Well, did she or didn’t she? That is the $64,000 question, because millions and millions of people would never even consider the idea, let alone give it any attention, but are they wise to do that? Are they just not interested, lazy or deceived? Was it just a piece of fruit, an apple perhaps, or is the fruit just pure symbolism? If it was just fruit, why did they cover their sexual regions with aprons and not their mouths? After all, it was very wicked this forbidden fruit!! Wasn’t it!!?? Either way, you now know what you have to do in order to find out.
So is my title question preposterous? If it is, how is it more preposterous than to think that the literal eating of a particular fruit from a particular tree, albeit forbidden by Yashua Messiah (The God of The Old Testament), can be considered that evil; that wicked; that heinous; that Adam and Eve should lose their opportunity of a continuing blessed physical life in paradise in The Garden and, with it, access to the Tree of Life, that is, Eternal Life?
If a child in our care were to not follow our instruction for the first time, would we lash out with a severe punishment at their first mistake? Obviously not, so why did The Lord Yashua Messiah punish our original parents so severely for eating the wrong kind of ‘apple’? OK, I know it doesn’t say apple, but it might just as well say it. Therefore, does this apparent trivial mistake and the punishment that follows make any sense or, in other words, does the punishment fit the crime?
One would have thought not, but if we take it a step further and accept the Biblical narrative as symbolic for something else, that is, something entirely different, then, as we will find out, yes it does make sense. Indeed, we can then presume, without much doubt, that Adam and Eve’s sin was so serious, so heinous and so wicked that The Lord Yashua Messiah had no option but to severely punish and banish our original parents from The Garden.
Moreover, this leaves us with the knock-on question of what kind of wickedness or evil sin(s) could it have been that would warrant such a severe punishment? Interestingly Paul makes a back handed reference to the nature of their sin in his epistle to the Romans:
Romans 5:14 (KJV) Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression (violation), who is the figure of Him that was to come. (Brackets and emphasis mine)
Notice, how many people from Adam’s time to Moses had not sinned to the same level of wickedness, here called a violation, as Adam and Eve had in The Garden.
Now up until a while ago, I was of the mind that Adam and Eve’s sin was just a simple act of bad judgement, a bad decision or a wrong choice, but writings I have discovered just lately have thrown a giant spanner into the works of my earlier understanding of the original sin. My understanding, too, not helped much by what is written in the King James Bible.
However, always remember, that as believers, our understanding is never ours, it’s the understanding we are given that matters and The Lord does not give us total understanding and knowledge all at once or, at the beginning of our walk with Him. It takes years of study and much waiting on Him. Having clarified that little aside, let’s write the crucial verses here so that we can see for ourselves what the Holy Scriptures actually say:
Genesis 3:15 (KJV) And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise His heel. (Emphasis mine)
This verse is most important in that it influences the whole of this study, for it mentions two seeds. Now what are these two “seeds”? because before we move on we must be clear in our minds what they represent and, of course, it’s very straight forward. Most readers will know what the Biblical word ‘seed’ means, in this context, but to make sure let’s use another example or two so that there is no ambiguity or confusion:
Genesis 9:8-9 (KJV) And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying, 9 And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you.
Genesis 15:3 (KJV) And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir.
Strong’s Hebrew Ref: H2233 – SEED – zera – zeh’-rah – From H2232; seed; figuratively fruit, plant, sowing time, posterity: – X carnally, child, fruitful, seed (-time), sowing-time.
Strong’s Hebrew Ref: H2232 – SEED – zâra‛ – zaw-rah’ – A primitive root; to sow; figuratively to disseminate, plant, fructify: – bear, conceive seed, set with, sow (-er), yield.
So as we can plainly see, the word ‘seed’ refers to conception and offspring and if we refer to Strong’s Concordance for further evidence we will find that the Hebrew word for ‘seed’ in Genesis 3:15 is the very same as in Genesis 9:9 and 15:3. OK, so if we go back to Genesis 3:15 we can see that The Lord Yashua Messiah is going to put enmity between these two very different seeds or lines, but who is The Lord Yashua Messiah speaking to? Let’s go there now to find out:
Genesis 3:14 (KJV) And The LORD God said unto The Serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: (Emphasis mine)
There we have it; The Lord Yashua Messiah is speaking to The Devil, Satan, The Serpent and arch-deceiver also known as The Destroyer, The Adversary and in this instance the arch-seducer, for, without doubt, one of the two seeds mentioned here is his seed.
Notice, too, the phrase “because thou hast done this,” and from that we can easily deduce that Satan actually did something and the term ‘doing something’, more often than not, refers to a physical action, not just an ‘action’ of sitting idly by on the sidelines enticing, goading or provoking as an exuberant spectator.
So what does all this mean? for we are very definitely dealing with a physical seed that belongs to the Devil! In turn, this now beggars the question, how can a spirit being have physical sexual relations with a woman? Well, the only verse in the Holy Scriptures we can rely on or turn to for any evidence in support of this event is in Genesis once more:
Genesis 6:1-2 (KJV) And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. (Emphasis mine)
Who were these so-called “sons of God” here that took the descendants or daughters of Adam for wives? Well they can only be one thing, they were fallen angels or angels that went astray and left their first estate as described in Jude 6:
Jude 1:6 (KJV) And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, He hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgement of The Great Day. (Emphasis mine)
The important words of this verse are ‘kept not’, ‘first estate’ and ‘own habitation’. The words ‘kept not’ mean they failed to keep a guard or failed to hold as precious their Spiritual inheritance or estate, that is, to maintain any value upon their Spiritual substance and the honour bestowed upon them as Spirit beings. Instead they took it upon themselves to choose the lower order of the physical or the base level of physical men. This means they despised their inheritance or first estate and placed more value upon human fleshy desires and, don’t forget, these daughters of Adam were women in the fallen condition – they were not saved.
Furthermore, these angels treated with contempt their manifestly higher order that The Lord Yashua Messiah had blessed them with, that is, their ‘first estate’ – their high position. Not only that, they gave up their home as well or their superior habitation. Very reckless and foolish indeed; so much so, it ultimately cost them their freedom because the Lord Yashua Messiah incarcerated them in darkness, where they are to this day and where they will remain until the Last Great Day at the end of the Millennium or the end of The Lord Yashua Messiah’s one thousand year reign on this earth as King of kings.
Now this brings us to an important issue. The wickedness of these fallen angels was not a one off, this had all happened before, and it was a follow on from the earlier wickedness of their leader, Satan the Devil, otherwise known as ‘Sammael’ in the other writings I mentioned earlier. He set the example in The Garden and these fallen angels followed in his footsteps, and their actions were a repeat of his wickedness.
So what was this wickedness? Quite simply, it was the seduction of Eve. We can then add in the cuckolding of Adam and/or very likely the sodomising of Adam – we do not know all the details other than Adam ate of the same ‘fruit’ as Eve, that is, Adam partook of the same wickedness as Eve.
However, what we do know is that the Devil contaminated their Godly union, which, up until that point, had not been consummated. This means that Adam and Eve discovered the sexual act through perversion (strange flesh), debauchery and lust and nothing but lust. This event was a compounding event, because after the Devil had had his evil way with Eve and Adam he then, through Eve, encouraged Adam to take her afterwards, thereby reducing her to the status of a sexual object, an adulteress or worse, a promiscuous slut or unpaid whore.
This, in effect, was the first pornographic act – the first threesome; the use of the woman’s body (and the man’s) for nothing but selfish sexual gratification. There was no love in this event at all, and it was the first sexual act on earth between a man and a woman, but only after she had been defiled by another.
This, too, is how they knew they were naked and covered themselves with leaves and why, too, they hid from The Lord Yashua Messiah in The Garden. They covered their sexual regions, they were laden with shame and guilt – they felt dirty and contaminated.
Furthermore, it was this act that gave them the knowledge of good and evil, not through the literal eating of an ‘apple’, the fruit is pure symbolism. Not only that, if we think the literal eating of fruit from the wrong tree can make us feel dirty, unclean and shameful what kind of fruit could that be? OK, we could and would feel guilty for having not followed The Lord Yashua Messiah’s instructions, but not dirty, contaminated and ashamed. No, there is only one act or acts that could have had that kind of effect on a previously innocent man and woman and those acts were the sodomising of Adam and the promiscuous, lustful, loveless, perverted sexual acts between The Devil and Eve and then Adam and Eve.
However, we now have the evidence that shows this wicked event took place, but where does this lead us? Quite simply, back to THE TWO SEEDS, the two seeds that produced two offspring – Cain and Abel. One child was of the Devil’s seed and the other was of Adam’s seed. How do we know this? Not easy, because the King James Bible is not that helpful, in fact it’s of no use at all, so we have to look elsewhere, but where? Well, before I do that let’s copy the KJV verse here, first, to analyse what it says:
Genesis 4:1-2 (KJV) And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from The LORD. 2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
Now, based upon the evidence that I have revealed from the Holy Scriptures, Genesis 4:1 seems to read like a complete contradiction of the previous verses. We know there are to be two seeds, but this verse looks as if it’s saying that Cain is Adam’s son and Abel is Adam’s son too, and not only that, but that Cain was a gift to Eve from The Lord Yashua Messiah Himself no less. Now where have THE TWO SEEDS gone? because if Cain and Abel are both Adam’s sons then they can only be of THE ONE SEED, for they are both of Adam’s seed, so what’s going on in this verse?
Well we know don’t we, The Truth or the true evidence has been written out of the narrative by the translators. Now there’s a surprise (much sarcasm), why would they do that!? They would do it, because it would mean that they would have to admit that there are certain beings (hu-man beings) we live with on this earth that are of a specific demonic race. It would also mean their having to admit what I have stated above, that Eve had sex with Devil and produced this race via Cain from that evil illegitimate union.
Furthermore, and this is a big furthermore, if the translators deliberately wrote this Truth out of the narrative, could it be that they themselves were descendants of Eve and The Devil!!?? I will leave you dear readers to come to your own conclusions, but I know what I think.
Finally, for part one of this series, who are these demonic hu-man beings and how do we identify them? Well, first of all, we have got to get to grips with a whole load of stuff going on here in Genesis 4:1 before I cover that, and it will require another article to do that, so stay with it folks.
Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit? – Part 2 – Cain and Abel.
OK, back to Genesis 4:1. What’s going on here, because it makes no sense when we add in the evidence which I revealed in part one, so I will copy it here again:
Genesis 4:1-2 (KJV) And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from The LORD. 2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. (Emphasis mine)
Now before I expound on the other writings, let’s look at the KJV first to see if we can make any sense of it: “And Adam knew Eve, his wife,” hello, excuse me, Adam did what? Adam had already ‘known’ his wife in The Garden, so how is it that after expulsion from The Garden he is only now ‘knowing’ his wife as if for the first time? And what has happened to The Two Seeds if Adam is the father of both Cain and Abel? Notice, it doesn’t say “And Adam knew Eve his wife again”.
Then it says she conceived and bare Cain and, not only that, but she says she has: “Gotten a man from The Lord”. How does that work!!?? We then have Eve conceiving and baring Abel, but with Adam having only known her once, so what’s going on here!!??
We need to understand, and MUST NOT lose sight of the fact, that Eve fell pregnant due to sinful, pornographic, evil, promiscuous and lascivious sexual acts and then declares she has been blessed with a man from The Lord Yashua Messiah. As already stated, and ask yourselves this: does The Lord Yashua Messiah bless sin!!??
If you’re in any doubt you only have to recall what happened to King David’s child through his illicit sexual shenanigans with Bathsheba to know that The Lord Yashua Messiah does not bless the fruits of the womb of Biblical characters when they seriously misbehave:
2 Samuel 12:7-14 (KJV) And Nathan said to David, Thou art the man. Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, I anointed thee king over Israel, and I delivered thee out of the hand of Saul; 8 And I gave thee thy master’s house, and thy master’s wives into thy bosom, and gave thee The House of Israel and (The House) of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things. 9 Wherefore hast thou despised the commandment of The LORD, to do evil in His sight? thou hast killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword, and hast taken his wife to be thy wife, and hast slain him with the sword of the children of Ammon. 10 Now therefore the sword shall never depart from thine house; because thou hast despised me, and hast taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be thy wife. 11 Thus saith The LORD, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun. 12 For thou didst it secretly: but I will do this thing before all Israel, and before the sun. 13 And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against The LORD. And Nathan said unto David, The LORD also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die. 14 Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of The LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die.
Here in the above verses we can see that The Lord Yashua Messiah does not bless sinful ‘fruits’ of the womb.
Make no mistake, Eve’s evil union with the Devil would, and could, only bring trouble, not only to her, but to Adam, and for all mankind in the future as well, culminating in the flood and the sinful post flood world, too, that is, our world today.
If we know the story, we will also know that the fruits of this event would be graphically displayed through the way in which Cain turns out, that is, what kind of a being he was – a sinful ‘hu-man’ being – NOT A MAN; Cain was the first ‘hu-man’ being. As an aside, ‘hu’ from the Hebrew/Gaelic tongue means ‘serpent’ so a ‘hu-man’ is a serpent-man – a descendant of Cain. A man therefore is NOT a ‘hu-man’ being and a ‘hu-man’ being is NOT a man. This is why The Lord Yashua Messiah was known as The Son of Man – a Son of Adam and was never a ‘hu-man’, nor was He a Canaanite Jew. (see link below)
Moreover, and that being the case, what was Eve really saying when she said she had: “Gotten a man from the Lord?” This KJV corrupted evidence also raises another question, how did the guilt ridden Eve come to the conclusion that Cain was a gift from The Lord!?
We now know that Adam and Eve’s sin in The Garden was sexual in nature, because they covered sexual regions with aprons to hide their shame. This means that Eve must have had a good idea of whose child she was carrying in her womb. That being the case, how did she come to the conclusion (according to the corrupted KJV) that it was a gift from the Lord? How does that make any sense?
Furthermore, how did the Freemason and ex-papist translators of the KJV think they were going to get away with this stupid nonsense – the nonsense of Eve’s statement that: “she had gotten a man from the Lord”? Was it a case that they thought she was completely naïve? I don’t think so, because all they wanted to do was hide the truth that Cain was literally a son of the Devil. Why did they want to do that and what did they have to gain from such devious behaviour? All will be revealed as this series of articles develops!
Again, if we continue to accept the story line, as written in the KJV, we then have to ask ourselves if Cain and Abel were twins, for it appears that Adam ‘knows’ Eve once only. So if Eve did have twins, could these twins have had different fathers? a phenomenon known in medical terms today as superfetation. Well, it has been known, and more often than we might at first think. A little web-search will soon reveal and confirm to you this not so uncommon anatomical phenomenon. Therefore, Cain and Abel could easily have been twins with the Devil as Cain’s father, and Adam as Abel’s father. The thing is, twins or not, it’s The Two Seeds or seed lines that matter here, nothing else, for this is the core of the matter.
Now before we move on to the other writings, let’s add another Holy Scripture here to help us unravel this mystery:
1 John 3:12 (MCV) Not as Cain, who was (born) of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.
Notice in this verse of John’s letter we have Cain who was “of that wicked one”. The word ‘of’ here in Strong’s Concordance means ‘origin’, so Cain’s “origins” are of the Devil which, again, points to him being the Devil’s seed.
Moreover, more evidence is made plain through the genealogy of Adam in Genesis 5. Notice, you will not find Cain’s name mentioned in that genealogy, why is that? Well, quite obviously, because Cain was not Adam’s child. I will copy the evidence here:
Genesis 5:3 (KJV) And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth. (Emphasis mine)
Now why did Moses write this verse like that? Why, to draw our attention to the fact that Seth was made in Adam’s own likeness, after his own image. Why make special reference to that? What other image could Eve have born in her womb, if it was not in Adam’s image and in his likeness!!?? Well obviously, this verse is telling us without actually saying it, that of the two sons Cain and Abel, Abel now deceased, only one of them was in Adam’s image and in his likeness – Abel. Elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures it tells us that Seth is a child born to Adam and Eve to take Abel’s place:
Genesis 4:25 (KJV) And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. (Emphasis mine)
The Adamic line to Noah:
So this means that from Adam we have Abel (murdered) and then Seth who begat Enos, who begat Cainan, who begat Mahalaleel, who begat Jared, who begat Enoch, who begat Methuselah, who begat Lamech and who begat Noah. So there we have it, the Adamic-Sethitic line from Adam to Noah, and all without a single mention of Cain – proving yet again that Cain was not Adam’s seed.
Right, I will now copy here what it says in documents known as the Aramaic Targum(s). Those of you not familiar with these writings, the Aramaic Targums are ancient Jewish writings dating from around the time of the Jews captivity in Babylon, so this means they date from around 550 BC. In general these writings are blasphemous in their content and I would not recommend them to Christian brothers and sisters at all. Having said that, we cannot conclude that everything written therein is error, for Truth can be found in the most unlikely of places, for example, in the caves where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found. OK, so here is writing number one:
And Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the angel (of death) and she became pregnant and bore Cain. And she said: “I have got a man from the angel of the LORD.”
And here is writing number two:
Targum Onkelos THE TARGUM OF PALESTINE IV:
Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Hava (Eve) his wife, who had desired (lusted after) the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Kain; and she said, I have acquired a man, (from) the angel of the Lord. And she added to bear from her husband Adam his twin, (superfetation) even Habel (Abel). And Habel was a shepherd of the flock, but Kain was a man working in the earth.
Now how about that for a revelation!!?? Here we can plainly see this verse has a completely different narrative altogether, and tells us a very different story from the corrupted meaningless nonsense in the KJV. It also begins to make some sense. We know that the Devil was always going to try and thwart The Lord Yashua Messiah’s plans for His pinnacle of creation – MANKIND. We are, after all, made in Their Image and what better way to thwart that plan than by literally polluting The Godhead’s creation by intercourse with His creation, Eve. Notice, too, how Eve’s statement has changed, and the naïvety of her KJV statement revealed for what it is – nonsense – the work of evil dissemblers via their agenda based corrupted translation.
Returning once more to the KJV, notice, too, how Eve is known as the “mother of all living” but Adam is not known as the ‘father of all living’:
Genesis 3:20 (KJV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.
The word ‘was’ here should more accurately be translated ‘was to become’ and of course she did become the mother of all living, but Adam is nowhere known as the ‘father of all living’. This, once again, tells us that Eve bore a child from another source other than Adam, and, of course, that source was The Devil.
If we now return to Genesis 4:1-2 we can then see that after Eve conceived Cain she then bare Abel, but it doesn’t say how long the interval between the two conceptions was, so as I said earlier some commentators say Cain and Abel were twins, others that Abel followed swiftly nine months later. Either way they were of a similar age and grew up together, one, Abel, being a keeper of sheep and the other, Cain, a tiller of the ground.
The story then continues with Cain’s infamous wicked act of murdering his half-brother, but what was behind this act? All will be revealed in part three.
Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:
Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit? – Part 3 – The Mark of Cain
Continuing straight on from part two, what was behind Cain’s murderous act; what was his motive? Most people believe it was just the evil act of a jealous brother whose offering to The Lord Yashua Messiah was not acceptable, but what made it unacceptable? Was it just because it was not an animal that made it unacceptable, or was there something else? and was the unsatisfactory offering of Cain symbolic of a deeper malaise within Cain? for we must not forget who his physical father was – The Serpent Creature.
OK, we know, too, that there was an argument between the two half-brothers but what was the argument about?
Genesis 4:8 (KJV) And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.
Here, the word ‘talked’, is meaningless KJV understatement on the part of the translators – dissembling at its best and I jest not. Cain and Abel were arguing ferociously, but what about? Well, we have a good idea, because it was the subject of sacrifices or offerings, that is, those that were acceptable to The Lord Yashua Messiah and those that were not. So what was unacceptable about Cain’s offering? Quite simply, it contained no blood, and it was one made partially with his hands. He had to plant the crops he offered, as opposed to Abel’s which was made totally without his hands and by God.
Yashua Messiah is the Stone or Rock (please note, all you deceived Roman Catholics) hewn without hands (see Daniel 2). Cain’s offering was a tarnished offering, an insulting offering, and Abel’s was unspotted and perfect, a lamb of the firstlings of his flock, a former type of the Passover Lamb with its shed blood that soaked into the ground.
There was something else, too, within this rebellion of Cain, for it was not just spiritual. The spiritual dimension to all this was only the half of it, for be aware, the rebellious physical descendants of Cain are still with us today, as is his name. But how can a spirit, six thousand years old, have influence over us today, I hear you say? Again, quite simply, because it was the spirit of the Devil, alive in Cain, and a spirit that would be carried over and through The Flood; through Ham and his sinful shenanigans with his mother Naamah.
At this moment in time a descendant of Cain has recently stood in the American elections for the Republican Party – Senator McCain. Mac means ‘son of’, so there we have him, a son of Cain, hoping to be made President of the USA. Then we have Dick Cheney. If we harden the ‘ch’ as in the Chaldean/Hebrew tongue, what we have in reality is Dick Cainey. Yet another descendant of Cain, as vice president of the US; how does that make you feel folks? Dan Quayle, too, is another Cainite name. Then more recently there was Herman Cain! They seem to like power, these descendants of Cain, do they not!!??
Having digressed a little, but keeping with the above theme, I’ll now return to the historical account. Cain wanted to rule the roost in both areas of influence and stamp his authority on everything. All politics and religion – THE SYSTEM, THE MATRIX, or THIS AGE or what the Holy Scriptures call THIS WORLD. Make no mistake folks, The New World Order started here with Cain, and there was no way he was going to allow his ‘upstart’ son of Adam (man) half brother to have any authority over him!
Cain, don’t forget, was a demonic hybrid – a half heavenly serpent being and half manly being – a ‘hu-man’ being, so no doubt considered himself far superior to his earthly, fully man, half brother Abel. As already made clear earlier, ‘hu’ from the Hebrew/Gaelic tongue means ‘serpent’ so a ‘hu-man’ is a ‘serpent-man’ and NOT A MAN! Mankind and hu-mankind are two very different species.
Moreover, this spirit was Satan’s spirit, imparted to Cain by his father, The Devil. Satan the Devil knew God’s plan would eventually mean men resurrected to Spirit status in the First Resurrection, (see link below) a status that would give resurrected Spiritual men POWER and AUTHORITY over him and his followers in the future. The Holy Scriptures bears this out when Paul said to the Corinthians:
1 Corinthians 6:3 (KJV) Know ye not that we shall judge angels? How much more things that pertain to this life?
Satan, therefore, was going to do all in his power to stop mankind attaining his ultimate prize – life eternal with authority over angels, for us as resurrected Spiritual beings in the Kingdom of God on this earth. His evil plan to thwart the progress of mankind, therefore, began with the murder of Abel through his inbred son Cain, and with this evil act came the infamous Mark of Cain:
Genesis 4:15 (KJV) And The LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And The LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
The question that now needs answering is WHY!!?? Why did The Lord spare Cain, for without any doubt it was a let off, if only a temporary let off. Under The Law (for The Law, in Spirit, was in force before Moses) of the Old Covenant he should have been slain immediately and in the same way as he had slain his brother – an eye for an eye etc.. So why did Yashua Messiah let him off? For the simple reason that everything is to God’s Glory and His Glory being ultimately served through His plan for mankind, which Satan was never going to stop – try as he will. In order to comprehend God’s ways, we must understand this fundamental of fundamentals. All the events in the narrative of the OT had to come to pass, in order to bring us to and necessitate Yashua Messiah’s birth into this world and then His sacrifice and His resurrection. This ‘Mark’ that Cain received is one and the same as the Mark of the Beast in Revelation, and I will deal with this in more detail later.
We must also remember, as well, that our ways are not God’s ways; our logic and reasoning are not God’s logic and reasoning. Our ideas of logic and reasoning are based solely upon our puffed up: “we think we know what’s best” vanity and pride, unless of course, we are Born of God (Born Again) and have a close brotherly relationship with Yashua Messiah who then teaches us His ways and His logic, that is, His wisdom.
Cain’s ways are not Yashua Messiah’s ways, for Yashua Messiah is The Way. Cain’s ways involve lies and vain deceit, philosophy, theology and the intellect, which man has emulated to his own downfall. This means man’s pride and vanity, through his reliance on his own logic and reasoning, has created nothing but blasphemous error when it comes to matters Scriptural and Spiritual. In turn, this mindset, a mindset of philosophical intellectual reasoning has separated man from his Creator.
Colossians 2:8 (KJV) Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
A good example of this phenomena was a Canaanite Jew by the name of Philo who operated out of Alexandria in Egypt in the first century AC, from whence we get the word ‘philosophy’. He groomed and ‘educated’ some of the counterfeiting ‘church fathers’, so-called, who then infiltrated the first century church in order to corrupt it and then go off in order to start their Christian RELIGION! This Philo, being a Canaanite Jew, made him a descendant of Cain.
Getting back to the story line, we then have God punishing Cain for Abel’s murder, but with a punishment Cain cannot bear. How is it a punishment he cannot bear? He cannot bear it because man’s environment was to be cursed by God a second time. Man lost the beautiful environment of the Garden of Eden through Adam and Eve’s sin and he was about to loose the fertility of the earth as a whole. The Lord was going to curse the earth totally so that it would no longer yield any crops at all and all men would know that Cain was to blame for it, and would therefore seek him out to kill him:
Genesis 4:12 (KJV) When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.
There we have it, Cain as fugitive on the run from his half-brother mankind for the rest of his days and, as a poverty stricken vagabond at that. Unsurprisingly, this was more than he could bear. So Cain pleads for mercy and The Lord hears him:
Genesis 4:13-15 (KJV) And Cain said unto The LORD, My punishment is greater than I can bear. 14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me. 15 And The LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And The LORD set a Mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
Again, there we have it and with Cain admitting that his face will be hid from The Lord and his life not worth a dime. So The Lord puts a Mark on Cain protecting him from his half-brother mankind lest any should attempt to kill him.
Now this is all very interesting I hear you say, but if we have modern descendants of Cain still with us today, do they still carry the same mark? Yes, of course they do. How do we know that? Easy, they get away with blue murder and never get apprehended. Here in Britain our ex-Prime Minister was nick named “Teflon Tony”, for it seemed nothing would stick to him. Crisis and crimes followed crisis and crimes, including unlawful wars and genocide in the Middle East, and he appeared untouchable which, of course, he was, and still is.
Both he, and Bush, are highly suspect in many of their escapades and dealings, but has anyone here in The West charged them with a single offence? No, no way, not a chance. Why? Why, because of the Mark of Cain. Mr Blair was also nick-named B. Liar, which is a play on the name Belial, one of Satan’s princes, the sons of whom are known more commonly as ‘lying scoundrels’. Doesn’t that just about sum up most politicians? I reckon.
Finally, we then have Cain’s genealogy from Enoch:
Gen 4:18-22 (KJV) And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech. 19 And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. 20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle. 21 And his brother’s name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ. 22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubal-Cain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubal-Cain was Naamah.
Now this Naamah is reputed to have been Noah’s wife, but the Holy Scriptures again go stone cold on this topic, for Mrs Noah is never referred to by name. However, she is mentioned in The Book of Jasher as Noah’s wife. There is also other evidence, too, with the name of Cain being mentioned post-Flood via the name of a tribe of people known as the Kenites. In the Hebrew language their name is a derivation of Cain. In the Hebrew, it’s pronounced ‘qey-niy’ or ‘kay-nee’ and Cain is pronounced ‘qayin’ or ‘kay-yin’ so we can see there is a definite connection.
We then have the name Canaan which is pronounced ‘ken-na’an’ or ‘Ken-ah-an’. So as we can plainly see all these people are related and originate from Cain. This means that Cain’s race did not die out with The Flood, it continued, but how? All will be revealed in my next article. I will also be dealing with the subject of the giants – the ‘nephilim’, who lived upon the earth at that time, so stay with it folks.
Why Are There Two Resurrections?
Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit? – Part 4 – Why the Curse on Canaan?
In part three I left it, where, according to the King James Bible, Noah’s wife is only referred to as “Mrs Noah” (my terminology), but who was she? As I showed in part three; in order for the line of Cain to bridge the flood one of the eight redeemed survivors that entered the ark had to be a descendant of Cain.
A crucial point we also need to understand is that at this point in mankind’s history the tribal, clannish or better, the seed line is carried by the male side and it does not change to the female side until Sarah, Abraham’s first wife. So this means that the Adam/Sethitic line or the line of man is carried by Noah and his three sons. This, in turn, means that Noah’s daughters-in-law could also have been descendants of Cain, but we are not told.
However, because the male side, at this juncture, carries the dynastic line, the genetic origins of these women are of no significance. The Adamic/Sethitic line is carried by all three sons for they were all sons of Adam via Seth and therefore men, not hu-man beings. So this brings us back to the racial identity of Mrs Noah, for it is she who is the link pin to this fascinating story. Please note, too, for this is important; all the offspring of Noah’s three sons will carry the Adamic/Sethitic line, but with one exception and I will return to this issue later in the article.
Now as I also stated in part three, there is a woman mentioned in Genesis 4:22 by the name of Naamah who was the sister of Tubal-Cain so she was, most definitely, a descendant of Cain. The thing is, was she Noah’s wife? The answer, and suspiciously so once more, cannot be found in the King James Bible so we have no option but to look elsewhere for the evidence. Having looked elsewhere, what do you think we will find? Answer: Yes, Naamah was Noah’s wife according to the Midrash Genesis Rabbah which are ancient Judaic texts and from the Wikipedia we get:
“Genesis Rabba Bereshith Rabba is a religious text from Judaism’s classical period. It is a midrash (Hebrew for ‘an interpretation’) comprising a collection of ancient rabbinical homiletical interpretations of the book of Genesis (Bereshith in Hebrew).”
From another source we have verses 15-16 in chapter five of the Book of Jasher, which reads as follows:
Jasher 5:15-16 And thou shalt raise up seed, and thy children with thee, in the midst of the earth; and Noah went and took a wife, and he chose Naamah the daughter of Enoch, and she was five hundred and eighty years old. 16 And Noah was four hundred and ninety-eight years old, when he took Naamah for a wife.
The Book of Jasher is referred to as the ‘lost’ Book of Jasher and in modern terms dates from a translation of 1887. Interestingly, this book gets mentioned twice in the Holy Scriptures, so from this evidence alone we can assume that it has more than some validity and here are the Scriptures for your information:
Joshua 10:13 (KJV) And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in The Book of Jasher?
2 Samuel 1:18 (KJV) (Also he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow: behold, it is written in the book of Jasher.)
Here we can plainly see that the Book of Jasher is referred to as a reference of some importance and used as proof text or back-up evidence for the two historical events mentioned. It is being used as a source of validation, so we cannot just sweep it aside as a book of myths and/or fallacious additional material.
OK, so with this proof and/or evidence in mind we will return to the Holy Scriptures where we read the account of Ham’s wickedness or his wicked sin perpetrated upon his father, Noah. Here again the King James Bible leaves much to be desired in its recording of this crucial event in mankind’s history. In effect it’s another of those dumbed down stories, like the fall in the Garden of Eden account. Both these accounts were written so as to mislead by not revealing the Truth of these sordid and evil events. Make no mistake; this solitary evil act by Ham would affect the outcome of this world’s history, for it was, without doubt, the Devil’s handiwork through Cain’s descendant, Naamah. So without further ado let’s copy the relevant Holy Scriptures here so that we can analyse them in detail:
Genesis 9:18-27 (KJV) And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham (the father of Canaan). 19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread. 20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, (the father of Canaan), saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. 23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness. 24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. 27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. (Brackets from The CLV translation pointing to the fact that these words are prophetic due to the fact that Canaan was not yet born or that Ham was to become the father of Canaan.)
Now the first thing that becomes apparent in this short passage of Holy Scripture is the mentioning of Ham being Canaan’s father and it’s mentioned twice. Why, why not reveal Ham’s other sons and why not refer to Shem’s sons as well as Japheth’s sons? What is so special about this Canaan that he should be mentioned twice whilst all the other grandchildren of Noah are ignored completely; what’s it all about? Quite simply, Canaan is a very different ‘grandchild’ altogether and not a grandchild at all in the ordinary sense, and more of that later.
Before I move on I wish to counter some negative stuff that some commentators have written about Noah and his drunkenness in this story. Let me tell you; their attitude is extremely judgemental with some of them even suggesting that Noah had become an alcoholic and that his drunkenness was a regular occurrence. This is pure guess-work on their part and, at best, blasphemous arrogant conjecture. After the flood Noah became a husbandman, and, amongst other husbandry, had planted a vineyard and was no doubt celebrating the fruits of his labours. All this story line is telling us is that he obviously ended up drinking too much, but this is no reason to label the great man an alcoholic; a man who found Grace in Yashua Messiah’s sight.
None-the-more-for-that, whilst intoxicated, something happens to Noah and this ‘happening’ is so serious that it results in Ham’s son, Canaan, being cursed. This is no light matter when we consider that patriarchs usually like to bless their offspring, not curse them. (Please read the account of Jacob/Israel blessing his two grandsons, Ephraim and Manasseh, in Genesis 48)
This event was tragic and traumatic for all concerned, including Shem and Japheth who had to literally cover their ‘father’s nakedness’. Now this occurrence leaves us with more questions. For instance, what was Ham trying to achieve here by involving his brothers? Did he boast about what he had done? Was this event symbolic of Adam and Eve’s aprons in the Garden? Was he trying to hide his guilt? Was he attempting a ‘cover-up’, (just as our corrupt rotten politicians do today) hoping that Noah would not find out?
Notice, too, that it needs both his brothers to carry the covering garment, so we’re not talking about a flimsy single sheet that we would use today to cover one of our modern beds, this was a very wide garment indeed and most likely wide enough to cover two people, and herein lies the first evidence that we are not just dealing with Ham seeing his father’s nudity.
Here again we have a parallel with the Garden of Eden account, for the punishment does not fit the crime if we take it as it reads. Once again we are dealing with symbolism or turns of phrase that have a deeper or stronger meaning. In this story we are having to focus on the term “uncovered his father’s nakedness” and what it really means, just as we had to take another look at what the Biblical rendering was alluding to when it said that Eve “took of the ‘fruit’ and did eat”.
So what was the real meaning of Ham “uncovering his father’s nakedness?” Fortunately, we don’t have look outside the Holy Scriptures for the answer of what this phrase means, for it is found within the pages of Leviticus:
Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.
Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
When a man forms a permanent union with a woman they become one flesh in God’s sight and the Holy Scriptures from Leviticus cement this view. In the New Testament the Lord Jesus Christ confirms this:
Matthew 19:5-6 (KJV) And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
So here we can see the seriousness of Ham’s sin, for he did put asunder the union between his father and his mother. He saw his father’s nakedness by lying with and having incestuous sexual relations with his mother and thereby made her pregnant with Canaan. This is the only explanation there can be for the singling out of Canaan as the recipient of the curse and not Ham’s other sons. By doing this, Noah not only punished his son, but he punished his wife too, for no mother wishes to see harm come to her children. Now we know why the covering garment needed two men to carry it, for it most likely covered their mother’s nakedness as well as their father’s – if only symbolically and nothing else. It is also worth mentioning that Noah never knew his wife sexually again after this event.
Now what of the nature of this curse, for it clearly states that Canaan’s descendants would be slaves to Shem’s descendants and slaves to Japheth’s descendants, and, even worse, slaves of slaves. They would also feature big time in the future when Joshua led the Israelites into the land of Canaan and more or less killed them all apart from a few whom they took as slaves:
Joshua 16:10 (KJV) And they drave not out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer: but the Canaanites dwell among the Ephraimites unto this day, and serve under tribute.
“The Ephraimites” in this verse represents the ten tribes of Israel, not just the tribe of Ephraim alone. Joshua was an Ephraimite. Also, the use of the word Ephraimites is used to differentiate between them and the twelve tribes which would have included Judah and Levi. In particular, though, for us in this latter day age it refers to England, her Commonwealth and Anglo-Saxon peoples of the USA where the slavery of Canaanites (black people) was at its greatest during the time period from the 16th to the 20th centuries – segregation was a type of slavery or a system where Canaanites were serving under tribute.
How do we know that the Canaanites were black people? Easy, Ham in the Egyptian language means ‘brown or reddish brown’ and Cush, one of Ham’s other sons, means ‘black’ in the Hebrew language. I cover this subject in more detail in my series of articles entitled “Was the Lord Jesus Christ a Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp?” (Coming soon) These articles are a must read if you want to find out about the counterfeit Christian religious Jesus who, in Truth, does not exist.
Now were all Canaanites black; obviously not, because the Romans were descended from Canaan, as were the Egyptians (modern Spaniards or Hispanics) who were brown rather that black? We then have the Babylonians (modern Italians; the slang for Italians is Ities from the Hitites) who are also brown and, notice; all these peoples, predominantly, have black hair.
Then, finally, we have the Canaanite Jews who originate from a forbidden and unholy union between the patriarch Judah and an Adullamite Canaanitess named Bathshuah as recorded in Genesis 38. Again, black hair predominates amongst Canaanite Jews or those of the dispersion. Have you ever noticed how the Orthodox Jews i.e. Canaanite Jews always wear black – black suits, black coats and black Homburg hats – just a coincidence; I think not?
Another interesting point is that Canaanite Jews do not even see themselves as white, nor do they want to:
“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.
We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”
– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.
The point I am making here is that there are ‘white’ Canaanites – The Jews, black Canaanites – Africans and there are yellow Canaanites – The Chinese. Canaan’s descendants interbred with all the races. This should not surprise us because the original sin was an act of racial interbreeding i.e. Eve and the Devil.
As mentioned earlier in this series we have people in Britain and the USA named Cain who are white; even Senator McCain, mentioned in part 3, whose name actually means “son of Cain” who not long ago attempted to reach the Whitehouse in the last election. This evidence alone proves that the line of Cain is still with us today, but do they still carry the ‘Mark of Cain’? Oh yes, most definitely.
OK, to round off, I will return to the point I made earlier about Noah’s sons and grandsons all being of the Sethitic line with one exception and of course that one exception was Canaan who carried Cain’s blood through the flood via the evil sin of his parents – Ham and his Cainite mother, Naamah. The Lord Yashua Messiah then had to curse Canaan through Noah just as he had to curse all of mankind through Adam and Eve’s sin by throwing them out of the Garden of Eden. Bad blood has to carry a curse, for it cannot find favour in the Father’s sight unless it’s redeemed by the Lord’s blood – His death and resurrection.
As a final point do not listen to mainstream Christians who will tell you that a curse placed upon a certain individual all those years ago cannot stand today or be applicable to people descended from him, living today, because it does. If this is not so, how is it when I tend my garden I am frequently a victim of thorns, briers and thistles and I perspire profusely across my brow too? How is it also that women still carry the same burden of pain in child birth as did Eve because of her original sin. These things are a good reminder of the fallen condition or of the curses placed upon all mankind – 1,500 years before the curse on Canaan, so don’t listen to any of their intellectual clap trap and pathetic attempts at explaining Biblical Truth away.