Now why am I asking this question, which, when measured against other Christian matters, is of such minimal importance? In fact, it’s so minimal it’s almost irrelevant, due to its insignificance? However, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion is replete with satanic gnat strainers and Pharisees, so the reason for asking it is because I have been falsely accused of preaching the Albigensian religious message. Obviously, this is just a lying satanic attack upon me for teaching people The Truth. The Truth being that once we’re born of God we’re new creations, and thereby sinless men and women, as confirmed for us by Yashua Messiah, through John:
1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man THAT HATH THIS HOPE IN HIM purifieth himself, EVEN AS HE IS PURE.
1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.
1 John 3:9 (KJV) WHOSOEVER IS BORN OF GOD DOTH NOT COMMIT SIN; for HIS SEED remaineth in him: AND HE CANNOT SIN, BECAUSE HE IS BORN OF GOD.
And also confirmed for us by Yashua Messiah, through Paul, TWICE!
Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.
See links Nos. 1 and 2 below.
Now so far, in my studies, I have not found anything that supports my accusers claim(s) that the Albigensians or The Cathars believed as I believe. So it could be that these Chalcedonian religious dog accusers are wrong on all counts. So no surprises there then.
A LITTLE HISTORY
The Albigensians were a so-called ‘Christian’ group from the Middle Ages (circa 12th to the 14th centuries) who lived in a place called Albi in Southern France. In beliefs they were similar, if not the same, as the Cathars who, in turn, were Gnostics, believers in reincarnation and vegetarians. They also held to the belief system of ‘Dualism’. This was not a belief in The Duality Godhead that I teach here on my blog, (see link No. 3 below).
‘Dualism’ was the belief in two deities, a god of good, and a god of evil. The god of evil was the god of the Old Testament, and the god of good was the god of the New Testament, so straight away, we can begin to see the errors that they were steeped in. If we then add in their beliefs in Gnosticism and reincarnation, we can quickly gather that they believed in a whole load of whacky nonsense. This, of course, included the standard Gnostic blasphemy that Yashua Messiah was NOT Yah (God) come in flesh, as do JWs.
However, on the other side of the coin, they were severely persecuted and treated brutally by the satanic Roman Cult, who launched an Albigensian Crusade against them in 1209. This was ordered by the pope of the day, Pope Innocent III, so innocence was certainly not in the picture when it came to the brutality he dished out upon these hapless Albigensians and their Catharian brothers. Many of whom who were burned at the stake! You can’t beat Roman Catholic ‘Christian love’ once it gets going – eh!!??
Now don’t get me wrong, for I am in no way defending the Albigensian Cathars, and it’s truly a tragedy that they died in their multiple thousands in defence of satanic error. Figures are estimated at between 200,000 to 1,000,000. A terrible evil atrocity, to say the least.
So what has any of this to do with my teaching? Well, according to this wretched creature, that I came across on my WordPress reader page, I am, amongst other things, an Albigensian heretic, a monomaniac troll, and I was not adequate to fit his site! LOL. This was because I am not a Chalcedonian (more on this religious garbage later), to him I was not much different from an atheist (strangely I saw that as a compliment coming from him), I am not amenable to reason! Classic! Yet more mirth for Messenger Charles. I am dangerous! – WOW! even more hilarious, and my occasional use of all-caps words for emphasis told him something! I wonder what it told him – best not to go there!
OK, the first judgemental accusation – ‘Albigensian heretic’. This means he’s accusing me of being a Gnostic, a vegetarian, a believer in reincarnation and ‘Dualism’ which are plainly erroneous satanic lies.
He then accused me of being a ‘monomaniac troll’.
And here is a definition for the word ‘monomaniac’:
“A person who is extremely interested in only one thing, often to such a degree that they are mentally ill.”
Now firstly I take this as a back handed compliment, for I am definitely single minded in my mission of teaching Yashua Messiah’s Good News message of the coming Kingdom of God and salvation for all Israel (not the Jews) and for all MANkind, but not for Serpent Seed hu-mankind. I am definitely single minded in my love and commitment to The Father and Yashua Messiah and my brothers and sisters in The TRUE FAITH. I am definitely single minded in my on going battle against The Adversary. I am also definitely single minded in my efforts to expose the Jewish criminals, and their shabbos goys that run The Rothschild Beast Worldwide Money Empire and System.
Secondly, I will definitely treat his comment as a back handed compliment for another reason, and here’s why:
John 10:20 (KJV) And many of them said, He hath a devil, and is mad; why hear ye Him?
To be classified as mad by a 21st century Pharisee, that is, adeluded religious dog, cannot be anything but a compliment!
OK, next we get another compliment: I was not adequate to fit his site! Now why would this be I wonder. Well clearly it’s obvious, as I will show through his next revealing comment, which was: that I am not a Chalcedonian!
So what is a Chalcedonian? I believe I have heard the word or seen the word in use in the past, but my memory fails me in terms of where it was that I heard it, and what it means. So without further ado let’s see what we can find out about this highfalutin pompous RELIGIOUS word.
The word originates from the Council of Chalcedon which was held in Chalcedon in 451 AC and, I presume, was not dissimilar, in spirit, from the satanic Council of Nicea in 325 AC. So we’re dealing here with unadulterated religious garbage of the most foul kind, and from start to finish.
From this council we get the spin-off word ‘Christology’ and that word alone should set alarm bells ringing in the ears of ALL True Christians. Why is that? Easy, because it’s laced with intellectualism and Hellenising philosophy = arrogant vanity.
Ask yourselves this one question: What would Peter, the down-to-earth fisherman and messenger of Yashua Messiah, have made of it, and did he study ‘Christology’ at his local seminary? LOL
When did following Yashua Messiah ever become an ‘ology’ or when did His Word EVER become theology or philosophy? It NEVER did, and that’s the satanic deception we’re dealing with here. Moreover, that’s the corrupted mind set that I was dealing with on this creature’s evil webpage, who had the audacity to say that I didn’t fit on his page as I was expounding The Holy Scriptures.
So back to this word ‘Christology’, and where does it lead us? Here from the Theopedia webpage we get:
“Jesus Christ is the originator and focus of the Christian faith based on the teaching of the Holy Bible. He is the eternal second person of the TRIUNE God.”
Bingo! And there it is! for it leads us straight to Tertullian’s conjuring trick The Trinity. (See link No. 4 below) However, just for fun, we need to learn a little more about what it means to be a Chalcedonian, or is it Callithumpian? Chuckle chuckle.
The Chalcedonian Definition (also called the Chalcedonian Creed or the Definition of Chalcedon) is a declaration of Christ’s nature, adopted at the Council of Chalcedon in AD 451. Chalcedon was an early centre of Christianity located in Asia Minor (modern Turkey). The council was the fourth of the ecumenical councils that are accepted by Chalcedonian churches which include the Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Lutheran, Anglican and Reformed churches.
It was the first council not to be recognised by any Oriental Orthodox church; for this reason these churches may be classified as Non-Chalcedonian.
Looks like the Non-Chalcedonian churches had got a little something going for them. So there we have it! The Albigensian Heresy revealed (a classic example of the pot calling the kettle black), and yet more evidence of how the vile Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION, in all its satanic wretchedness, came into being (see link Nos. 5, 6 and 7 below).
And I was told that I was not adequate for this blasphemer’s webpage. Well all I can say to that is, I am VERY GLAD to hear it!
In part two I will shred his ignorant garbage replies to my comments.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
1. Was The Apostle Paul a Schizophrenic?:
2. 1 John 1 – The First Chapter of John’s Letter Explained:
3. The Duality Godhead of The Father and The Son:
4. Exposing The Trinity Lie!:
Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity; Eastern (Russian) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity; AngliCAINism is NOT Christianity; Protestantism is NOT Christianity.
5. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
6. The Vile Satanic Curse Of Religion:
7. The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE? – Part 1:
What Is An Albigensian Heretic? – Part 2 of 2
This article will deal with some of the details of this wretches’ comments, and will clearly show you how a carnal, spiritually dead, religious mind works. Take note, for the minds of these people are more evil than the minds of the lost and unsaved. They are more dead than the lost and unsaved, for they are without any excuse, whereas the lost and unsaved do have an excuse! As Yashua Messiah made plain:
Matthew 13:10-11 (MCV) And the Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know The Mysteries of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN.
OK, so here’s his first ignorant outburst:
“None of what you write is responsive.”
Well clearly this just reveals that his Spiritual blindness is complete, for he is not capable of comprehending, nor understanding my Spiritual and Truthful replies, and that is because my replies are simple – too simple for his intellectual and philosophical brain, which is crammed full of pointless religious theology and drivel.
“Sir, you make it evident that you are another of the monomaniac trolls who here bedevil us from time to time. You are manifestly impervious to dialectic. So, you are not adequate or fit to this site.”
These points I covered in part 1, but it’s interesting to know that I am not alone in my 100% single minded commitment to The Father, Yashua Messiah and The Truth, here called ‘monomania’ by this judgemental so and so. Moreover, does this not also reveal that his commitment to The Father and Yashua Messiah is only half hearted, there is no zeal, and he’s just a part timer and/or half-baked. The man who buried his talent in the ground anyone? LOL
“We here are all Chalcedonians. In that common commitment consists the oecumene of the Orthosphere: Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox.”
So what do we have here? In two words: religious diarrhoea, that is, 100% unadulterated religious diarrhoea, for there is no other way to describe it. Notice the big words, oecumene and Orthosphere, that the uneducated Christian would never, in a million years, use, nor understand. So who are these big words for? Easy, they’re for his fellow vain and conceited RELIGIOUS intellectuals, and no one else – ALL IS VANITY – ALL IS MEANINGLESS, as King Solomon would have said!
“You are not a Chalcedonian. Indeed, you are not even a Mormon or a Jehovah’s Witness, or a 7th Day Adventist.”
Mercifully he is right, I am NOT a mickey mouse Chalcedonian! And then he does get some more things right, for I am NOT a Mormon, nor a JW nor an SDA. So perhaps there’s a chance for him yet, I doubt it, but we’ll see.
“OK. God bless you in your private opinions, but please: don’t any more belabor us with them, who can readily discern their heretical – and, so, dangerous – character.”
Oh dear, nothing pees me off more than the sickly, mainstream ‘Christian’, insincere, gratuitous, and meaningless throw away remark – GOD BLESS YOU! Then he calls The Truth, opinions. This proves that I had a blind guide of blind guides on my hands, with a ditch looming up in the distance. Hopefully I will get a ring side seat when he and his religious buddies fall in. LOL
Then we get the accusation that I am dangerous! I should have questioned him on this, and asked him what is dangerous in teaching The Truth about Baptism and being born of Yah (God) and receiving the Gift of The Holy Spirit. My guess is, he has no idea what Baptism is and what it really does for a new convert.
“Go away then. You are not much different to us than an atheist. Indeed, you are more different to us than some of our atheist interlocutors here, inasmuch as you are not amenable to reason. As you have yourself just now averred.”
As I said in part one, he pays me a compliment by likening me to an atheist. I suppose he sees them as monomaniacal trolls too! Much mirth once more for the author. Next we get the humdinger giveaway, and with another compliment of my not being ‘amenable to reason’. Whenever I hear this puffed up intellectual term, I immediately bring to mind that verse which encapsulates it so perfectly:
“Careful distinctions are a sine qua non of rational intellection.”
Ha ha, now in this sentence of gobbledegook we get a touch of Satan’s language: ‘sine qua non’ which means an ‘essential element or condition’ (I had to look it up). The thing is, why didn’t he write it in English? Easy, yet more pompous intellectual vanity. It’s sheer conceit, and to call him vain would be a gross understatement. However, let’s deal with the whole sentence in English:
“Careful distinctions are an essential element or condition of rational intellection.”
Now what’s the giveaway in this little diatribe? ‘Rational intellection’ is the giveaway. I couldn’t find a definition for his two word, word salad, but as it happens we don’t need it, for the definition of ‘intellection’ will suffice:
Intellection – the act or process of using the intellect; thinking or reasoning.
OK, so what’s wrong with that? I hear you ask. Everything is the answer, for ‘intellection’ is purely a carnal minded activity. There is no Holy Spirituality involved in it at all. If we then add in the word ‘rational’:
1. Having or exercising the ability to reason. synonym: logical.
Luke 5: 21-22 (KJV) And the Scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone? 22 But when Jesus perceived their thoughts, he answering said unto them, What reason ye in your hearts?
See where ‘reasoning’ leads?
Oh and ‘logical’ as defined by whom? These religious Chalcedonian deceivers and blind guides? QED. They’ll like that!
2. Consistent with or based on reason or good judgment; logical or sensible.
Yet more intellectual clap trap = ‘based on reason’ – Whose reasoning? If we have three satanic religious wretches reasoning, what will be the outcome? More nonsensical religious garbage is the answer.
Good judgement? Whose good judgement? What yard stick are they using in order to measure and determine what is, or what is not, good judgement? I’ll tell you their satanic RELIGIOUS yard stick. Furthermore, what outcome are they looking for when The Holy Scriptures have ALL the answers! What self-righteousness is this?
As for their ‘logic’: My ways are not YOUR WAYS and YOUR WAYS are NOT MY WAYS saith The Lord!
Isaiah 55:7-9 (MCV) Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto The Lord, and He will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon. 8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
So much for their religious ‘logic’.
3. Of sound mind; sane.
LOL, well we have already seen for ourselves, in part one, what they deem to be of a sound mind and sane, that is, belief in a meaningless satanic religion known as Chalcedonianism, from the pit of hell, and all part of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION!
“Without them, it is not possible to think clearly; without them, one can think only murkily, and end up confused, asserting propositions that, when examined carefully, turn out to be logically incoherent or inconsistent with experience.”
Now we get pompous arrogance combined with Spiritual ignorance. He also shoots himself in foot when he states one can only think murkily and end up confused, which is exactly what the average Trinity worshipper is – 100% confused, with now you see one, oops, no it isn’t, it’s three. LOL
He then boasts that he can ‘examine carefully’ what I say. How does a Spiritually dead dork examine anything of The Holy Spirit? Hilarious. He can’t, for it’s beyond his pea sized brain with its limited carnal mind, stuffed full of all his indoctrinated religious Chalcedonian nonsense. In turn, this means that anything I say will seem: “logically incoherent or inconsistent with experience” for his ways are not Yah’s ways.
“A nature is not a being, but the form or essence of a potential or actual being. Human nature is not a human being.”
I replied to another Chalcedonian religious dog, called Smith, with this: I will put it to you that you’re splitting hairs, and in Truth two natures means two beings. One being is the dead carnal man, and the other being is the New Creation – a new Spiritual Man or Woman born of God who cannot sin. His comment above was in answer to that.
He says a nature is not a being. Well beings have natures and there’s nothing wrong in using the word ‘nature’ to explain the two beings that we become post Baptism, with the indwelling of The Holy Spirit. Actually this is an excellent example of their Spiritual ignorance and blindness, for they cannot see it, nor comprehend it, nor understand what takes place at Baptism, with the indwelling of The Holy Spirit – it is COMPLETELY beyond them, which again proves their carnal mindedness and their pointless beliefs in their religion.
He also doesn’t understand that a hu-man is NOT a Man. (see link No. 1 below)
“It is perfectly possible for a single being to have more than one nature.”
Yes and that is called DID – Dissociative Identity Disorder, formerly known as Schizophrenia.
“The palmary example is of course Jesus Christ, who is a single substantial being, a single person, and a single subject, who has both divine and human natures (along with both divine and human wills, minds, and so forth).”
Now this is a load of lying nonsense, and a deflection. Yashua Messiah was a man like no other man – The Son of Man, who was the ONLY begotten son of The Father,born WITHOUT SIN and lived WITHOUT SIN!! This means that there is NO COMPARISON between Him and us fallen wretches begotten of Adam and Eve, whom He came to redeem. One strawman non-argument exposed and firmly rebutted.
His next piece of religious nonsense:
“The Athanasian Creed of roughly AD 500 spells out the doctrine of the hypostatic union of two natures in the one being, Christ Jesus the Lógos:”
“The Athanasian Creed, also called the Pseudo-Athanasian Creed and sometimes known as Quicunque Vult (or Quicumque Vult), which is both its Latin name and its opening words, meaning “Whosoever wishes”, is a Christian statement of belief focused on Trinitarian doctrine and Christology. Used by Christian churches since the sixth century, it was the first creed to explicitly state the equality of the three hypostases of the Trinity. It differs from the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed and the Apostles’ Creed in that it includes anathemas condemning those who disagree with its statements (as does the original Nicene Creed).”
So what have we got going on here? A whole load of, yet more, meaningless, lying, satanic, papist religious garbage! Is the answer to that. And I’ll rebut it with just one verse of Holy Scripture:
Genesis 1:26 (MCV) And The Elohim (the plural Yahhead of TWO distinct Spiritual beings) said, LET US make man in OUR IMAGE, after OUR LIKENESS (see link Nos. 4 and 7 above).
Please note that I will be writing an article exposing this ‘hypostases’ excrement very soon, so sign up as a follower to my blog, so that you don’t miss a thing.
And the diatribes continue:
“If you don’t make careful distinctions as competent, careful, canny philosophers and theologians do, you are going to end up at Arianism or Albigensianism or New Age or something equally whacked.”
One verse to counter this load of satanic intellectual BS:
Colossians 2:8 (KJV) Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
And the faecal matter keeps on coming:
“Who is it that is sinning, if not Paul? His Body of Death. It is *difficult* to put off the Body of Death altogether; for all but the holiest of saints, putting off the Body of Death is not completed except by physical death. This is why Paul mortifies his flesh: he doesn’t want his Body of Death to drag him back down again into sin (I Corinthians 9:27).”
To counter this load of ignorant trash and misuse of Scripture, I will draw your attention to The Holy Scriptures I quoted in my introduction in part one, namely 1 John 3:3; 1 John 3:6; 1 John 3:9; Romans 7:17; Romans 7:20. Which he and his fellow blind guides continue to ignore and contradict. This is mind boggling Spiritual blindness in action folks, so be warned so that you do not fall foul of the same satanic deceptions.
And the satanic nature of his comments reaches rock bottom:
“Those who are born of God – who have finished the process of rebirth and put off entirely the Body of Death, so that they are pure and fit to enter heaven – are those *who are no longer burdened by the Body of Death,* because they have Resurrection Bodies in Heaven.”
This is NOTHING but salvation by works and just the same as the evil teaching of the blasphemer L. Ray Smith (now deceased). Basically it is a belief system that claims that salvation is not achieved until The Resurrection of the dead = one vile satanic LIE!!
But it doesn’t end there, there’s yet more satanic crap!
“If Baptism creates in us a completely new person, hey presto, and the person of the sinner is left behind, *then the person of the sinner is not saved, but is still damned.* In that case, *the sacrifice on the Cross did men no good.* All it did was initiate a procedure for creating their replacements.”
Here’s a parable for this ignorant spiritual illegitimate:
Luke 5:36-38 (KJV) And He spake also a Parable unto them; No man putteth a piece of a new garment upon an old; if otherwise, then both the new maketh a rent, and the piece that was taken out of the new agreeth not with the old. 37 And no man putteth new wine into old bottles; else the new wine will burst the bottles, and be spilled, and the bottles shall perish. 38 But new wine must be put into new bottles; and both are preserved.
“But this contradicts I Timothy 1:15 This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief. So, Paul himself is the biggest sinner he knows of, and it is sinners such as he whom Christ came into the world to save.”
See link No.2 below in answer to this erroneous drivel:
Then for his penultimate outburst of utter nonsense, and misuse of Holy Scripture:
“We read also in Matthew 9:13:
But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”
And with that sinner’s repentance comes a one off confession of sins, and then BAPTISM (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone and the Gifting of The Holy Spirit – just as Peter commanded but ignored by this ignoramus:
Acts 2:38 (KJV) Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Finally we get confirmation of his delusion, as warned about by Paul to the Thessalonians:
“Your interpretation of Paul and John is (so far as I can tell) heterodox. It disagrees with the whole Christian patrimony. That is dangerous. As I wrote recently:
If you find yourself in disagreement with the Body of Christ, it is a safe bet that you are hellbound.”
MY interpretation!!?? Here he displays his carnal minded thinking, because he hasn’t a clue about Spiritual Discernment and the abilities we, as indwelled TRUE CHRISTIANS, are gifted with. My interpretation, therefore, is Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) interpretation = THE TRUTH!
Then he stoops to pick up nothing with his use of yet another useless religious word – ‘heterodox’. So let’s look that up:
“Heterodox – Not in agreement with accepted beliefs, especially in church doctrine or dogma. Holding unorthodox opinions.”
Whose accepted beliefs? I’ll tell you:
Matthew 7:13 (MCV) Enter ye in at the strait (narrow) gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to Spiritual ruin, and MANY there be which go in thereat:
The many here being those of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (see link No. 5 above) of which this deluded wretch is a part.
He then has one last arrogant swipe by hilariously claiming that he is a part of the Body of Yashua Messiah (Christ).
2 Thessalonians 2:7-11 (MCV) For The Mystery of Lawlessness is already at work, only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way. 8 And then shall that Wicked One be revealed, whom Yashua Messiah shall consume with The Spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming: 9 Even him, (The Pope – The False Prophet) whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of The Truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie.
MANY ARE CALLED, FEW ARE CHOSEN – Matthew 22:14
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
1. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:
2. 1 Timothy 1:15 – That Christ Jesus Came into The World to Save Sinners; OF WHOM I AM CHIEF!: