WERE ABRAHAM, ISAAC and JACOB, JEWS? – Part 1 – The Beginning —- Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob Jews? – Part 2 – The Patriarchs. – Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob Jews? – Part 3 – Joseph The Patriarch and The Birthright Inheritance

Now this is a very interesting question is it not? Why am I asking it? I am asking it for the simple reason that most of those people out there that know a little, or even a great deal, about early Bible history and The Book of Genesis, take it for granted that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were Jews. The thing is, why, and is it true that they were Jews? We could also ask the same question regarding Moses and Aaron, The Levites, and say were they Jews, for the same blind unquestioning belief applies? So what do they base this idea on and where is the Biblical evidence that proves these three men were Jews?

You would think, by the way that the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion talks and teaches, there is neither doubt nor any question about it at all, such is their blind ignorant confidence. There is, too, of course, all those so called Jewish people of the Judaic Torah or Talmudic Religions and persuasions that accept this idea as a given, as a concrete truth, no less. It is so concrete or hard set in their minds, they, having being indoctrinated from the cradle to the grave, that to contemplate thinking anything else, let alone question it or do some basic research to see if it’s true, would be beyond the pale for them, such is their blind belief and acceptance of this idea. If The Truth were realised, this would be a real rent your clothes job – not a pretty sight I might add. LOL

OK, so if I prove that they were not Jews, so what!? What use would that piece of information be, it all happened around 3,500 years ago, so who cares!? Unfortunately, not many people would care at all, but they should care, because this whole idea is the foundation of another set of ideas. One of which would be the idea that the present nation state of Israel, is Israel, when all the while it is not. Yes, geographically it is the land once known as Israel, but that’s where the connection ends. In effect, it is a counterfeit construct of the Rothschilds i.e. the Canaanite Jewish bankers and all planned by them well before WW1 and WW2. Even the so called Star of David, a satanic occult symbol which has nothing to do with King David the Old Testament King of Israel, is also a counterfeit construct of these same Canaanite Jewish bankers, commonly known as The Banksters. These Canaanite Jewish banksters, falsely called The Elite, by many misguided people, are just low life gangsters, murderers and mobsters in the order of Al Capone. Biblically they are known as dogs. Yet, they have literally stolen all the gold and wealth of the British, American and European peoples (including those of the British Commonwealth) over the last 350 years or so and all from under our very noses. We are talking a big time scam here, because all this theft has taken place with the blessings of our vile, bought and corrupt politicians and their equally corrupt, slimy media boot lickers, commonly known as presstitutes or journo-whores.

So, having revealed those little gems of Truth and made it very relevant for the 21st century, who else, apart from everyone, should care whether or not Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were Jews? Well, for starters, numerous Bible historians should care. I hope, too, that an even bigger number of Christians who are truly interested in The Truth – Yashua Anointed (The Lord Jesus Christ), and not the meaningless Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, will also care. I know what, I care, because only The Truth interests me and, of course, anything else that shows up the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion for the diabolical sham and counterfeit that it is; it’s all grist to the mill for me folks.

Right, let’s get to the Biblical proof and evidence that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were not Jews.

Genesis 11:28 (KJV) And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees.

Genesis 11:31 (KJV) And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son’s son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram’s wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran, and dwelt there.

Genesis 15:7 (KJV) And he said unto him, I am the LORD that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it.

Nehemiah 9:7 (KJV) Thou art the LORD the God, who didst choose Abram, and broughtest him forth out of Ur of the Chaldees, and gavest him the name of Abraham;

So there we have it, Abram, later named Abraham by The Lord came from Ur in Chaldea. This means, whether we like it or not, that Abraham was a Chaldean and he was not a Jew. He was also a descendant of Eber who in turn was a descendant of Shem, the son of Noah, and from Eber we get the name or title “Hebrew” (the ‘h’ being silent in the Hebrew tongue – Eberew or Ebrew). From this we know that Abram/Abraham spoke Hebrew possibly with a Chaldee dialect and from this we can easily deduce that the Hebrew language is not the language of the Jews. It is a language they use, yes, but they cannot lay claim to it as being solely theirs. The Old English tongue and British Gaelic tongues of Cornwall, Wales, Scotland and Ireland are Hebrew in origin as is Swiss German.

We also need to realise that at no point in this early Biblical history, regarding Abram/Abraham’s story, did God say to Abraham from here on in thou shalt be know as a Jew. At this point in time there were neither Jews nor Israelites on the face of the earth.

Alright then, but what about Isaac, he must have been Jewish, Isaac is a Jewish name isn’t it? Yes, Isaac is a Jewish name, because the Jews are descendants of Abraham, but that still doesn’t make Abraham a Jew, because the Jews didn’t start from Abraham. This thing is all about Patriarchs and the Jew’s Patriarchal forefather was someone else entirely. Yes, Abraham was the chief Patriarch, but there were other Patriarchs that were born of Abraham including a Patriarch that would be called Israel. We need to understand that Abraham was never called Israel even though he was a forefather of the Israelites.

Moving on, let’s continue in Genesis and look at Sarah or Sarai, Abram’s wife ‘cos maybe she was Jewish:

Genesis 11:29 (KJV) And Abram and Nahor (Abram’s brother) took them wives: the name of Abram’s wife was Sarai; and the name of Nahor’s wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran, the father of Milcah, and the father of Iscah. (Brackets mine)

Abram took Sarai (Sarah) to be his wife before he left Ur of the Chaldees, to live in Canaan. Sarai (Sarah) was his half sister so she had to be a Hebrew speaking Chaldean too – no Jews in this arrangement then. So this must mean that Isaac wasn’t a Jew either as both his parents were Hebrew speaking Chaldeans, and not Jews.

So if Isaac wasn’t a Jew then Isaac must have made Jacob a Jew through the woman he married. No such luck I’m afraid for all of you who think Jacob was a Jew. Abraham’s servant was given very specific instructions by Abraham on the bloodline of the girl Isaac was to marry and the Bible is very thorough in the detailed account of this crucial piece of history.

Let’s return to Genesis for more evidence:

Genesis 22:23 (KJV) And Bethuel begat Rebekah: these eight Milcah did bear to Nahor, Abraham’s brother.

Genesis 24:3-4 (KJV) And I will make thee swear by the LORD, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell: 4 But thou shalt go unto my country, and to my kindred, and take a wife unto my son Isaac. (Emphasis mine)

Not much Bolshevik Marxist social engineering, diversity and multiculturalism going on here then!!

Please pay special attention to the line I have emphasised above, for the Canaanites will feature in a big way later on in this story.

So again, there we have it, Hebrew speaking Chaldeans marrying Hebrew speaking Chaldeans and not a Jew to be seen anywhere; Canaanites galore on offer, but no Jews. Why is that? Simple, no Jews, as yet, had been born – none of this is rocket science, folks, just simple genealogy.

Moving on again, enter: Esau (aka Edom forefather of The Turks) and Jacob (Israel) the offspring of Isaac and Rebekah. Neither of these two sons were Jews because Isaac and Rebekah weren’t Jews. We all know the story of Esau selling his birthright for a bowl of soup and I won’t go into that part of the story now as it has no bearing on this study. What I will do, though, is swiftly move on to Jacob’s story and reveal The Truth that he, too, did not marry a Jew but, rather, like his father, Isaac, before him, married into the same family blood line from Nahor – Abraham’s brother.

Genesis 29:5-6 (KJV) And he said unto them, Know ye Laban the son of Nahor? And they said, We know him. 6 And he said unto them, Is he well? And they said, He is well: and, behold, Rachel his daughter cometh with the sheep.

So, there it is once more, Rachel, a Hebrew speaking Chaldean (as was her sister Leah), chosen as the future wife for Jacob the Hebrew speaking Chaldean and not a Jew in sight anywhere. That completes the story of the short genealogy of the three generations from Abraham to Jacob (Israel) without a single Jew being born, so obviously not mentioned in the Biblical account. This is because there weren’t any Jews born at this stage of the Biblical narrative, but they do enter the world’s stage with the next generation. So please stay with it as all will be revealed in the next article.

You might also be interested to know that the word ‘Jew’ was first used in an 18th century English play entitled “The Rivals” and thereafter added retrospectively to The KJV Bible and Shakespeare, no less. Prior to that the word had always been Iduean or other derivations of that word.

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob Jews? – Part 2 – The Patriarchs

If you haven’t done so, please read Part 1 before proceeding with the reading of this article – thank you.

Before I press on with the main theme, of this, my second article, on this crucial Biblical history, we need to establish or determine what a Patriarch is. First and foremost Patriarchs were very important people. How and why were they important? They were important because The Godhead made them important and it is fundamental that we understand that, they did not make themselves important. They did not set themselves up as Patriarchs, they were not little egotistic dictators or tin pot megalomaniacs or tyrants. The title ‘Patriarch’ is a bestowed gift; an honour or blessing from The Lord, all part of His glorious Grace.

OK, but why were they important and why are they important to us today in the 21st century? They were and are important because they were the original forefathers or progenitors of family dynasties, tribes or clansthat grew to become, in this age today, thirteen of the nations of the world we live in. If we are of Celtic-Anglo-Saxon-Judahite blood then The Patriarchs are our original forefathers.

Shem, Ham and Japheth, Noah’s sons, were Patriarchs too, and it’s from Shem that we get Abraham’s lineage plus the lineage of all white peoples. Now The Lord called Abram and gave him a new name – Abraham, and made him a Patriarch, and The Lord told him that nations, plural, would come from his loins.

Genesis 35:11 (KJV) And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins.

Not only one nation, as the erroneous brainwashed majority would have us believe, but a COMPANY OF NATIONS and kings too. As a Patriarch, Abraham would produce other Patriarchs – Isaac and Jacob/Israel his son and grandson were also Patriarchs. Before I move on, just ask yourself this question: when were The Jews ever a company of nations with kings ruling over them? Answers on the back of a postage stamp – thank you!!

Now, after Jacob, who was renamed Israel by The Lord, was that the end of the Patriarchs? NO, and I ask this, because many, especially those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, believe that to be the case, but they are catastrophically wrong. By being so seriously wrong they create a gaff of monumental proportions – a chasm of ignorance and error that totally distorts Biblical history and its whole message. Even the Gospels, and the identity of many of the intended recipients of that Good News message, are misunderstood. All the evidence is there in both Old and New Testaments, if only people would read and learn, but they don’t, they prefer blindness and deceptions, so I will now begin to reveal this awesome Truth.

Back to the Patriarchs, and as I was saying, was Jacob/Israel the last of the Patriarchs? The answer to this question is a decisive and resounding NO!! And as always we will go The Holy Scriptures for our proof and evidence. It’s strange, really, because the word ‘Patriarch’ is nowhere to be found in the Old Testament but, rather, in the New Testament and yet all the Patriarchs that ever lived, lived in Old Testament times. There are only four verses of Holy Scripture in the KJV that contain the word Patriarch(s) so I will copy them here:

Acts 2:29 (KJV) Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of The Patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. (Emphasis mine)

Straight way we have evidence that, even hundreds of years after Jacob, King David is referred to as a Patriarch, and he was a Patriarch, but in a very different way from the original Patriarchs. I will return to explain this difference in a future study.

Hebrews 7:4 (KJV) Now consider how great this man was, unto whom even The Patriarch Abraham gave the tenth of the spoils.

Acts 7:8-9 “And he gave him the covenant of circumcision: and so Abraham begat Isaac, and circumcised him the eighth day; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat The Twelve Patriarchs. 9 And The Patriarchs, moved with envy, sold Joseph into Egypt: but God was with him. (Emphasis mine)

Now here we have it in these last two verses of Acts – Jacob begat The Twelve Patriarchs, i.e. Jacob or Israel’s twelve sons by his four wives. We must understand, that these twelve sons were The Patriarchs of Twelve Family Dynasties that became The Twelve Tribes or clans, that became twelve independent nations, and these twelve nations are still with us today. The Judahites and Jews are descendant from only one of these Twelve Patriarchs and being known as Judahites and Jews they carry a derivation of their forefather’s name – Judah. Judah is The Patriarchal forefather of the Judahites and Jews only. He was not the forefather of The Israelites. Judah’s eleven brothers were his fellow Patriarchs and were separate individual progenitors in their own God given right to father their own identities as tribes, clans and then nations. Hence all Judahites are Israelites, but not all Israelites are Judahites. In fact the Judahites are a minority in Israel. You will notice that I have not included The Jews here as Israelites only Judahites.

