So who or what is Lucifer? I ask this question because this word, a Latin word, not a Hebrew or Greek word, believe it or not, only appears once in the whole of the King James Version of The Bible – only once, and not at all in the New Testament. Not only that, but how does one, very questionable and, thereby, insignificant word, manage to become so prominent and influential in, not only, Biblical and Spiritual matters, but in secular and atheist matters too? What’s going on? Corrupting satanic additions is what’s going on and, would you believe, by the very same two counterfeiting villains that added the blasphemous trinity nonsense to the Holy Scriptures. Does this prove that leopards never change their spots? You betcha.
The word ‘Lucifer’ can only be found in verse 12 of Isaiah chapter 14 in The Old Testament, but what is Isaiah chapter 14 all about, for we need to understand that taking Isaiah 14:12 on its own as a stand alone verse and attempting to interpret it is only going to lead to gross errors and false teachings galore? What time periods or ages was Isaiah alluding to in both Isaiah 13 and 14? Is Isaiah 14 prophetic symbolism? Is it really about Satan the Devil? Here is the Scripture in question:
Isaiah 14:12 (KJV) How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
Who is this Son of the Dawn or Son of the Morning? Is it about a king of Babylon, as mentioned in verse 4:….
…..or is the intended subject matter something or someone entirely different?
Who or what is Lucifer? Does Lucifer actually exist? Is the name Lucifer a construct and/or a Hellenising Roman Catholic invention and yet another of their devious shell game conjuring tricks – a total distraction and a devilish corruption of The Holy Scriptures? Is it true that the alleged name ‘Lucifer’ can be found only once in the KJV Old Testament Holy Scriptures and not at all in the KJV New Testament Holy Scriptures? If it turns out that ‘Lucifer’ doesn’t exist, how can ‘Lucifer’ be another name for Satan the Devil?
Now, as stated, if it turns out that ‘Lucifer’ does not exist, this must beggar the knock on question, can there be, in Truth, any ‘Luciferian Conspiracy’? Again, how can there be a ‘Luciferian Conspiracy’ if it happens that ‘Lucifer’ doesn’t exist and has never existed? Just do a web search on the word ‘Luciferian’ and see what comes up, for there you will find all manner of weird and even weirder web page titles like:
Washington DC – A Luciferian Plot?; The Luciferian Path – a Witches Sabbat;
Luciferian Sorcery; The Luciferian Legacy; The Lucis Trust, and so it goes, on and on and on with never ending web sites all obsessing about Luciferian conspiracies, plots and mysteries. I could even mockingly add: “Lucifer goes to Toy Town to conspire with Noddy and Big Ears,” such is the ludicrous nature of some of these silly ill informed web page offerings, and all built upon a deceptive idea that has never been thoroughly researched, studied or proven by the authors of these ridiculous infantile, asinine web pages.
OK, so back to reality, and let’s look at this ‘Lucifer’ thing another way, because this issue is much the same, in its foundation, as in other age old mysteries. Mysteries such as the mystery of The Arthurian Legend, otherwise known as the legend of King Arthur with his Knights (Templar) of the Round Table, or even Robin Hood with his Merry Men in Sherwood Forest until, that is, it comes to the numbers of people who will swiftly rush forward to tell us King Arthur and Robin Hood never existed – they were both make believe fictions. In reality, though, the jury is still out on them, for these stories (legends) have neither been wholly proved, nor totally disproved. Always remember, too, that legends do contain some Truths. Myths, as in ‘Luciferian Conspiracies’, do not.
Moreover, this ‘Lucifer Myth’ is slightly different, for here we have a global phenomenon not dissimilar to the worldwide fame of Manchester United FC, a football club. This is a football club that is otherwise known as The Red Devils, (how appropriate is that for this discussion!!??) with a global fan base of millions, irrespective of race, language, colour, religion or creed, it’s also a multi-million £ worldwide commercial brand to boot – a global phenomenon no less. Now, if we were to quiz a similar size worldwide audience with the question: “Who is Lucifer?” how many of them would parrot the mantra: “He’s Satan the Devil.” Nearly all of them I would wager!! On the other hand, how many of them would come forward and say: “Don’t be silly, Lucifer doesn’t exist”? Not many, if any, that’s for sure, and that’s how complete this strange deception is. This deception is so complete, The Devil, via the drug LSD, even got Lennon and McCartney to write a song about him, that is, “Lucy(fer) In The Sky With Diamonds”, so brazen with his deceptions is he in these last days. Always remember folks, wherever you find an all encompassing lie such as the nonsense about ‘Lucifer’ you know the Father of Lies will be in there somewhere, promoting it through his evil willing servants.
Right, that’s enough of the negative preamble, so let’s get down to business, and here is that solitary verse, once again, with its infamous corruption in the King James Version of Isaiah 14. After it, I will copy the Hebrew Transliteral Version of the same verse, along with the Concordant Literal Version, Young’s Literal Translation and The Amplified Bible Translation:
Isaiah 14:12 (KJV) How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
Isaiah 14:12 (Hebrew Transliteral) How you-fell from heavens howl you son of dawn you-were-hacked-down to the earth one defeating over nations.(Notice, NO Lucifer in the Hebrew original text – it ain’t there folks)
Isaiah 14:12 (CLV) How you have fallen from the heavens! Howl, son of the dawn! You are hacked down to the earth, defeater of all nations!
Isaiah 14:12 (TAB) How have you fallen from heaven, O light-bringer and daystar, son of the morning! How you have been cut down to the ground, you who weakened and laid low the nations [O blasphemous, satanic king of Babylon!]
Now here I have listed five translations with only one translation, the KJV, using the Latin derived noun or name ‘Lucifer’, a word which originates from the Latin term lucem ferre, and means ‘light bringer’ or ‘bearer of light’. This means it’s referring to a thing or a being. In Ancient Roman astrology and/or astronomy ‘Lucifer’ was the name given to the morning star, that is, the planet Venus, but is this relevant to the original Hebrew meaning of this verse? No, not at all.
Notice, too, that I say noun, because The Hebrew word that ‘Lucifer’ is translated from is a verb. Now in order for it to be a name, a noun would have to be present in the Hebrew text, but it isn’t, there is no noun, nor any word that could be translated as a name or a being from the Hebrew text, so what gives? The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious agenda is what gives, and I will return to this dimension later.
So how has a verb become a noun when the Hebrew word involved is this: halal; hawlal’; heylel or hay-lale’? Now as we can see from the Hebrew Transliteral and the Concordant Literal Version it means ‘to howl’ or ‘howl you’, that is, to shout or an exclamation. Others say it means ‘to shine’ or ‘shine forth’ or to ‘flash forth light’. If we combine the two meanings we could have ‘to shine’ and ‘to shout out boastfully’ as if we are dealing with someone who thinks he is some kind of big shot, who has got above himself. All these descriptions, though, are verb based, not noun based, and from Strong’s Concordance we get these definitions:
H1966 from H1984 (in the sense of brightness); the morning star: – lucifer.
If we now look at H1984 we get some more information from Strongs:
H1984 halal or hawlal’ “A primitive root; to be clear (originally of sound, but usually of colour); to shine; hence to make a show; to boast; and thus to be (clamourously) foolish; to rave; causatively to celebrate; also to stultify: – (make) boast (self), celebrate, commend, (deal, make), fool (-ish, -ly), glory, give [light], be (make, feign self) mad (against), give in marriage, [sing, be worthy of] praise, rage, renowned, shine.”
So from this we can see that either translation could be correct or perhaps both could be used, that is, ‘howl you’ or ‘shine you’ or ‘boast you’ or ‘rave you’ son of the dawn or son of the morning. It’s my view that both meanings are relevant here and we are dealing with someone who had a very high opinion of himself and let everyone know it. Notice, though, how the translators of the Young’s translation and the Amplified Bible have fallen for the noun trap by interpreting it as “O shining one” and “O light bringer and day star”. This means both these translations have erred along the same lines as the KJV by including noun based translations. They have just replaced ‘Lucifer’ with Venus.
Now notice how Strong, almost begrudgingly, gives his H1966 definition and then tacks old Lucifer’s name on right at the end without a capital ‘L’. Why did he do that and why did such an eminent and brilliant Bible scholar allow a verb to be translated as a noun? whether it be ‘Lucifer’ or ‘The Morning Star’ – a proper noun no less. Easy, because he already knew it was a Hellenised Roman Catholic corruption. At the same time he knew what the deluded consensus of opinion was throughout corrupted Christendom or, better, the satanic opinion of the worldwide Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and how that overwhelming erroneous opinion had been carried down through the ages from the second and fourth centuries AC, and had to be adhered to or else? Some might call it peer pressure!!
So, who were the heretical villains that introduced this corrupting Latin garbage into The Hebrew Old Testament Holy Scriptures? Well, we won’t be surprised to hear these two names mentioned again will we? Tertullian the trinity blasphemer circa 200 AC and later Jerome 390 AC the Latin Vulgate author/translator and Papist religious mongrel dog. Between them, these two blaspheming illegitimates introduced a nonsensical deceptive myth and a lie that many say originated from the Canaanite Jewish, 2nd Book of Enoch, written between 200 and 100 BC. So, as we can see, the satanic plot is thickening quite nicely, and it’s all beginning to look very magical, very magical indeed. Well Tertullian was a sorcerer so what do we expect?
To sum up this preliminary stage of this series of articles, we now know that the name ‘Lucifer’ is a corruption and fiction added to The Holy Scriptures by those with another agenda – a RELIGIOUS AGENDA. This was, and is, a deceptive agenda to get us to believe that Satan the Devil was, at one point in time, a bright and shining star, otherwise known as The Morning Star or The Son of The Dawn or The Day Star, who was hacked down to the earth from the heavenly realm and who also weakened and/or defeated the nations. Again, is any of this True and can any of it fit as an accurate description of Satan the Devil? No, and to prove it:
Revelation 2:26-28 (KJV) And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations: 27 And He shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. 28 And I will give him The Morning Star.
Here in this short passage of Holy Scripture we have reference to Yashua Messiah Himself offering the morning star to saints who overcome, so what is this all about when we cross reference it with Isaiah 14:12? Well, quite simply it is telling us that The Morning Star is more to do with The Lord than the Devil or with a supposed king of Babylon. This gift of The Morning Star is telling us that those believers who are or were a part of the Church at Thyatira will in the resurrection shine like The Morning Star.
Now if we then add in this Holy Scripture:
Revelation 22:16 (KJV) I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and The Bright and Morning Star.
Here, as we can see, Yashua Messiah is now The Bright and Morning Star so what does this mean? It means we have moved completely away from this perverted idea that ‘Lucifer’ as Satan the Devil was or is The Morning Star or The Son of The Dawn as written in the King James Version of Isaiah 14:12.
OK then, so if it’s not a king of Babylon and it’s not ‘Lucifer’ as Satan the Devil, who then is this Son of The Dawn or Son of The Morning?
All will be revealed in part two.
Exposing The Lucifer Lie (Isaiah 14:12) and, With It, All The Luciferian Myths – Part 2
In part one I proved unequivocally that the Latin name ‘Lucifer’ was, and is, a Cainite-Judeo-Roman Catholic corruption of the KJV of the Holy Scriptures. In doing so, this revealed many other anomalies in Isaiah 14 due to the previous erroneous ‘Lucifer’ associations. This, in turn, created other problems for me as well, because Isaiah 14, due to the ‘Lucifer’ nonsense, is linked closely with Ezekiel 28 where we will find reference to a covering cherub, an alleged angel, that is also supposed to be Satan before he allegedly fell, who again was supposed to be ‘Lucifer’, who was supposed to be The Morning Star, and is now, according to the ‘Lucifer’ adherents, supposed to be a fallen cherub (angel), but are these just more Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious lies and deceptions?
