BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 8 – The Blacks and Their Satanic Perversions of The Holy Scriptures Exposed

Before I start this crucial part of this series of blog posts we need to address this skin colour issue with regards to the writing of The Holy Scriptures and the reason why skin pigmentation does not appear to be of any importance to God or His authors. Why Is that? Quite simply because the black races were still in Africa and those that were in Mesopotamia, today called the Middle East, were there as slaves and/or eunuch slaves and were not deemed as people of any significance – they were non-entities. Did “Black lives matter”? Not at all. This means that The Holy Scriptures were written for white Israelite people and only white Israelite people because they were God’s chosen white Israelite people.

Is God, by Freudian Marxist Pharisee PC liberal standards, a RACIST!!!???? You bet.

We need to understand this basic, The Holy Scriptures are about Israel and then Israel and then Israel. Other nations and peoples only feature as and when they interact with???????? You got it, Israel and the Israelites who I will now prove were and still are WHITE!!!!!!!

Furthermore, I will confound their stupid non-arguments before I even expose one of their many infantile blasphemous errors and satanic misinterpretations and gross distortions of The Holy Scriptures by quoting one or three Holy Scriptures of my own and with some Strong’s definitions to back them up, but first things first – Adam and Eve:

Were they white or were they brown or were they – horror of horrors – black!!!???? From Strong’s Concordance:

Adam – H119 – ‘âdam – aw-dam’ – To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

OK, there it is folks – Adam flushed red in his face and was of a ruddy complexion, just like his descendant King David:

1 Samuel 17:42 (KJV) And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and RUDDY, and of a fair countenance. (Emphasis mine)

Now I don’t know about you, but I have NEVER heard of blacks being refered to as people of a fair countenance or that are beautiful or handsome or pleasing to the eye to look at. Moreover notice that David, like Adam, was RUDDY in complexion and from Strongs, once more, we get:

Ruddy – H132 – ad-mo-nee’, – ad-mo-nee’ – From H119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion): – red, ruddy.

Moving on we then find this gem of a verse which I believe says it all and it leaves the blacks and their black Israelite insulting whacky ideas stone dead in the water:

Lamentations 4:7 (KJV) Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire: (Emphasis mine)

Let’s also be clear, Nazerites are ISRAELITES and these Nazerites, that were residing in the Southern Kingdom of Judah when it was invaded by the Babylonians, are described as having skin that was purer than snow and whiter than milk. Now how white do Israelites have to be before these brainwashed blacks get the picture? In the next verse it states:

Lamentations 4:8 (KJV) Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick. (Emphasis mine)

Now if you get this verse thrown at you by these silly people just point out that white skin turns darker as starvation takes its toll. These people definitely died of starvation due to the seige of their city by the Babylonians.

From Answers.Com – Why do people turn black when they die?….

“As body begins purification, the skin will take on a greenish tone as sulfurous gasses break down the red blood cells. Intestinal gasses flood into the body tissues producing first green then dark coloration.”

OK, having laid the foundation that Israelites were and are white, I will now deal with a list of Holy Scriptures that these silly blacks use in the most pathetic ways in order to make their ludicrous and laughable claims – starting with:

2 Kings 5:27 (KJV) The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow.

Now here they use the recording of this event as proof that this Israelite man was black in order for the leprosy to contrast as white as snow with his black skin or to be recorded as the leprosy being a representation of a change of his skin colour. However if we do our research what do you think we will find? This:

As we can see brown skinned people do not produce leprosy that is as white a snow but rather leprosy that is the same colour as their brown or black skin. Here is a further image:

They then use Leviticus 13:2-6 in the same way with regard to leprosy but still making the same false claims:

Leviticus 13:4 (KJV) If the bright spot be white in the skin of his flesh, and in sight be not deeper than the skin, and the hair thereof be not turned white; then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague seven days:

Let’s be clear folks white people have white leprosy and blacks have black leprosy:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/leprosy?sort=mostpopular&excludenudity=true&mediatype=photography&phrase=leprosy

Next up we have Acts 21:37-38, but for this exposé I have included verse 39:

Acts 21:37-39 (KJV) And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek? 38 Art not thou that Egyptian (a Canaanite Jew inhabitant of Egypt), which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers? 39 But Paul said, I am a man which am [not a Jew] a Judean of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Before I press on dear people you also need to know that these duped black people believe that the Egyptians were black also. Egyptians were olive or swarthy, not black. So through using this passage they think that they can prove that Paul was black as the Roman captain thought he was an Egyptian. How bizarre can this weird concept get?

So what colour was this alleged Egyptian and what would an Egyptian be doing leading an insurrection of 4,000 murderers? Who were the biggest trouble makers and murderers that the Romans had to deal with in these parts of the Roman Empire? I will give you one guess. Yes that’s right – the Canaanite Jews – The Zealots who looked white even though they were, and are, not white and do not claim to be white.

In verse 39 we read Paul declaring that HE WAS A MAN!!! Now why would he make such a strange declaration? Did he think the chief captain was blind or even stupid? No, not at all, Paul was making it clear that he was not a hu-man, not a snake-man – not a viper man – not a serpent man from The Garden and Canaan post flood – not a Canaanite Jew.

Make sure you understand, folks, that Paul was a white Semitic Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin – fair skinned, not a Canaanite Jew or a black Canaanite. Modern day Benjaminites are the Nordic Nations of Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/Israel%20Not%20Captiv%20%5BA%5D.htm

Please note, the information in the above link, although very helpful, is not 100% accurate, especially when speaking of the Canaanite Jews. Canaanite Jews were NOT Edomites.

OK what do we have next?

Numbers 6:5 (KJV) All the days of the vow of his separation there shall no razor come upon his head: until the days be fulfilled, in the which he separateth himself unto the LORD, he shall be holy, and shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow. (Emphasis mine)

Now I presume these dolts read ‘blacks with their dreadlocks’ into this verse. LOL. Oh yeah marn – pass dat weed marn. Where’s Bob Marley when you need him? Absolutely hilarious.

As shown above, Nazerites were WHITE Israelites that decided to set themselves apart from the rest of Israelite society and make the Nazerite vow in the early days of Ancient Israel. This meant they would not shave their hair and allow it to grow, nor drink any alchohol or fruit of the vine, nor touch a dead body. You can read all the other details in Numbers chapter 6, but rest assured it has nothing to do with blacks and their dreadlocks. LOL

Next up and even more laughable, Jeremiah 8:21

Jeremiah 8:21 (KJV) For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me. (Emphasis mine)

Now believe it or not they actually construe this as a reference to skin colour. Unbelievable or what? In Truth this idea is beyond laughable and brings shame upon black people in general through the dumb ignorance of such a distorted and false interpretation.

In these verses from Jeremiah 8 we are getting a description of his reactions of what he is witnessing, that is, the seige and sacking of Jerusalem by the Babylonians with no signs of any repentance displayed by the Israelite occupants of that city. Jeremiah is stunned, traumatised, astonished, shocked and dismayed beyond anything we can begin to imagine or measure. He is hurt to his heart which is filled with a dark foreboding – a spiritual blackness and his countenance shows it through a metaphorical darkening of his face through mourning. No doubt he would have looked distraught, pale and drawn, devoid of expression. Strong’s describes it as ashen. Rest assured, though, and, as I have already proven above, Jeremiah, being an Israelite, was not a black man.

OK next verse, Hebrews 1:3:

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV) Who being the brightness of His Glory, and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by The Word of His Power, when he had by Himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of The Majesty on high.

Now this one has me beat so if any of you can make a connection between this verse and blacks I will be very interested to hear it, if only for humour value.

Next verse, Ezekiel 8:3:

Ezekiel 8:3 (KJV) And he put forth the form of an hand, and took me by a lock of mine head; and The Spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the inner gate that looketh toward the north; where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy.

I presume here that we are back to the dreadlocks nonsense and is if white people do not have locks of hair on their heads. Curiouser and curiouser ‘Cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English).’

Next verse, Genesis 2:7:

Genesis 2:7 (KJV) And The LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Now this one is even more surreal, because these blacks presume that Adam and Eve were brown instead of white. Through their wishful thinking they reason that because the dust MUST HAVE BEEN BROWN, Adam and Eve were therefore brown or worse, black!!!

Interestingly I challenged one of these idiots on social media comments by stating for the record that here in the UK, in Cornwall, we have white clay or white dust and I put it to him that there must have been white clay or dust in The Garden in order that Adam and Eve be created WHITE in order for him to blush and I will post from Strong’s again:

Adam: H119 – ‘âdam – aw-dam’: To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

Now I don’t know about you, but I don’t EVER remember seeing a black man turn rosy or flush red in the face. Perhaps they go from from one shade of black to another shade of black that no one would ever notice.

And with that I will call it a cut and continue with more of their laughable interpretations in part 9.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 7 – A Recap and More Crucial History

By way of a recap the first six parts of this series of articles are a revelation of the subversive racial, political and anti-white motives behind the Black Liberation Theology, Black Jesus blasphemy. As proven in those articles, the satanic Bolshevik Marxist Jews are, and have always been, the driving force behind this satanic anti-Christ anti-white movement with its, more than willing, demonic deluded blacks as the foot soldiers.

If any of you have any doubts about this, I quote these comments as evidence:

“While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

– Israel Cohen, 1912, Jewish Secretary of The World Zionist Organisation and co-founder of The Fabian Marxist Society with George Bernard Shaw and Israel Zengwill, author of “The Melting Pot” in 1910.

That same quote in full:

“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

– Thomas Abernethy, Republican Congressman of Mississippi, June 7th 1957 during a debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1957

What I find interesting, too, is the overtime that Canaanite Jewish owned and controlled sites like Wikipedia put into claiming that these quotes are forgeries, when they are from a well researched historian and honourable Christian man by the name of Eustace Mullins.

These lying shysters then build their feeble forgery claim on the minor issue of Mullin’s claim that Israel Cohen was a member of the British Communist Party in 1912 when officially the British Communist Party did not come into existence until 1920. However, what they conveniently forget to mention is that The British Socialist Party came into existence in 1911, with members of this group then splintering off and forming the British Communist Party in 1920. This means that unofficially the British Communist Party was in existence in 1912 and no doubt Mullins correctly saw no difference between the two. Always remember these golden rules folks and by their own admission:

“Democracy is indispensable to Socialism.” – V. I. Lenin

“Socialism leads to Communism.” – Karl Marx

Furthermore, Cohen did write a book titled: “A Racial-Program for the 20th Century.” with the above excerpt published in the Washington D.C. Evening Star in May 1957,

From: “The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations”, by Myron Fagan.

Notice, too, the open admission: “we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros.”

Nevermind that the Canaanite-Jews were by far the most active force involved in the black slave trade, for which they bear not one atom of guilt nor any remorse. Well being Serpent Seed snake creatures without a conscience why would they feel guilty? A total impossibility.

OK I think that completes the early historical foundation of this evil satanic business so we now move on to more recent events and when this Black Jesus garbage came into being in its modern guise.

“No body heard of black Hebrew or black Israelite’s until the 70’s when your cult was invented in Harlem and the ghettos of the South side of Chicago”

– Avrumeleh Melamid, a Youtube commentator

Now in Truth I cannot verify the information in the above comment, but it doesn’t sound unreasonable when we compare it to what Wiki has to say on the subject:

“Many Black Hebrew groups were founded in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, from Kansas to New York City, by both Americans and West Indian immigrants. In the mid-1980s, the number of Black Hebrews in the United States was between 25,000 and 40,000. In the 1990s, the Alliance of Black Jews (which is no longer operating) estimated that there were 200,000 African-American Jews; this estimate was based on a 1990 survey conducted by the Council of Jewish Federations.”

So here we can see that there has been a recent surge in growth of these deluded black people who even tried to gain citizenship in the unlawful state of Israel, only to be deported as aliens by the Canaanite Jews – who continue to reject these blacks and their whack job claims as being Jews and/or descendants of the Israelites.

In part 8 I will deal with some of the Holy Scriptures that these people twist, pervert and distort in order to try and prove their whacky satanic claims.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 5 – James Cone, Black Liberation Theologian

In part two I mentioned a few of the early agents provocateur in what I call The Black Rebellion, but for this stage of the exposé I will now focus on the more recent principal characters starting with:

James Cone (1938-) Theologian of Black Liberation Theology: “In assessing the theology of James Cone, it is critical to recognize that he sees black experience as the fundamental starting point for ascertaining theological truth. And his own writings are a reflection of his own “black experience” – that is, the discrimination he suffered while growing up as a child in Bearden, Arkansas.”

Again, from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

Notice immediately the oxymoron being applied here – ‘theological truth’. Look folks, there is very little, if any, Truth in theology. Theology is primarily the vain philosophical thinking, logic, reasoning and ramblings of carnal minded Spiritually dead men. This rebellious mindset then produces their own creation, a creation of a god in their image and with it fake doctrines and fake spirituallity. THAT’S IT!! There really is nothing more that can be said about theology, black liberation theology or otherwise, and yet Cone uses his ‘life experiences’ as a young black upon which to build his foundation of so called ‘theological truth’.

It is also from this erroneous thinking that comes the idea of blacks being an oppressed people in the USA when they are no such thing. If blacks are oppressed then they are oppressed by the Canaanite Jew with his victimhood programming and, in turn, by their own people who have swallowed this victimhood snake oil wholesale. Furthermore, if we want to play the victimhood game then ALL PEOPLE are victims of the Canaanite-Jews and their THIEVING USURY which has impoverished THE WHOLE WORLD!! Make no mistake dear people CANAANITE JEW USURY is a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Moreover and at the same time he mentions ‘discrimination’ whilst having been born into a white ‘might is right’ environment. How could there not be be any discrimination, when he is a minority black alien, whose grandparents were most likely the serfs of white people, residing in a nation still ruled by white people? What does he expect? Preferential treatment!!?? It is in the nature of man to look after his own and if some blacks are not up to it why blame the white man? Had he behaved this way in Soviet Russia he would have been in a Gulag quicker than he could have said Uncle Tom’s Cabin – never to be seen or heard of again!!

From the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.””

Now why would people, (I presume this accusation is toward white people), define black people as evil? Is this an unjust conclusion to come to? Well to apply it as a blanket description obviously, yes, because there are good black people, but is the accusation totally without foundation? No and here is the proof:

From the “Council of Conservative Citizens” web page, “The Truth About Interracial Rape.”

“Presently the FBI appears to have only published the full statistical tables up to year 2008. After that the FBI website only has smaller “bulletins” that do not include the full data.

“From this data we find that blacks commit sexual assault against almost as many whites as blacks. However, white on black sexual assault is an extreme rarity.

“Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
Black on White: 20,309
Black on Black: 21,104

“Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Black on Black: 35,330

“Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Black on Black: 36, 620

Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Black on Black: 7,705

“Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Black on Black: 12,780

“Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Black on Black: 34,841

“Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Black on Black: 148,380

“Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
Black on Black: 24,730”

Let me be clear, I don’t like statistics, in fact I hate them and for obvious reasons, as they are easily distorted and become worse than outright lies if used by disingenuous people or lying dissemblers. However, I have quoted these figures for one purpose only and that is to show how the idea that black people are oppressed by the white man does not reveal itself in this data. If anything it reveals the opposite or The Truth that it is the white man and especially the white woman that is oppressed and violently abused by the black man.

Notice, too, how the full data figures ceased to be available when the anti-white, lying racist war criminal Barack Obama became president in 2008!! Coincidence?? I will leave you to decide for yourselves.

Back to James Cone whose name incidently is just a play on the name Cain, so that you know who he is descended from. So what else do we know about James (Cain) Cone?

Again from the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“The chief architect of black liberation theology was James Cone, author of Black Theology and Black Power. One of the tasks of this movement, according to Cone, is to analyze the nature of the gospel of Jesus Christ in light of the experience of blacks who have long been victimized by white oppressors. According to black liberation theology, the inherent racism of white people precludes them from being able to recognize the humanity of nonwhites; moreover, their white supremacist orientation allegedly results in the establishment of a “white theology” that is irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. Consequently, liberation theologians contend that blacks need their own, race-specific theology to affirm their identity and their worth.”

Here we can see James (Cain) Cone’s satanic credentials, for it turns out that he is the chief architect of Black Liberation Theology and the author of Black Theology and Black Power. This sounds to me like he is an outright enemy of white people and no more a Christian than my neighbour’s cat.

Moreover, notice, the use of the emotionally charged PC Bolshevik Marxist term “white supremacist” and how it’s viewed as irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. I would counter with the question: When were supremacist whites EVER CONNECTED to the black experience!!?? Who thinks up all this satanic nonsense?

OK let’s have some WHITE EXPERIENCE!!! I was raised in an originally ALL WHITE London and watched it being deliberately invaded and overrun through the 60s, 70s and 80s by West Indians, Indians, Pakistanis, Turks and Greeks and at no time did I ever feel connected to any of them, nor them to me. Cultural remoteness was the order of the day, so what’s all this meaningless nonsense about disconnection from the black experience when there was never a connection in the first place? London today with whites a minority is no longer a white English city – it’s an alien hell hole.

Here’s another thing, why is white supremacy painted in a negative light and who would conjure up such a term and use it to beat up white people? What does the term conjure up in your mind, for it causes me no problems at all? I look at what the white man has achieved down through the centuries and it looks pretty impressive to me and makes the white man look supreme, so what’s with this issue of whites being supreme that these other races have a problem with, especially blacks and Canaanite Jews? Jealousy and envy perhaps?

Continuing again…

““What we need,” says Cone, “is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of Black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.” Observing that America was founded for white people, Cone calls for “the destruction of whiteness, which is the source of human misery in the world.” He advocates the use of Marxism as a tool of social analysis to help Christians to see “how things really are.””

Notice in true Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jew fashion he calls for “the destruction of whiteness”. Remember my earlier quote? If not, here it is again:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

So is James (Cain) Cone looking to help Christians see: “how things really are” from Yashua Messiah’s perspective, that is, through a Christian prism or through the satanic twisted and poisonous anti-white Bolshevik Marxist prism of Karl Marx and Friedrick Engels and the Canaanite Jews? Again no prizes for the right answer.

Part 6 coming soon.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 4 – Black Liberation Theology and its Marionettes

Having digressed somewhat in part three I will now return to the subject of Black Theology with the introduction of Black Liberation Theology.

Black Liberation Theology

From The Acton Institute web page:

“What is Black Liberation Theology anyway? Barack Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright catapulted black liberation theology onto a national stage, when America discovered Trinity United Church of Christ. Understanding the background of the movement might give better clarity into Wright’s recent vitriolic preaching. A clear definition of black theology was first given formulation in 1969 by the National Committee of Black Church Men in the midst of the civil-rights movement:”

OK so what have we got going on here? It seems that the Bolshevik Marxist Jew Obama (Obama is Jewish from his mother) is also a disciple of Black Liberation Theology and the anti-white racist, Black Jesus promoting, Jeremiah Wright. If we add in Obama’s fake Muslim personna we can begin to see what a total lying fraud Obama has always been.

So does all this evidence make the Bolshevik Marxist Jew Obama an anti-white racist bigot and a hater of American white people? No prizes for the right answer and don’t you just love my use of those Social Justice Warrior terms ‘racist’ ‘bigot’ and ‘hater’ in their right and proper context?

Moreover, this evidence also proves that the promotion and promulgation of the satanic Black Jesus propaganda comes from the very top, that is, The Obama Administration itself and most likely via the CIA and the anti-Christ Mossad.

As an aside I will draw your attention to the satanic name of Wright’s ‘church’ –
TRINITY United Church of Christ!

Continuing from The Acton Institute web page:

“Black theology is a theology of black liberation. It seeks to plumb the black condition in the light of God’s revelation in Jesus Christ, so that the black community can see that the gospel is commensurate with the achievements of black humanity. Black theology is a theology of ‘blackness.’ It is the affirmation of black humanity that emancipates black people from White racism, thus providing authentic freedom for both white and black people. It affirms the humanity of white people in that it says ‘No’ to the encroachment of white oppression.”

Now in the above piece we can see meaningless vain theology at its best, or should I say at its worst? It refers to ‘the black condition’ in relation to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), but what has that got to do with anything? A True Christian is CALLED by The Father to His Son and he or she then has to TAKE UP THEIR CROSS and follow Yashua Messiah. This is not an easy ride for ANY Christian, it is a life of trials, of facing abusive opposition, of mockings and ridicule and sometimes severe persecution, so why do SOME blacks see themselves as a special ‘woe is me’ case when highlighting ‘the black condition’? Are they looking for a special dispensation from Yashua Messiah?

It then says: “so that the black community can see that the gospel is commensurate with the achievements of black humanity.” I am not going to be drawn into a futile discussion on the achievements of black humanity, but is The Gospel commensurate (equal to) the achievements of black humanity?

Do these people actually KNOW what The Gospel message is!!?? In a nutshell it is the Good News of the coming Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years, followed by a New Heaven (atmosphere) and a New Earth that will come down from Heaven with The Father. It really has nothing to do with the achievements of ANY racial group, let alone black humanity, so I do hope you can see the nonsense in all this narcissistic racial theological waffle. They just make it up with terms like this: “Black theology is a theology of ‘blackness’.” WOW!

It then says: “It is the affirmation of black humanity that emancipates black people from White racism, thus providing authentic freedom for both white and black people.” Here’s a question: Why does black humanity need affirming and affirmation from whom? White folks!!!???? Where does all this insecurity come from? Surely not from black humanity itself!! And again what’s with all this white racism – do they not have a black president? How black does America have to become before all this alleged white racism disappears? Oh yes, totally black with no whites at all and then the Hispanics and Italians (far more racist than whites) and other races can listen to their non stop whingeing.

Did you also notice how ‘beneficial’ all this affirmation for blacks is going to be for whites? It will free white people too. How does that work exactly when white people need no affirmation from anyone especially in their own country? As already hinted, is all this gumpf just a form of anti-Semitic victimhood for blacks and really just inverted anti-white racism?

OK, moving on, we next have this from the same author:

“In the 1960s, black churches began to focus their attention beyond helping blacks cope with national racial discrimination particularly in urban areas.”

When I read falacious overarching generalised statements like the above I always find it interesting how these disgruntled black people have never considered helping their fellow whingers to return to Africa where, I presume, there would be no ‘national racial discrimination’ and where they could cope. For example, let’s say to the West African nations of the Ivory Coast, Senegal and The Gambia where, I believe, most of the blacks slaves originally came from.

For the last time we have this from The Acton Institute web page:

“The notion of “blackness” is not merely a reference to skin color, but rather is a symbol of oppression that can be applied to all persons of color who have a history of oppression (except whites, of course). So in this sense, as Wright notes, “Jesus was a poor black man” because he lived in oppression at the hands of “rich white people.” The overall emphasis of Black Liberation Theology is the black struggle for liberation from various forms of “white racism” and oppression.”

– Anthony B. Bradley, “The Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology.”

Notice from the opening remark of this paragraph, how we are no longer dealing with American blacks but have moved on to: “all persons of color who have a history of oppression.” This is classic Bolshevik Marxist Jew Internationalism, this is how they think and they can never think in nationalistic terms even though they have their unlawful State of Israel (not acknowledged by many Jews). This also proves that through Black Liberation Theology they are just making use of gullible duped American blacks to further their anti-white genocidal agenda. In Truth, they couldn’t care less about ‘oppressed blacks’, as already proved by their ancestor’s very active role in the black slave trade.

Notice, too, that this Jeremiah Wright idiot has swallowed wholesale the Black Jesus garbage. He also makes another error of calling Yashua Messiah poor when his step-father Joseph was a successful carpenter and builder who died whilst Yashua Messiah was still quite young. His wealthy great-uncle (Miriam’s [Mary’s] uncle) Joseph of Arimathea, the ship owning tin and gold merchant, then took Him under his wing, so rest assured Yashua Messiah never knew poverty.

Finally it says: “The overall emphasis of Black Liberation Theology is the black struggle for liberation from various forms of “white racism” and oppression.”

Now what and who does this statement remind us of? If I mention the name Barabbus will that help you? In the early first century, elements of the Canaanite-Jews were zealots fighting against the occupying Roman forces who were oppressing them.

However, did Yashua Messiah rally His followers to join these zealots and their movement in order to free themselves from Roman oppression? Did He whinge and whine and accuse the Romans of racism, hate speech and bigotry?? Answer: No He did not, but what He did say to Pontius Pilate is this:

John 18:36 (KJV) Jesus answered, My Kingdom is not of this world: if my Kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to The Jews: but now is my Kingdom not from hence.

Ever notice how Yashua Messiah did not say to Pilate: “That I should not be delivered to YOU (Pilate), but that I should not be delivered to the Canaanite-Jews.”

Part 5 coming up.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 3 – Liberation Theology

As briefly mentioned in part two the Liberation Theology Movement was an intrinsic element to the historical foundation of the Black Rebellion which in turn was cooked up and hitched onto this Black Jesus/Black Israelites nonsense.

“Liberation theology has been described as “an interpretation of Christian faith out of the experience of the poor…an attempt to read the Bible and key Christian doctrines with the eyes of the poor”, or “the message of the gospels”, restored from “the first three centuries [of Christianity in which] it was … a pacifist … religion of the poor”. Detractors have called it Christianized Marxism.”

– From Wikipedia – Liberation Theology

OK, Liberation Theology, let’s get this one sorted first and at the same time reveal the deceptive nature of this subject and its un-Scriptural origins. First and foremost Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was not the least bit interested in liberty (from whence comes the word liberation) nor was He the least bit interested in theology.

Why was He not interested in liberty or liberation? because liberty is a benefit privelige granted by masters to their slaves – period! Make sure you understand this devious deception. Liberty is NOT freedom and it is freedom that Yashua Messiah gives us, not liberty and He tells us so twice:

John 8:32 (KJV) And ye shall know The Truth, and The Truth shall make you FREE.

John 8:36 (KJV) If the Son therefore shall make you FREE, ye shall be FREE INDEED. (All emphasis mine)

The Truth shall make you free, not that The Truth shall set you at liberty and who is The Truth? Yashua Messiah is The Truth.

Right! Theology, what’s that? Vain deceit, Bible intellectualism and philosophy and The Truth it is NOT. Paul warned the Congregations of God about it in no uncertain terms:

Colossians 2:8 (KJV) BEWARE lest any man spoil you through PHILOSOPHY and VAIN DECEIT, AFTER THE TRADITION OF MEN, AFTER THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD, and not after Christ. (All emphasis mine)

Hellenising philosophers (the original theologians) out of Alexandria in the late first century founded what we know today as the Christian Religion and which I ‘affectionately’ call The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. These creatures were and are referred to as the ‘Church Fathers’, which they were not. They were the founders of the counterfeit Christian Religion. This includes Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, Anglicanism and Protestantism in ALL its denominational guises. This obviously includes Pentecostalism which is the favourite denomination (demon-ination) of black people.

Dear people make sure you fully grasp this Truth. Yashua Messiah was NOT a theologian, the Learners (disciples) were not theologians and real Christians are NOT theologians. Theology, like philosophy = vain deceit.

Having exposed the above I have now set the foundations of this discourse by exposing its futility through the ignorance of the creatures involved, who considered themselves knowledgeable and enlightened when all the while they were duped blind guides who operated in total darkness and still do to this day.

Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

Returning to the Wiki quote above you will have noticed that I enboldened the phrase: “Detractors have called it Christianized Marxism.” Now this statement is very deceptive and in true Wiki style very economical with The Truth, because Liberation Theology has ALWAYS been a Christian Marxist Theology with very little, if any, Jesus Christ in it at all, but plenty of satanic Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels holding sway.

So what does this mean? It means that Liberation Theology is just a Bolshevik Marxist revolutionary movement with Christian wall paper stuck all over it.

“As to the movement itself, it was mainly a movement of the religious left, in which Marxist analysis of economic and social conditions was given a very high place.”

“Some of the main figures in this movement back then were Gustavo Gutierrez, a Peruvian priest, Jose Miranda, a Mexican theologian, and Jose Miguez-Bonino, an Argentinian Protestant … That there was a very heavy reliance on Marxist thought is indicated in their book titles. For example, Miranda wrote Marx and the Bible (1971) and Miguez-Bonino penned Christians and Marxists: The Mutual Challenge to Revolution (1976).”

– Bill Muehlenberg’s Culture Watch web page.

The above gives us more proof as to the involvement of the Canaanite Jews in Liberation Theology who are ALWAYS behind Bolshevik Marxist movements.

Black Theology

Briefly, Black Theology is a title that covers a variety of Black Liberation Theologies, for there are more than one but, in general, Black Theology took most of its ideas from Latin American Liberation Theology with all its Bolshevik Marxist revolutionary leftist leanings. However the actual modus operandi of those involved in Black Theology is to give it a Christianised spin or flavour thereby hiding its Bolshevik Marxist core and Canaanite Jew, Bolshevik Marxist anti-white agenda.

So what, in a nutshell, is Black Theology? Answer: It is alleged to be a Christian Theology from the view point of an oppressed people, namely the blacks. Hello!!?? Excuse me!! Yes, I will re-state that: It is alleged to be a Christian Theology from the view point of an oppressed people, namely the blacks.

Now is it just me or do you get that old whingeing victimhood feeling that we are so used to hearing from the Canaanite Jews which the blacks have adopted as their own?? Yes, you bet your life I do, but I will leave it for you to make up your own minds. I will be returning to this emotionally driven nonsense later.

First, though, let’s focus our attention on the first century Christians for a while and ask ourselves this question: Were the early Christians oppressed? Again HELLO – EXCUSE ME!!?? And yes I will repeat that too. Were the early Christians oppressed? Yes oppressed, persecuted, imprisoned, tortured, and slain in all manner of brutal and savage ways – but do we ever hear about them whingeing and whining re the lot or hand that their Christian life had dealt them??????? Not a bit of it and if they did we are certainly not told about it, so what’s with all this WOE IS ME BS – THE WHITE MAN OWES ME garbage we hear continually from the Canaanite Jews and their black dupes? I’ll tell you – Bolshevik Jew Marxist anti-white hatred and racism using guilt laden emotional blackmail to brow-beat and attack generally good natured and tolerant white people.

Whiteness

From that you may say: “Don’t be daft, Canaanite Jews are white too.” However you would be very wrong for Canaanite Jews are Hamitic, NOT Semitic and Ham was the forefather of ALL olive, swarthy, light brown and black peoples. Here we get a Canaanite Jew openly admitting that he is not white and no longer wants to be seen as white:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

Notice the REAL HATRED within that piece and then realise how they have transferred that hateful mindset across to certain gullible black people using Bolshevik Marxism and the long past involuntary servitude nutmeg to keep the wounds open.

OK that’s it for Part 3

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 2 – The Historical Foundation

The Historical Foundation…

…but first, The Unwritten Historical Foundation to The Historical Foundation and the revealing of the ‘certain race’.

Before I press on there are two CRUCIAL things that MUST BE clarified, for these are issues that are NEVER raised in these discussions about blacks in involuntary servitude (erroneously called slavery), whether in The Caribbean or The Americas, and the first issue is the MIGHT IS RIGHT issue which always gets conveniently ignored.

Let’s be honest, (and leaving aside the issue of whether it is right or wrong under might is right), a hu-man being in neck braces and ankle chains has no rights at all – none whatsoever. He is totally at the mercy of his owner. How he is treated is totally dependent upon the kindness and benevolence of the owner or the ruthless cruelty of the owner. The servant cannot complain, he has no hu-man rights and if he was a black serf in Brazil or in a Spanish American colony his life expectancy was three years – tops. Some might say they were the lucky ones. In the American Plantations and Caribbean things were better.

However, as a contrast and comparison, I will now introduce the Orthodox Christian Russians who, in 1917 and the years that followed, were captured in their hundreds of thousands, leading to millions, and either executed on the spot or sent to the Gulags and deliberately worked to death by the Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jews (the certain race). Did these white Russian people have any hu-man rights? Did they have a Liberation Theology Movement that was allowed by the Soviet Government to speak up for them? Did ANYONE speak up for them and demand that they be set free?

Was there a Civil Rights Movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, 1930s, 40’s and 50’s demanding equality and compensation for the families of those that had lost loved ones? Was anyone charged with genocide or crimes against humanity as with the comparatively innocent Nazis at Nuremberg (ALL tortured for their ‘confessions’)? Was anyone made to feel guilty for their wicked evil genocidal RACIST past? Not on your life – not a whisper was heard – all was swept under the carpet and forgotten by the new Glasnost ‘friendly’ Russian authorities and the slimey duplicitous hypocritical Cultural Jew Marxist leftie, Socialist, Commie, liberal west, including the scum at the satanic cesspit known as The UN.

So what point am I making here? Well, quite obviously, it’s the bizarre idea that Anglo-Saxons, Celts and those of Nordic descent – The Israelites of America and Britain have to be permanently reminded of their ‘wicked ancestor’s’ past activities and behaviour and as if THEY were the only ones. So what kind of two faced double standards are being applied here?

This weird hypocritic phenomenon is then compounded by spineless white acquiescence and in some cases, guilt ridden shameful grovelling with these treacherous white wretches walking around with: “I am so sorry” placards hanging round their vile necks!!!

When was the last time you saw a Canaanite Jew even admit to the genocide of the appropriately named White Russians, let alone apologise for their satanic blood lust psychopathic murderous behaviour? Answer: You haven’t, nor will you ever until this verminous viper race is standing before Yashua Messiah’s Throne – His Judgement Seat – then you will see some real grovelling.

I would advise you dear readers to do your research into the Jews and their all encompassing involvement in the Bolshevik Marxist Revolution which was financed out of The City of London (The Rothschilds) and Wall Street.

OK that is the first crucial thing never mentioned and the second is the Canaanite Jews and their actual HANDS ON involvement with the Black Slave Trade with many of the slave ships being Jewish owned, which obviously included their modification and adaptation to carry hu-man cargo.

We then have many Canaanite Jews who changed their names to Spanish and other European sounding names in order to hide their true nationality. They organised the capture of slaves in Africa. They organised the slave auctions in the Caribbean and the Americas and they were into supplies and provisions to the plantations. In other words wherever a fast buck was to be made within this inhuman trafficking of blacks, the Canaanite Jew was in there. OY VEY!!!

For more in depth information on this subject please web search Professor of Black History, Tony Martin (now deceased) for all the details.

From Wiki: Martin died unexpectedly on January 17, 2013, aged 70, at Westshore Medical Hospital, Cocorite, Trinidad.

Strange how that always seems to happen to people of The Truth.

Right, having laid down the Unwritten Historical Foundation, I will attempt to lay down the The Historical Foundation.

First, some history on American Blacks and their ambitions for equality with American Whites and, in particular, with American Anglo-Saxon Israelites – The Tribe of Manasseh. Here is what two famous white Americans had to say on the subject:

“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about, in any way, the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not, nor ever have been in favour of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must the position of superior and inferior. And I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

– Abraham Lincoln, in his fourth debate with Stephen Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18th 1858

“Segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen.”

– Woodrow Wilson, addressing a delegation of black professionals led by Monroe Trotter, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Harvard and Boston newspaper editor, when they appeared at the White House to protest Wilson’s new policies of segregation.

“During Wilson’s first term in office the House passed a law making racial intermarriage a felony in the District of Columbia.”

– Wilson – A Portrait, The Public Broadcasting Service, African-Americans

So, as we can see, this was the racial status quo re white/black relations in the 19th and early 20th centuries out of which grew the racial tensions of the 1950s and 60s and the so called Civil Rights Movement.

However, there were other twists and turns to what I will call The Black Rebellion that more recently came out of something known as South American Liberation Theology or Latin American Liberation Theology and led to Black Theology. Black Theology then led to The Black Rebellion and a movement known as The Black Liberation Theology Movement.

Here are some of the black people, some with their ‘everything and everyone is black’ whacky ideas, who were involved in this anti-white Black Rebellion. Obviously you can do more research of your own into these characters if you wish:

Nat Turner (1800-1831) was the most notorious slave preacher who ever lived on American soil. Turner’s hatred of slavery propelled him to seek freedom by violence. Indeed, Turner killed nearly sixty white people before being captured and hanged in September, 1831. This violent revolt marked the beginning of the black struggle for liberation.

Marcus Garvey (1887-1940) is regarded by many as “the apostle of black theology in the United States of America.”[9] Martin Luther King, Jr., said Garvey “was the first man on a mass scale and level to give millions of Negroes a sense of dignity and destiny, and make the Negro feel he is somebody.”[10] Garvey was one of the first to speak of seeing God through black “spectacles.”

– From the: “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

William Saunders Crowdy (1847-1908) who founded in 1896 one of the first groups of Black Israelites known as the Church of God and Saints of Christ.

“He claimed to have a divine revelation from God that told him that America’s recently emancipated slaves were God’s chosen people, the true Hebrews. According to Black Judaism doctrine, when the Kingdom of Israel was destroyed, the Israelites were first scattered across the African continent and then selectively targeted by enemy African tribes who captured and sold them to European slave traders for bondage in the New World.

“It’s a common myth that slaves were randomly shackled up and carried off to slavery,” “General Yahanna,” leader of the present-day Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge, told the Intelligence Report. Actually, “Slave traders sailed for months and days to get to specific pickup points. They knew what people they were taking — specifically, the lost tribes of Israel.”

– From: “Understanding God’s Word Ministry” Web Page, “False Doctrine – Black Hebrew Israelite Movement”

“Howard Thurman (1899-1981), in his book Jesus and the Disinherited (1949), saw black life paralleling Jesus’ life because His poverty identified Him with the poor masses. Thurman also noted that Jesus was a member of a minority group (the Jews) in the midst of a larger and controlling dominant group (the Romans). Thurman thus drew many applications for the black experience from the life of Jesus.”

– Again from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

More in part three:

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 1

Introduction

Now, dear readers, surprisingly, I am somewhat stunned, and I am stunned that I am actually stunned because, usually, nothing much these days stuns me at all, but this one is an absolute cracker! After 35 years study, this has to be one of the most weird, whacky subjects I have ever encountered, as a Bible scholar and Kingdom of God Gospel messenger for Yashua Messiah who, for the record, was WHITE, as were Adam and Eve – but more on that later.

Moreover, this “Alice in Wonderland” subject, with all its rabbit holes, will take some unravelling, and the reason for that is that it had never before even entered into my mind, that the principal Bible characters were black, until I discovered it recently on YouTube – need I say more? A little chuckle here for the author. However, please stay with it as it will arm you with all the knowledge you will need to counter the satanic ideas of these duped foolish black people.

Having said that, I will say that I had heard of the minor, and misunderstood, issue of the “Black (Canaanite) Jews” in Africa – another sensationalised and over blown topic of little importance, but that was all. This subject, though, is another ball game altogether and far more corrosive to The Truth, due to its saturated evil coverage on YouTube (only the even more whacky and stupid CIA “flat earth” rubbish beats it).

I will also state for the record that due to the insulting anti-white nature of this topic it means, by default, that those of a ‘certain tribe or ethnicity’, or some people of a ‘certain Canaanite race’, have been very busy, putting in overtime, on this racially motivated and divisive anti-white evilness. It also means, that this isn’t just the handiwork of ignorant deceived blacks. In fact, I would classify the blacks involved as brainwashed deluded dupes or pawns and useful idiots for this ‘certain Canaanite race’.

Furthermore, and whilst keeping the ‘certain Canaanite race’ in the background for the moment and whom I will expose, this whole nasty satanic subversive business is compounded by the obsessive fanatical nature and the arrogant belligerent attitudes of the blacks who are promulgating this anti-white garbage across cyberspace, and, as if there is no tomorrow.

Moreover, most, if not all of these blacks, are Spiritually dead and totally incapable of discerning and understanding the Holy Scriptures – Bible scholars they are definitely not!! This, therefore, gives the whole unbelievable thing a surreal and perverted black humour value – pun intentional, due to their Scriptural ignorance. Let me be clear: “YOU WHAT!!!???” or “YOU MUST BE JOKING!!!!” doesn’t even come near with this unbelievable stuff.

OK, so where do we begin in our unravelling of this demonic mayhem? Make no mistake, for this satanic disinformation and/or misinformation did not materialise overnight and the idea wasn’t discovered at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet. Furthermore, as white Semitic people (primarily Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Dutch, Nordics, Gallics, Franks, Germanics and other white Europeans) we need to know who is behind it and what their aims are. Added to which, does this issue form part of a bigger anti-white genocidal conspiracy? Yes, absolutely.

Now you, if you are a PC, Cultural Marxist, Social Justice Warrior (SJW) may say: “Oh yeah, here we go again, yet another dumb delusional conspiracy theory.” And I would say yes, most, if not all conspiracies start out as theories until they are investigated and researched and once proven to be Conspiracies then the word ‘theory’ vanishes like the early morning mist, unless, of course, you are fearful, weak, lazy, cowardly, cognitively dissonant and emotionally unbalanced (an SJW) – a far more serious problem – for you.

“Conspiracy Theorist – a derogatory put-down term dreamt up by the CIA to discredit those who questioned the official narrative of the JFK assassination.”

— David Icke

“Conspiracy Theorist – someone who questions the statements of known liars.”

– Unknown

“Social Justice Warrior – someone who believes the statements of known liars and votes for them.”

– Brother Charles

“A conspiracy theory will remain forever a conspiracy theory until it is met with obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies from government(s) at which point the conspiracy theory defaults automatically to a conspiracy. E.g. the lying bullshit that is the NIST Report on 9/11.”

— Brother Charles

Right! Here we go, The BLACK JESUS and also The BLACK DISCIPLES and The BLACK APOSTLES and The BLACK KING DAVID and The BLACK JACOB/ISRAEL and, of course, the obligatory BLACK ISRAELITES and last but not least how BLACKS INVENTED EVERYTHING!!! = WOW! how amazing is that!!!???? How have we missed these incredible ‘historical truths’??? It’s all looking very BLACK indeed, isn’t it? I fear that us whites have a very DARK future ahead of us. LOL

Now hilarious as all this ridiculous gumpf is, there is even a more mirth filled element to it. According to these black ‘geniuses’ Jacob/Israel was black, but his twin brother Esau was white, red and hairy, as described in the Holy Scriptures and, of course, it’s also claimed by these daft blacks that he’s the forefather of all those ‘wicked’ Confederate Red Necks, just to give this whole subject a very convenient anti-white Southern USA slant or flavour. Clever eh?

Genesis 25:24-25 (KJV) And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her (Rebecca’s) womb. 25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Needless-to-say there is no mention here in The Holy Scriptures of Jacob being black.

So, as already stated, where do we begin? Well the obvious place to start, as with all these things, is with the agenda(s) and to pin point whose agenda and what kind of agenda, for there is ALWAYS AN AGENDA, folks, and it’s always bubbling away somewhere in the background. It NEVER fails.

This, therefore, leads us to ask some very basic questions like, is this strange Black Jesus phenomenon motivated by: 1) religious zeal, 2) politics, 3) hatred (oh how the ‘certain race’ loves that word) on solely anti-white racial grounds, 4) for revenge, 5) or just simple racial jealousy? From my research, thus far, I would say that all these factors come into play, accompanied by the associated and obligatory unhinged emotions. Added to which, all the elements are being deviously and deliberately stirred up by the ‘certain race’ for their anti-white genocidal programme. More in part two.