OK, having got this far, and already hinted, we now need to understand that the Jewish line from Judah is a little more complicated than the lineages from other eleven Patriarchs. Judah had a problem of not being able to keep it in his trousers (pants) and he took a fancy to an Adullamites’ daughter (A Canaanitess) named Bathshuah and sired three sons from her, two of whom were killed by The Lord for their wickedness, but the third son survived and he married yet another Canaanitess thereby starting the non-Israelite line known as the Canaanite Jews i.e. non-Jews or what some people erroneously call crypto-Jews, which they are not.

As already stated, the issue we now have to come to terms with is this, of all the Israelites, the Judahites/Jews are only a small part – one tribe only. Moreover, up until 1947 they were not a nation at all due to The Lord’s punishment and were dispersed around the globe. The first diaspora took place in circa 515 BC when they were released from Babylonian captivity by King Cyrus of Persia and again in 70 AD when the Romans destroyed Jerusalemcompletely. So the Judahites a long with their half-relations The Canaanite Jews, although a tribe of Israel, have never been a proper geographical nation known as Israel. Most of their existence has been spent as citizens, often persecuted citizens, of other nations. Is that important, most definitely, as we shall see?

We can now clearly see that there were eleven other Patriarchs who were not Judahites/Jews and I will list their names. Yes they were all brothers but not all full brothers. Jacob/Israel had four wives. Two of them were sisters – Laban’s daughters Leah and Racheland the other two were the hand maids of the sisters – Bilhah and Zilpah.

Leah the elder sister had six sons – Rueben (the eldest son), Simeon, Judah, Levi, Issachar and Zebulon.

Rachel, the wife Jacob loved, had two sons – Joseph and Benjamin (the youngest son)

Zilpah, Leah’s hand maid had two sons, Gad and Asher.

Bilhah, Rachel’s hand maid had two sons also, Dan and Naphtali.

Here listed above are The Twelve Patriarchs and each of whom sired their own Israelite tribe, clan and nation. Now only one of these was Judah who was the Patriarch of the Royal Judahites and the Canaanite Jews. The other eleven Patriarchs were Israelites but they were not Judahites or Jews. Judah was the first Judahite/Jew and his offspring only were Judahites and Jews.

Now there was one final twist to this fascinating story of historical Israel and that twist lay in the story of Joseph’s trials at the hand of his wicked jealous brothers which I will continue with in the next article. Please stay with it.

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob Jews? – Part 3 – Joseph The Patriarch and The Birthright Inheritance

Please read parts 1 and 2 of this series in order to gain a full understanding of this crucial story in OUR history. Thank you.

All of so called Christendom, that is, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and millions outside of it, know the story of Joseph and his special status in the sight of his father Jacob, later renamed Israel and, how, through this favour he received the famous coat or tunic of many colours. A more powerful story of family favouritism, feuding and the fallout from same, you would be hard pressed to find!! The thing is, did this have anything to do with Jewishness and whether or not Joseph was a Jew?

Quite plainly, from my previous articles on this subject, I have proven that Joseph, through his non-Jewish parentage of Jacob and Rachel, they, being descendants of Shem to Eber to Abraham to Isaac and all from the land of the Chaldeans, was not a Jew. Joseph’s half brother Judah was the forefather of the Jews – how, I hear you say? Easy, Judah, like his half brother Joseph, was a Patriarch and was therefore the progenitor of the so called ‘Jews’ but, properly, he was the first Judahite. All of his descendants were therefore either Canaanite Jews (from the Adullamite’s daughter) or Royal Judahites (from Tamar of Abraham’s family) – two distinct races of people begin here with Judah, and Judah only, not his eleven brothers who were fellow Israelites being sons of Jacob/Israel, but NOT Jews.

OK, so we have proven Joseph was not a Jew, but he, like his half brother Judah, was also a Patriarch and an Israelite. Joseph was the most favoured Patriarch and Israelite through Jacob’s blessings and favour, not Judah.
Later on in this story we will discover just how blessed Joseph and his descendants were to become, through the promises made by God to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, none of whom, including Joseph, were Jews or Judahites.

Moving on we discover that Joseph has been given the Spiritual gift of dreams or the gift of God given dreams with powerful messages for him and those around him:

Genesis 37:3 (KJV) Now Israel (Jacob) loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age: and he made him a coat of many colours. 4 And when his brethren saw that their father loved him more than all his brethren, they hated him, and could not speak peaceably unto him. 5 And Joseph dreamed a dream, and he told it his brethren: and they hated him yet the more. 6 And he said unto them, Hear, I pray you, this dream which I have dreamed: 7 For, behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and, lo, my sheaf arose, and also stood upright; and, behold, your sheaves stood round about, and made obeisance to my sheaf. 8 And his brethren said to him, Shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have dominion over us? And they hated him yet the more for his dreams, and for his words. 9 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me. 10 And he told it to his father, and to his brethren: and his father rebuked him, and said unto him, What is this dream that thou hast dreamed? Shall I and thy mother and thy brethren indeed come to bow down ourselves to thee to the earth? 11 And his brethren envied him; but his father observed (guarded or kept) the saying. (Brackets mine)

Here above in this short passage of Holy Scripture we have vividly described for us the beginnings of family jealousy and the subsequent feuding that would grow into tribal jealousy, rivalry and hatred; leading eventually to national antagonism and, in the future, numerous bloody wars. This, literally, is the beginnings of real national families at war.

However, as an aside, that is not all we have, for this dream of Joseph’s is repeated (a duality) in the symbolism of the Book of Revelation. Just this foreshadowing alone ties the Books of Genesis and Revelation together with a metaphorical umbilical cord:

Revelation 12:1-2, 5 (KJV) And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a Crown of Twelve Stars: 2 And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. 5 And she brought forth a Man Child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to His Throne.

Here we can see reference to a woman clothed with the sun (Jacob) and the moon (Rachel representing Jacob’s wives) and a crown of Twelve Stars = The Twelve Patriarchs of Israel. The woman here is obviously Miriam (Mary) who is a first century representation of the Israelite lineage from Jacob/Israel and his four wives. In turn, Miriam, as an Israelite descendant of Jacob/Israel, is mother to Yashua Messiah who will rule this earth with a rod of iron (tough discipline).

Moreover, most of us know the story from here on in but, if not, you can catch up by reading it all in Genesis chapter 37 and then chapters 39-47. I will come back to chapter 38 in another study re Judah and his wayward shenanigans (see link below).

The Birthright Inheritance

I will press on now and jump to Genesis chapter 48 where we read of Jacob/Israel’s passing on the blessings of Abraham and Isaac to his two grandsons, Joseph’s sons by his Egyptian wife whom he married whilst living many years in Egypt.

Manasseh was Joseph’s elder son and Ephraim his younger son. So not only do we have Joseph who is not Jewish, but we now have an Egyptian woman in the mix as well, who is not even an Israelite, producing two heirs to the birthright inheritance of Abraham Isaac and Jacob/Israel. Why are these two boys inheriting and not Jacob’s eldest son Reuben? Notice, too, that Judah, the forefather of the Jews and Judahites, is not inheriting either. The normal tradition would be for the eldest son to inherit. Unfortunately for Reuben he forfeited his right to the inheritance because of one serious misdemeanour – he defiled his father’s bed by sleeping with one of his father’s wives.

Genesis 49:3-4 (KJV) Reuben, thou art my first born, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power: 4 Unstable as water, thou shalt not excel; because thou wentest up to thy father’s bed; then defiledst thou it: he went up to my couch.

1 Chronicles 5:1-2 (KJV) Now the sons of Reuben the first born of Israel, (for he was the first born; but, for-as-much as he defiled his father’s bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph the son of Israel: and the [Royal] genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright. 2 For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler; [Royalty and the King’s line to David and Yashua Anointed – The Lord Jesus Christ – The Royal Judahite line, not The Canaanite Jewish line] but the birthright was Joseph’s:) [Square Brackets and emphasis mine].

The above Holy Scriptures tell us that Kings, as promised to Abraham, would come from him and through Isaac and Jacob/Israel to Judah to David to Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ), but Joseph, who was not a Jew would inherit the physical birthright blessings. We can now go to Genesis 48 where this whole chapter is given over to the blessings of Joseph’s two sons Manasseh and Ephraim.

Genesis 48:5 (KJV) And now thy two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, which were born unto thee in the land of Egypt before I came unto thee into Egypt, are mine; as Reuben and Simeon, they shall be mine.

Even though half Egyptian, Jacob makes these two boys full blooded Israelites thereby nullifying the Egyptian blood in their veins but, notice, they were not Jews and notice, too, that he specifically uses Reuben’s and Simeon’s names so as not to confuse anyone then or in the future with them being Jews or Judahites.

Verses 8-9 And Israel (Jacob) beheld Joseph’s sons, and said, Who are these? 9 And Joseph said unto his father, They are my sons, whom God hath given me in this place (Egypt). And he said, Bring them, I pray thee, unto me, and I will bless them.

Verse 10 Now the eyes of Israel (Jacob) were dim for age, so that he could not see. And he brought them near unto him; and he kissed them, and embraced them.

Verse 13 And Joseph took them both, Ephraim in his right hand toward Israel’s left hand, and Manasseh in his left hand toward Israel’s right hand, and brought them near unto him.

Here we see Joseph following family tradition and bringing Manasseh the elder son to Jacob’s right hand and Ephraim the younger to his left hand, but look what happens?

Verse 14 And Israel stretched out his right hand, and laid it upon Ephraim’s head, who was the younger, and his left hand upon Manasseh’s head, guiding his hands wittingly; for Manasseh was the first born. 15 And he blessed Joseph, and said, God, before whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac did walk, the God which fed me all my life long unto this day,

Joseph tries to correct his father:

Verse 17 And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father’s hand, to remove it from Ephraim’s head unto Manasseh’s head. 18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the first born; put thy right hand upon his head.

Jacob/Israel is having none of it:

Verse 19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations.

So here we have it or rather we have them, two boys who are half Egyptian and half Israelite made full Israelites by the blessings of their forefathers Abraham, Isaac and their grandfather Jacob/Israel but at the same time were not Jews or Judahites

Even if we didn’t have the background history we would have to be suspicious of the prophecy that descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob would become two great nations one of which becoming a multitude of nations. This prophecy if applied to the Jews could never be made to fit, because they have never been a great nation and they certainly have never been a multitude of nations. This evidence is crucial in proving that Israelites are not Jews.

These two boys were not only blessed with God’s national blessings, they also became Patriarchs too, as the fathers of two of the tribes of Israel and are mentioned in Revelation – Joseph representing Ephraim.

Revelation 7:4 (MCV) And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Children of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Naphtali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Ephraim (Joseph) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

Again here we have it, a time yet to come, just prior to, when Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) returns to this earth and seals in the foreheads 144,000 people from the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Now notice, only 12,000 are Judahites, and none of them are Jews, so who are the others? (See links below)

All will be revealed soon, including why the Tribe of Dan is not mentioned in Revelation.

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

105 thoughts on “WERE ABRAHAM, ISAAC and JACOB, JEWS? – Part 1 – The Beginning —- Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob Jews? – Part 2 – The Patriarchs. – Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob Jews? – Part 3 – Joseph The Patriarch and The Birthright Inheritance

  1. The Jews come from Esau/Edom as they freely admit in their jewish encyclopedia, not from Judah. Esau gave up his birthright and married into the canannites. The blessings go to the 12 sons of JACOB…..INCLUDING JUDAH.

    • Unfortunately for you, you have been duped by lying Jews or by ignorant misinformed Jews. If they did or do claim that they are from Esau they would also have known that they were cut off from the Abrahamic birthright because Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of soup.

      Rebekah then conned Isaac into blessing Jacob/Israel instead of Esau because he had chosen inbred alien non-Abrahamic wives. First a daughter of Ishmael the Egyptian from Hagar and then two Canaanite wives. These evil actions cut him off from any claim to the Abrahamic descendancy line and the Jews know it. So any Jewish Encyclopaedia claims that they are Edomites is an act of shooting themselves in the foot and an ignorant distraction – pure BS.

      To be a Jew their claim MUST be to being a descendant of Judah and thereby an Israelite. Esau was NEVER an Israelite, so to claim descendancy from Esau would automatically disqualify them from any claim to the land of Israel. JACOB was Israel, NOT ESAU. Time you were educated in these matters.

      You can start here:

      https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

      • LOL! That’s some good old fashioned schooling! Nothing like a slap upside the head from MCV!

      • LOL! They seldom ever think things through. I had forgotten I had written that! I’ll have to copy it and use it in my comments elsewhere. Nice reminder.

    • Great. Next time they admit that you can tell them they are not descendants of the house of Judah and hit the bricks.

  2. How do we account from Zedekiah to Yashua Messiah? The books of Ezra and Nehemiah paint a pretty bedraggled remnant returning from Babylon; a few Judhaites, Levites and Benjaminites, (and Shelahites). Where did the lineage go?

    • Most of Israel, probably as much as 95% was scattered, hence the Book of James starts with this verse:
      James 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to The Twelve Tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.

      NOTICE The Twelve Tribes, not The Ten Tribes.

      That means only a tiny remnant remained in Samaria and Judea in the post Babylonian captivity era. However, there were enough for the Godhead to accomplish their plans and for Yashua Messiah to come and teach, suffer, die and be resurrected from the dead – thereby making it possible for rebellious scattered Israel to be saved.

      • So, the Royal David line remains in the area and Yashua is born of it… how do we know that?

      • Some Judahites, Benjaminites and Levites returned to the area after the Babylonian captivity and remained there until 70 AD when they fled before the Roman seige began.

        Amongst those were all the recorded and mentioned New Testament people in the Gospels including Joseph and Miriam (Mary) who were both descendants of King David.

      • If someone asked you to prove that lineage what would you point to?

      • “”Judah is a lion’s whelp. Thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise. The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come.” – Gen. 49:9-10″

        How does this fit in the picture and who is Shiloh? Has Shiloh NOT come yet?

      • Judah is always represented by the the LION RAMPANT in European heraldry. The Sceptre is also a sign of ROYALTY and it would NEVER leave Judah and his descendants, many of whom are ROYAL with no throne or kingdom – AS YET!!!

        Shiloh is symbolism for Yashua Messiah AND His Kingdom – soon to come.

      • So, what happens to the royal line after Mary? Does the Royalty of Ireland heal the breach after captivity with the arrival of Tea Tephi and Jeremiah in Ireland bringing the Pharez and Zarah lines back together? Does that mean Tea Tephi is a descendant of Salomon’s brother too?

      • The Pharez line continued with Yashua Messiah’s half-siblings and any others who are unknown.

        The Zarah/Pharez breach was healed long before Miriam (Mary) was born. Tea Tephi’s arrival in Ireland was circa 585 BC when the Babylonians took the Kingdom of Judah captive. Jeremiah escaped with his Royal reponsibilities.

        Tea Tephi was a descendant of Solomon but from Rehoboam not from an alien concubine.

      • OK. So, where did the Judahites go after Christ?

        The healing of the breach in Ireland meant TT brought the Pharez to the Zarah? Is this how the Guelphs trace their lineage back to David?

        Does this make any sense to you:
        “I did not come to Earth to bring peace but a sword, to divide son (Shelah) from father (Judah), daughter-in-law (Bathshuah) from mother (Judah’s mother) and a man (Yashua) will find his enemies are under his own roof! (House of Judah)?? Am I reading something in there?

      • Mainly to the British Isles and then to the Commonwealth nations and the USA but with some remaining in Europe. The Hanoverians were in Germany along with the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha clan. ALL were/are Judahites.

        People with the suffix ‘Fitz’ to their name are Judahites, they being bastards of The Royal Court = Fitzwilliam, Fitzpatrick, Fitzjohn etc.

        E.g. Charles II had 12 mistresses (Biblical wives) and all bore him sons and daughters = Royal Judahites. Henry VIII was the same as was the Prince Regent.

        All British Royalty traces its lineage back to Zarah and Pharez.

        No, Shelah was always an outcast as soon as he bedded a Canaanite wife. No different from Esau = no claim on the Semitic bloodline.

        Yashua Messiah saying He brought a sword was reference ONLY to those who would be called by The Father and their calling would cause MAJOR RIFTS within their families setting father against son and son against father.

  3. Pingback: BREXIT PARTY! | Exposing End Times Dissos and Disinformation

    • Quasi-intellectual or theological clap trap like the word ‘Aryan’. Don’t get sucked into all that Jewtube blathering nonsense.

      Ashkenaz was a grandson of Japheth, a slit eyed yellow skinned oriental, no more Jewish than my neighbour’s cat.

      Genesis 10:2-3 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. 3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.

      • So, these Japethites, are they not cousins of the semites?

        They just borrowed the obscure name or how did it get applied to the Shelahites? I take it then all these various types of Jew are for the most part Shelahites?

      • Semites, Hamites and Japhethites are all sons of Adam via Noah = MANkind with Semites being white (Adam was white) and the chosen branch and from that chosen branch Abraham was chosen to be The Chief Patriarch of The Israelites.

        Canaanites are sons of Satan via Cain and Ham with his Cainite mother Naamah to Canaan = HU-MANkind.

        ALL RACIAL JEWS are from Shelah – whether there are sub-tribes of Shelahites I have no idea and I don’t care because a Jew is a Jew is a Jew is a Shelahite = Serpent Seed = the Spawn of The Devil.

      • Interesting. I wa given a book some time ago only to get to it now called: “Wandering Jew” by Dennis Marks.

        “All of Roth’s displaced characters conniving for new identities are metaphorical Jews. They are all alter ego of their creator, Moses Joseph Roth, the greatest shape-changer of them all.”

      • The Jew, Gilad Atzmon probably based his book: “The Wandering Who?” on that Dennis Marks’ book. I have not read either.

        I had not heard of Roth before, but looking at his pic in Jewpedia he has the typical Jew ‘rat face’ features.

      • It’s quite interesting reading now. Firms up the wandering shape-shifter pathology very well

      • Me thinks I am beginning to get the picture. I and perhaps everybody is looking through the glass the wrong way. Follow the lineage through the OT and if these people are not Shemites, Hamites, or Japethites they MUST be Canaanites. No Yes?

      • Yes and that’s the problem with these Edomite Jew idiots, they start their ‘history’ in Judea in the first century = like trying to build a house from the second floor up. More impossible than stupid.

  4. Hi Charles,

    Just making my way along through 2nd reading of OT. Moses just died. I’m sad. Thought I’d share that with you.

      • Great man. Sitting back and taking time reading the story. He did so much for the stiffnecked bastards!

        And they just keep running off and lusting after other gods. LOL

        Judges 9:28 almost reads like foreshadowing of the Vikings

      • Don’t forget, they were not saved in a Spiritual sense and the story is in there as a lesson to those of us who THINK they are saved and do so by keeping a physical Sabbath (Saturday or Sunday) under The Law instead of resting in His ETERNAL Sabbath Rest. – Hebrews 3 and 4. Like those stiff necked Israelites of old, they FAIL to ENTER INTO His Sabbath Rest – the Spiritual Promised Land!!

        Hebrews 3:19 (KJV) So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief. (Could not BELIEVE in The Truth that they were called)

  5. Charles, I’ve been using a KJV phone app, but am interested to obtain a proper book. There seem to be a great many bibles, even KJV on offer with all kinds of goings on bonus material etc. Are there any that are either particularly useful (or erroneous) I should consider before hand?

    • You can get them with the Apocrypha (additional books) or without. I would go for the Apocrypha version as those books, especially Maccabees, are historically useful.

      How’s it going with the Baptist fella?

      • Had a meeting with him yesterday. At the end he asked if he would mind a prayer and he prayed; such was his prayer that I thought he seems to be on the edge of a breakthrough ie God please help me

        So, who knows. I told him that I found our discussions useful and we’d catch up again.

      • God has already helped him with the Scriptural knowledge and proof you have presented to him and his fake prayer is just a rejection of what you have said – that’s my take on it – I maybe wrong, but I doubt it. That STRONG DELUSION is VERY STRONG.

        So what’s next? Are you going to try somewhere else?

      • Yea you!

        I’m planing a trip to the Isles. So, it may take a while! Sutton Hoo here we come…

        Who knows. I came away feeling it was a bit of both and that he is actually on the ropes. His paradox is he is surrounded by and knee deep in the doo-doo and he will have his beliefs compounded by or reinforced by those he regularly is with.

        Anyway, who knows I’m reading and studying in the meantime.

        Stumbled upon this and thought you might get a kick out of it?

      • Oh, I’m hoping and loosely planning at this point but the actual travel could be years away. I’d like to bring my wife and girls so who knows.

        In the meantime I’ll be reading up!

        Yea, clever video heh?

      • Oh, I thought it was imminent and was planning on getting you baptised. LOL

        In the meantime, keep on knocking on those doors. You never know!!

      • No, not imminent I’m afraid. Who knows, at the rate the UK is going it might be a police state by the time I get the $$ together!

        I press on.

      • Unfortunately, since the Christchurch faked event psyop, JewOz and Jew Zealand with their sodomite tranny are heading in the same police state direction as Britain.

        We all press on if we are called and chosen and nothing they do can change who we are and/or the One we represent = onwards and upwards.

        Keep me posted.

      • Yes indeed. I must admit to being thrown for a loop by that event myself!

        I think you mean sodomite tyranny???

        Are you familiar with the Scofield Bible? Any thoughts on that?

        I stumbled upon this while looking up standards of various tribes. If you click on the location there is a detailing of origin etc. Though there seem to be some mixed up ideas, there are also some interesting ones.

        http://www.british-israel.ca/israel.htm

      • Well, it made me think of that book, though I haven’t read it because apparently the British-Israel vision claims Jews to be the tribe of Judah, and this fellow’s work does as well.

        Is that you singing on the clip?

      • Yes the major flaw in nearly all British Israel teaching. They need to educate themselves on the Serpent Seed Cain/Canaanite subject.

        LOL no it’s not me singing on the clip.

      • OK. I was beginning to wonder if you’d totally lost your marbles.

        Thought you might enjoy this? In between JP lecturing is an old propaganda film:

      • LOL! No, it just occurred to me that a born of God individual might be otherwise occupied than making such videos.

        I am not sure whether JP is an idiot or an intentional deceiver, but he seems to miss his own Marxism right under his nose and out of his mouth; perhaps he is totally earnest but hamstrung by his profession in which he must equivocate all faiths and Gods etc?? He really doesn’t get what Marxism is, and he compounds errors while he bashes institutions for making them. At any rate, I didn’t give you that video to promote him, just for you to see the footage in between his babble.

        In other news, now that is Easter is approaching and official religion is cranking up the heat, is there anything funny with John 3:16? It strikes me as a perfect verse for the new age Christian vision.

      • I have not made any videos YET!! I wonder, though, when the time will come. Our Master has not yet guided me in that direction.

        I don’t think you can call JP an idiot, for he has a great mind, but nonetheless wasted on his Libertarian views. However, I will agree that he APPEARS to not understand Marxism and with that goes the Jew problem and racial/ethnic differences, which all Libertarians live in denial about.

        Now whether they do this intentionally or in ignorance I am not sure, but in JP’s case I would say that he does it intentionally and for expediency (keeps his job and the rabid Jew dogs at bay). For me, he’s just too clever to have such innocent blind spots.

        Let’s face it, just how easy is it to expose the Holohoax – a 10 year old could do it.

        John 3:16 should always be taken in the later context of John 6:44 and John 6:65. And I now believe that the word ‘world’ means His creation with only mankind in it. I don’t think He has ever loved the Serpent Seed, even though He has shown them mercy up until now and to the point of His return when He will exact His merciless revenge.

      • LOL!

        There I was wondering if that was you who’d made that video – now perhaps you understand why I thought you’d lost your marbles???

        You are correct JP does have a great mind and can’t be called an idiot. He seems to me a Mason, where all roads lead to the same “mysterious” and often conceptual god.

        Perhaps, however he is being brought up by God? Below is a link to a video that puts it all in a nutshell; in the hands of a skilled teacher such as yourself it could easily be used to help an inquiring student understand the errors?

      • Well first, I have had to conclude that you are probably correct re the prayer and the state of his ‘beliefs’. This leaves the necessity of looking elsewhere, but probably best not to go looking but let things present themselves.

      • Yes, I think he’s kicking the can down the road.

        Re looking elsewhere, He says KNOCK and the door will be opened to you, SEEK and ye shall find. However, you must do what the Holy Spirit leads you to do. The Spirit will guide you if you ask The Father.

        We may have covered this before, but have you asked your good lady? I think you said she was a believer.

      • Well,

        She may be but it opens a lengthy conversation that at this point I have not felt inclined to open. I’m currently waiting for the opportune moments to make a point or a question; letting things progress of a more natural understanding as opposed to opening up a whole can of bowl you over all at once. As with that saying “one can lead a horse to water but cannot make it drink.” I’m working on whetting the appetite but it raises a question of love of The Truth and whether that is there or not.

      • This raises the question, is she conversant with the full immersion Baptism ceremony – for want of a better description? In other words, does she know anything about it at all?

        Let’s say she is agreeable and you instruct her re the wording (no trinity wording) would she be any the wiser? Her ignorance could be your ally. Just some thoughts.

      • I doubt it.

        First step is to get a conversational ball rolling. Her father’s “dropping out” could be the talking point, as could be the questions that now come up from our girls on these issues.

      • What were the issues that caused your father-in-law to leave? He might be a better option than your wife, if she refuses. Does he still believe?

      • I can’t be sure. It might actually be a good question to get a ball rolling and open up a conversation. He is quite an artistic fellow and broad-minded so not interested in the dogmatic silliness of religion that’s for sure.

        You might be on to something there, and thanks for that suggestion. I suppose in my own way I’ve been musing that sooner or later something is going to have to happen on this line of discussion within my extended family. We will see.

    • No, not yet. It’s not a big deal, unless you’re an Irish Catholic (idolater). That was always Dan’s Achilles Heel from the get-go and it still pervades to this day, especially with Irish women and their Popery obsession.

      • Ha ha I noticed that on a Netflix show about the Irish rebellion, I think it was called Revolution, they had all this Mother Mary mania going on, chants etc.

      • Indeed and many now are fanatically obsessed with the Green religion. Sad. More priesthoods selling salvation and BS.

      • OK. Hadn’t thought of that.

        I have recently started reading Book of Jasher and wanted to ask you how you view in terms of credibility?

        Also, I can no longer access your minds page without signing up.

        Lastly I have checked the yes2 truth blog but can’t comment there and I thought t might be more appropriate to send you something like this there?

      • Jasher is alright for reference on areas where the Bible seems to be lacking information – most likely deliberately lacking information, but I wouldn’t use it as a prime source for Truth. As always sifting and discerning is key.

        Don’t know what’s going on with minds. I’ll sign out and check it to see what’s what.

        The yes2truth blog I have lost access to, due to losing and forgetting all identification to the site. I have been in touch with WordPress but without an e-mail proof of ID (also closed down and lost) I am screwed.

        I have therefore started a new blog and will publish a link once it’s up and running.

      • I found this:
        “And Cain the son of Adam advanced towards them.” 2:26

      • A classic example of error within its pages. Two Seeds came out of The Garden, not one seed and Cain’s bloodline does not feature from Adam to Noah – all Cain’s descendants died in the flood except for Naamah.

        Cain’s bloodline only features in Naamah’s line and her line was dead until she bore Canaan.

      • I am (as you aware) aware of all of that. However, what does this say of the Book of Jasher itself? Who was Jasher? Why is it referenced in Kings?

      • I have no idea. Who wrote the Aramaic Targums, which names Satan as Sammael and the father of Cain, and I use to support The TWO SEEDS Truth?

      • Well, I’m not sure and I’m not sure why you’d need the Aramaic Targums at any rate as genesis Chapter 5 makes it pretty clear the lineage of Adam.
        I just thought you might know who Jasher was and why he was significant enough to be constantly referred to in the Bible itself. I’d never heard of the Aramaic Targums.

      • Well it all rests on the false idea (premise) that The Bible is inerrant and is the sole source of knowledge (or be all that ends all information source) re the origins of man and his enemies.

        As you now know it cannot be relied upon 100% and there is most definitely a religious/ethnic deceptive agenda that has been written into or omitted from its pages.

      • The Bible may well be fiddled with, but The Truth can still be seen plainly enough in it’s pages and you have already demonstrated that. Frankly I had probably been called to it without really knowing that at a young age just by reading the words of Christ. I’ve never heard of the Targums through your work and while I’d read them as I’m reading Jasher, for more info, if The Bible is just a book like any other that to me just would send people on a wild goose chase; if The Truth is understood outside material can be understood but if the foundation is lost then we build our house on shifting sand – next thing you know people think Gilgamesh is comparable to the Bible.

        One thing I wanted to ask you is I can’t find that verse about Christ telling us to rebuke people but I’m pretty sure it is seared into your consciousness good and proper! Can you help a little brother out please?

      • The Bible has been far more than fiddled with – I would suggest that it’s been grossly perverted in a few crucial places and enough to deceive billions of people. Some fiddling, eh!?

        As I have said elsewhere in my articles, Bibles contain the Holy Scriptures, but Bibles, in and of themselves, are NOT the Holy Scriptures. This is where SPIRITUAL discernment comes in and why it’s imperative that new believers get Baptised and gifted with the Holy Spirit ASAP. ( I know you’re doing your best)

        Too many modern Christians forget that the bulk of the 2,000 years of church history (approx 1,500 years) have passed without any Bibles in circulation at all. What did those believers do apart from rely on travelling preachers?

        As I said, when the Holy Scriptures go quiet you have to look elsewhere to fill in the gaps.

      • I get your point. My point is that if it cannot be stated to anybody that The Truth is still contained within the pages of the Bible and that it cannot be found elsewhere (historical context can), it becomes very difficult to suggest to people that Christ isn’t just a story of the Bible a book like any other. My feeling is that most people aren’t that interested anyway, which means people like yourself and subsequently me will go into deeper territory but others and particularly those affronted by the assault on their deluded ideas will simply run away because they aren’t hearing any truth anyway. For example, you were able to prove and I was able to verify that Ham banged his mom all within the pages of the Bible.

        At any rate, what version of Targums do you refer to? I’m currently reading Jasher but, perhaps one day I’ll get on to Targums, though if I’m not mistaken they are the scriptures in Aramaic no?

      • Yashua Messiah is only relevant to those The Father is calling, no one else. What’s written, were it’s written and who by is neither here or nor there to a lost carnal mind. Like telling an Eskimo in Alaska that it’s 110+ degrees in Nigeria.

      • Indeed.

        I have discovered a PDF of the Targum of Onkelos and am reading a bit of Genesis, but it seems a bit academic at this point though I did find this “And Adam called his wife Have because she was the mother of all the children of men.”

      • Perhaps. It certainly makes a case but it doesn’t suggest she did not bear Kain she still gives her got a man from the LORD so, as you’ve stated if people aren’t being called they will argue whatever they like anyway because they simply won’t hear it or accept it.

        “And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.” Luke 16:15

      • Also from the Targum Onkelos THE TARGUM OF PALESTINE IV:

        Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Hava (Eve) his wife, who had desired (lusted after) the angel; and she conceived, and bare Kain; and she said, I have acquired a man, (from) the angel of the Lord. And she added to bear from her husband Adam his twin, (superfetation) even Habel (Abel). And Habel was a shepherd of the flock, but Kain was a man working in the earth. (All brackets mine)

        Even people who are being called will argue, most of mainstream Protestant Christianity is called but 1) they refuse to acknowledge it and 2) proving they are not chosen.

      • Ah ha. That is an interesting variation. I’m not sure about the “argument” you are talking about but comparing the Bible vs the Targum I stumbled upon I found the Bible to be more useful because the Targum made it sound as if Cain were mankind, whereas with the Bible at least there is mother of all living and thus open to Cain being Hu-man. At any rate, where did you find the Hu = serpent? Have you studied the ancient Hebrew?

      • Deceived people (mainstream Christians) always argue.

        As I have said elsewhere, these extra curricular sources are there just to fill in the gaps left by the corrupted KJV Bible – they are not up for general consideration as universal bona-fide documents for regular use.

        I found the ‘hu’ stuff somewhere in my travels across the webiverse, but cannot recollect where. It was a site that specialised in the ancient world histories. It also sounded very convincing and strongly resonated with me . Why have the two words at all (man or hu-man)? if one does not have a different meaning from the other.

        No, I’m not a multi-linguist.

      • In suggesting that most of mainstream Protestant Christianity is called does this explain why so few attend church anymore because they were called out the door of false doctrine and got fed up being under law but then have not been chosen so they are now just lost or without a shepherd?

      • If they have walked away from religion it could be for numerous reasons – most will be called, but not chosen. A minority will be chosen and leaving religion will be a step on their journeys to finding The Truth.

      • Just typed “Minds – The Christian Right” into the search bar and it came up first on the list. Clicked on the link and the site came up. This was in Brave browser.

      • Indeed it did. Not sure what happened there either. Thanks.

  6. I do not comprehend your thesis? Though it is base upon interesting facts it is incomprehensible to the biblical history.
    See : 1 Peter 2:
    …9But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, to proclaim the virtues of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light. 10Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.
    This speaks to Malachi 2. Lo ammi not my people Judahites and
    Ammi God says those who are not my people will be my people.
    Why are you chasing a bloodline? Jesus says to a Jew who was arrogant in birth right and genealogy – flesh and blood counts for nothing.
    Even Peter says God is not a respecter of person (fleshly superior pedigree), why? Because the gentiles just received the spirit of God and so all nations are blessed and this is why Jesus commanded the good news to all nations. Go ye therefore.
    Jesus said I have come but for the lost sheep of the house of Isreal – they were lost as the religious leaders cut them off from the temple. Jesus never went into some type of diaspora of a the old lost house of Israel. No. only a remnant will return.
    Not all Israel is of Israel as a statement was made in Romans to demonstrate they were cutt off and we no Israelites were grafted on. Please,
    bare in mind I mean no disrespect to your monumental and prolific work. It is genius on many levels but the idea that Jesus does not reign today in that heavenly city come down 2000yrs ago is just preposterous. For God so loved the world. Not a group of nations out of the loins of Joseph that is totally without merit.
    God bless us all as we ponder the truth in the face of the historical biblical facts.
    Respectfully.

    • What is there to not comprehend, unless your mind is closed and/or fixated on Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious deceptions.

      So, also, with respect, you’re building a top down pyramid, (just like Papists do with their Peter the pope, top down pyramid building), that is, by basing your argument from 1 Peter 2 and working backwards.

      All Holy Scripture starts from the BEGINNING, in Genesis. If you build on any other foundation (TOP DOWN RELIGIOUS DOGMA or PREMISES) then your doctrine will FAIL!

      Now for some correction: To whom were the 12 Messengers (apostles) sent, especially Peter? Here’s a clue from the lips of Yashua Messiah Himself:

      Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (The ‘lost’ Ten Tribes).
      He also gave the twelve disciples explicit instructions:

      Matthew 10:5-6 (KJV) These Twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

      Luke 19:9-10 (MCV)  And Jesus said unto him, This day is salvation come to this house, forsomuch as he also is a son of Abraham. 10 For The Son of Man is come to seek and to save that which was lost, That is, the ‘lost’ Tribes of Israel). 

      “Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.

      Israel became a nothing people to God in 740-725 BC when The Assyrians carried them off into captivity. They were removed from The Lord’s sight and banished from the land of Israel as punishment for their idolatry toward Moloch (child sacrifices). (I am NOT talking about the Canaanite Jews here).

      They received no mercy and multiple thousands, possibly millions, died by the Assyrian sword – they became a non-people in God’s sight.

      “Why are you chasing a bloodline”

      Why are you not researching the Bloodline? Why do you think Yashua Messiah is referred to as THE SON OF MAN 89 times in The Holy Scriptures? What other son could there be, if not a son of man?

      Go here to learn what a PERSON is:
      For There is No Respect of Persons With God – Romans 2:11 – But What is a Person? – Parts 1 & 2
      https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/for-there-is-no-respect-of-persons-with-god-romans-211-but-what-is-a-person-parts-1-2/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s