Why Did Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) Walk on The Sea? – Part 2 of 2

Here is the link to Part 1. Please read first before continuing:


At the end of part one I left it with another passage from Matthew’s Gospel namely verses 24-27 from chapter 17 which reads as follows:

Matthew 17:24-27 (KJV) And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your Master pay tribute? 25 He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? 26 Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free? 27 Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to THE SEA, and CAST AN HOOK, and TAKE UP THE FISH THAT FIRST COMETH UP; and WHEN THOU HAST OPENED HIS MOUTH, thou shalt find A PIECE OF MONEY: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.

In this article I will show you how Yashua Messiah walked on ‘the sea’ in the Spiritual sense, that He demonstrated in the literal sense in Matthew 14:22-33. This means that the actual walking on the sea was purely a representation of what He taught His Learners (disciples) later in Matthew 17 above.

So let’s set the scene and explain what’s going on here:

First we have a Roman tax collector who approaches Peter with the question: Doth not your Master pay tribute? In other words, does your Master pay His taxes? Peter answers in the affirmative, that is, Yes! However, Yashua Messiah takes him on one side and asks him a pertinent question, namely: “What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children or of strangers?” Peter answers Him by saying: “strangers”. Yashua Messiah then responds with: “Then are the children free?” That is, are the children free from levy? The answer to this is a resounding YES!

This then beggars the question, who are these ‘children’, and who or what do they represent? Well Yashua Messiah tells you who they are, they are flesh and blood free men and free women – sentient beings, not slaves, or subjects, or citizens, or strangers, or serfs, or fictional persons (masks) (see link No. 1 below)

However, what does Yashua Messiah then go on to say: “Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to THE SEA”.

Now this could also be interpreted as His desire for His Learners to remain in honour, so that no one could point any fingers at them for being tax dodgers and not ‘paying-their-way’ under Roman Civil Law, hence He says: “Lest that we should offend them.”

Now this is where it gets interesting – VERY INTERESTING, for this is what Yashua Messiah says next:

Go thou to THE SEA, and CAST AN HOOK, and TAKE UP THE FISH THAT FIRST COMETH UP; and WHEN THOU HAST OPENED HIS MOUTH, thou shalt find A PIECE OF MONEY: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.”

Now pay close attention, for He says: “Go thou to ‘the sea’.” So what is He saying? Easy, go to The Beast System, for ‘The Sea’ is The Beast System, and use it for your own advantageand cast an hook. By casting a hook He meant to ensnare them using THEIR system against them, but at the same time remaining in honour and meeting their tax demands.

He then says: “Take up the fish, that first commeth up” which means when they make their first demand upon you, you accept that as a presentment and a money offer, for in a National Bankruptcy there is no money, so any demand made upon you is the money. As this presentment is actually money you then “Accept it for Value” and return it as set-off for the alleged debt. This is the “piece of money” that Yashua Messiah is referring to in the fishes’ mouth.

What He is actually revealing here is for our age today, for the ‘fishes mouth’ is a direct reference to The VATICAN where they wear their Dagon Fish Hats.

In turn, this means you are requesting that The Vatican honours the National Bankruptcy, that they have orchestrated, and are in breach of by making dishonourable financial demands upon you as a flesh and blood sentient being – a free man and/or a free woman.

Moreover, the ‘piece-of-money’ in the fishes’ mouth could be better described as a specie-of-money or a financial instrument that commercial institutions use every day. Things like ‘promissory notes’ and/or ‘bills of exchange’.

The ‘money’ in your wallet is a ‘promissory note’ or a ‘promise-to-pay’, it’s just an I.O.U. = a debt instrument, a ‘minus instrument’, not a ‘plus instrument’. This means that every time we use these Pound Notes or Federal Reserve Notes we add to the National Debt, by default. Hence they use the word ‘purchase’, for to purchase means to use leverage in order to acquire things, rather than buy them. Truthfully speaking we cannot BUY anything with debt notes, but we can purchase things or leverage things into our possession, but we have not paid for them.

Everything financial today, due to the National Bankruptcy, is like looking in a mirror – it’s all back to front. The cash receipt you receive after having purchased something, is actually the REAL MONEY, that’s how crazy it has become. However, as I have already made plain we can use this craziness to our advantage and set-off our debts completely by accepting their presentments or offers for value and return them (see the A4V link below).

As before, if you have any questions feel free to ask, but no arguments, thank you.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

1. For There is No Respect of Persons With God – Romans 2:11 – But What is a Person? – Parts 1 & 2: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/for-there-is-no-respect-of-persons-with-god-romans-211-but-what-is-a-person-parts-1-2/

A little information on the Accept for Value process.


53 thoughts on “Why Did Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) Walk on The Sea? – Part 2 of 2

  1. Thanks Charles, that is great timing, at least for me (The Exposing of Bertra-what’s his face seemed out of left field but I’ve just re-finished Part 1 of this, which I had read years ago. I’ve just had a printer print of Books of Jasher and Peshitta, and am now in the midst of formatting a collection of your articles for printing, so these will go too.

    Having said all that, I’ve had a thought for you. Your articles appear in alphabetical order which is convenient in a way. However, I’ve wondered about you placing a category before each title, to put them in sections. For example; articles for learners and newbies would get an alphabetic or numeric prefix A or 1, then the title following “A) Why Did Yashua …..” and articles for those baptised would get a B or 2 with the title following. The idea came to me after your last reply to my queries on the Revelations articles. The answers did not really make sense though a few ideas did shift my understanding, but I said to myself: “Why am I wasting my time worrying about this; why am I worrying about advanced knowledge when I haven’t got square one figured out yet?” IE not being baptised it is just more knowledge and non-sensical. So, I asked The Father for help understanding Grace and have been busy on that since. So, first things first. Just for your reference what has happened since I asked The Father for help has been quite profound and included a certain random stumbling through a collection of your articles which no doubt helped get a number of ideas all up from and centre in my meditations. Revelations and Hell have been banished to that dark space as unimportant.

    I suggested a Worried Mum get in touch with you any contact?

    PS What do you mean questions but no arguments? Do you really mean mild debates but no hate mail?

    • Hi Edward,

      Followers of Comparet, Wickstrom and Finck are like Flat Earthers – totally deranged by an obsessive satanic psychosis.

      Thanks for printing up my articles and yes, I agree, I must do something about categorising them, but I am not sure what facilities WordPress offers in that regard. I only have a basic free account.

      As for ‘worriedmum’ she has become a follower and one communication but I think she’s a mainstreamer at heart. I may be wrong, but I tend not to be, when the resonation is not right – more on that in my next answer to you.

      Questions with no arguments = re wanting to know more, rather than them attempting to teach me with their erroneous drivel and nonsense.

      Hate mail? LOL I don’t get any, but if I did it would go straight in the trash bin.

      • My ideas for categorising them is to simply write an addition to your about the author that explains what the two or there categories are and then just stick a prefix in from of all your existing titles, for example A or B or C therefore all the A articles will appear together and then the B and then the C no?

      • Hi Charles, I’m now going to teach you some erroneuos drivel and nonsense! Ready?

        Now that we’ve got that sorted, I’ve noticed this Keith fellow seems a flat earther. This must explain why I suddenly felt a strong urge to discociate myself from him and Dawn, who seems all about New Age spiritualism. The unincorprate the name got me intruigued. Have you ever heard of such a thing or do you just use AFV?

  2. Pingback: Faith…. | Is The Father Calling YOU to His Son, Yashua Messiah?

  3. Charles, I’ve had a look again at the A4V process link. The history of the Civil War period link doesn’t work. Have you ever watched it and do you recommend it?
    What do you make of this Bitcoin thing?
    By this New Year, the missus and I will be completely debt free and looking never to return to such a land again but more for best ways to avoid it and build proper assets and wealth. It would be great for example to avoid taxation on the principle.

    • Glad to hear that you will be debt free, that’s a good place to be. I would have a look at putting everything into a trust so as to ring fence your property. Again you’ll need to study up on Trust Law.

      Re the link, yes I know.

      Basically the US Civil War was all about making citizen slaves of ALL Americans, whereas prior to that white Americans had been free = Outlaws, that is living without the dog-Latin law of The Federal Government of Washington DC .

      We got involved with a thing called ‘E-Gold’ and it cost us £700 in losses, so we have never touched another online money thing again and never will.

      There’s loads of stuff on this site: https://annavonreitz.com/

      • As Jim Rickards likes to say, don’t go more than 10% in gold, and make sure it’s physical though some could be shares in a producer. Nonehteless, just let it sit there for the long haul; it’s going nowhere but up.
        I noticed that Trust idea again on the A4V site. It does have me intrigued to learn more about it.

      • AFV is based 100% on the National Bankruptcy, which means there IS NO MONEY in circulation, just DEBT NOTES (promises-to-pay or IOUs) and you cannot pay a bill with debt, anymore than you can pay a bill with an IOU. So the bill or presentment that they send you IS THE MONEY, (everything is like looking in the mirror) usually accompanied with a cheque (the bit you tear off) at the bottom for the remittance of the bill.

        You then “accept that bill for value” and return it for set-off of the account.

        This is a set-off, NOT a discharge of the debt, for a discharge only puts the thing off into the future, and eventually will come back (to bite you) for settlement, so never discharge a debt.

        This is the basic nuts and bolts of the AFV process, which The Learners employed in order to settle their tax bill (tribute) with Rome.

      • Interesting. I was a scholar in math and economics in high school, but what you just explained makes my head hurt – lol! Seems like people are paying bills with debt notes all day every day…

        BTW I thought I would share this with you, this is Jim Rickards, he is somebody I watch from time to time and he seems quite straightforward on gold:

        (Just for the record I once watched him state to an interviewer “Jesus was a perfect sinless man when He was on earth and that’s the whole point”).

      • “Seems like people are paying bills with debt notes all day every day…”

        Exactly, and adding to the National Debt with EVERY transaction. This is why the coming earth shattering crash is inevitable.

        As an analogy, I liken it to something that is becoming so dense and heavy that the earth will not be able to bear the intense weight of it, and it will plunge right through the earth and exit the other side leaving a massive gaping hole thus destabilising the whole earth.

        As for gold watch this all the way through for you will be amazed at what he says about gold:


      • OK, I’ll check it out thanks.

        With regad to this A4V process. I have been mulling the following…

        Some centuries ago one coud pay for things using real gold and silver and eventually enough weighted 1lb sterling pieces were too cumbersome which led to the storage of them and pieces of paper issued by the storage (banks) that meant they owed you your principle (silver) if you ever returned with the note and demanded the real money back. So, I understand that if I were to take my lb notes to the bank I should be able to do the same (they’d flip out because they don’t have it), but if the government asks me to pay an annual bill (tax) for services they provide I have enjoyed how can I return that to them and demand my principle back?

      • That would be true if it were a real representation of the silver, that is, £10 Sterling = 10 lbs of silver – that’s pre 1925 I think, but don’t quote me. However, in reality, it’s a debt note, and cannot represent silver, for silver can never be a minus (debt) but always a plus = has value.

        Re the tax. You have three options: 1) Pay it; 2) Accept for Value and return it for set-off; 3) Stop using the NI number (SIN number in the States) and stop taking their benefit privileges. This will also involve closing any bank accounts and removing all your cash and putting it under the mattress or under the floor.

        Further to, any job where your employer pays tax from your wage you would need resign from, and go self-employed working for cash only or barter if they have stuff you need.

  4. Charles, if I receive a fine in the post for not wearing a seat belt the A4V process could be an option?

    Any luck on the Civil War link?


    • Oh yes, but I would start with a Notice of Conditional Acceptance, which immediately keeps you in honour, and rebuts their claim.

      A4V is used for settling (for set-off) of any outstanding demands they might be making on your strawman. You, the man, cannot be liable.

      Not with you on the Civil War comment.

  5. Keith says one has the right of reefusal to contract on forst offer and just write “Unclaimed. Return to Sender” and send it back. Expect to play ping-pong a few times. Mike Holt has a fine book that uses the Notice of Conditional Acceptance approach and signing below All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice so as to put myself under Common Law straight off.

    Any thought on bonnie Prince Charles now through the Accession process and apparently still continuing the Royal Style and Title and a commitment to “Constitutional Government”?

      • No, why do you say that about Charles? You are so hard on your namesake!

      • LOL Not at all, just realistic, and I would never judge him, for he will soon be Yah’s Anointed. However, that won’t stop him from making catastrophic mistakes, just like his mother did, and his forebears before her.

      • Well, 70 years of drift are over I suppose? Can the Monarchy get any lower? I have the idea right about now is a great time to help people with questions; historical knowledge and revelations on the true power structure. I also think this moment may have powerful psychic meaning for white males generally. God save the King.

      • No, in terms of politics, things will carry on just as before, only getting worse with each passing day. His Schwab/Rothschild/WEF connection will ensure this.

        Straight off, before his coronation, he may even create a crisis in the AngliCain Church with his ‘defender of faiths’ bullshit.

        If they allow it, it will then show us how spiritually debauched the AngliCain ‘Church’ has become.

        Interesting times if nothing else.

      • So far all I’ve seen in his assecion speeches and his address to the Commonwealth is his declaration of his own faith being “deeply rooted in the C O E” and “defender of the faith” – I reckon he is well on the way to upsetting people and may pull some surprises.

      • Hmm looks like he’s had the ultimatum or the ‘riot act’ read to him already.

        This is just like the political circus when scum politicians spew all their lying crap to get elected. Once in power they go back on their word and it’s just more of the same Cultural Jew Marxist dog vomit.

      • Well, only time will tell.

        While we’re somewhat on the related turf, the following is an excerpt from Judge Anna, and have you heard of such things?

        “In 1960, the Queen personally enacted the Corporate Bodies Contracts Act 1960 [8 & 9 Eliz. 2] [CH. 46]. This act in effect opened up the floodgates of corruption and allowed private individual contracts of BODIES/CORPORATIONS, and especially MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS a.k.a. STRAWMEN, to supersede and overcome the Constitutional contracts owed by the Queen, the Crown and Government to the people of Great Britain. Because of this Act, you could unknowingly sign away your Constitutional Guarantees and effectively “jump ship” to become a UNCITIZEN (and slave), subject to UN CORP “private law”. And if you didn’t do this unconsciously for yourself, then it could be done “for” you via the Birth Certification process.

        This started from the basis of a Constitutional Monarchy, which, as it has never been repealed, remains the basis for the land and soil jurisdiction of Australia. Even though they are running Australia as a corporation structure in the international jurisdiction of the sea and are enslaving Australians in that foreign jurisdiction. This allowed the Queen, the Crown, and the Parliament to evade their constitutional obligations, and provided an excuse for the Pope to enforce UN “Law” on the people of Great Britain using the poppets, STRAWMEN, as the new “Subjects” of the UK CORPORATION. This allowed the imposition of UNIDROIT as the private citizenry of Great Britain were sequentially “redefined” first as UK Corporations and second as public Municipal properties and UN franchise CORPORATIONS.”

      • Oh yes Constitutions are not worth the paper they are written on. Hence they trample all over Constitutions in their de facto administrative hearings that they fraudulently call courts.

        It also means that Constitutional Monarchs are powerless.

      • So, what of the charge that Ekizabeth is behind the Corporations Act, or is that error on Anna’s part?

      • Well, let’s get more detail on that. I understand only the Chief can treaty for the tribe in Common Law, so the Monarch is our ‘Chief’, but I reckon since Charles II the Monarchy has done nothing but fall while the bankers, industrialists and their world parliaments have only risen. So, when you say she, no he is under orders, is that actually the case or is the Monarch literally a hood ornament? Who is she under orders from? I reckon the corporate governments appoint all the Governor-Generals they want and she just signs whatever they send her if they send anything at all.

      • Yes she’s under the Law of The Land as the woman Elizabeth Windsor (Saxe-Coburg Gotha), doing business as Queen Elizabeth II under Commercial Law, but not as a Constitutional Monarch, which is an artificial construct. This is my view on it. The Constitution thing just muddies the waters.

        The monarchy fell with Charles I, and his son Charles II became king, after the the so-called Civil War, but he never ruled by Divine Right, like his father. So he must have been someone’s puppet. This is a short part of our history that I have not studied in depth.

        All I know is that by 1688/89 the Dutch Jews were fully in control, through William of Orange and his wife Mary Stuart, this they cemented with the planned Bank of England, 1694.

        The Queen is/was definitely a Rothschild (City of London) puppet, and took her orders from her so-called ministers in Whitehall, who are also Rothschild puppets. All MPs are vetted by The Rothschilds before they’re allowed to stand for ‘election’. Probably that’s done by MI5/MI6.

        Charlie will be no different.

      • Well, thanks for that.

        This constitution thing does indeed muddy the waters. Here in Australia our constitution being a common law document (of the land), continues if I understand it correctly because of a two-way commitment between the soveriegn (and heirs and successors) and the subjects. The government has been moved entirely into Maritime Law and the peopel are required to be Jeckyll & Hyde, split between two jurisdictions but they have no idea about this at all. I don;t consider myslef loyal to Charles because he is or isn’t evil but because he is our soveriegn the only one which can treaty under common law, and as such have valid questions over his blood authenticity – is he actually our people?

      • Not sure, but I think I have said this before. A constitutor is someone who signs to take responsibility for The National Debt, or admits that he or she is a debtor in the National Bankruptcy. When in Truth the opposite is The Truth.

        Flesh and blood men and women are The Creditors in the National Bankruptcy, not debtors. So anyone who invokes The Constitution to protect their rights, has shot their foot off without realising it.

      • Hmmm, so in cae of a national bankruptcy the living men and women are the creditors meaning the insolvent parties look to them for… what exactly?

      • All nations are bankrupt, and the living men and women are the creditors (they are owed big time), unless they elect to be citizens (strawmen) or constitutors, and then, by default, become debtors (owing big time).

      • Who is going to make the scoundrels pay what they owe? How much rope do we need?

        Heh, in other newws I recently saw a video that seems to have been made by Common Law Court Great Britain about the parliament swearing allegiance to King Charles as opposed to Charles the Third, it suggested that Elizabeth was always bogus with no stone and Charles can’t be king – total puppet show

      • All the tools of Commercial Law are there, but very few know how to use and implement them. Enforcing is always the difficulty.

        All Strawman Constitutional Monarchs are bogus.

      • So, what does this mean about Australia with it’s constitution where the people are supreme authority and it was proclaimed by Victoria a strawman Queen?

      • As I said, anyone who invokes a constitution automatically becomes a debtor in the National Bankruptcy. Citizens/constitutors have no authority – they’re debt slaves.

      • How interesting. So, when the shite hits the fan declare neither.

      • Just claim your right to be a free man on the land and not a person, nor a citizen and never invoke the constitution as a form of lawful protection, for their criminal courts don’t recognise it.

      • So, here in Australia there are Common Law Assemblies starting. I recently had a dust up with one fellow who is a key player in getting them going. He said he rejects Christ and is a pragmatic atheist. I told him I was LOL. Have you ever heard of people invoking inalienable rights and evolution together??? I’ve never heard of that.

        Have you ever heard of the 1666 Cestui Que Trust Act that truned everyone into dead people lost at sea?

      • This is the only problem with the Free Man Common Law and Commercial Law stuff, it attracts a lot of weirdos and whack jobs.

        Here in the UK it also attracted a lot of West Indian blacks, which I also found strange.

        Yes, the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666, and The Foreign Situs Trust. Winston Shrout covered this in his teaching seminars. We’re deemed dead and lost at sea unless we stand up and assert our claims as men and women.

        There’s also a time limit to it as well, if I remember correctly, not that that is enforceable, for everything can be done ab initio (from the beginning).

      • So, where does this leave those citing the constitution for their rights, as it is the Law of the Land vs the corporation BS? Is this why England just stumbles along as it has no constitution?

      • No different than those citing their ‘uman rights! Which are both benefit privileges, like liberty, and prison, that are granted to citizen slaves.

        England does have a Constitution, as written in Magna Charta 1215 and The Bill of Rights 1689. It’s just that it is not defined, or cited by many, as a Constitution.

        England also has two versions of Common Law. Anglo Saxon Common Law which was more the real deal, and the legalised BS ‘Common Law’ of the Normans from 1066 onwards, when it was adulterated and corrupted with Acts and Statutes.

    • Truth and lies and fear mongering – standard COMO (Controlled Opposition Modus Operandi). As for him being related to Vlad the Impaler, I would take that with a tub of salt.

      • LOL! That’s mostly how I have assessed this Langley hit-job? When you say controlled opposition at this point what opposition are we talking about? Is this part of the Q Trump-tard programme? Aside from that what’s the truth in it re: the Jimmy Saville, Klaus Schwab, and eco-utopia material?

      • I am pretty sure Q is a directly controlled, disso intelligence operation = CIA, Mossad and MI6. Whereas I believe Jones/Infowars is a Jesuit operation, along with Icke. Needless to say the Rothschild Jews are behind it all in terms of financing. As you know they have many tentacles, which includes the WHO, the WEF, CDC and Schwab, Gates and Soros, (who’s been quiet lately) is another one.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s