Right, before we move on to Ezekiel 28 there is one issue from Isaiah 14:12 that needs to be cleared up, first, and that issue is raised by The Amplified Bible version of this verse, as quoted in part one, where it states: “O blasphemous, satanic king of Babylon!” Now, not surprisingly, many Bible scholars believe that Isaiah 14 is centred around a literal king of Babylon alone, and possibly even King Nebuchadnezzar, but is this correct, or is it just symbolism for something or someone else? Let’s quote the earlier verse again in Isaiah 14 that the translators of The Amplified Bible are referring to:
Isaiah 14:4 (KJV) That thou shalt take up this proverb against The King of Babylon, and say, How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased!
Now the meaning and message that this verse is imparting is not as straight forward as we might think. First of all we need to know the time frame involved here, we need also to know who and what this oppressor actually is and of course the identity of The Golden City:
Isaiah 14:1-4 (KJV) For The LORD will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to The House of Jacob. 2 And the people shall take them, and bring them to their place: and The House of Israel shall possess them in the land of the LORD for servants and handmaids: and they shall take them captives, whose captives they were; and they shall rule over their oppressors. 3 And it shall come to pass in the day that the LORD shall give thee rest from thy sorrow, and from thy fear, and from the hard bondage wherein thou wast made to serve. 4 That thou shalt take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say, How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased!
This passage is referring to a future time when the descendants of Jacob/Israel, that is, primarily the Anglo-Saxon and Celtic peoples of Britain, Her Commonwealth and The USA along with the North Western Nations of Europe (The Scandinavian Nations) are restored to their lands after having been held captive as slaves under hard bondage by their oppressors. Oppressors who are represented by this metaphorical king of Babylon and his descendants. Isaiah says the people of these same Israelite nations will eventually taunt or mock their defeated oppressors.
Second of all we need to know that during Isaiah’s life time Babylon had not become a great power, so these verses were written prior to Babylon’s ascendancy. This also confirms that it is prophetic in a two, even a three fold way. Assyria (Ancient Germany) was the great power of Isaiah’s time circa 800 – 710 BC who took the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 740-725 BC. It wasn’t until King Nebuchadnezzar became king of Babylon that the Southern Kingdom of Judah (The Judahites, Levites, Benjaminites and The Canaanite Jews) were taken captive in circa 585 BC. We then have the prophetic future captivity of the same peoples today.
Moreover, the word ‘proverb’ here would be better translated as ‘maxim’, as in a ‘maxim in law’, meaning to take up this authoritative unambiguous statement or maxim in law as a taunt against this symbolic king of Babylon. The thing is, who or what is this term ‘king of Babylon’ referring to; who or what does it symbolise? Let’s use Strong’s again:
H894 babel baw-bel’ from H1101; confusion; Babel (that is, Babylon), including Babylonia and the Babylonian empire: – Babel, Babylon.
Notice the primary word here ‘confusion’ which now tells us we’re dealing with a king of confusion, but what, in a Biblical sense, does ‘confusion’ mean? Again we will refer to Strong’s after I have quoted these verses from Leviticus:
Leviticus 18:23 (KJV) Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.
Here we can see that ‘confusion’ in The Lord’s eyes is not as we would see confusion, that is, mental disorientation or a confused state of mind. The meaning of the word ‘confusion’ here is specific and bad blood or bad bloodlines caused by sexual ‘strange flesh’ perversions and bestial fornication are now in the picture, so let’s look at Strong’s again:
Confusion: H8397 tebel teh’-bel Apparently from H1101; mixture, that is, unnatural bestiality: – confusion.
Notice how Strong’s code number H1101 features again which is a reference to mixing or commingling of bloods, a mixture of bloods. This means we now have the king of mixed bloods or corrupted bloodlines, for this is precisely what the term ‘King of Babylon’ or ‘King of Babel’ in a general sense means here. So Isaiah is literally prophesying a laying down of the law by way of a taunt to the king of corrupt bloodlines, but who was that, for it could not have been solely a literal king of Babylon?
