Was JESUS CHRIST a JEW?…

…Or better, Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a JEW?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38.

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Canaanite Jews were and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (KJV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (KJV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Matthew 23:33 (KJV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially a viper or a reptile and therefore against Himself – IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, that’s what these Canaanite Jew people were and still are in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurous thieves and, worst of all, genocidal psychopathic cold blooded murderers, as in the so called Russian Revolution as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

“A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

– Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten God, for they had never known God at all and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them straight:

John 8:44 (KJV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (Brackets mine)

The Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of God, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the God of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so called African-American blacks.

However I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s parents. In Matthew we have Joseph’s lineage who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father but his step-father and in Luke we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (KJV) The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (JUDAH) and his brethren; 3 And Judas (JUDAH) begat Phares (PHAREZ) and Zara (ZARAH) of Thamar (TAMAR); and Phares (PHAREZ) begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam (REHOBOAM); and Roboam (REHOBOAM) begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
Mat 1:15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI. (Emphasis mine)

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (KJV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So did Joseph have two fathers or is this a contradiction or just an expression of of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still refered to as his father and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was Heli’s son.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon through Solomon’s son Rehoboam and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David, We therefore have Yashua Messiah who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (KJV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH).

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (KJV) The Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah nor his descendants until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However I can here the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another wife named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Lord for disobeying their father Judah and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consumation of their marriage to Tamar and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the first Canaanite Jews and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside and in turn this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews via their mothers and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father.

So to sum up we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Israelites; 3) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah, for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Canaanite Jew.

For further reading and understanding of the origins of the white Semitic Israelites and Canaanite Jews please see my two articles below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Advertisements

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 8 – The Blacks and Their Satanic Perversions of The Holy Scriptures Exposed

Before I start this crucial part of this series of blog posts we need to address this skin colour issue with regards to the writing of The Holy Scriptures and the reason why skin pigmentation does not appear to be of any importance to God or His authors. Why Is that? Quite simply because the black races were still in Africa and those that were in Mesopotamia, today called the Middle East, were there as slaves and/or eunuch slaves and were not deemed as people of any significance – they were non-entities. Did “Black lives matter”? Not at all. This means that The Holy Scriptures were written for white Israelite people and only white Israelite people because they were God’s chosen white Israelite people.

Is God, by Freudian Marxist Pharisee PC liberal standards, a RACIST!!!???? You bet.

We need to understand this basic, The Holy Scriptures are about Israel and then Israel and then Israel. Other nations and peoples only feature as and when they interact with???????? You got it, Israel and the Israelites who I will now prove were and still are WHITE!!!!!!!

Furthermore, I will confound their stupid non-arguments before I even expose one of their many infantile blasphemous errors and satanic misinterpretations and gross distortions of The Holy Scriptures by quoting one or three Holy Scriptures of my own and with some Strong’s definitions to back them up, but first things first – Adam and Eve:

Were they white or were they brown or were they – horror of horrors – black!!!???? From Strong’s Concordance:

Adam – H119 – ‘âdam – aw-dam’ – To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

OK, there it is folks – Adam flushed red in his face and was of a ruddy complexion, just like his descendant King David:

1 Samuel 17:42 (KJV) And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and RUDDY, and of a fair countenance. (Emphasis mine)

Now I don’t know about you, but I have NEVER heard of blacks being refered to as people of a fair countenance or that are beautiful or handsome or pleasing to the eye to look at. Moreover notice that David, like Adam, was RUDDY in complexion and from Strongs, once more, we get:

Ruddy – H132 – ad-mo-nee’, – ad-mo-nee’ – From H119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion): – red, ruddy.

Moving on we then find this gem of a verse which I believe says it all and it leaves the blacks and their black Israelite insulting whacky ideas stone dead in the water:

Lamentations 4:7 (KJV) Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire: (Emphasis mine)

Let’s also be clear, Nazerites are ISRAELITES and these Nazerites, that were residing in the Southern Kingdom of Judah when it was invaded by the Babylonians, are described as having skin that was purer than snow and whiter than milk. Now how white do Israelites have to be before these brainwashed blacks get the picture? In the next verse it states:

Lamentations 4:8 (KJV) Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick. (Emphasis mine)

Now if you get this verse thrown at you by these silly people just point out that white skin turns darker as starvation takes its toll. These people definitely died of starvation due to the seige of their city by the Babylonians.

From Answers.Com – Why do people turn black when they die?….

“As body begins purification, the skin will take on a greenish tone as sulfurous gasses break down the red blood cells. Intestinal gasses flood into the body tissues producing first green then dark coloration.”

