liberal fake Christians going, eh? I don’t think there could be a more tormenting or provocative statement or ‘meme’ (as they like to call it today) that one could present to these treacherous satanic evil disgusting wretches.

So how can the Kingdom of God be an Apartheid Kingdom? Quite easily, and Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Himself made it very clear:

Matthew 25:32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a Shepherd divideth His sheep from the goats: (Emphasis mine)

There it is folks – APARTHEID and/or segregation as in the American South, and whether we like it or not!! The nations will be separated or all ethnic groups divided and separated from one another so that they will all live together with their own kind – White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes with White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes, Germans with Germans, Russians with Russians, Slavs with Slavs, Spaniards with Spaniards, Arabs with Arabs, Indians with Indians, Japanese with Japanese and Ethiopians with Ethiopians. They will then remain racially pure with no Jewish encouraged inbreeding, no Jewish encouraged miscegenation, no Jewish encouraged satanic diversity, no Jewish encouraged satanic enriching, and no Jewish encouraged satanic multiculturalism.

However, Yashua Messiah also says: “Like a Shepherd divideth His Sheep from the goats,” so He is giving us this parallel, but what parallel, and who are the goats? because they are not the previously mentioned Nations. The Nations are Mankind and the Sheep are the White Caucasian Israelites, amongst those Mankind Nations, but the goats are not. The goats are a different group altogether; they are a hu-man sub-species and not of Mankind at all, so who are these goats?

Easy, they are the The Serpent Seed Canaanites – Satan’s people – his offspring, that is, The Jews, African blacks, the Turks, the Italians, the Red Indians, the Chinese, the Mongols and the Koreans, to name the principal Canaanite tribes.

Now obviously this state of affairs is not going to sit well with many liberal fake Christians; those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Christians that are really Cultural Jew Marxists (liberals) posing as Christians, and they will no doubt create a huge fuss and protest, accusing Yashua Messiah of being a HATER! a BIGOT! and a RACIST! So how do you think Yashua Messiah is going to deal with these rebellious vile evil people? Like this:

Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, (The Canaanite Jews and their shabbos goy duped Marxist slaves) which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. (Brackets mine)

So there is their sticky end, so lets hope that they repent and are quick about it! Lord hurry that day!

For those wondering who the White Caucasian Israelites are, here is my quick run down and exposé on that topic:

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
Levi – The Priesthood,
Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, British Royalty and Nobility,
Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AC and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

Caucasians = White Israelites

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rgLD2NtGRpUf/

https://www.minds.com/media/902217401290674176

In Yashua Messiah’s name – Brother Charles

Did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Say: I AM NOT GOOD and I AM NOT GOD?

The short, but very substantial, story of the Wealthy Young Ruler.

Now this subject is yet another of those ‘pain in the neck’ subjects that blaspheming Judaisers and satanic gnat strainers, alike, try to spiritually garrote me with, but, I hasten to add, they always fail. So let’s copy and paste here the Holy Scriptures that they then pollute with their perverted reasoning and satanic Judaising nonsense:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto Him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Mark 10:17-18 (KJV) And when He was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit Eternal Life? 18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

Luke 18:18-19 (KJV) And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit Eternal Life? 19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.

Now the first issue that these mongrel dogs will attempt to make mileage out of is the monotheism BS value that they think these verses possess. They think these verses PROVE that God is ONE and that Yashua Messiah was clearly stating that He was was not God, but is this TRUE? NO a thousand times NO!!! But hang on Yashua Messiah said: “none is good, save one, that is, God.” So how do you get around that, I hear you say? Quite easily is the answer to that and it all depends upon your understanding of the word ‘GOD’ in the New Testament.

However, in order to understand the word ‘God’ in the New Testament we have to understand the word ‘God’ in the Old Testament FIRST, for the Godhead never changes. We also have the issue of the Greek language of the New Testament, for it is too vague in its description of God, unlike the Hebrew definition of the Old Testament. Therefore from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

God – H430
אלהים – elohym – el-o-heemPlural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God[head]; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty. (Square brackets mine)

god – H433
אלהּ אלוהּ
‘ĕlôahh ‘ĕlôahh – el-o’-ah, el-o’-ah (The second form is rare); probably prolonged (emphatically) from H410; a deity or the deity: – god. See H430.

This ‘eloah’ singular deity would be used when describing Satan, who is the only solitary god (‘eloah’) of this world.

So from this proof we now know for sure that the Godhead is two distinct Spiritual beings, not one, other than their being number one with none above.

Moreover, if we now move onto The New Testament we have a Greek word being used for the word ‘God’ and not a Hebrew word. However, does that mean the nature of the Godhead changes? Do they become a different Godhead just because a new word is in use? No way, so what gives? The word ‘theos’ is what gives instead of ‘eloheem’ or ‘elohim’ but the plural nature of the Godhead remains the same. From Strong’s Concordance once more:

God – G2316
θεός – theos – theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

In ancient Greece there were only ‘gods’ ‘plural’ because the Greeks were polytheists and worshipped many gods, not two alone. However, there was no need for a singular Greek word for a god because there was no singular god in polytheistic Greek worship. This means the Greek word ‘theos’ did the job just fine when describing the true Duality Godhead = more than one!!

Matthew 1:23 (KJV) Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. (Emphasis mine)

OK, so here we can plainly see that Yashua Messiah is described as being: “God with us”, that is, in the flesh so, in turn, the Old Testament plural Duality Godhead ‘Elohim’ is also still with us with The Father in heaven and The Son on earth in the flesh and, therefore, still Two God’s.

So this brings us to our little conundrum of: “there is none good but one, that is, God:”

Now what was Yashua Messiah actually saying here? For we know for sure that He wasn’t saying God is one; He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t God and He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t good either, even though most will mistakenly think He was saying that. So what was He really saying? Well, first of all, He was telling us plainly, and those there present, that He was God in the flesh as part of the Godhead, but without them realising it. This is due to The Truth that the Godhead is a Duality Godhead and always was a Duality Godhead with Him now standing there amongst them as God, so how could He say that He was not good or tell His questioner not to call Him good? What was Yashua Messiah doing by saying that?

The answer to that my friends is very simple. This unsaved and lost wealthy young ruler was trying to win favour with Yashua Messiah by calling Him good. This was plain and simple flattery which got him nowhere with Yashua Messiah who quickly rebuked him with the question: Why callest thou me good? This was nothing to do with Yashua Messiah not being good. Of course He was good, He was God in the flesh so He had to be good – He could be nothing else.

However, just for the benefit of the wealthy young ruler He adds these two riders: “There is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.”

Now, as already shown, Yashua Messiah was God in the flesh so was stating clearly that He was good, but without anyone there realising it and yet at the same time giving Glory to His Father in heaven as being good as the other half of the Godhead.

With the second rider we have Yashua Messiah saying: “But if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.” In J B Phillips’ translation he has it better: “But if you WANT TO enter into [that] Life you must KEEP The Commandments.”

So first things first. Yashua Messiah is saying: “If you WANT TO enter into Life? So does this wealthy young ruler want to or not? Furthermore, where is The Law in this arrangement? It’s nowhere in it at all, so clearly Yashua Messiah is teaching the wealthy young ruler that this is about a FREE CONSCIOUS DECISION on his part and not a commandment issue = no Law. Second, we have this word ‘KEEP’ which everyone, and his dog, mistakenly thinks means OBEY when it mean what it says, that is, to keep – to protect – to hold onto as precious – internalised and have them written on our hearts so NOTHING to do with obedience at all. (Please see my article “When Did The Biblical Word KEEP Become OBEY?” – Link below.)

This is what Yashua Messiah was REALLY saying to the wealthy young man that came forward gushing and fawning all over Yashua Messiah in his initial, over the top, flattering enthusiasm.

Now don’t get me wrong on this, for later on I believe that this young man WAS saved. How do I know this? Easy, because Yashua Messiah loved him, so that means He knew the young man’s heart deep down and knew he was sincere. He also knew The Father was calling him, and KNEW that eventually he would repent and love his neighbour by giving up his wealth and then FOLLOWING Yashua Messiah. The same, in a different way, applied to Nicodemus but I won’t go into that subject now.

Furthermore we then have the issue of the wealthy young ruler’s question: “What good thing shall I DO, that I may have Eternal Life?” OK, I have made my point quite obvious here by emphasising the words ‘I DO’. Moreover, so what could this young man DO in order to inherit Eternal Life? NOTHING! absolutely nothing is the answer to that question. How do we know that? Quite simply because he was asking the question within the backdrop of the Ten Commandments of which he boasted in being a fautless observer. This means he was asking Yashua Messiah what other Commandment he should be observing or doing that he may have missed. His mission in questioning Yashua Messiah was solely Law based and understandably so because The Law was still in force at that time, even for the faithful.

However, The Lord then stuns him with His reply which immediately introduces the SPIRITUAL DIMENSION or SPIRITUAL THRUST of The Commandments = LOVE!! Not the feeble letter of The Law of The Commandments = legalistic Pharisaism and its close companion hypocrisy.

So the wealthy young ruler is challenged with Yashua Messiah’s charge to go sell all his possessions and give the proceeds to those in need and THEN to follow Him. Now mark this point and mark it well for the gifting of his wealth will not save him, but the act of gifting his wealth will prove that he is being called by The Father to Yashua Messiah and also prove that he is saved. Salvation is ALWAYS an undeserved free gift and our good works will follow as a result or as evidence that we are saved, not because we are trying to be saved or trying to earn our salvation.

Finally,Yashua Messiah in saying these tough things to the wealthy young ruler was in turn challenging his commitment to Him. Was he prepared to give up his Law/Commandment based life and comfortable wealthy lifestyle and put his sole trust and faith in Him? These are the points and questions that Yashua Messiah was getting across to the wealthy young ruler.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/when-did-the-biblical-word-keep-become-obey/

The DUALITY GODHEAD

The Duality Godhead!? What Godhead is that, I hear you ask? Well I’ll tell you straight, right away, They are not a mickey mouse triune godhead, They’re not a Christadelphian/Unitarian/Judaic/Islamic monotheistic godhead and They are not a Binatarian godhead either, if that’s what you were thinking.

Now what is a Binatarian godhead? I’ve never heard of such a thing, again I hear you say. OK, so let me explain, a Binatarian godhead is a half-truth, so that means it’s a lie, just like the monotheistic mono-god and the trinity triune godhead.

Binatarianism is belief in a Duality Godhead that has been corrupted with Triunism and turned into yet another lying hu-man magical construct. This means that instead of a mythical godhead that is one in three and three in one, they have constructed a godhead that, like the trinity, it is one in two and two in one = total fallacious religious nonsense.

We therefore need to understand that The Godhead consists of TWO DISTINCT Spiritual Beings who are NEVER at anytime one solitary spiritual being – a distinction that applies solely to Satan the Devil, for he is the ONLY MONO-GOD. This means that The Duality Godhead is very simple to understand, for we are told about Them right at the beginning in Genesis Chapter 1:1

Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God (H430 Elohim – plural) created the heaven and the earth.

There They are, in the very first verse of the Holy Scriptures: The ‘ELOHIM’ and the ‘Elohim’ is the plural of ‘Eloah’ or ‘Eloha’. So if the Godhead was ONE GOD, it would have read: “In the beginning God (Eloah – singular) created the heaven and the earth.” But it DOES NOT SAY THAT it says God ‘ELOHIM’ – PLURAL! MORE THAN ONE GOD – THE GODHEAD, but NOT a triune godhead! Please excuse the all-caps shouting folks, but shouting is very necessary at times, especially, for some stiff necked duped people out there who love to hang onto their nonsensical Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious myths, whether it be monotheist myths or triune myths.

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – H430 – אלהים ĕlôhı̂ym el-o-heem’ – Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.

Now pay attention to what Strong is doing here, for he is following a satanic monothesitic agenda and explaining away The Truth by introducing his own irrelevant intellectual nonsense into his definition of ‘Elohim’ “but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God;”

Moreover, ignoring his intellectual waffle, ask yourself this very pertinent question: Would a Bible scholar of Strong’s immense calibre, with his excellent knowledge of the Hebrew language, have not known of the word ‘Eloah’ or ‘Eloha’ and known its SINGULAR meaning, and also have known that ‘Elohim’ was the plural of that singular word? I will leave you all to answer that no brainer question for yourselves.

OK, so we have established from the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that the Godhead is more than one god and this is further confirmed for us in Genesis again:

Genesis 1:26 (first part) (KJV) And God (H430 Elohim – plural) said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness: (Emphasis mine)

Right, now is this erroneously claimed solitary mono-god speaking to himself? If not, who is he speaking to – the angels? No way, for I’ll tell you straight, the angels never created anything, and man is definitely not created in the image of angels. This means that if we take the “God is one” nonsense, seriously, it must mean that their god needs certifying, for he is hallucinating and seeing someone in his head that he is now attempting to hold a conversation with. Hilarious or what!?

Having said all that, I can now see all the monotheists jumping up and down, frothing at the mouth, and renting their clothes in true Moloch and Baal worshipping style, as they did in Elijah’s day when their mono-god failed to bring down fire to ignite the wet wood, such is their delusional thinking. (See 1 Kings 18) However, not only that, but when I have finished this article the trinity dupes will no doubt have joined them in their manic heathen frenzy. Who said being a follower of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) – The Way was not good fun? LOL

Moving on, I will now quote a segment from one of my earlier articles which covers the prime and/or premier “identity of God verse in Deuteronomy”, and we all know it, don’t we? This verse is the verse that nearly all monotheists quote in an attempt to support their erroneous satanic claims:

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Please note, as I dissect this verse it will be, in part, a repeat of what I have said above.

Hear, O Israel” – or better translated “Hear you Israel” or “Listen up you Israelites”, for I, your Lord, have something important to tell you:

The Lord our God” – properly translated from the Hebrew; The Lord = The Eternal or The Self-Existing. Our God = Our ‘Elohim’ (plural); the Godhead that has always self-existed before time began and was/is always a plural Duality Godhead.

Straight away in this short phrase of Holy Scripture we are told by the use of this word ‘Elohim’ (the plural of ‘Eloah’) that we are dealing with more than one God. Look folks, there is no getting away from this Truth, and we need to get it through our heads that the Hebrew word ‘Eloah’ (singular) would have been in use here, not ‘Elohim’, IF God was one. OK, so we have now ascertained that The Godhead is more than one, and yet it says:

Is One Lord” – so what’s going on here and what does this mean? The Hebrew word here for ‘one’ is ‘Echad’ which means ‘united’ or ‘in unity’ in one sense, and ‘number one’ the prime number in the other sense, that is, no one higher or no one above – The Most High as wriiten elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures.

One – H259 – אחד ‘echâd ekh-awd’ – A numeral from H258; properly united, that is, (as) one; or (as an ordinal) first:a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any (-thing), apiece, a certain [dai-] ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.

OK, as we can see the word ONE does not mean solitary or one god or a mono-god, for it means UNITED AS ONE, that is, in agreement in thought, word and deed, yet still distinct and separate as Two Spiritual Beings.

A Numeral – H258 אחד ‘âchad aw-khad’ – Perhaps a primitive root; to unify, that is, (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts): – go one way or other.

The primitive root word then confirms this for us – TO UNIFY!! And again this, in turn, means They are not one being, for being united or unified is always an arrangement whereby a number of beings are at one with each other or unanimous in their thoughts, aims and ideals, as in a football team. Newcastle United is a team of individuals united in one aim – to win, but they are not one being, they are eleven distinct beings. This is how it is with the Godhead; they are Two Spiritual Beings, united as one in thought, mind and deed – totally likeminded – united!

This, too, is why The Lord, through Paul, exhorts the Congregations of God to be like the Godhead in their relationships one with another:

Romans 15:5-6 (KJV) Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: 6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even The Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. [Two distinct beings] (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Take note, the Congregations of God were not ONE BEING, but they were exhorted by Paul to be of ONE MIND just like The Father and The Son and like the Godhead of God with God in the beginning who said: “Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness:”

If we now move on to the New Testament we have a new word for the Godhead and that word is the Greek word Theos’ instead of the Hebrew word ‘Elohim’. However we need to be clear that just because a Greek word is now used, instead of a Hebrew word, doesn’t mean that the nature and make-up of the Duality Godhead has changed. In fact the Greek word ‘theos’ is very useful for this topic for, generally, it means a DEITY and in the Greek sense that means gods plural, for the Greeks were polytheists – they, like the ancient Egyptians, had many gods. As far as I know they did not have a word in their language to describe a monotheistic god. It was only the Jews that worshipped such a deity and they worshipped that deity in error and in ignorance when they knew very well that God ‘Elohim’ was a plural Godhead.

God – G2316 θεός theos theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, ward].

So there we have it: ‘Theos’ = a deity and in Ancient Greece that would mean more than one god, not a mono-god. Not only that, but because ‘Theos’ is such a general all encompassing word in terms of objects of worship, it means it can be interpreted any way you like, if you have a monotheistic or triunistic agenda to fulfil. Moreover, notice that within this very definition we can see Strong doing just that with all his figurative nonsense regarding ‘magistrates’. With regard to ‘magistrates’ I will leave a link below for additional reading regarding this satanic subject.

Here is some interesting backup information from this web page: https://goedbericht.nl/english/god-placer/

Based on the previous blog, I received a question, How do you come to the definition of the Greek word “theos” (God) as PLACER? The well-known Lexicon to the New Testament of Dr. Spiros Zodhiates, says the following:

The most probable derivation is from the verb theo, to place (see tithemi, Str. 5087). The heathen thought the gods were disposers (theteres, placers) and formers of all things.

The Keyword Concordance of the Concordant Literal New Testament presents the same origin of theos. The verb appoint or place we also recognize in our word thesis, which is a proposition (anti-thesis = contrast, synthesis = composition). Below are some passages where the word theos is remarkable combined with tithemi, from which it was derived.

Romans 4:17 … A father of many nations have I appointed you – facing which, he believes it of the GOD … 1 Corinthians 12:18 Yet now GOD placed the members, each one of them, in the body according as He wills. 1 Corinthians 12:2…whom also GOD, indeed, placed in the ecclesia, first, apostl… 1Thessalonians 5:9 for GOD did not appoint us to indignati…

The Greek word theos is much more concrete than our word God. Theos refers to One Who appoints everything and gives it a place. Nothing takes place without Him giving it a place.”

Furthermore, because we know that the Godhead does not cause confusion re their identity we can definitely know for sure that plural ‘Theos’ in the NT means exactly the same as plural ‘Elohim’ in the OT – The Duality Godhead with The Holy Spirit as their LIVING POWER.

One last Holy Scripture:

Galatians 3:20 (KJV) Now a mediator is not [a mediator] of one, but God is one.

Now does this verse make any sense? First of all, who is The Mediator that this verse is referring to? Answer: Yashua Messiah. And was Yashua Messiah God come in the flesh? Answer: Yes, hence it states quite plainly that a mediator is not of one, so there has to be more than one in order for one to mediate to the other and yet it then says: “God is one!” So what’s going on here?

Easy, God = ‘Theos’ = ‘Elohim’ = more than one, for the Godhead does not change:

Malachi 3:6 (KJV) For I am The LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

Here below we have Yashua Messiah speaking on behalf of the Godhead for no one has ever seen or heard The Father:

John 1:18 (KJV) No man hath seen God (The Father) at any time; The Only Begotten Son, which is in the bosom of The Father, He hath declared Him. (Brackets and Emphasis mine)

John 5:37 (KJV) And The Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. YE HAVE NEITHER HEARD HIS VOICE AT ANY TIME, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE. (Emphasis mine)

So there it is folks, NO ONE has ever seen or heard The Father at any time, so that must mean that Yashua Messiah was The God of the Old Testament who spoke on behalf of Himself and/or The Father – The Duality Godhead.

In Yashua Messiah’s name,

Messenger Charles

Here are my complimentary articles to this article:

Exposing the Trinity Lie!:  https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

Can Christians Grieve The Holy Spirit?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/can-christians-grieve-the-holy-spirit/

Can Christians Lie to The Holy Spirit?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/ananias-and-sapphira-how-we-can-know-this-is-a-false-or-a-fake-story/

Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse and Baptism is Not Into The Trinity: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/should-christians-be-baptised-into-yashua-messiahs-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-1/

Are YOU a Heretic and What is Heresy?

If you are a Christian, or even not a Christian at all and with no interest in Christianity, have you ever wondered about these two words and what they mean? for they get banded about with great regularity by those of the satanic Roman Catholic Cult, which is a part of the equally satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Moreover, when you hear these words, do they resonate a positive vibe with you or a negative vibe? For me, they have always resonated a negative vibe, because they have always sounded accusatory and judgemental. Now don’t get me wrong, for there are some people that deserve to be labelled a heretic, that’s IF the word heretic actually means what people believe it to mean, that is, a blasphemer or an apostate, and again, that is, someone who has turned his back on Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and walked away as did these wretched people here:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

However, I have learned just recently that the words heretic and heresy from a Holy Scriptural sense are not what they seem when compared to the erroneous Roman Catholic religious interpretations. In fact, they do not mean what I have described above at all. They have been mistranslated from the Greek manuscripts, and more on that later, but first let’s look at some secular dictionary definitions for the words in question.

From Dictionary.com:

Heretic

1) A professed believer who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church or rejects doctrines prescribed by that church.

2) Roman Catholic Church – a baptized Roman Catholic who willfully and persistently rejects any article of faith.

3) Anyone who does not conform to an established attitude, doctrine, or principle.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heretic

1) Religion: a person who differs in opinion from established religious dogma; especially: a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church who refuses to acknowledge or accept a revealed truth the church regards them as heretics.

2) One who differs in opinion from an accepted belief or doctrine – a nonconformist.

From Dictionary.com:

Heresy

1. Opinion or doctrine at variance with the orthodox or accepted doctrine, especially of a church or religious system.

2. The maintaining of such an opinion or doctrine.

3. Roman Catholic Church. the willful and persistent rejection of any article of faith by a baptized member of the church.

4. Any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs, customs, etc.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heresy

1a:  adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma (see dogma 2) They were accused of heresy.

1b: denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church

1c :  an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

2a: dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice – to disagree with the party leadership was heresy.

2b: an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards

So there we have it from the secular perspective and notice how the Roman Catholic Cult features prominently in these definitions giving it a strong association with these two negative words.

Notice, too, in 2a how they now apply it to those that reject rigid political dogma as well. Rejection of Bolshevik Marxist Political Correctness (Cultural Marxism) anyone? Do I also sense the spirit of the legalistic satanic Pharisees here in the application of these two words? You bet your life!

OK, so what’s your point I hear you ask? confusion and some I would answer and to unravel that confusion let’s go now to the Holy Scriptures for The Truth regarding these two misused words:

First and foremost, the word heretic cannot be found in the KJV Bible at all – it ain’t there folks, so that tells you just how important this subject is to Yashua Messiah. However, it is VERY important to those Roman Catholic judgemental mongrel dogs who like to accuse people of being heretics, that is, those who have rumbled their money making, money laundering scam called a church and have started to voice their truthful opinions.

Second, and just as crucial, the word heresy can only be found once in the KJV Bible and here is the verse with its only use:

Acts 24:14 (KJV) But this I confess unto thee, that after The Way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in The Law and in The Prophets: (Emphasis mine)

So here we have some very interesting things being said by Paul. First of all, Paul let’s it be known that following Yashua Messiah was known by the followers of Yashua Messiah as The Way, for He is The Way – The ONLY Way to The Kingdom of God and Eternal Life and NO RELIGION required!

Second, the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION called those who were followers of The Way (Yashua Messiah), HERETICS!!! and their beliefs and Faith solely in Yashua Messiah – HERESY!!! How blasphemous is that?

Not only that, if we look up the word in the Greek MSS what do you think we will find? Answer, this from Strong’s Concordance:

Heresy – G139 – αἵρεσις – hairesis – hah’ee-res-is
From G138; properly a choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion. (“heresy” is the Greek word itself.): – heresy [which is the Greek word itself], sect.

Look what we have here: 1) a choice; 2) a party in disunion; 3) a sect. So what does this tell us? Well far from being negative, the word heresy looks like it is something very positive, that is, the separating of those who follow Yashua Messiah (The Way) from satanic religious illegitimates. In the first century that would have been primarily the Pharisees and Sadducees who were later usurped by the so called Hellenising philosophers known as the ‘church fathers’, that is, the counterfeit founders of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Be sure you understand that religion is a spirit called Legion and Satan presents this phenomena in a myriad of ways whether it be Jews or Fundie ‘Christians’ with their Judaising Law based religion or Papists with their Babylonian Mystery Religion.

Furthermore, today, whilst the Pope is traipsing here, there and everywhere around the world promoting his mickey mouse satanic multi-faith unity BS, Paul was and is teaching the exact opposite – now there’s a surprise and is that hilarious or what?

Moreover what’s more interesting is the way this Greek word hairesis has taken on a dual meaning in some people’s eyes for we find it used elsewhere:

Acts 28:22 (KJV) But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect (hairesis), we know that every where it is spoken against.
(Brackets and emphasis mine)

In this verse we can see the word hairesis used more accurately, in it being translated as sect and not heresy, but, either way, neither translations of this word point to the evil and distorted and satanic interpretations of The Devil’s Roman Catholic Cult who misuse, twist and pervert it to accuse those of The Truth and/or The Way of being heretics which, in reality, is a compliment to us, not an insult.

This means dear brothers and sisters that in the future if some evil papist calls you a heretic, just thank him or her as sarcastically as you can and be encouraged by their plug ignorance.

Brother Charles.

As a PS I would add that the word heresies can also be found three times which again should be translated as sects and which I will deal with here at a later date.

Was JESUS CHRIST a JEW?…

…Or Better Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a JEW?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38. (See the first 3 links below)

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Canaanite Jews were, and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

From Strong’s Concordance:

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING – by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially or ethnically a viper or a reptile and therefore against Himself! – IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, this is what these Canaanite Jew people were and still are today in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurious thieves and, worst of all, genocidal psychopathic cold blooded murderers, as exemplified in the so called Russian Revolution; as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

“A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten God, for they had never known God at all, and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them straight:

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of God, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the God of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a severe punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so-called African-American blacks.

However, I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand, and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) parents. In Matthew we have Joseph’s lineage who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father, but his step-father, and in Luke we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (KJV) The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (JUDAH) and his brethren; 3 And Judas (JUDAH) begat Phares (PHAREZ) and Zara (ZARAH) of Thamar (TAMAR); and Phares (PHAREZ) begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam (REHOBOAM); and Roboam (REHOBOAM) begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; 15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary (Miriam), of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? Easy, because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI. (Emphasis mine)

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (KJV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So did Joseph have two fathers, or is this a contradiction, or just an expression of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still referred to as his father and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was called Heli’s son.

From the Concordant Literal Translation:

Luke 3:23 (CLV) And He, Jesus, when beginning, was about thirty years old, being a son (as to the law) of Joseph, of Eli,

From The Greek Transliteral:

Luke 3:23 (Greek Transliteral) And He was the Jesus as-if of-years thirty beginning as was lawlized (was legalised) son of-Joseph of-the Heli.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon, through Solomon’s son Rehoboam, and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David, We therefore have Yashua Messiah, who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (KJV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH).

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his twin brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (KJV) The (ROYAL) Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah, nor his descendants, until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK, so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low, because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However, I can hear the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” AH, BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this ignorant empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar, who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another woman, his first woman, named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites, and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Lord for disobeying their father Judah, and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consummation of their marriage to Tamar and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband, but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime, Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the original parents of the first Canaanite Jews and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside, this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews, via their mothers, and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father, but he was a Freemason and did have a Jewish wife.

So to sum up, we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Israelites; 3) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Canaanite Jew. (See link 4 below)

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/