The Duality Godhead!? What Godhead is that, I hear you ask? Well I’ll tell you straight, right away, They are not a mickey mouse triune godhead, They’re not a Unitarian/Judaic/Islamic monotheistic godhead and They are not a Binatarian godhead either, if that’s what you were thinking.
Now what is a Binatarian godhead? I’ve never heard of such a thing, again I hear you say. OK, so let me explain, a Binatarian godhead is a half-truth so that means it’s a lie, just like the monotheistic monogod and the trinity godhead.
Binatarianism is belief in a Duality Godhead that has been corrupted with Triunism and turned into yet another lying hu-man magical construct. This means that instead of a mythical godhead that is one in three and three in one they have constructed a godhead that, like the trinity, it is one in two and two in one = total fallacious religious nonsense. We therefore need to understand that The Godhead consists of TWO DISTINCT Spiritual Beings who are NEVER at anytime one solitary spiritual being – a distinction that applies solely to Satan the Devil.
This means that The Duality Godhead is very simple to understand for we are told about Them right at the beginning in Genesis Chapter 1:
Genesis 1:1 (KJV) In the beginning God (H430 Elohim – plural) created the heaven and the earth.
There They are, in the very first verse of the Holy Scriptures: The ‘ELOHIM’ and the ‘Elohim’ is the plural of ‘Eloah’ or ‘Eloha’. So if the Godhead was ONE GOD, it would have read: “In the beginning God (Eloah – singular) created the heaven and the earth.” But it DOES NOT SAY THAT it says God ‘ELOHIM’ – PLURAL! MORE THAN ONE GOD – THE GODHEAD, but NOT a triune godhead! Please excuse the all-caps shouting folks, but shouting is very necessary at times, especially, for some stiff necked duped people out there who love to hang onto their nonsensical Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious myths = monotheism and/or triunism.
From Strong’s Concordance:
God – H430 – ‘ĕlôhı̂ym – el-o-heem’ – Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.
Now pay attention to what Strong is doing here, for he is following a satanic monothesitic agenda and explaining away The Truth by introducing his own irrelevant intellectual nonsense into his definition of ‘Elohim’ – “but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God;”
Moreover, ignoring his intellectual waffle, ask yourself this very pertinent question: Would a Bible scholar of Strong’s immense calibre, with his excellent knowledge of the Hebrew language, have not known of the word ‘Eloah’ or ‘Eloha’ and known its SINGULAR meaning and also have known that ‘Elohim’ was the plural of that singular word? I will leave you all to answer that no brainer question for yourselves.
OK, so we have established from the first verse of the Holy Scriptures that the Godhead is more than one god and this is further confirmed for us in Genesis again:
Genesis 1:26 (first part) (KJV) And God (H430 Elohim – plural) said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness: (Emphasis mine)
Right, now is this erroneously claimed solitary mono-god speaking to himself? If not, who is he speaking to – the angels? No way, for I’ll tell you straight, the angels never created anything, and man is definitely not created in the image of angels. This means that if we take the “God is one” nonsense, seriously, it must mean that their god needs certifying, for he is hallucinating and seeing someone in his head that he is now attempting to hold a conversation with. Hilarious or what!?
Having said all that, I can now see all the monotheists jumping up and down, frothing at the mouth, and renting their clothes in true Moloch and Baal worshipping style, as they did in Elijah’s day when their mono-god failed to bring down fire to ignite the wet wood, such is their delusional thinking. (See 1 Kings 18) However, not only that, but when I have finished this article the trinity dupes will no doubt have joined them in their manic heathen frenzy. Who said being a follower of Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) – The Way was not good fun? LOL
Moving on, I will now quote a segment from one of my earlier articles which covers the prime and/or premier “identity of God verse in Deuteronomy”, and we all know it, don’t we? This verse is the verse that nearly all monotheists quote in an attempt to support their erroneous satanic claims:
Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:
“Please note, as I disect this verse it will be, in part, a repeat of what I have said above.
“Hear, O Israel” – or better translated “Hear you Israel” or “Listen up you Israelites”, for I, your Lord, have something important to tell you:
“The Lord our God” – properly translated from the Hebrew; The Lord = The Eternal or The Self-Existing. Our God = Our ‘Elohim’ (plural); the Godhead that has always self-existed before time began and was/is always a plural Duality Godhead.
Straight away in this short phrase of Holy Scripture we are told by the use of this word ‘Elohim’ (the plural of ‘Eloah’) that we are dealing with more than one God. Look folks, there is no getting away from this Truth, and we need to get it through our heads that the Hebrew word ‘Eloah’ (singular) would have been in use here, not ‘Elohim’, IF God was one. OK, so we have now ascertained that The Godhead is more than one, and yet it says:
“Is One Lord” – so what’s going on here and what does this mean? The Hebrew word here for ‘one’ is ‘Echad’ which means ‘united’ or ‘in unity’ in one sense, and ‘number one’ the prime number in the other sense, that is, no one higher or no one above – The Most High as wriiten elsewhere in the Holy Scriptures.
One – H259 – echâd – ekh-awd’ – A numeral from H258; properly united, that is, (as) one; or (as an ordinal) first: – a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any (-thing), apiece, a certain [dai-] ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together.
OK, as we can see the word ONE does not mean solitary or one god or a mono-god, for it means UNITED AS ONE, that is, in agreement in thought, word and deed, yet still distinct and separate as Two Spiritual Beings.
A Numeral – H258 – אחד – âchad – aw-khad’ – Perhaps a primitive root; to unify, that is, (figuratively) collect (one’s thoughts): – go one way or other.
The primitive root word then confirms this for us – TO UNIFY!! And again this, in turn, means They are not one being, for being united or unified is always an arrangement whereby a number of beings are at one with each other or unanimous in their thoughts, aims and ideals, as in a football team. Newcastle United is a team of individuals united in one aim – to win, but they are not one being, they are eleven distinct beings. This is how it is with the Godhead; they are Two Spiritual Beings, united as one in thought, mind and deed – totally likeminded – united!
This, too, is why The Lord, through Paul, exhorts the Congregations of God to be like the Godhead in their relationships one with another:
Romans 15:5-6 (KJV) Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus: 6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even The Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. [Two distinct beings] (Emphasis and brackets mine)
Take note, the Congregations of God were not ONE BEING, but they were exhorted by Paul to be of ONE MIND just like The Father and The Son and like the Godhead of God with God in the beginning who said: “Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness:”
If we now move on to the New Testament we have a new word for the Godhead and that word is the Greek word ‘Theos’ instead of the Hebrew word ‘Elohim’. However we need to be clear that just because a Greek word is now used, instead of a Hebrew word, doesn’t mean that the nature and make-up of the Duality Godhead has changed. In fact the Greek word ‘theos’ is very useful for this topic for, generally, it means a DEITY and in the Greek sense that means gods plural, for the Greeks were polytheists – they, like the ancient Egyptians, had many gods. As far as I know they did not have a word in their language to describe a monotheistic god. It was only the Jews that worshipped such a deity and they worshipped that deity in error and in ignorance when they knew very well that God ‘Elohim’ was a plural Godhead.
God – G2316 – θεός – theos theh’-os – Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: – X exceeding, God, god [-ly, ward].
So there we have it: ‘Theos’ = a deity and in Ancient Greece that would mean more than one god, not a mono-god. Not only that, but because ‘Theos’ is such a general all encompassing word in terms of objects of worship, it means it can be interpreted any way you like, if you have a monotheistic or triunistic agenda to fulfil. Moreover, notice that within this very definition we can see Strong doing just that with all his figurative nonsense regarding ‘magistrates’. With regard to ‘magistrates’ I will leave a link below for additional reading regarding this satanic subject.
Here is some interesting backup information from this web page: https://goedbericht.nl/english/god-placer/
“Based on the previous blog, I received a question, How do you come to the definition of the Greek word “theos” (God) as PLACER? The well-known Lexicon to the New Testament of Dr. Spiros Zodhiates, says the following:
The most probable derivation is from the verb theo, to place (see tithemi, Str. 5087). The heathen thought the gods were disposers (theteres, placers) and formers of all things.
The Keyword Concordance of the Concordant Literal New Testament presents the same origin of theos. The verb appoint or place we also recognize in our word thesis, which is a proposition (anti-thesis = contrast, synthesis = composition). Below are some passages where the word theos is remarkable combined with tithemi, from which it was derived.
Romans 4:17 … A father of many nations have I appointed you – facing which, he believes it of the GOD … 1 Corinthians 12:18 Yet now GOD placed the members, each one of them, in the body according as He wills. 1 Corinthians 12:2…whom also GOD, indeed, placed in the ecclesia, first, apostl… 1Thessalonians 5:9 for GOD did not appoint us to indignati…
The Greek word theos is much more concrete than our word God. Theos refers to One Who appoints everything and gives it a place. Nothing takes place without Him giving it a place.”
Furthermore, because we know that the Godhead does not cause confusion re their identity we can definitely know for sure that plural ‘Theos’ in the NT means exactly the same a plural ‘Elohim’ in the OT – The Duality Godhead with The Holy Spirit as their LIVING POWER.
One last Holy Scripture:
Galatians 3:20 (KJV) Now a mediator is not [a mediator] of one, but God is one.
Now does this verse make any sense? First of all, who is The Mediator that this verse is referring to? Answer: Yashua Messiah. And was Yashua Messiah God come in the flesh? Answer: Yes, hence it states quite plainly that a mediator is not of one, so there has to be more than one in order for one to mediate to the other and yet it then says: “God is one!” So what’s going on here?
Easy, God = ‘Theos’ = ‘Elohim’ = more than one, for the Godhead does not change:
Malachi 3:6 (KJV) For I am The LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.
Here below we have Yashua Messiah speaking on behalf of the Godhead for no one has ever seen or heard The Father:
John 1:18 (KJV) No man hath seen God (The Father) at any time; The Only Begotten Son, which is in the bosom of The Father, He hath declared Him. (Brackets and Emphasis mine)
John 5:37 (KJV) And The Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. YE HAVE NEITHER HEARD HIS VOICE AT ANY TIME, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE. (Emphasis mine)
So there it is folks, NO ONE has ever seen or heard The Father at any time, so that must mean that Yashua Messiah was The God of the Old Testament who spoke on behalf of Himself and/or The Father – The Duality Godhead.
In Yashua Messiah’s name,
Here are my complimentary articles to this article:
Exposing the Trinity Lie!: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/exposing-the-trinity-lie-part-1/
Are Trinity Worshippers Anti-Christs?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/are-trinity-worshippers-anti-christs/
Can Christians Grieve The Holy Spirit?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/can-christians-grieve-the-holy-spirit/
Can Christians Lie to The Holy Spirit?: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/ananias-and-sapphira-how-we-can-know-this-is-a-false-or-a-fake-story/
Matthew 28:19 Is a Spurious Verse and Baptism is Not Into The Trinity: https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/should-christians-be-baptised-into-yashua-messiahs-the-lord-jesus-christs-name-alone-part-1/