Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Parts 1 & 2

Prologue

For those of you not familiar with my work for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) please allow me to explain that this series of articles is not for the faint hearted or for those new to my work. This topic is heavy going and could easily be described as a deep end subject, especially if you are a King James Bible (KJV) idolator, that is, you worship the KJV as being inerrant (100% true) – unfortunately a fallacy for the Spiritually blind.

If you are a newbie or a beginner in The Faith I would certainly recommend that you read a few of my other articles, first, in order to give yourself a foundation in The Truth, before attempting this series which, even I, after 35+ years of study, am finding very challenging and in need of much Holy Spiritual guidance in order to put them together.

I do not enjoy being critical of the KJV as I still believe it to be the best English translation of The Holy Scriptures, however when error is discovered in its pages we cannot close our eyes or, more importantly, our hearts and minds, and begin a life of living in denial of The Truth. These issues have to faced head on and confronted and then dealt with. The same applies to fear. Fear has to be confronted, challenged and overcome. Start running from fear and you will never stop running – the coward dies a 1,001 deaths!

Please note, this series is a first attempt at this huge subject and will be ammended and edited as I discover more Truth and expose more errors to add to its pages, but suffice it to say there is most definitely a case for questioning the authenticity of these three Epistles.

Having said that I do not believe that The Pastoral Epistles should be expunged from the The Holy Scriptures, because there is some Truth in them but at the same time those verses of Truth are surrounded by many errors – the errors of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Introduction

The Pastoral Epistles is a name that has been conjured up by someone, or some people, for three of Paul’s letters in the New Testament: 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus. Unofficially included in this grouping is 2 Peter which, allegedly, is also of spurious origin and that is the issue with all four of these books of the New Testament – their questionable authorship.

So where does this title come from, would be my first question regarding this tetchy subject? All the historical information I can find points to the commencement of the 19th century when Bible scholars began to question their authenticity, but I have no idea who originally coined the term. Perhaps someone could shed some Light on it.

From The Bible Hub: “History of the Christian Church, Volume I, Philip Schaff ”

“The three Pastoral Epistles, two to Timothy and one to Titus, form a group by themselves, and represent the last stage of the apostle’s life and labors, with his parting counsels to his beloved disciples and fellow-workers. They show us the transition of the apostolic church from primitive simplicity to a more definite system of doctrine and form of government. This is just what we might expect from the probable time of their composition after the first Roman captivity of Paul, and before the composition of the Apocalypse.”

Philip Schaff was a Calvinist preacher from that 19th century period and we can immediately see that he was of that snobbish, elitist, self-righteous, religious mind set when he condescendingly refered to the first century Congregations of God as having a primitive simplicity. Now pay attention dear people for this arrogant puffed up spirit and attitude is crucial in understanding the same spirit that pervades throughout the Pastoral Epistles. And now for a Holy Scripture that proves my point:

2 Corinthians 11:3 (KJV) But I fear, lest by any means, as The Serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. (Emphasis mine)

Here we can plainly see that Mr Schaff, the Calvinist, had allowed his mind (via Satan’s subtilty) to be corrupted and displayed by his vain disparaging opinion of the first century Congregations of God by calling them primitively simple. Rather him than me when he stands before Yashua Messiah in the first resurrection.

Furthermore, he compounds his vanity by stating, and I quote: “to a more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” So this ignorant man thought, just like the author of the Pastoral Epistles, that the first century church and its TRUE SIMPLE BELIEFS in Yashua Messiah and its simple egalitarian non-structure could be improved upon. Delusional vanity or what!?

As a final point I will raise the issue of the artificial religious construct known as the ‘Apostolic Church’. This term, like so many others created by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, cannot be found in the Holy Scriptures, nor can the word ‘apostolic’, now there’s a surprise. So here’s a question: Did Yashua Messiah come to this earth in order to plant HIS CHURCH – The Church of God or hand it over to His messengers, pompously called apostles, from the Greek word ‘apostolos’, by the religious translators of the KJV, and rename it the Church of The Apostles? For I tell you straight folks, that is exactly what the term ‘Apostolic Church’ means and The Church of God it is not.

Are you beginning to see The Light dear readers? because I have not even started analysing 1 Timothy 1:1 yet and already one of those who would try and support these Epistles as genuine has already been unceremoniously found out!

OK, the problems that are the so-called Pastoral Epistles. As already stated, the Pastoral Epistles constitute 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus. Although not included, 2 Peter also falls into the same questionable category re being authentic Holy Scripture and, not as claimed, as being written by the named authors.

Now with regard to the two books of Timothy and the book of Titus, are they the genuine writings of Paul or of a forger of a later date, as some Bible Scholars confidently declare? Taking that question further, if they are the writings of a forger and, I might add to some degree, a plagiariser, can we even challenge their right to be a part of what they call the Biblical Canon or even the inspired Word of God?

Let’s face it, the Biblical Canon was put together by religious people, with an evil Romish agenda, who would be very happy with the Pastoral Epistles and their content, hence the reasons for their inclusion in that Canon, and their defence of them today as being the authentic writings of Paul.

We need to get this Truth firmly fixed in our minds that the satanic religious spirit that pervaded the second, third and fourth centuries with its Hellenising philosophers still pervades today in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion of the 21st century – NOTHING has changed.

Paul, too, gave us this timeless warning:

Colossians 2:8 (KJV) BEWARE! lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, AND NOT AFTER CHRIST. (Emphasis mine)

Again, let’s be clear, for the aim of second, third and fourth century Hellenising philosophers was ALWAYS the usurping and supplanting of the True Church – the Church of God and putting in its place: “a more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” to quote our ‘friend’ Mr Schaff.

This is the more definite system of the Nicolaitans as mentioned by Yashua Messiah in Revelation TWICE!

Revelation 2:6 (KJV) But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.

Revelation 2:15 (KJV) So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. (All emphasis mine)

Notice that these evil people of the Hellenistic NICOLAITAN persuation had deeds and a DOCTRINE. Now what could those deeds and doctrine have been? The very same deeds and doctrine that Mr Schaff was rambling on about – things allegedly ‘superior’ to the primitive simplicity of the first century egalitarian Congregations of God.

Nico = To rule; Laitan = The laity; = To rule over the laity; = Something that Yashua Messiah HATES!! = “A more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” = the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion in ALL its guises with its Popes, Archbishops, Cardinals, Bishops, Ministers, Vicars, and satanic Priests called ‘Fathers’ etc. etc.. Non-egalitarian pecking orders with men lording it over other men who are their equals in God’s sight and with no God given authority whatsoever.

Fortunately, and as an aside, by the year 35 AD the Church of God had been planted in Britain and was not contaminated by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion until the arrivals of the Papist devils Augustine (not Augustine of Hippo) and Patrick the slave trader in circa 597 AD.

I think that will do for part one, part two coming up shortly.

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Part 2

Plagiarising

Without further ado I will get straight in with more opinions from the ‘experts’ and as one commentator (Leighton Pullan) from The Bible Hub put it:

“Their genuineness is more frequently denied than that of any other of St. Paul’s Epistles, and this attack upon their genuineness has been mostly based upon the character of their teaching about the office-bearers of the Church. Attempts have sometimes been made to separate some fragments supposed to be genuine from the remaining portions. All such attempts have failed. These Epistles must either be rejected entirely or accepted entirely. Otherwise we become involved in a hopeless tangle of conjectures.”

Having quoted this opinion, which I agree with in part, the major question for me here is this: Are these Epistles an intregral part of the early beginnings of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (primarily Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy) through a Hellenising philosopher(s) author making out that he was Paul, or not? If I can prove that there is much Hellenising philosophy and/or meaningless BS in terms of early religious jargon terms and expressions (allegedly a more definite system of doctrine) then the case for them being forgeries is a done deal, and, as he correctly put it: “These Epistles must either be rejected entirely or accepted entirely.”

However, I will add one caveat to that regarding his comment: “to separate some fragments supposed to be genuine from the remaining portions.” The point he has obviously missed is this: If someone sets out to deceive by making out they are someone else then they MUST at times use thoughts, ideas and material that will attempt to make them look like the man they are trying to impersonate. This will then mean that they are playing the old half-truth telling trick. We need to realise that without some Truth in the narrative the scam will easily be rumbled. This game is not new and it’s played some of the time in the mainstream fake news media today and even more so in the internet alternative media.

So let’s analyse Mr Pullan’s comment a little further: “Their genuineness is more frequently denied than that of any other of St. Paul’s Epistles.” Now why would that be I wonder? Has he really done his homework in an open minded unbiased way to find out what the reasoning is behind this frequency of denial? I would suggest that he has not. I would also suggest that he, like Philip Schaff, is already convinced of their alleged authenticity and sets about defending his flawed position.

He then states: “this attack upon their genuineness has been mostly based upon the character of their teaching about the office-bearers of the Church.” Question: When did Yashua Messiah, or Paul for that matter, declare the need for ‘office bearers’? When did the need for corporate officials or officialdom become necessary in God’s egalitarian Church? Certainly not in the first century church that’s for sure, so when did these satanic ideas creep in? Answer: As soon as, if not before, the Messengers (apostles) had died. The second century AD was the time when most of these blasphemers crawled out of the woodwork and asserted themselves as leaders and mouth pieces of this planned philosophised, Hellenised counterfeit church.

Here is a list of the counterfeiting scoundrels involved in founding the Hellenised Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, from the “Catholic Fidelity” web page:

Clement I, 4th Bishop of Rome, circa end of the first century. This is not the Clement of Paul’s time.

Ignatius of Antioch, died 110 AD

Polycarp of Symrna, places and dates 65 – 140 AD Allegedley a stalwart of the early Congregations of God.

Unknown Author of The Didache (The Teaching), Syria dates 70 – 110 AD. Author of what teaching?

Barnabus, circa 130 AD, so could not be the first century Barnabus as claimed on this site.

Papias of Hierapolis, Phyrgia circa 130 AD

Justin Martyr, circa 100-165 AD, philosopher and theologian.

Irenaeus, circa 140 – 202 AD

Clement of Alexandria, place and dates, Athens circa 150? – 215? AD

Tertullian, convert to the Christian Religion circa 190 – 195 AD. Sorcerer and conjurer of the pagan heathen Trinity doctrine circa 200 AD.

Origen, Alexandria circa 185? – 254? AD

If necessary I will provide more details of what these villains got up to, but as this series of articles is not specifically about the devious shennanigans of the so-called ‘Church Fathers’ (I cover the subject elsewhere on my blog) I will leave it there.

And now a quote from the “Early Christian Writings” web page.

“Vocabulary. While statistics are not always as meaningful as they may seem, of 848 words (excluding proper names) found in the Pastorals, 306 are not in the remainder of the Pauline corpus, even including the deutero-Pauline 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, and Ephesians. Of these 306 words, 175 do not occur elsewhere in the New Testament, while 211 are part of the general vocabulary of Christian writers of the second century. Indeed, the vocabulary of the Pastorals is closer to that of popular Hellenistic philosophy than it is to the vocabulary of Paul or the deutero-Pauline letters. Furthermore, the Pastorals use Pauline words in a non-Pauline sense: dikaios in Paul means “righteous” and here means “upright”; pistis, “faith,” has become “the body of Christian faith”; and so on.”

As this series progresses I will reveal several of these crucial words that prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that these three Epistles are not from the hand of Paul and are most definitely from the hand of a Hellenising philosopher of the 2nd century and a founder of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Right, let’s make a start with the first verses of 1 Timothy 1:

1 Timothy 1:1-2 (KJV) Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope; 2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.

1 Timothy 1:1-2 notes — This introduction is plagiarised from Paul’s earlier genuine Epistles, but with the addition of a greeting to Timothy which Paul probably did write, but the real Epistle was either lost or destroyed. We have to assume this because Timothy was a learner of Paul’s and we can be fairly sure Paul did write to him but not the nonsense that follows in verse 4 onwards:

1 Timothy 1:3 (KJV) As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine.

1 Timothy 1:3 notes — Instructions from Paul to Timothy which again are probably a genuine part of the original Epistle with instructions to remain in Ephesus, now lost or destroyed. However, I say, now lost or destroyed, because the Epistle now changes from the plagiarising part of the first half to counterfeiting in the second half of this verse. How do I know this? Answer: through the use of one suspicious word – ‘charge’ and one suspicious term – ‘no other doctrine’ combined with what then follows in verse 4.

Now the word ‘doctrine’ is one of those crucial words that I made reference to earlier. This is due to the fact that three Greek words are are involved here and this Greek word in 1 Tim 1:3 is partly the odd one out, being: ‘heterodidaskaleō’. The other two words are these: ‘didachē’ (Strong’s G1322) and ‘didaskalia’ (Strong’s G1319)

Moreover, here is where it gets very interesting. The word ‘didachē‘ (instruction) cannot be found anywhere in 1 & 2 Timothy or Titus and yet it is found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Romans and 1 Corinthians. In contrast all that can be found in 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus is the word ‘didaskalia’ (instruction – teaching) – if we then take the word ‘heterodidaskaleō’ we can see that it comes from ‘didaskalia’ and not ‘didachē’. So what!! I here you exclaim. Ah but there is much more to this than meets the eye as explained here:

From: “Is Doctrine a Dirty Word?” by Peter Ditzel

“”Doctrine/doctrines” appears fifty times in the King James Version New Testament. With the exception of one place (Hebrews 6:1 where it is translated from logos), it comes from either of two Greek words, didache and didaskalia. Didaskalia is derived from didaskalos, which means “teacher.” Didache comes from the verb didasko, “to teach.” Thus, strictly, didaskalia refers to the teaching of a teacher.”

So here we have that crucial difference explained and why ‘didache’ (Strong’s G1322) applies to Yashua Messiah’s and Paul’s instruction and ‘didaskalia’ (Strong’s G1319) applies to the teaching of a teacher, which leads us to the knock on question – WHICH TEACHER and WHAT TEACHING!!?? Answer: the teaching of Hellenising philosophers and religious counterfeiters.

If we now move straight on into verse 4 we can see how it is a continuation of the second part of verse 3 and notice, too, that from here on in (verse 4) we now enter a part fictional, part truthful, made up and fabricated la la land narrative with religious writings by an unknown early Hellenising religious author, most likely circa 150 AD, and long after Paul’s death. He, or they, would have been one of the alleged ‘Church Fathers’ of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, which was always a counterfeit and not officially organised until the Council of Nicea in 325 AD. However, in the meantime this satanic edifice had been nearly 300 years in the making, commencing with the Canaanite Jew Philo in Alexandria (philosophy) in the first century along with Simon Magus the sorcerer in Rome – the lover of filthy lucre. All these elements came together in Nicea in 325 AD under Constantine.

Second half of 1 Timothy 1:3 and 1 Timothy 1:4 (KJV) That thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine. 4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 1:4 Notes part 1 — “Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies.”

What are these ‘fables’ that this Hellenising author could be refering to? More on this later.