Moreover, let’s return to Isaiah 14:12 where it states that this king of corrupt bloodlines fell from the heavens: How hast thou fallen from the heavens, shine or boast you, son of the dawn!? Again, who could this shining boastful son of the dawn or morning be, for it’s certainly not Satan? He was a serpent from the beginning and more crafty than any other beast (living creature) of the field. Iniquity was never found in him, for he was always iniquitous right from the start. The Lord made him that way and He confirms this here:
John 8:44 (KJV) Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Genesis 3:1 (KJV) Now The Serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God HAD MADE. (Emphasis mine)
OK, I can now hear and see in my mind a few detractors getting a little agitated about this and they will most likely be shouting those verses from Ezekiel 28 at me. So let’s take a look at those verses now so that said detractors do not do themselves any harm:
Ezekiel 28:11-15 (KJV) Moreover The Word of The LORD came unto me, saying, 12 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon The King of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. 13 Thou hast been in Eden The Garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. 14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. 15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.
Let’s look at the last verse first: “From the day that thou wast created.” So was this King of Tyre created or was he born like the rest of us? Likewise, was there ever a king of Babylon that was created? How could this King of Tyre ever have been perfect in his ways? Wasn’t he a sinner like us all who were, or are, lost and not saved? Was the King of Tyre ever anointed? Was he ever in the Garden of Eden? Was the King of Tyre ever a covering cherub, that is, an angel? I wouldn’t have thought so, and what is a ‘covering cherub’ in the sense of these Holy Scriptures anyway – what’s this all about?
What, too, is this reference to: “iniquity being FOUND in him?” If this is meant to be an allusion to Satan the Devil, how can there be this allusion when Satan the Devil – that Old Serpent was MADE EVIL from the beginning. Evil and iniquity were NEVER found in Satan, these negative and nasty characteristics were there right from the start. To whom, then, could these verses be referring to?
Here are some more questions only, this time, a little more testing. Who does the King of Tyre actually represent? Could a man who was perfect in his ways be likened to a cherub? Yes, why not? Obviously not in a literal sense, because cherubs are a type of angel, but in a Spiritual sense, yes a man could be a cherub, especially if he was perfect in his ways and doing the job of a cherub, which would be watching over, guarding and/or protecting something, that is, The Garden of Eden. We often here people refer to innocent babies as being little cherubs which is a reference to their vulnerable innocence. Could someone perfect in his ways be referred to as completely child like in his innocence? I reckon, so are you beginning to see the picture here? I do hope so.
But what about all that stuff about precious stones and pipes and tabrets and him being anointed and then last, but not least, walking up and down amidst stones of fire? Easy, they all apply to Adam, and to him in particular, but Eve obviously features as well – she being made from one of his ribs – Adam’s flesh. So you see folks this business about iniquity being found can only apply to Adam and Eve, for they were both perfect in their ways until iniquity was found in them, and they were both in the Garden; the King of Tyre was not, nor was any King of Babylon. Furthermore, Adam & Eve had hearts of flesh until their hearts turned to stone. This is the core issue of the fallen condition or state of man in his lostness, and to prove what I am saying is true, we will refer once more to Strong’s:
Tyre or Tyrus – H6865 – tsor, tsor or tsore, tsore – The same as H6864; a rock; a place in Palestine: Tyre, Tyrus.
Tyre or Tyrus – H6864 – tsor or tsore – From H6696; a stone (as if pressed hard or to a point); (by implication of use) a knife: – flint, sharp stone.
Notice the references to ‘stone’ here and these can only apply to Adam’s fallen condition – his metaphoric and catastrophic Spiritual fall from the heavens – his now stony heart after his fall from being the perfectly innocent shining pinnacle of the Godhead’s creation, hence the precious stones reflecting the Light of the Godhead. Adam and Eve would have shone in the Garden with the Light of God – Morning Stars. None of these attributes could ever be applied to The Serpent Creature – The Devil, for his heart was made stony from the beginning.
So where does this King of Confusion with all it’s interbred strange flesh fit in I hear you ask? Well, for an explanation of that you will need to check out link No. 1 below, for all the details, because it’s in The Garden of Eden that the mixed blood issues start, that is, with Cain. Abel was Adam’s son and after Abel’s death, Seth. Seth, like Abel, being Adam and Eve’s son and Cain being the Devil’s son through Eve. Always remember Eve is the mother of all living. Adam is the father of mankind alone. The Lord would later be known as The Son of Man to let us know that He was descended from Adam and Eve, not the Devil and Eve.
OK, so now we know the identity origins of the Kings of Babylon and Tyre, that is, the originator of sinful mixed blood results or the confusion caused by Adam and Eve’s sin in the Garden. This means that Adam’s blood is not directly involved here but, indirectly, it is through Eve who had Adam’s blood. Therefore Adam had to take responsibility for Eve’s and his own transgressions in The Garden. He was the Son of The Dawn in The Garden, before he fell, that is, he shone with The Light of the favour of the Godhead. He was raised up symbolically to the heavens from the dust of the ground to be the perfect pinnacle of the Godhead’s creation. He was made in the Godhead’s image and The Lord is The Light, so Adam would have shone like a light as that pinnacle in the Garden – hence the stones of fire.
Next we have this other statement from verse 12: Defeater of the nations or weakener of the nations. What does this mean? Well first we must understand what this verse is alluding to when it says ‘nations’ because when we analyse the Hebrew we find it’s more specific, and from Strong’s we get:
Nations – H1471 – goy goy go’ee, go’ee – Apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts:- Gentile, heathen, nation, people. (See link No. 2 below)
So what do we have revealed to us here? What is this telling us? Quite plainly it is telling us that Adam’s descendants would weaken and/or defeat the nations. So who were Adam’s descendants? Let’s refer to Strong’s again:
H121 – Man – adam aw-dawm’ – The same as H120; Adam, the name of the first man, also of a place in Palestine:- Adam
H120 – Man – adam aw-dawm’ – From H119; ruddy.
H119 – Man – adam aw-dawm’ – To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).
Adam was of a ruddy complexion and could turn red in the face. What does this tell us? It tells us plainly that Adam was white and his descendants were white. OK, so where did the yellow, brown and black skinned people come from I hear you ask? Some came from Eve’s relationship with The Devil; the Cainites, others from the mixed bloods of Adam’s daughters and the fallen angels:
Genesis 6:1-2 (KJV) And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
So here we can see where the confusion continued from Adam and Eve’s original sin with the Devil. What followed later, when the fallen angels took white women to wife and bore mixed blood offspring. By the time of the flood with Noah and The Ark he had three sons who had wives, Shem was white, Ham was brown and Japheth was yellow. How did Noah produce sons of different colours? Through Naamah, his wife, who was a Cainite – the sister of Tubal-Cain.
Now am I introducing some form of racism here? Yes and no. No because there was nothing wrong with this arrangement in The Lord’s eyes, for this is what He had planned and had given His blessing too – He accepted and saved or redeemed all eight of these people out of the flood – white, brown and yellow, but yes at the same time because we have to accept that the descendants of Shem were white and that Abraham was a descendant of Shem and favoured by God. Furthermore, all was well after the flood until Ham lay with his mother Naamah, and that perverted union again reintroduced the mixed blood (confusion) through Canaan into the post-flood world.
However, the thing we must not lose sight of here is this; that Adam and Eve’s fall was all about sexual perversions causing mixed bloods through miscegenation with the Devil. This is the sole reason for their expulsion from The Garden of Eden. With the birth of Cain they could not be allowed to reside in the heavenly realm upon earth – The Garden of Eden. This, in turn, means that from the perverted liberal Cultural Jew Marxist perspective, God would be deemed a racist.
So to finish up, who were these kings, that is, the King of Babylon and the King of Tyre? They were both representations of Adam, one king the king of Tyre being Adam before he fell, that is, the covering cherub and the other the King of Babylon being a representation of the accursed confusion he had caused through his and Eve’s sin with the birth of Cain.
In part three I will tidy up the loose details that I have not covered in parts one and two.
Exposing The Lucifer Lie (Isaiah 14:12) and, With It, All The Luciferian Myths – Part 3
OK, a quick recap. In part one we learnt that ‘Lucifer’ was, and is, a Hellenised Roman Catholic corruption, via Tertullian and Jerome, of the Holy Scriptures. So having removed the fictional ‘Lucifer’ from the Scriptural equation it left us with the issue of who the ‘Son of the Dawn’ or ‘Son of the Morning’ could be. In part two we then showed how it was Adam that was the ‘Son of the Dawn’. We also learnt that the Kings of Tyre and Babylon were both representations of Adam and Eve, and how Eve, through her shenanigans with the Devil, brought about the disruption and confusion of bloods and bloodlines with the birth of Cain. Therefore, from here on in Isaiah 14 deals with Cain’s descendants, that is, The Babylonians and by association The Egyptians – The Mizraim and The Cushites who produced Nimrod, for they were both half-brothers of the Canaanites, all being sons of Ham.
Returning to part two I stated that I would tidy up the ‘loose ends’ in part three, so without further ado let’s write the first of those ‘loose ends’ here:
“Defeater of all nations” or “Weakener of all nations”. Now which of Adam & Eve’s descendants could this attribute be applied to? And what power or weapon would be at the disposal of these descendants in order that they should weaken or defeat all nations? In a word it’s USURY, and this is interesting, because it was Israel’s use of this weapon on the Canaanites, first, that helped to destroy them and they used it having been instructed to do so by The Lord.
Look folks, we need to be very aware of how destructive the charging of interest on borrowed money is. It is a powerful weapon of mass destruction that can be used to destroy and weaken those nations that are charged with it. The Lord, too, left strict instructions that interest should not be charged by Israelites on Israelites. This was an evil sin. However, for them to charge interest on their heathen neighbours loans was OK. This then is how Adam & Eve’s descendants weakened or defeated the nations, that is, the non-Israelite nations. Remember, too, that the Israelites were the ancestors of the Anglo-Saxon and Celtic peoples along with the North Western European nations which means usury should not occur within these nations.
Deuteronomy 23:19-20 (KJV) Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury: 20 Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it.
Exodus 22:25 (KJV) If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury.
Leviticus 25:35-37 (KJV) And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee; then thou shalt relieve him: yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee. 36 Take thou no usury of him, or increase: but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee. 37 Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.
How do the above verses compare with the greed and avaricious criminal behaviour of the thieving banksters in our modern world? Something for us all to ponder on.
Next we have these statements:
“How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased!”
Now here is where it gets interesting, because if there are any of you out there who are wondering when and where the New World Order began, it was right here with the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden and the resulting confusions caused by the birth of Cain. Here is where it all started folks, and it’s from this evil foundation that all the other so called wonders (lying wonders) of our modern world emanate, and to prove it, notice the first thing that Cain does:
Genesis 4:17 (KJV) And Cain knew his wife (a daughter of Adam and Eve); and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.
Cain builds a city to let us know the origins of the wicked idea of crowding people like sardines into confined spaces – Cain the master builder, metal worker (musical instrument manufacturer) and mason and the first Freemason – Sorcerer (the originator of the shell game) – Financier – Illuminist – Religionist – Politicist – Socialist/Communist. You name any ‘ist’ or ‘ism’ then you can be sure they all originated from Cain/Canaan.
Furthermore dear people, you must understand that I do not use the terms CAINterbury, AngliCAIN and VatiCAIN, as elsewhere in my articles, lightly or frivolously, because they all apply very accurately and appropriately indeed to the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. All religion stems from Cain. He and his half-brother Abel were arguing about Cain’s religious offering and no doubt with Abel telling his deceived half-brother that his religious ways were worthless and insulting to The Lord. (See link No. 3 below)
So this now leads us to this ‘oppressor’ who has ‘ceased’ which is a reference by Isaiah to both the future King Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylon which ceased with the Persian invasion and the Babylonian/Romish system of our day which will also cease in the not too distant future. In effect, what Isaiah is showing us is a complete history and prophecy of how Adam & Eve’s sins produced a confused breed Cain and who started this whole system off. If we then look at the term ‘Golden City’ and it having ceased, too, what is this term referring to and is it referring to an actual city? Let’s take a look at Strong’s Concordance for some light:
Golden City – H4062 – madhebah mad-hay-baw’ – Perhaps from the equivalent of H1722; gold making, that is, exactress:- golden city.
Gold – H1722 – d hab deh-hab’ – (Chaldee); corresponding to H2091; gold:- gold (-en).
As we can see this term ‘Golden City’ is not really descriptive enough to get across Isaiah’s message here, for what he is really saying is that we are dealing with a system that exacts payments or extortion for doing precisely nothing – an oppressor as in protection racketeering. So again we can see that the oppression is a financial oppression and the oppressor is a woman no less, that is, an exactress or more comically an ex-actress – a has-been. Seriously though you should by now know who this woman is:
Revelation 17:3-4 (KJV) So he carried me away in The Spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
See the gold mentioned here, whose gold is that? Why, it’s your gold, gold that has been exacted or stolen from you and me, stolen from our parents, our grand parents and our great-grandparents all the way back to Cain who even stole from The Lord with his sub-standard offering and then murdered his half-brother Abel for having shown his half-brother Cain the error of his ways.
OK, the next and final loose end unless my readers can find any more:
Isaiah 14:13-14 (KJV) For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
Now some of you might be saying: “Since when did Adam & Eve aspire to exalt their throne above the stars of God (the angels) and imagine themselves an equivalent of the Godhead?” Answer: In The Garden. Adam and Eve took it upon themselves to supplant The Lord, once they had taken of the fruit of the Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil. They then became like their mentor and deceiver the Devil who also fancied himself big time. The BIG SHOT mentality is The Devil’s mentality – The Gangster or Bankster mentality.
Furthermore, if we go back to the time of the Tower of Babel we can then see where this mindset of Cain/Canaan leads, hence we get the above verses in Isaiah 14 and here, too, is where Adam & Eve’s descendants tried to do that very thing:
Genesis 11:3-4 (KJV) And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar. 4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven;
If we then add in these words from The Lord:
Genesis 11:5-6 (KJV) And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. 6 And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
Notice how The Lord openly admits that nothing will be restrained from us or them which we have imagined to do. We must understand that man’s potential is endless whether for good or for evil, for it was the knowledge of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil that man acquired in The Garden.
Now it’s in this vein that we must look at our modern world in terms of what certain people (predominantly the sons and daughters of Cain/Canaan) are imagining to do right now, now that English has become the lingua franca of the planet, for we are nearly, once more, all of one tongue, that is, Babel revisited. This time, though, The Lord will be returning to sort things out once and for all time and then will the gold thieves and oppressors cease.
So there we have it, here is where Adam and Eve’s fall and the subsequent birth of Cain has led us, for the above Mother of Harlots is metaphorically Cain’s daughter – The Queen of Heaven and of the New World Order with Rome being, again metaphorically, the Golden City (Babylon, Sodom and Egypt – see link No. 4 below) and all financed by Cain’s sons in the banking industry The Rothschilds, Goldman Sachs, Warburgs etc. etc. etc – The Beast Power of the Canaanite Jews of The Synagogue of Satan.
When this satanic house of cards system collapses, and without any shadow of a doubt it will, then will we gaze upon them as they are reduced in terms of power to being on a level lower than us, and we will then take up a proverb against them and mock them for all eternity.
Revelation 18:2-3 (KJV) And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. 3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
Be encouraged my friends for the end truly is nigh.
1) Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:
2) What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?:
3) The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
4) The Great City Which Spiritually Is Called Sodom And Egypt!: