Was The Flood, otherwise known as Noah’s Flood or The Deluge, worldwide, or partial, that is, localised and didn’t cover the whole earth? Many take the position of: Who cares? But those of us who are fixated upon knowing The Truth, would never in a million years adopt a couldn’t care less attitude to this crucial subject. So which is it?
Holy Scripture first, if only to get this off on a positive trajectory:
Genesis 7:17-23 (KJV) And The Flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up The Ark, and it was lift up above the earth. 18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and The Ark went upon the face of the waters. 19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. 20 Fifteen cubits (26 feet approx) upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered. 21 And ALL FLESH DIED that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: 22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. 23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in The Ark.
Now it’s circus clown time. Here is the opening paragraph to the seventh chapter of Comparet’s – “The Complete Works of Bertrand Comparet”entitled: “Noah’s Flood was NOT Worldwide!”
“Among the many mistaken and unscriptural notions, commonly taught in nearly all churches, is the idea that the flood mentioned in the Bible, covered all the earth. It states everybody on earth was drowned excepting Noah and his family, who escaped death by being in the ark. Many churches have firmly insisted the Bible says this, when there is ample proof the flood was not worldwide.”
He goes on to say:
“Part of this mistaken idea about the flood is due to the many mistranslations found in the commonly used King James Bible. Part of it appears plainly to be false, if you carefully read even the King James Bible.”
Now don’t get me wrong, for I am FULLY AWARE of many of the mistranslations and corruptions in the KJV Bible, starting with Genesis 4:1; Isaiah 9:6; Matthew 28:19; 1 John 5:7-8; Romans 8:1; Romans 13:1-7; plus all the others that erroneously interpret The Holy Spirit as a personage of their mickey mouse Trinity. (See links 1, 2 and 3 below)
Further to, he says, and I quote: “If you carefully read even the King James Bible.” Which clearly he has not done, and which I will now unequivocally prove.
First of all he builds strawman number one, by referring to Cain being driven by God from “the face of the earth” (translated from the Hebrew word ‘erets’ or ‘eh-rets’) Here is what he says:
“First lets see what the translators have done to what Moses originally wrote. Remember the King James Bible says that the rain was upon the earth and the waters increased greatly upon the earth and all flesh died that moved upon the earth. Definitely not!” Remember that in Genesis 4:14, when Yahweh has driven Cain away in punishment for his murder of Abel, the King James Bible quotes Cain as saying, “Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth.” So what did Cain do, climb into his rocket ship and take off for outer space? Of course not! He was not driven from the face of the earth, and he never said so, only the translators said so.”
Never mind what the translators of the KJV said, let’s see what the translators of the more reliable Septuagint say:
Genesis 4:14 (Septuagint) If thou castest me out this day from the face of the earth, and I shall be hidden from thy presence, and I shall be groaning and trembling upon the earth, then it will be that any one that finds me shall slay me.
Genesis 4:14 (KJV) Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.
Well it looks more or less exactly the same as the KJV. So what is Cain actually saying here? Is he alluding to being physically removed from ‘the face of the earth’ or is he being allegorical and painting a picture of being deprived of ALL the fruits from THE FACE of the earth? so therefore being cast from the earth in terms of life’s sustenance. This means he was threatened with being cast from THE FACE of the WHOLE earth. I think, therefore, that we all know what Cain meant, apart from this numbskull Comparet with his syllogism building.
From Strong’s Concordance:
Earth – H776 – ʼerets, eh’-rets; – from an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land):—× common, country, earth, field, ground, land, × natins, way, + wilderness, world.
Outline of The Biblical Usage of the words ‘Earth’ and ‘Land’ from the Blue Letter Bible web page:
1 EARTH, LAND.
i Whole earth (as opposed to a part)
ii Earth (as opposed to heaven)
iii Earth (inhabitants)
i Country, territory
ii District, region
iii Tribal territory
iv Piece of ground
v Land of Canaan, Israel
vi Inhabitants of land
vii Sheol, land without return, (under) world
viii City (-state)
C. Ground, surface of the earth
D. (in phrases)
i People of the land
ii Space or distance of country (in measurements of distance)
iii Level or plain country
iv Land of the living
v End(s) of the earth
E. (Almost wholly late in usage)
i Lands, countries
ii Often in contrast to Canaan.
