Did The Messenger Paul REASON With THE JEWS In The Synagogues?

OK, now the first issue that arises out of this title is who were these Jews? for until we ascertain who they really were, we’re not going to fully understand this question, or this issue. We then have to see the word ‘synagogue’ in The Light of the Holy Scriptures for, again, unless we know for sure what ‘synagogues’ represent, we’ll flounder in the dark.

So let’s get this second point firmly set in our minds and onto our hearts of Truth, because there is NOTHING positive about synagogues, and the only synagogue mentioned by name in the Holy Scriptures is this one here, and it’s mentioned twice! just so we get it!

Revelation 2:9 (KJV) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are The Synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 (KJV) Behold, I will make them of The Synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

These verses tell us, without any ambiguity, that there’s only one kind of synagogue – SATAN’S SYNAGOGUE, for there is no other.

Right, so who were these ‘Jews’ that said they were Jews, but were lying? Now here we have the usual type of translator’s error that we find so often in the pages of the KJV, and which I reveal in so many of my articles. So let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some insight:

Jews – G2453Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:—Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

OK, the first thing we must understand here is The Truth that the word ‘Jew’, as used in the KJV, is 100% a misnomer, for it is automatically and deceptively leading us to believe that the word ‘Jew’ is referring to the Hebrew Israelites, The Chosen People of God, when NOTHING could be further from The Truth.

This means that these Jews were Jews who thought they were Judeans, but were not Judeans at all, for Judeans were Semitic Hebrew Israelites, and these ‘Jews’ claimed, falsely, that they were Judeans. These impostors, known as ‘Jews’, were/are, in Truth, Hamitic Canaanites from Bathshuah the Canaanitess, through her son Shelah, as recorded in Genesis 38, so they were NOT Judean Semitic Israelites at all. These days they openly admit it!:

“We are a chosen people. Most Jews do not like to admit it but our god is Lucifer and we Jews are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”

— The Jew, Harold W. Rosenthal

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

This is why I call the Jews The Serpent Seed from The Garden (see link Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 below for all the historical proof and evidence that the Jews are nothing to do with The Chosen People – The Twelve Tribes of Israel).

So moving on, we have now learned that these Jews were not Semitic Israelites, so who were these Judeans? The Judeans were descendants of a remnant of the three Tribes of The House of Judah that returned from the Babylonian captivity, namely Royal Judahites, Levites (The Priesthood) and Benjaminites. As examples we had Mary Mariam and Joseph who were Royal Judahites, John the Baptist and his family who were Levites, and The Messenger Paul who was a Benjaminite. Joseph of Arimathea was likewise a Royal Judahite, and no doubt Nicodemus was also a Levite. However, NONE of these crucial Biblical characters were Jews!

All this information now brings us to the thorny issue of whether or not Paul REASONED with the Jews if, by ‘Jews’, Holy Scripture is referring to the Canaanite Jews. If that was the case and the people present in the synagogue were Canaanite Jews then there would have been no reasoning with them at all. Paul would have preached and declared The Gospel of The Kingdom of God and the Jews would have argued with Paul and sent him packing or, worse, attempted to have him arrested and after a rigged trial had him put to death, most likely stoning him to death. This is how much the Jews hated The Gospel Message and thereby making any reasoning totally impossible.

However, if there had been Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites there present with these Canaanite Jews, then some kind of reasoning could have been possible, but always keeping in mind that unless The Father was calling these Judeans, they would also have been non-receptive to The Kingdom Gospel Message.

Moreover, all of you who have read my articles on “Theology and Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals” (see link Nos. 6 and 7 below), will know my views and be aware of the compelling evidence I have gathered that proves them to be next to useless when it comes to matters Holy Spiritual and Scriptural. If you have not read them, I thoroughly recommend them to you now for, without the knowledge contained therein you are, and will always be, vulnerable to their deceitful and deceptive ways. Make no mistake these so called experts will lead you astray if you give them, not even, half a chance.

