The DUALITY GODHEAD

The Duality Godhead? What Godhead is that, I hear you ask? Well I’ll tell you straight, right away, They are not a mickey mouse triune godhead, They’re not a Unitarian/Judaic/Islamic monotheistic godhead and They are not a Binatarian godhead either, if that’s what you were thinking.

Now what is a Binatarian godhead? I’ve never heard of such a thing, again I hear you say. OK, so let me explain, a Binatarian godhead is a half-truth so that means it’s a lie just like the monotheistic godhead and the trinity godhead.

Binatarianism is belief in a Duality Godhead that has been corrupted with Triunism and turned into yet another lying hu-man magical construct. This means that instead of a mythical godhead that is one in three and three in one they have constructed a godhead that, like the trinity, it is one in two and two in one – total fallacious religious nonsense. We therefore need to understand that The Godhead consists of TWO DISTINCT Spiritual Beings who are NEVER at anytime one solitary being.

This means that The Duality Godhead are very simple to understand for we are told about Them right at the beginning in Genesis Chapter 1:

Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God (‘Elohim’ – plural) created the heaven and the earth.

There They are, in the very first verse of the Holy Scriptures ‘ELOHIM’ and ‘Elohim’ is the plural of ‘Eloah’, so if the Godhead was ONE GOD, it would have read: “In the beginning God (‘Eloah’ – singular) created the heaven and the earth.” But it DOES NOT SAY THAT it says ‘ELOHIM’ – PLURAL! MORE THAN ONE GOD – THE GODHEAD! Please excuse the shouting folks, but shouting is very necessary for some stiff necked duped people out there who love to hang onto their nonsensical Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious myths = monotheism and/or triunism.

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – H430
אלהים
‘ĕlôhı̂ym
el-o-heem’
Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.

Now pay attention to what Strong is doing here, for he is following a satanic monothesitic agenda and explaining away The Truth by introducing his own irrelevant intellectual nonsense into his definition of ‘Elohim’“but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God;”

Moreover, ignoring his intellectual waffle, ask yourself this very pertinent question: Would a Bible scholar of Strong’s immense calibre, with his excellent knowledge of the Hebrew language, have not known of the word ‘Eloah’ and known its SINGULAR meaning and also have known that ‘Elohim’ was the plural of that singular word? I will leave you all to answer that no brainer question for yourselves.

OK, so we have established from the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that the Godhead is more than one god and this is further confirmed for us in Genesis again:

Genesis 1:26 (first part) (KJV) And God said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness: (Emphasis mine)

Right, now is this claimed solitary mono-god speaking to himself? If not, who is he speaking to – the angels? No way, for I’ll tell you straight, the angels never created anything, and man is definitely not created in the image of angels. This means that if we take the “God is one” nonsense, seriously, it must mean that their god needs certifying, for he is hallucinating and seeing someone in his head that he is now attempting to hold a conversation with. Hilarious or what!?

Having said all that, I can now see all the monotheists jumping up and down, frothing at the mouth, and renting their clothes in true Moloch and Baal worshipping style as they did in Elijah’s day when their mono-god failed to bring down fire to ignite the wet wood, such is their delusional thinking. Not only that, but when I have finished this article the trinity dupes will no doubt have joined them in their manic frenzy. Who said being a follower of Yashua Messiah – The Way was not good fun? LOL

Moving on I will now quote a segment from one of my earlier articles which covers the prime and/or premier “identity of God verse in Deuteronomy”, and we all know it, don’t we? This verse is the verse that nearly all monotheists quote in an attempt to support their erroneous satanic claims:

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Please note, as I disect this verse it will be, in part, a repeat of what I have said above.

“Hear, O Israel” – or better translated “Hear you Israel” or “Listen up you Israelites”, for I, your Lord, have something important to tell you:

“The Lord our God” – properly translated from the Hebrew; The Lord = The Eternal or The Self-Existing. Our God = Our ‘Elohim’ (plural); the Godhead that has always self-existed before time began and was/is always a plural Duality Godhead.

Straight away in this short phrase of Holy Scripture we are told by the use of this word ‘Elohim’ (the plural of ‘Eloah’) that we are dealing with more than one God. Look folks, there is no getting away from this Truth, and we need to get it through our heads that the Hebrew word ‘Eloah’ (singular) would have been in use here, not ‘Elohim’, IF God was one. OK, so we have now ascertained that The Godhead is more than one, and yet it says:

“Is One Lord” – so what’s going on here and what does this mean? The Hebrew word here for ‘one’ is ‘Echad’ which means ‘united’ or ‘in unity’ in one sense, and ‘number one’ the prime number in the other sense, that is, no one higher or no one above – The Most High as wriiten elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures.

One – H259
אחד
‘echâd
ekh-awd’
A numeral from H258; properly united, that is, (as) one; or (as an ordinal) first: – a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any (-thing), apiece, a certain [dai-] ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.

OK, as we can see the word ONE does not mean solitary or one god or a mono-god, for it means UNITED AS ONE, that is, in agreement in thought, word and deed, yet still distinct and separate as Two Spiritual Beings.

A Numeral – H258
אחד
‘âchad
aw-khad’
Perhaps a primitive root; to unify, that is, (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts): – go one way or other.

The primitive root word then confirms this for us – TO UNIFY!! And again this, in turn, means They are not one being, for being united or unified is always an arrangement whereby a number of beings are at one with each other or unanimous in their thoughts, aims and ideals, as in a football team. Newcastle United is a team of individuals united in one aim – to win, but they are not one being, they are eleven distinct beings. This is how it is with the Godhead; they are Two Spiritual Beings, united as one in thought, mind and deed – totally likeminded – united!

This, too, is why The Lord, through Paul, exhorts the Congregations of God to be like the Godhead in their relationships one with another:

Romans 15:5-6 (KJV) Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: 6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even The Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. [Two distinct beings] (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Take note, the Congregations of God were not ONE BEING, but they were exhorted by Paul to be of ONE MIND just like The Father and The Son and like the Godhead of God with God in the beginning who said: “Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness:”

If we now move on to the New Testament we have a new word for the Godhead and that word is the Greek word ‘Theos’ instead of the Hebrew word ‘Elohim’. However we need to be clear that just because a Greek word is now used instead of a Hebrew word doesn’t mean that the nature and make-up of the Duality Godhead has changed. In fact the Greek word ‘theos’ is very useful for this topic for, generally, it means a DEITY and in the Greek sense that means gods plural, for the Greeks were polytheists – they, like the ancient Egyptians, had many gods. As far as I know they did not have a word in their language to describe a monotheistic god. It was only the Jews that worshipped such a deity and they worshipped that deity in error and in ignorance when they knew very well that God ‘Elohim’ was a plural Godhead.

God – G2316
θεός
theos
theh’-os
Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

So there we have it: ‘Theos’ = a deity and in Ancient Greece that would mean more than one god, not a mono-god. Not only that, but because ‘Theos’ is such a general all encompassing word in terms of objects of worship, it means it can be interpreted any way you like, if you have a monotheistic or triunistic agenda to fulfil. Moreover, notice that within this very definition we can see Strong doing just that with all his figurative nonsense regarding ‘magistrates’. With regard to ‘magistrates’ I will leave a link below for additional reading regarding this satanic subject.

Furthermore, because we know that the Godhead does not cause confusion re their identity we can definitely know for sure that plural ‘Theos’ in the NT means exactly the same a plural ‘Elohim’ in the OT – The Duality Godhead with The Holy Spirit as their LIVING POWER.

One last Holy Scripture:

Galatians 3:20 (KJV) Now a mediator is not [a mediator] of one, but God is one.

Now does this verse make any sense? First of all, who is The Mediator that this verse is refering to? Answer: Yashua Messiah. And was Yashua Messiah God come in the flesh? Answer: Yes, hence it states quite plainly that a mediator is not of one, so there has to be more than one in order for one to mediate to the other and yet it then says: “God is one!” So what’s going on here?

Easy, God = ‘Theos’ = ‘Elohim’ = more than one, for the Godhead does not change:

Malachi 3:6 (KJV) For I am The LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. (Emphasis mine)

Here we have Yashua Messiah speaking on behalf of the Godhead, for no one has ever seen or heard The Father:

John 1:18 (KJV) No man hath seen God (The Father) at any time; The Only Begotten Son, which is in the bosom of The Father, He hath declared Him. (Brackets and Emphasis mine)

John 5:37 (KJV) And The Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. YE HAVE NEITHER HEARD HIS VOICE AT ANY TIME, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE. (Emphasis mine)

So there it is folks, NO ONE has ever seen or heard The Father at any time so that must mean that Yashua Messiah was The God of the Old Testament who spoke on behalf of Himself and/or The Father = The Duality Godhead.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/what-is-the-mystery-of-mystery-babylon-the-great/

Brother Charles

Advertisements

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Parts 1 & 2

Prologue

For those of you not familiar with my work for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) please allow me to explain that this series of articles is not for the faint hearted or for those new to my work. This topic is heavy going and could easily be described as a deep end subject, especially if you are a King James Bible (KJV) idolator, that is, you worship the KJV as being inerrant (100% true) – unfortunately a fallacy for the Spiritually blind.

If you are a newbie or a beginner in The Faith I would certainly recommend that you read a few of my other articles, first, in order to give yourself a foundation in The Truth, before attempting this series which, even I, after 35+ years of study, am finding very challenging and in need of much Holy Spiritual guidance in order to put them together.

I do not enjoy being critical of the KJV as I still believe it to be the best English translation of The Holy Scriptures, however when error is discovered in its pages we cannot close our eyes or, more importantly, our hearts and minds, and begin a life of living in denial of The Truth. These issues have to faced head on and confronted and then dealt with. The same applies to fear. Fear has to be confronted, challenged and overcome. Start running from fear and you will never stop running – the coward dies a 1,001 deaths!

Please note, this series is a first attempt at this huge subject and will be ammended and edited as I discover more Truth and expose more errors to add to its pages, but suffice it to say there is most definitely a case for questioning the authenticity of these three Epistles.

Having said that I do not believe that The Pastoral Epistles should be expunged from the The Holy Scriptures, because there is some Truth in them but at the same time those verses of Truth are surrounded by many errors – the errors of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Introduction

The Pastoral Epistles is a name that has been conjured up by someone, or some people, for three of Paul’s letters in the New Testament: 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus. Unofficially included in this grouping is 2 Peter which, allegedly, is also of spurious origin and that is the issue with all four of these books of the New Testament – their questionable authorship.

So where does this title come from, would be my first question regarding this tetchy subject? All the historical information I can find points to the commencement of the 19th century when Bible scholars began to question their authenticity, but I have no idea who originally coined the term. Perhaps someone could shed some Light on it.

From The Bible Hub: “History of the Christian Church, Volume I, Philip Schaff ”

“The three Pastoral Epistles, two to Timothy and one to Titus, form a group by themselves, and represent the last stage of the apostle’s life and labors, with his parting counsels to his beloved disciples and fellow-workers. They show us the transition of the apostolic church from primitive simplicity to a more definite system of doctrine and form of government. This is just what we might expect from the probable time of their composition after the first Roman captivity of Paul, and before the composition of the Apocalypse.”

Philip Schaff was a Calvinist preacher from that 19th century period and we can immediately see that he was of that snobbish, elitist, self-righteous, religious mind set when he condescendingly refered to the first century Congregations of God as having a primitive simplicity. Now pay attention dear people for this arrogant puffed up spirit and attitude is crucial in understanding the same spirit that pervades throughout the Pastoral Epistles. And now for a Holy Scripture that proves my point:

2 Corinthians 11:3 (KJV) But I fear, lest by any means, as The Serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. (Emphasis mine)

Here we can plainly see that Mr Schaff, the Calvinist, had allowed his mind (via Satan’s subtilty) to be corrupted and displayed by his vain disparaging opinion of the first century Congregations of God by calling them primitively simple. Rather him than me when he stands before Yashua Messiah in the first resurrection.

Furthermore, he compounds his vanity by stating, and I quote: “to a more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” So this ignorant man thought, just like the author of the Pastoral Epistles, that the first century church and its TRUE SIMPLE BELIEFS in Yashua Messiah and its simple egalitarian non-structure could be improved upon. Delusional vanity or what!?

As a final point I will raise the issue of the artificial religious construct known as the ‘Apostolic Church’. This term, like so many others created by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, cannot be found in the Holy Scriptures, nor can the word ‘apostolic’, now there’s a surprise. So here’s a question: Did Yashua Messiah come to this earth in order to plant HIS CHURCH – The Church of God or hand it over to His messengers, pompously called apostles, from the Greek word ‘apostolos’, by the religious translators of the KJV, and rename it the Church of The Apostles? For I tell you straight folks, that is exactly what the term ‘Apostolic Church’ means and The Church of God it is not.

Are you beginning to see The Light dear readers? because I have not even started analysing 1 Timothy 1:1 yet and already one of those who would try and support these Epistles as genuine has already been unceremoniously found out!

OK, the problems that are the so-called Pastoral Epistles. As already stated, the Pastoral Epistles constitute 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus. Although not included, 2 Peter also falls into the same questionable category re being authentic Holy Scripture and, not as claimed, as being written by the named authors.

Now with regard to the two books of Timothy and the book of Titus, are they the genuine writings of Paul or of a forger of a later date, as some Bible Scholars confidently declare? Taking that question further, if they are the writings of a forger and, I might add to some degree, a plagiariser, can we even challenge their right to be a part of what they call the Biblical Canon or even the inspired Word of God?

Let’s face it, the Biblical Canon was put together by religious people, with an evil Romish agenda, who would be very happy with the Pastoral Epistles and their content, hence the reasons for their inclusion in that Canon, and their defence of them today as being the authentic writings of Paul.

We need to get this Truth firmly fixed in our minds that the satanic religious spirit that pervaded the second, third and fourth centuries with its Hellenising philosophers still pervades today in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion of the 21st century – NOTHING has changed.

Paul, too, gave us this timeless warning:

Colossians 2:8 (KJV) BEWARE! lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, AND NOT AFTER CHRIST. (Emphasis mine)

Again, let’s be clear, for the aim of second, third and fourth century Hellenising philosophers was ALWAYS the usurping and supplanting of the True Church – the Church of God and putting in its place: “a more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” to quote our ‘friend’ Mr Schaff.

This is the more definite system of the Nicolaitans as mentioned by Yashua Messiah in Revelation TWICE!

Revelation 2:6 (KJV) But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.

Revelation 2:15 (KJV) So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. (All emphasis mine)

Notice that these evil people of the Hellenistic NICOLAITAN persuation had deeds and a DOCTRINE. Now what could those deeds and doctrine have been? The very same deeds and doctrine that Mr Schaff was rambling on about – things allegedly ‘superior’ to the primitive simplicity of the first century egalitarian Congregations of God.

Nico = To rule; Laitan = The laity; = To rule over the laity; = Something that Yashua Messiah HATES!! = “A more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” = the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion in ALL its guises with its Popes, Archbishops, Cardinals, Bishops, Ministers, Vicars, and satanic Priests called ‘Fathers’ etc. etc.. Non-egalitarian pecking orders with men lording it over other men who are their equals in God’s sight and with no God given authority whatsoever.

Fortunately, and as an aside, by the year 35 AD the Church of God had been planted in Britain and was not contaminated by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion until the arrivals of the Papist devils Augustine (not Augustine of Hippo) and Patrick the slave trader in circa 597 AD.

I think that will do for part one, part two coming up shortly.

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Part 2

Plagiarising

Without further ado I will get straight in with more opinions from the ‘experts’ and as one commentator (Leighton Pullan) from The Bible Hub put it:

“Their genuineness is more frequently denied than that of any other of St. Paul’s Epistles, and this attack upon their genuineness has been mostly based upon the character of their teaching about the office-bearers of the Church. Attempts have sometimes been made to separate some fragments supposed to be genuine from the remaining portions. All such attempts have failed. These Epistles must either be rejected entirely or accepted entirely. Otherwise we become involved in a hopeless tangle of conjectures.”

Having quoted this opinion, which I agree with in part, the major question for me here is this: Are these Epistles an intregral part of the early beginnings of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (primarily Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy) through a Hellenising philosopher(s) author making out that he was Paul, or not? If I can prove that there is much Hellenising philosophy and/or meaningless BS in terms of early religious jargon terms and expressions (allegedly a more definite system of doctrine) then the case for them being forgeries is a done deal, and, as he correctly put it: “These Epistles must either be rejected entirely or accepted entirely.”

However, I will add one caveat to that regarding his comment: “to separate some fragments supposed to be genuine from the remaining portions.” The point he has obviously missed is this: If someone sets out to deceive by making out they are someone else then they MUST at times use thoughts, ideas and material that will attempt to make them look like the man they are trying to impersonate. This will then mean that they are playing the old half-truth telling trick. We need to realise that without some Truth in the narrative the scam will easily be rumbled. This game is not new and it’s played some of the time in the mainstream fake news media today and even more so in the internet alternative media.

So let’s analyse Mr Pullan’s comment a little further: “Their genuineness is more frequently denied than that of any other of St. Paul’s Epistles.” Now why would that be I wonder? Has he really done his homework in an open minded unbiased way to find out what the reasoning is behind this frequency of denial? I would suggest that he has not. I would also suggest that he, like Philip Schaff, is already convinced of their alleged authenticity and sets about defending his flawed position.

He then states: “this attack upon their genuineness has been mostly based upon the character of their teaching about the office-bearers of the Church.” Question: When did Yashua Messiah, or Paul for that matter, declare the need for ‘office bearers’? When did the need for corporate officials or officialdom become necessary in God’s egalitarian Church? Certainly not in the first century church that’s for sure, so when did these satanic ideas creep in? Answer: As soon as, if not before, the Messengers (apostles) had died. The second century AD was the time when most of these blasphemers crawled out of the woodwork and asserted themselves as leaders and mouth pieces of this planned philosophised, Hellenised counterfeit church.

Here is a list of the counterfeiting scoundrels involved in founding the Hellenised Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, from the “Catholic Fidelity” web page:

Clement I, 4th Bishop of Rome, circa end of the first century. This is not the Clement of Paul’s time.

Ignatius of Antioch, died 110 AD

Polycarp of Symrna, places and dates 65 – 140 AD Allegedley a stalwart of the early Congregations of God.

Unknown Author of The Didache (The Teaching), Syria dates 70 – 110 AD. Author of what teaching?

Barnabus, circa 130 AD, so could not be the first century Barnabus as claimed on this site.

Papias of Hierapolis, Phyrgia circa 130 AD

Justin Martyr, circa 100-165 AD, philosopher and theologian.

Irenaeus, circa 140 – 202 AD

Clement of Alexandria, place and dates, Athens circa 150? – 215? AD

Tertullian, convert to the Christian Religion circa 190 – 195 AD. Sorcerer and conjurer of the pagan heathen Trinity doctrine circa 200 AD.

Origen, Alexandria circa 185? – 254? AD

If necessary I will provide more details of what these villains got up to, but as this series of articles is not specifically about the devious shennanigans of the so-called ‘Church Fathers’ (I cover the subject elsewhere on my blog) I will leave it there.

And now a quote from the “Early Christian Writings” web page.

“Vocabulary. While statistics are not always as meaningful as they may seem, of 848 words (excluding proper names) found in the Pastorals, 306 are not in the remainder of the Pauline corpus, even including the deutero-Pauline 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, and Ephesians. Of these 306 words, 175 do not occur elsewhere in the New Testament, while 211 are part of the general vocabulary of Christian writers of the second century. Indeed, the vocabulary of the Pastorals is closer to that of popular Hellenistic philosophy than it is to the vocabulary of Paul or the deutero-Pauline letters. Furthermore, the Pastorals use Pauline words in a non-Pauline sense: dikaios in Paul means “righteous” and here means “upright”; pistis, “faith,” has become “the body of Christian faith”; and so on.”

As this series progresses I will reveal several of these crucial words that prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that these three Epistles are not from the hand of Paul and are most definitely from the hand of a Hellenising philosopher of the 2nd century and a founder of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Right, let’s make a start with the first verses of 1 Timothy 1:

1 Timothy 1:1-2 (KJV) Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope; 2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.

1 Timothy 1:1-2 notes — This introduction is plagiarised from Paul’s earlier genuine Epistles, but with the addition of a greeting to Timothy which Paul probably did write, but the real Epistle was either lost or destroyed. We have to assume this because Timothy was a learner of Paul’s and we can be fairly sure Paul did write to him but not the nonsense that follows in verse 4 onwards:

1 Timothy 1:3 (KJV) As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine.

1 Timothy 1:3 notes — Instructions from Paul to Timothy which again are probably a genuine part of the original Epistle with instructions to remain in Ephesus, now lost or destroyed. However, I say, now lost or destroyed, because the Epistle now changes from the plagiarising part of the first half to counterfeiting in the second half of this verse. How do I know this? Answer: through the use of one suspicious word – ‘charge’ and one suspicious term – ‘no other doctrine’ combined with what then follows in verse 4.

Now the word ‘doctrine’ is one of those crucial words that I made reference to earlier. This is due to the fact that three Greek words are are involved here and this Greek word in 1 Tim 1:3 is partly the odd one out, being: ‘heterodidaskaleō’. The other two words are these: ‘didachē’ (Strong’s G1322) and ‘didaskalia’ (Strong’s G1319)

Moreover, here is where it gets very interesting. The word ‘didachē‘ (instruction) cannot be found anywhere in 1 & 2 Timothy or Titus and yet it is found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Romans and 1 Corinthians. In contrast all that can be found in 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus is the word ‘didaskalia’ (instruction – teaching) – if we then take the word ‘heterodidaskaleō’ we can see that it comes from ‘didaskalia’ and not ‘didachē’. So what!! I here you exclaim. Ah but there is much more to this than meets the eye as explained here:

From: “Is Doctrine a Dirty Word?” by Peter Ditzel

“”Doctrine/doctrines” appears fifty times in the King James Version New Testament. With the exception of one place (Hebrews 6:1 where it is translated from logos), it comes from either of two Greek words, didache and didaskalia. Didaskalia is derived from didaskalos, which means “teacher.” Didache comes from the verb didasko, “to teach.” Thus, strictly, didaskalia refers to the teaching of a teacher.”

So here we have that crucial difference explained and why ‘didache’ (Strong’s G1322) applies to Yashua Messiah’s and Paul’s instruction and ‘didaskalia’ (Strong’s G1319) applies to the teaching of a teacher, which leads us to the knock on question – WHICH TEACHER and WHAT TEACHING!!?? Answer: the teaching of Hellenising philosophers and religious counterfeiters.

If we now move straight on into verse 4 we can see how it is a continuation of the second part of verse 3 and notice, too, that from here on in (verse 4) we now enter a part fictional, part truthful, made up and fabricated la la land narrative with religious writings by an unknown early Hellenising religious author, most likely circa 150 AD, and long after Paul’s death. He, or they, would have been one of the alleged ‘Church Fathers’ of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, which was always a counterfeit and not officially organised until the Council of Nicea in 325 AD. However, in the meantime this satanic edifice had been nearly 300 years in the making, commencing with the Canaanite Jew Philo in Alexandria (philosophy) in the first century along with Simon Magus the sorcerer in Rome – the lover of filthy lucre. All these elements came together in Nicea in 325 AD under Constantine.

Second half of 1 Timothy 1:3 and 1 Timothy 1:4 (KJV) That thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine. 4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 1:4 Notes part 1 — “Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies.”

What are these ‘fables’ that this Hellenising author could be refering to? More on this later.

Furthermore, if there was to be no heeding of genealogies and the study of same, then what are Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 if they are not genealogies? In turn, why would Yashua Messiah object to his brothers and sisters in the faith studying up their own Israelite genealogies? And who determines what genealogies come under the umbrella of “endless genealogies”? And who would be opposed to such genealogies and for what reason? Would Paul? Who was proud of his Benjaminite tribal origins:

Romans 11:1 (KJV) I say then, Hath God cast away His people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

Philippians 3:5 (KJV) Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee.

Please note Paul was not a Jew.

Moreover, what information do genealogies provide us with? Why, the origins of different peoples as listed in the Old Testament and who hates the Old Testament? Why Rome hates the Old Testament and so do the Canaanite Jews with their Babylonian Talmud, the mainstay of their satanic Judaic religion.

So what does the first part of 1 Tim 1:4 constitute? It was an early Hellenising Romish dictat to dissuade people from researching True Israelite history and the identity of the True intended recipients of the Gospel message as instructed by Yashua Messiah Himself:

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

He also gave the twelve disciples explicit intructions:

Matthew 10:5-6 (KJV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

1 Timothy 1:4 notes part 2 — “Which minister questions.” Yet more of the tyranny of Catholicism revealed re unquestioning obedience – no Bereans or questioning allowed in this church, just blind faith and obedience.

1 Timothy 1:4 notes part 3 — Edifying – Strong’s 3622 – Administration. Everywhere else (7 times) the word ‘edifying’ – means “building up” see Strong’s 3619.

This word ‘edifying’ from the Greek MSS ‘oikonomia’ which means ‘administration’ is telling us quite plainly what this Hellenising philosopher writer has in mind, that is, only one thing – a church corporation – a money making church corporation and not the Spiritual Congregation of God that needed REAL edifying, that is, building up and/or encouraging and supporting.

Please note – Part 3 and all follow on articles in this series will be posted at this link below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-pastoral-epistles-parts-1-2/

Are YOU a Heretic and What is Heresy?

If you are a Christian, or even not a Christian at all and with no interest in Christianity, have you ever wondered about these two words and what they mean? for they get banded about with great regularity by those of the satanic Roman Catholic Cult, which is a part of the equally satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Moreover, when you hear these words, do they resonate a positive vibe with you or a negative vibe? For me, they have always resonated a negative vibe, because they have always sounded accusatory and judgemental. Now don’t get me wrong, for there are some people that deserve to be labelled a heretic, that’s IF the word heretic actually means what people believe it to mean, that is, a blasphemer or an apostate, and again, that is, someone who has turned his back on Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and walked away as did these wretched people here:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

However, I have learned just recently that the words heretic and heresy from a Holy Scriptural sense are not what they seem when compared to the erroneous Roman Catholic religious interpretations. In fact, they do not mean what I have described above at all. They have been mistranslated from the Greek manuscripts, and more on that later, but first let’s look at some secular dictionary definitions for the words in question.

From Dictionary.com:

Heretic

1) A professed believer who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church or rejects doctrines prescribed by that church.

2) Roman Catholic Church – a baptized Roman Catholic who willfully and persistently rejects any article of faith.

3) Anyone who does not conform to an established attitude, doctrine, or principle.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heretic

1) Religion: a person who differs in opinion from established religious dogma; especially: a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church who refuses to acknowledge or accept a revealed truth the church regards them as heretics.

2) One who differs in opinion from an accepted belief or doctrine – a nonconformist.

From Dictionary.com:

Heresy

1. Opinion or doctrine at variance with the orthodox or accepted doctrine, especially of a church or religious system.

2. The maintaining of such an opinion or doctrine.

3. Roman Catholic Church. the willful and persistent rejection of any article of faith by a baptized member of the church.

4. Any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs, customs, etc.

From Merriam-Webster:

Heresy

1a:  adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma (see dogma 2) They were accused of heresy.

1b: denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church

1c :  an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

2a: dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice – to disagree with the party leadership was heresy.

2b: an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards

So there we have it from the secular perspective and notice how the Roman Catholic Cult features prominently in these definitions giving it a strong association with these two negative words.

Notice, too, in 2a how they now apply it to those that reject rigid political dogma as well. Rejection of Bolshevik Marxist Political Correctness (Cultural Marxism) anyone? Do I also sense the spirit of the legalistic satanic Pharisees here in the application of these two words? You bet your life!

OK, so what’s your point I hear you ask? confusion and some I would answer and to unravel that confusion let’s go now to the Holy Scriptures for The Truth regarding these two misused words:

First and foremost, the word heretic cannot be found in the KJV Bible at all – it ain’t there folks, so that tells you just how important this subject is to Yashua Messiah. However, it is VERY important to those Roman Catholic judgemental mongrel dogs who like to accuse people of being heretics, that is, those who have rumbled their money making, money laundering scam called a church and have started to voice their truthful opinions.

Second, and just as crucial, the word heresy can only be found once in the KJV Bible and here is the verse with its only use:

Acts 24:14 (KJV) But this I confess unto thee, that after The Way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in The Law and in The Prophets: (Emphasis mine)

So here we have some very interesting things being said by Paul. First of all, Paul let’s it be known that following Yashua Messiah was known by the followers of Yashua Messiah as The Way, for He is The Way – The ONLY Way to The Kingdom of God and Eternal Life and NO RELIGION required!

Second, the creatures of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian RELIGION called those who were followers of The Way (Yashua Messiah), HERETICS!!! and their beliefs and Faith solely in Yashua Messiah – HERESY!!! How blasphemous is that?

Not only that, if we look up the word in the Greek MSS what do you think we will find? Answer, this from Strong’s Concordance:

Heresy – G139 – αἵρεσις – hairesis – hah’ee-res-is
From G138; properly a choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion. (“heresy” is the Greek word itself.): – heresy [which is the Greek word itself], sect.

Look what we have here: 1) a choice; 2) a party in disunion; 3) a sect. So what does this tell us? Well far from being negative, the word heresy looks like it is something very positive, that is, the separating of those who follow Yashua Messiah (The Way) from satanic religious illegitimates. In the first century that would have been primarily the Pharisees and Sadducees who were later usurped by the so called Hellenising philosophers known as the ‘church fathers’, that is, the counterfeit founders of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Be sure you understand that religion is a spirit called Legion and Satan presents this phenomena in a myriad of ways whether it be Jews or Fundie ‘Christians’ with their Judaising Law based religion or Papists with their Babylonian Mystery Religion.

Furthermore, today, whilst the Pope is traipsing here, there and everywhere around the world promoting his mickey mouse satanic multi-faith unity BS, Paul was and is teaching the exact opposite – now there’s a surprise and is that hilarious or what?

Moreover what’s more interesting is the way this Greek word hairesis has taken on a dual meaning in some people’s eyes for we find it used elsewhere:

Acts 28:22 (KJV) But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect (hairesis), we know that every where it is spoken against.
(Brackets and emphasis mine)

In this verse we can see the word hairesis used more accurately, in it being translated as sect and not heresy, but, either way, neither translations of this word point to the evil and distorted and satanic interpretations of The Devil’s Roman Catholic Cult who misuse, twist and pervert it to accuse those of The Truth and/or The Way of being heretics which, in reality, is a compliment to us, not an insult.

This means dear brothers and sisters that in the future if some evil papist calls you a heretic, just thank him or her as sarcastically as you can and be encouraged by their plug ignorance.

Brother Charles.

As a PS I would add that the word heresies can also be found three times which again should be translated as sects and which I will deal with here at a later date.

Tim Farron Avoids Saying Whether He Considers Gay Sex as a Sin – Part 1

For those of you who have never of Tim Farron he was, up until today, the 14th June 2017, the leader of the British Liberal Democrat Party (and an alleged Christian), otherwise known as the Lib-Dems, which only managed to secure 12 seats in the recent British General Election on the 8th June 2017. This was an increase of only three seats on their previous General Election performance. In contrast the Stalinist Labour Party won 262 seats and the Trotskyist Conservative Party 318. So as you can see this was a very poor show indeed.

Moreover, Tim Farron, although professing to be a liberal was, in reality, just another leftie Bolshevik Marxist in a yellow tie – yellow being the official colour of the spineless treacherous Lib-Dem Party. However, in truth, he was no more a liberal, as in the traditional liberal sense, e.g. as with Lloyd George, than Josef Stalin.

He also claimed that he was a Christian, but what kind of a Christian? A real Christian or a fake Christian? Here is a statement he made when questioned by a Channel 4 leftie, useless media jobsworth, Cathy Newman, with this question:

Farron was asked whether he believed, as a Christian, that the act of homosexual sex (sodomy) was a sin and replied: “To understand Christianity is to understand that we are all sinners.” (Brackets mine)

I will repeat that: “To understand Christianity is to understand that we are all sinners.”

OK, so what does this statement really mean? The word ‘understand’ in the language of legalese means to “stand under” so what he is really saying is this: To stand under the banner of Christianity is also to stand under the banner of “I am a sinner and don’t you forget it!”

Now is he right? IF we are Christians, are we still sinners? IF as Christians, we are still sinners, how will we enter the The Kingdom of God or IF as Christians we are still sinners how will we obtain or enter into Eternal Life? Do these people ever question their erroneous understanding or their own skewed reasoning?

Perhaps a better question would be, who teaches these wretched people and fills their heads with this satanic nonsense? And make no mistake, for it is satanic nonsense. So back to the first part of his statement: “To understand or stand under the banner of Christianity.” Well does he? Obviously not because he thinks that if one understands HIS idea of Christianity then we are all still sinners – DOH!!

So here’s a question: IF after having become a Christian we’re still sinners – WHAT’S CHANGED!!?? I’ll tell you – NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING HAS CHANGED!! In contrast, are the lost and unsaved majority, sinners? Yes, of course but this Tim Farron character has declared himself to be a sinner too, so what has his alleged Christian faith achieved for him? I’ll tell you again – NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

Let’s be clear about this folks – a sinner is a sinner is a sinner and that’s all there is to it, nothing more, nothing less and no matter what else he calls himself. A sinner will die in his or her sins – that’s it – fini – kaput – gone. They will then be dead in their graves until the Second Resurrection and The Great White Throne Tribunal at the end of The Millennium and with no part in the First Resurrection when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth, VERY SOON for His elect – REAL CHRISTIANS!

However, and here is the rub, someone who claims to be a Christian and a sinner as well, that is, people like our Mr Tim Farron, fall into a special group of people that will receive some special attention from Yashua Messiah when he returns to this earth very soon. This special attention is otherwise known as outer darkness.

Matthew 25:30 (KJV) And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

So are you saying that Tim Farron is an unprofitable servant? Yes of course and by his own admission. Ask yourself, how can a sinner ever be profitable to Yashua Messiah? So called Christians who are still sinners or who still see themselves as sinners are neither one thing or the other. Do you SEE THAT dear people? I do hope so for your Holy Spiritual future and welfare is totally dependent upon you SEEING IT, and the last thing I want to see is your being cast into outer darkness, that is, separation from Yashua Messiah and for I don’t know how long. That cannot be a very pleasant experience no matter what the duration.

OK so by now you must be wondering what it is that Tim Farron is missing and it’s quite simple. He is missing the miracle that occurs at Baptism (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone. Now this may be because he has never been taught or worse he has been taught and then poo pooed the teaching. Either way, he is not properly birthed into Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), for if he had been he would KNOW that as a Baptised born of God Christian, gifted with The Holy Spirit he would no longer be a sinner – end of.

This is explained to us by Yashua Messiah through John:

1 John 3:8 (KJV) He that committeth sin is of The Devil; for The Devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose The Son of God was manifested (made known), that He might destroy the works of The Devil. (Brackets mine)

Here we can plainly see, if we have the EYES to see that is, that anyone that commits sin is of The Devil. That’s it – simple and no argument!! Yet John says: “For this purpose The Son of God was manifested (made known), that He might destroy the works of The Devil.”

Right, here’s another question: Has The Son of God (Yashus Messiah), who I presume was made made known to Tim Farron, destroyed the works of The Devil in Tim Farron’s life? Answer: No of course not, because he still sees himself as a sinner and, worse, applies that same wretched condition to all his fellow erroneous fake Christians.

In turn this means that Yashua Messiah did nothing for Tim Farron at the stake (cross). He died and rose again thereby destroying the works of The Devil (death and sin) and yet Tim Farron (and those like him) is oblivious to this stupendous Truth.

Furthermore, and again, let’s be clear for Tim Farron, unfortunately, is not alone, and I exaggerate not an atom when I say that the bulk of those embroiled in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion think exactly the same way as Tim Farron thinks.

I will therefore quote John once more in order to explain how born of God sons and daughters of God, properly Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit cannot sin:

1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man that hath his hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.

Every man that keeps his hope in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) PURIFIES HIMSELF even as Yashua Messiah is pure.

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

Whosoever abides in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) SINS NOT!! Whosoever sins (Tim Farron and those like him) has not seen Yashua Messiah (experienced His presence via The Holy Spirit) and has never known Him!

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His Seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Whosoever is born of God does not sin because His Seed (His Holy Spirit) remains in him and he cannot sin and he cannot sin because he is born of God. He is NOW a NEW CREATION residing in a DEAD BODY of sin.

Paul also makes it plain – TWICE!:

Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Paul makes it clear that it is no longer him that sins but, rather, the dead sin that dwells within his dead body of sin which is no longer him.

I hope and pray that you all STAND UNDER (understand) this miraculous Father and Son gifted and given arrangement.

The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion

Now many of you, that is, you my regular readers, will be familiar with the above expression, for I use it frequently in my articles to describe mainstream Christianity or Churchianity or the Christian RELIGION or what some might call Christendom. For those of you new to my work for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) I use it as an umbrella term to cover all the branches of so called Christianity – Roman Catholicism; Eastern Orthodoxy; Anglicanism; Episcopalianism (American Anglicanism), plus ALL the myriad denominations (divisions = demon-inations) of Protestantism.

This umbrella title also covers all the so called cults who, I might add, do not have a monopoly on cultism and cultic behaviour. Roman Catholicism is the biggest cult of all, a money making, money laundering, cult with over a billion deluded and deceived adherents. However, having said that, I will list the principal cult culprits here for your information: Jehovah’s Witnesses; The Church of The Latter Day Saints (The Mormons); The Seventh Day Adventists (SDAs); The Christadelphians; The Worldwide Church of God, (now deviously and deceptively known as The Grace Communion International), with all its splinter or spin-off groups who broke away after the demonic Herbert W. Armstrong era ended.

Here are the names of some of these satanic Judaising splinter groups:

Midnight Ministries – Malcom B Heap
The Philadelphia Church Of God – Gerald Flurry
The Restored Church Of God
The Living Church Of God
The Intercontinental Church Of God
The United Church Of God, An International Association
The Church Of God’s Faithful
The Independent Church Of God
The Church Of God, An International Community
The Christian Biblical Church Of God
The Continuing Church of God

I have listed the names of all these groups (and please note this list is not exhaustive) because I was once a duped member of the original Worldwide Church of God under Armstrong’s teaching, so I have a particular interest in what these satanic groups are getting up to in these last days of the last days. Needless-to-say they are all blasphemous Judaisers and Grace killers banging there OBEDIENCE based drums and earning their own salvation and extorting money from their duped members via their Old Covenant tithing money grabbing systems, so don’t, whatever you do, get involved with any of them.

OK, I think I have covered the bulk of what purports to be so called Christianity on the face of this satanic earth in 2017 and I call it The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. If you know of any other major groups that claim to be Christian Churches that you think should be added to my list please let me know. Please note I am aware of the Pentecostal groups and have included them as an integral of Protestantism.

Moving on, I will now take each of the four words that make up my umbrella title and expound on their relevance and my reasons for placing them within the title starting with:

CAINITE

Right, why do I group all these varied and supposed Christian bodies together under the title The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion? And why in particular do I use the term ‘Cainite’ as the first part of their description? What has Cain got to do with modern, so called, Christianity or nominal fake Christianity? He and his offspring died in The Flood didn’t they? Yes they did, but his bloodline was rekindled post-flood by and through the birth of Canaan whom Noah cursed. However, I will not expound on that story here as I deal with it in my articles elsewhere here on my blog, but what I will do is look specifically at Cain’s behaviour which led up to his murdering his half-brother Abel. (Take note, Cain and Abel were NOT full brothers)

Now this event is as much Spiritual as it is physical and literal and it is timeless in its importance. The spirit of this story carries forward through 6,000 years of our history to our days here in 21st century. So what ties the murder of Abel to the year 2017? Easy, sacrifices and offerings or perhaps what I should have said is, the RIGHT KIND of sacrifice and offering. So let’s post the story of Cain and Abel’s sacrifices and offerings:

Genesis 4:3-4 (KJV) And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto The LORD. 4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And The LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:

So what’s going on here? because on the face of it it looks like The Lord is being unjust toward Cain just because his offering was from his crops of the ground. We are then told that The Lord had respect for Abel’s offering rather than Cain’s, so what gives?

BLOOD is what gives in Abel’s sacrifice, the BLOOD of a LAMB which spills into the ground. In Cain’s offering there is NO BLOOD at all making it a useless offering and thereby definitely not pleasing in The Lord’s sight as a sacrifice.

Yashua Messiah was The Lamb slain from before the foundation of the world as it is written in the Book of Revelation:

Revelation 13:8 (KJV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (Satan), whose names are NOT written in The Book of Life of The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

This means that in the past under the Old Covenant right and proper sacrifices to God should ALWAYS involve the blood of a lamb (even before the original Passover in Egypt) with Yashua Messiah becoming the ultimate Lamb of God sacrifice to end ALL blood sacrifices. (Watch for the evil blasphemous re-instatement of blood sacrifices in Jerusalem soon – The Abomination of Desolation.)

OK, so back to the thread. From this event we then get Cain’s jealousy of his half-brother for having found favour in The Lord’s sight. The half-brothers then argue with the end result of Cain killing Abel in a fit of jealous rage.
Now mark this event, for it is a type or forerunner or the first of multiple thousands of murders that will follow it, on down through the ages and even into the 21st century with real Christians (followers of Yashua Messiah – The Truth and The Way) being slain for their Faith being in Him and Him alone – with no RELIGION. So to sum up this first part, what we have graphically displayed here is the first man of RELIGION (CAIN) slaying the first True believer making his blood of The Lamb sacrifice.

Now this is all well and good I here you say, but how are you making a connection from Cain and Abel to the 21st century? Again that’s easy. Fake or counterfeit Christians – those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion believe in a fake Jesus who never spilled his blood. This is because he doesn’t exist and so he never died. This fake Jesus is like Cain’s offering of vegetables – there’s no blood. Ask yourself, how does a make-believe fictional character bleed and die? It doesn’t and it can’t – it would be impossible for it to do so.

Let’s be clear about this and get it firmly seated in our minds, only Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) the real Lord Jesus Christ died and shed His blood for us not their Cainite vegetable fake Jesus. So now you know why I use the word Cainite in my title the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

JUDEO

OK, so why do I use the word ‘Judeo’ in my title? Well this should be more straight forward and easier to understand, for Judaism is an all pervasive problem within the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, a VERY BIG pervasive problem. Now let’s be clear for nearly ALL the groups within it practice some form of Judaism i.e. salvation by works and/or salvation through obedience to The Law or obedience to the Ten Commanments or even obeying Yashua Messiah. This means that Yashua Messiah’s Saving Grace along with His Faith are either blasphemed against, that is, abused or are totally trampled on and snuffed out – killed. Which in turn means they trample all over Yashua Messiah’s sacrifice – His death and His resurrection. They treat Him with utter contempt and in many cases without even realising it.

‘Judeo’ also stands for monotheism in one form or another, whether it be just ONE GOD as in Judaism and Islam, rendering Yashua Messiah a non-entity and just a creation or what looks like an afterthought if viewed from the Godhead’s perspective. We then have their ONE GOD within a FICTIONAL TRINITY DEITY of ONE in three and three in ONE. That means whether it’s three in ONE or ONE in three we still have a form of monotheism rattling around in there somewhere. This is a shell game conjuring trick of now you see ONE or it could be now you see three depending on how many magic mushrooms you have eaten LOL.

Moreover, in all Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious ‘churches’ some form of obedience will be in force, whether obedience to the Ten Commandments (The Law of Moses) or obedience to a Pope, Archbishop, cardinals, bishops, priests or some ministerial or pastor/elder hierarchy (the evil system of the Nicolaitans as described by Yashua Messiah in Revelation). To make things even worse, in many Protestant groups women will be in the pulpits lording it over the men. Paul must be turning in his grave.

Furthermore, regulated Old Covenant Sabbath keeping will be the order of the day, whether seventh day or first day Sabbath keeping. There, also, will be annual pagan heathen fertility rite festivals like Christmas, Easter and Whitsun which have nothing to do with Yashua Messiah. Within the Judeo religious Roman Cult there is actually an idolatrous ‘saint’s day’ for every single day of the year. Needless-to-say these fakes are not real saints, because in order to be a real saint you have to be called and chosen by The Father and then born of God (born again). No man has the power or the authority to make a man or woman a saint.

Moreover, having revealed the above deceptive points, here is what you will not find active and operational in these so called ‘churches’, that is, egalitarian Grace filled fellowships with Holy Spirit gifted teachers for new converts and beginners and overseers (shepherds) to keep a watchful eye out for spies and trouble makers (wolves) and protect the flocks in general, as was the case in the first century congregations.

CHRISTIAN

OK the third and most deceptive word of my title – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Why the most deceptive I hear you say? Quite simply because it deceives billions, not just millions, but billions of people across the world. This is because when they hear the word Christian or Christianity they immediately link it, erroneously, to the organised satanic religions I have listed above who pose as followers of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ).

I go head to head daily with hundreds of lost and unsaved people on social media who accuse supposed Christians and Christianity of all manner of wickedness, historical persecutions, tortures, evils, murders and genocides and they are correct to do so, for the people who did these vile deeds posed as Christians and did their satanic evil deeds in the name of Christianity, thereby bringing shame and disgrace on Jesus Christ’s name – bringing His name into disrepute – and as wonderfully encapsulated by this famous heathen:

“I like your Christ; I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

— Muhatma Gandhi

Furthermore, these so called Christian groups follow their non-Scriptural hu-man made Creeds or their blasphemous Statements of Beliefs, not Yashua Messiah. These legalistic creeds and statements lay down the frameworks of their hu-man made organisations and have nothing to do with the Kingdom of God Gospel message that Yashua Messiah and His Messengers (apostles) taught in the first century. This is because they want their lemming followers to 1) believe that salvation is within their particular ‘church’ only or through being a member of their organisation or cult only and 2) to give their hard earned dosh or tithes to the organisations. However, if they go outside of it and leave, they’re then deemed an apostate or they’re damned to fiery hell or they’re excommunicated as a heretic. Either way they’re toast to these lying blasphemers as they chuck their satanic hierarchical weight around.

Now which ever way we cut this, none of it is Christian. To be a Christian is one who is called and chosen by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and who then follows Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) – that’s it, apart from full immersion Baptism and gifting of The Holy Spirit. Once these things have occurred you are now born of God (born again) and you’re a Christian – a new creation, a saint and a REAL CHRISTIAN!!

RELIGION

Oh dear what positive thing can be said about the meaningless vain persuit of RELIGION!!?? Answer: Nothing!! Make sure you understand and never forget it – GOD HAS NO RELIGION. ALL religions are hu-man made on behalf of the Devil himself. ALL religions worship Satan the Devil in one way or another and NONE of them worship Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) and that includes??? Yes you guessed it – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Yes men dress their stupid religions up to make out they are worshipping Yashua Messiah but the opposite is always The Truth – they ALL worship Satan the Devil!!

Now here’s a little test. Just search the four Gospels in the KJV Bible for the word ‘religion’ and see if you can find it. OK I jest, don’t worry yourselves, for I have already done so and can assure you that it’s not there. However feel free to do your own research as you should.

Furthermore, Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He come to this earth in order to start a religion. Religion = the vanity and egos of men. So there you have it – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion!

For additional reading in support of the above please see:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-the-father-calling-you-to-his-son-yashua-anointed/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/who-or-what-are-judaising-mongrel-dogs/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/do-born-of-god-christians-have-to-obey-or-learn-obedience-part-1/

Did Jesus Die So We Can Now Have License To Sin, Without Guilt, And Go to Heaven?

OK, first of all, this is not my question, and it’s so full of built in errors I don’t really know where to begin. Furthermore, it’s a question which was asked of me quite recently and, in doing so, it meant that my teaching on Grace was being attacked. To counter that attack, I would recommend to you my two articles about Grace entitled: “The Grace Of Our Lord Jesus Christ – His True Grace – Not The Watered Down Religious Version!” and “For By Grace Are Ye Saved Through Faith – And That Not Of Yourselves – It Is The Gift Of God – Eph 2:8,” in order to understand where these people are coming from, and what their blasphemous attack on God’s Holy Word is all about.

Right, so what’s wrong with this question? Well, straight away there is no mention of Yashua Messiah’s resurrection within this question and we should never leave out mention of His resurrection when mentioning His death, for His death was only half of the arrangement. Second, there is this word ‘license’ and it then linked to the word ‘sin’. Hence their phrase: “A license to sin.”

Now where does this weird phrase come from? I have to admit I have heard it used before by various ravening wolves in pulpits, but I have never taken the trouble to check it out to see if it’s Scriptural, and, of course, it isn’t. Now there’s a surprise!! So why is it used if it’s not Scriptural? Easy, because vain puffed up men love their meaningless jargon expressions, especially in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. They love to put their egotistic personal stamp on the Holy Scriptures and, as I have said before, they do it because the Holy Word of God is too simple for them. OK, so as it’s not a Scriptural phrase, let’s have a look in my Concise Oxford Dictionary to see what the word ‘license’ means:

License – allow (person to do, thing to be done; rare); allow complete freedom to; grant permit to person; authorize use of premises for certain purpose, etc.(It also means to grant LEGAL permission to a person to do something UNLAWFUL E.g. Licenced to kill) (Brackets mine)

So let’s rewrite this question using one of the dictionary definitions: Did Jesus die so we can now have a permit to sin or to allow us complete freedom to sin, without guilt, and go to heaven? Now is this question dumb or is it mind numbingly dumb? I would suggest to you it’s both.

What we have to ask ourselves here is why would anyone want a licence or a permit to sin? If we were dealing with a lost or unsaved man or woman, would they require licences or permits to sin? Why don’t you try asking one of them and see what kind of a reply you get, that’s after they have stopped laughing at you and wondering if you were unhinged. OK, so we know that the lost and unsaved don’t need a licence or a permit to sin, for they manage very well without one.

That leaves us with the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious perspective and whether or not they would require a licence or a permit to sin – well, would they, for many in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion seem to think they would, but why? What kind of Christian would even bring up such a subject? What kind of Christian rubs shoulders with those who would influence such thinking?

If we come genuinely to Yashua Messiah after The Father has called us, which means our repentance is genuine and our confession of sins is genuine, why would we seek a permit or licence to carry on sinning? Does any of this make any sense? No, it’s complete nonsense. So you see this question could and perhaps should have been worded like this: Should I repent and confess my sins so that I can then have a licence or permit to carry on sinning as I did in my old life, without guilt, and still go to heaven? Never mind that I had no guilt before in my old life anyway.

However, what this question is revealing to us is that we have people calling themselves Christians who are still struggling, through their own admission, with guilt. This means they see themselves as unforgiven and thereby not saved. How wretched is that?

Can you now see the inbuilt stupidity within this question? Why go to all the trouble of repentance, confession of sins (that is, all your sins, past, present and future) and baptism plus gifting of The Holy Spirit, if you want to carry on living as you did before? What would be the point of it and who would you be deceiving? As I think about all this I am actually becoming confused, and of course, that’s just what the Devil wants – confusion.

Moreover, why are Cainite-Judeo-Christians asking this silly question, and what else does it reveal to us? As I have already pointed out, they only mention Yashua Messiah’s death, not His resurrection and that’s because many Cainite-Judeo-Christians don’t understand what His resurrection achieved for them. OK, they believe everything was done at the cross, and yes, in part, it was all done. It was all done in terms of conquering death and sin, but what they don’t understand is the new Spiritual beings we become through His resurrection, that is, perfect in the Father’s sight and sinless beings that do not sin.

Now this is what they can’t get their heads around and that’s because they are not really Born Again. They are men of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion who practise Graceless Judaism – salvation by progress – salvation by process or by self-help, or by their own effort and endeavours, or commonly known as salvation by works. The Faith, Salvation, Grace thing is incomprehensible to them, they cannot understand it. In turn, it is through this blindness that they conjure up questions like the above.

Once more you will also notice the ‘without guilt’ bit in the middle of this question, which means they cannot even get their heads around this:

Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus. [who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit.]

Please note I have left off the second part of this verse because it’s missing in the Greek MSS, which means it was falsely added by the translators – it being interpolated from Romans 8:4 and unnecessarily repeated.

Romans 8:4 (KJV) That the righteousness of The Law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit.

Now what part of Romans 8:1 do these wretched people not understand, that is, there is now no further condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. If there is now no further condemnation, how can there be any guilt!? If there is guilt, there is something wrong with their birthing into Yashua Messiah. The guilty mindset is the fallen mindset and it behaves like Adam and Eve after their fall – they went and hid in guilt!

If we are born of God (Born Again) or born from above, we have been lifted out of guilt, for there is now no further condemnation laid upon us. So, this means we are sinless, even though our dead bodies of sin, sin. The thing is, is this a license to sin? Well, yes of course it is, if we are deluded and deceived liars and The Truth is not in us, but is that the case IF we are born of God? No, of course it is not the case, because The Truth, Yashua Messiah lives in us through His Holy Spirit POWER and the Holy Spirit cannot reside with LIVING sin.

So how would we be liars? We would be liars because there is no such thing as: “license to sin”, because as I have already proven, no one needs a licence to sin. If you want to sin, then just go right on ahead and sin, if that’s your DESIRE, and, of course, this is where we get to the nub of this issue, for that’s what it’s all about – DESIRE.

As Born Again believers, what should our DESIRE be, to sin or not to sin? Well, I hope it’s a DESIRE not to sin, and if that is the case, there is nothing wrong with your birthing in Yashua Messiah for your DESIRE not to sin proves that you love your Elder Brother in heaven. All this means is that you would hate to do something that Yashua Messiah would hate you to do. This also means we are endeavouring to please Him, but will this always be so? Not very likely if you’re the average man or woman who has been called out of this world by The Father to His Son and yet still lives in a dead body of sin. We will sin until we die; it’s inevitable, and we need to get this through our heads. I will reiterate, we’re still perfect and sinless in the Father’s sight even though our dead bodies of sin, sin. Paul explains it clearly and twice so we get it through our heads:

Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Now, if after all this we’re still looking for a ‘licence to sin’, because we want to sin, what is this revealing about our birthing into Yashua Messiah? If our DESIRE is to look for a licence to sin, what is this saying about us, and what is it saying about our repentance, our confession, and our baptism? Are we phoneys and fakes? If so, who are we fooling? Were all these things a charade or a façade to hide our real intentions of being or becoming a fake Christian? What would be the point?

OK, let’s leave out the ‘license to sin’ thing for a minute and just deal with the sin issue. What, if after baptism, our DESIRE is to carry on sinning, what would be the point of getting baptised? As I said previously, we can carry on sinning without any need to for baptism, so what is their point in the use of this stupid phrase?

Their point is this – they are looking at the whole thing through the eyes of Grace Killers, for they cannot comprehend the loving relationship of that between a Born Again son or daughter of God and their Redeemer, Yashua Messiah. They think it’s all about obedience to The Law, and if we speak of Grace, they will immediately think we are looking for excuses to sin – which is a judgemental lie. This is the mindset of Pharisees, for they behaved in the same way when Yashua Messiah confronted them with His Grace filled message, two thousand years ago and nothing has changed. These Cainite-Judeo-Christians behave and believe in exactly the same way.

You see when your salvation is down to you and your efforts this is how you will behave and view Grace. There is no room for Grace in their salvation-by-works world. In fact, Grace, from this legalistic Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious perspective, is a complete mystery to them, for it’s not on their radar screens and in reality it doesn’t exist to them. It cannot exist, for if it were to exist their Law based world would dissolve before their very eyes and all the reasons for their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious existence would disappear. They would be like captains without ships and totally surplus to requirements.

Finally, I won’t go into detail about their nonsensical going to heaven business as I cover this subject in detail in my articles: “Are Christians Going to Heaven?” and “When Christians Die, Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord? – Parts 1 & 2”. Needless to say, Christians going to heaven is as erroneous an idea as that of us needing a ‘license to sin’. Where do they get this stuff? Oh yes, at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet LOL!

Brother Charles

PS Please note, this edited article is ten+ years old.

Are You a 21st Century Foolish Galatian?

So how can anyone be a “Foolish Galatian” in the 21st century? They were just a first century phenomenon weren’t they? And only a serious problem for Paul and all the other Grace filled Assemblies in Galatia, surely? How can there be such a problem today? This must be nonsense, I hear you say. Well, it’s not as nonsensical as you might think and, in order to get a full understanding of what it’s all about, we need to take a look at Galatians to gain a better knowledge of what Paul was having to deal with.

We also need to know how the: “Justification through obedience to The Law” problem, for Grace filled and saved people, has never gone away. This vile evil concept is still with us today and do not err in your thinking, by making light of it:

Galatians 3:1 (KJV) O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not ‘obey’ (a corrupt translation – should read “you who have not been convinced of or persuaded by:-”) The Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? (Brackets and italics mine)

Galatians 3:1 (Amplified Version) O you poor and silly and thoughtless and unreflecting and senseless Galatians! Who has fascinated or bewitched or cast a spell over you, unto whom—right before your very eyes—Jesus Christ (the Messiah) was openly and graphically set forth and portrayed as crucified?

From the Amplified Version we get a better insight into how dumb and stupid these people were and how dumb and stupid modern Galatian people are as well. Let’s look at verse 2 for our proof and evidence:

Galatians 3:2 (KJV) This only would I learn of you, Received ye The Spirit by the works of The Law, or by The Hearing of Faith?

Galatians 3:2 (Amplified Version) Let me ask you this one question: Did you receive The [Holy] Spirit as the result of obeying The Law and doing its works, or was it by hearing [The Message of The Gospel] and believing [it]? [Was it from observing a Law of Rituals or from a Message of Faith?]

So here’s a question for all you blasphemers out there who think you can be saved by OBEDIENCE to The Commandments: Did you receive the gift of The Holy Spirit as a result of obeying The Commandments or by hearing The Message of Faith and BELIEVING it?

Let’s put this another way: Did you do anything or contribute anything by way of obedience to The Commandments in order to receive this free undeserved gift? If you did, let’s hear about it ‘cos I love a good laugh at the expense of vain puffed-up fools who think they can earn their own salvation by obedience to The Commandments.

Paul then begins to cement his case:

Galatians 3:3 (KJV) Are ye so foolish? having begun in The (Holy) Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? (Brackets mine)

Here again we can see how these stupid people had begun in The Holy Spirit which means that they were called by The Father to His Son by The Holy Spirit, but then said: “No thanks, we know a better way!!” And here is the first example of this evil mind set:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of His Learners (disciples) went back, and walked no more with Him.

These numb skull stiff necked people were just like The Galatians – they were precursors of those that Paul had to deal with later on. They thought they knew a better way, a way based upon their own initiative and motivation, their own efforts and their own vain imaginings of salvation under their own fuel and steam and not to mention their own terms and conditions. These bods had no use for The Holy Spirit, why would they, they were self-sufficient via their own righteousness through obedience to The Law – The Commandments.

Move forward a decade or so, to Paul’s time, and we then have these same kinds of vile wretched people who thought that The Holy Spirit’s saving Power was not enough i.e. NOT GOOD ENOUGH for them, can you believe that? So they re-invoked The Law – The Commandments, and obedience to same, in order to become ‘more righteous’ (chuckle, chuckle, chuckle) than their brothers and sisters living under Yashua Messiah’s Glorious Saving Grace being led by The Holy Spirit.

When we stop and think about this, it can only be summed up as gross mind-numbing blasphemous stupidity. What is even more mind-numbing and amazing is The Truth that these same types of stupid people are still with us today and yet, at the same time, profess to be Christians and/or followers of The Way – Yashua Messiah – how does that work!!??

Let’s be clear about this because elsewhere Paul makes it very plain:

Galatians 2:16 (KJV) Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of The Law, but by The Faith of Jesus Christ, even (so that) we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by The Faith of Christ, and not by the works of The Law: for by the works of The Law shall no flesh be justified. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Now we must fully comprehend the points Yashua Messiah is explaining here, through Paul:

Point 1) No man is justified i.e. made righteous by the works of The Law. This includes obedience to The Ten Commandments. How do we know that? Easy, because Sabbath Day observance is no longer required under Grace. Everyday is now a Sabbath Day for those who have entered into Yashua Messiah’s Sabbath Rest = everyday is now a Sabbath Day for those who believe totally in Him for their salvation. See Hebrews Chapters 3 and 4 and then read it and internalise it.

Point 2) Mankind is justified only by Yashua Messiah’s Faith i.e. HIS FAITH, NOT OUR FAITH. Yashua Messiah gives us Faith, along with Grace, so that we can believe. Without the free gifts of His Faith and His Grace we would not be able to believe and then build our faith for rewards only upon that Foundation.

Point 3) We are then justified by His Faith and Paul makes that very clear with his statement: “That we might be justified by The Faith of Christ.” Get this clear in your minds, folks, and written on your hearts: YOUR FAITH does not feature in this arrangement, so YOUR FAITH does not feature at all in your salvation – period.

OK, let’s move on, because Paul now starts to lay it on the line:

Galatians 2:17 (KJV) But if seeking to be justified in Christ, we ourselves also were found to be sinners, is Christ then a minister of sin? Let it not be!

So, if we claim to be justified in, through, and by Yashua Messiah’s Sacrifice, His Faith and His Grace and are also found to be sinners, what is going on? Can sinners ever be justified? Can sinners enter The Kingdom of God? Can blemished and spotted bridal gowns attend The Wedding Feast? Nay, God forbid. Hence Paul asks can Yashua Messiah be a pastor of sin? Yet what points out our sin? What reveals our sin? What condemns us for our sins? The Law and The Commandments reveal and point out our sins and then condemns us. So is Yashua Messiah a Pastor of The Law and thereby condemning us or is He a Pastor of Truth, Love, Mercy, Redemption, Forgiveness, Faith and Grace?

Let’s remind ourselves:

Romans 8:1 (KJV) There is therefore now no condemnation to those in Christ Jesus.

If there is now no condemnation for those IN Yashua Messiah where has The Law gone and what need is there for The Law and/or The Commanndments? The Law/Commandments or The Whole Law and the ensuing condemnation go hand in hand, as does The Law and obedience, so if there is now no more condemnation how can there be any Law over us? How can there be any need for obedience to The Law or The Commandments if they are no longer over us and condemning us?

Answers on the back of a postage stamp, thank you.

Brother Charles