In part two I mentioned a few of the early agents provocateur in what I call The Black Rebellion, but for this stage of the exposé I will now focus on the more recent principal characters starting with:
James Cone (1938-) Theologian of Black Liberation Theology: “In assessing the theology of James Cone, it is critical to recognize that he sees black experience as the fundamental starting point for ascertaining theological truth. And his own writings are a reflection of his own “black experience” – that is, the discrimination he suffered while growing up as a child in Bearden, Arkansas.”
Again, from the “Reasoning From The Scriptures Ministries” Web Page.
Notice immediately the oxymoron being applied here – ‘theological truth’. Look folks, there is very little, if any, Truth in theology. Theology is primarily the vain philosophical thinking, logic, reasoning and ramblings of carnal minded Spiritually dead men. This rebellious mindset then produces their own creation, a creation of a god in their image and with it fake doctrines and fake spirituallity. THAT’S IT!! There really is nothing more that can be said about theology, black liberation theology or otherwise, and yet Cone uses his ‘life experiences’ as a young black upon which to build his foundation of so called ‘theological truth’.
It is also from this erroneous thinking that comes the idea of blacks being an oppressed people in the USA when they are no such thing. If blacks are oppressed then they are oppressed by the Canaanite Jew with his victimhood programming and, in turn, by their own people who have swallowed this victimhood snake oil wholesale. Furthermore, if we want to play the victimhood game then ALL PEOPLE are victims of the Canaanite-Jews and their THIEVING USURY which has impoverished THE WHOLE WORLD!! Make no mistake dear people CANAANITE JEW USURY is a Weapon of Mass Destruction.
Moreover and at the same time he mentions ‘discrimination’ whilst having been born into a white ‘might is right’ environment. How could there not be be any discrimination, when he is a minority black alien, whose grandparents were most likely the serfs of white people, residing in a nation still ruled by white people? What does he expect? Preferential treatment!!?? It is in the nature of man to look after his own and if some blacks are not up to it why blame the white man? Had he behaved this way in Soviet Russia he would have been in a Gulag quicker than he could have said Uncle Tom’s Cabin – never to be seen or heard of again!!
From the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…
“Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It’s an attempt, he says “to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time.””
Now why would people, (I presume this accusation is toward white people), define black people as evil? Is this an unjust conclusion to come to? Well to apply it as a blanket description obviously, yes, because there are good black people, but is the accusation totally without foundation? No and here is the proof:
From the “Council of Conservative Citizens” web page, “The Truth About Interracial Rape.”
“Presently the FBI appears to have only published the full statistical tables up to year 2008. After that the FBI website only has smaller “bulletins” that do not include the full data.
“From this data we find that blacks commit sexual assault against almost as many whites as blacks. However, white on black sexual assault is an extreme rarity.
“Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
Black on White: 20,309
Black on Black: 21,104
“Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Black on Black: 35,330
“Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Black on Black: 36, 620
Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Black on Black: 7,705
“Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Black on Black: 12,780
“Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Black on Black: 34,841
“Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Black on Black: 148,380
“Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
Black on Black: 24,730”
Let me be clear, I don’t like statistics, in fact I hate them and for obvious reasons, as they are easily distorted and become worse than outright lies if used by disingenuous people or lying dissemblers. However, I have quoted these figures for one purpose only and that is to show how the idea that black people are oppressed by the white man does not reveal itself in this data. If anything it reveals the opposite or The Truth that it is the white man and especially the white woman that is oppressed and violently abused by the black man.
Notice, too, how the full data figures ceased to be available when the anti-white, lying racist war criminal Barack Obama became president in 2008!! Coincidence?? I will leave you to decide for yourselves.
Back to James Cone whose name incidently is just a play on the name Cain, so that you know who he is descended from. So what else do we know about James (Cain) Cone?
Again from the Discover the Networks Web Page, A Guide to The Political Left…
“The chief architect of black liberation theology was James Cone, author of Black Theology and Black Power. One of the tasks of this movement, according to Cone, is to analyze the nature of the gospel of Jesus Christ in light of the experience of blacks who have long been victimized by white oppressors. According to black liberation theology, the inherent racism of white people precludes them from being able to recognize the humanity of nonwhites; moreover, their white supremacist orientation allegedly results in the establishment of a “white theology” that is irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. Consequently, liberation theologians contend that blacks need their own, race-specific theology to affirm their identity and their worth.”
Here we can see James (Cain) Cone’s satanic credentials, for it turns out that he is the chief architect of Black Liberation Theology and the author of Black Theology and Black Power. This sounds to me like he is an outright enemy of white people and no more a Christian than my neighbour’s cat.
Moreover, notice, the use of the emotionally charged PC Bolshevik Marxist term “white supremacist” and how it’s viewed as irrevocably disconnected from the black experience. I would counter with the question: When were supremacist whites EVER CONNECTED to the black experience!!?? Who thinks up all this satanic nonsense?
OK let’s have some WHITE EXPERIENCE!!! I was raised in an originally ALL WHITE London and watched it being deliberately invaded and overrun through the 60s, 70s and 80s by West Indians, Indians, Pakistanis, Turks and Greeks and at no time did I ever feel connected to any of them, nor them to me. Cultural remoteness was the order of the day, so what’s all this meaningless nonsense about disconnection from the black experience when there was never a connection in the first place? London today with whites a minority is no longer a white English city – it’s an alien hell hole.
Here’s another thing, why is white supremacy painted in a negative light and who would conjure up such a term and use it to beat up white people? What does the term conjure up in your mind, for it causes me no problems at all? I look at what the white man has achieved down through the centuries and it looks pretty impressive to me and makes the white man look supreme, so what’s with this issue of whites being supreme that these other races have a problem with, especially blacks and Canaanite Jews? Jealousy and envy perhaps?
““What we need,” says Cone, “is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of Black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.” Observing that America was founded for white people, Cone calls for “the destruction of whiteness, which is the source of human misery in the world.” He advocates the use of Marxism as a tool of social analysis to help Christians to see “how things really are.””
Notice in true Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite Jew fashion he calls for “the destruction of whiteness”. Remember my earlier quote? If not, here it is again:
“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.
We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”
– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.
So is James (Cain) Cone looking to help Christians see: “how things really are” from Yashua Messiah’s perspective, that is, through a Christian prism or through the satanic twisted and poisonous anti-white Bolshevik Marxist prism of Karl Marx and Friedrick Engels and the Canaanite Jews? Again no prizes for the right answer.
Part 6 coming soon.