Why Are There Two Resurrections? – Parts 1 & 2

Or perhaps I should say: What Are The Two Resurrections? For most people, that is, those deceived by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, haven’t a clue about the Two Resurrections. Most of them are fooled into believing their mickey mouse Rapture nonsense, which I expose for the fraud that it is in my article entitled: “Unravelling The Satanic Rapture Deception parts 1 & 2.” (See link below)

So why are there Two Resurrections? simply put, so that all Mankind (but NOT Serpent Seed hu-mankind) can be saved and have Eternal Life in the Kingdom of God: (See link below entitled: “The Jews are The Tares”)

John 3:16-17 (MCV) For God so loved the world The Creation, that He gave His Only Begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have Everlasting Life. 17 For God sent not His Son into the world The Creation to condemn the world The Creation but that the world The Creation through Him might shall be saved.

From Strong’s Concordance:

The World – G2889 – κόσμος – kosmos – kos’-mos – Probably from the base of G2865; the orderly arrangement, that is, decoration; by implication the world (in a wide or narrow sense, including its inhabitants, literally or figuratively [morally]): – adorning, world.

Now I can hear all those Evangelists (so-called) and Fundamentalist ‘Christians’, otherwise known as ‘Fundies’ for short, howling and screaming in disbelief. I can even see some of them jumping up and down and renting their clothes in their pain and anguish at hearing this ‘dreadful news’ – not a pretty sight, I might add!:

“Oh no! Oh no! What are we going to do now, now that we can’t send all those evil sinners to our fiery hell!!?? Doesn’t this messenger Charles character realise how much of an adrenaline kick we get out of telling all those ‘wicked wretches’ they’re going to burn in torment for eternity in our hell fire and brimstone? Who does he think he is, spoiling our party, spoiling our self-righteous parade, spoiling all our psychopathic fun, and rendering us useless and surplus to requirements? We’ll have nothing to do now we can’t threaten, abuse, bully, browbeat and blackmail the dissolute masses through the fear and intimidation of the wrath of our tyrannical Trinity and Monotheistic Ogre gods!” (See links below)

Well all I can say to you mongrel dogs is TOUGH! And now you can start working on your own repentance forthwith, ‘cos if you don’t, it’ll be you who feels the ‘fire and brimstone’, not the lost and the unsaved.

Moreover, as we can see from the above information, we have one of the foundational building blocks of the bad news message of Fundamentalist ‘Christianity’, that is, FEAR, the FEAR FACTOR, the fear of a permanently wrathful and tyrannical ogre god. They are literally attempting to ‘save’ people through severe pressure and fear tactics and/or blackmail. Do they ever stop and think about what they are saying and/or doing? No, not all. Do they ever read what The Holy Scriptures actually say? NO, not a chance!

Therefore, bearing all that in mind, and without further ado I will deal with The Second Resurrection, FIRST. Hey! hang on a minute, what do you mean – The Second Resurrection, there’s no such thing, I hear you say? Well clearly there is because The First Resurrection is definitely mentioned in the Holy Scriptures and if a First Resurrection is mentioned then, by default, there must be a Second Resurrection, otherwise why call it The First Resurrection!?

Revelation 20:4-5 (MCV) And I saw Thrones, and they (the saints) sat upon them, and judgement was given unto them: and I saw the souls spirits of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for The Word of God, and which had not worshipped The Beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is The First Resurrection.

So here we have explained to us The First Resurrection where those who are part of that First Resurrection reign in power, ON THIS EARTH, with Yashua Messiah for one thousand years – The Millennium.

Now take note of verse 5: BUT THE REST OF THE DEAD LIVED NOT AGAIN UNTIL THE THOUSAND YEARS WERE FINISHED! This is the First Resurrection! Right, once more, if we have a First Resurrection then it MUST follow that there is a Second Resurrection otherwise these people referred to as the “rest of the dead” will remain dead and will not live again!

Revelation 20:6 (MCV) Blessed and Holy is he that hath part in The First Resurrection: on such The Second Death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.

We then have The First Resurrection confirmed in verse 6 along with The Second Death which I will go into later. Also, notice, that The Second Death has no power over those who are part of The First Resurrection and if there is a Second Death then, again, by default their MUST be a Second Resurrection.

So what other evidence do we have for this Second Resurrection? Right here:

Ezekiel 37:1-14 (MCV) The hand of The LORD was upon me, and carried me out in The Spirit of The LORD, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones, 2 And caused me to pass by them round about: and, behold, there were very many in the open valley; and, lo, they were very dry. 3 And He said unto me, Son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord GOD, thou knowest. 4 Again He said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear The Word of The LORD. 5 Thus saith The Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live: 6 And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am The LORD. 7 So I prophesied as I was commanded: and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and behold a shaking, and the bones came together, bone to his bone. 8 And when I beheld, lo, the sinews and the flesh came up upon them, and the skin covered them above: but there was no breath in them. 9 Then said He unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith The Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live. 10 So I prophesied as He commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army. 11 Then He said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole House of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts. 12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. 13 And ye shall know that I am The LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves, 14 And shall put my Spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I The LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith The LORD.

These incredible prophetic verses from Ezekiel confirm two things for us:

1) The Second Resurrection is a physical resurrection, unlike The First Resurrection which is a Spiritual Eternal Resurrection, and a far superior resurrection. Hence John says: “Blessed and Holy is he that hath part in The First Resurrection.”

Here is The First Resurrection:

1 Corinthians 15:40-44 (MCV) There are also celestial heavenly bodies, and bodies terrestrial earthly: but the glory of the celestial heavenly is one, and the glory of the terrestrial earthly is another. 41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. 42 So also is The Resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption (capable of decay and death); it is raised in incorruption (incapable of decay and death – Eternal): 43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in POWER: 44 It is sown a natural (flesh) body; it is raised a Spiritual (eternal) body. There is a natural (flesh) body, and there is a Spiritual (eternal) body.

2) What Paul said in Romans:

Romans 11:26 (MCV) And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion The Deliverer, and shall turn away irreverence and disrespect towards God from Jacob.

Now mark this and mark it well, for Paul says ALL ISRAEL, not just some Israelites, but ALL OF THEM, that is, from Jacob/Israel, his Twelve Patriarch sons and ALL their descendants, onwards and up unto this day and into the future – millions, upon millions, upon millions of them, and 98% of them (I’m probably being generous here) UNREGENERATED SINNERS who died IN THEIR SINS and yet they will ALL BE SAVED! So WHEN and HOW will this miraculous event be achieved? Read on for the answer, but first you need to know who the Israelites are!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans/tribes that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,

Benjamin the youngest son,

Simeon

Levi – The Priesthood,

Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,

Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,

Issachar,

Zeebulon,

Gad,

Asher,

Dan,

Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD), Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah = The Jutes, not the Jews = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond (the river) Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

— Flavius Josephus, first century historian.

If you think I am wrong, try and apply this verse to the Jews – God’s promises to Abraham:

Genesis 13:16 (MCV) And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules, (Gibraltar) and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

So as we can see there will be millions upon millions of resurrected Israelites in the future Second Resurrection and ALL given brand new super physical bodies.

However, here’s a question for all you wretched ‘Fundies’ and ‘Evangelists’ out there. If The Father and Yashua Messiah are going to go to all this trouble of giving the Children of Israel super new healthy youthful physical bodies, only to then throw them straight into the Lake of Fire, where is the sense in that? Is the Godhead a Godhead of failure? Is the Godhead that wasteful? Are They into irresponsible behaviour and futile actions? Why not just leave them dead in their graves never to see the light of day again? I will therefore state this for the record: If this is what you think the Godhead are capable of doing, and willing to do, then the godhead you believe in are a pair of merciless vengeful tyrants, and not an ALL POWERFUL Godhead at all. In direct contrast the ALL POWERFUL Godhead I worship is Love, Mercy, Forgiveness, and administer JUSTICE at all times, not mindless injustice and/or psychopathic revenge!! Yes, They punish and will punish SEVERELY, make no mistake, but ALWAYS FOR GOOD REASON! As demonstrated here:

Luke 12:47-48 (MCV) And that (regenerated) servant (one who was, or is, called), which knew his Lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more

Here in these prophetic verses, full of foreboding for certain self-righteous people who think they are saved, we can see who will be more severely punished, AND TAKE NOTE, IT ISN’T THE LOST AND UNSAVED!! Make sure you register this TRUTH in your minds IF you’re one of those self-righteous ‘Evangelicals’ or ‘Fundies’ who goes round judging and condemning the lost and unsaved to hell fire and brimstone in the Lake of Fire – YOU have been warned in agape love.

Revelation 20:11-15 (KJV) And I saw a Great White Throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Strong’s Concordance:

Judged – G2919 – κρίνω – krinō – kree’-no – Properly to distinguish, that is, decide (mentally or judicially); by implication to try, condemn, punish: – avenge, conclude, condemn, damn, decree, determine, esteem, judge, go to (sue at the) law, ordain, call in question, sentence to, think.

So here we can see that The Second Resurrection is NOT about summary mass execution but, rather, judging or evaluating what these people did in their first lives, here in this age, as lost souls. Now pay very close attention to what the Holy Scriptures are saying and refrain from using any close minded thought processes or those erroneous ideas indoctrinated into your minds by satanic ravening wolves from their ‘hell fire and brimstone’ lecterns and pulpits. So what are the Holy Scriptures saying? Well to answer that, here is the non-judgmental Truthful version of that same passage of Holy Scripture:

Revelation 20:11-15 (MCV) And I saw a Great White Throne, and Him (Yashua Messiah) that sat on it, from whose face (countenance or presence) the earth and the heaven atmosphere fled away; and there was found no place for them (forever moving through the aether). 12 And I saw the Spiritually dead, small and great, stand before God; and The Books were opened: and another Book was opened, which is The Book of Life: and the Spiritually dead were judged evaluated, or matters were determined out of those things which were written in The Books, according to their works. 13 And The Sea gave up the Spiritually dead which were in it; and Death and Hell delivered up the Spiritually dead which were in them: and they were judged evaluated, or matters were determined, regarding every man and woman, according to their works.14 And Death and Hell were cast into The Lake of Fire. This is The Second Death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in The Book of Life was cast into The Lake of Fire.

Now make sure you understand this crucial point, for here we can see that the ‘DEAD’ are not dead at all, because they are standing before Yashua Messiah’s Great White Throne, so the word ‘dead’ is referring to another type of death, that is, SPIRITUAL DEATH! This means we have billions of Spiritually unregenerated dead people, standing before Yashua Messiah’s throne. I will also remind you that at this stage they have been resurrected into superb new physical bodies. Now just stop and think about that for a while and endeavour to picture this awesome scene.

OK, so let’s do it, let us picture the scene, there they all are, awaiting their evaluation and, notice, it’s all according to their works in this life, and we know that no one can be saved according to their works, so why is Yashua Messiah evaluating them according to their works when works cannot save them? In fact, why is Yashua Messiah evaluating them at all if He’s going to throw them all, unceremoniously, into the Lake of Fire anyway? Furthermore, we know that they are all sinners, because they are all Spiritually dead, so, again, why not just throw them all into The Lake of Fire, job done!? Why bother with a tribunal!? Are they not already condemned!? Yes they are and THAT is why they were DEAD IN THEIR GRAVES!! Through dying they have paid the penalty for their sinful lives in this life!

John 3:18-19 (MCV) He that believeth on Him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of The Only Begotten Son of God.19 And this is the condemnation, that Light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than Light, because their deeds were evil. (Yashua Messiah is The Light)

Are YOU beginning to see The Light? I do hope so.

Furthermore, here’s a more pertinent point: If Yashua Messiah has taken the trouble to resurrect all these billions of people, given them brand new super physical bodies, just imagine the Spiritual Power and energy involved in doing that. Now imagine the planning and organisational skills involved in this awesome event, not to mention the generation allocations to be made for each era:

1 Corinthians 15:22-23 (MCV) For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23 But every man IN HIS OWN ORDER: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at His coming.

Order – G5001 – τάγμα – tagma – tag’-mah – From G5021; something orderly in arrangement (a troop), that is, (figuratively) a series or succession: – order.

So with these huge events and Truths in mind, is Yashua Messiah then going waste all His Spiritual Power and energy and that of His saints and angels, after having evaluated these people, by throwing them all into The Lake of Fire? Now stop and think (and I know this will be hard and painful for some) and ask yourself if this scenario is realistic and if it makes any sense? Of course it makes no sense, because The Second Resurrection is all about giving these people their FIRST CHANCE for salvation. First chance!!?? I hear you say. Yes their FIRST CHANCE! How do you work that out? I also hear you say. Quite easily as it happens:

The PARABLE of The PARABLES!

Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And the disciples Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in Parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN. 12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13 THEREFORE I SPEAK TO THEM IN PARABLES: because they seeing, see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross (has grown fat, congealed and lazy), and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM. 16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

Now please read the above passage of Holy Scripture and endeavour to understand what’s going on here. Read it several times, if necessary, because this passage is crucial to gaining full understanding of the reason for Yashua Messiah’s mission to this earth. Now pay careful attention for He tells us some critical fundamental Truths. 1) First and foremost, He tells us plainly that His Gospel Message was only for a select few – His Learners (disciples). 2) He tells us that He uses parables in order to CONCEAL The Truth from the majority. 3) He also tells us that He does that in order to protect that same majority from the Power of His Word as they are not ready, not equipped, nor able to receive it. 4) He tells us that He has deliberately blinded them and made them deaf, so that they are incapable of seeing and hearing. 5) Yet at the same time it is their fault and not His, for their hearts have hardened towards their God, as prophesied by Isaiah. 6) So here we have this massive conundrum in that Yashua Messiah is deliberately withholding His Truth from them, whilst blessing only a select few, but at the same time blaming them for not being receptive. 7) Does this make Yashua Messiah grossly unjust? 8) Yes it does APPEAR TO, but only grossly unjust, IF we ignorantly think THIS LIFE is, or THIS AGE is, the only opportunity for salvation. 9) And that is the rub of this conundrum, which, in Truth, is not a conundrum at all, as THIS AGE is clearly NOT THE ONLY OPPORTUNITY for salvation.

Right! After having read the above for as many times as is necessary, you should now understand WHY all these billions of Spiritually dead people will be standing before Yashua Messiah’s Throne on The Last Great Day ready to receive the gift of another life and the opportunity of salvation. So make no mistake, for this Great Day will be the greatest day in mankind’s history, and it will be the very day when Yashua Messiah’s prophecy is fulfilled:

John 12:32 (MCV) And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, I will draw drag all men unto me.

Now most of the wretches in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion will tell you that this verse is referring to that period of time which commenced with Yashua Messiah’s death and Resurrection and His subsequent Ascension into heaven in the first century, but nothing could be further from The Truth, because Yashua Messiah has not drawn (dragged) ANYONE to Himself —- YET! In this age. Take note, The Father does ALL the drawing (dragging) to His Son Yashua Messiah in this age:

John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

Strong’s Concordance:

Draw – G1670 – ἑλκύω, ἕλκω – helkuō helkō – hel-koo’-o, hel’-ko – Probably akin to G138; to drag (literally or figuratively): – draw. Compare G1667.

Having got this far I KNOW there will be many scoffers and stiff necked rebels out there who will maintain that people DO have a chance for salvation, in this life, but reject it, and I would rebut that nonsense and tell them to read the above Holy Scriptures (Matthew 13:10-16) and keep reading them until The Truth has registered in their minds and onto their hearts or see my article: What is True Rejection of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ)? for complimentary reading. (See link below.)

OK, that’s about it for this opening article and I know there are many other side issues attached to it, which I will cover in future articles, so stay with it.

Unravelling The Satanic Rapture Deception parts 1 & 2.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-satanic-rapture-deception-parts-1-and-2/

The Jews are The Tares – fit only for burning!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

Do You Worship an Ogre god – Parts 1- 4
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/do-you-worship-an-ogre-god-part-1/

What is True Rejection of Jesus Christ?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-true-rejection-of-yashua-anointed-the-lord-jesus-christ/

Why Are There Two Resurrections? – Part 2

In part one I covered the foundational basics of The Two Resurrections, and from that foundational knowledge many interesting points and questions spring.

However, before I deal with those questions we must return to the subject of The First Resurrection in order to set the scene for The Second Resurrection, which does not occur until the end of The Millennium, that is, at the end of Yashua Messiah’s 1000 year reign on this earth (NOT IN HEAVEN) as King of kings and Lord of lords.

So what constitutes The First Resurrection, what’s it all about? Training for the resurrected saints is what it’s all about, along with training for the people under their rule. So who are these people that will be under their rule?

These people:

Revelation 7:4-8 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Children of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Napthali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Joseph (Ephraim) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

And these people:

Revelation 7:9 (KJV) After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before The Throne (of King David), and before The Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands. (Brackets mine)

And who are all these people that are made up of both Israelites and non-Israelites?:

Revelation 7:13-14 (KJV) And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they? And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of (the) Great Tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of The Lamb.

OK, so the first thing we learn about these two great numbers of people is the fact that they have survived The Great Tribulation, they have lived through it and survived, and now stand before Yashua Messiah’s Throne on this earth. That is, The 144,000 of Israel (The Israelites, NOT JEWS and see part one if you’re confused) along with a great multitude of other ethnic groups OF MANKIND – not hu-man kind!

First and foremost, these people are not resurrected saints, they are the people that The Father and Yashua Messiah have chosen and sealed in their foreheads, that is, set aside as special people to populate The Kingdom of God, just as They did with the EIGHT in Noah’s day, hence Yashua Messiah likened the end times events to those of Noah’s time:

Matthew 24:37-38 (MCV) But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be. 38 For as in the days that were before The Flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into The Ark.

Here we also see these same people likened unto virgins:

Revelation 14:1-5 (MCV) And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on The Mount Sion, and with Him an hundred forty and four thousand, having His Father’s name written in their foreheads. 2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: 3 And they sung as it were a new song before The Throne, and before The Four Beasts Living Creatures, and The Elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were REDEEMED (‘agorazo’) from the earth. 4 THESE ARE THEY WHICH WERE NOT DEFILED WITH WOMEN; FOR THEY ARE VIRGINS. These are they which follow The Lamb whithersoever He goeth. These were REDEEMED from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to The Lamb. 5 And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before The Throne of God.

Now from Strong’s Concordance we get this. Now NOTICE, first, the word REDEEMED which is from the Greek word ‘agorazō’:

Redeemed – G59 – ἀγοράζω – agorazō – ag-or-ad’-zo – From G58; properly to go to market, that is, (by implication) to purchase; specifically to redeem: – buy, redeem.

So all these people have been purchased as if from a market place, that is, purchased as slaves in chains like goods and chattels in a market place and set free.

Now here’s a question or two that stem from these verses: 1) Are the 144,000 men only? for it says that they are undefiled with or by women, and furthermore, 2) Are these people literally virgins in the sexual sense? NO a thousand times NO in answer to both questions. So if that’s the case, who are these WOMEN that both the men and the women of the 144,000 are not defiled by? Answer COUNTERFEIT CHURCHES – Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism and Protestantism – all whoring religious prostitute ‘churches’ of The Devil.

This means that the 144,000 will be those from the secular world who have not been contaminated by the vile Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. It also means that they will not have heads full of religious garbage that would need unlearning and disinfecting, first, before they begin to learn The Truth; their hearts and minds will therefore be more ready to receive The Truth, and all uncluttered by satanic religious nonsense – they are and will be SPIRITUAL VIRGINS!

OK, moving on. Now pay special attention, for NONE of these people are Serpent Seed Canaanites, that is, no Jews, no Turks (Edomites), no black Africans and no Chinese, to name the principle hordes descended from Cain/Canaan. Yes, there are other Canaanite tribes, but not of importance for this article.

So what ethnic groups will make up this great multitude, I hear you ask? Quite simply they that constitute the rest of MANkind, who are not specifically of Israel, but are distant relations through Noah and his three sons. Some are more closely related to the Israelites, because they will be of Shem (White). For example The Assyrians (The Germans), Slavs, Poles and Russians, but others less so, if they are descended from Japheth (yellow Orientals), The Japanese and Ham (Spaniards, Ethiopians and Indians, and olive swarthy browns). However, the main issue here is that they are ALL OF MANKIND – ALL are from Adam and Eve, via Noah and his sons, and none will be of Cain/Canaan – The Serpent Seed from Ham’s incestuous relationship with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife).

Having said that many Canaanites will also survive The Great Tribulation, but will not inherit The Kingdom of God as described here:

Matthew 25:31-34 (MCV) When The Son of Man shall come in His Glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then shall He sit upon The Throne of His Glory (King David’s Throne here on this earth): 32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: 33 And He shall set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then shall The King say unto them on His right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit The Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

NOTICE first how these verses are dealing with NATIONS! This passage of Scripture is dealing solely with ethnicities and only those ethnic groups on His right hand (the Sheep) will inherit The Kingdom, NOT those ethnic groups on His left (The Goats).

So are you saying that no inbred Canaanites will enter The Kingdom of God? As far as I see and with what information The Holy Scriptures give us, the answer to that question is a RESOUNDING YES! (See link below)

Matthew 13:41-42 (KJV) The Son of Man shall send forth His angels, and they shall gather out of His Kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Now when does this event occur? Well it tells you, doesn’t it? Yashua Messiah’s Kingdom has now arrived and yet there are still people doing iniquitous things, so who could these people be? Why, none other than The Goats with their satanic Serpent Seed inbred blood. Inbred blood which is offensive to Yashua Messiah, which no doubt includes their accompanying diabolical satanic unrepentant behaviour. Hence Luke’s Gospel tells us what Yashua Messiah will do to those with this degenerate rebellious unrepentant mind set:

Luke 19:27 (MCV) But those mine enemies, (the Serpent Seed Jews and other Serpent Seed Canaanites) which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

So there we have it. ALL those not prepared to be ruled over by Yashua Messiah as King of kings and Lord of lords in His Kingdom will be for the chop.

However, what else does this verse tell us? Quite simply that these inbred wretches are PHYSICAL BEINGS, not resurrected SPIRITUAL BEINGS. How do you know that, I hear you say? Easy, because they can be slain and will be slain before Yashua Messiah on His Throne and only physical beings can be slain, not spiritual beings – justice will be done. This event, therefore, proves that physical beings will be present in The Kingdom of God, not just the resurrected spiritual saints who will be ruling with Yashua Messiah as His kings and royal priests.

OK, that just about rounds up the basics of The Two Resurrections, in part three I will go into some of those spring off questions.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

 

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 1

Introduction

This series of articles will set about unravelling one of the biggest deceptions in the King James Bible – the word ‘Gentiles’. This will be no easy task due to the ignorance or deliberate deceiving intentions of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translators of the KJV Bible – the principal culprit being the papist philosopher and humanist Desiderius Erasmus who put together the first Greek New Testament in 1512; this with a humanist agenda and associated philosophy(s) in play and no doubt, influencing his work. ‘Improved’ editions followed the 1512 edition. The martyr William Tyndale (1491?-1536), a contemporary of Erasmus, used Erasmus’ Greek New Testament when translating his English version. These earlier translations were then used by the translators of The KJV (1604-1611) along with The Great Bible (1539).

So why am I asking this question, it’s all very straight forward, isn’t it? Gentiles are non-Jews, aren’t they? Well that’s what we’re led to believe by the satanic blanket use of this, one-size-fits-all, infernal word, but is it True? What if the word ‘Gentiles’ means something else, something entirely different? Where will we be then? apart from being very confused and even upset and angry that we have been so deceptively and easily deceived. Some would say brainwashed, and completely duped; conned no less. To compound the problem the wretched word ‘Gentiles’ can be found throughout the King James Bible in both Old and New Testaments; 129 times in all, in 121 verses and here is its first usage in Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Gentiles (H1471) divided in their lands; every one after his own tongue, after their families, in their nations (H1471).

Now take note, for here we have the first use of this misleading word ‘Gentiles’ and with the same Strong’s reference number for both words in this verse. This occurs very early on in the Genesis historical account of Noah and his sons Ham, Shem and Japheth, and their families, before any Chosen Israelites or Canaanite Jews were even born:

Genesis 10:1 (MCV) Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.

No Israelites or Jews, so therefore no non-Israelites and no non-Jews, that is, alleged ‘Gentiles’ so why is the word already in use?

Furthermore, and as an aside, you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first 11 Books of The Bible and yet, here we have this deceptive word ‘Gentile’ in use where there is no way it can be referring to people or tribes of people who can be classified as non-Jews, as there were no Jews present at that time. So what’s it all about and, again, why is the word there at all?

Well let’s see what the word ‘Gentile’ really means so that we can begin to unravel this evil corrupting conundrum. First the etymology:

From the Online Etymology Dictionary:

Gentile – “From Late Latin noun use of Latin gentilis; “of the same family or clan, of or belonging to a Roman gens,” from gens (genitive gentis) “race, clan,” from PIE root *gene- “give birth, beget,” with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.”

From Wikipedia:

Gens – In ancient Rome, a gens (/ˈɡɛns/ or /ˈdʒɛnz/), plural gentes, was a family consisting of all those individuals who shared the same nomen and who claimed descent from a common ancestor.

Then we have the Biblical definition from the Hebrew in Strong’s Concordance:

Gentiles – H1471 – גֹּי גּוֹי – gôy gôy – go’ee, go’-ee – Apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts: – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

And then from Strong’s again with the Greek definition from the New Testament:

Gentiles – G1484 – ἔθνος – ethnos – eth’-nos – Probably from G1486; a race (as of the same habit), that is, a tribe; specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

Notice how the word has allegedly changed in its meaning from an OT usage to a NT usage!! No mention of Jews and non-Jews in the OT definition but, hey presto, surprise surprise, in the NT, all of a sudden, it does mean non-Jews!! Who decided to give it this new meaning!!?? The plot thickens, does it not?

So there we have it, the main definitions and NONE referring to Jews or non-Jews apart from Strong’s meaningless, peer pressure implied corrupting afterthought in brackets. The etymology plainly tells us that a ‘Gentile’ is from the Latin ‘gentilis’ and means someone who is not a Roman or not a Roman citizen and is nothing to do with people being either Jews and/or non-Jews.

We then get the Hebrew definition for ‘Gentile’ which clearly states ‘goy’ or a ‘foreign nation’ or, better, an Abrahamic or Israelite ‘nation’, so if we re-paste Genesis 10:5 we can more accurately translate it:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Goyim or nations (H1471 – Gentiles) divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.

In support I will include the Septuagint Greek Transliteral OT for Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (Septuagint Greek Transliteral) From out of these separated islands of the nations (Hebrew Goyim) in their land each according to tongue among their tribes and among their nations. (Brackets mine)

As stated earlier the above verse does not refer to Jews or non-Jews, it clearly applies to Noah and his family only, that is, before any Israelites or Jews had been born. This also means that Semites from Shem were also classified as Goyim or Nations as can be supported by this proof, that of God speaking to Abram:

Genesis 12:2 (MCV) And I will make of thee a great Goy (H1471 – Goy – Nation), and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

And again with The Lord speaking to Isaac’s wife Rebekah:

Genesis 25:23 (MCV) And the LORD said unto her, Two nations (H1471 – Goy – Nation) are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.

OK, so the word ‘Gentiles’ is not being used here in this verse, but the word ‘Nations’ is being used, and yet it is translated from the same Hebrew word H1471 Goy or Goyim. So we have the Semitic Hebrews Isaac and Rebekah with twins in her womb being referred to as GOY!!

So how come this same Hebrew word ‘Goy’ is here translated as ‘Nation’, a Hebrew Semitic nation no less, and elsewhere it’s translated as ‘Gentile’ with the translator’s intended meaning being that of a foreign nation? And who is the foreign nation foreign to? Which of these nations is not foreign, they’re all descendants of Noah aren’t they? Are you beginning to see the picture? What a ‘flexible’ and ‘useful’ word this ‘Gentiles’ word is (much sarcasm by the author and the accompanying mirth)!

So, with regard to all the other usages, who has made these translation determinations? Who has decided what kind of nation? Now we’re getting to it, and the answer? the agenda driven religious dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who had to preserve their pro-Jewish agenda deception, no matter what the cost to The Truth of the Holy Scriptures. Confusion and chaos was definitely the order of the day with these deceivers.

From “WHO ARE THE GENTILES?” by Bertrand L. Comparet and taken from “Your Heritage.”

“You may be surprised to know that there is no such word (as Gentile) in the Bible, in its original language. Oh yes, I know that you are now riffling through the pages of your King James Bible, looking for some of the many places you will find Gentile in it. However, I said that there was no such word in the original languages. The word was put into it by translators, who changed the wording of the Bible centuries after the last book of the Bible was written.”

And again from Comparet:

“The word Gentile is not once used in any Hebrew manuscript of the Old Testament. There is a very good reason for this, there is no such word in Hebrew, nor any word that corresponds to it. Everywhere you find the word Gentile used in the Old Testament, it is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word goi (goy), which means nation, the plural form of it is goyim. Since it means nation, why didn’t they translate it correctly? Sometimes they did, but for the most part they translated it to fit the official doctrines of the church of their day. It didn’t matter what violence that did to the true meaning of the word.”

Always good to get confirmation, eh? Please note that I am not a disciple of Comparet’s.

Moving on, and to firm up what I have already said, I will now quote Genesis again in reference to Jacob/Israel and his two grandsons Ephraim and Manasseh (Joseph’s sons), whom Jacob declared as being true Israelites even though their mother was Egyptian:

Genesis 48:17-19 (MCV) And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father’s hand, to remove it from Ephraim’s head unto Manasseh’s head. 18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head. 19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he (Manasseh) also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother (Ephraim) shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations (H1471 – Goyim).

So what do we have going on here!? Let’s be clear, for here we have two Hebrew Israelite lads being blessed by their Hebrew Israelite grandfather, Jacob/Israel, who is saying that one of them, along with his descendants, shall be a great goy (nation) and the other who shall become a great company, or commonwealth, or multitude of goyim (nations). This means we have Hebrew Israelites being called goy and goyim – WHAT!!!!??? This is enough to give the Jews apoplexy!! LOL. Just as well then that the Jews are not Israelites, so they are an irrelevance, until we get to the NT where we see them in their true Serpent Seed Canaanite light as the Christ killers. (See the links below for the true identity of the Jews and their origins)

However, where does this leave us with regard to this word ‘Gentile’ which we now know is a gross deception and means GOY (singular) and GOYIM (plural) and in turn means Israelite NATION or NATIONS! It also leaves us with the bigger problem of checking out every use of the word ‘Gentile’ but, more importantly, learning what is meant by the use of the word in that particular context. Is it being applied to Israelites, to non-Israelites, to Canaanites, to Greeks, to heathen barbarians/pagans, and, especially in erroneous association with the Jews? What are the Holy Scriptures REALLY alluding to in these differing cases?

As an aside, for those of you not aware, the words ‘goy’ and ‘goyim’ are frequently used by the Jews when describing non-Jews in an elitist put-down and derogatory manner. Other times they will call us ‘cattle’ such is their ignorant, arrogant, evil contempt for all other ethnic groups. Here are some examples:

“The differences between Jews and gentiles are not religious, historical, cultural or political. They are, rather, racial, genetic and scientifically unalterable. The one group (Gentiles) is at its very root and by natural constitution “Totally Evil”, while the other (Jews) is “Totally Good.””

— Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut by Rabbi Saadyi Grama

“A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from Holiness.”

— The Chabad-Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson

“We have to recognise that Jewish blood and the blood of the goy are not the same thing. Every law that is based on equating goys and Jews is completely unacceptable.”

— Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

How about that for satanic belligerence and arrogance!? This also tells us that Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, apart from being rabid racists, are not the sharpest tools in the box, having not studied The Holy Scriptures, and, despite all the BS we hear about their mythical cleverness and high intellect.

OK, just one more point from Genesis 48:19 where it refers to Manasseh as being ‘a people’ and from Strong’s, once more, we get:

People – H5971- עַם – ‛am – am – From H6004; a people (as a congregated unit); specifically a tribe (as those of Israel); hence (collectively) troops or attendants; figuratively a flock: – folk, men, nation, people.

As we can see, the Israelites descended from the Patriarch Manasseh were to become a great people, a tribe, or a troop, or a flock and/or a great nation, that is, a great goy.

Any the wiser? I hope so, if not, then press on to Part 2 for all will be revealed.

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 2 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites and The Canaanite Jews

So how do we discern what is really meant by the word ‘Gentile’? Well, first and foremost we have to learn who the Israelites were in Biblical history and, of course, who the Israelites are today, because without this crucial foundational knowledge you’re always going to flounder in your understanding like those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,

Benjamin the youngest son,

Simeon – The Scythians – The Scots

Levi – The Priesthood,

Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,

Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,

Issachar,

Zeebulon,

Gad,

Asher,

Dan,

Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes not the Jews) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules (The Strait of Gibraltar), and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.” (Brackets mine)

For further knowledge about True Israel see link below entitled: “The Jews are The Tares”

OK, so now that you know who The Israelites are, I will go straight to the last book of The Bible as the starting point of this study, for this is where it all has to culminate or climax. Six thousand years of Israel’s and mankind’s history are focused here, that is, just prior to Yashua Messiah’s return to this earth. From this starting point we can then go back and work our way through a few relevant Scriptures to make the case for a ‘Gentile’ free Bible. This will then show you, so that you fully understand, the evil deception that has taken place, that is, through the use of this useless and deceptive word ‘Gentiles’:

Revelation 7:4-8 (MCV) And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Sons and Daughters of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Napthali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Joseph (Ephraim) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

Now here is the question I always ask of those that worship and suck up to the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews as the chosen people, that is, satanic ‘Christian’ Zionists and those of their satanic ilk: “If the Jews are the chosen people, then tell me who these twelve tribes or nations of people are today – identify them if you can?” To date I have never had an answer from any of these wretched deluded people. And why is that? Simply, because the Jews are just one ethnic group – one tribe, not twelve tribes, and a tribe that is not even Semitic, they’re not Hebrews, nor are they of Israel! In fact, the Jews truly are the Gentiles or the Goy, if we were to use their words with their intended meanings. However, we’re not using their disingenuous words, so who are the Jews? The Jews are Shelahite Hamitic Canaanites, The Serpent Seed from The Garden, not Semitic Israelites. (Please see Genesis chapter 38 and the links below for all the details about the True Israelites and identity of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews).

So where are we now? for we have taken the Jews out of the equation completely and we’re now dealing with a totally different ethnic group, namely the True Israelites who became 12 modern nations or 12 modern goys. But what about the non-Israelites, how do we identify them? Answer, we don’t when confronted with this accursed word ‘Gentile’, but what we do learn is that The Holy Scriptures are mostly about the nation or goy of Israel and the Israelites and not about foreign nations at all, other than when they are specifically mentioned, come into contact with, and interrelate with the nation of Israel. This applies equally to the NT as it does the OT. Examples of the other nations in the OT being the tribes of Canaanites (the Hittites Jebusites, Kenites etc.) the Moabites, The Amorites, the Philistines, the Egyptians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians and the Persians etc. In the NT we get the Romans, the Greeks, the Samaritans, the Edomites (Herod) and the Canaanite Jews to name a few.

This means we’re left with three principal ethnic groups of people, those from the nations of Israel, the Adamic/Noahide mankind nations not of Israel and then the foreign heathen nations of the Serpent Seed, headed up by the Jews, namely the Canaanites. The Canaanites and/or the alien foreign nations, are hu-man kind and the Israelites, plus the other nations, are mankind. ‘Hu’ from the British Gaelic and Old English tongues means ‘serpent’ so a ‘hu-man’ is a serpent man, not a man. With these truthful elements in mind we will now unravel the infuriating use of this word ‘Gentile’.

Now here’s a thing. In the OT, ‘Gentile’ means Goy or nation – any nation, and ‘Gentile’, in the NT, means ‘Ethnos’ which must also mean ‘Goy’ or any other nation, if only to keep the continuity going. OK, in Strong’s NT definition it doesn’t say Goy, but when it came to identifying the differing peoples, nothing changed from OT times to NT times, the same ethnic groups were still around. It would, therefore, be foolishness to surmise that the pesky word ‘Gentile’ had changed from its OT Hebrew meaning when using the NT Greek word ‘Ethnos’. Moreover, this must mean that ‘Gentile’ (‘Ethnos’) is nothing to do with being a non-Israelite or a non-Jew unless the context of the verse determines it.

Having said all that I trust that you’re still with me, for I do know that it’s a very complex and confusing subject and we must understand that this confusion has been sown, either through ignorance or to serve a subversive pro-Jewish agenda in order to conceal the true identity of The Serpent Seed Jews and, of course, the True identity of the Twelve Tribes of Israelite peoples – The Goy and/or The Nations.

