Salvation is of The Jews! Oh Really, Is That So!? – John 4:22

Oh yes, is that so? and how many of you are deceived and brainwashed by this wickedly satanic corruption of the King James Bible? Furthermore, did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) actually say “the Jews”, or was He referring to a different ethnic group of people altogether?

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of The Jews The Judaean Israelites.

Right, let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some Light on this illegitimate KJV verse:

Jews – G2453 Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; – from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

So first off, for the word ‘Jews’ we have Judaean’ and ‘belonging to Jehudah’ (Judah). Now let’s get this firmly fixed in our minds, for Judaeans (the occupants and residents of Judaea) were not necessarily Jews, and Jews most definitely did not belong to Jehudah (Judah) (see link below).

In Judaea, in the first century, there were Royal Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites, who, in turn, were descended from the Israelite Tribes that made up the post Babylonian captivity House of Judah, that is, a remnant of those three tribes who returned to Judaea circa 515 BC. In fact, in a strict ethnic sense, Jews were not Judaeans at all. They were always alien usurpers, hijackers and parasitical subversive invaders, who inveigled their way into Israelite society, just as they do today in Britain, America and most civilised western nations.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I will firm up the Jewish Almanac quote by stating, for the record, that Jews were NEVER Hebrews, nor were they Israelites, hence you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first eleven books of The KJV Bible.

Juda – G2448Iouda ee-oo-dah’ of Hebrew origin (3063 or perhaps 3194); Judah (i.e. Jehudah or Juttah), a part of (or place in) Palestine:–Judah.

In this definition we have confirmed for us that Juda or Judah is of Hebrew origin so, therefore, nothing to do with The Jews.

Judas – G2455Ἰούδας Ioúdas, ee-oo-das’; – of Hebrew origin (H3063); Judas (i.e. Jehudah), the name of ten Israelites; also of the posterity of one of them and its region:—Juda(-h, -s); Jude.

Again, in this definition, we are told that the name Judas is of Hebrew origin, which when applied to Israelites would be correct. Hence we get this:

Matthew 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (Judah) and his brethren;

And this:

Matthew 13:55 (KJV) Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and His brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas (Judah)?

Judah – H3063Yhuwdah yeh-hoo-daw’ – from 3034; celebrated; Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five Israelites; also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory:–Judah.

Even in the Old Testament Mr Strong makes no reference to Jews, just Judahite Israelites.

However, Jews are very fond of hiding their Shelahite, Hamitic Canaanite, Serpent Seed identity by using names common to their host nation. This a favourite Jew trick, and this is why I am fairly certain that Judas Iscarriot, the betrayer of Yashua Messiah, was a Jew, and not an Israelite. Betrayal is a standard characteristic of the Jews, as evidenced by a past President of The US:

“The Jews are all through government, and we have got to get in those areas. The government is full of Jews, second, most Jews are disloyal. You can’t trust the bastards. They turn on you.”

President Richard M. Nixon, Nixon Tapes, July 3rd 1971.

In support of the above I will use this example, for we have Paul, later, professing his Israelite Hebrew ethnic identity:

Philippians 3:4-5 (KJV) Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching The Law, a Pharisee;

The first thing you will notice or, at least you SHOULD notice, is that he, at no time, professes himself as a Jew. So what does this mean? It means that erroneous ‘JEWISHNESS’ is read into these Holy Scriptures by ignorant uneducated people with a satanic agenda:

1) He was circumcised on the eighth day, as all Israelites were.

2) He was of the stock of Israel = a white Semite, so not a Jew.

3) The Israelite Tribe of Benjamin, so not a Jew.

4) An Hebrew of the Hebrews, so not a Jew.

5) Touching The Law, A Pharisee, and not all Pharisees were Jews. Nicodemus being another example of a non-Jew Pharisee.

Here is more solid gold evidence of who the Jews are, and Israelites they are definitely NOT!:

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Jews were easily identifiable for their rabid lusting for the death of Yashua Messiah and then claimed responsibility:

Matthew 27:25 (MCV) Then answered all the the Jews, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING; by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Having read all of the above quotes from the very lips of Yashua Messiah and John the Baptist, how on earth can salvation be of the Serpent Seed Jews = the spawn of the Devil himself, both literally and spiritually?

Essential reading for understanding the TRUE ORIGINS of the Serpent Seed Jews:

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

For more Light on this dark subject please read these articles here:

Salvation Is Of The Jews. Oh really, Is That So!?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/25/salvation-is-of-the-jews-oh-really-is-that-so-john-422/

The Jews are The Tares: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

And Pilate Wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/20/and-pilate-wrote-jesus-of-nazareth-the-king-of-the-jews/

I Know That (Ye Say) Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me! https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/john-837-i-know-that-ye-are-abrahams-seed-but-ye-seek-to-kill-me/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/what-is-the-word-gentile-doing-in-the-bible-part-1/

14 thoughts on “Salvation is of The Jews! Oh Really, Is That So!? – John 4:22

  1. Pingback: BREXIT PARTY | End Time's News, Exposing End Time's Fake News, Dissos and Disinformation

  2. Hi Charles, it seems this article got cut short and needs more on the actual corruption in the KJV? Have you found any other versions to demonstrate the corruption? Obviously salvation can’t be of these devils so are you saying the KJV is a translation error and Strong shows that or is there more?

    • I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. To me the article is self explanatory, and I have shown how there’s no way salvation could be of The Jews – the purpose of the article.

      However, feel free to add anything you think might enhance the article, but keeping it on topic.

      • What I meant was have you found any other translations to that effect? I agree obviously it makes no sense. I also meant that for you the article was a bit brief.

        Here’s what my copy of the Peshita says:
        “You worship something you know not; but we worship whom we know;
        for salvation is from the Jihudoyee.”

        There is obviously loose translation because this Jihudoyee often translates as Jews but also, in all places the Complete Jewish Bible lists it as Judeans for John 7:13. Imagine that!

        So, I guess that is the answer, it is pure translation laxity from a word which apparently has several translations and it is played with at will seemingly.

      • Oh yes it’s all agenda driven, so whatever they feel like, that’s what they choose, so that their erroneous position is defended and maintained.

        That’s why I always place links to the foundational articles: “Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel Jews?” and “The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews Explained.” Once that foundation is laid there are no arguments, and Jews cannot be Judahites or Israelites.

        Therefore the first century ‘Jews’ can be Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites (Judaeans) or Canaanite Jews depending upon the context of The Scriptures.

      • Agreed.

        Having gone back to the start of that ‘Chapter’, I found nothing made much sense.

        Firstly, Jesus Christ is in Samaria and the woman is referred to as a Samaritan. Seems to me she is a Samarian and there is a rogue ‘t’. She calls Him a ‘Jew’ but what she is really saying is (in today’s lingo): “Hey Homey, what you doing up in these parts anyway? What business does someone from Judah have in Samaria? We haven’t had dealings since the death of Solomon.”

        Way back in my series on ATJFTP I recall a Wiki link on the term ‘Jew’, which simply said ‘of Judah…’

        So, if I exchange John 4:9 ‘Jew’ with ‘of Judah’ and 4:9 ‘Jews’ with ‘Judaeans’ and 4:22 ‘Jews’ with ‘of Judah’ things make sense particularly as we know the messiah will come from the line of Judah.

        I found this link, which shows quite clearly the same strong’s G2449 is translates as both ‘Jewry’ and ‘Judaea’.
        https://studybible.info/KJV_Strongs/John%207

        Interestingly the Peshita lists ‘Jihuda’, ‘Jihudoya’ (singular) and ‘Jihudoyee’ (plural) in John 4.

        Quite right to establish that link on the truth of Israel!

      • We also have to consider how much the Pharisee Jews influenced the Israelites (those of the Three Tribes) re their bigotry toward the Samarians. Don’t forget that like today the Canaanite Jews had all the power in Judea and could ban people from attending and worship at The Temple.

        Was the Samarian woman up to speed regarding the Judahites and Canaanite Jews or were they all one ethnic group to her? It’s a mine-field of a subject and something we will not fully unravel until Yashua Messiah returns and educates us.

      • Agreed.

        It is indeed a great question. If she were saying to Him ‘what are you doing up here?’ was that based upon His clothing, or His ethnic identity face skin etc. Seems to me it would likely be clothing as He wouldn’t look like a Canaanite. Maybe the Jews had so much power that term had become pervasive colloquial jargon?

      • He would not have looked affluent that’s for sure, but at the same time not looking like a homeless vagabond. So I would put more emphasis on His ethnic identity = no black hair and no oily skin or swarthy skin. A woman would naturally focus on those things so perhaps she did know He was a Judahite and not a Jew.

        Once the conversation was under way she would have known for sure.

      • “Hey homey what you doing’ up these parts anyway?”

      • Actually it’s American ghetto speak. It’s not really appropriate, however it has given me pause to consider this episode. Can you imagine being in this woman’s shoes and just going down to the well for daily water and finding yourself face to face with The Messiah? More mind blow. I reiterated the phrase because it speaks to the reality of the territorial situation that we have uncovered as opposed to what comes off the page via the ‘lax’ translation. I agree that she would have definitely noticed his skin and hair but the clothes must also have said something for he certainly didn’t look like a ‘local’ – hence, “what you doing up here in these parts?”

  3. Pingback: Lax Translations: John 4. A Discussion. – Holy Bible Truth Seekers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s