Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 4

For Parts 1, 2 and 3 see link No’s. 5, 6 and 7 below.

Welcome back to this series of articles. In part one I reported that as I was writing this article in 2007 a number of people were gathering in South London to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the British Abolition of Slavery, and I asked the question:

Would Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) have joined in?

Since reporting that event there has been considerable press coverage with images that I found to be the most wretched, disgusting, gut-wrenching, phoney and pathetic I have ever witnessed in my life! Young and not so young white creatures (I won’t call them men) with fake chains and shackles around their legs, necks and wrists wearing T shirts with ‘So Sorry’ emblazoned across the front of them, parading themselves like spineless emasculated wimps for all to see. Here are two images of their vile treachery:

Sell Out Traitors To Their Own Kind!
Disgusting Treacherous Wretches Who Have Their ‘Rewards’ Awaiting Them!

As you can see, some of them were even down on their knees grovelling on the ground. (The origins of ‘bending the knee’ anyone?) Now to all you satanic Cultural Jew Marxists in our midst I am sure this will appear to you as OK, even all very fine, but in reality what does it say about them and you? (See link No. 4 below) Not only that, but what does it say about modern Britain (I tend to leave the word ‘Great’ out these days). Furthermore, what does it prove? Has their wretched grovelling proved anything? No! Has it changed anything? No! Has their stupid, irresponsible, infantile emotional unthinking behaviour changed history? No! Will their vile behaviour make them ‘feel better’? No! because it’s the permanent guilt that ‘keeps ‘em going’; it’s the guilt that makes them ‘feel good’ and feel ‘righteous’. This is how wretchedly rotten they are, for their minds are calcified and cancerous. Has this behaviour made a positive impression on the black people of South London? I very much doubt it, and if I were a black person I would consider it a patronising insult and treat the whole phony episode with contempt.

So what’s it all about, and would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) have joined them in their little self-righteous parade of false remorse and false humility for the cameras? I don’t think so, in fact, I know so. The only anniversaries Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) will be interested in, if any, will be the future anniversaries of the commencement of His Kingdom here on this earth when He returns. None of man’s activities in this age will be remembered, nor commemorated, by way of an anniversary in God’s Kingdom, if anything The Lord will want them all forgotten! Well let’s hope He does.

The question now is this: how can I be so sure Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not join in with this celebration? To answer that we need to understand the origins of ‘slavery’ (the accurate name being Involuntary Servitude) and ask ourselves why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) allowed it to take place at all? The answer to that question can be found in Genesis 9 where we read of Yashua Messiah’s curse on Canaan. This curse, pronounced by Yashua Messiah through Noah, came, because of Ham’s sin with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife). Noah’s son Ham, Canaan’s father, “saw his father Noah’s nakedness” which in Biblical language can only be interpreted that he had sexual intercourse with his mother, whilst his father was in a drunken sleep:

Genesis 9:20-22 (KJV) And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

OK, am I saying that some of Canaan’s descendants were and are black? Yes. How do I know that? Easy, Cush, Canaan’s half-brother was black; the name Cush literally means ‘black’ and all olive, swarthy, dark and brown skinned people are descended from Ham. OK, back to this curse of Yashua Messiah’s, through Noah, upon Canaan and here are the verses:

Genesis 9:24 (KJV) And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

The word ‘servant’ here means a ‘bond-man’ or a man in bondage – a sold-man – sold into involuntary servitude. Canaan and his descendants were to be bonded and even worse than that, bonded to those already bonded. Notice too, that they were also to be in servitude to the descendants of Shem (white people) and bonded serfs of the descendants of Japheth (yellow people, who are now colonising Africa and fulfilling that prophecy), that is, they were also to become serfs of serfs. Many serf masters promoted certain numbers of their serfs to the positions of overseers and managers on their plantations, and that meant they had authority over their fellow serfs – Canaan’s black descendants became serfs of serfs.

Here is another truth; Black Africans were sold to Jewish slave traders who literally ran the black slave trade, but by whom? Other Africans, black people sold their own kind into slavery. Captains or commanders of slave ships (many owned by Jews) didn’t capture the Africans they took on board their ships, they had already been captured by other black Africans who worked for the Jews. This was big business, and a lucrative business for all concerned, not just the ship’s masters and Jewish ship owners. These facts are, of course, conveniently forgotten, deliberately played down and airbrushed from history, or just ignored by Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooders (propagandists) in the west. This especially applies within the whoring media, who seem to want to continually beat themselves, and us, up about a time in our history that we can do nothing about, nor change. The point we have to take from this is that blacks were as guilty as the Jews, and whites to a lesser degree, in this whole episode of history. Any other view is evil, treacherous, western liberal, manipulation of The Truth.

Here is another question; if we were to replace the sin of involuntary servitude, with the sin of murder and celebrate its abolition, would it make any sense? If these people in South London had been celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of murder, do you think Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would have joined in with that? Do you think He would have joined in, when black yoofs, in drug gang wars, are regularly being gunned down and murdered on the very same streets of (in allegedly gun abolished) South London? Can you see the blatant hypocrisy of it all? Which in turn means can you also see the Jews operating in the background driving this anti-white, white genocide satanic activity? That is, blacks with guns and whites unarmed!

We need to understand that involuntary servitude, on this earth, has never gone away – it still goes on – especially where The Jews are living and also in the Arab countries of the Middle East. Involuntary servitude is also rife in the Jewish run porn industry – many white girls are abducted in the Ukraine and Russia. The British abolishing involuntary servitude in 1807 didn’t bring it to an end. In fact the so-called British abolition of involuntary servitude (slavery) was an act of mere window dressing – a facade.

Here is a further question: Is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) interested in man’s ‘achievements’, that is, all those things that man can do, and does do, under his own strength? Well yes, up to a point, but then again no, because Yashua Messiah created man in the first place. He was, therefore, and is, perfectly well aware of what His creation is capable of ‘achieving’, including the past; the present, and what they could be capable of in the future.

When man fell in the Garden of Eden he acquired the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil through ‘eating the fruit of the tree’ he was commanded not to eat (See link No. 2 below).Now becauseman has acquired the knowledge of good and evil he is, therefore, quite capable of doing both things. This, in turn, can depend very much upon outside influences, his mood swings, his general disposition and/or his motives. His motives for ‘doing good’ or what we call ‘do-gooding’do not come from the Godhead; they come from the fallen man himself, that is, Satan’s will.Man, therefore, is very able at doing evil, that is, enslaving people and also very able at do-gooding, that is, abolishing slavery. All this ‘slavery’ or ‘abolition of slavery’ amounts to is an active demonstration of man’s behaviour in his fallen condition, nothing else. I hope you can now see why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not be celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of slavery. It is wholly a celebration of man’s ‘achievements’. Slavery and its abolition have got nothing to do with Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Now here is some information for mainstream Christians who have been sucked into this deceptive worldly liberal phenomenon called “Permanent guilt over slavery.” You see, they haven’t a clue about what Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) actually said about slavery? So let’s go to Ephesians now to find out and thereby set the record straight:

Ephesians 6:5 (KJV) Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;

In the above verse we can see another example of translators tinkering with the Word of God. In the Greek, the word for ‘servants’ is ‘doulos’ which means slaves. So here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, saying to those in involuntary servitude “be good obedient serfs” not rebellious: “I want my freedom” serfs. In verse 9, verse 5 it is then supported with:

Ephesians 6:9 (KJV) And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with Him.

Here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, telling serf masters to be equitable and just toward their serfs. Notice, there is neither one jot nor an inkling of the suggestion that the status quo of the serf/master master/serf arrangement should be changed nor rebelled against, especially with regard to Canaanites (the Jews and blacks).

Here above is concrete evidence that Yashua Messiah did not come to change this world, nor did He leave any instructions with His Messengers (apostles) to do so either. That also means that we, as Christians, are not to get involved in this world’s political systems, even if they look good and righteous on the outside.

Would Jesus Christ have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid?

To answer this and affirm what I have said above, what we have to understand is that Yashua Messiah did not come the first time, that is, in the first century to change this world or this age, nor its systems of governance, nor in fact, people’s sinful lifestyles. He came to take away all the sins of mankind, conquer death, and allow The Father time to draw (drag) those He had predestined, to His Son, that is, the gift of Grace filled Salvation to those He would call and choose, and to no one else.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

However, Apartheid was another of man’s systems of governance, but this time based upon God’s plan for the coming Kingdom, and the impetus to change it or abolish it, was from hu-man beings and/or from Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooding white men, that is, shabbos goy self-righteous treacherous white men = serfs of The Jews. The misguided issue of ‘hu-man rights’ is also tied up in this Apartheid system as well, (See link No. 3 below) but I will not go into that here. Here, too, is another Truth, the Roman Empire was far more evil, ruthless and cruel than the Apartheid governments of South Africa, and yet Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not say a word nor lift a finger against it, but He did tell Pontius Pilate that this world/age was not His kingdom.

Moreover, what many mainstream Christians, those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, also forget is the Barabbas character in the account of Yashua Messiah’s criminal show trial. He is mentioned in God’s Word for good reason, for Barabbas was big on regime change, he was a zealot of zealots, a first century terrorist – a real terrorist, and he wanted the Romans out of Judea!! He wanted ‘freedom’ and ‘independence’ for the Jews.

Had he been alive during the Apartheid era he, too, would have been a Cultural Jew Marxist and big on regime change in South Africa. He would have fought tooth and nail to get the white man out of power in South Africa, and he would definitely have been big on useless ‘hu-man rights’ for blacks too.

Back to the trial of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), and we know the story, don’t we? The crowd (being the Jews) called out for Barabbas to be released, not Yashua Messiah. Barabbas was a man after their own reptile hearts, a man with whom they had much in common, and a man they could relate to. Barabbas was their hero – a ‘freedom’ fighter. Yashua Messiah was a ‘nobody’ when compared with Barabbas. Yashua Messiah might as well have been a foreign invader from a planet, such was their hatred for Him.

OK, so Barabbas was big on regime change, but was Yashua Messiah big on regime change? No, He wasn’t, not then, but He will be in the future when He returns to shepherd and segregate the nations of this earth with a rod of iron (tough love) – the biggest regime change you will ever see. (See link

No. 1 below)

Finally, did Barabbas win in his zeal to remove the Romans from Judea? Not a chance, for in 70 AC, less than 40 years later, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem completely – they razed it to the ground, including Herod’s Temple.

Moreover, it will be very interesting to see what becomes of South Africa over the next thirty years or so. If Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) is anything to go by, I don’t hold out much hope for it. Keep your eyes on the news folks and witness all the end time results of the white man’s self-righteous and delusional do-gooding, all on behalf of the Cultural Marxist Jews!!

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

So would Yashua Messiah have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid, no way? Will Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) bring an end to involuntary servitude (because it still goes on today, even in 2007 and 2021)? Oh yes, but not until He returns to take His Throne as King of kings and Lord of lords, and all of man’s ways, his systems, his governments and futile ideas are brought to an end. Yashua Messiah please hurry that day! Not long now folks so stay strong in The Faith.

As a PS, you maybe curious as to why I use the term “involuntary servitude” instead of “slavery” and the answer to that is quite simple. In pre-civil war USA white men were free and blacks were in involuntary servitude. After that war was was lost to the Federal Government, (the so-called Civil War was a war by the Federal Government on ALL The States) both white men and blacks became CITIZEN SLAVES of the Federal Government, and it’s been downhill for the whites of America ever since. The so-called Union Soldiers were just useful idiots for the Federal Government. Just a little true history to enlighten your day.

Oh and one thing I did forget: Would the fop fake long haired ‘Jesus’ have taken part in all this guff and garbage? Yes, of course he would, but then you knew that already, didn’t you? LOL

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. APARTHEID is The Kingdom Of God:

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

3. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

4. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

5.Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 1:

6. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 2:

7. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 3:

Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed…

…Are you a man of mankind: a son of Adam; or a hu-man being and not of mankind: not a son of Adam?

Or perhaps another way of saying it could be: are you a son of Adam, or a son of The Devil through Cain, and does this whole idea shock you? (See link No. 1 below). Most likely, if you are new to this Truth, it will shock you. In turn, I make no apologies for that, for The Truth MUST be made known, whether you take offence or not. And let’s be clear, offence can only be taken, not given, and lovers of The Truth (Yashua Messiah) will definitely NOT be offended by this Truthful article.

So what are we are dealing with here? For this subject can, and will, be deemed by libtard Cultural Jew Marxists as the ultimate form of RACISM! Ooh! and we can’t have that can we? What will all those lilly livered, limp-wristed, spineless, progressive, fake Christians say? No doubt they will rent their clothes and have apoplexy, and all this, instead of realising that Yashua Messiah Himself, BY THEIR EVIL STANDARDS, would, and will be classified as a RACIST! (See link No. 2 below). So much for the fake hoax concept known as RACISM!:

“”RACIST” A made up word by the Jew Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) in 1927 and used to browbeat all dissenters of the Jewish Bolshevik Marxist/Communist ideology, and still used today to keep white people walking on egg shells regarding other races. Only whites are racists according to these traitor whoresons, that is, evil wretches like John Mann, UK Labour MP.”

— Brother Charles

“”Racism” as an accusation, was shaped by Trotskyists and then sharpened politically by Magnus Hirschfeld, before being fully launched as an anti-white weapon by ethnic others in the American academic system.”

— John Piggot

OK, so with the short preamble over and a couple of educational quotes chucked in for good measure, let’s move on to the meat of this article: HU – who or what is ‘HU’? What kind of a word is ‘HU’? I’ve never heard of it I hear you say. Well its origin may surprise, for it is an ancient Welsh word, and ancient Welsh is from the even more ancient runic Hebrew tongue.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Welsh are The Levites, with The Druids of Cornwall and Wales who are descended from The Levitical Priesthood who administered life in Ancient Israel. This included responsibility for all religious, educational, financial and commercial activities in Ancient Israel – they administered The Tithe – a tax of ten percent on the people’s INCREASE, not the principal, so there was no Tithe/Tax on wages. Israel, during, and after, Joshua’s leadership at the time of The Judges, was a free Theocracy under God, that is, before it became a Kingdom under Saul, David and Solomon and their tax slavery began.

So immediately we have a Scriptural/Biblical connection going all the way back to the Patriarchs of Ancient Israel, that is, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, who were the Patriarchal forefathers of the Anglo-Saxon (Isaac’s sons = the Saacae or Saacsons), Celtic, Welsh, Dutch, Flemish, Gallic, Swiss and Nordic peoples, but not The Jews. (See links Nos. 3 and 4 below).

So who, or what exactly, is HU?

From The Serpent of Life and Wisdom web page:

The Caduceus is one of the most ancient of symbols:

You might best know this symbol as the DNA structure and healing used by the medical profession. Since ancient Mesopotamia The Caduceus presented two serpents intertwined (the central nervous system) around a staff (the spinal column) with the wings (the “swan”) on either side (the two hemispheres of the brain, with the circle in the centre representing the pineal gland, or the central sun and psychic center within). It also symbolized the kundalini energy.

“This was originally the symbol for the Anunnaki-Sirian creator god, EA, or EN.KI (who has become an Archetype), was the chief of the magicians, “the one who knows,” and infamous for being The Serpent of the Garden of Eden, who created lifeforms in test tubes half a million years ago with his half-sister Ninharsag, at the suggestion of his son, Marduk, to create hu-mans to be the workers for the gods. (The symbol is also based upon the winged globe for the planet Nibiru, the symbol of the royal Anunnaki family.)

Biblical writers called The Healing Serpent Ne-HU-shtan. The Hebrew word for serpent is “nahash.” The root of the word are the Hebrew letters Nun, Het and Shin, which means “to guess.” This was translated into other languages as “Satan,” which some say mean “enemy,” or “adversary.””

So from this we learn: 1) that the medical profession is 100% satanic with its Caduceus twin serpent logo and 2) I don’t know about you, but ‘test tubes’ half a million years ago, LOL, is total nonsense. However, what we do have here is our first reference to ‘Hu’ as Satan the Devil, and that’s all that matters from this little piece.

From Simon, on the “Followers of YHWH” Forum:

“Their temples wherein the sacred fire was preserved were generally situate on eminences and in dense groves of oak (see back slidden Ancient Israel), because a circle was the emblem of the universe; oval, in allusion to the mundane egg, from which issued, according to the traditions of many nations, the universe, or, according to others our first parents; serpentine, because a serpent was the symbol of HU, the Druidic Osiris; cruciform because a cross is an emblem of regeneration; or winged, to represent the motion of the divine spirit.”

From The Freemasons:

“The Druids had a high veneration for The Serpent. Their great god, Hu, was typified by that reptile; and he is represented by the Bards as ‘the wonderful chief Dragon, the sovereign of heaven’.

“The Serpent is universally esteemed a legitimate symbol of Freemasonry.”

– George Oliver, Freemason, Signs and Symbols, New York, Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, 1906, p. 36

So here we learn that the back slidden Ancient Israelites (our forefathers) had a ‘high veneration’ for Hu, The Serpent, and for one reason and one reason only, and that reason was their satanic incorporation of Molech worship (child sacrifice) into their beliefs. These evil satanic practises they copied from the Serpent Seed Canaanites who still practice these evil abominations to this day.

Hu The Serpent Entwined Around The Egg

From the Eden Saga Web Page, The Serpent People:

The ancient god of the British Isles, called Hu, was the master of the dragon world.”

From the Covenant of Rhiannon web page:

It is believed that Druidism was founded by Gwyddon Ganhebon, supposedly Seth of the Mosaic genealogy, in Asia and was brought to Britain by Hu Gadarn a contemporarydescendant of the Patriarch Abraham.

“Hu Gadarn originally came with the tribe of the Cymry (The Welsh, The Levites) to the Britannic Isles. They came from the Country of Summer, which is called Defrobani… They crossed the Misty Ocean (Tawch) and arrived in the Britannic Isles and Armorica, where they settled.”

Just to summarise, we now know that ‘Hu’ means ‘Serpent’ and the word ‘Hu-man’ means ‘Serpent-Man’, so in other words, hu-man beings are Canaanites – descendants of The Devil through Eve in The Garden.

Adam declared Eve as THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING, that is, both MANKIND and hu-mankind. Adam was NOT THE FATHER OF ALL LIVING, just the father of Mankind.

Genesis 3:20 (KJV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living. (Abel and Cain, both mankind and hu-mankind – Abel later replaced by Seth).

Now for those of you who think you are ‘quick on the draw’ and say: “Oh yeah, but all Cain’s descendants died in the flood, so you’re talking nonsense!” and I will retort with: “All his descendants bar ONE!” Namely Noah’s ‘Mrs’, whose name was Naamah, and she was the sister of Tubal-Cain. Hey! But it says Noah was perfect in ALL his generations from Adam, and that’s True, but his Mrs wasn’t perfect at all in her generations. However, that’s not important, because Noah carried the Adamic bloodline, which he passed onto his three sons, and they took their lineage from Noah, not their mother, who was of Cain.

Genesis 6:9-10 (KJV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

OK, so all this was just fine and dandy until the flood waters subsided and Noah started his new farming and agricultural (husbandry) lifestyle, which included the planting of a vineyard. We are then fast forwarded to the scene of Noah having harvested his grapes and bottled up his wine, so he thinks he’ll have a good old wine tasting evening. Unfortunately, he gets a bit carried away with the tasting of the wine and ends up blotto. No doubt the rest of his family were also partakers of this first year’s growth celebration and were a bit tipsy.

Moreover, whilst all the celebrating is going on Noah crashes out and Ham, his second son, gets into a strange incestuous relationship with his mother and, presumably whilst under the influence of Noah’s wine, he lies with her = he saw his father’s nakedness:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Now the outcome of this illicit evil union is the birth of Canaan, whom Noah curses. Now why did Noah curse the brat Canaan, and not his debauched son, Ham, and/or his wayward slutty wife, wouldn’t that have made more sense? Yes to our carnal minds it would have made more sense, but not to God who sees things very differently from us, hence He sees strange flesh from incest as an abomination and likewise any inbred offspring from such an incestuous union as anathema.

Furthermore, it’s crucial that we understand what has happened here. In the births of his three sons, Noah’s bloodline only, counted, but in this evil incestuous affair it was Naamah’s Cainite bloodline that counted in Canaan and not Ham’s Adamic blood. This means that with the birth of Canaan, Cain’s bloodline was re-kindled post-flood through Naamah his mother – the line of Cain was reborn and it’s still with us today in the shape of the Canaanite Jews, African Blacks, the Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans, the Turks and the Italians.

Another interesting twist to this is The Truth that the Canaanite Jews take their lineage from their mothers. Jewish society is a MATRIARCHAL society, not a Patriarchal society. So any claims or assertions that they make to a descendancy from Abraham or Judah is a lie. (See link No. 5 re the Jews’ false claims).

So there you have it, solid gold proof that (((THEY))) LIVE! (Have you seen that film?) If not, I recommend it.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Racist – The Canaanite Woman He Called a Dog!:

3. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

4. Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

5. I Know That Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!:

Exposing The Lying Blasphemer Bertrand Comparet – Part 1

Introduction

Was The Flood, otherwise known as Noah’s Flood or The Deluge, worldwide, or partial, that is, localised and didn’t cover the whole earth? Many take the position of: Who cares? But those of us who are fixated upon knowing The Truth, would never in a million years adopt a couldn’t care less attitude to this crucial subject. So which is it?

Holy Scripture first, if only to get this off on a positive trajectory:

Genesis 7:17-23 (KJV) And The Flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up The Ark, and it was lift up above the earth. 18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and The Ark went upon the face of the waters. 19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. 20 Fifteen cubits (26 feet approx) upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered. 21 And ALL FLESH DIED that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: 22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. 23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in The Ark.

Now it’s circus clown time. Here is the opening paragraph to the seventh chapter of Comparet’s – “The Complete Works of Bertrand Comparet”entitled: “Noah’s Flood was NOT Worldwide!”

Among the many mistaken and unscriptural notions, commonly taught in nearly all churches, is the idea that the flood mentioned in the Bible, covered all the earth. It states everybody on earth was drowned excepting Noah and his family, who escaped death by being in the ark. Many churches have firmly insisted the Bible says this, when there is ample proof the flood was not worldwide.”

He goes on to say:

Part of this mistaken idea about the flood is due to the many mistranslations found in the commonly used King James Bible. Part of it appears plainly to be false, if you carefully read even the King James Bible.”

Now don’t get me wrong, for I am FULLY AWARE of many of the mistranslations and corruptions in the KJV Bible, starting with Genesis 4:1; Isaiah 9:6; Matthew 28:19; 1 John 5:7-8; Romans 8:1; Romans 13:1-7; plus all the others that erroneously interpret The Holy Spirit as a personage of their mickey mouse Trinity. (See links 1, 2 and 3 below)

Further to, he says, and I quote: “If you carefully read even the King James Bible.” Which clearly he has not done, and which I will now unequivocally prove.

First of all he builds strawman number one, by referring to Cain being driven by God from “the face of the earth” (translated from the Hebrew word ‘erets’ or ‘eh-rets’) Here is what he says:

First lets see what the translators have done to what Moses originally wrote. Remember the King James Bible says that the rain was upon the earth and the waters increased greatly upon the earth and all flesh died that moved upon the earth. Definitely not!” Remember that in Genesis 4:14, when Yahweh has driven Cain away in punishment for his murder of Abel, the King James Bible quotes Cain as saying, “Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth.” So what did Cain do, climb into his rocket ship and take off for outer space? Of course not! He was not driven from the face of the earth, and he never said so, only the translators said so.”

Never mind what the translators of the KJV said, let’s see what the translators of the more reliable Septuagint say:

Genesis 4:14 (Septuagint) If thou castest me out this day from the face of the earth, and I shall be hidden from thy presence, and I shall be groaning and trembling upon the earth, then it will be that any one that finds me shall slay me.

Genesis 4:14 (KJV) Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.

Well it looks more or less exactly the same as the KJV. So what is Cain actually saying here? Is he alluding to being physically removed from ‘the face of the earth’ or is he being allegorical and painting a picture of being deprived of ALL the fruits from THE FACE of the earth? so therefore being cast from the earth in terms of life’s sustenance. This means he was threatened with being cast from THE FACE of the WHOLE earth. I think, therefore, that we all know what Cain meant, apart from this numbskull Comparet with his syllogism building.

From Strong’s Concordance:

Earth – H776ʼerets, eh’-rets; – from an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land):—× common, country, earth, field, ground, land, × natins, way, + wilderness, world.

Outline of The Biblical Usage of the words ‘Earth’ and ‘Land’ from the Blue Letter Bible web page:

1 EARTH, LAND.

A. Earth

i Whole earth (as opposed to a part)

ii Earth (as opposed to heaven)

iii Earth (inhabitants)

B. Land

i Country, territory

ii District, region

iii Tribal territory

iv Piece of ground

v Land of Canaan, Israel

vi Inhabitants of land

vii Sheol, land without return, (under) world

viii City (-state)

C. Ground, surface of the earth

i ground

ii soil

D. (in phrases)

i People of the land

ii Space or distance of country (in measurements of distance)

iii Level or plain country

iv Land of the living

v End(s) of the earth

E. (Almost wholly late in usage)

i Lands, countries

ii Often in contrast to Canaan.

From the above we can see all the multiple uses this Hebrew word ‘eh-rets’ has, so its meaning is directly affected by the context of the words surrounding it or, more importantly, its use in other verses of crucial Holy Scripture, which I will show later. However, let’s hear more from the numbskull Comparet:

When we come to Genesis chapter 7 where it is talking about the flood, wherever it says the flood covered the earth, the Hebrew word used in the original writing by Moses was eh-rats, meaning the land. The flood did cover the particular land where it occurred. It was a local flood, which covered one particular region or land, not the whole earth.

Here we can see him adding his agenda driven interpretations to what’s written, because ‘eh-rets’ primarily means The EARTH as a whole, so he’s lying straight off. He’s also playing word games, or is it a perverted form of semantics? I’ll go with both, for that’s exactly what it is. So let’s use his twisted logic to our advantage:

Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth (H776 eh-rets – erets).

So here in Genesis 1:1 we have exactly the same Hebrew word in play, that is, ‘eh-rets’ or ‘erets’ and what is Genesis 1:1 telling us? It’s telling us that the word ‘earth’ (‘eh-rets’ ‘erets’) IS REFERRING TO THE WHOLE EARTH OF THE CREATION. Or perhaps the numbskull Comparet thought the Creation was only a partial creation or even a localised creation! ROTFL!!

Now here’s another thing, if the translators wanted to use the word ‘land’ in the correct way, do you not think they would be capable of doing so? Here’s an example:

Genesis 2:11 (KJV) The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;

In this example we see the use of the word land (‘eh-rets’ or ‘erets’) in reference to the localised area of Havilah. So, in turn, why did they not use the word ‘land’ when describing the area covered by The Flood, if it was only a localised event and/or only a partial flood. Why use the word ‘earth’ if they didn’t mean the whole earth and meant some localised land where as we can see they did use it when they needed to, in order to describe a local area like Havilah?

So here we are, after having copied, pasted and written just over three and a half A4 pages we have utterly debunked this fraud’s ‘Partial Flood’ satanic ideas. However, I will not leave it at that, for there is more, much more, so please bear with me.

OK, let’s focus on the second part of the above paragraph:

The flood did cover the particular land where it occurred. It was a local flood, which covered one particular region or land, not the whole earth.”

Now apart from having already debunked his garbage, I will make use of some very valid points from a Tim Chaffey at “Answers in Genesis” (see video link below) where he does a great job of debunking this localised flood idea.

1 The Partial or Localised Flood makes God a liar.

How does that work? Quite simply because God gave Noah the sign of The Rainbow as part of a Covenant with Noah that He would NEVER flood the earth again. This means, that if The Flood of Noah’s day was localised or partial then God has broken His promise/covenant to Noah a million and one times, for there must have been millions of localised/partial floods since Noah’s time – which automatically makes God a liar for having broken His Covenant. All this when we know for sure that God cannot lie!

2 IF The Flood was partial or localised, why get Noah to build an Ark?

Good question eh? And very valid, because IF The Flood was only partial, or localised, why didn’t God get Noah and his clan to skedaddle off to where it didn’t flood, and thus negate the necessity of building an Ark, which must have taken Noah decades to construct. Let’s face it, God asking his pivotal characters to move elsewhere, would not have been a revolutionary idea. A good example being Abram moving to Canaan from Ur of the Chaldees, and then to Egypt to avoid a severe famine. Therefore Tim Chaffey has another great point here and makes nonsense of Comparet’s partial flood BS.

3 Why take birds on the Ark IF the Flood was localised and partial?

Yet another excellent point, so yes, why take birds on The Ark, when they could have easily flown off to where it was not flooded. Again, let’s face it, distance is no problem to birds, they can fly hundreds of miles, if necessary. However with such an insignificant localised mickey mouse flood, fleeing to safety would have been easy-peasy even for the smallest of birds, chuckle chuckle chuckle. I hope you’re beginning to see the stupidity of this man’s silly ideas.

4 The purpose of the Flood was to destroy ALL flesh:

Thirteen times the Holy Scriptures uses the term ‘All Flesh’ in relation to the world, before, during and after The Flood and thirteen is God’s number for rebellion, so very appropriate for reprobates like Comparet.

Genesis 6:12 (KJV) And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.

ALL FLESH was corrupted on the earth, not some flesh, but ALL OF IT!

Genesis 6:13 (KJV) And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

The end of ALL FLESH is come before God and the EARTH is filled with violence – ALL of the earth, not a part of it!

Genesis 6:17 (KJV) And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.

A Flood of waters to destroy ALL FLESH.

Genesis 6:19 (KJV) And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female.

Genesis 7:15 (KJV) And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.

Genesis 7:16 (KJV) And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him: and the Lord shut him in.

Genesis 7:21 (KJV) And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:

And ALL FLESH died that moved upon the earth. If it was only a partial flood then ALL FLESH would NOT HAVE DIED! And of course this is the straw-man scenario that the blasphemer Comparet is aiming to construct – more on this later.

Genesis 8:17 (KJV) Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.

Genesis 9:11 (KJV) And I will establish my covenant with you, neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.

“And I will establish my Covenant with you, neither shall ALL FLESH be cut off any more by the waters of a flood.” If it was only a partial flood, how would a Covenant be valid in terms of ALL FLESH not being cut off again by another flood, when ALL FLESH would not have been cut off by a partial flood? Do you see how this makes a total mockery of the partial flood idea? I do hope so.

Genesis 9:15 (KJV) And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh.

Genesis 9:16 (KJV) And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.

God’s Covenant is with every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. How would that be possible if the flood was only partial and/or localised.

Genesis 9:17 (KJV) And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.

OK, lets move on with more Comparet garbage:

If six miles of water covered the whole earth, then all nations must have been completely exterminated. However Babylonian, Egyptian and Chinese history runs right through this period without a break.”

Where has he got these ideas from? Fair enough he got the first bit nearly right, when he claimed six miles of water covered the whole earth, but even that was erroneous, because, no doubt, he was basing that on water covering modern day mount Everest at twenty nine thousand feet, which equates to five and half miles. However, in Noah’s day, mount Everest and the rest of the Himalayas didn’t even exist, they, being created by massive tectonic plate shifts that didn’t occur until The Flood and shortly thereafter, as described here:

Genesis 10:25 (KJV) And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.

H6504Dividedparad paw-rad’ – a primitive root; to break through, that is, spread or separate (oneself):–disperse, divide, be out of joint, part, scatter (abroad), separate (self), sever self, stretch, sunder.

At this time we know that the earth’s continents did form and break off from the land mass known as Panjea and separate through tectonic plate shifts, thereby causing mountains to rise up, but this was after The Flood, so it’s ridiculous to suggest that six miles depth of water would have been necessary to cover The Earth. We also know that there are trillions of marine fossils in the Himalayan mountains, just as they are found at the top of the Grand Canyon. (All deposited there by Mr Comparet’s partial flood LOL).

Then we have his bogus dates for the Chinese and Egyptian dynasties, all based upon erroneous, one following the other, chronology, when most of these dynasties were living side by side contemporaneously, not chronologically, which then reduces the time periods drastically. Egypt was in its infancy in the days of Abram, as were all the other fledgling empires of those times.

OK, that just about rounds it off for part one – part 2 follows so please stick with it.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Messenger Charles

1 The Duality Godhead: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/the-duality-godhead/

2 Exposing the Trinity Lie!: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/

3 Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/

https://www.britannica.com/place/Pangea

Exposing The Lying Blasphemer Bertrand Comparet – Part 2

In part one, I completely debunked Comparet’s stupid ideas regarding his partial flood and/or localised flood nonsense. In this article, we’ll get into the ‘meat’ of this subject, and I say ‘meat’, because these deceivers desperately need the partial flood BS in order to try and make the rest of their demonic doctrines stick.

Confused? Not to worry, for I will explain. So first of all, let’s be clear in our minds, for Comparet needed far more people to have survived The Flood than the eight souls who actually did survive The Flood and as confirmed for us in the NT by Peter:

1 Peter 3:20 (KJV) Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while The Ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

Notice, WHEREIN FEW, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

Now why do they need more than eight souls to have survived? Easy, because they erroneously claim that all three sons of Noah were white; that all three daughters-in-law were white, and that Noah’s wife was white. They erroneously deduce this whacky idea from this Holy Scripture:

Genesis 6:9-10 (KJV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

Genesis 6:9-10 (TAB) These are the records of the generations (family history) of Noah. Noah was a righteous man [one who was just and had right standing with God], blameless in his [evil] generation; Noah walked (lived) [in habitual fellowship] with God. 10 Now Noah became the father of three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

From this, we can easily fathom that the generational perfection was Noah’s and Noah’s only, and did not apply to any other member of his family, with the exception of Shem who, like his father, was white. His siblings however were not white. Ham was either dark brown or a swarthy brown and Japheth was slit eyed and yellow skinned.

Ham’s son was named Cush or Kush and Cush literally means black. The largest tribe of Cushites on earth today is the sub-continent Indians and they live south of the Hindu-Kush mountains in India. Likewise, Rebekah’s brother was called Laban and Laban means white and he was a white Semite. So these names mean what they say.

I have digressed slightly, so back to the thread. So how could this possibly be? Easy, through Naamah, Noah’s wife, who was the sister of Tubal-Cain, so Naamah was a Cainite, and not Adamic at all. WHOA!! I can hear all the Comparet sycophants screaming, you can’t be saying that!! But I am saying it, because it’s true. It has to be true in order for all the world’s ethnic groups to exist today, and they do exist, and they ALL come from the eight souls that disembarked The Ark after the WORLDWIDE flood waters had been on the earth for nearly a year. However, there is one caveat to this arrangement in the shape of the serpent creature called Canaan who made their number up to nine souls.

Now this is where it gets very messy, very messy indeed, if you’re a disciple of the blasphemer Comparet, because you desperately need your partial flood, whereby all the non-white people we share this earth with can be explained as people whose forefathers by-passed the localised flood and came through unscathed. LOL You see you have to have these mythical people in order to hang on to the falsehood that all three sons of Noah were white.

These Comparet numbskulls are never going to deny that black and slit eyed yellow skinned people exist, that would make them a bigger a laughing stock than they already are. They therefore desperately need this fairy story of a partial flood so that their imaginary descendants of the ‘beasts of the earth’ can get through the flood event as dry as a bone and totally unscathed. Hilarious or what?

Beasts of the earth? I hear you ask, who or what are they? They’re in Genesis 1:25:

Genesis 1:25 (KJV) And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

Now here the Comparet cultists go into magic mushroom creative thinking mode and add all manner of BS to the Holy Scripture narrative, because, for them, these are not beasts as we would obviously know beasts, oh no – nothing as straight forward and simple as that! These are beasts with chutzpah, pizazz and front! LOL. Allegedly, these are two legged apeoid or negroid beasts, that are not wiped out by the flood but, rather, come through by by-passing the flood event and ultimately end up producing the millions of sub-Saharan Africans that we know of today. Interestingly the oriental peoples get by-passed completely in this bestial mayhem. More laughs for Messenger Charles.

Now you can see how crucial it is for them to maintain the partial flood myth, for without it they know they are screwed. They also know that when they are confronted with the challenge of having to engage their brains, and work out how Noah’s three sons plus Canaan produced ALL the ethnic groups we see around us on this earth today, they are at a complete loss.

So what of the descendants of the eight that came off The Ark + Canaan? he was the first born after The Ark settled on mount Ararat. And how was it that Noah’s sons were NOT ALL WHITE? Quite simply, and as already mentioned, because Noah’s wife was the sister of Tubal-Cain, so she was a an inbred Cainite. However, that was not an issue, because only Noah’s Adamic blood counted in his three sons, irrespective of their skin colours and appearances = all three sons were Adamic with Noah’s blood in their veins.

However, the problems started when Ham bedded his mother whilst his father was drunk and she produced the incestuous bastard Canaan. Canaan’s birth rekindled Cain’s bloodline post-flood, hence Noah cursed him. In turn, Canaan took daughters from all three sons of Noah and that miscegenation produced all the different Canaanite tribes we have today. Namely The Jews (white Canaanites); The Chinese/Koreans (yellow Canaanites); Sub-Saharan Black Africans (Black Canaanites); The Turks (The Edomites swarthy Canaanites); The Italians (Chaldean/Babylonian Canaanites). There are, no doubt, numerous other Canaanite splinter tribes, but the above are the principal Canaanite tribes or ethnic groups.

Moreover, this leaves us with many non-white ethnic groups who are of mankind (Adamic) and are definitely not white, but they’re definitely not Canaanites. These are The Japanese, The Greeks, The Malayans, The Indonesians, The sub-continent Indians, The Ethiopians, The Spanish, The Portuguese, The Arabs and The Filipinos.

In case you missed it, white people are from Shem = Semites. Jews, who look white, are not white. Jews are Shelahite Hamitic Canaanites which I explain in detail here:

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/were-abraham-isaac-and-jacob-jews-genesis-38-royal-judahites-and-the-canaanite-jews-part-1-of-2/

And here:

The Jews are The Tares fit only for burning – a real Holocaust! https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/the-jews-are-the-tares/

More to follow.

In Yashua Messiah’s name

Messenger Charles