The other agenda at play here is that of the Papists who have always maintained their counterfeit claim to being ‘spiritual’ Israel, that is, the satanic Roman Cult Church having replaced the Abrahamic Covenant True Israel. Laughable or what?

So let’s copy and paste a few verses here that use the word ‘Gentile’ and expound on them to reveal their true meaning:

3 John 1:7 (MCV) Because that for His name’s sake they went forth, taking nothing of the Gentiles (G1484 – Ethnos)

Now in this verse we have the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ in the context of Messenger John’s epistles, but to whom are his epistles addressed? Many Bible ‘scholars’ say that they are to non-Israelite potential converts and non-Israelite Christians at Ephesus. Others say that John was living in Ephesus at that time and the epistles were written to the congregations at Corinth. However, are either of these stories true? Maybe, but a more likely narrative is that of Augustine of Hippo who stated that John’s epistles were written to The Parthians north of the Euphrates river. Now who resided there in the first century? Why, none other than the Ten Tribes of Israel, which means we have John fulfilling Yashua Messiah’s command to His Twelve Learners to go the lost Tribes of Israel ONLY!

Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These twelve Yashua sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles (Canaanite Jews and other non-Israelites), and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He (Yashua Messiah) answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Therefore this means that in 3 John 1:7 they took nothing of their fellow Israelites – Ethnos – Goyim – Nations.

Moving on with more evidence:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

Right, once again, who was Peter speaking to? for unless we know that, we will be stumbling in the dark and not be able to work out who these ‘Gentiles’ are. So let’s copy and paste the first verse of 1 Peter 1:

1 Peter 1:1 (MCV) Peter, a messenger of Jesus Christ, to the STRANGERS scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

From Strong’s Concordance:

Strangers – G3927 – παρεπίδημος – parepidēmos – par-ep-id’-ay-mos From G3844 and the base of G1927; an alien alongside, that is, a resident foreigner: – pilgrim, stranger.

So who were these ‘strangers’ or ‘resident foreigners’ that Peter was speaking to? See Matthew 10:5-6 above.

Moreover, if Peter was sent to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (and he was) and he is addressing people here called ‘strangers’, who could these ‘strangers’ be other that lost Israelites? here called ‘aliens alongside’, ‘resident foreigners’ and/or ‘pilgrims’? Sojourners might be a another name we could call them, that is, settled, but only temporarily settled for they were still in the process of migrating west into Europe and eventually into Britain.

However, we also need to understand that the places listed, that is, Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, that Peter was sent to are in Northern Asia (northern modern Turkey) where Paul was restrained by the Holy Spirit from venturing into. The reason for that being that Paul was the messenger to the non-Israelite peoples of mankind, that is, non-Israelite Semites and Hamites. Here is the Scripture to confirm what I have said:

Acts 16:6 (MCV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Spirit to preach The Word in Asia.

As an aside and just to let you know that it was Yashua Messiah restraining Paul through The Holy Spirit and not The Holy Spirit operating of itself. (Please see my articles below re The Trinity Blasphemy and The Duality Godhead)

Now why was Paul forbidden entry into Northern Asia? Easy, because that was Peter’s manor – Peter’s territory, where some of The Lost Tribes were residing and they were NOT ‘Gentiles’ as in the word’s intended erroneous meaning – they were Israelites. However Peter is making the comparison between these ‘stranger’ Israelites residing in a foreign land and the ‘Gentiles’ and I’ll post the verse again:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

So who are these ‘Gentiles’ that Peter is allegedly referring to? Well plainly they were heathen non-Israelites, so not God’s chosen people and they could have been of any of the other ethnicities whether of Noahide mankind or Canaan’s hu-man kind (Canaanites). Here, Peter is teaching his Israelite audience that their previous heathen ways of behaving (Gentile behaviour) were not good or helpful to God’s chosen people. Especially if The Father was calling any of them. This is an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ being used in its traditional sense.

Moving on once more we have this verse:

1 Timothy 3:16 (MCV) And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was made apparent in the flesh, justified in The Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into Glory.

So who did Yashua Messiah preach to? Who did He come for?

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (The Ten Tribes).

So here, yet again, we see the deceptive use of this erroneous word ‘Gentiles’ which is translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’ which means ‘Goyim’ and in turn means ‘Nations’, but which nations? Easy, in this case it must be the Israelite Nations because that is who Yashua Messiah declared He was sent to – NOT the heathen foreigners.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 (MCV) For ye, brethren, became followers of the Ecclesia of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen (fellow-tribes-men – Israelites), even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles Ethnos/Goyim/Nations that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the uttermost.

OK, so what do we have revealed to us here? First and foremost Paul is speaking to his fellow-tribes-men, for he refers to them as‘brethren’ who had become followers of Yashua Messiah. He then goes on to make it plain that they had suffered at the hands of their own fellow-tribes-men (Israelites) non-believers, who also had suffered at the hands of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, even though these fellow Israelites were not called and members of the Ecclesia. Sound familiar? We then have Paul stating that they, the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, both killed Yashua Messiah and the Prophets of Old Testament times. Furthermore he says that they tried to stop Paul from preaching to the GENTILES!!!

Now who are these ‘Gentiles’, because we already have the Israelites mentioned as ‘brethren’ to Paul and as fellow-tribes-men? Well that makes it plain, does it not? for here, again, we have the word ‘Gentiles’ meaning non-Israelites.

Here is another example:

Ephesians 4:17 (MCV) This I say therefore, and testify in The Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,

So to whom is Paul speaking? Non-Israelites is the answer. How do we know this? Easy, because no Israelites were resident in Ephesus. They were living in Northern Asia = Peter’s territory, not southern Asia where Ephesus was situated – Paul’s territory. Therefore we have Paul behooving these Ephesian non-Israelite believers to henceforth not behave in the same way as their fellows who were lost and degenerate non-Israelite Ephesians.

Matthew 10:17-18 (MCV) But beware of men Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; 18 And ye shall be brought before governors and kings (shabbos goy Jew pawns) for my sake, for a testimony against them, the Gentiles (Ethnos – Goyim – Israelite Nations and Foreign Nations).

Here we have an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ covering a multitude of sins, for it does not mean just non-Israelites, it also means Israelites as well. If, in the future, we are arrested for Yashua Messiah’s sake and brought before the criminals in power, we will be a testimony to all people, including our fellow Israelites. That means this word ‘Gentiles’ (‘Ethnos’ or ‘Goyim’) is being used in an all encompassing fashion for both Israelites and non-Israelites alike. Which, in turn, equates to its Old Testament usage where we saw Abram and his Israelite descendants referred to as ‘Goyim’‘Gentiles’‘Nations’. This, in turn, makes a total mockery of the translator’s intended meaning, that is, solely for the describing of heathen non-Jews.

Romans 1:13 (MCV) Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

So to whom is Paul speaking? Take note, so that you fully understand what is going on here. First of all Paul is addressing fellow tribes men (Israelite brethren) NOT fellow Christian brethren, because he adds the rider: “That I might have some fruit among you also!” So as he writes they are not yet regenerated brothers of Paul (Christians) and yet he calls them BRETHREN! Now notice how the translators have written it as “even as among OTHER GENTILES” This means that according to the translators we have Paul referring to unregenerated Israelites as ‘Gentiles’! How confusing is that?

Moreover, don’t forget that ‘Gentiles’ means ‘Ethnos’ or ‘Nations’ or ‘Goy’ so Paul could easily be referring to dispersed Israelites living amongst other nations.

OK, that’s it for part two, more revelations in part three.

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Exposing The Trinity Lie
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

The Duality Godhead
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 3 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites, The Canaanite Jews and Now The Greeks

In parts one and two I have revealed some, but not all, of the problems created by the use of the wretched word ‘Gentiles’. In the third part of this article we move on to another word which compounds and makes the word ‘Gentiles’ even more confusing than it already is.

OK, so let’s move on to the word ‘Greeks’ and why use the word ‘Greeks’ and not ‘Gentiles’. Why use two different words to describe the same thing? Greeks are ‘Gentiles’ aren’t they? that’s if we stick to their erroneous use of this irritating word, yes of course they are, so what’s going on? Well could it be that nearly all the uses of the word ‘Gentiles’ are referring to The Lost Ten Tribes of Israel (The Nations) and not to non-Israelites at all. This means that when non-Israelites was the intended meaning they used the word ‘Greeks’.

Here’s the first example:

John 7:35 (KJV) Then said the Jews among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles?

Correct translation:

John 7:35 (MCV) Then said the Jews Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, (not the Israelites), among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed (The Lost Israelites, that is, The Diaspora) among the Gentiles Greeks and teach the Gentiles Greeks.

So what have we here? Quite simply yet another deceptive variation on the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ where it is mistranslated from the Greek word ‘Hellen’ pronounced ‘Hellane’, and the Hellens were most likely the Greek speaking non-Israelite peoples. However, some of these Greek speakers may well have been migrating Israelites as well, although most would have been ethnically Greeks. However, we’re still left with the conundrum of why did they use the word ‘Gentiles’ when it should have been ‘Greeks’?

Moving on and just to set the scene, here is yet another anomaly to prove my case:

Romans 2:9-10 (MCV) Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also of the Gentile Greek 10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also to the Gentile Greek.

Once again, the word ‘Gentile’ here is translated from the NT Greek word ‘Hellen’ (Strong’s reference G1672) pronounced ‘Hellane’ and yet it is written as ‘Gentile’ and not ‘Greek’. In this case ‘Gentiles’ is not translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’. How confusing is that? Where is the consistency? These translators of the KJV were supposed to be learned men, so what were they up to?

For confirmation we get:

Mark 7:26 (MCV) The woman was a Greek, a Syrophoenician by nation; and she besought Him that He would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Greek – G1674 – Ἑλληνίς – Hellēnis – hel-lay-nis’ Feminine of G1672; a Grecian (that is, non-Jewish) woman: – Greek.

Here we can see a woman, who was known as a Syrophoenician by nation, in the Gospel of Mark, and yet is called a Greek when in truth she was a Canaanite and is called a Canaanite in the Matthew rendering of this account:

Matthew 15:22 (KJV) And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto Him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

“The woman was a Greek – Rosenmuller has well observed, that all heathens or idolaters were called Ἑλληνες, Greeks, by the Jews; whether they were Parthians, Medes, Arabs, Indians, or Ethiopians. Jews and Greeks divided the whole world at this period.”

Notice here that the Parthians and Medes were here called Greeks by the Canaanite Jews, when it is well known that the Parthians and Medes at that time were dispersed Israelites of The Ten Tribes. The lands of the Medes and Parthians north of the Euphrates river is where The Assyrians deposited the Israelites after they had taken them captive in 740-725 BC.

Josephus, the first century historian, is a witness to this fact:

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

So here we have solid gold proof that the Israelites, here erroneously labelled as Greeks, and therefore as Gentiles in the eyes of the Canaanite Jews, were alive and well and were a great multitude of people prospering in an alien land as strangers or sojourners.

OK, the above is a little digression, but an essential digression in order to build a bigger and more accurate overall historical picture, and to show what an evil deception this word ‘Gentiles’ is, so back to the thread of Jews, Greeks and Gentiles.

Right, let’s take a look a the word ‘Jew’ in the NT and let’s use a very deceptive verse as an example:

Galatians 3:28-29 (MCV) There is neither Jew Judean Israelite nor Greek non-Israelite, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

In first century Judea (not Jewdea) there was a remnant of the three Tribes of the Southern Kingdom of The House of Judah as opposed to the Northern Kingdom of the House of Israel – The Ten Tribes. These three tribes consisted of Judah, Levi and Benjamin who weren’t Jews. They were descendants of the small minority of Israelites who returned from the Babylonian captivity circa 515 BC. However, many at that time did not return, but joined up with their Northern Kingdom brethren living in alien lands abroad and never returned home to Judea.

Moreover, the Shelahite Canaanite Jews (The Serpent Seed) lived along side these Israelites as parasitical usurpers having stolen their language, their customs and their religion. The Sanhedrin with its ‘high priest’ consisted mostly of these satanic inbred Jewish impostors – the rare exception to this rule, that we know of, are John the Baptist and his family, Mary, Joseph, The Lord Yashua Messiah and His half siblings, The Twelve Learners, Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea and Saul, who later became Paul. Obviously there were many others, not named, but these are the principal New Testament characters who were Semitic Israelites, but not Serpent Seed Hamitic Canaanite Jews.

OK, so just to recap, here in the above Scripture we have Jews and Greeks mentioned, not Jews and Gentiles, why is that? when one would have thought ‘Gentiles’ was the ‘right word’! In the Greek MSS it uses the word ‘Hellen’, pronounced ‘Hellane’, which would suggest Greek pagans and heathens. However, it could also have a contrasting Spiritual meaning and be referring to Judeans as chosen people of the non-religious Truth and the Greeks as those of the pagan heathen religious persuasion, those of a religious mind set, just as Paul highlights here:

Acts 17:22 (MCV) Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ Hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious, that is, preoccupied with idolatrous religions.

Here is another interesting passage of Scripture that needs explaining, for here we find ‘Jews’, ‘Greeks’ and ‘Gentiles’ all mentioned, but all is not what it seems:

Acts 14:1-2 (MCV) And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both, that is, Paul and Barnabas together into the synagogue of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews Israelite Judeans and also of the Greeks believed. 2 But the unbelieving Canaanite Jews stirred up the Gentiles those of other Nations and made their minds evil affected against the brethren.

So what’s this all about? Well first and foremost we have Paul and Barnabas going into a synagogue, as was their want until, unsurprisingly, they eventually gave up on the satanic Canaanite Jews altogether. Later on we get Paul, Silas and Timothy having to confront the Jewish demons:

Acts 18:5-6 (MCV) And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the Spirit (laboured more intensely) and testified to the Canaanite Jews that Jesus was Christ. 6 Now at their resisting and blaspheming, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles Israelite Nations.

This was the general state of affairs that Paul and his companions had to continually deal with, so in Acts 14:1-2 we have a similar situation in that we have Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews rejecting Paul’s message. In contrast, Judean Israelites, plus Greeks, who were being called received The Word readily. However, this doesn’t stop here, for the Canaanite Jews then stir up the Judean Israelites and the Greeks, here called Nations, and poisoned their minds, turning them against Paul and the brethren.

Now here is a humdinger misunderstood verse:

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews Israelite Judeans.

What did Yashua Messiah really mean by this statement to the woman by the well? Easy, He was referring to Himself as a descendant of the Royal Judahite Israelites. The use of the word ‘Jew’ here by the ignorant translators is an abomination! Salvation was NEVER through or of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, nor could it ever be! Salvation was through Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) as a descendant of Abraham and Sarah to Isaac, to Jacob/Israel and to Judah via Tamar = Royal Judahites, not Judah and Bathshuah the Adullamite Canaanite inbreed who sired the first Canaanite Jews, Er, Onan (both struck down by The Lord) and Shelah.

Next verse:

Acts 11:19-20 (MCV) Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews Judean Israelites only. 20 And some of them were men of Cyprus and Cyrene, which, when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians, preaching the Lord Jesus.

Right, so who would have been the ones persecuted after Stephen was wickedly executed by the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? Quite simply, it was Judean Israelites of the three tribes resident in Judea who had been called and saved. They had obviously fled Jerusalem travelling as far as Phenice on the island of Crete, Cyprus and Antioch. Notice that some of these Judean Israelites were already residents of Cyprus and Cyrene and when they arrived at Antioch on their way home preached to some Greeks about Yashua Messiah. Mark it well, for none of these kindly people were Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews.

With that, I think we can call this a job done. However, if there are any other verses that you think need explaining then leave a comment and quoting the verse you need explained.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles.

 

The Parable of THE SOWER and The Parable of THE PARABLES

Now this is a long overdue article and the reason for that is Yashua Messiah’s restraining hand upon me, for He had not yet formulated all my thoughts on this most crucial of parables and, I might add, Yashua Messiah’s parables in general.

You see, it’s ALL about the foundational Holy Scriptures and when expounding on The Parables we MUST get our foundation laid first or otherwise we go off, shooting off our big mouths, with nothing but satanic error pouring forth from them. This is a very difficult tightrope that we walk with immense responsibility and one misplaced step can lead us to a very sticky end if we stubbornly persist in these errors and refuse to repent. Example: The rebellious Israelites in the wilderness who did not enter into His Promised Land (The Kingdom of God).

OK, so let’s get The Parable of The Sower copied here. I will copy Yashua Messiah’s explanation of it later which also needs expounding on.

The Parable of The Sower

Matthew 13:3-9 (MCV) And He spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow; 4 And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up: 5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away. 7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them: 8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Now notice! What is the most important verse in this short passage of Holy Scripture? Answer: The last verse, verse 9 – WHO HATH EARS TO HEAR, let him hear.

This now brings us onto The Parable of The Parables, which must be understood before we attempt to unravel ANY of Yashua Messiah’s other parables and again NOTICE, for the last verse is, once more, the crucial verse:

The Parable of The Parables

Matthew 13:10-16 (MCV) And the Learners came, and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto YOU to know the mysteries of The Kingdom of God, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN. 12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. 13 THEREFORE I SPEAK TO THEM IN PARABLES: because they seeing, see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: 15 For this people’s heart is waxed gross (has grown fat and lazy), and their ears are dull (incapable) of hearing (they are deaf), and their eyes they have closed (they are blind); lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM. 16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

Look at what Yashua Messiah is telling us in this narrative:

1) The ‘mysteries’, or the Spiritual dimension of knowledge and understanding regarding The Kingdom of God, are not given to the majority of people. (Now let all you blasphemous mainstream Christians fully understand this basic TRUTH! as you go around trying to convert all and sundry and threatening them with fiery hell if they fail to heed your nonsense)

2) Therefore, because the Spiritual dimension was/is NOT given to all, Yashua Messiah spoke to them in parables in order to conceal The Spiritual Truth from them – deliberately and intentionally.

3) This left them in a condition whereby they could listen, but not hear, they were Spiritually deaf. They could see, but not perceive – they were Spiritually blind. However, make sure that you fully comprehend what was going on here. This was/is Yashua Messiah’s doing, and not their doing, but at the same time it was their doing, and is today, still their doing, due to their indolence and laziness = their hearts had ‘waxed gross’ and are still ‘waxed gross’. It was/is not their fault, yet was/is their fault!! (More on this Godly Spiritual conundrum later).

4) Penultimately, Yashua Messiah confirms by stating: “Lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM.”

5) Finally, we get Yashua Messiah telling His Learners (disciples) that they are BLESSED, because their eyes SEE and their ears HEAR = both Fatherly Gifts from heaven and NOTHING to do with them and their abilities.

Now pay attention all you “I have accepted a ‘Jesus’ as my saviour” delusional dupes. The Father calls and Yashua Messiah converts and heals. Salvation and conversion is 100% in THEIR HANDS, not ours!!

So having laid the foundation to The Parables and to whom they were and are aimed, we can now move onto The Parable of The Sower, but always keeping in mind the above crucial knowledge. I will therefore copy it here again followed by Yashua Messiah’s explanation:

Matthew 13:3-9 (MCV) And He spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow; 4 And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up: 5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away. 7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them: 8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Yashua Messiah’s explanation of The Parable of The Sower

Matthew 13:18-23 (MCV) Hear ye therefore The Parable of The Sower. 9 When any one heareth The Word of The Kingdom of God, and understandeth it not, then cometh The Wicked One (Satan), and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side. 20 But he that received the seed into stony places (stony hearts), the same is he that heareth The Word, and anon with joy receiveth it; 21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended. 22 He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth The Word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke The Word, and he becometh unfruitful. 23 But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth The Word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

Once more, and before I continue, make sure you understand that this parable is for those who have been called. This parable is for CHRISTIANS, FAKE OR REAL, and/or those who profess some kind of belief in Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). It is for those who are Spiritually aware, NOT FOR THE LOST AND UNSAVED – IT’S A PARABLE – a Spiritual coded message!!!

So let’s begin first with the parable verses and then followed by Yashua Messiah’s explanation:

Matthew 13:4 (MCV) And when He sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up:

Matthew 13:19 (MCV) When any one heareth the word of The Kingdom of God, that is, The Good News message, and understandeth it not, then cometh The Wicked One, (Satan) and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side.

Right, we now know that Yashua Messiah’s parables are aimed at the Spiritually aware or Spiritually awakened, not the lost and unsaved. This means those that have been called, for, notice, some Truth is sown in their hearts, so they know what’s what. This could not happen to anyone that is lost and unsaved. So these people are called and then attend what they think is a church and are quickly subsumed into it and the fowls (ravening wolves) of The Wicked One in their pulpits of this church quickly devour any Truth initially learned.

Matthew 13:5-6 (MCV) Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

Matthew 13:20-21 (MCV) But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth The Word, and anon with joy receiveth it; 21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of The Word, by and by he is offended.

Again we have so-called Christians only this time with stony hearts that receive The Word with joy, so they are keen and eager and full of enthusiasm and charismatic luvvy duvviness, but what happens? for they seem to run out of steam. Well, first of all, because they have stony hearts (stony ground) they can only have head knowledge, not heart knowledge, for they do not have hearts of flesh!

Ezekiel 11:19 (MCV) And I will give them one heart, and I will put a New Spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh. (This only occurs with those planted in deep soil.)

Now here’s the rub, these fakes are not planted (not earthed in deep soil) in Yashua Messiah, otherwise they would endure and persevere. They would be strong and tough and able to weather any storm thrown at them – any persecution or any trial.

Moreover, this points to not being gifted with The Holy Spirit, thinking that Baptism is unnecessary and some even kid themselves that they can receive The Holy Spirit without Baptism – a catastrophic error made by such groups as the satanic Alpha Course. (see the link to my Cornelius article below). Look folks, this is a crucial issue and not one to be swept under the carpet.

Notice, too, that they are offended and who today is the most easily offended group of people? Why, it’s Cultural Jew Marxist liberals – otherwise known as ‘soy boys’ and ‘snowflakes’ or those that need their ‘safe spaces’, that are so easily offended. Many so-called Christians have adopted these worldly satanic political ideologies into their ‘Christian’ beliefs. These liberal ‘Christians’, if confronted with the True Gospel Message, are very easily offended, especially if the Truth about The Jews is presented to them. (again see all the links below) Not only that, they are even offended by certain points of Holy Scripture when asked to explain why the Israelites under Joshua butchered whole cities and towns of Serpent Seed Canaanites – men, women and children. This proves that they are pusillanimous liberals and not Christians!

Matthew 13:7 (MCV) And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them:

Matthew 13:22 (MCV) He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth The Word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.

The Care of This World? What did Yashua Messiah mean by this curious phrase? Quite simply he was prophesying that in the future there would be so-called Christians thinking that THEY are here to set up the Kingdom of God, that is, before Yashua Messiah returns to do that VERY THING! This means that they believe they are on some kind of do-gooding liberal mission to rescue mankind from themselves and to change the world.

“Let’s bring an end to poverty” they wail and with ministries here and ministries there, usually in some wretched Canaanite African back water = “Telescopic philanthropy” as Charles Dickens used to call it. “Kingdom Building” is another of their delusional chants, when Yashua Messiah left no instruction of the kind before His ascension. Go and make Learners (disciples) primarily of the Israelites and bear fruit were His only instructions.

Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These Twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the non-Israelites, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel – The Twelve Tribes (see list below)

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.

Matthew 10:7 (MCV) And as ye go, preach, saying, The Kingdom of God is at hand (within reach).

Matthew 28:19 (MCV) Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone. (see link below)

Finally for this thorny category we get: “deceitfulness of riches” which is partly the “health, wealth and prosperity non-gospel” preached by many false ministers and pastors today.

However, the biggest share of this group goes to the intellectual, theological and philosophical members of these ‘churches’ for riches can also be intellectual riches. Just like financial riches, intellectual riches puff up the ego and increase the pride and vanity. With this vain intellectual approach they make The Word of God to none effect through their over-complications and by adding their useless embellishments to their vain interpretations of The Holy Scriptures. The Trinity doctrine is a perfect example of this evil practise and it’s these satanic lying thorns choke the The Truth out of them.

Matthew 13:8-9 (MCV) But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Matthew 13:23 (MCV) But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth The Word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.

In these two verses Yashua Messiah emphasises by repeating the fruits that will be forthcoming from The Word (Seed) sown in the deep rich and fertile soil of those The Father has predestined, called and chosen.

Links:

THE PAIN IN THE BUTT That Is The Story of CORNELIUS! – Acts 10
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/09/25/the-pain-in-the-butt-that-is-the-story-of-cornelius-acts-10/

The Jews are The Tares!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Racist and The Canaanite Woman He Called a Dog!
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/was-the-lord-jesus-christ-a-racist-yashua-anointed-and-a-canaanite-woman-he-called-a-dog/

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/should-christians-be-baptised-into-yashua-messiahs-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-1/

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

*Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,*
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
*Levi – The Priesthood,*
*Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,*
*Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,*
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

Try and apply this verse to the Jews – God’s promise to Abraham:

Genesis 13:16 (MCV) *And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.*

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

*“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”*

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AD and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

“The apostles passed beyond the ocean to the isles called the Britannic Isles”

— Eusebius ( Demonstratio Evangelica or Proof of the Gospel , book 3, chap. 7)

“We certainly know that Christ, the true Son, afforded His light, the knowledge of His precepts, to our Island in the last year of Tiberius Caesar” (Tiberius died in 37 AC)

— Gildas the Wise, circa 550 AC (De Excidio Britanniae or On the Ruin of Britain )

Caucasians = White Israelites, White Caucasians are The True Israelites (NOT JEWS). They were placed in the Caucasus region circa 725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans) when Assyria invaded the Northern Kingdom of Israel and took them away as captives. From there they migrated west into Europe – the rest is history.

Our Ancestors Forgot Who We Are!
https://www.minds.com/media/902215686757830656

https://www.minds.com/media/902249474722271232
https://www.minds.com/media/902893671965282304
https://www.minds.com/media/902905549734813696

THE PAIN IN THE BUTT That Is The Story of CORNELIUS! – Acts 10

OK, straight away, let me make it very clear that, in and of itself, this story is FINE!!! So I will state for the record that it’s a valid Biblical account of a very interesting and informative topic. So what makes it a Pain In The Butt, I hear you ask? Members of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion or blind and deluded mainstream Christians are what make this uplifting story a Pain in the Butt! Pretty much like they do everything else from The Holy Scriptures with their perverted, satanic, blind guide misinterpretations, and this Cornelius story is a classic example of how they satanically misuse it to annul water Baptism. More on that later.

So how do they make this story a Pain in The Butt, I also hear you ask? Well in order to discover that, let’s copy and paste the Biblical narrative here, first, so that we are fully aware of what went on:

Acts 10:1-2 (MCV) There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band, 2 A sincere man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.

So here we have an Italian Roman Centurion which, would make him a Canaanite, for Italians are descended from the Babylonian Hittites, who were Canaanites. Romans were not Italians, so were not Canaanites. Notice that he feared God, so he and his household were Old Covenant believers, not New Covenant believers, so no Grace.

Now racially, to a chosen Israelite like Peter, who was NOT A JEW (Take note, Israelites are not Jews – see links below), this man would have been the lowest of the low. Again, racially, he would have been sub-species scum to Peter. We need to get this very real life scenario firmly fixed in our minds, so that we understand what’s going on here. No slimy, libtard, multicultural Cultural Jew Marxism is this society, as in our Jewified, dissolute, degenerate society today.

Don’t believe we are Jewified? Then believe it from one of their own:

“We have corrupted the blood of all the races of Europe — perhaps we have infected them today.

“Everything is Jewified.

“Our thinking is in everything living, our spirit rules the world.

“We are the masters, for everything that has power today is the child of our spirit.

“One may hate us, one may drive us away, our enemies may triumph over our physical weakness, but we are no longer to be gotten rid of.

“We have conquered peoples, conquered the races, defiled them, broken their strength, made everything rotten, lazy and corrupt with our stale culture, our spirit can no longer be exterminated.”

— Dr. Kurt Munzer, Jewish novelist, “The Way To Zion”

Moving on, we are also told that Cornelius is sincere in his belief, as are his household, which means they are all being called by The Father. We know this for they are all praying and giving alms. Next we have Cornelius seeing a vision:

Acts 10:3-4 (KJV) He saw in a vision, evidently about the ninth hour of the day, an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius. 4 And when he looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God.

Right, here we can see further confirmation that The Father has begun to call Cornelius for he has been praying and doing good deeds. These activities are an open sign that Cornelius has been called by The Father, otherwise he would not have been doing these things, especially praying. He then sees an angel of God in a vision, so this is a man that The Father has a specific job for.

Here the angel gives Cornelius his first instructions:

Acts 10:5-6 (KJV) And now send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon, whose surname is Peter: 6 He lodgeth with one Simon a tanner, whose house is by the sea side: he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do.

Cornelius follows the angel’s instructions:

Acts 10:7-8 (KJV) And when the angel which spake unto Cornelius was departed, he called two of his household servants, and a devout soldier of them that waited on him continually; 8 And when he had declared all these things unto them, he sent them to Joppa.

Next we jump to Peter who also sees a vision:

Acts 10:9-16 (KJV) On the morrow, as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour: 10 And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance, 11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth: 12 Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. 13 And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. 14 But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. 16 This was done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven.

Here in these verses we see the THRUST and CORE of the subject matter and the REAL REASON for this story = Peter’s OLD COVENANT mind set and his racial and religious aloofness re non-Israelites and how he had refused to eat and socialise with them as brothers and sisters in the Faith.

Peter is curious about the vision and wonders what it could mean whilst the messengers from Cornelius turn up at Peter’s lodgings:

Acts 10:17-18 (KJV) Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon’s house, and stood before the gate, 18 And called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there.

Peter dwells on the vision and then Yashua Messiah speaks to him through His Spirit and tells Peter what to do – not doubting. Peter meets and greets his visitors.

Acts 10:19 (MCV) While Peter thought on the vision, Yashua Messiah, through His Holy Spirit, said unto him, Behold, three men seek thee. 20 Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I, Yashua Messiah, have sent them. 21 Then Peter went down to the men which were sent unto him from Cornelius; and said, Behold, I am he whom ye seek: what is the cause wherefore ye are come?

The visitors tell Peter about Cornelius their master and of his good standing with the Judean people:

Acts 10:22 (MCV) And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Judeans (Israelites – not Jews), was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.

Peter lodges his visitors for the night and the following day journeyed with them to Caesarea taking some brethren from Joppa with them:

Acts 10:23 (KJV) Then called he them in, and lodged them. And on the morrow Peter went away with them, and certain brethren from Joppa accompanied him.

Cornelius is waiting for them:

Acts 10:24 (KJV) And the morrow after they entered into Caesarea. And Cornelius waited for them, and had called together his kinsmen and near friends.

Cornelius meets Peter and bows to the ground to worship him and Peter immediately lifts him up and corrects him:

Acts 10:25 (KJV) And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him. 26 But Peter took him up, saying, Stand up; I myself also am a man.

Peter shows that he has understood the vision that Yashua Messiah sent to him and explains the Old Covenant Law to Cornelius and how he (Peter) had been wrong:

Acts 10:27-29 (MCV) And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together. 28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is an Israelite to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. 29 Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent ye have sent for me?

Cornelius recites to Peter what he had experienced:

Acts 10:30-33 (KJV) And Cornelius said, Four days ago I was fasting until this hour; and at the ninth hour I prayed in my house, and, behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing, 31 And said, Cornelius, thy prayer is heard, and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God. 32 Send therefore to Joppa, and call hither Simon, whose surname is Peter; he is lodged in the house of one Simon a tanner by the sea side: who, when he cometh, shall speak unto thee. 33 Immediately therefore I sent to thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God.

Cornelius and his household and friends hear the Good News from Peter:

Acts 10:34-43 (MCV) Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that the Godhead is no respecter of persons fictions or masks: 35 But in every nation he that feareth Them, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with Them. 36 The word which The Father sent unto The Children of Israel, preaching peace by Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ): (he is Lord of all:)
37 That word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the Baptism which John preached; 38 How The Father anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with Power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of The Devil; for The Father was with Him. 39 And we are witnesses of all things which He did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: 40 Him The Father raised up the third day, and shewed Him openly; 41 Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of The Father, even to us, who did eat and drink with Him after He rose from the dead. 42 And He commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is He which was ordained of The Father to be the Evaluator of the Spiritually alive and the Spiritually dead. 43 To Him give all The Prophets witness, that through His name whosoever believeth in Him shall receive remission of sins.

The Holy Spirit falls on the non-Israelites:

Acts 10:44-48 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word. 45 And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out the gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, 47 CAN ANY MAN FORBID WATER, THAT THESE SHOULD NOT BE BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 And he commanded them to be Baptised in the name of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

Right, there it is, the full account of Peter and his encounter with Cornelius the non-Israelite Canaanite Italian and the tough lesson that Peter had to learn. This is the reason why this account is in the Book of Acts and no other and YET!!?? What do you think the gnat straining blasphemers of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion use this passage of Scripture to pathetically try and make a case for?

Answer: NON-BAPTISM CONVERSION OR REGENERATION!!! THAT IS, THE INDWELLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT WITHOUT BAPTISM!!!

And where do they get this idea from? Here:

Acts 10:45-46 (MCV) And they of the circumcision (the Israelites present) which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the non-Israelites also was poured out The Gift of the Holy Spirit. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.

Yet what happens next:

Acts 10:47 (MCV) Can any man forbid WATER, that these should not be BAPTISED, which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? 48 AND HE COMMANDED THEM TO BE BAPTISED IN THE NAME OF YASHUA MESSIAH (JESUS CHRIST).

Now why did this event take place when the norm for regeneration was and is repentance, confession of sins, Baptism and the Gifting of the Holy Spirit and as commanded by Peter at the very beginning of his work for Yashua Messiah:

Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, REPENT, and BE BAPTIZED EVERY ONE OF YOU in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

We’re also told the same by Yashua Messiah Himself:

John 3:3-5 (MCV) Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again (born of God), he cannot see The Kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto Him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be BORN OF WATER (BAPTISM) and of The Holy Spirit, HE CANNOT ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD!!

There it is folks, for all to see, and yet these demonic mongrel dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (so-called mainstream Christians) want to change all that and make regeneration meaningless and, more importantly, POWERLESS with their no-Baptism non-conversion, and this, all based on one misunderstood verse of Holy Scripture, which took place for totally different reasons than they try and make out.

So why did the Holy Spirit fall on Cornelius and SOME of his fellows before they were Baptised? Was it for their benefit or Peter’s and his fellow Israelite brothers benefit, who were present? You see, once we lose sight of the reason for this event we can then drift off into any old make believe, fairy land ideas or cuckoo land myths and fables, which is what non-baptism conversion is – a satanic lie – a myth and a fable.

This event took place in order to convince Peter and his brothers that select non-Israelites were now acceptable to the Godhead, and I did say SELECT! Make sure you notice this:

Acts 10:44 (MCV) While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard The Word.

ALL THEM WHICH HEARD THE WORD!! So what is this telling us? The Holy Spirit only fell on those which HEARD THE WORD! This is informing us that there were some there that didn’t hear The Word and The Holy Spirit did not fall upon them.

As a final warning do not let any evil mongrel dog, blind guide, lead you astray on this most crucial part of your Spiritual journey with Yashua Messiah. Repentance, confession of sins and Baptism MUST precede the Gifting of The Holy Spirit.

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

Did eve have sex with the devil or did she just eat some fruit?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Royal Judahites and the Canaanite Jews explained.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Exposing a Satanic REPROBATE ILLEGITIMATE Called Jim – Parts 1 & 2

Now this article will give me no pleasure at all, but it MUST be done so as warn potential newbies to the Faith, that is, those The Father is calling to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) at this moment in time or, in the future. Make no mistake this vile evil creature is like a roaring lion for Satan, seeking out those that he can devour with his filthy lies and stinking perversions of the Holy Scriptures.

So let’s begin with his first comment which was in reply to my article entitled: “For by GRACE are Ye Saved Through FAITH; AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is The Gift of God – Ephesians 2:8” (see link below)

Here is his first judgemental diatribe:

“If you’re trying to be saved or stay saved, you’re probably not saved, nor do you have the assurance of eternal life that the true gospel gives to all who believe it. The narrow path is the path of grace and faith for all who have received God’s unspeakable gift.”

Here the blind idiot is talking about being saved and yet hasn’t a clue about how one is saved, that is, through water Baptism and the gifting of the Holy Spirit which he satanically denies is necessary. He then quotes a Scripture and writes a load of perverted erroneous drivel after it:

2 Corinthians 9:15 Thanks be unto God for his unspeakable gift.
“A gift is free with no strings attached or it’s not a gift.”

Who says a free gift cannot come with certain terms and conditions? Is The New Covenant a contract or not? If there is a new contract in place, do contracts not require certain obligations on both parties within that contract?

If something is free all it means is that there is no financial charge for it, no financial obligations to be a recipient of it, that’s all.

Then we get this which, surprisingly, is correct:

“One of the worst doctrines of the devil is to redefine ”repentance” as a turning from sin, which immediately negates the gift by requiring you to do something (works) to be saved.

“Repentance doesn’t mean a turning from sin. “Metanoia” is the Greek word translated as “Repentance” and it means a change of mind:

“Meta=Change; Noia=Mind

“STRONGS NT 3341: μετάνοια – μετάνοια – μετανοίας, ἡ (μετανοέω), a change of mind:”

Nowhere do I teach that repentance is turning from sin. Repentance is a change of attitude towards sin – a desire not to sin and that is what I teach, which is a change of mind, so here the judgemental ignoramus has failed to read my other articles and LEARN! and has jumped straight in shouting off his big arrogant mouth.

His next load of BS:

“When you believe the gospel and trust Christ as your Savior, you have repented, and you have eternal life, now and forever. You should know you have eternal life, now.”

100% WRONG!!! No one has Eternal Life until they have DIED IN THE WATERY GRAVE OF BAPTISM WITH YASHUA MESSIAH AND ARE THEN LIFTED OUT OF THE WATER AND GIFTED WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT AND MADE A NEW MAN OR WOMAN = A NEW CREATION!!

The ‘old man’ must DIE FIRST before he can put on the ‘new man’ which Paul confirms for us here:

Romans 6:4-6 (MCV) Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism into death: (the watery grave) that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the Glory of The Father, even so we also should walk in newness of Life. 5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of His death, we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection, (raised up out of the Baptismal pool): 6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with Him, (in the watery grave) that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

NOTICE: The old man or the old man’s body of sin is DESTROYED! How is it destroyed? BY BAPTISM!!! Now tell me how the Holy Spirit could live with a LIVE BODY OF SIN? Because this is the idea that this blaspheming dog is putting forward.

And again from Paul:

Ephesians 4:22-24 (MCV) That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, (only Baptised people have an old man) which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; 23 And be renewed in The Spirit of your mind (be gifted with The Holy Spirit at Baptism); 24 And that ye put on the new man (only Baptised and Holy Spirit gifted people have a new man), which after God is created in righteousness and True Holiness.

Listen folks, do not be deceived by this lying illegitimate, for there is no other way a man or woman can be saved/born of God (born again) just as Yashua Messiah told Nicodemus:

John 3:3-5 (MCV) Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again (born of God), he cannot see The Kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto Him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of The Holy Spirit, (BAPTISM) HE CANNOT ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD!!

There it is, and fail to understand Yashua Messiah’s instructions at your peril! (see links below)

He then starts creating satanic contradictions and/or twisting the Holy Scriptures in order to build his strawman non-gospel and non argument:

1 John 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

No one can believe on the name of the son of God UNLESS they are born of God and that can only happen once they are Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit!

He then starts JUDGING with an arrogant vengeance which is breathtaking:

“It’s so important to get the gospel right or you could end up in hell. Paul threatened damnation twice (Gal 1:8-9) to anyone/thing who tried to add works to the gospel of grace he received directly from the Lord Jesus Christ.”

This stupid know-nothing idiot couldn’t get The Gospel right if it were a piece of 4×2 whacking him across the forehead!

Galatians 1:8-9 (KJV) But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

This blasphemer should look in a mirror and read those Scriptures to himself.

Pay attention, dear people, because what this evil dog is doing is classifying the act of Baptism and the gifting of The Holy Spirit as WORKS!! Can you believe it? You’d better ‘cos that’s exactly what he is saying and doing.

Notice the Holy Scriptures he uses in order to build his satanic strawman doctrine:

Romans 4:4 (KJV) Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

“If you try to add your works to be saved or to prove you’re saved, you negate God’s grace and you go to hell. God will not be a debtor to any man, we can receive salvation as His free gift or not at all.”

Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Acts 8:15-17 (MCV) Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Spirit: 16 (For as yet it was fallen upon none of them: only they were Baptised in the name of the Lord Jesus.) 17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.

The above crucial event is recorded for us so that there is no confusion regarding Baptism and gifting of The Holy Spirit as the ONLY WAY a newbie to the Faith can be born of God (born again) and SAVED! Even if there is a delay between Baptism and Holy Spirit gifting, as was the case for the Twelve Learners (disciples)

Right, moving on, here we can see the stupidity of this numbskull’s ideas because he uses Paul as an example in a pathetic attempt to make his non-case for the no need for Baptism:

Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

“The Apostle Paul received the gospel directly from the Lord Jesus Christ and not from any man per Gal 1:12.”

Gal 1:12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

OK, I will copy here the narrative of Saul’s calling on the road to Damascus and please read it right to the end:

Acts 9:1-18 (MCV) And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples Learners of The Lord, went unto the High Priest, 2 And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this Way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem. 3 And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a Light from heaven: 4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? 5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. 6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. 8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. 9 And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink. 10 And there was a certain disciple Learner at Damascus, named Ananias; and to him said the Lord in a vision, Ananias. And he said, Behold, I am here, Lord. 11 And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the street which is called Straight, and enquire in the house of Judas for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth, 12 And hath seen in a vision a man named Ananias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that he might receive his sight. 13 Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy Saints at Jerusalem: 14 And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. 15 But The Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles the Nations, and kings and The Children of Israel: 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name’s sake. 17 And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Spirit. 18 And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was BAPTISED.

So what we can easily deduce from this passage of Scripture is that Baptism WAS necessary for Saul, but it’s not necessary for this self-righteous jackass called Jim. He thinks he can waltz straight into The Kingdom of God with his unbaptised LIVE BODY OF SIN. He must be dumber than dumber. LOL

He then rambles on with more satanic drivel and misuse of Holy Scriptures:

“The gospel the Apostle Paul received directly from the risen Lord Jesus Christ is found in 1 Cor 15:1-4. This is the gospel that is relevant today and by which we are saved by today.”

Yes Paul did receive teaching directly from Yashua Messiah AFTER HE HAD BEEN BAPTISED AND GIFTED WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT!!

He then quotes these Holy Scriptures, delusionally thinking that they back up and support his no-Baptism satanic ideas:

1Co15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;

1Co 15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.

1Co 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;

1Co 15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

None of these Holy Scriptures support what he thinks. If he does think that, then he is reading his BS into them, that is, his wishful thinking – a favourite pastime of the deluded members of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

We then get more blasphemous lies:

“The moment someone believes the gospel personally, that the Christ bled and died on the cross for their sins, was buried, and rose again on the third day has received the gift of eternal life.”

The moment someone believes for the first time is in response to The Father’s call:

John 6:44 (MCV) No MAN can come to me, except The Father which hath sent me DRAW (DRAG) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

This is the ONLY WAY a man or a woman can come to Yashua Messiah. This is our calling but he or she MUST be Baptised and Gifted with The Holy Spirit in order to have Eternal Life. This is our outward sign of commitment to Him as our Saviour – a public declaration, if you like.

Yet more lies:

“The moment you believe, you’re eternally sealed with the Holy Spirit and are born again from above (Eph 1:13-14).”

Ephesians 1:13-14 (MCV) In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard The Word of Truth, the Good News of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, (were Baptised) ye were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise,14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of His Glory.

All these Scriptures are doing is describing the moment we are gifted with The Holy Spirit when, after our Baptism, we are eternally sealed, but not until then. No one is born again from above until after this event. NO ONE!!! The old man MUST DIE IN THE WATERY GRAVE WITH YASHUA MESSIAH FIRST!

Then he says:

“When you trust the Lord Jesus Christ as your Savior you can’t go to hell because the penalty for all your sins (past, present, & future) have already been paid for by Him.”

What he doesn’t tell us here is that NO ONE can fully trust Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) until they are Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit.

And yet again more lies:

“And only Christ kept the 10 Commandments and He imputes His righteousness, the righteousness of God, to your account the moment you believe the gospel and trust Him as Savior.”

And no one can fully believe the Gospel until they are Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit. Then they should have the Spiritual discernment to be able to read and understand the Gospel.

He then goes into all manner of nonsense about the mickey mouse Rapture and going to heaven, neither of which are going to happen – so all in all we can see what a blind guide he is:

“You may not feel like it but you become as holy and righteous as the Lord Jesus Christ and you’re eternally qualified for Heaven. You’re saved from hell and guaranteed Heaven when you die or are raptured because you believe the gospel and trust the Lord Jesus Christ as your Savior.”

For by GRACE are Ye Saved Through FAITH; AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is The Gift of God – Ephesians 2:8”

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/09/19/for-by-grace-are-ye-saved-through-faith-and-that-not-of-yourselves-it-is-the-gift-of-god-ephesians-28/

Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/should-christians-be-baptised-into-yashua-messiahs-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-1/

The Crucial Importance of Baptism Including What Baptism Is Not

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/understanding-the-crucial-importance-of-baptism-including-what-baptism-is-not/

Exposing a Satanic REPROBATE ILLEGITIMATE Called Jim – Part 2

Right, continuing straight on from part one we then get more conceited, arrogant, self-righteous, blasphemous drivel from this know-nothing mongrel dog:

“You’re a typical cult leader who only thinks they know the truth but in reality you preach an accursed gospel that Paul warned about in Gal 1:8-9. I know the gospel (1 Cor 1:15) and I know you don’t rightly divide the word of truth (2 Tim 2:15) You didn’t have the guts to post my comment because the real gospel disputes your false teachings.”

First he accuses me of being a cult leader. I would cry with laughing if what he said were not so sinful and serious, and that’s because all his false witness accusations are insults towards Yashua Messiah, not me, for it is He who has called and chosen me, I did not call on and choose Him. So this numbskull has indirectly blasphemed against Yashua Messiah and possibly the Holy Spirit that indwells me. Furthermore, and this is hilarious, I must be the first pauper cult leader LOL.

His armchair warrior bravado continues with him then calling me a coward, which is just infantile goading. This he compounds by then accusing me of being Scripturally ignorant when The Truth is the exact opposite, and it is he that is incapable of discerning Truth from The Holy Scriptures, which I proved unequivocally in part one.

His satanic evil vitriol continues:

“For example, you falsely teach water baptism to receive the Holy Spirit, when today the Holy Spirit is received when one believes the gospel. (Eph 1:13) May the Lord Jesus Christ rebuke you for leading people away from Him and His gospel.”

Here he just repeats his hollow empty claims, like a clanging cymbal, and compounds his evil sins, for which he will pay a severe penalty in the Resurrection, and with many more stripes than the lost and unsaved:

Luke 12:47-48 (MCV) And that servant, which knew his Lord’s will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to His will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.

Let this be a lesson to us when we get hold of the wrong end of the stick and then start lashing out with it and laying into our brothers and sisters when the errors are ours.

You see, what the dork has failed to understand is that when we are called The Holy Spirit visits us and then leaves, IT DOES NOT STAY! It comes in order to bring The Father’s calling card and then goes away again. It cannot stay within a live body of sin, hence our need for BAPTISM and the killing of our bodies of sin. This is a catastrophic lack of understanding and will cost him dear in the resurrection if he fails to repent.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles.

For by GRACE are Ye Saved Through FAITH; AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: It is The Gift of God – Ephesians 2:8

The above verse is yet another foundational Holy Scripture that is not understood by mainstream Christians, otherwise known as the delusional Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

This article is about the confusion that exists within the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion between belief and Faith, although most would not admit that they are confused. It’s also about them thinking that it’s their faith that saves them and this idea, of course, goes hand in hand with their other erroneous idea of them thinking that THEY can ‘accept’ Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) as their Saviour.

You see, everything they do in terms of salvation is ‘down to them’, and The Father does not feature in their salvation at all. How can He, when salvation is on their terms and conditions of acceptance? As I describe elsewhere in my articles, this is a “tail wagging the dog” scenario. Please see my article (link below) entitled Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah.

With the above in mind, this means, we often hear a term that they use with great regularity, especially within Anglicanism/Episcopalianism, and the term is: “I have a faith”. Now what, exactly, does this expression mean and what do they have a faith in? Well, we don’t know, do we, for they do not tell us and they do not tell us because they do not know themselves!? The correct expression should be “I have faith in God the Father” or “I have faith in the Lord Jesus Christ” which automatically tells us that he or she is trusting or putting their faith in the Godhead, but to just say “I have a faith”, tells us nothing. It could mean they have faith that night will follow day – so what, even the lost can do that!

We also hear another expression from them, not dissimilar from the one above, that is, “I have a saving faith” or even the question “Do you have a saving faith?” Again what, exactly, does this term and question mean? Quite plainly it means that they think that their faith is related to or directly connected to their salvation or that their faith is the determining factor in their salvation. Well I have news for them; their faith has nothing to do with it, it has nothing to do with their salvation at all and to prove it, I will turn to the book of James. There we read the evidence that faith without works is dead:

James 2:20 (KJV) But wilt thou know, O vain man, that Faith without works is dead? (Emphasis mine)

So, from this, we can easily deduce that our faith is not something we can have or express without effort or action on our part – it doesn’t really exist until we do something. This proves it is something we can bring to life and/or display or prove, by our actions or acts of faith – known Biblically as “works”.

Abraham showed his faith through action or with works when he offered his son Isaac as a sacrifice, but we never heard him say “I have a faith” or “I have a saving faith.” In reality, these terms are just churchianity or Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious jargon and the next time you hear them say these things, ask them what they have faith in and then for them to show you their works to prove it is real. You won’t be very popular, but then nor was Yashua Messiah when He walked this earth and challenged the men of religion of His day. You could also ask them who gave them their ‘saving faith’ but don’t hold your breath while you wait for their answer.

So then, moving on, this leads me to ask the question: Is belief, faith? No and yes is the answer to this question. Belief can mean acknowledging something or someone is true or real just like the demons do:

James 2:19 (MCV) Thou believest that there is one Godhead (that is the Godhead is number one and therefore all powerful); thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

Here we can see they believe there is a Godhead that’s number one and all powerful, but that’s it, (please note, to say that oneness as in the KJV causes them fear is utter nonsense) all they have to show for it is a dreadful fear of the Power and Awesomeness of God. There is no faith, exercised with works, by these demons and it would be impossible for them to show faith anyway for fear kills faith just as fear kills love.

So does belief become faith? Yes, if you keep on believing and/or remain trusting and faithful no matter what; this is where the two come together, for continued belief whilst suffering trials and not giving up in this life when the going gets tough, shows Faith, especially in times of persecution. However, when we do this, all we are doing is exercising the Faith we have been given. We were given this Faith with Grace at the beginning of our walk with Him. Our faith, though, comes into its own when we take a leap of faith like doing something risky and that may involve our sticking our necks out, so to speak. So if you haven’t, as yet, done so then go on, what are you waiting for!?

Now bearing all this in mind, what is Faith, for Our Lord specifically asks if He will find it on the earth when He returns:

Luke 18:8 (KJV) I tell you that He will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when The Son of Man cometh, shall He find Faith on the earth? (Emphasis mine)

Notice, He is not going to ask if any of them or any of us are believers, why would He? He gave or has given us the ability to believe at the point of our calling, that is, when we were saved and when The Father drew us to His Son. Once we are Baptised and receive the gift of The Holy Spirit we are given Faith and thereby the ability to believe 24/7. As already stated, this is all part of the free gift, along with His Glorious Grace. Once the Father God makes us aware of His presence or the fact that He exists we are without excuse, so we must believe, we have no choice – how can we not believe and how can we not answer His call?

Now from here on in is where the real Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious errors kick in and cause so much trouble and confusion for them.

“For by Grace are ye saved through Faith and that not of yourselves, it is The Gift of God”

Now, believe it or not, it’s from this very verse that most of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion thinks they are saved by their faith. They accept that Grace is a gift from God, but not the Faith part as well. So if the Faith part of this gift is not ours, whose is it? Come on, think about it, you should know very well whose Faith it is – Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) Faith, who else’s!?

Do you not know that it took immense Faith for Our Lord to go to the stake and die for us? This is what: “and that not of yourselves” is referring to, IT IS NOT OF US!! Do you understand this very basic and fundamental Truth, I hope you do, because this is real fundamentalism of the True Christian Faith, not that fear based meaningless, Ten Commandment obeying, Fundie, Bible bashing Judaiser’s variety?

Now mark, learn and inwardly digest this crucial point, for not only is Grace a part of this free gift but Faith is as well – Yashua Messiah’s Faith, it’s not our faith to begin with. Both His Grace and His Faith make up the wondrous free gift of salvation and we must take this fully on board or our Christian walk will be forever half baked or even dead. Why? Why, because as long as we think it is our faith that determines whether or not we are saved we will always have doubts about our salvation. This cataclysmic error is what the ‘salvation by works’ system of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion is based upon, it is founded upon not realising that Faith is part of the gift of salvation – period – full stop – end of.

Now just for the sake of this study, let’s look at it from another perspective. OK, so it’s not our faith; what’s the point you’re trying to make I hear some of you say? The point here is this; if we claim that all faith is ours then what we are really saying is that we are involved in our salvation and it’s all down to us when, quite clearly, it is not – we play no part in it at all. All we do is answer the Father’s call to His Son and receive His wondrous free gift, that’s all there is to it – nothing else. We have no part in the process of our salvation – none! Yashua Messiah is the author and finisher of Faith, not us:

Hebrews 12:2 (MCV) Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of Faith; who for the joy that was set before Him endured the stake, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of The Throne of God.

So what are you saying – what about OUR faith I hear you say again; are you saying our faith has no role at all!!?? A good question, what about OUR faith? Well, as I have clearly shown, to begin with, we don’t have any faith of our own; it’s given to us in order to redeem us and then it’s dead until we do something with it, that is, works: the Lord’s Faith has done its job and saved us, but all it is, is Faith alone.

James 2:17 (KJV) Even so Faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. (Emphasis mine)

There we have it; our faith is dead if it does not have works and yet we still have Faith and is here called ‘Faith alone’. This is like a business man receiving an interest free loan; he now has the money for free which will enable him to set up his business. He is now officially a business man (saved), but how he utilises this wonderful gift of free money (Faith) will determine whether he is a successful business man or an unsuccessful businessman – a good and faithful servant or a bad, slothful lazy servant. Please read the parable of the talents for the Lord’s explanation of this arrangement.

This is the point the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion misunderstands from the bad teaching they receive on Ephesians 2:8. If our salvation is dependent upon our faith and that faith in turn is then enlivened or made real by works, then we automatically have a part in our salvation and we can literally lay claim to it, for it is our works that have made our faith alive. Furthermore, we can even boast and pat ourselves on the back because our works are now involved; we could even say: “I have a saving faith,” for it’s all mine. Now most, if not all the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, will admit that we cannot earn our salvation by works, but at the same believe in just that – salvation by works. Is it any wonder why many of them are confused? You see, if we believe that all faith is ours and that it is brought into being by our works, our creativity, and is a catalyst in our salvation then, by default, our works must feature in our salvation and we are then earning our salvation and yet at the same time we all know (if we are TRUE Christians) this is nonsense and a blasphemy.

So, if our faith has nothing to do with our salvation, what is the point of our faith, what use is it and what does it achieve for us? Well I’ll tell you straight it doesn’t save you that’s for sure, but, what it does do is this, it proves and it rewards. It proves we are true believers because we remain believers through thick and thin, through trials and then faith becomes a verb instead of a noun, and hopefully we keep on believing right to the end of our lives, but be warned for this is the minimum requirement. For when we display faith in action as well, though risky living and/or stepping out in faith, it scores and stores us rewards or treasures in heaven which we will receive when Yashua Messiah returns to set up His Kingdom here on this earth.

As I have already mentioned, this is what the parable of the talents is all about in Matt 25:14-30. We all have God given talents of some description or another so we are literally without any excuse if we say we have nothing to offer our brothers, sisters and fellow man. The Father God gives us the basics or foundational building blocks of salvation through His Grace and Faith and it is up to us to build upon what we have and what we have been given. Here though is a warning. Whatever you do, do not bury or hide your talents for, whatever you were given will taken from you and given to those who showed that being the recipients of that free gift of Faith they put it to good use and displayed it by the results of their works.

Please note, acts of faith do not have to always be ‘good works’ or do-gooding charitable actions alone. For example you may take on a project that is outside your comfort zone – something challenging or testing. As a son or daughter of God you are in partnership with your brother The Lord Jesus Christ, no matter what you do, and you will rely upon Him for your success. When you succeed you will then give Him the praise, the thanks, the honour and the Glory.

From the other perspective, a worldly man will do none of these things apart from swagger, boast, pat himself on the back and show off to his friends. I know, because in the past as a lost soul, I did all these things, but they didn’t last!!

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-the-father-calling-you-to-his-son-yashua-anointed/

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Part 5 – 1 Timothy 2

Introduction

In parts one through four on this subject (link below) I proved without a shadow of doubt that the writer of 1 Timothy 1 was a forger of the early to mid 2nd century AC and that Paul was definitely not the author of chapter one of said Epistle. How can you be so certain I hear you ask? Well, that’s very simple, for the language of 1 Timothy 1, and the words used, are those of a Hellenising religious philosopher, that is, a deceiver. In other words, he was a philosophising counterfeiter of the early Romish Babylonian Church; the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion as I call it, and certainly not Paul the first century Messenger (Apostle) of Yashua Messiah.

Moreover, as I begin unravelling 1 Timothy 2, I will reveal to you even more convincing proof that this author is a forger. In fact, 1 Timothy 2 is the humdinger chapter that cements my case and proves the Hellenising, philosophising, religious credentials and provenance of these Epistles.

However, having said all that, there are times when The Truth is written into these forgeries, for a religious deceiver will always hide his lies amongst The Truth. Hence the adage: “A lie is best hidden between two Truths.” Furthermore, are The Truths within these Epistles from Paul’s pen or the forger’s pen? Are they from scraps of genuine manuscripts and then embellished by the forger’s own additional writings? Answer: I have no idea, but rest assured, there are some Truths in these epistles, which cannot be denied.

So, pressing on:

1 Timothy 2:1 (KJV) I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, BE MADE FOR ALL MEN; (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 2:1 Notes – part 1 — “THAT, FIRST OF ALL, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, BE MADE FOR ALL MEN.” Oh really, is that so!? Now is this statement a genuine Christian statement from Paul’s hand or is it meaningless religious clap trap and an erroneous generalised unscriptural religious statement with no Holy Spiritual or Holy Scriptural provenance whatsoever?

Now notice first the Spiritual contrast from Paul’s hand here:

Romans 8:26 (KJV) Likewise The Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but The Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. (Emphasis mine)

Here Paul is stating that we don’t even know how to pray correctly, so the Holy Spirit prays for us!!!

And again:

1 Corinthians 14:15 (KJV) What is it then? I will pray with The Spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with The Spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.

Now is The Holy Spirit even mentioned in 1 Timothy 2:1? Not at all. Notice the emphasis: “THAT, FIRST OF ALL.” So this exhortation is prioritised above any others following it, never mind praising The Father God and giving Him thanks FIRST. So, basically, what he’s saying is put supplications, prayers and intercessions first, for ALL men, and then not even any thanks to God before or afterwards – as you do – NOT!!

1 Timothy 2:1 Notes – part 2 — Moreover, should we be making supplications, praying and making intercessions FOR ALL MEN at all, or is this nothing but a man made religious idea? By the term “ALL MEN” we must assume that this author is referring to all rebellious, lost and unsaved creatures, both mankind and hu-mans (non-mankind) alike. Even those that may have heard the Kingdom Gospel message and ‘rejected it’. Yet what did Yashua Messiah say about these types of people?

Luke 10:13-16 (KJV) Woe (a curse) unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works had been done in Tyre and Sidon, which have been done in you, they had a great while ago repented, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. 14 But it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the judgment, than for you. 15 And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted to heaven, shalt be thrust down to hell. 16 He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me. (Brackets mine)

Woe unto thee Chorazin, which means a “horrendous grief” or CURSE towards Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum!!!

OK, so let’s get this straight and ask ourselves another pertinent question: Are we, as Christians, supposed to make prayers and supplications and intercede for people generally that Yashua Messiah would otherwise curse for their wicked rebellious behaviour in rejecting the Gospel Message when presented, that’s if He were here today in the flesh? Keeping in mind that these people would despise Yashua Messiah and The Father by treating Their Message with contempt, just like those people of Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum did in the first century.

We could also put this another way and ask this question: Are the rebellious, lost and unsaved masses entitled to the mercy, forgiveness and blessings as bestowed upon those The Father has called to His Son Yashua Messiah and saved? NO!!

If we then follow up with our due diligence on this subject of prayer what do we find?

1 Corinthians 14:13-14 (KJV) Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret. 14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.

2 Corinthians 5:20 (KJV) Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ’s stead, be ye reconciled to God.

2 Corinthians 13:7 (KJV) Now I pray to God that ye do no evil; not that we should appear approved, but that ye should do that which is honest, though we be as reprobates.

Philippians 1:9 (KJV) And this I pray, that your love may abound yet more and more in knowledge and in all judgment;

Colossians 1:9 (KJV) For this cause we also, since the day we heard it, do not cease to pray for you, and to desire that ye might be filled with the knowledge of his will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding;

1 Thessalonians 5:17 (KJV) Pray without ceasing.

1 Thessalonians 5:23 (MCV) And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

1 Thessalonians 5:25 Brethren, pray for us.

2 Thessalonians 1:11 (KJV) Wherefore also we pray always for you, that our God would count you worthy of this calling, and fulfill all the good pleasure of His goodness, and the work of faith with power:

2 Thessalonians 3:1 (KJV) Finally, brethren, pray for us, that The Word of the Lord may have free course, and be glorified, even as it is with you:

Make sure you understand, for ALL these genuine Pauline exhortations for prayer are Holy Spiritually based prayers and are for the brethren ALONE, not for mankind in general!

So what is 1 Timothy 2:1 all about? Answer: satanic Hellenising religious blanket universal forgiveness for all unrepentant sinners or a universal pardon FOR ALL MEN as long as they join matey’s new money making religious cult now on offer, by this forger, on behalf of the Babylonian Romish Cult or, as I call it, The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and cough up. Oh and don’t forget the hail (Queen of Heaven) Mary’s. LOL.

OK, I’m being deliberately facetious and sarcastic here, but the principle remains, and this is what 1 Timothy 2:1 is promoting here – the Hellenised Romish Cult. It is also a foundational verse of these fake epistles, for it sets the tone for what follows and from Paul’s pen they most definitely did not come!!

However, having said all that, if there is someone you know and wish to pray for them, by all means pray, but always remembering that if The Father is not calling them, then they will remain unsaved in this age and the answer to your prayer will be postponed to a future age. The same applies if they are sick. He may or may not heal them.

1 Timothy 2:2 (KJV) For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. (Emphasis mine and I will deal with the heinous and ghastly religious word ‘godliness’ in detail next)

1 Timothy 2:2 Notes — “For kings, and for all that are in authority;” Yes especially for Kings or Queens as they are anointed by God and are answerable to God alone. However, those ‘in authority’ (politicians) are your enemies, so pray for them as you would for any enemy, but you shouldn’t vote for them, nor co-operate with them, nor forgive them. No repentance, no forgiveness:

Luke 17:3 (KJV) Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him. (Emphasis mine)

So when you pray for these satanic verminous people in authority, remember that they are your sworn enemies and pray as Yashua Messiah told you to pray here:

Matthew 5:44 (KJV) But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; (This verse requires an article all of its own – coming soon)

Furthermore, as for praying so that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life, by all means, but always bearing in mind that these criminals in authority are The Devil’s own and your friends they are definitely NOT, and will do their damnedest to make sure that you do not have a quiet and peaceable life!! So keep this permanently in mind and be on your guard! This quote puts it into perspective:

“Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you!”

— Pericles (430 B.C.)

1 Timothy 2:3 (KJV) For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 2:3 Notes — This verse is part Truth especially in relation to what I have said above about 1 Timothy 2:2 so it is therefore only partly good, but it does tell us that Yashua Messiah is God.

1 Timothy 2:4 (KJV) Who WILL have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of The Truth. (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 2:4 Notes — Now this verse is solid gold Truth, BUT WILL NOT HAPPEN IN THIS AGE! All men being saved will occur in the Second Resurrection when they will come to a knowledge of The Truth. And who is The Truth? Yashua Messiah is The Truth. (A new article on the Two Resurrections subject coming soon.)

1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV) For [there is] one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; (‘who was made man’ from The Geneva Bible notes)

1 Timothy 2:5 Notes — This verse is blasphemous satanic ‘God is one’ Monotheistic nonsense. From the Greek Transliteral:

1 Timothy 2:5 (Greek Transliteral) One for God, One and Mediator of-God and of mankind the man Anointed Jesus.

1) NOTICE: The remark “For there is one God” is total translator nonsense, for the words in italics [there is] are a translators addition, so what it should say is:

1 Timothy 2:5 (MCV) For one is God The Father, and one is mediator God between God and men, the man Christ Jesus who came in the flesh;

That is, ONE who is God The Father and ONE who is Mediator for man as God – letting us know that there are Two Gods = The Father and The Son. (See links below.)

2) To emphasise, I trust also that you will notice how this verse has been sneakily corrupted. Yashua Messiah is God and Mediator of God, not a lesser being between man and God. He is God as Mediator, Advocate, Consoler and Comforter. This contamination is very subtle along the lines of both Monotheist and a Trinity corruption where the KJV says ‘Spirit of truth’, when it is the ‘Spirit of THE Truth’ as written in the Greek Transliteral. (See link below)

1 Timothy 2:6 (KJV) Who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

1 Timothy 2:6 Notes — Here we have more Truth, as long as you understand that “testified in due time” is referring to the future resurrections and not this age. The testifying in this age is only for those CALLED and those CALLED and CHOSEN by The Father, not for the masses of lost and unsaved.

1 Timothy 2:7 (KJV) Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak The Truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.

1 Timothy 2:7 Notes — This verse is fairly sound but whether it is from Paul’s pen or the forger I cannot say. However, I have my suspicions. For my notes on this verse I will go straight to the Greek Transliteral and then raise the relevant points:

1 Timothy 2:7 (Greek Transliteral) Into which was-placed I proclaimer (declarer or herald) and commissioner (messenger) Truth I-am-saying in Anointed (Christ) not I-am-falsifying teacher of nations in belief (faith) and Truth.

OK, the first relevant point here is ridding this verse of the religious slogan words ‘ordained’ ‘gentiles’ and ‘verity’. Paul was placed as a proclaimer or, better, placed as a declarer or herald of the Good News Kingdom of God message by Yashua Messiah Himself = no religious ritualistic ‘ordaining’ nonsense ever took place.

Gentiles is a word that needs full examination, for it means someone who is not a Roman Citizen from the Latin word ‘gentilis’. This meaningless corrupting Latin word can be found in both Old and New Testaments so what is it doing there? Answer: causing satanic confusion.

Secondly, and a final word on this verse, is that it may be genuine, but was corrupted by the religious translators anyway with the use of the word ‘verity’ – a derivation of the Latin word ‘veritatem’ which means Truth.

Now here’s a thing. This totally religious Latin based word ‘verity’ can only be found twice in The Holy Scriptures. Once in the Old Testament and once in the New Testament, here in 1 Timothy 2:7, so my questions would therefore be: 1) WHY? and 2) Is this some kind of KJV translator religious tokenism going on here, as if to leave their Latin Romish religious trade mark in both Testaments in some sort of gratuitous way? Or is it just a symbolic way to make a satanic statement like a rubber stamping? Everywhere else the word Truth is used, so why use this vain unnecessary word at all unless it’s only promoting elitist meaningless religiosity? Here is the verse from the Old Testament:

Psalm 111:7 (KJV) The works of His hands are verity (truth) and judgment; all His commandments are sure. (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Here is 1 Timothy 2:7 as it should be written:

1 Timothy 2:7 (MCV) Whereunto I am ordained placed a preacher, and a apostle Messenger, (I speak The Truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the gentiles Nations in Faith and verity Truth.

Right, enough of that:

1 Timothy 2:8 (KJV) I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.

1 Timothy 2:8 Notes — Now this verse is total Babylonian Romish religious drivel and humbug. Paul would have prayed no such thing, for most men everywhere were lost and unsaved and WITHOUT Holy hands, so why would Paul utter such erroneous generalised blanket rubbish? Let’s be clear, only a creature of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion could come out with bunk like this. So this verse is from the forger 100%.

As for wrath, the Word of God says be angry but do not sin, and don’t let the sun go down on your wrath – so nothing about being without wrath. Oh and how can you not be angry about this satanic evil world today, EVERYDAY!!?? Think on this very pertinent point!

Oh and finally, don’t you doubt his Babylonian Romish Cult or YOU will excommunicated forthwith!

1 Timothy 2:9-12 (KJV) In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; 10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. 11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. 12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 2:9-12 Notes — Whether this was from the hand of Paul or not I have no idea, but I have no issues with any of it apart from the use of the word ‘shamefacedness’ which can mean ‘shame’ and is therefore a blasphemy, if that’s the meaning the translators were implying. TAKE NOTE!: No son or daughter of God should feel any shame about ANYTHING now that they are forgiven ALL their sins, if Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit.

Furthermore, this word ‘shamefacedness’ can also mean ‘bashfulness’ which would be fine, especially as we look at the brazenness of the drunken tarts and froward hussies that parade themselves around the streets today semi-naked with no shame at all.

To compound this, today, we have vile Cultural Jew Marxist dyke (lesbian) feminists and filthy dyke politicians (amazons) strutting around with their bows and arrows and who now rule over us.

I will therefore quote Isaiah as a severe warning because it has all happened before, re our ancestors, in the Northern Kingdom of Ancient Israel before they were carried off in captivity by the Assyrians (forefathers of The Germans):

Isaiah 3:12 (KJV) As for my people, children are their oppressors, AND WOMEN RULE OVER THEM. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

This is what happens when we move away from the sound advice given here in 1 Timothy 2:9-12 whether it be from Paul’s hand or not.

Right, those brackets: “(which becometh women professing godliness).” What’s wrong with them I hear you ask? EVERYTHING is the answer to that question, but in what way? I also hear you ask. Quite simply, it’s all wrapped up in ONE WORD and that word is ‘godliness’ which is a satanic religious deception, for it means ‘piety’ and ‘piety’ is wholly a meaningless, empty, religious word:

From Strong’s Concordance:

Godliness – G2317 – θεοσέβεια – theosebeia – theh-os-eb’-i-ah – From G2318; devoutness, that is, piety: – godliness.

Now this non-word ‘godliness’ (notice how it’s spelt with a small ‘g’ and not a capital ‘G’) can only be found in the questionable books of the New Testament, namely, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus and 2 Peter which tells us three very important things:

1) It is a word NEVER used by Yashua Messiah in the Four Gospels.

2) It is not a word used by Paul or Peter in their genuine writings and…

3) ALL these books were most likely penned by the same Hellenising religious forger or by Hellenisers with same satanic religious mindset as the forger and Christians they certainly were NOT!

Moreover, let’s be clear, ‘piousness’ or ‘godliness’ is a religious state of being, a phony state of being, not a Christian state of being and it’s not a born of God (born again) state of being. For example, ‘piousness’ is not being ‘Holy’ for ‘Holy’ means to be ‘set apart’ by God or to be called out by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah and be made Holy by the indwelling of His HOLY Spirit. ‘Piousness’ or ‘godliness’ is none of this – it’s a fraud, it’s a fake religious counterfeit state of being, practised by the evil creatures of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, especially in the Babylonian Romish Cult and by its slapper daughter offspring Protestant Anglicanism = AngliCAINism.

Pious – Religious definitions from Dictionary.com:

1) Having or showing a dutiful spirit of reverence for God or an earnest wish to fulfill religious obligations.

2) Characterized by a hypocritical concern with virtue or religious devotion; sanctimonious.

3) Practiced or used in the name of real or pretended religious motives, or for some ostensibly good object; falsely earnest or sincere: a pious deception.

In the above secular definitions we can see how being ‘pious’ has many more negative meanings than positive, and even the ‘positive’ are still within the framework of RELIGION, and that’s because ‘pious’ and ‘piety’ as with ‘godliness’ are wholly religious, fake Christian, words and nothing to do with Christianity or following Yashua Messiah at all. A fake Jesus, yes, but not Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ). Notice, in point one of these definitions: ‘the dutiful spirit of reverence for god’ will be referring to the god of this world, Satan the Devil for he is the god of all RELIGION.

OK the final verses of 1 Timothy 2:

1 Timothy 2:13-15 (KJV) For Adam was first formed, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. 15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

Here, dear reader, is a little test for you. Can YOU see the religious humbug and outright lies in the satanic words of this verse? I do hope so, but if not, no matter, for we all have to learn and I recommend that you pray to The Father and ask Him to give you the Spiritual gift of discernment.

Lie No 1) And Adam was not deceived.

Lie No 2) Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing.

So did Eve beguile and deceive Adam or not? Who was responsible for whom in The Garden? Upon whose desk did the buck stop? Is not the Man the head of the wife? Once we know what the original sin REALLY WAS (see link below) then EVERYTHING else falls into place, and this verse just reads like Babylonian Romish Cult religious hogwash and humbug.

So here’s a question: When was a woman ever saved through child bearing? Answer on the back of a postage stamp, thank you.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

Unravelling The Pastoral Epistles – Parts 1 – 4

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-pastoral-epistles-parts-1-2/

The Duality Godhead:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

Exposing The Trinity Lie:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

 

APARTHEID Is The Kingdom of God!

How about that to get all those self-hating, guilt ridden, anti-white liberal fake Christians going, eh? I don’t think there could be a more tormenting or provocative statement or ‘meme’ (as they like to call it today) that one could present to these treacherous satanic evil disgusting wretches.

So how can the Kingdom of God be an Apartheid Kingdom? Quite easily, and Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Himself made it very clear:

Matthew 25:32 And before Him shall be gathered all nations: and He shall separate them one from another, as a Shepherd divideth His sheep from the goats: (Emphasis mine)

There it is folks – APARTHEID and/or segregation as in the American South, and whether we like it or not!! The nations will be separated or all ethnic groups divided and separated from one another so that they will all live together with their own kind – White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes with White Caucasian Israelites in their Tribes, Germans with Germans, Russians with Russians, Slavs with Slavs, Spaniards with Spaniards, Arabs with Arabs, Indians with Indians, Japanese with Japanese and Ethiopians with Ethiopians. They will then remain racially pure with no Jewish encouraged inbreeding, no Jewish encouraged miscegenation, no Jewish encouraged satanic diversity, no Jewish encouraged satanic enriching, and no Jewish encouraged satanic multiculturalism.

However, Yashua Messiah also says: “Like a Shepherd divideth His Sheep from the goats,” so He is giving us this parallel, but what parallel, and who are the goats? because they are not the previously mentioned Nations. The Nations are Mankind and the Sheep are the White Caucasian Israelites, amongst those Mankind Nations, but the goats are not. The goats are a different group altogether; they are a hu-man sub-species and not of Mankind at all, so who are these goats?

Easy, they are the The Serpent Seed Canaanites – Satan’s people – his offspring, that is, The Jews, African blacks, the Turks, the Italians, the Red Indians, the Chinese, the Mongols and the Koreans, to name the principal Canaanite tribes.

Now obviously this state of affairs is not going to sit well with many liberal fake Christians; those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Christians that are really Cultural Jew Marxists (liberals) posing as Christians, and they will no doubt create a huge fuss and protest, accusing Yashua Messiah of being a HATER! a BIGOT! and a RACIST! So how do you think Yashua Messiah is going to deal with these rebellious vile evil people? Like this:

Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, (The Canaanite Jews and their shabbos goy duped Marxist slaves) which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. (Brackets mine)

So there is their sticky end, so lets hope that they repent and are quick about it! Lord hurry that day!

For those wondering who the White Caucasian Israelites are, here is my quick run down and exposé on that topic:

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
Levi – The Priesthood,
Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, British Royalty and Nobility,
Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AC and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

Caucasians = White Israelites

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rgLD2NtGRpUf/

https://www.minds.com/media/902217401290674176

In Yashua Messiah’s name – Brother Charles

Have you ‘FALLEN IN LOVE’ With Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ)?

OK, this will be a short one, just in case I have to go to the loo in order to throw up due to diabolical vileness of this subject matter!

What a question eh? Why am I asking it? I am asking it, because I see it everywhere on wretched Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious Yewtube threads. Most, I have to admit, are from silly delusional women commenting in the comments section and who all sign off with that equally irritating, gratuitous and meaningless slogan: “God bless you”, another of my pet hates!

Now as it happens I was on a Yewtube thread today (9th June 2018) entitled: “Rabbis Call Him the Most Dangerous Man in America! – Frank Eiklor.” Published on the: “Sid Roth’s It’s Supernatural!” Yewtube Channel.

Now I have listened to this Jewish Sid Roth character before and he is definitely a blind guide, and this Frank Eiklor fella is also a blind guide, but which blind guide is leading the other, I have no idea, but rest assured an empty ditch should soon be accommodating both of them quite comfortably in the near future if it hasn’t done so already.

However, I have digressed slightly so back to this satanic video. Now approximately five minutes and forty seconds into it, which consists of Eiklor telling us about his childhood and early introduction to the US military, we then get to this point where he states, and I quote:

“….here is someone with all power, here is The One who said He was The Creator of the whole universe, putting on flesh, disguised as a hu-man being, as Messiah, as Saviour, and yeah, I’ll be very candid with you, I FELL IN LOVE like no one had ever FALLEN MORE IN LOVE!”

Can you believe this stuff? The Jew, Sid Roth then comes back with the equally evil line:

“As a curiosity I have to ask you this question, being raised as a Jew hater, how did you handle the fact that Jesus was Jewish? (See link below)

This evil garbage video lasts for nearly 26 minutes – I could only bear half of it.

So this deluded fraud claims that he ‘FELL IN LOVE’ (as in a romance) with Yashua Messiah, not that he had been called by The Father and was drawn or dragged to Yashua Messiah.

John 6:44 No MAN can come to me, except The Father which hath sent me DRAW (DRAG) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That no MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

Moreover what are we to deduce from this wickedness? Was this a Jewlywood sodomite’s romance he was experiencing here? ‘cos I’ll tell you straight, this son of The Devil blind guide was NOT experiencing a Fatherly call.

Furthermore, to claim that he had ‘fallen in love’ as in romantically ‘fallen in love’ with Yashua Messiah makes this ‘love’ a vile evil blasphemy. Why is that? Quite simply because it would be INCESTUOUS in nature!!!

Godly Fatherly or Brotherly love, from the Greek word ‘agapao’ is not ‘falling in love’ – period – fullstop – end of!!

Mark 12:30-31 And thou shalt love (agapao) The Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is The First Commandment. 31 And the second is like this, Thou shalt love (agapao) thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other Commandment greater than these.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Love – G25 – ἀγαπάω – agapaō – ag-ap-ah’-o -Perhaps from ἄγαν agan (much; or compare [H5689]); to love (in a social or moral sense): – (be-) love (-ed). Compare G5368.

1 Corinthians 13:1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity (agape love) I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

From Strong’s once more:

Love – G26 – ἀγάπη – agapē – ag-ah’-pay – From G25; love, that is, benevolence; specifically (plural) a love feast (offering): – (feast of) charity ([-ably]), love.

Now let’s be clear about this, for to ‘fall in love’ would immediately infer a romantic connotation, which would then necessitate the Greek word ‘eros’ for that kind of love. This is a word which cannot be found in the Greek New Testament.

So what does this tell us? It tells us that satanic mainstream so-called Christians, those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, have erroneously romanticised their relationship with Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ). This, my friends, can only be a demonic perversion of OUR TRUE RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM as our King, High Priest, Comforter, Master, Saviour, Friend and eldest Brother!!

Whatever you do, do not be sucked into this subtle deceptive wickedness.

Brother Charles in brotherly agapao love!

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

The JEWS are The TARES!

The Parable of The Wheat and The Tares

The Tares are The Jews!!!!??? How on earth did you work that out, I hear you say? Quite easily, because once you know what a Tare is, you will then know it can only apply to The Jews and to no other race or ethnic group on the face of this earth!

So first things first, and let’s copy the relevant Holy Scriptures here:

Matthew 13:24-30 (MCV) Another parable put He forth unto them, saying, The Kingdom of God is likened unto a man which sowed good seed (White Caucasian Israelites) in his field: 25 But while men (White Caucasian Israelites) slept, his enemy (Satan) came and sowed Tares (The Jews) among The Wheat, (White Caucasian Israelites) and went his way. 26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit (White Caucasian Israelite offspring), then appeared The Tares (The Jews) also. 27 So the servants (Those AWAKE) of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed (White Caucasian Israelites) in thy field? from whence then hath it Tares (Jews)? 28 He said unto them, An enemy (Satan) hath done this. The servants (those AWAKE) said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? 29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up The Tares (The Jews), ye root up also The Wheat (The White Caucasian Israelites) with them. 30 Let both grow together until THE HARVEST: and IN THE TIME OF HARVEST I will say to the reapers (The Angels), Gather ye together first The Tares (The Jews), and bind them in bundles to BURN THEM (A REAL HOLOCAUST): but gather The Wheat (The White Caucasian Israelites) into my barn.

Above, you can see the True version of Matthew 13:24-30 hence I call it the MCV version or Messenger Charles’ Version, for, and on behalf of, Yashua Messiah.

Right, now for second things second. What is a Tare? for we need to know what it is before we go blazing forth in exuberant error as so many do! A Tare is a weed, but not an ordinary kind of weed, for that would make it very easy to spot and it would stand out like a dollop of mud on an otherwise spotless white suit, that is, the field of White Wheat. So take note, these devious tricky Tares were only visible amongst The Wheat to those who were able to spot them, that is, the awakened servants of The Farmer.

OK, so what kind of weed were these Tares? Easy, they were a counterfeit type of wheat otherwise known as ‘bearded darnels’. And from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

Tare – G2215 – ζιζάνιον – zizanion – dziz-an’-ee-on – Of uncertain origin; darnel or false grain: – tares.

In the Latin it is known as: ‘Lolium temulentum’ and it is POISONOUS. From Wiki: “Lolium temulentum, typically known as darnel, poison darnel, darnel rye-grass or cockle,” – how appropriate IS THAT!!?? (See link below.)

So here we have a very deceptive weed (a false grain or fake wheat) that looks very much like The WHITE Wheat amongst which it is sown and yet it is no such thing and it’s highly poisonous as well. So what does this tell us?

An interesting point is the similarity between the origins of the words ‘white’ and ‘wheat’ and from The Philipendium web page we get this:

“The word “white” is from the Old English hwīt. The modern Norwegian word is hvit, nearly identical to the Old English. The modern Dutch word — wit — is also quite similar. In English there is a striking similarity between the words “white” and “wheat” — the latter of which is derived from the Old English hwǣte. The words “white” and “wheat” are in fact related, because “wheat” is derived from a proto-Germanic word that literally meant “that which is white.””

So here we have graphically revealed to us The TRUTH that The Wheat is White and the fake wheat, The Tares, are not white because they are not wheat. It also tell us that The Jews, like the Tares, look like wheat (bearded darnels), that is, they look white but are, in Truth, not Wheat, that is, not white and nor do they see themselves as white, even though they look white, and as (((they))) confirm for us here:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

— Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

“You’re on the endangered list [White people]. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving. In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won’t be any more white people around.”

— The Jew, Tim Wise

“If white men were not complaining, it would be an indication we weren’t succeeding and making the inroads that we are.”

— Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Jew owner of The New York Times.

“The goal of abolishing the white race is, on its face, so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed WHITE SUPREMACISTS….Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed.”

– Noel Ignatiev, Jewish Harvard professor and co-founder of ‘Race Traitor’ magazine.

“Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity. The key to solving the problems of our age is to abolish the white race, the abolishment of the privileges of the white skin”

– Noel Ignatiev, Jewish Harvard professor and co-founder of ‘Race Traitor’ magazine.

https://www.minds.com/media/903332083325427712

As we can see from the five nasty HATE FILLED quotes above, Jews do not consider themselves to be a part of The White Caucasian Israelite Race – Semites, nor of any other white Semitic race, for example the Assyrian Germans – Semites, and wish to see its total demise and/or annihilation. Not only that, but from this we can easily deduce that Anti-Semitism re the Jews is just a lying scam. and it has ALWAYS been a lying scam. The Jews are Hamitic Canaanites and carry the brown skin genes of Ham, Naamah (Noah’s Cainite wife) and the incestuous Canaan and not the white skin gene of Adam, Noah and Shem = JEWS ARE NOT SEMITES!!

OK, finally we have Yashua Messiah explaining the Parable of The Wheat and The Tares to His Learners (disciples):

Matthew 13:36-43 (MCV) Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and His disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of The Tares of The Field. 37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth The Good Seed (White Caucasian Israelites) is The Son of Man (Yashua Messiah); 38 The field is the world; The Good Seed are The Children of The Kingdom (White Caucasian Israelites and others of Mankind); but The Tares are The Children of The Wicked One (Satan’s offspring The Jews, and all other Canaanites – hu-man kind, not Mankind); 39 The enemy that sowed them is The Devil; The Harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. 40 As therefore The Tares are gathered and burned in the fire (A REAL HOLOCAUST); so shall it be in the end of this world. 41 The Son of Man shall send forth His angels, and they shall gather out of His Kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in The Kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolium_temulentum

Companion reading to the above article:

Did Eve have sex with The Devil producing Cain – The Serpent Seed?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel Jews?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

The Jews are Hamitic Canaanites not Semitic Israelites, nor are they Royal Judahites!

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was NOT A JEW!!

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Israelites are Anglo-Saxon and Celtic White Caucasians:

OUR ANCESTORS FORGOT WHO WE ARE!!!!!!!

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,
Benjamin the youngest son,
Simeon,
Levi – The Priesthood,
Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,
Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,*
Issachar,
Zeebulon,
Gad,
Asher,
Dan,
Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

Try and apply this verse to the Jews – God’s promise to Abraham:

Genesis 13:16 (MCV) *And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.*

From the Declaration of Arbroath to the Pope 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”

Daniel 9:7 (KJV) O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee.

Britain consists of five of the Twelve Tribes of Israel – Ephraim = England; Simeon = Scotland; Wales and Cornwall = Levi; Judah = Northern Ireland and Scotland; Dan = Southern Ireland.

The British Gaelic and Old English tongues are Hebrew in origin, this has been proven by linguistic scholars.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Saaca or Saacea (Isaac’s sons = saxons) came from the lands of the Medes and Parthians where the Assyrians (Germans) placed them after taking the Northern Kingdom of Israel captive in 725 BC.

The Scythians (The tribe of Simeon – The Scots) came from the same area between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea and north of the Black Sea.

Sir Francis Drake and Elizabeth I both knew England was Israel – privately QE II also knows.

Joshua 1:3 (KJV) Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

The Mayflower American founding fathers (the Puritans) all knew that England was Israel and planted Israel in the promised land of the New World – New England.

The word British is from the Hebrew words ‘Berith’ and ‘Ish’. Hebrew Berith = Covenant and Hebrew Ish = man so British means Covenant Man.

Engl-land again is from the Hebrew word ‘igl’ which means bullock. England = Bullock-land. Ephraim was known as God’s young bullock, the firstlings, and his fair child.

Deuteronomy 33:17 (KJV) His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.

Ireland was originally known as Ebernia from Abraham’s forefather Eber from whence comes the Hebrew tongue and the race collectively known as the Hebrews – Eber’s descendants.

The Iberian peninsular also gets its name from Eber. These places were named by Zarah in his migrations who was the twin brother of Pharez who were Judah’s two sons by Tamar – Saragossa in Spain takes its name from Zarah who had the red thread tied to his wrist at the time of his birth – the Zarah Red Hand of Northern Ireland and on its flag to this day.

The Hebrides off the west of Scotland are really the Hebrew-des.

The Scots and Irish both play the bagpipes which are known to have Middle Eastern origins.

The first Christian churches planted outside of Jerusalem were in Britain in 35 AD and there is archaeological evidence to prove it. These churches were planted by Joseph of Arimathea and his small band of saints. This proves the Israelites were in Britain. British churches pre-date Antioch.

“The apostles passed beyond the ocean to the isles called the Britannic Isles”

— Eusebius ( Demonstratio Evangelica or Proof of the Gospel , book 3, chap. 7)

“We certainly know that Christ, the true Son, afforded His light, the knowledge of His precepts, to our Island in the last year of Tiberius Caesar” (Tiberius died in 37 AC)

— Gildas the Wise, circa 550 AC (De Excidio Britanniae or On the Ruin of Britain )

Caucasians = White Israelites, White Caucasians are The True Israelites (NOT JEWS). They were placed in the Caucasus region circa 725 BC by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans) when Assyria invaded the Northern Kingdom of Israel and took them away as captives. From there they migrated west into Europe – the rest is history.

Our Ancestors Forgot Who We Are:
https://www.minds.com/media/902249474722271232
https://www.minds.com/media/902893671965282304
https://www.minds.com/media/902905549734813696

Did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Say: I AM NOT GOOD and I AM NOT GOD?

The short, but very substantial, story of the Wealthy Young Ruler.

Now this subject is yet another of those ‘pain in the neck’ subjects that blaspheming Judaisers and satanic gnat strainers, alike, try to spiritually garrote me with, but, I hasten to add, they always fail. So let’s copy and paste here the Holy Scriptures that they then pollute with their perverted reasoning and satanic Judaising nonsense:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto Him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Mark 10:17-18 (KJV) And when He was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit Eternal Life? 18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

Luke 18:18-19 (KJV) And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit Eternal Life? 19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.

Now the first issue that these mongrel dogs will attempt to make mileage out of is the monotheism BS value that they think these verses possess. They think these verses PROVE that God is ONE and that Yashua Messiah was clearly stating that He was was not God, but is this TRUE? NO a thousand times NO!!! But hang on Yashua Messiah said: “none is good, save one, that is, God.” So how do you get around that, I hear you say? Quite easily is the answer to that and it all depends upon your understanding of the word ‘GOD’ in the New Testament.

However, in order to understand the word ‘God’ in the New Testament we have to understand the word ‘God’ in the Old Testament FIRST, for the Godhead never changes. We also have the issue of the Greek language of the New Testament, for it is too vague in its description of God, unlike the Hebrew definition of the Old Testament. Therefore from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

God – H430
אלהים – elohym – el-o-heemPlural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God[head]; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty. (Square brackets mine)

god – H433
אלהּ אלוהּ
‘ĕlôahh ‘ĕlôahh – el-o’-ah, el-o’-ah (The second form is rare); probably prolonged (emphatically) from H410; a deity or the deity: – god. See H430.

This ‘eloah’ singular deity would be used when describing Satan, who is the only solitary god (‘eloah’) of this world.

So from this proof we now know for sure that the Godhead is two distinct Spiritual beings, not one, other than their being number one with none above.

Moreover, if we now move onto The New Testament we have a Greek word being used for the word ‘God’ and not a Hebrew word. However, does that mean the nature of the Godhead changes? Do they become a different Godhead just because a new word is in use? No way, so what gives? The word ‘theos’ is what gives instead of ‘eloheem’ or ‘elohim’ but the plural nature of the Godhead remains the same. From Strong’s Concordance once more:

God – G2316
θεός – theos – theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

In ancient Greece there were only ‘gods’ ‘plural’ because the Greeks were polytheists and worshipped many gods, not two alone. However, there was no need for a singular Greek word for a god because there was no singular god in polytheistic Greek worship. This means the Greek word ‘theos’ did the job just fine when describing the true Duality Godhead = more than one!!

Matthew 1:23 (KJV) Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. (Emphasis mine)

OK, so here we can plainly see that Yashua Messiah is described as being: “God with us”, that is, in the flesh so, in turn, the Old Testament plural Duality Godhead ‘Elohim’ is also still with us with The Father in heaven and The Son on earth in the flesh and, therefore, still Two God’s.

So this brings us to our little conundrum of: “there is none good but one, that is, God:”

Now what was Yashua Messiah actually saying here? For we know for sure that He wasn’t saying God is one; He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t God and He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t good either, even though most will mistakenly think He was saying that. So what was He really saying? Well, first of all, He was telling us plainly, and those there present, that He was God in the flesh as part of the Godhead, but without them realising it. This is due to The Truth that the Godhead is a Duality Godhead and always was a Duality Godhead with Him now standing there amongst them as God, so how could He say that He was not good or tell His questioner not to call Him good? What was Yashua Messiah doing by saying that?

The answer to that my friends is very simple. This unsaved and lost wealthy young ruler was trying to win favour with Yashua Messiah by calling Him good. This was plain and simple flattery which got him nowhere with Yashua Messiah who quickly rebuked him with the question: Why callest thou me good? This was nothing to do with Yashua Messiah not being good. Of course He was good, He was God in the flesh so He had to be good – He could be nothing else.

However, just for the benefit of the wealthy young ruler He adds these two riders: “There is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.”

Now, as already shown, Yashua Messiah was God in the flesh so was stating clearly that He was good, but without anyone there realising it and yet at the same time giving Glory to His Father in heaven as being good as the other half of the Godhead.

With the second rider we have Yashua Messiah saying: “But if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.” In J B Phillips’ translation he has it better: “But if you WANT TO enter into [that] Life you must KEEP The Commandments.”

So first things first. Yashua Messiah is saying: “If you WANT TO enter into Life? So does this wealthy young ruler want to or not? Furthermore, where is The Law in this arrangement? It’s nowhere in it at all, so clearly Yashua Messiah is teaching the wealthy young ruler that this is about a FREE CONSCIOUS DECISION on his part and not a commandment issue = no Law. Second, we have this word ‘KEEP’ which everyone, and his dog, mistakenly thinks means OBEY when it mean what it says, that is, to keep – to protect – to hold onto as precious – internalised and have them written on our hearts so NOTHING to do with obedience at all. (Please see my article “When Did The Biblical Word KEEP Become OBEY?” – Link below.)

This is what Yashua Messiah was REALLY saying to the wealthy young man that came forward gushing and fawning all over Yashua Messiah in his initial, over the top, flattering enthusiasm.

Now don’t get me wrong on this, for later on I believe that this young man WAS saved. How do I know this? Easy, because Yashua Messiah loved him, so that means He knew the young man’s heart deep down and knew he was sincere. He also knew The Father was calling him, and KNEW that eventually he would repent and love his neighbour by giving up his wealth and then FOLLOWING Yashua Messiah. The same, in a different way, applied to Nicodemus but I won’t go into that subject now.

Furthermore we then have the issue of the wealthy young ruler’s question: “What good thing shall I DO, that I may have Eternal Life?” OK, I have made my point quite obvious here by emphasising the words ‘I DO’. Moreover, so what could this young man DO in order to inherit Eternal Life? NOTHING! absolutely nothing is the answer to that question. How do we know that? Quite simply because he was asking the question within the backdrop of the Ten Commandments of which he boasted in being a fautless observer. This means he was asking Yashua Messiah what other Commandment he should be observing or doing that he may have missed. His mission in questioning Yashua Messiah was solely Law based and understandably so because The Law was still in force at that time, even for the faithful.

However, The Lord then stuns him with His reply which immediately introduces the SPIRITUAL DIMENSION or SPIRITUAL THRUST of The Commandments = LOVE!! Not the feeble letter of The Law of The Commandments = legalistic Pharisaism and its close companion hypocrisy.

So the wealthy young ruler is challenged with Yashua Messiah’s charge to go sell all his possessions and give the proceeds to those in need and THEN to follow Him. Now mark this point and mark it well for the gifting of his wealth will not save him, but the act of gifting his wealth will prove that he is being called by The Father to Yashua Messiah and also prove that he is saved. Salvation is ALWAYS an undeserved free gift and our good works will follow as a result or as evidence that we are saved, not because we are trying to be saved or trying to earn our salvation.

Finally,Yashua Messiah in saying these tough things to the wealthy young ruler was in turn challenging his commitment to Him. Was he prepared to give up his Law/Commandment based life and comfortable wealthy lifestyle and put his sole trust and faith in Him? These are the points and questions that Yashua Messiah was getting across to the wealthy young ruler.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/when-did-the-biblical-word-keep-become-obey/

I Have Been Called a Christofascist! – Hilarious or What!?

Ever heard of that one before? If not, no matter, for nor had I until a month or so back (29th August 2017). So let me enlighten you:

From Wikipedia (Jewpedia):

“Christofascism is a combination of Christian and fascism coined by Dorothee Sölle in 1970. Sölle, a liberation theology proponent, used the term to describe segments of the Christian church which she characterized as totalitarian and imperialistic.”

First, a little grammar correction, where I believe they should have said: “A combination of Christianity and Fascism” and not: “A combination of Christian and Fascism.”

OK, with little aside dealt with, who is this ‘Dorothee Sölle’, when she’s at home?

Again from Wikipedia (Jewpedia):

“Dorothee Steffensky-Sölle (born Nipperdey; 30 September 1929 – 27 April 2003) was a German liberation theologian and writer who coined the term Christofascism. She was born in Cologne and died at a congress in Göppingen.”

Now those of you who have read my series of articles on “Blacks and Their Black Jesus and Those Behind it” (see the link below), which is founded upon Black Liberation Theology in the USA, will know of my strong views on this evil satanic subject, for evil and satanic it undoubtedly is. This evil philosophy is just vile modern social justice liberalism and/or progressivism. It is more truthfully known as Bolshevik Jew Marxism which, these days, is known by the more benign sounding title, Cultural Marxism and/or Critical Theory, which is straight out of the subversive Jewish Frankfurt School.

So here we have this ‘woman’ Dorothee Sölle with Cultural Jew Marxist, SJW (Social Justice Warrior), liberal credentials criticising and pontificating about committed Christians (albeit misguided committed Christians) of the fundamental variety and calling them Christofascists. I will deal later with the issue of whether or not I am a Christofascist.

From Gendering Liberation: “Deprivatising” Women’s Subjectivity in the Prayer-Poetry of Dorothee Sölle. — Katja Lisa Elena Neumann

“In an English-speaking context, Sölle is typically ranked amongst American Liberation Theologies, which mark her most sustained theological focus. Reflecting on her own theological project, which developed as a Political Theology, informed by the works of Rudolf Bultmann and Dietrich Bonhoeffer – but also deeply affected by Jewish thinkers such as Martin Buber – she declares that the language of Liberation Theology appeared much more appropriate to her political theological starting points. Her approach, based on a biblical hermeneutics – figured in the metaphor of eating of the Psalms – also has implications for this study, even though I do not place my emphasis on the Bible but on an engagement with Sölle‘s poetic texts.”

So in the above paragraph we can begin to see the negative influences that guided Dorothee Sölle, the inventor of the term Christofascist and in particular the Jewish thinker (always very dangerous for ‘Christians’) Martin Buber.

We then read: “she declares that the language of Liberation Theology appeared much more appropriate to her political theological starting points.”

From her interest in: “the language of Liberation Theology” we can easily deduce that her motivations are Bolshevik Jew Marxist secularism/atheism and/or Cultural Jew Marxist political social justice, with her so-called ‘theology’ a fraud or a cover. Not that theology has anything to do with Yashua Messiah’s Kingdom Gospel message, for it hasn’t. Theology is just Spiritually dead, hu-man made, quasi-intellectual secular reasoning, that is, Hellenising philosophy. This is the driving, quasi-intellectual, and carnal philosophising force of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

From Liberation Theology we also get Theological Liberalism which Sölle was also a proponent and came out with such statements as this: Every theological statement must be a political statement as well.”

Now did Yashua Messiah come out with theological political statements or did He just tell people the simple Truth which, by default, were attacks on the theological political system of His day (Pharisaism) which is exactly the same theological political system that we have today, only they now call it POLITICAL CORRECTNESS which is Communism which is Talmudic Judaism.

“Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.”

– Rabbi S. Wise, The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935.

“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism (Communism) itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.”

– The Jewish Chronicle, April 4, 1919

Furthermore, let’s be clear, for The Truth is the enemy of The State and there is no way Sölle was an enemy of The State. On the contrary her ideas were very state friendly as we will see from the quote below:

From Theopedia: Theological Liberalism:

“Theological liberalism, sometimes known as Protestant Liberalism, is a theological movement rooted in the early 19th century German Enlightenment, notably in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant and the religious views of Friedrich Schleiermacher. It is an attempt to incorporate modern thinking and developments, especially in the sciences, into the Christian faith. Liberalism tends to emphasize ethics over doctrine and experience over Scriptural authority. While essentially a 19th century movement, theological liberalism came to dominate the American mainline churches in the early 20th century. Liberal Christian scholars embraced and encouraged THE ‘HIGHER BIBLICAL CRITICISM’ of modern Biblical scholarship.”

Here we can plainly see that Sölle was an arrogant Theological Liberal and a philosopher and therefore a stranger to The Truth – The Holy Scriptures. Paul warns us about the dangers of listening to such satanic people:

Colossians 2:8 (KJV) Beware lest any man spoil you through PHILOSOPHY and VAIN DECEIT, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So there we have it and all exposed for what it is – Liberation Theology and Theological Liberalism and it is definitely NOT AFTER CHRIST!

Notice, too, the humdinger proof of her arrogance, for these conceited popinjays actually believe that they have a ‘HIGHER BIBLICAL UNDERSTANDING’ which apparently equips them to be critical of the Holy Scriptures!

OK, so what is the trap? for there is ALWAYS a trap with these ear tickling liberal ideas. The trap is ‘Social justice liberal do-gooding’ and Sölle was no different from any other worldly self-righteous liberal do-gooder. As with all these fake politicised Christians they latch onto WORLDLY SOCIALISM (Utopianism) and add it to their so-called Christianity. This Utopianism was otherwise known as Bolshevik Marxism in the early 20th century and today it’s known as Cultural Marxism. This, modern movement in its alledged ideals, is worse than Bolshevik Marxism with all its blood letting. Cultural Marxism is the violent assault on people’s minds, rather than a violent assault on the body. Hence their “Thought Police,” as portrayed by Orwell in his book “1984,” are now the order of the day, through Jew controlled political, media and educational (conditioning) whores.

Here are some of Sölle’s crusading statements and ideas:

From Wiki once more: “Sölle, a liberation theology proponent, used the term Christofascist to describe segments of the Christian church which she characterized as totalitarian and imperialistic.

Now who were these alleged Christians that she labelled as: ‘totalitarian and imperialistic’? No doubt they were 1) Fundamentalist Bible bashing Christians and 2) Protestant Puritans and Strict and Particular Baptists, and 3) 19th and early 20th century British Empire building Christians of the Victorian and Edwardian eras.

Now don’t get me wrong, for these people did do some amazing work in the British Territories overseas and thouands of people got to hear about Jesus Christ, but unfortunately they tended to be the legalistic Judaising type of ‘Christian’ believing that they could force their 10 Commandment, Old Covenant religion down people’s throats, so were not Scriptural in their approach at all, having no GRACE.

Moreover, this means that these satanic judgemental liberal Cultural Marxist ‘progressive’ types like Sölle had a point in their criticism of these false Christians. However, as we know, TWO WRONGS NEVER DID MAKE A RIGHT.

OK, so moving on with a definition from the Urban Dictionary:

Christofascist:

“Christian religious extremist. Often a person who believes in forcing a right-wing Christian agenda on the rest of the world. Also known as a ‘fundamentalist’ or more recently ‘evangelical’…..”

So what do we have here? Well first let’s gain some understanding with a very appropriate quote regarding the words Fascist and Fascism, for the Jewish controlled Cultural Marxist left always use these emotive words very successfully in their lying propagandised attacks on people with right-wing views:

“Dealing with The Jews requires a Jewish Primer on how the Jews talk and how they use certain words:

1) “Fascist.” Jews call someone a fascist when that person prevents the Jews from taking control of the politics of a particular nation.

2) “Fascism.” The political status of a particular nation that keeps the Jews in their place and out of power.

“There is not a single instance when the Jews have not fully deserved the bitter fruit of the fury of their persecutors….We come to the nations pretending to escape persecution, we [Jews] are the most deadly persecutors in all the wretched annals of men.”

— Samuel Roth, Jewish writer, Jews Must Live (NY,NY: The Golden Hind Press Inc., 1934) pp. 64-65

Right, there you have it, and once you have fully absorbed the above Truth, the words “Fascist” and “Fascism” lose most, if not all, of their automatic negative connotations, as deviously planted in the unthinking minds of the duped leftie plebs and proles of so-called western democracies.

However, here is a conundrum, because, as I have already stated, Christianity cannot be forced upon anyone, at least, not successfully, for a REAL Christian HAS TO BE CALLED by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) in order to be a REAL Christian, so the fundies and zealots of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion do The Faith and The Way a disservice and bring Yashua Messiah’s name into disrepute. Hence their punishment will be more severe than the lost and unsaved in the resurrection.

Continuing:

“…..since many Christofascists bristle at the term ‘fundamentalist’ there has been a movement to get the media to refer to them as ‘evangelicals.’ However the term ‘evangelical’ is a misleading one as many Christian sects are evangelical in nature and not all evangelical Christians have such extreme views or political agendas. Christofascist is a more descriptive term for these right-wing extremists.”

“James Dobson’s Focus on the Family is a Christofascist hate group bent on banning abortion and opressing homosexuals.”

OK, so what do we have here? Well, first, let’s understand the self-righteousness of these Cultural Jew Marxist zealots and bigots in the way that they have twisted and perverted what is right and what is wrong so that they can adopt some kind of satanic, demonic and demented hypocritical moral high ground.

Let’s be clear about this stinking, diabolical, evil wickedness, for THEY in their support for the genocidal mass murder of living foetuses (in Britain alone 186,000 per annum and counting) are then accusing these alleged Christians of being right-wing extremists for speaking out against their vile selfish murderous policies and actions. Just how demonic, sick and perverted is their thinking? Answer: Sick and perverted enough for Yashua Messiah to wipe them all out with FIRE upon His return to this earth, just as He did with water to the pre-flood world.

So all you dumbed down secular brainwashed dupes out their, take this as a VERY SERIOUS warning to all of you who are foolish enough to support satanic Cultural Jew Marxist dogmas and ideologies, for a FIERY END awaits you unless you change your vile, evil, satanic, murdereous thinking and ideas.

Finally, back to the original accusation of my being an alleged Christofascist, well am I, that is the question? Well it would seem that in THEIR HYPOCRITICAL PHARISAICAL PERVERTED EYES I am, but when we consider that they, like their first century Pharisee spiritual forebears, are Spiritually dead and totally blind and deaf, as well, does it really matter what they think or say? – so NO I am not a Christofascist, I am a REAL Christian whom they call a Christofascist!

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/03/10/blacks-and-their-black-jesus-and-those-behind-it-part-1/

The DUALITY GODHEAD

The Duality Godhead? What Godhead is that, I hear you ask? Well I’ll tell you straight, right away, They are not a mickey mouse triune godhead, They’re not a Unitarian/Judaic/Islamic monotheistic godhead and They are not a Binatarian godhead either, if that’s what you were thinking.

Now what is a Binatarian godhead? I’ve never heard of such a thing, again I hear you say. OK, so let me explain, a Binatarian godhead is a half-truth so that means it’s a lie just like the monotheistic godhead and the trinity godhead.

Binatarianism is belief in a Duality Godhead that has been corrupted with Triunism and turned into yet another lying hu-man magical construct. This means that instead of a mythical godhead that is one in three and three in one they have constructed a godhead that, like the trinity, it is one in two and two in one – total fallacious religious nonsense. We therefore need to understand that The Godhead consists of TWO DISTINCT Spiritual Beings who are NEVER at anytime one solitary being.

This means that The Duality Godhead are very simple to understand for we are told about Them right at the beginning in Genesis Chapter 1:

Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God (‘Elohim’ – plural) created the heaven and the earth.

There They are, in the very first verse of the Holy Scriptures ‘ELOHIM’ and ‘Elohim’ is the plural of ‘Eloah’, so if the Godhead was ONE GOD, it would have read: “In the beginning God (‘Eloah’ – singular) created the heaven and the earth.” But it DOES NOT SAY THAT it says ‘ELOHIM’ – PLURAL! MORE THAN ONE GOD – THE GODHEAD! Please excuse the shouting folks, but shouting is very necessary for some stiff necked duped people out there who love to hang onto their nonsensical Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious myths = monotheism and/or triunism.

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – H430
אלהים
‘ĕlôhı̂ym
el-o-heem’
Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.

Now pay attention to what Strong is doing here, for he is following a satanic monothesitic agenda and explaining away The Truth by introducing his own irrelevant intellectual nonsense into his definition of ‘Elohim’“but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God;”

Moreover, ignoring his intellectual waffle, ask yourself this very pertinent question: Would a Bible scholar of Strong’s immense calibre, with his excellent knowledge of the Hebrew language, have not known of the word ‘Eloah’ and known its SINGULAR meaning and also have known that ‘Elohim’ was the plural of that singular word? I will leave you all to answer that no brainer question for yourselves.

