Was The Serpent Creature a Beast of The Field?

Introduction

Now this is going to be a very interesting article, and one that I had not been planning, for the subject matter only came to light a few days ago on the 14th November 2022. My earlier view on it was that the origins of The Adversary were just as Genesis 3:1 has it, that is, that The Serpent Creature was the most crafty, devious and cunning Beast of The Field that The Yahavah Yah had made, but as it turns out, I was duped by yet another corruption in the KJV Bible.

OK, so let’s get the crucial Scripture written here:

Genesis 3:1 (MCV) Now The Serpent Creature was more devious, cunning and crafty than any [Beast of The Field] which The Yahavah Yah (The Elohim) HAD MADE. And he said unto the woman (Eve), Yea, hath Yah said, Ye shall not eat of every ‘Tree’ of The Garden?

There we have it, or should I say there we have their gross deception, and how did I come to the conclusion that it is a gross deception? With GREAT difficulty, I can tell you that, for I have been working on this topic for several days solid, and without let up, because each and every way I turned I was stone walled when trying to make sense of the whole idea that this Serpent Creature was formed from the ground a physical living breathing creature, and yet at the same time supposed to be a spiritual creature with the ability to reason, walk upright and talk, that is, the Devil, and as we read in Revelation:

Revelation 20:1-2 (MCV) And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having The Key of The Bottomless Pit and a great chain in his hand. 2 And he laid hold on The Dragon, that Old Serpent, which is The Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years.

However, this past several days has not been wasted, for I have learned one or two other things, along the way, as you do, once you start Biblical word searches and studies. So the first thing I learned was that the word ‘Satan’ can nowhere be found in the Hebrew Masoretic Texts of the Old Testament. Each and every time it’s found in the English translations it has been mistranslated from the word ‘Adversary’, so Adversary is the word that should be written there, not Satan. I now believe there’s question mark over this word ‘Satan’ too, but that’s a subject for another day.

Moving on, I was next confronted in my searches online, by numerous sites ranting and raving about a pre-Adamic beast species, allegedly Negroids, that is, based on the erroneous ideas that: 1) the beasts of the field were two legged humanoid upright creatures, half hu-man and half animal, and not natural quadruped animals, and 2) that Genesis chapter 1 was a first creation, and Genesis chapter 2, with Adam and Eve, as a second creation – all 100% bogus, I might add. How do I know it’s bogus? Easy, and I’ll post just two verses here in order to prove my point:

Genesis 1:27 (MCV) So The Yahavah Yah (The Elohim) created man (Hebrew ‘aw-dawm’ – Adam) in Their own image, in the image of Yah created He him; male and female created He them.

Genesis 2:7 (MCV) And The Yahavah Yah formed man (Hebrew ‘aw-dawm’ – Adam) of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath (the spirit) of life; and man became a living soul – a living creature.

So were there two Adams and two Eves? Furthermore, if Eve was the mother of ALL living, that is mankind and hu-mankind, what progeny did these other Adam’s and Eve’s produce? (See link No. 1 below)

Genesis 3:20 (MCV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living (Mankind and hu-mankind).

The next problem I had was that of understanding how a brute beast of the field could scheme, talk to and seduce (beguile) a woman (see link No. 2 below). Some say that The Adversary entered or possessed a serpent creature thereby enabling it to talk and to carry out The Adversary’s dastardly deed, but that would mean The Adversary had not actually done it, and the beast was just a proxy. And let’s be clear, for The Adversary wanted his genes and DNA impregnated into Eve, not those of some dumb beast. So that rules out the demonic possession nonsense.

I then had the issue of The Yahavah Yah declaring His creation as good and very good, so how could it be declared as such if there was an evil beast of the field, as a part of that very same creation, roaming around like a roaring lion looking for innocent victims to devour?

Genesis 1:18 (MCV) And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and Yah saw that it was good.

Genesis 1:31 (MCV) And Yah saw every thing that He had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

On top of this I also had this verse in the mix:

Revelation 13:8 (MCV) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (The Adversary), whose names are not written in The Book of Life of THE LAMB SLAIN FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD.

OK, so let me explain. If Yashua Messiah was The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, that meant that sin and evil HAD TO enter into the world or into the creation in order for this prophetic statement of Yashua Messiah’s to be true, and to come true. So when did evil and sin enter into the world or the creation? Answer: as soon as The Serpent Creature entered The Garden and seduced Eve = The Original Sin.

However, notice this important point. The Garden event didn’t occur until AFTER the creation was finished, and The Spiritual Serpent Creature had been made before the creation, so was not a part of it.

So, at this point, I began getting suspicious, and having already proven that Genesis 4:1 is a corrupted spurious verse (see link No. 3 below), why not Genesis 3:1 as well. OK, I am fairly sure that this is just a coincidence, but you never know.

Today, (17th November 2022) I came across a web page that proposed the idea that the heavenly Four Beasts (Living Creatures) of Revelation 4 had once been Five Beasts (Living Creatures) with The Adversary being the fifth, as one with the head of a Serpent, but who left his first estate in order to play around being a hu-man, as did the so-called ‘sons’ of Yah in Genesis 6.

Now this made sense to me, as he would not have been a part of the physical creation, so thereby not tarnishing it by being a part of it, and leaving the creation clear to be classified as good and very good by The Yahavah Yah. Let’s face it, as a heavenly beast he would have been a usurper from outside and not a part of the physical creation.

This now left me with the task of rewording the verse, so that it made sense and here it is:

Genesis 3:1 (MCV) Now The Serpent Creature was more devious, cunning and crafty than any Beast of Heaven which The Yahavah Yah (The Elohim) HAD MADE. And he said unto the woman (Eve), Yea, hath Yah said, Ye shall not eat of every ‘Tree’ of The Garden?

Another thing that didn’t sit right with me was the use of the two words ‘HAD MADE’ when referring to a ‘beast of the field’, when it should have read ‘had been formed from the ground’. ‘HAD MADE’ sounded a far more appropriate term in reference to the making of angels, when beasts of the earth were formed from the ground.

So there you have it, that Old Serpent was ALWAYS a spirit being and MADE crafty, devious and cunning by The Yahavah Yah, hence he left his first estate in order to pursue his evil career, but with the added ability to become physical and seduce Eve.

If any of you has a problem with the idea of The Yahavah Yah creating things evil, then Scripture will bear me out (see link No. 4 below):

Proverbs 16:4 (MCV) The Yahavah hath made all things for Himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Messenger Charles

1. Hu; Hu-mans; Cainites; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed…

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

DID EVE HAVE SEX WITH THE DEVIL or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit? – Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

3. Genesis 4:1 Did EVE Really Say: “I have Gotten a MAN From The Lord?”:

Genesis 4:1 Did EVE Really Say: “I have Gotten a MAN From The Lord?”

4. Isaiah 45:7 (MCV) I Make Peace, AND CREATE EVIL: I The Eternal Do All These Things!:

Isaiah 45:7 (MCV) I Make Peace, AND CREATE EVIL: I The Eternal Do All These Things!

And Pilate wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS

The title for this article is from John 19:19 (KJV) and here is the complete verse:

John 19:19 (KJV) And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross (stake). And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Now elsewhere, here on my blog, I have already written an article entitled “Was Jesus Christ a Jew?” (see link No. 1 below) where I prove, without a shadow of doubt, that Yashua Messiah was NOT a Jew.

However, this episode, at the end of Yashua Messiah’s life, and as horrendous as it was, is very much misunderstood by almost everybody. When I say to misinformed people that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew, their first port of call, or reference point, is this verse, which they ignorantly use in order to try and make their erroneous case for Him being a Jew.

They will say things like: “So are you saying that Pontius Pilate didn’t know what he was doing when he had the sign made?” And I reply: “Oh yes he knew EXACTLY what he was doing when he made that sign, but I bet it’s not what you’re thinking.”

The other the verse they will ignorantly use is this one:

John 4:22 (KJV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

I will cover this in a new article soon and rest assured that salvation is DEFINITELY NOT OF THE SERPENT SEED JEWS.

However, I have digressed somewhat. So, what was Pilate doing, and thinking, at that time when he made that sign? To answer this correctly requires some critical thinking which, generally, is very much in short supply these days. For the dumbed down masses it is much easier to allow others to do their thinking for them. They certainly cannot think for themselves, that’s for sure. This means they will NEVER question ANYTHING and accept, as a given, that Pilate did do the right thing when he made his sign for Yashua Messiah’s cross. The idea that it was a deliberate political wind up, on the part of Pilate, to the Talmudic Canaanite Jew Pharisees and their racial brethren in Jerusalem, would probably never enter into their dumbed down minds. And yet we have the evidence that this is exactly what Pilate did:

John 19:21 (KJV) Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.

Now this verse raises some interesting points:

1) We can see straight away that the Jews did not want Roman recognition or, possibly, universal non-Jewish recognition that they, The Jews, had crucified a king, whether He was allegedly their king, or anyone else’s king.

2) Notice that the Jews accuse Yashua Messiah of claiming to be their king when He did no such thing. All He admitted to Pilate was the Truth that He was sent to be a King, but without any mention of whose King. So The Jews, in their arrogant vanity and conceit, jumped to the erroneous conclusion that Yashua Messiah had declared that He was their king when nothing could be further from The Truth.

3) He claimed to have come for His People – The Israelites, not the Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews who were, and are, the offspring, both literally and spiritually of Satan the Devil. (see link No. 2 below)

Matthew 15:24 (KJV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I could and can assure him that the first Hebrews were definitely not Jews. The word ‘Jew’ cannot be found in the first eleven books of the Bible. (See link No.s 4 and 5 below)

4) Scripturally He was known as The Son of man (Adam) to let us know quite clearly He was NOT a son of anyone else. Eighty nine times the phrase “the Son of man” is used in the New Testament, just so that we get it through our thick heads who, exactly, Yashua Messiah was, and why it is/was so important that we learned this fundamental TRUTH!! TWO SEEDS came out of The Garden and Yashua Messiah was descended from only one of those seeds, that is, Adam’s seed, and not the other. (see link No. 2 below)

From Strong’s Concordance:

MAN – H120 – ‘adam aw-dawm’ – from 119; ruddy i.e. a human being mankind (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.):–X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.

OK, so let’s be clear about this and build the backdrop to this event. The Jews were an unrelenting thorn in the flesh of The Romans and were always causing insurrections, rebellions and troubles. There were numerous Jewish zealots (terrorists as we would call them today) in Jerusalem and Judea who would attack Roman supply lines and infrastructure often killing Roman soldiers. Barabbas, whom the baying Jewish mob called out for and chose instead of Yashua Messiah, was a renowned zealot and murderer of Romans. So from these known facts, it’s not difficult to imagine Pilate’s opinions and feelings toward these renegade troublesome Jews. Here’s a quote from those times:

“The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force, one knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

— Marcus Tullius Cicero – 106 BC – 43 BC, Governor of the Roman province of Cilicia in the Roman Empire.

We then have the torment and guilt created in Pilate’s mind by these Jews, and their unrelenting demands upon him to find Yashua Messiah guilty of their evil trumped up charges. In turn, his own wife warns him to have nothing to do with Yashua Messiah, calling Him a righteous man.

Matthew 27:19 (KJV) When he (Pilate) was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of Him.

So, after this, we must assume that Pilate, like his wife, was troubled in mind when knowing he must give the order, albeit, under Jewish political pressure, to execute an innocent man. Therefore is it so hard to imagine that he would get his own back on these despicable Jews, by winding them up, with his provocative title “JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS”.

Rest assured Pilate had no idea whether Yashua Messiah was the King of The Jews or not, and I doubt that he was really that interested, either way, but one thing is for sure, he wanted revenge on the troublesome Jews and got it with the use of his provocative political title.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

1 Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

2 Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

3 The Jews are The Tares: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

4 Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

5 Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/