Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 4

For Parts 1, 2 and 3 see link No’s. 5, 6 and 7 below.

Welcome back to this series of articles. In part one I reported that as I was writing this article in 2007 a number of people were gathering in South London to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the British Abolition of Slavery, and I asked the question:

Would Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) have joined in?

Since reporting that event there has been considerable press coverage with images that I found to be the most wretched, disgusting, gut-wrenching, phoney and pathetic I have ever witnessed in my life! Young and not so young white creatures (I won’t call them men) with fake chains and shackles around their legs, necks and wrists wearing T shirts with ‘So Sorry’ emblazoned across the front of them, parading themselves like spineless emasculated wimps for all to see. Here are two images of their vile treachery:

Sell Out Traitors To Their Own Kind!

Disgusting Treacherous Wretches Who Have Their ‘Rewards’ Awaiting Them!

As you can see, some of them were even down on their knees grovelling on the ground. (The origins of ‘bending the knee’ anyone?) Now to all you satanic Cultural Jew Marxists in our midst I am sure this will appear to you as OK, even all very fine, but in reality what does it say about them and you? (See link No. 4 below) Not only that, but what does it say about modern Britain (I tend to leave the word ‘Great’ out these days). Furthermore, what does it prove? Has their wretched grovelling proved anything? No! Has it changed anything? No! Has their stupid, irresponsible, infantile emotional unthinking behaviour changed history? No! Will their vile behaviour make them ‘feel better’? No! because it’s the permanent guilt that ‘keeps ‘em going’; it’s the guilt that makes them ‘feel good’ and feel ‘righteous’. This is how wretchedly rotten they are, for their minds are calcified and cancerous. Has this behaviour made a positive impression on the black people of South London? I very much doubt it, and if I were a black person I would consider it a patronising insult and treat the whole phony episode with contempt.

So what’s it all about, and would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) have joined them in their little self-righteous parade of false remorse and false humility for the cameras? I don’t think so, in fact, I know so. The only anniversaries Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) will be interested in, if any, will be the future anniversaries of the commencement of His Kingdom here on this earth when He returns. None of man’s activities in this age will be remembered, nor commemorated, by way of an anniversary in God’s Kingdom, if anything The Lord will want them all forgotten! Well let’s hope He does.

The question now is this: how can I be so sure Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not join in with this celebration? To answer that we need to understand the origins of ‘slavery’ (the accurate name being Involuntary Servitude) and ask ourselves why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) allowed it to take place at all? The answer to that question can be found in Genesis 9 where we read of Yashua Messiah’s curse on Canaan. This curse, pronounced by Yashua Messiah through Noah, came, because of Ham’s sin with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife). Noah’s son Ham, Canaan’s father, “saw his father Noah’s nakedness” which in Biblical language can only be interpreted that he had sexual intercourse with his mother, whilst his father was in a drunken sleep:

Genesis 9:20-22 (KJV) And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

OK, am I saying that some of Canaan’s descendants were and are black? Yes. How do I know that? Easy, Cush, Canaan’s half-brother was black; the name Cush literally means ‘black’ and all olive, swarthy, dark and brown skinned people are descended from Ham. OK, back to this curse of Yashua Messiah’s, through Noah, upon Canaan and here are the verses:

Genesis 9:24 (KJV) And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

The word ‘servant’ here means a ‘bond-man’ or a man in bondage – a sold-man – sold into involuntary servitude. Canaan and his descendants were to be bonded and even worse than that, bonded to those already bonded. Notice too, that they were also to be in servitude to the descendants of Shem (white people) and bonded serfs of the descendants of Japheth (yellow people, who are now colonising Africa and fulfilling that prophecy), that is, they were also to become serfs of serfs. Many serf masters promoted certain numbers of their serfs to the positions of overseers and managers on their plantations, and that meant they had authority over their fellow serfs – Canaan’s black descendants became serfs of serfs.

Here is another truth; Black Africans were sold to Jewish slave traders who literally ran the black slave trade, but by whom? Other Africans, black people sold their own kind into slavery. Captains or commanders of slave ships (many owned by Jews) didn’t capture the Africans they took on board their ships, they had already been captured by other black Africans who worked for the Jews. This was big business, and a lucrative business for all concerned, not just the ship’s masters and Jewish ship owners. These facts are, of course, conveniently forgotten, deliberately played down and airbrushed from history, or just ignored by Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooders (propagandists) in the west. This especially applies within the whoring media, who seem to want to continually beat themselves, and us, up about a time in our history that we can do nothing about, nor change. The point we have to take from this is that blacks were as guilty as the Jews, and whites to a lesser degree, in this whole episode of history. Any other view is evil, treacherous, western liberal, manipulation of The Truth.

Here is another question; if we were to replace the sin of involuntary servitude, with the sin of murder and celebrate its abolition, would it make any sense? If these people in South London had been celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of murder, do you think Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would have joined in with that? Do you think He would have joined in, when black yoofs, in drug gang wars, are regularly being gunned down and murdered on the very same streets of (in allegedly gun abolished) South London? Can you see the blatant hypocrisy of it all? Which in turn means can you also see the Jews operating in the background driving this anti-white, white genocide satanic activity? That is, blacks with guns and whites unarmed!

We need to understand that involuntary servitude, on this earth, has never gone away – it still goes on – especially where The Jews are living and also in the Arab countries of the Middle East. Involuntary servitude is also rife in the Jewish run porn industry – many white girls are abducted in the Ukraine and Russia. The British abolishing involuntary servitude in 1807 didn’t bring it to an end. In fact the so-called British abolition of involuntary servitude (slavery) was an act of mere window dressing – a facade.

Here is a further question: Is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) interested in man’s ‘achievements’, that is, all those things that man can do, and does do, under his own strength? Well yes, up to a point, but then again no, because Yashua Messiah created man in the first place. He was, therefore, and is, perfectly well aware of what His creation is capable of ‘achieving’, including the past; the present, and what they could be capable of in the future.

When man fell in the Garden of Eden he acquired the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil through ‘eating the fruit of the tree’ he was commanded not to eat (See link No. 2 below).Now becauseman has acquired the knowledge of good and evil he is, therefore, quite capable of doing both things. This, in turn, can depend very much upon outside influences, his mood swings, his general disposition and/or his motives. His motives for ‘doing good’ or what we call ‘do-gooding’do not come from the Godhead; they come from the fallen man himself, that is, Satan’s will.Man, therefore, is very able at doing evil, that is, enslaving people and also very able at do-gooding, that is, abolishing slavery. All this ‘slavery’ or ‘abolition of slavery’ amounts to is an active demonstration of man’s behaviour in his fallen condition, nothing else. I hope you can now see why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not be celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of slavery. It is wholly a celebration of man’s ‘achievements’. Slavery and its abolition have got nothing to do with Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Now here is some information for mainstream Christians who have been sucked into this deceptive worldly liberal phenomenon called “Permanent guilt over slavery.” You see, they haven’t a clue about what Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) actually said about slavery? So let’s go to Ephesians now to find out and thereby set the record straight:

Ephesians 6:5 (KJV) Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;

In the above verse we can see another example of translators tinkering with the Word of God. In the Greek, the word for ‘servants’ is ‘doulos’ which means slaves. So here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, saying to those in involuntary servitude “be good obedient serfs” not rebellious: “I want my freedom” serfs. In verse 9, verse 5 it is then supported with:

Ephesians 6:9 (KJV) And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with Him.

Here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, telling serf masters to be equitable and just toward their serfs. Notice, there is neither one jot nor an inkling of the suggestion that the status quo of the serf/master master/serf arrangement should be changed nor rebelled against, especially with regard to Canaanites (the Jews and blacks).

Here above is concrete evidence that Yashua Messiah did not come to change this world, nor did He leave any instructions with His Messengers (apostles) to do so either. That also means that we, as Christians, are not to get involved in this world’s political systems, even if they look good and righteous on the outside.

Would Jesus Christ have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid?

To answer this and affirm what I have said above, what we have to understand is that Yashua Messiah did not come the first time, that is, in the first century to change this world or this age, nor its systems of governance, nor in fact, people’s sinful lifestyles. He came to take away all the sins of mankind, conquer death, and allow The Father time to draw (drag) those He had predestined, to His Son, that is, the gift of Grace filled Salvation to those He would call and choose, and to no one else.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

However, Apartheid was another of man’s systems of governance, but this time based upon God’s plan for the coming Kingdom, and the impetus to change it or abolish it, was from hu-man beings and/or from Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooding white men, that is, shabbos goy self-righteous treacherous white men = serfs of The Jews. The misguided issue of ‘hu-man rights’ is also tied up in this Apartheid system as well, (See link No. 3 below) but I will not go into that here. Here, too, is another Truth, the Roman Empire was far more evil, ruthless and cruel than the Apartheid governments of South Africa, and yet Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not say a word nor lift a finger against it, but He did tell Pontius Pilate that this world/age was not His kingdom.

Moreover, what many mainstream Christians, those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, also forget is the Barabbas character in the account of Yashua Messiah’s criminal show trial. He is mentioned in God’s Word for good reason, for Barabbas was big on regime change, he was a zealot of zealots, a first century terrorist – a real terrorist, and he wanted the Romans out of Judea!! He wanted ‘freedom’ and ‘independence’ for the Jews.

Had he been alive during the Apartheid era he, too, would have been a Cultural Jew Marxist and big on regime change in South Africa. He would have fought tooth and nail to get the white man out of power in South Africa, and he would definitely have been big on useless ‘hu-man rights’ for blacks too.

Back to the trial of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), and we know the story, don’t we? The crowd (being the Jews) called out for Barabbas to be released, not Yashua Messiah. Barabbas was a man after their own reptile hearts, a man with whom they had much in common, and a man they could relate to. Barabbas was their hero – a ‘freedom’ fighter. Yashua Messiah was a ‘nobody’ when compared with Barabbas. Yashua Messiah might as well have been a foreign invader from a planet, such was their hatred for Him.

OK, so Barabbas was big on regime change, but was Yashua Messiah big on regime change? No, He wasn’t, not then, but He will be in the future when He returns to shepherd and segregate the nations of this earth with a rod of iron (tough love) – the biggest regime change you will ever see. (See link

No. 1 below)

Finally, did Barabbas win in his zeal to remove the Romans from Judea? Not a chance, for in 70 AC, less than 40 years later, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem completely – they razed it to the ground, including Herod’s Temple.

Moreover, it will be very interesting to see what becomes of South Africa over the next thirty years or so. If Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) is anything to go by, I don’t hold out much hope for it. Keep your eyes on the news folks and witness all the end time results of the white man’s self-righteous and delusional do-gooding, all on behalf of the Cultural Marxist Jews!!

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

So would Yashua Messiah have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid, no way? Will Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) bring an end to involuntary servitude (because it still goes on today, even in 2007 and 2021)? Oh yes, but not until He returns to take His Throne as King of kings and Lord of lords, and all of man’s ways, his systems, his governments and futile ideas are brought to an end. Yashua Messiah please hurry that day! Not long now folks so stay strong in The Faith.

As a PS, you maybe curious as to why I use the term “involuntary servitude” instead of “slavery” and the answer to that is quite simple. In pre-civil war USA white men were free and blacks were in involuntary servitude. After that war was was lost to the Federal Government, (the so-called Civil War was a war by the Federal Government on ALL The States) both white men and blacks became CITIZEN SLAVES of the Federal Government, and it’s been downhill for the whites of America ever since. The so-called Union Soldiers were just useful idiots for the Federal Government. Just a little true history to enlighten your day.

Oh and one thing I did forget: Would the fop fake long haired ‘Jesus’ have taken part in all this guff and garbage? Yes, of course he would, but then you knew that already, didn’t you? LOL

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. APARTHEID is The Kingdom Of God:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/apartheid-is-the-kingdom-of-god/

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/

3. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2021/08/18/hu-hu-mans-canaanites-the-serpent-seed/

4. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2021/10/04/are-you-a-cultural-jew-marxist-or-a-christian/

5.Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 1:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/was-yashua-anointed-the-lord-jesus-christ-a-long-haired-effeminate-looking-wimp-part-1/

6. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 2:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2021/10/06/was-yahsua-messiah-the-lord-jesus-christ-a-long-haired-effeminate-looking-wimp-part-2/

7. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 3:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/was-yashua-messiah-the-lord-jesus-christ-a-long-haired-effeminate-looking-wimp-part-3/

Are You a Cultural Jew Marxist or a Christian?….

….All About The Satanic Malevolent Curse of Progressive Cultural Jew Marxist Liberalism (Cloaked Bolshevism) in So-Called ‘Christian Churches’, that is, The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.

So how would you know if you are Cultural Jew Marxist or not? For I will tell you straight that many people wander around these days, whether they be Christians or secular bots, parroting Cultural Jew Marxist slogans left, right and centre. Here is my short list of these slogans, for it is by no means exhaustive:

HATER! – XENOPHOBE! – LITTLE ENGLANDER! – NAZI! – RACIST! – SEXIST! – FASCIST! – HOMOPHOBE! – BIGOT! – HATE SPEECH! – WHITE SUPREMACIST! – RED NECK! – ANTI-SEMITE! – WHITE PRIVILEGE!

There they are and if you’re someone who uses these slogans when pointing your judgemental accusatory finger at your fellow white neighbour, then you can consider yourself as a Cultural Jew Marxist and certainly not a Christian. You’re also a brainwashed and indoctrinated, unthinking moron, who has never had an original thought of your own in the whole of your useless life. This is because some other satanic useless piece of flesh has been doing all your thinking for you, namely the evil lying scum on your TV = Tell-aLie-Vision.

Now I know all this will sound very hard hitting, but at the same time it’s very necessary in the hope that it will wake some of you deluded people up. Moreover, if your thinking is so perverted and degenerate as to use these spiteful, satanic, politicised slogans, against your fellow man, and without any forethought, proof or foundation, you are more despicable than a hardened criminal, and need to be treated as such.

However, you may want to know why I use the term ‘Cultural Jew Marxist’ and not ‘Cultural Marxist’ as the majority in the Alternative Media do. The first reason is because I am not controlled opposition as are most of those in the Alternative Media, and I name and expose the Jews at every opportunity I can. The second reason is because Cultural Marxism is wholly a creation of The Jews and is phase two of their plan to take over the democracies of The West. Phase one was their failed attempt at Bolshevising The West after WW2. None the more for that, there was ALWAYS a Jewish PLAN to see their Communist mission through as shown here:

“When we get ready to take the United States, we will not take it under the labels of Communism; we will not take it under the label of Socialism. These labels are unpleasant to the American people, and have been speared too much. We will take the United States under labels we have made very lovable; we will take it under liberalism, under progressivism, under democracy. But, take it, we will.”

— The Jew, Alexander Trachtenberg (1885-1966) at the National Convention of Communist Parties, Madison Square Garden, 1944 – source: Bella Dodd (1904-1966)

Now here is where I will introduce you to The Jewish Frankfurt School:

The Frankfurt School – Critical Theory – Cultural Marxism = Social Justice – Feminism – Neo-Progressivism – Post-Colonialism – all born out of Critical Theory and come under the umbrella of Cultural (Jew) Marxism….(Brackets mine)

The Frankfurt School – Critical Theory – Cultural Marxism.

Founders:

Felix Weil – Jew

Erich Fromm – Jew

Herbert Marcuse – Jew

Max Horkheimer – Jew

Walter Benjamin – Jew

Theodor Adorno – half-Jew, Catholic mother

Georg Lukacs – Jew

Claude Levi-Strauss – Jew

Jurgen Habermas – German?

“Be it gender, sexual orientation, family, race, culture or religion every aspect of a person’s identity is to be questioned. Every norm or standard in society challenged and ideally altered to benefit supposedly oppressed groups.

“Thorium explains this socio-political philosophy that was designed to bring down Western Civilization and the white race that created it…

Classical Marxism vs Cultural Marxism

“Classical Marxism saw conflict as occurring between the bourgeoisie and proletariat, between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots.’ Cultural Marxism used such a conflict as existing between the oppressed and the oppressors, between those with privilege and those without it. The ‘Working Class’ has been replaced by ‘Minorities’.

“Majority Groups are defined as ‘privileged’ and ‘oppressive’, with minority groups accordingly labelled as ‘under-privileged’ and ‘oppressed’. Heterosexuals are deemed ‘oppressive’, cisgender people are ‘oppressive’, whites are ‘oppressive’ especially white men, Christians are ‘oppressive’. Those who do not fit into those groups are considered ‘oppressed’. It stands to reason therefore that if heterosexuals are oppressors the solution is to encourage other forms of sexuality. (From Jewpedea: Cisgender (sometimes cissexual, or shortened to cis) describes a person whose gender identity matches their sex assigned at birth.)

“If whites are oppressors the solution is racial diversity. If cisgender people are oppressors the solution is to encourage transgenderism. If Christians are oppressors the solution is to propagate Islam.

“The half-Jew Theodor Adorno and an original founder of The Frankfurt School wrote in his book: “The Authoritarian Personality” in which he defines parenthood, pride in one’s family, Christianity, adherence to traditional gender roles and attitudes towards sex and the love of one’s own country as a pathological phenomena, (that is, a destructiveness against others).

“This tendency to pathologise opinions and life patterns which are not in accordance with his own political ends is characteristic of Cultural Marxism (the Jew and his hypocrisy). Differing views are thus described as irrational fears and phobias. For example, a person who feels uncomfortable living as a minority in an area dominated by Muslim migrants will be decried as an Islamaphobe, since living amongst those culturally and ethnically similar to one’s self is considered sick and phobic.

“When Pakistani Muslims, living in Britain by contrast, show in-group preference converting entire sections of a town or a city into a mini-Pakistan there is no sickness, no phobia, only multiculturalism.

“A popular and propagandist manifestation of Cultural Marxism is Political Correctness in which media channels and social scientists make it a mandatory exercise to do the following: 1) Question common language: Illegal immigrants for example are to be referred to as ‘undocumented migrants’ while ethnic discrimination is referred to as ‘affirmative action’. Their ambition to define and redefine words can be seen as a means of controlling the discourse and altering cultural norms.

“Racism and Sexism have been redefined as a product of prejudice plus power which leads to such ridiculous statements as: ‘There is no such thing as sexism against men. That’s because sexism is prejudice plus power. Men are the predominant gender with power in society’ And ‘I an ethnic minority woman, cannot be racist or sexist towards white men’. 2) Maintain an unwaveringly favourable view of the ‘oppressed’. ‘Black Lives Matter’ is a peaceful legitimate protest movement; Feminism is only about equality and so forth.

“No deviation from the aforementioned narrative will be entertained – EVER!! Nor will criticism.

End Goal:

“While Communism, as Marx envisioned it, offered the resolution of class conflict in a utopian social system all that Cutural Marxism offers is a desolate form of eternal warfare between ever more narrowly defined groups of offended minorities. The only meaningful consequence that this wide application could possibly ever have is the marginalisation (and destruction through race mixing) of traditional European cultures.”

– Thorium

So here we can see graphically explained to us what Cultural JEW Marxism is, and that to call it Cultural Marxism, only, is missing the point entirely, for it immediately lets the Jew originators of this satanic conspiratorial plot off the hook completely, and gives us a false impression, and thereby no one to hold directly as accountable – which is what (((they))) want.

This is why we end up with BS obfuscations like: ‘The Elites’; ‘The Powers That Be’; ‘The Establishment’; ‘The Deep State’, when all the while it’s THE JEWS, led by the ‘KINGS’ OF THE JEWS – THE ROTHSCHILDS. (See link No. 1 below)

We can also add into the mix The Jesuits and The Vatican, but ultimately he who pays The Piper calls the tune, and The Rothschilds are definitely the payers of The Piper, with The Rothschild funded Vatican controlled by money laundering P2 Freemasons, and dancing to The Rothschild’s Money Empire tune.

However, I digress, so back to the subject at hand and how this cancerous scourge of a political dogma known as ‘Progressivism’ has infiltrated the so-called ‘Christian’ churches, aka The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and in particular The Anglican (AngliCAIN) Communion led by the Canaanite Jew, Justin Welby – a kosher archbishop eh? How does that work? Well for Cultural Jew Marxists it works very well, but that’s all – God centred Christians, followers of The Way, can take a hike. No wonder the Anglican Communion is on its last legs with an average age of 65 for its attendees, and I jest not.

OK, let’s begin, and I will use just one example of this satanic Cultural Jew Marxist dogma, namely ‘Progressive Christianity dot org’ which is, no doubt, atypical of the evil dross you will find on any progressive ‘Christian’ web page. To be honest it pains me greatly to use the word ‘Christian’ when referring to these debauched, apostate reprobates, and as I will graphically show.

Moreover, on this page we will be introduced to a Cultural Jew Marxist wretch who goes by the handle: ‘Reverend Jim Burklo’. Now how worthy of reverence you deem him to be I will leave to you to decide, dear readers, for I would give him none at all, and once I have revealed what he stands for I trust and hope your views will be much the same as mine.

Rev. James Burklo – A Progressive Cultural Jew Marxist Posing As A Christian.

This page starts off with a woman, here called Susan, who has been a member of The Assemblies of God denomination (demon-ination) for fifteen years and I will copy and paste her opening words here:

“I have been an on and off member of a Assemblies of God church 15 years – the pastor is more liberal in his style of message giving. They can’t and don’t speak to the issues of gayness and they would say that Jesus is the only way to God.”

Right, so from this we already get an inkling of her dissolute perverted thinking, and we also get a picture that the Assemblies of God do have something going for them, but I will not let them off the hook, because they are still a demon-ination of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. However, you will note that she has never been a committed member of this demon-ination anyway, so that tells us straight away that she’s looking for a ‘church’ moulded in her image, not God’s image.

Now here’s a thing, as I work my way through Burklo’s satanic diatribe, as a True Christian, you will notice some crucial elements of being a Christian missing. These illegitimates just write out ANYTHING that offends them and remodel everything to THEIR own liking; Yashua Messiah and His Word can go do the other thing.

So what do we have revealed to us here within this short paragraph? Three crucial things 1) She’s actually questioning The Truth that Yashua Messiah is the ONLY way to The Father. 2) She’s also making an issue of sodomy as being a valid way of life for a Christian and 3) The word ‘repentance’ is non-existent in her vocabulary, and all this when on the first Pentecost Peter made it VERY CLEAR:

Acts 2:38 (MCV) Then Peter said unto them, REPENT, (change your ways) and be Baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

From The Blue Letter Bible:

Repent – to change one’s mind, that is, to repent to change one’s mind for better, heartily to amend with abhorrence of one’s past sins.

From Strong’s Concordance – first part:

Repent – G3340 – μετανοέω, μετάνω; future μετανοήσω; 1 aorist μετενόησα; from (Antiphon), Xenophon down; the Sept. several times for נִחַם; to change one’s mind, that is, to repent (to feel sorry that one has done this or that, Jonah 3:9, of having offended someone…..

So what we MUST deduce from this is the fact that she sees sodomy as not a sin and repentance is not a requirement for being a Christian. Boy! Can you actually believe this satanic garbage?

Moving on with her nonsense:

“This pastor has meant so much to me. He introduced me to the person of Jesus…”

Here, she is oblivious to The Truth that Yashua Messiah was/is NOT a person, and there was no way that Burklo was going to point that out to her, for no doubt he thinks his fake ‘Jesus’ is a ‘person’ too. (See link No. 2 below)

Here is the rest of her blurb:

“….which has led to my graduate studies in theology. Problem is, I am much more progressive than they are. I’ve had a troubled childhood, so my journey to God has been fraught with questions, which theology school is helping me to investigate.

Oh dear, “graduate studies in theology” and: “Problem is, I am much more progressive than they are.” So at least she admits she is more satanic than they are. She then admits she’s had a troubled childhood which says to me a good shrink would be more useful to her than a bumbling useless theology school that will pump her mind with more satanic error.

“I also have a child who dislikes Sunday school at this church, which makes me sad. I want her to feel excited about knowing God, but the language they use sometimes is a bit unapproachable – even reading the Bible to a kid with words like “righteous” means nothing – even to me.

Oh yes whatever you do guard your brat from The Truth and don’t teach her what ‘righteous’ means. This is most likely because she doesn’t know what it means either. LOL

“I was going to try the Universalist Unitarian church, but it seems to denounce God and lessen Jesus. I want to be a Christian and I want to show my daughter who God is and can be, but I’m at a loss. Do I stay where I am or do I join a less Christian church? Either way I will feel like an outsider.”

Right, first off, her comments about this monotheist Unitarian group means she’s a Trinitarian, so therefore is as lost as lost can be, not that I am saying Universalist Unitarians are right, with their blasphemous monotheism. (See link Nos. 3, 4 and 5 below)

She then says she wants to be a Christian, well she doesn’t sound very humble to me in order to be a Christian and then talks about designing a god into a god that can be to her brat’s liking. How about that for prideful audacity? She then wonders why she feels like an outsider!

That is the end of her communication to this Commie ‘Reverend’ Burklo and I will give one or three lines of his reply to her before I move on to his itemised points of recommendation to help her choose a fake satanic church:

“Dear Susan,

“You are in excellent company in your quandary, and in your quest to find your way into a faith community that serves the souls of you and your dear daughter.”

Excellent company eh? The delusion is VERY strong with these people, for he refers to a faith ‘community’, not a faith fellowship, or faith congregation, or a faith Church. Why Community? Cultural Jew Marxist Communitarianism is why. We MUST understand what we’re dealing with here, for these evil wretches are not Christians, they’re evil political animals driven by a satanic, secular, atheist, libtard, Marxist agenda, which they have inveigled into the Christian religion in order to usurp it and take it over. This is a standard Cultural Jew Marxist modus-operandi.

He goes on to say:

“Good news! In your area there are many wonderful progressive Christian churches: open-hearted, open-minded, Jesus-loving communities.”

‘Open hearted and open minded’ meaning: “we will accept any form of licentious behaviour and debauched degenerate lifestyles, and any alien satanic religious beliefs without a shred of repentance in sight anywhere.

Now to Burklo’s response points:

1. Can I make great new friends there?

Notice, he doesn’t say can I meet likeminded souls in the True Faith there, or likeminded souls who will be iron sharpening iron? Notice also that it all sounds like seeking membership of a secular club, which of course is what it is.

2. Does it have meaningful worship?

Whatever that is.

3. Does it offer Bible study?

To what end would they want Bible Study? when they disagree with much of what Yashua Messiah says and rewrite it to suit their own satanic worldly Cultural Jew Marxist agenda. Here’s a couple of good examples:

Romans 1:24 (MCV) Wherefore God also gave them, (that is, sodomites and lesbians) up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour (pollute) their own bodies between themselves:

Romans 1:26-28 (MCV) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature (depraved): 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error (HIV and all manner of other vile diseases) which was meet (appropriate). 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate (degenerate) mind, to do those things which are not convenient (forbidden and shameful);

4. Will it help me grow in my relationship with Jesus?

This will be a non-existent relationship with a fake ‘Jesus’ of their own pro-sodomite agenda and creation.

5. Does it practice meditative prayer?

Ah yes, now we’re getting to it, that good old New Age meditation, just what Christians need, NOT!

6. Can it help to get me involved in activism for service and social justice?

And now even more getting to it, with worldly Cultural Jew Marxist political activism, and social justice, just what a Christian needs (like a hole in the head), and with Yashua Messiah nowhere to be seen in any of it – Barrabas the political zealot must be jumping with joy in his grave. I wonder if they snort lines of cocaine before setting off on their Communist activities – atheist bank robber Uncle Joe Stalin would be really proud of ‘em.

7. Do its members take the Bible seriously without having to take it literally?

Oh no! Whatever you do don’t take The Holy Scriptures literally, otherwise you’ll have to admit that Yashua Messiah was literally crucified by The Jews (using the Romans as their proxies), and buried in His tomb, and three days and three nights later was raised from the dead (resurrected), and a further 40 days later ascended into heaven to be with His Father.

8. Does it take scientific and intellectual exploration seriously – for example, does it accept the validity of the theory of evolution?

LOL look at this for a load of faithless garbage: ‘Scientific and intellectual exploration and the theory of evolution’? I will post one Holy Scripture in order to rebut this worldly BS:

Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

9. Are women given the same opportunities for leadership positions in the church as men?

Again I will post just one Holy Scripture to rebut this satanic Cultural Jew Marxist crap:

Isaiah 3:12 (MCV) As for my people, children are their oppressors (infantile Cultural Jew Marxists), and women (Cultural Jew Marxist feminists) rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

10. Does it fully affirm LGBTQI sexuality, and celebrate same-sex marriage?

Of course, we must allow ALL vile sexual perversions, including gender bender lunatics, pederasts and paedophiles, and why not child sacrificing to their Canaanite god Moloch, for ‘good’ measure – why hold back eh? Can you believe this stuff? You had better, for it’s near the mark in their filthy debauched apostate minds.

11. Does it teach that how we treat others is the true test of our faith, rather than belief in a fixed doctrine?

Now here’s a devious satanic loaded question if ever I saw one, by ‘treating others’ he really means tolerating people of any demonic religious beliefs and faiths, and accepting them as equivalents to the non-religious Christian Way. This is a blasphemy of blasphemies. Theirs are the satanic religions, for God has no religion, and they are ALL DECEIVED by their RELIGIONS, of which Satan is the author! Furthermore, you will NOT find the word ‘RELIGION’ in the Four Gospels, so that means Yashua Messiah NEVER UTTERED THE WORD ‘RELIGION’, nor gave any instructions to his Learners to go off and start a RELIGION!

12. Does it respect and celebrate other faiths? Does it teach that other religions might be as good for others as Christianity is for us?

This question just confirms what I have said above and reveals just how evil this illegitimate is. I bet the wretched Prince of Wales loves him – the future defender OF FAITHS! May Yashua Messiah help us and save us from this insanity.

13. Does it teach that because God is love, nobody is going to hell?

I am not even going to bother answering this dumb question and assertion, because no doubt this numbskull has no idea what Hell is. (See link No. 6 below).

OK, that just about wraps it up. However, there is more on his error filled blasphemous cesspit of a site, but there’s only so much filthy excrement one can deal with in a single day, before one starts feeling queasy. Moreover, I will therefore return with a Part 2, for there is too much error there that cannot be left unanswered and also needs rebutting. (For additional reading see link No. 7 below.)

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. The CROWN Corporation:

https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-crown corporation_nWKoHh7GzxS2UNS.html

2. For There is No Respect of Persons With God – Romans 2:11 – But What is a Person? – Parts 1 & 2:

For There is No Respect of Persons With God – Romans 2:11 – But What is a Person? – Parts 1 & 2

3. The Duality Godhead:

The DUALITY GODHEAD

4. Exposing the Trinity Lie!:

Exposing The Trinity Lie – Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5

5. The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE?:

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE?

6. Hell:

HELL

7. Progressive or Libertine Christianity Versus Fundamental Christianity:

Progressive or Libertine ‘Christianity’ versus Fundamental ‘Christianity’

As Wretched As Wretched Can Get…

….and I have NEVER, EVER, read such evil satanic adulterated garbage in my whole life, so I am going to reveal it to you now:

From a webpage that’s called: “What God May Be Really Like – (Done with Religion)”

https://donewithreligion.com/2021/08/08/what-does-god-believe-about-gays/

“What Does God Believe About Gays?” – By a Mike Edwards

Now at this stage I have no idea what kind of Christian this wretch thinks he is, or maybe he isn’t, but before I have finished shredding his satanic rubbish, I will definitely know for sure, and so will you dear readers.

Now get a load of this liberal sentimental yucky muck for starters:

“Believing God exists or doesn’t exist requires faith,” “but it seems intuitive a loving Creator would love the way we were created to love…”

No it doesn’t, it requires that a man or woman be called by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) and then he or she is given the gift of Faith along with Grace, and that is only after he or she has been Baptised (full immersion) into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) name alone and gifted with The Holy Spirit by laying on of hands.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Ephesians 2:8-9 (MCV) For by Grace are ye saved through Faith; and that not of yourselves (that is, neither The Grace or The Faith): it is (for both are) The Gift of God: 9 Not of works (not through obedience to The Law), lest any man should boast.

Acts 8:14-17 (MCV) Now when The Messengers (apostles) which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received The Word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John: 15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive The Holy Spirit: 16 (For as yet it was fallen upon none of them: only they were Baptised in the name of The Lord Jesus Christ.) 17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received The Holy Spirit.

“…but it seems intuitive a loving Creator would love the way we were created to love.”

Here he uses the word ‘love’ in a deceptive satanic way, for what he really means by ‘love’ is Cultural Jew Marxist liberal, sentimental, Jewlywood, syrupy puke, and not LOVE at all. Get with it folks, for ‘Godly agape’, that is, Godly love is TOUGH LOVE. Love like this:

Exodus 15:23 (KJV) And when they came to Marah, they could not drink of the waters of Marah, for they were bitter: therefore the name of it was called Marah.

Now why did God give our Israelite forefathers BITTER water to drink? Easy, to clear out the tapeworms and other nasty parasites that their bodies were infested with through living in Egypt all those years.

And again, Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) LOVING the Pharisee Jews:

Matthew 12:34 (MCV) O generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 23:33 (MCV) Ye SERPENTS, ye generation (offspring or race) of vipers (snakes or reptiles), how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

From Strong’s Concordance:

Generation – G1081 – gennema ghen’-nay-mah – from G1080; OFFSPRING; by analogy produce (literally or figuratively): – fruit, generation.

John 8:44 (MCV) Ye are of your father The Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in The Truth, because there is no Truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

“Hypocrites!!” “Ye Serpents” “Generation (race) of vipers” “With throats like open graves” “Whited walls” “Whited sepulchres” “Sons of the Devil.”

How was Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) LOVING the Pharisee Jews by saying these tough things to them? Again, that’s easy, to challenge them with The Truth about themselves, and to invoke some inkling of repentance within them. Was He successful? Is The Pope a Christian? LOL

Next up, yet more putrid drivel:

“We can examine what a loving God is like though our moral intuitions, our consciences.”

He can examine God can he? This has to be the ultimate in satanic effrontery, and I am sure God will be mighty pleased that this blasphemous know-nothing upstart has examined Him. I bet He wondered how many marks out of ten He got. Hilarious or what? Then he even thinks he can measure God by his useless moral intuitions and his pathetic conscience. (See link No. 1 below)

“Christians may argue we should trust “biblical truths” about God, but differing interpretations exist for many moral issues. Also, we can’t prove if biblical writers always understood God perfectly.”

Here he goes again, rambling on about useless carnal moral issues, and also admitting that he relies on others for Scriptural understanding, by stating that there are ‘differing interpretations’. This must mean that he has no ‘interpretation(s)’ of his own and has obviously NEVER studied the Holy Scriptures, or even read this Holy Scripture:

1 John 2:27 (MCV) But The Anointing which ye have received of Him abideth in you, AND YE NEED NOT THAT ANY MAN TEACH YOU: but as the same Anointing teacheth you of all things, and is Truth, and is no lie, and even as IT hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him. (Emphasis mine)

“We aren’t always certain how to best love, but we know that we or a Creator ought to love others as we want to be loved.”

Now this satanic carnal minded mush can be interpreted in anyway you like, especially when the focus of his vile article is about defending sodomites and lesbians. I think, therefore, you know where this satanic effluence is going – straight into The Abyss with Satan himself. He then has the audacity to tell God how He ought to be loving people. This is some uppity clay pot we have here, telling The Potter what He should or should not be doing! Hilarious if it were not so wicked.

Right, now we get to the rub of his diatribe, and the BS intensifies:

“What does the Bible really say about God and gays?

“Leviticus (18:22, 20:13) list unnatural male same sex activities as an abomination.”

So what have we got here? Well for starters he was too bone idle to copy and paste the Holy Scriptures, so I will do it for him:

Leviticus 18:22 (KJV) Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.

Leviticus 20:13 (KJV) If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

How straight forward are those two Holy Scriptures? And you won’t believe what he writes in order to try and explain them away.

“Unnatural in OT times could be sex not for procreation. We can’t be sure what activity the writers had in mind.”

He admits that unnatural same sex activities are an abomination to God and then starts upon a tirade of slimy evil explaining away nonsense. Notice how he perverts ‘sex not for procreation’ that could occur between a man and his wife. He then pollutes this idea with the lie that Moses was not sure of what he had written after having been told what to write by God (Yashua Messiah) Himself. This displays his Scriptural ignorance.

He then goes on to say:

“Are lesbians safe because nothing is said about same sex women activities?”

There is another lie!

Romans 1:24 (KJV) Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

No mention of any genders in that verse. So it applies to both men and women.

Romans 1:26 (KJV) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

This is when lesbians strap on their rubber dicks and make out that they’re men! How sick does he want it to get before it registers in his debauched mind?

Then we get dissembling sophistry of the most evil kind:

“The OT also lists as abominations lying lips, arrogance, etc. Are straights screwed?”

What has this got to do with anything? NOTHING! a sin is a sin is a sin, and sodomy and lesbianism are sins – vile sins of perversion, being against nature, against family, against procreation, and comparable to Adam and Eve’s original sin in The Garden. (See link No. 2 below)

Then we get more sophistry and lying:

“The word “homosexual” doesn’t appear in some English translations before 1946.”

The devious so and so says the word ‘homosexual’ doesn’t appear in some English translations before 1946, (as if that’s an error) and that’s because the words SODOMY and SODOMITES have always done the job superbly, and needed no faggot friendly BS words to replace them.

“In passages such as I Cor.6:9-10 and I Tim. 1:10 the translation often wasn’t homosexuals” but “boy molesters.” Big difference! And the passage says wrongdoers don’t inherit the kingdom of God. I guess we are all screwed!”

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (KJV) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit The Kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Effeminate:

1. of a catamite

2. of a boy kept for homosexual relations with a man

3. of a male who submits his body to unnatural lewdness

4. of a male prostitute

1 Timothy 1:10 (KJV) For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;

Now in the above vile paragraph he tries to get sodomites off the hook re their predilection for boys and the seduction of same via molestation, when 95% of sodomites (pederasts) lust after boys, whether it be in the boy scouts, football clubs, church choirs, altar boys, youth clubs, you name it, wherever there’s young boys gathered, you will find predatory sodomites prowling around somewhere, some might call them paedophiles. We know this is true because satanic sodomite lobbyists are always pressuring western governments to lower the age of consent for sexual unions between adults and children.

“Many growing up in church only condemn gays out of devotion to the God of the Bible.”

Many growing up in their Christian environment know what sin is, and sodomy is a sin. No doubt their views will be just as forthright and anti towards adulterers and fornicators and ALL out of devotion to God and His Word. Here we see this Cultural Jew Marxist trying to make capital as if sodomites are some kind of oppressed group, when it is they that shove their satanic perverted lifestyle down our throats with their filthy sordid PRIDE MARCHES! The media whores, likewise, promote sodomites on TV and ram them down people’s throats.

“Let’s assume it could be proven God controlled pens and minds of the writers so every word in the Bible came from God. The truth is literature requires interpretation, even if ever word written, edited, or translated was inspired by God.”

Here the carnal minded dog displays his ignorance of Spiritual Discernment, for he hasn’t a clue as to how The Holy Scriptures are interpreted.

“We mustn’t claim our interpretations are infallible when being wrong has tremendous consequences. Scholars, who accept Scriptures as authoritative, don’t agree the Bible condemns same-gender loving relationships.”

Notice how the idiot uses the Papist slogan ‘infallible’ when The Truth is always superior to mickey mouse infallibity. Then he mentions ‘scholars’. Who are these so-called ‘scholars’, when they condone what God calls an abomination in His Word. If they’re scholars, then I’m President of The United States of America!

“Why would anyone choose to be gay?

“How could a loving God possibly condemn gays when they can no more choose who they are attracted to than straights can?”

Here we get more ignorance, for God has already told him:

Romans 1:21-24 (KJV) Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

God gave them up to their vile perversions through the lusts of their own hearts!

So it’s THEIR FAULT!

“If you are a straight man, don’t you naturally have to fight not looking at naked women than men?”

Yet another lame non-argument. Lusting after a woman is a natural sin for a man, and not an abomination. Lusting after another man is an abomination.

Then we get more Cultural Jew Marxist dog vomit with the slogan ‘bigotry’ – oh so very predictable:

“Ask gays their battle! Who chooses to be gay when one has to hide their sexuality because of bigotry and hostility? The mental health damage is tremendous!”

He says ask sodomites their battle. Why? is my answer to that. If they are unrepentant sodomites, then let them get on with it. It’s their choice, no one forced them to become sodomites. Oh, and if they have to hide their perverted sexual desires, good job. Keeping it to themselves is far better than parading down the high street bragging about their evil lifestyles and polluting the minds of innocent children that may be witnesses to their stinking perversions.

“Parents often only condemn their gay children because of a supposed correct interpretation of a Book.”

Parents have no need to condemn their wayward children, for The Law of God does that anyway. ALL SINNERS are condemned by God’s Law, and the only escape is to be called by The Father to His Son Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). However, if parents teach their children the right way to live and they rebel against it, that is not the fault of the parents.

“It is impossible to feel loved and accepted when someone says “I love you but I hate your sin. But we tell alcoholics we hate their sin!””

Tough!

Next we get this whingeing perverted thinking:

“Hating homosexual sex is only loving if homosexual sex is sinful.”

Sodomy is sinful, an abomination – period!

“Hating alcoholic behavior is loving because alcohol abuse really is harmful.

Alcoholism is sinful – period!

“A parent need not reject a gay child according to the Bible.”

A parent would be failing their child by not rejecting them – period.

Then we get yet more Cultural Jew Marxist diarrhoea:

“What do our moral intuitions, consciences tell us about God and gays?

“My moral intuitions tell me that God is not bias against females, people of color, or gays.”

His ‘moral intuitions’ and alleged ‘consciences’ are just BS virtue signalling – total meaningless flapping. I wonder if he’s a faggot? LOL. God loves women as long as they submit to their father’s will, and then their husband’s will. Otherwise he deems them as rebellious and useless = a troublesome liability to their men folk.

“Shouldn’t we choose the least harmful view? We don’t know why one has feelings for the same sex or opposite sex.”

More lies from the Cultural Jew Marxist son of The Devil. Yes we do, if one has ‘feelings’ for the same sex then they are either sodomite or lesbian perverts.

This paragraph is just the meaningless ramblings of wretched unsaved loser who has run out of things to say:

“If you think there is a .0001% possibility that science proves sexual orientation isn’t a choice, why would we judge?”

Science cannot prove anything unless it demonstrates something through thorough experimentation.

“It’s a myth that sexual choices are always the result of some trauma or rebellion in our lives.”

Oh and what science has proved is that sodomy is a developmental disorder.

Then the dog finishes off with this:

I am convinced the Bible is silent on monogamous same sex relationships, while supporting relationships that show love and concern for one another.

Yet again he lies and I have provided the Holy Scriptures above that proves he is lying, but then he is a Cultural Jew Marxist, and lying comes first nature to these evil Communist illegitimates:

“In our country the lie has become not just a moral category, but a pillar of the state.”

— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

1. Is The Christian Life About Ethics and Morals?:

Is The Christian Life About Ethics And Morals?

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/did-eve-have-sex-with-the-devil-or-did-she-just-eat-some-fruit-part-1/