OK, so we have established from the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that the Godhead is more than one god and this is further confirmed for us in Genesis again:

Genesis 1:26 (first part) (KJV) And God said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness: (Emphasis mine)

Right, now is this claimed solitary mono-god speaking to himself? If not, who is he speaking to – the angels? No way, for I’ll tell you straight, the angels never created anything, and man is definitely not created in the image of angels. This means that if we take the “God is one” nonsense, seriously, it must mean that their god needs certifying, for he is hallucinating and seeing someone in his head that he is now attempting to hold a conversation with. Hilarious or what!?

Having said all that, I can now see all the monotheists jumping up and down, frothing at the mouth, and renting their clothes in true Moloch and Baal worshipping style as they did in Elijah’s day when their mono-god failed to bring down fire to ignite the wet wood, such is their delusional thinking. Not only that, but when I have finished this article the trinity dupes will no doubt have joined them in their manic frenzy. Who said being a follower of Yashua Messiah – The Way was not good fun? LOL

Moving on I will now quote a segment from one of my earlier articles which covers the prime and/or premier “identity of God verse in Deuteronomy”, and we all know it, don’t we? This verse is the verse that nearly all monotheists quote in an attempt to support their erroneous satanic claims:

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Please note, as I disect this verse it will be, in part, a repeat of what I have said above.

“Hear, O Israel” – or better translated “Hear you Israel” or “Listen up you Israelites”, for I, your Lord, have something important to tell you:

“The Lord our God” – properly translated from the Hebrew; The Lord = The Eternal or The Self-Existing. Our God = Our ‘Elohim’ (plural); the Godhead that has always self-existed before time began and was/is always a plural Duality Godhead.

Straight away in this short phrase of Holy Scripture we are told by the use of this word ‘Elohim’ (the plural of ‘Eloah’) that we are dealing with more than one God. Look folks, there is no getting away from this Truth, and we need to get it through our heads that the Hebrew word ‘Eloah’ (singular) would have been in use here, not ‘Elohim’, IF God was one. OK, so we have now ascertained that The Godhead is more than one, and yet it says:

“Is One Lord” – so what’s going on here and what does this mean? The Hebrew word here for ‘one’ is ‘Echad’ which means ‘united’ or ‘in unity’ in one sense, and ‘number one’ the prime number in the other sense, that is, no one higher or no one above – The Most High as wriiten elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures.

One – H259
אחד
‘echâd
ekh-awd’
A numeral from H258; properly united, that is, (as) one; or (as an ordinal) first: – a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any (-thing), apiece, a certain [dai-] ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.

OK, as we can see the word ONE does not mean solitary or one god or a mono-god, for it means UNITED AS ONE, that is, in agreement in thought, word and deed, yet still distinct and separate as Two Spiritual Beings.

A Numeral – H258
אחד
‘âchad
aw-khad’
Perhaps a primitive root; to unify, that is, (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts): – go one way or other.

The primitive root word then confirms this for us – TO UNIFY!! And again this, in turn, means They are not one being, for being united or unified is always an arrangement whereby a number of beings are at one with each other or unanimous in their thoughts, aims and ideals, as in a football team. Newcastle United is a team of individuals united in one aim – to win, but they are not one being, they are eleven distinct beings. This is how it is with the Godhead; they are Two Spiritual Beings, united as one in thought, mind and deed – totally likeminded – united!

This, too, is why The Lord, through Paul, exhorts the Congregations of God to be like the Godhead in their relationships one with another:

Romans 15:5-6 (KJV) Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: 6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even The Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. [Two distinct beings] (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Take note, the Congregations of God were not ONE BEING, but they were exhorted by Paul to be of ONE MIND just like The Father and The Son and like the Godhead of God with God in the beginning who said: “Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness:”

If we now move on to the New Testament we have a new word for the Godhead and that word is the Greek word ‘Theos’ instead of the Hebrew word ‘Elohim’. However we need to be clear that just because a Greek word is now used instead of a Hebrew word doesn’t mean that the nature and make-up of the Duality Godhead has changed. In fact the Greek word ‘theos’ is very useful for this topic for, generally, it means a DEITY and in the Greek sense that means gods plural, for the Greeks were polytheists – they, like the ancient Egyptians, had many gods. As far as I know they did not have a word in their language to describe a monotheistic god. It was only the Jews that worshipped such a deity and they worshipped that deity in error and in ignorance when they knew very well that God ‘Elohim’ was a plural Godhead.

God – G2316
θεός
theos
theh’-os
Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

So there we have it: ‘Theos’ = a deity and in Ancient Greece that would mean more than one god, not a mono-god. Not only that, but because ‘Theos’ is such a general all encompassing word in terms of objects of worship, it means it can be interpreted any way you like, if you have a monotheistic or triunistic agenda to fulfil. Moreover, notice that within this very definition we can see Strong doing just that with all his figurative nonsense regarding ‘magistrates’. With regard to ‘magistrates’ I will leave a link below for additional reading regarding this satanic subject.

Furthermore, because we know that the Godhead does not cause confusion re their identity we can definitely know for sure that plural ‘Theos’ in the NT means exactly the same a plural ‘Elohim’ in the OT – The Duality Godhead with The Holy Spirit as their LIVING POWER.

One last Holy Scripture:

Galatians 3:20 (KJV) Now a mediator is not [a mediator] of one, but God is one.

Now does this verse make any sense? First of all, who is The Mediator that this verse is refering to? Answer: Yashua Messiah. And was Yashua Messiah God come in the flesh? Answer: Yes, hence it states quite plainly that a mediator is not of one, so there has to be more than one in order for one to mediate to the other and yet it then says: “God is one!” So what’s going on here?

Easy, God = ‘Theos’ = ‘Elohim’ = more than one, for the Godhead does not change:

Malachi 3:6 (KJV) For I am The LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. (Emphasis mine)

Here we have Yashua Messiah speaking on behalf of the Godhead, for no one has ever seen or heard The Father:

John 1:18 (KJV) No man hath seen God (The Father) at any time; The Only Begotten Son, which is in the bosom of The Father, He hath declared Him. (Brackets and Emphasis mine)

John 5:37 (KJV) And The Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. YE HAVE NEITHER HEARD HIS VOICE AT ANY TIME, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE. (Emphasis mine)

So there it is folks, NO ONE has ever seen or heard The Father at any time so that must mean that Yashua Messiah was The God of the Old Testament who spoke on behalf of Himself and/or The Father = The Duality Godhead.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-the-mystery-of-mystery-babylon-the-great/

Brother Charles

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Parts 1 & 2

Prologue

For those of you not familiar with my work for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) please allow me to explain that this series of articles is not for the faint hearted or for those new to my work. This topic is heavy going and could easily be described as a deep end subject, especially if you are a King James Bible (KJV) idolator, that is, you worship the KJV as being inerrant (100% true) – unfortunately a fallacy for the Spiritually blind.

If you are a newbie or a beginner in The Faith I would certainly recommend that you read a few of my other articles, first, in order to give yourself a foundation in The Truth, before attempting this series which, even I, after 35+ years of study, am finding very challenging and in need of much Holy Spiritual guidance in order to put them together.

I do not enjoy being critical of the KJV as I still believe it to be the best English translation of The Holy Scriptures, however when error is discovered in its pages we cannot close our eyes or, more importantly, our hearts and minds, and begin a life of living in denial of The Truth. These issues have to faced head on and confronted and then dealt with. The same applies to fear. Fear has to be confronted, challenged and overcome. Start running from fear and you will never stop running – the coward dies a 1,001 deaths!

Please note, this series is a first attempt at this huge subject and will be ammended and edited as I discover more Truth and expose more errors to add to its pages, but suffice it to say there is most definitely a case for questioning the authenticity of these three Epistles.

Having said that I do not believe that The Pastoral Epistles should be expunged from the The Holy Scriptures, because there is some Truth in them but at the same time those verses of Truth are surrounded by many errors – the errors of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Introduction

The Pastoral Epistles is a name that has been conjured up by someone, or some people, for three of Paul’s letters in the New Testament: 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus. Unofficially included in this grouping is 2 Peter which, allegedly, is also of spurious origin and that is the issue with all four of these books of the New Testament – their questionable authorship.

So where does this title come from, would be my first question regarding this tetchy subject? All the historical information I can find points to the commencement of the 19th century when Bible scholars began to question their authenticity, but I have no idea who originally coined the term. Perhaps someone could shed some Light on it.

From The Bible Hub: “History of the Christian Church, Volume I, Philip Schaff ”

“The three Pastoral Epistles, two to Timothy and one to Titus, form a group by themselves, and represent the last stage of the apostle’s life and labors, with his parting counsels to his beloved disciples and fellow-workers. They show us the transition of the apostolic church from primitive simplicity to a more definite system of doctrine and form of government. This is just what we might expect from the probable time of their composition after the first Roman captivity of Paul, and before the composition of the Apocalypse.”

Philip Schaff was a Calvinist preacher from that 19th century period and we can immediately see that he was of that snobbish, elitist, self-righteous, religious mind set when he condescendingly refered to the first century Congregations of God as having a primitive simplicity. Now pay attention dear people for this arrogant puffed up spirit and attitude is crucial in understanding the same spirit that pervades throughout the Pastoral Epistles. And now for a Holy Scripture that proves my point:

2 Corinthians 11:3 (KJV) But I fear, lest by any means, as The Serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. (Emphasis mine)

Here we can plainly see that Mr Schaff, the Calvinist, had allowed his mind (via Satan’s subtilty) to be corrupted and displayed by his vain disparaging opinion of the first century Congregations of God by calling them primitively simple. Rather him than me when he stands before Yashua Messiah in the first resurrection.

Furthermore, he compounds his vanity by stating, and I quote: “to a more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” So this ignorant man thought, just like the author of the Pastoral Epistles, that the first century church and its TRUE SIMPLE BELIEFS in Yashua Messiah and its simple egalitarian non-structure could be improved upon. Delusional vanity or what!?

As a final point I will raise the issue of the artificial religious construct known as the ‘Apostolic Church’. This term, like so many others created by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, cannot be found in the Holy Scriptures, nor can the word ‘apostolic’, now there’s a surprise. So here’s a question: Did Yashua Messiah come to this earth in order to plant HIS CHURCH – The Church of God or hand it over to His messengers, pompously called apostles, from the Greek word ‘apostolos’, by the religious translators of the KJV, and rename it the Church of The Apostles? For I tell you straight folks, that is exactly what the term ‘Apostolic Church’ means and The Church of God it is not.

Are you beginning to see The Light dear readers? because I have not even started analysing 1 Timothy 1:1 yet and already one of those who would try and support these Epistles as genuine has already been unceremoniously found out!

OK, the problems that are the so-called Pastoral Epistles. As already stated, the Pastoral Epistles constitute 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus. Although not included, 2 Peter also falls into the same questionable category re being authentic Holy Scripture and, not as claimed, as being written by the named authors.

Now with regard to the two books of Timothy and the book of Titus, are they the genuine writings of Paul or of a forger of a later date, as some Bible Scholars confidently declare? Taking that question further, if they are the writings of a forger and, I might add to some degree, a plagiariser, can we even challenge their right to be a part of what they call the Biblical Canon or even the inspired Word of God?

Let’s face it, the Biblical Canon was put together by religious people, with an evil Romish agenda, who would be very happy with the Pastoral Epistles and their content, hence the reasons for their inclusion in that Canon, and their defence of them today as being the authentic writings of Paul.

We need to get this Truth firmly fixed in our minds that the satanic religious spirit that pervaded the second, third and fourth centuries with its Hellenising philosophers still pervades today in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion of the 21st century – NOTHING has changed.

Paul, too, gave us this timeless warning:

Colossians 2:8 (KJV) BEWARE! lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, AND NOT AFTER CHRIST. (Emphasis mine)

Again, let’s be clear, for the aim of second, third and fourth century Hellenising philosophers was ALWAYS the usurping and supplanting of the True Church – the Church of God and putting in its place: “a more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” to quote our ‘friend’ Mr Schaff.

This is the more definite system of the Nicolaitans as mentioned by Yashua Messiah in Revelation TWICE!

Revelation 2:6 (KJV) But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.

Revelation 2:15 (KJV) So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. (All emphasis mine)

Notice that these evil people of the Hellenistic NICOLAITAN persuation had deeds and a DOCTRINE. Now what could those deeds and doctrine have been? The very same deeds and doctrine that Mr Schaff was rambling on about – things allegedly ‘superior’ to the primitive simplicity of the first century egalitarian Congregations of God.

Nico = To rule; Laitan = The laity; = To rule over the laity; = Something that Yashua Messiah HATES!! = “A more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” = the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion in ALL its guises with its Popes, Archbishops, Cardinals, Bishops, Ministers, Vicars, and satanic Priests called ‘Fathers’ etc. etc.. Non-egalitarian pecking orders with men lording it over other men who are their equals in God’s sight and with no God given authority whatsoever.

Fortunately, and as an aside, by the year 35 AD the Church of God had been planted in Britain and was not contaminated by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion until the arrivals of the Papist devils Augustine (not Augustine of Hippo) and Patrick the slave trader in circa 597 AD.

I think that will do for part one, part two coming up shortly.

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Part 2

Plagiarising

Without further ado I will get straight in with more opinions from the ‘experts’ and as one commentator (Leighton Pullan) from The Bible Hub put it:

“Their genuineness is more frequently denied than that of any other of St. Paul’s Epistles, and this attack upon their genuineness has been mostly based upon the character of their teaching about the office-bearers of the Church. Attempts have sometimes been made to separate some fragments supposed to be genuine from the remaining portions. All such attempts have failed. These Epistles must either be rejected entirely or accepted entirely. Otherwise we become involved in a hopeless tangle of conjectures.”

Having quoted this opinion, which I agree with in part, the major question for me here is this: Are these Epistles an intregral part of the early beginnings of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (primarily Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy) through a Hellenising philosopher(s) author making out that he was Paul, or not? If I can prove that there is much Hellenising philosophy and/or meaningless BS in terms of early religious jargon terms and expressions (allegedly a more definite system of doctrine) then the case for them being forgeries is a done deal, and, as he correctly put it: “These Epistles must either be rejected entirely or accepted entirely.”

However, I will add one caveat to that regarding his comment: “to separate some fragments supposed to be genuine from the remaining portions.” The point he has obviously missed is this: If someone sets out to deceive by making out they are someone else then they MUST at times use thoughts, ideas and material that will attempt to make them look like the man they are trying to impersonate. This will then mean that they are playing the old half-truth telling trick. We need to realise that without some Truth in the narrative the scam will easily be rumbled. This game is not new and it’s played some of the time in the mainstream fake news media today and even more so in the internet alternative media.

So let’s analyse Mr Pullan’s comment a little further: “Their genuineness is more frequently denied than that of any other of St. Paul’s Epistles.” Now why would that be I wonder? Has he really done his homework in an open minded unbiased way to find out what the reasoning is behind this frequency of denial? I would suggest that he has not. I would also suggest that he, like Philip Schaff, is already convinced of their alleged authenticity and sets about defending his flawed position.

He then states: “this attack upon their genuineness has been mostly based upon the character of their teaching about the office-bearers of the Church.” Question: When did Yashua Messiah, or Paul for that matter, declare the need for ‘office bearers’? When did the need for corporate officials or officialdom become necessary in God’s egalitarian Church? Certainly not in the first century church that’s for sure, so when did these satanic ideas creep in? Answer: As soon as, if not before, the Messengers (apostles) had died. The second century AD was the time when most of these blasphemers crawled out of the woodwork and asserted themselves as leaders and mouth pieces of this planned philosophised, Hellenised counterfeit church.

Here is a list of the counterfeiting scoundrels involved in founding the Hellenised Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, from the “Catholic Fidelity” web page:

Clement I, 4th Bishop of Rome, circa end of the first century. This is not the Clement of Paul’s time.

Ignatius of Antioch, died 110 AD

Polycarp of Symrna, places and dates 65 – 140 AD Allegedley a stalwart of the early Congregations of God.

Unknown Author of The Didache (The Teaching), Syria dates 70 – 110 AD. Author of what teaching?

Barnabus, circa 130 AD, so could not be the first century Barnabus as claimed on this site.

Papias of Hierapolis, Phyrgia circa 130 AD

Justin Martyr, circa 100-165 AD, philosopher and theologian.

Irenaeus, circa 140 – 202 AD

Clement of Alexandria, place and dates, Athens circa 150? – 215? AD

Tertullian, convert to the Christian Religion circa 190 – 195 AD. Sorcerer and conjurer of the pagan heathen Trinity doctrine circa 200 AD.

Origen, Alexandria circa 185? – 254? AD

If necessary I will provide more details of what these villains got up to, but as this series of articles is not specifically about the devious shennanigans of the so-called ‘Church Fathers’ (I cover the subject elsewhere on my blog) I will leave it there.

And now a quote from the “Early Christian Writings” web page.

“Vocabulary. While statistics are not always as meaningful as they may seem, of 848 words (excluding proper names) found in the Pastorals, 306 are not in the remainder of the Pauline corpus, even including the deutero-Pauline 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, and Ephesians. Of these 306 words, 175 do not occur elsewhere in the New Testament, while 211 are part of the general vocabulary of Christian writers of the second century. Indeed, the vocabulary of the Pastorals is closer to that of popular Hellenistic philosophy than it is to the vocabulary of Paul or the deutero-Pauline letters. Furthermore, the Pastorals use Pauline words in a non-Pauline sense: dikaios in Paul means “righteous” and here means “upright”; pistis, “faith,” has become “the body of Christian faith”; and so on.”

As this series progresses I will reveal several of these crucial words that prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that these three Epistles are not from the hand of Paul and are most definitely from the hand of a Hellenising philosopher of the 2nd century and a founder of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Right, let’s make a start with the first verses of 1 Timothy 1:

1 Timothy 1:1-2 (KJV) Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope; 2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.

1 Timothy 1:1-2 notes — This introduction is plagiarised from Paul’s earlier genuine Epistles, but with the addition of a greeting to Timothy which Paul probably did write, but the real Epistle was either lost or destroyed. We have to assume this because Timothy was a learner of Paul’s and we can be fairly sure Paul did write to him but not the nonsense that follows in verse 4 onwards:

1 Timothy 1:3 (KJV) As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine.

1 Timothy 1:3 notes — Instructions from Paul to Timothy which again are probably a genuine part of the original Epistle with instructions to remain in Ephesus, now lost or destroyed. However, I say, now lost or destroyed, because the Epistle now changes from the plagiarising part of the first half to counterfeiting in the second half of this verse. How do I know this? Answer: through the use of one suspicious word – ‘charge’ and one suspicious term – ‘no other doctrine’ combined with what then follows in verse 4.

Now the word ‘doctrine’ is one of those crucial words that I made reference to earlier. This is due to the fact that three Greek words are are involved here and this Greek word in 1 Tim 1:3 is partly the odd one out, being: ‘heterodidaskaleō’. The other two words are these: ‘didachē’ (Strong’s G1322) and ‘didaskalia’ (Strong’s G1319)

Moreover, here is where it gets very interesting. The word ‘didachē‘ (instruction) cannot be found anywhere in 1 & 2 Timothy or Titus and yet it is found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Romans and 1 Corinthians. In contrast all that can be found in 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus is the word ‘didaskalia’ (instruction – teaching) – if we then take the word ‘heterodidaskaleō’ we can see that it comes from ‘didaskalia’ and not ‘didachē’. So what!! I here you exclaim. Ah but there is much more to this than meets the eye as explained here:

From: “Is Doctrine a Dirty Word?” by Peter Ditzel

“”Doctrine/doctrines” appears fifty times in the King James Version New Testament. With the exception of one place (Hebrews 6:1 where it is translated from logos), it comes from either of two Greek words, didache and didaskalia. Didaskalia is derived from didaskalos, which means “teacher.” Didache comes from the verb didasko, “to teach.” Thus, strictly, didaskalia refers to the teaching of a teacher.”

So here we have that crucial difference explained and why ‘didache’ (Strong’s G1322) applies to Yashua Messiah’s and Paul’s instruction and ‘didaskalia’ (Strong’s G1319) applies to the teaching of a teacher, which leads us to the knock on question – WHICH TEACHER and WHAT TEACHING!!?? Answer: the teaching of Hellenising philosophers and religious counterfeiters.

If we now move straight on into verse 4 we can see how it is a continuation of the second part of verse 3 and notice, too, that from here on in (verse 4) we now enter a part fictional, part truthful, made up and fabricated la la land narrative with religious writings by an unknown early Hellenising religious author, most likely circa 150 AD, and long after Paul’s death. He, or they, would have been one of the alleged ‘Church Fathers’ of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, which was always a counterfeit and not officially organised until the Council of Nicea in 325 AD. However, in the meantime this satanic edifice had been nearly 300 years in the making, commencing with the Canaanite Jew Philo in Alexandria (philosophy) in the first century along with Simon Magus the sorcerer in Rome – the lover of filthy lucre. All these elements came together in Nicea in 325 AD under Constantine.

Second half of 1 Timothy 1:3 and 1 Timothy 1:4 (KJV) That thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine. 4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 1:4 Notes part 1 — “Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies.”

What are these ‘fables’ that this Hellenising author could be refering to? More on this later.

Furthermore, if there was to be no heeding of genealogies and the study of same, then what are Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 if they are not genealogies? In turn, why would Yashua Messiah object to his brothers and sisters in the faith studying up their own Israelite genealogies? And who determines what genealogies come under the umbrella of “endless genealogies”? And who would be opposed to such genealogies and for what reason? Would Paul? Who was proud of his Benjaminite tribal origins:

Romans 11:1 (KJV) I say then, Hath God cast away His people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

Philippians 3:5 (KJV) Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee.

Please note Paul was not a Jew.

Moreover, what information do genealogies provide us with? Why, the origins of different peoples as listed in the Old Testament and who hates the Old Testament? Why Rome hates the Old Testament and so do the Canaanite Jews with their Babylonian Talmud, the mainstay of their satanic Judaic religion.

So what does the first part of 1 Tim 1:4 constitute? It was an early Hellenising Romish dictat to dissuade people from researching True Israelite history and the identity of the True intended recipients of the Gospel message as instructed by Yashua Messiah Himself:

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

He also gave the twelve disciples explicit intructions:

Matthew 10:5-6 (KJV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

1 Timothy 1:4 notes part 2 — “Which minister questions.” Yet more of the tyranny of Catholicism revealed re unquestioning obedience – no Bereans or questioning allowed in this church, just blind faith and obedience.

1 Timothy 1:4 notes part 3 — Edifying – Strong’s 3622 – Administration. Everywhere else (7 times) the word ‘edifying’ – means “building up” see Strong’s 3619.

This word ‘edifying’ from the Greek MSS ‘oikonomia’ which means ‘administration’ is telling us quite plainly what this Hellenising philosopher writer has in mind, that is, only one thing – a church corporation – a money making church corporation and not the Spiritual Congregation of God that needed REAL edifying, that is, building up and/or encouraging and supporting.

Please note – Part 3 and all follow on articles in this series will be posted at this link below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-pastoral-epistles-parts-1-2/

Are YOU a Heretic and What is Heresy?

If you are a Christian, or even not a Christian at all and with no interest in Christianity, have you ever wondered about these two words and what they mean? for they get banded about with great regularity by those of the satanic Roman Catholic Cult, which is a part of the equally satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Moreover, when you hear these words, do they resonate a positive vibe with you or a negative vibe? For me, they have always resonated a negative vibe, because they have always sounded accusatory and judgemental. Now don’t get me wrong, for there are some people that deserve to be labelled a heretic, that’s IF the word heretic actually means what people believe it to mean, that is, a blasphemer or an apostate, and again, that is, someone who has turned his back on Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and walked away as did these wretched people here:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

However, I have learned just recently that the words heretic and heresy from a Holy Scriptural sense are not what they seem when compared to the erroneous Roman Catholic religious interpretations. In fact, they do not mean what I have described above at all. They have been mistranslated from the Greek manuscripts, and more on that later, but first let’s look at some secular dictionary definitions for the words in question.

From Dictionary.com:

Heretic

1) A professed believer who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church or rejects doctrines prescribed by that church.

2) Roman Catholic Church – a baptized Roman Catholic who willfully and persistently rejects any article of faith.

3) Anyone who does not conform to an established attitude, doctrine, or principle.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heretic

1) Religion: a person who differs in opinion from established religious dogma; especially: a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church who refuses to acknowledge or accept a revealed truth the church regards them as heretics.

2) One who differs in opinion from an accepted belief or doctrine – a nonconformist.

From Dictionary.com:

Heresy

1. Opinion or doctrine at variance with the orthodox or accepted doctrine, especially of a church or religious system.

2. The maintaining of such an opinion or doctrine.

3. Roman Catholic Church. the willful and persistent rejection of any article of faith by a baptized member of the church.

4. Any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs, customs, etc.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heresy

1a:  adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma (see dogma 2) They were accused of heresy.

1b: denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church

1c :  an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

2a: dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice – to disagree with the party leadership was heresy.

2b: an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards

So there we have it from the secular perspective and notice how the Roman Catholic Cult features prominently in these definitions giving it a strong association with these two negative words.

Notice, too, in 2a how they now apply it to those that reject rigid political dogma as well. Rejection of Bolshevik Marxist Political Correctness (Cultural Marxism) anyone? Do I also sense the spirit of the legalistic satanic Pharisees here in the application of these two words? You bet your life!

OK, so what’s your point I hear you ask? confusion and some I would answer and to unravel that confusion let’s go now to the Holy Scriptures for The Truth regarding these two misused words:

First and foremost, the word heretic cannot be found in the KJV Bible at all – it ain’t there folks, so that tells you just how important this subject is to Yashua Messiah. However, it is VERY important to those Roman Catholic judgemental mongrel dogs who like to accuse people of being heretics, that is, those who have rumbled their money making, money laundering scam called a church and have started to voice their truthful opinions.

Second, and just as crucial, the word heresy can only be found once in the KJV Bible and here is the verse with its only use:

Acts 24:14 (KJV) But this I confess unto thee, that after The Way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in The Law and in The Prophets: (Emphasis mine)

So here we have some very interesting things being said by Paul. First of all, Paul let’s it be known that following Yashua Messiah was known by the followers of Yashua Messiah as The Way, for He is The Way – The ONLY Way to The Kingdom of God and Eternal Life and NO RELIGION required!

Second, the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION called those who were followers of The Way (Yashua Messiah), HERETICS!!! and their beliefs and Faith solely in Yashua Messiah – HERESY!!! How blasphemous is that?

Not only that, if we look up the word in the Greek MSS what do you think we will find? Answer, this from Strong’s Concordance:

Heresy – G139 – αἵρεσις – hairesis – hah’ee-res-is
From G138; properly a choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion. (“heresy” is the Greek word itself.): – heresy [which is the Greek word itself], sect.

Look what we have here: 1) a choice; 2) a party in disunion; 3) a sect. So what does this tell us? Well far from being negative, the word heresy looks like it is something very positive, that is, the separating of those who follow Yashua Messiah (The Way) from satanic religious illegitimates. In the first century that would have been primarily the Pharisees and Sadducees who were later usurped by the so called Hellenising philosophers known as the ‘church fathers’, that is, the counterfeit founders of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Be sure you understand that religion is a spirit called Legion and Satan presents this phenomena in a myriad of ways whether it be Jews or Fundie ‘Christians’ with their Judaising Law based religion or Papists with their Babylonian Mystery Religion.

Furthermore, today, whilst the Pope is traipsing here, there and everywhere around the world promoting his mickey mouse satanic multi-faith unity BS, Paul was and is teaching the exact opposite – now there’s a surprise and is that hilarious or what?

Moreover what’s more interesting is the way this Greek word hairesis has taken on a dual meaning in some people’s eyes for we find it used elsewhere:

Acts 28:22 (KJV) But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect (hairesis), we know that every where it is spoken against.
(Brackets and emphasis mine)

In this verse we can see the word hairesis used more accurately, in it being translated as sect and not heresy, but, either way, neither translations of this word point to the evil and distorted and satanic interpretations of The Devil’s Roman Catholic Cult who misuse, twist and pervert it to accuse those of The Truth and/or The Way of being heretics which, in reality, is a compliment to us, not an insult.

This means dear brothers and sisters that in the future if some evil papist calls you a heretic, just thank him or her as sarcastically as you can and be encouraged by their plug ignorance.

Brother Charles.

As a PS I would add that the word heresies can also be found three times which again should be translated as sects and which I will deal with here at a later date.

Tim Farron Avoids Saying Whether He Considers Gay Sex as a Sin – Part 1

For those of you who have never of Tim Farron he was, up until today, the 14th June 2017, the leader of the British Liberal Democrat Party (and an alleged Christian), otherwise known as the Lib-Dems, which only managed to secure 12 seats in the recent British General Election on the 8th June 2017. This was an increase of only three seats on their previous General Election performance. In contrast the Stalinist Labour Party won 262 seats and the Trotskyist Conservative Party 318. So as you can see this was a very poor show indeed.

Moreover, Tim Farron, although professing to be a liberal was, in reality, just another leftie Bolshevik Marxist in a yellow tie – yellow being the official colour of the spineless treacherous Lib-Dem Party. However, in truth, he was no more a liberal, as in the traditional liberal sense, e.g. as with Lloyd George, than Josef Stalin.

He also claimed that he was a Christian, but what kind of a Christian? A real Christian or a fake Christian? Here is a statement he made when questioned by a Channel 4 leftie, useless media jobsworth, Cathy Newman, with this question:

Farron was asked whether he believed, as a Christian, that the act of homosexual sex (sodomy) was a sin and replied: “To understand Christianity is to understand that we are all sinners.” (Brackets mine)

I will repeat that: “To understand Christianity is to understand that we are all sinners.”

OK, so what does this statement really mean? The word ‘understand’ in the language of legalese means to “stand under” so what he is really saying is this: To stand under the banner of Christianity is also to stand under the banner of “I am a sinner and don’t you forget it!”

Now is he right? IF we are Christians, are we still sinners? IF as Christians, we are still sinners, how will we enter the The Kingdom of God or IF as Christians we are still sinners how will we obtain or enter into Eternal Life? Do these people ever question their erroneous understanding or their own skewed reasoning?

Perhaps a better question would be, who teaches these wretched people and fills their heads with this satanic nonsense? And make no mistake, for it is satanic nonsense. So back to the first part of his statement: “To understand or stand under the banner of Christianity.” Well does he? Obviously not because he thinks that if one understands HIS idea of Christianity then we are all still sinners – DOH!!

So here’s a question: IF after having become a Christian we’re still sinners – WHAT’S CHANGED!!?? I’ll tell you – NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING HAS CHANGED!! In contrast, are the lost and unsaved majority, sinners? Yes, of course but this Tim Farron character has declared himself to be a sinner too, so what has his alleged Christian faith achieved for him? I’ll tell you again – NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

Let’s be clear about this folks – a sinner is a sinner is a sinner and that’s all there is to it, nothing more, nothing less and no matter what else he calls himself. A sinner will die in his or her sins – that’s it – fini – kaput – gone. They will then be dead in their graves until the Second Resurrection and The Great White Throne Tribunal at the end of The Millennium and with no part in the First Resurrection when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth, VERY SOON for His elect – REAL CHRISTIANS!

However, and here is the rub, someone who claims to be a Christian and a sinner as well, that is, people like our Mr Tim Farron, fall into a special group of people that will receive some special attention from Yashua Messiah when he returns to this earth very soon. This special attention is otherwise known as outer darkness.

Matthew 25:30 (KJV) And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

So are you saying that Tim Farron is an unprofitable servant? Yes of course and by his own admission. Ask yourself, how can a sinner ever be profitable to Yashua Messiah? So called Christians who are still sinners or who still see themselves as sinners are neither one thing or the other. Do you SEE THAT dear people? I do hope so for your Holy Spiritual future and welfare is totally dependent upon you SEEING IT, and the last thing I want to see is your being cast into outer darkness, that is, separation from Yashua Messiah and for I don’t know how long. That cannot be a very pleasant experience no matter what the duration.

OK so by now you must be wondering what it is that Tim Farron is missing and it’s quite simple. He is missing the miracle that occurs at Baptism (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone. Now this may be because he has never been taught or worse he has been taught and then poo pooed the teaching. Either way, he is not properly birthed into Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), for if he had been he would KNOW that as a Baptised born of God Christian, gifted with The Holy Spirit he would no longer be a sinner – end of.

This is explained to us by Yashua Messiah through John:

1 John 3:8 (KJV) He that committeth sin is of The Devil; for The Devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose The Son of God was manifested (made known), that He might destroy the works of The Devil. (Brackets mine)

Here we can plainly see, if we have the EYES to see that is, that anyone that commits sin is of The Devil. That’s it – simple and no argument!! Yet John says: “For this purpose The Son of God was manifested (made known), that He might destroy the works of The Devil.”

Right, here’s another question: Has The Son of God (Yashus Messiah), who I presume was made made known to Tim Farron, destroyed the works of The Devil in Tim Farron’s life? Answer: No of course not, because he still sees himself as a sinner and, worse, applies that same wretched condition to all his fellow erroneous fake Christians.

In turn this means that Yashua Messiah did nothing for Tim Farron at the stake (cross). He died and rose again thereby destroying the works of The Devil (death and sin) and yet Tim Farron (and those like him) is oblivious to this stupendous Truth.

Furthermore, and again, let’s be clear for Tim Farron, unfortunately, is not alone, and I exaggerate not an atom when I say that the bulk of those embroiled in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion think exactly the same way as Tim Farron thinks.

I will therefore quote John once more in order to explain how born of God sons and daughters of God, properly Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit cannot sin:

1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man that hath his hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.

Every man that keeps his hope in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) PURIFIES HIMSELF even as Yashua Messiah is pure.

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

Whosoever abides in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) SINS NOT!! Whosoever sins (Tim Farron and those like him) has not seen Yashua Messiah (experienced His presence via The Holy Spirit) and has never known Him!

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His Seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Whosoever is born of God does not sin because His Seed (His Holy Spirit) remains in him and he cannot sin and he cannot sin because he is born of God. He is NOW a NEW CREATION residing in a DEAD BODY of sin.

Paul also makes it plain – TWICE!:

Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Paul makes it clear that it is no longer him that sins but, rather, the dead sin that dwells within his dead body of sin which is no longer him.

I hope and pray that you all STAND UNDER (understand) this miraculous Father and Son gifted and given arrangement.

The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion

cross-918459__480

Now many of you, that is, you my regular readers, will be familiar with the above expression, for I use it frequently in my articles to describe mainstream Christianity or Churchianity or the Christian RELIGION or what some might call Christendom. For those of you new to my work for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) I use it as an umbrella term to cover all the branches of so called Christianity – Roman Catholicism; Eastern Orthodoxy; Anglicanism; Episcopalianism (American Anglicanism), plus ALL the myriad denominations (divisions = demon-inations) of Protestantism.

This umbrella title also covers all the so called cults who, I might add, do not have a monopoly on cultism and cultic behaviour. Roman Catholicism is the biggest cult of all, a money making, money laundering, cult with over a billion deluded and deceived adherents. However, having said that, I will list the principal cult culprits here for your information: Jehovah’s Witnesses; The Church of The Latter Day Saints (The Mormons); The Seventh Day Adventists (SDAs); The Christadelphians; The Worldwide Church of God, (now deviously and deceptively known as The Grace Communion International), with all its splinter or spin-off groups who broke away after the demonic Herbert W. Armstrong era ended.

Here are the names of some of these satanic Judaising splinter groups:

Midnight Ministries – Malcolm B Heap
The Philadelphia Church Of God – Gerald Flurry
The Restored Church Of God
The Living Church Of God
The Intercontinental Church Of God
The United Church Of God, An International Association
The Church Of God’s Faithful
The Independent Church Of God
The Church Of God, An International Community
The Christian Biblical Church Of God
The Continuing Church of God

I have listed the names of all these groups (and please note this list is not exhaustive) because I was once a duped member of the original Worldwide Church of God under Armstrong’s teaching, so I have a particular interest in what these satanic groups are getting up to in these last days of the last days. Needless-to-say they are all blasphemous Judaisers and Grace killers banging there OBEDIENCE based drums and earning their own salvation and extorting money from their duped members via their Old Covenant tithing money grabbing systems, so don’t, whatever you do, get involved with any of them.

