Salvation is of The Jews! Oh Really, Is That So!? – John 4:22

Oh yes, is that so? and how many of you are deceived and brainwashed by this wickedly satanic corruption of the King James Bible? Furthermore, did Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) actually say “the Jews”, or was He referring to a different ethnic group of people altogether?

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of The Jews The Judaean Israelites.

Right, let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some Light on this illegitimate KJV verse:

Jews – G2453 Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; – from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

So first off, for the word ‘Jews’ we have Judaean’ and ‘belonging to Jehudah’ (Judah). Now let’s get this firmly fixed in our minds, for Judaeans (the occupants and residents of Judaea) were not necessarily Jews, and Jews most definitely did not belong to Jehudah (Judah) (see link below).

In Judaea, in the first century, there were Royal Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites, who, in turn, were descended from the Israelite Tribes that made up the post Babylonian captivity House of Judah, that is, a remnant of those three tribes who returned to Judaea circa 515 BC. In fact, in a strict ethnic sense, Jews were not Judaeans at all. They were always alien usurpers, hijackers and parasitical subversive invaders, who inveigled their way into Israelite society, just as they do today in Britain, America and most civilised western nations.

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

I will firm up the Jewish Almanac quote by stating, for the record, that Jews were NEVER Hebrews, nor were they Israelites, hence you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first eleven books of The KJV Bible.

Juda – G2448Iouda ee-oo-dah’ of Hebrew origin (3063 or perhaps 3194); Judah (i.e. Jehudah or Juttah), a part of (or place in) Palestine:–Judah.

In this definition we have confirmed for us that Juda or Judah is of Hebrew origin so, therefore, nothing to do with The Jews.

Judas – G2455Ἰούδας Ioúdas, ee-oo-das’; – of Hebrew origin (H3063); Judas (i.e. Jehudah), the name of ten Israelites; also of the posterity of one of them and its region:—Juda(-h, -s); Jude.

Again, in this definition, we are told that the name Judas is of Hebrew origin, which when applied to Israelites would be correct. Hence we get this:

Matthew 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas (Judah) and his brethren;

And this:

Matthew 13:55 (KJV) Is not this the carpenter’s son? is not his mother called Mary? and His brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas (Judah)?

Judah – H3063Yhuwdah yeh-hoo-daw’ – from 3034; celebrated; Jehudah (or Judah), the name of five Israelites; also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory:–Judah.

Even in the Old Testament Mr Strong makes no reference to Jews, just Judahite Israelites.

However, Jews are very fond of hiding their Shelahite, Hamitic Canaanite, Serpent Seed identity by using names common to their host nation. This a favourite Jew trick, and this is why I am fairly certain that Judas Iscarriot, the betrayer of Yashua Messiah, was a Jew, and not an Israelite. Betrayal is a standard characteristic of the Jews, as evidenced by a past President of The US:

“The Jews are all through government, and we have got to get in those areas. The government is full of Jews, second, most Jews are disloyal. You can’t trust the bastards. They turn on you.”

President Richard M. Nixon, Nixon Tapes, July 3rd 1971.

In support of the above I will use this example, for we have Paul, later, professing his Israelite Hebrew ethnic identity:

Philippians 3:4-5 (KJV) Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching The Law, a Pharisee;

The first thing you will notice or, at least you SHOULD notice, is that he, at no time, professes himself as a Jew. So what does this mean? It means that erroneous ‘JEWISHNESS’ is read into these Holy Scriptures by ignorant uneducated people with a satanic agenda:

1) He was circumcised on the eighth day, as all Israelites were.

2) He was of the stock of Israel = a white Semite, so not a Jew.

3) The Israelite Tribe of Benjamin, so not a Jew.

4) An Hebrew of the Hebrews, so not a Jew.

5) Touching The Law, A Pharisee, and not all Pharisees were Jews. Nicodemus being another example of a non-Jew Pharisee.

Here is more solid gold evidence of who the Jews are, and Israelites they are definitely NOT!:

John the Baptist:

Matthew 3:7 (MCV) But when he (John) saw many of the Pharisee Jews and Sadducee Jews come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

Yashua Messiah:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The Jews were easily identifiable for their rabid lusting for the death of Yashua Messiah and then claimed responsibility:

Matthew 27:25 (MCV) Then answered all the the Jews, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

Generation – G1081gennema – ghen’-nay-mah – From G1080; OFFSPRING; by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

Having read all of the above quotes from the very lips of Yashua Messiah and John the Baptist, how on earth can salvation be of the Serpent Seed Jews = the spawn of the Devil himself, both literally and spiritually?

Essential reading for understanding the TRUE ORIGINS of the Serpent Seed Jews:

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

For more Light on this dark subject please read these articles here:

Salvation Is Of The Jews. Oh really, Is That So!?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/25/salvation-is-of-the-jews-oh-really-is-that-so-john-422/

The Jews are The Tares:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

And Pilate Wrote: JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWS:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2020/07/20/and-pilate-wrote-jesus-of-nazareth-the-king-of-the-jews/

I Know That (Ye Say) Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/john-837-i-know-that-ye-are-abrahams-seed-but-ye-seek-to-kill-me/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/what-is-the-word-gentile-doing-in-the-bible-part-1/

The Prophetic Parable Of Lazarus And The Rich Man – Part 1

Introduction

This article could and perhaps should have been entitled: When Christians Die, Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord”? – Part 3, (see link below for parts 1 & 2), but that, to some degree, would be missing the point. The question of whether this passage of Holy Scripture proves or does not prove that we ‘go to be with The Lord’ when we die is really only a side issue. Yashua Messiah’s (The Lord Jesus Christ’s) intended theme and Spiritual thrust of this story has a different purpose altogether. Needless to say, this theme is totally missed or ignored by the Bible ‘experts’. Moreover, this parable is so well known, and so much discussed, it had to be used as the title of this article. You will therefore notice that I have deliberately referred to this passage of Holy Scripture as a Prophetic Parable, for that is what it is.

Now calling it a Prophetic Parable will upset many in the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion (mainstream Christianity), because it is one of their ‘golden nugget’ sections of the New Testament, which they misuse. This is because they use it to support their mythical ideas that they: 1) instantaneously ‘Go to be with the Lord’ when they die, that is, they go straight to heaven when they die (yet another lie) and 2) ‘sinners’ go straight to a fiery hell; otherwise known as Purgatory by deluded ignorant Papists.

However, unfortunately for them, the parable of Lazarus and the rich man is just that – a parable, and not a factual literal description of what happens when we die. It’s a Spiritual analogy, as are all of Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) parables.

The Rich Man and Lazarus

The Parable of Lazarus and The Rich Man

The Prophetic Parable

Luke 16:19 (KJV) There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day: 20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, 21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. 22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; 23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 And he cried and said, father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. 25 But Abraham said, son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. 26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. 27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father’s house: 28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment. 29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. 30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. 31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. (All emphasis mine)

Some interesting points before I move on. This parable can only be found in Luke’s Gospel and Lazarus is named, but the rich man remains anonymous. And don’t forget that it is mostly prophetic – for the future, that is, the near future, post Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection and the distant future at Yashua Messiah’s second coming – both events are involved in this parable.

The Explanation

So how do we know this story is a parable? Easy, the opening verse tells us straight away, because Yashua Messiah makes special reference to the colour of the rich man’s robes – PURPLE. Now this may seem, at first glance, all very trivial and insignificant, but nothing could be further from The Truth. Purple raiment is always synonymous with God, royalty, the priesthood and the counterfeit priesthood of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

FakeChurch-1-380x230

Two Fake Christians With One in Purple, and Wearing a Heathen Dagon Fish Hat

Exodus 26:1 (KJV) Moreover thou shalt make the tabernacle with ten curtains of fine twined linen, and blue, and purple, and scarlet: with cherubims of cunning work shalt thou make them.

Numbers 4:13 (KJV) And they shall take away the ashes from the altar, and spread a purple cloth thereon:

John 19:5 (KJV) Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And Pilate saith unto them, Behold the man!

Revelation 17:4 (KJV) And the woman (the mother of harlots) was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication.

In these four Scriptures we can see various connotations associated with purple cloth, but they have some things in common: God, Royalty, the Priesthood, and the counterfeit priesthood in Revelation 17. So, this rich man, dressed in fine purple linen, is symbolically a priest or a representative of the counterfeit priesthood and/or The Sanhedrin as it was known in the first century.

Now this parable is another of those parables that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) frequently used in order to attack the hypocrisy of the Jewish Pharisee and Sadducee religious leaders. There they were, all dressed up for the part, but in reality they were “whited sepulchres” or “whited walls”, cold, ruthless and hollow and empty within – lacking any love or Spiritual substance. They were Spiritually dead with “throats like open graves”. Notice, too, this man lived it up everyday, well he was loaded with money and therefore a lover of filthy lucre, as were the Pharisee Jews, so why not eat, drink and be merry, eh?

Moving on, and as always, keeping it in the Spiritual dimension, we then have poor Lazarus who represents all those who are desirous and hungry, nay starving, for lack of Spiritual food, for lack of even just a few crumbs of Spiritual Truth and/or the Word of God. In the early first century that meant Moses and The Prophets, but in the prophetic future sense it is highlighting Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and His glorious message taught by His Messengers, that is, The Good News of Grace, Salvation and Eternal Life in the coming Kingdom of God.

On top of this poor Lazarus’ malnourished Spiritual condition is compounded by the trials of this life – his sores. As a Spiritual babe he is even tormented and spiritually attacked by dogs or spiritual prostitutes – or those of the circumcision, as described by Paul in Galatians – legalists and Grace killers.

Philippians 3:2 (MCV) Beware of Judaising mongrel dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the circumcision.

In Strong’s Concordance the Old Testament definition for ‘dogs’ is male prostitutes – sodomites:

Dog – H3611 – keleb – keh’-leb – From an unused root meaning to yelp, or else to attack; a dog; hence (by euphemism) a male prostitute: – dog.

Have you yet noticed the picture that is developing here? no man, unless he is being drawn to The Son by The Father, can be desirous for Spiritual food, so this means Lazarus represents those The Father is calling and has chosen! Notice, too, how we also have purple garments and spiritual prostitution in association – one with the other – the the purple robed dogs of the meaningless, vain Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

The next thing we must understand is that Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ), on numerous occasions said The Kingdom of God is at hand. What did He mean by that turn of phrase? Quite simply, He was referring to a time in the very near future or the time directly after His death and resurrection when Salvation would be made available to all those The Father would be calling and choosing through hearing the Messenger’s (apostles’) preaching.

Now keeping this Truth in mind we now continue with the parable, and next we have the death of Lazarus, here called a beggar, which means he is hungering and thirsting after mercy and righteousness plus justice and justification:

Matthew 5:6 (KJV) Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.

Notice here, too, that Lazarus is desirous to be fed the Spiritual scraps, not to mention the literal scraps of food, that fell from this selfish self-indulgent purple clothed minister’s table.

OK, so now we have Lazarus crying out for The Word of God – The Good News of The Kingdom, salvation and righteousness (justice and justification). However, what happens? he dies, but what kind of death is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) really referring to here, apart from a physical death?

Lazarus’ death here is symbolic of the watery grave of Baptism – the old Lazarus dies and then what happens – he is lifted up by the angels into Abraham’s bosom and his name is written in the Book of Life. This means he is lifted up a new man – born of God (born again) into Abraham’s bosom. How does that work? Who and what does Abraham represent? Easy, he represents faith and the faithful – he is the elder of the faithful and the man that the men dressed in purple fine linen thought they were descended from, and were supposed to represent, that is, the Spirit of The Law, not the letter of The Law.

Don’t forget, too, this message is being delivered by Yashua Messiah under the Old Covenant and Abraham’s Bosom is a forerunner or type of the Kingdom of God to be ruled by Yashua Messiah. Please note, Lazarus’ physical death, as with all those who are born of God (born again), has no hold over him, as his place in the Kingdom of God at Yashua Messiah’s return is assured. Make sure you understand that there is no resurrection of the dead for ANYONE until Yashua Messiah returns, and that includes Enoch and Elijah. (Future articles on this pesky subject coming soon)

1 Corinthians 15:36 (KJV) Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:

Colossians 2:12 (KJV) Buried with Him in Baptism, wherein also ye are risen with Him through the Faith (Abraham’s Bosom) of the operation of God, who hath raised Him from the dead.

Romans 6:4 (KJV) Therefore we are buried with Him by Baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by The Glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. (All emphasis and brackets mine)

Now, notice, Lazarus is comforted in Abraham’s bosom and in the not too distant future, after The Lord’s death and resurrection, those called and chosen would also be comforted just like Lazarus. Comforted by whom? why, by Yashua Messiah of course. This proves that Yashua Messiah is using Abraham’s bosom here as a type for Himself in His Kingdom.

John 14:18 (KJV) I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.

In part two I will explain the meanings of the tormented sufferings or ordeals of the rich man.

The Parable Of Lazarus And The Rich Man – Part 2.

The Explanation continued

Now what of the rich man? He dies and is buried and comes to a place called hell. How does this work? because we know that the dead are dead and know nothing? (Please see link below to my article “Are Christians going to heaven?”) Yet this rich man is conscious and can see Lazarus in Abraham’s bosom and Abraham, too, is alive and can see him. So what is this all about and at what point in time is all this taking place?

First of all, it’s all about mental and spiritual torment, not physical torment. Secondly, the time is just after that time when the rich man, (representative of the Jews and counterfeit religious priesthood), will have been resurrected with all those who were called and chosen. This is the time of the return of Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) to this earth and the First Resurrection. The rich man is like the five foolish virgins who ran out of oil. Here though, The Lord has taken the scenario one step further and placed the rich man in a metaphorical place of torment. This ‘hell’ is a point in time in the future where all the unrepentant men in purple robes will realise it’s too late, like the unwise virgins who discovered their purchased oil was useless. If we refer to the end of that parable, the unwise virgins are not allowed into the wedding feast and Yashua Messiah informs them that He does not know them even though they were given oil (Grace) in the first place. In this instance Yashua Messiah does not elaborate on their reaction to this horrendous news.

However, in this parable, we are told about the rich man’s ordeals and/or his reaction to the news that he has been excluded from the Kingdom of God – Abraham’s bosom – Salvation. He, like the unwise virgins at the beginning, was given oil – Grace or here referred to as the ‘good things’ – the Spiritual Law of Moses and the Prophets – The Gracious gifts of God to the priesthood. This rich man, like modern mainstream Christian ministers of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, had all the benefits the knowledge of God can bestow upon a man. His, (the rich man) and their wickedness, has resulted in the Children of God, that is, those they were, and are, responsible for, and supposed to look after (shepherd) were/are starving through lack of Spiritual food. So here he is, as a result, in wretched mental torment for his just reward:

Matthew 8:11 (KJV) And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven (God). 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (Wretched fearful mental torment and/or emotional ordeals).

Luke 13:28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all The Prophets, in the Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out. (Wretched fearful mental torment and/or emotional ordeals).

Make no mistake, this rich man represents a “child of the kingdom” as are all those who are called into the ministry, but many run out of oil – Grace, and turn to religious form and legalism as a blasphemous replacement. Turning or making The Word of God to none effect. This parable was given as a warning to them and, notice, they understood The Lord’s parables so were, without excuse.

Luke 16:14 (KJV) And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.

Now in order to respond in this way, these men must have understood what Yashua Messiah was talking about. Only the Learners (disciples), after The Lord had explained to them the meaning, were privy to this understanding, that is, apart from these satanic men of religion.

Moreover, we now move on to where the rich man, in his ‘burning tormented’ condition catches sight of Abraham with Lazarus in his bosom and he cries out, but what is he crying out for? Just a drop of water from the tip of Lazarus’ finger. The thing is, if the rich man is in a real burning cauldron how is a drop of water on the end of Lazarus’ finger going to bring him any relief, how will it quench his thirst? Well, quite plainly it won’t, so what does this water represent? Again we return to the Spiritual Truth of Yashua Messiah:

Just One Drop of Water

Whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life

John 4:13 Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: 14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life. 15 The woman saith unto him, Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw.

Wow!! I think this is one of the most emotional and uplifting passages of Holy Scripture in The Bible. Here we can see the amazing God given wisdom of the woman, by the well, who longed to have her thirst quenched, once and for all time, by The Lord’s metaphorical Holy Spiritual water. Indeed, we can now see the water the rich man was crying out and pleading for, in a new Light. He knew what kind of water would be on Lazarus’ finger tip and he also knew that just one single drop would be enough to rescue him from his mental anguish and torment – a well of water springing up into everlasting life and him, being comforted by Yashua Messiah (Abraham’s bosom) in The Kingdom of God.

Furthermore, we then learn that there is a gulf between the rich man and Lazarus in Abraham’s bosom, a gulf that cannot be bridged from either direction. This gulf is the same gulf that denied the five unwise virgins a share of the oil from the five wise virgin’s lamps. This is a ‘never the twain shall meet’ situation. This situation can be likened to the sheep and goats, with one; the sheep on God’s right hand and the other; the goats, on His left – the sheep inherit and the goats do not. (see link below)

This is the future point in time that the rich man has reached and he vainly requests that Abraham send Lazarus from the dead to his five brethren who, again, remind us of the five unwise virgins. It was too late for them and it’s too late for the rich man’s brethren, the Grace has gone out of their lives.

We then get the killer verse. Verse 31 And He said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. Here in this verse Yashua Messiah is referring to Himself as the “one rose from the dead” and look at what He is saying. This verse not only covers the Jewish religious leaders of the first century, but brings us loud and clear into the last days which commenced on the first Pentecost AD 31. We are talking about so called men of God here, now in this age – ‘teachers’ and ‘preachers’, not the unsaved. Even though Yashua Messiah came and died to take all of mankind’s sins, was resurrected to give us new lives in Him or in ‘Abraham’s bosom’ and give us His glorious Grace, there are still those rich men who stand in their pulpits each week and ‘teach’ the same Pharisaical message against it – those men dressed in their fine purple linen – both metaphorically and/or literally!

Finally, and to end on a more positive note, we must also understand that the rich man’s punishment is only for a season – albeit a thousand year season, but eventually he will be part of the second resurrection as described in Revelation 20. The Father God does not remain angry forever, but vengeance is always His, and all the Lazarus’s of this world must be avenged.

“No one who has been martyred by the Jews should remain unknown. And no one who has been martyred by the Jews will remain unavenged.”

— Eustace Mullins

When Christians Die Do They Instantly “Go To Be With The Lord”? – Parts 1 and 2:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/when-christians-die-do-they-instantly-go-to-be-with-the-lord-part-1/

Are Christians going to Heaven?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-christians-going-to-heaven/

Apartheid is The Kingdom Of God:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 1

Introduction

This series of articles will set about unravelling one of the biggest deceptions in the King James Bible – the word ‘Gentiles’. This will be no easy task due to the ignorance or deliberate deceiving intentions of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious translators of the KJV Bible – the principal culprit being the papist philosopher and humanist Desiderius Erasmus who put together the first Greek New Testament in 1512; this with a humanist agenda and associated philosophy(s) in play and no doubt, influencing his work. ‘Improved’ editions followed the 1512 edition. The martyr William Tyndale (1491?-1536), a contemporary of Erasmus, used Erasmus’ Greek New Testament when translating his English version. These earlier translations were then used by the translators of The KJV (1604-1611) along with The Great Bible (1539).

So why am I asking this question, it’s all very straight forward, isn’t it? Gentiles are non-Jews, aren’t they? Well that’s what we’re led to believe by the satanic blanket use of this, one-size-fits-all, infernal word, but is it True? What if the word ‘Gentiles’ means something else, something entirely different? Where will we be then? apart from being very confused and even upset and angry that we have been so deceptively and easily deceived. Some would say brainwashed, and completely duped; conned no less. To compound the problem the wretched word ‘Gentiles’ can be found throughout the King James Bible in both Old and New Testaments; 129 times in all, in 121 verses and here is its first usage in Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Gentiles (H1471) divided in their lands; every one after his own tongue, after their families, in their nations (H1471).

Now take note, for here we have the first use of this misleading word ‘Gentiles’ and with the same Strong’s reference number for both words in this verse. This occurs very early on in the Genesis historical account of Noah and his sons Ham, Shem and Japheth, and their families, before any Chosen Israelites or Canaanite Jews were even born:

Genesis 10:1 (MCV) Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.

No Israelites or Jews, so therefore no non-Israelites and no non-Jews, that is, alleged ‘Gentiles’ so why is the word already in use?

Furthermore, and as an aside, you will not find the word ‘Jew’ in the first 11 Books of The Bible and yet, here we have this deceptive word ‘Gentile’ in use where there is no way it can be referring to people or tribes of people who can be classified as non-Jews, as there were no Jews present at that time. So what’s it all about and, again, why is the word there at all?

Well let’s see what the word ‘Gentile’ really means so that we can begin to unravel this evil corrupting conundrum. First the etymology:

From the Online Etymology Dictionary:

Gentile – “From Late Latin noun use of Latin gentilis; “of the same family or clan, of or belonging to a Roman gens,” from gens (genitive gentis) “race, clan,” from PIE root *gene- “give birth, beget,” with derivatives referring to procreation and familial and tribal groups.”

From Wikipedia:

Gens – In ancient Rome, a gens (/ˈɡɛns/ or /ˈdʒɛnz/), plural gentes, was a family consisting of all those individuals who shared the same nomen and who claimed descent from a common ancestor.

Then we have the Biblical definition from the Hebrew in Strong’s Concordance:

Gentiles – H1471 – גֹּי גּוֹי – gôy gôy – go’ee, go’-ee – Apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts: – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

And then from Strong’s again with the Greek definition from the New Testament:

Gentiles – G1484 – ἔθνος – ethnos – eth’-nos – Probably from G1486; a race (as of the same habit), that is, a tribe; specifically a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually by implication pagan): – Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

Notice how the word has allegedly changed in its meaning from an OT usage to a NT usage!! No mention of Jews and non-Jews in the OT definition but, hey presto, surprise surprise, in the NT, all of a sudden, it does mean non-Jews!! Who decided to give it this new meaning!!?? The plot thickens, does it not?

So there we have it, the main definitions and NONE referring to Jews or non-Jews apart from Strong’s meaningless, peer pressure implied corrupting afterthought in brackets. The etymology plainly tells us that a ‘Gentile’ is from the Latin ‘gentilis’ and means someone who is not a Roman or not a Roman citizen and is nothing to do with people being either Jews and/or non-Jews.

We then get the Hebrew definition for ‘Gentile’ which clearly states ‘goy’ or a ‘foreign nation’ or, better, an Abrahamic or Israelite ‘nation’, so if we re-paste Genesis 10:5 we can more accurately translate it:

Genesis 10:5 (MCV) By these were the isles of the Goyim or nations (H1471 – Gentiles) divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.

In support I will include the Septuagint Greek Transliteral OT for Genesis 10:5:

Genesis 10:5 (Septuagint Greek Transliteral) From out of these separated islands of the nations (Hebrew Goyim) in their land each according to tongue among their tribes and among their nations. (Brackets mine)

As stated earlier the above verse does not refer to Jews or non-Jews, it clearly applies to Noah and his family only, that is, before any Israelites or Jews had been born. This also means that Semites from Shem were also classified as Goyim or Nations as can be supported by this proof, that of God speaking to Abram:

Genesis 12:2 (MCV) And I will make of thee a great Goy (H1471 – Goy – Nation), and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

And again with The Lord speaking to Isaac’s wife Rebekah:

Genesis 25:23 (MCV) And the LORD said unto her, Two nations (H1471 – Goy – Nation) are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.

OK, so the word ‘Gentiles’ is not being used here in this verse, but the word ‘Nations’ is being used, and yet it is translated from the same Hebrew word H1471 Goy or Goyim. So we have the Semitic Hebrews Isaac and Rebekah with twins in her womb being referred to as GOY!!

So how come this same Hebrew word ‘Goy’ is here translated as ‘Nation’, a Hebrew Semitic nation no less, and elsewhere it’s translated as ‘Gentile’ with the translator’s intended meaning being that of a foreign nation? And who is the foreign nation foreign to? Which of these nations is not foreign, they’re all descendants of Noah aren’t they? Are you beginning to see the picture? What a ‘flexible’ and ‘useful’ word this ‘Gentiles’ word is (much sarcasm by the author and the accompanying mirth)!

So, with regard to all the other usages, who has made these translation determinations? Who has decided what kind of nation? Now we’re getting to it, and the answer? the agenda driven religious dogs of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, who had to preserve their pro-Jewish agenda deception, no matter what the cost to The Truth of the Holy Scriptures. Confusion and chaos was definitely the order of the day with these deceivers.

From “WHO ARE THE GENTILES?” by Bertrand L. Comparet and taken from “Your Heritage.”

“You may be surprised to know that there is no such word (as Gentile) in the Bible, in its original language. Oh yes, I know that you are now riffling through the pages of your King James Bible, looking for some of the many places you will find Gentile in it. However, I said that there was no such word in the original languages. The word was put into it by translators, who changed the wording of the Bible centuries after the last book of the Bible was written.”

And again from Comparet:

“The word Gentile is not once used in any Hebrew manuscript of the Old Testament. There is a very good reason for this, there is no such word in Hebrew, nor any word that corresponds to it. Everywhere you find the word Gentile used in the Old Testament, it is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word goi (goy), which means nation, the plural form of it is goyim. Since it means nation, why didn’t they translate it correctly? Sometimes they did, but for the most part they translated it to fit the official doctrines of the church of their day. It didn’t matter what violence that did to the true meaning of the word.”

Always good to get confirmation, eh? Please note that I am not a disciple of Comparet’s.

Moving on, and to firm up what I have already said, I will now quote Genesis again in reference to Jacob/Israel and his two grandsons Ephraim and Manasseh (Joseph’s sons), whom Jacob declared as being true Israelites even though their mother was Egyptian:

Genesis 48:17-19 (MCV) And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father’s hand, to remove it from Ephraim’s head unto Manasseh’s head. 18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head. 19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he (Manasseh) also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother (Ephraim) shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations (H1471 – Goyim).

So what do we have going on here!? Let’s be clear, for here we have two Hebrew Israelite lads being blessed by their Hebrew Israelite grandfather, Jacob/Israel, who is saying that one of them, along with his descendants, shall be a great goy (nation) and the other who shall become a great company, or commonwealth, or multitude of goyim (nations). This means we have Hebrew Israelites being called goy and goyim – WHAT!!!!??? This is enough to give the Jews apoplexy!! LOL. Just as well then that the Jews are not Israelites, so they are an irrelevance, until we get to the NT where we see them in their true Serpent Seed Canaanite light as the Christ killers. (See the links below for the true identity of the Jews and their origins)

However, where does this leave us with regard to this word ‘Gentile’ which we now know is a gross deception and means GOY (singular) and GOYIM (plural) and in turn means Israelite NATION or NATIONS! It also leaves us with the bigger problem of checking out every use of the word ‘Gentile’ but, more importantly, learning what is meant by the use of the word in that particular context. Is it being applied to Israelites, to non-Israelites, to Canaanites, to Greeks, to heathen barbarians/pagans, and, especially in erroneous association with the Jews? What are the Holy Scriptures REALLY alluding to in these differing cases?

As an aside, for those of you not aware, the words ‘goy’ and ‘goyim’ are frequently used by the Jews when describing non-Jews in an elitist put-down and derogatory manner. Other times they will call us ‘cattle’ such is their ignorant, arrogant, evil contempt for all other ethnic groups. Here are some examples:

“The differences between Jews and gentiles are not religious, historical, cultural or political. They are, rather, racial, genetic and scientifically unalterable. The one group (Gentiles) is at its very root and by natural constitution “Totally Evil”, while the other (Jews) is “Totally Good.””

— Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut by Rabbi Saadyi Grama

“A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from Holiness.”

— The Chabad-Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson

“We have to recognise that Jewish blood and the blood of the goy are not the same thing. Every law that is based on equating goys and Jews is completely unacceptable.”

— Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

How about that for satanic belligerence and arrogance!? This also tells us that Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, apart from being rabid racists, are not the sharpest tools in the box, having not studied The Holy Scriptures, and, despite all the BS we hear about their mythical cleverness and high intellect.

OK, just one more point from Genesis 48:19 where it refers to Manasseh as being ‘a people’ and from Strong’s, once more, we get:

People – H5971- עַם – ‛am – am – From H6004; a people (as a congregated unit); specifically a tribe (as those of Israel); hence (collectively) troops or attendants; figuratively a flock: – folk, men, nation, people.

As we can see, the Israelites descended from the Patriarch Manasseh were to become a great people, a tribe, or a troop, or a flock and/or a great nation, that is, a great goy.

Any the wiser? I hope so, if not, then press on to Part 2 for all will be revealed.

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 2 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites and The Canaanite Jews

So how do we discern what is really meant by the word ‘Gentile’? Well, first and foremost we have to learn who the Israelites were in Biblical history and, of course, who the Israelites are today, because without this crucial foundational knowledge you’re always going to flounder in your understanding like those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Here are the ‘Lost’ Tribes or The Twelve Tribes of Israel:

These are Jacob/Israel’s Twelve Sons who were or became The Twelve Patriarchs and progenitors of twelve clans that became 12 modern western nations.

Joseph, whom Jacob loved, represented by Joseph’s two sons Ephraim and Manasseh – the Birthright Inheritors,

Benjamin the youngest son,

Simeon – The Scythians – The Scots

Levi – The Priesthood,

Judah – The Royal Sceptre to Yashua Messiah, King David, British Royalty and Nobility,

Reuben – the eldest son who, like Esau, lost the Birthright Inheritance,

Issachar,

Zeebulon,

Gad,

Asher,

Dan,

Naphtali.

Joseph = Ephraim = Anglo-Saxon England (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons) and Her Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth – Australia, Canada, NZ and S Africa (Now stolen).

Joseph = Manasseh = Anglo-Saxon USA (The Saacae or Saaka – Isaac’s sons = Saxons)

Simeon = Scotland (The Scythians) and Scottish descendants everywhere.

Levi = Wales, (The Druids = descendants of The Levitical Priesthood with many butchered by the Romans in 46 AD) Cornwall and The Walloons of Belgium and Welsh descendants everywhere.

Judah (The Jutes not the Jews) = Northern Ireland (The Red Hand Flag of Zarah), Scotland and some dispersed in England with some also still dispersed in Western Europe including Germany (Assyria).

Benjamin = Norway, Iceland and Denmark.

Dan = (The Tuatha de Danaan) Southern Ireland and Irish descendants everywhere.

Reuben = Northern Gallic France = Paris, Brittany and Normandy and Gallic French descendants everywhere.

Zebulon pronounced Zeebulon – a haven for ships = Holland (the Zuider Zee) and Dutch descendants everywhere.

Gad = Flanders (modern Belgium) including The Walloons.

Issachar = Switzerland.

Naphtali = Finland.

Asher = Sweden and Swedish descendants everywhere.

13 tribes listed in all due to Joseph’s two sons Ephraim & Manasseh both inheriting.

From the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXII 1320 AD:

“Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Mediterranean Sea) and the Pillars of Hercules (The Strait of Gibraltar), and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.” (Brackets mine)

For further knowledge about True Israel see link below entitled: “The Jews are The Tares”

OK, so now that you know who The Israelites are, I will go straight to the last book of The Bible as the starting point of this study, for this is where it all has to culminate or climax. Six thousand years of Israel’s and mankind’s history are focused here, that is, just prior to Yashua Messiah’s return to this earth. From this starting point we can then go back and work our way through a few relevant Scriptures to make the case for a ‘Gentile’ free Bible. This will then show you, so that you fully understand, the evil deception that has taken place, that is, through the use of this useless and deceptive word ‘Gentiles’:

Revelation 7:4-8 (MCV) And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all The Tribes of The Sons and Daughters of Israel. 5 Of The Tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of The Tribe of Asher were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Napthali were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Manasseh were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of The Tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of The Tribe of Zebulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Joseph (Ephraim) were sealed twelve thousand. Of The Tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

Now here is the question I always ask of those that worship and suck up to the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews as the chosen people, that is, satanic ‘Christian’ Zionists and those of their satanic ilk: “If the Jews are the chosen people, then tell me who these twelve tribes or nations of people are today – identify them if you can?” To date I have never had an answer from any of these wretched deluded people. And why is that? Simply, because the Jews are just one ethnic group – one tribe, not twelve tribes, and a tribe that is not even Semitic, they’re not Hebrews, nor are they of Israel! In fact, the Jews truly are the Gentiles or the Goy, if we were to use their words with their intended meanings. However, we’re not using their disingenuous words, so who are the Jews? The Jews are Shelahite Hamitic Canaanites, The Serpent Seed from The Garden, not Semitic Israelites. (Please see Genesis chapter 38 and the links below for all the details about the True Israelites and identity of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews).

So where are we now? for we have taken the Jews out of the equation completely and we’re now dealing with a totally different ethnic group, namely the True Israelites who became 12 modern nations or 12 modern goys. But what about the non-Israelites, how do we identify them? Answer, we don’t when confronted with this accursed word ‘Gentile’, but what we do learn is that The Holy Scriptures are mostly about the nation or goy of Israel and the Israelites and not about foreign nations at all, other than when they are specifically mentioned, come into contact with, and interrelate with the nation of Israel. This applies equally to the NT as it does the OT. Examples of the other nations in the OT being the tribes of Canaanites (the Hittites Jebusites, Kenites etc.) the Moabites, The Amorites, the Philistines, the Egyptians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians and the Persians etc. In the NT we get the Romans, the Greeks, the Samaritans, the Edomites (Herod) and the Canaanite Jews to name a few.

This means we’re left with three principal ethnic groups of people, those from the nations of Israel, the Adamic/Noahide mankind nations not of Israel and then the foreign heathen nations of the Serpent Seed, headed up by the Jews, namely the Canaanites. The Canaanites and/or the alien foreign nations, are hu-man kind and the Israelites, plus the other nations, are mankind. ‘Hu’ from the British Gaelic and Old English tongues means ‘serpent’ so a ‘hu-man’ is a serpent man, not a man. With these truthful elements in mind we will now unravel the infuriating use of this word ‘Gentile’.

Now here’s a thing. In the OT, ‘Gentile’ means Goy or nation – any nation, and ‘Gentile’, in the NT, means ‘Ethnos’ which must also mean ‘Goy’ or any other nation, if only to keep the continuity going. OK, in Strong’s NT definition it doesn’t say Goy, but when it came to identifying the differing peoples, nothing changed from OT times to NT times, the same ethnic groups were still around. It would, therefore, be foolishness to surmise that the pesky word ‘Gentile’ had changed from its OT Hebrew meaning when using the NT Greek word ‘Ethnos’. Moreover, this must mean that ‘Gentile’ (‘Ethnos’) is nothing to do with being a non-Israelite or a non-Jew unless the context of the verse determines it.

Having said all that I trust that you’re still with me, for I do know that it’s a very complex and confusing subject and we must understand that this confusion has been sown, either through ignorance or to serve a subversive pro-Jewish agenda in order to conceal the true identity of The Serpent Seed Jews and, of course, the True identity of the Twelve Tribes of Israelite peoples – The Goy and/or The Nations.

The other agenda at play here is that of the Papists who have always maintained their counterfeit claim to being ‘spiritual’ Israel, that is, the satanic Roman Cult Church having replaced the Abrahamic Covenant True Israel. Laughable or what?

So let’s copy and paste a few verses here that use the word ‘Gentile’ and expound on them to reveal their true meaning:

3 John 1:7 (MCV) Because that for His name’s sake they went forth, taking nothing of the Gentiles (G1484 – Ethnos)

Now in this verse we have the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ in the context of Messenger John’s epistles, but to whom are his epistles addressed? Many Bible ‘scholars’ say that they are to non-Israelite potential converts and non-Israelite Christians at Ephesus. Others say that John was living in Ephesus at that time and the epistles were written to the congregations at Corinth. However, are either of these stories true? Maybe, but a more likely narrative is that of Augustine of Hippo who stated that John’s epistles were written to The Parthians north of the Euphrates river. Now who resided there in the first century? Why, none other than the Ten Tribes of Israel, which means we have John fulfilling Yashua Messiah’s command to His Twelve Learners to go the lost Tribes of Israel ONLY!

Matthew 10:5-6 (MCV) These twelve Yashua sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles (Canaanite Jews and other non-Israelites), and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He (Yashua Messiah) answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.

Therefore this means that in 3 John 1:7 they took nothing of their fellow Israelites – Ethnos – Goyim – Nations.

Moving on with more evidence:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

Right, once again, who was Peter speaking to? for unless we know that, we will be stumbling in the dark and not be able to work out who these ‘Gentiles’ are. So let’s copy and paste the first verse of 1 Peter 1:

1 Peter 1:1 (MCV) Peter, a messenger of Jesus Christ, to the STRANGERS scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

From Strong’s Concordance:

Strangers – G3927 – παρεπίδημος – parepidēmos – par-ep-id’-ay-mos From G3844 and the base of G1927; an alien alongside, that is, a resident foreigner: – pilgrim, stranger.

So who were these ‘strangers’ or ‘resident foreigners’ that Peter was speaking to? See Matthew 10:5-6 above.

Moreover, if Peter was sent to The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (and he was) and he is addressing people here called ‘strangers’, who could these ‘strangers’ be other that lost Israelites? here called ‘aliens alongside’, ‘resident foreigners’ and/or ‘pilgrims’? Sojourners might be a another name we could call them, that is, settled, but only temporarily settled for they were still in the process of migrating west into Europe and eventually into Britain.

However, we also need to understand that the places listed, that is, Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, that Peter was sent to are in Northern Asia (northern modern Turkey) where Paul was restrained by the Holy Spirit from venturing into. The reason for that being that Paul was the messenger to the non-Israelite peoples of mankind, that is, non-Israelite Semites and Hamites. Here is the Scripture to confirm what I have said:

Acts 16:6 (MCV) Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Spirit to preach The Word in Asia.

As an aside and just to let you know that it was Yashua Messiah restraining Paul through The Holy Spirit and not The Holy Spirit operating of itself. (Please see my articles below re The Trinity Blasphemy and The Duality Godhead)

Now why was Paul forbidden entry into Northern Asia? Easy, because that was Peter’s manor – Peter’s territory, where some of The Lost Tribes were residing and they were NOT ‘Gentiles’ as in the word’s intended erroneous meaning – they were Israelites. However Peter is making the comparison between these ‘stranger’ Israelites residing in a foreign land and the ‘Gentiles’ and I’ll post the verse again:

1 Peter 4:3 (MCV) For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles (Ethnos or Goyim), when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries:

So who are these ‘Gentiles’ that Peter is allegedly referring to? Well plainly they were heathen non-Israelites, so not God’s chosen people and they could have been of any of the other ethnicities whether of Noahide mankind or Canaan’s hu-man kind (Canaanites). Here, Peter is teaching his Israelite audience that their previous heathen ways of behaving (Gentile behaviour) were not good or helpful to God’s chosen people. Especially if The Father was calling any of them. This is an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ being used in its traditional sense.

Moving on once more we have this verse:

1 Timothy 3:16 (MCV) And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was made apparent in the flesh, justified in The Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into Glory.

So who did Yashua Messiah preach to? Who did He come for?

Matthew 15:24 (MCV) But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel (The Ten Tribes).

So here, yet again, we see the deceptive use of this erroneous word ‘Gentiles’ which is translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’ which means ‘Goyim’ and in turn means ‘Nations’, but which nations? Easy, in this case it must be the Israelite Nations because that is who Yashua Messiah declared He was sent to – NOT the heathen foreigners.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 (MCV) For ye, brethren, became followers of the Ecclesia of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen (fellow-tribes-men – Israelites), even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles Ethnos/Goyim/Nations that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the uttermost.

OK, so what do we have revealed to us here? First and foremost Paul is speaking to his fellow-tribes-men, for he refers to them as‘brethren’ who had become followers of Yashua Messiah. He then goes on to make it plain that they had suffered at the hands of their own fellow-tribes-men (Israelites) non-believers, who also had suffered at the hands of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, even though these fellow Israelites were not called and members of the Ecclesia. Sound familiar? We then have Paul stating that they, the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, both killed Yashua Messiah and the Prophets of Old Testament times. Furthermore he says that they tried to stop Paul from preaching to the GENTILES!!!

Now who are these ‘Gentiles’, because we already have the Israelites mentioned as ‘brethren’ to Paul and as fellow-tribes-men? Well that makes it plain, does it not? for here, again, we have the word ‘Gentiles’ meaning non-Israelites.

Here is another example:

Ephesians 4:17 (MCV) This I say therefore, and testify in The Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,

So to whom is Paul speaking? Non-Israelites is the answer. How do we know this? Easy, because no Israelites were resident in Ephesus. They were living in Northern Asia = Peter’s territory, not southern Asia where Ephesus was situated – Paul’s territory. Therefore we have Paul behooving these Ephesian non-Israelite believers to henceforth not behave in the same way as their fellows who were lost and degenerate non-Israelite Ephesians.

Matthew 10:17-18 (MCV) But beware of men Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; 18 And ye shall be brought before governors and kings (shabbos goy Jew pawns) for my sake, for a testimony against them, the Gentiles (Ethnos – Goyim – Israelite Nations and Foreign Nations).

Here we have an example of the word ‘Gentiles’ covering a multitude of sins, for it does not mean just non-Israelites, it also means Israelites as well. If, in the future, we are arrested for Yashua Messiah’s sake and brought before the criminals in power, we will be a testimony to all people, including our fellow Israelites. That means this word ‘Gentiles’ (‘Ethnos’ or ‘Goyim’) is being used in an all encompassing fashion for both Israelites and non-Israelites alike. Which, in turn, equates to its Old Testament usage where we saw Abram and his Israelite descendants referred to as ‘Goyim’‘Gentiles’‘Nations’. This, in turn, makes a total mockery of the translator’s intended meaning, that is, solely for the describing of heathen non-Jews.

Romans 1:13 (MCV) Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

So to whom is Paul speaking? Take note, so that you fully understand what is going on here. First of all Paul is addressing fellow tribes men (Israelite brethren) NOT fellow Christian brethren, because he adds the rider: “That I might have some fruit among you also!” So as he writes they are not yet regenerated brothers of Paul (Christians) and yet he calls them BRETHREN! Now notice how the translators have written it as “even as among OTHER GENTILES” This means that according to the translators we have Paul referring to unregenerated Israelites as ‘Gentiles’! How confusing is that?

Moreover, don’t forget that ‘Gentiles’ means ‘Ethnos’ or ‘Nations’ or ‘Goy’ so Paul could easily be referring to dispersed Israelites living amongst other nations.

OK, that’s it for part two, more revelations in part three.

Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jews?
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-part-1-the-beginning/

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew.
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/06/13/was-jesus-christ-a-jew/

Exposing The Trinity Lie
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

The Duality Godhead
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

The Jews are The Tares
https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing In The Bible? – Part 3 – The Chosen Hebrew Israelites, The Canaanite Jews and Now The Greeks

In parts one and two I have revealed some, but not all, of the problems created by the use of the wretched word ‘Gentiles’. In the third part of this article we move on to another word which compounds and makes the word ‘Gentiles’ even more confusing than it already is.

OK, so let’s move on to the word ‘Greeks’ and why use the word ‘Greeks’ and not ‘Gentiles’. Why use two different words to describe the same thing? Greeks are ‘Gentiles’ aren’t they? that’s if we stick to their erroneous use of this irritating word, yes of course they are, so what’s going on? Well could it be that nearly all the uses of the word ‘Gentiles’ are referring to The Lost Ten Tribes of Israel (The Nations) and not to non-Israelites at all. This means that when non-Israelites was the intended meaning they used the word ‘Greeks’.

Here’s the first example:

John 7:35 (KJV) Then said the Jews among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles, and teach the Gentiles?

Correct translation:

John 7:35 (MCV) Then said the Jews Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, (not the Israelites), among themselves, Whither will He go, that we shall not find Him? will He go unto the dispersed (The Lost Israelites, that is, The Diaspora) among the Gentiles Greeks and teach the Gentiles Greeks.

So what have we here? Quite simply yet another deceptive variation on the use of the word ‘Gentiles’ where it is mistranslated from the Greek word ‘Hellen’ pronounced ‘Hellane’, and the Hellens were most likely the Greek speaking non-Israelite peoples. However, some of these Greek speakers may well have been migrating Israelites as well, although most would have been ethnically Greeks. However, we’re still left with the conundrum of why did they use the word ‘Gentiles’ when it should have been ‘Greeks’?

Moving on and just to set the scene, here is yet another anomaly to prove my case:

Romans 2:9-10 (MCV) Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also of the Gentile Greek 10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew Israelite Judean first, and also to the Gentile Greek.

Once again, the word ‘Gentile’ here is translated from the NT Greek word ‘Hellen’ (Strong’s reference G1672) pronounced ‘Hellane’ and yet it is written as ‘Gentile’ and not ‘Greek’. In this case ‘Gentiles’ is not translated from the Greek word ‘Ethnos’. How confusing is that? Where is the consistency? These translators of the KJV were supposed to be learned men, so what were they up to?

For confirmation we get:

Mark 7:26 (MCV) The woman was a Greek, a Syrophoenician by nation; and she besought Him that He would cast forth the devil out of her daughter.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Greek – G1674 – Ἑλληνίς – Hellēnis – hel-lay-nis’ Feminine of G1672; a Grecian (that is, non-Jewish) woman: – Greek.

Here we can see a woman, who was known as a Syrophoenician by nation, in the Gospel of Mark, and yet is called a Greek when in truth she was a Canaanite and is called a Canaanite in the Matthew rendering of this account:

Matthew 15:22 (KJV) And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto Him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

From Adam Clarke’s Commentary:

“The woman was a Greek – Rosenmuller has well observed, that all heathens or idolaters were called Ἑλληνες, Greeks, by the Jews; whether they were Parthians, Medes, Arabs, Indians, or Ethiopians. Jews and Greeks divided the whole world at this period.”

Notice here that the Parthians and Medes were here called Greeks by the Canaanite Jews, when it is well known that the Parthians and Medes at that time were dispersed Israelites of The Ten Tribes. The lands of the Medes and Parthians north of the Euphrates river is where The Assyrians deposited the Israelites after they had taken them captive in 740-725 BC.

Josephus, the first century historian, is a witness to this fact:

“…there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while The Ten Tribes are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.”

So here we have solid gold proof that the Israelites, here erroneously labelled as Greeks, and therefore as Gentiles in the eyes of the Canaanite Jews, were alive and well and were a great multitude of people prospering in an alien land as strangers or sojourners.

OK, the above is a little digression, but an essential digression in order to build a bigger and more accurate overall historical picture, and to show what an evil deception this word ‘Gentiles’ is, so back to the thread of Jews, Greeks and Gentiles.

Right, let’s take a look a the word ‘Jew’ in the NT and let’s use a very deceptive verse as an example:

Galatians 3:28-29 (MCV) There is neither Jew Judean Israelite nor Greek non-Israelite, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

In first century Judea (not Jewdea) there was a remnant of the three Tribes of the Southern Kingdom of The House of Judah as opposed to the Northern Kingdom of the House of Israel – The Ten Tribes. These three tribes consisted of Judah, Levi and Benjamin who weren’t Jews. They were descendants of the small minority of Israelites who returned from the Babylonian captivity circa 515 BC. However, many at that time did not return, but joined up with their Northern Kingdom brethren living in alien lands abroad and never returned home to Judea.

Moreover, the Shelahite Canaanite Jews (The Serpent Seed) lived along side these Israelites as parasitical usurpers having stolen their language, their customs and their religion. The Sanhedrin with its ‘high priest’ consisted mostly of these satanic inbred Jewish impostors – the rare exception to this rule, that we know of, are John the Baptist and his family, Mary, Joseph, The Lord Yashua Messiah and His half siblings, The Twelve Learners, Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea and Saul, who later became Paul. Obviously there were many others, not named, but these are the principal New Testament characters who were Semitic Israelites, but not Serpent Seed Hamitic Canaanite Jews.

OK, so just to recap, here in the above Scripture we have Jews and Greeks mentioned, not Jews and Gentiles, why is that? when one would have thought ‘Gentiles’ was the ‘right word’! In the Greek MSS it uses the word ‘Hellen’, pronounced ‘Hellane’, which would suggest Greek pagans and heathens. However, it could also have a contrasting Spiritual meaning and be referring to Judeans as chosen people of the non-religious Truth and the Greeks as those of the pagan heathen religious persuasion, those of a religious mind set, just as Paul highlights here:

Acts 17:22 (MCV) Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ Hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious, that is, preoccupied with idolatrous religions.

Here is another interesting passage of Scripture that needs explaining, for here we find ‘Jews’, ‘Greeks’ and ‘Gentiles’ all mentioned, but all is not what it seems:

Acts 14:1-2 (MCV) And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both, that is, Paul and Barnabas together into the synagogue of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews Israelite Judeans and also of the Greeks believed. 2 But the unbelieving Canaanite Jews stirred up the Gentiles those of other Nations and made their minds evil affected against the brethren.

So what’s this all about? Well first and foremost we have Paul and Barnabas going into a synagogue, as was their want until, unsurprisingly, they eventually gave up on the satanic Canaanite Jews altogether. Later on we get Paul, Silas and Timothy having to confront the Jewish demons:

Acts 18:5-6 (MCV) And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the Spirit (laboured more intensely) and testified to the Canaanite Jews that Jesus was Christ. 6 Now at their resisting and blaspheming, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles Israelite Nations.

This was the general state of affairs that Paul and his companions had to continually deal with, so in Acts 14:1-2 we have a similar situation in that we have Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews rejecting Paul’s message. In contrast, Judean Israelites, plus Greeks, who were being called received The Word readily. However, this doesn’t stop here, for the Canaanite Jews then stir up the Judean Israelites and the Greeks, here called Nations, and poisoned their minds, turning them against Paul and the brethren.

Now here is a humdinger misunderstood verse:

John 4:22 (MCV) Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews Israelite Judeans.

What did Yashua Messiah really mean by this statement to the woman by the well? Easy, He was referring to Himself as a descendant of the Royal Judahite Israelites. The use of the word ‘Jew’ here by the ignorant translators is an abomination! Salvation was NEVER through or of the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews, nor could it ever be! Salvation was through Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) as a descendant of Abraham and Sarah to Isaac, to Jacob/Israel and to Judah via Tamar = Royal Judahites, not Judah and Bathshuah the Adullamite Canaanite inbreed who sired the first Canaanite Jews, Er, Onan (both struck down by The Lord) and Shelah.

Next verse:

Acts 11:19-20 (MCV) Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews Judean Israelites only. 20 And some of them were men of Cyprus and Cyrene, which, when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians, preaching the Lord Jesus.

Right, so who would have been the ones persecuted after Stephen was wickedly executed by the Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews? Quite simply, it was Judean Israelites of the three tribes resident in Judea who had been called and saved. They had obviously fled Jerusalem travelling as far as Phenice on the island of Crete, Cyprus and Antioch. Notice that some of these Judean Israelites were already residents of Cyprus and Cyrene and when they arrived at Antioch on their way home preached to some Greeks about Yashua Messiah. Mark it well, for none of these kindly people were Serpent Seed Canaanite Jews.

With that, I think we can call this a job done. However, if there are any other verses that you think need explaining then leave a comment and quoting the verse you need explained.

In Yashua Messiah’s name
Brother Charles.