Back to the title question; well did he? Did Paul ‘reason’ with the Canaanite Jews in the Synagogues? In fact, as already stated, did Paul ‘reason’ with anyone? What if he did or he did not, what does it matter? It matters greatly for, if he didn’t, why is the word ‘reasoned’ in the Holy Scriptures at all?

Let’s deal with the question.

Did Paul reason with the Jews?

Well the KJV of The Holy Bible says he did so that must be it, yes? Actually, no is the plain and simple answer to that. To help us with this study I will list the relevant Holy Scriptures here:

Please take note that the word ‘reasoned’ cannot be found in any of Paul’s letters, nor in Hebrews. So this tells us that it’s a word that only Luke uses in Acts which immediately puts a question mark over it.

Acts 17:1-2 (KJV)Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews: And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.

Acts 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.

Acts 18:19And he came to Ephesus, and left them there: but he himself entered into the synagogue, and reasoned with the Jews.

Acts 24:25 And as he reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come, Felix trembled, and answered, Go thy way for this time; when I have a convenient season, I will call for thee.

There we are, four Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals and theologians love, especially Roman Catholic Bible intellectuals. Why do they love these Holy Scriptures? because they think that Paul was just like them, a debating, pontificating Bible intellectual or theologian, when nothing could be further from The Truth, and The Truth is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

OK, let’s print Strong’s definition of this word:

Reasoned – G1256διαλέγομαι dialegomai dee-al-eg’-om-ahee. Middle voice from G1223 and G3004; to say thoroughly, that is, discuss (in argument or exhortation): – dispute, preach (unto), reason (with), speak.

Now here in Strong’s definition we can see some confusion through his contradictory remarks:

On one hand he says ‘dialegomai’ means: “To say thoroughly”; “To preach (unto)”; “To speak”; “To exhort.” Then on the other hand he says it means: “To discuss”; “To argue”; “To dispute”; “To reason.”

Now which is it, for it cannot be both?

In 2 Corinthians 12:20 Paul states quite clearly what he thinks of debating, reasoning and arguing:

2 Corinthians 12:20 (MCV) For I fear, lest, when I come, I shall not find you such as I would, and that I shall be found unto you such as ye would not: lest there be debates, (reasoning) envyings, wraths, strifes, (arguments) backbitings, whisperings, swellings, (haughtiness through puffed up meaningless intellectual vanity) tumults.

Is Paul a hypocrite? Is he giving advice and warnings to those he is teaching whilst he himself does the opposite!! Is this an example of the worldly norm of: “Don’t do as I do, just do as I tell you?” Is that what it’s all about – is that what Paul was saying here? I don’t think so, in fact I know so and we all know so, don’t we? if The Truth is in us.

Here is the bottom line: “Saying thoroughly”; “preaching unto”; “speaking and exhorting” is a one way street. These activities do not invite debate, unless you are opposed to the aforementioned declarations. We need to understand The Word of God is not up for debate, nor up for discussion, nor up for reasoning on for hours and hours. It is preached and either received or rejected; there is no half way house.

Paul went into the synagogues and preached and there stated his case (he said thoroughly) for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). Now there would have been some there that received Paul’s message joyfully, and others that would not have done so. Those who received it joyfully would have questioned Paul further initially being curious and then hungry for The Word of God, and wanting to know more. No doubt those who did not receive his message would have given him much opposition. This opposition would have come from the men of religion, but he would not have argued and reasoned with them. He would have said the same things to them as Yashua Messiah said to the Pharisee Canaanite Jews of His day. Hypocrites; whited sepulchres; nests of vipers etc. etc. The mindset that is opposed God – the carnal hu-man mindset cannot be reasoned with, it’s impossible and Paul knew this. See link No. 8 below)

Let’s not forget he was once one of them himself, a Pharisee, so he knew exactly how their minds worked. That’s why he stated this in Romans 8:6-7

Romans 8:6-7 (KJV) For to be carnally minded is death; but to be Spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

So there we have it; it’s either one or the other, called or not called.

Let’s now take a closer look at those Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals use to support their right to foolishly reason and pontificate on The Holy Word of God, something they are not Spiritually qualified to do.

1) “And three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.”

What does this tell us? It tells us the opposite of The Truth. It says Paul reasoned with them for three Sabbath days, which means every Sabbath, for three consecutive weeks Paul went to this synagogue to preach The Word of God out of The Holy Scriptures. He didn’t reason out of the Holy Scriptures, for it is impossible for a Spirit born son of God to do so. Therefore to ‘say thoroughly’ is just another way of saying he spoke with confidence and authority; he taught, preached to or exhorted those present he didn’t reason. One only reasons with people who are in disagreement. If, as True Believers, we reason with the argumentative, we automatically give credence to their view. If someone was disagreeing with the Messenger Paul, whose servant do you think this trouble maker was? Only one chance for the right answer folks and no prizes for getting it right!

2) “And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.”

Here we go again; he ‘reasoned’ and persuaded the Jews Judeans and Greeks. No he didn’t, he ‘said thoroughly’ what the Holy Scriptures said and then they were persuaded. They were convinced by what they heard. How?

John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

This is how it works folks: The Father God calls a man or a woman to His Son and this is made possible by The Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has not yet indwelled this convert yet, but he or she is receiving special attention from The Father through His Spirit. After this miraculous event, and a called person hears The Word of God preached or ‘said thoroughly’ by a messenger from God, he or she will respond positively, they can do nothing else. This is how these Israelite Judeans and Greeks were able to be ‘convinced’. The Father God was calling them and Paul was His messenger bringing them the Good News.

If we look at Strong’s definition for ‘persuaded’ it’s not the best word choice for this situation:

Persuaded – G3982πείθω peithō pi’-tho A primary verb; to convince (by argument, true or false); by analogy to pacify or conciliate (by other fair means); reflexively or passively to assent (to evidence or authority), to rely (by inward certainty): – agree, assure, believe, have confidence, be (wax) content, make friend, obey, persuade, trust, yield.

In order to satisfy The Truth of John 6:44 we need something better than ‘persuaded’ because to be ‘persuaded’ means a choice has been made and that is not the case at all as being saved is not up to us, it’s not our decision. Let’s assess this miracle properly: “To passively assent to”; “to trust and rely on with an inward certainty”; “to trust and be in agreement with”; “to have no doubts and total confidence that what we and they are hearing is The Truth.” All of the above is only possible through The Father making it possible through The Holy Spirit and Yashua Messiah with us for, where else would this inward certainty originate – from ourselves!!??

When Samuel the Prophet was called The Father God did not reason with him, He just called his name and Samuel replied: “Here am I.”

1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the LORD called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

Have you noticed two things missing here – reasoning and persuasion, well, would you believe it? I do hope so, because the words ‘reasoned’ and ‘persuaded’ are the additions of Bible intellectuals, who over time have contaminated The Word of God through their personal religious agendas, and thereby reflected them in the pages of The Holy Bible.

As a final point, you could argue’ that I am reasoning’ with you to persuade’ you with this article, right this minute, but again that would not be true unless The Father were already calling you to His Son. If that is the case you will need no reasoning or persuading, and I will certainly not have to argue with you. I am only the sower and the seed is The Word of God and you are either fertile soil or stony ground. Furthermore, I cannot tell you whether you are fertile soil or not, only you can answer this question for yourself, for you will either agree with me or disagree with me.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

3. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

4. Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:

5. The Jews are The Tares, Fit Only For Burning!:

6. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Parts 1, 2 & 3:

7. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Part 4:

8. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:


28 thoughts on “Did The Messenger Paul REASON With THE JEWS In The Synagogues?

  1. Hi Charles, I completely agree about this no reasoning business. They will either hear or won’t hear and if they won’t hear then one might as well talk to a stone.

      • Typos! 10-4. I’ll get on that thanks. I’ve been over it a few times…perhaps I’ve been distracted.

        I have actually. Major floods here and I reckon there are a few people on to the weather modification thing now – 700mm of rain in 24 hours. Totally off the charts. Place is now a war-zone but we’re up high and dry. So many are completely stuffed.

      • If it will help, I will let you know where they are.

        700mm!!!! That is off the chart – that’s river depth in one hit! Any low lying neighbourhoods must be completely submerged!

        Definitely a satanic weather attack.

        Glad to hear that you’re OK.

      • Mate the photos I’ve seen coming in are unbelievable; so many towns are a complete write off. It’s all up the coast for hundrreds of miles. I think this guy is on itl never mind the ongoing banter but check out the assessment of the weather:

      • Thanks Charles. I’ll check it. It’s interesting the satellite stuff. The first time I watched it I was intrigued. The second time it looked eroneous until 5 minutes in and then it was spot on.

      • Yes. Wow. I’d say he’s pretty much spot on and a week later it should be obvious to so many but as he says they are too stupid. It has had me depressed to a point where I can’t think about it and I have to step back and watch the madness – I’m back at work and I know that just a drive away, on a route that I am the spare driver on the carnage is unbelievable. A fellow I train has been 7 days doing clean ups, and I have yet to do 1 for various reasons, and it is brutal work. This Sunday I might get to finally go and shovel or whatever. Mate, a Sikh charity brigade were up here on the night all the way from Melbourne. Unbelievable story they have been putting out 1000 meals a day while the officials play their games and waste everybody’s time. There is a community up here and they’ve got their supply lines sorted and they just get on with it. Great people. Just the kind you’d like to be in a foxhole with, but all of OUR people have become Liberal hippies and mamon worshipping bastards, and these poor bastards out in Lismore are now just one of many many towns flooded to disaster. The media shows the PM touring the towns as if here were King George, not a spec of dirt on him. It’s all so sickening. Thanks for this link. I’m going to try and meet this bloke.

      • I can only imagine what it’s like, there’s no reporting of it over here, that I know of, but then I don’t watch MSM at all.

        OK, let me know how you get on with the meeting – he seemed a good guy and I felt for him.

      • No meeting. Who knows where he is now… he came down from Gold Coast. I’ve got other things to do. I’m back at work and trying to donate $$$ and on the free days go help. In an odd way it is very freeing, at least if you look at it in a way. Picture 5 metres of water coming through your town, would you pay any attention to media after that? Amazingly some do but others get flushed out by the reality of the situtaion. It scares me that I just spent 2 years feeling like a duck at a carnival shooting gallery during “Covid” and suddenly all the fools are off chasing the next bone. That last 2 years was an absolute day to day nightmare for me. The masses truly are deaf dumb and blind. The fellow I helped last Sunday said he had been baptised in the Jordan river. I said to him that this was how man’s rebellion against God would end (pointing to all the flood waste). he replied “Rejoice!” I did, and every once in a while that perspective comes back and I do again.

      • Hi Edward,

        I didn’t know the Cov-Yid 1984 had hit you so hard, as you always sound as if you’re taking everything in your stride – the power of the Holy Spirit???

        As for people in general, I have given up on them, they are a lost cause. I see myself as a modern day Jeremiah watching the 21st century Babylonians carry my people off into captivity, and there’s nothing I can do about it.

        The fellow you helped was a real character!! To remain full of faith at a time like that is awesome.

        As always, good to hear from you, brother.

      • Totally agree, or sometimes I feel like Nehemiah returning to survey the wreckage.

      • Thanks for the footage. It looked very grim – so much suffering for people who can ill afford it when they are most likely already struggling with everyday life. Especially those not insured.

        I’ll have a look at Tenpenny’s video and report back.

      • Tenpenny was one of the first whistleblowers on vaccines I encountered. I remeber buying her DVDs years ago. She’s kind of a funny little ol’ US gal, very folksy.

        Yes, it’s pretty disgusting here. The media is giving everybody big cover on poor displaced Ukrainians while we probably have 50-100,00 displaced internal refugees now and some towns I think still have water in them. Some people understand others are back suiting themselves and slavishly following TV. There’s an election coming up so they are busy preparing the discussion, burying Covid, avoiding this disaster, releasing a budget blah blah blah. I’m planning on going out again this weekend which will have been a month and see where things are at.

        In other news, this came out of a link a friend gave me and I thought it might be interesting for your arsenal?

        Best regards bro!

        ““The brain weighs only three pounds, yet it is the most complex object in the solar system,” says Michio Kaku in The Future of the Mind: The Scientific Quest to Understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind

        “This means that, in some sense, free will is a fake. Decisions are made ahead of time by the brain, without the input of consciousness, and then later the brain tries to cover this up (as it’s wont to do) by claiming that the decision was conscious. Dr. Michael Sweeney concludes, “Libet’s findings suggested that the brain knows what a person will decide before the person does. … The world must reassess not only the idea of movements divided between voluntary and involuntary, but also the very idea of free will.” All this seems to indicate that free will, the cornerstone of society, is a fiction, an illusion created by our left brain. So are we masters of our fate, or just pawns in a swindle perpetuated by the brain?”

      • The media whores don’t give a shit about poor people at home. Charles Dickens called it ‘Telescopic Philanthropy’ when mocking his fellow liberal Victorian do-gooders who focused on people in faraway places instead of those in greater need at home.

        “So are we masters of our fate, or just pawns in a swindle perpetuated by the brain?””

        Just pawns in Satan’s swindle and ably assisted by our carnal minds. Which as a carnal minded individual he doesn’t understand, but nevertheless he had a shot at it! LOL

      • Charles, on a different note, I wanted to ask you about 1Corinthians 11 and communion. If I recall you have no articles on this and it would seem Paul is indicating the observance or taking of it post baptism> Any thoughst on that?

        FYI Just had 460mm of rain last night in an absolute cracker of a strom!

      • Hi Edward,

        Yes 1 Corinthians 11 and all that jazz! LOL No, but seriously, I must admit, I haven’t a clue. In verse 2 we allegedly have Paul rambling on about ‘ordinances’ = Traditions in the Judaised KJV, which is not the same word as ‘ordinances’ = Dogma in Colossians 2:14 The Law being nailed to the stake.

        So what’s with all these traditions that these Corinthians are keeping? unless they’re Israelites living in Corinth. That’s my first point.

        Then we have the Communion thing, which I am still doubtful about as necessary for a born of God Holy Spirit indwelled Christian.

        However, if I were in company with a group of fellow believers that liked to observe this remembrance ceremony, then I would happily partake of it, if nothing else to avoid causing offence – I would also include feet washing in that, as we used to do in Worldwide.

        What are your views?

        I hope there was no more flooding, but with 460 mm I cannot see how there could not have been.

      • Hi Charles,

        yes indeed there was more flooding… (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAby0p2zajQ). It’s a pretty dysfuntional mess right now to say the least, but personally myself and all I know are ok, save the fellow who I have been helping out from the last flood. I think he must have been smashed again though I haven’t got the buthcer’s bill yet from him direct. He has been up at a mates for safe keeping. If he is lucky it won’t have got up into his house again and maye even have helped clear away some mess, but we will see…

        As far as the communion goes, it is indeed an interesting topic, because it seems to me what Paul is talking about first off does not apply to unbaptised people, ie is not applicable to non-born-of-spirit people. Next, it does not appear to be fixed to any particular schedule, therefore it could be a regular thing or it could be for example something you and I might do if we ever got a chance to meet, so it strikes me it is really something that baptised born-of-spirit heirs of Christ do. That said, most so-called “Christians” not able to really undertstand Elohim, not being baptised are off on ritualistic schedules I would imagine, hoping their salvation comes from those works, which of course they do not. So, I’m keeping Paul close and now see there is just so much noise and nonsense out there all of it keeping people from coming to Him/The Truth.

        Recently I saw a great meme that said: “Don’t talk fear talk faith!” I thought that really summed it up. The problem with our people is their lack of faith; they are sheepish.

      • Yes for us to meet and take the bread and the wine would be fine with me.

        Talking of meeting I have received a comment from a Graham Leonard who, from memory, resides on the West Coast of Australia and he’s a former JW. I have given him your blog link so you might hear from him. I did mention that you were on the East Coast near Brisbane. You’ll find his comment here: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/about/

        Oh yes, FEAR being the ‘substance’ of their belief system(s). Let’s face it Rome would cease to exist, if it were not for the FEAR factor. Then we get their (Mass) transubstantiation nonsense, otherwise known as hocus pocus and, as you were saying, with their ‘off with the fairies’ ‘ritualistic schedules’.

        I am very glad to hear that you and yours have escaped the worst of the floods.

      • Thanks mate. Pretty full on to say the least. The climate people are all fuming. As for the cloud seeding, while I’m certain the technology is viable, the particulars of who would be signing off on such weapons here and pulling the trigger etc is not anything I have good knowledge of. I’m watching that space, but at this point, just observing how lost most people are; there’s an election coming up and we’ll see how easily everyone forgets 2 years of Covid and gets lured into a budget argument etc lol.

      • You’re always welcome.

        Re the weaponised weather, we have to look at the US military (Pentagon) which is controlled by The City of London, so it’s the usual culprits. If we think about it, it’s got Rothschild stamped all over it. It’s just up their street, like pigeons from Belgium (Waterloo) in order to manipulate the Stock Exchange. Behind the scenes dirty work is their standard MO.

        Yes people are more lost than lost now with this ‘virus’ jab malarkey, and now the Ukraine/Russia BS. The next attack is already taking shape with rampant inflation, our petrol is now £1.75 a litre and domestic fuel £1.17 a litre.

        Plus they’re talking 100% price hikes by this time next year for gas and electric, which are already expensive. This is obviously not such an issue for say people in Spain, with their climate, but here our weather is cold or cool for most of the year, so how poor, and even middle class people, will cope, I dread to think.

        The evil bastards are definitely tightening the screws.

      • Yup. Feeling the petrol prices here. Now after all the floods they are getting the Climate mob back out again. Though there may be a third that have left after Covid is my guess; they’ve come to understand at least something. Next up is to get those people to look up “Grand Solar Minimum” and “Magnetic North Pole Drift” in their search engines to find out what is actually driving any weather variances (which are exactly what one would expect on a planet no?).

        However, that said, we will no doubt see those people which want to become one with the computer and I still see these fools walking around in masks. It is going to get very strange. We will see some absoultely unfathomable things I’m sure.

      • Not a fan of the so-called ‘grand solar minimum’, mainly due to the fact that it’s headed up by the disso Piers Corbyn, here in the UK, and he’s the brother of the Commie politician Jeremy Corbyn, ex Labour Party leader.

        The other thing that makes me think it’s a hoax is the truth that our winters are getting warmer and warmer and winter arrives in March/April with sub-zero temperatures at night, that we should be getting in November/December/January/February but are non-existent.

        What we’re experiencing, in reality, is season change, not climate change, nor a cooling, and this is being controlled by HAARP and Nexrad technologies. So my money would be on the grand solar minimum being a distraction.

      • The season change rings a bell. However, since I left Canada, the winters there have been brutal and cold and the kind I wished I’d had as a child (not that I know this personally but from family anecdotes and sites like this: https://electroverse.net

        In any case, I don’t go for the CO2 stuff. As far as this weather we’ve been having, it makes just as much sense to me that Yashua is sending this down upon Mammon worshipping, heathen backsliding/pro-Isra-hell Israelites.

      • I don’t think He’s doing it directly but, rather, using hu-man agents or allowing hu-man agents a free hand, that is, Satan’s little helpers to wreak havoc on the earth through abnormal controlled weather. Just as He used the Assyrians to punish our forefathers.

        I also don’t think we have yet reached the stage(s) of Revelation’s hailstones and blood red rain, but it’s getting closer. That’s if all that stuff is literal.

      • Well, one thing is for sure. I am unable to make heads or tails of most of that book. I’ve noticed how much scrioture gets used to mislead and set people against each other particularly with wild interpretations of Revelations. However, letting Satan wreak havoc is an idea I can get my wee brain around.

      • Yes, it’s his final curtain call, so he’ll make it particularly uncomfortable for us, if he can, but only for a short while = the woman in travail, and then the rejoicing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s