Furthermore, if there was to be no heeding of genealogies and the study of same, then what are Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 if they are not genealogies? In turn, why would Yashua Messiah object to his brothers and sisters in the faith studying up their own Israelite genealogies? And who determines what genealogies come under the umbrella of “endless genealogies”? And who would be opposed to such genealogies and for what reason? Would Paul? Who was proud of his Benjaminite tribal origins:

Romans 11:1 (KJV) I say then, Hath God cast away His people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

Philippians 3:5 (KJV) Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee.

Please note Paul was not a Jew.

Moreover, what information do genealogies provide us with? Why, the origins of different peoples as listed in the Old Testament and who hates the Old Testament? Why Rome hates the Old Testament and so do the Canaanite Jews with their Babylonian Talmud, the mainstay of their satanic Judaic religion.

So what does the first part of 1 Tim 1:4 constitute? It was an early Hellenising Romish dictat to dissuade people from researching True Israelite history and the identity of the True intended recipients of the Gospel message as instructed by Yashua Messiah Himself:

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

He also gave the twelve disciples explicit intructions:

Matthew 10:5-6 (KJV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

1 Timothy 1:4 notes part 2 — “Which minister questions.” Yet more of the tyranny of Catholicism revealed re unquestioning obedience – no Bereans or questioning allowed in this church, just blind faith and obedience.

1 Timothy 1:4 notes part 3 — Edifying – Strong’s 3622 – Administration. Everywhere else (7 times) the word ‘edifying’ – means “building up” see Strong’s 3619.

This word ‘edifying’ from the Greek MSS ‘oikonomia’ which means ‘administration’ is telling us quite plainly what this Hellenising philosopher writer has in mind, that is, only one thing – a church corporation – a money making church corporation and not the Spiritual Congregation of God that needed REAL edifying, that is, building up and/or encouraging and supporting.

Please note – Part 3 and all follow on articles in this series will be posted at this link below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-pastoral-epistles-parts-1-2/

Tim Farron Avoids Saying Whether He Considers Gay Sex as a Sin – Part 1

For those of you who have never of Tim Farron he was, up until today, the 14th June 2017, the leader of the British Liberal Democrat Party (and an alleged Christian), otherwise known as the Lib-Dems, which only managed to secure 12 seats in the recent British General Election on the 8th June 2017. This was an increase of only three seats on their previous General Election performance. In contrast the Stalinist Labour Party won 262 seats and the Trotskyist Conservative Party 318. So as you can see this was a very poor show indeed.

Moreover, Tim Farron, although professing to be a liberal was, in reality, just another leftie Bolshevik Marxist in a yellow tie – yellow being the official colour of the spineless treacherous Lib-Dem Party. However, in truth, he was no more a liberal, as in the traditional liberal sense, e.g. as with Lloyd George, than Josef Stalin.

He also claimed that he was a Christian, but what kind of a Christian? A real Christian or a fake Christian? Here is a statement he made when questioned by a Channel 4 leftie, useless media jobsworth, Cathy Newman, with this question:

Farron was asked whether he believed, as a Christian, that the act of homosexual sex (sodomy) was a sin and replied: “To understand Christianity is to understand that we are all sinners.” (Brackets mine)

I will repeat that: “To understand Christianity is to understand that we are all sinners.”

OK, so what does this statement really mean? The word ‘understand’ in the language of legalese means to “stand under” so what he is really saying is this: To stand under the banner of Christianity is also to stand under the banner of “I am a sinner and don’t you forget it!”

Now is he right? IF we are Christians, are we still sinners? IF as Christians, we are still sinners, how will we enter the The Kingdom of God or IF as Christians we are still sinners how will we obtain or enter into Eternal Life? Do these people ever question their erroneous understanding or their own skewed reasoning?

Perhaps a better question would be, who teaches these wretched people and fills their heads with this satanic nonsense? And make no mistake, for it is satanic nonsense. So back to the first part of his statement: “To understand or stand under the banner of Christianity.” Well does he? Obviously not because he thinks that if one understands HIS idea of Christianity then we are all still sinners – DOH!!

So here’s a question: IF after having become a Christian we’re still sinners – WHAT’S CHANGED!!?? I’ll tell you – NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING HAS CHANGED!! In contrast, are the lost and unsaved majority, sinners? Yes, of course but this Tim Farron character has declared himself to be a sinner too, so what has his alleged Christian faith achieved for him? I’ll tell you again – NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

Let’s be clear about this folks – a sinner is a sinner is a sinner and that’s all there is to it, nothing more, nothing less and no matter what else he calls himself. A sinner will die in his or her sins – that’s it – fini – kaput – gone. They will then be dead in their graves until the Second Resurrection and The Great White Throne Tribunal at the end of The Millennium and with no part in the First Resurrection when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth, VERY SOON for His elect – REAL CHRISTIANS!

However, and here is the rub, someone who claims to be a Christian and a sinner as well, that is, people like our Mr Tim Farron, fall into a special group of people that will receive some special attention from Yashua Messiah when he returns to this earth very soon. This special attention is otherwise known as outer darkness.

Matthew 25:30 (KJV) And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

So are you saying that Tim Farron is an unprofitable servant? Yes of course and by his own admission. Ask yourself, how can a sinner ever be profitable to Yashua Messiah? So called Christians who are still sinners or who still see themselves as sinners are neither one thing or the other. Do you SEE THAT dear people? I do hope so for your Holy Spiritual future and welfare is totally dependent upon you SEEING IT, and the last thing I want to see is your being cast into outer darkness, that is, separation from Yashua Messiah and for I don’t know how long. That cannot be a very pleasant experience no matter what the duration.

OK so by now you must be wondering what it is that Tim Farron is missing and it’s quite simple. He is missing the miracle that occurs at Baptism (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone. Now this may be because he has never been taught or worse he has been taught and then poo pooed the teaching. Either way, he is not properly birthed into Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), for if he had been he would KNOW that as a Baptised born of God Christian, gifted with The Holy Spirit he would no longer be a sinner – end of.

This is explained to us by Yashua Messiah through John:

1 John 3:8 (KJV) He that committeth sin is of The Devil; for The Devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose The Son of God was manifested (made known), that He might destroy the works of The Devil. (Brackets mine)

Here we can plainly see, if we have the EYES to see that is, that anyone that commits sin is of The Devil. That’s it – simple and no argument!! Yet John says: “For this purpose The Son of God was manifested (made known), that He might destroy the works of The Devil.”

Right, here’s another question: Has The Son of God (Yashus Messiah), who I presume was made made known to Tim Farron, destroyed the works of The Devil in Tim Farron’s life? Answer: No of course not, because he still sees himself as a sinner and, worse, applies that same wretched condition to all his fellow erroneous fake Christians.

In turn this means that Yashua Messiah did nothing for Tim Farron at the stake (cross). He died and rose again thereby destroying the works of The Devil (death and sin) and yet Tim Farron (and those like him) is oblivious to this stupendous Truth.

Furthermore, and again, let’s be clear for Tim Farron, unfortunately, is not alone, and I exaggerate not an atom when I say that the bulk of those embroiled in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion think exactly the same way as Tim Farron thinks.

I will therefore quote John once more in order to explain how born of God sons and daughters of God, properly Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit cannot sin:

1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man that hath his hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.

Every man that keeps his hope in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) PURIFIES HIMSELF even as Yashua Messiah is pure.

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

Whosoever abides in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) SINS NOT!! Whosoever sins (Tim Farron and those like him) has not seen Yashua Messiah (experienced His presence via The Holy Spirit) and has never known Him!

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His Seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Whosoever is born of God does not sin because His Seed (His Holy Spirit) remains in him and he cannot sin and he cannot sin because he is born of God. He is NOW a NEW CREATION residing in a DEAD BODY of sin.

Paul also makes it plain – TWICE!:

Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Paul makes it clear that it is no longer him that sins but, rather, the dead sin that dwells within his dead body of sin which is no longer him.

