Genesis 4:1 Did EVE Really Say: “I have Gotten a MAN From The Lord?”

Introduction:

Now this article should really be Part 5 of my series of articles: “Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil, Or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?” (See link No.1 below), so I will be adding it to that page, whilst leaving this article as a stand alone article. Moreover, I have dealt with this subject within that series of articles, but due to my having discovered more proof and evidence, this week commencing 13th February 2022, that shows that Genesis 4:1 in its KJV rendering is 100% bunkum and hogwash. It therefore behoved me to share this additional Truth about the damnable translation of this verse.

Here is the bogus verse in question, as written in the KJV:

Genesis 4:1 (KJV) And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from The Lord.

OK, so let me make this known first of all, for this will be mostly the work of a man by the name of Clifton A. Emahiser who was knowledgable in THE SEEDLINE DOCTRINE, as it is known by some, but not by me, I call it The Two Seeds Truth. Moreover, he wasn’t correct in all his teaching, which I will reveal in another article. So here are his opening remarks on Genesis 4:1:

THE PROBLEM WITH GENESIS 4:1

Many may reply, “I didn’t know there was a question concerning that verse.” Unless one understands that the Hebrew is badly corrupted on this passage, he will, like most everyone else who has ever read it, arrive at a mistaken conclusion. Before we start an evaluation to discover the ramifications, let’s read it according to the KJV: “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.

Genesis 4:1 is probably one of the most misunderstood verses in the Bible. This is really an understatement of fact to say the least. On the understanding of this verse, lies the entire theme of the Bible. Actually Genesis 3:15 is the main theme of the Bible, but without a correct understanding of Genesis 4:1, the theme becomes muddled and confused! Therefore it is of the utmost importance that one gain an understanding of this verse or the entire Bible will remain a mystery! It is with this thought, that the object of this Bible study is to completely master this passage so that the story of the Bible can be opened up to us in all of its splendour and brilliance.”

Later, he then goes on to say:

It would appear, if this were the only verse in the Bible that had anything to say about this matter of the birth of Cain, and if the King James version of the Bible were the only version of the Bible we had, that we would have to accept the fact that Adam was the father of Cain. You see, here is the problem, Adam was not the father of Cain! Not only are the “Jews” of today not of Adam, but they know themselves they are descended from Cain. Let’s see who the “Jew” admits himself to be. In the “Jewish” publication Liberal Judaism, January, 1949, there is an article entitled, “Liberal Judaism and Israel” written by one of their greatest and most renowned Rabbis, Dr. Abba Hillel Silver. Dr. Silver, writing about the then new State of Israel says:

{“’ … the third commonwealth of the Jewish Nation is thus an accomplished fact. The State of Israel exists.

{“’As a result the concept of the wandering Jew is bound eventually to disappear along with the term (galut) exile. All nations send forth immigrants to all parts of the world. People are continually moving from one country to another, and change their citizenship, but they are not regarded as exiles.

{“’This fact alone – the end of national exile for the Jewish people, as such —is destined to affect favourably the psyche of the Jew throughout the world. It will endow the Jew, wherever he lives, with a self respect and a sense of security, a normal tone, long-wanting in Jewish experience. For the curse of Cain, the curse of being an outcast and a “wanderer” over the face of the earth has been removed …’”}

So here, Emahiser, in using this quote from Rabbi Silver, has proven to us that the Jews KNOW WHO THEY ARE, and that they definitely KNOW who they are descended from, and, just as they knew in the first century, when they lied to Yashua Messiah our future King, when they claimed that: “They were not born of fornication”.

John 8:40-41 (MCV) But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you The Truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to Him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

Notice, that they did not say they have Abraham as their father, they went straight to The Garden event claiming to be sons of Adam – a part of God’s creation, and thereby denied (they lied) that they were the Devil’s sons through Cain.

For further evidence, we now go to the immense work called “The Interpreter’s Bible”, which I only learned of at the commencement of this study. The Interpreter’s Bible, is a twelve volume work of 36 editors who worked together in order to produce it. It is available online at this web address:

Here it says this:

Cain seems originally to have been the ancestor of the Kenites … The meaning of the name is ‘metalworker’ or ‘smith’; here, however, it is represented as a derivation of a word meaning ‘acquire’, ‘get’ — one of the popular etymologies frequent in Genesis — hence the mother’s words I have gotten a man. ‘From the Lord’ (KJV) is a rendering, following the Septuagint (LXX) and Vulgate., of ’eth Yahweh, which is literally, ‘with Yahweh’, and so unintelligible here (the help of [RSV] is not in the Hebrew). It seems probable that ’eth should be ’oth — so, ‘the mark of Yahweh’ — and that the words are a gloss …”

Did you notice that? As Genesis 4:1 is written in the KJV it is taken from the Hebrew term ‘Eth Yahweh’ meaning ‘with Yahweh’ or better ‘laying with Yahweh in order to conceive’ which, as they have correctly said, is unintelligible or utter nonsense, and it is from this very same nonsense that they conjured up the erroneous term: I have gotten a man from the Lord.”

If we now go to the other writings that I used to support The Truth in my original article, and post them here, we’ll see how they make even more sense now that I have revealed Emahiser’s findings:

First from the Aramaic Targums:

Genesis 4:1 And the woman saw Sammael, the angel of death, and she was afraid and knew that the tree was good for food, and that it was a remedy for the enlightenment of the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise. She took of its fruit and ate and also gave (it) to her husband and he ate.”

Second from the Aramaic Targum, pseudo-Jonathan:

Genesis 4:1 Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the Angel (of death) and she became pregnant and bore Cain. And he was like those on high and not like those below. And she said: ‘I have got a man from the angel of the LORD’.”

Third from the Targum Onkelos: THE TARGUM OF PALESTINE IV:

Genesis 4:1 And Adam knew Hava (Eve) his wife, who had desired (lusted after) the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Kain; and she said, I have acquired a man, (from) the angel of the Lord. And she added to bear from her husband Adam his twin, (superfetation) even Habel (Abel). And Habel was a shepherd of the flock, but Kain was a man working in the earth. (All brackets mine)

Fourth from the Rabbinic work of Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer: (See link below.)

Genesis 4:1 And she saw that his likeness was not of earthly beings, but of the heavenly beings, and she prophesied and said: I have gotten a man from the Lord.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirkei_De-Rabbi_Eliezer

So there we have it, Eve NEVER said “I have gotten a man from the Lord” but rather: “I have gotten a man from the angel of death – The Serpent Creature!!”

I will add further articles to this series as I am sure more evidence will reveal itself.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

Some complimentary reading to the above:

2. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

3. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

4. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

5. Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:

6. The Jews are The Tares fit only for burning – a real Holocaust!:

7: Salvation Is Of The Jews. Oh really, Is That So!?:

Did The Messenger Paul REASON With THE JEWS In The Synagogues?

OK, now the first issue that arises out of this title is who were these Jews? for until we ascertain who they really were, we’re not going to fully understand this question, or this issue. We then have to see the word ‘synagogue’ in The Light of the Holy Scriptures for, again, unless we know for sure what ‘synagogues’ represent, we’ll flounder in the dark.

So let’s get this second point firmly set in our minds and onto our hearts of Truth, because there is NOTHING positive about synagogues, and the only synagogue mentioned by name in the Holy Scriptures is this one here, and it’s mentioned twice! just so we get it!

Revelation 2:9 (KJV) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are The Synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 (KJV) Behold, I will make them of The Synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

These verses tell us, without any ambiguity, that there’s only one kind of synagogue – SATAN’S SYNAGOGUE, for there is no other.

Right, so who were these ‘Jews’ that said they were Jews, but were lying? Now here we have the usual type of translator’s error that we find so often in the pages of the KJV, and which I reveal in so many of my articles. So let’s go straight to Strong’s Concordance for some insight:

Jews – G2453Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos, ee-oo-dah’-yos; from G2448 (in the sense of G2455 as a country); Judæan, that is, belonging to Jehudah:—Jew(-ess), of Judæa.

OK, the first thing we must understand here is The Truth that the word ‘Jew’, as used in the KJV, is 100% a misnomer, for it is automatically and deceptively leading us to believe that the word ‘Jew’ is referring to the Hebrew Israelites, The Chosen People of God, when NOTHING could be further from The Truth.

This means that these Jews were Jews who thought they were Judeans, but were not Judeans at all, for Judeans were Semitic Hebrew Israelites, and these ‘Jews’ claimed, falsely, that they were Judeans. These impostors, known as ‘Jews’, were/are, in Truth, Hamitic Canaanites from Bathshuah the Canaanitess, through her son Shelah, as recorded in Genesis 38, so they were NOT Judean Semitic Israelites at all. These days they openly admit it!:

“We are a chosen people. Most Jews do not like to admit it but our god is Lucifer and we Jews are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.”

— The Jew, Harold W. Rosenthal

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

— 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

This is why I call the Jews The Serpent Seed from The Garden (see link Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 below for all the historical proof and evidence that the Jews are nothing to do with The Chosen People – The Twelve Tribes of Israel).

So moving on, we have now learned that these Jews were not Semitic Israelites, so who were these Judeans? The Judeans were descendants of a remnant of the three Tribes of The House of Judah that returned from the Babylonian captivity, namely Royal Judahites, Levites (The Priesthood) and Benjaminites. As examples we had Mary Mariam and Joseph who were Royal Judahites, John the Baptist and his family who were Levites, and The Messenger Paul who was a Benjaminite. Joseph of Arimathea was likewise a Royal Judahite, and no doubt Nicodemus was also a Levite. However, NONE of these crucial Biblical characters were Jews!

All this information now brings us to the thorny issue of whether or not Paul REASONED with the Jews if, by ‘Jews’, Holy Scripture is referring to the Canaanite Jews. If that was the case and the people present in the synagogue were Canaanite Jews then there would have been no reasoning with them at all. Paul would have preached and declared The Gospel of The Kingdom of God and the Jews would have argued with Paul and sent him packing or, worse, attempted to have him arrested and after a rigged trial had him put to death, most likely stoning him to death. This is how much the Jews hated The Gospel Message and thereby making any reasoning totally impossible.

However, if there had been Judahites, Levites and Benjaminites there present with these Canaanite Jews, then some kind of reasoning could have been possible, but always keeping in mind that unless The Father was calling these Judeans, they would also have been non-receptive to The Kingdom Gospel Message.

Moreover, all of you who have read my articles on “Theology and Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals” (see link Nos. 6 and 7 below), will know my views and be aware of the compelling evidence I have gathered that proves them to be next to useless when it comes to matters Holy Spiritual and Scriptural. If you have not read them, I thoroughly recommend them to you now for, without the knowledge contained therein you are, and will always be, vulnerable to their deceitful and deceptive ways. Make no mistake these so called experts will lead you astray if you give them, not even, half a chance.

Back to the title question; well did he? Did Paul ‘reason’ with the Canaanite Jews in the Synagogues? In fact, as already stated, did Paul ‘reason’ with anyone? What if he did or he did not, what does it matter? It matters greatly for, if he didn’t, why is the word ‘reasoned’ in the Holy Scriptures at all?

Let’s deal with the question.

Did Paul reason with the Jews?

Well the KJV of The Holy Bible says he did so that must be it, yes? Actually, no is the plain and simple answer to that. To help us with this study I will list the relevant Holy Scriptures here:

Please take note that the word ‘reasoned’ cannot be found in any of Paul’s letters, nor in Hebrews. So this tells us that it’s a word that only Luke uses in Acts which immediately puts a question mark over it.

Acts 17:1-2 (KJV)Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a synagogue of the Jews: And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.

Acts 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.

Acts 18:19And he came to Ephesus, and left them there: but he himself entered into the synagogue, and reasoned with the Jews.

Acts 24:25 And as he reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come, Felix trembled, and answered, Go thy way for this time; when I have a convenient season, I will call for thee.

There we are, four Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals and theologians love, especially Roman Catholic Bible intellectuals. Why do they love these Holy Scriptures? because they think that Paul was just like them, a debating, pontificating Bible intellectual or theologian, when nothing could be further from The Truth, and The Truth is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

OK, let’s print Strong’s definition of this word:

Reasoned – G1256διαλέγομαι dialegomai dee-al-eg’-om-ahee. Middle voice from G1223 and G3004; to say thoroughly, that is, discuss (in argument or exhortation): – dispute, preach (unto), reason (with), speak.

Now here in Strong’s definition we can see some confusion through his contradictory remarks:

On one hand he says ‘dialegomai’ means: “To say thoroughly”; “To preach (unto)”; “To speak”; “To exhort.” Then on the other hand he says it means: “To discuss”; “To argue”; “To dispute”; “To reason.”

Now which is it, for it cannot be both?

In 2 Corinthians 12:20 Paul states quite clearly what he thinks of debating, reasoning and arguing:

2 Corinthians 12:20 (MCV) For I fear, lest, when I come, I shall not find you such as I would, and that I shall be found unto you such as ye would not: lest there be debates, (reasoning) envyings, wraths, strifes, (arguments) backbitings, whisperings, swellings, (haughtiness through puffed up meaningless intellectual vanity) tumults.

Is Paul a hypocrite? Is he giving advice and warnings to those he is teaching whilst he himself does the opposite!! Is this an example of the worldly norm of: “Don’t do as I do, just do as I tell you?” Is that what it’s all about – is that what Paul was saying here? I don’t think so, in fact I know so and we all know so, don’t we? if The Truth is in us.

Here is the bottom line: “Saying thoroughly”; “preaching unto”; “speaking and exhorting” is a one way street. These activities do not invite debate, unless you are opposed to the aforementioned declarations. We need to understand The Word of God is not up for debate, nor up for discussion, nor up for reasoning on for hours and hours. It is preached and either received or rejected; there is no half way house.

Paul went into the synagogues and preached and there stated his case (he said thoroughly) for Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ). Now there would have been some there that received Paul’s message joyfully, and others that would not have done so. Those who received it joyfully would have questioned Paul further initially being curious and then hungry for The Word of God, and wanting to know more. No doubt those who did not receive his message would have given him much opposition. This opposition would have come from the men of religion, but he would not have argued and reasoned with them. He would have said the same things to them as Yashua Messiah said to the Pharisee Canaanite Jews of His day. Hypocrites; whited sepulchres; nests of vipers etc. etc. The mindset that is opposed God – the carnal hu-man mindset cannot be reasoned with, it’s impossible and Paul knew this. See link No. 8 below)

Let’s not forget he was once one of them himself, a Pharisee, so he knew exactly how their minds worked. That’s why he stated this in Romans 8:6-7

Romans 8:6-7 (KJV) For to be carnally minded is death; but to be Spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

So there we have it; it’s either one or the other, called or not called.

Let’s now take a closer look at those Holy Scriptures that Bible intellectuals use to support their right to foolishly reason and pontificate on The Holy Word of God, something they are not Spiritually qualified to do.

1) “And three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures.”

What does this tell us? It tells us the opposite of The Truth. It says Paul reasoned with them for three Sabbath days, which means every Sabbath, for three consecutive weeks Paul went to this synagogue to preach The Word of God out of The Holy Scriptures. He didn’t reason out of the Holy Scriptures, for it is impossible for a Spirit born son of God to do so. Therefore to ‘say thoroughly’ is just another way of saying he spoke with confidence and authority; he taught, preached to or exhorted those present he didn’t reason. One only reasons with people who are in disagreement. If, as True Believers, we reason with the argumentative, we automatically give credence to their view. If someone was disagreeing with the Messenger Paul, whose servant do you think this trouble maker was? Only one chance for the right answer folks and no prizes for getting it right!

2) “And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.”

Here we go again; he ‘reasoned’ and persuaded the Jews Judeans and Greeks. No he didn’t, he ‘said thoroughly’ what the Holy Scriptures said and then they were persuaded. They were convinced by what they heard. How?

John 6:44 (MCV) No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw drag him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

This is how it works folks: The Father God calls a man or a woman to His Son and this is made possible by The Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has not yet indwelled this convert yet, but he or she is receiving special attention from The Father through His Spirit. After this miraculous event, and a called person hears The Word of God preached or ‘said thoroughly’ by a messenger from God, he or she will respond positively, they can do nothing else. This is how these Israelite Judeans and Greeks were able to be ‘convinced’. The Father God was calling them and Paul was His messenger bringing them the Good News.

If we look at Strong’s definition for ‘persuaded’ it’s not the best word choice for this situation:

Persuaded – G3982πείθω peithō pi’-tho A primary verb; to convince (by argument, true or false); by analogy to pacify or conciliate (by other fair means); reflexively or passively to assent (to evidence or authority), to rely (by inward certainty): – agree, assure, believe, have confidence, be (wax) content, make friend, obey, persuade, trust, yield.

In order to satisfy The Truth of John 6:44 we need something better than ‘persuaded’ because to be ‘persuaded’ means a choice has been made and that is not the case at all as being saved is not up to us, it’s not our decision. Let’s assess this miracle properly: “To passively assent to”; “to trust and rely on with an inward certainty”; “to trust and be in agreement with”; “to have no doubts and total confidence that what we and they are hearing is The Truth.” All of the above is only possible through The Father making it possible through The Holy Spirit and Yashua Messiah with us for, where else would this inward certainty originate – from ourselves!!??

When Samuel the Prophet was called The Father God did not reason with him, He just called his name and Samuel replied: “Here am I.”

1 Samuel 3:4 (KJV) That the LORD called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I.

Have you noticed two things missing here – reasoning and persuasion, well, would you believe it? I do hope so, because the words ‘reasoned’ and ‘persuaded’ are the additions of Bible intellectuals, who over time have contaminated The Word of God through their personal religious agendas, and thereby reflected them in the pages of The Holy Bible.

As a final point, you could argue’ that I am reasoning’ with you to persuade’ you with this article, right this minute, but again that would not be true unless The Father were already calling you to His Son. If that is the case you will need no reasoning or persuading, and I will certainly not have to argue with you. I am only the sower and the seed is The Word of God and you are either fertile soil or stony ground. Furthermore, I cannot tell you whether you are fertile soil or not, only you can answer this question for yourself, for you will either agree with me or disagree with me.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

3. The Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

4. Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:

5. The Jews are The Tares, Fit Only For Burning!:

6. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Parts 1, 2 & 3:

7. Do Born of God Christians Need Theology & Theologians or Bible Intellectualism and Bible Intellectuals – Part 4:

8. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE? – Part 2

For part 1 please go here:

The Satanic Curse of Monotheism – Is God ONE? – Part 1:

In part one we learned that there are only three occasions where we will find the term ‘God is one’ in the pages of The King James Bible, just three times. Now if we search for the term ‘one God’ how many times do you think we will find that? Answer: seven times with only one in the Old Testament namely:

Malachi 2:10 (KJV) Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

Now before I press on you MUST remember that the word ‘God’ really means ‘Godhead’ for it is from the plural word Elohim = more than one!

So let’s rewrite this verse so that it makes sense:

Malachi 2:10 (MCV) Have we not all one Father – The Most High and a united member or the Godhead? hath not a united Godhead (H410 El = Yashua Messiah as a member of that Godhead) created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

Genesis 1:26 (MCV) And God (The Elohim plural) said, Let US make man in OUR IMAGE, after OUR LIKENESS:

NOT let ME make man in MY image and MY likeness!

From Strong’s Concordance:

One – H259 ‘echad ekh-awd’ a numeral from 258; properly, united, i.e. one; or (as an ordinal) first:–a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any(-thing), apiece, a certain, (dai-)ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together,

One – 258 – ‘achad aw-khad’ perhaps a primitive root; to unify, i.e. (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts):–go one way or other.

NOTICE! we’re dealing with a UNION and a UNIFYING of the Godhead members of God with God.

Next Scripture:

Mark 12:32 (KJV) And the scribe said unto Him, Well, Master, thou hast said The Truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but He:

Correct translation:

Mark 12:32 (MCV) And the scribe (an evil lawyer) said unto Him, Well, Master, thou hast said The Truth: for there is one united Godhead (Elohim plural) and there is no other but He Them (from the Greek word autos).

From Strong’s Concordance:

He – G846αὐτός autós, ow-tos’; from the particle αὖ aû (perhaps akin to the base of G109 through the idea of a baffling wind) (backward); the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative G1438) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons:—her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same, ((him-, my-, thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves), there(-at, – by, -in, -into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this (man), those, together, very, which. Compare G848.

Romans 3:30 (KJV) Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.

Correct translation:

Romans 3:30 (MCV) Seeing it is one united Godhead of The Father and Son, which shall justify the circumcision by Faith, and uncircumcision through Faith.

And the next:

1 Corinthians 8:6 (KJV) But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by Him.

Correct translation:

1 Corinthians 8:6 (MCV) But to us there is but a united Godhead of The Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him, and a united God The Son, Yashua Messiah, through whom are all things, and we through Him.

Next verse:

Ephesians 4:6 (KJV) One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.

Correct translation:

Ephesians 4:6 One Godhead with The Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.

Next verse:

1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV) For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

Correct translation:

1 Timothy 2:5 (MCV) For there is one Godhead, and one mediator between The Father and men, the man Christ Jesus;

Roll up, roll up, for the last corrupted verse:

James 2:19 (KJV) Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

This one deserves a little more attention to reveal how silly it is. Here we’re expected to believe that the devils tremble with fear because this god is one! Hello! Excuse me because of what? Because God is one! LOL. Let me tell you straight, the devils fear because of an Almighty powerful Godhead with none above them because they are Number One, not because of the oneness of a fake god. You couldn’t make this stuff up, but amazingly they have.

OK that wraps it up for now, but there will eventually be a part three so stay in touch.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles.

Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 4

For Parts 1, 2 and 3 see link No’s. 5, 6 and 7 below.

Welcome back to this series of articles. In part one I reported that as I was writing this article in 2007 a number of people were gathering in South London to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the British Abolition of Slavery, and I asked the question:

Would Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) have joined in?

Since reporting that event there has been considerable press coverage with images that I found to be the most wretched, disgusting, gut-wrenching, phoney and pathetic I have ever witnessed in my life! Young and not so young white creatures (I won’t call them men) with fake chains and shackles around their legs, necks and wrists wearing T shirts with ‘So Sorry’ emblazoned across the front of them, parading themselves like spineless emasculated wimps for all to see. Here are two images of their vile treachery:

Sell Out Traitors To Their Own Kind!
Disgusting Treacherous Wretches Who Have Their ‘Rewards’ Awaiting Them!

As you can see, some of them were even down on their knees grovelling on the ground. (The origins of ‘bending the knee’ anyone?) Now to all you satanic Cultural Jew Marxists in our midst I am sure this will appear to you as OK, even all very fine, but in reality what does it say about them and you? (See link No. 4 below) Not only that, but what does it say about modern Britain (I tend to leave the word ‘Great’ out these days). Furthermore, what does it prove? Has their wretched grovelling proved anything? No! Has it changed anything? No! Has their stupid, irresponsible, infantile emotional unthinking behaviour changed history? No! Will their vile behaviour make them ‘feel better’? No! because it’s the permanent guilt that ‘keeps ‘em going’; it’s the guilt that makes them ‘feel good’ and feel ‘righteous’. This is how wretchedly rotten they are, for their minds are calcified and cancerous. Has this behaviour made a positive impression on the black people of South London? I very much doubt it, and if I were a black person I would consider it a patronising insult and treat the whole phony episode with contempt.

So what’s it all about, and would Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) have joined them in their little self-righteous parade of false remorse and false humility for the cameras? I don’t think so, in fact, I know so. The only anniversaries Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) will be interested in, if any, will be the future anniversaries of the commencement of His Kingdom here on this earth when He returns. None of man’s activities in this age will be remembered, nor commemorated, by way of an anniversary in God’s Kingdom, if anything The Lord will want them all forgotten! Well let’s hope He does.

The question now is this: how can I be so sure Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not join in with this celebration? To answer that we need to understand the origins of ‘slavery’ (the accurate name being Involuntary Servitude) and ask ourselves why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) allowed it to take place at all? The answer to that question can be found in Genesis 9 where we read of Yashua Messiah’s curse on Canaan. This curse, pronounced by Yashua Messiah through Noah, came, because of Ham’s sin with his mother Naamah (Noah’s wife). Noah’s son Ham, Canaan’s father, “saw his father Noah’s nakedness” which in Biblical language can only be interpreted that he had sexual intercourse with his mother, whilst his father was in a drunken sleep:

Genesis 9:20-22 (KJV) And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

OK, am I saying that some of Canaan’s descendants were and are black? Yes. How do I know that? Easy, Cush, Canaan’s half-brother was black; the name Cush literally means ‘black’ and all olive, swarthy, dark and brown skinned people are descended from Ham. OK, back to this curse of Yashua Messiah’s, through Noah, upon Canaan and here are the verses:

Genesis 9:24 (KJV) And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.

The word ‘servant’ here means a ‘bond-man’ or a man in bondage – a sold-man – sold into involuntary servitude. Canaan and his descendants were to be bonded and even worse than that, bonded to those already bonded. Notice too, that they were also to be in servitude to the descendants of Shem (white people) and bonded serfs of the descendants of Japheth (yellow people, who are now colonising Africa and fulfilling that prophecy), that is, they were also to become serfs of serfs. Many serf masters promoted certain numbers of their serfs to the positions of overseers and managers on their plantations, and that meant they had authority over their fellow serfs – Canaan’s black descendants became serfs of serfs.

Here is another truth; Black Africans were sold to Jewish slave traders who literally ran the black slave trade, but by whom? Other Africans, black people sold their own kind into slavery. Captains or commanders of slave ships (many owned by Jews) didn’t capture the Africans they took on board their ships, they had already been captured by other black Africans who worked for the Jews. This was big business, and a lucrative business for all concerned, not just the ship’s masters and Jewish ship owners. These facts are, of course, conveniently forgotten, deliberately played down and airbrushed from history, or just ignored by Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooders (propagandists) in the west. This especially applies within the whoring media, who seem to want to continually beat themselves, and us, up about a time in our history that we can do nothing about, nor change. The point we have to take from this is that blacks were as guilty as the Jews, and whites to a lesser degree, in this whole episode of history. Any other view is evil, treacherous, western liberal, manipulation of The Truth.

Here is another question; if we were to replace the sin of involuntary servitude, with the sin of murder and celebrate its abolition, would it make any sense? If these people in South London had been celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of murder, do you think Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would have joined in with that? Do you think He would have joined in, when black yoofs, in drug gang wars, are regularly being gunned down and murdered on the very same streets of (in allegedly gun abolished) South London? Can you see the blatant hypocrisy of it all? Which in turn means can you also see the Jews operating in the background driving this anti-white, white genocide satanic activity? That is, blacks with guns and whites unarmed!

We need to understand that involuntary servitude, on this earth, has never gone away – it still goes on – especially where The Jews are living and also in the Arab countries of the Middle East. Involuntary servitude is also rife in the Jewish run porn industry – many white girls are abducted in the Ukraine and Russia. The British abolishing involuntary servitude in 1807 didn’t bring it to an end. In fact the so-called British abolition of involuntary servitude (slavery) was an act of mere window dressing – a facade.

Here is a further question: Is Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) interested in man’s ‘achievements’, that is, all those things that man can do, and does do, under his own strength? Well yes, up to a point, but then again no, because Yashua Messiah created man in the first place. He was, therefore, and is, perfectly well aware of what His creation is capable of ‘achieving’, including the past; the present, and what they could be capable of in the future.

When man fell in the Garden of Eden he acquired the knowledge of ‘good’ and evil through ‘eating the fruit of the tree’ he was commanded not to eat (See link No. 2 below).Now becauseman has acquired the knowledge of good and evil he is, therefore, quite capable of doing both things. This, in turn, can depend very much upon outside influences, his mood swings, his general disposition and/or his motives. His motives for ‘doing good’ or what we call ‘do-gooding’do not come from the Godhead; they come from the fallen man himself, that is, Satan’s will.Man, therefore, is very able at doing evil, that is, enslaving people and also very able at do-gooding, that is, abolishing slavery. All this ‘slavery’ or ‘abolition of slavery’ amounts to is an active demonstration of man’s behaviour in his fallen condition, nothing else. I hope you can now see why Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) would not be celebrating the 200th anniversary of the British abolition of slavery. It is wholly a celebration of man’s ‘achievements’. Slavery and its abolition have got nothing to do with Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Now here is some information for mainstream Christians who have been sucked into this deceptive worldly liberal phenomenon called “Permanent guilt over slavery.” You see, they haven’t a clue about what Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) actually said about slavery? So let’s go to Ephesians now to find out and thereby set the record straight:

Ephesians 6:5 (KJV) Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;

In the above verse we can see another example of translators tinkering with the Word of God. In the Greek, the word for ‘servants’ is ‘doulos’ which means slaves. So here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, saying to those in involuntary servitude “be good obedient serfs” not rebellious: “I want my freedom” serfs. In verse 9, verse 5 it is then supported with:

Ephesians 6:9 (KJV) And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with Him.

Here we have Yashua Messiah, through Paul, telling serf masters to be equitable and just toward their serfs. Notice, there is neither one jot nor an inkling of the suggestion that the status quo of the serf/master master/serf arrangement should be changed nor rebelled against, especially with regard to Canaanites (the Jews and blacks).

Here above is concrete evidence that Yashua Messiah did not come to change this world, nor did He leave any instructions with His Messengers (apostles) to do so either. That also means that we, as Christians, are not to get involved in this world’s political systems, even if they look good and righteous on the outside.

Would Jesus Christ have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid?

To answer this and affirm what I have said above, what we have to understand is that Yashua Messiah did not come the first time, that is, in the first century to change this world or this age, nor its systems of governance, nor in fact, people’s sinful lifestyles. He came to take away all the sins of mankind, conquer death, and allow The Father time to draw (drag) those He had predestined, to His Son, that is, the gift of Grace filled Salvation to those He would call and choose, and to no one else.

John 6:44 (MCV) NO MAN can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

John 6:65 (MCV) And He said, Therefore said I unto you, That NO MAN can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

However, Apartheid was another of man’s systems of governance, but this time based upon God’s plan for the coming Kingdom, and the impetus to change it or abolish it, was from hu-man beings and/or from Cultural Jew Marxist liberal do-gooding white men, that is, shabbos goy self-righteous treacherous white men = serfs of The Jews. The misguided issue of ‘hu-man rights’ is also tied up in this Apartheid system as well, (See link No. 3 below) but I will not go into that here. Here, too, is another Truth, the Roman Empire was far more evil, ruthless and cruel than the Apartheid governments of South Africa, and yet Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) did not say a word nor lift a finger against it, but He did tell Pontius Pilate that this world/age was not His kingdom.

Moreover, what many mainstream Christians, those of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, also forget is the Barabbas character in the account of Yashua Messiah’s criminal show trial. He is mentioned in God’s Word for good reason, for Barabbas was big on regime change, he was a zealot of zealots, a first century terrorist – a real terrorist, and he wanted the Romans out of Judea!! He wanted ‘freedom’ and ‘independence’ for the Jews.

Had he been alive during the Apartheid era he, too, would have been a Cultural Jew Marxist and big on regime change in South Africa. He would have fought tooth and nail to get the white man out of power in South Africa, and he would definitely have been big on useless ‘hu-man rights’ for blacks too.

Back to the trial of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ), and we know the story, don’t we? The crowd (being the Jews) called out for Barabbas to be released, not Yashua Messiah. Barabbas was a man after their own reptile hearts, a man with whom they had much in common, and a man they could relate to. Barabbas was their hero – a ‘freedom’ fighter. Yashua Messiah was a ‘nobody’ when compared with Barabbas. Yashua Messiah might as well have been a foreign invader from a planet, such was their hatred for Him.

OK, so Barabbas was big on regime change, but was Yashua Messiah big on regime change? No, He wasn’t, not then, but He will be in the future when He returns to shepherd and segregate the nations of this earth with a rod of iron (tough love) – the biggest regime change you will ever see. (See link

No. 1 below)

Finally, did Barabbas win in his zeal to remove the Romans from Judea? Not a chance, for in 70 AC, less than 40 years later, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem completely – they razed it to the ground, including Herod’s Temple.

Moreover, it will be very interesting to see what becomes of South Africa over the next thirty years or so. If Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) is anything to go by, I don’t hold out much hope for it. Keep your eyes on the news folks and witness all the end time results of the white man’s self-righteous and delusional do-gooding, all on behalf of the Cultural Marxist Jews!!

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

So would Yashua Messiah have ‘made a stand’ against Apartheid, no way? Will Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) bring an end to involuntary servitude (because it still goes on today, even in 2007 and 2021)? Oh yes, but not until He returns to take His Throne as King of kings and Lord of lords, and all of man’s ways, his systems, his governments and futile ideas are brought to an end. Yashua Messiah please hurry that day! Not long now folks so stay strong in The Faith.

As a PS, you maybe curious as to why I use the term “involuntary servitude” instead of “slavery” and the answer to that is quite simple. In pre-civil war USA white men were free and blacks were in involuntary servitude. After that war was was lost to the Federal Government, (the so-called Civil War was a war by the Federal Government on ALL The States) both white men and blacks became CITIZEN SLAVES of the Federal Government, and it’s been downhill for the whites of America ever since. The so-called Union Soldiers were just useful idiots for the Federal Government. Just a little true history to enlighten your day.

Oh and one thing I did forget: Would the fop fake long haired ‘Jesus’ have taken part in all this guff and garbage? Yes, of course he would, but then you knew that already, didn’t you? LOL

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. APARTHEID is The Kingdom Of God:

2. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

3. Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed:

4. Are You A Cultural Jew Marxist Or A Christian?…:

5.Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp? – Part 1:

6. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 2:

7. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) A Long Haired Effeminate Looking Wimp – Part 3:

The Vile Satanic Curse Of RELIGION….

.And a word that Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was never recorded as having uttered!

Now here’s a thing, a HUGE THING. The WHOLE WORLD, to a greater extent, has gone after one religion or another, and if we were to add up all those people that do have a religion, of one kind or another, I bet those left would only amount to a very small minority – which would also include followers of Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ).

Even those who profess to be atheists worship other things in place of an organised religion or deity, namely themselves in the mirror (narcissists), the creation, that is, the green eco-nutters (Extinction Rebellion morons), their families, (yes there is such a thing as ‘family worship’), their pets, wealth, careers, their cars, their boats, sun-worshipping holidays, science, technology, art, music, or even football teams. All of these things, however we cut it, can be, and are, objects of their RELIGION, that is, idolatry and, whether they like to hear it or not. So you see, dear people, in Truth there is NO ESCAPE from RELIGION – it’s all enveloping and encompassing and across the whole world.

However the reason for this article is not for the atheist lost and unsaved, although they are welcome to read and learn from it, IF the Father is calling them. No, the reason for this article is to rebuke and admonish in agape love, those who profess to be Christians, and yet waste their time and money on the wretched pursuit of religion, delusionally thinking that they are doing Yashua Messiah’s (the Lord Jesus Christ’s) will.

And now for the proof and evidence from The Holy Scriptures that show us that ALL RELIGION is of Satan the Devil and not of God. But before I do that here is a foundational aside: the word ‘RELIGION’ is derived from the multi-faceted demon called LEGION, whom Yashua Messiah cast into The Gadarene Swine. All the swine died as they plunged over the cliff edge, but LEGION did not, for spirits cannot die. This means that LEGION had a make-over and re-invented himself as RE-LEGION, and there you have it = the multi-faceted evil spirit (demon) that pervades ALL RELIGIONS, whether it be Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Bahaism, Confucianism and, of course, not forgetting the most important one, the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion which at the moment doesn’t have an ‘ism’. Perhaps I should invent one! LOL

OK, here are ALL the verses from the New Testament that mention the word RELIGION, followed by the word RELIGIOUS, and you will immediately notice that NONE OF THEM are from the Four Gospels, which means Yashua Messiah never uttered the word, nor did He instruct His learners in the ways of RELIGION for He did not have a RELIGION – GOD HAS NO RELIGION:

Acts 26:5 (KJV) Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our RELIGION (G2356) I lived a Pharisee.

In this first offering we get an inkling of what RELIGION really is, that is, ‘a straitest sect’, as Paul accurately calls it, so from this we can immediately deduce that this is a very legalistic set up, and, of course, we already know that, because we know that The Serpent Seed Pharisee Jews were satanic Judaisers and very ritualistic. This means they dotted every ‘i’ and crossed every ‘t’ of The Mosaic Law in an attempt to pathetically save themselves. This, in turn, resulted in Yashua Messiah mocking them with the remark: “The ‘healthy’ have no need of The Physician!”

So straight off, the first example of the word RELIGION is a negative one.

Galatians 1:13 (KJV) For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454), how that beyond measure I persecuted The Church of God, and wasted it:

In this verse, our first negative verse above is confirmed for us once again by Paul with an even more negative example. Here he beefs it up by calling it the (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION and how, in the name of that VILE SATANIC RELIGION, he persecuted the Church of God and wasted it.

‘Wasted’ here meaning to destroy and overthrow or to make havock, and from Strong’s Concordance we get:

Wasted – G4199: πορθέω πορθέω: imperfect ἐπόρθουν; 1 aorist participle πορθήσας; (πέρθω, πεπορθα, to lay waste); from Homer down; to destroy, to overthrow (R. V. uniformly to make havock): τινα, Acts 9:21; τήν ἐκκλησίαν, Galatians 1:13; τήν πίστιν, ibid. 23.

So clearly we can now see what an evil thing the Jews’ RELIGION is, that is, Judaism, and please keep this in mind as we analyse the three remaining verses.

Galatians 1:14 (KJV) And profited in THE JEWS’ RELIGION (G2454) above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

Here Paul reveals how he ‘profited’ or progressed in The (Serpent Seed) JEWS’ RELIGION, and left his contemporaries way behind, so zealous was he for this evil satanic cult and its dogma. We MUST fully understand that Saul was a ruthless cold blooded murderer before Yashua Messiah gave him the shock of his life on the road to Damascus.

Next, we have two very interesting verses that seem to go against everything Paul has revealed and taught us about his past involvement with RELIGION, and how evil it was/is. We therefore have what some misguided people use as an example of sending up RELIGION, and let’s be clear, for these are the ONLY VERSES in the whole Bible that appear to paint RELIGION in a positive light, but do they?

In order to answer this question we will need Strong’s Concordance once more for there are several Greek words at play here. The first is G2356 and the second is G2454 and here are the definitions:

Religion – G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah; – from a derivative of G2357; ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.

Religion – G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; from G2450; “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.

Religion – G2357threskos thrace’-kos probably – from the base of 2360; ceremonious in worship (as demonstrative), i.e. pious:–religious.

Religion – G2450Ioudaizo ee-oo-dah-id’-zo from 2453; to become a Judaean, i.e. “Judaize”:– live as the Jews.

James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain.

James 1:27 (KJV) PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

Right, now we get down to some very devious and deceptive nonsense going on here, for in Acts 26:5 we get the G2356 reference to Paul speaking of his previous religious life which is exactly the same religion as mentioned in Galatians 1:13-14 and yet the translators have given it a new number, that is, G2454. So what’s going on? Has Paul’s past religion changed from being, and I quote: G2356 ceremonial observance:—religion, worshipping.” to G2454 “Judaism”, i.e. the Jewish faith and usages:—Jews’ religion.” Or are they just one and the same, but dressed up differently in the G2356 definition.

Do you see what’s happening here? With the use of G2356 θρησκεία thrēskeía, thrace-ki’-ah they are attempting to paint Paul’s old religion in a benign oh so loving, compassionate and kind, kind of way, that is, people who generally wouldn’t hurt a fly, and then with the use of the next word: G2454 Ἰουδαϊσμός Ioudaïsmós, ee-oo-dah-is-mos’; we’re then dealing with murdering psychopaths namely, Saul, and his fellow Pharisee criminals, and yet we’re definitely talking about the same RELIGION. The irony here being that the KJV translators have got this right by using the word RELIGION for both Greek words.

OK, so it looks like a load of shenanigans has taken place with the Greek manuscripts, proving that they, too, are liable to little corruptions, as with Matthew 28-19, which I unravelled in my article: “Should Christians Be Baptised Into Yashua Messiah’s (Jesus Christ’s) Name Alone? – Part 1” (See link No. 1 below).

So let’s now move on to James and analyse what he’s up to and I’ll repost the two troublesome verses below:

James 1:26 (KJV) If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s RELIGION (G2356) is vain 27 PURE RELIGION (G2356) and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

So straight away we have use of that deceptive G2356 definition which, as we have already ascertained really means the same as G2454 – Saul’s and the Pharisee Jews’ satanic Judaising religion. But why is James rambling on about religion anyway? Well it’s obvious, isn’t it? Look at the opening statement: If any man among you seem to be religious.” What does he mean by this remark? Let’s copy and paste the Concordant Literal Version for a better understanding:

James 1:26-27 (CLV) If anyone is seeming to be a ritualist, not bridling his tongue, but seducing his heart, the ritual of this one is vain, 27 for ritual clean and undefiled with God the Father is this: to be visiting the bereaved and widowed in their affliction, to be keeping oneself unspotted from the world.”

Why would anyone in the Church of God be hanging on to old religious ritualistic customs, that is, the ways of the world? When all of this was done away, with Yashua Messiah’s death and resurrection. Why would this wretch want to be seen as someone who was still into meaningless rituals and religion?

So here’s a further pertinent question or two: 1) Since when did visiting the bereaved and widowed become ritualistic or religious? Answer: It never has. 2) In what way is visiting the bereaved and widowed a ritualistic or religious activity? Answer: It’s not, nor has it ever been, so what’s James on about?

Easy, he’s mocking the whole idea sarcastically. James 1:26-27 is all about exposing this fraud (whoever he or she might be) and possibly doesn’t exist at all, but he’s using this possible scenario, as an example, so that anyone within his congregation that still fancies himself as religious or hankers after the old Pharisaical ways, had better shape up and get with the New Covenant and repent of his old Pharisaical Religious ways or else. (See link No.2 below)

So there we have it, RELIGION fully revealed and exposed from The Holy Scriptures for the fraud that it is, and NOW is the time for ALL true Christians to set themselves free from it:

Revelation 18:4 (KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse and Baptism Is Not Into The Trinity:

Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity. Eastern (Russian and Greek) Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity. Protestantism is NOT Christianity.

2. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

Hu; Hu-mans; Canaanites; The Serpent Seed…

…Are you a man of mankind: a son of Adam; or a hu-man being and not of mankind: not a son of Adam?

Or perhaps another way of saying it could be: are you a son of Adam, or a son of The Devil through Cain, and does this whole idea shock you? (See link No. 1 below). Most likely, if you are new to this Truth, it will shock you. In turn, I make no apologies for that, for The Truth MUST be made known, whether you take offence or not. And let’s be clear, offence can only be taken, not given, and lovers of The Truth (Yashua Messiah) will definitely NOT be offended by this Truthful article.

So what are we are dealing with here? For this subject can, and will, be deemed by libtard Cultural Jew Marxists as the ultimate form of RACISM! Ooh! and we can’t have that can we? What will all those lilly livered, limp-wristed, spineless, progressive, fake Christians say? No doubt they will rent their clothes and have apoplexy, and all this, instead of realising that Yashua Messiah Himself, BY THEIR EVIL STANDARDS, would, and will be classified as a RACIST! (See link No. 2 below). So much for the fake hoax concept known as RACISM!:

“”RACIST” A made up word by the Jew Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Bronstein) in 1927 and used to browbeat all dissenters of the Jewish Bolshevik Marxist/Communist ideology, and still used today to keep white people walking on egg shells regarding other races. Only whites are racists according to these traitor whoresons, that is, evil wretches like John Mann, UK Labour MP.”

— Brother Charles

“”Racism” as an accusation, was shaped by Trotskyists and then sharpened politically by Magnus Hirschfeld, before being fully launched as an anti-white weapon by ethnic others in the American academic system.”

— John Piggot

OK, so with the short preamble over and a couple of educational quotes chucked in for good measure, let’s move on to the meat of this article: HU – who or what is ‘HU’? What kind of a word is ‘HU’? I’ve never heard of it I hear you say. Well its origin may surprise, for it is an ancient Welsh word, and ancient Welsh is from the even more ancient runic Hebrew tongue.

“The English tongue agreeth with the Hebrew a thousand times more than with the Latin.”

– William Tyndale – multi-linguist and early translator of the English Bible.

The Welsh are The Levites, with The Druids of Cornwall and Wales who are descended from The Levitical Priesthood who administered life in Ancient Israel. This included responsibility for all religious, educational, financial and commercial activities in Ancient Israel – they administered The Tithe – a tax of ten percent on the people’s INCREASE, not the principal, so there was no Tithe/Tax on wages. Israel, during, and after, Joshua’s leadership at the time of The Judges, was a free Theocracy under God, that is, before it became a Kingdom under Saul, David and Solomon and their tax slavery began.

So immediately we have a Scriptural/Biblical connection going all the way back to the Patriarchs of Ancient Israel, that is, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, who were the Patriarchal forefathers of the Anglo-Saxon (Isaac’s sons = the Saacae or Saacsons), Celtic, Welsh, Dutch, Flemish, Gallic, Swiss and Nordic peoples, but not The Jews. (See links Nos. 3 and 4 below).

So who, or what exactly, is HU?

From The Serpent of Life and Wisdom web page:

The Caduceus is one of the most ancient of symbols:

You might best know this symbol as the DNA structure and healing used by the medical profession. Since ancient Mesopotamia The Caduceus presented two serpents intertwined (the central nervous system) around a staff (the spinal column) with the wings (the “swan”) on either side (the two hemispheres of the brain, with the circle in the centre representing the pineal gland, or the central sun and psychic center within). It also symbolized the kundalini energy.

“This was originally the symbol for the Anunnaki-Sirian creator god, EA, or EN.KI (who has become an Archetype), was the chief of the magicians, “the one who knows,” and infamous for being The Serpent of the Garden of Eden, who created lifeforms in test tubes half a million years ago with his half-sister Ninharsag, at the suggestion of his son, Marduk, to create hu-mans to be the workers for the gods. (The symbol is also based upon the winged globe for the planet Nibiru, the symbol of the royal Anunnaki family.)

Biblical writers called The Healing Serpent Ne-HU-shtan. The Hebrew word for serpent is “nahash.” The root of the word are the Hebrew letters Nun, Het and Shin, which means “to guess.” This was translated into other languages as “Satan,” which some say mean “enemy,” or “adversary.””

So from this we learn: 1) that the medical profession is 100% satanic with its Caduceus twin serpent logo and 2) I don’t know about you, but ‘test tubes’ half a million years ago, LOL, is total nonsense. However, what we do have here is our first reference to ‘Hu’ as Satan the Devil, and that’s all that matters from this little piece.

From Simon, on the “Followers of YHWH” Forum:

“Their temples wherein the sacred fire was preserved were generally situate on eminences and in dense groves of oak (see back slidden Ancient Israel), because a circle was the emblem of the universe; oval, in allusion to the mundane egg, from which issued, according to the traditions of many nations, the universe, or, according to others our first parents; serpentine, because a serpent was the symbol of HU, the Druidic Osiris; cruciform because a cross is an emblem of regeneration; or winged, to represent the motion of the divine spirit.”

From The Freemasons:

“The Druids had a high veneration for The Serpent. Their great god, Hu, was typified by that reptile; and he is represented by the Bards as ‘the wonderful chief Dragon, the sovereign of heaven’.

“The Serpent is universally esteemed a legitimate symbol of Freemasonry.”

– George Oliver, Freemason, Signs and Symbols, New York, Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Company, 1906, p. 36

So here we learn that the back slidden Ancient Israelites (our forefathers) had a ‘high veneration’ for Hu, The Serpent, and for one reason and one reason only, and that reason was their satanic incorporation of Molech worship (child sacrifice) into their beliefs. These evil satanic practises they copied from the Serpent Seed Canaanites who still practice these evil abominations to this day.

Hu The Serpent Entwined Around The Egg

From the Eden Saga Web Page, The Serpent People:

The ancient god of the British Isles, called Hu, was the master of the dragon world.”

From the Covenant of Rhiannon web page:

It is believed that Druidism was founded by Gwyddon Ganhebon, supposedly Seth of the Mosaic genealogy, in Asia and was brought to Britain by Hu Gadarn a contemporarydescendant of the Patriarch Abraham.

“Hu Gadarn originally came with the tribe of the Cymry (The Welsh, The Levites) to the Britannic Isles. They came from the Country of Summer, which is called Defrobani… They crossed the Misty Ocean (Tawch) and arrived in the Britannic Isles and Armorica, where they settled.”

Just to summarise, we now know that ‘Hu’ means ‘Serpent’ and the word ‘Hu-man’ means ‘Serpent-Man’, so in other words, hu-man beings are Canaanites – descendants of The Devil through Eve in The Garden.

Adam declared Eve as THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING, that is, both MANKIND and hu-mankind. Adam was NOT THE FATHER OF ALL LIVING, just the father of Mankind.

Genesis 3:20 (KJV) And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living. (Abel and Cain, both mankind and hu-mankind – Abel later replaced by Seth).

Now for those of you who think you are ‘quick on the draw’ and say: “Oh yeah, but all Cain’s descendants died in the flood, so you’re talking nonsense!” and I will retort with: “All his descendants bar ONE!” Namely Noah’s ‘Mrs’, whose name was Naamah, and she was the sister of Tubal-Cain. Hey! But it says Noah was perfect in ALL his generations from Adam, and that’s True, but his Mrs wasn’t perfect at all in her generations. However, that’s not important, because Noah carried the Adamic bloodline, which he passed onto his three sons, and they took their lineage from Noah, not their mother, who was of Cain.

Genesis 6:9-10 (KJV) These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. 10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

OK, so all this was just fine and dandy until the flood waters subsided and Noah started his new farming and agricultural (husbandry) lifestyle, which included the planting of a vineyard. We are then fast forwarded to the scene of Noah having harvested his grapes and bottled up his wine, so he thinks he’ll have a good old wine tasting evening. Unfortunately, he gets a bit carried away with the tasting of the wine and ends up blotto. No doubt the rest of his family were also partakers of this first year’s growth celebration and were a bit tipsy.

Moreover, whilst all the celebrating is going on Noah crashes out and Ham, his second son, gets into a strange incestuous relationship with his mother and, presumably whilst under the influence of Noah’s wine, he lies with her = he saw his father’s nakedness:

Leviticus 18:8 (KJV) The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

Leviticus 20:11 (KJV) And the man that lieth with his father’s wife hath uncovered his father’s nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Now the outcome of this illicit evil union is the birth of Canaan, whom Noah curses. Now why did Noah curse the brat Canaan, and not his debauched son, Ham, and/or his wayward slutty wife, wouldn’t that have made more sense? Yes to our carnal minds it would have made more sense, but not to God who sees things very differently from us, hence He sees strange flesh from incest as an abomination and likewise any inbred offspring from such an incestuous union as anathema.

Furthermore, it’s crucial that we understand what has happened here. In the births of his three sons, Noah’s bloodline only, counted, but in this evil incestuous affair it was Naamah’s Cainite bloodline that counted in Canaan and not Ham’s Adamic blood. This means that with the birth of Canaan, Cain’s bloodline was re-kindled post-flood through Naamah his mother – the line of Cain was reborn and it’s still with us today in the shape of the Canaanite Jews, African Blacks, the Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans, the Turks and the Italians.

Another interesting twist to this is The Truth that the Canaanite Jews take their lineage from their mothers. Jewish society is a MATRIARCHAL society, not a Patriarchal society. So any claims or assertions that they make to a descendancy from Abraham or Judah is a lie. (See link No. 5 re the Jews’ false claims).

So there you have it, solid gold proof that (((THEY))) LIVE! (Have you seen that film?) If not, I recommend it.

In Yashua Messiah’s Holy name

Messenger Charles

1. Did Eve Have Sex With The Devil or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit?:

2. Was Yashua Messiah (The Lord Jesus Christ) a Racist – The Canaanite Woman He Called a Dog!:

3. Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

4. Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

5. I Know That Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!: