Did The Messenger Paul REASON With THE JEWS In The Synagogues?

OK, now the first issue that arises out of this title is who were these Jews? for until we ascertain who they really were, we’re not going to fully understand this question, or this issue. We then have to see the word ‘synagogue’ in The Light of the Holy Scriptures for, again, unless we know for sure what ‘synagogues’ represent, we’ll flounder in the dark.

So let’s get this second point firmly set in our minds and onto our hearts of Truth, because there is NOTHING positive about synagogues, and the only synagogue mentioned by name in the Holy Scriptures is this one here, and it’s mentioned twice! just so we get it!

Revelation 2:9 (KJV) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are The Synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 (KJV) Behold, I will make them of The Synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

These verses tell us, without any ambiguity, that there’s only one kind of synagogue – SATAN’S SYNAGOGUE, for there is no other.

Right, so who were these ‘Jews’ that said they were Jews, but were lying? Now here we have the usual type of translator’s error that we find so often in the pages of the KJV, and which I reveal in so many of my articles. So let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some insight:

Jews – G2453Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:—Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

OK, the first thing we must understand here is The Truth that the word ‘Jew’, as used in the KJV, is 100% a misnomer, for it is automatically and deceptively leading us to believe that the word ‘Jew’ is referring to the Hebrew Israelites, The Chosen People of God, when NOTHING could be further from The Truth.

This means that these Jews were Jews who thought they were Judeans, but were not Judeans at all, for Judeans were Semitic Hebrew Israelites, and these ‘Jews’ claimed, falsely, that they were Judeans. These impostors, known as ‘Jews’, were/are, in Truth, Hamitic Canaanites from Bathshuah the Canaanitess, through her son Shelah, as recorded in Genesis 38, so they were NOT Judean Semitic Israelites at all. These days they openly admit it!:

“We are a chosen people. Most Jews do not like to admit it but our god is Lucifer and we Jews are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”

— The Jew, Harold W. Rosenthal

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

This is why I call the Jews The Serpent Seed from The Garden (see link Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 below for all the historical proof and evidence that the Jews are nothing to do with The Chosen People – The Twelve Tribes of Israel).

So moving on, we have now learned that these Jews were not Semitic Israelites, so who were these Judeans? The Judeans were descendants of a remnant of the three Tribes of The House of Judah that returned from the Babylonian captivity, namely Royal Judahites, Levites (The Priesthood) and Benjaminites. As examples we had Mary Mariam and Joseph who were Royal Judahites, John the Baptist and his family who were Levites, and The Messenger Paul who was a Benjaminite. Joseph of Arimathea was likewise a Royal Judahite, and no doubt Nicodemus was also a Levite. However, NONE of these crucial Biblical characters were Jews!

All this information now brings us to the thorny issue of whether or not Paul REASONED with the Jews if, by ‘Jews’, Holy Scripture is referring to the Canaanite Jews. If that was the case and the people present in the synagogue were Canaanite Jews then there would have been no reasoning with them at all. Paul would have preached and declared The Gospel of The Kingdom of God and the Jews would have argued with Paul and sent him packing or, worse, attempted to have him arrested and after a rigged trial had him put to death, most likely stoning him to death. This is how much the Jews hated The Gospel Message and thereby making any reasoning totally impossible.

However, if there had been Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites there present with these Canaanite Jews, then some kind of reasoning could have been possible, but always keeping in mind that unless The Father was calling these Judeans, they would also have been non-receptive to The Kingdom Gospel Message.

Moreover, all of you who have read my articles on “Theology and Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals” (see link Nos. 6 and 7 below), will know my views and be aware of the compelling evidence I have gathered that proves them to be next to useless when it comes to matters Holy Spiritual and Scriptural. If you have not read them, I thoroughly recommend them to you now for, without the knowledge contained therein you are, and will always be, vulnerable to their deceitful and deceptive ways. Make no mistake these so called experts will lead you astray if you give them, not even, half a chance.

Back to the title question; well did he? Did Paul ‘reason’ with the Canaanite Jews in the Synagogues? In fact, as already stated, did Paul ‘reason’ with anyone? What if he did or he did not, what does it matter? It matters greatly for, if he didn’t, why is the word ‘reasoned’ in the Holy Scriptures at all?

Let’s deal with the question.

Did Paul reason with the Jews?

Well the KJV of The Holy Bible says he did so that must be it, yes? Actually, no is the plain and simple answer to that. To help us with this study I will list the relevant Holy Scriptures here:

Please take note that the word ‘reasoned’ cannot be found in any of Paul’s letters, nor in Hebrews. So this tells us that it’s a word that only Luke uses in Acts which immediately puts a question mark over it.

Acts 17:1-2 (KJV)Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews: And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.

Acts 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.

Acts 18:19And he came to Ephesus, and left them there: but he himself entered into the synagogue, and reasoned with the Jews.

Acts 24:25 And as he reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come, Felix trembled, and answered, Go thy way for this time; when I have a convenient season, I will call for thee.

There we are, four Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals and theologians love, especially Roman Catholic Bible intellectuals. Why do they love these Holy Scriptures? because they think that Paul was just like them, a debating, pontificating Bible intellectual or theologian, when nothing could be further from The Truth, and The Truth is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

OK, let’s print Strong’s definition of this word:

Reasoned – G1256διαλέγομαι dialegomai dee-al-eg’-om-ahee. Middle voice from G1223 and G3004; to say thoroughly, that is, discuss (in argument or exhortation): – dispute, preach (unto), reason (with), speak.

Now here in Strong’s definition we can see some confusion through his contradictory remarks:

On one hand he says ‘dialegomai’ means: “To say thoroughly”; “To preach (unto)”; “To speak”; “To exhort.” Then on the other hand he says it means: “To discuss”; “To argue”; “To dispute”; “To reason.”

Now which is it, for it cannot be both?

In 2 Corinthians 12:20 Paul states quite clearly what he thinks of debating, reasoning and arguing:

2 Corinthians 12:20 (MCV) For I fear, lest, when I come, I shall not find you such as I would, and that I shall be found unto you such as ye would not: lest there be debates, (reasoning) envyings, wraths, strifes, (arguments) backbitings, whisperings, swellings, (haughtiness through puffed up meaningless intellectual vanity) tumults.

Is Paul a hypocrite? Is he giving advice and warnings to those he is teaching whilst he himself does the opposite!! Is this an example of the worldly norm of: “Don’t do as I do, just do as I tell you?” Is that what it’s all about – is that what Paul was saying here? I don’t think so, in fact I know so and we all know so, don’t we? if The Truth is in us.

Here is the bottom line: “Saying thoroughly”; “preaching unto”; “speaking and exhorting” is a one way street. These activities do not invite debate, unless you are opposed to the aforementioned declarations. We need to understand The Word of God is not up for debate, nor up for discussion, nor up for reasoning on for hours and hours. It is preached and either received or rejected; there is no half way house.

Paul went into the synagogues and preached and there stated his case (he said thoroughly) for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). Now there would have been some there that received Paul’s message joyfully, and others that would not have done so. Those who received it joyfully would have questioned Paul further initially being curious and then hungry for The Word of God, and wanting to know more. No doubt those who did not receive his message would have given him much opposition. This opposition would have come from the men of religion, but he would not have argued and reasoned with them. He would have said the same things to them as Yashua Messiah said to the Pharisee Canaanite Jews of His day. Hypocrites; whited sepulchres; nests of vipers etc. etc. The mindset that is opposed God – the carnal hu-man mindset cannot be reasoned with, it’s impossible and Paul knew this. See link No. 8 below)

Let’s not forget he was once one of them himself, a Pharisee, so he knew exactly how their minds worked. That’s why he stated this in Romans 8:6-7

Romans 8:6-7 (KJV) For to be carnally minded is death; but to be Spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

So there we have it; it’s either one or the other, called or not called.

Let’s now take a closer look at those Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals use to support their right to foolishly reason and pontificate on The Holy Word of God, something they are not Spiritually qualified to do.

1) “And three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.”

What does this tell us? It tells us the opposite of The Truth. It says Paul reasoned with them for three Sabbath days, which means every Sabbath, for three consecutive weeks Paul went to this synagogue to preach The Word of God out of The Holy Scriptures. He didn’t reason out of the Holy Scriptures, for it is impossible for a Spirit born son of God to do so. Therefore to ‘say thoroughly’ is just another way of saying he spoke with confidence and authority; he taught, preached to or exhorted those present he didn’t reason. One only reasons with people who are in disagreement. If, as True Believers, we reason with the argumentative, we automatically give credence to their view. If someone was disagreeing with the Messenger Paul, whose servant do you think this trouble maker was? Only one chance for the right answer folks and no prizes for getting it right!

2) “And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.”

Here we go again; he ‘reasoned’ and persuaded the Jews Judeans and Greeks. No he didn’t, he ‘said thoroughly’ what the Holy Scriptures said and then they were persuaded. They were convinced by what they heard. How?

John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

This is how it works folks: The Father God calls a man or a woman to His Son and this is made possible by The Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has not yet indwelled this convert yet, but he or she is receiving special attention from The Father through His Spirit. After this miraculous event, and a called person hears The Word of God preached or ‘said thoroughly’ by a messenger from God, he or she will respond positively, they can do nothing else. This is how these Israelite Judeans and Greeks were able to be ‘convinced’. The Father God was calling them and Paul was His messenger bringing them the Good News.

If we look at Strong’s definition for ‘persuaded’ it’s not the best word choice for this situation:

Persuaded – G3982πείθω peithō pi’-tho A primary verb; to convince (by argument, true or false); by analogy to pacify or conciliate (by other fair means); reflexively or passively to assent (to evidence or authority), to rely (by inward certainty): – agree, assure, believe, have confidence, be (wax) content, make friend, obey, persuade, trust, yield.

In order to satisfy The Truth of John 6:44 we need something better than ‘persuaded’ because to be ‘persuaded’ means a choice has been made and that is not the case at all as being saved is not up to us, it’s not our decision. Let’s assess this miracle properly: “To passively assent to”; “to trust and rely on with an inward certainty”; “to trust and be in agreement with”; “to have no doubts and total confidence that what we and they are hearing is The Truth.” All of the above is only possible through The Father making it possible through The Holy Spirit and Yashua Messiah with us for, where else would this inward certainty originate – from ourselves!!??

When Samuel the Prophet was called The Father God did not reason with him, He just called his name and Samuel replied: “Here am I.”

1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the LORD called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

Have you noticed two things missing here – reasoning and persuasion, well, would you believe it? I do hope so, because the words ‘reasoned’ and ‘persuaded’ are the additions of Bible intellectuals, who over time have contaminated The Word of God through their personal religious agendas, and thereby reflected them in the pages of The Holy Bible.

As a final point, you could argue’ that I am reasoning’ with you to persuade’ you with this article, right this minute, but again that would not be true unless The Father were already calling you to His Son. If that is the case you will need no reasoning or persuading, and I will certainly not have to argue with you. I am only the sower and the seed is The Word of God and you are either fertile soil or stony ground. Furthermore, I cannot tell you whether you are fertile soil or not, only you can answer this question for yourself, for you will either agree with me or disagree with me.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

3. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

4. Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:

5. The Jews are The Tares, Fit Only For Burning!:

6. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Parts 1, 2 & 3:

7. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Part 4:

8. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 4

For Parts 1, 2 and 3 see link No’s. 5, 6 and 7 below.

Welcome back to this series of articles. In part one I reported that as I was writing this article in 2007 a number of people were gathering in South London to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the British Abolition of Slavery, and I asked the question:

Would Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) have joined in?

Since reporting that event there has been considerable press coverage with images that I found to be the most wretched, disgusting, gut-wrenching, phoney and pathetic I have ever witnessed in my life! Young and not so young white creatures (I won’t call them men) with fake chains and shackles around their legs, necks and wrists wearing T shirts with ‘So Sorry’ emblazoned across the front of them, parading themselves like spineless emasculated wimps for all to see. Here are two images of their vile treachery:

Sell Out Traitors To Their Own Kind!
Disgusting Treacherous Wretches Who Have Their ‘Rewards’ Awaiting Them!

As you can see, some of them were even down on their knees grovelling on the ground. (The origins of ‘bending the knee’ anyone?) Now to all you satanic Cultural Jew Marxists in our midst I am sure this will appear to you as OK, even all very fine, but in reality what does it say about them and you? (See link No. 4 below) Not only that, but what does it say about modern Britain (I tend to leave the word ‘Great’ out these days). Furthermore, what does it prove? Has their wretched grovelling proved anything? No! Has it changed anything? No! Has their stupid, irresponsible, infantile emotional unthinking behaviour changed history? No! Will their vile behaviour make them ‘feel better’? No! because it’s the permanent guilt that ‘keeps ‘em going’; it’s the guilt that makes them ‘feel good’ and feel ‘righteous’. This is how wretchedly rotten they are, for their minds are calcified and cancerous. Has this behaviour made a positive impression on the black people of South London? I very much doubt it, and if I were a black person I would consider it a patronising insult and treat the whole phony episode with contempt.

So what’s it all about, and would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) have joined them in their little self-righteous parade of false remorse and false humility for the cameras? I don’t think so, in fact, I know so. The only anniversaries Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) will be interested in, if any, will be the future anniversaries of the commencement of His Kingdom here on this earth when He returns. None of man’s activities in this age will be remembered, nor commemorated, by way of an anniversary in God’s Kingdom, if anything The Lord will want them all forgotten! Well let’s hope He does.

The question now is this: how can I be so sure Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not join in with this celebration? To answer that we need to understand the origins of ‘slavery’ (the accurate name being Involuntary Servitude) and ask ourselves why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) allowed it to take place at all? The answer to that question can be found in Genesis 9 where we read of Yashua Messiah’s curse on Canaan. This curse, pronounced by Yashua Messiah through Noah, came, because of Ham’s sin with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife). Noah’s son Ham, Canaan’s father, “saw his father Noah’s nakedness” which in Biblical language can only be interpreted that he had sexual intercourse with his mother, whilst his father was in a drunken sleep:

Genesis 9:20-22 (KJV) And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

OK, am I saying that some of Canaan’s descendants were and are black? Yes. How do I know that? Easy, Cush, Canaan’s half-brother was black; the name Cush literally means ‘black’ and all olive, swarthy, dark and brown skinned people are descended from Ham. OK, back to this curse of Yashua Messiah’s, through Noah, upon Canaan and here are the verses:

Genesis 9:24 (KJV) And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

The word ‘servant’ here means a ‘bond-man’ or a man in bondage – a sold-man – sold into involuntary servitude. Canaan and his descendants were to be bonded and even worse than that, bonded to those already bonded. Notice too, that they were also to be in servitude to the descendants of Shem (white people) and bonded serfs of the descendants of Japheth (yellow people, who are now colonising Africa and fulfilling that prophecy), that is, they were also to become serfs of serfs. Many serf masters promoted certain numbers of their serfs to the positions of overseers and managers on their plantations, and that meant they had authority over their fellow serfs – Canaan’s black descendants became serfs of serfs.

Here is another truth; Black Africans were sold to Jewish slave traders who literally ran the black slave trade, but by whom? Other Africans, black people sold their own kind into slavery. Captains or commanders of slave ships (many owned by Jews) didn’t capture the Africans they took on board their ships, they had already been captured by other black Africans who worked for the Jews. This was big business, and a lucrative business for all concerned, not just the ship’s masters and Jewish ship owners. These facts are, of course, conveniently forgotten, deliberately played down and airbrushed from history, or just ignored by Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooders (propagandists) in the west. This especially applies within the whoring media, who seem to want to continually beat themselves, and us, up about a time in our history that we can do nothing about, nor change. The point we have to take from this is that blacks were as guilty as the Jews, and whites to a lesser degree, in this whole episode of history. Any other view is evil, treacherous, western liberal, manipulation of The Truth.

Here is another question; if we were to replace the sin of involuntary servitude, with the sin of murder and celebrate its abolition, would it make any sense? If these people in South London had been celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of murder, do you think Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would have joined in with that? Do you think He would have joined in, when black yoofs, in drug gang wars, are regularly being gunned down and murdered on the very same streets of (in allegedly gun abolished) South London? Can you see the blatant hypocrisy of it all? Which in turn means can you also see the Jews operating in the background driving this anti-white, white genocide satanic activity? That is, blacks with guns and whites unarmed!

We need to understand that involuntary servitude, on this earth, has never gone away – it still goes on – especially where The Jews are living and also in the Arab countries of the Middle East. Involuntary servitude is also rife in the Jewish run porn industry – many white girls are abducted in the Ukraine and Russia. The British abolishing involuntary servitude in 1807 didn’t bring it to an end. In fact the so-called British abolition of involuntary servitude (slavery) was an act of mere window dressing – a facade.

Here is a further question: Is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) interested in man’s ‘achievements’, that is, all those things that man can do, and does do, under his own strength? Well yes, up to a point, but then again no, because Yashua Messiah created man in the first place. He was, therefore, and is, perfectly well aware of what His creation is capable of ‘achieving’, including the past; the present, and what they could be capable of in the future.

When man fell in the Garden of Eden he acquired the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil through ‘eating the fruit of the tree’ he was commanded not to eat (See link No. 2 below).Now becauseman has acquired the knowledge of good and evil he is, therefore, quite capable of doing both things. This, in turn, can depend very much upon outside influences, his mood swings, his general disposition and/or his motives. His motives for ‘doing good’ or what we call ‘do-gooding’do not come from the Godhead; they come from the fallen man himself, that is, Satan’s will.Man, therefore, is very able at doing evil, that is, enslaving people and also very able at do-gooding, that is, abolishing slavery. All this ‘slavery’ or ‘abolition of slavery’ amounts to is an active demonstration of man’s behaviour in his fallen condition, nothing else. I hope you can now see why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not be celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of slavery. It is wholly a celebration of man’s ‘achievements’. Slavery and its abolition have got nothing to do with Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Now here is some information for mainstream Christians who have been sucked into this deceptive worldly liberal phenomenon called “Permanent guilt over slavery.” You see, they haven’t a clue about what Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) actually said about slavery? So let’s go to Ephesians now to find out and thereby set the record straight:

Ephesians 6:5 (KJV) Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;

In the above verse we can see another example of translators tinkering with the Word of God. In the Greek, the word for ‘servants’ is ‘doulos’ which means slaves. So here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, saying to those in involuntary servitude “be good obedient serfs” not rebellious: “I want my freedom” serfs. In verse 9, verse 5 it is then supported with:

Ephesians 6:9 (KJV) And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with Him.

Here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, telling serf masters to be equitable and just toward their serfs. Notice, there is neither one jot nor an inkling of the suggestion that the status quo of the serf/master master/serf arrangement should be changed nor rebelled against, especially with regard to Canaanites (the Jews and blacks).

Here above is concrete evidence that Yashua Messiah did not come to change this world, nor did He leave any instructions with His Messengers (apostles) to do so either. That also means that we, as Christians, are not to get involved in this world’s political systems, even if they look good and righteous on the outside.

Would Jesus Christ have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid?

To answer this and affirm what I have said above, what we have to understand is that Yashua Messiah did not come the first time, that is, in the first century to change this world or this age, nor its systems of governance, nor in fact, people’s sinful lifestyles. He came to take away all the sins of mankind, conquer death, and allow The Father time to draw (drag) those He had predestined, to His Son, that is, the gift of Grace filled Salvation to those He would call and choose, and to no one else.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

However, Apartheid was another of man’s systems of governance, but this time based upon God’s plan for the coming Kingdom, and the impetus to change it or abolish it, was from hu-man beings and/or from Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooding white men, that is, shabbos goy self-righteous treacherous white men = serfs of The Jews. The misguided issue of ‘hu-man rights’ is also tied up in this Apartheid system as well, (See link No. 3 below) but I will not go into that here. Here, too, is another Truth, the Roman Empire was far more evil, ruthless and cruel than the Apartheid governments of South Africa, and yet Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not say a word nor lift a finger against it, but He did tell Pontius Pilate that this world/age was not His kingdom.

Moreover, what many mainstream Christians, those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, also forget is the Barabbas character in the account of Yashua Messiah’s criminal show trial. He is mentioned in God’s Word for good reason, for Barabbas was big on regime change, he was a zealot of zealots, a first century terrorist – a real terrorist, and he wanted the Romans out of Judea!! He wanted ‘freedom’ and ‘independence’ for the Jews.

Had he been alive during the Apartheid era he, too, would have been a Cultural Jew Marxist and big on regime change in South Africa. He would have fought tooth and nail to get the white man out of power in South Africa, and he would definitely have been big on useless ‘hu-man rights’ for blacks too.

Back to the trial of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), and we know the story, don’t we? The crowd (being the Jews) called out for Barabbas to be released, not Yashua Messiah. Barabbas was a man after their own reptile hearts, a man with whom they had much in common, and a man they could relate to. Barabbas was their hero – a ‘freedom’ fighter. Yashua Messiah was a ‘nobody’ when compared with Barabbas. Yashua Messiah might as well have been a foreign invader from a planet, such was their hatred for Him.

OK, so Barabbas was big on regime change, but was Yashua Messiah big on regime change? No, He wasn’t, not then, but He will be in the future when He returns to shepherd and segregate the nations of this earth with a rod of iron (tough love) – the biggest regime change you will ever see. (See link

No. 1 below)

Finally, did Barabbas win in his zeal to remove the Romans from Judea? Not a chance, for in 70 AC, less than 40 years later, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem completely – they razed it to the ground, including Herod’s Temple.

Moreover, it will be very interesting to see what becomes of South Africa over the next thirty years or so. If Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) is anything to go by, I don’t hold out much hope for it. Keep your eyes on the news folks and witness all the end time results of the white man’s self-righteous and delusional do-gooding, all on behalf of the Cultural Marxist Jews!!

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

So would Yashua Messiah have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid, no way? Will Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) bring an end to involuntary servitude (because it still goes on today, even in 2007 and 2021)? Oh yes, but not until He returns to take His Throne as King of kings and Lord of lords, and all of man’s ways, his systems, his governments and futile ideas are brought to an end. Yashua Messiah please hurry that day! Not long now folks so stay strong in The Faith.

As a PS, you maybe curious as to why I use the term “involuntary servitude” instead of “slavery” and the answer to that is quite simple. In pre-civil war USA white men were free and blacks were in involuntary servitude. After that war was was lost to the Federal Government, (the so-called Civil War was a war by the Federal Government on ALL The States) both white men and blacks became CITIZEN SLAVES of the Federal Government, and it’s been downhill for the whites of America ever since. The so-called Union Soldiers were just useful idiots for the Federal Government. Just a little true history to enlighten your day.

Oh and one thing I did forget: Would the fop fake long haired ‘Jesus’ have taken part in all this guff and garbage? Yes, of course he would, but then you knew that already, didn’t you? LOL

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. APARTHEID is The Kingdom Of God:

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

3. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

4. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

5.Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 1:

6. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 2:

7. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 3:

Was Yahsua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 2

For Part 1 please see link No. 4 below.

Before I press on with answering the questions I listed in Part 1, I will quote some Scriptures that are very much linked to this subject of the false images of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). In fact The Lord warns us about a time when these deceivers will come on the world scene and lead many, or multitudes, astray. We are talking big numbers here, not just a few, and these deceivers were already at it before the end of the first century.

Matthew 24:5 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Mark 13:6 (MCV) For many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Luke 21:8 (MCV) And He said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many (a great number) shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

A great number will come in The Lord’s name,but how will they come? Why, with all their Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious paraphernalia, (see link No. 1 below) that’s how. With all their self aggrandising ‘church’ buildings, their love of money, their fancy robes, their silly Dagon fish hats, and even sillier meaningless relics, their insulting icons, statues, paintings, and all accompanied with their non-gospel of the bad news, or salvation by works, the whole satanic marketing package.

Do not be deceived, this is big business – religious big business and they dress up for the part too. Furthermore, do not be deceived by those who will attempt to explain the above verses away. They will do this by saying that The Lord was warning us only about those people who would say they “actually are Jesus Christ”, that is, impostors, and those who would be deranged and unhinged. Yes, there will be examples of these weird whacky people too, including the Papacy. Let’s not forget, Popes believe they stand in the place of Christ, and they are false Christs, but they, fortunately, will only be very few in numbers. To support The Truth and expose their false interpretations of these verses we only have to check out the Greek rendering:

Matthew 24:5 (Greek Transliteral) Many shall be coming on the name of me saying that I am and many they shall be straying.

Here we can see that many will be coming saying that ‘Christ is’ or ‘preaching a Christ’, a false Christ and not saying that they actually are Christ.

OK, on with those questions.

Would Jesus Christ have stood up for your human rights? Now I was going to answer this question here, but because the topic invites such a large amount of information to reveal it for what it is, it will need an article all of its own, so I will press on with next question.

Would Jesus Christ have given His blessing on multiculturalism? Before I continue with answering this question, we first need to know what it is, just what, exactly, is multiculturalism? Well it’s more than one culture isn’t it? No it isn’t and that’s the demonic lie and deceptiveness built into this word and in turn in its manipulative use. A person can be multicultural, that is, able to mix in easily and adapt to several cultures and that would be down to that man or woman’s individual desire, tastes, likes and societal abilities, but do we all have that desire and those abilities? NO!

Furthermore, is it a sin not to have them? No. So if being a multiculturalist is not multiculturalism, what is multiculturalism!? Multiculturalism is an unachievable societal system invented and orchestrated by the Canaanite Jews, those in real authority, who are now dictating, via their political puppets, how we ought to behave and live. This is a draconian, Pharisaical, legalistic, self-righteous, pseudo religious system of governance. Instead of being free to decide whether or not we want to be multicultural, we are now told we must be multicultural, this is multiculturalism. If we have no desire to be multicultural we are then branded as bigots, haters, racists, xenophobes, and even heretics. Now there is only one outcome to the attempted enforcement of this issue = VIOLENCE, and that is just what (((those))) in power want, so that they can introduce Martial Law.

Moreover, it will, and already does involve state control and manipulation over your lives. How? How, because we, in the west, now live in democracies or better, DeMon-oCracies which in abbreviated form spells D.M.C. or Domination, Manipulation and Control. You think you are free under this system, but in reality you are deceived and conned and are thereby enslaved and held captive to it. The Truth is, we in the west live in bondage to a system that controls, manipulates and enslaves us and the real power-brokers are the heads of the global corporations, including the Vatican, and the global bankers (The Rothschild Banking Cartel) more commonly known as the New World Order or The Deep State. Politicians are just cloned lackeys, ‘jokers’, puppets and front men for these real sources of power. Whatever these power-broker people say, goes and there are no arguments.

This multiculturalism thing is a classic example of how D.M.C. works. All (((they))) do (they, as already described, being the real authorities (The Jews) behind the politicians) is deliberately create an unworkable societal mould. They then make those, that is, the majority, who wish to have no part in multiculturalism feel guilty (a bogus guilt created by them for manipulative purposes), when there is no reason to feel guilty at all. Now they do this through subtle, and at times not so subtle, propaganda, which amounts to a form of guilt layering, emotional blackmail and through it, coercion. This is victimisation through false accusations of the majority or host nation culture, and is achieved by mental harassment, via the media (also under their control). The host nation’s culture, who have done nothing wrong by wanting to maintain and keep their own culture intact, are made to feel guilty and responsible, via this blatant emotional manipulation, for not ‘doing more’ for those whose cultures are not their own. All this, when all the while it should be the responsibility of those with the foreign cultures to adapt to the host nation’s culture – not the other way round. This, in a world of true justice would not be unreasonable.

The evil wickedness of multiculturalism then creates animosity, bitterness, resentfulness and hatred between peoples and drives a wedge between the people of different cultures, instead of helping them assimilate into the host nation’s culture – not that this is possible for it clearly isn’t. This is how we end up with ghettos.

What we, the indigenous population or host culture are supposed to do, in a practical sense, to bring about this multicultural society no one has yet explained to any of us, nor are they likely to – hence the Commie traitor Merkel has begrudgingly admitted that it is a failure. This is because, in reality, there is nothing we can do and they, the criminal orchestrators, know it, it has all been done deliberately to cause unrest and division. This though, is not the only issue, as far these authority figures are concerned. All of this is of no matter to them, because all they are interested in is the deliberate brow beating and victimisation of their fellow countrymen. This is massive treachery on a national scale, it is nothing but treason and do not be surprised by it. This is not a fanciful idea; it is the Truth and spelled out quite clearly in the Holy Scriptures:

2 Timothy 3:1 (MCV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, (narcissistic politicians obsessed with their own images and their imaginary ‘legacies’, and nothing else) covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, (not listening to wise counsel from their parents and elders) unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection (no compassion), truce-breakers, (breakers of treaties) false accusers, incontinent, (without self control) fierce, (savage) despisers of those that are good, (passing legislation that is a blasphemy to God and an affront to the Godly) 4 Traitors, (the selling out and betrayal of their own people and nation) heady (rash and impetuous), high-minded, (inflated with conceit) lovers of pleasures (debauched and licentious) more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof (followers of and believers in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and not Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ): from such turn away.

As you read the above passage of Scripture, just think of how many of these labels you could easily hang around the necks of your ‘church’ leaders and criminal political ‘leaders’!!??

I have digressed a little above, so getting back to the thread again here is another Truth. ‘Isms’ divide and segregate, they never unite. An ‘ism’ and ‘isms’ tend mostly to be divisive and negative, elitist or they are cultish and clannish in make up. They invariably drive a wedge through societies and automatically create an ‘us and them’ arrangement. Here are some examples: Bolshevism, Communism, Socialism, Cultural Jew Marxism, Conservatism, Judaism, Islamism, Methodism, Protestantism, Catholicism, Liberalism, Elitism, Hinduism and Multiculturalism. There are many more that could be added to this list, but I’m sure you get the picture. ‘Isms’ antagonise, divide and cause jealousy; hate and friction, they do not unite and bring peace, only a God given new heart in men and freedom under Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) Grace can do that.

Having said all that, would Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) give His blessing on multiculturalism? I think I have already answered that one, don’t you? A better question would be: What has The Light and/or The Way got to do with darkness or the evil manipulative treacherous schemes of men? Answer: NOTHING!

Again, here’s the question we have to ask: Would the effeminate long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ bless multiculturalism? Of course he would, he already does through all those mainstream ‘Christians’ of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who buy into multiculturalism think there is nothing wrong with it. The Jewish Cultural Marxist Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby being a perfect example. He and they love multiculturalism; they actually think it is part and parcel of The Kingdom of God being built by them now, here on this earth.

So here we have so called Christians absorbing into their beliefs the misguided evil ideas of carnal minded unbelieving hu-man beings = ATHEISTS! – unbelievable! Their delusion is complete. Many of these so called Christians call themselves ‘Progressive Christians’. (See link Nos. 1 and 2 below)

Re Justin Welby I think you will find via his website that what I have said regarding his faith in multiculturalism is true. Welby as a worldly contaminated Laodicean and a firm believer in the long haired wimp ‘Jesus’ he would be, wouldn’t he, so no surprises there then?

No surprises perhaps, but there may be some surprises in the following articles, so please stay with me on this important exposure of their false image based religious scam – The Cainite-Judeo-Christain Religion.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

2. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

3. Progressive or Libertine Christianity Versus Fundamental Christianity:

4. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp Part 1:?

Was Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) a Jew?

Now I ask this question because you would not believe the number of ignorant people who come on social media threads shouting the odds about Yashua Messiah (The Yahavah Yashua Messiah) being a Jew, when He was no such thing. In Truth, to call Yashua Messiah a Jew is one of the biggest blasphemies and insults that you can hurl at Him.

Moreover, I do cover this subject elsewhere here on my blog, but only in a general sense, that is, when dealing with the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews and their racial origins as an ethnic Canaanite group starting in Genesis chapter 38. (See link Nos. 1, 2 & 3 below)

The thing is, how do these silly people make this erroneous connection when Yashua Messiah made it perfectly clear who the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews were, and did so twice in no uncertain terms, along with John the Baptist, so three times in all and recorded in Matthew, Mark and Luke.

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

From Strong’s Concordance:

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING – by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Are you getting it? I do hope so, because if Yashua Messiah was a Canaanite Jew then He, likewise, would have been racially or ethnically A SERPENT! A VIPER! or A SNAKE! and therefore against Himself! – TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE!!!

However, this is what these Canaanite Jewish people were, and still are today, in terms of their BLOOD!!! – vicious evil viper snakes, born liars, swindlers, crooks, (see video link below) parasites on any host nation in which they reside, pornographers, corrupters, usurious thieves and, worst of all, genocidal, psychopathic, cold blooded murderers, as exemplified in the so called Russian Revolution; as evidenced by this brave man here:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.”

It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

A great disaster had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks, the majority of their leaders.”

— Jewish World, April 16, 1919

Solzhenitsyn was not to know that these Canaanite Jewish devils had not forgotten Yah, for they had never known Yah at all, and from the beginning. Hence Yashua Messiah told them so, straight:

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of YOUR FATHER The Devil, and the lusts of YOUR FATHER ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning (his son Cain), and abode not in The Truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews are the physical descendants of Cain, through Canaan post-flood. Canaan was the literal rekindling of Cain’s bloodline after The Flood and that’s why Noah, on behalf of Yah, cursed him.

Noah’s son Ham had sexual relations with his mother Naamah and produced Canaan from that wicked evil union – Ham saw his father’s nakedness which means:

Leviticus 18:8 (MCV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (MCV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Here in the second verse we can see that later on from the days of Ham, Yashua Messiah (the Yah of the Old Testament) firmed this up by including a severe punishment for the Israelites if they behaved as Ham had done with his mother. Ham therefore was the original “motherfucker” and pay attention, for there is a another race of Canaanite people that regularly uses this expression. This is because it is an intrinsic part of their racial make up, their psyche and their vocabulary, and it lets you know who their original parents were. I refer here, of course, to so-called African-American blacks.

However, I have digressed somewhat, so back to the subject at hand, and here are the genealogies of Yashua Messiah’s parents. In Matthew 1 we have Joseph’s lineage, who was not Yashua Messiah’s real father, but his step-father, and in Luke 3 we have Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage:

Joseph’s lineage in Matthew:

Matthew 1:1-17 (MCV) The book of the generation of Yashua Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat JUDAH and his brethren; 3 And JUDAH begat Pharez and ZARAH of Thamar (TAMAR); and PHAREZ begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz (BOAZ) of Rachab; and Booz (BOAZ) begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat REHOBOAM; and REHOBOAM begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; 15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16 And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary (Miriam), of whom was born Yashua, who is called The Messiah – The Anointed. 17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto The Messiah – The Anointed are fourteen generations.

Miriam’s (Mary’s) lineage in Luke:

Luke 3:23-38 (MCV) And Yashua Himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI, 24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, 25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge, 26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, 27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, 28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, 29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, 30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of NATHAN, which was the son of David, 32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, (BOAZ) which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson, 33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, (PHAREZ) which was the son of Juda (JUDAH), 34 Which was the son of Jacob (ISRAEL), which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, (TERAH) which was the son of Nachor, 35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, 36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem (SHEM), which was the son of Noe (NOAH), which was the son of Lamech, 37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of Yah.

Now how do we know that Luke’s lineage is that of Miriam’s and not just a repeat of Joseph’s lineage? Easy, because look what it says here:

Luke 3:23 (MCV) And Yashua Himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of HELI.

And yet it says in Matthew:

Matthew 1:16 (MCV) And JACOB begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Yashua, who is called The Messiah – The Anointed.

So did Joseph have two fathers, or is this a contradiction, or just an expression of male dominant ancient customs? An expression of male dominant ancient customs is the answer, because HELI was Joseph’s FATHER-in-law and yet still referred to as his father, and not Miriam’s (Mary’s) father. Notice that Jacob begat Joseph, but Heli did not beget Joseph even though he was called Heli’s son.

From the Concordant Literal Translation:

Luke 3:23 (CLV) And He, Jesus, when beginning, was about thirty years old, being a son (as to the law) of Joseph, of Eli,

From The Greek Transliteral:

Luke 3:23 (Greek Transliteral) And He was the Jesus as-if of-years thirty beginning as was lawlized (was legalised) son of-Joseph of-the Heli.

Notice, too, in Joseph’s lineage that he is a descendant of King Solomon, through Solomon’s son Rehoboam, and Miriam is not. She is the descendant of Nathan who was Solomon’s younger brother. Solomon was not the only child that Bathsheba bore to King David, We therefore have Yashua Messiah, who is definitely a descendant of King David, but most certainly not a descendant of the wayward King Solomon. Interesting eh?

I will now draw attention to the crucial part of this genealogy of Yashua Messiah and pay special attention:

Luke 3:33 (MCV) Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of PHAREZ which was the son of JUDAH.

Pharez was one of the twin sons born to Judah and Tamar, Zarah being his twin brother. This makes Yashua Messiah a Royal Judahite, for Judah was the forefather of ALL ISRAELITE ROYALTY hence it says in Genesis:

Genesis 49:10 (MCV) The (ROYAL) Sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh (Yashua Messiah) come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.

The Sceptre is the insignia of Royalty and Sovereignty and it will NEVER leave Judah, nor his descendants, until Yashua Messiah comes to rule in Power in His Kingdom – The Kingdom of Yah on this earth for 1,000 years. This will be followed by the New Heaven (atmosphere) and the New Earth when The Father will make His home with ALL mankind for all eternity.

OK, so as you can see the word JEW has not been mentioned ONCE in this article because Royal Judahites are Israelites, so not Jews, and there is NOTHING royal about Jews. They are the lowest of the low, because they are lying viper snakes and you can’t get much lower than that, can you?

However, I can hear the deceived detractors saying: “Hey you can’t deny Jews their Israelite origins, they come from Judah just like Jesus!!!” AH, BUT DO THEY??!!

In answer to this ignorant empty claim I will return to Judah who begat Pharez and Zarah through Tamar, who was a Semite and related to Abraham. However, Judah also had another partner, his Canaanite wife, named Bathshuah who was the daughter of an Adullamite named Hirah. Hirah was an employee of Jacob – Judah’s father.

Now Adullamites were Canaanites, and this Canaanite wife of Judah’s produced three sons ER, ONAN and SHELAH. Er and Onan were both struck down dead by The Yahavah for disobeying their father Judah, and not siring children through Tamar – they spilled their seed (sperm) on the ground to avoid consummation of their marriage to Tamar, and thereby not producing offspring. This meant that Shelah should have been given to Tamar as her husband, but Judah forgot to follow through with his pledge to Tamar.

In the meantime, Shelah, the third son of Judah and Bathshuah, had married a Canaanite woman and this union sealed and produced the original parents of the first Canaanite Jews and the people we know today as The Jews. To reinforce this, the Jews today will tell you straight that the mother determines their bloodline, NOT the father. So you could have Eskimo for a father, but if the Eskimo’s wife was a Jewess then the offspring would be Jews.

As an aside, this is how we know that both Churchill and Roosevelt were Jews, via their mothers, and Stalin was only a half-Jew having only a Jewish father, but he was a Freemason and did have a Jewish wife.

So to sum up, we now know who The Jews, or more accurately The Canaanite Jews, are and, more importantly, we know who they are NOT, that is, they are: 1) NOT Semites; 2) they are NOT Hebrews; 3) they are NOT Israelites; 4) they are NOT racially related to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), for He was a Royal Judahite Israelite and NOT a Serpent Seed Canaanite Jew. (See link 4 below)

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…” (I will firm this Truth up by stating that The Hebrews were never Jewish.)

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

Video link: https://archive.org/details/jewish-grandmother-says-jews-are-crooks

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews? – The Beginning: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

3. The Scriptural Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews Explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

4. The Jews are The Tares – Fit Only For Burning!: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

5. Why Did Pilate Write: JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/20/and-pilate-wrote-jesus-of-nazareth-the-king-of-the-jews/

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 9 – Their Laughable Abuse of Deuteronomy 28

In part 8 I began to deal with their satanic perversions of The Holy Scriptures, picking from a select list of Holy Scriptures that they regularly pervert and use to build their satanic pyramid arguments.

However, Deuteronomy 28 is a special case because this chapter keeps cropping up all over the web and here is how they misapply it.

This is from a web page called Deuteronomy28.org where they state:

“The scripture in Deut 28:15-68 clearly explain the curses upon Israel for the breaking of YAH’s laws and worshiping other gods. There are several prophecy’s throughout the old testament of Israel being scattered throughout the four corners of the earth. The temple that you see today in Jerusalem is prophecy fulfilled and it was destroyed in 70 AD by the Romans, which has scattered all the 12 tribes of Israel into Africa.”

Now here we have two lies and child like errors and I will list them here:

1) There is no way that blacks have EVER been scattered to the four corners of the earth. Brazil, The Spanish American Colonies, The Caribbean, The USA, Arab countries and that’s it, but NEVER to the four corners of the earth. So which peoples does Deuteronomy 28 refer too? These peoples – the Twelve Tribes of Israel:

(Joseph) Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

(Joseph) Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae – Isaac’s sons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes) (Royalty to Yashua Messiah, King David and British Royalty) = Northern Ireland and Scotland and some still dispersed in Western Europe with some in Germany.

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium).

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

Now the above peoples have definitely been scattered to the four corners of the earth from Alaska in the far North West to New Zealand in the far South East and most places in between and as described here:

Deuteronomy 14:2 (KJV) For thou art an Holy people unto The LORD thy God, and The LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto Himself, ABOVE ALL THE NATIONS THAT ARE UPON THE EARTH. (The British Empire followed by the USA)

2) In the second part of their dumb comment they laughably say this: “The temple that you see today in Jerusalem is prophecy fulfilled and it was destroyed in 70 AD by the Romans, which has scattered all the 12 tribes of Israel into Africa…..”

The TWELVE TRIBES scattered into Africa??????? Hilarious!! In 70 AD there were only the remnants of THREE of the Tribes of Israel in Jerusalem in 70 AD. They were Benjamin, Levi and Judah and those of them that had become Christians had already left before the Romans arrived as they would have heeded Yashua Messiah’s advice as written in the Holy Scriptures:

Matthew 24:16 (KJV) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains.

So here we can see that these silly blacks have no idea of what they are talking about. Furthermore, nowhere in the ancient histories, nor in the Holy Scriptures does it make any mention of Benjaminites, Levites or Judahites escaping to Africa. Let’s face it, only an idiot would attempt to cross the thousands of miles of Saharan arid and sandy desert lands in order to reach the more fertile areas of tropical Africa only to die of tropical diseases when they arrived.

Here is further proof of where the Israelites were scattered:

1 Kings 14:15 (KJV) For The LORD shall smite Israel, as a reed is shaken in the water, and he shall root up Israel out of this good land, which he gave to their fathers, and shall scatter them beyond the river (Euphrates), because they have made their groves, provoking the LORD to anger. (Brackets mine)

The lands beyond the river Euphrates are the lands of the Medes and Parthians – modern Iran and Syria south of the Caucasus Mountains.

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond the River Euphrates, an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

— Flavius Josephus

Furthermore, the crucial historical points these ignoramuses miss is The Truth that Israel was a divided Kingdom when they went into their separate captivities, the Northern Kingdom of Israel in circa 725 BC and the Southern Kingdom of Judah 140 years later in circa 585 BC.

The Northern Kingdom was taken captive by the Assyrians (forefathers of the Germans) and placed in the lands of the Medes and the Parthians just south of the Caucasus Mountains, hence white Israelite people are known today as Caucasians – there is a pass going north (the opposite direction of Africa LOL) through the Caucasus Mountains called the Pass of Israel which the Israelites took in their migrations into Europe.

Moreover, the Southern Kingdom of Judah was later taken captive by the Babylonians (forefathers of the Italians) and they were carried off to Babylon and remained there until the King of Persia invaded Babylon 70 years later and set the three tribes of Judah along with the Canaanite Jews free.

Now a group of these people returned returned to Jerusalem, but this group mostly consisted of Canaanite Jews, not Judahites, Benjaminites and Levites. Yes, some Judahites, Benjaminites and Levites did return, but only a small contingent. The majority of these three tribes made up the diaspora from Babylon and began their slow westward migrations into Europe and eventually joined up with their Northern Kingdom brothers in Britain and North Western Europe (Scandinavia)

This means that the majority of the people who returned to Jerusalem were Canaanite Jews, not Israelites. You will also notice the absence of any blacks in this TRUE HISTORY!!!

OK, returning to the quote and notice how they deviously leave out the first fourteen verses of Deuteronomy 28 so I will include them here for they are an integral contextual part of the narrative of Deuteronomy 28. I will also put in bold text the crucial elements that cannot, in any way, shape or form, be applied to blacks and their history:

Deuteronomy 28:1-14 (KJV) And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently unto the voice of The LORD thy God, to observe and to do all His commandments which I command thee this day, that The LORD thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth: 2 And all these blessings shall come on thee, and overtake thee, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of The LORD thy God. 3 Blessed shalt thou be in the city, and blessed shalt thou be in the field. 4 Blessed shall be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy ground, and the fruit of thy cattle, the increase of thy kine (heifers and cows), and the flocks of thy sheep. 5 Blessed shall be thy basket and thy store. 6 Blessed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed shalt thou be when thou goest out. 7 The LORD shall cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways. 8 The LORD shall command the blessing upon thee in thy storehouses, and in all that thou settest thine hand unto; and He shall bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. 9 The LORD shall establish thee an Holy People unto Himself, as He hath sworn unto thee, if thou shalt keep the commandments of The LORD thy God, and walk in His ways. 10 And all people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of The LORD; and they shall be afraid of thee. 11 And The LORD shall make thee plenteous in goods, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy ground, in the land which The LORD sware unto thy fathers to give thee. 12 The LORD shall open unto thee His good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto thy land in His season, and to bless all the work of thine hand: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow. 13 And The LORD shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath; if that thou hearken unto the commandments of The LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do them: 14 And thou shalt not go aside from any of the words which I command thee this day, to the right hand, or to the left, to go after other gods to serve them.

Now as we can plainly see none of the enboldened elements apply to blacks and their history, so what game do they think they are playing when they ignore these verses of this chapter and start at verse 15? Moreover, I am not going to copy and paste the rest of Deuteronomy 28 as the case has already been proven above, so it will be just the verses that these numb skulls use to pathetically try and make a claim for their black Israelite garbage:

Continuing from point 2 above and from the Deuteronomy.org web page:

“…..and then in later time as per prophecy mentioned in Deut 28:68, the Israelites were sold into slavery…According to the prophecy mentioned in
Deut 28:68, the only race of people who were sold into slavery by ships (bond men and bondwoman) were black people as per scripture are the TRUE descendants of the biblical Israelite’s”

So let’s copy and paste that verse here:

Deuteronomy 28:68 (KJV) And The LORD shall bring thee into Egypt AGAIN with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you. (Emphasis mine)

Right, what are the give aways here?

1) Taken to Egypt AGAIN, so this is the second time these people have been taken captive as slaves to EGYPT!!!

2) When were blacks EVER taken enmass as slaves to Egypt once, let alone twice?

3) And no man shall buy you!!! Now if my memory serves me correctly the history of the black slave trade records how blacks were readily bought and sold at Canaanite Jewish run slave auctions at both ends of the trafficking system i.e. in Africa and America or the Caribbean. So this must mean we are dealing with a very different body of people that no one wants to buy.

4) This also means that these silly blacks are calling America and the Caribbean Egypt. LOL

5) OK, so the fact that we have a reference to WHITE Israelites who are being taken to Egypt a SECOND TIME in SHIPS, what can this possibly mean, for it is nothing to do with blacks? AND there has never been a second captivity in Egypt for the Israelites, to this day, so what gives? PROPHECY is what gives. This verse is unfulfilled prophecy, for it certainly does not apply to the Canaanite Jews, because no ships would be needed to carry off the Canaanite Jew Israelis (currently in unlawful occupation of Palestine) to Egypt, just a very large fleet of guarded buses.

6) Furthermore, when were the WHITE Israelites EVER taken into captivity in ships? They never have been, so this is yet more proof that this verse is prophetic and is an event yet to occur in the not too distant future, if the modern WHITE Israelites fail to turn from their evil satanic ways and wake their ideas up.

7) Notice: “and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen.” Now this is interesting and again proves that this verse has nothing to do with black slaves for they were NOT BONDED. A bonded slave has a debt that he owes to his master that he has to work off and pay with his or her labour in order to be set free. Black slaves who were in involuntary servitude were not bonded, they were slaves for life and so were their children who were born into slavery. Freedom only came from a benevolent master as a gift.

Out of interest the bonded slave system only came into existence after involuntary servitude (so called slavery) had been abolished or at the end of the American Civil War, when both blacks and whites then became citizen slaves of the US Federal Government. This also means that the prophecy of Deuteronomy 28:68 has already been partially fulfilled with just the carrying off in ships being the completion.

As a final point I will add that most born of God Christians will not be a part of this carrying off having already gone to a place of safety as described in Revelation:

Revelation 12:14 (KJV) And to the woman (Spiritual Israel) were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, (three and a half years) from the face of the serpent.

So with that I will call it a cut, unless any more black arrested development buffoonery comes up and needs mocking for all it’s worth. LOL

With love in Yashua Messiah’s name

Brother Charles

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 7 – A Recap and More Crucial History

By way of a recap the first six parts of this series of articles are a revelation of the subversive racial, political and anti-white motives behind the Black Liberation Theology, Black Jesus blasphemy. As proven in those articles, the satanic Bolshevik Marxist Jews are, and have always been, the driving force behind this satanic anti-Christ anti-white movement with its, more than willing, demonic deluded blacks as the foot soldiers.

If any of you have any doubts about this, I quote these comments as evidence:

“While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

– Israel Cohen, 1912, Jewish Secretary of The World Zionist Organisation and co-founder of The Fabian Marxist Society with George Bernard Shaw and Israel Zengwill, author of “The Melting Pot” in 1910.

That same quote in full:

“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.

– Thomas Abernethy, Republican Congressman of Mississippi, June 7th 1957 during a debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1957

What I find interesting, too, is the overtime that Canaanite Jewish owned and controlled sites like Wikipedia put into claiming that these quotes are forgeries, when they are from a well researched historian and honourable Christian man by the name of Eustace Mullins.

These lying shysters then build their feeble forgery claim on the minor issue of Mullin’s claim that Israel Cohen was a member of the British Communist Party in 1912 when officially the British Communist Party did not come into existence until 1920. However, what they conveniently forget to mention is that The British Socialist Party came into existence in 1911, with members of this group then splintering off and forming the British Communist Party in 1920. This means that unofficially the British Communist Party was in existence in 1912 and no doubt Mullins correctly saw no difference between the two. Always remember these golden rules folks and by their own admission:

“Democracy is indispensable to Socialism.” – V. I. Lenin

“Socialism leads to Communism.” – Karl Marx

Furthermore, Cohen did write a book titled: “A Racial-Program for the 20th Century.” with the above excerpt published in the Washington D.C. Evening Star in May 1957,

From: “The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations”, by Myron Fagan.

Notice, too, the open admission: “we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros.”

Nevermind that the Canaanite-Jews were by far the most active force involved in the black slave trade, for which they bear not one atom of guilt nor any remorse. Well being Serpent Seed snake creatures without a conscience why would they feel guilty? A total impossibility.

OK I think that completes the early historical foundation of this evil satanic business so we now move on to more recent events and when this Black Jesus garbage came into being in its modern guise.

“No body heard of black Hebrew or black Israelite’s until the 70’s when your cult was invented in Harlem and the ghettos of the South side of Chicago”

– Avrumeleh Melamid, a Youtube commentator

Now in Truth I cannot verify the information in the above comment, but it doesn’t sound unreasonable when we compare it to what Wiki has to say on the subject:

“Many Black Hebrew groups were founded in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, from Kansas to New York City, by both Americans and West Indian immigrants. In the mid-1980s, the number of Black Hebrews in the United States was between 25,000 and 40,000. In the 1990s, the Alliance of Black Jews (which is no longer operating) estimated that there were 200,000 African-American Jews; this estimate was based on a 1990 survey conducted by the Council of Jewish Federations.”

So here we can see that there has been a recent surge in growth of these deluded black people who even tried to gain citizenship in the unlawful state of Israel, only to be deported as aliens by the Canaanite Jews – who continue to reject these blacks and their whack job claims as being Jews and/or descendants of the Israelites.

In part 8 I will deal with some of the Holy Scriptures that these people twist, pervert and distort in order to try and prove their whacky satanic claims.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 5 – James Cone, Black Liberation Theologian

In part two I mentioned a few of the early agents provocateur in what I call The Black Rebellion, but for this stage of the exposé I will now focus on the more recent principal characters starting with:

James Cone (1938-) Theologian of Black Liberation Theology: “In assessing the theology of James Cone, it is critical to recognize that he sees black experience as the fundamental starting point for ascertaining theological truth. And his own writings are a reflection of his own “black experience” – that is, the discrimination he suffered while growing up as a child in Bearden, Arkansas.”

Again, from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

Notice immediately the oxymoron being applied here – ‘theological truth’. Look folks, there is very little, if any, Truth in theology. Theology is primarily the vain philosophical thinking, logic, reasoning and ramblings of carnal minded Spiritually dead men. This rebellious mindset then produces their own creation, a creation of a god in their image and with it fake doctrines and fake spirituallity. THAT’S IT!! There really is nothing more that can be said about theology, black liberation theology or otherwise, and yet Cone uses his ‘life experiences’ as a young black upon which to build his foundation of so called ‘theological truth’.

It is also from this erroneous thinking that comes the idea of blacks being an oppressed people in the USA when they are no such thing. If blacks are oppressed then they are oppressed by the Canaanite Jew with his victimhood programming and, in turn, by their own people who have swallowed this victimhood snake oil wholesale. Furthermore, if we want to play the victimhood game then ALL PEOPLE are victims of the Canaanite-Jews and their THIEVING USURY which has impoverished THE WHOLE WORLD!! Make no mistake dear people CANAANITE JEW USURY is a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Moreover and at the same time he mentions ‘discrimination’ whilst having been born into a white ‘might is right’ environment. How could there not be be any discrimination, when he is a minority black alien, whose grandparents were most likely the serfs of white people, residing in a nation still ruled by white people? What does he expect? Preferential treatment!!?? It is in the nature of man to look after his own and if some blacks are not up to it why blame the white man? Had he behaved this way in Soviet Russia he would have been in a Gulag quicker than he could have said Uncle Tom’s Cabin – never to be seen or heard of again!!

From the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.””

Now why would people, (I presume this accusation is toward white people), define black people as evil? Is this an unjust conclusion to come to? Well to apply it as a blanket description obviously, yes, because there are good black people, but is the accusation totally without foundation? No and here is the proof:

From the “Council of Conservative Citizens” web page, “The Truth About Interracial Rape.”

“Presently the FBI appears to have only published the full statistical tables up to year 2008. After that the FBI website only has smaller “bulletins” that do not include the full data.

“From this data we find that blacks commit sexual assault against almost as many whites as blacks. However, white on black sexual assault is an extreme rarity.

“Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
Black on White: 20,309
Black on Black: 21,104

“Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Black on Black: 35,330

“Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Black on Black: 36, 620

Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Black on Black: 7,705

“Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Black on Black: 12,780

“Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Black on Black: 34,841

“Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Black on Black: 148,380

“Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
Black on Black: 24,730”

Let me be clear, I don’t like statistics, in fact I hate them and for obvious reasons, as they are easily distorted and become worse than outright lies if used by disingenuous people or lying dissemblers. However, I have quoted these figures for one purpose only and that is to show how the idea that black people are oppressed by the white man does not reveal itself in this data. If anything it reveals the opposite or The Truth that it is the white man and especially the white woman that is oppressed and violently abused by the black man.

Notice, too, how the full data figures ceased to be available when the anti-white, lying racist war criminal Barack Obama became president in 2008!! Coincidence?? I will leave you to decide for yourselves.

Back to James Cone whose name incidently is just a play on the name Cain, so that you know who he is descended from. So what else do we know about James (Cain) Cone?

Again from the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…

“The chief architect of black liberation theology was James Cone, author of Black Theology and Black Power. One of the tasks of this movement, according to Cone, is to analyze the nature of the gospel of Jesus Christ in light of the experience of blacks who have long been victimized by white oppressors. According to black liberation theology, the inherent racism of white people precludes them from being able to recognize the humanity of nonwhites; moreover, their white supremacist orientation allegedly results in the establishment of a “white theology” that is irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. Consequently, liberation theologians contend that blacks need their own, race-specific theology to affirm their identity and their worth.”

Here we can see James (Cain) Cone’s satanic credentials, for it turns out that he is the chief architect of Black Liberation Theology and the author of Black Theology and Black Power. This sounds to me like he is an outright enemy of white people and no more a Christian than my neighbour’s cat.

Moreover, notice, the use of the emotionally charged PC Bolshevik Marxist term “white supremacist” and how it’s viewed as irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. I would counter with the question: When were supremacist whites EVER CONNECTED to the black experience!!?? Who thinks up all this satanic nonsense?

OK let’s have some WHITE EXPERIENCE!!! I was raised in an originally ALL WHITE London and watched it being deliberately invaded and overrun through the 60s, 70s and 80s by West Indians, Indians, Pakistanis, Turks and Greeks and at no time did I ever feel connected to any of them, nor them to me. Cultural remoteness was the order of the day, so what’s all this meaningless nonsense about disconnection from the black experience when there was never a connection in the first place? London today with whites a minority is no longer a white English city – it’s an alien hell hole.

Here’s another thing, why is white supremacy painted in a negative light and who would conjure up such a term and use it to beat up white people? What does the term conjure up in your mind, for it causes me no problems at all? I look at what the white man has achieved down through the centuries and it looks pretty impressive to me and makes the white man look supreme, so what’s with this issue of whites being supreme that these other races have a problem with, especially blacks and Canaanite Jews? Jealousy and envy perhaps?

Continuing again…

““What we need,” says Cone, “is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of Black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.” Observing that America was founded for white people, Cone calls for “the destruction of whiteness, which is the source of human misery in the world.” He advocates the use of Marxism as a tool of social analysis to help Christians to see “how things really are.””

Notice in true Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jew fashion he calls for “the destruction of whiteness”. Remember my earlier quote? If not, here it is again:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

So is James (Cain) Cone looking to help Christians see: “how things really are” from Yashua Messiah’s perspective, that is, through a Christian prism or through the satanic twisted and poisonous anti-white Bolshevik Marxist prism of Karl Marx and Friedrick Engels and the Canaanite Jews? Again no prizes for the right answer.

Part 6 coming soon.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 4 – Black Liberation Theology and its Marionettes

Having digressed somewhat in part three I will now return to the subject of Black Theology with the introduction of Black Liberation Theology.

Black Liberation Theology

From The Acton Institute web page:

“What is Black Liberation Theology anyway? Barack Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright catapulted black liberation theology onto a national stage, when America discovered Trinity United Church of Christ. Understanding the background of the movement might give better clarity into Wright’s recent vitriolic preaching. A clear definition of black theology was first given formulation in 1969 by the National Committee of Black Church Men in the midst of the civil-rights movement:”

OK so what have we got going on here? It seems that the Bolshevik Marxist Jew Obama (Obama is Jewish from his mother) is also a disciple of Black Liberation Theology and the anti-white racist, Black Jesus promoting, Jeremiah Wright. If we add in Obama’s fake Muslim personna we can begin to see what a total lying fraud Obama has always been.

So does all this evidence make the Bolshevik Marxist Jew Obama an anti-white racist bigot and a hater of American white people? No prizes for the right answer and don’t you just love my use of those Social Justice Warrior terms ‘racist’ ‘bigot’ and ‘hater’ in their right and proper context?

Moreover, this evidence also proves that the promotion and promulgation of the satanic Black Jesus propaganda comes from the very top, that is, The Obama Administration itself and most likely via the CIA and the anti-Christ Mossad.

As an aside I will draw your attention to the satanic name of Wright’s ‘church’ –
TRINITY United Church of Christ!

Continuing from The Acton Institute web page:

“Black theology is a theology of black liberation. It seeks to plumb the black condition in the light of God’s revelation in Jesus Christ, so that the black community can see that the gospel is commensurate with the achievements of black humanity. Black theology is a theology of ‘blackness.’ It is the affirmation of black humanity that emancipates black people from White racism, thus providing authentic freedom for both white and black people. It affirms the humanity of white people in that it says ‘No’ to the encroachment of white oppression.”

Now in the above piece we can see meaningless vain theology at its best, or should I say at its worst? It refers to ‘the black condition’ in relation to Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ), but what has that got to do with anything? A True Christian is CALLED by The Father to His Son and he or she then has to TAKE UP THEIR CROSS and follow Yashua Messiah. This is not an easy ride for ANY Christian, it is a life of trials, of facing abusive opposition, of mockings and ridicule and sometimes severe persecution, so why do SOME blacks see themselves as a special ‘woe is me’ case when highlighting ‘the black condition’? Are they looking for a special dispensation from Yashua Messiah?

It then says: “so that the black community can see that the gospel is commensurate with the achievements of black humanity.” I am not going to be drawn into a futile discussion on the achievements of black humanity, but is The Gospel commensurate (equal to) the achievements of black humanity?

Do these people actually KNOW what The Gospel message is!!?? In a nutshell it is the Good News of the coming Kingdom of God on this earth for 1,000 years, followed by a New Heaven (atmosphere) and a New Earth that will come down from Heaven with The Father. It really has nothing to do with the achievements of ANY racial group, let alone black humanity, so I do hope you can see the nonsense in all this narcissistic racial theological waffle. They just make it up with terms like this: “Black theology is a theology of ‘blackness’.” WOW!

It then says: “It is the affirmation of black humanity that emancipates black people from White racism, thus providing authentic freedom for both white and black people.” Here’s a question: Why does black humanity need affirming and affirmation from whom? White folks!!!???? Where does all this insecurity come from? Surely not from black humanity itself!! And again what’s with all this white racism – do they not have a black president? How black does America have to become before all this alleged white racism disappears? Oh yes, totally black with no whites at all and then the Hispanics and Italians (far more racist than whites) and other races can listen to their non stop whingeing.

Did you also notice how ‘beneficial’ all this affirmation for blacks is going to be for whites? It will free white people too. How does that work exactly when white people need no affirmation from anyone especially in their own country? As already hinted, is all this gumpf just a form of anti-Semitic victimhood for blacks and really just inverted anti-white racism?

OK, moving on, we next have this from the same author:

“In the 1960s, black churches began to focus their attention beyond helping blacks cope with national racial discrimination particularly in urban areas.”

When I read falacious overarching generalised statements like the above I always find it interesting how these disgruntled black people have never considered helping their fellow whingers to return to Africa where, I presume, there would be no ‘national racial discrimination’ and where they could cope. For example, let’s say to the West African nations of the Ivory Coast, Senegal and The Gambia where, I believe, most of the blacks slaves originally came from.

For the last time we have this from The Acton Institute web page:

“The notion of “blackness” is not merely a reference to skin color, but rather is a symbol of oppression that can be applied to all persons of color who have a history of oppression (except whites, of course). So in this sense, as Wright notes, “Jesus was a poor black man” because he lived in oppression at the hands of “rich white people.” The overall emphasis of Black Liberation Theology is the black struggle for liberation from various forms of “white racism” and oppression.”

– Anthony B. Bradley, “The Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology.”

Notice from the opening remark of this paragraph, how we are no longer dealing with American blacks but have moved on to: all persons of color who have a history of oppression.” This is classic Bolshevik Marxist Jew Internationalism, this is how they think and they can never think in nationalistic terms even though they have their unlawful State of Israel (not acknowledged by many Jews). This also proves that through Black Liberation Theology they are just making use of gullible duped American blacks to further their anti-white genocidal agenda. In Truth, they couldn’t care less about ‘oppressed blacks’, as already proved by their ancestor’s very active role in the black slave trade.

Notice, too, that this Jeremiah Wright idiot has swallowed wholesale the Black Jesus garbage. He also makes another error of calling Yashua Messiah poor when his step-father Joseph was a successful carpenter and builder who died whilst Yashua Messiah was still quite young. His wealthy great-uncle (Miriam’s [Mary’s] uncle) Joseph of Arimathea, the ship owning tin and gold merchant, then took Him under his wing, so rest assured Yashua Messiah never knew poverty.

Finally it says: “The overall emphasis of Black Liberation Theology is the black struggle for liberation from various forms of “white racism” and oppression.”

Now what and who does this statement remind us of? If I mention the name Barabbus will that help you? In the early first century, elements of the Canaanite-Jews were zealots fighting against the occupying Roman forces who were oppressing them.

However, did Yashua Messiah rally His followers to join these zealots and their movement in order to free themselves from Roman oppression? Did He whinge and whine and accuse the Romans of racism, hate speech and bigotry?? Answer: No He did not, but what He did say to Pontius Pilate is this:

John 18:36 (KJV) Jesus answered, My Kingdom is not of this world: if my Kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to The Jews: but now is my Kingdom not from hence.

Ever notice how Yashua Messiah did not say to Pilate: “That I should not be delivered to YOU (Pilate), but that I should not be delivered to the Canaanite-Jews.”

Part 5 coming up.

BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and (((Those))) Behind It – Part 2 – The Historical Foundation

The Historical Foundation…

…but first, The Unwritten Historical Foundation to The Historical Foundation and the revealing of the ‘certain race’.

Before I press on there are two CRUCIAL things that MUST BE clarified, for these are issues that are NEVER raised in these discussions about blacks in involuntary servitude (erroneously called slavery), whether in The Caribbean or The Americas, and the first issue is the MIGHT IS RIGHT issue which always gets conveniently ignored.

Let’s be honest, (and leaving aside the issue of whether it is right or wrong under might is right), a hu-man being in neck braces and ankle chains has no rights at all – none whatsoever. He is totally at the mercy of his owner. How he is treated is totally dependent upon the kindness and benevolence of the owner or the ruthless cruelty of the owner. The servant cannot complain, he has no hu-man rights and if he was a black serf in Brazil or in a Spanish American colony his life expectancy was three years – tops. Some might say they were the lucky ones. In the American Plantations and Caribbean things were better.

However, as a contrast and comparison, I will now introduce the Orthodox Christian Russians who, in 1917 and the years that followed, were captured in their hundreds of thousands, leading to millions, and either executed on the spot or sent to the Gulags and deliberately worked to death by the Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jews (the certain race). Did these white Russian people have any hu-man rights? Did they have a Liberation Theology Movement that was allowed by the Soviet Government to speak up for them? Did ANYONE speak up for them and demand that they be set free?

Was there a Civil Rights Movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, 1930s, 40’s and 50’s demanding equality and compensation for the families of those that had lost loved ones? Was anyone charged with genocide or crimes against humanity as with the comparatively innocent Nazis at Nuremberg (ALL tortured for their ‘confessions’)? Was anyone made to feel guilty for their wicked evil genocidal RACIST past? Not on your life – not a whisper was heard – all was swept under the carpet and forgotten by the new Glasnost ‘friendly’ Russian authorities and the slimey duplicitous hypocritical Cultural Jew Marxist leftie, Socialist, Commie, liberal west, including the scum at the satanic cesspit known as The UN.

So what point am I making here? Well, quite obviously, it’s the bizarre idea that Anglo-Saxons, Celts and those of Nordic descent – The Israelites of America and Britain have to be permanently reminded of their ‘wicked ancestor’s’ past activities and behaviour and as if THEY were the only ones. So what kind of two faced double standards are being applied here?

This weird hypocritic phenomenon is then compounded by spineless white acquiescence and in some cases, guilt ridden shameful grovelling with these treacherous white wretches walking around with: “I am so sorry” placards hanging round their vile necks!!!

When was the last time you saw a Canaanite Jew even admit to the genocide of the appropriately named White Russians, let alone apologise for their satanic blood lust psychopathic murderous behaviour? Answer: You haven’t, nor will you ever until this verminous viper race is standing before Yashua Messiah’s Throne – His Judgement Seat – then you will see some real grovelling.

I would advise you dear readers to do your research into the Jews and their all encompassing involvement in the Bolshevik Marxist Revolution which was financed out of The City of London (The Rothschilds) and Wall Street.

OK that is the first crucial thing never mentioned and the second is the Canaanite Jews and their actual HANDS ON involvement with the Black Slave Trade with many of the slave ships being Jewish owned, which obviously included their modification and adaptation to carry hu-man cargo.

We then have many Canaanite Jews who changed their names to Spanish and other European sounding names in order to hide their true nationality. They organised the capture of slaves in Africa. They organised the slave auctions in the Caribbean and the Americas and they were into supplies and provisions to the plantations. In other words wherever a fast buck was to be made within this inhuman trafficking of blacks, the Canaanite Jew was in there. OY VEY!!!

For more in depth information on this subject please web search Professor of Black History, Tony Martin (now deceased) for all the details.

From Wiki: Martin died unexpectedly on January 17, 2013, aged 70, at Westshore Medical Hospital, Cocorite, Trinidad.

Strange how that always seems to happen to people of The Truth.

Right, having laid down the Unwritten Historical Foundation, I will attempt to lay down the The Historical Foundation.

First, some history on American Blacks and their ambitions for equality with American Whites and, in particular, with American Anglo-Saxon Israelites – The Tribe of Manasseh. Here is what two famous white Americans had to say on the subject:

“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about, in any way, the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not, nor ever have been in favour of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must the position of superior and inferior. And I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

– Abraham Lincoln, in his fourth debate with Stephen Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18th 1858

“Segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen.”

– Woodrow Wilson, addressing a delegation of black professionals led by Monroe Trotter, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Harvard and Boston newspaper editor, when they appeared at the White House to protest Wilson’s new policies of segregation.

“During Wilson’s first term in office the House passed a law making racial intermarriage a felony in the District of Columbia.”

– Wilson – A Portrait, The Public Broadcasting Service, African-Americans

So, as we can see, this was the racial status quo re white/black relations in the 19th and early 20th centuries out of which grew the racial tensions of the 1950s and 60s and the so called Civil Rights Movement.

However, there were other twists and turns to what I will call The Black Rebellion that more recently came out of something known as South American Liberation Theology or Latin American Liberation Theology and led to Black Theology. Black Theology then led to The Black Rebellion and a movement known as The Black Liberation Theology Movement.

Here are some of the black people, some with their ‘everything and everyone is black’ whacky ideas, who were involved in this anti-white Black Rebellion. Obviously you can do more research of your own into these characters if you wish:

Nat Turner (1800-1831) was the most notorious slave preacher who ever lived on American soil. Turner’s hatred of slavery propelled him to seek freedom by violence. Indeed, Turner killed nearly sixty white people before being captured and hanged in September, 1831. This violent revolt marked the beginning of the black struggle for liberation.

Marcus Garvey (1887-1940) is regarded by many as “the apostle of black theology in the United States of America.”[9] Martin Luther King, Jr., said Garvey “was the first man on a mass scale and level to give millions of Negroes a sense of dignity and destiny, and make the Negro feel he is somebody.”[10] Garvey was one of the first to speak of seeing God through black “spectacles.”

– From the: “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

William Saunders Crowdy (1847-1908) who founded in 1896 one of the first groups of Black Israelites known as the Church of God and Saints of Christ.

“He claimed to have a divine revelation from God that told him that America’s recently emancipated slaves were God’s chosen people, the true Hebrews. According to Black Judaism doctrine, when the Kingdom of Israel was destroyed, the Israelites were first scattered across the African continent and then selectively targeted by enemy African tribes who captured and sold them to European slave traders for bondage in the New World.

“It’s a common myth that slaves were randomly shackled up and carried off to slavery,” “General Yahanna,” leader of the present-day Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge, told the Intelligence Report. Actually, “Slave traders sailed for months and days to get to specific pickup points. They knew what people they were taking — specifically, the lost tribes of Israel.”

– From: “Understanding God’s Word Ministry” Web Page, “False Doctrine – Black Hebrew Israelite Movement”

“Howard Thurman (1899-1981), in his book Jesus and the Disinherited (1949), saw black life paralleling Jesus’ life because His poverty identified Him with the poor masses. Thurman also noted that Jesus was a member of a minority group (the Jews) in the midst of a larger and controlling dominant group (the Romans). Thurman thus drew many applications for the black experience from the life of Jesus.”

– Again from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.

More in part three: