Did The Messenger Paul REASON With THE JEWS In The Synagogues?

OK, now the first issue that arises out of this title is who were these Jews? for until we ascertain who they really were, we’re not going to fully understand this question, or this issue. We then have to see the word ‘synagogue’ in The Light of the Holy Scriptures for, again, unless we know for sure what ‘synagogues’ represent, we’ll flounder in the dark.

So let’s get this second point firmly set in our minds and onto our hearts of Truth, because there is NOTHING positive about synagogues, and the only synagogue mentioned by name in the Holy Scriptures is this one here, and it’s mentioned twice! just so we get it!

Revelation 2:9 (KJV) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are The Synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 (KJV) Behold, I will make them of The Synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

These verses tell us, without any ambiguity, that there’s only one kind of synagogue – SATAN’S SYNAGOGUE, for there is no other.

Right, so who were these ‘Jews’ that said they were Jews, but were lying? Now here we have the usual type of translator’s error that we find so often in the pages of the KJV, and which I reveal in so many of my articles. So let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some insight:

Jews – G2453Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:—Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

OK, the first thing we must understand here is The Truth that the word ‘Jew’, as used in the KJV, is 100% a misnomer, for it is automatically and deceptively leading us to believe that the word ‘Jew’ is referring to the Hebrew Israelites, The Chosen People of God, when NOTHING could be further from The Truth.

This means that these Jews were Jews who thought they were Judeans, but were not Judeans at all, for Judeans were Semitic Hebrew Israelites, and these ‘Jews’ claimed, falsely, that they were Judeans. These impostors, known as ‘Jews’, were/are, in Truth, Hamitic Canaanites from Bathshuah the Canaanitess, through her son Shelah, as recorded in Genesis 38, so they were NOT Judean Semitic Israelites at all. These days they openly admit it!:

“We are a chosen people. Most Jews do not like to admit it but our god is Lucifer and we Jews are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”

— The Jew, Harold W. Rosenthal

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

This is why I call the Jews The Serpent Seed from The Garden (see link Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 below for all the historical proof and evidence that the Jews are nothing to do with The Chosen People – The Twelve Tribes of Israel).

So moving on, we have now learned that these Jews were not Semitic Israelites, so who were these Judeans? The Judeans were descendants of a remnant of the three Tribes of The House of Judah that returned from the Babylonian captivity, namely Royal Judahites, Levites (The Priesthood) and Benjaminites. As examples we had Mary Mariam and Joseph who were Royal Judahites, John the Baptist and his family who were Levites, and The Messenger Paul who was a Benjaminite. Joseph of Arimathea was likewise a Royal Judahite, and no doubt Nicodemus was also a Levite. However, NONE of these crucial Biblical characters were Jews!

All this information now brings us to the thorny issue of whether or not Paul REASONED with the Jews if, by ‘Jews’, Holy Scripture is referring to the Canaanite Jews. If that was the case and the people present in the synagogue were Canaanite Jews then there would have been no reasoning with them at all. Paul would have preached and declared The Gospel of The Kingdom of God and the Jews would have argued with Paul and sent him packing or, worse, attempted to have him arrested and after a rigged trial had him put to death, most likely stoning him to death. This is how much the Jews hated The Gospel Message and thereby making any reasoning totally impossible.

However, if there had been Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites there present with these Canaanite Jews, then some kind of reasoning could have been possible, but always keeping in mind that unless The Father was calling these Judeans, they would also have been non-receptive to The Kingdom Gospel Message.

Moreover, all of you who have read my articles on “Theology and Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals” (see link Nos. 6 and 7 below), will know my views and be aware of the compelling evidence I have gathered that proves them to be next to useless when it comes to matters Holy Spiritual and Scriptural. If you have not read them, I thoroughly recommend them to you now for, without the knowledge contained therein you are, and will always be, vulnerable to their deceitful and deceptive ways. Make no mistake these so called experts will lead you astray if you give them, not even, half a chance.

Back to the title question; well did he? Did Paul ‘reason’ with the Canaanite Jews in the Synagogues? In fact, as already stated, did Paul ‘reason’ with anyone? What if he did or he did not, what does it matter? It matters greatly for, if he didn’t, why is the word ‘reasoned’ in the Holy Scriptures at all?

Let’s deal with the question.

Did Paul reason with the Jews?

Well the KJV of The Holy Bible says he did so that must be it, yes? Actually, no is the plain and simple answer to that. To help us with this study I will list the relevant Holy Scriptures here:

Please take note that the word ‘reasoned’ cannot be found in any of Paul’s letters, nor in Hebrews. So this tells us that it’s a word that only Luke uses in Acts which immediately puts a question mark over it.

Acts 17:1-2 (KJV)Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews: And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.

Acts 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.

Acts 18:19And he came to Ephesus, and left them there: but he himself entered into the synagogue, and reasoned with the Jews.

Acts 24:25 And as he reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come, Felix trembled, and answered, Go thy way for this time; when I have a convenient season, I will call for thee.

There we are, four Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals and theologians love, especially Roman Catholic Bible intellectuals. Why do they love these Holy Scriptures? because they think that Paul was just like them, a debating, pontificating Bible intellectual or theologian, when nothing could be further from The Truth, and The Truth is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

OK, let’s print Strong’s definition of this word:

Reasoned – G1256διαλέγομαι dialegomai dee-al-eg’-om-ahee. Middle voice from G1223 and G3004; to say thoroughly, that is, discuss (in argument or exhortation): – dispute, preach (unto), reason (with), speak.

Now here in Strong’s definition we can see some confusion through his contradictory remarks:

On one hand he says ‘dialegomai’ means: “To say thoroughly”; “To preach (unto)”; “To speak”; “To exhort.” Then on the other hand he says it means: “To discuss”; “To argue”; “To dispute”; “To reason.”

Now which is it, for it cannot be both?

In 2 Corinthians 12:20 Paul states quite clearly what he thinks of debating, reasoning and arguing:

2 Corinthians 12:20 (MCV) For I fear, lest, when I come, I shall not find you such as I would, and that I shall be found unto you such as ye would not: lest there be debates, (reasoning) envyings, wraths, strifes, (arguments) backbitings, whisperings, swellings, (haughtiness through puffed up meaningless intellectual vanity) tumults.

Is Paul a hypocrite? Is he giving advice and warnings to those he is teaching whilst he himself does the opposite!! Is this an example of the worldly norm of: “Don’t do as I do, just do as I tell you?” Is that what it’s all about – is that what Paul was saying here? I don’t think so, in fact I know so and we all know so, don’t we? if The Truth is in us.

Here is the bottom line: “Saying thoroughly”; “preaching unto”; “speaking and exhorting” is a one way street. These activities do not invite debate, unless you are opposed to the aforementioned declarations. We need to understand The Word of God is not up for debate, nor up for discussion, nor up for reasoning on for hours and hours. It is preached and either received or rejected; there is no half way house.

Paul went into the synagogues and preached and there stated his case (he said thoroughly) for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). Now there would have been some there that received Paul’s message joyfully, and others that would not have done so. Those who received it joyfully would have questioned Paul further initially being curious and then hungry for The Word of God, and wanting to know more. No doubt those who did not receive his message would have given him much opposition. This opposition would have come from the men of religion, but he would not have argued and reasoned with them. He would have said the same things to them as Yashua Messiah said to the Pharisee Canaanite Jews of His day. Hypocrites; whited sepulchres; nests of vipers etc. etc. The mindset that is opposed God – the carnal hu-man mindset cannot be reasoned with, it’s impossible and Paul knew this. See link No. 8 below)

Let’s not forget he was once one of them himself, a Pharisee, so he knew exactly how their minds worked. That’s why he stated this in Romans 8:6-7

Romans 8:6-7 (KJV) For to be carnally minded is death; but to be Spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

So there we have it; it’s either one or the other, called or not called.

Let’s now take a closer look at those Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals use to support their right to foolishly reason and pontificate on The Holy Word of God, something they are not Spiritually qualified to do.

1) “And three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.”

What does this tell us? It tells us the opposite of The Truth. It says Paul reasoned with them for three Sabbath days, which means every Sabbath, for three consecutive weeks Paul went to this synagogue to preach The Word of God out of The Holy Scriptures. He didn’t reason out of the Holy Scriptures, for it is impossible for a Spirit born son of God to do so. Therefore to ‘say thoroughly’ is just another way of saying he spoke with confidence and authority; he taught, preached to or exhorted those present he didn’t reason. One only reasons with people who are in disagreement. If, as True Believers, we reason with the argumentative, we automatically give credence to their view. If someone was disagreeing with the Messenger Paul, whose servant do you think this trouble maker was? Only one chance for the right answer folks and no prizes for getting it right!

2) “And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.”

Here we go again; he ‘reasoned’ and persuaded the Jews Judeans and Greeks. No he didn’t, he ‘said thoroughly’ what the Holy Scriptures said and then they were persuaded. They were convinced by what they heard. How?

John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

This is how it works folks: The Father God calls a man or a woman to His Son and this is made possible by The Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has not yet indwelled this convert yet, but he or she is receiving special attention from The Father through His Spirit. After this miraculous event, and a called person hears The Word of God preached or ‘said thoroughly’ by a messenger from God, he or she will respond positively, they can do nothing else. This is how these Israelite Judeans and Greeks were able to be ‘convinced’. The Father God was calling them and Paul was His messenger bringing them the Good News.

If we look at Strong’s definition for ‘persuaded’ it’s not the best word choice for this situation:

Persuaded – G3982πείθω peithō pi’-tho A primary verb; to convince (by argument, true or false); by analogy to pacify or conciliate (by other fair means); reflexively or passively to assent (to evidence or authority), to rely (by inward certainty): – agree, assure, believe, have confidence, be (wax) content, make friend, obey, persuade, trust, yield.

In order to satisfy The Truth of John 6:44 we need something better than ‘persuaded’ because to be ‘persuaded’ means a choice has been made and that is not the case at all as being saved is not up to us, it’s not our decision. Let’s assess this miracle properly: “To passively assent to”; “to trust and rely on with an inward certainty”; “to trust and be in agreement with”; “to have no doubts and total confidence that what we and they are hearing is The Truth.” All of the above is only possible through The Father making it possible through The Holy Spirit and Yashua Messiah with us for, where else would this inward certainty originate – from ourselves!!??

When Samuel the Prophet was called The Father God did not reason with him, He just called his name and Samuel replied: “Here am I.”

1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the LORD called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

Have you noticed two things missing here – reasoning and persuasion, well, would you believe it? I do hope so, because the words ‘reasoned’ and ‘persuaded’ are the additions of Bible intellectuals, who over time have contaminated The Word of God through their personal religious agendas, and thereby reflected them in the pages of The Holy Bible.

As a final point, you could argue’ that I am reasoning’ with you to persuade’ you with this article, right this minute, but again that would not be true unless The Father were already calling you to His Son. If that is the case you will need no reasoning or persuading, and I will certainly not have to argue with you. I am only the sower and the seed is The Word of God and you are either fertile soil or stony ground. Furthermore, I cannot tell you whether you are fertile soil or not, only you can answer this question for yourself, for you will either agree with me or disagree with me.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

3. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

4. Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:

5. The Jews are The Tares, Fit Only For Burning!:

6. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Parts 1, 2 & 3:

7. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Part 4:

8. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It? Some Recent Objections

For parts 1 and 2 see link No. 1 below.

This is my third article on this contentious issue, and I recently received some objections to my teaching on it via e-mail. This complainant was very agitated and vociferous, with all his e-mails written in block capitals. Why do people shout when they are in error? Do they think people are going to take more notice of what they are saying if they shout? I suppose they must, but is this the case? I don’t think so, in fact I know so, because all it does is makes them sound and look foolish, combined with The Truth that text written in all-caps is harder to read than upper/lower text, and the writer thereby self-defeated.

So what were his objections? His objections were based on Old Testament Holy Scriptures where it states, and I will quote:

Leviticus 22:18 (KJV) Speak unto Aaron, and to his sons, and unto all the children of Israel, and say unto them, Whatsoever he be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers in Israel, that will offer his oblation for all his vows, and for all his freewill offerings, which they will offer unto the LORD for a burnt offering.

OK, the pesky word is written there, but does it change anything that I have not already covered in my previous two articles? Let’s return to some of my teaching just to clarify. Man is a fallen being, a lost being, an unsaved being and that is his overall condition, into which he is born, and he cannot be rescued from that condition until he is called by The Father God to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), and regenerated through water Baptism (full immersion), and the gifting of The Holy Spirit.

Genesis 3:5 (KJV) For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

Genesis 3:22 (KJV) And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil.

Here is the fallen condition, and notice what God says: “He is become as one of us,” that is, to know ‘good’ and to know evil, to have the knowledge of these two ways of behaving or living. This means from that moment in time (when Adam and Eve fell) man knew about being ‘good’ and about being evil. It also meant he would now be capable of both actions, good, kind or generous actions, even loving actions, or evil, cruel and spiteful actions.

Now if we transfer this reality of The Truth of man’s overall fallen condition to so called ‘freewill offerings’, does this mean that man has had freewill all along and the fall of man in the Garden of Eden didn’t take place. For, make no mistake, this is what it means. It also means man had free will after he fell. For if we say we have free will, it means the fall of man never took place, and we are all free from the bondage of sin and are therefore free, so, by default, we must have free will and we are free to choose. The other issue, and far more important, being that there would been no need for Yashua Messiah to come and die for us.

This, though, flies in the face of The Truth, for in the fallen condition we are slaves to sin, we are lost, so how can we be free. OK, so we are slaves to sin, so what does that mean in terms of will, because we now know it’s not free will that we possess, for we are slaves and slaves have no freedom whatsoever. We have will, certainly, but it’s not free. As mankind we can only have one of two wills, either it’s the Devil’s will, or it’s the Father God’s will, we certainly don’t have any will of our own, and this is what it means to be fallen or lost.

How can that be I hear you ask? Quite simply because God is in charge, but so, in a lesser way, is the other god – the god of this world – Satan. The difference being, the god of this world or this age is soon to lose all his power, but at this moment in time he is still the god of this world and people of this world do his will – period – full stop – end of.

So what is his will? His will is that people believe his lies and that they do it continually, just as they did from day one in The Garden. People love to be lied to, and that’s why they vote for politicians; why they think politicians are on their side; it’s why they go to ‘church’; it’s why they follow religions of all descriptions. It’s all lies and deceptions of the Devil and people love them!! These are nothing but outward displays of the lost, fallen condition and man can behave in no other way – he’s fallen. Paul confirms this for us:

Romans 8:7 (KJV) Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to The Law of God, neither indeed can be.

Apart from that, it is also the Devil’s will that man behaves in accordance with the knowledge he acquired when he fell in the Garden of Eden. This issue is of paramount importance when we deal with issue of ‘freewill’ offerings, and it also confirms that Satan maintains his deception through people doing ‘good’ as well as doing evil. If he got people to do evil and only evil his cover would soon be blown, and all people would see him for what he is. No, he is the arch-deceiver and he deceives the whole world, apart from one group of people – The Church of God, otherwise known as The Ekklesia, those called out of this world by The Father.

Freewill offerings – H5071nᵉdâbâh, ned-aw-baw’; from H5068; properly (abstractly) spontaneity, or (adjectively) spontaneous; also (concretely) a spontaneous or (by inference, in plural) abundant gift:—free(-will) offering, freely, plentiful, voluntary(-ily, offering), willing(-ly), offering).

So to press on, there are seventeen verses in the OT where we will find the word ‘freewill’ and the above verse from Leviticus is one of them. The first problem we have with the usage of this word is the usual one of translation error, for if we look in the Hebrew version of the OT we find the word ‘voluntary’ is used. In other words it’s voluntary offerings, not freewill offerings, and there is a subtle difference between these two words. Mr Strong in his concordance gives it as ‘spontaneous’ but has any of this shown that man has free will? No, not at all. Therefore the use of the word ‘freewill’ is definitely misleading, and it is definitely a translator’s choice, so therefore gratuitous, when the word ‘spontaneous’ would work far better and not mislead. These voluntary offerings were a display of ‘good’ works, the ‘good’ part of the ‘good’ and evil make up of fallen man, and sometimes they were offerings that were given for a reason – there was a motive or an agenda.

In Ezra we find voluntary offerings being given towards helping with the construction of the Temple:

Ezra 1:4 (KJV) And whosoever remaineth in any place where he sojourneth, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods, and with beasts, beside the freewill offering for the house of God that is in Jerusalem.

As I have already stated, all these acts of generosity were acts of ‘goodness’ and therefore fall under the umbrella of the fallen condition, for man has the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil. This means these acts of giving offerings were not ‘freewill offerings’ they were fallen condition offerings, ‘spontaneous’ acts of ‘goodness’ within that fallen condition.

To decide between doing ‘good’ or evil is all part of the Devil’s deception, so that people like my complainant think free will is involved when deciding whether to do ‘good’ or not. Which ever thing we decide to do, the things we are doing are still the Devil’s will, not our own will, for it is all part and parcel of the fallen condition. There is no escape from it until we are born of God (born again).

John 8:32 (MCV) And ye shall know The Truth (Yashua Messiah), and The Truth (Yashua Messiah) shall make you free

John 8:36 (KJV) If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

We need to get these verses into our heads, and written on our hearts, for they tell us plainly and simply that only Faith and belief in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) can set us free, and thereby give us free will. And who gives us the ability to believe – Yashua Messiah Himself through The Father’s call, His will, not our will.

John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

In addition to all I have said thus far, another excellent example of this ‘good’ issue is the British liberal reformers of the nineteenth century. They did all manner of what they thought were ‘good works’ and kind deeds and some of them were, indeed, good and kind works. They were kindly, well meaning people, and they chose’ to do these ‘good deeds’, but unless they were born of God (born again) these people’s actions and choices were still only do-gooding acts within the lost and fallen condition, just like the ‘spontaneous’ offerings in Leviticus.

If these reformers were not born of God (born again), their motive for doing ‘good’ was not for God’s Glory but, rather, for their own glory, and for the benefit of mankind. God was not in the picture, and that means His will was not in the picture either. So if God’s will was not involved in these do-gooding acts of kindness, whose will was it? Why, it was Satan’s will via man’s choices within the fallen condition, so it could not be a free will decision, any more than the so called free will offerings in Leviticus were. These were acts of ‘good’ emanating from men who had the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil – the fallen condition. Whatever man does, whether it be ‘good’ or evil, he is still a slave, a slave to sin, until he is born of God (born again) and he has no free will until that happens.

Ever heard the expression: “Only the good die young!?” Is it true? Well it’s my belief that if fallen people are too good in Satan’s eyes, he takes them out, because he hates them doing all their good deeds – or he hates them if they have a kind disposition and they love their neighbours on a daily basis. To Satan this is not the right kind of behaviour for someone in the fallen condition, for only the right kind of do-gooding is allowed = self-centred do-gooding, not selfless do-gooding.

I trust this will help you all (including my complainant) to come to a clearer understanding of the issue of fallen man’s ‘will’ for it is most definitely not free.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It?:

FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It?

Introduction

This is a three part series of articles (parts 1 and 2 here – see link No.7 below to part three) that I wrote several years ago, in April 2008 to be precise, and now edited and tweaked to bring them into line with my added knowledge. However, what I will say is that they needed very little in the way of tweaking in order to improve them, and bring them up to date, so what you see is pretty much the same as I wrote 14 years ago.

Well does he? because most of mainstream Christianity (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion – see link No. 6 below) and certainly those outside of Christianity thinks he does? It’s one of those numerous blanket issues that the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion are very fond of and takes for granted, and without question.Sadly, nearly everything they believe is based on the traditions of men, or the teachings of men of religion – Hellenising philosophers and Judaisers alike, so it’s no wonder they don’t understand.

Mark 7:9 (KJV) And He said unto them, Full well ye reject The Commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

So does fallen mankind have free will? Did he ever have free will? Did Adam and Eve, before they fell, have free will? Now these are very interesting questions, are they not? There are also some other questions that come out of these first questions: If Adam and Eve did have free will, did The Godhead take bets from the angels on which way they would turn, if so, where did They lay their bets off!!?? (Only joking) Furthermore, did the Godhead take a big risk and leave it all to chance, or was it an accidental flaw in their creation of Adam and Eve – a calamitous mistake?? If They did take a big risk or make a big mistake, we have to imagine They had a plan B or even a plan C, that They would quickly implement, in a state of panic, as a rear guard defensive manoeuvre in order to prop things up. Was that the case?

Was the fall of Adam and Eve something that took the Godhead by surprise? Was it a grand game of pot luck or lucky dip, or was it a case of: Did the Godhead plan to ‘fail’, for want of a better expression? Perhaps a better way of putting it would be: Did The Godhead create Adam and Eve knowing, in advance and full well, that they would fall at their first hurdle? Or, in other words, did the Godhead plan it the way it happened? OK, let’s see if we can answer these questions?

Genesis 2:7 (KJV) And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. (See link No. 1 below)

Take note, for the question of ‘free will’ is answered right here in this first Holy Scripture. It’s so simple, I cannot understand where this idea of man’s free will came from, unless it’s through non-belief in the whole Bible, brought about by the “New Testament Only” people. These are so-called Christians that think that the Old Testament should be deleted from what they call The Canon of Scripture, thus taking away Scriptures like the above that upset them.

Now as we can see, man was not asked if he would like to be created, he was not invited to a business meeting and his opinion and agreement sought!! Believe it or not, though, this is the very basis upon which many ‘Christians’ build their lives as ‘believers’, that is, God needs our co-operation in order to be a success!! LOL. This is why they say: “There is no way I can be saved unless ‘I’ accept a Jesus as my saviour,” never mind John 6:44:

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MANcan come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drawdrag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.”

John 6:65 (KJV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

Look what Isaiah had to say on this matter:

Isaiah 29:16 (KJV) Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay: for shall the work say of Him that made it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of Him that framed it, He had no understanding?

Isaiah 64:8 (KJV) But now, O LORD, thou art our Father; we are the clay, and thou our Potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.

We are the clay, The Lord God (Yashua Messiah) is The Potter, and we are the work of the Lord’s hand, how unambiguous is that!!?? Just where does mankind’s will, free or otherwise, fit in to this scenario or arrangement? As we can plainly see, it doesn’t.

OK, the Garden of Eden scene is nearly complete, just one more character to add: enter The Serpent otherwise known as the Destroyer, or the Author of Ruin and the Author of Lies. He is also known as the Author of Confusion (miscegenation or mixed bloods – see link No. 2 below), Satan, the Adversary, the Devil; so many names but with only one purpose – to destroy or wipe mankind, especially non-Jewish White Semitic Israel, from the face of the earth, if he possibly can.

Why is he like that? Easy, God (Yashua Messiah) made him that way. If the Godhead had already planned for Adam and Eve to fall, how were They going to bring it about?

Genesis 3:1 (KJV)Now The Serpent was more subtle (devious, cunning or crafty) than any beast of the field which the LORD God HAD MADE.And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

There he is folks, that old serpent – the Devil whom God made. Now, should this revelation (apologies to those of you who already know this Truth) shock us? Well yes it should, if, like me in the past, you have always believed what men of religion have taught you, without questioning it. Make no mistake, I came from that very same fold, too, until Yashua Messiah set me free into His Glorious Light and Truth and under His Glorious Grace. So yes it should shock us, but then again after a further study of His Word, shock turns quickly to: Well I’ll be…..!! How did I ever miss that??

By ‘missing that’, I mean the sons of perdition like the Pharaoh who confronted Moses, and Judas Iscariot who betrayed Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). In both cases the Godhead hardened the Pharaoh’s heart and Judas’ heart, not the Devil. OK, the Devil played his part in leading Judas astray, but that act of betrayal had to happen and someone had to do it in order for the Scriptures to be fulfilled. Notice, too, that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was prophesied to fulfil His mission before the foundation of the world.

Revelation 13:8 (MCV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, (Satan) whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

Exodus 7:2 (KJV) Thou shalt speak all that I command thee: and Aaron thy brother shall speak unto Pharaoh, that he send the children of Israel out of his land. 3 And I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and multiply my signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt.

John 17:12 (KJV) While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but The Son of Perdition (Judas); that The Scripture might be fulfilled.

Even before Adam and Eve were created The Lord was The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. This means He and the Father God knew what was going to happen in the Garden of Eden before it happened. It had to happen the way it did in order that the Scriptures be fulfilled, God be glorified and Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) become the first and only begotten of The Father – God come in the flesh.

Here is an analogy that I now use to great effect: Mankind is like a prisoner and a prisoner can ‘choose’ to be a ‘good’ prisoner and win favour with the prison staff, or he can ‘choose’ to be an evil nasty prisoner, but either way he is still a prisoner with no freedom, so his ‘choices’ are a fantasy and, therefore, so is his imagined free will.

OK, so if man doesn’t have free will, what will does he have? Again that’s easy, he has rebellious will, stubborn will, a carnal will, but none of these wills are free, they’re controlled and manipulated by the one who led our parents astray in the first place – The Serpent – Satan – The Devil. Mankind can either do God’s will – but only after The Father has called him/her to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), or Satan’s will. Mankind can have no other wills but these, and one will is bondage and captivity to sin, and the other is freedom from sin and death under His Glorious Grace.

It’s no good a man or woman saying “I don’t believe in the Devil – it’s all hogwash,” as that is all part of the Devil’s armoury anyway. To get people to think and say he doesn’t exist suits him just fine, and that viewpoint doesn’t make him go away and leave us alone, in fact it encourages him. This world (age) is his world (age) and he is the god of it, but not for much longer.

2 Corinthians 4:4 (KJV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of The Glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

So there we have it; mankind has no free will other than in his vain imaginations or fantasies.

Part 2 coming right up:

Messenger Charles

FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It? – Further Proof and Evidence That He Doesn’t.

For those of you who were not convinced or persuaded by my first article on this subject, I thought I would add to it with more proof and evidence. If you haven’t done so, it will help if you read my first article “Free will – Does Fallen Mankind Have It” before this one. Thank you.

As it happens, someone e-mailed me recently questioning my ‘claims’ that mankind does not have free will. As always, I will remind readers that The Truth is not something that is claimed, it is always something that is declared in confidence or preached as news – the Good News, and then either accepted or rejected. Now this man made his remarks based upon the idea that Paul reasoned with the Jews in the synagogues. Which he did not, please see my soon coming article: “Did The Apostle Paul Reason With The Jews In The Synagogues?” He then went on to say:

You claimed to refute the idea that Paul reasoned with the Jews, and implied that logical reasoning is evil and worldly. But I ask to you: if reason is evil, then why can Christians use it so effectively to minister to atheists?

Now here he is missing the point or points, because there is nothing wrong with reasoning, if it’s accompanied and guided by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but in too many cases it isn’t, and that includes the head knowledge men who translated the Holy Word of God into the English of the King James Bible. Now this head knowledge carnal reasoning is the problem, and yes it is evil if it’s applied to the Holy Word of God without the Holy Spirit. Finally he said:

However, I do believe that God can use the faculties He has given us to lead us to Himself.”

Here again, we see the mainstream Christian inability or the trinity blindness causing them to be unable to see the Father and The Son as two supreme beings, (see link No. 3 below) not one being, and this is precisely the issue. It’s the Father that leads us, not to Himself, but to His Son – Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and no man or woman can come to Yashua Messiah unless The Father calls us:

John 6:44 (MCV) “No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.”

By this, too, I trust you all understand that the act of salvation is not in the hands of man, but, rather, in the hands of The Father God alone and no one else. This is why the mainstream Christian slogans I have found Jesus” or I have made a decision for Jesus” or “I have accepted Jesus as my saviour” are not true, they’re just delusional lies. When The Father calls, the answer can only be as it was for Samuel and Jeremiah. In Samuel’s case it was a simple answer “Here am I”.

1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the Lord called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

In Jeremiah’s case it was predestination – Jeremiah was always going to be Jeremiah the prophet, come what may, so where was Jeremiah’s free will in this arrangement! It wasn’t, it wasn’t there at all, because Jeremiah didn’t have free will!

Jeremiah 1:4 (MCV) Then the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, 5 before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee; and I bestowed upon thee the honour of being a prophet unto the nations.

He further said:

I know that you’re probably thinking that those people can’t see your truth because they are incapable of doing so. However, this denies the freewill that is the core of what it is to be human. After all, God “created man in His own image.” If we are created in God’s image (which I am sure you believe) and we lack free will, then that implies that God doesn’t have free will either.

Yes we were created in the image of the Godhead, but unfortunately this man has forgotten one catastrophic event – man’s fall from the benefits that came with being created in God’s image. As you know, man chose (and chose for the last time) to believe a liar instead of his Creator, who told him The Truth, always. Once man fell he lost any freedom he once had and became a slave to sin, and fell under the curse of death, and as a servant of the Devil. Again, as you must know slaves and servants just do as they are told, they have no freedom and certainly no freedom to choose, so they have no free will. We have to be set free in order to have free will.

The fallen and lost have a will, yes, but it’s not free because the only will they can perform is the Devil’s will, for he is the god of this world (age or its systems) and he deceives the whole world. Man is in a rebellious frame of mind, continually, against his Creator. Even if man does ‘good’, he is still in the overall fallen condition, for he has the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil within that fallen condition. This means he will sometimes do ‘good’ and sometimes do evil, but he is still fallen and in slavery and/or in bondage to sin.

John 8:32 (KJV) And ye shall know The Truth, and The Truth shall make you free.

Freedom only comes with being born of God (born again). Anyone not born of God (born again) is not free, so therefore has no free will. If we say we have free will, what is this real freedom the Lord is referring to? Freedom is freedom you cannot have categories or stages of freedom, it’s either freedom or slavery to sin.

I do not make any claims, for The Truth is not something we claim, it is something we either have, or do not have, so we tell it like it is, that is, through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in order for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) to make His home with us. Once this has occurred we can only speak The Truth. Claims are for Hellenising philosophers, Bible intellectuals and theologians who do not have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

Moreover, ‘Christians’ can minister to atheists until they are blue in the face, but unless the Father is calling those atheists they will remain atheists.

He further added:

At the end of your article, you said that those who claim that you were using reason to convince them of reason’s evil were in essence wrong, because they were using reasoning to do so. In doing so, you created a circular logic that comes across as “the only reasoning that is true is that which I declare to be true”–something that has turned many intelligent nonbelievers away from the Lord.”

My ‘reasoning’, as he calls it, only appears circular because reasoning without the indwelling of the Holy Spirit can only be circular. This was the problem the first century Church had with Hellenising Greeks with their philosophers who infiltrated the Church and corrupted it with their non-gospel. Once born of God (born again) His Spirit joins our spirit and all our reasoning then points in a straight line to Him and is no longer circular.

Romans 8:16 (KJV) The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God.

It’s a Spiritual thing not a reason based logical thing, and this is where so many go wrong within mainstream Christianity (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion).

He then says: “the only reasoning that is true is that which I declare to be true”–something that has turned many intelligent nonbelievers away from the Lord.”

Well this is clearly not true, for The Truth could never turn away anyone The Father is calling to His Son Yashua Messiah, and the response from a genuine newbie would be the complete opposite of what he is describing. This then tells us that the intellect in man is often a stumbling block, just like riches are usually a stumbling block for wealthy men. In fact the intellect is a form of riches.

He came back again:

Dear Messenger Charles,

Thank you for taking the time for e-mailing me back. While I still do not completely agree with you, especially on the point that persons without Christ do not have free will (if our will is not free, then God determines who will be saved and who won’t, which is against His plan for us, for “it is not God’s will that any should perish.”), it is good to know that you are not one of those people who considers himself above responding to people with honest questions.”

I thanked him for his reply and pointed out that, in part, he had answered his own queries.

He was right, it is not God’s will that any man should perish and that is precisely what will happen – God’s will, will happen. (See link No. 4 below) Is God all powerful or not!? God’s will is not our will, for His ways are not our ways (unless we are born of God (born again) which, if it is God’s will that is being done, it proves that our will is not in the picture – free or otherwise.

Yashua Messiah came and conquered death, so if any man dies and remains dead, that is, has not been a part of any resurrection, then He and the Father will have failed. Nothing is conquered completely if any fraction of it remains unconquered. Yashua Messiah did not come to this earth to partly conquer sin and death, He came to conquer it all completely, and He did!

With regards to his point about our ‘free will’ he had not understood the issue that it’s only being born of God (born again) that gives us free will. Adam and Eve lost their ‘free will’ – the first Adam. We are under the Grace of The Second Adam and have been restored to an even better position than the first Adam before he fell. We are, in effect, more free than the first Adam, so we have free will, if we are born of God, but the lost and unsaved do not have free will, for they are not born of God, and they can only do the Devil’s will – that is the fallen condition.

If we believe that the lost and unsaved have free will then by default we are saying that they have a say in whether they are saved or not. By default, you are saying man’s decision overrides or overrules The Father’s decision, and man has the power to control God’s will – ridiculous! This is a tail wagging the dog scenario of cataclysmic proportions that he is describing here, whichever way you look at it, and makes God look powerless. This, too, is the foundational flaw in all mainstream Christian denominational teaching, and it renders all adherents to it as believers in a non-gospel – which is not a gospel at all, as Paul graphically pointed out:

Galatians 1:6-7 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

Once we embark upon a spiritual journey of salvation based upon man’s decisions, or upon man’s authority, which, if it is our decision, then it must be based upon our authority, we then have a spiritual journey of Spiritual insecurity. This is why mainstream Christians are always questioning the validity of their salvation and, in turn, why they live lives of worry, fear, guilt and doubt about their place in Christ (see link No. 5 below). Why? I will tell you why, because it all started on a sandy foundation of their decision; based upon the myth of their free will; when all the while it is not their decision at all but, rather, The Father’s decision alone to call them and save them = 100% Spiritual security.

I told him, I hoped it would help him in his understanding and we parted on good terms, with him saying he thought I made some very interesting points. He said he would have to think long and hard on this subject. He thanked me again for being willing to sacrifice my precious time, so it was refreshing and encouraging to part amicably.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. What is Soul Sleep and Do The Holy Scriptures Disprove It? (The Myth of The Immortal Soul) – Part 1 of 2:

2. Exposing The Lucifer Lie:

3. The Duality Godhead:

4. Why Are There Two Resurrections?:

5. Can Born Of God, Spirit Led, Christians Lose Their Salvation?:

Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity; Eastern (Russian) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity; Anglicanism is NOT Christianity; Protestantism is NOT Christianity.

6. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

7. FREE WILL – Does Fallen Mankind Have It? Some Recent Objections:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2022/02/06/free-will-does-fallen-mankind-have-it-some-recent-objections/

Isaiah 45:7 (MCV) I Make Peace, AND CREATE EVIL: I The Eternal Do All These Things!

Here is the complete verse:

Isaiah 45:7 (MCV) I Yashua Messiah form The Light, and create darkness: I make peace, AND CREATE EVIL: I The Eternal do all these [things].

Isaiah 45:7 (Septuagint Interlinear) I (Yashua Messiah) [am] The One carefully preparing light, and I made darkness; and The One making peace, and [The One] creating bad [things]. I [am] [the] Lord God, The One doing all these [things]. (Round brackets mine)

Isaiah 45:7 (Septuagint Brenton) I (Yashua Messiah) am He that prepared light, and formed darkness; who make peace, and create evil; I am the Lord God, that does all these things. (Brackets mine)

I have included the two Septuagint translations, just to firm up the narrative and to remove any doubts you may have regarding the Masoretic Hebrew text.

Now this is a very controversial subject for some, that is, liberal luvvy-duvvy Cultural Jew Marxists that, in these last days, pose as Christians and proliferate mainstream Christianity (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion) in their thousands. These politically driven, deluded, liberal imposters get very upset when the subject matter of this verse gets aired, for it goes against much of what they stand for and believe.

Now this is because it doesn’t sit well with their preconceived ideas of who The Father is, or who Yashua Messiah is. You see, they don’t really know The Godhead at all, nor do they know what They are about. They therefore know nothing about The Godhead’s real plans, that is, what things they originally brought about, or put into being, in order that Their plans should be and would be accomplished and brought to fruition.

Moreover, this is a verse that gets their explaining away engines working flat out and doing much over time, to make sure that their liberal lemming followers are not offended or upset. This means we get guff like this from the ‘Got Questions?” web page:

God did not create evil, but He does allow evil. If God had not allowed for the possibility of evil, both mankind and angels would be serving God out of obligation, not choice. He did not want “robots” that simply did what He wanted them to do because of their “programming.” God allowed for the possibility of evil so that we could genuinely have a free will and choose whether or not we wanted to serve Him.”

In this short paragraph we can see how they are immediately offended by the idea that God does create evil, and has created evil, and He did that so that evil entered into the world, so that Yashua Messiah would be crucified and killed for us, so that we could have Eternal Life and reside with Him forever in The Kingdom of God. This means they never stop and ask this simple question – If there was no evil in the world how could Yashua Messiah have been crucified and murdered?

Notice, too, the old ‘free will’ nutmeg that they always stumble over when explaining The Truth away, as in the above paragraph.

Ephesians 1:3-4 (MCV) Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all Spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: 4 According AS HE HATH CHOSEN US IN HIM BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, that we should be Holy (separate) and without blame (sinless) before Him in love:

He did not want robots! he says. LOL. Well that’s exactly what we are or were = Satan’s Robots!!! Until The Father intervened in our lives and called us to His Son.

Revelation 13:8 (KJV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (Satan), whose names are not written in The Book of Life of THE LAMB SLAIN FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD.

Furthermore, if we, as lost and fallen creatures, have free will, why would The Father have chosen us from before the foundation of the world? What say do we have in this scenario? I’ll tell you, NONE! ZILCH! ZERO!

So back to the paragraph and his idea that: “God ALLOWED for the POSSIBILITY of EVIL!” Really!? So it was all a game of ‘Hit and Miss’ was it? How does anyone ever believe this satanic gumpf? Well, He has sent them STRONG DELUSION so this must be a perfect example of it, for these duped fake Christians do believe it.

From the CARM web page:

Does God create evil? Isaiah 45:7 and Amos 3:6. No, God does not create ontological evil. He creates calamity which is sometimes translated as ‘evil.’”

Amos 3:6 (KJV) Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it?

Now with this joker we can see a pathetic attempt at trying to counter Isaiah 45:7 by using Amos 3:6, when these are two very different cases using the word ‘evil’. Isaiah 45:7 is no way referring to a calamitous event, for it opens with the subject matter of ‘light and darkness’ and any believer half switched on will know exactly what is being inferred here. If you’re still in the dark (like the pun?) let’s shed some light on it.

1 Peter 2:9 (MCV) But ye are a Chosen Offspring, a Royal Priesthood, an Holy Nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of Him who hath called you out of darkness into His marvellous light.

This is the light and darkness that Isaiah is referring to, so we’re dealing with the subject of sin and wickedness, not calamitous events and it is God Himself that created it. So how did He create it? Let’s go to Genesis to find out:

Genesis 3:1 (MCV) (First Part) Now The Serpent was more subtil (sly, devious and crafty) than any beast of the field which The Eternal HAD MADE.

Genesis 3:1 (Septuagint Interlinear) (First part) But The Serpent was most skilled {read into that negatively what you will} of all the wild beasts of the ones upon the earth whom [made [the] Lord God.]

Genesis 3:1 (Septuagint Brenton) (First part) Now The Serpent was the most crafty of all the brutes on the earth, which the Lord God made.

And there we have it – Yashua Messiah created evil in The Serpent from the beginning. Satan was never a fallen angel, nor a cherub, (see link Nos. 1 and 2 below). He was a beast of the field, albeit with certain spiritual powers, created evil by Yashua Messiah, from the beginning, and placed in The Garden.

This is how sin entered into the world and all as a part of the Godhead’s plan = no hit and miss, no uncertainty and definitely NO FREE WILL!!

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Exposing The Lucifer Lie:

Saturday Sabbath or Sunday Sabbath – Which One Should We Be Observing?

In a word, neither and I know this remark will stir up all kinds of negative emotions in cult followers and their opponents in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, alike (see link No. 1 below).

Let’s be clear, many cult followers love to promote their Hebrew/Judaic brand of ‘Christianity’ by observing the Hebrew Sabbath (which btw is not a Jewish Sabbath, see link No.s 2 and 3 below), with many of them observing it from sunset on Friday to sunset on Saturday. I know this to be true, because I used to observe it this way myself, when I was a member of Armstrong’s Worldwide Church of God or, better, his ‘three tithes’ money grabbing, criminal, scam organisation.

Proper little Pharisees we were, complete with our superiority complexes, looking down on all those inferior satanic mainstream Christians, keeping their blasphemous Roman Cult (first day of the week) Sunday Sabbath. How proud and self-righteous we were, citing our knowledge of Scripture and ancient history. You know, all about the events that took place at The Council of Nicea in 325 AC, where the Christian Religious, Hellenising dogs and counterfeiters changed the Sabbath from the seventh day of the week to the first day of the week. (Again, see link No. 1 below).

Let me explain here, for this ‘correct’ Sabbath day keeping issue was crucial to Armstrong’s belief system, because he made the claim that “seventh day Sabbath keeping” was the pivotal identifying sign that his church was the true Church of God – all the other ‘churches’ and demon-inations (divisions) keeping a Sunday Sabbath were apostate Romanised churches. It, too, was my anchor to that claim as well, so, likewise, I believed as Armstrong did, such was my delusion.

Now all this is very interesting, because here, within this concept, we have a double whammy of error, or a compounding of error(s) by these deluded people. The problems with these ideas, that is, for the counterfeiters, were two fold: 1) there was the New Covenant Biblical Truth that regulated Sabbath keeping had been nailed to the cross with the rest of The Law and which these men of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion did not understand, and still don’t to this day, (see link No. 4 below). 2) Now if the first point is true, and it is, why were they going to the trouble of changing the day the Sabbath was held on, what difference did it make, and who were these people that were obviously, bringing pressure to bear with their seventh day Sabbath keeping, and influencing their ideas to change it? Who were these people that troubled the counterfeiters at Nicea? They must have considered them a threat or they would not have behaved in such a way. Why did the Nicea attendees wish to distance themselves from these Judaising Sabbath observers? Easy, through what we call today, anti-Semitism. These early Roman Catholics blamed the Jews for the death of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), which was true, and so began the so-called persecution of Jews by counterfeit Hellenising Religious Christians. From here on in, anything that they deemed to be Judaic was frowned upon as blasphemous and, after Nicea, was classified as heretical. Take note, this is in the literal sense, not a Spiritual sense, for Spiritually we all killed Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ), for we are all born into this world as sinners. However, Yashua Messiah had to come and take all the sins of mankind with Him to the cross.

OK, so Rome versus Jewry, Jewry versus Rome is nothing new, nor is there anything revelatory in what I have said on this subject, but what about these Judaic ‘Christians’, in the first, second and third centuries, that were such a thorn in the flesh of the men of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion? Were they, for instance, only Jews that were members of this sect? No, they had Israelite and non-Israelite adherents too, but were they True Believers? Were they the real thing or the real Church as opposed to the counterfeiters at Nicea? No, if anything, they were worse, but who were they, does Holy Scripture make mention of them and what made them worse than the counterfeiters? In answer to the first questions; no they were not the real thing and nor were they true believers whilst they remained deceived by this evil teaching. In answer to the third question, yes, of course the Holy Scriptures mentions them and we find them in the book of Galatians where Paul refers to them as fools:

Galatians 3:1 (MCV) O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not attentively hearken to The Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?

In addition to the above verse, why were they fools and what made them worse than the Christian Religious counterfeiters? Well, if we go to Galatians once more, we will find out:

Galatians 1:6 (KJV) I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into The Grace of Christ unto another gospel:

Now straight away we can see why they are fools, they have been ‘removed’ from Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), that is, removed from belief solely in Him, and swiftly. That means they didn’t hang around, so stupid were they. This means, also, that no sooner were they baptised into Yashua Messiah they had upped sticks and transferred their faith to another gospel, and rejected Yashua Messiah’s Grace at the same time. How dumb is that? I’ll tell you, it’s very dumb indeed, because I’ve been there and done it myself, although I had not been birthed into The Truth prior to my membership of the cult, I was a greenhorn, so I hadn’t deserted Yashua Messiah in order to join, I had gone straight into error from the get-go. Never-the-less, please take it from me, and don’t be dumb and foolish by falling for any Judaiser’s non-Gospel poison.

Next we have Paul declaring that this ‘gospel’ isn’t a gospel at all, it’s evil bad news, not The Good News:

Galatians 1:7 (KJV) Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert The Gospel of Christ.

And Armstrong was such a man:

“You have probably heard that you are saved by Grace – Oh my friends what poppycock.”

— Herbert W. Armstrong

Furthermore, we can also see that in the first century there were some who would and did pervert The Lord’s Gospel message. Who were these people, and how did they pervert the Gospel? Paul, in Galatians, tells us who they were, they were evil creatures who infiltrated the church to spy on the brethren and witness the freedom they were experiencing and enjoying under His Grace:

Galatians 2:4 (KJV) And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty freedom which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage. (Strike-through mine)

Notice, that they might bring us into bondage – the bondage of what? Why, the bondage of creatures of the circumcision, and what did circumcision represent, or what did it symbolise? Easy, the whole Mosaic Law, summarised by the Ten Commandments, with all its minor rules and regulations as written down in the book of Leviticus, which included The Law of keeping the seventh day Sabbath. Sabbath keeping is law keeping which ever way we cut this folks and especially if we make it binding on other people.

Philippians 3:2 (MCV) Beware of Judaising mongrel dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the circumcision.

Moreover, the Holy Scriptures are very definite about keeping days Holy and how we should go about observing them, if we wish. Basically its about freedom and voluntary agreement between brothers and sisters and about when they decide which day they wish to keep Holy to The Lord. Individually we can keep any day we like, or none at all, if that’s what we want to do.

Colossians 2:16 (KJV) Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an Holy Day, or of the new moon, or of the Sabbath [days]:

There we are: let no man judge you, which means let no man determine or dictate which days you keep. We are now free to decide for ourselves under His Grace which days we keep and, if none at all, then so be it.

Colossians 2:13-14 (KJV) And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath He quickened (made Spiritual) together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses; 14 Blotting out The Handwriting of Ordinances (THE WHOLE LAW) that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to His cross. (Brackets mine)

The above verses are telling us straight! regulated Sabbath keeping on Saturday (the seventh day of the week) or any other day of the week, and made binding on believers, is Old Covenant legalism (PHARISAICAL JUDAISM), and not required under the New Covenant Law of GRACE!!

Can we now see why these Christian Religious counterfeiters of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion wished to separate themselves from the Judaisers?

Yet that didn’t make ‘em right, because they still wanted their own form of legalism and religion, with all the rules and regulations that went with it.

However, they didn’t want to be seen as a branch of Judaism, due to their prejudice and self-righteousness. So, in order to not be outdone they moved the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday where it has remained to this day. As you can now see this is just one satanic religion versus another satanic religion, proving that the Devil is not divided, and has nothing to do with living under Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) glorious Saving Grace.

I therefore hope and trust you can now see the futility and blasphemy of any form of regulated and religiously imposed Sabbath keeping.

Watch out for my latest follow-on article: Have YOU Entered Into Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) ETERNAL SABBATH REST?….

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

3. Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews Explained:

4. Was it Only The ‘Ceremonial Law’ That Was Nailed to The Cross?:

The Truth of John 1:1-4 – Part 2 of 2

This article is an important postscript to part one which is essential reading before reading this article so please take time out to read that first (see link below – thank you).

Now having compiled the first article, I was soon drawn by Yashua Messiah to another Holy Scripture in Revelation. This, whilst doing some study on The End Times, and the soon coming return of Yashua Messiah to commence rule over His Kingdom as King of kings and Lord of lords, on King David’s Throne, on this earth. Moreover, this End Times subject will involve another article, or series of articles, over which I have been cogitating for many years, and I jest not.

However, what of these Holy Scriptures in Revelation? I’ll copy and paste them here:

Revelation 19:11-13 (KJV) And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and He that sat upon him IT was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself. 13 And He was clothed with a vesture (cloak or garment) dipped in blood: and his ‘autos’ ITS name is called The Word of God. (Strike through, brackets and emphasis mine)

Revelation 19:11-13 (Greek Transliteral) And I perceived the heaven having-been-up-opened and (you)-be-perceiving horse white and the one-sitting on IT believing being-called and Truthful and in just-togetherness He-is-judging and is-battling 12 The yet viewers of-Him blaze of-fire and on the head of-Him diadems many having names having-been-written which not-yet-one has-perceived if no He 13 and having-been-about-cast cloak having-been-dipped to-blood and has-been-called the name [Him] ‘autos’ of-IT The Saying of-the God(placer).

Here in Revelation 19:13 we see some differences between the Greek Transliteral and the KJV (well would you believe it!? – the usual mirth here for the author) Here in verse twelve we have a ‘name’ whereas in the Greek Transliteral we have ‘names’ plural. Then we have what seems to be a translators whimsical driven choice of ‘HIM’ rather than ‘IT’ when referring to the horse. I won’t say agenda driven here because in this instance I am not sure that it is an agenda driven issue. Moreover, let me draw your attention to verse eleven to set the precedent where it says: “and behold a white horse; and He that sat upon him IT was called Faithful and True.”

Now in this verse we have the same Greek word ‘autoswhich can mean ‘it’; ‘he’; ‘him’; ‘himself’ and in the KJV the horse is definitely referred to as a ‘him’ and yet the Greek MSS has it as an ‘IT’, so the translators chose ‘autos as ‘HIM’ instead of ‘IT’ just as we would normally refer to an animal, unless we’re into humanising animals, as many people do today and would refer to it as a him.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Him; Himself; He; It – G846αὐτός autós, ow-tos’; – from the particle αὖ aû (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a baffling wind) (backward); the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:—her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-, thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, – by, -in, -into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very, which. Compare G848.

How does a baffling wind become a ‘he’ or a ‘him’? Perhaps it’s best that we don’t even go there. OK, so we’ve set the precedent, which needs now to be applied in verse thirteen. Confused? Don’t worry, for all will be explained.

In verse thirteen in the KJV we are led to believe that: “and He had a name written, that no man knew, but He Himself” and then straight away in 13 “And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and His name is called The Word of God”.

Have you noticed this before? In one breath it’s a name written that that no man knew apart from Yashua Messiah Himself, and in the next breath it’s: “His name is called The Word of God!” Hello! Excuse me! How does that work? Easy, for this is how it works:

Verse thirteen once more: And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and [His] ITS name is called The Word (The Saying) of God (Please refer to part one if you haven’t already done so).

OK so what am I saying here? Quite simply I am saying that Yashua Messiah is clothed (cloaked as in the Greek MSS) in The Holy Spirit. The Cloak is representative of The Holy Spirit and The Cloak or Garment is dipped in blood. How do you know that, I hear you ask? and well you should ask, for it took a little searching out and it led me to some new understanding, which I always love.

Luke 24:49 (KJV) And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be ENDUED with power from on high.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Endued – G1746 ἐνδύω endýō, en-doo’-o; from G1722 and G1416 (in the sense of sinking into a garment); to invest with clothing (literally or figuratively):—array, clothe (with), endue, have (put) on.

So here we have graphically explained to us how The Holy Spirit is likened to a garment or a cloak or clothing in which we sink into, and that is exactly what is being described to us, by John, in Revelation 19:13. This, too, as I proved in part one, is yet more proof that The Holy Spirit was TOWARD God (as in the Greek MSS) or close to God and VERY near to God, as in this wonderful picture of our Saviour sinking into His Holy Spirit like an enveloping garment or cloak = an IT, not a ‘he’ or ‘him’.

We then have this issue of blood and the garment or cloak (The Holy Spirit) having been dipped or more accurately soaked in blood, where does this blood come from? Once again that’s easy, for John tells us in verse eleven: and in righteousness He doth judge and make war. And how will Yashua Messiah on His horse make war? Through the immense POWER of His Holy Spirit and in that war the Holy Spirit will be drenched in the blood of Yashua Messiah’s enemies. This is described for us in Isaiah:

Isaiah 63:1-4 (KJV) Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? this that is glorious in His (Holy Spiritual) apparel, travelling in the greatness of His strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save. 2 Wherefore art thou red in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth in the winefat 3 I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment. 4 For the day of vengeance is in mine heart, and the year of my redeemed is come.

As a final point, does this mean that even though as born of God (born again) Christians we’re indwelled with The Holy Spirit, that The Holy Spirit still comes upon us as a cloak or garment? Hmm I am not so sure about that. I know for sure that those The Father is calling certainly get regular visits from The Holy Spirit, if not permanent protection, until they’re Baptised and indwelled, but I would need Scriptural proof that those already indwelled get the same visits when The Holy Spirit is already within them.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

The Truth of John 1:1-4 – Part 1 of 2:

The Truth of John 1:1-4 – Part 1 of 2

There I was, having just started a new article about ‘God and Science’, which amazingly led me into this article, in as much that the new discoveries that I had made in my research for that article, forced me to drop everything regarding that article and focus on this one.

So what is The Truth of John 1:1-4? To answer that we must first copy and paste the relevant Holy Scriptures here, so that we can see all that’s going on in these verses and, rest assured, for here we will find yet more mistranslations and corruptions within The KJV, and which will be revealed for all to see:

John 1:1-4 (KJV) In the beginning was The Word, and The Word was with God, and The Word was God. 2 The same (Word) was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In Him was life; and The Life was The Light of men. (Brackets mine)

Now what is the mainstream Christian (the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion’s) teaching regarding these verses? Answer: They think it proves their mickey mouse Trinity, when it does no such thing. Perhaps, what I should have said, is what was my understanding of these verses? for I was once just as deceived as they are on this crucial passage of Holy Scripture.

Moreover, as we progress, we’ll discover some strong similarities with my unravelling of The Trinity deception (see link No. 1 below). We will also learn some more crucial Truth to support Yashua Messiah’s teaching re The Duality Godhead, and The Truth that The Holy Spirit is an ‘it’ and not a ‘he’ or a ‘him’, that is, the LIVING POWER or LIVING FORCE of The Godhead, so not a personage of a non-existent Trinity.

OK, so let’s now write out the Greek Transliteral version of this same passage of Holy Scripture to firm up this Truth:

John 1:1-4 (Greek Transliteral) In original was The Saying and The Saying was TOWARD The God(Placer) and The God(Placer) was The Saying. 2 This was in original TOWARD The God(Placer) 3 All through IT became and apart from IT became not yet one which has become 4 in IT Life was and The Life was The Light of men.

In the beginning, here termed the original, was The Saying and The Saying was TOWARD God(placer) that is, facing The Godhead or was/is near to The Godhead, so we’re dealing with something that was very close to The Godhead and yet it says The Godhead was The Saying. How does this work? Read on:

Notice verse three: All things through IT came into being and apart from IT not one thing came into being. So what does this mean, when I have ALWAYS believed that The Word or The Saying or The Logos was Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), but how can that be? for He is definitely not an IT!! He is a Spiritual Being, so what is this IT? Answer: It’s The Holy Spirit which is The Saying or The Word or The Logos which is the LIVING POWER or LIVING FORCE of The Godhead and brings things into being through ITS immense supernatural POWER or FORCE. As confirmed for us here:

All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a Force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this Force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.

— Professor Max Planck, the father of quantum physics.

An Image of The Atom

Here we have explained to us, in scientific terminology, The Holy Spirit in ACTION and how IT brings the particles of the atom, by virtue of vibrations, and through those vibrations IT holds the particles of the atom together. Now what are these vibrations? Easy, they are the vibrations of The Sayings and/or the vibrations of the spoken Word of the Godhead. This is confirmed for us in Psalms:

Psalms 33:6 (KJV) By The Word (The Saying – vibrations) of The Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by The Breath of His mouth. (Brackets mine)

We then have the term: ‘The Breath of His mouth’. What is this a direct reference to? Again, that’s easy:

John 20:21-22 (MCV) Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. 22 And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye The Holy Spirit:

So from and through Yashua Messiah’s breath the Twelve Learners received the gift of the Holy Spirit and from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

Old Testament Hebrew:

H7307 – Spirit – רוּחrûwach, roo’-akh; – from H7306; wind; by resemblance breath, i.e. a sensible (or even violent) exhalation; figuratively, life, anger, unsubstantiality; by extension, a region of the sky; by resemblance spirit, but only of a rational being (including its expression and functions):—air, anger, blast, breath, × cool, courage, mind, × quarter, × side, spirit(-ual), tempest, × vain, (whirl-) wind(-y).

New Testament Greek:

G4151 – Spirit/Ghostπνεῦμα pneûma, pnyoo’-mah; – from G4154; a current of air, i.e. breath (blast) or a breeze; by analogy or figuratively, a spirit, i.e. (human) the rational soul, (by implication) vital principle, mental disposition, etc., or (superhuman) an angel, demon, or (divine) God, Christ’s spirit, the Holy Spirit:—ghost, life, spirit(-ual, -ually), mind. Compare G5590.

OK, so far so good, but what of this statement in John 1:2 The same (Word) or same (Saying) was in the beginning with God. Quite simply, the Saying was toward God or IT was close to God or IT was facing God, but IT was never God, for IT, that is, Yashua Messiah’s Saying, was His POWER or His ‘breath’ which carried the Godhead’s Sayings and actioned those same sayings.

Numbers 14:35 (KJV) I The Lord have said (The Saying), I will surely do it unto all this evil congregation, that are gathered together against me: in this wilderness they shall be consumed, and there they shall die.

Isaiah 14:24 (KJV) The Lord of hosts hath sworn, saying (The Saying), Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, so shall it stand:

Ezekiel 24:14 (KJV) I The Lord have spoken it (The Saying): it shall come to pass, and I will do it; I will not go back, neither will I spare, neither will I repent; according to thy ways, and according to thy doings, shall they judge thee, saith the Lord God.

Next we have verse 4: In Him was life; and The Life was The Light of men, and once again from the Greek Transliteral verse 4: in IT Life was and The Life was The Light of men.

Notice how this PROVES that The Holy Spirit is an IT and is LIFE, that is, a LIVING FORCE which gives Life to all things. So now we know that The Holy Spirit is The Word (The Saying) and goes forth from The Father and from Yashua Messiah in order to exercise Their will throughout Their Creation.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing The Trinity Lie:

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE? – Part 2

For part 1 please go here:

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE? – Part 1:

In part one we learned that there are only three occasions where we will find the term ‘God is one’ in the pages of The King James Bible, just three times. Now if we search for the term ‘one God’ how many times do you think we will find that? Answer: seven times with only one in the Old Testament namely:

Malachi 2:10 (KJV) Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

Now before I press on you MUST remember that the word ‘God’ really means ‘Godhead’ for it is from the plural word Elohim = more than one!

So let’s rewrite this verse so that it makes sense:

Malachi 2:10 (MCV) Have we not all one Father – The Most High and a united member or the Godhead? hath not a united Godhead (H410 El = Yashua Messiah as a member of that Godhead) created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

Genesis 1:26 (MCV) And God (The Elohim plural) said, Let US make man in OUR IMAGE, after OUR LIKENESS:

NOT let ME make man in MY image and MY likeness!

From Strong’s Concordance:

One – H259 ‘echad ekh-awd’ a numeral from 258; properly, united, i.e. one; or (as an ordinal) first:–a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any(-thing), apiece, a certain, (dai-)ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together,

One – 258 – ‘achad aw-khad’ perhaps a primitive root; to unify, i.e. (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts):–go one way or other.

NOTICE! we’re dealing with a UNION and a UNIFYING of the Godhead members of God with God.

Next Scripture:

Mark 12:32 (KJV) And the scribe said unto Him, Well, Master, thou hast said The Truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but He:

Correct translation:

Mark 12:32 (MCV) And the scribe (an evil lawyer) said unto Him, Well, Master, thou hast said The Truth: for there is one united Godhead (Elohim plural) and there is no other but He Them (from the Greek word autos).

From Strong’s Concordance:

He – G846αὐτός autós, ow-tos’; from the particle αὖ aû (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a baffling wind) (backward); the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:—her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-, thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, – by, -in, -into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very, which. Compare G848.

Romans 3:30 (KJV) Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.

Correct translation:

Romans 3:30 (MCV) Seeing it is one united Godhead of The Father and Son, which shall justify the circumcision by Faith, and uncircumcision through Faith.

And the next:

1 Corinthians 8:6 (KJV) But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by Him.

Correct translation:

1 Corinthians 8:6 (MCV) But to us there is but a united Godhead of The Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him, and a united God The Son, Yashua Messiah, through whom are all things, and we through Him.

Next verse:

Ephesians 4:6 (KJV) One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.

Correct translation:

Ephesians 4:6 One Godhead with The Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.

Next verse:

1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV) For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

Correct translation:

1 Timothy 2:5 (MCV) For there is one Godhead, and one mediator between The Father and men, the man Christ Jesus;

Roll up, roll up, for the last corrupted verse:

James 2:19 (KJV) Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

This one deserves a little more attention to reveal how silly it is. Here we’re expected to believe that the devils tremble with fear because this god is one! Hello! Excuse me because of what? Because God is one! LOL. Let me tell you straight, the devils fear because of an Almighty powerful Godhead with none above them because they are Number One, not because of the oneness of a fake god. You couldn’t make this stuff up, but amazingly they have.

OK that wraps it up for now, but there will eventually be a part three so stay in touch.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles.

Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 4

For Parts 1, 2 and 3 see link No’s. 5, 6 and 7 below.

Welcome back to this series of articles. In part one I reported that as I was writing this article in 2007 a number of people were gathering in South London to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the British Abolition of Slavery, and I asked the question:

Would Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) have joined in?

Since reporting that event there has been considerable press coverage with images that I found to be the most wretched, disgusting, gut-wrenching, phoney and pathetic I have ever witnessed in my life! Young and not so young white creatures (I won’t call them men) with fake chains and shackles around their legs, necks and wrists wearing T shirts with ‘So Sorry’ emblazoned across the front of them, parading themselves like spineless emasculated wimps for all to see. Here are two images of their vile treachery:

Sell Out Traitors To Their Own Kind!
Disgusting Treacherous Wretches Who Have Their ‘Rewards’ Awaiting Them!

As you can see, some of them were even down on their knees grovelling on the ground. (The origins of ‘bending the knee’ anyone?) Now to all you satanic Cultural Jew Marxists in our midst I am sure this will appear to you as OK, even all very fine, but in reality what does it say about them and you? (See link No. 4 below) Not only that, but what does it say about modern Britain (I tend to leave the word ‘Great’ out these days). Furthermore, what does it prove? Has their wretched grovelling proved anything? No! Has it changed anything? No! Has their stupid, irresponsible, infantile emotional unthinking behaviour changed history? No! Will their vile behaviour make them ‘feel better’? No! because it’s the permanent guilt that ‘keeps ‘em going’; it’s the guilt that makes them ‘feel good’ and feel ‘righteous’. This is how wretchedly rotten they are, for their minds are calcified and cancerous. Has this behaviour made a positive impression on the black people of South London? I very much doubt it, and if I were a black person I would consider it a patronising insult and treat the whole phony episode with contempt.

So what’s it all about, and would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) have joined them in their little self-righteous parade of false remorse and false humility for the cameras? I don’t think so, in fact, I know so. The only anniversaries Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) will be interested in, if any, will be the future anniversaries of the commencement of His Kingdom here on this earth when He returns. None of man’s activities in this age will be remembered, nor commemorated, by way of an anniversary in God’s Kingdom, if anything The Lord will want them all forgotten! Well let’s hope He does.

The question now is this: how can I be so sure Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not join in with this celebration? To answer that we need to understand the origins of ‘slavery’ (the accurate name being Involuntary Servitude) and ask ourselves why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) allowed it to take place at all? The answer to that question can be found in Genesis 9 where we read of Yashua Messiah’s curse on Canaan. This curse, pronounced by Yashua Messiah through Noah, came, because of Ham’s sin with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife). Noah’s son Ham, Canaan’s father, “saw his father Noah’s nakedness” which in Biblical language can only be interpreted that he had sexual intercourse with his mother, whilst his father was in a drunken sleep:

Genesis 9:20-22 (KJV) And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

OK, am I saying that some of Canaan’s descendants were and are black? Yes. How do I know that? Easy, Cush, Canaan’s half-brother was black; the name Cush literally means ‘black’ and all olive, swarthy, dark and brown skinned people are descended from Ham. OK, back to this curse of Yashua Messiah’s, through Noah, upon Canaan and here are the verses:

Genesis 9:24 (KJV) And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

The word ‘servant’ here means a ‘bond-man’ or a man in bondage – a sold-man – sold into involuntary servitude. Canaan and his descendants were to be bonded and even worse than that, bonded to those already bonded. Notice too, that they were also to be in servitude to the descendants of Shem (white people) and bonded serfs of the descendants of Japheth (yellow people, who are now colonising Africa and fulfilling that prophecy), that is, they were also to become serfs of serfs. Many serf masters promoted certain numbers of their serfs to the positions of overseers and managers on their plantations, and that meant they had authority over their fellow serfs – Canaan’s black descendants became serfs of serfs.

Here is another truth; Black Africans were sold to Jewish slave traders who literally ran the black slave trade, but by whom? Other Africans, black people sold their own kind into slavery. Captains or commanders of slave ships (many owned by Jews) didn’t capture the Africans they took on board their ships, they had already been captured by other black Africans who worked for the Jews. This was big business, and a lucrative business for all concerned, not just the ship’s masters and Jewish ship owners. These facts are, of course, conveniently forgotten, deliberately played down and airbrushed from history, or just ignored by Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooders (propagandists) in the west. This especially applies within the whoring media, who seem to want to continually beat themselves, and us, up about a time in our history that we can do nothing about, nor change. The point we have to take from this is that blacks were as guilty as the Jews, and whites to a lesser degree, in this whole episode of history. Any other view is evil, treacherous, western liberal, manipulation of The Truth.

Here is another question; if we were to replace the sin of involuntary servitude, with the sin of murder and celebrate its abolition, would it make any sense? If these people in South London had been celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of murder, do you think Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would have joined in with that? Do you think He would have joined in, when black yoofs, in drug gang wars, are regularly being gunned down and murdered on the very same streets of (in allegedly gun abolished) South London? Can you see the blatant hypocrisy of it all? Which in turn means can you also see the Jews operating in the background driving this anti-white, white genocide satanic activity? That is, blacks with guns and whites unarmed!

We need to understand that involuntary servitude, on this earth, has never gone away – it still goes on – especially where The Jews are living and also in the Arab countries of the Middle East. Involuntary servitude is also rife in the Jewish run porn industry – many white girls are abducted in the Ukraine and Russia. The British abolishing involuntary servitude in 1807 didn’t bring it to an end. In fact the so-called British abolition of involuntary servitude (slavery) was an act of mere window dressing – a facade.

Here is a further question: Is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) interested in man’s ‘achievements’, that is, all those things that man can do, and does do, under his own strength? Well yes, up to a point, but then again no, because Yashua Messiah created man in the first place. He was, therefore, and is, perfectly well aware of what His creation is capable of ‘achieving’, including the past; the present, and what they could be capable of in the future.

When man fell in the Garden of Eden he acquired the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil through ‘eating the fruit of the tree’ he was commanded not to eat (See link No. 2 below).Now becauseman has acquired the knowledge of good and evil he is, therefore, quite capable of doing both things. This, in turn, can depend very much upon outside influences, his mood swings, his general disposition and/or his motives. His motives for ‘doing good’ or what we call ‘do-gooding’do not come from the Godhead; they come from the fallen man himself, that is, Satan’s will.Man, therefore, is very able at doing evil, that is, enslaving people and also very able at do-gooding, that is, abolishing slavery. All this ‘slavery’ or ‘abolition of slavery’ amounts to is an active demonstration of man’s behaviour in his fallen condition, nothing else. I hope you can now see why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not be celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of slavery. It is wholly a celebration of man’s ‘achievements’. Slavery and its abolition have got nothing to do with Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Now here is some information for mainstream Christians who have been sucked into this deceptive worldly liberal phenomenon called “Permanent guilt over slavery.” You see, they haven’t a clue about what Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) actually said about slavery? So let’s go to Ephesians now to find out and thereby set the record straight:

Ephesians 6:5 (KJV) Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;

In the above verse we can see another example of translators tinkering with the Word of God. In the Greek, the word for ‘servants’ is ‘doulos’ which means slaves. So here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, saying to those in involuntary servitude “be good obedient serfs” not rebellious: “I want my freedom” serfs. In verse 9, verse 5 it is then supported with:

Ephesians 6:9 (KJV) And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with Him.

Here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, telling serf masters to be equitable and just toward their serfs. Notice, there is neither one jot nor an inkling of the suggestion that the status quo of the serf/master master/serf arrangement should be changed nor rebelled against, especially with regard to Canaanites (the Jews and blacks).

Here above is concrete evidence that Yashua Messiah did not come to change this world, nor did He leave any instructions with His Messengers (apostles) to do so either. That also means that we, as Christians, are not to get involved in this world’s political systems, even if they look good and righteous on the outside.

Would Jesus Christ have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid?

To answer this and affirm what I have said above, what we have to understand is that Yashua Messiah did not come the first time, that is, in the first century to change this world or this age, nor its systems of governance, nor in fact, people’s sinful lifestyles. He came to take away all the sins of mankind, conquer death, and allow The Father time to draw (drag) those He had predestined, to His Son, that is, the gift of Grace filled Salvation to those He would call and choose, and to no one else.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

However, Apartheid was another of man’s systems of governance, but this time based upon God’s plan for the coming Kingdom, and the impetus to change it or abolish it, was from hu-man beings and/or from Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooding white men, that is, shabbos goy self-righteous treacherous white men = serfs of The Jews. The misguided issue of ‘hu-man rights’ is also tied up in this Apartheid system as well, (See link No. 3 below) but I will not go into that here. Here, too, is another Truth, the Roman Empire was far more evil, ruthless and cruel than the Apartheid governments of South Africa, and yet Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not say a word nor lift a finger against it, but He did tell Pontius Pilate that this world/age was not His kingdom.

Moreover, what many mainstream Christians, those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, also forget is the Barabbas character in the account of Yashua Messiah’s criminal show trial. He is mentioned in God’s Word for good reason, for Barabbas was big on regime change, he was a zealot of zealots, a first century terrorist – a real terrorist, and he wanted the Romans out of Judea!! He wanted ‘freedom’ and ‘independence’ for the Jews.

Had he been alive during the Apartheid era he, too, would have been a Cultural Jew Marxist and big on regime change in South Africa. He would have fought tooth and nail to get the white man out of power in South Africa, and he would definitely have been big on useless ‘hu-man rights’ for blacks too.

Back to the trial of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), and we know the story, don’t we? The crowd (being the Jews) called out for Barabbas to be released, not Yashua Messiah. Barabbas was a man after their own reptile hearts, a man with whom they had much in common, and a man they could relate to. Barabbas was their hero – a ‘freedom’ fighter. Yashua Messiah was a ‘nobody’ when compared with Barabbas. Yashua Messiah might as well have been a foreign invader from a planet, such was their hatred for Him.

OK, so Barabbas was big on regime change, but was Yashua Messiah big on regime change? No, He wasn’t, not then, but He will be in the future when He returns to shepherd and segregate the nations of this earth with a rod of iron (tough love) – the biggest regime change you will ever see. (See link

No. 1 below)

Finally, did Barabbas win in his zeal to remove the Romans from Judea? Not a chance, for in 70 AC, less than 40 years later, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem completely – they razed it to the ground, including Herod’s Temple.

Moreover, it will be very interesting to see what becomes of South Africa over the next thirty years or so. If Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) is anything to go by, I don’t hold out much hope for it. Keep your eyes on the news folks and witness all the end time results of the white man’s self-righteous and delusional do-gooding, all on behalf of the Cultural Marxist Jews!!

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

So would Yashua Messiah have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid, no way? Will Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) bring an end to involuntary servitude (because it still goes on today, even in 2007 and 2021)? Oh yes, but not until He returns to take His Throne as King of kings and Lord of lords, and all of man’s ways, his systems, his governments and futile ideas are brought to an end. Yashua Messiah please hurry that day! Not long now folks so stay strong in The Faith.

As a PS, you maybe curious as to why I use the term “involuntary servitude” instead of “slavery” and the answer to that is quite simple. In pre-civil war USA white men were free and blacks were in involuntary servitude. After that war was was lost to the Federal Government, (the so-called Civil War was a war by the Federal Government on ALL The States) both white men and blacks became CITIZEN SLAVES of the Federal Government, and it’s been downhill for the whites of America ever since. The so-called Union Soldiers were just useful idiots for the Federal Government. Just a little true history to enlighten your day.

Oh and one thing I did forget: Would the fop fake long haired ‘Jesus’ have taken part in all this guff and garbage? Yes, of course he would, but then you knew that already, didn’t you? LOL

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. APARTHEID is The Kingdom Of God:

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

3. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

4. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

5.Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 1:

6. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 2:

7. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 3:

The Vile Satanic Curse Of RELIGION….

.And a word that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was never recorded as having uttered!

Now here’s a thing, a HUGE THING. The WHOLE WORLD, to a greater extent, has gone after one religion or another, and if we were to add up all those people that do have a religion, of one kind or another, I bet those left would only amount to a very small minority – which would also include followers of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Even those who profess to be atheists worship other things in place of an organised religion or deity, namely themselves in the mirror (narcissists), the creation, that is, the green eco-nutters (Extinction Rebellion morons), their families, (yes there is such a thing as ‘family worship’), their pets, wealth, careers, their cars, their boats, sun-worshipping holidays, science, technology, art, music, or even football teams. All of these things, however we cut it, can be, and are, objects of their RELIGION, that is, idolatry and, whether they like to hear it or not. So you see, dear people, in Truth there is NO ESCAPE from RELIGION – it’s all enveloping and encompassing and across the whole world.

However the reason for this article is not for the atheist lost and unsaved, although they are welcome to read and learn from it, IF the Father is calling them. No, the reason for this article is to rebuke and admonish in agape love, those who profess to be Christians, and yet waste their time and money on the wretched pursuit of religion, delusionally thinking that they are doing Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) will.

And now for the proof and evidence from The Holy Scriptures that show us that ALL RELIGION is of Satan the Devil and not of God. But before I do that here is a foundational aside: the word ‘RELIGION’ is derived from the multi-faceted demon called LEGION, whom Yashua Messiah cast into The Gadarene Swine. All the swine died as they plunged over the cliff edge, but LEGION did not, for spirits cannot die. This means that LEGION had a make-over and re-invented himself as RE-LEGION, and there you have it = the multi-faceted evil spirit (demon) that pervades ALL RELIGIONS, whether it be Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Bahaism, Confucianism and, of course, not forgetting the most important one, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion which at the moment doesn’t have an ‘ism’. Perhaps I should invent one! LOL

OK, here are ALL the verses from the New Testament that mention the word RELIGION, followed by the word RELIGIOUS, and you will immediately notice that NONE OF THEM are from the Four Gospels, which means Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He instruct His learners in the ways of RELIGION for He did not have a RELIGION – GOD HAS NO RELIGION:

Acts 26:5 (KJV) Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our RELIGION (G2356) I lived a Pharisee.

In this first offering we get an inkling of what RELIGION really is, that is, ‘a straitest sect’, as Paul accurately calls it, so from this we can immediately deduce that this is a very legalistic set up, and, of course, we already know that, because we know that The Serpent Seed Pharisee Jews were satanic Judaisers and very ritualistic. This means they dotted every ‘i’ and crossed every ‘t’ of The Mosaic Law in an attempt to pathetically save themselves. This, in turn, resulted in Yashua Messiah mocking them with the remark: “The ‘healthy’ have no need of The Physician!”

So straight off, the first example of the word RELIGION is a negative one.

Galatians 1:13 (KJV) For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454), how that beyond measure I persecuted The Church of God, and wasted it:

In this verse, our first negative verse above is confirmed for us once again by Paul with an even more negative example. Here he beefs it up by calling it the (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION and how, in the name of that VILE SATANIC RELIGION, he persecuted the Church of God and wasted it.

‘Wasted’ here meaning to destroy and overthrow or to make havock, and from Strong’s Concordance we get:

Wasted – G4199: πορθέω πορθέω: imperfect ἐπόρθουν; 1 aorist participle πορθήσας; (πέρθω, πεπορθα, to lay waste); from Homer down; to destroy, to overthrow (R. V. uniformly to make havock): τινα, Acts 9:21; τήν ἐκκλησίαν, Galatians 1:13; τήν πίστιν, ibid. 23.

So clearly we can now see what an evil thing the Jews’ RELIGION is, that is, Judaism, and please keep this in mind as we analyse the three remaining verses.

Galatians 1:14 (KJV) And profited in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454) above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

Here Paul reveals how he ‘profited’ or progressed in The (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION, and left his contemporaries way behind, so zealous was he for this evil satanic cult and its dogma. We MUST fully understand that Saul was a ruthless cold blooded murderer before Yashua Messiah gave him the shock of his life on the road to Damascus.

Next, we have two very interesting verses that seem to go against everything Paul has revealed and taught us about his past involvement with RELIGION, and how evil it was/is. We therefore have what some misguided people use as an example of sending up RELIGION, and let’s be clear, for these are the ONLY VERSES in the whole Bible that appear to paint RELIGION in a positive light, but do they?

In order to answer this question we will need Strong’s Concordance once more for there are several Greek words at play here. The first is G2356 and the second is G2454 and here are the definitions:

Religion – G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah; – from a derivative of G2357; ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.

Religion – G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; from G2450; “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.

Religion – G2357threskos thrace’-kos probably – from the base of 2360; ceremonious in worship (as demonstrative), i.e. pious:–religious.

Religion – G2450Ioudaizo ee-oo-dah-id’-zo from 2453; to become a Judaean, i.e. “Judaize”:– live as the Jews.

James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain.

James 1:27 (KJV) PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

Right, now we get down to some very devious and deceptive nonsense going on here, for in Acts 26:5 we get the G2356 reference to Paul speaking of his previous religious life which is exactly the same religion as mentioned in Galatians 1:13-14 and yet the translators have given it a new number, that is, G2454. So what’s going on? Has Paul’s past religion changed from being, and I quote: G2356 ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.” to G2454 “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.” Or are they just one and the same, but dressed up differently in the G2356 definition.

Do you see what’s happening here? With the use of G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah they are attempting to paint Paul’s old religion in a benign oh so loving, compassionate and kind, kind of way, that is, people who generally wouldn’t hurt a fly, and then with the use of the next word: G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; we’re then dealing with murdering psychopaths namely, Saul, and his fellow Pharisee criminals, and yet we’re definitely talking about the same RELIGION. The irony here being that the KJV translators have got this right by using the word RELIGION for both Greek words.

OK, so it looks like a load of shenanigans has taken place with the Greek manuscripts, proving that they, too, are liable to little corruptions, as with Matthew 28-19, which I unravelled in my article: “Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? – Part 1” (See link No. 1 below).

So let’s now move on to James and analyse what he’s up to and I’ll repost the two troublesome verses below:

James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain 27 PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

So straight away we have use of that deceptive G2356 definition which, as we have already ascertained really means the same as G2454 – Saul’s and the Pharisee Jews’ satanic Judaising religion. But why is James rambling on about religion anyway? Well it’s obvious, isn’t it? Look at the opening statement: If any man among you seem to be religious.” What does he mean by this remark? Let’s copy and paste the Concordant Literal Version for a better understanding:

James 1:26-27 (CLV) If anyone is seeming to be a ritualist, not bridling his tongue, but seducing his heart, the ritual of this one is vain, 27 for ritual clean and undefiled with God the Father is this: to be visiting the bereaved and widowed in their affliction, to be keeping oneself unspotted from the world.”

Why would anyone in the Church of God be hanging on to old religious ritualistic customs, that is, the ways of the world? When all of this was done away, with Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection. Why would this wretch want to be seen as someone who was still into meaningless rituals and religion?

So here’s a further pertinent question or two: 1) Since when did visiting the bereaved and widowed become ritualistic or religious? Answer: It never has. 2) In what way is visiting the bereaved and widowed a ritualistic or religious activity? Answer: It’s not, nor has it ever been, so what’s James on about?

Easy, he’s mocking the whole idea sarcastically. James 1:26-27 is all about exposing this fraud (whoever he or she might be) and possibly doesn’t exist at all, but he’s using this possible scenario, as an example, so that anyone within his congregation that still fancies himself as religious or hankers after the old Pharisaical ways, had better shape up and get with the New Covenant and repent of his old Pharisaical Religious ways or else. (See link No.2 below)

So there we have it, RELIGION fully revealed and exposed from The Holy Scriptures for the fraud that it is, and NOW is the time for ALL true Christians to set themselves free from it:

Revelation 18:4 (KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse and Baptism Is Not Into The Trinity:

Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity. Eastern (Russian and Greek) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity. Protestantism is NOT Christianity.

2. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 3

For parts 1 and 2 see links 4 and 5 below.

Would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) stand at the window with the Pope at the Vatican sharing the adulation? As I wrote this I had to have a little laugh, just because of the whole farcical idea, it is just so hilariously preposterous and ridiculous – I think I will consider a new career as a comedian – only joking of course!

Can you imagine the above scenario? Well perhaps you can and, if you can, here is another question for you: Which Pope would it be? ‘cos there’s been an estimated 266 of ‘em, which includes the even more hilarious idea that Peter The Messenger (apostle) was the first one, ROTFL! (see link No. 1 below). So which one would share this platform – the one who drew the shortest straw? Oh boy, this stuff just cracks me up. Let’s face it, they’re all going to be in heaven aren’t they? Well no, they won’t, as no hu-man being, or man or woman of mankind is going to heaven, but that’s another story for another article. (See link No. 2 below)

However, what we need to ask ourselves is this: where in the Holy Scriptures does it say that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) needs a leading representative on earth to stand on a platform anywhere on His behalf? Nowhere!! Yashua Messiah has us – His Elect, those called and chosen by The Father to His Son, The Saints, and He needs no one else. We are The Ecclesia, not some snake in the grass appointee of other snakes in the grass, that is, the demonic creatures and/or counterfeiters of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

OK, so let’s stop and think about this, what entities or bodies have representatives? Governments, corporations and businesses do and, of course, low and behold, we are dealing with the largest government/corporation on this earth – the Babylonian Mystery Religion Corporation, with Catholicism in the west and Orthodoxy in the east. Not forgetting, of course, all their Protestant denominational subsidiaries – the demon-inations. I said this false effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ was big business, didn’t I? and here is the evidence. Not only that, but some of them with Swiss Bank accounts too, to keep things neat, tidy and oh so very unaccountable and secretive. I wonder if Peter and the other Messengers had Swiss bank accounts? Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle.

Here is the Truth, when Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) returns to this earth He is going to take His throne. A throne that will be given to Him by His Father, but which throne is that and where will it be located?And take note, for He will not be sharing His Throne with anyone else. In turn, He will give thrones to the Twelve Messengers (Apostles) for they will judge the Twelve Tribes of Israel….

Matthew 19:28 (MCV) And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration (through being born again) and whenever the Son of man shall sit in The Throne of His Glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging (evaluating) The Twelve Tribes of Israel.

….but He will sit alone upon His Throne, a Throne above all others here on this earth, not in heaven. Only the Father’s Throne is in heaven.

Luke 22:30 (MCV) That ye may eat and drink at my table in my Kingdom, and sit on thrones judging (evaluating) The Twelve Tribes of Israel.

Jeremiah 14:21 (KJV) Do not abhor us, for thy name’s sake, do not disgrace The Throne of Thy Glory: remember, break not thy covenant with us.

Matthew 25:31 (KJV) When the Son of man shall come in His Glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then shall He sit upon The Throne of His Glory:

Luke 1:32 (KJV) He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of The Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto Him The Throne of His father David:

Jeremiah 3:17 (KJV) At that time they shall call Jerusalem The Throne of the LORD; and all the nations shall be gathered unto it, to the name of the LORD, to Jerusalem: neither shall they walk any more after the imagination of their evil heart.

By the sound of these Holy Scriptures they seem to be alluding to the fact that The Throne already exists on earth and, of course, it does.It is King David’s throne and it is The Throne of Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) glory. Notice, there is no mention here of a ‘throne resurrection’, first, that is, the creation of a new throne, before The Lord Jesus takes it as His own, so this is more evidence that this throne already exists on earth. Notice too, it is not in Rome and it is not a counterfeit religious throne, but a true Royal Monarchical throne, a Kingly throne with a line directly back to King David.

Jeremiah 33:17 (KJV) For thus saith the LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon The Throne of the House of Israel;

The word ‘want’ here means ‘cut off’, so King David will never be cut off from a man (or woman), that is, a successor by Divine right, through the Royal blood line of Judah (Pharez and Zarah), to sit upon his throne. This Royal Throne is occupied to this day by a genuine Royal Monarch – God’s Anointed, not a scam-mongering fraud and impostor who heads up a money making, money laundering cult or global corporation in Babylon (Rome). Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) will be King of kings and Lord of lords, not a king of religious blaspheming phonys, illegitimates and impostors.

So where is this Royal Monarchical throne that can trace its beginnings back to King David, located? That very same throne that Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) will take upon His return to this earth? There is only one place it can be and that is Great Britain – True Israel. (See link No. 3 below).

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II sits on King David’s’s throne and if she is still alive when Yashua Messiah returns she will give it up to Yashua Messiah. She, like her ancestors, knows that she is God’s anointed and should be ruling by Divine right, but that arrangement came to an end in 1649 with the assassination of King Charles I by the Jews. Hence, even in its neutered constitutional form, it is a throne that is continually under threat of extinction, from The Rothschild Jews also, who were behind the assassination of The Czar and his beautiful family in Russia. All this, plus the increasing threat of treacherous republicanism – even from her own disloyal government ministers who are just appointees of The Rothschilds. This threat is just another identifying sign that points to Yashua Messiah’s imminent return to rescue and secure The Throne of His Glory for all eternity.

So here is that question again, only this time, I have put the false Jesus into the picture. So would this effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ share a platform with the Pope(s) in order to get some adulation? Of course he would, he is metaphorically in their employ as their marketing tool – their flunky and their lackey. To prove it, they carry around crucifixes with a little statue of their wimp ‘Jesus’ dead on a cross, and that’s where they want him, DEAD and lifeless, and not raised from the dead, all powerful, ready and waiting to return to this earth in POWER AND GLORY.

Think about it, with His all powerful arrival and return to this earth they will be defunct, surplus to requirements, unemployable, USELESS!!! Fit only for road sweeping or cleaning toilets, if that!

Moreover, what about Yashua Messiah, the real Lord Jesus Christ, what will He be doing while this wimp impostor is sharing a platform in the Vatican? He will be very busy crushing and pulverising all those representations of their religious idolatry into chaff on His worldwide threshing floor. The remains of this threshing, that is, the chaff, will immediately be carried away on the wind never to be seen nor heard of again – gone forever – Hallelujah!!

Daniel 2:35 (MCV) Then was the iron (Rome), the clay (The Jews), the brass (Ancient Greece), the silver (Persia), and the gold (Babylon), broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the Stone that smote the image (and all other images) became a Great Mountain (Great Kingdom), and filled the whole earth.

In Daniel 2:35 we can see the demise of the Babylonian image of King Nebuchadnezzar, (it’s all about images folks – false images) this image being the representation of five Satanic empires (if we include The Jew’s Money Empire). These empires stretch through time from King Nebuchadnezzar unto this day, that is, Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome + Clay. All religion is represented by Satan’s Babylonian Mystery Religion which The Stone – the Chief Cornerstone – Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) destroys completely and utterly when He returns to this earth. The smashed and pulverised remains of this image being like chaff carried away on the wind. The Stone cut without hands – Jesus Christ, notice, becomes a great mountain metaphor for a Great Kingdom that fills the whole earth. Here we can see Yashua Messiah (the real Lord Jesus Christ) in action – The Powerful ‘He-man’ Jesus Christ, not some feeble ineffectual pathetic effeminate wimp with long hair.

I will be publishing a full length series of articles on Nebuchadnezzar’s image very soon. This Biblical prophecy is crucial in identifying the Whore of Babylon which rides The Beast of Revelation – The Rothschild’s Worldwide Money Empire.

OK, that’s about it for this article, next up, that emotive issue of slavery (correct name: “Involuntary Servitude”), well it is for some and, of course, the effeminate wimp ‘Jesus’ loves this subject. In the meantime, have no fear, for all will be revealed, and so will Yashua Messiah’s view on this, the most favoured hand wringing subject of wretched, do-gooding, guilt ladened, self-flagellating, liberal thinking ‘men’. A more pathetic group of people you would be hard pressed to find; in fact, on reflection, I am sure you would not find a more wretched and pathetic group of people – anywhere!!

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Was Peter The First Pope – The Truth of Matthew 16 Revealed:

2. Are Christians Going To Heaven?:

3. The True Israelites are White Europeans, Jews Admit It, Blacks Deny and Hate It!:

https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-true-israelites-are-white-europeans-jews-admit-it-blacks-deny-and-hate-it_YV623JNaZ7Gy5IK.html

4. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? Part 1:

5. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 2:

Was Yahsua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 2

For Part 1 please see link No. 4 below.

Before I press on with answering the questions I listed in Part 1, I will quote some Scriptures that are very much linked to this subject of the false images of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). In fact The Lord warns us about a time when these deceivers will come on the world scene and lead many, or multitudes, astray. We are talking big numbers here, not just a few, and these deceivers were already at it before the end of the first century.

Matthew 24:5 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Mark 13:6 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Luke 21:8 (MCV) And He said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

A great number will come in The Lord’s name,but how will they come? Why, with all their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious paraphernalia, (see link No. 1 below) that’s how. With all their self aggrandising ‘church’ buildings, their love of money, their fancy robes, their silly Dagon fish hats, and even sillier meaningless relics, their insulting icons, statues, paintings, and all accompanied with their non-gospel of the bad news, or salvation by works, the whole satanic marketing package.

Do not be deceived, this is big business – religious big business and they dress up for the part too. Furthermore, do not be deceived by those who will attempt to explain the above verses away. They will do this by saying that The Lord was warning us only about those people who would say they “actually are Jesus Christ”, that is, impostors, and those who would be deranged and unhinged. Yes, there will be examples of these weird whacky people too, including the Papacy. Let’s not forget, Popes believe they stand in the place of Christ, and they are false Christs, but they, fortunately, will only be very few in numbers. To support The Truth and expose their false interpretations of these verses we only have to check out the Greek rendering:

Matthew 24:5 (Greek Transliteral) Many shall be coming on the name of me saying that I am and many they shall be straying.

Here we can see that many will be coming saying that ‘Christ is’ or ‘preaching a Christ’, a false Christ and not saying that they actually are Christ.

OK, on with those questions.

Would Jesus Christ have stood up for your human rights? Now I was going to answer this question here, but because the topic invites such a large amount of information to reveal it for what it is, it will need an article all of its own, so I will press on with next question.

Would Jesus Christ have given His blessing on multiculturalism? Before I continue with answering this question, we first need to know what it is, just what, exactly, is multiculturalism? Well it’s more than one culture isn’t it? No it isn’t and that’s the demonic lie and deceptiveness built into this word and in turn in its manipulative use. A person can be multicultural, that is, able to mix in easily and adapt to several cultures and that would be down to that man or woman’s individual desire, tastes, likes and societal abilities, but do we all have that desire and those abilities? NO!

Furthermore, is it a sin not to have them? No. So if being a multiculturalist is not multiculturalism, what is multiculturalism!? Multiculturalism is an unachievable societal system invented and orchestrated by the Canaanite Jews, those in real authority, who are now dictating, via their political puppets, how we ought to behave and live. This is a draconian, Pharisaical, legalistic, self-righteous, pseudo religious system of governance. Instead of being free to decide whether or not we want to be multicultural, we are now told we must be multicultural, this is multiculturalism. If we have no desire to be multicultural we are then branded as bigots, haters, racists, xenophobes, and even heretics. Now there is only one outcome to the attempted enforcement of this issue = VIOLENCE, and that is just what (((those))) in power want, so that they can introduce Martial Law.

Moreover, it will, and already does involve state control and manipulation over your lives. How? How, because we, in the west, now live in democracies or better, DeMon-oCracies which in abbreviated form spells D.M.C. or Domination, Manipulation and Control. You think you are free under this system, but in reality you are deceived and conned and are thereby enslaved and held captive to it. The Truth is, we in the west live in bondage to a system that controls, manipulates and enslaves us and the real power-brokers are the heads of the global corporations, including the Vatican, and the global bankers (The Rothschild Banking Cartel) more commonly known as the New World Order or The Deep State. Politicians are just cloned lackeys, ‘jokers’, puppets and front men for these real sources of power. Whatever these power-broker people say, goes and there are no arguments.

This multiculturalism thing is a classic example of how D.M.C. works. All (((they))) do (they, as already described, being the real authorities (The Jews) behind the politicians) is deliberately create an unworkable societal mould. They then make those, that is, the majority, who wish to have no part in multiculturalism feel guilty (a bogus guilt created by them for manipulative purposes), when there is no reason to feel guilty at all. Now they do this through subtle, and at times not so subtle, propaganda, which amounts to a form of guilt layering, emotional blackmail and through it, coercion. This is victimisation through false accusations of the majority or host nation culture, and is achieved by mental harassment, via the media (also under their control). The host nation’s culture, who have done nothing wrong by wanting to maintain and keep their own culture intact, are made to feel guilty and responsible, via this blatant emotional manipulation, for not ‘doing more’ for those whose cultures are not their own. All this, when all the while it should be the responsibility of those with the foreign cultures to adapt to the host nation’s culture – not the other way round. This, in a world of true justice would not be unreasonable.

The evil wickedness of multiculturalism then creates animosity, bitterness, resentfulness and hatred between peoples and drives a wedge between the people of different cultures, instead of helping them assimilate into the host nation’s culture – not that this is possible for it clearly isn’t. This is how we end up with ghettos.

What we, the indigenous population or host culture are supposed to do, in a practical sense, to bring about this multicultural society no one has yet explained to any of us, nor are they likely to – hence the Commie traitor Merkel has begrudgingly admitted that it is a failure. This is because, in reality, there is nothing we can do and they, the criminal orchestrators, know it, it has all been done deliberately to cause unrest and division. This though, is not the only issue, as far these authority figures are concerned. All of this is of no matter to them, because all they are interested in is the deliberate brow beating and victimisation of their fellow countrymen. This is massive treachery on a national scale, it is nothing but treason and do not be surprised by it. This is not a fanciful idea; it is the Truth and spelled out quite clearly in the Holy Scriptures:

2 Timothy 3:1 (MCV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, (narcissistic politicians obsessed with their own images and their imaginary ‘legacies’, and nothing else) covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, (not listening to wise counsel from their parents and elders) unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection (no compassion), truce-breakers, (breakers of treaties) false accusers, incontinent, (without self control) fierce, (savage) despisers of those that are good, (passing legislation that is a blasphemy to God and an affront to the Godly) 4 Traitors, (the selling out and betrayal of their own people and nation) heady (rash and impetuous), high-minded, (inflated with conceit) lovers of pleasures (debauched and licentious) more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof (followers of and believers in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and not Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ): from such turn away.

As you read the above passage of Scripture, just think of how many of these labels you could easily hang around the necks of your ‘church’ leaders and criminal political ‘leaders’!!??

I have digressed a little above, so getting back to the thread again here is another Truth. ‘Isms’ divide and segregate, they never unite. An ‘ism’ and ‘isms’ tend mostly to be divisive and negative, elitist or they are cultish and clannish in make up. They invariably drive a wedge through societies and automatically create an ‘us and them’ arrangement. Here are some examples: Bolshevism, Communism, Socialism, Cultural Jew Marxism, Conservatism, Judaism, Islamism, Methodism, Protestantism, Catholicism, Liberalism, Elitism, Hinduism and Multiculturalism. There are many more that could be added to this list, but I’m sure you get the picture. ‘Isms’ antagonise, divide and cause jealousy; hate and friction, they do not unite and bring peace, only a God given new heart in men and freedom under Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) Grace can do that.

Having said all that, would Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) give His blessing on multiculturalism? I think I have already answered that one, don’t you? A better question would be: What has The Light and/or The Way got to do with darkness or the evil manipulative treacherous schemes of men? Answer: NOTHING!

Again, here’s the question we have to ask: Would the effeminate long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ bless multiculturalism? Of course he would, he already does through all those mainstream ‘Christians’ of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who buy into multiculturalism think there is nothing wrong with it. The Jewish Cultural Marxist Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby being a perfect example. He and they love multiculturalism; they actually think it is part and parcel of The Kingdom of God being built by them now, here on this earth.

So here we have so called Christians absorbing into their beliefs the misguided evil ideas of carnal minded unbelieving hu-man beings = ATHEISTS! – unbelievable! Their delusion is complete. Many of these so called Christians call themselves ‘Progressive Christians’. (See link Nos. 1 and 2 below)

Re Justin Welby I think you will find via his website that what I have said regarding his faith in multiculturalism is true. Welby as a worldly contaminated Laodicean and a firm believer in the long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ he would be, wouldn’t he, so no surprises there then?

No surprises perhaps, but there may be some surprises in the following articles, so please stay with me on this important exposure of their false image based religious scam – The Cainite-Judeo-Christain Religion.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

2. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

3. Progressive or Libertine Christianity Versus Fundamental Christianity:

4. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp Part 1:?

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE? – Part 1

.Or perhaps a better title would have been: The Satanic Curses of Judaism and Islam – Is God One?

Introduction

Now this article has been up on Ezine Articles since 2009, so it’s obviously long overdue for a little revising and editing, because my knowledge has greatly increased since 2009. In turn, it must be said that it’s a crucial support article for my other articles: “Exposing The Trinity Lie – Parts 1 through 5”; “Do YOU Worship and Ogre god? – Parts 1 through 4”; “Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs? and “The Duality Godhead”, (See link Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 below.) This means, also, that it’s long overdue for a place on my blog. Still, better late than never, eh?

So, to my question, IS HE ONE, that is, is God ONE!? for the phrase “God is one” can only be found three times in the whole King James Bible – THREE TIMES ONLY! Now here’s a thing, for all of my regular readers will, by now, be aware of a little conundrum that we have going on here, that is, within the confines of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. That conundrum, of course, is this mysterious habit they have of majoring in the minors. It seems to be a common practice of theirs to make big theological determinations with very little Scriptural proof for backing up those determinations. The silly Trinity dogma being a very good example of it, with two references, only, to the Trinity, again, in the whole of the King James Bible (see link No. 1 below). Not only that but no mention of it by the name, the Trinity. However, having said all that, MANY people still believe that their god is one and in the case of believers in the Trinity, for them it’s three in ONE!

So back to the thread, and to prove it, here’s another thing: All the Jews and all the Muslims on this earth believe their god or their Allah is one. There he is, up there in his ‘heavenly domain’, all alone, that is, a single solitary god, who is the object of their worship and of their deification (chuckle, chuckle, chuckle).

The thing is, is their worship of this deity all in vain? and is it just a massive deception on the part of the god of this world, Satan the Devil? We must be clear about this, for he is most definitely a god, that is, the god of this world, or the god of this age, or the god of this world’s system, or even the god of The Matrix, to use the modern vernacular. If you have any doubts about this arrangement, then you must refer to the Holy Scriptures for the proof, and thereby assuage those doubts:

2 Corinthians 4:4 (MCV) In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest The Light of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image (one in whom the likeness of anyone is seen) of God, should shine unto them.

As an aside, notice, the minds of the lost and unsaved who don’t believe are completely blinded to The Gospel of Yashua Messiah, which is yet more solid gold proof that no man or woman can accept a ‘Jesus’ as their saviour of their own volition or own initiation, for only The Father can remove the scales from our eyes.

Ephesians 2:2 (MCV) Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to The Prince of The Power of The Air, the evil spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience (and unbelief):

OK, now all this is very straight forward, because we know that the lost and unsaved do not believe, and the above verses explain clearly why they don’t believe. Moreover, what about the Jews and the Muslims, for they do believe and, boy, do they believe? Let’s face it, we could never doubt their zeal and their fervour, especially the Muslims, so what gives? Is their belief in vain, for we know that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) does not feature in The Jew’s beliefs at all. The Jews have their imaginary satanic Talmudic ‘god’, and the Muslims have their ‘Allah’, but Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) as God with God is not included in either of these blasphemous belief systems.

However, Islam does acknowledge a ‘Jesus’ as a prophet, but this imaginary ‘Jesus’ is not revered any higher than their prophet Mohammed which, in itself, is an evil blasphemy. (For the origins of Islam see link No. 5 below.)

So to briefly sum up, we have at least two religions that believe in gods that are one, that is, alone and solitary. Now some of you may say well so what, we’re Christians, and we believe that God is one, too? Yes, quite so, but is that true and who told you that God is one? And if God IS ONE what separates your god from the heathen god of the Jews and Muslims, for he is one too? Answer: NOTHING! Oh come on, there are loads of Holy Scriptures that say God is one, I hear you say, and yes there are some that appear to say that, but do they really say it? Well, there is only one way to find out using these examples:

In Mark 12:29 the Lord Jesus Christ quotes Deuteronomy 6:4 which He voices aloud:

Mark 12:29 (KJV) And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

Now this statement is a word for word exact copy of what Moses wrote down in Deuteronomy 6:4. You can check it for yourselves if you do not believe me.

Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our GOD is one LORD.

OK, let’s analyse this Scripture in detail, from the Hebrew, as it predates Mark’s Gospel by approximately fifteen hundred years:

Hear, O Israel:

1) The Lord The Jehovah or The Eternal our God (Elohim) who has always self-existed.

2) Our God now the word ‘God’ or ‘Elohim’ in Hebrew means God plural – more than one. The Hebrew word ‘Eloha’ or Eloah is the singular word for Elohim. Now if God is one, a singular solitary God, then ‘Eloha’ is the word that would have been used here, not Elohim – more than one. This evidence alone, and in one fell swoop, disproves monotheism or Judaism, for the Elohim Godhead is more than one being.

3) Is oneOK, God = Elohim = plural beings, which in turn means we have the Elohim (plural) Godhead of more than one being, being described as ‘one’, but is that one being? and how can plural beings be one? In Hebrew the word for ONE is ‘Echad’ which means unified or united or in unity or at one and it also means number one; first and none above, the prime number. This means that The Elohim (plural) Godhead is united – completely likeminded and in unison, that is, in total agreement.

A football team is united as in Newcastle United, and they are united as one team with one goal – to win, but they are also a team of eleven individuals. The Godhead is one team of two Spiritualbeings who have plans to add to their number by calling sons and daughters/brothers and sisters, not close themselves off in isolation in a closed trinity. The number 3 is God’s number for finality and if anything comes in threes with God that’s it – fini – kaput – the end, nothing more, just like the three woes in Revelation. The thing is, there is nothing final in God’s plan for us His future family! Plus all of mankind, eventually, in the Kingdom of God!!

4) LordEternal or self-existent.

So there we have it, and if we were to ask the question is God one? we can reply and affirmative yes to that, for the expounded question should read as: IS THE GODHEAD UNITED AS ONE? that is, a Godhead of two individuals who have always self-existed, a God with God who later became The Father and The Son, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) and then a Godhead in heaven with Yashua Messiah at The Father’s right hand.

Here, alone, we have enough proof and evidence to disprove monotheism or the worship of one god. The Godhead has always been two who are unified or united or at one with themselves, with each other, or in oneness of mind, word and deed, that is, in complete and total agreement and totally likeminded – yet distinct Spiritual beings; this is the True nature of the Duality Godhead.

Hopefully, too, you will have noticed that the Holy Spirit is nowhere mentioned in Deuteronomy 6:4, nor in Mark 12:29 in the description of The Duality of the nature of the Godhead. Am I denying the existence of The Holy Spirit? no way, for The Holy Spirit is the Godhead’s living POWER, but not a personage of a mickey mouse Trinity. (See link No. 1 below)

Moreover, we now have a full understanding of Deuteronomy 6:4 of which Mark 12:29 is a direct copy. Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently quoted Old Testament Holy Scriptures (from The Septuagint) when preaching. So what is the point I am making here? The point I am making is this: Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12:29 are identical and yet they are taught differently, due to the change of language or misinterpretation of same, that is, from Hebrew into Greek.

If we copy out Mark 12:29 from the Greek you will see what I mean:

Mark 12:29 (Greek Transliteral) Answered the Jesus that before-most is (foremost) be hearing (be you hearing) Israel Master (Lord) the God of us Master (Lord) one is.

OK, if we concordance the word ‘God’ we will find a subtle change has taken place:

From Strong’s Concordance:

God – G2316 theos theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

Notice; a deity, not the deities. God in the Old Testament was Elohim – plural, not Eloha = not singular, but look at what has happened here. God has become a singular god – a deity, not the deities of The Elohim who are ‘at one’ or who are ‘unified as one’ and in ‘perfect likemindedness’ – two united beings thinking as one. And all this when The Greeks were polytheists = more than one god.

This deliberate language corruption is what causes all the trouble and confusion within the pages of the New Testament and deceives millions of people within mainstream Christianity. Look folks, the Godhead does not change, they have never changed and that is why THEY SAID in Genesis 1:26; “let us make man in OUR IMAGE and OUR LIKENESS; they were always the two beings of the Godhead. This, therefore, means that what was written in Deuteronomy 6:4 should have been copied exactly into Mark 12:29 with same OT meaning, for the Lord Himself uttered the very same words. This also means that because the word ‘God’ now has a different meaning, a singular meaning, not a unified plural meaning, a translator’s corruption has most definitely occurred. Well just fancy that!!??


Moving on, if we now take a look at a few Holy Scriptures that allude to their claim that ‘God is one’, we will then gain a better understanding of what the evil translators of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion have done to God’s Holy Word, and what better example than the following verses from Matthew’s Gospel, for there are corruptions galore in these two verses:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

And from the Greek Transliteral, and supported by The Concordant Literal Version:

Matthew 19:16 (Greek Transliteral) And be-perceiving (lo!) one toward-coming (coming to) to-Him (Him) said Teacher! Any (what) good I-shall-be-doing that I-should-be-having life eonian?

Matthew 19:6 (CLV) And lo! one coming to Him said, “Teacher, what good shall I be doing that I should be having life eonian?

OK, so what have we got going on here? Hmm, well, as we can see, this verse is revealing that Matthew 19:16-17 is not quite as good as we may have, at first, thought (like the pun?). The operative word here, of course, being ‘good’. Notice, the man in the Greek original does not call Yashua Messiah ‘Good Master’. The word ‘good’ has been thrown in gratuitously by the devious translators, but why? Well that’s easy to answer; in order to corrupt the whole passage and give it a different focus and a blasphemous, phony new emphasis. Not only that, but we have the assertion that The Father God is the ONLY ONE that is good, so there it is, the ugly perversion of Jewish monotheism slithering in like a snake by the back door, so to speak.

As it happens, this has always been a passage of Holy Scripture that I have never been comfortable with and, now, as I examine the original Greek rendering I fully understand why I have always felt uncomfortable with it. Notice the crucial element to this missing word ‘good’. If Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) is not the ‘Good Master’ and is only the Master or Teacher as in the original Greek, then by default it makes a mockery of what Yashua Messiah was supposed to have said to the man, that is, “Why callest thou me good?” For as we can see the man said no such thing, but what he did refer to was what one good thing must he do in order to have Eternal Life, so what’s going on?

Back to the Greek Transliteral for the answer:

Matthew 19:17 (Greek Transliteral) The yet He-said to-him any (why) me you-are-asking about (concerning) the good one [thing] is the good if yet you-are-willing into the life to-be-into-coming keep (keep-you) the directions (precepts) [Square brackets mine]

Straight away, it is crucial that we realise there is no reference to God in this verse at all especially the nonsense phrase: “there is none good but one”, and we now know, too, that the phrase: “Why callest thou me good?” is also bogus. What this means in Truth, is that there is not an inkling of any suggestion within this passage to suggest that God, in anyway, shape or form is here alluded to as one. Unless, of course, you have a demonic evil agenda and your desire is to classify Yashua Messiah as not being ‘good’ which, of course, is what the blasphemous KJV does – DELIBERATELY in my view.

First, though, lets finish analysing the Greek version of verse 17. The verse opens with the Lord answering the man’s question and notice, for the emphasis is purely on the subject of the man’s question and nothing else. What the Lord is asking him here is this: “Why are you asking me about this one good thing that you think you should be doing in order to enter Eternal Life, when you should know that the only good thing you can do is to keep (hold Spiritually dear) the commandments and love God?” OK, having cleared that up, let’s return to the blasphemous KJV and I will re-copy it here for your convenience:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Right, we know from the Greek rendering the man did not say ‘Good Master’, so this must mean that the Lord had no need to reply with that spurious man made question, and nor did He, for it is not there in the Greek. To confirm, if we check once more in the Greek version of verse 17 we also have the proof that the Lord did not ask the man that question: “Why callest thou me good?” So all this wickedness and deceit is added by the translators – WHY? Why, because through this verse in the KJV it is scandalously trying to tell us that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not see Himself as good and, in turn, by doing that making us think that He was not God. If He was not good, then how could He be God in the flesh?

Now this truly is an evil heresy we have unravelled here! It’s also constitutes a heresy with them trying to fool us into thinking that there is only one God. As stated, Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was God in the flesh, so how could He be anything but good? Obviously, the Lord cannot be anything but good, but to those in the blasphemous Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, they want us to think that only the Father God is good. What kind of diabolical evil is this? I’ll tell you, it’s Jerome’s and Erasmus’ diabolical evil and whoever else had their filthy Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translator’s mitts on God’s Holy Word when they wrote their King James Bible.

Furthermore, if you think Matthew’s account is a one off and Mark’s account says otherwise you would be wrong and I will keep this brief for I wish to move on to the next misunderstood verse:

Mark 10:17 (KJV) And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?

Again from the Greek Transliteral:

Mark 10:17 (Greek Transliteral) And of-out-going (of-going-out) of-Him into way (road) toward-running one and knee-falling (falling-on-his-knees) him inquired-of Him Teacher! good any (what) I-shall-be-doing that life eonian I-should-be-tenanting (I-should-be-enjoying-the-allotment-of).

Here again we can see that the translators have chosen to place the word ‘good’ before ‘Teacher’ or ‘Master’ instead of correctly attaching it to the subject at hand after the word ‘Master’, that is, what good thing should this man be doing in order to enter into Eternal Life? Notice, too, that the word ‘good’ only appears once so, by default, it must apply to the ‘thing’ and not to Yashua Messiah. Why is that I hear you say? It’s that, because in the Matthew account we learnt that the second ‘good’ was gratuitously thrown in by the translators.

In part two I will expose more translator corruptions.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Exposing the Trinity Lie!:

2. Do You Worship an Ogre god – Parts 1- 4:

3. Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?:

4. The Duality Godhead:

5. The Islamic-Vatican Connection by Prof. Walter Veith:

https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-islamic-vatican-connection-by-prof-walter-veith_gM5BHdgLIIc6zZr.html

Understanding YOUR Christian CALLING

Matthew 22:14 (KJV) For MANY Are CALLED, but FEW Are CHOSEN.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65-66 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From THAT many of His learners went back, and walked no more with Him.

1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the Lord called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

Jeremiah 1:5 (KJV) Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

John 4:23 (KJV) But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship The Father in Spirit and in Truth: for The Father seeketh such to worship him.

John 6:37 All that The Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

John 6:70 (KJV) Jesus answered them, Have not I CHOSEN you twelve, and one of you is a devil?

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not CHOSEN me, but I have CHOSEN you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of The Father in my name, He may give it you.

Above are the most important Holy Scriptures that deal with and explain the Christian calling, and if you are paying attention, you will notice that NONE of them mention the ‘acceptance’ of a ‘Jesus’ as your saviour – a blasphemous satanic idea conjured up by fake Christians of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with their fake Jesus.

Now this article has come about due to an argumentative so and so, on Youtube comments, who claimed that Yashua Messiah does the calling and choosing as well as the Father, and he cited John 6:70 as his reason for this belief. He argued that Judas was also called and chosen even though Yashua Messiah made it plain that Judas was a devil and a son of perdition. One wonders what’s going on in their addled brains.

However, was he correct in making these claims? and why is it that these lying creatures love to create contradictions. All this when Yashua Messiah also made it very plain, that NO MAN can come to Him unless The Father draws or, better, DRAGS them to Him? John 6:44 is the gold standard precedent for this whole Christian calling topic. Any other Scriptures that are subject related to it MUST be treated as complimentary Scriptures, not manipulated into contradictory Scriptures. A favourite pastime of these ignorant evil people.

OK, so what have we got? In John 6:44 we have The Father doing the calling and choosing, and then we get Yashua Messiah ‘choosing’ The Twelve Learners, including Judas. However, the last part of John 6:44 says this: “And I will raise him up at the last day.” So will Judas be raised up at the last day? Not a chance, so this ‘choosing’ of Yashua Messiah’s must be a different kind of choosing from The Father’s calling and choosing in John 6:44. And would you believe it, when we look at the Greek Manuscripts what do you think we will find? Answer: TWO WORDS with slightly different meanings.

For the word ‘chosen’ in Matthew 22:14 we get ‘eklektos’ (G1588) and for the word ‘chosen’ in John 6:70 we get ‘eklegomai’ (G1586) and here are Strong’s definitions:

Chosen – G1588 – ἐκλεκτός eklektós, ek-lek-tos’; from G1586; select; by implication, favorite:—chosen, elect.

Chosen – G1586 – κλέγομαι eklégomai, ek-leg’-om-ahee; middle voice from G1537 and G3004 (in its primary sense); to select:—make choice, choose (out), chosen.

You will notice that the second definition lacks the word ‘elect’, which means that we’re dealing with two kinds of choosing here. It also means that when Yashua Messiah ‘chose’ his Twelve Learners, the Father had already called them previously by visiting them through His Holy Spirit. How do we know this? Easy, just read these Holy Scriptures:

John 6:45 (KJV) It is written in The Prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of The Father, cometh unto me.

A slightly better rendering from The Concordant Literal Translation:

John 6:45 (CLV) It is written in The Prophets: And they shall all be taught of God. Everyone, then, who hears from The Father and is learning The Truth, is coming to Me.

Matthew 4:18-19 (MCV) And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishermen. 19 And He saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.

Matthew 8:21-23 (MCV) And another of His learners said unto Him, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father. 22 But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead. 23 And when He was entered into a ship, His learners followed Him.

Notice, first, in John 6:45 how The Father teaches us and makes us receptive to hearing The Truth, and so it would have been for the twelve learners before they even met Yashua Messiah.

Notice, second, how these young men followed without a word, without any objections and without a single question or protest or argument. It was an instantaneous “YES SIR!” even from the one who felt the need to bury his father first. They all dropped what they were doing and willingly followed Him.

Now if we refer back to John 6:44 we find that The Father’s call involves drawing (dragging) people to Yashua Messiah, which must mean that when The Father initially called Peter, Andrew and the others there must have been some resistance, perhaps even strong resistance, active and operational in their minds. Peter, especially, whom we know was wilfully strong minded, and yet when Yashua Messiah turns up at the lake side and says stop your fishing and come follow me, both brothers do so without a murmer – not a single word of objection. This tells us that it was not the first divine intervention in their lives. They must have had some communication from The Father prior to Yashua Messiah turning up. This means Yashua Messiah’s arrival at the lake side and His subsequent instruction for them to follow Him was a mere formality – inwardly they had been expecting Him.

Moreover, if we return to the subject of the two Greek words ‘eklektos’ and eklegomai’ we can now see why they are used, for they have two slightly different meanings. One is the overarching ‘chosen’ as in the calling and choosing of all the Elect, who will be raised up at the last day, and the other, a more personalised ‘choosing’ of the Twelve Learners (who had already been called by The Father) by Yashua Messiah, including one who was a devil. With regards to Judas we must take on board that he was never called and chosen, he received a calling only, by The Father, for he will not be raised up at the last day.

As a penultimate point I will draw your attention to John 15:16:

John 15:16 (MCV) Ye have not CHOSEN me, but I have CHOSEN you, and placed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of The Father in my name, He may give it you.

The word ‘chosen’ used here, is again, ‘eklegomai’ and not ‘eklektos’. This confirms what I have already said about these as being second personal callings from Yashua Messiah in addition to The Father’s earlier call. However, the crucial part to all of this is that NONE of the twelve ACCEPTED Yashua Messiah as their saviour – ALL were CALLED and CHOSEN with the exception of Judas who was called only.

Finally I will post some Holy Scriptures from Paul’s letters where he emphasises our being CHOSEN and our CALLING in numerous places:

Romans 9:11 (MCV) (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election (having been chosen) might stand, not of works, but of Him (The Father) that CALLETH;

1 Corinthians 1:26-28 (MCV) For ye see your CALLING, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are CALLED: 27 But God hath CHOSEN the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath CHOSEN the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God CHOSEN, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought (zero) things that are:

Ephesians 1:18 (MCV) The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of His CALLING, and what the riches of The Glory of His inheritance in the saints,

Ephesians 4:1 (MCV) I therefore, the captive of The Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the CALLING wherewith ye are CALLED,

Ephesians 4:4 (MCV) There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are CALLED in one hope of your CALLING;

2 Timothy 1:9 (MCV) Who hath saved us, AND CALLED US with an HOLY CALLING, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and Grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Part 5 – 1 Timothy 2

Introduction

In parts one through four on this subject (link below) I proved without a shadow of doubt that the writer of 1 Timothy 1 was a forger of the early to mid 2nd century AC and that Paul was definitely not the author of chapter one of said Epistle. How can you be so certain I hear you ask? Well, that’s very simple, for the language of 1 Timothy 1, and the words used, are those of a Hellenising religious philosopher, that is, a deceiver. In other words, he was a philosophising counterfeiter of the early Romish Babylonian Church; the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion as I call it, and certainly not Paul the first century Messenger (Apostle) of Yashua Messiah.

Moreover, as I begin unravelling 1 Timothy 2, I will reveal to you even more convincing proof that this author is a forger. In fact, 1 Timothy 2 is the humdinger chapter that cements my case and proves the Hellenising, philosophising, religious credentials and provenance of these Epistles.

However, having said all that, there are times when The Truth is written into these forgeries, for a religious deceiver will always hide his lies amongst The Truth. Hence the adage: “A lie is best hidden between two Truths.” Furthermore, are The Truths within these Epistles from Paul’s pen or the forger’s pen? Are they from scraps of genuine manuscripts and then embellished by the forger’s own additional writings? Answer: I have no idea, but rest assured, there are some Truths in these epistles, which cannot be denied.

So, pressing on:

1 Timothy 2:1 (KJV) I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, BE MADE FOR ALL MEN; (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 2:1 Notes – part 1 — “THAT, FIRST OF ALL, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, BE MADE FOR ALL MEN.” Oh really, is that so!? Now is this statement a genuine Christian statement from Paul’s hand or is it meaningless religious clap trap and an erroneous generalised unscriptural religious statement with no Holy Spiritual or Holy Scriptural provenance whatsoever?

Now notice first the Spiritual contrast from Paul’s hand here:

Romans 8:26 (KJV) Likewise The Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but The Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. (Emphasis mine)

Here Paul is stating that we don’t even know how to pray correctly, so the Holy Spirit prays for us!!!

And again:

1 Corinthians 14:15 (KJV) What is it then? I will pray with The Spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with The Spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.

Now is The Holy Spirit even mentioned in 1 Timothy 2:1? Not at all. Notice the emphasis: “THAT, FIRST OF ALL.” So this exhortation is prioritised above any others following it, never mind praising The Father God and giving Him thanks FIRST. So, basically, what he’s saying is put supplications, prayers and intercessions first, for ALL men, and then not even any thanks to God before or afterwards – as you do – NOT!!

1 Timothy 2:1 Notes – part 2 — Moreover, should we be making supplications, praying and making intercessions FOR ALL MEN at all, or is this nothing but a man made religious idea? By the term “ALL MEN” we must assume that this author is referring to all rebellious, lost and unsaved creatures, both mankind and hu-mans (non-mankind) alike. Even those that may have heard the Kingdom Gospel message and ‘rejected it’. Yet what did Yashua Messiah say about these types of people?

Luke 10:13-16 (KJV) Woe (a curse) unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works had been done in Tyre and Sidon, which have been done in you, they had a great while ago repented, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. 14 But it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the judgment, than for you. 15 And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted to heaven, shalt be thrust down to hell. 16 He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me. (Brackets mine)

Woe unto thee Chorazin, which means a “horrendous grief” or CURSE towards Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum!!!

OK, so let’s get this straight and ask ourselves another pertinent question: Are we, as Christians, supposed to make prayers and supplications and intercede for people generally that Yashua Messiah would otherwise curse for their wicked rebellious behaviour in rejecting the Gospel Message when presented, that’s if He were here today in the flesh? Keeping in mind that these people would despise Yashua Messiah and The Father by treating Their Message with contempt, just like those people of Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum did in the first century.

We could also put this another way and ask this question: Are the rebellious, lost and unsaved masses entitled to the mercy, forgiveness and blessings as bestowed upon those The Father has called to His Son Yashua Messiah and saved? NO!!

If we then follow up with our due diligence on this subject of prayer what do we find?

1 Corinthians 14:13-14 (KJV) Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret. 14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.

2 Corinthians 5:20 (KJV) Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ’s stead, be ye reconciled to God.

2 Corinthians 13:7 (KJV) Now I pray to God that ye do no evil; not that we should appear approved, but that ye should do that which is honest, though we be as reprobates.

Philippians 1:9 (KJV) And this I pray, that your love may abound yet more and more in knowledge and in all judgment;

Colossians 1:9 (KJV) For this cause we also, since the day we heard it, do not cease to pray for you, and to desire that ye might be filled with the knowledge of his will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding;

1 Thessalonians 5:17 (KJV) Pray without ceasing.

1 Thessalonians 5:23 (MCV) And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

1 Thessalonians 5:25 Brethren, pray for us.

2 Thessalonians 1:11 (KJV) Wherefore also we pray always for you, that our God would count you worthy of this calling, and fulfill all the good pleasure of His goodness, and the work of faith with power:

2 Thessalonians 3:1 (KJV) Finally, brethren, pray for us, that The Word of the Lord may have free course, and be glorified, even as it is with you:

Make sure you understand, for ALL these genuine Pauline exhortations for prayer are Holy Spiritually based prayers and are for the brethren ALONE, not for mankind in general!

So what is 1 Timothy 2:1 all about? Answer: satanic Hellenising religious blanket universal forgiveness for all unrepentant sinners or a universal pardon FOR ALL MEN as long as they join matey’s new money making religious cult now on offer, by this forger, on behalf of the Babylonian Romish Cult or, as I call it, The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and cough up. Oh and don’t forget the hail (Queen of Heaven) Mary’s. LOL.

OK, I’m being deliberately facetious and sarcastic here, but the principle remains, and this is what 1 Timothy 2:1 is promoting here – the Hellenised Romish Cult. It is also a foundational verse of these fake epistles, for it sets the tone for what follows and from Paul’s pen they most definitely did not come!!

However, having said all that, if there is someone you know and wish to pray for them, by all means pray, but always remembering that if The Father is not calling them, then they will remain unsaved in this age and the answer to your prayer will be postponed to a future age. The same applies if they are sick. He may or may not heal them.

1 Timothy 2:2 (KJV) For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. (Emphasis mine and I will deal with the heinous and ghastly religious word ‘godliness’ in detail next)

1 Timothy 2:2 Notes — “For kings, and for all that are in authority;” Yes especially for Kings or Queens as they are anointed by God and are answerable to God alone. However, those ‘in authority’ (politicians) are your enemies, so pray for them as you would for any enemy, but you shouldn’t vote for them, nor co-operate with them, nor forgive them. No repentance, no forgiveness:

Luke 17:3 (KJV) Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him. (Emphasis mine)

So when you pray for these satanic verminous people in authority, remember that they are your sworn enemies and pray as Yashua Messiah told you to pray here:

Matthew 5:44 (KJV) But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; (This verse requires an article all of its own – coming soon)

Furthermore, as for praying so that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life, by all means, but always bearing in mind that these criminals in authority are The Devil’s own and your friends they are definitely NOT, and will do their damnedest to make sure that you do not have a quiet and peaceable life!! So keep this permanently in mind and be on your guard! This quote puts it into perspective:

“Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you!”

— Pericles (430 B.C.)

1 Timothy 2:3 (KJV) For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 2:3 Notes — This verse is part Truth especially in relation to what I have said above about 1 Timothy 2:2 so it is therefore only partly good, but it does tell us that Yashua Messiah is God.

1 Timothy 2:4 (KJV) Who WILL have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of The Truth. (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 2:4 Notes — Now this verse is solid gold Truth, BUT WILL NOT HAPPEN IN THIS AGE! All men being saved will occur in the Second Resurrection when they will come to a knowledge of The Truth. And who is The Truth? Yashua Messiah is The Truth. (A new article on the Two Resurrections subject coming soon.)

1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV) For [there is] one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; (‘who was made man’ from The Geneva Bible notes)

1 Timothy 2:5 Notes — This verse is blasphemous satanic ‘God is one’ Monotheistic nonsense. From the Greek Transliteral:

1 Timothy 2:5 (Greek Transliteral) One for God, One and Mediator of-God and of mankind the man Anointed Jesus.

1) NOTICE: The remark “For there is one God” is total translator nonsense, for the words in italics [there is] are a translators addition, so what it should say is:

1 Timothy 2:5 (MCV) For one is God The Father, and one is mediator God between God and men, the man Christ Jesus who came in the flesh;

That is, ONE who is God The Father and ONE who is Mediator for man as God – letting us know that there are Two Gods = The Father and The Son. (See links below.)

2) To emphasise, I trust also that you will notice how this verse has been sneakily corrupted. Yashua Messiah is God and Mediator of God, not a lesser being between man and God. He is God as Mediator, Advocate, Consoler and Comforter. This contamination is very subtle along the lines of both Monotheist and a Trinity corruption where the KJV says ‘Spirit of truth’, when it is the ‘Spirit of THE Truth’ as written in the Greek Transliteral. (See link below)

1 Timothy 2:6 (KJV) Who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

1 Timothy 2:6 Notes — Here we have more Truth, as long as you understand that “testified in due time” is referring to the future resurrections and not this age. The testifying in this age is only for those CALLED and those CALLED and CHOSEN by The Father, not for the masses of lost and unsaved.

1 Timothy 2:7 (KJV) Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak The Truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.

1 Timothy 2:7 Notes — This verse is fairly sound but whether it is from Paul’s pen or the forger I cannot say. However, I have my suspicions. For my notes on this verse I will go straight to the Greek Transliteral and then raise the relevant points:

1 Timothy 2:7 (Greek Transliteral) Into which was-placed I proclaimer (declarer or herald) and commissioner (messenger) Truth I-am-saying in Anointed (Christ) not I-am-falsifying teacher of nations in belief (faith) and Truth.

OK, the first relevant point here is ridding this verse of the religious slogan words ‘ordained’ ‘gentiles’ and ‘verity’. Paul was placed as a proclaimer or, better, placed as a declarer or herald of the Good News Kingdom of God message by Yashua Messiah Himself = no religious ritualistic ‘ordaining’ nonsense ever took place.

Gentiles is a word that needs full examination, for it means someone who is not a Roman Citizen from the Latin word ‘gentilis’. This meaningless corrupting Latin word can be found in both Old and New Testaments so what is it doing there? Answer: causing satanic confusion.

Secondly, and a final word on this verse, is that it may be genuine, but was corrupted by the religious translators anyway with the use of the word ‘verity’ – a derivation of the Latin word ‘veritatem’ which means Truth.

Now here’s a thing. This totally religious Latin based word ‘verity’ can only be found twice in The Holy Scriptures. Once in the Old Testament and once in the New Testament, here in 1 Timothy 2:7, so my questions would therefore be: 1) WHY? and 2) Is this some kind of KJV translator religious tokenism going on here, as if to leave their Latin Romish religious trade mark in both Testaments in some sort of gratuitous way? Or is it just a symbolic way to make a satanic statement like a rubber stamping? Everywhere else the word Truth is used, so why use this vain unnecessary word at all unless it’s only promoting elitist meaningless religiosity? Here is the verse from the Old Testament:

Psalm 111:7 (KJV) The works of His hands are verity (truth) and judgment; all His commandments are sure. (Emphasis and brackets mine)

Here is 1 Timothy 2:7 as it should be written:

1 Timothy 2:7 (MCV) Whereunto I am ordained placed a preacher, and a apostle Messenger, (I speak The Truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the gentiles Nations in Faith and verity Truth.

Right, enough of that:

1 Timothy 2:8 (KJV) I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.

1 Timothy 2:8 Notes — Now this verse is total Babylonian Romish religious drivel and humbug. Paul would have prayed no such thing, for most men everywhere were lost and unsaved and WITHOUT Holy hands, so why would Paul utter such erroneous generalised blanket rubbish? Let’s be clear, only a creature of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion could come out with bunk like this. So this verse is from the forger 100%.

As for wrath, the Word of God says be angry but do not sin, and don’t let the sun go down on your wrath – so nothing about being without wrath. Oh and how can you not be angry about this satanic evil world today, EVERYDAY!!?? Think on this very pertinent point!

Oh and finally, don’t you doubt his Babylonian Romish Cult or YOU will excommunicated forthwith!

1 Timothy 2:9-12 (KJV) In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; 10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. 11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. 12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 2:9-12 Notes — Whether this was from the hand of Paul or not I have no idea, but I have no issues with any of it apart from the use of the word ‘shamefacedness’ which can mean ‘shame’ and is therefore a blasphemy, if that’s the meaning the translators were implying. TAKE NOTE!: No son or daughter of God should feel any shame about ANYTHING now that they are forgiven ALL their sins, if Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit.

Furthermore, this word ‘shamefacedness’ can also mean ‘bashfulness’ which would be fine, especially as we look at the brazenness of the drunken tarts and froward hussies that parade themselves around the streets today semi-naked with no shame at all.

To compound this, today, we have vile Cultural Jew Marxist dyke (lesbian) feminists and filthy dyke politicians (amazons) strutting around with their bows and arrows and who now rule over us.

I will therefore quote Isaiah as a severe warning because it has all happened before, re our ancestors, in the Northern Kingdom of Ancient Israel before they were carried off in captivity by the Assyrians (forefathers of The Germans):

Isaiah 3:12 (KJV) As for my people, children are their oppressors, AND WOMEN RULE OVER THEM. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

This is what happens when we move away from the sound advice given here in 1 Timothy 2:9-12 whether it be from Paul’s hand or not.

Right, those brackets: “(which becometh women professing godliness).” What’s wrong with them I hear you ask? EVERYTHING is the answer to that question, but in what way? I also hear you ask. Quite simply, it’s all wrapped up in ONE WORD and that word is ‘godliness’ which is a satanic religious deception, for it means ‘piety’ and ‘piety’ is wholly a meaningless, empty, religious word:

From Strong’s Concordance:

Godliness – G2317 – θεοσέβεια – theosebeia – theh-os-eb’-i-ah – From G2318; devoutness, that is, piety: – godliness.

Now this non-word ‘godliness’ (notice how it’s spelt with a small ‘g’ and not a capital ‘G’) can only be found in the questionable books of the New Testament, namely, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus and 2 Peter which tells us three very important things:

1) It is a word NEVER used by Yashua Messiah in the Four Gospels.

2) It is not a word used by Paul or Peter in their genuine writings and…

3) ALL these books were most likely penned by the same Hellenising religious forger or by Hellenisers with same satanic religious mindset as the forger and Christians they certainly were NOT!

Moreover, let’s be clear, ‘piousness’ or ‘godliness’ is a religious state of being, a phony state of being, not a Christian state of being and it’s not a born of God (born again) state of being. For example, ‘piousness’ is not being ‘Holy’ for ‘Holy’ means to be ‘set apart’ by God or to be called out by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah and be made Holy by the indwelling of His HOLY Spirit. ‘Piousness’ or ‘godliness’ is none of this – it’s a fraud, it’s a fake religious counterfeit state of being, practised by the evil creatures of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, especially in the Babylonian Romish Cult and by its slapper daughter offspring Protestant Anglicanism = AngliCAINism.

Pious – Religious definitions from Dictionary.com:

1) Having or showing a dutiful spirit of reverence for God or an earnest wish to fulfill religious obligations.

2) Characterized by a hypocritical concern with virtue or religious devotion; sanctimonious.

3) Practiced or used in the name of real or pretended religious motives, or for some ostensibly good object; falsely earnest or sincere: a pious deception.

In the above secular definitions we can see how being ‘pious’ has many more negative meanings than positive, and even the ‘positive’ are still within the framework of RELIGION, and that’s because ‘pious’ and ‘piety’ as with ‘godliness’ are wholly religious, fake Christian, words and nothing to do with Christianity or following Yashua Messiah at all. A fake Jesus, yes, but not Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ). Notice, in point one of these definitions: ‘the dutiful spirit of reverence for god’ will be referring to the god of this world, Satan the Devil for he is the god of all RELIGION.

OK the final verses of 1 Timothy 2:

1 Timothy 2:13-15 (KJV) For Adam was first formed, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. 15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

Here, dear reader, is a little test for you. Can YOU see the religious humbug and outright lies in the satanic words of this verse? I do hope so, but if not, no matter, for we all have to learn and I recommend that you pray to The Father and ask Him to give you the Spiritual gift of discernment.

Lie No 1) And Adam was not deceived.

Lie No 2) Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing.

So did Eve beguile and deceive Adam or not? Who was responsible for whom in The Garden? Upon whose desk did the buck stop? Is not the Man the head of the wife? Once we know what the original sin REALLY WAS (see link below) then EVERYTHING else falls into place, and this verse just reads like Babylonian Romish Cult religious hogwash and humbug.

So here’s a question: When was a woman ever saved through child bearing? Answer on the back of a postage stamp, thank you.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

Unravelling The Pastoral Epistles – Parts 1 – 4

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-pastoral-epistles-parts-1-2/

The Duality Godhead:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

Exposing The Trinity Lie:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

 

Did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) Say: I AM NOT GOOD and I AM NOT GOD?

The short, but very substantial, story of the Wealthy Young Ruler.

Now this subject is yet another of those ‘pain in the neck’ subjects that blaspheming Judaisers and satanic gnat strainers, alike, try to spiritually garrote me with, but, I hasten to add, they always fail. So let’s copy and paste here the Holy Scriptures that they then pollute with their perverted reasoning and satanic Judaising nonsense:

Matthew 19:16-17 (KJV) And, behold, one came and said unto Him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life? 17 And He said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Mark 10:17-18 (KJV) And when He was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to Him, and asked Him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit Eternal Life? 18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

Luke 18:18-19 (KJV) And a certain ruler asked Him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit Eternal Life? 19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.

Now the first issue that these mongrel dogs will attempt to make mileage out of is the monotheism BS value that they think these verses possess. They think these verses PROVE that God is ONE and that Yashua Messiah was clearly stating that He was was not God, but is this TRUE? NO a thousand times NO!!! But hang on Yashua Messiah said: “none is good, save one, that is, God.” So how do you get around that, I hear you say? Quite easily is the answer to that and it all depends upon your understanding of the word ‘GOD’ in the New Testament.

However, in order to understand the word ‘God’ in the New Testament we have to understand the word ‘God’ in the Old Testament FIRST, for the Godhead never changes. We also have the issue of the Greek language of the New Testament, for it is too vague in its description of God, unlike the Hebrew definition of the Old Testament. Therefore from Strong’s Concordance we get this:

God – H430
אלהים – elohym – el-o-heemPlural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God[head]; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty. (Square brackets mine)

god – H433
אלהּ אלוהּ
‘ĕlôahh ‘ĕlôahh – el-o’-ah, el-o’-ah (The second form is rare); probably prolonged (emphatically) from H410; a deity or the deity: – god. See H430.

This ‘eloah’ singular deity would be used when describing Satan, who is the only solitary god (‘eloah’) of this world.

So from this proof we now know for sure that the Godhead is two distinct Spiritual beings, not one, other than their being number one with none above.

Moreover, if we now move onto The New Testament we have a Greek word being used for the word ‘God’ and not a Hebrew word. However, does that mean the nature of the Godhead changes? Do they become a different Godhead just because a new word is in use? No way, so what gives? The word ‘theos’ is what gives instead of ‘eloheem’ or ‘elohim’ but the plural nature of the Godhead remains the same. From Strong’s Concordance once more:

God – G2316
θεός – theos – theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].

In ancient Greece there were only ‘gods’ ‘plural’ because the Greeks were polytheists and worshipped many gods, not two alone. However, there was no need for a singular Greek word for a god because there was no singular god in polytheistic Greek worship. This means the Greek word ‘theos’ did the job just fine when describing the true Duality Godhead = more than one!!

Matthew 1:23 (KJV) Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. (Emphasis mine)

OK, so here we can plainly see that Yashua Messiah is described as being: “God with us”, that is, in the flesh so, in turn, the Old Testament plural Duality Godhead ‘Elohim’ is also still with us with The Father in heaven and The Son on earth in the flesh and, therefore, still Two God’s.

So this brings us to our little conundrum of: “there is none good but one, that is, God:”

Now what was Yashua Messiah actually saying here? For we know for sure that He wasn’t saying God is one; He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t God and He certainly wasn’t saying He wasn’t good either, even though most will mistakenly think He was saying that. So what was He really saying? Well, first of all, He was telling us plainly, and those there present, that He was God in the flesh as part of the Godhead, but without them realising it. This is due to The Truth that the Godhead is a Duality Godhead and always was a Duality Godhead with Him now standing there amongst them as God, so how could He say that He was not good or tell His questioner not to call Him good? What was Yashua Messiah doing by saying that?

The answer to that my friends is very simple. This unsaved and lost wealthy young ruler was trying to win favour with Yashua Messiah by calling Him good. This was plain and simple flattery which got him nowhere with Yashua Messiah who quickly rebuked him with the question: Why callest thou me good? This was nothing to do with Yashua Messiah not being good. Of course He was good, He was God in the flesh so He had to be good – He could be nothing else.

However, just for the benefit of the wealthy young ruler He adds these two riders: “There is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.”

Now, as already shown, Yashua Messiah was God in the flesh so was stating clearly that He was good, but without anyone there realising it and yet at the same time giving Glory to His Father in heaven as being good as the other half of the Godhead.

With the second rider we have Yashua Messiah saying: “But if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP The Commandments.” In J B Phillips’ translation he has it better: “But if you WANT TO enter into [that] Life you must KEEP The Commandments.”

So first things first. Yashua Messiah is saying: “If you WANT TO enter into Life? So does this wealthy young ruler want to or not? Furthermore, where is The Law in this arrangement? It’s nowhere in it at all, so clearly Yashua Messiah is teaching the wealthy young ruler that this is about a FREE CONSCIOUS DECISION on his part and not a commandment issue = no Law. Second, we have this word ‘KEEP’ which everyone, and his dog, mistakenly thinks means OBEY when it mean what it says, that is, to keep – to protect – to hold onto as precious – internalised and have them written on our hearts so NOTHING to do with obedience at all. (Please see my article “When Did The Biblical Word KEEP Become OBEY?” – Link below.)

This is what Yashua Messiah was REALLY saying to the wealthy young man that came forward gushing and fawning all over Yashua Messiah in his initial, over the top, flattering enthusiasm.

Now don’t get me wrong on this, for later on I believe that this young man WAS saved. How do I know this? Easy, because Yashua Messiah loved him, so that means He knew the young man’s heart deep down and knew he was sincere. He also knew The Father was calling him, and KNEW that eventually he would repent and love his neighbour by giving up his wealth and then FOLLOWING Yashua Messiah. The same, in a different way, applied to Nicodemus but I won’t go into that subject now.

Furthermore we then have the issue of the wealthy young ruler’s question: “What good thing shall I DO, that I may have Eternal Life?” OK, I have made my point quite obvious here by emphasising the words ‘I DO’. Moreover, so what could this young man DO in order to inherit Eternal Life? NOTHING! absolutely nothing is the answer to that question. How do we know that? Quite simply because he was asking the question within the backdrop of the Ten Commandments of which he boasted in being a fautless observer. This means he was asking Yashua Messiah what other Commandment he should be observing or doing that he may have missed. His mission in questioning Yashua Messiah was solely Law based and understandably so because The Law was still in force at that time, even for the faithful.

However, The Lord then stuns him with His reply which immediately introduces the SPIRITUAL DIMENSION or SPIRITUAL THRUST of The Commandments = LOVE!! Not the feeble letter of The Law of The Commandments = legalistic Pharisaism and its close companion hypocrisy.

So the wealthy young ruler is challenged with Yashua Messiah’s charge to go sell all his possessions and give the proceeds to those in need and THEN to follow Him. Now mark this point and mark it well for the gifting of his wealth will not save him, but the act of gifting his wealth will prove that he is being called by The Father to Yashua Messiah and also prove that he is saved. Salvation is ALWAYS an undeserved free gift and our good works will follow as a result or as evidence that we are saved, not because we are trying to be saved or trying to earn our salvation.

Finally,Yashua Messiah in saying these tough things to the wealthy young ruler was in turn challenging his commitment to Him. Was he prepared to give up his Law/Commandment based life and comfortable wealthy lifestyle and put his sole trust and faith in Him? These are the points and questions that Yashua Messiah was getting across to the wealthy young ruler.

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/when-did-the-biblical-word-keep-become-obey/

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Parts 1 & 2

Prologue

For those of you not familiar with my work for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) please allow me to explain that this series of articles is not for the faint hearted or for those new to my work. This topic is heavy going and could easily be described as a deep end subject, especially if you are a King James Bible (KJV) idolator, that is, you worship the KJV as being inerrant (100% true) – unfortunately a fallacy for the Spiritually blind.

If you are a newbie or a beginner in The Faith I would certainly recommend that you read a few of my other articles, first, in order to give yourself a foundation in The Truth, before attempting this series which, even I, after 35+ years of study, am finding very challenging and in need of much Holy Spiritual guidance in order to put them together.

I do not enjoy being critical of the KJV as I still believe it to be the best English translation of The Holy Scriptures, however when error is discovered in its pages we cannot close our eyes or, more importantly, our hearts and minds, and begin a life of living in denial of The Truth. These issues have to faced head on and confronted and then dealt with. The same applies to fear. Fear has to be confronted, challenged and overcome. Start running from fear and you will never stop running – the coward dies a 1,001 deaths!

Please note, this series is a first attempt at this huge subject and will be ammended and edited as I discover more Truth and expose more errors to add to its pages, but suffice it to say there is most definitely a case for questioning the authenticity of these three Epistles.

Having said that I do not believe that The Pastoral Epistles should be expunged from the The Holy Scriptures, because there is some Truth in them but at the same time those verses of Truth are surrounded by many errors – the errors of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Introduction

The Pastoral Epistles is a name that has been conjured up by someone, or some people, for three of Paul’s letters in the New Testament: 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus. Unofficially included in this grouping is 2 Peter which, allegedly, is also of spurious origin and that is the issue with all four of these books of the New Testament – their questionable authorship.

So where does this title come from, would be my first question regarding this tetchy subject? All the historical information I can find points to the commencement of the 19th century when Bible scholars began to question their authenticity, but I have no idea who originally coined the term. Perhaps someone could shed some Light on it.

From The Bible Hub: “History of the Christian Church, Volume I, Philip Schaff ”

“The three Pastoral Epistles, two to Timothy and one to Titus, form a group by themselves, and represent the last stage of the apostle’s life and labors, with his parting counsels to his beloved disciples and fellow-workers. They show us the transition of the apostolic church from primitive simplicity to a more definite system of doctrine and form of government. This is just what we might expect from the probable time of their composition after the first Roman captivity of Paul, and before the composition of the Apocalypse.”

Philip Schaff was a Calvinist preacher from that 19th century period and we can immediately see that he was of that snobbish, elitist, self-righteous, religious mind set when he condescendingly refered to the first century Congregations of God as having a primitive simplicity. Now pay attention dear people for this arrogant puffed up spirit and attitude is crucial in understanding the same spirit that pervades throughout the Pastoral Epistles. And now for a Holy Scripture that proves my point:

2 Corinthians 11:3 (KJV) But I fear, lest by any means, as The Serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. (Emphasis mine)

Here we can plainly see that Mr Schaff, the Calvinist, had allowed his mind (via Satan’s subtilty) to be corrupted and displayed by his vain disparaging opinion of the first century Congregations of God by calling them primitively simple. Rather him than me when he stands before Yashua Messiah in the first resurrection.

Furthermore, he compounds his vanity by stating, and I quote: “to a more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” So this ignorant man thought, just like the author of the Pastoral Epistles, that the first century church and its TRUE SIMPLE BELIEFS in Yashua Messiah and its simple egalitarian non-structure could be improved upon. Delusional vanity or what!?

As a final point I will raise the issue of the artificial religious construct known as the ‘Apostolic Church’. This term, like so many others created by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, cannot be found in the Holy Scriptures, nor can the word ‘apostolic’, now there’s a surprise. So here’s a question: Did Yashua Messiah come to this earth in order to plant HIS CHURCH – The Church of God or hand it over to His messengers, pompously called apostles, from the Greek word ‘apostolos’, by the religious translators of the KJV, and rename it the Church of The Apostles? For I tell you straight folks, that is exactly what the term ‘Apostolic Church’ means and The Church of God it is not.

Are you beginning to see The Light dear readers? because I have not even started analysing 1 Timothy 1:1 yet and already one of those who would try and support these Epistles as genuine has already been unceremoniously found out!

OK, the problems that are the so-called Pastoral Epistles. As already stated, the Pastoral Epistles constitute 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus. Although not included, 2 Peter also falls into the same questionable category re being authentic Holy Scripture and, not as claimed, as being written by the named authors.

Now with regard to the two books of Timothy and the book of Titus, are they the genuine writings of Paul or of a forger of a later date, as some Bible Scholars confidently declare? Taking that question further, if they are the writings of a forger and, I might add to some degree, a plagiariser, can we even challenge their right to be a part of what they call the Biblical Canon or even the inspired Word of God?

Let’s face it, the Biblical Canon was put together by religious people, with an evil Romish agenda, who would be very happy with the Pastoral Epistles and their content, hence the reasons for their inclusion in that Canon, and their defence of them today as being the authentic writings of Paul.

We need to get this Truth firmly fixed in our minds that the satanic religious spirit that pervaded the second, third and fourth centuries with its Hellenising philosophers still pervades today in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion of the 21st century – NOTHING has changed.

Paul, too, gave us this timeless warning:

Colossians 2:8 (KJV) BEWARE! lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, AND NOT AFTER CHRIST. (Emphasis mine)

Again, let’s be clear, for the aim of second, third and fourth century Hellenising philosophers was ALWAYS the usurping and supplanting of the True Church – the Church of God and putting in its place: “a more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” to quote our ‘friend’ Mr Schaff.

This is the more definite system of the Nicolaitans as mentioned by Yashua Messiah in Revelation TWICE!

Revelation 2:6 (KJV) But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.

Revelation 2:15 (KJV) So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. (All emphasis mine)

Notice that these evil people of the Hellenistic NICOLAITAN persuation had deeds and a DOCTRINE. Now what could those deeds and doctrine have been? The very same deeds and doctrine that Mr Schaff was rambling on about – things allegedly ‘superior’ to the primitive simplicity of the first century egalitarian Congregations of God.

Nico = To rule; Laitan = The laity; = To rule over the laity; = Something that Yashua Messiah HATES!! = “A more definite system of doctrine and form of government.” = the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion in ALL its guises with its Popes, Archbishops, Cardinals, Bishops, Ministers, Vicars, and satanic Priests called ‘Fathers’ etc. etc.. Non-egalitarian pecking orders with men lording it over other men who are their equals in God’s sight and with no God given authority whatsoever.

Fortunately, and as an aside, by the year 35 AD the Church of God had been planted in Britain and was not contaminated by the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion until the arrivals of the Papist devils Augustine (not Augustine of Hippo) and Patrick the slave trader in circa 597 AD.

I think that will do for part one, part two coming up shortly.

Unravelling The So-Called Pastoral Epistles – Part 2

Plagiarising

Without further ado I will get straight in with more opinions from the ‘experts’ and as one commentator (Leighton Pullan) from The Bible Hub put it:

“Their genuineness is more frequently denied than that of any other of St. Paul’s Epistles, and this attack upon their genuineness has been mostly based upon the character of their teaching about the office-bearers of the Church. Attempts have sometimes been made to separate some fragments supposed to be genuine from the remaining portions. All such attempts have failed. These Epistles must either be rejected entirely or accepted entirely. Otherwise we become involved in a hopeless tangle of conjectures.”

Having quoted this opinion, which I agree with in part, the major question for me here is this: Are these Epistles an intregral part of the early beginnings of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (primarily Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy) through a Hellenising philosopher(s) author making out that he was Paul, or not? If I can prove that there is much Hellenising philosophy and/or meaningless BS in terms of early religious jargon terms and expressions (allegedly a more definite system of doctrine) then the case for them being forgeries is a done deal, and, as he correctly put it: “These Epistles must either be rejected entirely or accepted entirely.”

However, I will add one caveat to that regarding his comment: “to separate some fragments supposed to be genuine from the remaining portions.” The point he has obviously missed is this: If someone sets out to deceive by making out they are someone else then they MUST at times use thoughts, ideas and material that will attempt to make them look like the man they are trying to impersonate. This will then mean that they are playing the old half-truth telling trick. We need to realise that without some Truth in the narrative the scam will easily be rumbled. This game is not new and it’s played some of the time in the mainstream fake news media today and even more so in the internet alternative media.

So let’s analyse Mr Pullan’s comment a little further: “Their genuineness is more frequently denied than that of any other of St. Paul’s Epistles.” Now why would that be I wonder? Has he really done his homework in an open minded unbiased way to find out what the reasoning is behind this frequency of denial? I would suggest that he has not. I would also suggest that he, like Philip Schaff, is already convinced of their alleged authenticity and sets about defending his flawed position.

He then states: “this attack upon their genuineness has been mostly based upon the character of their teaching about the office-bearers of the Church.” Question: When did Yashua Messiah, or Paul for that matter, declare the need for ‘office bearers’? When did the need for corporate officials or officialdom become necessary in God’s egalitarian Church? Certainly not in the first century church that’s for sure, so when did these satanic ideas creep in? Answer: As soon as, if not before, the Messengers (apostles) had died. The second century AD was the time when most of these blasphemers crawled out of the woodwork and asserted themselves as leaders and mouth pieces of this planned philosophised, Hellenised counterfeit church.

Here is a list of the counterfeiting scoundrels involved in founding the Hellenised Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, from the “Catholic Fidelity” web page:

Clement I, 4th Bishop of Rome, circa end of the first century. This is not the Clement of Paul’s time.

Ignatius of Antioch, died 110 AD

Polycarp of Symrna, places and dates 65 – 140 AD Allegedley a stalwart of the early Congregations of God.

Unknown Author of The Didache (The Teaching), Syria dates 70 – 110 AD. Author of what teaching?

Barnabus, circa 130 AD, so could not be the first century Barnabus as claimed on this site.

Papias of Hierapolis, Phyrgia circa 130 AD

Justin Martyr, circa 100-165 AD, philosopher and theologian.

Irenaeus, circa 140 – 202 AD

Clement of Alexandria, place and dates, Athens circa 150? – 215? AD

Tertullian, convert to the Christian Religion circa 190 – 195 AD. Sorcerer and conjurer of the pagan heathen Trinity doctrine circa 200 AD.

Origen, Alexandria circa 185? – 254? AD

If necessary I will provide more details of what these villains got up to, but as this series of articles is not specifically about the devious shennanigans of the so-called ‘Church Fathers’ (I cover the subject elsewhere on my blog) I will leave it there.

And now a quote from the “Early Christian Writings” web page.

“Vocabulary. While statistics are not always as meaningful as they may seem, of 848 words (excluding proper names) found in the Pastorals, 306 are not in the remainder of the Pauline corpus, even including the deutero-Pauline 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, and Ephesians. Of these 306 words, 175 do not occur elsewhere in the New Testament, while 211 are part of the general vocabulary of Christian writers of the second century. Indeed, the vocabulary of the Pastorals is closer to that of popular Hellenistic philosophy than it is to the vocabulary of Paul or the deutero-Pauline letters. Furthermore, the Pastorals use Pauline words in a non-Pauline sense: dikaios in Paul means “righteous” and here means “upright”; pistis, “faith,” has become “the body of Christian faith”; and so on.”

As this series progresses I will reveal several of these crucial words that prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that these three Epistles are not from the hand of Paul and are most definitely from the hand of a Hellenising philosopher of the 2nd century and a founder of the satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Right, let’s make a start with the first verses of 1 Timothy 1:

1 Timothy 1:1-2 (KJV) Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope; 2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.

1 Timothy 1:1-2 notes — This introduction is plagiarised from Paul’s earlier genuine Epistles, but with the addition of a greeting to Timothy which Paul probably did write, but the real Epistle was either lost or destroyed. We have to assume this because Timothy was a learner of Paul’s and we can be fairly sure Paul did write to him but not the nonsense that follows in verse 4 onwards:

1 Timothy 1:3 (KJV) As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine.

1 Timothy 1:3 notes — Instructions from Paul to Timothy which again are probably a genuine part of the original Epistle with instructions to remain in Ephesus, now lost or destroyed. However, I say, now lost or destroyed, because the Epistle now changes from the plagiarising part of the first half to counterfeiting in the second half of this verse. How do I know this? Answer: through the use of one suspicious word – ‘charge’ and one suspicious term – ‘no other doctrine’ combined with what then follows in verse 4.

Now the word ‘doctrine’ is one of those crucial words that I made reference to earlier. This is due to the fact that three Greek words are are involved here and this Greek word in 1 Tim 1:3 is partly the odd one out, being: ‘heterodidaskaleō’. The other two words are these: ‘didachē’ (Strong’s G1322) and ‘didaskalia’ (Strong’s G1319)

Moreover, here is where it gets very interesting. The word ‘didachē‘ (instruction) cannot be found anywhere in 1 & 2 Timothy or Titus and yet it is found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Romans and 1 Corinthians. In contrast all that can be found in 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus is the word ‘didaskalia’ (instruction – teaching) – if we then take the word ‘heterodidaskaleō’ we can see that it comes from ‘didaskalia’ and not ‘didachē’. So what!! I here you exclaim. Ah but there is much more to this than meets the eye as explained here:

From: “Is Doctrine a Dirty Word?” by Peter Ditzel

“”Doctrine/doctrines” appears fifty times in the King James Version New Testament. With the exception of one place (Hebrews 6:1 where it is translated from logos), it comes from either of two Greek words, didache and didaskalia. Didaskalia is derived from didaskalos, which means “teacher.” Didache comes from the verb didasko, “to teach.” Thus, strictly, didaskalia refers to the teaching of a teacher.”

So here we have that crucial difference explained and why ‘didache’ (Strong’s G1322) applies to Yashua Messiah’s and Paul’s instruction and ‘didaskalia’ (Strong’s G1319) applies to the teaching of a teacher, which leads us to the knock on question – WHICH TEACHER and WHAT TEACHING!!?? Answer: the teaching of Hellenising philosophers and religious counterfeiters.

If we now move straight on into verse 4 we can see how it is a continuation of the second part of verse 3 and notice, too, that from here on in (verse 4) we now enter a part fictional, part truthful, made up and fabricated la la land narrative with religious writings by an unknown early Hellenising religious author, most likely circa 150 AD, and long after Paul’s death. He, or they, would have been one of the alleged ‘Church Fathers’ of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, which was always a counterfeit and not officially organised until the Council of Nicea in 325 AD. However, in the meantime this satanic edifice had been nearly 300 years in the making, commencing with the Canaanite Jew Philo in Alexandria (philosophy) in the first century along with Simon Magus the sorcerer in Rome – the lover of filthy lucre. All these elements came together in Nicea in 325 AD under Constantine.

Second half of 1 Timothy 1:3 and 1 Timothy 1:4 (KJV) That thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine. 4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. (Emphasis mine)

1 Timothy 1:4 Notes part 1 — “Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies.”

What are these ‘fables’ that this Hellenising author could be refering to? More on this later.

Furthermore, if there was to be no heeding of genealogies and the study of same, then what are Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 if they are not genealogies? In turn, why would Yashua Messiah object to his brothers and sisters in the faith studying up their own Israelite genealogies? And who determines what genealogies come under the umbrella of “endless genealogies”? And who would be opposed to such genealogies and for what reason? Would Paul? Who was proud of his Benjaminite tribal origins:

Romans 11:1 (KJV) I say then, Hath God cast away His people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

Philippians 3:5 (KJV) Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee.

Please note Paul was not a Jew.

Moreover, what information do genealogies provide us with? Why, the origins of different peoples as listed in the Old Testament and who hates the Old Testament? Why Rome hates the Old Testament and so do the Canaanite Jews with their Babylonian Talmud, the mainstay of their satanic Judaic religion.

So what does the first part of 1 Tim 1:4 constitute? It was an early Hellenising Romish dictat to dissuade people from researching True Israelite history and the identity of the True intended recipients of the Gospel message as instructed by Yashua Messiah Himself:

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

He also gave the twelve disciples explicit intructions:

Matthew 10:5-6 (KJV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

1 Timothy 1:4 notes part 2 — “Which minister questions.” Yet more of the tyranny of Catholicism revealed re unquestioning obedience – no Bereans or questioning allowed in this church, just blind faith and obedience.

1 Timothy 1:4 notes part 3 — Edifying – Strong’s 3622 – Administration. Everywhere else (7 times) the word ‘edifying’ – means “building up” see Strong’s 3619.

This word ‘edifying’ from the Greek MSS ‘oikonomia’ which means ‘administration’ is telling us quite plainly what this Hellenising philosopher writer has in mind, that is, only one thing – a church corporation – a money making church corporation and not the Spiritual Congregation of God that needed REAL edifying, that is, building up and/or encouraging and supporting.

Please note – Part 3 and all follow on articles in this series will be posted at this link below:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/unravelling-the-pastoral-epistles-parts-1-2/

What is a HERESY? What Are HERESIES and Are YOU a HERETIC?

First of all we’ll get some insight from Adam Clarke’s Commentary on this word ‘heresy’:

The high priest – and – the sect of the Sadducees – Αἱρεσις των Σαδδουκαιων, The heresy of the Sadducees. In this place, (Acts 5:17) as well as in several others, the word αἱρεσις, heresy, has no evil meaning in itself; it is a word of distinction, and may receive either a good or bad colouring from the persons or opinions designated by it. It signifies a sect or party, whether good or bad, distinguished from any other sect.”

So in and of itself the word ‘heresy’ is benign, however, if you are a True Christian, or even a member of a counterfeit Protestant denomination (demon-ination), or not even a Christian at all, and with no interest in Christianity, have you ever wondered about these three words and what they mean? for they get banded about by the secular and religious alike, and with great regularity, especially by those of the satanic and judgemental Roman Catholic Cult, which is a major part of the equally satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. (See link No.s 1 and 2 below) Let’s face it, as soon as you decide not to go with the flow, you’re quickly branded a HERETIC!!

Moreover, when you hear these words levelled at someone, do they resonate a positive vibe within you, or a negative vibe? For me, they have always resonated a negative vibe, because they have always sounded accusatory and judgemental. Furthermore, historically, it usually meant the unfortunate people being judged and accused by The Roman Cult of ‘heresy’ were often brutally tortured, in order to extract their ‘confessions’. Shortly thereafter they would be burned at the stake for their alleged ‘heresies’ (usually based upon trumped up perjurious charges) and in true Roman Catholic loving ‘Christian’ style, of course. Nothing like spreading the Good News Gospel of The Kingdom eh? Furthermore, just to compound their evil wickedness, they, in their gross arrogance and self-righteousness, would be self-convinced that they were doing The Lord’s work – such was their delusional vain satanic thinking, and it still persists to this day as demonstrated here:

This is a social media comment addressed to me recently by an illegitimate who calls himself Pantocrator’:

“‘Thetruthnotdoctrine’ is a heretic. The fool’s Internet alius is paradoxical: how can one communicate the truth without doctrine? Let all Christians on this forum beware of his poisonous doctrines – let him be anathema.”

For those interested to know what a ‘Pantocrator’ is, here’s a little from Wikipedia:

In Christian Iconography, Christ Pantocrator – Greek: Χριστὸς Παντοκράτωρ – is a specific depiction of Christ (an idolatrous image). Pantocrator or Pantokrator, usually translated as “Almighty” or “all-powerful”, is derived from one of many names of God in Judaism.

The Pantokrator, largely an Eastern Orthodox or Eastern Catholic theological conception, is less common under that name in Western Roman Catholicism and largely unknown to most Protestants. In the West the equivalent image in art is known (more Idolatry) as Christ in Majesty, which developed a rather different iconography. Christ Pantocrator has come to suggest Christ as a mild but stern, all-powerful judge of humanity.” (Brackets mine).

So here we have graphically displayed for us, an idolatrous dissolute reprobate – an apostate – a worshipper of graven icons, images and idols, that is, a vile creature of religion, calling me a heretic, and for me to be declared anathema!! I can hear his weeping, wailing and the gnashing of his teeth in The Resurrection from here LOL.

I have digressed slightly, so back to the thread:

Now, don’t get me wrong, for as we can see from the above, there are some people that deserve to be labelled a heretic’, that’s if we take the Roman Catholic meaning of the word. However, the word ‘heretic’ doesn’t exist in The Holy Scriptures, now there’s a surprise! But what do exist are the words ‘Heresy’ and ‘Heresies’, ‘Heresy’ is used only once, and ‘Heresies’ three times, so they are REALLY IMPORTANT BIBLICAL WORDS! Much mocking sarcasm from the author with much laughter. Not only that, but are they a correct translation?

So let’s get Strong’s input on these two words and afterwards I will post all four Holy Scriptures so that we can get a contextual understanding:

G139 – Heresy αἵρεσις haíresis, hah’-ee-res-is; – from G138; properly, a choice, that is, (specially) a party or (abstractly) disunion:—heresy (which is the Greek word itself), sect.

G138 – Heresyαἱρέομαι hairéomai, hahee-reh’-om-ahee; – probably akin to G142; to take for oneself, that is, to prefer:—choose. Some of the forms are borrowed from a cognate ἕλλομαι héllomai hel’-lom-ahee; which is otherwise obsolete.

From The Blue Letter Bible Lexicon:

a) act of taking, capture: e.g. storming a city; b) choosing, choice; c) that which is chosen; d) a body of men following their own tenets (a sect or party)

Look what we have here from Strong’s: 1) a choice; 2) a party; 3) disunion; 4) a sect. Then we get confirmation from the Blue Letter Bible Lexicon. So what does this tell us? Well far from being negative, the word heresy looks like it is something very positive, that is, the separating of those who follow Yashua Messiah (The Way) from satanic religious illegitimates and Judaising mongrel dogs. In the first century that would have been primarily a separation from the Pharisee and Sadducee Jews, who were later usurped by the so-called Hellenising philosophers, known as the ‘church fathers’, that is, the counterfeit founders of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

Be sure you understand that religion is ruled by a spirit called Legion, and he presents this phenomena in a myriad of ways, (again see link No. 2 below) whether it be the religion of the ‘Christian’ Zionists, Jews, Muslims or Fundie ‘Christians’ with their Judaising Law based religion. We can then add in Papists with their Babylonian Mystery Religion, or Eastern Orthodox ‘Pantokrators’ with their iconographic idolatry. Furthermore, today, whilst the Pope is traipsing here, there and everywhere around the world promoting his mickey mouse satanic multi-faith unity BS, Paul was, and is, teaching the exact opposite – now there’s another surprise, and is that hilarious or what?

Acts 24:14 (KJV) But this I confess unto thee, that after The Way which they call heresy (‘a sect’), so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in The Law and in The Prophets: (Emphasis mine)

So here we have the ONLY use of the word ‘heresy’ in the whole of the Holy Scriptures, and all very positive it is, too, for it looks like the members of the True Church were known by certain evil creatures of religion as ‘heretics’. Now I wonder who these verminous mongrel dogs were that called the elect and/or the saints, heretics? Let’s see if we can shed any Light on it:

Acts 24:1-2 first part (KJV) And after five days Ananias the High Priest descended with the elders, and with a certain orator named Tertullus, who informed the governor against Paul.

2 And when he was called forth, Tertullus began to accuse him…

Acts 24:5 (MCV) For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Judean Israelites (not Jews) throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes:

Acts 24: 9 (MCV) And the Canaanite Jews also assented, saying that these things were so.

So there we have it, the Sanhedrin Canaanite Jews making use of this secular orator Tertullus (strange how he had a name very similar to the satanic Hellenising dog, Tertullian, who came on the scene over a hundred years later – circa 200 AC). Today, this orator would be known as a barrister, or an attorney in the USA, so a man ‘gifted’ with a slippery evil tongue.

From the above account we learn that the real ‘heretics’ were those very same types of people that laid accusations on our Lord Yashua Messiah before they crucified Him, and they were now accusing the brethren of Paul.

Right, let’s now move on to these three other verses that use the word ‘heresies’:

1 Corinthians 11:1619 (Concordant Greek Literal Version) Now if anyone is presuming to be rivalrous, we have no such usage, neither The Ecclesias of God.” 17 Now in giving this charge I am not applauding, for you are coming together, not for the better, but for discomfiture.” 18 For first, indeed, at your coming together in The Ecclesia, I am hearing of schisms inhering among you, and some part I am believing.” 19 For it must be that there are sects (‘heresies’) also among you, that those also who are qualified may be becoming apparent among you.”

In this passage we can see that there was a load of argy-bargy going on within the fellowship of the Corinthian Church, with rivalries, which were causing discomfort to the brethren, due to the rivalries between them. These rivalries then developing into schisms and finally into sects, here called ‘heresies’ in the good old RELIGIOUS friendly King James Version.

Now there is a crucial point I would like to make here, and that is the choice of this word ‘heresies’, because, for me, it’s got Popery stamped all over it!! That means that there was no need for its use at all, when the word ‘sects’ was definitely more accurate and more appropriate from the non-religious True Christian perspective.

OK next verse:

Galatians 5:19-21 (Concordant Greek Literal Version) Now apparent are the works of the flesh, which are adultery, prostitution, uncleanness, wantonness, 20 idolatry, enchantment, enmities, strife, jealousies, furies, factions, dissensions, sects (heresies’), 21 envies, murders, drunkennesses, revelries, and the like of these, which, I am predicting to you, according as I predicted also, that those committing such things shall not be enjoying the allotment of The Kingdom of God.”

As we can see the same Roman Catholic RELIGIOUS evil contamination has taken place with the erroneous choice of ‘heresies’ on the part of the translators instead of ‘sects’.

Final verse:

2 Peter 2:1 (Concordant Greek Literal Version) Yet there came to be false prophets also among the people, as among you also there will be false teachers who will be smuggling in destructive sects (‘heresies’), even disowning The Owner (Yashua Messiah) Who buys them, bringing on themselves swift destruction.” (Brackets mine)

I think that just about wraps it up unless you think the article is heretical! LOL

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/05/26/the-cainite-judeo-christian-religion/

2. The Vile Satanic Curse Of Religion: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2021/10/20/the-vile-satanic-curse-of-religion/

Tim Farron Avoids Saying Whether He Considers Gay Sex as a Sin – Part 1

For those of you who have never of Tim Farron he was, up until today, the 14th June 2017, the leader of the British Liberal Democrat Party (and an alleged Christian), otherwise known as the Lib-Dems, which only managed to secure 12 seats in the recent British General Election on the 8th June 2017. This was an increase of only three seats on their previous General Election performance. In contrast the Stalinist Labour Party won 262 seats and the Trotskyist Conservative Party 318. So as you can see this was a very poor show indeed.

Moreover, Tim Farron, although professing to be a liberal was, in reality, just another leftie Bolshevik Marxist in a yellow tie – yellow being the official colour of the spineless treacherous Lib-Dem Party. However, in truth, he was no more a liberal, as in the traditional liberal sense, e.g. as with Lloyd George, than Josef Stalin.

He also claimed that he was a Christian, but what kind of a Christian? A real Christian or a fake Christian? Here is a statement he made when questioned by a Channel 4 leftie, useless media jobsworth, Cathy Newman, with this question:

Farron was asked whether he believed, as a Christian, that the act of homosexual sex (sodomy) was a sin and replied: “To understand Christianity is to understand that we are all sinners.” (Brackets mine)

I will repeat that: “To understand Christianity is to understand that we are all sinners.”

OK, so what does this statement really mean? The word ‘understand’ in the language of legalese means to “stand under” so what he is really saying is this: To stand under the banner of Christianity is also to stand under the banner of “I am a sinner and don’t you forget it!”

Now is he right? IF we are Christians, are we still sinners? IF as Christians, we are still sinners, how will we enter the The Kingdom of God or IF as Christians we are still sinners how will we obtain or enter into Eternal Life? Do these people ever question their erroneous understanding or their own skewed reasoning?

Perhaps a better question would be, who teaches these wretched people and fills their heads with this satanic nonsense? And make no mistake, for it is satanic nonsense. So back to the first part of his statement: “To understand or stand under the banner of Christianity.” Well does he? Obviously not because he thinks that if one understands HIS idea of Christianity then we are all still sinners – DOH!!

So here’s a question: IF after having become a Christian we’re still sinners – WHAT’S CHANGED!!?? I’ll tell you – NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING HAS CHANGED!! In contrast, are the lost and unsaved majority, sinners? Yes, of course but this Tim Farron character has declared himself to be a sinner too, so what has his alleged Christian faith achieved for him? I’ll tell you again – NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

Let’s be clear about this folks – a sinner is a sinner is a sinner and that’s all there is to it, nothing more, nothing less and no matter what else he calls himself. A sinner will die in his or her sins – that’s it – fini – kaput – gone. They will then be dead in their graves until the Second Resurrection and The Great White Throne Tribunal at the end of The Millennium and with no part in the First Resurrection when Yashua Messiah returns to this earth, VERY SOON for His elect – REAL CHRISTIANS!

However, and here is the rub, someone who claims to be a Christian and a sinner as well, that is, people like our Mr Tim Farron, fall into a special group of people that will receive some special attention from Yashua Messiah when he returns to this earth very soon. This special attention is otherwise known as outer darkness.

Matthew 25:30 (KJV) And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

So are you saying that Tim Farron is an unprofitable servant? Yes of course and by his own admission. Ask yourself, how can a sinner ever be profitable to Yashua Messiah? So called Christians who are still sinners or who still see themselves as sinners are neither one thing or the other. Do you SEE THAT dear people? I do hope so for your Holy Spiritual future and welfare is totally dependent upon you SEEING IT, and the last thing I want to see is your being cast into outer darkness, that is, separation from Yashua Messiah and for I don’t know how long. That cannot be a very pleasant experience no matter what the duration.

OK so by now you must be wondering what it is that Tim Farron is missing and it’s quite simple. He is missing the miracle that occurs at Baptism (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone. Now this may be because he has never been taught or worse he has been taught and then poo pooed the teaching. Either way, he is not properly birthed into Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), for if he had been he would KNOW that as a Baptised born of God Christian, gifted with The Holy Spirit he would no longer be a sinner – end of.

This is explained to us by Yashua Messiah through John:

1 John 3:8 (KJV) He that committeth sin is of The Devil; for The Devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose The Son of God was manifested (made known), that He might destroy the works of The Devil. (Brackets mine)

Here we can plainly see, if we have the EYES to see that is, that anyone that commits sin is of The Devil. That’s it – simple and no argument!! Yet John says: “For this purpose The Son of God was manifested (made known), that He might destroy the works of The Devil.”

Right, here’s another question: Has The Son of God (Yashus Messiah), who I presume was made made known to Tim Farron, destroyed the works of The Devil in Tim Farron’s life? Answer: No of course not, because he still sees himself as a sinner and, worse, applies that same wretched condition to all his fellow erroneous fake Christians.

In turn this means that Yashua Messiah did nothing for Tim Farron at the stake (cross). He died and rose again thereby destroying the works of The Devil (death and sin) and yet Tim Farron (and those like him) is oblivious to this stupendous Truth.

Furthermore, and again, let’s be clear for Tim Farron, unfortunately, is not alone, and I exaggerate not an atom when I say that the bulk of those embroiled in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion think exactly the same way as Tim Farron thinks.

I will therefore quote John once more in order to explain how born of God sons and daughters of God, properly Baptised and gifted with The Holy Spirit cannot sin:

1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man that hath his hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.

Every man that keeps his hope in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) PURIFIES HIMSELF even as Yashua Messiah is pure.

1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

Whosoever abides in Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) SINS NOT!! Whosoever sins (Tim Farron and those like him) has not seen Yashua Messiah (experienced His presence via The Holy Spirit) and has never known Him!

1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His Seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Whosoever is born of God does not sin because His Seed (His Holy Spirit) remains in him and he cannot sin and he cannot sin because he is born of God. He is NOW a NEW CREATION residing in a DEAD BODY of sin.

Paul also makes it plain – TWICE!:

Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Paul makes it clear that it is no longer him that sins but, rather, the dead sin that dwells within his dead body of sin which is no longer him.

I hope and pray that you all STAND UNDER (understand) this miraculous Father and Son gifted and given arrangement.

The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion

cross-918459__480

Now many of you, that is, you my regular readers, will be familiar with the above expression, for I use it frequently in my articles to describe mainstream Christianity, or Churchianity, or the Christian RELIGION, or what some might call Christendom. For those of you new to my work for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) I use it as an umbrella term to cover all the branches of so called Christianity – Roman Catholicism; Eastern Orthodoxy; Anglicanism; Episcopalianism (American Anglicanism), plus ALL the myriad denominations (divisions = demon-inations) of Protestantism.

This umbrella title also covers all the so called cults who, I might add, do not have a monopoly in cultism and/or cult behaviour. Roman Catholicism is the biggest cult of all, that is, a money making, money laundering cult with over a billion deluded and deceived adherents, and now controlled by the Rothschild Jew Beast Power of Revelation.

However, having said that, I will now list the principal cult culprits here for your information: Jehovah’s Witnesses; The Church of The Latter Day Saints (The Mormons); The Seventh Day Adventists (SDAs); The Christadelphians; The Worldwide Church of God, (now deviously and deceptively known as The Grace Communion International), with all its splinter or spin-off groups who broke away after the demonic Judaising dog Herbert W. Armstrong era ended.

Here are the names of some of these satanic Judaising splinter groups:

Midnight Ministries – Malcom B. Heap

The Philadelphia Church Of God – Gerald Flurry
The Restored Church Of God
The Living Church Of God
The Intercontinental Church Of God
The United Church Of God, An International Association
The Church Of God’s Faithful
The Independent Church Of God
The Church Of God, An International Community
The Christian Biblical Church Of God

The Continuing Church of God

I have listed the names of all these groups (and please note this list is not exhaustive) because I was once a duped member of the original Worldwide Church of God under Armstrong’s original teaching, so I have a particular interest in what these satanic groups are getting up to in these last days of the last days. Needless-to-say, they are all blasphemous Judaisers and Grace killers, banging there OBEDIENCE based drums, earning their own salvation and extorting money from their duped members via their Old Covenant tithing money grabbing systems, so don’t, whatever you do, get involved with any of them.

OK, I think I have covered the bulk of what purports to be so called Christianity on the face of this satanic earth in 2017 and I call it The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. If you know of any other major groups that claim to be Christian Churches that you think should be added to my list please let me know in the comments section below. Please note I am aware of the Pentecostal groups and have included them as an integral of Protestantism.

The Cainite-Judeo-Christian-Religion = Mainstream Christians

Matthew 7:13-14 (KJV) Enter ye in at the strait (narrow) gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, (Spiritual ruin) and MANY there be which go in thereat: 
14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

Moving on, I will now take each of the four words that make up my umbrella title, and expound on their relevance and my reasons for placing them within the title starting with:

CAINITE

Right, why do I group all these varied and supposed Christian bodies together under the title The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion? And why in particular do I use the term ‘Cainite’ as the first part of their description? What has Cain got to do with modern, so called, Christianity or nominal fake Christianity? He and his offspring died in The Flood didn’t they? Yes they did, but his bloodline was rekindled post-flood by and through the birth of Canaan, whom Noah cursed. However, I will not expound on that story here as I deal with it in my articles elsewhere here on my blog (see link No. 1 below), but what I will do is look specifically at Cain’s behaviour which led up to his murdering his half-brother Abel. (Take note, Cain and Abel were NOT full brothers) (see link No. 1 below)

Now this event is as much Spiritual as it is physical and literal and it is timeless in its importance. The spirit of this story carries forward through 6,000 years of our history to our days here in 21st century. So what ties the murder of Abel to the year 2021? Easy, sacrifices and offerings or perhaps what I should have said is, the RIGHT KIND of sacrifice and offering. So let’s post the story of Cain and Abel’s sacrifices and offerings:

Genesis 4:3-4 (KJV) And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto The LORD. 4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And The LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:

So what’s going on here? because on the face of it, it looks like The Lord is being unjust toward Cain just because his offering was from his crops of the ground. We are then told that The Lord had respect for Abel’s offering rather than Cain’s, so what gives?

BLOOD is what gives, that is, in Abel’s sacrifice, the BLOOD of a LAMB which spills into the ground. In Cain’s offering there was NO BLOOD at all making it a useless offering and thereby definitely not pleasing in The Lord’s sight as a sacrifice.

Yashua Messiah was The Lamb slain from before the foundation of the world as it is written in the Book of Revelation:

Revelation 13:8 (KJV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (Satan), whose names are NOT written in The Book of Life of The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

This means that in the past under the Old Covenant right and proper sacrifices to God should ALWAYS involve the blood of a lamb (even before the original Passover in Egypt) with Yashua Messiah becoming the ultimate Lamb of God sacrifice to end ALL blood sacrifices. (Watch for the evil blasphemous re-instatement of animal blood sacrifices in Jerusalem soon – The Abomination of Desolation.)

OK, so back to the thread. From this event we then get Cain’s jealousy of his half-brother for having found favour in The Lord’s sight. The half-brothers then argue with the end result of Cain killing Abel in a fit of jealous rage.

Cain, Satan’s son, slaying his half brother Abel

Now mark this event, for it is a type or forerunner or the first of multiple thousands of murders that will follow it, on down through the ages and even into the 21st century with real Christians (followers of Yashua Messiah – The Truth and The Way) being slain for their Faith being in Him, and Him alone, with no RELIGION (no crops of the ground). So to sum up this first part, what we have graphically displayed here is the first hu-man creature of RELIGION (CAIN) slaying the first man, a True believer, making his blood of The Lamb sacrifice to his Creator.

Now this is all correct I here you say, but how are you making a connection from Cain and Abel to the 21st century? Again that’s easy. Fake or counterfeit Christians – those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion believe in a fake Jesus who never spilled his blood. This is because he doesn’t exist, and so he never died. This fake Jesus is like Cain’s offering of vegetables – there’s no blood. Ask yourself, how does a make-believe fictional character bleed and die? It doesn’t and it can’t – it would be impossible for it to do so (see link No. 2 below).

Let’s be clear about this and get it firmly seated in our minds, only Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) the real Lord Jesus Christ died and shed His blood for us, not their Cainite vegetable fake Jesus. So now you know why I use the word Cainite in my title the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

JUDEO

OK, so why do I use the word ‘Judeo’ in my title? Well this should be more straight forward and easier to understand, for Judaism is an all pervasive problem within the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, a VERY BIG pervasive problem. Now make no mistake, for nearly ALL the groups within the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion practice some form of Judaism, that is, salvation by works, and/or salvation through obedience to The Law and/or obedience to the Ten Commanments or even obeying Yashua Messiah. This means that Yashua Messiah’s Saving Grace along with His Faith are either blasphemed against, that is, abused or are totally trampled on and snuffed out – killed. Which, in turn, means they trample all over Yashua Messiah’s sacrifice, that is, His death and His resurrection. They treat Him with utter contempt and in many cases without even realising it.

‘Judeo’ also stands for monotheism, in one form or another, whether it be just ONE GOD as in Judaism and Islam, rendering Yashua Messiah a non-entity, and just a creation or what looks like an afterthought, if viewed from the Godhead’s perspective. We then have their ONE GOD within a FICTIONAL TRINITY DEITY of ONE in three and three in ONE. That means whether it’s three in ONE or ONE in three, we still have a form of monotheism rattling around in there somewhere. This is a shell game conjuring trick of now you see ONE or it could be now you see three depending on how many magic mushrooms you have eaten LOL.

Moreover, in all Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious ‘churches’ some form of obedience will be in force, whether obedience to the Ten Commandments (The Law of Moses) or obedience to a Pope, Archbishop, cardinals, bishops, priests or some ministerial or pastor/elder hierarchy. This is the evil system of the Nicolaitans as described by Yashua Messiah in Revelation. To make things even worse, in many Protestant groups women will be in the pulpits lording it over the men. Paul must be turning in his grave.

Furthermore, regulated Old Covenant Sabbath keeping will be the order of the day, whether seventh day or first day Sabbath keeping. There, also, will be annual pagan heathen fertility rite festivals like Christmas, Easter and Whitsun which have nothing to do with Yashua Messiah.

Within the Judeo religious Roman Cult there is actually an idolatrous ‘saint’s day’ for every single day of the year. Needless-to-say these fakes are not real saints, because in order to be a real saint you have to be called and chosen by The Father and then born of God (born again). No man has the power or the authority to make a man or woman a saint.

Moreover, having revealed the above deceptive points, here is what you will not find active and operational in these so called ‘churches’, that is, egalitarian Grace filled fellowships with Holy Spirit gifted teachers for new converts and beginners and overseers (shepherds) to keep a watchful eye out for spies and trouble makers (wolves) and protect the flocks in general, as was the case in the first century congregations.

CHRISTIAN

OK the third and most deceptive word of my title – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Why the most deceptive I hear you say? Quite simply because it deceives billions, not just millions, but billions of people across the world. This is because when they hear the word Christian or Christianity they immediately link it, erroneously, to the organised satanic religions I have listed above who pose as followers of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ).

I go head to head daily with hundreds of lost and unsaved people on social media who accuse supposed Christians and Christianity of all manner of wickedness, historical persecutions, tortures, evils, murders and genocides. The thing is, are they are correct to do so? Yes, for the people who did these vile deeds posed as Christians and did their satanic evil deeds in the name of Christianity, thereby bringing shame and disgrace on Jesus Christ’s name – bringing His name into disrepute – and as wonderfully encapsulated by this famous heathen:

I like your Christ; I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

— Muhatma Gandhi

Furthermore, these so called Christian groups follow their non-Scriptural hu-man made Creeds (see link No. 4 below) or their blasphemous Statements of Beliefs, not Yashua Messiah. These legalistic creeds and statements lay down the frameworks of their hu-man made organisations and have nothing to do with the Kingdom of God Gospel message that Yashua Messiah and His Messengers (apostles) taught in the first century.

This is because they want their lemming followers to 1) believe that salvation is within their particular ‘church’ only, or through being a member of their organisation or cult only and, 2) to give their hard earned dosh or tithes to these organisations. However, if they go outside of it and leave, they’re then deemed an apostate or they’re damned to fiery hell or they’re excommunicated as a heretic. Either way, they’re toast to these lying blasphemers as they chuck their satanic hierarchical weight around.

Now which ever way we cut this, none of it is Christian. To be a Christian is one who is called and chosen by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and who then follows Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) – that’s it, apart from full immersion Baptism into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone, and the gifting of The Holy Spirit. Once these things have occurred you are now born of God (born again) and you’re a Christian – a new creation, a saint and a REAL CHRISTIAN!!

RELIGION

Oh dear what positive thing can be said about the meaningless vain pursuit of RELIGION!!?? Answer: Nothing!! (See link No. 3 below). Make sure you understand and never forget it – GOD HAS NO RELIGION. ALL religions are hu-man made on behalf of the Devil himself. ALL religions worship Satan the Devil in one way or another and NONE of them worship Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) and that includes??? Yes you guessed it – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. Yes men dress their stupid religions up to make out they are worshipping Yashua Messiah, but the opposite is always The Truth – they ALL worship Satan the Devil!!

Now here’s a little test. Just search the four Gospels in the KJV Bible for the word ‘religion’ and see if you can find it. OK I jest, don’t worry yourselves, for I have already done so and can assure you that it’s not there. However feel free to do your own research, as you should.

Furthermore, Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He come to this earth in order to start a religion. Religion = the vanity and egos of men. So there you have it – The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion!

Adendum:

Since writing part one of this short series of articles I have since learned an interesting fact or two and it looks like the term “Judeo-Christian” is not that old.

Here is a segment from a sermon given by Pastor Don Elmore and copied and recorded by “The Fellowship of God’s Covenant People” on their web page (I do not recommend Pastor Elmore or The Fellowship of God’s Covenant People as it looks like they, themselves, are Law invoking Judaisers):

The term Judeo-Christianity did not originate with the name of a Jewish synagogue or a Christian Church or a merging of the two. It didn’t come from any views of any of their own theological rabbis or theologians. In fact, it originated from an English novelist who was born in the land where the serpent was blown–India. The novelist lived in India till he was five years old and then went back to England to live, while his father lived in India. The Englishman then went back to India to work for about five years before he returned to England. His name: Eric Arthur Blair. You probably never heard of him by his birth name. But I would say that probably all of you know his pen name, George Orwell. He is famous for his books ‘Animal Farm’ and ‘1984’.

Eric or George wrote this hyphenated word, “Judeo-Christian” as a linguistic attempt to fight against anti-Jewishness in the late 1930s. By using “Judeo-Christian,” Orwell meant to indicate tolerance and solidarity with a persecuted religious minority (i.e. the Jews). The National Conference of Christians and Jews (now called the National Conference for Community and Justice) subsequently adopted the term, and the Four Chaplains — a rabbi and three Christian ministers who in 1943 together gave their lives to rescue others aboard their sinking ship—became an icon of the postwar understanding of America’s religious pluralism.

But one might think that Christianity and Judaism are theologically linked in a way that merits a special term to describe their shared history and belief system. But this notion fails to hold up under scrutiny. The Jewish theologian Eliezer Berkovitz perhaps put it most concisely when he wrote that: “Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity, and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism.””

More here from Jewpedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judeo-Christian_ethics

In the above Jewpedia article we can see lying propaganda galore about the Jew Marxist subversive Roosevelt and how he and his fellow Jews set about the task of politicising American mainstream Christianity with the Judeo-Marxist dogma. They also used this dogma as a tool and/or reason to wage a ‘righteous war’ against Germany and Japan whilst, in truth, Germany and Japan were far more righteous than the Jew tool nations Britain, France and The USA.

The above was graphically confirmed by the Polish ambassador of the day, Count Jerzy Potocki, to the US who reported back to Warsaw that President was working fanatically to develop a ‘war psychosis’ in the minds of the America people. As evidenced here:

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html/

Moreover, today we now have Cultural Jew Marxist liberals by the thousands who pose as Christians, but are, in reality, just Godless politicised wretches who promote their fake Marxist ‘Jesus’. Not only that, but freely use their Cultural Jew Marxist slogans like ‘hate’, ‘hater’, ‘hate speech’, ‘bigot’, ‘Nazi’, ‘xenophobe’, ‘white supremacist’ etc. etc. with great regularity. You name ’em and they use ’em, delusionally and self-righteously thinking that they are doing The Lord’s work, when all the while they are doing Karl Marx’s work!

So there you have it – the rotten satanic Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion laid bare for all to see.

Revelation 18:4 (KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 1:

3. The Vile Satanic Curse Of Religion:

4. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

Companion reading to this article:

5. Are You Fearful of Being Born of God (Born Again)?:

6. Is The Father Calling You To His Son Yashua Messiah?:

7. What is True Rejection of Jesus Christ?:

Did Jesus Die So We Can Now Have License To Sin, Without Guilt, And Go to Heaven?

OK, first of all, this is not my question, and it’s so full of built in errors I don’t really know where to begin. Furthermore, it’s a question which was asked of me quite recently and, in doing so, it meant that my teaching on Grace was being attacked. To counter that attack, I would recommend to you my two articles about Grace entitled: “The Grace Of Our Lord Jesus Christ – His True Grace – Not The Watered Down Religious Version!” and “For By Grace Are Ye Saved Through Faith – And That Not Of Yourselves – It Is The Gift Of God – Eph 2:8,” in order to understand where these people are coming from, and what their blasphemous attack on God’s Holy Word is all about.

Right, so what’s wrong with this question? Well, straight away there is no mention of Yashua Messiah’s resurrection within this question and we should never leave out mention of His resurrection when mentioning His death, for His death was only half of the arrangement. Second, there is this word ‘license’ and it then linked to the word ‘sin’. Hence their phrase: “A license to sin.”

Now where does this weird phrase come from? I have to admit I have heard it used before by various ravening wolves in pulpits, but I have never taken the trouble to check it out to see if it’s Scriptural, and, of course, it isn’t. Now there’s a surprise!! So why is it used if it’s not Scriptural? Easy, because vain puffed up men love their meaningless jargon expressions, especially in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. They love to put their egotistic personal stamp on the Holy Scriptures and, as I have said before, they do it because the Holy Word of God is too simple for them. OK, so as it’s not a Scriptural phrase, let’s have a look in my Concise Oxford Dictionary to see what the word ‘license’ means:

License – allow (person to do, thing to be done; rare); allow complete freedom to; grant permit to person; authorize use of premises for certain purpose, etc.(It also means to grant LEGAL permission to a person to do something UNLAWFUL E.g. Licenced to kill) (Brackets mine)

So let’s rewrite this question using one of the dictionary definitions: Did Jesus die so we can now have a permit to sin or to allow us complete freedom to sin, without guilt, and go to heaven? Now is this question dumb or is it mind numbingly dumb? I would suggest to you it’s both.

What we have to ask ourselves here is why would anyone want a licence or a permit to sin? If we were dealing with a lost or unsaved man or woman, would they require licences or permits to sin? Why don’t you try asking one of them and see what kind of a reply you get, that’s after they have stopped laughing at you and wondering if you were unhinged. OK, so we know that the lost and unsaved don’t need a licence or a permit to sin, for they manage very well without one.

That leaves us with the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious perspective and whether or not they would require a licence or a permit to sin – well, would they, for many in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion seem to think they would, but why? What kind of Christian would even bring up such a subject? What kind of Christian rubs shoulders with those who would influence such thinking?

If we come genuinely to Yashua Messiah after The Father has called us, which means our repentance is genuine and our confession of sins is genuine, why would we seek a permit or licence to carry on sinning? Does any of this make any sense? No, it’s complete nonsense. So you see this question could and perhaps should have been worded like this: Should I repent and confess my sins so that I can then have a licence or permit to carry on sinning as I did in my old life, without guilt, and still go to heaven? Never mind that I had no guilt before in my old life anyway.

However, what this question is revealing to us is that we have people calling themselves Christians who are still struggling, through their own admission, with guilt. This means they see themselves as unforgiven and thereby not saved. How wretched is that?

Can you now see the inbuilt stupidity within this question? Why go to all the trouble of repentance, confession of sins (that is, all your sins, past, present and future) and baptism plus gifting of The Holy Spirit, if you want to carry on living as you did before? What would be the point of it and who would you be deceiving? As I think about all this I am actually becoming confused, and of course, that’s just what the Devil wants – confusion.

Moreover, why are Cainite-Judeo-Christians asking this silly question, and what else does it reveal to us? As I have already pointed out, they only mention Yashua Messiah’s death, not His resurrection and that’s because many Cainite-Judeo-Christians don’t understand what His resurrection achieved for them. OK, they believe everything was done at the cross, and yes, in part, it was all done. It was all done in terms of conquering death and sin, but what they don’t understand is the new Spiritual beings we become through His resurrection, that is, perfect in the Father’s sight and sinless beings that do not sin.

Now this is what they can’t get their heads around and that’s because they are not really Born Again. They are men of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion who practise Graceless Judaism – salvation by progress – salvation by process or by self-help, or by their own effort and endeavours, or commonly known as salvation by works. The Faith, Salvation, Grace thing is incomprehensible to them, they cannot understand it. In turn, it is through this blindness that they conjure up questions like the above.

Once more you will also notice the ‘without guilt’ bit in the middle of this question, which means they cannot even get their heads around this:

Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus. [who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit.]

Please note I have left off the second part of this verse because it’s missing in the Greek MSS, which means it was falsely added by the translators – it being interpolated from Romans 8:4 and unnecessarily repeated.

Romans 8:4 (KJV) That the righteousness of The Law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit.

Now what part of Romans 8:1 do these wretched people not understand, that is, there is now no further condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. If there is now no further condemnation, how can there be any guilt!? If there is guilt, there is something wrong with their birthing into Yashua Messiah. The guilty mindset is the fallen mindset and it behaves like Adam and Eve after their fall – they went and hid in guilt!

If we are born of God (Born Again) or born from above, we have been lifted out of guilt, for there is now no further condemnation laid upon us. So, this means we are sinless, even though our dead bodies of sin, sin. The thing is, is this a license to sin? Well, yes of course it is, if we are deluded and deceived liars and The Truth is not in us, but is that the case IF we are born of God? No, of course it is not the case, because The Truth, Yashua Messiah lives in us through His Holy Spirit POWER and the Holy Spirit cannot reside with LIVING sin.

So how would we be liars? We would be liars because there is no such thing as: “license to sin”, because as I have already proven, no one needs a licence to sin. If you want to sin, then just go right on ahead and sin, if that’s your DESIRE, and, of course, this is where we get to the nub of this issue, for that’s what it’s all about – DESIRE.

As Born Again believers, what should our DESIRE be, to sin or not to sin? Well, I hope it’s a DESIRE not to sin, and if that is the case, there is nothing wrong with your birthing in Yashua Messiah for your DESIRE not to sin proves that you love your Elder Brother in heaven. All this means is that you would hate to do something that Yashua Messiah would hate you to do. This also means we are endeavouring to please Him, but will this always be so? Not very likely if you’re the average man or woman who has been called out of this world by The Father to His Son and yet still lives in a dead body of sin. We will sin until we die; it’s inevitable, and we need to get this through our heads. I will reiterate, we’re still perfect and sinless in the Father’s sight even though our dead bodies of sin, sin. Paul explains it clearly and twice so we get it through our heads:

Romans 7:17 (KJV) NOW THEN IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Romans 7:20 (KJV) Now if I do that I would not, IT IS NO MORE I THAT DO IT, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Now, if after all this we’re still looking for a ‘licence to sin’, because we want to sin, what is this revealing about our birthing into Yashua Messiah? If our DESIRE is to look for a licence to sin, what is this saying about us, and what is it saying about our repentance, our confession, and our baptism? Are we phoneys and fakes? If so, who are we fooling? Were all these things a charade or a façade to hide our real intentions of being or becoming a fake Christian? What would be the point?

OK, let’s leave out the ‘license to sin’ thing for a minute and just deal with the sin issue. What, if after baptism, our DESIRE is to carry on sinning, what would be the point of getting baptised? As I said previously, we can carry on sinning without any need to for baptism, so what is their point in the use of this stupid phrase?

Their point is this – they are looking at the whole thing through the eyes of Grace Killers, for they cannot comprehend the loving relationship of that between a Born Again son or daughter of God and their Redeemer, Yashua Messiah. They think it’s all about obedience to The Law, and if we speak of Grace, they will immediately think we are looking for excuses to sin – which is a judgemental lie. This is the mindset of Pharisees, for they behaved in the same way when Yashua Messiah confronted them with His Grace filled message, two thousand years ago and nothing has changed. These Cainite-Judeo-Christians behave and believe in exactly the same way.

You see when your salvation is down to you and your efforts this is how you will behave and view Grace. There is no room for Grace in their salvation-by-works world. In fact, Grace, from this legalistic Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious perspective, is a complete mystery to them, for it’s not on their radar screens and in reality it doesn’t exist to them. It cannot exist, for if it were to exist their Law based world would dissolve before their very eyes and all the reasons for their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious existence would disappear. They would be like captains without ships and totally surplus to requirements.

Finally, I won’t go into detail about their nonsensical going to heaven business as I cover this subject in detail in my articles: “Are Christians Going to Heaven?” and “When Christians Die, Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord? – Parts 1 & 2”. Needless to say, Christians going to heaven is as erroneous an idea as that of us needing a ‘license to sin’. Where do they get this stuff? Oh yes, at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet LOL!

Brother Charles

PS Please note, this edited article is ten+ years old.

The Anatomy Of a Fake Christian

Introduction

Before I start please be warned that I use some strong language in this article and I have no desire to shock or offend anyone not prepared, so please be warned. Moreover, please note that I take no prisoners when dealing with anti-Christ arrogant blasphemers of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, that is, enemies of the Gospel message.

Now you could say that this article is long overdue, and I must admit that I have been planning such an article for a long long time, but to date, I have to say, that an easily usable or adaptable example for an article has not been forthcoming, but this bod takes first prize, and as I will reveal, is a classic example – he’s almost made to measure.

His name I will keep anonymous by using initials, as I have no wish to make capital out of his Spiritual blindness, ignorance, stupidity and other assorted accompanying delusional afflictions. So without further ado here is his first comment to me on social media which, incidentally, came out of the blue:

“brother charles YOUR blog is a load of manure an nonsense …ive read part of it and its COMPLETE BS ….its YOU who need to get back to the bible an gods word NOT YOURS ….YOUR opinions an YOUR take on the word of god ARE NOT the final word or the answer ….in just the small amount that i DID read YOU are espousing all manor of crap that ISNT in the bible …for example saying that senator john McCain is a relative of cain from the bible and that its his bloodline etc is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE !!”

You will notice that his first comment is just unfounded opinionated hot air about one of my articles which he took objection to, so it was an empty emotional protest without any factual argument to make his case or rebut anything I had said. This is the comment of a stiff necked, rebellious, brainwashed closed ignorant mind and beyond wretched.

However, my first reply:

@ DB “LOL and your comment is NOT opinionated meaningless bull crap??????? Now you can start proving your case by leaving a comment on my blog and I’ll make you a laughing stock. Mac = son of. McCain is a son of Cain – period and one evil son of the Devil.”

He came back with another silly non-comment which proved he knew nothing about the evil activities of John McCain:

“Brother Charles sooo…john mccain is the son of the devil….HAHAHAHA….and you think you can make ME a laughing stock …you are REALLY delusional arent you.”

If you web search “The treachery of John McCain” whom I have proven to be a son of Cain you will find ooddles of information about McCain with his selling out in Vietnam and his ties to ISIS and his involvement in funding them and yet this uninformed dupe labels me as delusional LOL. Yet more unfounded emotional worthless opinions from DB.

My second reply

@ DB “Cain was the Devil’s son through Eve – period. TWO SEEDS came out of The Garden. You’re a know-nothing numb skull moron. ROTFLMAO”

He came back yet again only this time the chinks in his alluminium fake Christian armour are beginning to show – I have split this comment into two parts:

“Brother Charles i wont be commenting to your blog because i dont make it a habit of contributing / encouraging NONSENSE ….”Matthew 7:21-23” Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven; but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness….

Here he continues with his hollow opinionated claims by declaring for a second time that my blog is nonsense without one atom of proof. He then starts to judge me as well, that is, as being a false Christian who will be rejected by The Lord when He returns. As it happens I have never cast out a demon, having never encountered anyone with one, nor have I performed miracles or claimed to have done so. Furthermore, seeing as I reside under Yashua Messiah’s Glorious Grace it would be impossible for me to practice lawlessness, as I am not under The Law.

He continues

….It is apparent that the people in Jesus’ example thought they were Christians. Even though they may have performed many works in Jesus’ name as proof of their religious devotion, Jesus rejected them with the statement, “I never knew you.” Given Jesus’ preceding warnings about “false prophets” who would masquerade as followers of Jesus Christ (verse 15), is it any wonder Jesus commanded us to test the “fruit” of religious teachers before embracing them into the fold.     YOUR BLOG is a PERFECT example”

Ironically in the opening sentence of this second part he is actually speaking of himself without realising it, such is his delusional state of mind. He thinks that out of the two of us HE is the Christian – hilarious or what? Then he gives his game away with a reference to…..and wait for it….. RELIGIOUS DEVOTION!! A non-Scriptural term. This is our first concrete evidence that we are dealing with a fake Christian. God has no religion nor did Yashua Messiah come to this earth in order to start a religion. Furthermore you will not find the word ‘religion’ in the four Gospels, so now we know what his faith is in – RELIGION.

He then speaks of fruit when: 1) he doesn’t even know me and 2) he has only read a tiny part of one of my articles without understanding it and then condemns my whole blog based upon his unresearched erroneous conclusions. This, my friends, just constitutes another judgemental rant.

I then replied with a rebuttal:

@ DB “You won’t be commenting on my blog because you’re a spineless coward full of satanic mainstream religious bull crap. You have no argument as your comment proves – you’re just a mouthy clanging cymbal. LOL”

“Brother Charles HAHAHA…your funny …i wont be commenting on your blog because its  NONSENSE …YOUR opinion IS NOT the last word on the bible and YOU are not a prophet of the lord …the fact that you think ANYONE ought to contribute to you BULLSHIT is ridicules ….like i said before i try not to encourage MORONS !!”

He then makes further false accusations by declaring for a third time that my blog is nonsense. Once more without an atom of factual proof or argument. He then claims that my researched and Spiritually inspired articles are just my opinions. His ignorant audacity knows no bounds. He then states that I am not a Prophet of The Lord. Well that’s a relief because I never thought I was. He’s probably not even aware that John the Baptist was the last Prophet of The Lord:

Matthew 11:13 (KJV) For all The Prophets and The Law prophesied until John.

Luke 16:16 (KJV) The Law and The Prophets were until John: since that time The Kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

I responded with yet another rebuttal and a challenge:

@ DB “PROVE IT, you mouthy ignorant jerk.”

He then tries to pull a fast one thinking he’s a smart Alec by saying my blog proves HIS case. His delusions intensify LOL:

“Brother Charles you have proven it for me bub …the simple fact that you THINK that YOUR blog/opinions on the bible is Gods ”TRUTH” is full on evidence that YOU are delusional and your blog is nothing more than the blathering of an idiot with a broken mind !”

No further comment on that post so I rebut his drivel once again:

@ DB “ALL you post is your mouthy ignorant opinions – no Scriptural back up whatsoever because you’re a fake and liar – full of religious bull crap.”

“Brother Charles 1st of all i GAVE you some scripture to back it up even though i dont really need scripture to back me up in proving your a fukin lunatic …you are continually doing an awesome job of that YOURSELF ….the simple fact that you think that YOU and your blog of mindless drivel ARE somehow the last word on the bible and that you are somehow speaking some unheard truth from god  is FAR AND AWAY proof enough that you are delusional buddy !!”

Then he lies by saying he gave me Scripture as proof and evidence when all he did was to missuse Scripture to compound or try to back up his ignorant opinions. It was a total missuse of Scripture and he proved nothing with its use. I was then inspired to challenge him with what I thought would be a knock out punch. I challenged him with a deadly question:

@ DB “Right let’s start you lying illegitimate: Tell me, when did you accept a Jesus as your saviour?”

He then came back with this, thinking erroneously that it was an answer, but as you can see, at the end of his post, he was trying to weedle out of the subject now being discussed:

“Brother Charles May 14 1981 is when i was saved…For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” Say, “Father in Heaven, I believe that Jesus died for my sins.”…..not that that has ANYTHING whatsoever to do with this !”

I therefore pressed him further:

@ DB “Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?”

He then comes back with a mixed bag, but I could tell at this point by his response, that, having read more of my blog, he was not so sure of himself. It even resulted with him realising and admitting, in an ever so back handed way, that I spoke with Yashua Messiah’s authority and yet quickly resorting to accusing me of operating with and for my own agenda. He also accuses me of being Spiritually bankrupt – just a little more judging to compound his blasphemies.

“Brother Charles ill give you details of my being saved when you explain exactly how an why this has ANY bearing WHATSOEVER in this thread of conversation …. my faith isnt in question here …the subject is that YOU somehow believe that YOUR  writings  and YOUR interpretation of the bible an gods word are IT …that somehow YOU have the WHOLE thing figured out …YOU DONT …..i have read enough of your blog to see without question that your are not only delusional but that somehow YOU think you are SO ENLIGHTENED that you can tell/judge ANYONE on their faith and THAT my friend is ENOUGH to see you are spreading false teachings an that YOU are the 1 who is morally an spiritually corrupt …the bible is VERY specific about those who spread false teachings and those who pretend to have ALL the answers …its very specific about people who take the scripture an manipulate it to fit their OWN agenda and then spread that agenda to others !!”

He also tries to introduce terms and conditions re his alleged salvation and goes on the defensive by declaring HIS faith isn’t in question when it most definitely was in question, and he most assuredly did not like my having things all figured out. THAT was not allowed in his sandy foundation fake Christian world.

I respond to him once more:

@ DB “OH YES your faith is EVERYTHING to do with it i.e. what is your faith in? and the fact that you cannot simply answer my question TELLS ME EVERYTHING I need to know. However I will give you another chance and remind you of what Peter said:

1 Peter 3:15 (KJV) But sanctify The Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:

I will therefore repeat the question so there is no confusion: Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?”

This repeated request has gone unaswered and after 36 hours I am still waiting for his reply. Now dear people why do you think that is? Has the cat got his tongue? Could it be that I frightened him off with a question that had echoes of the past? Let me remind you:

John 6:65-66 And He said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.

I have covered this issue elsewhere on my blog but it won’t hurt to go over it again. Notice what Yashua Messiah has said and then what has taken place. He said in no uncertain terms that unless The Father had innitiated their inner desire to follow Him (had called them) they could NOT TRULY COME TO HIM. So what did they do? THEY FAKED IT! Then, when confronted with the reality of their artificial situation they walked away from Him.

Why did they walk away from Him? What did they find so upsetting in His words?: “Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.” Easy, they could not accept this Truth. They believed that it was THEIR IDEA to follow Him so that they could pat themselves on the back (boast) and say to themselves what clever people they were. After all THEY HAD ACCEPTED HIM as their saviour – their idea – their wisdom – their intelligence – their decision and their terms and conditions, if we follow it through to its inevitable ludicrous conclusion.

Right, now lets transfer this Truth and apply it to our pompous little arrogant wretch called DB who when challenged with the question: “Was that your decision or did The Father call you to His Son?” He could not answer. WHY COULD HE NOT ANSWER – IT’S SIMPLE ENOUGH, ISN’T IT??? Obviously not for him for it silenced him just like Yashua Messiah silenced the Pharisees and Sadducees.

One fake Christian exposed.

PS if he returns with another comment I will update this page.

Brother Charles

PS as of today, 30th January 2017 and 15 days since his ignorant rant, I have not had a word from him. Interesting eh?

Was JESUS CHRIST a JEW?…

…Or Better Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a JEW?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38. (See the first 3 links below)

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Canaanite Jews were, and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye GENERATION (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

From Strong’s Concordance:

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING – by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially or ethnically a viper or a reptile and therefore against Himself! – IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, this is what these Canaanite Jew people were and still are today in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurious thieves and, worst of all, genocidal psychopathic cold blooded murderers, as exemplified in the so called Russian Revolution; as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

“A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten God, for they had never known God at all, and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them straight:

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of God, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the God of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a severe punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so-called African-American blacks.

However, I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand, and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) parents. In Matthew we have Joseph’s lineage who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father, but his step-father, and in Luke we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (KJV) The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (JUDAH) and his brethren; 3 And Judas (JUDAH) begat Phares (PHAREZ) and Zara (ZARAH) of Thamar (TAMAR); and Phares (PHAREZ) begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam (REHOBOAM); and Roboam (REHOBOAM) begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; 15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary (Miriam), of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? Easy, because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI. (Emphasis mine)

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (KJV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. (Emphasis mine)

So did Joseph have two fathers, or is this a contradiction, or just an expression of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still referred to as his father and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was called Heli’s son.

From the Concordant Literal Translation:

Luke 3:23 (CLV) And He, Jesus, when beginning, was about thirty years old, being a son (as to the law) of Joseph, of Eli,

From The Greek Transliteral:

Luke 3:23 (Greek Transliteral) And He was the Jesus as-if of-years thirty beginning as was lawlized (was legalised) son of-Joseph of-the Heli.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon, through Solomon’s son Rehoboam, and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David, We therefore have Yashua Messiah, who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (KJV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH).

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his twin brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (KJV) The (ROYAL) Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah, nor his descendants, until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK, so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low, because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However, I can hear the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” AH, BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this ignorant empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar, who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another woman, his first woman, named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites, and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Lord for disobeying their father Judah, and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consummation of their marriage to Tamar and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband, but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime, Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the original parents of the first Canaanite Jews and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside, this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews, via their mothers, and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father, but he was a Freemason and did have a Jewish wife.

So to sum up, we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Israelites; 3) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Canaanite Jew. (See link 4 below)

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 5 – James Cone, Black Liberation Theologian

In part two I mentioned a few of the early agents provocateur in what I call The Black Rebellion, but for this stage of the exposé I will now focus on the more recent principal characters starting with:

James Cone (1938-) Theologian of Black Liberation Theology: “In assessing the theology of James Cone, it is critical to recognize that he sees black experience as the fundamental starting point for ascertaining theological truth. And his own writings are a reflection of his own “black experience” – that is, the discrimination he suffered while growing up as a child in Bearden, Arkansas.”

Again, from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

Notice immediately the oxymoron being applied here – ‘theological truth’. Look folks, there is very little, if any, Truth in theology. Theology is primarily the vain philosophical thinking, logic, reasoning and ramblings of carnal minded Spiritually dead men. This rebellious mindset then produces their own creation, a creation of a god in their image and with it fake doctrines and fake spirituallity. THAT’S IT!! There really is nothing more that can be said about theology, black liberation theology or otherwise, and yet Cone uses his ‘life experiences’ as a young black upon which to build his foundation of so called ‘theological truth’.

It is also from this erroneous thinking that comes the idea of blacks being an oppressed people in the USA when they are no such thing. If blacks are oppressed then they are oppressed by the Canaanite Jew with his victimhood programming and, in turn, by their own people who have swallowed this victimhood snake oil wholesale. Furthermore, if we want to play the victimhood game then ALL PEOPLE are victims of the Canaanite-Jews and their THIEVING USURY which has impoverished THE WHOLE WORLD!! Make no mistake dear people CANAANITE JEW USURY is a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Moreover and at the same time he mentions ‘discrimination’ whilst having been born into a white ‘might is right’ environment. How could there not be be any discrimination, when he is a minority black alien, whose grandparents were most likely the serfs of white people, residing in a nation still ruled by white people? What does he expect? Preferential treatment!!?? It is in the nature of man to look after his own and if some blacks are not up to it why blame the white man? Had he behaved this way in Soviet Russia he would have been in a Gulag quicker than he could have said Uncle Tom’s Cabin – never to be seen or heard of again!!

From the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.””

Now why would people, (I presume this accusation is toward white people), define black people as evil? Is this an unjust conclusion to come to? Well to apply it as a blanket description obviously, yes, because there are good black people, but is the accusation totally without foundation? No and here is the proof:

From the “Council of Conservative Citizens” web page, “The Truth About Interracial Rape.”

“Presently the FBI appears to have only published the full statistical tables up to year 2008. After that the FBI website only has smaller “bulletins” that do not include the full data.

“From this data we find that blacks commit sexual assault against almost as many whites as blacks. However, white on black sexual assault is an extreme rarity.

“Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
Black on White: 20,309
Black on Black: 21,104

“Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Black on Black: 35,330

“Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Black on Black: 36, 620

Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Black on Black: 7,705

“Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Black on Black: 12,780

“Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Black on Black: 34,841

“Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Black on Black: 148,380

“Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
Black on Black: 24,730”

Let me be clear, I don’t like statistics, in fact I hate them and for obvious reasons, as they are easily distorted and become worse than outright lies if used by disingenuous people or lying dissemblers. However, I have quoted these figures for one purpose only and that is to show how the idea that black people are oppressed by the white man does not reveal itself in this data. If anything it reveals the opposite or The Truth that it is the white man and especially the white woman that is oppressed and violently abused by the black man.

Notice, too, how the full data figures ceased to be available when the anti-white, lying racist war criminal Barack Obama became president in 2008!! Coincidence?? I will leave you to decide for yourselves.

Back to James Cone whose name incidently is just a play on the name Cain, so that you know who he is descended from. So what else do we know about James (Cain) Cone?

Again from the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“The chief architect of black liberation theology was James Cone, author of Black Theology and Black Power. One of the tasks of this movement, according to Cone, is to analyze the nature of the gospel of Jesus Christ in light of the experience of blacks who have long been victimized by white oppressors. According to black liberation theology, the inherent racism of white people precludes them from being able to recognize the humanity of nonwhites; moreover, their white supremacist orientation allegedly results in the establishment of a “white theology” that is irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. Consequently, liberation theologians contend that blacks need their own, race-specific theology to affirm their identity and their worth.”

Here we can see James (Cain) Cone’s satanic credentials, for it turns out that he is the chief architect of Black Liberation Theology and the author of Black Theology and Black Power. This sounds to me like he is an outright enemy of white people and no more a Christian than my neighbour’s cat.

Moreover, notice, the use of the emotionally charged PC Bolshevik Marxist term “white supremacist” and how it’s viewed as irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. I would counter with the question: When were supremacist whites EVER CONNECTED to the black experience!!?? Who thinks up all this satanic nonsense?

OK let’s have some WHITE EXPERIENCE!!! I was raised in an originally ALL WHITE London and watched it being deliberately invaded and overrun through the 60s, 70s and 80s by West Indians, Indians, Pakistanis, Turks and Greeks and at no time did I ever feel connected to any of them, nor them to me. Cultural remoteness was the order of the day, so what’s all this meaningless nonsense about disconnection from the black experience when there was never a connection in the first place? London today with whites a minority is no longer a white English city – it’s an alien hell hole.

Here’s another thing, why is white supremacy painted in a negative light and who would conjure up such a term and use it to beat up white people? What does the term conjure up in your mind, for it causes me no problems at all? I look at what the white man has achieved down through the centuries and it looks pretty impressive to me and makes the white man look supreme, so what’s with this issue of whites being supreme that these other races have a problem with, especially blacks and Canaanite Jews? Jealousy and envy perhaps?

Continuing again…

““What we need,” says Cone, “is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of Black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.” Observing that America was founded for white people, Cone calls for “the destruction of whiteness, which is the source of human misery in the world.” He advocates the use of Marxism as a tool of social analysis to help Christians to see “how things really are.””

Notice in true Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jew fashion he calls for “the destruction of whiteness”. Remember my earlier quote? If not, here it is again:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

So is James (Cain) Cone looking to help Christians see: “how things really are” from Yashua Messiah’s perspective, that is, through a Christian prism or through the satanic twisted and poisonous anti-white Bolshevik Marxist prism of Karl Marx and Friedrick Engels and the Canaanite Jews? Again no prizes for the right answer.

Part 6 coming soon.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 1

Introduction

Now, dear readers, surprisingly, I am somewhat stunned, and I am stunned that I am actually stunned because, usually, nothing much these days stuns me at all, but this one is an absolute cracker! After 35 years study, this has to be one of the most weird, whacky subjects I have ever encountered, as a Bible scholar and Kingdom of God Gospel messenger for Yashua Messiah who, for the record, was WHITE, as were Adam and Eve – but more on that later.

Moreover, this “Alice in Wonderland” subject, with all its rabbit holes, will take some unravelling, and the reason for that is that it had never before even entered into my mind, that the principal Bible characters were black, until I discovered it recently on YouTube – need I say more? A little chuckle here for the author. However, please stay with it as it will arm you with all the knowledge you will need to counter the satanic ideas of these duped foolish black people.

Having said that, I will say that I had heard of the minor, and misunderstood, issue of the “Black (Canaanite) Jews” in Africa – another sensationalised and over blown topic of little importance, but that was all. This subject, though, is another ball game altogether and far more corrosive to The Truth, due to its saturated evil coverage on YouTube (only the even more whacky and stupid CIA “flat earth” rubbish beats it).

I will also state for the record that due to the insulting anti-white nature of this topic it means, by default, that those of a ‘certain tribe or ethnicity’, or some people of a ‘certain Canaanite race’, have been very busy, putting in overtime, on this racially motivated and divisive anti-white evilness. It also means, that this isn’t just the handiwork of ignorant deceived blacks. In fact, I would classify the blacks involved as brainwashed deluded dupes or pawns and useful idiots for this ‘certain Canaanite race’.

Furthermore, and whilst keeping the ‘certain Canaanite race’ in the background for the moment and whom I will expose, this whole nasty satanic subversive business is compounded by the obsessive fanatical nature and the arrogant belligerent attitudes of the blacks who are promulgating this anti-white garbage across cyberspace, and, as if there is no tomorrow.

Moreover, most, if not all of these blacks, are Spiritually dead and totally incapable of discerning and understanding the Holy Scriptures – Bible scholars they are definitely not!! This, therefore, gives the whole unbelievable thing a surreal and perverted black humour value – pun intentional, due to their Scriptural ignorance. Let me be clear: “YOU WHAT!!!???” or “YOU MUST BE JOKING!!!!” doesn’t even come near with this unbelievable stuff.

OK, so where do we begin in our unravelling of this demonic mayhem? Make no mistake, for this satanic disinformation and/or misinformation did not materialise overnight and the idea wasn’t discovered at the bottom of an empty cornflakes packet. Furthermore, as white Semitic people (primarily Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Dutch, Nordics, Gallics, Franks, Germanics and other white Europeans) we need to know who is behind it and what their aims are. Added to which, does this issue form part of a bigger anti-white genocidal conspiracy? Yes, absolutely.

Now you, if you are a PC, Cultural Marxist, Social Justice Warrior (SJW) may say: “Oh yeah, here we go again, yet another dumb delusional conspiracy theory.” And I would say yes, most, if not all conspiracies start out as theories until they are investigated and researched and once proven to be Conspiracies then the word ‘theory’ vanishes like the early morning mist, unless, of course, you are fearful, weak, lazy, cowardly, cognitively dissonant and emotionally unbalanced (an SJW) – a far more serious problem – for you.

“Conspiracy Theorist – a derogatory put-down term dreamt up by the CIA to discredit those who questioned the official narrative of the JFK assassination.”

— David Icke

“Conspiracy Theorist – someone who questions the statements of known liars.”

– Unknown

“Social Justice Warrior – someone who believes the statements of known liars and votes for them.”

– Brother Charles

“A conspiracy theory will remain forever a conspiracy theory until it is met with obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies from government(s) at which point the conspiracy theory defaults automatically to a conspiracy. E.g. the lying bullshit that is the NIST Report on 9/11.”

— Brother Charles

Right! Here we go, The BLACK JESUS and also The BLACK DISCIPLES and The BLACK APOSTLES and The BLACK KING DAVID and The BLACK JACOB/ISRAEL and, of course, the obligatory BLACK ISRAELITES and last but not least how BLACKS INVENTED EVERYTHING!!! = WOW! how amazing is that!!!???? How have we missed these incredible ‘historical truths’??? It’s all looking very BLACK indeed, isn’t it? I fear that us whites have a very DARK future ahead of us. LOL

Now hilarious as all this ridiculous gumpf is, there is even a more mirth filled element to it. According to these black ‘geniuses’ Jacob/Israel was black, but his twin brother Esau was white, red and hairy, as described in the Holy Scriptures and, of course, it’s also claimed by these daft blacks that he’s the forefather of all those ‘wicked’ Confederate Red Necks, just to give this whole subject a very convenient anti-white Southern USA slant or flavour. Clever eh?

Genesis 25:24-25 (KJV) And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her (Rebecca’s) womb. 25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. (Brackets and emphasis mine)

Needless-to-say there is no mention here in The Holy Scriptures of Jacob being black.

So, as already stated, where do we begin? Well the obvious place to start, as with all these things, is with the agenda(s) and to pin point whose agenda and what kind of agenda, for there is ALWAYS AN AGENDA, folks, and it’s always bubbling away somewhere in the background. It NEVER fails.

This, therefore, leads us to ask some very basic questions like, is this strange Black Jesus phenomenon motivated by: 1) religious zeal, 2) politics, 3) hatred (oh how the ‘certain race’ loves that word) on solely anti-white racial grounds, 4) for revenge, 5) or just simple racial jealousy? From my research, thus far, I would say that all these factors come into play, accompanied by the associated and obligatory unhinged emotions. Added to which, all the elements are being deviously and deliberately stirred up by the ‘certain race’ for their anti-white genocidal programme. More in part two.