I hope and pray that you all STAND UNDER (understand) this miraculous Father and Son gifted and given arrangement.

The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion

Now many of you, that is, you my regular readers, will be familiar with the above expression, for I use it frequently in my articles to describe mainstream Christianity or Churchianity or the Christian RELIGION or what some might call Christendom. For those of you new to my work for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) I use it as an umbrella term to cover all the branches of so called Christianity – Roman Catholicism; Eastern Orthodoxy; Anglicanism; Episcopalianism (American Anglicanism), plus ALL the myriad denominations (divisions = demon-inations) of Protestantism.

This umbrella title also covers all the so called cults who, I might add, do not have a monopoly on cultism and cultic behaviour. Roman Catholicism is the biggest cult of all, a money making, money laundering, cult with over a billion deluded and deceived adherents. However, having said that, I will list the principal cult culprits here for your information: Jehovah’s Witnesses; The Church of The Latter Day Saints (The Mormons); The Seventh Day Adventists (SDAs); The Christadelphians; The Worldwide Church of God, (now deviously and deceptively known as The Grace Communion International), with all its splinter or spin-off groups who broke away after the demonic Herbert W. Armstrong era ended.

Here are the names of some of these satanic Judaising splinter groups:

Midnight Ministries – Malcom B Heap
The Philadelphia Church Of God – Gerald Flurry
The Restored Church Of God
The Living Church Of God
The Intercontinental Church Of God
The United Church Of God, An International Association
The Church Of God’s Faithful
The Independent Church Of God
The Church Of God, An International Community
The Christian Biblical Church Of God
The Continuing Church of God

I have listed the names of all these groups (and please note this list is not exhaustive) because I was once a duped member of the original Worldwide Church of God under Armstrong’s teaching, so I have a particular interest in what these satanic groups are getting up to in these last days of the last days. Needless-to-say they are all blasphemous Judaisers and Grace killers banging there OBEDIENCE based drums and earning their own salvation and extorting money from their duped members via their Old Covenant tithing money grabbing systems, so don’t, whatever you do, get involved with any of them.

OK, I think I have covered the bulk of what purports to be so called Christianity on the face of this satanic earth in 2017 and I call it The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. If you know of any other major groups that claim to be Christian Churches that you think should be added to my list please let me know. Please note I am aware of the Pentecostal groups and have included them as an integral of Protestantism.

Moving on, I will now take each of the four words that make up my umbrella title and expound on their relevance and my reasons for placing them within the title starting with:

CAINITE

Right, why do I group all these varied and supposed Christian bodies together under the title The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion? And why in particular do I use the term ‘Cainite’ as the first part of their description? What has Cain got to do with modern, so called, Christianity or nominal fake Christianity? He and his offspring died in The Flood didn’t they? Yes they did, but his bloodline was rekindled post-flood by and through the birth of Canaan whom Noah cursed. However, I will not expound on that story here as I deal with it in my articles elsewhere here on my blog, but what I will do is look specifically at Cain’s behaviour which led up to his murdering his half-brother Abel. (Take note, Cain and Abel were NOT full brothers)

Now this event is as much Spiritual as it is physical and literal and it is timeless in its importance. The spirit of this story carries forward through 6,000 years of our history to our days here in 21st century. So what ties the murder of Abel to the year 2017? Easy, sacrifices and offerings or perhaps what I should have said is, the RIGHT KIND of sacrifice and offering. So let’s post the story of Cain and Abel’s sacrifices and offerings:

Genesis 4:3-4 (KJV) And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto The LORD. 4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And The LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:

So what’s going on here? because on the face of it it looks like The Lord is being unjust toward Cain just because his offering was from his crops of the ground. We are then told that The Lord had respect for Abel’s offering rather than Cain’s, so what gives?

BLOOD is what gives in Abel’s sacrifice, the BLOOD of a LAMB which spills into the ground. In Cain’s offering there is NO BLOOD at all making it a useless offering and thereby definitely not pleasing in The Lord’s sight as a sacrifice.

Yashua Messiah was The Lamb slain from before the foundation of the world as it is written in the Book of Revelation:

Revelation 13:8 (KJV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (Satan), whose names are NOT written in The Book of Life of The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

This means that in the past under the Old Covenant right and proper sacrifices to God should ALWAYS involve the blood of a lamb (even before the original Passover in Egypt) with Yashua Messiah becoming the ultimate Lamb of God sacrifice to end ALL blood sacrifices. (Watch for the evil blasphemous re-instatement of blood sacrifices in Jerusalem soon – The Abomination of Desolation.)

OK, so back to the thread. From this event we then get Cain’s jealousy of his half-brother for having found favour in The Lord’s sight. The half-brothers then argue with the end result of Cain killing Abel in a fit of jealous rage.
Now mark this event, for it is a type or forerunner or the first of multiple thousands of murders that will follow it, on down through the ages and even into the 21st century with real Christians (followers of Yashua Messiah – The Truth and The Way) being slain for their Faith being in Him and Him alone – with no RELIGION. So to sum up this first part, what we have graphically displayed here is the first man of RELIGION (CAIN) slaying the first True believer making his blood of The Lamb sacrifice.

Now this is all well and good I here you say, but how are you making a connection from Cain and Abel to the 21st century? Again that’s easy. Fake or counterfeit Christians – those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion believe in a fake Jesus who never spilled his blood. This is because he doesn’t exist and so he never died. This fake Jesus is like Cain’s offering of vegetables – there’s no blood. Ask yourself, how does a make-believe fictional character bleed and die? It doesn’t and it can’t – it would be impossible for it to do so.

Let’s be clear about this and get it firmly seated in our minds, only Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) the real Lord Jesus Christ died and shed His blood for us not their Cainite vegetable fake Jesus. So now you know why I use the word Cainite in my title the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

JUDEO

OK, so why do I use the word ‘Judeo’ in my title? Well this should be more straight forward and easier to understand, for Judaism is an all pervasive problem within the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, a VERY BIG pervasive problem. Now let’s be clear for nearly ALL the groups within it practice some form of Judaism i.e. salvation by works and/or salvation through obedience to The Law or obedience to the Ten Commanments or even obeying Yashua Messiah. This means that Yashua Messiah’s Saving Grace along with His Faith are either blasphemed against, that is, abused or are totally trampled on and snuffed out – killed. Which in turn means they trample all over Yashua Messiah’s sacrifice – His death and His resurrection. They treat Him with utter contempt and in many cases without even realising it.

‘Judeo’ also stands for monotheism in one form or another, whether it be just ONE GOD as in Judaism and Islam, rendering Yashua Messiah a non-entity and just a creation or what looks like an afterthought if viewed from the Godhead’s perspective. We then have their ONE GOD within a FICTIONAL TRINITY DEITY of ONE in three and three in ONE. That means whether it’s three in ONE or ONE in three we still have a form of monotheism rattling around in there somewhere. This is a shell game conjuring trick of now you see ONE or it could be now you see three depending on how many magic mushrooms you have eaten LOL.

Moreover, in all Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious ‘churches’ some form of obedience will be in force, whether obedience to the Ten Commandments (The Law of Moses) or obedience to a Pope, Archbishop, cardinals, bishops, priests or some ministerial or pastor/elder hierarchy (the evil system of the Nicolaitans as described by Yashua Messiah in Revelation). To make things even worse, in many Protestant groups women will be in the pulpits lording it over the men. Paul must be turning in his grave.

Furthermore, regulated Old Covenant Sabbath keeping will be the order of the day, whether seventh day or first day Sabbath keeping. There, also, will be annual pagan heathen fertility rite festivals like Christmas, Easter and Whitsun which have nothing to do with Yashua Messiah. Within the Judeo religious Roman Cult there is actually an idolatrous ‘saint’s day’ for every single day of the year. Needless-to-say these fakes are not real saints, because in order to be a real saint you have to be called and chosen by The Father and then born of God (born again). No man has the power or the authority to make a man or woman a saint.

Moreover, having revealed the above deceptive points, here is what you will not find active and operational in these so called ‘churches’, that is, egalitarian Grace filled fellowships with Holy Spirit gifted teachers for new converts and beginners and overseers (shepherds) to keep a watchful eye out for spies and trouble makers (wolves) and protect the flocks in general, as was the case in the first century congregations.

CHRISTIAN

OK the third and most deceptive word of my title – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Why the most deceptive I hear you say? Quite simply because it deceives billions, not just millions, but billions of people across the world. This is because when they hear the word Christian or Christianity they immediately link it, erroneously, to the organised satanic religions I have listed above who pose as followers of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ).

I go head to head daily with hundreds of lost and unsaved people on social media who accuse supposed Christians and Christianity of all manner of wickedness, historical persecutions, tortures, evils, murders and genocides and they are correct to do so, for the people who did these vile deeds posed as Christians and did their satanic evil deeds in the name of Christianity, thereby bringing shame and disgrace on Jesus Christ’s name – bringing His name into disrepute – and as wonderfully encapsulated by this famous heathen:

“I like your Christ; I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

— Muhatma Gandhi

Furthermore, these so called Christian groups follow their non-Scriptural hu-man made Creeds or their blasphemous Statements of Beliefs, not Yashua Messiah. These legalistic creeds and statements lay down the frameworks of their hu-man made organisations and have nothing to do with the Kingdom of God Gospel message that Yashua Messiah and His Messengers (apostles) taught in the first century. This is because they want their lemming followers to 1) believe that salvation is within their particular ‘church’ only or through being a member of their organisation or cult only and 2) to give their hard earned dosh or tithes to the organisations. However, if they go outside of it and leave, they’re then deemed an apostate or they’re damned to fiery hell or they’re excommunicated as a heretic. Either way they’re toast to these lying blasphemers as they chuck their satanic hierarchical weight around.

Now which ever way we cut this, none of it is Christian. To be a Christian is one who is called and chosen by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and who then follows Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) – that’s it, apart from full immersion Baptism and gifting of The Holy Spirit. Once these things have occurred you are now born of God (born again) and you’re a Christian – a new creation, a saint and a REAL CHRISTIAN!!

RELIGION

Oh dear what positive thing can be said about the meaningless vain persuit of RELIGION!!?? Answer: Nothing!! Make sure you understand and never forget it – GOD HAS NO RELIGION. ALL religions are hu-man made on behalf of the Devil himself. ALL religions worship Satan the Devil in one way or another and NONE of them worship Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) and that includes??? Yes you guessed it – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Yes men dress their stupid religions up to make out they are worshipping Yashua Messiah but the opposite is always The Truth – they ALL worship Satan the Devil!!

Now here’s a little test. Just search the four Gospels in the KJV Bible for the word ‘religion’ and see if you can find it. OK I jest, don’t worry yourselves, for I have already done so and can assure you that it’s not there. However feel free to do your own research as you should.

Furthermore, Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He come to this earth in order to start a religion. Religion = the vanity and egos of men. So there you have it – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion!

For additional reading in support of the above please see:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/is-the-father-calling-you-to-his-son-yashua-anointed/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/who-or-what-are-judaising-mongrel-dogs/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/do-born-of-god-christians-have-to-obey-or-learn-obedience-part-1/

Did Jesus Die So We Can Now Have License To Sin, Without Guilt, And Go to Heaven?

OK, first of all, this is not my question, and it’s so full of built in errors I don’t really know where to begin. Furthermore, it’s a question which was asked of me quite recently and, in doing so, it meant that my teaching on Grace was being attacked. To counter that attack, I would recommend to you my two articles about Grace entitled: “The Grace Of Our Lord Jesus Christ – His True Grace – Not The Watered Down Religious Version!” and “For By Grace Are Ye Saved Through Faith – And That Not Of Yourselves – It Is The Gift Of God – Eph 2:8,” in order to understand where these people are coming from, and what their blasphemous attack on God’s Holy Word is all about.

Right, so what’s wrong with this question? Well, straight away there is no mention of Yashua Messiah’s resurrection within this question and we should never leave out mention of His resurrection when mentioning His death, for His death was only half of the arrangement. Second, there is this word ‘license’ and it then linked to the word ‘sin’. Hence their phrase: “A license to sin.”

Now where does this weird phrase come from? I have to admit I have heard it used before by various ravening wolves in pulpits, but I have never taken the trouble to check it out to see if it’s Scriptural, and, of course, it isn’t. Now there’s a surprise!! So why is it used if it’s not Scriptural? Easy, because vain puffed up men love their meaningless jargon expressions, especially in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. They love to put their egotistic personal stamp on the Holy Scriptures and, as I have said before, they do it because the Holy Word of God is too simple for them. OK, so as it’s not a Scriptural phrase, let’s have a look in my Concise Oxford Dictionary to see what the word ‘license’ means:

License – allow (person to do, thing to be done; rare); allow complete freedom to; grant permit to person; authorize use of premises for certain purpose, etc.(It also means to grant LEGAL permission to a person to do something UNLAWFUL E.g. Licenced to kill) (Brackets mine)

So let’s rewrite this question using one of the dictionary definitions: Did Jesus die so we can now have a permit to sin or to allow us complete freedom to sin, without guilt, and go to heaven? Now is this question dumb or is it mind numbingly dumb? I would suggest to you it’s both.

What we have to ask ourselves here is why would anyone want a licence or a permit to sin? If we were dealing with a lost or unsaved man or woman, would they require licences or permits to sin? Why don’t you try asking one of them and see what kind of a reply you get, that’s after they have stopped laughing at you and wondering if you were unhinged. OK, so we know that the lost and unsaved don’t need a licence or a permit to sin, for they manage very well without one.

That leaves us with the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious perspective and whether or not they would require a licence or a permit to sin – well, would they, for many in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion seem to think they would, but why? What kind of Christian would even bring up such a subject? What kind of Christian rubs shoulders with those who would influence such thinking?

If we come genuinely to Yashua Messiah after The Father has called us, which means our repentance is genuine and our confession of sins is genuine, why would we seek a permit or licence to carry on sinning? Does any of this make any sense? No, it’s complete nonsense. So you see this question could and perhaps should have been worded like this: Should I repent and confess my sins so that I can then have a licence or permit to carry on sinning as I did in my old life, without guilt, and still go to heaven? Never mind that I had no guilt before in my old life anyway.

However, what this question is revealing to us is that we have people calling themselves Christians who are still struggling, through their own admission, with guilt. This means they see themselves as unforgiven and thereby not saved. How wretched is that?

Can you now see the inbuilt stupidity within this question? Why go to all the trouble of repentance, confession of sins (that is, all your sins, past, present and future) and baptism plus gifting of The Holy Spirit, if you want to carry on living as you did before? What would be the point of it and who would you be deceiving? As I think about all this I am actually becoming confused, and of course, that’s just what the Devil wants – confusion.

Moreover, why are Cainite-Judeo-Christians asking this silly question, and what else does it reveal to us? As I have already pointed out, they only mention Yashua Messiah’s death, not His resurrection and that’s because many Cainite-Judeo-Christians don’t understand what His resurrection achieved for them. OK, they believe everything was done at the cross, and yes, in part, it was all done. It was all done in terms of conquering death and sin, but what they don’t understand is the new Spiritual beings we become through His resurrection, that is, perfect in the Father’s sight and sinless beings that do not sin.

Now this is what they can’t get their heads around and that’s because they are not really Born Again. They are men of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion who practise Graceless Judaism – salvation by progress – salvation by process or by self-help, or by their own effort and endeavours, or commonly known as salvation by works. The Faith, Salvation, Grace thing is incomprehensible to them, they cannot understand it. In turn, it is through this blindness that they conjure up questions like the above.

Once more you will also notice the ‘without guilt’ bit in the middle of this question, which means they cannot even get their heads around this:

Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus. [who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit.]

Please note I have left off the second part of this verse because it’s missing in the Greek MSS, which means it was falsely added by the translators – it being interpolated from Romans 8:4 and unnecessarily repeated.

Romans 8:4 (KJV) That the righteousness of The Law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit.

Now what part of Romans 8:1 do these wretched people not understand, that is, there is now no further condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. If there is now no further condemnation, how can there be any guilt!? If there is guilt, there is something wrong with their birthing into Yashua Messiah. The guilty mindset is the fallen mindset and it behaves like Adam and Eve after their fall – they went and hid in guilt!

If we are born of God (Born Again) or born from above, we have been lifted out of guilt, for there is now no further condemnation laid upon us. So, this means we are sinless, even though our dead bodies of sin, sin. The thing is, is this a license to sin? Well, yes of course it is, if we are deluded and deceived liars and The Truth is not in us, but is that the case IF we are born of God? No, of course it is not the case, because The Truth, Yashua Messiah lives in us through His Holy Spirit POWER and the Holy Spirit cannot reside with LIVING sin.

So how would we be liars? We would be liars because there is no such thing as: “license to sin”, because as I have already proven, no one needs a licence to sin. If you want to sin, then just go right on ahead and sin, if that’s your DESIRE, and, of course, this is where we get to the nub of this issue, for that’s what it’s all about – DESIRE.

As Born Again believers, what should our DESIRE be, to sin or not to sin? Well, I hope it’s a DESIRE not to sin, and if that is the case, there is nothing wrong with your birthing in Yashua Messiah for your DESIRE not to sin proves that you love your Elder Brother in heaven. All this means is that you would hate to do something that Yashua Messiah would hate you to do. This also means we are endeavouring to please Him, but will this always be so? Not very likely if you’re the average man or woman who has been called out of this world by The Father to His Son and yet still lives in a dead body of sin. We will sin until we die; it’s inevitable, and we need to get this through our heads. I will reiterate, we’re still perfect and sinless in the Father’s sight even though our dead bodies of sin, sin. Paul explains it clearly and twice so we get it through our heads:

Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Now, if after all this we’re still looking for a ‘licence to sin’, because we want to sin, what is this revealing about our birthing into Yashua Messiah? If our DESIRE is to look for a licence to sin, what is this saying about us, and what is it saying about our repentance, our confession, and our baptism? Are we phoneys and fakes? If so, who are we fooling? Were all these things a charade or a façade to hide our real intentions of being or becoming a fake Christian? What would be the point?

OK, let’s leave out the ‘license to sin’ thing for a minute and just deal with the sin issue. What, if after baptism, our DESIRE is to carry on sinning, what would be the point of getting baptised? As I said previously, we can carry on sinning without any need to for baptism, so what is their point in the use of this stupid phrase?

Their point is this – they are looking at the whole thing through the eyes of Grace Killers, for they cannot comprehend the loving relationship of that between a Born Again son or daughter of God and their Redeemer, Yashua Messiah. They think it’s all about obedience to The Law, and if we speak of Grace, they will immediately think we are looking for excuses to sin – which is a judgemental lie. This is the mindset of Pharisees, for they behaved in the same way when Yashua Messiah confronted them with His Grace filled message, two thousand years ago and nothing has changed. These Cainite-Judeo-Christians behave and believe in exactly the same way.

You see when your salvation is down to you and your efforts this is how you will behave and view Grace. There is no room for Grace in their salvation-by-works world. In fact, Grace, from this legalistic Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious perspective, is a complete mystery to them, for it’s not on their radar screens and in reality it doesn’t exist to them. It cannot exist, for if it were to exist their Law based world would dissolve before their very eyes and all the reasons for their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious existence would disappear. They would be like captains without ships and totally surplus to requirements.

Finally, I won’t go into detail about their nonsensical going to heaven business as I cover this subject in detail in my articles: “Are Christians Going to Heaven?” and “When Christians Die, Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord? – Parts 1 & 2”. Needless to say, Christians going to heaven is as erroneous an idea as that of us needing a ‘license to sin’. Where do they get this stuff? Oh yes, at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet LOL!

Brother Charles

PS Please note, this edited article is ten+ years old.

The Anatomy Of a Fake Christian

Introduction

Before I start please be warned that I use some strong language in this article and I have no desire to shock or offend anyone not prepared, so please be warned. Moreover, please note that I take no prisoners when dealing with anti-Christ arrogant blasphemers of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, that is, enemies of the Gospel message.

Now you could say that this article is long overdue, and I must admit that I have been planning such an article for a long long time, but to date, I have to say, that an easily usable or adaptable example for an article has not been forthcoming, but this bod takes first prize, and as I will reveal, is a classic example – he’s almost made to measure.

His name I will keep anonymous by using initials, as I have no wish to make capital out of his Spiritual blindness, ignorance, stupidity and other assorted accompanying delusional afflictions. So without further ado here is his first comment to me on social media which, incidentally, came out of the blue:

“brother charles YOUR blog is a load of manure an nonsense …ive read part of it and its COMPLETE BS ….its YOU who need to get back to the bible an gods word NOT YOURS ….YOUR opinions an YOUR take on the word of god ARE NOT the final word or the answer ….in just the small amount that i DID read YOU are espousing all manor of crap that ISNT in the bible …for example saying that senator john McCain is a relative of cain from the bible and that its his bloodline etc is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE !!”

You will notice that his first comment is just unfounded opinionated hot air about one of my articles which he took objection to, so it was an empty emotional protest without any factual argument to make his case or rebut anything I had said. This is the comment of a stiff necked, rebellious, brainwashed closed ignorant mind and beyond wretched.

However, my first reply:

@ DB “LOL and your comment is NOT opinionated meaningless bull crap??????? Now you can start proving your case by leaving a comment on my blog and I’ll make you a laughing stock. Mac = son of. McCain is a son of Cain – period and one evil son of the Devil.”

He came back with another silly non-comment which proved he knew nothing about the evil activities of John McCain:

“Brother Charles sooo…john mccain is the son of the devil….HAHAHAHA….and you think you can make ME a laughing stock …you are REALLY delusional arent you.”

If you web search “The treachery of John McCain” whom I have proven to be a son of Cain you will find ooddles of information about McCain with his selling out in Vietnam and his ties to ISIS and his involvement in funding them and yet this uninformed dupe labels me as delusional LOL. Yet more unfounded emotional worthless opinions from DB.

My second reply

@ DB “Cain was the Devil’s son through Eve – period. TWO SEEDS came out of The Garden. You’re a know-nothing numb skull moron. ROTFLMAO”

He came back yet again only this time the chinks in his alluminium fake Christian armour are beginning to show – I have split this comment into two parts:

“Brother Charles i wont be commenting to your blog because i dont make it a habit of contributing / encouraging NONSENSE ….”Matthew 7:21-23” Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven; but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness….

Here he continues with his hollow opinionated claims by declaring for a second time that my blog is nonsense without one atom of proof. He then starts to judge me as well, that is, as being a false Christian who will be rejected by The Lord when He returns. As it happens I have never cast out a demon, having never encountered anyone with one, nor have I performed miracles or claimed to have done so. Furthermore, seeing as I reside under Yashua Messiah’s Glorious Grace it would be impossible for me to practice lawlessness, as I am not under The Law.

He continues

….It is apparent that the people in Jesus’ example thought they were Christians. Even though they may have performed many works in Jesus’ name as proof of their religious devotion, Jesus rejected them with the statement, “I never knew you.” Given Jesus’ preceding warnings about “false prophets” who would masquerade as followers of Jesus Christ (verse 15), is it any wonder Jesus commanded us to test the “fruit” of religious teachers before embracing them into the fold.     YOUR BLOG is a PERFECT example”

Ironically in the opening sentence of this second part he is actually speaking of himself without realising it, such is his delusional state of mind. He thinks that out of the two of us HE is the Christian – hilarious or what? Then he gives his game away with a reference to…..and wait for it….. RELIGIOUS DEVOTION!! A non-Scriptural term. This is our first concrete evidence that we are dealing with a fake Christian. God has no religion nor did Yashua Messiah come to this earth in order to start a religion. Furthermore you will not find the word ‘religion’ in the four Gospels, so now we know what his faith is in – RELIGION.

He then speaks of fruit when: 1) he doesn’t even know me and 2) he has only read a tiny part of one of my articles without understanding it and then condemns my whole blog based upon his unresearched erroneous conclusions. This, my friends, just constitutes another judgemental rant.

I then replied with a rebuttal:

@ DB “You won’t be commenting on my blog because you’re a spineless coward full of satanic mainstream religious bull crap. You have no argument as your comment proves – you’re just a mouthy clanging cymbal. LOL”

“Brother Charles HAHAHA…your funny …i wont be commenting on your blog because its  NONSENSE …YOUR opinion IS NOT the last word on the bible and YOU are not a prophet of the lord …the fact that you think ANYONE ought to contribute to you BULLSHIT is ridicules ….like i said before i try not to encourage MORONS !!”

He then makes further false accusations by declaring for a third time that my blog is nonsense. Once more without an atom of factual proof or argument. He then claims that my researched and Spiritually inspired articles are just my opinions. His ignorant audacity knows no bounds. He then states that I am not a Prophet of The Lord. Well that’s a relief because I never thought I was. He’s probably not even aware that John the Baptist was the last Prophet of The Lord:

Matthew 11:13 (KJV) For all The Prophets and The Law prophesied until John.

Luke 16:16 (KJV) The Law and The Prophets were until John: since that time The Kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

I responded with yet another rebuttal and a challenge:

@ DB “PROVE IT, you mouthy ignorant jerk.”

He then tries to pull a fast one thinking he’s a smart Alec by saying my blog proves HIS case. His delusions intensify LOL:

“Brother Charles you have proven it for me bub …the simple fact that you THINK that YOUR blog/opinions on the bible is Gods ”TRUTH” is full on evidence that YOU are delusional and your blog is nothing more than the blathering of an idiot with a broken mind !”

No further comment on that post so I rebut his drivel once again:

@ DB “ALL you post is your mouthy ignorant opinions – no Scriptural back up whatsoever because you’re a fake and liar – full of religious bull crap.”

“Brother Charles 1st of all i GAVE you some scripture to back it up even though i dont really need scripture to back me up in proving your a fukin lunatic …you are continually doing an awesome job of that YOURSELF ….the simple fact that you think that YOU and your blog of mindless drivel ARE somehow the last word on the bible and that you are somehow speaking some unheard truth from god  is FAR AND AWAY proof enough that you are delusional buddy !!”

Then he lies by saying he gave me Scripture as proof and evidence when all he did was to missuse Scripture to compound or try to back up his ignorant opinions. It was a total missuse of Scripture and he proved nothing with its use. I was then inspired to challenge him with what I thought would be a knock out punch. I challenged him with a deadly question:

@ DB “Right let’s start you lying illegitimate: Tell me, when did you accept a Jesus as your saviour?”

He then came back with this, thinking erroneously that it was an answer, but as you can see, at the end of his post, he was trying to weedle out of the subject now being discussed:

“Brother Charles May 14 1981 is when i was saved…For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” Say, “Father in Heaven, I believe that Jesus died for my sins.”…..not that that has ANYTHING whatsoever to do with this !”

I therefore pressed him further:

@ DB “Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?”

He then comes back with a mixed bag, but I could tell at this point by his response, that, having read more of my blog, he was not so sure of himself. It even resulted with him realising and admitting, in an ever so back handed way, that I spoke with Yashua Messiah’s authority and yet quickly resorting to accusing me of operating with and for my own agenda. He also accuses me of being Spiritually bankrupt – just a little more judging to compound his blasphemies.

“Brother Charles ill give you details of my being saved when you explain exactly how an why this has ANY bearing WHATSOEVER in this thread of conversation …. my faith isnt in question here …the subject is that YOU somehow believe that YOUR  writings  and YOUR interpretation of the bible an gods word are IT …that somehow YOU have the WHOLE thing figured out …YOU DONT …..i have read enough of your blog to see without question that your are not only delusional but that somehow YOU think you are SO ENLIGHTENED that you can tell/judge ANYONE on their faith and THAT my friend is ENOUGH to see you are spreading false teachings an that YOU are the 1 who is morally an spiritually corrupt …the bible is VERY specific about those who spread false teachings and those who pretend to have ALL the answers …its very specific about people who take the scripture an manipulate it to fit their OWN agenda and then spread that agenda to others !!”

He also tries to introduce terms and conditions re his alleged salvation and goes on the defensive by declaring HIS faith isn’t in question when it most definitely was in question, and he most assuredly did not like my having things all figured out. THAT was not allowed in his sandy foundation fake Christian world.

I respond to him once more:

@ DB “OH YES your faith is EVERYTHING to do with it i.e. what is your faith in? and the fact that you cannot simply answer my question TELLS ME EVERYTHING I need to know. However I will give you another chance and remind you of what Peter said:

1 Peter 3:15 (KJV) But sanctify The Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:

I will therefore repeat the question so there is no confusion: Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?”

This repeated request has gone unaswered and after 36 hours I am still waiting for his reply. Now dear people why do you think that is? Has the cat got his tongue? Could it be that I frightened him off with a question that had echoes of the past? Let me remind you:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

I have covered this issue elsewhere on my blog but it won’t hurt to go over it again. Notice what Yashua Messiah has said and then what has taken place. He said in no uncertain terms that unless The Father had innitiated their inner desire to follow Him (had called them) they could NOT TRULY COME TO HIM. So what did they do? THEY FAKED IT! Then, when confronted with the reality of their artificial situation they walked away from Him.

Why did they walk away from Him? What did they find so upsetting in His words?: “Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.” Easy, they could not accept this Truth. They believed that it was THEIR IDEA to follow Him so that they could pat themselves on the back (boast) and say to themselves what clever people they were. After all THEY HAD ACCEPTED HIM as their saviour – their idea – their wisdom – their intelligence – their decision and their terms and conditions, if we follow it through to its inevitable ludicrous conclusion.

Right, now lets transfer this Truth and apply it to our pompous little arrogant wretch called DB who when challenged with the question: “Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?” He could not answer. WHY COULD HE NOT ANSWER – IT’S SIMPLE ENOUGH, ISN’T IT??? Obviously not for him for it silenced him just like Yashua Messiah silenced the Pharisees and Sadducees.

One fake Christian exposed.

PS if he returns with another comment I will update this page.

Brother Charles

PS as of today, 30th January 2017 and 15 days since his ignorant rant, I have not had a word from him. Interesting eh?

Was JESUS CHRIST a JEW?…

…Or better, Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a JEW?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38.

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Canaanite Jews were and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (KJV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (KJV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Matthew 23:33 (KJV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially a viper or a reptile and therefore against Himself – IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, that’s what these Canaanite Jew people were and still are in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurous thieves and, worst of all, genocidal psychopathic cold blooded murderers, as in the so called Russian Revolution as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

“A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

– Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten God, for they had never known God at all and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them straight:

John 8:44 (KJV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (Brackets mine)

The Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of God, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the God of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so called African-American blacks.

However I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s parents. In Matthew we have Joseph’s lineage who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father but his step-father and in Luke we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (KJV) The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (JUDAH) and his brethren; 3 And Judas (JUDAH) begat Phares (PHAREZ) and Zara (ZARAH) of Thamar (TAMAR); and Phares (PHAREZ) begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam (REHOBOAM); and Roboam (REHOBOAM) begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
Mat 1:15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI. (Emphasis mine)

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (KJV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So did Joseph have two fathers or is this a contradiction or just an expression of of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still refered to as his father and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was Heli’s son.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon through Solomon’s son Rehoboam and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David, We therefore have Yashua Messiah who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (KJV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH).

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (KJV) The Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah nor his descendants until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However I can here the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another wife named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Lord for disobeying their father Judah and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consumation of their marriage to Tamar and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the first Canaanite Jews and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside and in turn this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews via their mothers and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father.

So to sum up we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Israelites; 3) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah, for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Canaanite Jew.

For further reading and understanding of the origins of the white Semitic Israelites and Canaanite Jews please see my two articles below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 5 – James Cone, Black Liberation Theologian

In part two I mentioned a few of the early agents provocateur in what I call The Black Rebellion, but for this stage of the exposé I will now focus on the more recent principal characters starting with:

James Cone (1938-) Theologian of Black Liberation Theology: “In assessing the theology of James Cone, it is critical to recognize that he sees black experience as the fundamental starting point for ascertaining theological truth. And his own writings are a reflection of his own “black experience” – that is, the discrimination he suffered while growing up as a child in Bearden, Arkansas.”

Again, from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

Notice immediately the oxymoron being applied here – ‘theological truth’. Look folks, there is very little, if any, Truth in theology. Theology is primarily the vain philosophical thinking, logic, reasoning and ramblings of carnal minded Spiritually dead men. This rebellious mindset then produces their own creation, a creation of a god in their image and with it fake doctrines and fake spirituallity. THAT’S IT!! There really is nothing more that can be said about theology, black liberation theology or otherwise, and yet Cone uses his ‘life experiences’ as a young black upon which to build his foundation of so called ‘theological truth’.

It is also from this erroneous thinking that comes the idea of blacks being an oppressed people in the USA when they are no such thing. If blacks are oppressed then they are oppressed by the Canaanite Jew with his victimhood programming and, in turn, by their own people who have swallowed this victimhood snake oil wholesale. Furthermore, if we want to play the victimhood game then ALL PEOPLE are victims of the Canaanite-Jews and their THIEVING USURY which has impoverished THE WHOLE WORLD!! Make no mistake dear people CANAANITE JEW USURY is a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Moreover and at the same time he mentions ‘discrimination’ whilst having been born into a white ‘might is right’ environment. How could there not be be any discrimination, when he is a minority black alien, whose grandparents were most likely the serfs of white people, residing in a nation still ruled by white people? What does he expect? Preferential treatment!!?? It is in the nature of man to look after his own and if some blacks are not up to it why blame the white man? Had he behaved this way in Soviet Russia he would have been in a Gulag quicker than he could have said Uncle Tom’s Cabin – never to be seen or heard of again!!

From the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.””

Now why would people, (I presume this accusation is toward white people), define black people as evil? Is this an unjust conclusion to come to? Well to apply it as a blanket description obviously, yes, because there are good black people, but is the accusation totally without foundation? No and here is the proof:

From the “Council of Conservative Citizens” web page, “The Truth About Interracial Rape.”

“Presently the FBI appears to have only published the full statistical tables up to year 2008. After that the FBI website only has smaller “bulletins” that do not include the full data.

“From this data we find that blacks commit sexual assault against almost as many whites as blacks. However, white on black sexual assault is an extreme rarity.

“Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
Black on White: 20,309
Black on Black: 21,104

“Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Black on Black: 35,330

“Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Black on Black: 36, 620

Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Black on Black: 7,705

“Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Black on Black: 12,780

“Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Black on Black: 34,841

“Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Black on Black: 148,380

“Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
Black on Black: 24,730”

Let me be clear, I don’t like statistics, in fact I hate them and for obvious reasons, as they are easily distorted and become worse than outright lies if used by disingenuous people or lying dissemblers. However, I have quoted these figures for one purpose only and that is to show how the idea that black people are oppressed by the white man does not reveal itself in this data. If anything it reveals the opposite or The Truth that it is the white man and especially the white woman that is oppressed and violently abused by the black man.

Notice, too, how the full data figures ceased to be available when the anti-white, lying racist war criminal Barack Obama became president in 2008!! Coincidence?? I will leave you to decide for yourselves.

Back to James Cone whose name incidently is just a play on the name Cain, so that you know who he is descended from. So what else do we know about James (Cain) Cone?

Again from the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“The chief architect of black liberation theology was James Cone, author of Black Theology and Black Power. One of the tasks of this movement, according to Cone, is to analyze the nature of the gospel of Jesus Christ in light of the experience of blacks who have long been victimized by white oppressors. According to black liberation theology, the inherent racism of white people precludes them from being able to recognize the humanity of nonwhites; moreover, their white supremacist orientation allegedly results in the establishment of a “white theology” that is irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. Consequently, liberation theologians contend that blacks need their own, race-specific theology to affirm their identity and their worth.”

Here we can see James (Cain) Cone’s satanic credentials, for it turns out that he is the chief architect of Black Liberation Theology and the author of Black Theology and Black Power. This sounds to me like he is an outright enemy of white people and no more a Christian than my neighbour’s cat.

Moreover, notice, the use of the emotionally charged PC Bolshevik Marxist term “white supremacist” and how it’s viewed as irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. I would counter with the question: When were supremacist whites EVER CONNECTED to the black experience!!?? Who thinks up all this satanic nonsense?

OK let’s have some WHITE EXPERIENCE!!! I was raised in an originally ALL WHITE London and watched it being deliberately invaded and overrun through the 60s, 70s and 80s by West Indians, Indians, Pakistanis, Turks and Greeks and at no time did I ever feel connected to any of them, nor them to me. Cultural remoteness was the order of the day, so what’s all this meaningless nonsense about disconnection from the black experience when there was never a connection in the first place? London today with whites a minority is no longer a white English city – it’s an alien hell hole.

Here’s another thing, why is white supremacy painted in a negative light and who would conjure up such a term and use it to beat up white people? What does the term conjure up in your mind, for it causes me no problems at all? I look at what the white man has achieved down through the centuries and it looks pretty impressive to me and makes the white man look supreme, so what’s with this issue of whites being supreme that these other races have a problem with, especially blacks and Canaanite Jews? Jealousy and envy perhaps?

Continuing again…

““What we need,” says Cone, “is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of Black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.” Observing that America was founded for white people, Cone calls for “the destruction of whiteness, which is the source of human misery in the world.” He advocates the use of Marxism as a tool of social analysis to help Christians to see “how things really are.””

Notice in true Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jew fashion he calls for “the destruction of whiteness”. Remember my earlier quote? If not, here it is again:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

So is James (Cain) Cone looking to help Christians see: “how things really are” from Yashua Messiah’s perspective, that is, through a Christian prism or through the satanic twisted and poisonous anti-white Bolshevik Marxist prism of Karl Marx and Friedrick Engels and the Canaanite Jews? Again no prizes for the right answer.

Part 6 coming soon.