The Truth is The True Gospel Message of the coming Kingdom of God and Salvation under His Glorious Grace and KNOWING The Duality Godhead of The Father and The Son – The ONLY Godhead. And always remember that The Truth (Yashua Messiah) is the enemy of The State. Below is the Lion of Judah (not the Jews). Please scroll down for the selected article.
This chapter looks like it is going to be more of same, and I am wondering whether there’s any point to an MCV version of these Epistles at all!
Chapter 3
(KJV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 Timothy 3:1 (KJV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 Timothy 3:1 Notes: Now here’s a thing – John, in his first epistle, makes it plain that those living in the first century were living in the last days:
1 John 2:18 (MCV) My dear novices in The Faith, it is the last hour (days): and as ye have heard that anti-Christ shall come, even now are there many anti-Christs; whereby we know that it is the last hour (days).
Now our forger seems to be most assured of when the last days begin, but he makes no effort to explain himself, and make that known. He speaks most assuredly of them being future, and not applicable to the times he, and his duped followers, were living in, as John makes plain to his followers. So why would this be? Did he know something that John didn’t?
The first century Assemblies of Yah definitely believed that Yashua Messiah’s return was imminent, especially when the Romans sacked Jerusalem and destroyed The Temple. And so each generation of Christians since then has, at some time or other, believed in the imminent return of our Messiah. However, our forger is certain that it is a future event, and not for the present.
I do not doubt for one second that perilous times will come, but what is interesting about this is the thinking behind it. As I said, the first century believers definitely believed The Messiah’s return was imminent, but by the time of our forger’s writing in circa 150 AC, it was no longer considered an issue or a valid opinion, especially with those building a counterfeit, religious, Hellenised edifice, like the author.
We then have three verses which could easily be of Paul’s hand, as well as those of the forger, so I will leave them be.
2-4 (KJV) For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
However, we get the usual religious clanger that always crops up when we drop our guard in terms of monitoring carefully what our forger is saying:
5 (KJV) Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
2 Timothy 3:5 (KJV) Having a form of godliness = piety, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
2 Timothy 3:5 Notes: So we return to the sanctimonious word GODLINESS = PIETY, which immediately makes me feel nauseous, due to The Truth that it is the complete opposite of what he thinks it means. And who would want a: ‘form of Godliness’? It beggars belief!
Not only that, but having a ‘form of Godliness’ and denying the power thereof! What imaginary power could that be, I wonder?
6 (KJV) For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
2 Timothy 3:6 (KJV) For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
2 Timothy 3:6 Notes: Here our forger is explaining to us what the celibate priests of his counterfeit church will be doing in the future, that is, leading gullible women astray with their diverse lusts. I won’t expound on the details, but the confessional led to far more than just hearing about these ladies sins and mistakes!
We then revert to more genuine sounding verses, which I still believe are of the forger’s hand, because they are based upon error:
7 (KJV) Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
2 Timothy 3:7 (KJV) Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
2 Timothy 3:7 Notes: Now there is much irony in this verse, for our author should be looking in a mirror and reading this to himself, especially re his whacky ideas of The Resurrection being the day of our Salvation! He, therefore, is the one for ever learning but never coming to a knowledge of The Truth.
8-9(KJV) Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as their’s also was.
2 Timothy 3:8-9 (KJV) Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.
2 Timothy 3:8-9 Notes: Here he applies the rebellion of Jannes and Jambres to Hymenaeus and Philetus, but as we have ascertained, these two fellas were on the right track, and our forger ‘friend’ was way off the mark with a reprobate corrupt mind.
So we must read the following verses in same Light, but remembering that he uses genuine Scriptures to give his writings a ring of authenticity, especially when passing himself off as Paul – see verse 11. Keep in mind that these epistles were written circa 150 AC, and long after the death of Paul, so plagiarising was very much the order of the day when it comes to these so-called Pastoral Epistles.
The next verses 10-14 are fairly sound, if they are Paul’s writings as in verses 11 and 12, but the rest possibly not, so you must deal with them as if they are the forgers handiwork. I will leave you to decide, but I know what I think.
10-14 (KJV) But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, charity, patience, 11 Persecutions, afflictions, which came unto me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra; what persecutions I endured: but out of them all the Lord delivered me. 12 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. 13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. 14 But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
15 (KJV) And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
2 Timothy 3:15 (KJV) And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
2 Timothy 3:15 Notes: From this verse I suppose he is referring to Timothy who it appears knew The Set Apart Scriptures that were able to make him wise UNTO SALVATION!!! So what is he giving away here? Well we know don’t we, he’s confirming for us his blasphemous beliefs in The Resurrection being the day of our Salvation, and that Timothy, although already Baptised and gifted with the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, was being made wise and being made ready for Salvation, for in our forger’s eyes he had not as yet gained Salvation!!! Make sure you understand the blasphemous nature of these epistles!
16-17 (KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 (KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 Notes: Again, these last verses are a mixed bag, but I think they reek of a judgemental attitude on the part of our forger ‘friend’. This spirit runs right through these epistles with what amounts to a load of people who are obviously not repentant, and I strongly suspect of not being called by The Father. This means they are secular carnal minded people who have been invited to join matey’s Hellenising outfit posing as a church!
This chapter starts off well with it possibly being of Paul’s hand, but by verse 5 we have the forger latching on to 1 Corinthians 9:24-27, which I expose as spurious, or at least suspect in many ways (see link No. 1 below). He may be the author of the above passage, as well, and was placing this connecting verse in 2 Timothy 2 in order to link his forgery to Paul’s work. Remember that these Epistles were written circa 150 AC, not in the first century.
This chapter will not contain many MCV verses, because like the previous chapter there is so much religious drivel herein that it would have been a waste of my time attempting to correct it – you cannot make a silk purse out of sow’s ear!
Chapter 2
1 (MCV) Thou therefore, my son in The Faith, be strong in The Grace that is in Messiah Yashuah.
(KJV) Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus.
2 (MCV) And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to Faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.
(KJV) And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.
3 (MCV) Thou therefore endure trials and afflictions, as a good soldier of Yashua Messiah.
(KJV) Thou therefore endure hardness, as a good soldier of Jesus Christ.
4 (MCV) No man that wars for Yashua Messiah entangles himself with the affairs of this life or the ways of this world; that he may please The Father who hath chosen him to be a soldier.
(KJV) No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier.
Verse 5 is bogus so I have deleted from my MCV! (See link No. 1 below)
5 (KJV) And if a man also strive for masteries, yet is he not crowned, except he strive lawfully.
Verses 6-9 are passable so I have left them in with some corrections, but by verse 10 the chapter disintegrates into so much erroneous blasphemous nonsense.
6 (MCV) The husbandman or farmer that labours must be first partaker of the fruits.
(KJV) The husbandman that laboureth must be first partaker of the fruits.
7 (MCV) Consider what I say; and The Yahavah give thee understanding in all things that are essential.
(KJV) Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things.
8 (MCV) Remember that Yashua Messiah of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to the Gospel of the Kingdom that I teach:
(KJV) Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to my gospel:
9 (MCV) Wherein I suffer trouble, and labelled an evil doer, even unto bonds; but The Sayings of Yah are not bound. (See link No. 2 below).
(KJV) Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer, even unto bonds; but the word of God is not bound.
10 (MCV) Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sakes, that have obtained salvation which is in Messiah Yashua with Eternal Glory.
(KJV) Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
The MCV ends here and begins again in chapter 3.
This is an anti-Baptism blind guide at work in the pages of the KJV! There is no other way of putting it, no matter what your misguided protestations may be! This means we cannot trust the words he writes thereafter – HE’S A MAN OF THE HELLENISED, HU-MAN MADE, CAINITE-JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RELIGION, THAT WAS A FORERUNNER OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, FOUNDED AT NICEA IN 325 AC – 100%.(See link Nos. 3 and 4 below).
2 Timothy 2:10 (KJV) Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
2 Timothy 2:10 Notes — (a) You see, here we have solid gold proof that we are dealing with an impostor, and a forger, WHO HAS NO UNDERSTANDING OF SALVATION, or when that occurs!!! He literally doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He is talking FUTURE here, that is, that we MAY ALSO OBTAIN THE SALVATION! And he’s not talking to unsaved people, for he is also talking to Timothy, and we know he is already BAPTISED and SAVED! So we know that he is speaking of Salvation as some mythical future event, namely the day of our RESURRECTION – WHICH IS NOT THE DAY OF OUR SALVATION!!
This is also proof that Hymenaeus and Philetus were not teaching another Gospel! (See notes below).
(KJV) It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him.
2 Timothy 2:11 (KJV) It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him:
2 Timothy 2:11 Notes: Notice how the obfuscation continues with no expounding of HOW WE DIE WITH HIM, and how we are raised as new beings from the watery grave! This is because he doesn’t want us to know, other than misleading us into thinking that salvation is not until The Resurrection = a heinous blasphemy.
Again, if this is Paul has he suffered a serious memory lapse?:
Romans 6:4 (MCV) Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism (full immersion) into death: that like as The Messiah – The Anointed was raised up from the dead by The Glory of The Father, even so we also should walk in newness of Life as Spirit indwelled new men and women.
(KJV) If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us:
2 Timothy 2:12 (KJV) If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us:
2 Timothy 2:12 Notes: To whom is he speaking here? If they are born of Yah Christians, are they about to deny Yashua Messiah, and is suffering all that is required to be entitled to reign with Him? Yet again no mention of Baptism, and what of Christians who don’t suffer? Are they excluded!?
(KJV) If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.
2 Timothy 2:13 (KJV) If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.
2 Timothy 2:13 Notes: Why would we: “believe not?” What’s this nonsense all about? Again, who is he speaking to, and why would Yashua Messiah ever have a need to deny Himself? If someone doesn’t believe it means The Father hasn’t called them to Yashua Messiah, and He’s not going to lose any sleep over them, He’s only interested in those The Father has called!:
Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And the Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the hidden ways of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN.
(KJV) Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers.
2 Timothy 2:14 (KJV) Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers.
2 Timothy 2:14 Notes: Here we go again, what’s it all about with all these words? Are these words all about confusing The Resurrection with Salvation, that we have already exposed him of doing?
(KJV) Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV) Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
2 Timothy 2:15 Notes: So what have we got going on here: looks like we’re WORKING to show ourselves approved unto Yah, so that we need not feel ashamed! I wonder what happened to Grace?
And ‘rightly dividing’ The Sayings of Yah! I’d no idea that Yah’s Sayings needed dividing, unless one had a forked tongue, and it was one’s mission to deceive! But then that’s just what the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion has got, and does do, for it is a stranger to The Truth.
(KJV) But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
2 Timothy 2:16 (KJV) But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
2 Timothy 2:16 Notes: Do not be deceived, for this forger is the creature of vain babblings and profanities, and he uses his favourite word: godliness = piety to let us know where he is coming from, only with an ‘un’ prefix to disguise it = un-piety or un-piousness. From his perspective, this word has nothing to do with wickedness, it means un-religious, and a definite no no in his book, for his sanctimonious religion must be maintained at all times.
(KJV) And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; 18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
2 Timothy 2:17-18 (KJV) and their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; 18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
2 Timothy 2:17-18 Notes: Now here is a serious test for you: 1) We have already ascertained that this author is a forger and blasphemer and 2) he refers to our RESURRECTION as the day of our Salvation, so 3) what if Hymenaeus and Philetus were saying that the day of our Salvation is past already, that is, the day of our Baptism and gifting of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit,and not that The Resurrection was past already?
THINK ABOUT IT! How on earth could our Resurrections be already past? How do you pass yourself off as a Resurrected Spirit Being when you’re still a flesh and blood being, and still bleed, and can die? You can’t; it’s a nonsense, hence we have our forger gaslighting those he has accused!
They were most likely countering this forger’s heresy by saying that Salvation was already passed if Baptism and gifting of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit had taken place. So our Salvation could easily be past IF we believed in Baptism and gifting of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, as a standard requirement for Salvation! Which we can confidently presume our forger didn’t believe in!
He then falsely accuses them of saying the day of our Resurrection has already passed because that’s what HE erroneously believes.
This probably proves that infant water sprinkling was now the order of the day in his budding Hellenised fake church!
To sum up and, by default, we have our liar and forger claiming that the day of our Resurrection is our day of Salvation, so he makes the catastrophic error of miss-labelling what Hymenaeus, Alexander and Philetus were saying in order to paint himself in the right, and they in the wrong.
(KJV) Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
2 Timothy 2:19 (KJV) Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
2 Timothy 2:19 Notes: He then goes into self-righteous defence and overdrive mode by claiming that he is one of chosen ones, when nothing could be further from The Truth. He then lets it be known that Hymenaeus and Philetus were using Yashuah Messiah’s name in what they were declaring, so what does that tell us!? Quite simply that they were declaring The Truth, and our forger was the liar and deceiver!
(KJV) But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth; and some to honour, and some to dishonour.
2 Timothy 2:20 (KJV) But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth; and some to honour, and some to dishonour.
2 Timothy 2:20 Notes: Now I have always been suspicious of this verse, that’s long before I knew what I know now. So what is this ‘great house’ that our forger is attempting to reveal to us here? What does it refer to? Well it may come as no surprise that there is only one other verse that mentions a ‘great house’ in the KJV:
Amos 6:11 (MCV) For, behold, The Yahavah commandeth, and He will smite the ‘great house’ with breaches, and the little house with clefts.
So it doesn’t look too good for this ‘great house’ does it? Would it be because our forger has a Basilica, in his mind’s eye, planned for the future, in Rome!? Not only that, but with gold and silver for the occupants and, of course, the riff raff left with the earth and some wood = “You will own nothing, and be happy!”
(KJV) If a man therefore purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the master’s use, and prepared unto every good work.
2 Timothy 2:21 (KJV) If a man therefore purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the master’s use, and prepared unto every good work.
2 Timothy 2:21 Notes: Oh yes, you can’t beat a good bit of SELF motivated PURGING, and all of the SELF to make him a vessel unto ‘honour’! I wonder if he invited Yashua Messiah along, with His Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, to enjoy the spectacle.
(KJV) Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.
2 Timothy 2:22 (KJV) Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.
2 Timothy 2:22 Notes: What kind of a heart does a born of Yah Christian have, but a pure heart?:
1 John 3:3 (MCV) And every man THAT HATH THIS HOPE IN HIM purifieth himself, even as HE IS PURE.
How pure do you want your heart to be!
(KJV) But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes.
2 Timothy 2:23 (KJV) But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes.
2 Timothy 2:23 Notes: Make sure your questions are not dumb questions, for this elitist man of the Hellenised Religion has no time or patience for pertinent questions that will most likely expose his religious fraud.
(KJV) And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,
2 Timothy 2:24 (KJV) And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,
2 Timothy 2:24 Notes: Notice how he manipulates his budding cult followers by invoking The Yahavah’s name, by making them compliant (gentle), and not troublesome with naturally inquisitive questions. The Truth fears no searching questions! So what has he got to hide!?
(KJV) In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
2 Timothy 2:25 (KJV) In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
2 Timothy 2:25 Notes: Ah here’s a sneaky move: they’re now opposing themselves, are they? just because they declare The Truth that Salvation is past, if they’re Baptised and gifted with the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit. He then invokes Yah’s name to compound his deception.
(KJV) And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.
2 Timothy 2:26 (KJV) And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.
2 Timothy 2:26 Notes: Ha ha, he then fakes his concern for them by hoping they will believe his Hellenising Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious bogus non-Gospel and escape the snare of The Adversary, when it is he that is laying the snare with his Resurrection is Salvation blasphemous nonsense.
On to 2 Timothy 3:
In Yashua Messiah’s Set Apart name
Messenger Charles
1. 1 Corinthians 9:24-27 Did The Messenger Paul Bring His Body Into Subjection?
Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity; Eastern (Russian & Greek) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity; AngliCAINism is NOT Christianity; PROTESTantism is NOT Christianity.
3. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
Now this last chapter of 1 Timothy reverts to genuine sounding Scripture, but do not be deceived, for it is still of a forger’s hand, and not of Paul’s hand. How do you know that? I hear you ask! EASY! Because the give away words ‘GODLINESS’, ‘DOCTRINE’ and ‘POTENTATE’ are in their muddying the waters. These meaningless religious words, alone, tell you it was written by a Hellenising philosopher, a creature of satanic RELIGION, and not a man indwelt of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit’ and a born of Yah Christian like Paul!
It is also addressed to a body of people of questionable character. There may be some true believers amongst them, but in the main they are suspect with them being plagued with wealth and all the sins that go with it.
These are the issues we have to consider:
1) Due to the three dreaded words, as mentioned, we cannot rely upon them as being bona-fide Scriptures.
2) We cannot see them as speaking for us, as True followers of Yashua Messiah, for this author is a usurper and a subversive; faking his Christianity!
3) This means we are dealing with an agent who is speaking for a counterfeit concept and bogus Hellenised religious body, who is actively giving true believers a bad name – see verses 3 – 6;
4) He then changes the thrust of his message by sounding sincere with his sickly pious words – see verses 7 – 8. Godliness (wretched piety) being the give away. There is no such Christian concept as GODLINESS = PIETY!
5) He then compounds his error by his judgemental admission that regenerated Christians are capable of various nefarious sins: “But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.” verses 9 – 10.
How many true Christians do you know that are rich? Is it common policy for The Father to call wealthy sons and daughters, only for them to be ensnared by the temptations of filthy lucre and hurtful lusts? What happened to: “Deliver us from evil!” NO! So what is he on about? Answer: His new religion, whereby there will be members who are filthy rich and will succumb to myriad temptations and hurtful lusts, because they are counterfeiters!
6) We then get three verses of what seem to be sound verses – verses 10, 11 and 12, but I am not convinced, and none the more for that will leave them be –see notes.
7) Verses 13 and 14 are not words that I would use, but I suppose they make him look good.
8) Verse 15 – Potentate? What kind of a word is that? It sounds ROMAN CATHOLIC to me! And I am right, but what is it doing in an English Bible? See notes.
9) In verse 16 we have a the usual misunderstanding about The Light. Whether this is a translator error, or a forger error, I have no idea, but knowing the forger’s track record I know where I would place my money, if I were a gambler! See notes.
10) Then in verse 17 we get a CHARGE = A COMMAND! He likes to chuck his weight around this forger, instead of merely instructing and teaching his learners. See notes.
11) In verses 18 and 19 we have a religious verses posing as a genuine verses!
12) Followed by more proof that he was writing to a bunch of counterfeiters in verses 20 and 21.
Chapter 6
There will be no MCV verses for this chapter, as I see it as a pointless exercise.
1 Timothy 6:1-2 (KJV) Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honour, that the name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed. 2 And they that have believing masters, let them not despise them, because they are brethren; but rather do them service, because they are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things teach and exhort.
1 Timothy 6:1-2 Notes: Interesting how we have blessings referred to as benefits, as if some gift of government! And no mention of obtaining your freedom if at all possible!
1 Timothy 6:3 (KJV) If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;
1 Timothy 6:3 Notes: Who’s wholesome words? And then he has the effrontery of saying they’re Yashua Messiah’s Sayings, according to GODLINESS, which is an insult, for it is religious mumbo jumbo and cannot be Yashua Messiah’s words!
1 Timothy 6:4 (KJV) He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,
1 Timothy 6:4 Notes: He then goes into a tirade of accusations that apply to him and his reprobate followers! for there can be no questions asked of suspect words like GODLINESS = religious gobbledegook. No Berean attitudes allowed in this church! Ask yourself this: if he was preaching the Sayings of Yah would there be any questions at all.
1 Timothy 6:5 (KJV) Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.
1 Timothy 6:5 Notes: He then goes into another tirade of accusing them of being seekers of GODLINESS through gain! Why would anyone seek ‘PIETY through gain’ unless they were as counterfeit as him! Who has allowed these religious wretches into their group?
1 Timothy 6:6 (KJV) But godliness with contentment is great gain.
1 Timothy 6:6 Notes: Get a load of this for confirmation! “But religious piety with self-satisfied contentment is great gain” Oh really, is that so!? A self-righteous charter if ever heard one.
1 Timothy 6:7-8 (KJV) For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. 8 And having food and raiment let us be therewith content.
1 Timothy 6:7-8 Notes: These are verses with some semblance of Truth, but the agenda behind them is still that of RELIGION, and him building his Hellenised edifice! (See link No. 1 below).
1 Timothy 6:9 (KJV) But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.
1 Timothy 6:9 Notes: My question here is this: what are they doing in this group IF they are professing to be True Christians, yet at the same time rolling in filthy lucre? Does this wretch not know that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of needle than for a wealthy man to enter The Kingdom of Yah:
Matthew 19:24 (MCV) And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into The Kingdom of Yah.
1 Timothy 6:10 (KJV) For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
1 Timothy 6:10 Notes: Here he opens with a Truth, but one wonders what he’s talking about when he has so many filthy lucre loving members in his group. He’s obviously one of those who speaks out of both sides of his mouth at the same time! Down crying the numerous members with money, who are funding his money making church, and at the same time accusing them of behaving as any wealthy man would behave!
1 Timothy 6:11 (KJV) But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.
1 Timothy 6:11 Notes: Then he tries to hoodwink us with trite words, but with an unhealthy dollop of…………you guessed it! GODLINESS!! = Piety!!
1 Timothy 6:12-13 (KJV) Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses. 13 I give thee charge in the sight of God, who quickeneth all things, and before Christ Jesus, who before Pontius Pilate witnessed a good confession;
1 Timothy 6:12-13 Notes: Here he tries to redeem himself with more feigned sincerity. He does this with yet more fine words that you might consider genuine and Truthful, but you would 100% wrong. You see, he uses generalised statements like: “who quickeneth all things,” when Yah does no such thing, He only quickens those that He is calling!
1 Timothy 6:14 (KJV) That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ:
1 Timothy 6:14 Notes: Now he’s into writing new commandments, as he sees fit, as you do when you’re building a mickey mouse religion. All this, of course, is all based upon Graceless Commandment obeying; (see link No. 2 below).
1 Timothy 6:15 (KJV) Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;
1 Timothy 6:15 Notes: Now what have we got here: a Mr Potentate, no less? Which means Yashuah Messiah now has a Roman Catholic position of authority, and it looks like it precedes that of ROYALTY and Kingliness! WHO COULD THAT BE I WONDER! From the Etymology online dictionary:
“POTENTATE c. 1400, potentat, “a ruler, lord, prince, monarch; person who possesses independent power or sway,” from Old French potentat and directly from Late Latin potentatus “a ruler,” also “political power,” from Latin potentatus “might, power, rule, dominion,” from potentem (nominative potens) “powerful,” from potis “powerful, able, capable; possible;” of persons, “better, preferable; chief, principal; strongest, foremost,” from PIE root *poti- “powerful; lord.”
1 Timothy 6:16 (KJV) Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.
1 Timothy 6:16 Notes: Notice the gargantuan gaff in this verse: Yashua Messiah is THE LIGHT, so He doesn’t dwell in the light, as if it was coming from somewhere or someone else, as our forger would no doubt like us to believe.
1 Timothy 6:17 (KJV) Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy;
1 Timothy 6:17 Notes: Here we go again with him ‘charging’ or ‘commanding’ those who are filthy rich, and who put their trust in said riches. Well what does he expect when Yashuah Messiah Himself drew the analogy about camels and eyes of needles!
1 Timothy 6:18-19 (KJV) That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate; 19 Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life.
1 Timothy 6:18-19Notes: What born of Yah Christian doesn’t do good works? What born of Yah Christian has not already laid hold of Eternal Life? It looks like we’re earning Eternal Life, too. There also seems to be a very strong emphasis on financial gain in this chapter which makes me very suspicious of the motives behind it.
1 Timothy 6:20-21 (KJV) O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
1 Timothy 6:20-21 Notes: All the vain Hellenised religious babblings are his! Then he compounds his dissembling by yet more deflections of accusations against those challenging his religious nonsense!
That’s it for this wretched book – the expose continues in 2 Timothy.
I do hope that you are enjoying your journey of discovery regarding these Epistles, for it has been very challenging, to say the least, especially if you were, like me in the past, one who was delusionally very sure of their genuineness.
So without further ado let’s press on, for this chapter is even more tricky than the preceding chapters, in that it needs to be looked at from both angles, to see if it works from a genuine perspective or a forger’s perspective.
Like these people here:
1 (MCV) Now the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit speaks distinctly, that in the last days some shall depart from The Faith, giving heed to the seducing spirits of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with their teachings of The Adversary;
2 (MCV) Speaking lies in hypocrisy (those of The Synagogue of Satan); having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
John 6:65-68 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that revelation many of His Learners went back, and walked no more with Him.
1 Timothy 4:1-2 (KJV) Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from The Faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; 2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
1 Timothy 4:1-2 Notes — (a) Now what do we have here? For if this forger is a Hellenising philosopher, (and I think we can be fairly sure of that, based upon all the proof I have provided in my notes on 1 Timothy chapters 1, 2 and 3), then we cannot take these verses as written, and apply them as if written about The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit (The Holy Spirit). Therefore, by default, we’re dealing with another spirit. So let’s take a closer look:
1) We have a Spirit, but not called The Set Apart Exclusive (Holy) Spirit which: “speaks expressly,” this word should be ‘distinctly’; 2) and this term ‘speaks expressly’ can be found nowhere else in The KJV Bible; 3) To whom is this spirit speaking? Is it supposed to be Timothy? for we know from my article: “Exposing The Trinity Lie” (see link No. 1 below) that Yashua Messiah is the Comforter and that HE speaks to us through His Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, so it’s never the Set Apart Exclusive speaking of its own volition. So this verse is telling us that the forger is also a Trinitarian, which Paul was not – so no surprises there then (see link No. 2 below).
1 Timothy 4:1-2 Notes — (b) We then have him talking about people leaving The Faith! but what faith is he alluding to? For if it’s his bogus religious faith, that is, his faith in his Hellenising Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION, the people he will be referring to as ‘leavers’ are True Believers, who have sussed out his religious humbug and are leaving in order to protect themselves from his doctrines of devils.
However, if genuine, these verses are prophetically true if we’re speaking of the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, and not another spirit, so they could be Paul’s plagiarised words, and used by the forger to give his work some validity, so this passage could be taken either way.
3 (MCV) Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from certain foods, which Yah hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know The Truth.
4 (MCV) For every creature of Yah is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
5 (MCV) For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
1 Timothy 4:3-5 (KJV) Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know The Truth. 4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: 5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
1 Timothy 4:3–5 Notes — (a) Then we have a dig at the future Roman Cult with their enforced celibacy for their fake priests, followed by a dig at the Canaanite Jews with their Judaising, law obeying, dietary rituals. So these verses could be from Paul’s hand and used by the forger for his own ends.
6 (MCV) If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good servant of Yashua Messiah, nourished up in The Sayings of Faith and of sound teaching, whereunto thou hast progressed.
1 Timothy 4:6 (KJV) If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained.
1 Timothy 4:6 Notes — (a) I have no issues with verse 6, and I have edited it for my MCV version.
7 (MCV) But refuse heathen and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness.
8 (MCV) For bodily exercise profiteth little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.
1 Timothy 4:7-8 (KJV) But refuse profane and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness. 8 For bodily exercise profiteth little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.
1 Timothy 4:7-8 Notes — (a) Here we get another dig at the Canaanite Jews: “With their Talmud being stuffed full of the most ridiculous and profane fables that ever disgraced the human intellect.” – Adam Clarke’s Commentary.
1 Timothy 4:7-8 Notes — (b) We then have use of that wretched religious word ‘godliness = piety’ once more, which I dealt with earlier – please revise if you’re not sure. I have therefore removed it from my MCV Bible as it is just irrelevant religious nonsense.
9 (MCV) This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation.
1 Timothy 4:9 (KJV) This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation.
1 Timothy 4:9 Notes — (a) Is this verse referring to the preceding verses or those that follow? If it’s the preceding verses I would refer you to my comments above for your consideration.
1 Timothy 4:9 Notes — (b) If it’s referring to the verses that follow, then I will refer you to my article: “Why Are There Two Resurrections?” (see link No. 3 below).
10 (MCV) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living Yahavah Yashua Messiah, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe, (again see link No. 3 below).
11 (MCV) These things instruct and teach.
1 Timothy 4:10-11 (KJV) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. 11 These things command and teach.
1 Timothy 4:10-11 Notes — (a) Again, these verses are fine, but always remembering that they are referring to the forger’s future plans of building a counterfeit religious edifice known as the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion and not Yashua Messiah’s true Ecclesia. This is one of those numerous occasions where his narrative fits both scenarios – the genuine and the fake.
12 (MCV) Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example to the believers, in sayings, in behaviour, in agape Love, in the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, in Faith, in sexual purity.
13 (MCV) Till I come, give attendance to vain book learning, to piteous begging and to doctrinal nonsense.
14 (MCV) Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy (nonsense), with the laying on of the hands (no mention of baptism) of the presbytery (the Nicolaitan court – religious hierarchies).
15 (MCV) Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them; that thy profiting may appear to all.
16 (MCV) Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.
1 Timothy 4:12-16 (KJV) Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity. 13 Till I come, give attendance to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine. 14 Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery. 15 Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them; that thy profiting may appear to all. 16 Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.
1 Timothy 4:12-16 Notes — (a) OK, I have lumped these last five verses together due to the fact that they’re all Hellenising religious hogwash verses – they are nothing but religious humbug!
They start off with Paul allegedly advising Timothy who, again allegedly, is a youth, when earlier Paul was alleged to have said “DO NOT MAKE A NOVICE A DEACON”!!! So what kind of inconsistency and duplicity is this? if we’re expected to believe that Timothy, as a youth, was appointed to be a messenger along side Paul!? Then we get supposed exhortations from Paul to Timothy telling him how to behave? I mean, come on!! Is this fella a born of Yah Christian or not? or is Paul now telling him to observe the basics as if he is a novice and knows NOTHING!!
1 Timothy 4:12-16 Notes — (b) Oh yes, then we get a religious jargon humdinger: “give attendance to reading” Oh yeah? reading what? I might ask. Easy, his favourite Hellenising philosopher. If this was supposed to be an instruction to read The Scriptures, Paul would have said that, and would have been specific, but he wasn’t! However, it wasn’t Paul for he didn’t write this religious philosophical garbage.
1 Timothy 4:12-16 Notes — (c) “Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery.” Given thee BY WHAT!? Take note: The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit is given to us by The Yahhead, either by The Father or Yashua Messiah, not by prophecy. This event may have been prophesied, but that is not the determining factor. Baptism comes FIRST and then the laying on of hands, and they are the determining factors. Oh and how do we neglect the gift that is in us? Who is in charge here? I won’t event bother mentioning the word ‘presbytery’ for that silly religious word speaks for itself.
1 Timothy 4:12-16 Notes — (d) in verse 15 we get use of the word ‘meditation’ but they forgot the Yoga!! LOL. OK I’m being deliberately facetious here, but I am sure you get my drift. Finally in verse 16 we then get the coffin nail give away: “for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.”
Hey guys, we now have nothing to worry about, for WE ARE saving ourselves, and those that hear us!! Boy! I had no idea that we were that powerful! – NOT!
Now this verse in 1 Corinthians 15 is very interesting, but not for reasons that you might at first imagine for, in my opinion, this is not a Scripture at all, and yet there it is in the penultimate chapter of 1 Corinthians. This is a bogus verse, having already caused many, many, many hours of wasted time for Bible scholars of all denominations (demon-inations), who have spent those hours trying to explain it, but failing every time, NEVER coming to a satisfactory conclusion. Quite a few of them refer to it as the most perplexing and difficult verse to understand in all the writings of Paul, even in the whole of the New Testament. So when I read these views in their papers my Spiritual antennae went into overdrive, and they flashed their helpful warning lights at me.
This means that I immediately ceased doing by own research on this nonsensical verse, resulting in only three or four hours of wasted time. However, it was still three of four hours of precious time that I could have used more productively, now that I am embroiled in writing my own version of the Set Apart Scriptures, which, as you can imagine, is a mammoth task, even with the assistance of computer technology.
So, as is my want, let’s copy and paste the culprit verse here from one or seven Bible Versions; starting with my version – The MCV, followed by the KJV, The Greek Transliteral, The Scriptures 2009, The Good News Bible, The Phillips NT and The Amplified Bible:
1 Corinthians 15:29 (MCV) Else what shall they do, that is, those which are Baptised for the Spiritually dead, if the dead rise not at all? And why are they then Baptised for their sake?
1 Corinthians 15:29 (KJV) Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?
1 Corinthians 15:29 (The Greek Transliteral) Else (any) what? They-shall-be-doing the ones-being-baptised for-sake-of dead-ones if absolutely (wholly) dead-ones not are-being-roused why also they-are-being baptised for-sake-of them.
1 Corinthians 15:29 (The Scriptures 2009) Otherwise, what shall they do who are immersed for the dead, if the dead are not raised at all? Why indeed are they immersed for the dead?
1 Corinthians 15:29 (Good News Bible) Now, what about those people who are baptized for the dead? What do they hope to accomplish? If it is true, as some claim, that the dead are not raised to life, why are those people being baptized for the dead?
1 Corinthians 15:29 (The Phillips NT) Further, you should consider this, that if there is to be no resurrection what is the point of some of you being baptised for the dead by proxy? Why should you be baptised for dead bodies?
1 Corinthians 15:29 (The Amplified Bible) Otherwise, what will those do who are being baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people even baptized for them?
Right, first question! What is this satanic drivel all about? Answer: Baptism for the sake of the dead, whether they are Spiritually dead, or completely dead, is what it’s all about!
How is that even a thing? How is it Scriptural? And why is Paul even mentioning it? when it’s not Scriptural, for NO ONE can be Baptised for the sake of another man or woman, whether they are Spiritually dead or completely dead. The whole thing is ludicrous, and 100% erroneous, so why is this verse in 1 Corinthians 15? And why has Paul not exposed it for what it is?
In the previous verses we have this:
1 Corinthians 15:23-28 But each man in his own order: The Messiah – The Anointed being the first-fruits; afterwards they that are The Messiah’s – The Anointed’s at His coming to be near at hand. 24 Then cometh the end, when He shall have delivered up The Kingdom to Yah The Father; when He shall have neutered, and rendered useless, all ruling principalities, and all authorities and power structures on this earth. 25 For He must Reign and rule His Kingdom with a Royal Sceptre of iron, till He hath put all His enemies under His feet. 26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 27 For The Father hath put all things under His Son’s feet. But when The Father says: “All things have been put into subjection under my Son,” it is clear that The Father, who put all things in subjection under Him, is excepted, because The Father is not in subjection to His own Son. 28 And when all things shall be subjected unto The Son, then shall The Son also Himself be subject unto The Father that put all things under Him, that Yah The Father may be all in all.
Notice how verse 29 starts, for it reads as if it is a continuation of what’s been written before in the previous verse….else what shall they do?…. Yet this short opening phrase bears no relation to verse 28 at all!
Notice also the subject matter of the whole passage, for it has NOTHING to do with Baptism, let alone Baptism for the sake of others, so what’s going on? This thing has echoes of the other examples of spurious additions to the KJV I have revealed in the past: (see link Nos. 1, 2 & 3 below).
OK, so let’s see one or two examples of what these Bible scholars say:
From the: “For What Saith The Scriptures” web page, which I do not recommend:
“This is probably the most mysterious verse in all of the Pauline epistles—yea, in all the Bible. I doubt there is a person on earth who could fully explain it.”
He’s probably right, and that’s why it’s in there. For me, this verse stinks of sabotage and subversion by satanic Hellenising religious philosophers of the late first century and early second century AC, who wanted to mock Baptism. Plus to generally confuse believers on a huge scale and bog them down in endless research, studies and debates.
Look folks, I’ll tell you straight, just web search this verse and witness the number of web sites all attempting their silly meaningless explanations, when all the while no explanation exists, and is totally impossible to unravel – it’s a trap, or what they call today, in the modern vernacular, a ‘sting operation’! It can also be likened to an ‘Alice in Wonderland’ or ‘Through The Looking Glass’ blind rabbit hole, which leads us nowhere = the obvious intention of the saboteurs from the start!
Needless to say The Mormons (The Church of Latter Day Saints) are big on this verse and practise Baptism for the dead.
So were there any examples of this phenomenon in The Assemblies of Yah in Paul’s day? No, of course not, but certain pagan heathen water rituals were not unheard of.
From Wikipedia we get this:
“Baptism for the dead is mentioned in 1 Corinthians 15:29 as proof of a physical resurrection, though the exact meaning of the phrase is an open question among scholars. The plainest reading of the Greek text suggests vicarious baptisms performed by the living on behalf of the deceased, but some scholars dispute whether Paul approved of the practice or whether the verse truly refers to an actual physical practice among early Christians. Early heresiologists Epiphanius of Salamis (Panarion 28) and Chrysostom (Homilies 40) attributed the practice respectively to the Cerinthians and to the Marcionites, whom they identified as heretical “Gnostic” groups, while Ambrosiaster and Tertullian affirmed that the practice was legitimate and found among the New Testament Christians (though Tertullian later recanted his original beliefs in his later life as he became associated with Montanism)”
In this little piece we can see another reason for this satanic verse, that is, they have used it in a pathetic attempt to try and prove their blasphemous PHYSICAL resurrection garbage, when The Resurrection is a SPIRITUAL resurrection (see link No. 4 below). We then get a connection to Marcion and the Gnostics, who, apparently, practised this satanic ritual.
Next we have this Cerinthus creature who was a Serpent Seed Canaanite Jew, and active in the apostate Hellenised church…. (see link No. 5 below):
Cerinthus:
“One of a sect of early heretics, followers of Cerinthus, a Jew believed to have been born before the crucifixion, and one of the first heresiarchs in the (counterfeit) church. (Brackets mine)
“One of an ancient religious sect, so called from Cerinthus, a Jew, who attempted to unite the doctrines of Christ with the opinions of the Jews and Gnostics.”
….along with, the religious criminal Tertullian who, surprise surprise, also practised this blasphemous ritual – he seems to pop up everywhere, and always where there are evil shenanigans going on. My file on this reprobate is growing considerably, and I might even have enough evidence for an article on him alone. Watch this space.
OK I think that just about wraps it up. If you want to do more research on it, feel free, and also leave a comment, but I have wasted too much time on it already, and will happily strike it through when I publish 1 Corinthians in my MCV version.
In Yashua Messiah’s Set Apart name
Messenger Charles
1. Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons and Daughters of Yah Have To Obey Secular or Religious Authorities?:
Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity; Eastern (Russian & Greek) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity; AngliCAINism is NOT Christianity; PROTESTantism is NOT Christianity.
5. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
Now this article should really be Part 5 of my series of articles: “Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil, Or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?” (See link No.1 below), so I will be adding it to that page, whilst leaving this article as a stand alone article. Moreover, I have dealt with this subject within that series of articles, but due to my having discovered more proof and evidence, this week commencing 13th February 2022, that shows that Genesis 4:1 in its KJV rendering is 100% bunkum and hogwash. It therefore behoved me to share this additional Truth about the damnable translation of this verse.
Here is the bogus verse in question, as written in the KJV:
Genesis 4:1 (KJV) And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from The Lord.
OK, so let me make this known first of all, for this will be mostly the work of a man by the name of Clifton A. Emahiser who was knowledgable in THE SEEDLINE DOCTRINE, as it is known by some, but not by me, I call it The Two Seeds Truth. Moreover, he wasn’t correct in all his teaching, which I will reveal in another article. So here are his opening remarks on Genesis 4:1:
“THE PROBLEM WITH GENESIS 4:1
“Many may reply, “I didn’t know there was a question concerning that verse.” Unless one understands that the Hebrew is badly corrupted on this passage, he will, like most everyone else who has ever read it, arrive at a mistaken conclusion. Before we start an evaluation to discover the ramifications, let’s read it according to the KJV: “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
“Genesis 4:1 is probably one of the most misunderstood verses in the Bible. This is really an understatement of fact to say the least. On the understanding of this verse, lies the entire theme of the Bible. Actually Genesis 3:15 is the main theme of the Bible, but without a correct understanding of Genesis 4:1, the theme becomes muddled and confused!Therefore it is of the utmost importance that one gain an understanding of this verse or the entire Bible will remain a mystery! It is with this thought, that the object of this Bible study is to completely master this passage so that the story of the Bible can be opened up to us in all of its splendour and brilliance.”
Later, he then goes on to say:
“It would appear, if this were the only verse in the Bible that had anything to say about this matter of the birth of Cain, and if the King James version of the Bible were the only version of the Bible we had, that we would have to accept the fact that Adam was the father of Cain. You see, here is the problem, Adam was not the father of Cain! Not only are the “Jews” of today not of Adam, but they know themselves they are descended from Cain. Let’s see who the “Jew” admits himself to be. In the “Jewish” publication Liberal Judaism, January, 1949, there is an article entitled, “Liberal Judaism and Israel” written by one of their greatest and most renowned Rabbis, Dr. Abba Hillel Silver. Dr. Silver, writing about the then new State of Israel says:
{“’ … the third commonwealth of the Jewish Nation is thus an accomplished fact. The State of Israel exists.
{“’As a result the concept of the wandering Jew is bound eventually to disappear along with the term (galut) exile. All nations send forth immigrants to all parts of the world. People are continually moving from one country to another, and change their citizenship, but they are not regarded as exiles.
{“’This fact alone – the end of national exile for the Jewish people, as such —is destined to affect favourably the psyche of the Jew throughout the world. It will endow the Jew, wherever he lives, with a self respect and a sense of security, a normal tone, long-wanting in Jewish experience. For the curse of Cain, the curse of being an outcast and a “wanderer” over the face of the earth has been removed …’”}
So here, Emahiser, in using this quote from Rabbi Silver, has proven to us that the Jews KNOW WHO THEY ARE, and that they definitely KNOW who they are descended from, and, just as they knew in the first century, when they lied to Yashua Messiah our future King, when they claimed that: “They were not born of fornication”.
John 8:40-41 (MCV) But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you The Truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to Him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
Notice, that they did not say they have Abraham as their father, they went straight to The Garden event claiming to be sons of Adam – a part of God’s creation, and thereby denied (they lied) that they were the Devil’s sons through Cain.
For further evidence, we now go to the immense work called “The Interpreter’s Bible”, which I only learned of at the commencement of this study. The Interpreter’s Bible, is a twelve volume work of 36 editors who worked together in order to produce it. It is available online at this web address:
“Cain seems originally to have been the ancestor of the Kenites … The meaning of the name is ‘metalworker’ or ‘smith’; here, however, it is represented as a derivation of a word meaning ‘acquire’, ‘get’ — one of the popular etymologies frequent in Genesis — hence the mother’s words I have gotten a man. ‘From the Lord’ (KJV) is a rendering, following the Septuagint (LXX) and Vulgate., of ’eth Yahweh, which is literally, ‘with Yahweh’, and so unintelligible here (the help of [RSV] is not in the Hebrew). It seems probable that ’eth should be ’oth — so, ‘the mark of Yahweh’ — and that the words are a gloss …”
Did you notice that? As Genesis 4:1 is written in the KJV it is taken from the Hebrew term ‘Eth Yahweh’ meaning ‘with Yahweh’ or better ‘laying with Yahweh in order to conceive’ which, as they have correctly said, is unintelligible or utter nonsense, and it is from this very same nonsense that they conjured up the erroneous term: “I have gotten a man from the Lord.”
This can be firmed up from The Geneva Bible where it states:
Genesis 4:1 (Geneva Bible) Afterward the man knew Eve his wife, which conceived and bare Cain, and said, I have obtained a man by the LORD.
This interpretation clearly leads us to believe that Eve lay with The Lord in order to conceive, which has already been declared here as preposterous. However, at the same time, it is also telling us that Eve definitely conceived by someone other than Adam!
If we now go to the other writings that I used to support The Truth in my original article, and post them here, we’ll see how they make even more sense now that I have revealed Emahiser’s findings:
First from the Aramaic Targums:
“Genesis 4:1 And the woman saw Sammael, the angel of death, and she was afraid and knew that the tree was good for food, and that it was a remedy for the enlightenment of the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise. She took of its fruit and ate and also gave (it) to her husband and he ate.”
Second from the Aramaic Targum,pseudo-Jonathan:
“Genesis 4:1 Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the Angel (of death) and she became pregnant and bore Cain. And he was like those on high and not like those below. And she said: ‘I have got a man from the angel of the LORD’.”
Third fromthe Targum Onkelos: THE TARGUM OF PALESTINE IV:
“Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Hava (Eve) his wife, who had desired (lusted after) the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Kain; and she said, I have acquired a man, (from) the angel of the Lord. And she added to bear from her husband Adam his twin, (superfetation) even Habel (Abel). And Habel was a shepherd of the flock, but Kain was a man working in the earth. (All brackets mine)
Fourth from the Rabbinic work of Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer: (See link below.)
“Genesis 4:1 And she saw that his likeness was not of earthly beings, but of the heavenly beings, and she prophesied and said: I have gotten a man from the Lord.”
So there we have it, Eve NEVER said “I have gotten a man from the Lord” but rather: “I have gotten a man from the angel of death – The Serpent Creature!!”
I will add further articles to this series as I am sure more evidence will reveal itself.
In Yashua Messiah’s Set Apart name
Messenger Charles
1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
This is a three part series of articles, with Parts 1 and 2 here, that I wrote several years ago, in April 2008, to be precise, and now edited and tweaked to bring them into line with my added knowledge. However, what I will say is that they needed very little in the way of tweaking in order to improve them, and bring them up to date, so what you see here is pretty much the same as I wrote 14 years ago.
So to the question: well does he? because most of fakestream Christianity, that is, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, (see link No. 6 below) and certainly those outside of ‘Christianity’ thinks he does? It’s one of those numerous blanket issues, both within and without, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Which means both the secular and religious are very fond of this idea, and takes it for granted without question.Sadly, nearly everything they believe is based on the traditions of hu-man beings and men, or the teachings of the hu-man beings and men of religion – Hellenising philosophers and Judaisers alike, so it’s no wonder they don’t understand.
Mark 7:9 (MCV) And He said unto them, Full well ye reject The Commandment of Yah, that ye may keep your own tradition.
So does fallen mankind have free will? Did he ever have free will? Did Adam and Eve, before they fell, have free will? Now these are very interesting questions, are they not? There are also some other questions that come out of these first questions: If Adam and Eve did have free will, did The Yahhead take bets from the angels on which way they would turn, if so, where did They lay their bets off!!?? (OK only joking) Furthermore, did the Yahhead take a big risk and leave it all to chance, or was it an accidental flaw in their plans of the creation of Adam and Eve – a calamitous mistake?? If They did take a big risk or make a big mistake, we have to imagine They had a plan B or even a plan C, that They would quickly implement, in a state of panic, as a rear guard defensive manoeuvre in order to prop things up. Was that the case? LOL
Was the fall of Adam and Eve something that took the Yahhead by surprise? Was it a grand game of pot luck or lucky dip, or was it a case of: Did the Yahhead plan to ‘fail’, for want of a better expression? Perhaps a better way of putting it would be: Did The Yahhead create Adam and Eve knowing, in advance and full well, that they would fall at their first hurdle? Or, in other words, did the Yahhead plan it the way it happened? OK, let’s see if we can answer these questions?
Genesis 2:7 (MCV) And The YAHAVAH Yah formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. (See link No. 1 below)
Take note, for the question of ‘free will’ is answered right here in this first Set Apart (Holy) Scripture. It’s so simple, I cannot understand where this idea of man’s free will came from, unless it’s through non-belief in the whole Bible, brought about by the “New Testament Only” people. These are so-called Christians that think that the Old Testament should be deleted from what they call The Canon of Scripture, thus taking away Scriptures like the above that upset them.
Now as we can see, man was not asked if he would like to be created, he was not invited to a business meeting and his opinion and agreement sought!! Believe it or not, though, this is the very basis upon which many ‘Christians’ build their lives as ‘believers’, that is, Yah needs our co-operation in order to be a success!! LOL. This is why they say: “There is no way I can be saved unless ‘I’ accept a Jesus as my saviour,” never mind John 6:44:
John 6:44 (MCV) “NO MANcan come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drawdrag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.”
John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Look what Isaiah had to say on this matter:
Isaiah 29:16 (MCV) Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay: for shall the work say of Him that made it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of Him that framed it, He had no understanding?
Isaiah 64:8 (MCV) But now, O YAHAVAH, thou art our Father; we are the clay, and thou our Potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.
We are the clay, The Yahavah Yah (Yashua Messiah) is The Potter, and we are the work of The Yahavah’s hand, how unambiguous is that!!?? Just where does mankind’s will, free or otherwise, fit in to this scenario or arrangement? As we can plainly see, it doesn’t.
OK, the Garden of Eden scene is nearly complete, just one more character to add: enter The Serpent Creature otherwise known as the Destroyer, or the Author of Ruin and the Author of Lies. He is also known as the Author of Confusion (miscegenation or mixed bloods – see link No. 2 below), The Adversary, the Devil; so many names but with only one purpose – to destroy or wipe mankind, especially non-Jewish White Semitic Israel, from the face of the earth, if he possibly can.
Why is he like that? Easy, Yah (Yashua Messiah) made him that way. If The Yahhead had already planned for Adam and Eve to fall, how were They going to bring it about?
Genesis 3:1 (MCV)Now The Serpent Creature was more subtle (devious, cunning or crafty) than any beast of heavenwhich The YAHAVAHYah HAD MADE.And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath Yah said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? (See link No. 7 below)
There he is folks, that old serpent – The Adversary whom Yah made. Now, should this revelation (apologies to those of you who already know this Truth) shock us? Well yes it should, if, like me in the past, you have always believed what men of religion have taught you, without questioning it. Make no mistake, I came from that very same fold, too, until Yashua Messiah set me free into His Glorious Light and Truth and under His Glorious Grace. So yes it should shock us, but then again, after a further study of His Word, shock turns quickly to: Well I’ll be…..!! How did I ever miss that??
By ‘missing that’, I mean the sons of perdition like the Pharaoh who confronted Moses, and Judas Iscariot who betrayed Yashua Messiah. In both cases the Yahhead hardened the Pharaoh’s heart and Judas’ heart, not The Adversary’s heart. OK, The Adversary played his part in leading Judas astray, but that act of betrayal had to happen and someone had to do it in order for The Scriptures to be fulfilled. Notice, too, that Yashua Messiah was prophesied to fulfil His missionbefore the foundation of the world.
Revelation 13:8 (MCV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, (The Adversary) whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
Exodus 7:2 (MCV) Thou shalt speak all that I command thee: and Aaron thy brother shall speak unto Pharaoh, that he send The Children of Israel out of his land. 3 And I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and multiply my signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt.
John 17:12 (MCV) While I was with them in this age (in the world), I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but The Son of Perdition (Judas); that The Scripture might be fulfilled.
Even before Adam and Eve were created The Yahavah was The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. This means He and the Father Yah knew what was going to happen in the Garden of Eden before it happened. It had to happen the way it did in order that The Scriptures be fulfilled, Yah be glorified and Yashua Messiah become the first and only begotten of The Father – Yah come in the flesh.
Here is an analogy that I now use to great effect: Mankind is like a prisoner and a prisoner can ‘choose’ to be a ‘good’ prisoner and win favour with the prison staff, or he can ‘choose’ to be an evil nasty prisoner, but either way he is still a prisoner with no freedom, so his ‘choices’ are a fantasy and, therefore, so is his imagined free will.
OK, so if man doesn’t have free will, what will does he have? Again that’s easy, he has rebellious will, stubborn will, a carnal will, but none of these wills are free, they’re controlled and manipulated by the one who led our parents astray in the first place – The Serpent Creature – The Adversary.
Therefore, Mankind can either do Yah’s will – but only after The Father has called him/her to His Son Yashua Messiah, or The Adversary’s will. Mankind can have no other wills but these, and one will is imprisonment, bondage, slavery and captivity to sin, and the other is total freedom from sin and death under His Glorious Grace.
It’s no good a man or woman saying “I don’t believe in The Adversary – it’s all hogwash,” as that is all part of The Adversary’s armoury anyway. To get people to think and say he doesn’t exist suits him just fine, and that viewpoint doesn’t make him go away and leave us alone, in fact it encourages him. This world (age) is his world (age) and he is the god of it, but not for much longer.
2 Corinthians 4:4 (MCV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of The Glorious Gospel of The Messiah – The Anointed, who is the image of Yah, should shine unto them.
So there we have it; mankind has no free will other than in his vain imaginations and fantasies.
Part 2 coming right up:
In Yashua Messiah’s name
Messenger Charles
FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It? – Further Proof and Evidence That He Doesn’t.
For those of you who were not convinced or persuaded by my first article on this subject, I thought I would add to it with more proof and evidence. If you haven’t done so, it will help if you read my first article above “Free will – Does Fallen Mankind Have It” before this one. Thank you.
As it happens, someone e-mailed me recently questioning my ‘claims’ that mankind does not have free will. As always, I will remind readers that The Truth is not something that is claimed, it is always something that is declared in confidence or announced as news – the Good News, and then either accepted or rejected. Now this man made his remarks based upon the idea that Paul reasoned with the Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews in the synagogues. Which he did not, please see my soon coming article: “Did The Apostle Paul Reason With The Jews In The Synagogues?” He then went on to say:
“You claimed to refute the idea that Paul reasoned with the Jews, and implied that logical reasoning is evil and worldly. But I ask to you: if reason is evil, then why can Christians use it so effectively to minister to atheists?
Now here he is missing the point or points completely, because there is nothing wrong with reasoning, if it’s accompanied and guided by the indwelling of the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit, but in too many cases it isn’t, and that includes the head knowledge men who translated The Word of Yah into the English of the King James Bible. Now this head knowledge carnal reasoning is the problem, and yes it is evil if it’s applied to The Word of God without the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit. Finally he said:
“However, I do believe that God can use the faculties He has given us to lead us to Himself.”
Here again, we see the fakestream Christian inability or the trinity blindness causing them to be unable to see the Father and The Son as two supreme beings, (see link No. 3 below) not one being, and this is precisely the issue. It’s the Father that leads us, not to Himself, but to His Son – Yashua Messiah and no man or woman can come to Yashua Messiah unless The Father calls us:
John 6:44 (MCV) “No man can come to me, except The Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.”
By this, too, I trust you all understand that the act of salvation is not in the hands of man, but, rather, in the hands of The Father Yah alone and no one else. This is why the fakestream Christian slogans “I have found Jesus” or “I have made a decision for Jesus” or “I have accepted Jesus as my saviour” are not true, they’re just delusional lies. When The Father calls, the answer can only be as it was for Samuel and Jeremiah. In Samuel’s case it was a simple answer “Here am I”.
1 Samuel 3:4 (MCV) That The Yahavah called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.
In Jeremiah’s case it was showing us how predestination works – Jeremiah was always going to be Jeremiah the prophet, come what may, so where was Jeremiah’s free will in this arrangement! It wasn’t, it wasn’t there at all, because Jeremiah didn’t have free will!
Jeremiah 1:4 (MCV) Then the word of The Yahavah came unto me, saying, 5 before I formed thee in the wombI knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb Iset thee apart and sanctified thee; and I bestowed upon thee the honour of being a prophet unto the nations.
He further said:
“I know that you’re probably thinking that those people can’t see your truth because they are incapable of doing so. However, this denies the freewill that is the core of what it is to be human. After all, God “created man in His own image.” If we are created in God’s image (which I am sure you believe) and we lack free will, then that implies that God doesn’t have free will either.
Yes we were created in the image of the Yahhead, but unfortunately this man has forgotten one catastrophic event – man’s fall from the benefits that came with being created in Yah’s image. As you know, man chose (and chose for the last time) to believe a liar instead of his Creator, who told him The Truth, always. Once man fell he lost any freedom he once had, and became a slaveto sin, and fell under the curse of death, as a servant of The Adversary. Again, as you must know slaves and servants just do as they are told, they have no freedom and certainly no freedom to choose, so they have no free will. We have to be set free in order to have free will.
The fallen and lost have a will, yes, but it’s not free, because the only will they can perform is The Adversary’s will, for he is the god of this world (age or its systems) and he deceives the whole world. Carnal Man is in a rebellious frame of mind, continually, against his Creator. Even if man does ‘good’, he is still in the overall fallen condition, for he has the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil within that fallen condition. This means he will sometimes do ‘good’ and sometimes do evil, but he is still fallen and in slavery and/or in bondage to sin = no free will.
John 8:32 (MCV) And ye shall know The Truth, and The Truth shall make you free.
Freedom only comes with being born of Yah (born again). Anyone not born of Yah (born again) is not free, so therefore has no free will. If we say we have free will, what is this real freedom The Yahavah is referring to? Freedom is freedom you cannot have categories or stages of freedom, it’s either freedom or slavery to sin.
I do not make any claims, for The Truth is not something we claim, it is something we declare. Either we have The Truth, or do not have The Truth, so we tell it like it is, that is, through the indwelling of the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit in order for Yashua Messiah to make His home with us. Once this has occurred we can only speak The Truth. Claims are only for Hellenising philosophers, Bible intellectuals, Bible seminary graduates and theologians who do not have the indwelling of the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit.
Moreover, fake Christians can minister to atheists until they are blue in the face, but unless The Father is calling those atheists they will remain atheists.
He further added:
“At the end of your article, you said that those who claim that you were using reason to convince them of reason’s evil were in essence wrong, because they were using reasoning to do so. In doing so, you created a circular logic that comes across as “the only reasoning that is true is that which I declare to be true”–something that has turned many intelligent nonbelievers away from the Lord.”
My ‘reasoning’, as he calls it, only appears circular because reasoning without the indwelling of the Set Apart Exclusive [Holy] Spirit can only be circular. This was the problem the first century Assemblies of Yah (The Ecclesia) had with Hellenising intellectuals with their philosophers who infiltrated The Assemblies – The Ecclesia and corrupted it with their non-gospel. Once born of Yah (born again) His Set Apart Exclusive Spirit joins our spirit and all our reasoning then points in a straight line to Him and is no longer circular.
Romans 8:16 (MCV) The set apart Exclusive Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the sons and daughters of Yah: (Notice that the set apart Exclusive Spirit is an IT! Not a ‘he’ or a ‘him’.)
It’s a Spiritual thing not a reason based logical thing, and this is where so many go wrong within fakestream Christianity (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion).
He then says: “the only reasoning that is true is that which I declare to be true”–something that has turned many intelligent nonbelievers away from the Lord.”
Well this is clearly not true, for The Truth could never turn away anyone The Father is calling to His Son Yashua Messiah, and the response from a genuine newbie would be the complete opposite of what he is describing. This then tells us that the intellect in man is often a stumbling block, just like riches are usually a stumbling block for wealthy men. In fact the intellect is a form of riches.
He came back again:
“Dear Messenger Charles,
Thank you for taking the time for e-mailing me back. While I still do not completely agree with you, especially on the point that persons without Christ do not have free will (if our will is not free, then God determines who will be saved and who won’t, which is against His plan for us, for “it is not God’s will that any should perish.”), it is good to know that you are not one of those people who considers himself above responding to people with honest questions.”
I thanked him for his reply and pointed out that, in part, he had answered his own queries.
He was right, it is not Yah’s will that any man should perish and that is precisely what will happen – Yah’s will, will happen. (See link No. 4 below) Is Yah all powerful or not!? Yah’s will is not our will, for His ways are not our ways (unless we are born of Yah (born again) which, if it is Yah’s will that is being done, it proves that our will is not in the picture – free or otherwise.
Yashua Messiah came and conquered death, so if any man dies and remains dead, that is, has not been a part of any resurrection, then He and the Father will have failed. Nothing is conquered completely if any fraction of it remains unconquered. Yashua Messiah did not come to this earth to partly conquer sin and death, He came to conquer it all completely, and He did!
With regards to his point about our ‘free will’ he had not understood the issue that it’s only being born of Yah (born again) that gives us free will. Adam and Eve lost their ‘free will’ – the first Adam. We are under the Grace of The Second Adam and have been restored to an even better position than the first Adam before he fell. We are, in effect, more free than the first Adam, so we have free will, if we are born of Yah, but the lost and unsaved do not have free will, for they are not born of Yah, and they can only do The Adversary’s will – that is the fallen condition.
If we believe that the lost and unsaved have free will then by default we are saying that they have a say in whether they are saved or not. By default, you are saying man’s decision overrides or overrules The Father’s decision, and man has the power to control Yah’s will – ridiculous!
This is a tail wagging the dog scenario of cataclysmic proportions that he is describing here, whichever way you look at it, and makes Yah look powerless and ineffective. This, too, is the foundational flaw in all fakestream Christian denominational teaching, and it renders all adherents to it as believers in a non-gospel – which is not a gospel at all, as Paul graphically pointed out:
Galatians 1:6-7 (MCV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of The Messiah – The Anointed unto another gospel: 7 Which is not a Gospel at all!; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert The Gospel of The Messiah – The Anointed.
You see, once we embark upon a spiritual journey of salvation based upon man’s decisions, or upon man’s authority, which, if it is our decision, then it must be based upon our authority, we then have a spiritual journey of Spiritual insecurity. This is why fakestream Christians are always questioning the validity of their salvation and, in turn, why they live lives of worry, fear, guilt and doubt about their place in The Messiah – The Anointed (see link No. 5 below). Why? I will tell you why, because it all started on a sandy foundation of their decision; based upon the myth of their free will; when all the while it is not their decision at all but, rather, The Father’s decision alone to call them and save them = 100% Spiritual security.
Philippians 1:6 (MCV) Being confident of this very thing, that He which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Yashua Messiah’s return:
Hebrews 12:2 (MCV) Looking unto Yashua Messiah the author and finisher of Faith; who for the joy that was set before Him endured the stake, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of The Throne of His Father.
I told him, I hoped it would help him in his understanding and we parted on good terms, with him saying he thought I made some very interesting points. He said he would have to think long and hard on this subject. He thanked me again for being willing to sacrifice my precious time, so it was refreshing and encouraging to part amicably.
In Yashua Messiah’s name
Messenger Charles
1. What is Soul Sleep and Do The Holy Scriptures Disprove It? (The Myth of The Immortal Soul) – Part 1 of 2:
Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity; Eastern (Russian) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity; Anglicanism is NOT Christianity; Protestantism is NOT Christianity.
6. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
In part one we learned that there are only three occasions where we will find the term ‘God is one’ in the pages of The King James Bible, just three times. Now if we search for the term ‘one God’ how many times do you think we will find that? Answer: seven times with only one in the Old Testament namely:
Malachi 2:10 (KJV) Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?
Now before I press on you MUST remember that the word ‘God’ really means ‘Godhead’ for it is from the plural word Elohim = more than one!
So let’s rewrite this verse so that it makes sense:
Malachi 2:10 (MCV) Have we not all one Father – The Most High and a united member or the Godhead? hath not a united Godhead (H410 El = Yashua Messiah as a member of that Godhead) created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?
Genesis 1:26 (MCV) And God (The Elohim plural) said, Let US make man in OUR IMAGE, after OUR LIKENESS:
NOT let ME make man in MY image and MY likeness!
From Strong’s Concordance:
One – H259 –‘echad ekh-awd’a numeral from 258; properly, united, i.e. one; or (as an ordinal) first:–a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any(-thing), apiece, a certain, (dai-)ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together,
One – 258 – ‘achad aw-khad’ perhaps a primitive root; to unify, i.e. (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts):–go one way or other.
NOTICE! we’re dealing with a UNION and a UNIFYING of the Godhead members of God with God.
Next Scripture:
Mark 12:32 (KJV) And the scribe said unto Him, Well, Master, thou hast said The Truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but He:
Correct translation:
Mark 12:32 (MCV) And the scribe (an evil lawyer) said unto Him, Well, Master, thou hast said The Truth: for there is one united Godhead (Elohim plural) and there is no other but He Them (from the Greek word autos).
From Strong’s Concordance:
He – G846 – αὐτός autós, ow-tos’; from the particle αὖ aû (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a baffling wind) (backward); the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:—her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-, thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, – by, -in, -into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very, which. Compare G848.
Romans 3:30 (KJV) Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
Correct translation:
Romans 3:30 (MCV) Seeing it is one united Godhead of The Father and Son, which shall justify the circumcision by Faith, and uncircumcision through Faith.
And the next:
1 Corinthians 8:6 (KJV) But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by Him.
Correct translation:
1 Corinthians 8:6 (MCV) But to us there is but a united Godhead of The Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him, and a united God The Son, Yashua Messiah, through whom are all things, and we through Him.
Next verse:
Ephesians 4:6 (KJV) One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
Correct translation:
Ephesians 4:6 One Godhead with The Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
Next verse:
1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV) For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
Correct translation:
1 Timothy 2:5 (MCV) For there is one Godhead, and one mediator between The Father and men, the man Christ Jesus;
Roll up, roll up, for the last corrupted verse:
James 2:19 (KJV) Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
This one deserves a little more attention to reveal how silly it is. Here we’re expected to believe that the devils tremble with fear because this god is one! Hello! Excuse me because of what? Because God is one! LOL. Let me tell you straight, the devils fear because of an Almighty powerful Godhead with none above them because they are Number One, not because of the oneness of a fake god. You couldn’t make this stuff up, but amazingly they have.
OK that wraps it up for now, but there will eventually be a part three so stay in touch.
….And a word that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was never recorded as having uttered!
Now here’s a thing, a HUGE THING. The WHOLE WORLD, to a greater extent, has gone after one religion or another, and if we were to add up all those people that do have a religion, of one kind or another, I bet those left would only amount to a very small minority – which would also include followers of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).
Even those who profess to be atheists worship other things in place of an organised religion or deity, namely themselves in the mirror (narcissists), the creation, that is, the green eco-nutters (Extinction Rebellion morons), their families, (yes there is such a thing as ‘family worship’), their pets, wealth, careers, their cars, their boats, sun-worshipping holidays, science, technology, art, music, or even football teams. All of these things, however we cut it, can be, and are, objects of their RELIGION, that is, idolatry and, whether they like to hear it or not. So you see, dear people, in Truth there is NO ESCAPE from RELIGION – it’s all enveloping and encompassing and across the whole world.
However the reason for this article is not for the atheist lost and unsaved, although they are welcome to read and learn from it, IF the Father is calling them. No, the reason for this article is to rebuke and admonish in agape love, those who profess to be Christians, and yet waste their time and money on the wretched pursuit of religion, delusionally thinking that they are doing Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) will.
And now for the proof and evidence from The Holy Scriptures that show us that ALL RELIGION is of Satan the Devil and not of God. But before I do that here is a foundational aside: the word ‘RELIGION’ is derived from the multi-faceted demon called LEGION, whom Yashua Messiah cast into The Gadarene Swine. All the swine died as they plunged over the cliff edge, but LEGION did not, for spirits cannot die. This means that LEGION had a make-over and re-invented himself as RE-LEGION, and there you have it = the multi-faceted evil spirit (demon) that pervades ALL RELIGIONS, whether it be Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Bahaism, Confucianism and, of course, not forgetting the most important one, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion which at the moment doesn’t have an ‘ism’. Perhaps I should invent one! LOL
OK, here are ALL the verses from the New Testament that mention the word RELIGION, followed by the word RELIGIOUS, and you will immediately notice that NONE OF THEM are from the Four Gospels, which means Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He instruct His learners in the ways of RELIGION for He did not have a RELIGION – GOD HAS NO RELIGION:
Acts 26:5 (KJV) Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our RELIGION (G2356) I lived a Pharisee.
In this first offering we get an inkling of what RELIGION really is, that is, ‘a straitest sect’, as Paul accurately calls it, so from this we can immediately deduce that this is a very legalistic set up, and, of course, we already know that, because we know that The Serpent Seed Pharisee Jews were satanic Judaisers and very ritualistic. This means they dotted every ‘i’ and crossed every ‘t’ of The Mosaic Law in an attempt to pathetically save themselves. This, in turn, resulted in Yashua Messiah mocking them with the remark: “The ‘healthy’ have no need of The Physician!”
So straight off, the first example of the word RELIGION is a negative one.
Galatians 1:13 (KJV) For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454), how that beyond measure I persecuted The Church of God, and wasted it:
In this verse, our first negative verse above is confirmed for us once again by Paul with an even more negative example. Here he beefs it up by calling it the (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION and how, in the name of that VILE SATANIC RELIGION, he persecuted the Church of God and wasted it.
‘Wasted’ here meaning to destroy and overthrow or to make havock, and from Strong’s Concordance we get:
Wasted – G4199:πορθέω πορθέω: imperfect ἐπόρθουν; 1 aorist participle πορθήσας; (πέρθω, πεπορθα, to lay waste); from Homer down; to destroy, to overthrow (R. V. uniformly to make havock): τινα, Acts 9:21; τήν ἐκκλησίαν, Galatians 1:13; τήν πίστιν, ibid. 23.
So clearly we can now see what an evil thing the Jews’ RELIGION is, that is, Judaism, and please keep this in mind as we analyse the three remaining verses.
Galatians 1:14 (KJV) And profited in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454) above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.
Here Paul reveals how he ‘profited’ or progressed in The (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION, and left his contemporaries way behind, so zealous was he for this evil satanic cult and its dogma. We MUST fully understand that Saul was a ruthless cold blooded murderer before Yashua Messiah gave him the shock of his life on the road to Damascus.
Next, we have two very interesting verses that seem to go against everything Paul has revealed and taught us about his past involvement with RELIGION, and how evil it was/is. We therefore have what some misguided people use as an example of sending up RELIGION, and let’s be clear, for these are the ONLY VERSES in the whole Bible that appear to paint RELIGION in a positive light, but do they?
In order to answer this question we will need Strong’s Concordance once more for there are several Greek words at play here. The first is G2356 and the second is G2454 and here are the definitions:
Religion – G2356θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah; – from a derivative of G2357; ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.
Religion – G2454Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; from G2450; “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.
Religion – G2357 – threskos thrace’-kos probably – from the base of 2360; ceremonious in worship (as demonstrative), i.e. pious:–religious.
Religion – G2450 – Ioudaizo ee-oo-dah-id’-zo from 2453; to become a Judaean, i.e. “Judaize”:– live as the Jews.
James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain.
James 1:27 (KJV) PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
Right, now we get down to some very devious and deceptive nonsense going on here, for in Acts 26:5 we get the G2356 reference to Paul speaking of his previous religious life which is exactly the same religion as mentioned in Galatians 1:13-14 and yet the translators have given it a new number, that is, G2454. So what’s going on? Has Paul’s past religion changed from being, and I quote: “G2356 ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.” to “G2454 “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.” Or are they just one and the same, but dressed up differently in the G2356 definition.
Do you see what’s happening here? With the use of G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah they are attempting to paint Paul’s old religion in a benign oh so loving, compassionate and kind, kind of way, that is, people who generally wouldn’t hurt a fly, and then with the use of the next word: G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; we’re then dealing with murdering psychopaths namely, Saul, and his fellow Pharisee criminals, and yet we’re definitely talking about the same RELIGION. The irony here being that the KJV translators have got this right by using the word RELIGION for both Greek words.
OK, so it looks like a load of shenanigans has taken place with the Greek manuscripts, proving that they, too, are liable to little corruptions, as with Matthew 28-19, which I unravelled in my article: “Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? – Part 1” (See link No. 1 below).
So let’s now move on to James and analyse what he’s up to and I’ll repost the two troublesome verses below:
James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain 27 PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
So straight away we have use of that deceptive G2356 definition which, as we have already ascertained really means the same as G2454 – Saul’s and the Pharisee Jews’ satanic Judaising religion. But why is James rambling on about religion anyway? Well it’s obvious, isn’t it? Look at the opening statement: “If any man among you seem to be religious.” What does he mean by this remark? Let’s copy and paste the Concordant Literal Version for a better understanding:
James 1:26-27 (CLV) If anyone is seeming to be a ritualist, not bridling his tongue, but seducing his heart, the ritual of this one is vain, 27 for ritual clean and undefiled with God the Father is this: to be visiting the bereaved and widowed in their affliction, to be keeping oneself unspotted from the world.”
Why would anyone in the Church of God be hanging on to old religious ritualistic customs, that is, the ways of the world? When all of this was done away, with Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection. Why would this wretch want to be seen as someone who was still into meaningless rituals and religion?
So here’s a further pertinent question or two: 1) Since when did visiting the bereaved and widowed become ritualistic or religious? Answer: It never has. 2) In what way is visiting the bereaved and widowed a ritualistic or religious activity? Answer: It’s not, nor has it ever been, so what’s James on about?
Easy, he’s mocking the whole idea sarcastically. James 1:26-27 is all about exposing this fraud (whoever he or she might be) and possibly doesn’t exist at all, but he’s using this possible scenario, as an example, so that anyone within his congregation that still fancies himself as religious or hankers after the old Pharisaical ways, had better shape up and get with the New Covenant and repent of his old Pharisaical Religious ways or else. (See link No.2 below)
So there we have it, RELIGION fully revealed and exposed from The Holy Scriptures for the fraud that it is, and NOW is the time for ALL true Christians to set themselves free from it:
Revelation 18:4 (KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name
Messenger Charles
1. Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse and Baptism Is Not Into The Trinity:
….All About The Satanic Malevolent Curse of Progressive Cultural Jew Marxist Liberalism (Cloaked Bolshevism) in So-Called ‘Christian Churches’, that is, The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.
So how would you know if you are Cultural Jew Marxist or not? For I will tell you straight that many people wander around these days, whether they be Christians or secular bots, parroting Cultural Jew Marxist slogans left, right and centre. Here is my short list of these slogans, for it is by no means exhaustive:
HATER! – XENOPHOBE! – LITTLE ENGLANDER! – NAZI! – RACIST! – SEXIST! – FASCIST! – HOMOPHOBE! – BIGOT! – HATE SPEECH! – WHITE SUPREMACIST! – RED NECK! – ANTI-SEMITE! – WHITE PRIVILEGE!
There they are and if you’re someone who uses these slogans when pointing your judgemental accusatory finger at your fellow white neighbour, then you can consider yourself as a Cultural Jew Marxist and certainly not a Christian. You’re also a brainwashed and indoctrinated, unthinking moron, who has never had an original thought of your own in the whole of your useless life. This is because some other satanic useless piece of flesh has been doing all your thinking for you, namely the evil lying scum on your TV = Tell-aLie-Vision.
Now I know all this will sound very hard hitting, but at the same time it’s very necessary in the hope that it will wake some of you deluded people up. Moreover, if your thinking is so perverted and degenerate as to use these spiteful, satanic, politicised slogans, against your fellow man, and without any forethought, proof or foundation, you are more despicable than a hardened criminal, and need to be treated as such.
However, you may want to know why I use the term ‘Cultural Jew Marxist’ and not ‘Cultural Marxist’ as the majority in the Alternative Media do. The first reason is because I am not controlled opposition as are most of those in the Alternative Media, and I name and expose the Jews at every opportunity I can. The second reason is because Cultural Marxism is wholly a creation of The Jews and is phase two of their plan to take over the democracies of The West. Phase one was their failed attempt at Bolshevising The West after WW2. None the more for that, there was ALWAYS a Jewish PLAN to see their Communist mission through as shown here:
“When we get ready to take the United States, we will not take it under the labels of Communism; we will not take it under the label of Socialism. These labels are unpleasant to the American people, and have been speared too much. We will take the United States under labels we have made very lovable; we will take it under liberalism, under progressivism, under democracy. But, take it, we will.”
— The Jew, Alexander Trachtenberg (1885-1966) at the National Convention of Communist Parties, Madison Square Garden, 1944 – source: Bella Dodd (1904-1966)
Now here is where I will introduce you to The Jewish Frankfurt School:
The Frankfurt School – Critical Theory – Cultural Marxism = Social Justice – Feminism – Neo-Progressivism – Post-Colonialism – all born out of Critical Theory and come under the umbrella of Cultural (Jew) Marxism….(Brackets mine)
The Frankfurt School – Critical Theory – Cultural Marxism.
Founders:
Felix Weil – Jew
Erich Fromm – Jew
Herbert Marcuse – Jew
Max Horkheimer – Jew
Walter Benjamin – Jew
Theodor Adorno – half-Jew, Catholic mother
Georg Lukacs – Jew
Claude Levi-Strauss – Jew
Jurgen Habermas – German?
“Be it gender, sexual orientation, family, race, culture or religion every aspect of a person’s identity is to be questioned. Every norm or standard in society challenged and ideally altered to benefit supposedly oppressed groups.
“Thorium explains this socio-political philosophy that was designed to bring down Western Civilization and the white race that created it…
Classical Marxism vs Cultural Marxism
“Classical Marxism saw conflict as occurring between the bourgeoisie and proletariat, between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots.’ Cultural Marxism used such a conflict as existing between the oppressed and the oppressors, between those with privilege and those without it. The ‘Working Class’ has been replaced by ‘Minorities’.
“Majority Groups are defined as ‘privileged’ and ‘oppressive’, with minority groups accordingly labelled as ‘under-privileged’ and ‘oppressed’. Heterosexuals are deemed ‘oppressive’, cisgender people are ‘oppressive’, whites are ‘oppressive’ especially white men, Christians are ‘oppressive’. Those who do not fit into those groups are considered ‘oppressed’. It stands to reason therefore that if heterosexuals are oppressors the solution is to encourage other forms of sexuality. (From Jewpedea: Cisgender (sometimes cissexual, or shortened to cis) describes a person whose gender identity matches their sex assigned at birth.)
“If whites are oppressors the solution is racial diversity. If cisgender people are oppressors the solution is to encourage transgenderism. If Christians are oppressors the solution is to propagate Islam.
“The half-Jew Theodor Adorno and an original founder of The Frankfurt School wrote in his book: “The Authoritarian Personality” in which he defines parenthood, pride in one’s family, Christianity, adherence to traditional gender roles and attitudes towards sex and the love of one’s own country as a pathological phenomena, (that is, a destructiveness against others).
“This tendency to pathologise opinions and life patterns which are not in accordance with his own political ends is characteristic of Cultural Marxism (the Jew and his hypocrisy). Differing views are thus described as irrational fears and phobias. For example, a person who feels uncomfortable living as a minority in an area dominated by Muslim migrants will be decried as an Islamaphobe, since living amongst those culturally and ethnically similar to one’s self is considered sick and phobic.
“When Pakistani Muslims, living in Britain by contrast, show in-group preference converting entire sections of a town or a city into a mini-Pakistan there is no sickness, no phobia, only multiculturalism.
“A popular and propagandist manifestation of Cultural Marxism is Political Correctness in which media channels and social scientists make it a mandatory exercise to do the following: 1) Question common language: Illegal immigrants for example are to be referred to as ‘undocumented migrants’ while ethnic discrimination is referred to as ‘affirmative action’. Their ambition to define and redefine words can be seen as a means of controlling the discourse and altering cultural norms.
“Racism and Sexism have been redefined as a product of prejudice plus power which leads to such ridiculous statements as: ‘There is no such thing as sexism against men. That’s because sexism is prejudice plus power. Men are the predominant gender with power in society’ And ‘I an ethnic minority woman, cannot be racist or sexist towards white men’. 2) Maintain an unwaveringly favourable view of the ‘oppressed’. ‘Black Lives Matter’ is a peaceful legitimate protest movement; Feminism is only about equality and so forth.
“No deviation from the aforementioned narrative will be entertained – EVER!! Nor will criticism.
End Goal:
“While Communism, as Marx envisioned it, offered the resolution of class conflict in a utopian social system all that Cutural Marxism offers is a desolate form of eternal warfare between ever more narrowly defined groups of offended minorities. The only meaningful consequence that this wide application could possibly ever have is the marginalisation (and destruction through race mixing) of traditional European cultures.”
– Thorium
So here we can see graphically explained to us what Cultural JEW Marxism is, and that to call it Cultural Marxism, only, is missing the point entirely, for it immediately lets the Jew originators of this satanic conspiratorial plot off the hook completely, and gives us a false impression, and thereby no one to hold directly as accountable – which is what (((they))) want.
This is why we end up with BS obfuscations like: ‘The Elites’; ‘The Powers That Be’; ‘The Establishment’; ‘The Deep State’, when all the while it’s THE JEWS, led by the ‘KINGS’ OF THE JEWS – THE ROTHSCHILDS. (See link No. 1 below)
We can also add into the mix The Jesuits and The Vatican, but ultimately he who pays The Piper calls the tune, and The Rothschilds are definitely the payers of The Piper, with The Rothschild funded Vatican controlled by money laundering P2 Freemasons, and dancing to The Rothschild’s Money Empire tune.
However, I digress, so back to the subject at hand and how this cancerous scourge of a political dogma known as ‘Progressivism’ has infiltrated the so-called ‘Christian’ churches, aka The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and in particular The Anglican (AngliCAIN) Communion led by the Canaanite Jew, Justin Welby – a kosher archbishop eh? How does that work? Well for Cultural Jew Marxists it works very well, but that’s all – God centred Christians, followers of The Way, can take a hike. No wonder the Anglican Communion is on its last legs with an average age of 65 for its attendees, and I jest not.
OK, let’s begin, and I will use just one example of this satanic Cultural Jew Marxist dogma, namely ‘Progressive Christianity dot org’ which is, no doubt, atypical of the evil dross you will find on any progressive ‘Christian’ web page. To be honest it pains me greatly to use the word ‘Christian’ when referring to these debauched, apostate reprobates, and as I will graphically show.
Moreover, on this page we will be introduced to a Cultural Jew Marxist wretch who goes by the handle: ‘Reverend Jim Burklo’. Now how worthy of reverence you deem him to be I will leave to you to decide, dear readers, for I would give him none at all, and once I have revealed what he stands for I trust and hope your views will be much the same as mine.
Rev. James Burklo – A Progressive Cultural Jew Marxist Posing As A Christian.
This page starts off with a woman, here called Susan, who has been a member of The Assemblies of God denomination (demon-ination) for fifteen years and I will copy and paste her opening words here:
“I have been an on and off member of a Assemblies of God church 15 years – the pastor is more liberal in his style of message giving. They can’t and don’t speak to the issues of gayness and they would say that Jesus is the only way to God.”
Right, so from this we already get an inkling of her dissolute perverted thinking, and we also get a picture that the Assemblies of God do have something going for them, but I will not let them off the hook, because they are still a demon-ination of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. However, you will note that she has never been a committed member of this demon-ination anyway, so that tells us straight away that she’s looking for a ‘church’ moulded in her image, not God’s image.
Now here’s a thing, as I work my way through Burklo’s satanic diatribe, as a True Christian, you will notice some crucial elements of being a Christian missing. These illegitimates just write out ANYTHING that offends them and remodel everything to THEIR own liking; Yashua Messiah and His Word can go do the other thing.
So what do we have revealed to us here within this short paragraph? Three crucial things 1) She’s actually questioning The Truth that Yashua Messiah is the ONLY way to The Father. 2) She’s also making an issue of sodomy as being a valid way of life for a Christian and 3) The word ‘repentance’ is non-existent in her vocabulary, and all this when on the first Pentecost Peter made it VERY CLEAR:
Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, REPENT, (change your ways)and be Baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
From The Blue Letter Bible:
Repent – to change one’s mind, that is, to repent to change one’s mind for better, heartily to amend with abhorrence of one’s past sins.
From Strong’s Concordance – first part:
Repent – G3340 – μετανοέω, μετάνω; future μετανοήσω; 1 aorist μετενόησα; from (Antiphon), Xenophon down; the Sept. several times for נִחַם; to change one’s mind, that is, to repent (to feel sorry that one has done this or that, Jonah 3:9, of having offended someone…..
So what we MUST deduce from this is the fact that she sees sodomy as not a sin and repentance is not a requirement for being a Christian. Boy! Can you actually believe this satanic garbage?
Moving on with her nonsense:
“This pastor has meant so much to me. He introduced me to the person of Jesus…”
Here, she is oblivious to The Truth that Yashua Messiah was/is NOT a person, and there was no way that Burklo was going to point that out to her, for no doubt he thinks his fake ‘Jesus’ is a ‘person’ too. (See link No. 2 below)
Here is the rest of her blurb:
“….which has led to my graduate studies in theology.Problem is, I am much more progressive than they are. I’ve had a troubled childhood, so my journey to God has been fraught with questions, which theology school is helping me to investigate.
Oh dear, “graduate studies in theology” and: “Problem is, I am much more progressive than they are.” So at least she admits she is more satanic than they are. She then admits she’s had a troubled childhood which says to me a good shrink would be more useful to her than a bumbling useless theology school that will pump her mind with more satanic error.
“I also have a child who dislikes Sunday school at this church, which makes me sad. I want her to feel excited about knowing God, but the language they use sometimes is a bit unapproachable – even reading the Bible to a kid with words like “righteous” means nothing – even to me.
Oh yes whatever you do guard your brat from The Truth and don’t teach her what ‘righteous’ means. This is most likely because she doesn’t know what it means either. LOL
“I was going to try the Universalist Unitarian church, but it seems to denounce God and lessen Jesus. I want to be a Christian and I want to show my daughter who God is and can be, but I’m at a loss. Do I stay where I am or do I join a less Christian church? Either way I will feel like an outsider.”
Right, first off, her comments about this monotheist Unitarian group means she’s a Trinitarian, so therefore is as lost as lost can be, not that I am saying Universalist Unitarians are right, with their blasphemous monotheism. (See link Nos. 3, 4 and 5 below)
She then says she wants to be a Christian, well she doesn’t sound very humble to me in order to be a Christian and then talks about designing a god into a god that can be to her brat’s liking. How about that for prideful audacity? She then wonders why she feels like an outsider!
That is the end of her communication to this Commie ‘Reverend’ Burklo and I will give one or three lines of his reply to her before I move on to his itemised points of recommendation to help her choose a fake satanic church:
“Dear Susan,
“You are in excellent company in your quandary, and in your quest to find your way into a faith community that serves the souls of you and your dear daughter.”
Excellent company eh? The delusion is VERY strong with these people, for he refers to a faith ‘community’, not a faith fellowship, or faith congregation, or a faith Church. Why Community? Cultural Jew Marxist Communitarianism is why. We MUST understand what we’re dealing with here, for these evil wretches are not Christians, they’re evil political animals driven by a satanic, secular, atheist, libtard, Marxist agenda, which they have inveigled into the Christian religion in order to usurp it and take it over. This is a standard Cultural Jew Marxist modus-operandi.
He goes on to say:
“Good news! In your area there are many wonderful progressive Christian churches: open-hearted, open-minded, Jesus-loving communities.”
‘Open hearted and open minded’ meaning: “we will accept any form of licentious behaviour and debauched degenerate lifestyles, and any alien satanic religious beliefs without a shred of repentance in sight anywhere.
Now to Burklo’s response points:
1. Can I make great new friends there?
Notice, he doesn’t say can I meet likeminded souls in the True Faith there, or likeminded souls who will be iron sharpening iron? Notice also that it all sounds like seeking membership of a secular club, which of course is what it is.
2. Does it have meaningful worship?
Whatever that is.
3. Does it offer Bible study?
To what end would they want Bible Study? when they disagree with much of what Yashua Messiah says and rewrite it to suit their own satanic worldly Cultural Jew Marxist agenda. Here’s a couple of good examples:
Romans 1:24 (MCV) Wherefore God also gave them, (that is, sodomites and lesbians) up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour (pollute) their own bodies between themselves:
Romans 1:26-28 (MCV) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature (depraved): 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error(HIV and all manner of other vile diseases) which was meet (appropriate). 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate (degenerate) mind, to do those things which are not convenient (forbidden and shameful);
4. Will it help me grow in my relationship with Jesus?
This will be a non-existent relationship with a fake ‘Jesus’ of their own pro-sodomite agenda and creation.
5. Does it practice meditative prayer?
Ah yes, now we’re getting to it, that good old New Age meditation, just what Christians need, NOT!
6. Can it help to get me involved in activism for service and social justice?
And now even more getting to it, with worldly Cultural Jew Marxist political activism, and social justice, just what a Christian needs (like a hole in the head), and with Yashua Messiah nowhere to be seen in any of it – Barrabas the political zealot must be jumping with joy in his grave. I wonder if they snort lines of cocaine before setting off on their Communist activities – atheist bank robber Uncle Joe Stalin would be really proud of ‘em.
7. Do its members take the Bible seriously without having to take it literally?
Oh no! Whatever you do don’t take The Holy Scriptures literally, otherwise you’ll have to admit that Yashua Messiah was literally crucified by The Jews (using the Romans as their proxies), and buried in His tomb, and three days and three nights later was raised from the dead (resurrected), and a further 40 days later ascended into heaven to be with His Father.
8. Does it take scientific and intellectual exploration seriously – for example, does it accept the validity of the theory of evolution?
LOL look at this for a load of faithless garbage: ‘Scientific and intellectual exploration and the theory of evolution’? I will post one Holy Scripture in order to rebut this worldly BS:
Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
9. Are women given the same opportunities for leadership positions in the church as men?
Again I will post just one Holy Scripture to rebut this satanic Cultural Jew Marxist crap:
Isaiah 3:12 (MCV) As for my people, children are their oppressors (infantile Cultural Jew Marxists), and women (Cultural Jew Marxist feminists) rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
10. Does it fully affirm LGBTQI sexuality, and celebrate same-sex marriage?
Of course, we must allow ALL vile sexual perversions, including gender bender lunatics, pederasts and paedophiles, and why not child sacrificing to their Canaanite god Moloch, for ‘good’ measure – why hold back eh? Can you believe this stuff? You had better, for it’s near the mark in their filthy debauched apostate minds.
11. Does it teach that how we treat others is the true test of our faith, rather than belief in a fixed doctrine?
Now here’s a devious satanic loaded question if ever I saw one, by ‘treating others’ he really means tolerating people of any demonic religious beliefs and faiths, and accepting them as equivalents to the non-religious Christian Way. This is a blasphemy of blasphemies. Theirs are the satanic religions, for God has no religion, and they are ALL DECEIVED by their RELIGIONS, of which Satan is the author! Furthermore, you will NOT find the word ‘RELIGION’ in the Four Gospels, so that means Yashua Messiah NEVER UTTERED THE WORD ‘RELIGION’, nor gave any instructions to his Learners to go off and start a RELIGION!
12. Does it respect and celebrate other faiths? Does it teach that other religions might be as good for others as Christianity is for us?
This question just confirms what I have said above and reveals just how evil this illegitimate is. I bet the wretched Prince of Wales loves him – the future defender OF FAITHS! May Yashua Messiah help us and save us from this insanity.
13. Does it teach that because God is love, nobody is going to hell?
I am not even going to bother answering this dumb question and assertion, because no doubt this numbskull has no idea what Hell is. (See link No. 6 below).
OK, that just about wraps it up. However, there is more on his error filled blasphemous cesspit of a site, but there’s only so much filthy excrement one can deal with in a single day, before one starts feeling queasy. Moreover, I will therefore return with a Part 2, for there is too much error there that cannot be left unanswered and also needs rebutting. (For additional reading see link No. 7 below.)
“What Does God Believe About Gays?” – By a Mike Edwards
Now at this stage I have no idea what kind of Christian this wretch thinks he is, or maybe he isn’t, but before I have finished shredding his satanic rubbish, I will definitely know for sure, and so will you dear readers.
Now get a load of this liberal sentimental yucky muck for starters:
“Believing God exists or doesn’t exist requires faith,” “but it seems intuitive a loving Creator would love the way we were created to love…”
No it doesn’t, it requires that a man or woman be called by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and then he or she is given the gift of Faith along with Grace, and that is only after he or she has been Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone and gifted with The Holy Spirit by laying on of hands.
John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Ephesians 2:8-9 (MCV) For by Grace are ye saved through Faith; and that not of yourselves (that is, neither The Grace or The Faith): it is (for both are) The Gift of God: 9 Not of works (not through obedience to The Law), lest any man should boast.
Acts 8:14-17 (MCV) Now when The Messengers (apostles) which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received The Word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John: 15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive The Holy Spirit: 16 (For as yet it was fallen upon none of them: only they were Baptised in the name of The Lord Jesus Christ.) 17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received The Holy Spirit.
“…but it seems intuitive a loving Creator would love the way we were created to love.”
Here he uses the word ‘love’ in a deceptive satanic way, for what he really means by ‘love’ is Cultural Jew Marxist liberal, sentimental, Jewlywood, syrupy puke, and not LOVE at all. Get with it folks, for ‘Godly agape’, that is, Godly love is TOUGH LOVE. Love like this:
Exodus 15:23 (KJV) And when they came to Marah, they could not drink of the waters of Marah, for they were bitter: therefore the name of it was called Marah.
Now why did God give our Israelite forefathers BITTER water to drink? Easy, to clear out the tapeworms and other nasty parasites that their bodies were infested with through living in Egypt all those years.
And again, Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) LOVING the Pharisee Jews:
Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.
Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
From Strong’s Concordance:
Generation – G1081 – gennema ghen’-nay-mah – from G1080; OFFSPRING; by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.
John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
“Hypocrites!!” “Ye Serpents” “Generation (race) of vipers” “With throats like open graves” “Whited walls” “Whited sepulchres” “Sons of the Devil.”
How was Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) LOVING the Pharisee Jews by saying these tough things to them? Again, that’s easy, to challenge them with The Truth about themselves, and to invoke some inkling of repentance within them. Was He successful? Is The Pope a Christian? LOL
Next up, yet more putrid drivel:
“We can examine what a loving God is like though our moral intuitions, our consciences.”
He can examine God can he? This has to be the ultimate in satanic effrontery, and I am sure God will be mighty pleased that this blasphemous know-nothing upstart has examined Him. I bet He wondered how many marks out of ten He got. Hilarious or what? Then he even thinks he can measure God by his useless moral intuitions and his pathetic conscience. (See link No. 1 below)
“Christians may argue we should trust “biblical truths” about God, but differing interpretations exist for many moral issues. Also, we can’t prove if biblical writers always understood God perfectly.”
Here he goes again, rambling on about useless carnal moral issues, and also admitting that he relies on others for Scriptural understanding, by stating that there are ‘differing interpretations’. This must mean that he has no ‘interpretation(s)’ of his own and has obviously NEVER studied the Holy Scriptures, or even read this Holy Scripture:
1 John 2:27 (MCV) But The Anointing which ye have received of Him abideth in you, AND YE NEED NOT THAT ANY MAN TEACH YOU: but as the same Anointing teacheth you of all things, and is Truth, and is no lie, and even as IT hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him. (Emphasis mine)
“We aren’t always certain how to best love, but we know that we or a Creator ought to love others as we want to be loved.”
Now this satanic carnal minded mush can be interpreted in anyway you like, especially when the focus of his vile article is about defending sodomites and lesbians. I think, therefore, you know where this satanic effluence is going – straight into The Abyss with Satan himself. He then has the audacity to tell God how He ought to be loving people. This is some uppity clay pot we have here, telling The Potter what He should or should not be doing! Hilarious if it were not so wicked.
Right, now we get to the rub of his diatribe, and the BS intensifies:
“What does the Bible really say about God and gays?
“Leviticus (18:22, 20:13) list unnatural male same sex activities as an abomination.”
So what have we got here? Well for starters he was too bone idle to copy and paste the Holy Scriptures, so I will do it for him:
Leviticus 18:22 (KJV) Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 (KJV) If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
How straight forward are those two Holy Scriptures? And you won’t believe what he writes in order to try and explain them away.
“Unnatural in OT times could be sex not for procreation. We can’t be sure what activity the writers had in mind.”
He admits that unnatural same sex activities are an abomination to God and then starts upon a tirade of slimy evil explaining away nonsense. Notice how he perverts ‘sex not for procreation’ that could occur between a man and his wife. He then pollutes this idea with the lie that Moses was not sure of what he had written after having been told what to write by God (Yashua Messiah) Himself. This displays his Scriptural ignorance.
He then goes on to say:
“Are lesbians safe because nothing is said about same sex women activities?”
There is another lie!
Romans 1:24 (KJV) Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
No mention of any genders in that verse. So it applies to both men and women.
Romans 1:26 (KJV) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
This is when lesbians strap on their rubber dicks and make out that they’re men! How sick does he want it to get before it registers in his debauched mind?
Then we get dissembling sophistry of the most evil kind:
“The OT also lists as abominations lying lips, arrogance, etc. Are straights screwed?”
What has this got to do with anything? NOTHING! a sin is a sin is a sin, and sodomy and lesbianism are sins – vile sins of perversion, being against nature, against family, against procreation, and comparable to Adam and Eve’s original sin in The Garden. (See link No. 2 below)
Then we get more sophistry and lying:
“The word “homosexual” doesn’t appear in some English translations before 1946.”
The devious so and so says the word ‘homosexual’ doesn’t appear in some English translations before 1946, (as if that’s an error) and that’s because the words SODOMY and SODOMITES have always done the job superbly, and needed no faggot friendly BS words to replace them.
“In passages such as I Cor.6:9-10 and I Tim. 1:10 the translation often wasn’t homosexuals” but “boy molesters.” Big difference! And the passage says wrongdoers don’t inherit the kingdom of God. I guess we are all screwed!”
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (KJV) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit The Kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Effeminate:
1. of a catamite
2. of a boy kept for homosexual relations with a man
3. of a male who submits his body to unnatural lewdness
4. of a male prostitute
1 Timothy 1:10 (KJV) For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
Now in the above vile paragraph he tries to get sodomites off the hook re their predilection for boys and the seduction of same via molestation, when 95% of sodomites (pederasts) lust after boys, whether it be in the boy scouts, football clubs, church choirs, altar boys, youth clubs, you name it, wherever there’s young boys gathered, you will find predatory sodomites prowling around somewhere, some might call them paedophiles. We know this is true because satanic sodomite lobbyists are always pressuring western governments to lower the age of consent for sexual unions between adults and children.
“Many growing up in church only condemn gays out of devotion to the God of the Bible.”
Many growing up in their Christian environment know what sin is, and sodomy is a sin. No doubt their views will be just as forthright and anti towards adulterers and fornicators and ALL out of devotion to God and His Word. Here we see this Cultural Jew Marxist trying to make capital as if sodomites are some kind of oppressed group, when it is they that shove their satanic perverted lifestyle down our throats with their filthy sordid PRIDE MARCHES! The media whores, likewise, promote sodomites on TV and ram them down people’s throats.
“Let’s assume it could be proven God controlled pens and minds of the writers so every word in the Bible came from God. The truth is literature requires interpretation, even if ever word written, edited, or translated was inspired by God.”
Here the carnal minded dog displays his ignorance of Spiritual Discernment, for he hasn’t a clue as to how The Holy Scriptures are interpreted.
“We mustn’t claim our interpretations are infallible when being wrong has tremendous consequences. Scholars, who accept Scriptures as authoritative, don’t agree the Bible condemns same-gender loving relationships.”
Notice how the idiot uses the Papist slogan ‘infallible’ when The Truth is always superior to mickey mouse infallibity. Then he mentions ‘scholars’. Who are these so-called ‘scholars’, when they condone what God calls an abomination in His Word. If they’re scholars, then I’m President of The United States of America!
“Why would anyone choose to be gay?
“How could a loving God possibly condemn gays when they can no more choose who they are attracted to than straights can?”
Here we get more ignorance, for God has already told him:
Romans 1:21-24 (KJV) Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
God gave them up to their vile perversions through the lusts of their own hearts!
So it’s THEIR FAULT!
“If you are a straight man, don’t you naturally have to fight not looking at naked women than men?”
Yet another lame non-argument. Lusting after a woman is a natural sin for a man, and not an abomination. Lusting after another man is an abomination.
Then we get more Cultural Jew Marxist dog vomit with the slogan ‘bigotry’ – oh so very predictable:
“Ask gays their battle! Who chooses to be gay when one has to hide their sexuality because of bigotry and hostility? The mental health damage is tremendous!”
He says ask sodomites their battle. Why? is my answer to that. If they are unrepentant sodomites, then let them get on with it. It’s their choice, no one forced them to become sodomites. Oh, and if they have to hide their perverted sexual desires, good job. Keeping it to themselves is far better than parading down the high street bragging about their evil lifestyles and polluting the minds of innocent children that may be witnesses to their stinking perversions.
“Parents often only condemn their gay children because of a supposed correct interpretation of a Book.”
Parents have no need to condemn their wayward children, for The Law of God does that anyway. ALL SINNERS are condemned by God’s Law, and the only escape is to be called by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). However, if parents teach their children the right way to live and they rebel against it, that is not the fault of the parents.
“It is impossible to feel loved and accepted when someone says “I love you but I hate your sin. But we tell alcoholics we hate their sin!””
Tough!
Next we get this whingeing perverted thinking:
“Hating homosexual sex is only loving if homosexual sex is sinful.”
Sodomy is sinful, an abomination – period!
“Hating alcoholic behavior is loving because alcohol abuse really is harmful.
Alcoholism is sinful – period!
“A parent need not reject a gay child according to the Bible.”
A parent would be failing their child by not rejecting them – period.
Then we get yet more Cultural Jew Marxist diarrhoea:
“What do our moral intuitions, consciences tell us about God and gays?
“My moral intuitions tell me that God is not bias against females, people of color, or gays.”
His ‘moral intuitions’ and alleged ‘consciences’ are just BS virtue signalling – total meaningless flapping. I wonder if he’s a faggot? LOL. God loves women as long as they submit to their father’s will, and then their husband’s will. Otherwise he deems them as rebellious and useless = a troublesome liability to their men folk.
“Shouldn’t we choose the least harmful view? We don’t know why one has feelings for the same sex or opposite sex.”
More lies from the Cultural Jew Marxist son of The Devil. Yes we do, if one has ‘feelings’ for the same sex then they are either sodomite or lesbian perverts.
This paragraph is just the meaningless ramblings of wretched unsaved loser who has run out of things to say:
“If you think there is a .0001% possibility that science proves sexual orientation isn’t a choice, why would we judge?”
Science cannot prove anything unless it demonstrates something through thorough experimentation.
“It’s a myth that sexual choices are always the result of some trauma or rebellion in our lives.”
Oh and what science has proved is that sodomy is a developmental disorder.
Then the dog finishes off with this:
I am convinced the Bible is silent on monogamous same sex relationships, while supporting relationships that show love and concern for one another.
Yet again he lies and I have provided the Holy Scriptures above that proves he is lying, but then he is a Cultural Jew Marxist, and lying comes first nature to these evil Communist illegitimates:
“In our country the lie has become not just a moral category, but a pillar of the state.”
— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
1. Is The Christian Life About Ethics and Morals?:
Obadiah or Obdias, as he is known in the Greek Septuagint Old Testament, is the author of the smallest Book of the Old Testament, that is, a Scriptural Book just twenty one verses long, yet it contains some very important information for us in the last days of last days in the 21st century. His name means ‘Serving Jah’ or ‘Serving The Lord’.
Obadiah is said to have lived in the 6th to 5th century BC at the time of the captivity of The House of Judah (The Southern Kingdom of what was once a divided Israel) by the Babylonians so he was a contemporary of Jeremiah. The Northern Kingdom of The House of Israel was taken captive in 740-725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans). Now because Edom was complicit in Judah’s downfall, Obadiah calls for God’s punishment upon Edom with its total destruction – just a little background info and history.
Before I continue, I will add this caveat to inform you that I am NOT a prophet, nor do I have the Holy Spiritual gift of prophecy, so some things I say in this article should not be taken as 100% Truth (therefore you must do your own research to verify what I am saying is The Truth, or not The Truth). However, what I will say re the modern day identity of Esau/Edom (the Edomites) and the Idumeans (the later name of the Edomites, especially in the first century) you can take as solid gold Truth.
OK, so here we go, and I will start with verse nine of Obadiah, not verse one, for verse nine leads us directly into the genealogies of Esau/Edom, which are crucial to the understanding of the true identity of The Edomites, and I’ll tell you straight, right now, it ain’t The Jews and NEVER listen to any lying dogs that tell you the Edomites are Jews!
This means I’m gonna be ruthlessly blunt, because if you are a deluded brainwashed follower of the blasphemers Bertrand Comparet, the ex-con Jew liar, William (Bill) Finck of Christogenea disinformation infamy, and/or James P. Wickstrom, now deceased, you had better be ready to get educated, or otherwise you can take a hike, for there are no half-way houses or half measures with this crucial knowledge. It’s all very clearly defined, and those blasphemers are WRONG! VERY WRONG! This is big time errors I am speaking of here, not mistakes, for with the above mentioned people there will be an evil agenda in there somewhere. (See link No. 1 below.) So you have been warned. Now back to the topic at hand:
Obadiah 1:9 (KJV) And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount (the nation) of Esau may be cut off by slaughter. (Brackets mine)
Here in this verse we have an Edomite by the name of Teman and from his name comes the name Ottoman and the Ottomans were Turks (Ottoman is also known in the Arabic form as Uthman, from Osman). The Turkish Empire, which lasted from 1301 until 1923 AC, was known as The Ottoman Empire and consisted of Seljuk Turks, and please pay attention to this name “Seljuk Turks” for it will feature again.
From “The Ottoman Empire” by Larry Gormley:
“In the 13th century, the region of Anatolia (most of the Asian part of present day Turkey) was controlled by the Byzantine Empire in the northwest and the Seljuk Turks in the south-west. Around 1290, Osman I (1258-1324), a Muslim warrior and leader of a small principality inside Seljuk Turk territory, declared his independence from the Seljuk sultan. The Ottoman Empire was founded. (Ottoman is derived from Uthman, the Arabic form of Osman.)”
Now Teman is mentioned eleven times in The Holy Scriptures, the first of which is in Genesis 36:11:
Genesis 36:11 (KJV) And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz.
And who was Eliphaz? From Genesis again:
Genesis 36:4 (KJV) And Adah (the Canaanitess) bare to Esau Eliphaz; and Bashemath bare Reuel; (Brackets mine)
So here we can see that Teman was a direct descendant of Esau/Edom, through Esau’s son Eliphaz. Now if we go to Genesis 36:1-2 we glean more crucial information:
Genesis 36:1-2 (KJV) Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom.2 Esau took his wives of the daughters of Canaan; Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite.
Here we learn that Esau was also named Edom and he took two Canaanites for wives, which cost him his Abrahamic birthright inheritance from his father Isaac. The fact that he became a race mixer and/or a miscegenator is what grieved his parents, Isaac and Rebecca the most, as disclosed here:
Genesis 27:46 (KJV) And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth (Canaanite Hittites): if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?
This verse tells us exactly what Esau/Edom had done in marrying a Hittite and Hivite Canaanite, he had grieved his mother intensely, making her question even the purpose of her life, so in turn she made sure Esau/Edom’s inheritance went to Jacob/Israel his younger twin brother. Notice, too, how these Canaanite daughters, like their forefather Cain, were ‘daughters of the land’ which means any sacrifice would have been crops of the land, not the BLOOD of a lamb as offered up by Abel. Some important background information. (See link No. 4 below)
OK, moving on, and back to the subject of The Turks being from Esau/Edom and not the Jews. So let’s start at the best place = The Beginning:
Genesis 25:23 (KJV) And the Lord said unto her (Rebecca), Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger. (Esau/Edom was the elder and Jacob/Israel the younger)
So if the descendants of Esau/Edom are The Jews, since when did they serve anyone? Since when have the non-Jews not been servants of the Jews through their MONEY POWER AND USURY = The CROWN – The Rothschild WORLDWIDE Banking Cartel!? (Take note that Jacob/Israel was not the forefather of the Jews – see links 2 and 3 below)
So here we also learn that two nations would stem from Esau/Edom and Jacob/Israel which then makes these two men Patriarchs.
From “Turkey In Prophecy” by Herman L. Hoeh
“Esau’s descendants play a vital part in world affairs today! Where are his descendants?
“Notice some of the sons of Esau: Teman, Omar, Amalek (Genesis 25:11). These are not Jewish names! Yet some claim that the Jews are the children of Esau. Nothing could be further from the truth – as we shall presently see.
“Esau, or Edom, as he is also called, lived south-east of Palestine near Petra. Arab Bedouins live there now. Then where have Esau’s children gone?
“From the days of Nebuchadnezzar, who carried them captive, they disappear for 1000 years from history. Then suddenly we find Amalek the name of a city in Turkestan in Central Asia (from Paul Herrmann’s SIEBEN VORBEI UND ACHT VERWEHT, p.451). The Egyptians used to call the Amalekites the Amu. In Turkestan is the River Amu today! In Bible times the Edomites inhabited Mt. Seir (Genesis 32:4). In Turkestan is the Syr Darya – the River of Syr or Seir.
“The leading Turkish tribe is the Ottoman. The prophecies referring to Edom or Esau mention Teman as the leading tribe in these latter days (Obadiah 9). The conclusion is inescapable. The Ottoman Turks are the sons of Teman. Merely the vowels in spelling have been changed over these past millenniums. From Central Asia the Turks or Edomites moved into Asia Minor. That is where Esau’s children live today! Turkey controls the “crossway” of the nations — the Dardanelles (Obadiah 14).
How clear, ESAU OR EDOM IS TURKEY today!”
Obadiah 1:14 (KJV) Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress.
Right, now I am going to shoot off at a bit of a tangent and change the thrust of this article considerably and yet it will still be based upon Obadiah in verse 4:
Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.
Now quite few people make the silly mistake of linking this ‘Eagle’ with The USA and its national emblem, the Bald Eagle, but that is totally erroneous, for this ‘Eagle’ has a very different symbolic meaning altogether, and it also ties us to The Turks in a very surreptitious way. I will therefore copy and paste here some interesting pieces of information from the Masonic Dictionary.
Here is the opening paragraph from their website:
“Here is the type of article that makes glad the heart of an editor. With its lack of guesswork and with its wide-sweeping learning, it may well serve as a model and an inspiration to budding (Freemason) students….” (Brackets mine)
So from this opening statement we can be fairly sure of the provenance of the information I am about to reveal and share.
OK, more from their website:
“….Brother Parker has recently completed an eight hundred page work on archaeology; when it is published we shall hope to review it in THE BUILDER. For some strange reason the two-headed eagle, for all its symbolical appeal, has seldomly attracted the attention of Masonic scholars.”
Here we can see mention of this symbolic two-headed eagle which will be crucial in our understanding of this Edomite/Turkey connection.
“The most able treatment of it thus far has been the chapter in The Migration of Symbols by Count Goblet d’Alviela of Belgium; Brother Parker’s own article loses nothing by comparison with that chapter. Indeed, it carries the symbolism back to a far earlier time, and embodies more recent information. A student who may care to launch out upon researches of his own will find, along with the present article, that the references in the Encyclopedia Britannica, are valuable; consult the index volume under Double-headed Eagle; also see the articles on Heraldry and Hittites. For a reliable but rapid survey of what is known of the Hittites see Jastrow’s chapter on the subject in Exploration in Bible Lands, by Hilprecht (1903). See also Mackey’s Encyclopedia, Vol. I., page 225; and Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, Vol. III, page 104.”
WHAM No. 1!! there we have our first connection – The Double-Headed Eagle and its Hittite heraldic origins, and who did Esau/Edom marry? A HITTITE Canaanite!
Moving on:
“THERE IS SCARCELY a symbol in any of the philosophical or chivalric degrees of the Scottish Rite so striking in design and import as that of the double-headed eagle. The Tau Cross and (The) Serpent of the Twenty-fifth Degree, the sun of the Twenty-eighth Degree, and the cross of St. Andrew in the Twenty-ninth Degree are indeed fraught with deep meaning, both historic and esoteric, but none can claim a more romantic or significant history than that of the Thirtieth Degree, that of the Grand Elect Knight Kadosh, or Knight of the Black and White Eagle. As an emblem this eagle is the epitome of religious andsymbolic historyand to trace the winding flight of the double-headed bird is to survey the whole course of civilization, from its grey dawn north of the Persian gulf to this modern World.…..”
That will be the symbolic history of the Edomite Canaanites via Esau’s Hittite wife. Take note, for ALL Canaanites are Serpent Seed miscegenated inbreeds from The Garden = Satan’s offspring through Eve. (See link No. 5 below)
“When our ancient brethren, the holy Crusaders, passed through Byzantium on their way to the tomb of the Saviour, the Double-Headed Eagle which they saw embroidered in gold on heavy banners of silk, borne aloft by the Seljuk Turks, had been four thousand years on its way.”
WHAM No. 2!! The Seljuk Turks (Edomites) and their Double-Headed Eagle held high on gold embroidered banners as they went into battle. So let’s paste Obadiah verse 4 again just to remind ourselves:
Obadiah 1:4 (KJV) Though thou exalt thyself as the EAGLE, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith The Lord.
Turkish Dirilis Ertugral
“To these same Crusaders this emblem was an honoured one, and though the enemy displayed it, yet they would fight to death for its possession and in triumph bear it, dripping with blood, to their encampments on the Levantine shore. It was from this Eastern Empire that the knights took this banner to adorn the courts of Charlemagne, and as a sacred relic hung it in the great cathedrals, whose architects and masons had so often been honoured by this Emperor of the West.”
Here above we can see how this Hittite Canaanite heraldic symbol wormed its way into the west.
“From whence came this two-headed eagle, and how came it to be associated with Scottish Rite Masonry? The last part of this question is easier to answer than the first, for there is direct testimony that Frederick of Prussia supplied this crest during the formative stages of the Rite, but neither Frederick nor indeed Prussia could claim the exclusive right the use or to bestow it. It is the imperial emblem of Russia, Austria, Serbia and other portions of the disrupted Holy Roman Empire, and Prussia adopted the emblem long after it had flown over Byzantium as the royal arms of the “Emperors of the East and West.”
“In Germany we find the Double-Headed Eagle used as the seal of the Count of Wurzburg in 1202; it was the coat of arms of Henricus de Rode in 1276; while Philip of Saxony bore it upon his shield in 1278. It was also the seal of the Bishop of Cologne, who no doubt adopted it from the city arms.
“As the arms of towns and cities in England, this emblem appears upon the official seals of Salisbury, Perth, (Perthshire), Airedale and Lamark. In Holland and France there are also numerous instances of its use.
“As the badge of royal orders we find the two-headed bird upon the emblems of the Austrian Order of the Iron Crown; in Russia upon the emblems of the Order of St. Andrew, founded by Peter the Great in 1689; in Poland upon the emblem of the Order of Military Merit, (founded May 24, 1792). As late as 1883, the King of Serbia adopted it as the emblem of the Order of the Double-Headed Eagle, commemorative of the restoration of the Serbian kingdom.
In these paragraphs we can see how Satan beguiled many western nations with their incorporation of the Double-Headed Eagle into their own heraldry – especially the Germanic nations.
“But the double-headed eagle is not European in origin for its use depends upon the contact of Europe with Asia Minor, and indeed with trade or warfare with the Turks.
The Turkish name for this conspicuous emblem is HAMCA, and by this name they call it when they see it carved upon the walls of ancient castles, upon time worn coins or emblazoned upon frayed silken banners in ancient palaces.”
WHAM No. 3!! Now notice what we have here: 1) Further confirmation the origins of this Double-Headed Eagle are of Turkish/Edomite origins. 2) And the Turkish name for this image is HAMCA! WOW! = HAMitic CAnaanites!! So the Double-Headed Eagle is the incestuous Canaan’s heraldic emblem.
“Travellers in Asia Minor, indeed, are surprised by the frequency of the double-headed eagle sculptures upon the castles of the Seljukian Turks, and upon the more ancient monuments of the Hittites, whose civilization was at its height when the Hebrews were wild tribesmen upon the Arabian plains.”
First off, pay no attention to the blasphemous mention of the Hebrews as wild tribesmen. The Hebrews were always husbandmen with their flocks and herds of animals not wild men, however Esau/Edom WAS a wild man and ferocious in battle. He and his clans were warriors of warriors, and this is yet another characteristic that does NOT FIT THE JEWS. Edomites were NEVER JEWS.
….Or perhaps a better title would have been: The Satanic Curses of Judaism and Islam – Is God One?
Introduction
Now this article has been up on Ezine Articles since 2009, so it’s obviously long overdue for a little revising and editing, because my knowledge has greatly increased since 2009. In turn, it must be said that it’s a crucial support article for my other articles: “Exposing The Trinity Lie – Parts 1 through 5”; “Do YOU Worship and Ogre god? – Parts 1 through 4”; “Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs? and “The Duality Godhead”, (See link Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 below.) This means, also, that it’s long overdue for a place on my blog. Still, better late than never, eh?
So, to my question, IS HE ONE, that is, is God ONE!? for the phrase “God is one” can only be found three times in the whole King James Bible – THREE TIMES ONLY! Now here’s a thing, for all of my regular readers will, by now, be aware of a little conundrum that we have going on here, that is, within the confines of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. That conundrum, of course, is this mysterious habit they have of majoring in the minors. It seems to be a common practice of theirs to make big theological determinations with very little Scriptural proof for backing up those determinations. The silly Trinity dogma being a very good example of it, with two references, only, to the Trinity, again, in the whole of the King James Bible (see link No. 1 below). Not only that but no mention of it by the name, the Trinity. However, having said all that, MANY people still believe that their god is one and in the case of believers in the Trinity, for them it’s three in ONE!
So back to the thread, and to prove it, here’s another thing: All the Jews and all the Muslims on this earth believe their god or their Allah is one. There he is, up there in his ‘heavenly domain’, all alone, that is, a single solitary god, who is the object of their worship and of their deification (chuckle, chuckle, chuckle).
The thing is, is their worship of this deity all in vain? and is it just a massive deception on the part of the god of this world, Satan the Devil? We must be clear about this, for he is most definitely a god, that is, the god of this world, or the god of this age, or the god of this world’s system, or even the god of The Matrix, to use the modern vernacular. If you have any doubts about this arrangement, then you must refer to the Holy Scriptures for the proof, and thereby assuage those doubts:
2 Corinthians 4:4 (MCV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image (one in whom the likeness of anyone is seen) of God, should shine unto them.
As an aside, notice, the minds of the lost and unsaved who don’t believe are completely blinded to The Gospel of Yashua Messiah, which is yet more solid gold proof that no man or woman can accept a ‘Jesus’ as their saviour of their own volition or own initiation, for only The Father can remove the scales from our eyes.
Ephesians 2:2 (MCV) Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to The Prince of The Power of The Air, the evil spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience (and unbelief):
OK, now all this is very straight forward, because we know that the lost and unsaved do not believe, and the above verses explain clearly why they don’t believe. Moreover, what about the Jews and the Muslims, for they do believe and, boy, do they believe? Let’s face it, we could never doubt their zeal and their fervour, especially the Muslims, so what gives? Is their belief in vain, for we know that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) does not feature in The Jew’s beliefs at all. The Jews have their imaginary satanic Talmudic ‘god’, and the Muslims have their ‘Allah’, but Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) as God with God is not included in either of these blasphemous belief systems.
However, Islam does acknowledge a ‘Jesus’ as a prophet, but this imaginary ‘Jesus’ is not revered any higher than their prophet Mohammed which, in itself, is an evil blasphemy. (For the origins of Islam see link No. 5 below.)
So to briefly sum up, we have at least two religions that believe in gods that are one, that is, alone and solitary. Now some of you may say well so what, we’re Christians, and we believe that God is one, too? Yes, quite so, but is that true and who told you that God is one? And if God IS ONE what separates your god from the heathen god of the Jews and Muslims, for he is one too? Answer: NOTHING! Oh come on, there are loads of Holy Scriptures that say God is one, I hear you say, and yes there are some that appear to say that, but do they really say it? Well, there is only one way to find out using these examples:
In Mark 12:29 the Lord Jesus Christ quotes Deuteronomy 6:4 which He voices aloud:
Mark 12:29 (KJV) And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
Now this statement is a word for word exact copy of what Moses wrote down in Deuteronomy 6:4. You can check it for yourselves if you do not believe me.
Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our GOD is one LORD.
OK, let’s analyse this Scripture in detail, from the Hebrew, as it predates Mark’s Gospel by approximately fifteen hundred years:
Hear, O Israel:
1) The Lord – The Jehovah or The Eternal our God (Elohim) who has always self-existed.
2) Our God – now the word ‘God’ or ‘Elohim’ in Hebrew means God plural – more than one. The Hebrew word ‘Eloha’ or Eloah is the singular word for Elohim. Now if God is one, a singular solitary God, then ‘Eloha’ is the word that would have been used here, not Elohim – more than one. This evidence alone, and in one fell swoop, disproves monotheism or Judaism, for the Elohim Godhead is more than one being.
3) Is one – OK, God = Elohim = plural beings, which in turn means we have the Elohim (plural) Godhead of more than one being, being described as ‘one’, but is that one being? and how can plural beings be one? In Hebrew the word for ONE is ‘Echad’ which means unified or united or in unity or at one and it also means number one; first and none above, the prime number. This means that The Elohim (plural) Godhead is united – completely likeminded and in unison, that is, in total agreement.
A football team is united as in Newcastle United, and they are united as one team with one goal – to win, but they are also a team of eleven individuals. The Godhead is one team of two Spiritualbeings who have plans to add to their number by calling sons and daughters/brothers and sisters, not close themselves off in isolation in a closed trinity. The number 3 is God’s number for finality and if anything comes in threes with God that’s it – fini – kaput – the end, nothing more, just like the three woes in Revelation. The thing is, there is nothing final in God’s plan for us His future family! Plus all of mankind, eventually, in the Kingdom of God!!
4) Lord– Eternal or self-existent.
So there we have it, and if we were to ask the question is God one? we can reply and affirmative yes to that, for the expounded question should read as: IS THE GODHEAD UNITED AS ONE? that is, a Godhead of two individuals who have always self-existed, a God with God who later became The Father and The Son, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and then a Godhead in heaven with Yashua Messiah at The Father’s right hand.
Here, alone, we have enough proof and evidence to disprove monotheism or the worship of one god. The Godhead has always been two who are unified or united or at one with themselves, with each other, or in oneness of mind, word and deed, that is, in complete and total agreement and totally likeminded – yet distinct Spiritual beings; this is the True nature of the Duality Godhead.
Hopefully, too, you will have noticed that the Holy Spirit is nowhere mentioned in Deuteronomy 6:4, nor in Mark 12:29 in the description of The Duality of the nature of the Godhead. Am I denying the existence of The Holy Spirit? no way, for The Holy Spirit is the Godhead’s living POWER, but not a personage of a mickey mouse Trinity. (See link No. 1 below)
Moreover, we now have a full understanding of Deuteronomy 6:4 of which Mark 12:29 is a direct copy. Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently quoted Old Testament Holy Scriptures (from The Septuagint) when preaching. So what is the point I am making here? The point I am making is this: Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12:29 are identical and yet they are taught differently, due to the change of language or misinterpretation of same, that is, from Hebrew into Greek.
If we copy out Mark 12:29 from the Greek you will see what I mean:
Mark 12:29 (Greek Transliteral) Answered the Jesus that before-most is (foremost) be hearing (be you hearing) Israel Master (Lord) the God of us Master (Lord) one is.
OK, if we concordance the word ‘God’ we will find a subtle change has taken place:
From Strong’s Concordance:
God – G2316 – theos theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].
Notice; a deity, not the deities. God in the Old Testament was Elohim – plural, not Eloha = not singular, but look at what has happened here. God has become a singular god – a deity, not the deities of The Elohim who are ‘at one’ or who are ‘unified as one’ and in ‘perfect likemindedness’ – two united beings thinking as one. And all this when The Greeks were polytheists = more than one god.
This deliberate language corruption is what causes all the trouble and confusion within the pages of the New Testament and deceives millions of people within mainstream Christianity. Look folks, the Godhead does not change, they have never changed and that is why THEY SAID in Genesis 1:26; “let us make man in OUR IMAGE and OUR LIKENESS; they were always the two beings of the Godhead. This, therefore, means that what was written in Deuteronomy 6:4 should have been copied exactly into Mark 12:29 with same OT meaning, for the Lord Himself uttered the very same words. This also means that because the word ‘God’ now has a different meaning, a singular meaning, not a unified plural meaning, a translator’s corruption has most definitely occurred. Well just fancy that!!??
Moving on, if we now take a look at a few Holy Scriptures that allude to their claim that ‘God is one’, we will then gain a better understanding of what the evil translators of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion have done to God’s Holy Word, and what better example than the following verses from Matthew’s Gospel, for there are corruptions galore in these two verses:
Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good?there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
And from the Greek Transliteral, and supported by The Concordant Literal Version:
Matthew 19:16 (Greek Transliteral) And be-perceiving (lo!) one toward-coming (coming to) to-Him (Him) said Teacher! Any (what) good I-shall-be-doing that I-should-be-having life eonian?
Matthew 19:6 (CLV) And lo! one coming to Him said, “Teacher, what good shall I be doing that I should be having life eonian?
OK, so what have we got going on here? Hmm, well, as we can see, this verse is revealing that Matthew 19:16-17 is not quite as ‘good‘ as we may have, at first, thought (like the pun?). The operative word here, of course, being ‘good’. Notice, the man in the Greek original does not call Yashua Messiah ‘Good Master’. The word ‘good’ has been thrown in gratuitously by the devious translators, but why? Well that’s easy to answer; in order to corrupt the whole passage and give it a different focus and a blasphemous, phony new emphasis. Not only that, but we have the assertion that The Father God is the ONLY ONE that is good, so there it is, the ugly perversion of Jewish monotheism slithering in like a snake by the back door, so to speak.
As it happens, this has always been a passage of Holy Scripture that I have never been comfortable with and, now, as I examine the original Greek rendering I fully understand why I have always felt uncomfortable with it. Notice the crucial element to this missing word ‘good’. If Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) is not the ‘Good Master’ and is only the Master or Teacher as in the original Greek, then by default it makes a mockery of what Yashua Messiah was supposed to have said to the man, that is, “Why callest thou me good?” For as we can see the man said no such thing, but what he did refer to was what one good thing must he do in order to have Eternal Life, so what’s going on?
Back to the Greek Transliteral for the answer:
Matthew 19:17 (Greek Transliteral) The yet He-said to-him any (why) me you-are-asking about (concerning) the good one [thing] is the good if yet you-are-willing into the life to-be-into-coming keep (keep-you) the directions (precepts) [Square brackets mine]
Straight away, it is crucial that we realise there is no reference to God in this verse at all especially the nonsense phrase: “there is none good but one”, and we now know, too, that the phrase: “Why callest thou me good?” is also bogus. What this means in Truth, is that there is not an inkling of any suggestion within this passage to suggest that God, in anyway, shape or form is here alluded to as one. Unless, of course, you have a demonic evil agenda and your desire is to classify Yashua Messiah as not being ‘good’ which, of course, is what the blasphemous KJV does – DELIBERATELY in my view.
First, though, lets finish analysing the Greek version of verse 17. The verse opens with the Lord answering the man’s question and notice, for the emphasis is purely on the subject of the man’s question and nothing else. What the Lord is asking him here is this: “Why are you asking me about this one good thing that you think you should be doing in order to enter Eternal Life, when you should know that the only good thing you can do is to keep (hold Spiritually dear) the commandments and love God?” OK, having cleared that up, let’s return to the blasphemous KJV and I will re-copy it here for your convenience:
Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
Right, we know from the Greek rendering the man did not say ‘Good Master’, so this must mean that the Lord had no need to reply with that spurious man made question, and nor did He, for it is not there in the Greek. To confirm, if we check once more in the Greek version of verse 17 we also have the proof that the Lord did not ask the man that question: “Why callest thou me good?” So all this wickedness and deceit is added by the translators – WHY? Why, because through this verse in the KJV it is scandalously trying to tell us that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not see Himself as good and, in turn, by doing that making us think that He was not God. If He was not good, then how could He be God in the flesh?
Now this truly is an evil heresy we have unravelled here! It’s also constitutes a heresy with them trying to fool us into thinking that there is only one God. As stated, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was God in the flesh, so how could He be anything but good? Obviously, the Lord cannot be anything but good, but to those in the blasphemous Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, they want us to think that only the Father God is good. What kind of diabolical evil is this? I’ll tell you, it’s Jerome’s and Erasmus’ diabolical evil and whoever else had their filthy Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translator’s mitts on God’s Holy Word when they wrote their King James Bible.
Furthermore, if you think Matthew’s account is a one off and Mark’s account says otherwise you would be wrong and I will keep this brief for I wish to move on to the next misunderstood verse:
Mark 10:17 (KJV) And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?
Again from the Greek Transliteral:
Mark 10:17 (Greek Transliteral) And of-out-going (of-going-out) of-Him into way (road) toward-running one and knee-falling (falling-on-his-knees) him inquired-of Him Teacher! good any (what) I-shall-be-doing that life eonian I-should-be-tenanting (I-should-be-enjoying-the-allotment-of).
Here again we can see that the translators have chosen to place the word ‘good’ before ‘Teacher’ or ‘Master’ instead of correctly attaching it to the subject at hand after the word ‘Master’, that is, what good thing should this man be doing in order to enter into Eternal Life? Notice, too, that the word ‘good’ only appears once so, by default, it must apply to the ‘thing’ and not to Yashua Messiah. Why is that I hear you say? It’s that, because in the Matthew account we learnt that the second ‘good’ was gratuitously thrown in by the translators.
In part two I will expose more translator corruptions.
“Why Do Christians Try To Impose Their Values On Others?”
OK, this article sub-title is from an individual who goes by the handle: “Got Questions,” on a web site that goes by this name: “Faith By The Word Ministries”, with a so-called pastor by the name of Dave Winstead. I am therefore using this article as an example for Mainstream Christianity as a whole, for his beliefs are pretty much bog standard for the bulk of the wretched Protestant arm of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. The other two factions (the satanic cults) namely Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism are even more wretched and deluded.
Now don’t get me wrong, for I have nothing against this man personally, but I do have everything against him in his capacity as an alleged minister of God. I have therefore copied and pasted this article word for word, not knowing if this bod ‘Got Questions’ is one and the same as Dave Winstead or not. However, that’s not the issue. What is the issue, is the utter nonsense and worldly drivel within the article:
Before I start, one point to clear up immediately is this, real Christians HAVE NO VALUES, whatever they are. If you want to know what ‘values’ are, you better ask the vile shabbos goy, Communist traitor, ex-British Prime Minister Theresa May, as she was always banging on about Christian ‘values’ and British ‘values’ = total meaningless political effluence of the most foul kind.
Right, with that not so little niggle out of the way, we will begin, and I hope you are sitting comfortably:
By ‘Got Questions’.
“Christians are frequently accused of trying to impose their values or their beliefs on others. The oft-heard accusation is that Christians are trying to “shove their religion down our throats.” In addressing this question, we must also address the implied accusation that Christians are an authoritarian group that seeks to impinge on the rights of others….
Here he opens the topic with a defensive statement that actively displays his ignorant delusion, for it is a blatant example of his attempt to defend the indefensible. This is because these so-called ‘Christians’ do impose their values and their beliefs on others, (probably without even knowing it) and they do it because of one main specific reason, which I will come to as we dissect his useless diatribe. Notice, too, how he sees his fellow band of fakes as non-authoritarian. Now tell me, what use are non-authoritarian Christians? Did Yashua Messiah not speak with authority? Did The Messengers not speak with authority?
Further to, in a pathetic attempt to bolster his non-argument he uses the lame duck excuse that there have always been tyrants that professed to be Christians, but were not Christians at all. Never mind that these imposters professed to believe in much the same nonsense as himself, for example, their ritualistic religion, their ‘acceptable’ fake Jesus and their phony Trinity, amongst other things.
“….Of course, there have been tyrants who were professed Christians, but true followers of Jesus Christ do not seek to infringe on anyone’s basic human rights. The same God who granted volition to the believer also granted volition to the unbeliever.
He then goes on with further excuses by stating that TRUE followers of Jesus Christ do not seek to infringe on anyone’s basic ‘uman rights! WHAT!? Was Yashua Messiah or John the Baptist the least bit worried about the ‘uman rights of their audiences? especially the Pharisee Jews! note these vehement outpourings: “Hypocrites!!” “Ye Serpents” “Generation (race) of vipers” “With throats like open graves” “Whited walls” “Whited sepulchres” “Sons of the Devil.” All very non-offensive! NOT!
However, all this is by the by, for what he says next is a clincher: “The same God who granted volition to the believer also granted volition to the unbeliever.”
Oh really, is that so!? What we see here is a combination of his worldliness by his mentioning worthless and irrelevant ‘uman rights, followed by the clanger of his assertion that unbelievers have free will. In turn, this means he has never read this crucial passage of Holy Scripture, or if he has, it did not sink into his Spiritually dead brain:
The PARABLE of THE PARABLES!
Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And The Learners (disciples) came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN. 12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13 THEREFORE I SPEAK TO THEM IN PARABLES: because they seeing, see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross (has grown fat and lazy), and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM. 16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
Above we can see graphically explained to us by Yashua Messiah HIMSELF how He DELIBERATELY withholds The Truth from THE MAJORITY of people, with ONLY THE FEW being blessed with the knowledge and understanding of His Word. More from our blind guide:
“God extends His general blessings to everyone (Matthew 5:45); therefore, freedom for all is a Christian value. Man is a special creation of God (Genesis 1:27); therefore, human dignity and respect for the individual are Christian values.
Here he misinterprets Matthew 5:45 by quoting it out of context and relating it to ‘freedom for all’, when in Truth the lost and unsaved are slaves to sin and not free at all. The lost and unsaved do Satan’s will, whether it be ‘good’ things or evil things – that is the fallen condition from Adam and Eve until today.
“Some say that it is wrong to try to “legislate morality.” We say that it is impossible not to. Every law “imposes” someone’s moral “values” on someone else. A law that prohibits murder, for example, imposes a belief that murder is wrong and upholds the Christian tenet that human life has intrinsic worth.
“Almost everyone agrees that murder, adultery, stealing, lying, and greed are wrong. Most people agree that respecting one’s parents is right. This sense of right and wrong, woven into the fabric of our society, reflects six of the Bible’s Ten Commandments. Those who object to the “imposition” of Judeo-Christian values should perhaps work to repeal the laws against murder, perjury, and theft.
Here he waters down God’s Law by referring to ‘moral values’. God has no moral values. In Habeas-Corpus jurisdictions (Britain, Her Commonwealth and The USA) we all should know that The Common Law, so-called, is based upon The Ten Commandments, and is our unalienable right to be governed by same. We are not supposed to be governed by thousands of racketeering Acts and Statutes (Corporate rules and regulations) and, in turn, used to fleece the people and keep them oppressed, enslaved and poor. No doubt he’s completely oblivious to this institutionalised criminal government scam.
“Christians don’t want to impose their values, but they do recognize that, in every society, someone’s values must reign supreme. The question is whose values will predominate? There is no such thing as a neutral value system. Therefore, Christians work to advance their values in the sincere belief that, in a world of competing convictions, Christian values best promote the general welfare and preserve the domestic tranquillity.
Now this paragraph is very deceptive and it’s also grossly disingenuous for it’s very questionable that so-called Christians have any input on how our Commie Godless nations are run. However, here I will return to my earlier remark about them imposing ‘their values’ and by ‘their values’ we should ALL know what he means. If not I will sum it up as briefly as I can:
Mainstream Christian ‘values’ means telling the lost and unsaved or preaching to the lost and unsaved and telling them, that unless they turn to ‘their Jesus’ and invite him into their lives (accept him as their saviour) they will be thrown into hell when they die. What they classify as ‘hell’, I have no idea. LOL. Most likely, nor do they, but hey ho! The joys of being an airy-fairy non-Christian eh?