From the above we can see all the multiple uses this Hebrew word ‘eh-rets’ has, so its meaning is directly affected by the context of the words surrounding it or, more importantly, its use in other verses of crucial Holy Scripture, which I will show later. However, let’s hear more from the numbskull Comparet:
“When we come to Genesis chapter 7 where it is talking about the flood, wherever it says the flood covered the earth, the Hebrew word used in the original writing by Moses was eh-rats, meaning the land. The flood did cover the particular land where it occurred. It was a local flood, which covered one particular region or land, not the whole earth.
Here we can see him adding his agenda driven interpretations to what’s written, because ‘eh-rets’ primarily means The EARTH as a whole, so he’s lying straight off. He’s also playing word games, or is it a perverted form of semantics? I’ll go with both, for that’s exactly what it is. So let’s use his twisted logic to our advantage:
Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth (H776 eh-rets – erets).
So here in Genesis 1:1 we have exactly the same Hebrew word in play, that is, ‘eh-rets’ or ‘erets’ and what is Genesis 1:1 telling us? It’s telling us that the word ‘earth’ (‘eh-rets’ ‘erets’) IS REFERRING TO THE WHOLE EARTH OF THE CREATION. Or perhaps the numbskull Comparet thought the Creation was only a partial creation or even a localised creation! ROTFL!!
Now here’s another thing, if the translators wanted to use the word ‘land’ in the correct way, do you not think they would be capable of doing so? Here’s an example:
Genesis 2:11 (KJV) The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
In this example we see the use of the word land (‘eh-rets’ or ‘erets’) in reference to the localised area of Havilah. So, in turn, why did they not use the word ‘land’ when describing the area covered by The Flood, if it was only a localised event and/or only a partial flood. Why use the word ‘earth’ if they didn’t mean the whole earth and meant some localised land where as we can see they did use it when they needed to, in order to describe a local area like Havilah?
So here we are, after having copied, pasted and written just over three and a half A4 pages we have utterly debunked this fraud’s ‘Partial Flood’ satanic ideas. However, I will not leave it at that, for there is more, much more, so please bear with me.
OK, let’s focus on the second part of the above paragraph:
“The flood did cover the particular land where it occurred. It was a local flood, which covered one particular region or land, not the whole earth.”
Now apart from having already debunked his garbage, I will make use of some very valid points from a Tim Chaffey at “Answers in Genesis” (see video link below) where he does a great job of debunking this localised flood idea.
1 The Partial or Localised Flood makes God a liar.
How does that work? Quite simply because God gave Noah the sign of The Rainbow as part of a Covenant with Noah that He would NEVER flood the earth again. This means, that if The Flood of Noah’s day was localised or partial then God has broken His promise/covenant to Noah a million and one times, for there must have been millions of localised/partial floods since Noah’s time – which automatically makes God a liar for having broken His Covenant. All this when we know for sure that God cannot lie!
2 IF The Flood was partial or localised, why get Noah to build an Ark?
Good question eh? And very valid, because IF The Flood was only partial, or localised, why didn’t God get Noah and his clan to skedaddle off to where it didn’t flood, and thus negate the necessity of building an Ark, which must have taken Noah decades to construct. Let’s face it, God asking his pivotal characters to move elsewhere, would not have been a revolutionary idea. A good example being Abram moving to Canaan from Ur of the Chaldees, and then to Egypt to avoid a severe famine. Therefore Tim Chaffey has another great point here and makes nonsense of Comparet’s partial flood BS.
3 Why take birds on the Ark IF the Flood was localised and partial?
Yet another excellent point, so yes, why take birds on The Ark, when they could have easily flown off to where it was not flooded. Again, let’s face it, distance is no problem to birds, they can fly hundreds of miles, if necessary. However with such an insignificant localised mickey mouse flood, fleeing to safety would have been easy-peasy even for the smallest of birds, chuckle chuckle chuckle. I hope you’re beginning to see the stupidity of this man’s silly ideas.
4 The purpose of the Flood was to destroy ALL flesh:
Thirteen times the Holy Scriptures uses the term ‘All Flesh’ in relation to the world, before, during and after The Flood and thirteen is God’s number for rebellion, so very appropriate for reprobates like Comparet.
Genesis 6:12 (KJV) And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
ALL FLESH was corrupted on the earth, not some flesh, but ALL OF IT!
Genesis 6:13 (KJV) And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
The end of ALL FLESH is come before God and the EARTH is filled with violence – ALL of the earth, not a part of it!
Genesis 6:17 (KJV) And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
A Flood of waters to destroy ALL FLESH.
Genesis 6:19 (KJV) And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female.
Genesis 7:15 (KJV) And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.
Genesis 7:16 (KJV) And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him: and the Lord shut him in.
Genesis 7:21 (KJV) And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
And ALL FLESH died that moved upon the earth. If it was only a partial flood then ALL FLESH would NOT HAVE DIED! And of course this is the straw-man scenario that the blasphemer Comparet is aiming to construct – more on this later.
Genesis 8:17 (KJV) Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.
Genesis 9:11 (KJV) And I will establish my covenant with you, neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.
“And I will establish my Covenant with you, neither shall ALL FLESH be cut off any more by the waters of a flood.” If it was only a partial flood, how would a Covenant be valid in terms of ALL FLESH not being cut off again by another flood, when ALL FLESH would not have been cut off by a partial flood? Do you see how this makes a total mockery of the partial flood idea? I do hope so.
Genesis 9:15 (KJV) And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh.
Genesis 9:16 (KJV) And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.
God’s Covenant is with every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. How would that be possible if the flood was only partial and/or localised.
Genesis 9:17 (KJV) And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.
OK, lets move on with more Comparet garbage:
“If six miles of water covered the whole earth, then all nations must have been completely exterminated. However Babylonian, Egyptian and Chinese history runs right through this period without a break.”
Where has he got these ideas from? Fair enough he got the first bit nearly right, when he claimed six miles of water covered the whole earth, but even that was erroneous, because, no doubt, he was basing that on water covering modern day mount Everest at twenty nine thousand feet, which equates to five and half miles. However, in Noah’s day, mount Everest and the rest of the Himalayas didn’t even exist, they, being created by massive tectonic plate shifts that didn’t occur until The Flood and shortly thereafter, as described here:
Genesis 10:25 (KJV) And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.
H6504 – Divided – parad paw-rad’ – a primitive root; to break through, that is, spread or separate (oneself):–disperse, divide, be out of joint, part, scatter (abroad), separate (self), sever self, stretch, sunder.
At this time we know that the earth’s continents did form and break off from the land mass known as Panjea and separate through tectonic plate shifts, thereby causing mountains to rise up, but this was after The Flood, so it’s ridiculous to suggest that six miles depth of water would have been necessary to cover The Earth. We also know that there are trillions of marine fossils in the Himalayan mountains, just as they are found at the top of the Grand Canyon. (All deposited there by Mr Comparet’s partial flood LOL).
Then we have his bogus dates for the Chinese and Egyptian dynasties, all based upon erroneous, one following the other, chronology, when most of these dynasties were living side by side contemporaneously, not chronologically, which then reduces the time periods drastically. Egypt was in its infancy in the days of Abram, as were all the other fledgling empires of those times.
OK, that just about rounds it off for part one – part 2 follows so please stick with it.
In Yashua Messiah’s name
1 The Duality Godhead: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/
2 Exposing the Trinity Lie!: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/
3 Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/
Exposing The Lying Blasphemer Bertrand Comparet – Part 2
In part one, I completely debunked Comparet’s stupid ideas regarding his partial flood and/or localised flood nonsense. In this article, we’ll get into the ‘meat’ of this subject, and I say ‘meat’, because these deceivers desperately need the partial flood BS in order to try and make the rest of their demonic doctrines stick.
Confused? Not to worry, for I will explain. So first of all, let’s be clear in our minds, for Comparet needed far more people to have survived The Flood than the eight souls who actually did survive The Flood and as confirmed for us in the NT by Peter:
1 Peter 3:20 (KJV) Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while The Ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
Notice, WHEREIN FEW, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
Now why do they need more than eight souls to have survived? Easy, because they erroneously claim that all three sons of Noah were white; that all three daughters-in-law were white, and that Noah’s wife was white. They erroneously deduce this whacky idea from this Holy Scripture:
Genesis 6:9-10 (KJV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Genesis 6:9-10 (TAB) These are the records of the generations (family history) of Noah. Noah was a righteous man [one who was just and had right standing with God], blameless in his [evil] generation; Noah walked (lived) [in habitual fellowship] with God. 10 Now Noah became the father of three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
From this, we can easily fathom that the generational perfection was Noah’s and Noah’s only, and did not apply to any other member of his family, with the exception of Shem who, like his father, was white. His siblings however were not white. Ham was either dark brown or a swarthy brown and Japheth was slit eyed and yellow skinned.
Ham’s son was named Cush or Kush and Cush literally means black. The largest tribe of Cushites on earth today is the sub-continent Indians and they live south of the Hindu-Kush mountains in India. Likewise, Rebekah’s brother was called Laban and Laban means white and he was a white Semite. So these names mean what they say.
I have digressed slightly, so back to the thread. So how could this possibly be? Easy, through Naamah, Noah’s wife, who was the sister of Tubal-Cain, so Naamah was a Cainite, and not Adamic at all. WHOA!! I can hear all the Comparet sycophants screaming, you can’t be saying that!! But I am saying it, because it’s true. It has to be true in order for all the world’s ethnic groups to exist today, and they do exist, and they ALL come from the eight souls that disembarked The Ark after the WORLDWIDE flood waters had been on the earth for nearly a year. However, there is one caveat to this arrangement in the shape of the serpent creature called Canaan who made their number up to nine souls.
Now this is where it gets very messy, very messy indeed, if you’re a disciple of the blasphemer Comparet, because you desperately need your partial flood, whereby all the non-white people we share this earth with can be explained as people whose forefathers by-passed the localised flood and came through unscathed. LOL You see you have to have these mythical people in order to hang on to the falsehood that all three sons of Noah were white.
These Comparet numbskulls are never going to deny that black and slit eyed yellow skinned people exist, that would make them a bigger a laughing stock than they already are. They therefore desperately need this fairy story of a partial flood so that their imaginary descendants of the ‘beasts of the earth’ can get through the flood event as dry as a bone and totally unscathed. Hilarious or what?
Beasts of the earth? I hear you ask, who or what are they? They’re in Genesis 1:25:
Genesis 1:25 (KJV) And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Now here the Comparet cultists go into magic mushroom creative thinking mode and add all manner of BS to the Holy Scripture narrative, because, for them, these are not beasts as we would obviously know beasts, oh no – nothing as straight forward and simple as that! These are beasts with chutzpah, pizazz and front! LOL. Allegedly, these are two legged apeoid or negroid beasts, that are not wiped out by the flood but, rather, come through by by-passing the flood event and ultimately end up producing the millions of sub-Saharan Africans that we know of today. Interestingly the oriental peoples get by-passed completely in this bestial mayhem. More laughs for Messenger Charles.
Now you can see how crucial it is for them to maintain the partial flood myth, for without it they know they are screwed. They also know that when they are confronted with the challenge of having to engage their brains, and work out how Noah’s three sons plus Canaan produced ALL the ethnic groups we see around us on this earth today, they are at a complete loss.
So what of the descendants of the eight that came off The Ark + Canaan? he was the first born after The Ark settled on mount Ararat. And how was it that Noah’s sons were NOT ALL WHITE? Quite simply, and as already mentioned, because Noah’s wife was the sister of Tubal-Cain, so she was a an inbred Cainite. However, that was not an issue, because only Noah’s Adamic blood counted in his three sons, irrespective of their skin colours and appearances = all three sons were Adamic with Noah’s blood in their veins.
However, the problems started when Ham bedded his mother whilst his father was drunk and she produced the incestuous bastard Canaan. Canaan’s birth rekindled Cain’s bloodline post-flood, hence Noah cursed him. In turn, Canaan took daughters from all three sons of Noah and that miscegenation produced all the different Canaanite tribes we have today. Namely The Jews (white Canaanites); The Chinese/Koreans (yellow Canaanites); Sub-Saharan Black Africans (Black Canaanites); The Turks (The Edomites swarthy Canaanites); The Italians (Chaldean/Babylonian Canaanites). There are, no doubt, numerous other Canaanite splinter tribes, but the above are the principal Canaanite tribes or ethnic groups.
Moreover, this leaves us with many non-white ethnic groups who are of mankind (Adamic) and are definitely not white, but they’re definitely not Canaanites. These are The Japanese, The Greeks, The Malayans, The Indonesians, The sub-continent Indians, The Ethiopians, The Spanish, The Portuguese, The Arabs and The Filipinos.
In case you missed it, white people are from Shem = Semites. Jews, who look white, are not white. Jews are Shelahite Hamitic Canaanites which I explain in detail here:
Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/
The Jews are The Tares fit only for burning – a real Holocaust! https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/
More to follow.
In Yashua Messiah’s name