OK, having laid the foundation that Israelites were and are white, I will now deal with a list of Holy Scriptures that these silly blacks use in the most pathetic ways in order to make their ludicrous and laughable claims – starting with:

2 Kings 5:27 (KJV) The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow.

Now here they use the recording of this event as proof that this Israelite man was black in order for the leprosy to contrast as white as snow with his black skin or to be recorded as the leprosy being a representation of a change of his skin colour. However if we do our research what do you think we will find? This:

As we can see brown skinned people do not produce leprosy that is as white a snow but rather leprosy that is the same colour as their brown or black skin. Here is a further image:

They then use Leviticus 13:2-6 in the same way with regard to leprosy but still making the same false claims:

Leviticus 13:4 (KJV) If the bright spot be white in the skin of his flesh, and in sight be not deeper than the skin, and the hair thereof be not turned white; then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague seven days:

Let’s be clear folks white people have white leprosy and blacks have black leprosy:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/leprosy?sort=mostpopular&excludenudity=true&mediatype=photography&phrase=leprosy

Next up we have Acts 21:37-38, but for this exposé I have included verse 39:

Acts 21:37-39 (KJV) And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek? 38 Art not thou that Egyptian (a Canaanite Jew inhabitant of Egypt), which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers? 39 But Paul said, I am a man which am [not a Jew] a Judean of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Before I press on dear people you also need to know that these duped black people believe that the Egyptians were black also. Egyptians were olive or swarthy, not black. So through using this passage they think that they can prove that Paul was black as the Roman captain thought he was an Egyptian. How bizarre can this weird concept get?

So what colour was this alleged Egyptian and what would an Egyptian be doing leading an insurrection of 4,000 murderers? Who were the biggest trouble makers and murderers that the Romans had to deal with in these parts of the Roman Empire? I will give you one guess. Yes that’s right – the Canaanite Jews – The Zealots who looked white even though they were, and are, not white and do not claim to be white.

In verse 39 we read Paul declaring that HE WAS A MAN!!! Now why would he make such a strange declaration? Did he think the chief captain was blind or even stupid? No, not at all, Paul was making it clear that he was not a hu-man, not a snake-man – not a viper man – not a serpent man from The Garden and Canaan post flood – not a Canaanite Jew.

Make sure you understand, folks, that Paul was a white Semitic Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin – fair skinned, not a Canaanite Jew or a black Canaanite. Modern day Benjaminites are the Nordic Nations of Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/Israel%20Not%20Captiv%20%5BA%5D.htm

Please note, the information in the above link, although very helpful, is not 100% accurate, especially when speaking of the Canaanite Jews. Canaanite Jews were NOT Edomites.

OK what do we have next?

Numbers 6:5 (KJV) All the days of the vow of his separation there shall no razor come upon his head: until the days be fulfilled, in the which he separateth himself unto the LORD, he shall be holy, and shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow. (Emphasis mine)

Now I presume these dolts read ‘blacks with their dreadlocks’ into this verse. LOL. Oh yeah marn – pass dat weed marn. Where’s Bob Marley when you need him? Absolutely hilarious.

As shown above, Nazerites were WHITE Israelites that decided to set themselves apart from the rest of Israelite society and make the Nazerite vow in the early days of Ancient Israel. This meant they would not shave their hair and allow it to grow, nor drink any alchohol or fruit of the vine, nor touch a dead body. You can read all the other details in Numbers chapter 6, but rest assured it has nothing to do with blacks and their dreadlocks. LOL

Next up and even more laughable, Jeremiah 8:21

Jeremiah 8:21 (KJV) For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me. (Emphasis mine)

Now believe it or not they actually construe this as a reference to skin colour. Unbelievable or what? In Truth this idea is beyond laughable and brings shame upon black people in general through the dumb ignorance of such a distorted and false interpretation.

In these verses from Jeremiah 8 we are getting a description of his reactions of what he is witnessing, that is, the seige and sacking of Jerusalem by the Babylonians with no signs of any repentance displayed by the Israelite occupants of that city. Jeremiah is stunned, traumatised, astonished, shocked and dismayed beyond anything we can begin to imagine or measure. He is hurt to his heart which is filled with a dark foreboding – a spiritual blackness and his countenance shows it through a metaphorical darkening of his face through mourning. No doubt he would have looked distraught, pale and drawn, devoid of expression. Strong’s describes it as ashen. Rest assured, though, and, as I have already proven above, Jeremiah, being an Israelite, was not a black man.

OK next verse, Hebrews 1:3:

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV) Who being the brightness of His Glory, and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by The Word of His Power, when he had by Himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of The Majesty on high.

Now this one has me beat so if any of you can make a connection between this verse and blacks I will be very interested to hear it, if only for humour value.

Next verse, Ezekiel 8:3:

Ezekiel 8:3 (KJV) And he put forth the form of an hand, and took me by a lock of mine head; and The Spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the inner gate that looketh toward the north; where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy.

I presume here that we are back to the dreadlocks nonsense and is if white people do not have locks of hair on their heads. Curiouser and curiouser ‘Cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English).’

Next verse, Genesis 2:7:

Genesis 2:7 (KJV) And The LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Now this one is even more surreal, because these blacks presume that Adam and Eve were brown instead of white. Through their wishful thinking they reason that because the dust MUST HAVE BEEN BROWN, Adam and Eve were therefore brown or worse, black!!!

Interestingly I challenged one of these idiots on social media comments by stating for the record that here in the UK, in Cornwall, we have white clay or white dust and I put it to him that there must have been white clay or dust in The Garden in order that Adam and Eve be created WHITE in order for him to blush and I will post from Strong’s again:

Adam: H119 – ‘âdam – aw-dam’: To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

Now I don’t know about you, but I don’t EVER remember seeing a black man turn rosy or flush red in the face. Perhaps they go from from one shade of black to another shade of black that no one would ever notice.

And with that I will call it a cut and continue with more of their laughable interpretations in part 9.