Moreover, THIS is what all the accusations are about, and quite right too, for it is an evil and erroneous message that they are attempting to ram down people’s throats. For they DO attempt to do this, and all his excuses are just that EXCUSES and LIES. I have witnessed it a 1,001 times on discussion platforms when the exchange starts off all luvvy-duvvy with the ‘Christian’ being as sentimental and syrupy as they can be, only to be rejected by the lost individual who tells them to clear off (I’m being polite here). Then come the ‘hell threats’ like there’s no tomorrow, and another unsaved wretch more adamant and entrenched than ever before in his unbelief and/or atheism.
“Christians don’t want to impose their values, but they do see the importance of having an authority higher than ourselves. Societies which attempt to produce a moral code based solely on human rationale can be manipulated by whoever has the most votes or the most weapons. Whether it’s the case of a humanistic despot such as Joseph Stalin or a collective tyranny such as the French Revolution, the exclusion of Christian principles leads to less freedom, not more.
Here he lies once more, for they do try to impose their views and they do this because of evil misplaced zeal, a zeal fed by the satanic doctrines and teachings of their religious cult(s) namely, that THIS LIFETIME, OR THIS AGE, IS THE ONLY OPPORTUNITY THAT THE LOST AND UNSAVED HAVE FOR SALVATION! Upon this false satanic premise or concept they build their even more satanic churches. (See link No. 1 below)
“Christians don’t want to impose their values, but they do want to live peaceably in whatever society they dwell (Romans 12:18; 1 Timothy 2:2). Christians are obligated to do good to all (1 Corinthians 6:10) and to pray for everyone (1 Timothy 2:1). Christ taught His followers to return blessing for cursing (Matthew 5:44), a teaching which He modeled perfectly (1 Peter 2:23).
There are some who wish for a purely “secular” society where religion is relegated to its cloister and all Christian opinion is silenced. To those individuals, we offer these reminders.
Again he lies, for with their false non-Gospel message, they can do nothing else but attempt to impose their beliefs on the lost and unsaved, and they would be totally failing in their mission if they did not hammer home their hell, fear based beliefs. The fact that they are mentally pressured non-stop by their: ‘salvation in this life time is the only chance you’ve got’ satanic doctrine, means they can do nothing else but try to impose their beliefs on the lost and unsaved.
I will also clarify at this point that these ‘Christians’ will attack me on this topic, because they think I am proposing a second chance for those not called in this age, when I am doing no such thing. What I am proposing is their FIRST CHANCE for salvation and for reasons made very plain by my eldest Brother Yashua Messiah in Matthew 13:10-16.
Moving on where he compounds his satanic worldly errors:
1) Christians have as much right to be involved in the political process as anyone else. This means they may vote, rally, lobby, caucus, and hold office just like any other citizen—all the while promoting laws that reflect their own values. Christians do not seek to subvert the political process; they engage it, as it is the right of every citizen.
He has even forgotten Yashua Messiah’s fundamental teaching (if he was ever instructed on it at all) on our place in The World – The System or, rather, our non-place in The World – The System:
John 17:14-18 (MCV) I have given them Thy Word; and The World (The System) hath hated them, because they are not of The World (The System), even as I am not of The World (The System). 15 I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of The World (The System), but that thou shouldest keep them from The Evil One. 16 They are not of The World (The System), even as I am not of The World (The System). 17 Sanctify them through Thy Truth: Thy Word is Truth. 18 As thou hast sent me into The World (The System), even so have I also sent them into The World (The System).
John 15:19 (KJV) If ye were of The World, The World would love his own: but because ye are not of The World, but I have chosen you out of The World, therefore The World hateth you.
Christians are not of The World (The System) and The World (The System) hates us, so what use would we be as politicians, if we’re already hated before we even open our mouths? This fella hasn’t a clue about The Way that we follow, for Yashua Messiah is The Way and this numb-skull is advocating the worldly ways of The Devil = POLITICS.
“2) Christians in a pluralistic society have as much right to voice their opinions as anyone else. This means they may broadcast, write, speak, publish, and create art as they will—all the while voicing their own view of morality. Christians are sometimes accused of censorship, on the basis that they have criticized a certain book or have objected to their tax dollars funding anti-Christian speech, but they are not burning books. The reality is that freedom of expression is a Christian value.
Here he talks a load of tosh and nonsense, for his so-called ‘pluralistic society’ is anathema to God. A ‘pluralistic society’ is straight out of The Abyss = Satan’s World, and Christians have no rights in it at all. They are hated and loathed by such a society, and if they speak out against this society they will immediately be attacked and persecuted by it. In effect Christians have no rights at all in this world, nor should they expect any, for their Kingdom is not of this world in any way, shape or form.
“3) Christians in a religiously free society have as much right to live out their beliefs as anyone else. This means they may preach and teach the gospel and live according to the Bible and their conscience. When a Christian says, “You must be born again” (John 3:7), he is not trying to impose his values; he is speaking the truth, which anyone is free to accept or reject.
Again, more errors from our world loving fake preacher and banging on about rights that we do not have, and I won’t repeat what I have already said above, other than to add that if you say to an unbeliever: “You MUST be born again,” all you are doing is casting your pearls before swine – see Matthew 13:10-16 above, once more.
“There is no doubt that when Christians share the joy that comes from faith in Christ, some see that as an attempt to impose Christianity on others. But the truth is that as Christians, we know that we have the antidote for human misery in this life and an eternity in hell in the next.
Here we go again. How can these ‘Christians’ share something with those that cannot comprehend what they are experiencing, namely their supposed joy? Do they not know how the carnal mind works?
Romans 8:7 (KJV) Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to The Law of God, neither indeed can be.
This means they cannot be anything else but threatened by what they see as unhinged behaviour, and he tries to play it down by saying: “some see that as an attempt to impose Christianity on others.” when he knows full well that’s just how they will interpret it.
We then get confirmation of what I said earlier, that is, his threats of hell, and then he wonders why he and his fellow fake Christian dupes are repelled by the lost and unsaved and accused by them. He also makes the erroneous assumption that we’re here to end misery in this life – utter baloney. Misery will only be ended when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth in great power and glory – AND THEN we’ll see an end to ALL misery, suffering, oppression and poverty.
To not share that cure with others, as we are commanded by Christ to do (Matthew 28:18-20), would be like knowing the cure for cancer and refusing to share it with the rest of the world. We can’t force our beliefs on anyone; all we can do is offer them the cure and pray they will accept it. If some see that effort as “imposing” our beliefs on them, that is a matter of their perception, not a reflection of reality.
And then he finishes off with yet more bunkum: Cure, what cure? There will be no cure until Yashua Messiah comes to rescue the earth. This ‘cure’ drivel, again, is based upon their flawed satanic doctrines. They think that they’re here to usher in The Kingdom of God, and there’s no telling how many hundreds of years they have been attempting to do that, whilst in reality the world becomes more evil, violent, degenerate and debauched by the day – the complete opposite of what they claim they are doing – how’s that for strong delusion?
“We can’t force our beliefs on anyone.” And again that’s exactly what they try to do, driven on by their flawed, evil and judgemental doctrines, as I described above. One blind guide thoroughly exposed.
The Hebrew Roots Movement? Who or what are they? I hear you ask. A good question, for in my travels across worldwide cyberspace or the cyber-aether as it should accurately be called, I occasionally get asked by mainstream Christians if I am a member of this group, but why, when I am white, not black, and who are these people? All will be revealed.
However, in the meantime, I must admit to an identity mistake I made, in thinking that this Hebrew Roots lot were none other than the Black Israelites or Black Jesus mob. These lunatics are officially known as The Black Hebrew Movement and/or The Black Hebrew Israelites, so an easy mistake on my part, to make, especially when I had never heard of this other Hebrew Roots Movement, only the Black Hebrew Movement. (See link No. 1 below)
So, with the intro over, let’s have a Holy Scripture or three to get us off on the right track:
Ephesians 2:8-9 (MCV) For by Grace are ye saved through Faith; and that not of yourselves (That is, neither The Grace or The Faith are of ourselves): they are The Gift of God: 9 Not of works (not through obedience to The Commandments or The Law), lest any man should boast.
1 Timothy 1:9 (MCV) Knowing this, that The Law is not made for a righteous man (the saved man), but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, (for those of the Hebrew Roots Movement) for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
Hebrews 7:19, 22 (MCV) For The Law (The Commandments) made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God. Hebrews 7:22 (MCV) By so much was Jesus made a surety (guarantee) of a better [testament.] Covenant (The New Covenant).
Now we’ll have a close look at these Hebrew Roots people and see what they are all about, for they have a web page, and the first thing that confronts us is this extended title:
“The Hebrew Roots of Christianity” – 21st century Christians meet the 1st century Faith of The Early Church.
They then go on to say:
“The Hebrew Roots Movement is a general term used for an emerging grassroots spiritual awakening taking place worldwide with Christians returning to the original first century faith, beliefs, and understanding of the Scriptures as taught by the Messiah, Early Church and Apostles. Hebrew Roots is not a denomination or church, but rather a mindset seeking to emulateJesus (Y’shua) as much as possible.” (All emphasis theirs)
Now in this opening paragraph I can see why these mainstreamers think (albeit mistakenly) that I am a member of this movement, because they use the word ‘Y’shua’ when naming Jesus Christ, as do I, only I write it this way ‘Yashua’ and not ‘Y’shua’ so that’s quite a difference for these people that obsess and rent their clothes about Yashua Messiah’s name. LOL. I use it for the simple reason that it separates me from the fakes and fraudsters out there who call themselves Christians, but are, in reality, just politically motivated religious liberals (Cultural Jew Marxists and Zionists) who pose as Christians, and call themselves Christians.
OK, so for me, this name thing is a trivial matter, for I am more interested in the doctrines and teachings of this movement, not what wretched mainstream Christians think of them. So let’s take a look-see and see if they measure up to The Grace Filled Word of God, that is, Scriptural Truth.
Here is their next sub-heading:
Description of the End-Times Church:
“Here is a call for the endurance of the saints, those who keep the commandments of God and their faith in Jesus.” Revelation 14:12 ESV.
Now there are three things that jump out at me here as warning signs, and that’s just from this tiny sub-heading, so it doesn’t bode well for what I might find further on, on this website. However, let’s deal with these three crucial things first:
1. “Here is a call for the endurance of the saints, those who keep the commandments of God.”
OK, someone is calling for the endurance of the saints. Who might that be? The owner of the web page? The Father? Yashua Messiah? Paul from his grave? (See link No. 2 below)
Well straight away we can rule out Paul, for he is dead in his grave, but what about Yashua Messiah, is He calling for us to endure, or does He already know that we will endure through these end times, due to the POWER He has given us? Have we not been given The POWER of The Holy Spirit to endure to the end? In contrast, who, who are without The Holy Spirit, will endure through these end times? Answer NONE!!! not a single one, not a single sentient being will endure through these end times, unless they are protected by The Father and delivered through them like the 144,000 of Revelation 7.
However, what are these Hebrew Roots Movement people suggesting here? Are they suggesting to us that it’s ALL DOWN TO YOU AND ME? through…..and wait for it…..YOUR/MY abilities, YOUR/MY strength and YOUR/MY will and resolve at keeping obeying The Commandments? Are they actually suggesting that obedience to The Law (The Commandments) will save them and see them through to the end? How does that work? Don’t even go there until you have read this:
Galatians 3:10-14 (The Amplified Bible) 10 For all who depend on The Law [seeking justification and salvation by obedience to The Law and the observance of rituals] are under a Curse; for it is written, “Cursed (condemned to destruction) is everyone who does not abide by all things written in The Book of The Law, so as to practice them.” 11 Now it is clear that no one is justified [that is, declared free of the guilt of sin and its penalty, and placed in right standing] before God by The Law, for “The righteous (the just, the upright) shall live by Faith.” 12 But The Law does not rest on or require Faith [it has nothing to do with Faith], but [instead, the Law] says, “He who practices them [the things prescribed by The Law] shall live by them [instead of Faith].” 13 Christ purchased our freedom and redeemed us from the Curse of The Law and its condemnation by becoming a curse for us – for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs [crucified] on a tree (cross)” – 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might also come to the [Gentiles] Nations so that we would all receive [the realization of] the promise of the [Holy] Spirit through Faith.
We then get:
2.“and their faith in Jesus.”
If they’re endeavouring to OBEY The Commandments (The Law) for justification why would they need Faith in Yashua Messiah? Notice how it’s THEIR faith and, notice, too, how this is almost begrudgingly tacked on as an afterthought: “Oh I suppose we ought to make mention of good old Y’shua, if only for old times sake, eh. We don’t want people thinking we’re a bunch of Commandment obeying legalists or Judaising mongrel dogs, do we? – oh no, that won’t do at all!”
Now please take note of what I am about to say here, for if these people are attempting to emulate the first century Church of God, this sub-heading should have read like this, that is, IF these Hebrew Roots Movement people are the real deal:
Description of the End-Times Church:
“Here is reassurance and comfort for the saints, that is, those who have the faith OF Jesus and their faith in Him, who will endure to the end.”
3. These people have quoted the ESV – always a bad sign in my opinion, so let’s set the record straight using the KJV – WOW!:
Revelation 14:12 (KJV) Here is the patience (patient endurance) of the saints: here are they that keep (hold onto or hold as precious) the commandments of God, and The Faith OF Jesus. (Brackets mine) (See link No. 3 below)
Notice: Here is the patient endurance of the saints – this is a statement of Truth or fact, not a call to be patient and enduring – THEY ALREADY ARE PATIENTLY ENDURING. Here they are, recorded in a vision given to John, patiently enduring, keeping (holding onto as precious) The Commandments, and likewise holding onto the Faith OF Jesus, along with their own faith in Him.
I trust you can now see how blasphemously wrong they are in just this opening sub-heading. So let’s see what else they dish up:
“The 1st Century Church, the apostles, AND Paul ALL obeyed God’s Laws
When the Jerusalem Council heard Paul’s report of his work they all glorified God and said:
…how many thousands … have believed. They are all zealous for the law… Acts 21:19-20
Oh so Paul and all his learners disciples OBEYED God’s Laws did they? Well lets see what Paul actually said:
Galatians 3:2 (KJV) This only would I learn of you, Received ye The Spirit by the works of The Law, or by The Hearing of Faith?
Galatians 3:5 He (Yashua Messiah) therefore that bestows to you The Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth He it by the works of The Law, or by The Hearing of Faith?
Right, lets copy and paste ALL of Acts 21:19-20 from The KJV including verse 18:
Acts 21:18-20 (KJV) And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles nations by his ministry. 20 And when they heard it, they glorified The Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of [Jews] Judean Israelites (not Jews) there are WHICH BELIEVE; and they are all zealous of The Law. (re gentiles see link No. 5 below)
So what are the brethren actually saying to Paul here? Are they emphasising and reinforcing the observing of The Law or pointing out The Truth that even though these Judean Israelites (not Jews) were zealous for The Law, they had repented and BELIEVED!! No one can truly believe IF they are endeavouring to save themselves through obedience to The Commandments – The Law. Either you’re under His Grace, with The Law written on your heart, or you’re cursed under The Commandments – The Law.
So did the 1st century Church, The Messengers (apostles) and Paul who was also a Messenger OBEY The Commandments. Not on your life, they lived under Yashua Messiah’s Grace, with The Commandments written on their hearts. However, we need to know which Commandments were written on their hearts. These Commandments:
Matthew 22:35-40 (KJV) Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked Him a question, tempting Him, and saying, 36 Master, which is The Great Commandment in The Law? 37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love The Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and Great Commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these Two Commandments hang all The Law and The Prophets.
Not a Living Bible fan, as such, but there are times when it can be quite useful as in this example, but they do slip up when using the word ‘obey’ in verse 40. (See link No. 4 below)
Matthew 22:33-40 (The Living Bible) The crowds were profoundly impressed by his answers— 34-35 but not the Pharisees! When they heard that He had routed the Sadducees with His reply, they thought up a fresh question of their own to ask Him. One of them, a lawyer, spoke up: 36 “Sir, which is the most important command in The Laws of Moses?” 37 Jesus replied, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind.’ 38-39 This is the first and greatest commandment. The second most important is similar: ‘Love your neighbor as much as you love yourself.’ 40 All the other Commandments and all the demands of The Prophets stem from these two laws and are fulfilled if you obey voluntarily follow them. Keep only these and you will find that you are obeying all the others (by default).” (Brackets mine)
So there we have the Hebrew Roots Movement all trussed up and ready for the oven like a turkey. Here’s hoping they repent and are swift about it for the end times are upon us NOW!
Philippians 3:2 (MCV) Beware of Judaising mongrel dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the circumcision.
You have been warned in love, so steer well clear of these Hebrew Roots Judaising blasphemers.
In Yashua Messiah’s name,
Messenger Charles.
1. Blacks and Their Black Jesus and Those Behind it:
Was The Flood, otherwise known as Noah’s Flood or The Deluge, worldwide, or partial, that is, localised and didn’t cover the whole earth? Many take the position of: Who cares? But those of us who are fixated upon knowing The Truth, would never in a million years adopt a couldn’t care less attitude to this crucial subject. So which is it?
Holy Scripture first, if only to get this off on a positive trajectory:
Genesis 7:17-23 (KJV) And The Flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up The Ark, and it was lift up above the earth. 18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and The Ark went upon the face of the waters. 19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. 20 Fifteen cubits (26 feet approx) upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered. 21 And ALL FLESH DIEDthat moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: 22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. 23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in The Ark.
Now it’s circus clown time. Here is the opening paragraph to the seventh chapter of Comparet’s – “The Complete Works of Bertrand Comparet”entitled: “Noah’s Flood was NOT Worldwide!”
“Among the many mistaken and unscriptural notions, commonly taught in nearly all churches, is the idea that the flood mentioned in the Bible, covered all the earth. It states everybody on earth was drowned excepting Noah and his family, who escaped death by being in the ark. Many churches have firmly insisted the Bible says this, when there is ample proof the flood was not worldwide.”
He goes on to say:
“Part of this mistaken idea about the flood is due to the many mistranslations found in the commonly used King James Bible. Part of it appears plainly to be false, if you carefully read even the King James Bible.”
Now don’t get me wrong, for I am FULLY AWARE of many of the mistranslations and corruptions in the KJV Bible, starting with Genesis 4:1; Isaiah 9:6; Matthew 28:19; 1 John 5:7-8; Romans 8:1; Romans 13:1-7; plus all the others that erroneously interpret The Holy Spirit as a personage of their mickey mouse Trinity. (See links 1, 2 and 3 below)
Further to, he says, and I quote: “If you carefully read even the King James Bible.” Which clearly he has not done, and which I will now unequivocally prove.
First of all he builds strawman number one, by referring to Cain being driven by God from “the face of the earth” (translated from the Hebrew word ‘erets’ or ‘eh-rets’) Here is what he says:
“First lets see what the translators have done to what Moses originally wrote. Remember the King James Bible says that the rain was upon the earth and the waters increased greatly upon the earth and all flesh died that moved upon the earth. Definitely not!” Remember that in Genesis 4:14, when Yahweh has driven Cain away in punishment for his murder of Abel, the King James Bible quotes Cain as saying, “Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth.” So what did Cain do, climb into his rocket ship and take off for outer space? Of course not! He was not driven from the face of the earth, and he never said so, only the translators said so.”
Never mind what the translators of the KJV said, let’s see what the translators of the more reliable Septuagint say:
Genesis 4:14 (Septuagint) If thou castest me out this day from the face of the earth, and I shall be hidden from thy presence, and I shall be groaning and trembling upon the earth, then it will be that any one that finds me shall slay me.
Genesis 4:14 (KJV) Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.
Well it looks more or less exactly the same as the KJV. So what is Cain actually saying here? Is he alluding to being physically removed from ‘the face of the earth’ or is he being allegorical and painting a picture of being deprived of ALL the fruits from THE FACE of the earth? so therefore being cast from the earth in terms of life’s sustenance. This means he was threatened with being cast from THE FACE of the WHOLE earth. I think, therefore, that we all know what Cain meant, apart from this numbskull Comparet with his syllogism building.
From Strong’s Concordance:
Earth – H776 – ʼerets, eh’-rets; – from an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land):—× common, country, earth, field, ground, land, × natins, way, + wilderness, world.
Outline of The Biblical Usage of the words ‘Earth’ and ‘Land’ from the Blue Letter Bible web page:
1 EARTH, LAND.
A. Earth
i Whole earth (as opposed to a part)
ii Earth (as opposed to heaven)
iii Earth (inhabitants)
B. Land
i Country, territory
ii District, region
iii Tribal territory
iv Piece of ground
v Land of Canaan, Israel
vi Inhabitants of land
vii Sheol, land without return, (under) world
viii City (-state)
C. Ground, surface of the earth
i ground
ii soil
D. (in phrases)
i People of the land
ii Space or distance of country (in measurements of distance)
iii Level or plain country
iv Land of the living
v End(s) of the earth
E. (Almost wholly late in usage)
i Lands, countries
ii Often in contrast to Canaan.
From the above we can see all the multiple uses this Hebrew word ‘eh-rets’ has, so its meaning is directly affected by the context of the words surrounding it or, more importantly, its use in other verses of crucial Holy Scripture, which I will show later. However, let’s hear more from the numbskull Comparet:
“When we come to Genesis chapter 7 where it is talking about the flood, wherever it says the flood covered the earth, the Hebrew word used in the original writing by Moses was eh-rats, meaning the land. The flood did cover the particular land where it occurred. It was a local flood, which covered one particular region or land, not the whole earth.
Here we can see him adding his agenda driven interpretations to what’s written, because ‘eh-rets’ primarily means The EARTH as a whole, so he’s lying straight off. He’s also playing word games, or is it a perverted form of semantics? I’ll go with both, for that’s exactly what it is. So let’s use his twisted logic to our advantage:
Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth (H776 eh-rets – erets).
So here in Genesis 1:1 we have exactly the same Hebrew word in play, that is, ‘eh-rets’ or ‘erets’ and what is Genesis 1:1 telling us? It’s telling us that the word ‘earth’ (‘eh-rets’ ‘erets’) IS REFERRING TO THE WHOLE EARTH OF THE CREATION. Or perhaps the numbskull Comparet thought the Creation was only a partial creation or even a localised creation! ROTFL!!
Now here’s another thing, if the translators wanted to use the word ‘land’ in the correct way, do you not think they would be capable of doing so? Here’s an example:
Genesis 2:11 (KJV) The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
In this example we see the use of the word land (‘eh-rets’ or ‘erets’) in reference to the localised area of Havilah. So, in turn, why did they not use the word ‘land’ when describing the area covered by The Flood, if it was only a localised event and/or only a partial flood. Why use the word ‘earth’ if they didn’t mean the whole earth and meant some localised land where as we can see they did use it when they needed to, in order to describe a local area like Havilah?
So here we are, after having copied, pasted and written just over three and a half A4 pages we have utterly debunked this fraud’s ‘Partial Flood’ satanic ideas. However, I will not leave it at that, for there is more, much more, so please bear with me.
OK, let’s focus on the second part of the above paragraph:
“The flood did cover the particular land where it occurred. It was a local flood, which covered one particular region or land, not the whole earth.”
Now apart from having already debunked his garbage, I will make use of some very valid points from a Tim Chaffey at “Answers in Genesis” (see video link below) where he does a great job of debunking this localised flood idea.
1 The Partial or Localised Flood makes God a liar.
How does that work? Quite simply because God gave Noah the sign of The Rainbow as part of a Covenant with Noah that He would NEVER flood the earth again. This means, that if The Flood of Noah’s day was localised or partial then God has broken His promise/covenant to Noah a million and one times, for there must have been millions of localised/partial floods since Noah’s time – which automatically makes God a liar for having broken His Covenant. All this when we know for sure that God cannot lie!
2 IF The Flood was partial or localised, why get Noah to build an Ark?
Good question eh? And very valid, because IF The Flood was only partial, or localised, why didn’t God get Noah and his clan to skedaddle off to where it didn’t flood, and thus negate the necessity of building an Ark, which must have taken Noah decades to construct. Let’s face it, God asking his pivotal characters to move elsewhere, would not have been a revolutionary idea. A good example being Abram moving to Canaan from Ur of the Chaldees, and then to Egypt to avoid a severe famine. Therefore Tim Chaffey has another great point here and makes nonsense of Comparet’s partial flood BS.
3 Why take birds on the Ark IF the Flood was localised and partial?
Yet another excellent point, so yes, why take birds on The Ark, when they could have easily flown off to where it was not flooded. Again, let’s face it, distance is no problem to birds, they can fly hundreds of miles, if necessary. However with such an insignificant localised mickey mouse flood, fleeing to safety would have been easy-peasy even for the smallest of birds, chuckle chuckle chuckle. I hope you’re beginning to see the stupidity of this man’s silly ideas.
4 The purpose of the Flood was to destroy ALL flesh:
Thirteen times the Holy Scriptures uses the term ‘All Flesh’ in relation to the world, before, during and after The Flood and thirteen is God’s number for rebellion, so very appropriate for reprobates like Comparet.
Genesis 6:12 (KJV) And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
ALL FLESH was corrupted on the earth, not some flesh, but ALL OF IT!
Genesis 6:13 (KJV) And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
The end of ALL FLESH is come before God and the EARTH is filled with violence – ALL of the earth, not a part of it!
Genesis 6:17 (KJV) And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
A Flood of waters to destroy ALL FLESH.
Genesis 6:19 (KJV) And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female.
Genesis 7:15 (KJV) And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.
Genesis 7:16 (KJV) And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him: and the Lord shut him in.
Genesis 7:21 (KJV) And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
And ALL FLESH died that moved upon the earth. If it was only a partial flood then ALL FLESH would NOT HAVE DIED! And of course this is the straw-man scenario that the blasphemer Comparet is aiming to construct – more on this later.
Genesis 8:17 (KJV) Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.
Genesis 9:11 (KJV) And I will establish my covenant with you, neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.
“And I will establish my Covenant with you, neither shall ALL FLESH be cut off any more by the waters of a flood.” If it was only a partial flood, how would a Covenant be valid in terms of ALL FLESH not being cut off again by another flood, when ALL FLESH would not have been cut off by a partial flood? Do you see how this makes a total mockery of the partial flood idea? I do hope so.
Genesis 9:15 (KJV) And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh.
Genesis 9:16 (KJV) And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.
God’s Covenant is with every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. How would that be possible if the flood was only partial and/or localised.
Genesis 9:17 (KJV) And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.
OK, lets move on with more Comparet garbage:
“If six miles of water covered the whole earth, then all nations must have been completely exterminated. However Babylonian, Egyptian and Chinese history runs right through this period without a break.”
Where has he got these ideas from? Fair enough he got the first bit nearly right, when he claimed six miles of water covered the whole earth, but even that was erroneous, because, no doubt, he was basing that on water covering modern day mount Everest at twenty nine thousand feet, which equates to five and half miles. However, in Noah’s day, mount Everest and the rest of the Himalayas didn’t even exist, they, being created by massive tectonic plate shifts that didn’t occur until The Flood and shortly thereafter, as described here:
Genesis 10:25 (KJV) And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.
H6504 – Divided – parad paw-rad’ – a primitive root; to break through, that is, spread or separate (oneself):–disperse, divide, be out of joint, part, scatter (abroad), separate (self), sever self, stretch, sunder.
At this time we know that the earth’s continents did form and break off from the land mass known as Panjea and separate through tectonic plate shifts, thereby causing mountains to rise up, but this was after The Flood, so it’s ridiculous to suggest that six miles depth of water would have been necessary to cover The Earth. We also know that there are trillions of marine fossils in the Himalayan mountains, just as they are found at the top of the Grand Canyon. (All deposited there by Mr Comparet’s partial flood LOL).
Then we have his bogus dates for the Chinese and Egyptian dynasties, all based upon erroneous, one following the other, chronology, when most of these dynasties were living side by side contemporaneously, not chronologically, which then reduces the time periods drastically. Egypt was in its infancy in the days of Abram, as were all the other fledgling empires of those times.
OK, that just about rounds it off for part one – part 2 follows so please stick with it.
Exposing The Lying Blasphemer Bertrand Comparet – Part 2
In part one, I completely debunked Comparet’s stupid ideas regarding his partial flood and/or localised flood nonsense. In this article, we’ll get into the ‘meat’ of this subject, and I say ‘meat’, because these deceivers desperately need the partial flood BS in order to try and make the rest of their demonic doctrines stick.
Confused? Not to worry, for I will explain. So first of all, let’s be clear in our minds, for Comparet needed far more people to have survived The Flood than the eight souls who actually did survive The Flood and as confirmed for us in the NT by Peter:
1 Peter 3:20 (KJV) Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while The Ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
Notice, WHEREIN FEW, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
Now why do they need more than eight souls to have survived? Easy, because they erroneously claim that all three sons of Noah were white; that all three daughters-in-law were white, and that Noah’s wife was white. They erroneously deduce this whacky idea from this Holy Scripture:
Genesis 6:9-10 (KJV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Genesis 6:9-10 (TAB) These are the records of the generations (family history) of Noah. Noah was a righteous man [one who was just and had right standing with God], blameless in his [evil] generation; Noah walked (lived) [in habitual fellowship] with God. 10 Now Noah became the father of three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
From this, we can easily fathom that the generational perfection was Noah’s and Noah’s only, and did not apply to any other member of his family, with the exception of Shem who, like his father, was white. His siblings however were not white. Ham was either dark brown or a swarthy brown and Japheth was slit eyed and yellow skinned.
Ham’s son was named Cush or Kush and Cush literally means black. The largest tribe of Cushites on earth today is the sub-continent Indians and they live south of the Hindu-Kush mountains in India. Likewise, Rebekah’s brother was called Laban and Laban means white and he was a white Semite. So these names mean what they say.
I have digressed slightly, so back to the thread. So how could this possibly be? Easy, through Naamah, Noah’s wife, who was the sister of Tubal-Cain, so Naamah was a Cainite, and not Adamic at all. WHOA!! I can hear all the Comparet sycophants screaming, you can’t be saying that!! But I am saying it, because it’s true. It has to be true in order for all the world’s ethnic groups to exist today, and they do exist, and they ALL come from the eight souls that disembarked The Ark after the WORLDWIDE flood waters had been on the earth for nearly a year. However, there is one caveat to this arrangement in the shape of the serpent creature called Canaan who made their number up to nine souls.
Now this is where it gets very messy, very messy indeed, if you’re a disciple of the blasphemer Comparet, because you desperately need your partial flood, whereby all the non-white people we share this earth with can be explained as people whose forefathers by-passed the localised flood and came through unscathed. LOL You see you have to have these mythical people in order to hang on to the falsehood that all three sons of Noah were white.
These Comparet numbskulls are never going to deny that black and slit eyed yellow skinned people exist, that would make them a bigger a laughing stock than they already are. They therefore desperately need this fairy story of a partial flood so that their imaginary descendants of the ‘beasts of the earth’ can get through the flood event as dry as a bone and totally unscathed. Hilarious or what?
Beasts of the earth? I hear you ask, who or what are they? They’re in Genesis 1:25:
Genesis 1:25 (KJV) And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Now here the Comparet cultists go into magic mushroom creative thinking mode and add all manner of BS to the Holy Scripture narrative, because, for them, these are not beasts as we would obviously know beasts, oh no – nothing as straight forward and simple as that! These are beasts with chutzpah, pizazz and front! LOL. Allegedly, these are two legged apeoid or negroid beasts, that are not wiped out by the flood but, rather, come through by by-passing the flood event and ultimately end up producing the millions of sub-Saharan Africans that we know of today. Interestingly the oriental peoples get by-passed completely in this bestial mayhem. More laughs for Messenger Charles.
Now you can see how crucial it is for them to maintain the partial flood myth, for without it they know they are screwed. They also know that when they are confronted with the challenge of having to engage their brains, and work out how Noah’s three sons plus Canaan produced ALL the ethnic groups we see around us on this earth today, they are at a complete loss.
So what of the descendants of the eight that came off The Ark + Canaan? he was the first born after The Ark settled on mount Ararat. And how was it that Noah’s sons were NOT ALL WHITE? Quite simply, and as already mentioned, because Noah’s wife was the sister of Tubal-Cain, so she was a an inbred Cainite. However, that was not an issue, because only Noah’s Adamic blood counted in his three sons, irrespective of their skin colours and appearances = all three sons were Adamic with Noah’s blood in their veins.
However, the problems started when Ham bedded his mother whilst his father was drunk and she produced the incestuous bastard Canaan. Canaan’s birth rekindled Cain’s bloodline post-flood, hence Noah cursed him. In turn, Canaan took daughters from all three sons of Noah and that miscegenation produced all the different Canaanite tribes we have today. Namely The Jews (white Canaanites); The Chinese/Koreans (yellow Canaanites); Sub-Saharan Black Africans (Black Canaanites); The Turks (The Edomites swarthy Canaanites); The Italians (Chaldean/Babylonian Canaanites). There are, no doubt, numerous other Canaanite splinter tribes, but the above are the principal Canaanite tribes or ethnic groups.
Moreover, this leaves us with many non-white ethnic groups who are of mankind (Adamic) and are definitely not white, but they’re definitely not Canaanites. These are The Japanese, The Greeks, The Malayans, The Indonesians, The sub-continent Indians, The Ethiopians, The Spanish, The Portuguese, The Arabs and The Filipinos.
In case you missed it, white people are from Shem = Semites. Jews, who look white, are not white. Jews are Shelahite Hamitic Canaanites which I explain in detail here:
OK, so by now, having read parts 1 and 2, which I trust you have done, if not, I would recommend that you do so, for they will give you a good grounding as to where I am coming from with this most difficult work, for I am no man of letters. However, I am a man of Yashua Messiah’s Set Apart Exclusive Spirit with the gift of Spiritual Discernment, so that MORE than makes up for my lack of fancy literacy and intellectualism, both of which I would deem a hindrance to His work anyway (see link Nos. 1 and 2 below).
Now chapter 3 of 1 Timothy is a dead giveaway for satanic religiosity and Hellenising humbug, with it being full of Nicolaitan hierarchical nonsense, with bishops here and presbyters and deacons there. This means we have these creatures all lusting after their positions of POWER and AUTHORITY, lording it over their brothers and sisters – as you do NOT, if you’re a real Christian, and part of the egalitarian Church of Yah!! We are ALL equal as servants of Yah in His sight and as servants of each other as brothers and sisters in The Faith.
OK, so let’s get straight on with the first two verses of 1 Timothy 3:
1 (MCV) This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of an overseer, he desires a good work.
2(MCV) Anoverseer then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, able and willing to teach;
1 Timothy 3:1-2 (KJV) This is a true saying, if a man desirethe office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. 2A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach.
1 Timothy 3:1-2 Notes — (a) “This is a true saying.” he says, but is it a true saying? We shall see. If a man desirethe office of a bishop! So let’s have a look at what the Greek MSS says about offices and bishops:
1 Timothy 3:1 (Greek Transliteral) Believing the saying if any-one of-on-noting (supervision) is craving of-ideal work he-is-on-feeling (desiring).
Now why would a humble Christian be craving an alleged position of supervision (authority), in a supposed church? Does this imaginary creature fancy his chances of being ‘king of the heap’ in this assembly? or see himself as lording it over his brothers and sisters? whom, he perhaps feels are in need of a good whipping into shape? You betcha!
Is ‘supervision’ the right word, or would ‘overseer’ be a better word? I speak here as if giving the benefit of the doubt to most of the verses of 1 Timothy 3, that is, verses 1 through 13, as being genuine Pauline verses which, in truth, I will prove are not.
Moreover, what policy or agenda were the KJV translators serving here, and promoting, with the use of this word ‘office’? Well obviously it’s administrative and GOVERNMENTAL, is it not? and nothing to do with egalitarian Christian brotherly and sisterly love and fellowship at all. This is the modus operandi of the pecking order system of the Nicolaitans which is being promulgated here – plain and simple.
We then get this 100% pompous, religious term ‘BISHOP’, translated from the Greek word ‘episkope’ which, in turn, means an ‘overseer’, that is, someone who keeps a watchful eye, as a protector and guardian, over the flocks, and who, no doubt, was selected by the elders of the assembly as someonefit for the job, not some upstart who fancied himself as a big shot in his so-called local church and desired, that is, most likely lusted after the position, with its incumbent authority.
1 Timothy 3:1-2 Notes — (b)Not only that, but this religious, 100% mythical, lustful Hellenising bishop must be blameless, eh? That’s a tough call to say the least. Where do you find a blameless counterfeit Christian, who fancies himself as a bishop? Nowhere! And vanity, not repented of, must be the first blot on the list with regard to the character of this would-be so-called ‘bishop’.
And then we get, and wait for it! ‘the husband of one wife’!! Wow!! What’s going on here? This suggests to me, that in these Hellenising congregations there were a few bods with MORE THAN ONE WIFE! Was this permissible in the first century Assemblies of Yah? I have no idea, but here’s something on it:
Either way, I am not really interested, other than in what went on in the true Assemblies of Yah, and I doubt very much that polygamy was something practised by them so, yet again, bringing into doubt the provenance of these so-called Pastoral Epistles.
After the ‘only one wife’ hoo-ha we get: ‘vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach’. I find this totally hilarious! What kind of so-called Christians are we dealing with here? If the laity are prone to being a load of inhospitable, yobbish boozers who lack the character quality of vigilance, what’s going on? Are we having described for us here a load of reprobates or Christians?
Then we get ‘apt to teach’. So are these bishop candidates gifted with the Spiritual gift of teaching or not? I would say that if someone who fancies himself as a bishop, and is NOT gifted with the Spiritual gift of teaching, is next to useless for the job.
1 Corinthians 12:28 (MCV) And Yah hath appointed these in The Assembly – The Ecclesia, first messengers, secondarily those with the gift of prophecy, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, guides and different kinds of tongues.
Notice how the list of gifted abilities above does not include bishops, governors, administrators, bosses, leaders or tin pot dictators.
I will leave it there and move on:
3 (MCV) Not a compulsive drinker, not violent, not one who lusts after filthy lucre; but patient, peaceful, not envious of another’s wealth;
1 Timothy 3:3 (KJV) Not given to wine, no striker (no quarrelsome bruiser), not greedy of filthy lucre (not a lover of money); but patient (lenient), not a brawler (peace loving), not covetous; (Brackets mine)
1 Timothy 3:3 Notes — (a)The comedy continues…and in the same vein as verse two we have all these worldly characteristics being highlighted as if we were dealing with lost and unsaved reprobates – unrepentant sinners no less, who, if truly under Paul’s stewardship and guidance, would have been severely reprimanded or admonished and possibly threatened with expulsion from The Assembly. Furthermore, what would such people be doing in a Christian fellowship at all? let alone stand to be considered as a candidate for an overseer! I trust you can see the ignorant, ludicrous nonsense message these verses portray.
4 (MCV) One that rules well his own house, having his children in subjection with all uprightness and honesty;
5 (MCV) For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of The Assembly of Yah?
1 Timothy 3:4-5 (KJV) One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; 5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of The Church of God?)
1 Timothy 3:4-5 Notes — (a)OK, this one could be taken as somewhat ambiguous: ‘one that RULETH well his own house’! Does this mean that the same rigid dictatorial mindset that operates in his household is then transferred to his local assembly? For it then says: ‘having his children in subjection with all gravity;’ so we have to assume that this transfer ofstrict ruler-ship is what the forger means by this and then classifies it by adding in the gratuitous: ‘For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of The Assembly of Yah?’. ‘Taking care’ meaning ruling the roost? Still at least he got the name of The Assembly right.
Now don’t get me wrong, for a certain amount of no-nonsense discipline is definitely required when bringing up children properly, but, should this Victorian sounding, parent-child, disciplinary regime be transferred to The Assembly of Yah? Let’s be clear, sound informative Gospel teaching is all that is required when dealing with Christian adults, not a big stick pseudo-tyranny.
My verdict, therefore, on these two verses is take from them what you will, and for what they are worth, and use much wisdom. Always bearing in mind that the agenda being served here in these epistles is not a Christian agenda, but, rather, the Hellenising Religious agenda of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.
6 (MCV) Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.
1 Timothy 3:6 (KJV) not a novice, lest beinglifted up he may fall into the condemnation of The Devil;
1 Timothy 3:6 Notes: Now this sounds like don’t give the keys to your Ferrari and the booze cabinet to your 18 year old son, whilst you’re away for the weekend. The only thing I’ll add, is this: Would the elders of genuine Assembly of Yah be giving the position of overseer, with all the great responsibilities that that entails, to a boy or a novice new convert to the faith and to the fellowship? Not a chance!
7 (MCV) Moreover he must have a good report and reputation with regards to them which are outside the Assembly of Yah; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.
1 Timothy 3:7 (KJV) Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall and be blamed by them and becomeensnared of The Adversary.
1 Timothy 3:7 Notes — (a) Now get a load of this! Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without. YOU WHAT!!?? So are we to believe that Paul would have written this irrelevant worldly garbage? Are the called and chosen members of Yah’s Assembly – The Ecclesia – The Elect now chosen based upon the so-called ‘good reports’ of worldly sinners or the lost and unsaved!? What business do the Spiritually dead and/or unregenerated have with The Assemblies of Yah, other than to be recipients and beneficiaries of Christian good works? NONE! ZILCH! ZERO!
1 Timothy 3:7 Notes — (b) ‘that he may not fall into reproach and a snare of The Devil’.
From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:
“Lest he fall into reproach, for his former scandalous life. And the snare of the devil. Snares and temptations, such as he fell in and fell by before. This is called the snare of the devil; for, as he well knows the constitution of such persons, and what is most likely to prevail, he infers that what was
effectual before to their transgressing may be so still;”
Looks like confession of sins, repentance and forgiveness is non-existent in these illegitimate Hellenising fake churches and, in contrast, judging by those not entitled to judge, is a full time occupation. Let’s be clear about this, real Christians repent before they are Baptised. That means they TURN from their old ways, they give up their old lives and bury them in the watery grave of Yashua Messiah’s death/sacrifice. They then rise out of the water a new creation – a new man or new woman, not capable of sin, that is, once gifted with The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit. This means that if our former scandalous life is still held against us by certain people within and without this so-called church, then we have an untenable situation, and those enforcing such a policy are judgemental, spiritual renegades and apostates who do need dealing with. This verse is yet more solid gold proof that it is not of Paul’s hand!
1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.
1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
Rest assured, the clown who penned 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus hadn’t a clue about Christian Spiritual regeneration.
8 (MCV) Likewise attendants must be honourable, not double-tongued and/or two-faced, not compulsive drinkers, not those who lust after filthy lucre;
1 Timothy 3:8 (KJV) Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre;
1 Timothy 3:8 Notes: Again, as before, what kind of Christians are we dealing with here, if they’re double tongued boozers and money grabbers? It would be hilarious if not so serious. It looks like matey, the second century author of these epistles, hasn’t a clue about regenerated Christians and Christianity, but then as a founder of the Satanic Hellenised Roman Cult, how could he!?
9 (MCV) Holding the hidden ways of The Faith in a pure conscience.
1 Timothy 3:9 (KJV) Holding the mystery (hidden ways) of the faith in a pure conscience.
1 Timothy 3:9 Notes — (a)You what? What is he rambling on about? ‘mystery of the faith’ What mystery or hidden ways? How is SIMPLE faith in Yashua Messiahmysterious? Is it not all very straight forward. Paul confirms it for us, doesn’t he?
2 Corinthians 11:3 (MCV) But I fear, lest by any means, as The Serpent Creature beguiled (and sexually seduced) Evethrough his subtilty (his evil and diabolical craftiness; see link No. 5 below); so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in The Messiah – The Anointed.
If someone or something is simple to understand, where is the mystery? There is no mystery, but there’s plenty of mystery in the Babylonian MYSTERY Religion otherwise known as the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (see link Nos. 3 and 4 below).
1 Timothy 3:9 Notes — (b)He then, almost gratuitously, throws in: ‘in a pure conscience’. Answer methis, dear readers, what kind of conscience does a regenerated Christian have, if it’s not pure? Does this author creature have any understanding at all? Is a Christian completely forgiven or not – is he or she Justified and beyond reproach or not, that is, beyond condemnation?
1 John 3:3 (MCV) And every man that hath his hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.
Romans 8:1 (MCV) There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus.
10 (MCV) And let these potential attendants first be proved; let them use their appointment of being an attendant, as a test to see if they are trustworthy and reliable.
11 (MCV) Likewise so must their wives be upright and honourable, not slanderers and false accusers, sober, trustworthy in all things.
12 (MCV) Let the attendants be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.
13 (MCV) For they that have served well as attendants will gain a good standing for themselves and, with it, great boldness in The Faith which is in Messiah Yashua.
1 Timothy 3:10-13 (KJV) And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office of a deacon, being found blameless. 11 Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things. 12 Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. 13 For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.
1 Timothy 3:10-13 Notes — (a) Much of thisis just a repeat of the nonsense that applied to their so-called bishops, however there are one or two other issues within these verses: “Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things”. I will highlight once more, what kind of Christians are we dealing with here? Are they regenerated or not? Are they being led by the Set Apart Exclusive Spirit or not? All I see in these verses are the characteristics of the heathen and lost, not born of Yah Christians – yet at the same time people that would be more than welcome in their Hellenised church, which would later morph into The Roman Cult.
1 Timothy 3:10-13 Notes — (b) “For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.”
From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:
Verse 13. ‘That have used the office of a deacon well’ They who, having been tried or proved, 1Ti 3:10, have shown by their steadiness, activity, and zeal, that they might be raised to a higher office, are here said to have purchased to themselves a good degree.
Here we can graphically see explained to us by Adam Clarke, the pecking order system of the Nicolaitans, that this forger is promoting and promulgating. “If you do well then the sky is the limit and one day you could be a pope” This is the spirit that’s at work here – advancement as if an employee in a large corporation, which is exactly what the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion is (see link No. 4 below).
14 (MCV) These things write I unto thee, hoping to come unto thee shortly:
15 (MCV) But if I delay my departure, that thou may know how thou ought to behave thyself in The House of Yah, which is The Ecclesia of the living Yah, the pillar and ground of The Truth.
16 (MCV) And without controversy great is the hidden way of Set Apartness: Yah was manifest in the flesh, justified in The Set Apart Exclusive Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Israelites and Adamic Nations, believed on in the world, received up into Glory.
1 Timothy 3:14-16 (KJV) These things write I unto thee, hoping to come unto thee shortly: 15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth. 16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes — (a) Now the above last verses of 1 Timothy 3 are 50/50 in terms of Truth and religious hogwash. Verse 14 is irrelevant to the subject matter at hand, as the forger is quite obviously attempting to pass himself off as Paul. However, this statement is true, if the message is figurative: “how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the Truth.”If it’s not figurative, and the forger is referring to a literal CHURCH BUILDING, made with man’s hands, then he gives himself away in no uncertain terms. In fact it could carry a dual meaning, as we know how their grandiose church buildings and cathedrals would feature in the future, and then be referred to as ‘a house of God’
1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes — (b) “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness.” Once more we have this religious bunkum word ‘godliness’ which I previously unravelled in my earlier writings on 1 Timothy 2. (see link No. 2 below).
1 Timothy 3:14-16 Notes — (c)Finally we get this: “God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.”
“God was manifest in the flesh” I have no problem with that, but “justified in The Spirit” I am not so sure about. Did the only begotten Son of Yah need to be justified? And “believed on in the world”. Is this speaking generally or referring to a select few that he met on His travels? Not very clear is it?
Now also notice how there is no mention of who Yashua Messiah really came for, so let me refresh your memories:
Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (not Jews).
He also gave The Twelve Learners explicit instructions:
Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Adamic Nations, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (not Jews).
Please note: I am not referring to the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews when mentioning The Twelve Tribes of Israel (see video link below).
To summarise, these last verses are probably the best verses in the whole chapter, but still leave a lot to be desired and certainly don’t let the Hellenising religious forger off the hook. 1 Timothy 4 coming up.
OK, straight away, let me make it very clear that, in and of itself, this story is FINE!!!So I will state for the record that it’s a valid Biblical account of a very interesting and informative topic. So what makes it a Pain In The Butt, I hear you ask? Members of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion or blind and deluded mainstream Christians are what make this uplifting story a Pain in the Butt! Pretty much like they do everything else from The Holy Scriptures with their perverted, satanic, blind guide misinterpretations, and this Cornelius story is a classic example of how they satanically misuse it to annul water Baptism. More on that later.
So how do they make this story a Pain in The Butt, I also hear you ask? Well in order to discover that, let’s copy and paste the Biblical narrative here, first, so that we are fully aware of what went on:
Acts 10:1-2 (MCV) There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band, 2 A sincere man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.
So here we have an Italian Roman Centurion which, would make him a Canaanite, for Italians are descended from the Babylonian Hittites, who were Canaanites. Romans were not Italians, so were not Canaanites. Notice that he feared God, so he and his household were Old Covenant believers, not New Covenant believers, so no Grace.
Now racially, to a chosen Israelite like Peter, who was NOT A JEW (Take note, Israelites are not Jews – see links below), this man would have been the lowest of the low. Again, racially, he would have been sub-species scum to Peter. We need to get this very real life scenario firmly fixed in our minds, so that we understand what’s going on here. No slimy, libtard, multicultural Cultural Jew Marxism is this society, as in our Jewified, dissolute, degenerate society today.
Don’t believe we are Jewified? Then believe it from one of their own:
“We have corrupted the blood of all the races of Europe — perhaps we have infected them today.
“Everything is Jewified.
“Our thinking is in everything living, our spirit rules the world.
“We are the masters, for everything that has power today is the child of our spirit.
“One may hate us, one may drive us away, our enemies may triumph over our physical weakness, but we are no longer to be gotten rid of.
“We have conquered peoples, conquered the races, defiled them, broken their strength, made everything rotten, lazy and corrupt with our stale culture, our spirit can no longer be exterminated.”
— Dr. Kurt Munzer, Jewish novelist, “The Way To Zion”
Moving on, we are also told that Cornelius is sincere in his belief, as are his household, which means they are all being called by The Father. We know this for they are all praying and giving alms. Next we have Cornelius seeing a vision:
Acts 10:3-4 (KJV) He saw in a vision, evidently about the ninth hour of the day, an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius. 4 And when he looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God.
Right, here we can see further confirmation that The Father has begun to call Cornelius for he has been praying and doing good deeds. These activities are an open sign that Cornelius has been called by The Father, otherwise he would not have been doing these things, especially praying. He then sees an angel of God in a vision, so this is a man that The Father has a specific job for.
Here the angel gives Cornelius his first instructions:
Acts 10:5-6 (KJV) And now send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon, whose surname is Peter: 6 He lodgeth with one Simon a tanner, whose house is by the sea side: he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do.
Cornelius follows the angel’s instructions:
Acts 10:7-8 (KJV) And when the angel which spake unto Cornelius was departed, he called two of his household servants, and a devout soldier of them that waited on him continually; 8 And when he had declared all these things unto them, he sent them to Joppa.
Next we jump to Peter who also sees a vision:
Acts 10:9-16 (KJV) On the morrow, as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour: 10 And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance, 11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth: 12 Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. 13 And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. 14 But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. 16 This was done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven.
Here in these verses we see the THRUST and CORE of the subject matter and the REAL REASON for this story = Peter’s OLD COVENANT mind set and his racial and religious aloofness re non-Israelites and how he had refused to eat and socialise with them as brothers and sisters in the Faith.
Peter is curious about the vision and wonders what it could mean whilst the messengers from Cornelius turn up at Peter’s lodgings:
Acts 10:17-18 (KJV) Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon’s house, and stood before the gate, 18 And called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there.
Peter dwells on the vision and then Yashua Messiah speaks to him through His Spirit and tells Peter what to do – not doubting. Peter meets and greets his visitors.
Acts 10:19 (MCV) While Peter thought on the vision, Yashua Messiah, through His Holy Spirit, said unto him, Behold, three men seek thee. 20 Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I, Yashua Messiah, have sent them. 21 Then Peter went down to the men which were sent unto him from Cornelius; and said, Behold, I am he whom ye seek: what is the cause wherefore ye are come?
The visitors tell Peter about Cornelius their master and of his good standing with the Judean people:
Acts 10:22 (MCV) And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Judeans (Israelites – not Jews), was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.
Peter lodges his visitors for the night and the following day journeyed with them to Caesarea taking some brethren from Joppa with them:
Acts 10:23 (KJV) Then called he them in, and lodged them. And on the morrow Peter went away with them, and certain brethren from Joppa accompanied him.
Cornelius is waiting for them:
Acts 10:24 (KJV) And the morrow after they entered into Caesarea. And Cornelius waited for them, and had called together his kinsmen and near friends.
Cornelius meets Peter and bows to the ground to worship him and Peter immediately lifts him up and corrects him:
Acts 10:25 (KJV) And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him. 26 But Peter took him up, saying, Stand up; I myself also am a man.
Peter shows that he has understood the vision that Yashua Messiah sent to him and explains the Old Covenant Law to Cornelius and how he (Peter) had been wrong:
Acts 10:27-29 (MCV) And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together. 28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is an Israelite to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. 29 Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent ye have sent for me?
Cornelius recites to Peter what he had experienced:
Acts 10:30-33 (KJV) And Cornelius said, Four days ago I was fasting until this hour; and at the ninth hour I prayed in my house, and, behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing, 31 And said, Cornelius, thy prayer is heard, and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God. 32 Send therefore to Joppa, and call hither Simon, whose surname is Peter; he is lodged in the house of one Simon a tanner by the sea side: who, when he cometh, shall speak unto thee. 33 Immediately therefore I sent to thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God.
Cornelius and his household and friends hear the Good News from Peter:
Acts 10:34-43 (MCV) Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that the Godhead is no respecter of persons fictions or masks: 35 But in every nation he that feareth Them, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with Them. 36 The word which The Father sent unto The Children of Israel, preaching peace by Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ): (he is Lord of all:)
37 That word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the Baptism which John preached; 38 How The Father anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with Power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of The Devil; for The Father was with Him. 39 And we are witnesses of all things which He did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: 40 Him The Father raised up the third day, and shewed Him openly; 41 Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of The Father, even to us, who did eat and drink with Him after He rose from the dead. 42 And He commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is He which was ordained of The Father to be the Evaluator of the Spiritually alive and the Spiritually dead. 43 To Him give all The Prophets witness, that through His name whosoever believeth in Him shall receive remission of sins.
The Holy Spirit falls on the non-Israelites:
Acts 10:44-48 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word. 45 And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out the gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, 47 CAN ANY MAN FORBID WATER, THAT THESE SHOULD NOT BE BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 And he commanded them to be Baptised in the name of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.
Right, there it is, the full account of Peter and his encounter with Cornelius the non-Israelite Canaanite Italian and the tough lesson that Peter had to learn. This is the reason why this account is in the Book of Acts and no other and YET!!?? What do you think the gnat straining blasphemers of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion use this passage of Scripture to pathetically try and make a case for?
Answer: NON-BAPTISM CONVERSION OR REGENERATION!!! THAT IS, THE INDWELLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT WITHOUT BAPTISM!!!
And where do they get this idea from? Here:
Acts 10:45-46 (MCV) And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out The Gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.
Yet what happens next:
Acts 10:47 (MCV) Can any man forbid WATER, that these should not be BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 AND HE COMMANDED THEM TO BE BAPTISED IN THE NAME OF YASHUA MESSIAH (JESUS CHRIST).
Now why did this event take place when the norm for regeneration was and is repentance, confession of sins, Baptism and the Gifting of the Holy Spirit and as commanded by Peter at the very beginning of his work for Yashua Messiah:
Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, REPENT, and BE BAPTIZED EVERY ONE OF YOU in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
We’re also told the same by Yashua Messiah Himself:
John 3:3-5 (MCV) Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again (born of God), he cannot see The Kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto Him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be BORN OF WATER (BAPTISM) and of The Holy Spirit, HE CANNOT ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD!!
There it is folks, for all to see, and yet these demonic mongrel dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (so-called mainstream Christians) want to change all that and make regeneration meaningless and, more importantly, POWERLESS with their no-Baptism non-conversion, and this, all based on one misunderstood verse of Holy Scripture, which took place for totally different reasons than they try and make out.
So why did the Holy Spirit fall on Cornelius and SOME of his fellows before they were Baptised? Was it for their benefit or Peter’s and his fellow Israelite brothers benefit, who were present? You see, once we lose sight of the reason for this event we can then drift off into any old make believe, fairy land ideas or cuckoo land myths and fables, which is what non-baptism conversion is – a satanic lie – a myth and a fable.
This event took place in order to convince Peter and his brothers that select non-Israelites were now acceptable to the Godhead, and I did say SELECT! Make sure you notice this:
Acts 10:44 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word.
ALL THEM WHICH HEARD THE WORD!! So what is this telling us? The Holy Spirit only fell on those which HEARD THE WORD! This is informing us that there were some there that didn’t hear The Word and The Holy Spirit did not fall upon them.
As a final warning do not let any evil mongrel dog, blind guide, lead you astray on this most crucial part of your Spiritual journey with Yashua Messiah. Repentance, confession of sins and Baptism MUST precede the Gifting of The Holy Spirit.
Now this article will give me no pleasure at all, but it MUST be done so as warn potential newbies to the Faith, that is, those The Father is calling to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) at this moment in time or, in the future. Make no mistake this vile evil creature is like a roaring lion for Satan, seeking out those that he can devour with his filthy lies and stinking perversions of the Holy Scriptures.
So let’s begin with his first comment which was in reply to my article entitled: “For by GRACE are Ye Saved Through FAITH; AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is The Gift of God – Ephesians 2:8” (see link below)
Here is his first judgemental diatribe:
“If you’re trying to be saved or stay saved, you’re probably not saved, nor do you have the assurance of eternal life that the true gospel gives to all who believe it. The narrow path is the path of grace and faith for all who have received God’s unspeakable gift.”
Here the blind idiot is talking about being saved and yet hasn’t a clue about how one is saved, that is, through water Baptism and the gifting of the Holy Spirit which he satanically denies is necessary. He then quotes a Scripture and writes a load of perverted erroneous drivel after it:
2 Corinthians 9:15 Thanks be unto God for his unspeakable gift. “A gift is free with no strings attached or it’s not a gift.”
Who says a free gift cannot come with certain terms and conditions? Is The New Covenant a contract or not? If there is a new contract in place, do contracts not require certain obligations on both parties within that contract?
If something is free all it means is that there is no financial charge for it, no financial obligations to be a recipient of it, that’s all.
Then we get this which, surprisingly, is correct:
“One of the worst doctrines of the devil is to redefine ”repentance” as a turning from sin, which immediately negates the gift by requiring you to do something (works) to be saved.
“Repentance doesn’t mean a turning from sin. “Metanoia” is the Greek word translated as “Repentance” and it means a change of mind:
“Meta=Change; Noia=Mind
“STRONGS NT 3341: μετάνοια – μετάνοια – μετανοίας, ἡ (μετανοέω), a change of mind:”
Nowhere do I teach that repentance is turning from sin. Repentance is a change of attitude towards sin – a desire not to sin and that is what I teach, which is a change of mind, so here the judgemental ignoramus has failed to read my other articles and LEARN! and has jumped straight in shouting off his big arrogant mouth.
His next load of BS:
“When you believe the gospel and trust Christ as your Savior, you have repented, and you have eternal life, now and forever. You should know you have eternal life, now.”
100% WRONG!!! No one has Eternal Life until they have DIED IN THE WATERY GRAVE OF BAPTISM WITH YASHUA MESSIAH AND ARE THEN LIFTED OUT OF THE WATER AND GIFTED WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT AND MADE A NEW MAN OR WOMAN = A NEW CREATION!!
The ‘old man’ must DIE FIRST before he can put on the ‘new man’ which Paul confirms for us here:
Romans 6:4-6 (MCV) Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism into death: (the watery grave) that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the Glory of The Father, even so we also should walk in newness of Life. 5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of His death, we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection, (raised up out of the Baptismal pool): 6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with Him, (in the watery grave) that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
NOTICE: The old man or the old man’s body of sin is DESTROYED! How is it destroyed? BY BAPTISM!!! Now tell me how the Holy Spirit could live with a LIVE BODY OF SIN? Because this is the idea that this blaspheming dog is putting forward.
And again from Paul:
Ephesians 4:22-24 (MCV) That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man,(only Baptised people have an old man) which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; 23 And be renewed in The Spirit of your mind (be gifted with The Holy Spirit at Baptism); 24 And that ye put on the new man (only Baptised and Holy Spirit gifted people have a new man), which after God is created in righteousness and True Holiness.
Listen folks, do not be deceived by this lying illegitimate, for there is no other way a man or woman can be saved/born of God (born again) just as Yashua Messiah told Nicodemus:
John 3:3-5 (MCV) Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again (born of God), he cannot see The Kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto Him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of The Holy Spirit, (BAPTISM) HE CANNOT ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD!!
There it is, and fail to understand Yashua Messiah’s instructions at your peril! (see links below)
He then starts creating satanic contradictions and/or twisting the Holy Scriptures in order to build his strawman non-gospel and non argument:
1 John 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.
No one can believe on the name of the son of God UNLESS they are born of God and that can only happen once they are Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit!
He then starts JUDGING with an arrogant vengeance which is breathtaking:
“It’s so important to get the gospel right or you could end up in hell. Paul threatened damnation twice (Gal 1:8-9) to anyone/thing who tried to add works to the gospel of grace he received directly from the Lord Jesus Christ.”
This stupid know-nothing idiot couldn’t get The Gospel right if it were a piece of 4×2 whacking him across the forehead!
Galatians 1:8-9 (KJV) But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
This blasphemer should look in a mirror and read those Scriptures to himself.
Pay attention, dear people, because what this evil dog is doing is classifying the act of Baptism and the gifting of The Holy Spirit as WORKS!! Can you believe it? You’d better ‘cos that’s exactly what he is saying and doing.
Notice the Holy Scriptures he uses in order to build his satanic strawman doctrine:
Romans 4:4 (KJV) Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.
“If you try to add your works to be saved or to prove you’re saved, you negate God’s grace and you go to hell. God will not be a debtor to any man, we can receive salvation as His free gift or not at all.”
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Acts 8:15-17 (MCV) Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Spirit: 16 (For as yet it was fallen upon none of them: only they were Baptised in the name of the Lord Jesus.) 17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.
The above crucial event is recorded for us so that there is no confusion regarding Baptism and gifting of The Holy Spirit as the ONLY WAY a newbie to the Faith can be born of God (born again) and SAVED! Even if there is a delay between Baptism and Holy Spirit gifting, as was the case for the Twelve Learners (disciples)
Right, moving on, here we can see the stupidity of this numbskull’s ideas because he uses Paul as an example in a pathetic attempt to make his non-case for the no need for Baptism:
Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
“The Apostle Paul received the gospel directly from the Lord Jesus Christ and not from any man per Gal 1:12.”
Gal 1:12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
OK, I will copy here the narrative of Saul’s calling on the road to Damascus and please read it right to the end:
Acts 9:1-18 (MCV) And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples Learners of The Lord, went unto the High Priest, 2 And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this Way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem. 3 And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a Light from heaven: 4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? 5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. 6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. 8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. 9 And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink. 10 And there was a certain disciple Learner at Damascus, named Ananias; and to him said the Lord in a vision, Ananias. And he said, Behold, I am here, Lord. 11 And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the street which is called Straight, and enquire in the house of Judas for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth, 12 And hath seen in a vision a man named Ananias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that he might receive his sight. 13 Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy Saints at Jerusalem: 14 And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. 15 But The Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles the Nations, and kings and The Children of Israel: 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name’s sake. 17 And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Spirit. 18 And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was BAPTISED.
So what we can easily deduce from this passage of Scripture is that Baptism WAS necessary for Saul, but it’s not necessary for this self-righteous jackass called Jim. He thinks he can waltz straight into The Kingdom of God with his unbaptised LIVE BODY OF SIN. He must be dumber than dumber. LOL
He then rambles on with more satanic drivel and misuse of Holy Scriptures:
“The gospel the Apostle Paul received directly from the risen Lord Jesus Christ is found in 1 Cor 15:1-4. This is the gospel that is relevant today and by which we are saved by today.”
Yes Paul did receive teaching directly from Yashua Messiah AFTER HE HAD BEEN BAPTISED AND GIFTED WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT!!
He then quotes these Holy Scriptures, delusionally thinking that they back up and support his no-Baptism satanic ideas:
1Co15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
1Co 15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
1Co 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
1Co 15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
None of these Holy Scriptures support what he thinks. If he does think that, then he is reading his BS into them, that is, his wishful thinking – a favourite pastime of the deluded members of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.
We then get more blasphemous lies:
“The moment someone believes the gospel personally, that the Christ bled and died on the cross for their sins, was buried, and rose again on the third day has received the gift of eternal life.”
The moment someone believes for the first time is in response to The Father’s call:
John 6:44 (MCV) No MAN can come to me, except The Father which hath sent me DRAW (DRAG) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
This is the ONLY WAY a man or a woman can come to Yashua Messiah. This is our calling but he or she MUST be Baptised and Gifted with The Holy Spirit in order to have Eternal Life. This is our outward sign of commitment to Him as our Saviour – a public declaration, if you like.
Yet more lies:
“The moment you believe, you’re eternally sealed with the Holy Spirit and are born again from above (Eph 1:13-14).”
Ephesians 1:13-14 (MCV) In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard The Word of Truth, the Good News of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, (were Baptised) ye were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise,14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of His Glory.
All these Scriptures are doing is describing the moment we are gifted with The Holy Spirit when, after our Baptism, we are eternally sealed, but not until then. No one is born again from above until after this event. NO ONE!!! The old man MUST DIE IN THE WATERY GRAVE WITH YASHUA MESSIAH FIRST!
Then he says:
“When you trust the Lord Jesus Christ as your Savior you can’t go to hell because the penalty for all your sins (past, present, & future) have already been paid for by Him.”
What he doesn’t tell us here is that NO ONE can fully trust Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) until they are Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit.
And yet again more lies:
“And only Christ kept the 10 Commandments and He imputes His righteousness, the righteousness of God, to your account the moment you believe the gospel and trust Him as Savior.”
And no one can fully believe the Gospel until they are Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit. Then they should have the Spiritual discernment to be able to read and understand the Gospel.
He then goes into all manner of nonsense about the mickey mouse Rapture and going to heaven, neither of which are going to happen – so all in all we can see what a blind guide he is:
“You may not feel like it but you become as holy and righteous as the Lord Jesus Christ and you’re eternally qualified for Heaven. You’re saved from hell and guaranteed Heaven when you die or are raptured because you believe the gospel and trust the Lord Jesus Christ as your Savior.”
For by GRACE are Ye Saved Through FAITH; AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is The Gift of God – Ephesians 2:8”
Exposing a Satanic REPROBATE ILLEGITIMATE Called Jim – Part 2
Right, continuing straight on from part one we then get more conceited, arrogant, self-righteous, blasphemous drivel from this know-nothing mongrel dog:
“You’re a typical cult leader who only thinks they know the truth but in reality you preach an accursed gospel that Paul warned about in Gal 1:8-9. I know the gospel (1 Cor 1:15) and I know you don’t rightly divide the word of truth (2 Tim 2:15) You didn’t have the guts to post my comment because the real gospel disputes your false teachings.”
First he accuses me of being a cult leader. I would cry with laughing if what he said were not so sinful and serious, and that’s because all his false witness accusations are insults towards Yashua Messiah, not me, for it is He who has called and chosen me, I did not call on and choose Him. So this numbskull has indirectly blasphemed against Yashua Messiah and possibly the Holy Spirit that indwells me. Furthermore, and this is hilarious, I must be the first pauper cult leader LOL.
His armchair warrior bravado continues with him then calling me a coward, which is just infantile goading. This he compounds by then accusing me of being Scripturally ignorant when The Truth is the exact opposite, and it is he that is incapable of discerning Truth from The Holy Scriptures, which I proved unequivocally in part one.
His satanic evil vitriol continues:
“For example, you falsely teach water baptism to receive the Holy Spirit, when today the Holy Spirit is received when one believes the gospel. (Eph 1:13) May the Lord Jesus Christ rebuke you for leading people away from Him and His gospel.”
Here he just repeats his hollow empty claims, like a clanging cymbal, and compounds his evil sins, for which he will pay a severe penalty in the Resurrection, and with many more stripes than the lost and unsaved:
Luke 12:47-48 (MCV) And that servant, which knew his Lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.
Let this be a lesson to us when we get hold of the wrong end of the stick and then start lashing out with it and laying into our brothers and sisters when the errors are ours.
You see, what the dork has failed to understand is that when we are called The Holy Spirit visits us and then leaves, IT DOES NOT STAY! It comes in order to bring The Father’s calling card and then goes away again. It cannot stay within a live body of sin, hence our need for BAPTISM and the killing of our bodies of sin. This is a catastrophic lack of understanding and will cost him dear in the resurrection if he fails to repent.
…but first, The Unwritten Historical Foundation to The Historical Foundation and the revealing of the ‘certain race’.
Before I press on there are two CRUCIAL things that MUST BE clarified, for these are issues that are NEVER raised in these discussions about blacks in involuntary servitude (erroneously called slavery), whether in The Caribbean or The Americas, and the first issue is the MIGHT IS RIGHT issue which always gets conveniently ignored.
Let’s be honest, (and leaving aside the issue of whether it is right or wrong under might is right), a hu-man being in neck braces and ankle chains has no rights at all – none whatsoever. He is totally at the mercy of his owner. How he is treated is totally dependent upon the kindness and benevolence of the owner or the ruthless cruelty of the owner. The servant cannot complain, he has no hu-man rights and if he was a black serf in Brazil or in a Spanish American colony his life expectancy was three years – tops. Some might say they were the lucky ones. In the American Plantations and Caribbean things were better.
However, as a contrast and comparison, I will now introduce the Orthodox Christian Russians who, in 1917 and the years that followed, were captured in their hundreds of thousands, leading to millions, and either executed on the spot or sent to the Gulags and deliberately worked to death by the Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jews (the certain race). Did these white Russian people have any hu-man rights? Did they have a Liberation Theology Movement that was allowed by the Soviet Government to speak up for them? Did ANYONE speak up for them and demand that they be set free?
Was there a Civil Rights Movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, 1930s, 40’s and 50’s demanding equality and compensation for the families of those that had lost loved ones? Was anyone charged with genocide or crimes against humanity as with the comparatively innocent Nazis at Nuremberg (ALL tortured for their ‘confessions’)? Was anyone made to feel guilty for their wicked evil genocidal RACIST past? Not on your life – not a whisper was heard – all was swept under the carpet and forgotten by the new Glasnost ‘friendly’ Russian authorities and the slimey duplicitous hypocritical Cultural Jew Marxist leftie, Socialist, Commie, liberal west, including the scum at the satanic cesspit known as The UN.
So what point am I making here? Well, quite obviously, it’s the bizarre idea that Anglo-Saxons, Celts and those of Nordic descent – The Israelites of America and Britain have to be permanently reminded of their ‘wicked ancestor’s’ past activities and behaviour and as if THEY were the only ones. So what kind of two faced double standards are being applied here?
This weird hypocritic phenomenon is then compounded by spineless white acquiescence and in some cases, guilt ridden shameful grovelling with these treacherous white wretches walking around with: “I am so sorry” placards hanging round their vile necks!!!
When was the last time you saw a Canaanite Jew even admit to the genocide of the appropriately named White Russians, let alone apologise for their satanic blood lust psychopathic murderous behaviour? Answer: You haven’t, nor will you ever until this verminous viper race is standing before Yashua Messiah’s Throne – His Judgement Seat – then you will see some real grovelling.
I would advise you dear readers to do your research into the Jews and their all encompassing involvement in the Bolshevik Marxist Revolution which was financed out of The City of London (The Rothschilds) and Wall Street.
OK that is the first crucial thing never mentioned and the second is the Canaanite Jews and their actual HANDS ON involvement with the Black Slave Trade with many of the slave ships being Jewish owned, which obviously included their modification and adaptation to carry hu-man cargo.
We then have many Canaanite Jews who changed their names to Spanish and other European sounding names in order to hide their true nationality. They organised the capture of slaves in Africa. They organised the slave auctions in the Caribbean and the Americas and they were into supplies and provisions to the plantations. In other words wherever a fast buck was to be made within this inhuman trafficking of blacks, the Canaanite Jew was in there. OY VEY!!!
For more in depth information on this subject please web search Professor of Black History, Tony Martin (now deceased) for all the details.
From Wiki: Martin died unexpectedly on January 17, 2013, aged 70, at Westshore Medical Hospital, Cocorite, Trinidad.
Strange how that always seems to happen to people of The Truth.
Right, having laid down the Unwritten Historical Foundation, I will attempt to lay down the The Historical Foundation.
First, some history on American Blacks and their ambitions for equality with American Whites and, in particular, with American Anglo-Saxon Israelites – The Tribe of Manasseh. Here is what two famous white Americans had to say on the subject:
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about, in any way, the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not, nor ever have been in favour of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must the position of superior and inferior. And I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
– Abraham Lincoln, in his fourth debate with Stephen Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18th 1858
“Segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen.”
– Woodrow Wilson, addressing a delegation of black professionals led by Monroe Trotter, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Harvard and Boston newspaper editor, when they appeared at the White House to protest Wilson’s new policies of segregation.
“During Wilson’s first term in office the House passed a law making racial intermarriage a felony in the District of Columbia.”
– Wilson – A Portrait, The Public Broadcasting Service, African-Americans
So, as we can see, this was the racial status quo re white/black relations in the 19th and early 20th centuries out of which grew the racial tensions of the 1950s and 60s and the so called Civil Rights Movement.
However, there were other twists and turns to what I will call The Black Rebellion that more recently came out of something known as South American Liberation Theology or Latin American Liberation Theology and led to Black Theology. Black Theology then led to The Black Rebellion and a movement known as The Black Liberation Theology Movement.
Here are some of the black people, some with their ‘everything and everyone is black’ whacky ideas, who were involved in this anti-white Black Rebellion. Obviously you can do more research of your own into these characters if you wish:
Nat Turner (1800-1831) was the most notorious slave preacher who ever lived on American soil. Turner’s hatred of slavery propelled him to seek freedom by violence. Indeed, Turner killed nearly sixty white people before being captured and hanged in September, 1831. This violent revolt marked the beginning of the black struggle for liberation.
Marcus Garvey (1887-1940) is regarded by many as “the apostle of black theology in the United States of America.”[9] Martin Luther King, Jr., said Garvey “was the first man on a mass scale and level to give millions of Negroes a sense of dignity and destiny, and make the Negro feel he is somebody.”[10] Garvey was one of the first to speak of seeing God through black “spectacles.”
– From the: “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.
William Saunders Crowdy (1847-1908) who founded in 1896 one of the first groups of Black Israelites known as the Church of God and Saints of Christ.
“He claimed to have a divine revelation from God that told him that America’s recently emancipated slaves were God’s chosen people, the true Hebrews. According to Black Judaism doctrine, when the Kingdom of Israel was destroyed, the Israelites were first scattered across the African continent and then selectively targeted by enemy African tribes who captured and sold them to European slave traders for bondage in the New World.
“It’s a common myth that slaves were randomly shackled up and carried off to slavery,” “General Yahanna,” leader of the present-day Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge, told the Intelligence Report. Actually, “Slave traders sailed for months and days to get to specific pickup points. They knew what people they were taking — specifically, the lost tribes of Israel.”
– From: “Understanding God’s Word Ministry” Web Page, “False Doctrine – Black Hebrew Israelite Movement”
“Howard Thurman (1899-1981), in his book Jesus and the Disinherited (1949), saw black life paralleling Jesus’ life because His poverty identified Him with the poor masses. Thurman also noted that Jesus was a member of a minority group (the Jews) in the midst of a larger and controlling dominant group (the Romans). Thurman thus drew many applications for the black experience from the life of Jesus.”
– Again from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.
Now, dear readers, surprisingly, I am somewhat stunned, and I am stunned that I am actually stunned because, usually, nothing much these days stuns me at all, but this one is an absolute cracker! After 35 years study, this has to be one of the most weird, whacky subjects I have ever encountered, as a Bible scholar and Kingdom of God Gospel messenger for Yashua Messiah who, for the record, was WHITE, as were Adam and Eve – but more on that later.
Moreover, this “Alice in Wonderland” subject, with all its rabbit holes, will take some unravelling, and the reason for that is that it had never before even entered into my mind, that the principal Bible characters were black, until I discovered it recently on YouTube – need I say more? A little chuckle here for the author. However, please stay with it as it will arm you with all the knowledge you will need to counter the satanic ideas of these duped foolish black people.
Having said that, I will say that I had heard of the minor, and misunderstood, issue of the “Black (Canaanite) Jews” in Africa – another sensationalised and over blown topic of little importance, but that was all. This subject, though, is another ball game altogether and far more corrosive to The Truth, due to its saturated evil coverage on YouTube (only the even more whacky and stupid CIA “flat earth” rubbish beats it).
I will also state for the record that due to the insulting anti-white nature of this topic it means, by default, that those of a ‘certain tribe or ethnicity’, or some people of a ‘certain Canaanite race’, have been very busy, putting in overtime, on this racially motivated and divisive anti-white evilness. It also means, that this isn’t just the handiwork of ignorant deceived blacks. In fact, I would classify the blacks involved as brainwashed deluded dupes or pawns and useful idiots for this ‘certain Canaanite race’.
Furthermore, and whilst keeping the ‘certain Canaanite race’ in the background for the moment and whom I will expose, this whole nasty satanic subversive business is compounded by the obsessive fanatical nature and the arrogant belligerent attitudes of the blacks who are promulgating this anti-white garbage across cyberspace, and, as if there is no tomorrow.
Moreover, most, if not all of these blacks, are Spiritually dead and totally incapable of discerning and understanding the Holy Scriptures – Bible scholars they are definitely not!! This, therefore, gives the whole unbelievable thing a surreal and perverted black humour value – pun intentional, due to their Scriptural ignorance. Let me be clear: “YOU WHAT!!!???” or “YOU MUST BE JOKING!!!!” doesn’t even come near with this unbelievable stuff.
OK, so where do we begin in our unravelling of this demonic mayhem? Make no mistake, for this satanic disinformation and/or misinformation did not materialise overnight and the idea wasn’t discovered at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet. Furthermore, as white Semitic people (primarily Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Dutch, Nordics, Gallics, Franks, Germanics and other white Europeans) we need to know who is behind it and what their aims are. Added to which, does this issue form part of a bigger anti-white genocidal conspiracy? Yes, absolutely.
Now you, if you are a PC, Cultural Marxist, Social Justice Warrior (SJW) may say: “Oh yeah, here we go again, yet another dumb delusional conspiracy theory.” And I would say yes, most, if not all conspiracies start out as theories until they are investigated and researched and once proven to be Conspiracies then the word ‘theory’ vanishes like the early morning mist, unless, of course, you are fearful, weak, lazy, cowardly, cognitively dissonant and emotionally unbalanced (an SJW) – a far more serious problem – for you.
“Conspiracy Theorist – a derogatory put-down term dreamt up by the CIA to discredit those who questioned the official narrative of the JFK assassination.”
— David Icke
“Conspiracy Theorist – someone who questions the statements of known liars.”
– Unknown
“Social Justice Warrior – someone who believes the statements of known liars and votes for them.”
– Brother Charles
“A conspiracy theory will remain forever a conspiracy theory until it is met with obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies from government(s) at which point the conspiracy theory defaults automatically to a conspiracy. E.g. the lying bullshit that is the NIST Report on 9/11.”
— Brother Charles
Right! Here we go, The BLACK JESUS and also The BLACK DISCIPLES and The BLACK APOSTLES and The BLACK KING DAVID and The BLACK JACOB/ISRAEL and, of course, the obligatory BLACK ISRAELITES and last but not least how BLACKS INVENTED EVERYTHING!!! = WOW! how amazing is that!!!???? How have we missed these incredible ‘historical truths’??? It’s all looking very BLACK indeed, isn’t it? I fear that us whites have a very DARK future ahead of us. LOL
Now hilarious as all this ridiculous gumpf is, there is even a more mirth filled element to it. According to these black ‘geniuses’ Jacob/Israel was black, but his twin brother Esau was white, red and hairy, as described in the Holy Scriptures and, of course, it’s also claimed by these daft blacks that he’s the forefather of all those ‘wicked’ Confederate Red Necks, just to give this whole subject a very convenient anti-white Southern USA slant or flavour. Clever eh?
Genesis 25:24-25 (KJV) And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her (Rebecca’s) womb. 25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. (Brackets and emphasis mine)
Needless-to-say there is no mention here in The Holy Scriptures of Jacob being black.
So, as already stated, where do we begin? Well the obvious place to start, as with all these things, is with the agenda(s) and to pin point whose agenda and what kind of agenda, for there is ALWAYS AN AGENDA, folks, and it’s always bubbling away somewhere in the background. It NEVER fails.
This, therefore, leads us to ask some very basic questions like, is this strange Black Jesus phenomenon motivated by: 1) religious zeal, 2) politics, 3) hatred (oh how the ‘certain race’ loves that word) on solely anti-white racial grounds, 4) for revenge, 5) or just simple racial jealousy? From my research, thus far, I would say that all these factors come into play, accompanied by the associated and obligatory unhinged emotions. Added to which, all the elements are being deviously and deliberately stirred up by the ‘certain race’ for their anti-white genocidal programme. More in part two.
Is The Father Calling YOU to His Son, Yashua Messiah? 