OK, I think I have covered the bulk of what purports to be so called Christianity on the face of this satanic earth in 2017 and I call it The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. If you know of any other major groups that claim to be Christian Churches that you think should be added to my list please let me know. Please note I am aware of the Pentecostal groups and have included them as an integral of Protestantism.

The Cainite-Judeo-Christian-Religion = Mainstream Christians

Matthew 7:13-14 (KJV) Enter ye in at the strait (narrow) gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, (Spiritual ruin) and MANY there be which go in thereat: 
14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

Moving on, I will now take each of the four words that make up my umbrella title and expound on their relevance and my reasons for placing them within the title starting with:

CAINITE

Right, why do I group all these varied and supposed Christian bodies together under the title The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion? And why in particular do I use the term ‘Cainite’ as the first part of their description? What has Cain got to do with modern, so called, Christianity or nominal fake Christianity? He and his offspring died in The Flood didn’t they? Yes they did, but his bloodline was rekindled post-flood by and through the birth of Canaan whom Noah cursed. However, I will not expound on that story here as I deal with it in my articles elsewhere here on my blog, but what I will do is look specifically at Cain’s behaviour which led up to his murdering his half-brother Abel. (Take note, Cain and Abel were NOT full brothers)

Now this event is as much Spiritual as it is physical and literal and it is timeless in its importance. The spirit of this story carries forward through 6,000 years of our history to our days here in 21st century. So what ties the murder of Abel to the year 2017? Easy, sacrifices and offerings or perhaps what I should have said is, the RIGHT KIND of sacrifice and offering. So let’s post the story of Cain and Abel’s sacrifices and offerings:

Genesis 4:3-4 (KJV) And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto The LORD. 4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And The LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:

So what’s going on here? because on the face of it it looks like The Lord is being unjust toward Cain just because his offering was from his crops of the ground. We are then told that The Lord had respect for Abel’s offering rather than Cain’s, so what gives?

BLOOD is what gives in Abel’s sacrifice, the BLOOD of a LAMB which spills into the ground. In Cain’s offering there is NO BLOOD at all making it a useless offering and thereby definitely not pleasing in The Lord’s sight as a sacrifice.

Yashua Messiah was The Lamb slain from before the foundation of the world as it is written in the Book of Revelation:

Revelation 13:8 (KJV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (Satan), whose names are NOT written in The Book of Life of The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

This means that in the past under the Old Covenant right and proper sacrifices to God should ALWAYS involve the blood of a lamb (even before the original Passover in Egypt) with Yashua Messiah becoming the ultimate Lamb of God sacrifice to end ALL blood sacrifices. (Watch for the evil blasphemous reinstatement of blood sacrifices in Jerusalem soon – The Abomination of Desolation.)

OK, so back to the thread. From this event we then get Cain’s jealousy of his half-brother for having found favour in The Lord’s sight. The half-brothers then argue with the end result of Cain killing Abel in a fit of jealous rage.
Now mark this event, for it is a type or forerunner or the first of multiple thousands of murders that will follow it, on down through the ages and even into the 21st century with real Christians (followers of Yashua Messiah – The Truth and The Way) being slain for their Faith being in Him and Him alone – with no RELIGION. So to sum up this first part, what we have graphically displayed here is the first man of RELIGION (CAIN) slaying the first True believer making his blood of The Lamb sacrifice.

Now this is all well and good I here you say, but how are you making a connection from Cain and Abel to the 21st century? Again that’s easy. Fake or counterfeit Christians – those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion believe in a fake Jesus who never spilled his blood. This is because he doesn’t exist and so he never died. This fake Jesus is like Cain’s offering of vegetables – there’s no blood. Ask yourself, how does a make-believe fictional character bleed and die? It doesn’t and it can’t – it would be impossible for it to do so.

Let’s be clear about this and get it firmly seated in our minds, only Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) the real Lord Jesus Christ died and shed His blood for us not their Cainite vegetable fake Jesus. So now you know why I use the word Cainite in my title the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

JUDEO

OK, so why do I use the word ‘Judeo’ in my title? Well this should be more straight forward and easier to understand, for Judaism is an all pervasive problem within the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, a VERY BIG pervasive problem. Now let’s be clear for nearly ALL the groups within it practice some form of Judaism i.e. salvation by works and/or salvation through obedience to The Law or obedience to the Ten Commandments or even obeying Yashua Messiah. This means that Yashua Messiah’s Saving Grace along with His Faith are either blasphemed against, that is, abused or are totally trampled on and snuffed out – killed. Which in turn means they trample all over Yashua Messiah’s sacrifice – His death and His resurrection. They treat Him with utter contempt and in many cases without even realising it.

‘Judeo’ also stands for monotheism in one form or another, whether it be just ONE GOD as in Judaism and Islam, rendering Yashua Messiah a non-entity and just a creation or what looks like an afterthought if viewed from the Godhead’s perspective. We then have their ONE GOD within a FICTIONAL TRINITY DEITY of ONE in three and three in ONE. That means whether it’s three in ONE or ONE in three we still have a form of monotheism rattling around in there somewhere. This is a shell game conjuring trick of now you see ONE or it could be now you see three depending on how many magic mushrooms you have eaten LOL.

Moreover, in all Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious ‘churches’ some form of obedience will be in force, whether obedience to the Ten Commandments (The Law of Moses) or obedience to a Pope, Archbishop, cardinals, bishops, priests or some ministerial or pastor/elder hierarchy (the evil system of the Nicolaitans as described by Yashua Messiah in Revelation). To make things even worse, in many Protestant groups women will be in the pulpits lording it over the men. Paul must be turning in his grave.

Furthermore, regulated Old Covenant Sabbath keeping will be the order of the day, whether seventh day or first day Sabbath keeping. There, also, will be annual pagan heathen fertility rite festivals like Christmas, Easter and Whitsun which have nothing to do with Yashua Messiah. Within the Judeo religious Roman Cult there is actually an idolatrous ‘saint’s day’ for every single day of the year. Needless-to-say these fakes are not real saints, because in order to be a real saint you have to be called and chosen by The Father and then born of God (born again). No man has the power or the authority to make a man or woman a saint.

Moreover, having revealed the above deceptive points, here is what you will not find active and operational in these so called ‘churches’, that is, egalitarian Grace filled fellowships with Holy Spirit gifted teachers for new converts and beginners and overseers (shepherds) to keep a watchful eye out for spies and trouble makers (wolves) and protect the flocks in general, as was the case in the first century congregations.

CHRISTIAN

OK the third and most deceptive word of my title – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Why the most deceptive I hear you say? Quite simply because it deceives billions, not just millions, but billions of people across the world. This is because when they hear the word Christian or Christianity they immediately link it, erroneously, to the organised satanic religions I have listed above who pose as followers of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ).

I go head to head daily with hundreds of lost and unsaved people on social media who accuse supposed Christians and Christianity of all manner of wickedness, historical persecutions, tortures, evils, murders and genocides and they are correct to do so, for the people who did these vile deeds posed as Christians and did their satanic evil deeds in the name of Christianity, thereby bringing shame and disgrace on Jesus Christ’s name – bringing His name into disrepute – and as wonderfully encapsulated by this famous heathen:

“I like your Christ; I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

— Muhatma Gandhi

Furthermore, these so called Christian groups follow their non-Scriptural hu-man made Creeds or their blasphemous Statements of Beliefs, not Yashua Messiah. These legalistic creeds and statements lay down the frameworks of their hu-man made organisations and have nothing to do with the Kingdom of God Gospel message that Yashua Messiah and His Messengers (apostles) taught in the first century. This is because they want their lemming followers to 1) believe that salvation is within their particular ‘church’ only or through being a member of their organisation or cult only and 2) to give their hard earned dosh or tithes to the organisations. However, if they go outside of it and leave, they’re then deemed an apostate or they’re damned to fiery hell or they’re excommunicated as a heretic. Either way they’re toast to these lying blasphemers as they chuck their satanic hierarchical weight around.

Now which ever way we cut this, none of it is Christian. To be a Christian is one who is called and chosen by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and who then follows Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) – that’s it, apart from full immersion Baptism and gifting of The Holy Spirit. Once these things have occurred you are now born of God (born again) and you’re a Christian – a new creation, a saint and a REAL CHRISTIAN!!

RELIGION

Oh dear what positive thing can be said about the meaningless vain persuit of RELIGION!!?? Answer: Nothing!! Make sure you understand and never forget it – GOD HAS NO RELIGION. ALL religions are hu-man made on behalf of the Devil himself. ALL religions worship Satan the Devil in one way or another and NONE of them worship Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) and that includes??? Yes you guessed it – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Yes men dress their stupid religions up to make out they are worshipping Yashua Messiah but the opposite is always The Truth – they ALL worship Satan the Devil!!

Now here’s a little test. Just search the four Gospels in the KJV Bible for the word ‘religion’ and see if you can find it. OK I jest, don’t worry yourselves, for I have already done so and can assure you that it’s not there. However feel free to do your own research as you should.

Furthermore, Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He come to this earth in order to start a religion. Religion = the vanity and egos of men. So there you have it – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion!

For additional reading in support of the above please see:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-the-father-calling-you-to-his-son-yashua-anointed/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/who-or-what-are-judaising-mongrel-dogs/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/do-born-of-god-christians-have-to-obey-or-learn-obedience-part-1/

Did Jesus Die So We Can Now Have License To Sin, Without Guilt, And Go to Heaven?

OK, first of all, this is not my question, and it’s so full of built in errors I don’t really know where to begin. Furthermore, it’s a question which was asked of me quite recently and, in doing so, it meant that my teaching on Grace was being attacked. To counter that attack, I would recommend to you my two articles about Grace entitled: “The Grace Of Our Lord Jesus Christ – His True Grace – Not The Watered Down Religious Version!” and “For By Grace Are Ye Saved Through Faith – And That Not Of Yourselves – It Is The Gift Of God – Eph 2:8,” in order to understand where these people are coming from, and what their blasphemous attack on God’s Holy Word is all about.

Right, so what’s wrong with this question? Well, straight away there is no mention of Yashua Messiah’s resurrection within this question and we should never leave out mention of His resurrection when mentioning His death, for His death was only half of the arrangement. Second, there is this word ‘license’ and it then linked to the word ‘sin’. Hence their phrase: “A license to sin.”

Now where does this weird phrase come from? I have to admit I have heard it used before by various ravening wolves in pulpits, but I have never taken the trouble to check it out to see if it’s Scriptural, and, of course, it isn’t. Now there’s a surprise!! So why is it used if it’s not Scriptural? Easy, because vain puffed up men love their meaningless jargon expressions, especially in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. They love to put their egotistic personal stamp on the Holy Scriptures and, as I have said before, they do it because the Holy Word of God is too simple for them. OK, so as it’s not a Scriptural phrase, let’s have a look in my Concise Oxford Dictionary to see what the word ‘license’ means:

License – allow (person to do, thing to be done; rare); allow complete freedom to; grant permit to person; authorize use of premises for certain purpose, etc.(It also means to grant LEGAL permission to a person to do something UNLAWFUL E.g. Licenced to kill) (Brackets mine)

So let’s rewrite this question using one of the dictionary definitions: Did Jesus die so we can now have a permit to sin or to allow us complete freedom to sin, without guilt, and go to heaven? Now is this question dumb or is it mind numbingly dumb? I would suggest to you it’s both.

What we have to ask ourselves here is why would anyone want a licence or a permit to sin? If we were dealing with a lost or unsaved man or woman, would they require licences or permits to sin? Why don’t you try asking one of them and see what kind of a reply you get, that’s after they have stopped laughing at you and wondering if you were unhinged. OK, so we know that the lost and unsaved don’t need a licence or a permit to sin, for they manage very well without one.

That leaves us with the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious perspective and whether or not they would require a licence or a permit to sin – well, would they, for many in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion seem to think they would, but why? What kind of Christian would even bring up such a subject? What kind of Christian rubs shoulders with those who would influence such thinking?

If we come genuinely to Yashua Messiah after The Father has called us, which means our repentance is genuine and our confession of sins is genuine, why would we seek a permit or licence to carry on sinning? Does any of this make any sense? No, it’s complete nonsense. So you see this question could and perhaps should have been worded like this: Should I repent and confess my sins so that I can then have a licence or permit to carry on sinning as I did in my old life, without guilt, and still go to heaven? Never mind that I had no guilt before in my old life anyway.

However, what this question is revealing to us is that we have people calling themselves Christians who are still struggling, through their own admission, with guilt. This means they see themselves as unforgiven and thereby not saved. How wretched is that?

Can you now see the inbuilt stupidity within this question? Why go to all the trouble of repentance, confession of sins (that is, all your sins, past, present and future) and baptism plus gifting of The Holy Spirit, if you want to carry on living as you did before? What would be the point of it and who would you be deceiving? As I think about all this I am actually becoming confused, and of course, that’s just what the Devil wants – confusion.

Moreover, why are Cainite-Judeo-Christians asking this silly question, and what else does it reveal to us? As I have already pointed out, they only mention Yashua Messiah’s death, not His resurrection and that’s because many Cainite-Judeo-Christians don’t understand what His resurrection achieved for them. OK, they believe everything was done at the cross, and yes, in part, it was all done. It was all done in terms of conquering death and sin, but what they don’t understand is the new Spiritual beings we become through His resurrection, that is, perfect in the Father’s sight and sinless beings that do not sin.

Now this is what they can’t get their heads around and that’s because they are not really Born Again. They are men of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion who practise Graceless Judaism – salvation by progress – salvation by process or by self-help, or by their own effort and endeavours, or commonly known as salvation by works. The Faith, Salvation, Grace thing is incomprehensible to them, they cannot understand it. In turn, it is through this blindness that they conjure up questions like the above.

Once more you will also notice the ‘without guilt’ bit in the middle of this question, which means they cannot even get their heads around this:

Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus. [who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit.]

Please note I have left off the second part of this verse because it’s missing in the Greek MSS, which means it was falsely added by the translators – it being interpolated from Romans 8:4 and unnecessarily repeated.

Romans 8:4 (KJV) That the righteousness of The Law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit.

Now what part of Romans 8:1 do these wretched people not understand, that is, there is now no further condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. If there is now no further condemnation, how can there be any guilt!? If there is guilt, there is something wrong with their birthing into Yashua Messiah. The guilty mindset is the fallen mindset and it behaves like Adam and Eve after their fall – they went and hid in guilt!

If we are born of God (Born Again) or born from above, we have been lifted out of guilt, for there is now no further condemnation laid upon us. So, this means we are sinless, even though our dead bodies of sin, sin. The thing is, is this a license to sin? Well, yes of course it is, if we are deluded and deceived liars and The Truth is not in us, but is that the case IF we are born of God? No, of course it is not the case, because The Truth, Yashua Messiah lives in us through His Holy Spirit POWER and the Holy Spirit cannot reside with LIVING sin.

So how would we be liars? We would be liars because there is no such thing as: “license to sin”, because as I have already proven, no one needs a licence to sin. If you want to sin, then just go right on ahead and sin, if that’s your DESIRE, and, of course, this is where we get to the nub of this issue, for that’s what it’s all about – DESIRE.

As Born Again believers, what should our DESIRE be, to sin or not to sin? Well, I hope it’s a DESIRE not to sin, and if that is the case, there is nothing wrong with your birthing in Yashua Messiah for your DESIRE not to sin proves that you love your Elder Brother in heaven. All this means is that you would hate to do something that Yashua Messiah would hate you to do. This also means we are endeavouring to please Him, but will this always be so? Not very likely if you’re the average man or woman who has been called out of this world by The Father to His Son and yet still lives in a dead body of sin. We will sin until we die; it’s inevitable, and we need to get this through our heads. I will reiterate, we’re still perfect and sinless in the Father’s sight even though our dead bodies of sin, sin. Paul explains it clearly and twice so we get it through our heads:

Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Now, if after all this we’re still looking for a ‘licence to sin’, because we want to sin, what is this revealing about our birthing into Yashua Messiah? If our DESIRE is to look for a licence to sin, what is this saying about us, and what is it saying about our repentance, our confession, and our baptism? Are we phoneys and fakes? If so, who are we fooling? Were all these things a charade or a façade to hide our real intentions of being or becoming a fake Christian? What would be the point?

OK, let’s leave out the ‘license to sin’ thing for a minute and just deal with the sin issue. What, if after baptism, our DESIRE is to carry on sinning, what would be the point of getting baptised? As I said previously, we can carry on sinning without any need to for baptism, so what is their point in the use of this stupid phrase?

Their point is this – they are looking at the whole thing through the eyes of Grace Killers, for they cannot comprehend the loving relationship of that between a Born Again son or daughter of God and their Redeemer, Yashua Messiah. They think it’s all about obedience to The Law, and if we speak of Grace, they will immediately think we are looking for excuses to sin – which is a judgemental lie. This is the mindset of Pharisees, for they behaved in the same way when Yashua Messiah confronted them with His Grace filled message, two thousand years ago and nothing has changed. These Cainite-Judeo-Christians behave and believe in exactly the same way.

You see when your salvation is down to you and your efforts this is how you will behave and view Grace. There is no room for Grace in their salvation-by-works world. In fact, Grace, from this legalistic Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious perspective, is a complete mystery to them, for it’s not on their radar screens and in reality it doesn’t exist to them. It cannot exist, for if it were to exist their Law based world would dissolve before their very eyes and all the reasons for their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious existence would disappear. They would be like captains without ships and totally surplus to requirements.

Finally, I won’t go into detail about their nonsensical going to heaven business as I cover this subject in detail in my articles: “Are Christians Going to Heaven?” and “When Christians Die, Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord? – Parts 1 & 2”. Needless to say, Christians going to heaven is as erroneous an idea as that of us needing a ‘license to sin’. Where do they get this stuff? Oh yes, at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet LOL!

Brother Charles

PS Please note, this edited article is ten+ years old.

Are You a 21st Century Foolish Galatian?

So how can anyone be a “Foolish Galatian” in the 21st century? They were just a first century phenomenon weren’t they? And only a serious problem for Paul and all the other Grace filled Assemblies in Galatia, surely? How can there be such a problem today? This must be nonsense, I hear you say. Well, it’s not as nonsensical as you might think and, in order to get a full understanding of what it’s all about, we need to take a look at Galatians to gain a better knowledge of what Paul was having to deal with.

We also need to know how the: “Justification through obedience to The Law” problem, for Grace filled and saved people, has never gone away. This vile evil concept is still with us today and do not err in your thinking, by making light of it:

Galatians 3:1 (KJV) O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not ‘obey’ (a corrupt translation – should read “you who have not been convinced of or persuaded by:-”) The Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? (Brackets and italics mine)

Galatians 3:1 (Amplified Version) O you poor and silly and thoughtless and unreflecting and senseless Galatians! Who has fascinated or bewitched or cast a spell over you, unto whom—right before your very eyes—Jesus Christ (the Messiah) was openly and graphically set forth and portrayed as crucified?

From the Amplified Version we get a better insight into how dumb and stupid these people were and how dumb and stupid modern Galatian people are as well. Let’s look at verse 2 for our proof and evidence:

Galatians 3:2 (KJV) This only would I learn of you, Received ye The Spirit by the works of The Law, or by The Hearing of Faith?

Galatians 3:2 (Amplified Version) Let me ask you this one question: Did you receive The [Holy] Spirit as the result of obeying The Law and doing its works, or was it by hearing [The Message of The Gospel] and believing [it]? [Was it from observing a Law of Rituals or from a Message of Faith?]

So here’s a question for all you blasphemers out there who think you can be saved by OBEDIENCE to The Commandments: Did you receive the gift of The Holy Spirit as a result of obeying The Commandments or by hearing The Message of Faith and BELIEVING it?

Let’s put this another way: Did you do anything or contribute anything by way of obedience to The Commandments in order to receive this free undeserved gift? If you did, let’s hear about it ‘cos I love a good laugh at the expense of vain puffed-up fools who think they can earn their own salvation by obedience to The Commandments.

Paul then begins to cement his case:

Galatians 3:3 (KJV) Are ye so foolish? having begun in The (Holy) Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? (Brackets mine)

Here again we can see how these stupid people had begun in The Holy Spirit which means that they were called by The Father to His Son by The Holy Spirit, but then said: “No thanks, we know a better way!!” And here is the first example of this evil mind set:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His Learners (disciples) went back, and walked no more with Him.

These numb skull stiff necked people were just like The Galatians – they were precursors of those that Paul had to deal with later on. They thought they knew a better way, a way based upon their own initiative and motivation, their own efforts and their own vain imaginings of salvation under their own fuel and steam and not to mention their own terms and conditions. These bods had no use for The Holy Spirit, why would they, they were self-sufficient via their own righteousness through obedience to The Law – The Commandments.

Move forward a decade or so, to Paul’s time, and we then have these same kinds of vile wretched people who thought that The Holy Spirit’s saving Power was not enough i.e. NOT GOOD ENOUGH for them, can you believe that? So they re-invoked The Law – The Commandments, and obedience to same, in order to become ‘more righteous’ (chuckle, chuckle, chuckle) than their brothers and sisters living under Yashua Messiah’s Glorious Saving Grace being led by The Holy Spirit.

When we stop and think about this, it can only be summed up as gross mind-numbing blasphemous stupidity. What is even more mind-numbing and amazing is The Truth that these same types of stupid people are still with us today and yet, at the same time, profess to be Christians and/or followers of The Way – Yashua Messiah – how does that work!!??

Let’s be clear about this because elsewhere Paul makes it very plain:

Galatians 2:16 (KJV) Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of The Law, but by The Faith of Jesus Christ, even (so that) we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by The Faith of Christ, and not by the works of The Law: for by the works of The Law shall no flesh be justified. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Now we must fully comprehend the points Yashua Messiah is explaining here, through Paul:

Point 1) No man is justified i.e. made righteous by the works of The Law. This includes obedience to The Ten Commandments. How do we know that? Easy, because Sabbath Day observance is no longer required under Grace. Everyday is now a Sabbath Day for those who have entered into Yashua Messiah’s Sabbath Rest = everyday is now a Sabbath Day for those who believe totally in Him for their salvation. See Hebrews Chapters 3 and 4 and then read it and internalise it.

Point 2) Mankind is justified only by Yashua Messiah’s Faith i.e. HIS FAITH, NOT OUR FAITH. Yashua Messiah gives us Faith, along with Grace, so that we can believe. Without the free gifts of His Faith and His Grace we would not be able to believe and then build our faith for rewards only upon that Foundation.

Point 3) We are then justified by His Faith and Paul makes that very clear with his statement: “That we might be justified by The Faith of Christ.” Get this clear in your minds, folks, and written on your hearts: YOUR FAITH does not feature in this arrangement, so YOUR FAITH does not feature at all in your salvation – period.

OK, let’s move on, because Paul now starts to lay it on the line:

Galatians 2:17 (KJV) But if seeking to be justified in Christ, we ourselves also were found to be sinners, is Christ then a minister of sin? Let it not be!

So, if we claim to be justified in, through, and by Yashua Messiah’s Sacrifice, His Faith and His Grace and are also found to be sinners, what is going on? Can sinners ever be justified? Can sinners enter The Kingdom of God? Can blemished and spotted bridal gowns attend The Wedding Feast? Nay, God forbid. Hence Paul asks can Yashua Messiah be a pastor of sin? Yet what points out our sin? What reveals our sin? What condemns us for our sins? The Law and The Commandments reveal and point out our sins and then condemns us. So is Yashua Messiah a Pastor of The Law and thereby condemning us or is He a Pastor of Truth, Love, Mercy, Redemption, Forgiveness, Faith and Grace?

Let’s remind ourselves:

Romans 8:1 (KJV) There is therefore now no condemnation to those in Christ Jesus.

If there is now no condemnation for those IN Yashua Messiah where has The Law gone and what need is there for The Law and/or The Commanndments? The Law/Commandments or The Whole Law and the ensuing condemnation go hand in hand, as does The Law and obedience, so if there is now no more condemnation how can there be any Law over us? How can there be any need for obedience to The Law or The Commandments if they are no longer over us and condemning us?

Answers on the back of a postage stamp, thank you.

Brother Charles

The Anatomy Of a Fake Christian

Introduction

Before I start please be warned that I use some strong language in this article and I have no desire to shock or offend anyone not prepared, so please be warned. Moreover, please note that I take no prisoners when dealing with anti-Christ arrogant blasphemers of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, that is, enemies of the Gospel message.

Now you could say that this article is long overdue, and I must admit that I have been planning such an article for a long long time, but to date, I have to say, that an easily usable or adaptable example for an article has not been forthcoming, but this bod takes first prize, and as I will reveal, is a classic example – he’s almost made to measure.

His name I will keep anonymous by using initials, as I have no wish to make capital out of his Spiritual blindness, ignorance, stupidity and other assorted accompanying delusional afflictions. So without further ado here is his first comment to me on social media which, incidentally, came out of the blue:

“brother charles YOUR blog is a load of manure an nonsense …ive read part of it and its COMPLETE BS ….its YOU who need to get back to the bible an gods word NOT YOURS ….YOUR opinions an YOUR take on the word of god ARE NOT the final word or the answer ….in just the small amount that i DID read YOU are espousing all manor of crap that ISNT in the bible …for example saying that senator john McCain is a relative of cain from the bible and that its his bloodline etc is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE !!”

You will notice that his first comment is just unfounded opinionated hot air about one of my articles which he took objection to, so it was an empty emotional protest without any factual argument to make his case or rebut anything I had said. This is the comment of a stiff necked, rebellious, brainwashed closed ignorant mind and beyond wretched.

However, my first reply:

@ DB “LOL and your comment is NOT opinionated meaningless bull crap??????? Now you can start proving your case by leaving a comment on my blog and I’ll make you a laughing stock. Mac = son of. McCain is a son of Cain – period and one evil son of the Devil.”

He came back with another silly non-comment which proved he knew nothing about the evil activities of John McCain:

“Brother Charles sooo…john mccain is the son of the devil….HAHAHAHA….and you think you can make ME a laughing stock …you are REALLY delusional arent you.”

If you web search “The treachery of John McCain” whom I have proven to be a son of Cain you will find ooddles of information about McCain with his selling out in Vietnam and his ties to ISIS and his involvement in funding them and yet this uninformed dupe labels me as delusional LOL. Yet more unfounded emotional worthless opinions from DB.

My second reply

@ DB “Cain was the Devil’s son through Eve – period. TWO SEEDS came out of The Garden. You’re a know-nothing numb skull moron. ROTFLMAO”

He came back yet again only this time the chinks in his alluminium fake Christian armour are beginning to show – I have split this comment into two parts:

“Brother Charles i wont be commenting to your blog because i dont make it a habit of contributing / encouraging NONSENSE ….”Matthew 7:21-23” Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven; but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness….

Here he continues with his hollow opinionated claims by declaring for a second time that my blog is nonsense without one atom of proof. He then starts to judge me as well, that is, as being a false Christian who will be rejected by The Lord when He returns. As it happens I have never cast out a demon, having never encountered anyone with one, nor have I performed miracles or claimed to have done so. Furthermore, seeing as I reside under Yashua Messiah’s Glorious Grace it would be impossible for me to practice lawlessness, as I am not under The Law.

He continues

….It is apparent that the people in Jesus’ example thought they were Christians. Even though they may have performed many works in Jesus’ name as proof of their religious devotion, Jesus rejected them with the statement, “I never knew you.” Given Jesus’ preceding warnings about “false prophets” who would masquerade as followers of Jesus Christ (verse 15), is it any wonder Jesus commanded us to test the “fruit” of religious teachers before embracing them into the fold.     YOUR BLOG is a PERFECT example”

Ironically in the opening sentence of this second part he is actually speaking of himself without realising it, such is his delusional state of mind. He thinks that out of the two of us HE is the Christian – hilarious or what? Then he gives his game away with a reference to…..and wait for it….. RELIGIOUS DEVOTION!! A non-Scriptural term. This is our first concrete evidence that we are dealing with a fake Christian. God has no religion nor did Yashua Messiah come to this earth in order to start a religion. Furthermore you will not find the word ‘religion’ in the four Gospels, so now we know what his faith is in – RELIGION.

He then speaks of fruit when: 1) he doesn’t even know me and 2) he has only read a tiny part of one of my articles without understanding it and then condemns my whole blog based upon his unresearched erroneous conclusions. This, my friends, just constitutes another judgemental rant.

I then replied with a rebuttal:

@ DB “You won’t be commenting on my blog because you’re a spineless coward full of satanic mainstream religious bull crap. You have no argument as your comment proves – you’re just a mouthy clanging cymbal. LOL”

“Brother Charles HAHAHA…your funny …i wont be commenting on your blog because its  NONSENSE …YOUR opinion IS NOT the last word on the bible and YOU are not a prophet of the lord …the fact that you think ANYONE ought to contribute to you BULLSHIT is ridicules ….like i said before i try not to encourage MORONS !!”

He then makes further false accusations by declaring for a third time that my blog is nonsense. Once more without an atom of factual proof or argument. He then claims that my researched and Spiritually inspired articles are just my opinions. His ignorant audacity knows no bounds. He then states that I am not a Prophet of The Lord. Well that’s a relief because I never thought I was. He’s probably not even aware that John the Baptist was the last Prophet of The Lord:

Matthew 11:13 (KJV) For all The Prophets and The Law prophesied until John.

Luke 16:16 (KJV) The Law and The Prophets were until John: since that time The Kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

I responded with yet another rebuttal and a challenge:

@ DB “PROVE IT, you mouthy ignorant jerk.”

He then tries to pull a fast one thinking he’s a smart Alec by saying my blog proves HIS case. His delusions intensify LOL:

“Brother Charles you have proven it for me bub …the simple fact that you THINK that YOUR blog/opinions on the bible is Gods ”TRUTH” is full on evidence that YOU are delusional and your blog is nothing more than the blathering of an idiot with a broken mind !”

No further comment on that post so I rebut his drivel once again:

@ DB “ALL you post is your mouthy ignorant opinions – no Scriptural back up whatsoever because you’re a fake and liar – full of religious bull crap.”

“Brother Charles 1st of all i GAVE you some scripture to back it up even though i dont really need scripture to back me up in proving your a fukin lunatic …you are continually doing an awesome job of that YOURSELF ….the simple fact that you think that YOU and your blog of mindless drivel ARE somehow the last word on the bible and that you are somehow speaking some unheard truth from god  is FAR AND AWAY proof enough that you are delusional buddy !!”

Then he lies by saying he gave me Scripture as proof and evidence when all he did was to missuse Scripture to compound or try to back up his ignorant opinions. It was a total missuse of Scripture and he proved nothing with its use. I was then inspired to challenge him with what I thought would be a knock out punch. I challenged him with a deadly question:

@ DB “Right let’s start you lying illegitimate: Tell me, when did you accept a Jesus as your saviour?”

He then came back with this, thinking erroneously that it was an answer, but as you can see, at the end of his post, he was trying to weedle out of the subject now being discussed:

“Brother Charles May 14 1981 is when i was saved…For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” Say, “Father in Heaven, I believe that Jesus died for my sins.”…..not that that has ANYTHING whatsoever to do with this !”

I therefore pressed him further:

@ DB “Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?”

He then comes back with a mixed bag, but I could tell at this point by his response, that, having read more of my blog, he was not so sure of himself. It even resulted with him realising and admitting, in an ever so back handed way, that I spoke with Yashua Messiah’s authority and yet quickly resorting to accusing me of operating with and for my own agenda. He also accuses me of being Spiritually bankrupt – just a little more judging to compound his blasphemies.

“Brother Charles ill give you details of my being saved when you explain exactly how an why this has ANY bearing WHATSOEVER in this thread of conversation …. my faith isnt in question here …the subject is that YOU somehow believe that YOUR  writings  and YOUR interpretation of the bible an gods word are IT …that somehow YOU have the WHOLE thing figured out …YOU DONT …..i have read enough of your blog to see without question that your are not only delusional but that somehow YOU think you are SO ENLIGHTENED that you can tell/judge ANYONE on their faith and THAT my friend is ENOUGH to see you are spreading false teachings an that YOU are the 1 who is morally an spiritually corrupt …the bible is VERY specific about those who spread false teachings and those who pretend to have ALL the answers …its very specific about people who take the scripture an manipulate it to fit their OWN agenda and then spread that agenda to others !!”

He also tries to introduce terms and conditions re his alleged salvation and goes on the defensive by declaring HIS faith isn’t in question when it most definitely was in question, and he most assuredly did not like my having things all figured out. THAT was not allowed in his sandy foundation fake Christian world.

I respond to him once more:

@ DB “OH YES your faith is EVERYTHING to do with it i.e. what is your faith in? and the fact that you cannot simply answer my question TELLS ME EVERYTHING I need to know. However I will give you another chance and remind you of what Peter said:

1 Peter 3:15 (KJV) But sanctify The Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:

I will therefore repeat the question so there is no confusion: Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?”

This repeated request has gone unaswered and after 36 hours I am still waiting for his reply. Now dear people why do you think that is? Has the cat got his tongue? Could it be that I frightened him off with a question that had echoes of the past? Let me remind you:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

I have covered this issue elsewhere on my blog but it won’t hurt to go over it again. Notice what Yashua Messiah has said and then what has taken place. He said in no uncertain terms that unless The Father had innitiated their inner desire to follow Him (had called them) they could NOT TRULY COME TO HIM. So what did they do? THEY FAKED IT! Then, when confronted with the reality of their artificial situation they walked away from Him.

Why did they walk away from Him? What did they find so upsetting in His words?: “Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.” Easy, they could not accept this Truth. They believed that it was THEIR IDEA to follow Him so that they could pat themselves on the back (boast) and say to themselves what clever people they were. After all THEY HAD ACCEPTED HIM as their saviour – their idea – their wisdom – their intelligence – their decision and their terms and conditions, if we follow it through to its inevitable ludicrous conclusion.

Right, now lets transfer this Truth and apply it to our pompous little arrogant wretch called DB who when challenged with the question: “Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?” He could not answer. WHY COULD HE NOT ANSWER – IT’S SIMPLE ENOUGH, ISN’T IT??? Obviously not for him for it silenced him just like Yashua Messiah silenced the Pharisees and Sadducees.

One fake Christian exposed.

PS if he returns with another comment I will update this page.

Brother Charles

PS as of today, 30th January 2017 and 15 days since his ignorant rant, I have not had a word from him. Interesting eh?

Does God HAVE a NAME?

Now is that a stupid question or could it even be a really STUPID question? I say this because the name of God or the subject of the name(s) of God get’s more, so called, Christians bent out of shape than any other Biblical topic that I know of. Gnat straining and camel swallowing doesn’t even come near to this storm in teacup subject.

I also say this because I have recently gone head to head on social media with a Judaising mongrel dog wretch who obsesses about this very issue. In fact he was so bent out of shape that I had to block him for his own good, that is, before he had a stroke or a heart attack, such was his unhinged, unbalanced emotional and fanatical attachment to this non-issue. Now don’t get me wrong here for it is important to know the name(s) of God or, better, to KNOW which God we are refering to when we say God or whether it’s the GODHEAD of God with God as in the beginning (Please note that the Godhead is a Duality of two distinct Spiritual Beings not a Trinity nor a Mono-god):

Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God (H430 the Hebrew name Elohim – plural) created the heaven and the earth. (Brackets mine)

OK so straight away in the FIRST VERSE of the Holy Scriptures we are told a name of God – some might say it’s the name of the Godhead for we are dealing with the Hebrew name Elohim which is the plural of the singular Hebrew word Eloah. And from Strong’s Concordance we get:

God – H430 – elohiym – el-o-heem’ – Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God[head]; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty. (Square brackets mine)

This means we are not dealing with one God and we have the Hebrew name ELOHIM. We then we get:

Genesis 1:26 (KJV) And God H430 (The Hebrew name Elohim – plural) said, LET US make man in OUR IMAGE, after OUR LIKENESS: (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Now believe it or not, some numb skulls interpret this verse as a singular God speaking to the angels which is utter nonsense as angels cannot create and were never created themselves by God to be creators. So let’s get this golden nugget of Truth firmly set in our minds and from Strong’s once more:

Angels – H4397 – mal’âk – mal-awk’ – From an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically of God, that is, an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher): – ambassador, angel, king, messenger.

There we have it, angels are primarily messengers, NOT creators and nowhere in Scripture does it say that angels were ever creators.

So as an early sum up we now have one name of God – “Elohim” and the first name mentioned in the Holy Scriptures and because of this fact should this name take pre-eminence over any other names? We shall see.

Right, what other names do we have in the Holy Scriptures? This name:

Genesis 2:4 (KJV) These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that The LORD God made the earth and the heavens. (Emphasis mine)

What have we got here? for this is the first verse in the Holy Scriptures where we find the name or Title: “The LORD God” so who is this LORD God? To answer that I will copy and paste another verse:

Genesis 2:16 (KJV) And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of The Garden thou mayest freely eat: (Emphasis mine)

Here we can plainly see that this “LORD God” communicated with Adam – the man. So what? I hear you say. Ah but this piece of information is crucial in identifying this “LORD God” who also has a different Hebrew name and from Strong’s once more:

LORD – H3068 – yehôvâh – yeh-ho-vaw’ – From H1961; (the) self Existent or eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God: – Jehovah, the Lord. Compare H3050, H3069.

God – H430 – elohiym – el-o-heem’ – Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God[head]; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty. (Square brackets mine)

Again, what have we got here? for this God who is still Elohim – plural has another name – a second name, to accompany His first name – God. This means we have Yehovah God or Jehovah God which, as we can see, also means The Self-Existent or The Eternal.

Moreover we now need to know who this Yehovah God is and I have already revealed that He spoke to Adam and gave him certain commands. So if we now go straight to the New Testament we will discover who this Yehovah God is:

John 5:37 (KJV) And The Father Himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard His voice at any time, nor seen His shape. (Emphasis mine)

There we have it from Yashua Messiah’s very lips. Up until that point in time in the first century no one had ever seen or heard The Father – so who spoke and commanded Adam? Answer: Yehovah God, and who was this Yehovah God? Answer: Yashua Messiah as God before He became flesh – The I AM who spoke to Moses and the Melchisedek who spoke with Abraham.

Here are some more names of God:

Yehovah God (ELOHIM) who became Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ or Joshua Anointed) is The Way and there is no other way for He is THE WAY, THE LIFE, THE TRUTH, THE LIGHT, THE I AM, THE ALPHA AND OMEGA, THE WORD or THE MIND, THE SON OF MAN, THE SECOND ADAM, THE COMFORTER, THE ADVOCATE, THE ETERNAL HIGH PRIEST, THE KING OF RIGHTEOUSNESS (Justice) THE KING OF PEACE (SALEM).

However, this is only half of the story for here are some of his unhinged comments:

“You don’t need the bible? It seems you need it more than anyone I’ve ever talked to. Why won’t you read us Psalms 83:18? Satan got your tongue?”

First of all I did not say to him that I did not need The Bible, I said that in this instance I did not need the OT or the Old Covenant (his satanic perversions of what I had said). Here, too, we can see the focus of his obsession – one verse of Old Covenant Holy Scripture in Psalm 83 after I had explained to him that it was Old Covenant, but that Truth didn’t register in his mind at all. He then followed it with this:

“Psalms 83:18 MAY PEOPLE KNOW THAT YOU WHOSE NAME IS “JEHOVAH”, YOU ALONE ARE THE MOST HIGH OVER ALL THE EARTH That’s Jehovah, YHWH in Hebrew. You are afraid of his name, because you are the embodiment of Satan himself, and Satan cannot stand his name. You are evil through and through…..”

These blind guides are buried in the Old Testament and cannot see the New Testament. In fact they cannot see any further than the ends of their noses. However, I did not push him further as it would have been a waste of my time, but it is quite obvious that he does not see Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) as the Yahovah God of the Old Testament or that when we mention His Name, that is, Yashua Messiah or Jesus Christ we are then directly referring to the Yahovah God of the Old Testament and thereby SAYING HIS NAME!! There we are – simples, but too simples for him.

Brother Charles in Yashua Messiah’s NAME!!

 

Was JESUS CHRIST a JEW?…

…Or better, Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a JEW?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38.

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Canaanite Jews were and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

From Strong’s Concordance:

Generation – G1081 – gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; *OFFSPRING;* by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially a viper or a reptile and therefore against Himself – IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, this is what these Canaanite Jew people were and still are today in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurious thieves and, worst of all, genocidal psychopathic cold blooded murderers, as exemplified in the so-called Russian Revolution; as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

“A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

– Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten God, for they had never known God at all and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them straight:

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of God, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness, which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the God of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so called African-American blacks.

However, I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s parents. In Matthew we have Joseph’s lineage, who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father, but his step-father, and in Luke we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (KJV) The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (JUDAH) and his brethren; 3 And Judas (JUDAH) begat Phares (PHAREZ) and Zara (ZARAH) of Thamar (TAMAR); and Phares (PHAREZ) begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam (REHOBOAM); and Roboam (REHOBOAM) begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
Mat 1:15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s (Mary’s) and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? Easy, because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI. (Emphasis mine)

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (KJV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So did Joseph have two fathers or is this a contradiction or just an expression of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still referred to as his father and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was called Heli’s son.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon, through Solomon’s son Rehoboam, and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David. We therefore have Yashua Messiah, who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah, and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (KJV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH).

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his twin brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite, for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (MCV) The (Royal) Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah, nor his descendants, until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK, so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews, and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However, I can hear the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another wife named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Lord for disobeying their father Judah, and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consummation of their marriage to Tamar and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband, but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the first Canaanite Jews, and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have an Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside, and in turn, this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews via their mothers and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father.

So to sum up we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Israelites; 3) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah, for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Canaanite Jew.

For further reading and understanding of the origins of the white Semitic Israelites and Canaanite Jews please see my two articles below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 9 – Their Laughable Abuse of Deuteronomy 28

In part 8 I began to deal with their satanic perversions of The Holy Scriptures, picking from a select list of Holy Scriptures that they regularly pervert and use to build their satanic pyramid arguments.

However, Deuteronomy 28 is a special case because this chapter keeps cropping up all over the web and here is how they misapply it.

This is from a web page called Deuteronomy28.org where they state:

“The scripture in Deut 28:15-68 clearly explain the curses upon Israel for the breaking of YAH’s laws and worshiping other gods. There are several prophecy’s throughout the old testament of Israel being scattered throughout the four corners of the earth. The temple that you see today in Jerusalem is prophecy fulfilled and it was destroyed in 70 AD by the Romans, which has scattered all the 12 tribes of Israel into Africa.”

Now here we have two lies and child like errors and I will list them here:

1) There is no way that blacks have EVER been scattered to the four corners of the earth. Brazil, The Spanish American Colonies, The Caribbean, The USA, Arab countries and that’s it, but NEVER to the four corners of the earth. So which peoples does Deuteronomy 28 refer too? These peoples – the Twelve Tribes of Israel:

(Joseph) Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

(Joseph) Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) (Royalty to Yashua Messiah, King David and British Royalty) = Northern Ireland and Scotland and some still dispersed in Western Europe with some in Germany.

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium).

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

Now the above peoples have definitely been scattered to the four corners of the earth from Alaska in the far North West to New Zealand in the far South East and most places in between and as described here:

Deuteronomy 14:2 (KJV) For thou art an Holy people unto The LORD thy God, and The LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto Himself, ABOVE ALL THE NATIONS THAT ARE UPON THE EARTH. (The British Empire followed by the USA)

2) In the second part of their dumb comment they laughably say this: “The temple that you see today in Jerusalem is prophecy fulfilled and it was destroyed in 70 AD by the Romans, which has scattered all the 12 tribes of Israel into Africa…..”

The TWELVE TRIBES scattered into Africa??????? Hilarious!! In 70 AD there were only the remnants of THREE of the Tribes of Israel in Jerusalem in 70 AD. They were Benjamin, Levi and Judah and those of them that had become Christians had already left before the Romans arrived as they would have heeded Yashua Messiah’s advice as written in the Holy Scriptures:

Matthew 24:16 (KJV) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains.

So here we can see that these silly blacks have no idea of what they are talking about. Furthermore, nowhere in the ancient histories, nor in the Holy Scriptures does it make any mention of Benjaminites, Levites or Judahites escaping to Africa. Let’s face it, only an idiot would attempt to cross the thousands of miles of Saharan arid and sandy desert lands in order to reach the more fertile areas of tropical Africa only to die of tropical diseases when they arrived.

Here is further proof of where the Israelites were scattered:

1 Kings 14:15 (KJV) For The LORD shall smite Israel, as a reed is shaken in the water, and he shall root up Israel out of this good land, which he gave to their fathers, and shall scatter them beyond the river (Euphrates), because they have made their groves, provoking the LORD to anger. (Brackets mine)

The lands beyond the river Euphrates are the lands of the Medes and Parthians – modern Iran and Syria south of the Caucasus Mountains.

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond the River Euphrates, an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

— Flavius Josephus

Furthermore, the crucial historical points these ignoramuses miss is The Truth that Israel was a divided Kingdom when they went into their separate captivities, the Northern Kingdom of Israel in circa 725 BC and the Southern Kingdom of Judah 140 years later in circa 585 BC.

The Northern Kingdom was taken captive by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans) and placed in the lands of the Medes and the Parthians just south of the Caucasus Mountains, hence white Israelite people are known today as Caucasians – there is a pass going north (the opposite direction of Africa LOL) through the Caucasus Mountains called the Pass of Israel which the Israelites took in their migrations into Europe.

Moreover, the Southern Kingdom of Judah was later taken captive by the Babylonians (forefathers of the Italians) and they were carried off to Babylon and remained there until the King of Persia invaded Babylon 70 years later and set the three tribes of Judah along with the Canaanite Jews free.

Now a group of these people returned returned to Jerusalem, but this group mostly consisted of Canaanite Jews, not Judahites, Benjaminites and Levites. Yes, some Judahites, Benjaminites and Levites did return, but only a small contingent. The majority of these three tribes made up the diaspora from Babylon and began their slow westward migrations into Europe and eventually joined up with their Northern Kingdom brothers in Britain and North Western Europe (Scandinavia)

This means that the majority of the people who returned to Jerusalem were Canaanite Jews, not Israelites. You will also notice the absence of any blacks in this TRUE HISTORY!!!

OK, returning to the quote and notice how they deviously leave out the first fourteen verses of Deuteronomy 28 so I will include them here for they are an integral contextual part of the narrative of Deuteronomy 28. I will also put in bold text the crucial elements that cannot, in any way, shape or form, be applied to blacks and their history:

Deuteronomy 28:1-14 (KJV) And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently unto the voice of The LORD thy God, to observe and to do all His commandments which I command thee this day, that The LORD thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth: 2 And all these blessings shall come on thee, and overtake thee, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of The LORD thy God. 3 Blessed shalt thou be in the city, and blessed shalt thou be in the field. 4 Blessed shall be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy ground, and the fruit of thy cattle, the increase of thy kine (heifers and cows), and the flocks of thy sheep. 5 Blessed shall be thy basket and thy store. 6 Blessed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed shalt thou be when thou goest out. 7 The LORD shall cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways. 8 The LORD shall command the blessing upon thee in thy storehouses, and in all that thou settest thine hand unto; and He shall bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. 9 The LORD shall establish thee an Holy People unto Himself, as He hath sworn unto thee, if thou shalt keep the commandments of The LORD thy God, and walk in His ways. 10 And all people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of The LORD; and they shall be afraid of thee. 11 And The LORD shall make thee plenteous in goods, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy ground, in the land which The LORD sware unto thy fathers to give thee. 12 The LORD shall open unto thee His good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto thy land in His season, and to bless all the work of thine hand: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow. 13 And The LORD shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath; if that thou hearken unto the commandments of The LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do them: 14 And thou shalt not go aside from any of the words which I command thee this day, to the right hand, or to the left, to go after other gods to serve them.

Now as we can plainly see none of the enboldened elements apply to blacks and their history, so what game do they think they are playing when they ignore these verses of this chapter and start at verse 15? Moreover, I am not going to copy and paste the rest of Deuteronomy 28 as the case has already been proven above, so it will be just the verses that these numb skulls use to pathetically try and make a claim for their black Israelite garbage:

Continuing from point 2 above and from the Deuteronomy.org web page:

“…..and then in later time as per prophecy mentioned in Deut 28:68, the Israelites were sold into slavery…According to the prophecy mentioned in
Deut 28:68, the only race of people who were sold into slavery by ships (bond men and bondwoman) were black people as per scripture are the TRUE descendants of the biblical Israelite’s”

So let’s copy and paste that verse here:

Deuteronomy 28:68 (KJV) And The LORD shall bring thee into Egypt AGAIN with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you. (Emphasis mine)

Right, what are the give aways here?

1) Taken to Egypt AGAIN, so this is the second time these people have been taken captive as slaves to EGYPT!!!

2) When were blacks EVER taken enmass as slaves to Egypt once, let alone twice?

3) And no man shall buy you!!! Now if my memory serves me correctly the history of the black slave trade records how blacks were readily bought and sold at Canaanite Jewish run slave auctions at both ends of the trafficking system i.e. in Africa and America or the Caribbean. So this must mean we are dealing with a very different body of people that no one wants to buy.

4) This also means that these silly blacks are calling America and the Caribbean Egypt. LOL

5) OK, so the fact that we have a reference to WHITE Israelites who are being taken to Egypt a SECOND TIME in SHIPS, what can this possibly mean, for it is nothing to do with blacks? AND there has never been a second captivity in Egypt for the Israelites, to this day, so what gives? PROPHECY is what gives. This verse is unfulfilled prophecy, for it certainly does not apply to the Canaanite Jews, because no ships would be needed to carry off the Canaanite Jew Israelis (currently in unlawful occupation of Palestine) to Egypt, just a very large fleet of guarded buses.

6) Furthermore, when were the WHITE Israelites EVER taken into captivity in ships? They never have been, so this is yet more proof that this verse is prophetic and is an event yet to occur in the not too distant future, if the modern WHITE Israelites fail to turn from their evil satanic ways and wake their ideas up.

7) Notice: “and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen.” Now this is interesting and again proves that this verse has nothing to do with black slaves for they were NOT BONDED. A bonded slave has a debt that he owes to his master that he has to work off and pay with his or her labour in order to be set free. Black slaves who were in involuntary servitude were not bonded, they were slaves for life and so were their children who were born into slavery. Freedom only came from a benevolent master as a gift.

Out of interest the bonded slave system only came into existence after involuntary servitude (so called slavery) had been abolished or at the end of the American Civil War, when both blacks and whites then became citizen slaves of the US Federal Government. This also means that the prophecy of Deuteronomy 28:68 has already been partially fulfilled with just the carrying off in ships being the completion.

As a final point I will add that most born of God Christians will not be a part of this carrying off having already gone to a place of safety as described in Revelation:

Revelation 12:14 (KJV) And to the woman (Spiritual Israel) were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, (three and a half years) from the face of the serpent.

So with that I will call it a cut, unless any more black arrested development buffoonery comes up and needs mocking for all it’s worth. LOL

With love in Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

Ananias and Sapphira – How We Can Know This is a False or a Fake Story

Once again this is an overdue article and the reason being is because I didn’t complete my “Exposing The Trinity Lie” series of articles, so it is my mistake. However, just recently, I have had much noisy opposition to my Truthful teaching on the lying shell game scam known as the trinity dogma, otherwise known as Tertullian’s conjuring trick called The Trinitas circa 200 AD.

Here is one of their favourite erroneous mantras as thrown at me the other day:

“The Holy Spirit is a person who can be grieved, can be lied to, etc. (Eph 4:30, Acts 5:3).”

Now the grieving of The Holy Spirit nonsense I deal with here:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/can-christians-grieve-the-holy-spirit/

And the ‘Holy Spirit being lied to’ I will deal with in this article, but first let’s get the story copied here so we are familiar with the WHOLE story and have ALL the details:

Acts 5:1-11 (KJV) But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, 2 And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet. 3 But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land? 4 Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God. 5 And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great FEAR came on all them that heard these things. 6 And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him. 7 And it was about the space of three hours after, when his wife, not knowing what was done, came in. 8 And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much. 9 Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out. 10 Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband. 11 And great FEAR came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things. (Emphasis mine)

Now before I analyse the above passage of so called Scripture I will follow the same procedure that I employed in my article entitled: “Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons of God Have To Obey Secular or Religious Authorities?”

This means I will quote the overall contextual theme of Acts 4 and Acts 5 and show how this, off topic, alleged Scriptural story was added for very different reasons than you may at first realise. Here are the verses from the end of Acts 4 and, notice, how encouraging, positive and upbeat it all is:

Acts 4:32-37 (KJV) And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. 33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of The Lord Jesus: and Great Grace was upon them all. 34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. 36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, 37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.

Continuing I will now add Acts 5 from verse 12:

Acts 5:12-14 (KJV) And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people; (and they were all with one accord in Solomon’s porch. 13 And of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the people magnified them. 14 And believers were the more added to The Lord, multitudes both of men and women.) (Emphasis mine)

Notice how the positive story line continues and how the people are elated with joy and gladness and all are likeminded and of one accord. So what is this very negative fear based story of Ananias and Sapphira doing right there in the middle of this very Spiritually uplifting narrative? (Please note, I will give special attention to verse 13 at the end of this article.)

Notice, too, how the same trick has been played as they did in Romans 13:1-7 by breaking up the continuum of the positive story line in order to shove in their agenda fuelled lies.

Now for some questioning analysis of this suspect story:

1) Who were these two people? For in Adam Clarke’s Commentary he states this:

“’But a certain man named Ananias’ – Of these unhappy people we have no farther account than what is recorded here. In reference to birth, connections, etc., their names are written in the dust. The import of his name, Chananiyah, the Grace or Mercy of The Lord, agrees very ill with his conduct.”

So someone whose name means: “Grace or Mercy of The Lord” is mercilessly struck down dead by The Lord for telling a lie? Do I sense some sort of mocking going on here by the authors of this evil corruption?

Moreover we have two Biblical nobodies, not previously mentioned anywhere else in the Holy Scriptures, and there they are, out of the blue, and also known by name, just for the recording of this very negative story. All very handy and convenient eh? Too convenient for my liking!!!

2) Look at how the authors stole, in copycat fashion, the “land or property” subject matter from chapter 4. This means that they were too lazy and unimaginative to make up something original in order to try and make their lying point, as we shall see:

Acts 4:34-37 (KJV) Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. 36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, 37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet. (Emphasis mine)

3) “But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost?”

OK, now in my article “Exposing The Trinity Lie Parts 1-5” I prove without a shadow of doubt that The Holy Spirit (here called The Holy Ghost) is not a personage of The Godhead but, rather, is the Living Power or Living Force of The Godhead, a Living Force that does things like this:

“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a Force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this Force the existence of a conscious and Intelligent Mind. This Mind is the Matrix of all matter.” (Emphasis mine)

– Professor Max Planck, the father of quantum physics.

So here we have a qualified scientist describing The Holy Spirit in action, without actually stating it out loud and, notice, that he says “BEHIND THIS FORCE there is an Intelligent Mind.” So behind The Holy Spirit there is The Godhead of The Father and The Son. That means, folks, from this Truthful scientific perspective that The Holy Spirit is NOT A PERSON of a trinity but a FORCE!!

Moreover, and with this Truth in mind, how could the Holy Spirit be lied to if the Holy Spirit is a FORCE and not a person? It can’t, and that’s it. So if nothing else this makes Acts 5 verse 3 a blatant corruption and a LIE!!!! and the whole story a fraud.

4) Peter sits in judgement!! At what point were the Messengers (Apostles) given the power or the authority to sit in judgement over their brothers and sisters, or the power to interrogate them like a Communist KGB officer?

We know very little about the travels and experiences of the other Messengers (Apostles) but we do know much about Paul. Now where do we find him anywhere giving his brothers and sisters the third degree type inquisition re their sins? We don’t, other than him telling us that certain members had to be handed back to Satan for blaspheming, that is, teaching a satanic false gospel against Yashua Messiah’s Gospel Message that Paul was teaching, which is blaspheming against the Holy Spirit. Were they struck down dead?

Now here’s another thing. How well does this blatant nonsense story fit in with the other Papist LIE of Peter being a Pope – a fake in authority? Very well indeed is the answer to that!! Coincidence anyone?

5) “Why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.”

Look at that for another LIE!!! How did these dissembling authors get away with this? How did Ananias and Sapphira not lie unto men? If this story is true then they lied to both God and men. Did their brothers and sisters not believe that they had given all the proceeds of the sale of their property to be shared? If so, then Ananias and Sapphira lied to them as well as God. So what’s this erroneous nonsense verse all about? Answer: building up the emotional crap is what it’s all about, in order to make it a more emotionally convincing story. However, it backfired, and like all liars they always shoot themselves in the feet at the same time. This verse is pure arrogant embellishment.

6) “And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great FEAR came on all them that heard these things.”

RIGHT!!! Now we get to the rub!! For this is the REAL REASON for the addition of this satanic evil corruption – FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! Oh how the Papist illegitimates love to put FEAR into their duped lemming followers. Without FEAR and mind numbing superstition the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion would cease to exist.

Always remember folks that FEAR is the OPPOSITE OF LOVE. People KILL what they FEAR. FEAR is the breeding ground for mindless uncontrolled HATE. So why would Yashua Messiah allow such wickedness to be included in His Word? He didn’t, evil people with an evil agenda added it to serve that evil religious agenda – the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious agenda.

Again, compare this narrative with the positive verses each side of it. Its sole purpose is to negate the uplifting verses that go before it and after it and, of course, to add in the nonsense that The Holy Spirit can be lied to. All this, when Yashua Messiah knows what we are going to do before we even do it, and acts as our Advocate on the rare occasions that might be necessary.

7) Were Ananias and Sapphira Born Again, that is, were they born of God? If so, then they could not sin:

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man that hath this hope in Him purify himself, even as He is pure.

This issue, backed by the above Holy Scriptures, raises a massive point in confounding this vile eleven verse contamination of The Holy Scriptures. Make no mistake, folks, because if these two characters WERE BORN OF GOD there is no way they would have done what they were accused of doing.

Romans 8:4-5 (KJV) That the righteousness of The Law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit. 5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after The Spirit the things of The Spirit.

The question that now needs to be asked is whether Ananias and Sapphira were Spirit led Christians or not? If they were, there is no way they would have done what they are allegedly accused of doing, that is, they would not have been walking after the flesh. However, if they were not saved then the flesh is all that they could have served and their behaviour completely understandable.

Therefore, there is no way Peter would have dealt with them as he did, if they were unsaved and minding the things of the flesh. So yet again we have more solid gold proof that this story is a lying fabrication and a satanic corruption by addition.

Furthermore, whoever added this passage had no understanding of what it means to be born of God – a new creation so it had to be written by someone with a Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious mindset, not a Christian Spiritual mindset.

8) And great FEAR came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things.

LOL and then finally and, for ‘good’ measure, they bung in another verse of FEAR MONGERING, but not just the congregation of God this time but also those outside that heard of this event. Just what you need to give The Church a loving Christian reputation.

Well, let’s face it, when you’re building a house of cards like the Babylonian Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with hoped for billions of deluded serfs and slaves as members, in the future, how do you hold them in captivity without an unhealthy dollop of FEAR!!!???? Think of all that lovely dosh you will lose without the FEAR!!!

9) For the final point I will return to verse 13 of Acts 5 “And of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the people magnified them.”

Now why did the rest (whoever they were) not dare (durst not) to join the congregation of God and yet they magnified them – praised them? Was it because of the alleged fearful episode that was supposed to have taken place or because they were not prepared to sell all that they had and lay it at the Messenger’s feet to be given to the needy? Yet at the same time were very impressed by such overwhelming acts of kindness and generosity and praised them for doing so? The next verse gives us the answer:

Acts 5:14 (KJV) And believers were the more added to The Lord, multitudes both of men and women.

Again this verse proves that the events of Acts 5:1-11 NEVER TOOK PLACE and the whole episode is a lying fabrication made up by the founding fathers of the Hellenised counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – STOP PRESS!!!

Great News This Morning the 20th April 2016 from an idiot called Ron who likes to leave lying evil comments (which I will never publish) and in doing so shoots himself in the foot by posting links to his satanic site about non-existent black Israelites LOL. They really should lock these people up and throw the key away, if only for their own protection.

However I have to make mention of his latest ignorant diatribe if only to reveal that he has informed me today that the name Laban, (The direct Abrahamic relation to Isaac and Jacob/Israel) whose sister was Rebekah, means WHITE. Proving once more that the people of Shem to Eber to Abraham were WHITE!!!!!!! Isn’t it fortunate that most people have lost the ability to think, for it makes the exposing of their nonsense such an easy task.

From Strong’s Concordance: Laban – H3836 lâbân lâbên – law-bawn’, law-bane’ – From H3835; white: – white.

Have a nice day folks and spread the Word of TRUTH.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 8 – The Blacks and Their Satanic Perversions of The Holy Scriptures Exposed

Before I start this crucial part of this series of blog posts we need to address this skin colour issue with regards to the writing of The Holy Scriptures and the reason why skin pigmentation does not appear to be of any importance to God or His authors. Why Is that? Quite simply because the black races were still in Africa and those that were in Mesopotamia, today called the Middle East, were there as slaves and/or eunuch slaves and were not deemed as people of any significance – they were non-entities. Did “Black lives matter”? Not at all. This means that The Holy Scriptures were written for white Israelite people and only white Israelite people because they were God’s chosen white Israelite people.

Is God, by Freudian Marxist Pharisee PC liberal standards, a RACIST!!!???? You bet.

We need to understand this basic, The Holy Scriptures are about Israel and then Israel and then Israel. Other nations and peoples only feature as and when they interact with???????? You got it, Israel and the Israelites who I will now prove were and still are WHITE!!!!!!!

Furthermore, I will confound their stupid non-arguments before I even expose one of their many infantile blasphemous errors and satanic misinterpretations and gross distortions of The Holy Scriptures by quoting one or three Holy Scriptures of my own and with some Strong’s definitions to back them up, but first things first – Adam and Eve:

Were they white or were they brown or were they – horror of horrors – black!!!???? From Strong’s Concordance:

Adam – H119 – ‘âdam – aw-dam’ – To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

OK, there it is folks – Adam flushed red in his face and was of a ruddy complexion, just like his descendant King David:

1 Samuel 17:42 (KJV) And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and RUDDY, and of a fair countenance. (Emphasis mine)

Now I don’t know about you, but I have NEVER heard of blacks being refered to as people of a fair countenance or that are beautiful or handsome or pleasing to the eye to look at. Moreover notice that David, like Adam, was RUDDY in complexion and from Strongs, once more, we get:

Ruddy – H132 – ad-mo-nee’, – ad-mo-nee’ – From H119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion): – red, ruddy.

Moving on we then find this gem of a verse which I believe says it all and it leaves the blacks and their black Israelite insulting whacky ideas stone dead in the water:

Lamentations 4:7 (KJV) Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire: (Emphasis mine)

Let’s also be clear, Nazerites are ISRAELITES and these Nazerites, that were residing in the Southern Kingdom of Judah when it was invaded by the Babylonians, are described as having skin that was purer than snow and whiter than milk. Now how white do Israelites have to be before these brainwashed blacks get the picture? In the next verse it states:

Lamentations 4:8 (KJV) Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick. (Emphasis mine)

Now if you get this verse thrown at you by these silly people just point out that white skin turns darker as starvation takes its toll. These people definitely died of starvation due to the seige of their city by the Babylonians.

From Answers.Com – Why do people turn black when they die?….

“As body begins purification, the skin will take on a greenish tone as sulfurous gasses break down the red blood cells. Intestinal gasses flood into the body tissues producing first green then dark coloration.”

OK, having laid the foundation that Israelites were and are white, I will now deal with a list of Holy Scriptures that these silly blacks use in the most pathetic ways in order to make their ludicrous and laughable claims – starting with:

2 Kings 5:27 (KJV) The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow.

Now here they use the recording of this event as proof that this Israelite man was black in order for the leprosy to contrast as white as snow with his black skin or to be recorded as the leprosy being a representation of a change of his skin colour. However if we do our research what do you think we will find? This:

As we can see brown skinned people do not produce leprosy that is as white a snow but rather leprosy that is the same colour as their brown or black skin. Here is a further image:

They then use Leviticus 13:2-6 in the same way with regard to leprosy but still making the same false claims:

Leviticus 13:4 (KJV) If the bright spot be white in the skin of his flesh, and in sight be not deeper than the skin, and the hair thereof be not turned white; then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague seven days:

Let’s be clear folks white people have white leprosy and blacks have black leprosy:

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/leprosy?sort=mostpopular&excludenudity=true&mediatype=photography&phrase=leprosy

Next up we have Acts 21:37-38, but for this exposé I have included verse 39:

Acts 21:37-39 (KJV) And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek? 38 Art not thou that Egyptian (a Canaanite Jew inhabitant of Egypt), which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers? 39 But Paul said, I am a man which am [not a Jew] a Judean of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Before I press on dear people you also need to know that these duped black people believe that the Egyptians were black also. Egyptians were olive or swarthy, not black. So through using this passage they think that they can prove that Paul was black as the Roman captain thought he was an Egyptian. How bizarre can this weird concept get?

So what colour was this alleged Egyptian and what would an Egyptian be doing leading an insurrection of 4,000 murderers? Who were the biggest trouble makers and murderers that the Romans had to deal with in these parts of the Roman Empire? I will give you one guess. Yes that’s right – the Canaanite Jews – The Zealots who looked white even though they were, and are, not white and do not claim to be white.

In verse 39 we read Paul declaring that HE WAS A MAN!!! Now why would he make such a strange declaration? Did he think the chief captain was blind or even stupid? No, not at all, Paul was making it clear that he was not a hu-man, not a snake-man – not a viper man – not a serpent man from The Garden and Canaan post flood – not a Canaanite Jew.

Make sure you understand, folks, that Paul was a white Semitic Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin – fair skinned, not a Canaanite Jew or a black Canaanite. Modern day Benjaminites are the Nordic Nations of Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/Israel%20Not%20Captiv%20%5BA%5D.htm

Please note, the information in the above link, although very helpful, is not 100% accurate, especially when speaking of the Canaanite Jews. Canaanite Jews were NOT Edomites.

OK what do we have next?

Numbers 6:5 (KJV) All the days of the vow of his separation there shall no razor come upon his head: until the days be fulfilled, in the which he separateth himself unto the LORD, he shall be holy, and shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow. (Emphasis mine)

Now I presume these dolts read ‘blacks with their dreadlocks’ into this verse. LOL. Oh yeah marn – pass dat weed marn. Where’s Bob Marley when you need him? Absolutely hilarious.

As shown above, Nazerites were WHITE Israelites that decided to set themselves apart from the rest of Israelite society and make the Nazerite vow in the early days of Ancient Israel. This meant they would not shave their hair and allow it to grow, nor drink any alchohol or fruit of the vine, nor touch a dead body. You can read all the other details in Numbers chapter 6, but rest assured it has nothing to do with blacks and their dreadlocks. LOL

Next up and even more laughable, Jeremiah 8:21

Jeremiah 8:21 (KJV) For the hurt of the daughter of my people am I hurt; I am black; astonishment hath taken hold on me. (Emphasis mine)

Now believe it or not they actually construe this as a reference to skin colour. Unbelievable or what? In Truth this idea is beyond laughable and brings shame upon black people in general through the dumb ignorance of such a distorted and false interpretation.

In these verses from Jeremiah 8 we are getting a description of his reactions of what he is witnessing, that is, the seige and sacking of Jerusalem by the Babylonians with no signs of any repentance displayed by the Israelite occupants of that city. Jeremiah is stunned, traumatised, astonished, shocked and dismayed beyond anything we can begin to imagine or measure. He is hurt to his heart which is filled with a dark foreboding – a spiritual blackness and his countenance shows it through a metaphorical darkening of his face through mourning. No doubt he would have looked distraught, pale and drawn, devoid of expression. Strong’s describes it as ashen. Rest assured, though, and, as I have already proven above, Jeremiah, being an Israelite, was not a black man.

OK next verse, Hebrews 1:3:

Hebrews 1:3 (KJV) Who being the brightness of His Glory, and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by The Word of His Power, when he had by Himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of The Majesty on high.

Now this one has me beat so if any of you can make a connection between this verse and blacks I will be very interested to hear it, if only for humour value.

Next verse, Ezekiel 8:3:

Ezekiel 8:3 (KJV) And he put forth the form of an hand, and took me by a lock of mine head; and The Spirit lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the visions of God to Jerusalem, to the door of the inner gate that looketh toward the north; where was the seat of the image of jealousy, which provoketh to jealousy.

I presume here that we are back to the dreadlocks nonsense and is if white people do not have locks of hair on their heads. Curiouser and curiouser ‘Cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English).’

Next verse, Genesis 2:7:

Genesis 2:7 (KJV) And The LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Now this one is even more surreal, because these blacks presume that Adam and Eve were brown instead of white. Through their wishful thinking they reason that because the dust MUST HAVE BEEN BROWN, Adam and Eve were therefore brown or worse, black!!!

Interestingly I challenged one of these idiots on social media comments by stating for the record that here in the UK, in Cornwall, we have white clay or white dust and I put it to him that there must have been white clay or dust in The Garden in order that Adam and Eve be created WHITE in order for him to blush and I will post from Strong’s again:

Adam: H119 – ‘âdam – aw-dam’: To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: – be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

Now I don’t know about you, but I don’t EVER remember seeing a black man turn rosy or flush red in the face. Perhaps they go from from one shade of black to another shade of black that no one would ever notice.

And with that I will call it a cut and continue with more of their laughable interpretations in part 9.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 7 – A Recap and More Crucial History

By way of a recap the first six parts of this series of articles are a revelation of the subversive racial, political and anti-white motives behind the Black Liberation Theology, Black Jesus blasphemy. As proven in those articles, the satanic Bolshevik Marxist Jews are, and have always been, the driving force behind this satanic anti-Christ anti-white movement with its, more than willing, demonic deluded blacks as the foot soldiers.

If any of you have any doubts about this, I quote these comments as evidence:

“While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

– Israel Cohen, 1912, Jewish Secretary of The World Zionist Organisation and co-founder of The Fabian Marxist Society with George Bernard Shaw and Israel Zengwill, author of “The Melting Pot” in 1910.

That same quote in full:

“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.

– Thomas Abernethy, Republican Congressman of Mississippi, June 7th 1957 during a debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1957

What I find interesting, too, is the overtime that Canaanite Jewish owned and controlled sites like Wikipedia put into claiming that these quotes are forgeries, when they are from a well researched historian and honourable Christian man by the name of Eustace Mullins.

These lying shysters then build their feeble forgery claim on the minor issue of Mullin’s claim that Israel Cohen was a member of the British Communist Party in 1912 when officially the British Communist Party did not come into existence until 1920. However, what they conveniently forget to mention is that The British Socialist Party came into existence in 1911, with members of this group then splintering off and forming the British Communist Party in 1920. This means that unofficially the British Communist Party was in existence in 1912 and no doubt Mullins correctly saw no difference between the two. Always remember these golden rules folks and by their own admission:

“Democracy is indispensable to Socialism.” – V. I. Lenin

“Socialism leads to Communism.” – Karl Marx

Furthermore, Cohen did write a book titled: “A Racial-Program for the 20th Century.” with the above excerpt published in the Washington D.C. Evening Star in May 1957,

From: “The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations”, by Myron Fagan.

Notice, too, the open admission: “we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros.”

Nevermind that the Canaanite-Jews were by far the most active force involved in the black slave trade, for which they bear not one atom of guilt nor any remorse. Well being Serpent Seed snake creatures without a conscience why would they feel guilty? A total impossibility.

OK I think that completes the early historical foundation of this evil satanic business so we now move on to more recent events and when this Black Jesus garbage came into being in its modern guise.

“No body heard of black Hebrew or black Israelite’s until the 70’s when your cult was invented in Harlem and the ghettos of the South side of Chicago”

– Avrumeleh Melamid, a Youtube commentator

Now in Truth I cannot verify the information in the above comment, but it doesn’t sound unreasonable when we compare it to what Wiki has to say on the subject:

“Many Black Hebrew groups were founded in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, from Kansas to New York City, by both Americans and West Indian immigrants. In the mid-1980s, the number of Black Hebrews in the United States was between 25,000 and 40,000. In the 1990s, the Alliance of Black Jews (which is no longer operating) estimated that there were 200,000 African-American Jews; this estimate was based on a 1990 survey conducted by the Council of Jewish Federations.”

So here we can see that there has been a recent surge in growth of these deluded black people who even tried to gain citizenship in the unlawful state of Israel, only to be deported as aliens by the Canaanite Jews – who continue to reject these blacks and their whack job claims as being Jews and/or descendants of the Israelites.

In part 8 I will deal with some of the Holy Scriptures that these people twist, pervert and distort in order to try and prove their whacky satanic claims.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 6 – Martin Luther King, Jr – born Michael King

“Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968) was America’s most visible civil rights leader from 1955 until his assassination in April, 1968 in Memphis, Tennessee. Though he cannot be called a formal participant in the black theology movement, he nevertheless roused the conscience of black America to passionate commitment to liberation.

“King was an advocate of Ghandian nonviolent social change. Through nonviolent suffering, King believed that “blacks would not only liberate themselves from the necessity of bitterness and the feeling of inferiority toward whites, but would also prick the conscience of whites and liberate them from a feeling of superiority.”[11] To some, King’s assassination indicated that nonviolence as a means of liberation had failed and that perhaps a more revolutionary theology was needed.”

Once more from: Reasoning from The Scriptures Ministries web page.

Now the above “icing sugar” piece tells us one or four things: 1) He wasn’t a part of Black Liberation Theology and yet his aims were more or less the same as those of the Black Liberation Theology Movement. 2) This means if we dig a little deeper into King’s history and background will we find the same Bolshevik Marxist Jew influence and agenda live and operational as with Black Liberation Theology? 3) Notice the Jew fed black arrogance regarding whites needing their consciences pricked. This is the self-righteous hypocritical 21st century Pharisee Jews at their best with their poisoning the minds of black people and thereby duping them. 4) Taking the last comment above: “To some, King’s assassination indicated that nonviolence as a means of liberation had failed and that perhaps a more revolutionary theology was needed.”

This means two things: 1) we have to ask, was King always a patsy for the Bolshevik Marxist Jews with his assassination being just a part of their plan to foment more anti-white feelings amongst blacks and amongst guilt ridden treacherous PC Cultural Marxist liberal white traitors? And 2) To use it as an excuse to stoke outright rebellion and violence on the streets of America.

Moreover whilst speaking of guilt ridden treacherous PC Cultural Marxist liberal white traitors we are led to Grundy County, Tennessee, in the USA and a place, very innocently, called The Highlander Folk School and man by the name of Myles Hortorn (1905-1990):

“When people think of the Civil Rights Movement, they often think of Selma, Montgomery, Atlanta or Memphis. Maybe they should think of Grundy County, Tennessee.

“After all, it was at the Highlander Folk School in Grundy County where early civil rights strategy was mapped out. At Highlander, white and black activists — including as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks — regularly met in the 1950s and talked about how they might change the South, and here that many people trained for the Civil Rights Movement.”

From the “TN History for Kids” web page.

Notice we have white and black activists and Rosa Parks of refusing to move out of Montgomery bus seat fame. We also have Ralph Abernathy, close friend of Martin Luther King, Jr. who became the National President of SCLC – the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

“Ralph Abernathy, National President of SCLC was named as a sponsor of the Communist Party USA dominated National Anti-Imperialist Conference in Solidarity With African Liberation held at Dunbar Vocational High School, Martin Luther King Drive, Chicago, October 19 to 21 1973”

The Southern Christian Leadership Conference leads us to a Bolshevik Marxist Jew by the name of Stanley Levison who was a Communist Party USA member and mentor to Martin Luther King, Jr:

“Ella J. Baker and her fellow African-American civil-rights activist Bayard Rustin introduced secret Communist Party USA member Stanley Levison to Martin Luther King, Jr. A special relationship developed; from the late 1950s until King’s death, in 1968, it was without a doubt King’s closest friendship with a white person. In December of 1956 and January of 1957 Levison served as Rustin’s primary sounding board as Rustin drew up the founding-agenda documents for what came to be called the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.”

From the Keywiki web page

Baker and Rustin were both Socialist Party USA members or as bad as Communists. Always remember folks that Democracy and Socialism always lead to Communism as confirmed by the satanic founders:

“Democracy is indispensable to Socialism.” – V. I. Lenin

“Socialism leads to Communism.” – Karl Marx

“The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation.” – V. I. Lenin

Notice, too, the fatal error of referring to Levison as white man when Jews are not white and nor do they see themselves as white. In Truth they have more in common racially with blacks than they do with whites.

OK returning to Myles Horton the founder of The Highlander Folk School:

“Because it was so controversial, the Highlander Folk School was shut down by the state government and its assets seized.”
A Training School for Communists, Highlander Folk School Monteagle
King is marked as number 1

As we can see this innocent sounding Highlander Folk School was not quite as innocent as it sounded. Furthermore, in this Myles Horton individual we have a very misguided mainstream Christian (when are they not misguided) who thought it was A OK to blend satanic Commie politics into his Christian beliefs and to incorporate a secular worldly crusade for black Americans. Do these wretched people ever read a Bible:

2 Peter 2:20-22 (KJV) For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of The Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. 21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the Holy Commandment delivered unto them. 22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire. (Emphasis mine)

Horton was a known radical of his day and received a cheque for $100 from Eleanor Roosevelt in support of the Highlander Folk School. She was a known Bolshevik Marxist like her war mongering Jewish Communist agent husband. I cannot call these people traitors because they weren’t Americans and should have been executed as spies.

So the $64,000 questions: 1) Was Michael King alias Martin Luther King, Jr a Communist traitor? I would state for the record, not officially or openly, but secretly yes. 2) Was he an anti-white enemy of the white people of the USA? Most definitely. 3) Was he a Jew tool and patsy? Again most definitely. 4) Was he assassinated by agencies of the Jew controlled US Government? Oh yes.

MUST SEE VIDEO Michael King Jr. was a Phony American Hating Communist Sexual Degenerate:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9tRMbdR5YfQR/

Part 7 will follow soon.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 5 – James Cone, Black Liberation Theologian

In part two I mentioned a few of the early agents provocateur in what I call The Black Rebellion, but for this stage of the exposé I will now focus on the more recent principal characters starting with:

James Cone (1938-) Theologian of Black Liberation Theology: “In assessing the theology of James Cone, it is critical to recognize that he sees black experience as the fundamental starting point for ascertaining theological truth. And his own writings are a reflection of his own “black experience” – that is, the discrimination he suffered while growing up as a child in Bearden, Arkansas.”

Again, from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

Notice immediately the oxymoron being applied here – ‘theological truth’. Look folks, there is very little, if any, Truth in theology. Theology is primarily the vain philosophical thinking, logic, reasoning and ramblings of carnal minded Spiritually dead men. This rebellious mindset then produces their own creation, a creation of a god in their image and with it fake doctrines and fake spirituallity. THAT’S IT!! There really is nothing more that can be said about theology, black liberation theology or otherwise, and yet Cone uses his ‘life experiences’ as a young black upon which to build his foundation of so called ‘theological truth’.

It is also from this erroneous thinking that comes the idea of blacks being an oppressed people in the USA when they are no such thing. If blacks are oppressed then they are oppressed by the Canaanite Jew with his victimhood programming and, in turn, by their own people who have swallowed this victimhood snake oil wholesale. Furthermore, if we want to play the victimhood game then ALL PEOPLE are victims of the Canaanite-Jews and their THIEVING USURY which has impoverished THE WHOLE WORLD!! Make no mistake dear people CANAANITE JEW USURY is a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Moreover and at the same time he mentions ‘discrimination’ whilst having been born into a white ‘might is right’ environment. How could there not be be any discrimination, when he is a minority black alien, whose grandparents were most likely the serfs of white people, residing in a nation still ruled by white people? What does he expect? Preferential treatment!!?? It is in the nature of man to look after his own and if some blacks are not up to it why blame the white man? Had he behaved this way in Soviet Russia he would have been in a Gulag quicker than he could have said Uncle Tom’s Cabin – never to be seen or heard of again!!

From the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.””

Now why would people, (I presume this accusation is toward white people), define black people as evil? Is this an unjust conclusion to come to? Well to apply it as a blanket description obviously, yes, because there are good black people, but is the accusation totally without foundation? No and here is the proof:

From the “Council of Conservative Citizens” web page, “The Truth About Interracial Rape.”

“Presently the FBI appears to have only published the full statistical tables up to year 2008. After that the FBI website only has smaller “bulletins” that do not include the full data.

“From this data we find that blacks commit sexual assault against almost as many whites as blacks. However, white on black sexual assault is an extreme rarity.

“Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
Black on White: 20,309
Black on Black: 21,104

“Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Black on Black: 35,330

“Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Black on Black: 36, 620

Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Black on Black: 7,705

“Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Black on Black: 12,780

“Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Black on Black: 34,841

“Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Black on Black: 148,380

“Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
Black on Black: 24,730”

Let me be clear, I don’t like statistics, in fact I hate them and for obvious reasons, as they are easily distorted and become worse than outright lies if used by disingenuous people or lying dissemblers. However, I have quoted these figures for one purpose only and that is to show how the idea that black people are oppressed by the white man does not reveal itself in this data. If anything it reveals the opposite or The Truth that it is the white man and especially the white woman that is oppressed and violently abused by the black man.

Notice, too, how the full data figures ceased to be available when the anti-white, lying racist war criminal Barack Obama became president in 2008!! Coincidence?? I will leave you to decide for yourselves.

Back to James Cone whose name incidently is just a play on the name Cain, so that you know who he is descended from. So what else do we know about James (Cain) Cone?

Again from the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“The chief architect of black liberation theology was James Cone, author of Black Theology and Black Power. One of the tasks of this movement, according to Cone, is to analyze the nature of the gospel of Jesus Christ in light of the experience of blacks who have long been victimized by white oppressors. According to black liberation theology, the inherent racism of white people precludes them from being able to recognize the humanity of nonwhites; moreover, their white supremacist orientation allegedly results in the establishment of a “white theology” that is irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. Consequently, liberation theologians contend that blacks need their own, race-specific theology to affirm their identity and their worth.”

Here we can see James (Cain) Cone’s satanic credentials, for it turns out that he is the chief architect of Black Liberation Theology and the author of Black Theology and Black Power. This sounds to me like he is an outright enemy of white people and no more a Christian than my neighbour’s cat.

Moreover, notice, the use of the emotionally charged PC Bolshevik Marxist term “white supremacist” and how it’s viewed as irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. I would counter with the question: When were supremacist whites EVER CONNECTED to the black experience!!?? Who thinks up all this satanic nonsense?

OK let’s have some WHITE EXPERIENCE!!! I was raised in an originally ALL WHITE London and watched it being deliberately invaded and overrun through the 60s, 70s and 80s by West Indians, Indians, Pakistanis, Turks and Greeks and at no time did I ever feel connected to any of them, nor them to me. Cultural remoteness was the order of the day, so what’s all this meaningless nonsense about disconnection from the black experience when there was never a connection in the first place? London today with whites a minority is no longer a white English city – it’s an alien hell hole.

Here’s another thing, why is white supremacy painted in a negative light and who would conjure up such a term and use it to beat up white people? What does the term conjure up in your mind, for it causes me no problems at all? I look at what the white man has achieved down through the centuries and it looks pretty impressive to me and makes the white man look supreme, so what’s with this issue of whites being supreme that these other races have a problem with, especially blacks and Canaanite Jews? Jealousy and envy perhaps?

Continuing again…

““What we need,” says Cone, “is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of Black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.” Observing that America was founded for white people, Cone calls for “the destruction of whiteness, which is the source of human misery in the world.” He advocates the use of Marxism as a tool of social analysis to help Christians to see “how things really are.””

Notice in true Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jew fashion he calls for “the destruction of whiteness”. Remember my earlier quote? If not, here it is again:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

So is James (Cain) Cone looking to help Christians see: “how things really are” from Yashua Messiah’s perspective, that is, through a Christian prism or through the satanic twisted and poisonous anti-white Bolshevik Marxist prism of Karl Marx and Friedrick Engels and the Canaanite Jews? Again no prizes for the right answer.

Part 6 coming soon.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 4 – Black Liberation Theology and its Marionettes

Having digressed somewhat in part three I will now return to the subject of Black Theology with the introduction of Black Liberation Theology.

Black Liberation Theology

From The Acton Institute web page:

“What is Black Liberation Theology anyway? Barack Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright catapulted black liberation theology onto a national stage, when America discovered Trinity United Church of Christ. Understanding the background of the movement might give better clarity into Wright’s recent vitriolic preaching. A clear definition of black theology was first given formulation in 1969 by the National Committee of Black Church Men in the midst of the civil-rights movement:”

OK so what have we got going on here? It seems that the Bolshevik Marxist Jew Obama (Obama is Jewish from his mother) is also a disciple of Black Liberation Theology and the anti-white racist, Black Jesus promoting, Jeremiah Wright. If we add in Obama’s fake Muslim personna we can begin to see what a total lying fraud Obama has always been.

So does all this evidence make the Bolshevik Marxist Jew Obama an anti-white racist bigot and a hater of American white people? No prizes for the right answer and don’t you just love my use of those Social Justice Warrior terms ‘racist’ ‘bigot’ and ‘hater’ in their right and proper context?

Moreover, this evidence also proves that the promotion and promulgation of the satanic Black Jesus propaganda comes from the very top, that is, The Obama Administration itself and most likely via the CIA and the anti-Christ Mossad.

As an aside I will draw your attention to the satanic name of Wright’s ‘church’ –
TRINITY United Church of Christ!

Continuing from The Acton Institute web page:

“Black theology is a theology of black liberation. It seeks to plumb the black condition in the light of God’s revelation in Jesus Christ, so that the black community can see that the gospel is commensurate with the achievements of black humanity. Black theology is a theology of ‘blackness.’ It is the affirmation of black humanity that emancipates black people from White racism, thus providing authentic freedom for both white and black people. It affirms the humanity of white people in that it says ‘No’ to the encroachment of white oppression.”

Now in the above piece we can see meaningless vain theology at its best, or should I say at its worst? It refers to ‘the black condition’ in relation to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), but what has that got to do with anything? A True Christian is CALLED by The Father to His Son and he or she then has to TAKE UP THEIR CROSS and follow Yashua Messiah. This is not an easy ride for ANY Christian, it is a life of trials, of facing abusive opposition, of mockings and ridicule and sometimes severe persecution, so why do SOME blacks see themselves as a special ‘woe is me’ case when highlighting ‘the black condition’? Are they looking for a special dispensation from Yashua Messiah?

It then says: “so that the black community can see that the gospel is commensurate with the achievements of black humanity.” I am not going to be drawn into a futile discussion on the achievements of black humanity, but is The Gospel commensurate (equal to) the achievements of black humanity?

Do these people actually KNOW what The Gospel message is!!?? In a nutshell it is the Good News of the coming Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years, followed by a New Heaven (atmosphere) and a New Earth that will come down from Heaven with The Father. It really has nothing to do with the achievements of ANY racial group, let alone black humanity, so I do hope you can see the nonsense in all this narcissistic racial theological waffle. They just make it up with terms like this: “Black theology is a theology of ‘blackness’.” WOW!

It then says: “It is the affirmation of black humanity that emancipates black people from White racism, thus providing authentic freedom for both white and black people.” Here’s a question: Why does black humanity need affirming and affirmation from whom? White folks!!!???? Where does all this insecurity come from? Surely not from black humanity itself!! And again what’s with all this white racism – do they not have a black president? How black does America have to become before all this alleged white racism disappears? Oh yes, totally black with no whites at all and then the Hispanics and Italians (far more racist than whites) and other races can listen to their non stop whingeing.

Did you also notice how ‘beneficial’ all this affirmation for blacks is going to be for whites? It will free white people too. How does that work exactly when white people need no affirmation from anyone especially in their own country? As already hinted, is all this gumpf just a form of anti-Semitic victimhood for blacks and really just inverted anti-white racism?

OK, moving on, we next have this from the same author:

“In the 1960s, black churches began to focus their attention beyond helping blacks cope with national racial discrimination particularly in urban areas.”

When I read falacious overarching generalised statements like the above I always find it interesting how these disgruntled black people have never considered helping their fellow whingers to return to Africa where, I presume, there would be no ‘national racial discrimination’ and where they could cope. For example, let’s say to the West African nations of the Ivory Coast, Senegal and The Gambia where, I believe, most of the blacks slaves originally came from.

For the last time we have this from The Acton Institute web page:

“The notion of “blackness” is not merely a reference to skin color, but rather is a symbol of oppression that can be applied to all persons of color who have a history of oppression (except whites, of course). So in this sense, as Wright notes, “Jesus was a poor black man” because he lived in oppression at the hands of “rich white people.” The overall emphasis of Black Liberation Theology is the black struggle for liberation from various forms of “white racism” and oppression.”

– Anthony B. Bradley, “The Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology.”

Notice from the opening remark of this paragraph, how we are no longer dealing with American blacks but have moved on to: all persons of color who have a history of oppression.” This is classic Bolshevik Marxist Jew Internationalism, this is how they think and they can never think in nationalistic terms even though they have their unlawful State of Israel (not acknowledged by many Jews). This also proves that through Black Liberation Theology they are just making use of gullible duped American blacks to further their anti-white genocidal agenda. In Truth, they couldn’t care less about ‘oppressed blacks’, as already proved by their ancestor’s very active role in the black slave trade.

Notice, too, that this Jeremiah Wright idiot has swallowed wholesale the Black Jesus garbage. He also makes another error of calling Yashua Messiah poor when his step-father Joseph was a successful carpenter and builder who died whilst Yashua Messiah was still quite young. His wealthy great-uncle (Miriam’s [Mary’s] uncle) Joseph of Arimathea, the ship owning tin and gold merchant, then took Him under his wing, so rest assured Yashua Messiah never knew poverty.

Finally it says: “The overall emphasis of Black Liberation Theology is the black struggle for liberation from various forms of “white racism” and oppression.”

Now what and who does this statement remind us of? If I mention the name Barabbus will that help you? In the early first century, elements of the Canaanite-Jews were zealots fighting against the occupying Roman forces who were oppressing them.

However, did Yashua Messiah rally His followers to join these zealots and their movement in order to free themselves from Roman oppression? Did He whinge and whine and accuse the Romans of racism, hate speech and bigotry?? Answer: No He did not, but what He did say to Pontius Pilate is this:

John 18:36 (KJV) Jesus answered, My Kingdom is not of this world: if my Kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to The Jews: but now is my Kingdom not from hence.

Ever notice how Yashua Messiah did not say to Pilate: “That I should not be delivered to YOU (Pilate), but that I should not be delivered to the Canaanite-Jews.”

Part 5 coming up.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 3 – Liberation Theology

As briefly mentioned in part two the Liberation Theology Movement was an intrinsic element to the historical foundation of the Black Rebellion which in turn was cooked up and hitched onto this Black Jesus/Black Israelites nonsense.

“Liberation theology has been described as “an interpretation of Christian faith out of the experience of the poor…an attempt to read the Bible and key Christian doctrines with the eyes of the poor”, or “the message of the gospels”, restored from “the first three centuries [of Christianity in which] it was … a pacifist … religion of the poor”. Detractors have called it Christianized Marxism.

– From Wikipedia – Liberation Theology

OK, Liberation Theology, let’s get this one sorted first and at the same time reveal the deceptive nature of this subject and its un-Scriptural origins. First and foremost Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was not the least bit interested in liberty (from whence comes the word liberation) nor was He the least bit interested in theology.

Why was He not interested in liberty or liberation? because liberty is a benefit privelige granted by masters to their slaves – period! Make sure you understand this devious deception. Liberty is NOT freedom and it is freedom that Yashua Messiah gives us, not liberty and He tells us so twice:

John 8:32 (KJV) And ye shall know The Truth, and The Truth shall make you FREE.

John 8:36 (KJV) If the Son therefore shall make you FREE, ye shall be FREE INDEED. (All emphasis mine)

The Truth shall make you free, not that The Truth shall set you at liberty and who is The Truth? Yashua Messiah is The Truth.

Right! Theology, what’s that? Vain deceit, Bible intellectualism and philosophy and The Truth it is NOT. Paul warned the Congregations of God about it in no uncertain terms:

Colossians 2:8 (KJV) BEWARE lest any man spoil you through PHILOSOPHY and VAIN DECEIT, AFTER THE TRADITION OF MEN, AFTER THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD, and not after Christ. (All emphasis mine)

Hellenising philosophers (the original theologians) out of Alexandria in the late first century founded what we know today as the Christian Religion and which I ‘affectionately’ call The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. These creatures were and are referred to as the ‘Church Fathers’, which they were not. They were the founders of the counterfeit Christian Religion. This includes Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, Anglicanism and Protestantism in ALL its denominational guises. This obviously includes Pentecostalism which is the favourite denomination (demon-ination) of black people.

Dear people make sure you fully grasp this Truth. Yashua Messiah was NOT a theologian, the Learners (disciples) were not theologians and real Christians are NOT theologians. Theology, like philosophy = vain deceit.

Having exposed the above I have now set the foundations of this discourse by exposing its futility through the ignorance of the creatures involved, who considered themselves knowledgeable and enlightened when all the while they were duped blind guides who operated in total darkness and still do to this day.

Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

Returning to the Wiki quote above you will have noticed that I enboldened the phrase: “Detractors have called it Christianized Marxism.” Now this statement is very deceptive and in true Wiki style very economical with The Truth, because Liberation Theology has ALWAYS been a Christian Marxist Theology with very little, if any, Jesus Christ in it at all, but plenty of satanic Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels holding sway.

So what does this mean? It means that Liberation Theology is just a Bolshevik Marxist revolutionary movement with Christian wall paper stuck all over it.

“As to the movement itself, it was mainly a movement of the religious left, in which Marxist analysis of economic and social conditions was given a very high place.”

“Some of the main figures in this movement back then were Gustavo Gutierrez, a Peruvian priest, Jose Miranda, a Mexican theologian, and Jose Miguez-Bonino, an Argentinian Protestant … That there was a very heavy reliance on Marxist thought is indicated in their book titles. For example, Miranda wrote Marx and the Bible (1971) and Miguez-Bonino penned Christians and Marxists: The Mutual Challenge to Revolution (1976).”

– Bill Muehlenberg’s Culture Watch web page.

The above gives us more proof as to the involvement of the Canaanite Jews in Liberation Theology who are ALWAYS behind Bolshevik Marxist movements.

Black Theology

Briefly, Black Theology is a title that covers a variety of Black Liberation Theologies, for there are more than one but, in general, Black Theology took most of its ideas from Latin American Liberation Theology with all its Bolshevik Marxist revolutionary leftist leanings. However the actual modus operandi of those involved in Black Theology is to give it a Christianised spin or flavour thereby hiding its Bolshevik Marxist core and Canaanite Jew, Bolshevik Marxist anti-white agenda.

So what, in a nutshell, is Black Theology? Answer: It is alleged to be a Christian Theology from the view point of an oppressed people, namely the blacks. Hello!!?? Excuse me!! Yes, I will re-state that: It is alleged to be a Christian Theology from the view point of an oppressed people, namely the blacks.

Now is it just me or do you get that old whingeing victimhood feeling that we are so used to hearing from the Canaanite Jews which the blacks have adopted as their own?? Yes, you bet your life I do, but I will leave it for you to make up your own minds. I will be returning to this emotionally driven nonsense later.

First, though, let’s focus our attention on the first century Christians for a while and ask ourselves this question: Were the early Christians oppressed? Again HELLO – EXCUSE ME!!?? And yes I will repeat that too. Were the early Christians oppressed? Yes oppressed, persecuted, imprisoned, tortured, and slain in all manner of brutal and savage ways – but do we ever hear about them whingeing and whining re the lot or hand that their Christian life had dealt them??????? Not a bit of it and if they did we are certainly not told about it, so what’s with all this WOE IS ME BS – THE WHITE MAN OWES ME garbage we hear continually from the Canaanite Jews and their black dupes? I’ll tell you – Bolshevik Jew Marxist anti-white hatred and racism using guilt laden emotional blackmail to brow-beat and attack generally good natured and tolerant white people.

Whiteness

From that you may say: “Don’t be daft, Canaanite Jews are white too.” However you would be very wrong for Canaanite Jews are Hamitic, NOT Semitic and Ham was the forefather of ALL olive, swarthy, light brown and black peoples. Here we get a Canaanite Jew openly admitting that he is not white and no longer wants to be seen as white:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

Notice the REAL HATRED within that piece and then realise how they have transferred that hateful mindset across to certain gullible black people using Bolshevik Marxism and the long past involuntary servitude nutmeg to keep the wounds open.

OK that’s it for Part 3

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 2 – The Historical Foundation

The Historical Foundation…

…but first, The Unwritten Historical Foundation to The Historical Foundation and the revealing of the ‘certain race’.

Before I press on there are two CRUCIAL things that MUST BE clarified, for these are issues that are NEVER raised in these discussions about blacks in involuntary servitude (erroneously called slavery), whether in The Caribbean or The Americas, and the first issue is the MIGHT IS RIGHT issue which always gets conveniently ignored.

Let’s be honest, (and leaving aside the issue of whether it is right or wrong under might is right), a hu-man being in neck braces and ankle chains has no rights at all – none whatsoever. He is totally at the mercy of his owner. How he is treated is totally dependent upon the kindness and benevolence of the owner or the ruthless cruelty of the owner. The servant cannot complain, he has no hu-man rights and if he was a black serf in Brazil or in a Spanish American colony his life expectancy was three years – tops. Some might say they were the lucky ones. In the American Plantations and Caribbean things were better.

However, as a contrast and comparison, I will now introduce the Orthodox Christian Russians who, in 1917 and the years that followed, were captured in their hundreds of thousands, leading to millions, and either executed on the spot or sent to the Gulags and deliberately worked to death by the Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jews (the certain race). Did these white Russian people have any hu-man rights? Did they have a Liberation Theology Movement that was allowed by the Soviet Government to speak up for them? Did ANYONE speak up for them and demand that they be set free?

Was there a Civil Rights Movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, 1930s, 40’s and 50’s demanding equality and compensation for the families of those that had lost loved ones? Was anyone charged with genocide or crimes against humanity as with the comparatively innocent Nazis at Nuremberg (ALL tortured for their ‘confessions’)? Was anyone made to feel guilty for their wicked evil genocidal RACIST past? Not on your life – not a whisper was heard – all was swept under the carpet and forgotten by the new Glasnost ‘friendly’ Russian authorities and the slimey duplicitous hypocritical Cultural Jew Marxist leftie, Socialist, Commie, liberal west, including the scum at the satanic cesspit known as The UN.

So what point am I making here? Well, quite obviously, it’s the bizarre idea that Anglo-Saxons, Celts and those of Nordic descent – The Israelites of America and Britain have to be permanently reminded of their ‘wicked ancestor’s’ past activities and behaviour and as if THEY were the only ones. So what kind of two faced double standards are being applied here?

This weird hypocritic phenomenon is then compounded by spineless white acquiescence and in some cases, guilt ridden shameful grovelling with these treacherous white wretches walking around with: “I am so sorry” placards hanging round their vile necks!!!

When was the last time you saw a Canaanite Jew even admit to the genocide of the appropriately named White Russians, let alone apologise for their satanic blood lust psychopathic murderous behaviour? Answer: You haven’t, nor will you ever until this verminous viper race is standing before Yashua Messiah’s Throne – His Judgement Seat – then you will see some real grovelling.

I would advise you dear readers to do your research into the Jews and their all encompassing involvement in the Bolshevik Marxist Revolution which was financed out of The City of London (The Rothschilds) and Wall Street.

OK that is the first crucial thing never mentioned and the second is the Canaanite Jews and their actual HANDS ON involvement with the Black Slave Trade with many of the slave ships being Jewish owned, which obviously included their modification and adaptation to carry hu-man cargo.

We then have many Canaanite Jews who changed their names to Spanish and other European sounding names in order to hide their true nationality. They organised the capture of slaves in Africa. They organised the slave auctions in the Caribbean and the Americas and they were into supplies and provisions to the plantations. In other words wherever a fast buck was to be made within this inhuman trafficking of blacks, the Canaanite Jew was in there. OY VEY!!!

For more in depth information on this subject please web search Professor of Black History, Tony Martin (now deceased) for all the details.

From Wiki: Martin died unexpectedly on January 17, 2013, aged 70, at Westshore Medical Hospital, Cocorite, Trinidad.

Strange how that always seems to happen to people of The Truth.

Right, having laid down the Unwritten Historical Foundation, I will attempt to lay down the The Historical Foundation.

First, some history on American Blacks and their ambitions for equality with American Whites and, in particular, with American Anglo-Saxon Israelites – The Tribe of Manasseh. Here is what two famous white Americans had to say on the subject:

“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about, in any way, the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not, nor ever have been in favour of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must the position of superior and inferior. And I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

– Abraham Lincoln, in his fourth debate with Stephen Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18th 1858

“Segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen.”

– Woodrow Wilson, addressing a delegation of black professionals led by Monroe Trotter, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Harvard and Boston newspaper editor, when they appeared at the White House to protest Wilson’s new policies of segregation.

“During Wilson’s first term in office the House passed a law making racial intermarriage a felony in the District of Columbia.”

– Wilson – A Portrait, The Public Broadcasting Service, African-Americans

So, as we can see, this was the racial status quo re white/black relations in the 19th and early 20th centuries out of which grew the racial tensions of the 1950s and 60s and the so called Civil Rights Movement.

However, there were other twists and turns to what I will call The Black Rebellion that more recently came out of something known as South American Liberation Theology or Latin American Liberation Theology and led to Black Theology. Black Theology then led to The Black Rebellion and a movement known as The Black Liberation Theology Movement.

Here are some of the black people, some with their ‘everything and everyone is black’ whacky ideas, who were involved in this anti-white Black Rebellion. Obviously you can do more research of your own into these characters if you wish:

Nat Turner (1800-1831) was the most notorious slave preacher who ever lived on American soil. Turner’s hatred of slavery propelled him to seek freedom by violence. Indeed, Turner killed nearly sixty white people before being captured and hanged in September, 1831. This violent revolt marked the beginning of the black struggle for liberation.

Marcus Garvey (1887-1940) is regarded by many as “the apostle of black theology in the United States of America.”[9] Martin Luther King, Jr., said Garvey “was the first man on a mass scale and level to give millions of Negroes a sense of dignity and destiny, and make the Negro feel he is somebody.”[10] Garvey was one of the first to speak of seeing God through black “spectacles.”

– From the: “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

William Saunders Crowdy (1847-1908) who founded in 1896 one of the first groups of Black Israelites known as the Church of God and Saints of Christ.

“He claimed to have a divine revelation from God that told him that America’s recently emancipated slaves were God’s chosen people, the true Hebrews. According to Black Judaism doctrine, when the Kingdom of Israel was destroyed, the Israelites were first scattered across the African continent and then selectively targeted by enemy African tribes who captured and sold them to European slave traders for bondage in the New World.

“It’s a common myth that slaves were randomly shackled up and carried off to slavery,” “General Yahanna,” leader of the present-day Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge, told the Intelligence Report. Actually, “Slave traders sailed for months and days to get to specific pickup points. They knew what people they were taking — specifically, the lost tribes of Israel.”

– From: “Understanding God’s Word Ministry” Web Page, “False Doctrine – Black Hebrew Israelite Movement”

“Howard Thurman (1899-1981), in his book Jesus and the Disinherited (1949), saw black life paralleling Jesus’ life because His poverty identified Him with the poor masses. Thurman also noted that Jesus was a member of a minority group (the Jews) in the midst of a larger and controlling dominant group (the Romans). Thurman thus drew many applications for the black experience from the life of Jesus.”

– Again from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

More in part three:

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 1

Introduction

Now, dear readers, surprisingly, I am somewhat stunned, and I am stunned that I am actually stunned because, usually, nothing much these days stuns me at all, but this one is an absolute cracker! After 35 years study, this has to be one of the most weird, whacky subjects I have ever encountered, as a Bible scholar and Kingdom of God Gospel messenger for Yashua Messiah who, for the record, was WHITE, as were Adam and Eve – but more on that later.

Moreover, this “Alice in Wonderland” subject, with all its rabbit holes, will take some unravelling, and the reason for that is that it had never before even entered into my mind, that the principal Bible characters were black, until I discovered it recently on YouTube – need I say more? A little chuckle here for the author. However, please stay with it as it will arm you with all the knowledge you will need to counter the satanic ideas of these duped foolish black people.

Having said that, I will say that I had heard of the minor, and misunderstood, issue of the “Black (Canaanite) Jews” in Africa – another sensationalised and over blown topic of little importance, but that was all. This subject, though, is another ball game altogether and far more corrosive to The Truth, due to its saturated evil coverage on YouTube (only the even more whacky and stupid CIA “flat earth” rubbish beats it).

I will also state for the record that due to the insulting anti-white nature of this topic it means, by default, that those of a ‘certain tribe or ethnicity’, or some people of a ‘certain Canaanite race’, have been very busy, putting in overtime, on this racially motivated and divisive anti-white evilness. It also means, that this isn’t just the handiwork of ignorant deceived blacks. In fact, I would classify the blacks involved as brainwashed deluded dupes or pawns and useful idiots for this ‘certain Canaanite race’.

Furthermore, and whilst keeping the ‘certain Canaanite race’ in the background for the moment and whom I will expose, this whole nasty satanic subversive business is compounded by the obsessive fanatical nature and the arrogant belligerent attitudes of the blacks who are promulgating this anti-white garbage across cyberspace, and, as if there is no tomorrow.

Moreover, most, if not all of these blacks, are Spiritually dead and totally incapable of discerning and understanding the Holy Scriptures – Bible scholars they are definitely not!! This, therefore, gives the whole unbelievable thing a surreal and perverted black humour value – pun intentional, due to their Scriptural ignorance. Let me be clear: “YOU WHAT!!!???” or “YOU MUST BE JOKING!!!!” doesn’t even come near with this unbelievable stuff.

OK, so where do we begin in our unravelling of this demonic mayhem? Make no mistake, for this satanic disinformation and/or misinformation did not materialise overnight and the idea wasn’t discovered at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet. Furthermore, as white Semitic people (primarily Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Dutch, Nordics, Gallics, Franks, Germanics and other white Europeans) we need to know who is behind it and what their aims are. Added to which, does this issue form part of a bigger anti-white genocidal conspiracy? Yes, absolutely.

Now you, if you are a PC, Cultural Marxist, Social Justice Warrior (SJW) may say: “Oh yeah, here we go again, yet another dumb delusional conspiracy theory.” And I would say yes, most, if not all conspiracies start out as theories until they are investigated and researched and once proven to be Conspiracies then the word ‘theory’ vanishes like the early morning mist, unless, of course, you are fearful, weak, lazy, cowardly, cognitively dissonant and emotionally unbalanced (an SJW) – a far more serious problem – for you.

“Conspiracy Theorist – a derogatory put-down term dreamt up by the CIA to discredit those who questioned the official narrative of the JFK assassination.”

— David Icke

“Conspiracy Theorist – someone who questions the statements of known liars.”

– Unknown

“Social Justice Warrior – someone who believes the statements of known liars and votes for them.”

– Brother Charles

“A conspiracy theory will remain forever a conspiracy theory until it is met with obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies from government(s) at which point the conspiracy theory defaults automatically to a conspiracy. E.g. the lying bullshit that is the NIST Report on 9/11.”

— Brother Charles

Right! Here we go, The BLACK JESUS and also The BLACK DISCIPLES and The BLACK APOSTLES and The BLACK KING DAVID and The BLACK JACOB/ISRAEL and, of course, the obligatory BLACK ISRAELITES and last but not least how BLACKS INVENTED EVERYTHING!!! = WOW! how amazing is that!!!???? How have we missed these incredible ‘historical truths’??? It’s all looking very BLACK indeed, isn’t it? I fear that us whites have a very DARK future ahead of us. LOL

Now hilarious as all this ridiculous gumpf is, there is even a more mirth filled element to it. According to these black ‘geniuses’ Jacob/Israel was black, but his twin brother Esau was white, red and hairy, as described in the Holy Scriptures and, of course, it’s also claimed by these daft blacks that he’s the forefather of all those ‘wicked’ Confederate Red Necks, just to give this whole subject a very convenient anti-white Southern USA slant or flavour. Clever eh?

Genesis 25:24-25 (KJV) And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her (Rebecca’s) womb. 25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Needless-to-say there is no mention here in The Holy Scriptures of Jacob being black.

So, as already stated, where do we begin? Well the obvious place to start, as with all these things, is with the agenda(s) and to pin point whose agenda and what kind of agenda, for there is ALWAYS AN AGENDA, folks, and it’s always bubbling away somewhere in the background. It NEVER fails.

This, therefore, leads us to ask some very basic questions like, is this strange Black Jesus phenomenon motivated by: 1) religious zeal, 2) politics, 3) hatred (oh how the ‘certain race’ loves that word) on solely anti-white racial grounds, 4) for revenge, 5) or just simple racial jealousy? From my research, thus far, I would say that all these factors come into play, accompanied by the associated and obligatory unhinged emotions. Added to which, all the elements are being deviously and deliberately stirred up by the ‘certain race’ for their anti-white genocidal programme. More in part two.