Are You Fearful of Being Born of God (Born Again)?

And does the whole idea frighten the life out of you, if so, why? Yashua Messiah (Our Lord Jesus Christ) said these very words:

John 3:3 (KJV) Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot see The Kingdom of God. (Emphasis mine)

The words ‘born again’ are not really an accurate translation of the original Greek MSS. In one of my Interlinear Greek/English New Testaments it states it as “born from above” and in the other an even better translation “receives birth from above.” In 1 John 3:9 it describes it more directly as being ‘born of God’:

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His Seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Notice, too, that once we’re born of God we become sinless in His sight – perfect. So as we can see, we are talking about a superlative gift from God and we are talking about a re-birth – a brand new start – a new life – as a new man or new woman – a new creation, and the beginning of a new life that will last for all eternity. A life free from all real worries and insecurities that we have known in the past. Yes, life can, and will, continue to be difficult with all its trials and tribulations, but after being born of God (born again) all these difficulties of life will be seen in a different Light; a new Light – His Light. This is literally a new beginning for any and all of us fortunate enough to be chosen for this high calling, for a calling is what it is:

John 6:44 (KJV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day. (Brackets mine)

John 6:65 (KJV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

1 Corinthians 1:26-28 (MCV) For ye see your CALLING, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are CALLED: 27 But God hath CHOSEN the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath CHOSEN the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God CHOSEN, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought (zero) things that are:

Moreover, to receive this “birth from God” is a most wondrous and uplifting thing, the most wondrous thing that can happen to a man or woman, and is, quite plainly, a miracle. Please note, too, that we do not initiate this miracle, it has nothing to do with us; the Father God calls and we answer, and that’s it.

Always be wary of people who say they have “accepted Jesus Christ” (not possible) or they have “found Jesus Christ.” (not possible) or “made a decision for Christ.” (Also not possible, see link No. 1 below)

Let us now return to the story in John 3; Nicodemus, a Pharisee, a ruler of the Judean Israelites and Canaanite Jews, comes to The Lord at night, so this was obviously a private meeting, some might say clandestine. He openly confesses to The Lord that he believes He is a teacher from God and that God is with Him (see verse 2).

Not many people understand the significance of Nicodemus’ admissions here, first of all he says ‘we’ so he speaks for some of his fellow Pharisees as well, but from then on the conversation with Our Lord becomes very close to the heart for Nicodemus. These admissions and the fact that he has taken the trouble to enquire of The Lord at unsociable hours are the first signs of Nicodemus’ calling. My guess (and it is only mine) is that Nicodemus came to Jesus more for his own benefit than for that of his colleagues and quite right too. The parable of the pearl of great price teaches this very same principle.

OK, now all of this is very fine and I will return to the story line later, but the question most of you will probably want answering is: “What about me! How do I know if I am being called and born from above?” These are very good questions and the only answer I can give is this: it’s different for every one of us, for we are all unique and no two birthing experiences are the same, for they are tailor made for each of us, but there can be some common factors in most Spiritual births.

1. In many cases The Father uses life situations or life crises to bring us to His Son; we have to have a need for Him and many converts are often in a state of brokenness when they become receptive to The Father’s call. Others are not so, and don’t need so much persuasion. Many will look around them and see the wretchedness and breakdown of their society around them. Their fellow man becoming colder and less compassionate, the paedophilia, the violence, the debauchery, the thieving and murders on our streets, children and young people out of control, the drugs, the increase in sexually transmitted diseases, rampant drunkenness and alcohol abuse, abortions (200,000 per year in Britain alone and counting), family breakdown and the wicked corruption of traitors in high places – our corrupt so called leaders who dispense injustice, rather than justice.

Many will see all these problems and know deep down within themselves that man has completely lost his way and is without any answers. Once born of God (born again), though, we then understand we have a powerful Father God who is fully aware of ALL these problems that man has brought upon himself. As born of God (born again) sons and daughters we learn that The Father and His Son are the ones who will eventually sort ALL the problems out, and we do not have to fret or worry ourselves about them.

2. Once we start to believe, many issues, concerns and problems or cares of this world that used to weigh us down, especially guilt, disappear completely with the realisation that we are now truly forgiven. This forms part of what is known as the ‘peace that passeth all understanding’. There is a certain kind of elation that kicks in here and stays with a believer always. It may wane at times but it always returns to lift us up.

3. As stated in point 2, the affairs of treacherous men (politics) or “cares of this world” as Yashua Messiah refers to them, will begin to look insignificant and of little importance, because these things or ‘cares’ are ‘of this world’ and His Kingdom which is not ‘of this world’ is now all that interests us. We are still “in the world” but we are no longer “of the world.” We are now witnesses, which simply means we watch or witness. Contrary to what you may hear from assorted pulpits, witnessing is not shooting off our big mouths trying to force people or blackmail people into believing through fear tactics but, rather, letting our lights shine. How, by growing in Grace and Faith which those around you will witness? Please note, we are still free to speak out against the wickedness we see around us, and it will depend very much on how much faith we have in determining how bold we are. This boldness comes over a period of time, as we grow, but it is not for us to join political parties in order to do so. We should speak for Yashua Messiah and no one else, but as free agents, not ‘party members’.

4. This one is a sure sign; you will feel an overwhelming desire to share your new found love of Yashua Messiah with all your family and friends and very quickly will discover that they are not the least bit interested in your new found love for Him. This will probably be your first (and only, I hope) round of rejection experiences, and don’t worry because you are now learning that they are ‘rejecting’ Him, not you. He who now lives in you via The Holy Spirit is being ‘rejected’, although it does feel like we are being rejected personally. Once they know you believe, it’s best to keep your counsel and only discuss the subject again if they ask. Again please note, this ‘rejection’ of Yashua Messiah is not real rejection, as they can do nothing but ‘reject’ Him. (See link No. 2 below).

5. You will probably have a desire to read The Holy Scriptures; possibly for the first time. Now here is another miracle; if you have read The Holy Scriptures in the past and have found it impossible to make sense of them, with all their supposed contradictions you will now begin to make sense of them, and here’s why:

1 John 2:27 (KJV) “But The Anointing which ye have received of Him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same Anointing teacheth you of all things, and is Truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him.” (Emphasis mine)

6. Here is another good sign; He calls the low and base things of this world in order to confound the worldly wise or ‘clever people’. Mankind’s trust and faith in the high intellect is one of mankind’s greatest stumbling blocks and/or weaknesses; man’s vanity, pride and arrogance are his major flaws. To eventually be put in his place by the likes of those he has always looked down upon; the poor and poorly educated. This will be a great shock to him, so if you fit the categories of Low and Base you could be in line for a ‘Heavenly phone call’ and you won’t need a mobile/cell phone to receive it!!

7. You will also have a desire to meet up with fellow believers and this may prove more difficult than you at first thought. There are dozens of demon-inations (denominations = divisions)) out there, but very few that are Grace filled, so you must exercise great caution as to where you choose to attend. If you’re like me you will not attend anywhere, because finding a congregation of True Believers is like looking for a proverbial needle in a haystack – some might say a hen’s tooth. Needless-to-say I wish you well with your search.

Now I have given you a lot of information, but is there anything in it to be fearful of? No, a thousand times no. This birthing is nothing to be fearful of as it will cause the recipient no harm whatsoever, but it will involve the removing of what is known metaphorically as ‘the scales coming from our eyes’ to enable us to see; to see what? Now notice, the last part of John 3:3 – The Kingdom of God. How do we see the Kingdom of God? Easy, first of all we realise the Kingdom of God is in us and because it is in us we long for the return of Yashua Messiah to set up His Kingdom in its fullness here on this earth. We also ‘see it’ in our imaginations, we develop a mental picture of it or of what it will be like. If we picture a beautiful place we have seen here on earth and then imagine it a hundred times more beautiful (if that’s humanly possible – probably not) we then begin to get a feel for it. I hope to be writing another article on the Kingdom of God, but in the meantime we need to understand some important factors, that is, what Our Lord says about one or three things on His free gift to us:

1. “No one who having put his hands to the plough and then looks back is fit for The Kingdom of God.” Which means, don’t go back or turn away after you have started, that is, commitment – stick with it – onwards and upwards and finish the mission. You don’t have to compete, but you do have to finish it, and The Lord will help you to finish.

2. “Take up your cross and follow me” This means there is a price to following Him and this price does involve suffering for Him through trials, including being hated by those not chosen, but He will not let you suffer more than you can bear:

1 Corinthians 10:13 (MCV) There hath no temptation trial or testing taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer allow you to be tempted tested or tried above that ye are able; but will, with the temptation testing and trying, also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.

For God is Love, Mercy and Forgiveness and He has promised never to leave you nor forsake you, come what may.

3 “Take my yoke upon you for it is light” In support of what I have said above Yashua Messiah also tells us to carry His yoke, for it is light and easy to carry, unlike the burdens we have grown used to in our worldly lives. Here is a warning too, don’t let any man or woman in a pulpit make that yoke heavy with false teaching. You will know immediately, because they will lay guilt upon you and will make you feel down trodden and discouraged – they will also be big on rules and regulations (The Ten Commandments), teaching you that your salvation is down to you, when it is not – it’s a free gift. Through these experiences you will learn and know if you have joined the right fellowship or not. Whatever you do, once you understand that the teaching is false you must leave immediately – do not hesitate for you owe them NOTHING. See link Nos. 3 and 4 below).

Right, let’s return to the story line of John 3 in verse 4 to see how we are born again or born of God. Nicodemus saith unto Him, how can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? Here Nicodemus shows his lack of Spiritual understanding taking Our Lord’s words literally. Our Lord answers him in verse 5: Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into The Kingdom of God.

Here Our Lord is giving instructions to Nicodemus that unless he is Baptised and has hands laid on him to receive The Holy Spirit he cannot enter The Kingdom of God. Our Lord then goes on to explain in verses 6-7.

John 3:6-7 (KJV) That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of The Spirit is Spirit. 7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

Here Our Lord is explaining that those who believe and are Baptised and receive The Holy Spirit are now new Spiritual beings and not born of the flesh, even though they are still in the flesh, that is, flesh that died in the watery grave of Baptism.

Now this teaching is seldom understood today, but it must mean that, in order for scriptures like….

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

….to make sense, and because we are now gifted with The Holy Spirit, and now abide in Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) we don’t sin, but those who don’t abide in Him and do not know Him, by default, continue in sin. To support this we then read:

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His (Yashua Messiah’s) seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

For the born of God (born again) believerit is our bodies of sin that sin, but we are no longer of the flesh, of our bodies, we are now of The Holy Spirit and because of that indwelling, our new man cannot sin.

Taking all this Truth on board takes time, and we can now see there is nothing to fear in the process of being born from above. If The Father is calling you to His Son what is there to fear? Nothing! All you have to say when The Father calls is: “Here am I”. Just like Samuel:

1 Samuel 3:4 That the LORD called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah (Yashua Anointed):

2. What is True Rejection of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ)?:

3. The Glorious Saving Grace of Yashua Messiah:

4. For by GRACE are Ye Saved Through FAITH; AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is The Gift of God – Ephesians 2:8:

Hu; Hu-mans; Cainites; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed…

…Are you a man of mankind, a son of Adam, or a hu-man being and not of mankind, so not a son of Adam?

Or perhaps another way of saying it could be: are you a son of Adam, or a literal son of The Serpent Creature, The Adversary,through Cain, and does this whole idea shock you? (See link Nos. 1, 2 & 3 below). Most likely, if you are new to this Truth, it will shock you. In turn, I make no apologies for that, for The Truth MUST be made known, whether you take offence or not. And let’s be clear, offence can only be taken, not given, and lovers of The Truth (Yashua Messiah) will definitely NOT be offended by this Truthful article.

So what are we are dealing with here? For this subject can, and will, be deemed, that is, by libtard Cultural Jew Marxists, as the ultimate form of RACISM! Ooh! and we can’t have that can we? What will all those lilly livered, limp-wristed, spineless, progressive, fake Christians say? No doubt they will rent their clothes and have apoplexy, and all this, instead of realising that Yashua Messiah Himself, BY THEIR EVIL STANDARDS, would, and will be classified as a RACIST! (See link No. 4 below). So much for the fake hoax concept known as RACISM!:

“”RACIST” A made up word by the Jew Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) in 1927 and used to browbeat all dissenters of the Jewish Bolshevik Marxist/Communist ideology, and still used today to keep white people walking on egg shells regarding other races. Only whites are racists according to these traitor whoresons, that is, evil wretches like John Mann, UK Labour MP.”

— Brother Charles

“”Racism” as an accusation, was shaped by Trotskyists and then sharpened politically by Magnus Hirschfeld, before being fully launched as an anti-white weapon by ethnic others in the American academic system.”

— John Piggot

OK, so with the short introductory preamble over and a couple of educational quotes chucked in for good measure, let’s move on to the meat of this article: HU – who or what is ‘HU’? What kind of a word is ‘HU’? I’ve never heard of it I hear you say. Well its origin may surprise, for it is an ancient Welsh word, and ancient Welsh is from the even more ancient runic Hebrew tongue.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Welsh are The Levites, through The Druids of Cornwall and Wales who are descended from The Levitical Priesthood who administered life in Ancient Israel. This included responsibility for all religious, educational, financial and commercial activities in Ancient Israel – they administered The Tithe – a tax of ten percent on the people’s INCREASE, not the principal, so there was no Tithe/Tax on wages. (See video links 1 and 2 below)

Israel, during, and after, Joshua’s leadership at the time of The Judges, was a free Theocracy under Yah, that is, before it became a Kingdom under Saul, David and Solomon and their tax slavery began.

So, immediately, we have a Scriptural/Biblical connection going all the way back to the Patriarchs of Ancient Israel, that is, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, who were the Patriarchal forefathers of the Anglo-Saxon (Isaac’s sons = the Saacae or Saacsons), Celtic, Welsh, Dutch, Flemish, Gallic, Swiss and Nordic peoples, but not The Canaanite Jews. (See links Nos. 5 and 6 below).

So who, or what exactly, is HU?

From The Serpent of Life and Wisdom web page:

The Caduceus is one of the most ancient of symbols:

You might best know this symbol as the DNA structure and healing used by the medical profession. Since ancient Mesopotamia The Caduceus presented two serpents intertwined (the central nervous system) around a staff (the spinal column) with the wings (the “swan”) on either side (the two hemispheres of the brain, with the circle in the centre representing the pineal gland, or the central sun and psychic center within). It also symbolized the kundalini energy.

“This was originally the symbol for the Anunnaki-Sirian creator god, EA, or EN.KI (who has become an Archetype), was the chief of the magicians, “the one who knows,” and infamous for being The Serpent of the Garden of Eden, who created lifeforms in test tubes half a million years ago with his half-sister Ninharsag, at the suggestion of his son, Marduk, to create hu-mans to be the workers for the gods. (The symbol is also based upon the winged globe for the planet Nibiru, the symbol of the royal Anunnaki family.)

Biblical writers called The Healing Serpent Ne-HU-shtan. The Hebrew word for serpent is “nahash.” The root of the word are the Hebrew letters Nun, Het and Shin, which means “to guess.” This was translated into other languages as “Satan,” which some say mean “enemy,” or “adversary.””

So from this we learn: 1) that the medical profession is 100% satanic with its Caduceus twin serpent logo and 2) I don’t know about you, but ‘test tubes’ half a million years ago, LOL, is total nonsense. However, what we do have here is our first reference to ‘Hu’ as The Adversary, and that’s all that matters from this little piece.

From Simon, on the “Followers of YHWH” Forum:

“Their temples wherein the sacred fire was preserved were generally situate on eminences and in dense groves of oak (see back slidden Ancient Israel), because a circle was the emblem of the universe; oval, in allusion to the mundane egg, from which issued, according to the traditions of many nations, the universe, or, according to others our first parents; serpentine, because a serpent was the symbol of HU, the Druidic Osiris; cruciform because a cross is an emblem of regeneration; or winged, to represent the motion of the divine spirit.”

From The Freemasons:

“The Druids had a high veneration for The Serpent. Their great god, Hu, was typified by that reptile; and he is represented by the Bards as ‘the wonderful chief Dragon, the sovereign of heaven’.

“The Serpent is universally esteemed a legitimate symbol of Freemasonry.”

– George Oliver, Freemason, Signs and Symbols, New York, Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, 1906, p. 36

So here we learn that the back slidden Ancient Israelites (our forefathers) had a ‘high veneration’ for Hu, The Serpent, and for one reason and one reason only, and that reason was their satanic incorporation of Molech worship (child sacrifice) into their beliefs. These evil satanic practises they copied from the Serpent Seed Canaanites who still practice these evil abominations to this day.

Hu The Serpent Entwined Around The Egg

From the Eden Saga Web Page, The Serpent People:

The ancient god of the British Isles, called Hu, was the master of the dragon world.”

From the Covenant of Rhiannon web page:

It is believed that Druidism was founded by Gwyddon Ganhebon, supposedly Seth of the Mosaic genealogy, in Asia and was brought to Britain by Hu Gadarn a contemporarydescendant of the Patriarch Abraham.

“Hu Gadarn originally came with the tribe of the Cymry (The Welsh, The Levites) to the Britannic Isles. They came from the Country of Summer, which is called Defrobani… They crossed the Misty Ocean (Tawch) and arrived in the Britannic Isles and Armorica, where they settled.”

Finally, we have Ballantine’s Law Dictionary, as used by The US Congress, which states that a ‘hu-man being’ is a monster:

Human being See MONSTER. – Ballentine’s Law Dictionary (1930)

“Monster – A human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land.”

Ballentine’s Law Dictionary (1930)

Just to summarise, we now know that ‘Hu’ means ‘Serpent’ and the word ‘Hu-man’ means ‘Serpent-Man’, so in other words, hu-man beings are Canaanites – descendants of The Serpent Creature, through Eve, in The Garden of Eden.

Adam declared Eve as THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING, that is, both MANKIND and hu-mankind. Adam was NOT THE FATHER OF ALL LIVING, just the father of Mankind.

Genesis 3:20 (MCV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living, that is Abel and Cain, both mankind and hu-mankind – Abel later replaced by Seth.

Now for those of you who think you are ‘quick on the draw’ and say: “Oh yeah, but all Cain’s descendants died in the flood, so you’re talking nonsense!” and I will retort with: “All his descendants bar ONE!” Namely Noah’s ‘Mrs’, whose name was Naamah, and she was the sister of Tubal-Cain. Hey! But it says Noah was perfect in ALL his generations from Adam, and that’s True, but his Mrs wasn’t perfect at all in her generations. However, that’s not important, because Noah carried the Adamic bloodline, which he passed onto his three sons, and they took their lineage from Noah, not their mother, who was of Cain.

Genesis 6:9-10 (MCV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with Yah. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

OK, so all this was just fine and dandy until the flood waters subsided and Noah started his new farming and agricultural (husbandry) lifestyle, which included the planting of a vineyard. We are then fast forwarded to the scene of Noah having harvested his grapes and bottled up his wine, so he thinks he’ll have a good old wine tasting evening. Unfortunately, he gets a bit carried away with the tasting of the wine and ends up blotto. No doubt the rest of his family were also partakers of this first year’s growth celebration and were a bit tipsy.

Moreover, whilst all the celebrating is going on Noah crashes out and Ham, his second son, gets into a strange incestuous relationship with his mother and, presumably whilst under the influence of Noah’s wine, he lies with her = he saw his father’s nakedness:

Leviticus 18:8 (MCV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (MCV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Now the outcome of this illicit evil union is the birth of Canaan, whom Noah curses. Now why did Noah curse the brat Canaan, and not his debauched son, Ham, and/or his wayward slutty wife, wouldn’t that have made more sense? Yes to our carnal minds it would have made more sense, but not to Yah who sees things very differently from us, hence He sees strange flesh born from incest as an abomination, and likewise any inbred offspring from such an incestuous union as anathema.

Furthermore, it’s crucial that we understand what has happened here. In the births of his three sons, Noah’s bloodline only, counted. However, in this evil incestuous affair it was Naamah’s Cainite bloodline that counted in Canaan and not Ham’s Adamic blood. This means that with the birth of Canaan, Cain’s bloodline was re-kindled post-flood through Naamah his mother. Therefore, the line of Cain was reborn and it’s still with us today in the shape of the Canaanite Jews, African Blacks, the Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans, the Turks and the Italians, to name just a few.

Another interesting twist to this is The Truth that the Canaanite Jews take their lineage from their mothers. Canaanite Jewish society is a MATRIARCHAL society, not a Patriarchal society. So any claims or assertions that they make to a descendancy from Abraham or Judah is a lie. (See link No. 5 re the Jews’ false claims).

So there you have it, solid gold proof that (((THEY))) LIVE! (Have you seen that film?) If not, I recommend it.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Was The Serpent Creature a Beast of The Field?:

3. Genesis 4:1 Did EVE Really Say: “I have Gotten a MAN From The Lord?”:

4.Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Racist – The Canaanite Woman He Called a Dog!:

5. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

6. Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

7. I Know That Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!:

Video link 1. British Israel – The True Israelites Are White British and White North Western Europeans: https://archive.org/details/british-israel-the-true-israelites-are-white-europeans

Video link 2. What Happened To The 12 Tribes Of Israel? E. Raymond Capt: https://archive.org/details/what-happened-to-the-12-tribes-of-israel-e.-raymond-capt

To ‘Gain’ or ‘Win’ People For Christ or To ‘Save’ People For Christ? – 1 Corinthians 9:19-22

1 Corinthians 9:19-22 (KJV) For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. 20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under The Law; 21 To them that are without Law, as without Law, (being not without Law to God, but under the Law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without Law. 22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means SAVE some.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Gain – G2770κερδαίνω kerdaínō, ker-dah’-ee-no; – from G2771; to gain (literally or figuratively):—(get) gain, win.

Save – G4982σώζω sṓzō, sode’-zo; – from a primary σῶς sōs (contraction for obsolete σάος sáos, “safe”); to save, i.e. deliver or protect (literally or figuratively):—heal, preserve, save (self), do well, be (make) whole.

Now I have always found this passage of Scripture somewhat testing and difficult to understand, for we NEVER hear of the other Messengers employing such tactics when preaching the good news of The Kingdom of God. This, therefore, seems to be a speciality of Paul’s, and no one else’s. Furthermore, how do we square these verses in 1 Corinthians, with these verses in John’s Gospel and also, more importantly from Paul himself in Galatians 3:1-13?:

Galatians 3:1-13 (MCV) O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not attentively hearken to The Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye The Holy Spirit by the works of The Law, or by the Hearing of Faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in The Holy Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 5 He therefore that bestows to you The Holy Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth He it by the works of The Law, or by the Hearing of Faith? 6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of Faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And The Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through Faith, preached before The Gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of Faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10 For as many as are of the works of The Law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in The Book of The Law to do them. 11 But that no man is justified by The Law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by Faith. 12 And The Law is not of Faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of The Law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drag (draw) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Draw – G1670 helkyo, hel-koo’-o; probably akin to G138; to drag (literally or figuratively):- draw. Compare G1667.

John 6:45 (KJV) It is written in The Prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of The Father, cometh unto me.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

So what is Paul talking about in 1 Corinthians 9:19-22? and let’s be clear, for Peter, Paul and the other Messengers NEVER saved anyone – period! – full stop! – end of! In their travels they preached the Kingdom of God Gospel Message and those that The Father was calling responded positively to that message and those that He was not calling (the majority) rejected it out of hand. Now Paul knew all this, for he was taught by Yashua Messiah Himself; he also admitted it:

Romans 8:7 (KJV) Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to The Law of God, neither indeed can be.

Here we get further confirmation:

Acts 13:45-48 (MCV) But when the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming. 46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that The Word of God should first have been spoken to you Canaanite Jews (posing and masquerading as God’s chosen people): but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles lost Israelite Nations and Nations of Mankind. 47 For so hath The Lord commanded us, saying, I have set thee to be a Light of the Lost Tribes of Israel and Nations of Mankind, that thou shouldest be for salvation unto the ends of the earth. 48 And when those Gentiles of the Lost Tribes of Israel and Nations of Mankind heard this, they were glad, and glorified The Word of The Lord: and as many as were appointed (called and chosen by The Father) to eternal life, believed. (See link No. 1 below)

OK so what we MUST deduce from all this Scriptural proof and evidence is that Paul did not mean he was attempting to gain anyone or win anyone to Yashua Messiah in a Spiritual sense or a regeneration sense, especially the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews and yet he says he became as a Jew in order to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ them. So what did he mean by that?

From The Forerunner Commentary:

What Paul means in this passage becomes clear when we understand the sense and usage of two Greek words, those translated as “win” and “save.” In the evangelical (Mainstream Christian) world, both of them have taken on lives of their own, but with just a little digging, we will see that no contradiction lies between this passage and the numerous other clear statements.

The word translated as “win” is kerdaino (Strong’s #2770), and its basic meaning is “gain,” which is how it is typically translated. It means “to acquire by effort or investment.” It can mean “to earn” or “to make a profit.” The flipside is that it can also mean “to cause a loss not to occur.”” (Brackets mine)

Right, so from this we learn that Paul was attempting to come alongside these people in order to not offend them and alienate them clumsily or deliberately through over zealous teaching or preaching. To interpret it another way, “We can even be wrong when we’re right” if you get my drift. However, this was not an attempt by Paul to convert these people, for he knew that only The Father had the power to do that, and if he experience hostile opposition from them he would endeavour to meet them where they were at, in order to keep them alongside as best he could and not part as outright enemies.

Having cleared up that little niggle, we can now move on to a more controversial issue, that of Paul’s entering The Temple with the four vow takers and allegedly purifying himself ACCORDING TO THE LAW!!! as recorded in Acts 21:

Acts 21:18-20 (MCV) And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles The Lost Tribes of Israel and the Nations of Mankind by his ministry.

20 And when they heard it, they glorified The Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of The Law:

Now what’s going on here? for it looks like a little egotistic boasting is going on = my mission in Jerusalem is just as big as yours, so there! Does it not look as if James is salivating over all these Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, who allegedly believe, and are still zealous of The Law! How does that work?

The other question that immediately comes to mind is how infiltrated the Church in Jerusalem had become by these Judaising mongrel dogs of the circumcision? It looks to me as if the Church no longer existed in Jerusalem, hence Paul was told by The Holy Spirit TWICE! NOT TO GO THERE!

Acts 21:4 (TAB) After looking up the disciples [in Tyre], we stayed there [with them] seven days; and they kept telling Paul through the [Holy] Spirit [a]not to set foot in Jerusalem.

Yet he stubbornly refuses, again, how does that work? In contrast, elsewhere in Acts, when The Holy Spirit guided they all followed, that is, not going on deeper into Asia. To me these are inconsistencies in terms of what we know about Paul from his letters.

We then get into all the nonsense of Paul’s purification in The Temple! WHAT!!? Is this what he meant by being all things to all people – especially appeasing the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? I find all this very hard to believe and yet it’s there in Acts allegedly! So let’s get some Scripture:

Acts 21:21 (KJV) And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs.

So these Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews already know what Paul teaches.

Now from the Amplified Bible to get a clearer understanding of what’s been written in the KJV.

Acts 21:21-24 (TAB) Now they have been told about you, that you are teaching all the Jews who are living among the Gentiles to turn away from [the Law of] Moses, advising them not to circumcise their children or to live according to the [Mosaic] customs. 22 What then should be done? They will certainly hear that you have arrived. 23 Therefore do just what we tell you. We have four men who have taken a vow; 24 take these men and purify yourself along with them, and pay their expenses [for the temple offerings] so that they may shave their heads. Then everyone will know that there is nothing to the things they have been told about you, but that you yourself also follow and keep The Law.

So what do we have here? If this account is true, do I spy politicking? Do I spy lies, deceit and deception going on here? Oh let’s paint a false picture in order to placate these satanic Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews. How about Paul and his brothers doing a swift exit out of Jerusalem as fast their legs could carry them? why was that not suggested, or for them to go into hiding until the baying mob had gone home. Oh no we have to go through all these meaningless lying theatricals in order to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ some – NOT!

Acts 21:27 (TAB) When the seven days [required to complete the ritual] were almost over, [some] Jews from [the province of] Asia [Minor], caught sight of him in The Temple, and began to stir up the crowd, and they seized him,

What is Paul doing in The Temple when he knows full well that his presence their will be an act of provocation? What’s happened to the policy of gaining and winning some? Then we get confirmation of what I said to be correct:

Acts 21:30 (TAB) Then the whole city was provoked and confused, and the people rushed together. They seized Paul and dragged him out of the temple, and immediately the gates were closed.

Here’s another thing: Did Paul have a death wish? for he clearly stated that he had no fear of going up to Jerusalem, even if it meant death:

Acts 21:13 (TAB) Then Paul replied, “What are you doing, weeping and breaking my heart [like this]? For I am ready not only to be bound and imprisoned, but even to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.”

Then we get more confirmation:

Acts 21:27 (TAB) When the seven days [required to complete the ritual] were almost over, [some] Jews from [the province of] Asia [Minor], caught sight of him in the temple, and began to stir up the crowd, and they seized him,

So the stupid ritual was not even completed (an act of God IMO) before the Serpent Seed Jews caught sight of him in The Temple AGAIN! And grabbed him. How many acts of provocation was that? None of this makes any sense unless he deliberately wanted death at their hands.

Acts 21:28-29 (TAB) shouting, “Men of Israel, help us! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against our people and The Law and this place. And besides, he has brought Greeks into The Temple and has defiled this holy place.” 29 For they had previously seen Trophimus the Ephesian in the city with Paul, and they assumed that he had brought the man into the temple [beyond the court of the Gentiles].

So not only does he provoke them by being there himself, he also brings a Greek brother along to Jerusalem as well, as you do when you’re aiming to ‘gain’ or ‘win’ a few Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews – much sarcasm here by the author. We therefore have yet more examples of blatant provocation on the part of Paul, and we can only assume that these were deliberate acts of provocation in order to bring about his untimely end. I cannot see this any other way unless you, my readers, have any other ideas.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

PS Message for Thomas Howard: I trust this answers your silly comment about Paul’s (non-existent) fear of the Jews.

1. What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?:

As Wretched As Wretched Can Get…

.and I have NEVER, EVER, read such evil satanic adulterated garbage in my whole life, so I am going to reveal it to you now:

From a webpage that’s called: “What God May Be Really Like – (Done with Religion)”

https://donewithreligion.com/2021/08/08/what-does-god-believe-about-gays/

What Does God Believe About Gays?” – By a Mike Edwards

Now at this stage I have no idea what kind of Christian this wretch thinks he is, or maybe he isn’t, but before I have finished shredding his satanic rubbish, I will definitely know for sure, and so will you dear readers.

Now get a load of this liberal sentimental yucky muck for starters:

Believing God exists or doesn’t exist requires faith,” “but it seems intuitive a loving Creator would love the way we were created to love…”

No it doesn’t, it requires that a man or woman be called by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and then he or she is given the gift of Faith along with Grace, and that is only after he or she has been Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone and gifted with The Holy Spirit by laying on of hands.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Ephesians 2:8-9 (MCV) For by Grace are ye saved through Faith; and that not of yourselves (that is, neither The Grace or The Faith): it is (for both are) The Gift of God: 9 Not of works (not through obedience to The Law), lest any man should boast.

Acts 8:14-17 (MCV) Now when The Messengers (apostles) which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received The Word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John: 15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive The Holy Spirit: 16 (For as yet it was fallen upon none of them: only they were Baptised in the name of The Lord Jesus Christ.) 17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received The Holy Spirit.

…but it seems intuitive a loving Creator would love the way we were created to love.”

Here he uses the word ‘love’ in a deceptive satanic way, for what he really means by ‘love’ is Cultural Jew Marxist liberal, sentimental, Jewlywood, syrupy puke, and not LOVE at all. Get with it folks, for Godly agape’, that is, Godly love is TOUGH LOVE. Love like this:

Exodus 15:23 (KJV) And when they came to Marah, they could not drink of the waters of Marah, for they were bitter: therefore the name of it was called Marah.

Now why did God give our Israelite forefathers BITTER water to drink? Easy, to clear out the tapeworms and other nasty parasites that their bodies were infested with through living in Egypt all those years.

And again, Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) LOVING the Pharisee Jews:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

From Strong’s Concordance:

Generation – G1081 – gennema ghen’-nay-mahfrom G1080; OFFSPRING; by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

“Hypocrites!!” “Ye Serpents” “Generation (race) of vipers” “With throats like open graves” “Whited walls” “Whited sepulchres” “Sons of the Devil.”

How was Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) LOVING the Pharisee Jews by saying these tough things to them? Again, that’s easy, to challenge them with The Truth about themselves, and to invoke some inkling of repentance within them. Was He successful? Is The Pope a Christian? LOL

Next up, yet more putrid drivel:

We can examine what a loving God is like though our moral intuitions, our consciences.”

He can examine God can he? This has to be the ultimate in satanic effrontery, and I am sure God will be mighty pleased that this blasphemous know-nothing upstart has examined Him. I bet He wondered how many marks out of ten He got. Hilarious or what? Then he even thinks he can measure God by his useless moral intuitions and his pathetic conscience. (See link No. 1 below)

Christians may argue we should trust “biblical truths” about God, but differing interpretations exist for many moral issues. Also, we can’t prove if biblical writers always understood God perfectly.”

Here he goes again, rambling on about useless carnal moral issues, and also admitting that he relies on others for Scriptural understanding, by stating that there are ‘differing interpretations’. This must mean that he has no ‘interpretation(s)’ of his own and has obviously NEVER studied the Holy Scriptures, or even read this Holy Scripture:

1 John 2:27 (MCV) But The Anointing which ye have received of Him abideth in you, AND YE NEED NOT THAT ANY MAN TEACH YOU: but as the same Anointing teacheth you of all things, and is Truth, and is no lie, and even as IT hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him. (Emphasis mine)

We aren’t always certain how to best love, but we know that we or a Creator ought to love others as we want to be loved.”

Now this satanic carnal minded mush can be interpreted in anyway you like, especially when the focus of his vile article is about defending sodomites and lesbians. I think, therefore, you know where this satanic effluence is going – straight into The Abyss with Satan himself. He then has the audacity to tell God how He ought to be loving people. This is some uppity clay pot we have here, telling The Potter what He should or should not be doing! Hilarious if it were not so wicked.

Right, now we get to the rub of his diatribe, and the BS intensifies:

What does the Bible really say about God and gays?

Leviticus (18:22, 20:13) list unnatural male same sex activities as an abomination.”

So what have we got here? Well for starters he was too bone idle to copy and paste the Holy Scriptures, so I will do it for him:

Leviticus 18:22 (KJV) Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.

Leviticus 20:13 (KJV) If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

How straight forward are those two Holy Scriptures? And you won’t believe what he writes in order to try and explain them away.

Unnatural in OT times could be sex not for procreation. We can’t be sure what activity the writers had in mind.”

He admits that unnatural same sex activities are an abomination to God and then starts upon a tirade of slimy evil explaining away nonsense. Notice how he perverts ‘sex not for procreation’ that could occur between a man and his wife. He then pollutes this idea with the lie that Moses was not sure of what he had written after having been told what to write by God (Yashua Messiah) Himself. This displays his Scriptural ignorance.

He then goes on to say:

Are lesbians safe because nothing is said about same sex women activities?”

There is another lie!

Romans 1:24 (KJV) Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

No mention of any genders in that verse. So it applies to both men and women.

Romans 1:26 (KJV) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

This is when lesbians strap on their rubber dicks and make out that they’re men! How sick does he want it to get before it registers in his debauched mind?

Then we get dissembling sophistry of the most evil kind:

The OT also lists as abominations lying lips, arrogance, etc. Are straights screwed?”

What has this got to do with anything? NOTHING! a sin is a sin is a sin, and sodomy and lesbianism are sins – vile sins of perversion, being against nature, against family, against procreation, and comparable to Adam and Eve’s original sin in The Garden. (See link No. 2 below)

Then we get more sophistry and lying:

The word “homosexual” doesn’t appear in some English translations before 1946.”

The devious so and so says the word ‘homosexual’ doesn’t appear in some English translations before 1946, (as if that’s an error) and that’s because the words SODOMY and SODOMITES have always done the job superbly, and needed no faggot friendly BS words to replace them.

In passages such as I Cor.6:9-10 and I Tim. 1:10 the translation often wasn’t homosexuals” but “boy molesters.” Big difference! And the passage says wrongdoers don’t inherit the kingdom of God. I guess we are all screwed!”

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (KJV) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit The Kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Effeminate:

1. of a catamite

2. of a boy kept for homosexual relations with a man

3. of a male who submits his body to unnatural lewdness

4. of a male prostitute

1 Timothy 1:10 (KJV) For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;

Now in the above vile paragraph he tries to get sodomites off the hook re their predilection for boys and the seduction of same via molestation, when 95% of sodomites (pederasts) lust after boys, whether it be in the boy scouts, football clubs, church choirs, altar boys, youth clubs, you name it, wherever there’s young boys gathered, you will find predatory sodomites prowling around somewhere, some might call them paedophiles. We know this is true because satanic sodomite lobbyists are always pressuring western governments to lower the age of consent for sexual unions between adults and children.

Many growing up in church only condemn gays out of devotion to the God of the Bible.”

Many growing up in their Christian environment know what sin is, and sodomy is a sin. No doubt their views will be just as forthright and anti towards adulterers and fornicators and ALL out of devotion to God and His Word. Here we see this Cultural Jew Marxist trying to make capital as if sodomites are some kind of oppressed group, when it is they that shove their satanic perverted lifestyle down our throats with their filthy sordid PRIDE MARCHES! The media whores, likewise, promote sodomites on TV and ram them down people’s throats.

Let’s assume it could be proven God controlled pens and minds of the writers so every word in the Bible came from God. The truth is literature requires interpretation, even if ever word written, edited, or translated was inspired by God.”

Here the carnal minded dog displays his ignorance of Spiritual Discernment, for he hasn’t a clue as to how The Holy Scriptures are interpreted.

We mustn’t claim our interpretations are infallible when being wrong has tremendous consequences. Scholars, who accept Scriptures as authoritative, don’t agree the Bible condemns same-gender loving relationships.”

Notice how the idiot uses the Papist slogan ‘infallible’ when The Truth is always superior to mickey mouse infallibity. Then he mentions ‘scholars’. Who are these so-called ‘scholars’, when they condone what God calls an abomination in His Word. If they’re scholars, then I’m President of The United States of America!

Why would anyone choose to be gay?

How could a loving God possibly condemn gays when they can no more choose who they are attracted to than straights can?”

Here we get more ignorance, for God has already told him:

Romans 1:21-24 (KJV) Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

God gave them up to their vile perversions through the lusts of their own hearts!

So it’s THEIR FAULT!

If you are a straight man, don’t you naturally have to fight not looking at naked women than men?”

Yet another lame non-argument. Lusting after a woman is a natural sin for a man, and not an abomination. Lusting after another man is an abomination.

Then we get more Cultural Jew Marxist dog vomit with the slogan ‘bigotry’ – oh so very predictable:

Ask gays their battle! Who chooses to be gay when one has to hide their sexuality because of bigotry and hostility? The mental health damage is tremendous!”

He says ask sodomites their battle. Why? is my answer to that. If they are unrepentant sodomites, then let them get on with it. It’s their choice, no one forced them to become sodomites. Oh, and if they have to hide their perverted sexual desires, good job. Keeping it to themselves is far better than parading down the high street bragging about their evil lifestyles and polluting the minds of innocent children that may be witnesses to their stinking perversions.

Parents often only condemn their gay children because of a supposed correct interpretation of a Book.”

Parents have no need to condemn their wayward children, for The Law of God does that anyway. ALL SINNERS are condemned by God’s Law, and the only escape is to be called by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). However, if parents teach their children the right way to live and they rebel against it, that is not the fault of the parents.

It is impossible to feel loved and accepted when someone says “I love you but I hate your sin. But we tell alcoholics we hate their sin!””

Tough!

Next we get this whingeing perverted thinking:

Hating homosexual sex is only loving if homosexual sex is sinful.”

Sodomy is sinful, an abomination – period!

Hating alcoholic behavior is loving because alcohol abuse really is harmful.

Alcoholism is sinful – period!

A parent need not reject a gay child according to the Bible.”

A parent would be failing their child by not rejecting them – period.

Then we get yet more Cultural Jew Marxist diarrhoea:

What do our moral intuitions, consciences tell us about God and gays?

My moral intuitions tell me that God is not bias against females, people of color, or gays.”

His ‘moral intuitions’ and alleged ‘consciences’ are just BS virtue signalling – total meaningless flapping. I wonder if he’s a faggot? LOL. God loves women as long as they submit to their father’s will, and then their husband’s will. Otherwise he deems them as rebellious and useless = a troublesome liability to their men folk.

Shouldn’t we choose the least harmful view? We don’t know why one has feelings for the same sex or opposite sex.”

More lies from the Cultural Jew Marxist son of The Devil. Yes we do, if one has ‘feelings’ for the same sex then they are either sodomite or lesbian perverts.

This paragraph is just the meaningless ramblings of wretched unsaved loser who has run out of things to say:

If you think there is a .0001% possibility that science proves sexual orientation isn’t a choice, why would we judge?”

Science cannot prove anything unless it demonstrates something through thorough experimentation.

It’s a myth that sexual choices are always the result of some trauma or rebellion in our lives.”

Oh and what science has proved is that sodomy is a developmental disorder.

Then the dog finishes off with this:

I am convinced the Bible is silent on monogamous same sex relationships, while supporting relationships that show love and concern for one another.

Yet again he lies and I have provided the Holy Scriptures above that proves he is lying, but then he is a Cultural Jew Marxist, and lying comes first nature to these evil Communist illegitimates:

“In our country the lie has become not just a moral category, but a pillar of the state.”

— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

1. Is The Christian Life About Ethics and Morals?:

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

Obadiah; Esau; The Edomites; Idumea; Turkey

Obadiah or Obdias, as he is known in the Greek Septuagint Old Testament, is the author of the smallest Book of the Old Testament, that is, a Scriptural Book just twenty one verses long, yet it contains some very important information for us in the last days of last days in the 21st century. His name means ‘Serving Jah’ or ‘Serving The Lord’.

Obadiah is said to have lived in the 6th to 5th century BC at the time of the captivity of The House of Judah (The Southern Kingdom of what was once a divided Israel) by the Babylonians so he was a contemporary of Jeremiah. The Northern Kingdom of The House of Israel was taken captive in 740-725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans). Now because Edom was complicit in Judah’s downfall, Obadiah calls for God’s punishment upon Edom with its total destruction – just a little background info and history.

Before I continue, I will add this caveat to inform you that I am NOT a prophet, nor do I have the Holy Spiritual gift of prophecy, so some things I say in this article should not be taken as 100% Truth (therefore you must do your own research to verify what I am saying is The Truth, or not The Truth). However, what I will say re the modern day identity of Esau/Edom (the Edomites) and the Idumeans (the later name of the Edomites, especially in the first century) you can take as solid gold Truth.

OK, so here we go, and I will start with verse nine of Obadiah, not verse one, for verse nine leads us directly into the genealogies of Esau/Edom, which are crucial to the understanding of the true identity of The Edomites, and I’ll tell you straight, right now, it ain’t The Jews and NEVER listen to any lying dogs that tell you the Edomites are Jews!

This means I’m gonna be ruthlessly blunt, because if you are a deluded brainwashed follower of the blasphemers Bertrand Comparet, the ex-con Jew liar, William (Bill) Finck of Christogenea disinformation infamy, and/or James P. Wickstrom, now deceased, you had better be ready to get educated, or otherwise you can take a hike, for there are no half-way houses or half measures with this crucial knowledge. It’s all very clearly defined, and those blasphemers are WRONG! VERY WRONG! This is big time errors I am speaking of here, not mistakes, for with the above mentioned people there will be an evil agenda in there somewhere. (See link No. 1 below.) So you have been warned. Now back to the topic at hand:

Obadiah 1:9 (KJV) And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount (the nation) of Esau may be cut off by slaughter. (Brackets mine)

Here in this verse we have an Edomite by the name of Teman and from his name comes the name Ottoman and the Ottomans were Turks (Ottoman is also known in the Arabic form as Uthman, from Osman). The Turkish Empire, which lasted from 1301 until 1923 AC, was known as The Ottoman Empire and consisted of Seljuk Turks, and please pay attention to this name “Seljuk Turks” for it will feature again.

From “The Ottoman Empire” by Larry Gormley:

In the 13th century, the region of Anatolia (most of the Asian part of present day Turkey) was controlled by the Byzantine Empire in the northwest and the Seljuk Turks in the south-west. Around 1290, Osman I (1258-1324), a Muslim warrior and leader of a small principality inside Seljuk Turk territory, declared his independence from the Seljuk sultan. The Ottoman Empire was founded. (Ottoman is derived from Uthman, the Arabic form of Osman.)”

Now Teman is mentioned eleven times in The Holy Scriptures, the first of which is in Genesis 36:11:

Genesis 36:11 (KJV) And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz.

And who was Eliphaz? From Genesis again:

Genesis 36:4 (KJV) And Adah (the Canaanitess) bare to Esau Eliphaz; and Bashemath bare Reuel; (Brackets mine)

So here we can see that Teman was a direct descendant of Esau/Edom, through Esau’s son Eliphaz. Now if we go to Genesis 36:1-2 we glean more crucial information:

Genesis 36:1-2 (KJV) Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom. 2 Esau took his wives of the daughters of Canaan; Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite.

Here we learn that Esau was also named Edom and he took two Canaanites for wives, which cost him his Abrahamic birthright inheritance from his father Isaac. The fact that he became a race mixer and/or a miscegenator is what grieved his parents, Isaac and Rebecca the most, as disclosed here:

Genesis 27:46 (KJV) And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth (Canaanite Hittites): if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?

This verse tells us exactly what Esau/Edom had done in marrying a Hittite and Hivite Canaanite, he had grieved his mother intensely, making her question even the purpose of her life, so in turn she made sure Esau/Edom’s inheritance went to Jacob/Israel his younger twin brother. Notice, too, how these Canaanite daughters, like their forefather Cain, were ‘daughters of the land’ which means any sacrifice would have been crops of the land, not the BLOOD of a lamb as offered up by Abel. Some important background information. (See link No. 4 below)

OK, moving on, and back to the subject of The Turks being from Esau/Edom and not the Jews. So let’s start at the best place = The Beginning:

Genesis 25:23 (KJV) And the Lord said unto her (Rebecca), Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. (Esau/Edom was the elder and Jacob/Israel the younger)

So if the descendants of Esau/Edom are The Jews, since when did they serve anyone? Since when have the non-Jews not been servants of the Jews through their MONEY POWER AND USURY = The CROWN – The Rothschild WORLDWIDE Banking Cartel!? (Take note that Jacob/Israel was not the forefather of the Jews – see links 2 and 3 below)

So here we also learn that two nations would stem from Esau/Edom and Jacob/Israel which then makes these two men Patriarchs.

From “Turkey In Prophecy” by Herman L. Hoeh

Esau’s descendants play a vital part in world affairs today! Where are his descendants?

Notice some of the sons of Esau: Teman, Omar, Amalek (Genesis 25:11). These are not Jewish names! Yet some claim that the Jews are the children of Esau. Nothing could be further from the truth – as we shall presently see.

Esau, or Edom, as he is also called, lived south-east of Palestine near Petra. Arab Bedouins live there now. Then where have Esau’s children gone?

From the days of Nebuchadnezzar, who carried them captive, they disappear for 1000 years from history. Then suddenly we find Amalek the name of a city in Turkestan in Central Asia (from Paul Herrmann’s SIEBEN VORBEI UND ACHT VERWEHT, p.451). The Egyptians used to call the Amalekites the Amu. In Turkestan is the River Amu today! In Bible times the Edomites inhabited Mt. Seir (Genesis 32:4). In Turkestan is the Syr Darya – the River of Syr or Seir.

The leading Turkish tribe is the Ottoman. The prophecies referring to Edom or Esau mention Teman as the leading tribe in these latter days (Obadiah 9). The conclusion is inescapable. The Ottoman Turks are the sons of Teman. Merely the vowels in spelling have been changed over these past millenniums. From Central Asia the Turks or Edomites moved into Asia Minor. That is where Esau’s children live today! Turkey controls the “crossway” of the nations — the Dardanelles (Obadiah 14).

How clear, ESAU OR EDOM IS TURKEY today!”

Obadiah 1:14 (KJV) Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.

Right, now I am going to shoot off at a bit of a tangent and change the thrust of this article considerably and yet it will still be based upon Obadiah in verse 4:

Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.

Now quite few people make the silly mistake of linking this ‘Eagle’ with The USA and its national emblem, the Bald Eagle, but that is totally erroneous, for this ‘Eagle’ has a very different symbolic meaning altogether, and it also ties us to The Turks in a very surreptitious way. I will therefore copy and paste here some interesting pieces of information from the Masonic Dictionary.

Here is the opening paragraph from their website:

Here is the type of article that makes glad the heart of an editor. With its lack of guesswork and with its wide-sweeping learning, it may well serve as a model and an inspiration to budding (Freemason) students….” (Brackets mine)

So from this opening statement we can be fairly sure of the provenance of the information I am about to reveal and share.

OK, more from their website:

“….Brother Parker has recently completed an eight hundred page work on archaeology; when it is published we shall hope to review it in THE BUILDER. For some strange reason the two-headed eagle, for all its symbolical appeal, has seldomly attracted the attention of Masonic scholars.”

Here we can see mention of this symbolic two-headed eagle which will be crucial in our understanding of this Edomite/Turkey connection.

The most able treatment of it thus far has been the chapter in The Migration of Symbols by Count Goblet d’Alviela of Belgium; Brother Parker’s own article loses nothing by comparison with that chapter. Indeed, it carries the symbolism back to a far earlier time, and embodies more recent information. A student who may care to launch out upon researches of his own will find, along with the present article, that the references in the Encyclopedia Britannica, are valuable; consult the index volume under Double-headed Eagle; also see the articles on Heraldry and Hittites. For a reliable but rapid survey of what is known of the Hittites see Jastrow’s chapter on the subject in Exploration in Bible Lands, by Hilprecht (1903). See also Mackey’s Encyclopedia, Vol. I., page 225; and Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, Vol. III, page 104.”

WHAM No. 1!! there we have our first connection – The Double-Headed Eagle and its Hittite heraldic origins, and who did Esau/Edom marry? A HITTITE Canaanite!

Moving on:

THERE IS SCARCELY a symbol in any of the philosophical or chivalric degrees of the Scottish Rite so striking in design and import as that of the double-headed eagle. The Tau Cross and (The) Serpent of the Twenty-fifth Degree, the sun of the Twenty-eighth Degree, and the cross of St. Andrew in the Twenty-ninth Degree are indeed fraught with deep meaning, both historic and esoteric, but none can claim a more romantic or significant history than that of the Thirtieth Degree, that of the Grand Elect Knight Kadosh, or Knight of the Black and White Eagle. As an emblem this eagle is the epitome of religious andsymbolic historyand to trace the winding flight of the double-headed bird is to survey the whole course of civilization, from its grey dawn north of the Persian gulf to this modern World.…..”

That will be the symbolic history of the Edomite Canaanites via Esau’s Hittite wife. Take note, for ALL Canaanites are Serpent Seed miscegenated inbreeds from The Garden = Satan’s offspring through Eve. (See link No. 5 below)

When our ancient brethren, the holy Crusaders, passed through Byzantium on their way to the tomb of the Saviour, the Double-Headed Eagle which they saw embroidered in gold on heavy banners of silk, borne aloft by the Seljuk Turks, had been four thousand years on its way.”

WHAM No. 2!! The Seljuk Turks (Edomites) and their Double-Headed Eagle held high on gold embroidered banners as they went into battle. So let’s paste Obadiah verse 4 again just to remind ourselves:

Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.

Turkish Dirilis Ertugral

To these same Crusaders this emblem was an honoured one, and though the enemy displayed it, yet they would fight to death for its possession and in triumph bear it, dripping with blood, to their encampments on the Levantine shore. It was from this Eastern Empire that the knights took this banner to adorn the courts of Charlemagne, and as a sacred relic hung it in the great cathedrals, whose architects and masons had so often been honoured by this Emperor of the West.”

Here above we can see how this Hittite Canaanite heraldic symbol wormed its way into the west.

From whence came this two-headed eagle, and how came it to be associated with Scottish Rite Masonry? The last part of this question is easier to answer than the first, for there is direct testimony that Frederick of Prussia supplied this crest during the formative stages of the Rite, but neither Frederick nor indeed Prussia could claim the exclusive right the use or to bestow it. It is the imperial emblem of Russia, Austria, Serbia and other portions of the disrupted Holy Roman Empire, and Prussia adopted the emblem long after it had flown over Byzantium as the royal arms of the “Emperors of the East and West.”

In Germany we find the Double-Headed Eagle used as the seal of the Count of Wurzburg in 1202; it was the coat of arms of Henricus de Rode in 1276; while Philip of Saxony bore it upon his shield in 1278. It was also the seal of the Bishop of Cologne, who no doubt adopted it from the city arms.

As the arms of towns and cities in England, this emblem appears upon the official seals of Salisbury, Perth, (Perthshire), Airedale and Lamark. In Holland and France there are also numerous instances of its use.

As the badge of royal orders we find the two-headed bird upon the emblems of the Austrian Order of the Iron Crown; in Russia upon the emblems of the Order of St. Andrew, founded by Peter the Great in 1689; in Poland upon the emblem of the Order of Military Merit, (founded May 24, 1792). As late as 1883, the King of Serbia adopted it as the emblem of the Order of the Double-Headed Eagle, commemorative of the restoration of the Serbian kingdom.

In these paragraphs we can see how Satan beguiled many western nations with their incorporation of the Double-Headed Eagle into their own heraldry – especially the Germanic nations.

But the double-headed eagle is not European in origin for its use depends upon the contact of Europe with Asia Minor, and indeed with trade or warfare with the Turks.

The Turkish name for this conspicuous emblem is HAMCA, and by this name they call it when they see it carved upon the walls of ancient castles, upon time worn coins or emblazoned upon frayed silken banners in ancient palaces.”

WHAM No. 3!! Now notice what we have here: 1) Further confirmation the origins of this Double-Headed Eagle are of Turkish/Edomite origins. 2) And the Turkish name for this image is HAMCA! WOW! = HAMitic CAnaanites!! So the Double-Headed Eagle is the incestuous Canaan’s heraldic emblem.

Travellers in Asia Minor, indeed, are surprised by the frequency of the double-headed eagle sculptures upon the castles of the Seljukian Turks, and upon the more ancient monuments of the Hittites, whose civilization was at its height when the Hebrews were wild tribesmen upon the Arabian plains.”

First off, pay no attention to the blasphemous mention of the Hebrews as wild tribesmen. The Hebrews were always husbandmen with their flocks and herds of animals not wild men, however Esau/Edom WAS a wild man and ferocious in battle. He and his clans were warriors of warriors, and this is yet another characteristic that does NOT FIT THE JEWS. Edomites were NEVER JEWS.

I would advise you go here, for there is much more historic information on the double-headed eagle. https://freemasonrymatters.co.uk/freemasonry/double-headed-eagle/

OK, that’s it for this article and I hope you found it rewarding and enlightening.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing The Lying Blasphemer Bertrand Comparet Parts 1 and 2:

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

3. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

4. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

5. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE? – Part 1

.Or perhaps a better title would have been: The Satanic Curses of Judaism and Islam – Is God One?

Introduction

Now this article has been up on Ezine Articles since 2009, so it’s obviously long overdue for a little revising and editing, because my knowledge has greatly increased since 2009. In turn, it must be said that it’s a crucial support article for my other articles: “Exposing The Trinity Lie – Parts 1 through 5”; “Do YOU Worship and Ogre god? – Parts 1 through 4”; “Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs? and “The Duality Godhead”, (See link Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 below.) This means, also, that it’s long overdue for a place on my blog. Still, better late than never, eh?

So, to my question, IS HE ONE, that is, is God ONE!? for the phrase “God is one” can only be found three times in the whole King James Bible – THREE TIMES ONLY! Now here’s a thing, for all of my regular readers will, by now, be aware of a little conundrum that we have going on here, that is, within the confines of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. That conundrum, of course, is this mysterious habit they have of majoring in the minors. It seems to be a common practice of theirs to make big theological determinations with very little Scriptural proof for backing up those determinations. The silly Trinity dogma being a very good example of it, with two references, only, to the Trinity, again, in the whole of the King James Bible (see link No. 1 below). Not only that but no mention of it by the name, the Trinity. However, having said all that, MANY people still believe that their god is one and in the case of believers in the Trinity, for them it’s three in ONE!

So back to the thread, and to prove it, here’s another thing: All the Jews and all the Muslims on this earth believe their god or their Allah is one. There he is, up there in his ‘heavenly domain’, all alone, that is, a single solitary god, who is the object of their worship and of their deification (chuckle, chuckle, chuckle).

The thing is, is their worship of this deity all in vain? and is it just a massive deception on the part of the god of this world, Satan the Devil? We must be clear about this, for he is most definitely a god, that is, the god of this world, or the god of this age, or the god of this world’s system, or even the god of The Matrix, to use the modern vernacular. If you have any doubts about this arrangement, then you must refer to the Holy Scriptures for the proof, and thereby assuage those doubts:

2 Corinthians 4:4 (MCV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image (one in whom the likeness of anyone is seen) of God, should shine unto them.

As an aside, notice, the minds of the lost and unsaved who don’t believe are completely blinded to The Gospel of Yashua Messiah, which is yet more solid gold proof that no man or woman can accept a ‘Jesus’ as their saviour of their own volition or own initiation, for only The Father can remove the scales from our eyes.

Ephesians 2:2 (MCV) Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to The Prince of The Power of The Air, the evil spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience (and unbelief):

OK, now all this is very straight forward, because we know that the lost and unsaved do not believe, and the above verses explain clearly why they don’t believe. Moreover, what about the Jews and the Muslims, for they do believe and, boy, do they believe? Let’s face it, we could never doubt their zeal and their fervour, especially the Muslims, so what gives? Is their belief in vain, for we know that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) does not feature in The Jew’s beliefs at all. The Jews have their imaginary satanic Talmudic ‘god’, and the Muslims have their ‘Allah’, but Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) as God with God is not included in either of these blasphemous belief systems.

However, Islam does acknowledge a ‘Jesus’ as a prophet, but this imaginary ‘Jesus’ is not revered any higher than their prophet Mohammed which, in itself, is an evil blasphemy. (For the origins of Islam see link No. 5 below.)

So to briefly sum up, we have at least two religions that believe in gods that are one, that is, alone and solitary. Now some of you may say well so what, we’re Christians, and we believe that God is one, too? Yes, quite so, but is that true and who told you that God is one? And if God IS ONE what separates your god from the heathen god of the Jews and Muslims, for he is one too? Answer: NOTHING! Oh come on, there are loads of Holy Scriptures that say God is one, I hear you say, and yes there are some that appear to say that, but do they really say it? Well, there is only one way to find out using these examples:

In Mark 12:29 the Lord Jesus Christ quotes Deuteronomy 6:4 which He voices aloud:

Mark 12:29 (KJV) And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

Now this statement is a word for word exact copy of what Moses wrote down in Deuteronomy 6:4. You can check it for yourselves if you do not believe me.

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our GOD is one LORD.

OK, let’s analyse this Scripture in detail, from the Hebrew, as it predates Mark’s Gospel by approximately fifteen hundred years:

Hear, O Israel:

1) The Lord The Jehovah or The Eternal our God (Elohim) who has always self-existed.

2) Our God now the word ‘God’ or ‘Elohim’ in Hebrew means God plural – more than one. The Hebrew word ‘Eloha’ or Eloah is the singular word for Elohim. Now if God is one, a singular solitary God, then ‘Eloha’ is the word that would have been used here, not Elohim – more than one. This evidence alone, and in one fell swoop, disproves monotheism or Judaism, for the Elohim Godhead is more than one being.

3) Is oneOK, God = Elohim = plural beings, which in turn means we have the Elohim (plural) Godhead of more than one being, being described as ‘one’, but is that one being? and how can plural beings be one? In Hebrew the word for ONE is ‘Echad’ which means unified or united or in unity or at one and it also means number one; first and none above, the prime number. This means that The Elohim (plural) Godhead is united – completely likeminded and in unison, that is, in total agreement.

A football team is united as in Newcastle United, and they are united as one team with one goal – to win, but they are also a team of eleven individuals. The Godhead is one team of two Spiritualbeings who have plans to add to their number by calling sons and daughters/brothers and sisters, not close themselves off in isolation in a closed trinity. The number 3 is God’s number for finality and if anything comes in threes with God that’s it – fini – kaput – the end, nothing more, just like the three woes in Revelation. The thing is, there is nothing final in God’s plan for us His future family! Plus all of mankind, eventually, in the Kingdom of God!!

4) LordEternal or self-existent.

So there we have it, and if we were to ask the question is God one? we can reply and affirmative yes to that, for the expounded question should read as: IS THE GODHEAD UNITED AS ONE? that is, a Godhead of two individuals who have always self-existed, a God with God who later became The Father and The Son, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and then a Godhead in heaven with Yashua Messiah at The Father’s right hand.

Here, alone, we have enough proof and evidence to disprove monotheism or the worship of one god. The Godhead has always been two who are unified or united or at one with themselves, with each other, or in oneness of mind, word and deed, that is, in complete and total agreement and totally likeminded – yet distinct Spiritual beings; this is the True nature of the Duality Godhead.

Hopefully, too, you will have noticed that the Holy Spirit is nowhere mentioned in Deuteronomy 6:4, nor in Mark 12:29 in the description of The Duality of the nature of the Godhead. Am I denying the existence of The Holy Spirit? no way, for The Holy Spirit is the Godhead’s living POWER, but not a personage of a mickey mouse Trinity. (See link No. 1 below)

Moreover, we now have a full understanding of Deuteronomy 6:4 of which Mark 12:29 is a direct copy. Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently quoted Old Testament Holy Scriptures (from The Septuagint) when preaching. So what is the point I am making here? The point I am making is this: Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12:29 are identical and yet they are taught differently, due to the change of language or misinterpretation of same, that is, from Hebrew into Greek.

If we copy out Mark 12:29 from the Greek you will see what I mean:

Mark 12:29 (Greek Transliteral) Answered the Jesus that before-most is (foremost) be hearing (be you hearing) Israel Master (Lord) the God of us Master (Lord) one is.

OK, if we concordance the word ‘God’ we will find a subtle change has taken place:

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – G2316 theos theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

Notice; a deity, not the deities. God in the Old Testament was Elohim – plural, not Eloha = not singular, but look at what has happened here. God has become a singular god – a deity, not the deities of The Elohim who are ‘at one’ or who are ‘unified as one’ and in ‘perfect likemindedness’ – two united beings thinking as one. And all this when The Greeks were polytheists = more than one god.

This deliberate language corruption is what causes all the trouble and confusion within the pages of the New Testament and deceives millions of people within mainstream Christianity. Look folks, the Godhead does not change, they have never changed and that is why THEY SAID in Genesis 1:26; “let us make man in OUR IMAGE and OUR LIKENESS; they were always the two beings of the Godhead. This, therefore, means that what was written in Deuteronomy 6:4 should have been copied exactly into Mark 12:29 with same OT meaning, for the Lord Himself uttered the very same words. This also means that because the word ‘God’ now has a different meaning, a singular meaning, not a unified plural meaning, a translator’s corruption has most definitely occurred. Well just fancy that!!??


Moving on, if we now take a look at a few Holy Scriptures that allude to their claim that ‘God is one’, we will then gain a better understanding of what the evil translators of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion have done to God’s Holy Word, and what better example than the following verses from Matthew’s Gospel, for there are corruptions galore in these two verses:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

And from the Greek Transliteral, and supported by The Concordant Literal Version:

Matthew 19:16 (Greek Transliteral) And be-perceiving (lo!) one toward-coming (coming to) to-Him (Him) said Teacher! Any (what) good I-shall-be-doing that I-should-be-having life eonian?

Matthew 19:6 (CLV) And lo! one coming to Him said, “Teacher, what good shall I be doing that I should be having life eonian?

OK, so what have we got going on here? Hmm, well, as we can see, this verse is revealing that Matthew 19:16-17 is not quite as good as we may have, at first, thought (like the pun?). The operative word here, of course, being ‘good’. Notice, the man in the Greek original does not call Yashua Messiah ‘Good Master’. The word ‘good’ has been thrown in gratuitously by the devious translators, but why? Well that’s easy to answer; in order to corrupt the whole passage and give it a different focus and a blasphemous, phony new emphasis. Not only that, but we have the assertion that The Father God is the ONLY ONE that is good, so there it is, the ugly perversion of Jewish monotheism slithering in like a snake by the back door, so to speak.

As it happens, this has always been a passage of Holy Scripture that I have never been comfortable with and, now, as I examine the original Greek rendering I fully understand why I have always felt uncomfortable with it. Notice the crucial element to this missing word ‘good’. If Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) is not the ‘Good Master’ and is only the Master or Teacher as in the original Greek, then by default it makes a mockery of what Yashua Messiah was supposed to have said to the man, that is, “Why callest thou me good?” For as we can see the man said no such thing, but what he did refer to was what one good thing must he do in order to have Eternal Life, so what’s going on?

Back to the Greek Transliteral for the answer:

Matthew 19:17 (Greek Transliteral) The yet He-said to-him any (why) me you-are-asking about (concerning) the good one [thing] is the good if yet you-are-willing into the life to-be-into-coming keep (keep-you) the directions (precepts) [Square brackets mine]

Straight away, it is crucial that we realise there is no reference to God in this verse at all especially the nonsense phrase: “there is none good but one”, and we now know, too, that the phrase: “Why callest thou me good?” is also bogus. What this means in Truth, is that there is not an inkling of any suggestion within this passage to suggest that God, in anyway, shape or form is here alluded to as one. Unless, of course, you have a demonic evil agenda and your desire is to classify Yashua Messiah as not being ‘good’ which, of course, is what the blasphemous KJV does – DELIBERATELY in my view.

First, though, lets finish analysing the Greek version of verse 17. The verse opens with the Lord answering the man’s question and notice, for the emphasis is purely on the subject of the man’s question and nothing else. What the Lord is asking him here is this: “Why are you asking me about this one good thing that you think you should be doing in order to enter Eternal Life, when you should know that the only good thing you can do is to keep (hold Spiritually dear) the commandments and love God?” OK, having cleared that up, let’s return to the blasphemous KJV and I will re-copy it here for your convenience:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Right, we know from the Greek rendering the man did not say ‘Good Master’, so this must mean that the Lord had no need to reply with that spurious man made question, and nor did He, for it is not there in the Greek. To confirm, if we check once more in the Greek version of verse 17 we also have the proof that the Lord did not ask the man that question: “Why callest thou me good?” So all this wickedness and deceit is added by the translators – WHY? Why, because through this verse in the KJV it is scandalously trying to tell us that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not see Himself as good and, in turn, by doing that making us think that He was not God. If He was not good, then how could He be God in the flesh?

Now this truly is an evil heresy we have unravelled here! It’s also constitutes a heresy with them trying to fool us into thinking that there is only one God. As stated, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was God in the flesh, so how could He be anything but good? Obviously, the Lord cannot be anything but good, but to those in the blasphemous Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, they want us to think that only the Father God is good. What kind of diabolical evil is this? I’ll tell you, it’s Jerome’s and Erasmus’ diabolical evil and whoever else had their filthy Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translator’s mitts on God’s Holy Word when they wrote their King James Bible.

Furthermore, if you think Matthew’s account is a one off and Mark’s account says otherwise you would be wrong and I will keep this brief for I wish to move on to the next misunderstood verse:

Mark 10:17 (KJV) And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?

Again from the Greek Transliteral:

Mark 10:17 (Greek Transliteral) And of-out-going (of-going-out) of-Him into way (road) toward-running one and knee-falling (falling-on-his-knees) him inquired-of Him Teacher! good any (what) I-shall-be-doing that life eonian I-should-be-tenanting (I-should-be-enjoying-the-allotment-of).

Here again we can see that the translators have chosen to place the word ‘good’ before ‘Teacher’ or ‘Master’ instead of correctly attaching it to the subject at hand after the word ‘Master’, that is, what good thing should this man be doing in order to enter into Eternal Life? Notice, too, that the word ‘good’ only appears once so, by default, it must apply to the ‘thing’ and not to Yashua Messiah. Why is that I hear you say? It’s that, because in the Matthew account we learnt that the second ‘good’ was gratuitously thrown in by the translators.

In part two I will expose more translator corruptions.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing the Trinity Lie!:

2. Do You Worship an Ogre god – Parts 1- 4:

3. Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?:

4. The Duality Godhead:

5. The Islamic-Vatican Connection by Prof. Walter Veith:

https://archive.org/details/the-islamic-vatican-connection-prof.-walter-j.-veith

Did Paul Circumcise Timothy For The ‘Believing’ Jews? – Acts 16:3-5

Now, as I am sometimes want to do, I am going to challenge my readers, yet again, with what I deem to be a very dodgy piece of Scripture. I won’t say Holy Scripture, because I believe it to be satanic, and not Holy at all.

You see, since I discovered that Romans 13:1-7 was a corruption by addition to Paul’s Letter to the Romans (seven whole verses – see the link below), that is, completely bogus, I have started checking one or three other places in the Freemason-Canaanite-Judaic King James Bible to see what else I can find that would merit my scrutiny. Now what do you think I found? low and behold, Acts 16:3-5 jumped right out at me, just as my good wife and I were studying The Holy Scriptures, this very day – the 8th June 2014.

As usual, I went online to see what most commentators were parroting, and it was all the usual guff about Paul being all things to all men in order to gain some of them for Christ. However, I could not rationalise this sweeping generalisation in order to apply it to what Paul was supposed to have done regarding Timothy and HIS member – not Paul’s member, if you get my drift. If we stop and think about this issue for a minute or two, we must ask ourselves who the blazes was Paul to take it upon himself to order a brother in Yashua Messiah, or a brother in The Faith under His Glorious Grace, to give him the authority to maim and mutilate Timothy’s body, that is, The Temple of The Holy Spirit? Just what is supposed to be going on here? Were Paul and Timothy under The Law, or under Yashua Messiah’s Saving Grace?

Let’s be clear, Paul had no rank or authority over Timothy, other than Timothy was Paul’s charge as a Learner (disciple) of Paul, a student, and therefore in Paul’s care on behalf of Yashua Messiah, and that was a great responsibility. Moreover, was Paul about to insult and blaspheme against Yashua Messiah and His sacrifice and go back on his own words as well?:

Galatians 1:6-7 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

“But there be some that trouble you.” Who were those troubling the brothers and sisters in Galatia? The very same types of people that we’re told Paul kowtowed to in Derbe and Lystra, so what is this all about? Are you suspicious yet? If not, I will copy this verse for you:

Galatians 2:21 (KJV) I do not frustrate The Grace of God: for if righteousness come by The Law, (circumcision) then Christ is dead in vain. (Brackets mine)

Is that simple enough to understand or are we going to explain it away with intellectual, philosophical, religious sophistry and clap trap?

And this verse:

Philippians 3:2 (KJV) Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the CONCISION. (Emphasis mine)

BEWARE OF THE CIRCUMSION!!!

Come on peeps, what are we dealing with here in Acts 16:3? I will copy it here for your information:

Acts 16:3 (MCV) Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Canaanite Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek.

Are we being asked to believe that Paul did a 180 degree U-turn and went back on all he had learnt from Yashua Messiah, and he himself taught elsewhere just to pander to a few Canaanite Judaising dogs of the circumcision? Well, if we read the King James Bible as it stands, and believe like lemmings that it has no errors, nor any Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious agenda, then yes YOU are being asked to believe it, and unfortunately probably do.

However, before you make your decision to carry on blindly believing this verse in Acts, as written, you might want to consider the story of Paul and Peter, and Peter’s refusal to eat with non-Israelite foreigners. Did Paul rebuke and admonish Peter severely for pandering to the religious whims of the Concision – the circumcised Jews? You bet your life he did. So are we now being asked to accept that Paul is now a hypocrite? Yes you are, because that’s how the translators of The KJV have polluted this chapter of Acts: 1) to discredit the character of Paul, 2) to cause confusion and 3) to get silly blind believers in the ‘inerrant KJV’ making all kinds of excuses on Paul’s behalf in order to explain this satanic verse away.

So did Paul circumcise Timothy? Not on your life and to prove it I will use the same method that I used to prove that Romans 13:1-7 is a satanic corruption of the Holy Scriptures. So let’s copy Acts 16 from verse 1 through to verse 8:

Acts 16:1-2 (MCV) Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, who was a Jewess, Judean Israelite and believed; but his father was a Greek: 2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium.

The first thing we must understand about these opening eight verses is that they are primarily an itinerary of Paul’s travels in this part of the world, that’s all. This is the primary focus of these verses and later on I will write them as they would have been written before they were corrupted by this satanic addition.

Acts 16:3 (MCV) Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek.

If Timothy was well received and well reported of, why the need for circumcision? or indeed, how did they know he wasn’t circumcised? Does that make any sense!!?? Furthermore, if his father was a Greek, that is a heathen, even more reason for him not to be circumcised, because heathen converts to The Faith did not have to fulfil the demands of The Law. Yet, conversely, with Timothy having a Judahite Israelite mother (not a Jewess), one would have expected him to have been circumcised when he was eight days old.

Acts 16:4 (KJV) And as they went through the cities, they delivered them the decrees for to keep, that were ordained of the apostles and elders which were at Jerusalem.

Here is the same verse as written in The Amplified Version:

Acts 16:4 (TAV) As they went on their way from town to town, they delivered over [to the assemblies] for their observance the regulations decided upon by the apostles and elders who were at Jerusalem.

Now what do we have here? Does this verse also sound all a bit legalistic and hierarchical (the system of the Nicolaitans that Yashua Messiah hates) with Jerusalem being the HQ like an early type of Rome dishing out its Papal Bulls and directives!!?? Again, if it doesn’t to you, then I suggest you have a rethink or perhaps you can point out The Grace within that verse.

Acts 16:5 (KJV) And so were the churches established in The Faith, and increased in number daily.

This verse as we read it sounds benign enough, but to me it has a propaganda ring to it, making you think that hundreds of people came flocking. How great were these numbers that were added when Paul, later on in Athens, after speaking in the Auditorium with 100’s, possibly 1,000’s in attendance, gathered two named people and certain men. ‘Certain men’ sounds very specific doesn’t it? small in number without doubt.

Acts 17:34 (KJV) Howbeit certain men clave unto him, and believed: among the which was Dionysius the Areopagite, and a woman named Damaris, and others with them.

Who were these others? Were they genuinely interested or just curious? We’re not told. However, this verse is not crucial to the point I am making here about Acts 16:3-4, which are definitely spurious. If we then look at verses 6-8, we can see the continuum issue that I raised in Romans 13:1-7 cropping up again, where the story flow gets interrupted with lies and nonsense and then reverts back the relevant subject of Paul’s itinerary:

Acts 16:6-8 (KJV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.

So let’s post this same passage as I believe it should be written without verses 3 and 4:

Acts 16:1-8 (MCV) Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess Judean Israelite, and believed; but his father was a Greek: 2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium. 5 And so were the churches established in the faith, and increased in number daily. 6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden by Yashua Messiah through the Holy Spirit to preach the word in Asia, 7 After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but Yashua Messiah via The Holy Spirit suffered them not. 8 And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.

There it is folks, as it was truly written – no Jewess mother, no circumcision of Timothy and no nonsense about KGB rules and regulations coming from ‘Papal Jerusalem’, or even of thousands flocking to Paul.

Matthew 22:14 Many are called, FEW are chosen.

Matthew 7:13-14 (MCV) Enter ye in at the strait (narrow and difficult) gate: for wide (easy) is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, (Spiritual ruin) and MANY there be which go in thereat: 14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and FEW there be that find it.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Brother Charles

Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons and Daughters of God Have To Obey Secular or Religious Authorities?: