Once again this is an overdue article and the reason being is because I didn’t complete my “Exposing The Trinity Lie” series of articles, so it is my mistake. However, just recently, I have had much noisy opposition to my Truthful teaching on the lying shell game scam known as the trinity dogma, otherwise known as Tertullian’s conjuring trick called The Trinitas circa 200 AD.
Here is one of their favourite erroneous mantras as thrown at me the other day:
“The Holy Spirit is a person who can be grieved, can be lied to, etc. (Eph 4:30, Acts 5:3).”
Now the grieving of The Holy Spirit nonsense I deal with here:
And the ‘Holy Spirit being lied to’ I will deal with in this article, but first let’s get the story copied here so we are familiar with the WHOLE story and have ALL the details:
Acts 5:1-11 (KJV) But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, 2 And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet. 3 But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land? 4 Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God. 5 And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great FEAR came on all them that heard these things. 6 And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him. 7 And it was about the space of three hours after, when his wife, not knowing what was done, came in. 8 And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much. 9 Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out. 10 Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband. 11 And great FEAR came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things. (Emphasis mine)
Now before I analyse the above passage of so called Scripture I will follow the same procedure that I employed in my article entitled: “Romans 13:1-7 Do Sons of God Have To Obey Secular or Religious Authorities?”
This means I will quote the overall contextual theme of Acts 4 and Acts 5 and show how this, off topic, alleged Scriptural story was added for very different reasons than you may at first realise. Here are the verses from the end of Acts 4 and, notice, how encouraging, positive and upbeat it all is:
Acts 4:32-37 (KJV) And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. 33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of The Lord Jesus: and Great Grace was upon them all. 34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. 36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, 37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.
Continuing I will now add Acts 5 from verse 12:
Acts 5:12-14 (KJV) And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people; (and they were all with one accord in Solomon’s porch. 13 And of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the people magnified them. 14 And believers were the more added to The Lord, multitudes both of men and women.) (Emphasis mine)
Notice how the positive story line continues and how the people are elated with joy and gladness and all are likeminded and of one accord. So what is this very negative fear based story of Ananias and Sapphira doing right there in the middle of this very Spiritually uplifting narrative? (Please note, I will give special attention to verse 13 at the end of this article.)
Notice, too, how the same trick has been played as they did in Romans 13:1-7 by breaking up the continuum of the positive story line in order to shove in their agenda fuelled lies.
Now for some questioning analysis of this suspect story:
1) Who were these two people? For in Adam Clarke’s Commentary he states this:
“’But a certain man named Ananias’ – Of these unhappy people we have no farther account than what is recorded here. In reference to birth, connections, etc., their names are written in the dust. The import of his name, Chananiyah, the Grace or Mercy of The Lord, agrees very ill with his conduct.”
So someone whose name means: “Grace or Mercy of The Lord” is mercilessly struck down dead by The Lord for telling a lie? Do I sense some sort of mocking going on here by the authors of this evil corruption?
Moreover we have two Biblical nobodies, not previously mentioned anywhere else in the Holy Scriptures, and there they are, out of the blue, and also known by name, just for the recording of this very negative story. All very handy and convenient eh? Too convenient for my liking!!!
2) Look at how the authors stole, in copycat fashion, the “land or property” subject matter from chapter 4. This means that they were too lazy and unimaginative to make up something original in order to try and make their lying point, as we shall see:
Acts 4:34-37 (KJV) Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. 36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, 37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet. (Emphasis mine)
3) “But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost?”
OK, now in my article “Exposing The Trinity Lie Parts 1-5” I prove without a shadow of doubt that The Holy Spirit (here called The Holy Ghost) is not a personage of The Godhead but, rather, is the Living Power or Living Force of The Godhead, a Living Force that does things like this:
“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a Force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this Force the existence of a conscious and Intelligent Mind. This Mind is the Matrix of all matter.” (Emphasis mine)
– Professor Max Planck, the father of quantum physics.
So here we have a qualified scientist describing The Holy Spirit in action, without actually stating it out loud and, notice, that he says “BEHIND THIS FORCE there is an Intelligent Mind.” So behind The Holy Spirit there is The Godhead of The Father and The Son. That means, folks, from this Truthful scientific perspective that The Holy Spirit is NOT A PERSON of a trinity but a FORCE!!
Moreover, and with this Truth in mind, how could the Holy Spirit be lied to if the Holy Spirit is a FORCE and not a person? It can’t, and that’s it. So if nothing else this makes Acts 5 verse 3 a blatant corruption and a LIE!!!! and the whole story a fraud.
4) Peter sits in judgement!! At what point were the Messengers (Apostles) given the power or the authority to sit in judgement over their brothers and sisters, or the power to interrogate them like a Communist KGB officer?
We know very little about the travels and experiences of the other Messengers (Apostles) but we do know much about Paul. Now where do we find him anywhere giving his brothers and sisters the third degree type inquisition re their sins? We don’t, other than him telling us that certain members had to be handed back to Satan for blaspheming, that is, teaching a satanic false gospel against Yashua Messiah’s Gospel Message that Paul was teaching, which is blaspheming against the Holy Spirit. Were they struck down dead?
Now here’s another thing. How well does this blatant nonsense story fit in with the other Papist LIE of Peter being a Pope – a fake in authority? Very well indeed is the answer to that!! Coincidence anyone?
5) “Why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.”
Look at that for another LIE!!! How did these dissembling authors get away with this? How did Ananias and Sapphira not lie unto men? If this story is true then they lied to both God and men. Did their brothers and sisters not believe that they had given all the proceeds of the sale of their property to be shared? If so, then Ananias and Sapphira lied to them as well as God. So what’s this erroneous nonsense verse all about? Answer: building up the emotional crap is what it’s all about, in order to make it a more emotionally convincing story. However, it backfired, and like all liars they always shoot themselves in the feet at the same time. This verse is pure arrogant embellishment.
6) “And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great FEAR came on all them that heard these things.”
RIGHT!!! Now we get to the rub!! For this is the REAL REASON for the addition of this satanic evil corruption – FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! Oh how the Papist illegitimates love to put FEAR into their duped lemming followers. Without FEAR and mind numbing superstition the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion would cease to exist.
Always remember folks that FEAR is the OPPOSITE OF LOVE. People KILL what they FEAR. FEAR is the breeding ground for mindless uncontrolled HATE. So why would Yashua Messiah allow such wickedness to be included in His Word? He didn’t, evil people with an evil agenda added it to serve that evil religious agenda – the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious agenda.
Again, compare this narrative with the positive verses each side of it. Its sole purpose is to negate the uplifting verses that go before it and after it and, of course, to add in the nonsense that The Holy Spirit can be lied to. All this, when Yashua Messiah knows what we are going to do before we even do it, and acts as our Advocate on the rare occasions that might be necessary.
7) Were Ananias and Sapphira Born Again, that is, were they born of God? If so, then they could not sin:
1 John 3:9 (KJV) Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.
1 John 3:3 (KJV) And every man that hath this hope in Him purify himself, even as He is pure.
This issue, backed by the above Holy Scriptures, raises a massive point in confounding this vile eleven verse contamination of The Holy Scriptures. Make no mistake, folks, because if these two characters WERE BORN OF GOD there is no way they would have done what they were accused of doing.
Romans 8:4-5 (KJV) That the righteousness of The Law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after The Spirit. 5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after The Spirit the things of The Spirit.
The question that now needs to be asked is whether Ananias and Sapphira were Spirit led Christians or not? If they were, there is no way they would have done what they are allegedly accused of doing, that is, they would not have been walking after the flesh. However, if they were not saved then the flesh is all that they could have served and their behaviour completely understandable.
Therefore, there is no way Peter would have dealt with them as he did, if they were unsaved and minding the things of the flesh. So yet again we have more solid gold proof that this story is a lying fabrication and a satanic corruption by addition.
Furthermore, whoever added this passage had no understanding of what it means to be born of God – a new creation so it had to be written by someone with a Cainite-Judeo-Christian religious mindset, not a Christian Spiritual mindset.
8) And great FEAR came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things.
LOL and then finally and, for ‘good’ measure, they bung in another verse of FEAR MONGERING, but not just the congregation of God this time but also those outside that heard of this event. Just what you need to give The Church a loving Christian reputation.
Well, let’s face it, when you’re building a house of cards like the Babylonian Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion with hoped for billions of deluded serfs and slaves as members, in the future, how do you hold them in captivity without an unhealthy dollop of FEAR!!!???? Think of all that lovely dosh you will lose without the FEAR!!!
9) For the final point I will return to verse 13 of Acts 5 “And of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the people magnified them.”
Now why did the rest (whoever they were) not dare (durst not) to join the congregation of God and yet they magnified them – praised them? Was it because of the alleged fearful episode that was supposed to have taken place or because they were not prepared to sell all that they had and lay it at the Messenger’s feet to be given to the needy? Yet at the same time were very impressed by such overwhelming acts of kindness and generosity and praised them for doing so? The next verse gives us the answer:
Acts 5:14 (KJV) And believers were the more added to The Lord, multitudes both of men and women.
Again this verse proves that the events of Acts 5:1-11 NEVER TOOK PLACE and the whole episode is a lying fabrication made up by the founding fathers of the Hellenised counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion.
Hi Brother Charles, very interesting,but how did they get away with corrupting these versus of the Bible, and how are we to know what Bible has not been corrupted? I thought God would have somehow put a stop to the Bible being corrupted in such a way. What Bible do you suggest? They say even the King James Bible has corruptions. So how does this affect Christians with our reading of the Bible if we cannot rely upon it as absolute truth due to corruption and added lies to versus. Seems very scary to me. God bless to you and your wife.
There is NO NEED to be scared – this is just a learning curve.
Between 100 and 400 AD there was a vacuum caused by a dearth of the written Word in those centuries. Diocletian and other Roman barbarians had destroyed nearly all the Greek manuscripts, so the manuscripts that were left were then put together by the scribes of the times who were mostly fake Christian Hellenising philosophers and intellectuals – the erroneously called ‘church fathers’. These bods were the founders of Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, not the founders of The Christian Congregations of God who were always small in numbers.
The Word of God was spread orally, not by the written Word – we attach far more importance to the written Word today because of literacy and printing – this was not the case in the first centuries. Those people of the early days were mostly illiterate and there was no printing so the spoken Word was king.
The KJV Bible has to be the best because of Strong’s Concordance. If there was no Strong’s Concordance then the KJV would just be another English translation amongst other English translations.
When reading The Bible two words are paramount: Spiritual Discernment – this is a Spiritual gift, so if you don’t have it then ask The Father for it.
Acts 5:1-11 IS a corruption of the KJV.
With the New Testament one simple rule you can always use is The GRACE RULE. Now apply that rule to Acts 5:1-11 and show me any GRACE in that story.
However NOTICE what it says in the earlier verses – GREAT GRACE was upon them. Where was that GREAT GRACE in Acts 5:1-11??????? Answer NOWHERE!!!!!!! That means the Acts 5:1-11 narrative is a total contradiction of the previous verses.
Many thanks for your comment.
Thanks for your enlightenment, when looking at the world today and the influence exerted by these dark forces, I’m not shocked at all by these findings and of course the scriptures make mention of such shenanigans.
“Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.”
You’re welcome and yes, likewise, nothing comes as a shock to me anymore, either.
Thanks for the comment.
It does come as abit of a shock to me I must say, I’m starting to get really worried about what I’m reading and if it is truth and properly scripturally based. So many Christians I know are feeling confused, it is just unbelievable that the Bible can have so many twists and turns to it. I really pray to God all the time to not let me be misled. And so many denominations teach something different and all say they are the truth. I guess buying a good concordance will help me, hopefully they are not too hard to use. Thanks for the article too
Peggy, you must make a decision on which teacher you rely on – whether it is me or someone else, until you are ready to stand alone with Yashua Messiah as your teacher.
Yes a Strong’s Concordance is a must along with a KJV Bible.
Have you got any Bible software?
Thank-you Chris and Brother Charles, no I do not have any Bible software. I am going to look for the concordance today after work.
Try and get a second hand Strong’s as they are better than the new editions – and a lot cheaper. Download e-sword and scripture4all – those are the two programmes I mostly use.
Hi Peggy, I personally rely on the Messiahs saving grace and then consider everything else as part of the journey and learning experience. I agree it can be shocking but what else should we expect considering the subject matter, I’d be more shocked if everything was right with the world.
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
I am relieved to find that I’m not the only one who finds this passage offensive. It’s been in the back of my mind for a few years now. I started my quest for truth a long time ago and strive everyday to keep my actions in line with the lessons I have learned from the Bible. But when something just doesn’t ever make sense no matter how many times I chew on it I just couldn’t swallow it. This little passage just doesn’t mesh with the spirit in Jesus knowing about Judas’ betrayal and still dining with him. It doesn’t match with Jesus telling Peter to his face that he would deny him three times and still accepting him after his resurrection. Love and truth are my Lord. Patience and kindness is the underlying story of the Bible in my opinion. When we are directed to forgive 70 times 7, that is patience and to give people over to their sins when they sin against you, because it is heaping burning coals on their head. That tells me the punishment or the turning of those people is left to God, Jesus, and the Spirit of Truth. I do agree it is a force instead of a physical person. And Bless you for writing this article. It was such a relief to find it among all the appalling children’s lessons on such a blatant lie. And to find such a well stated argument. It didn’t even occur to me to read it as though it wasn’t there and see how much more it didn’t make sense with the context. Well done and a Thank you.
You’re welcome, and many thanks for your encouraging and uplifting words – it’s very hard at times being a lone voice in the wilderness of this evil world, so it’s very good to hear from someone The Lord has reached with His Truth.
Re the forgiveness of others, it only comes after their repentance – love is unconditional, but forgiveness is conditional.
Luke 17:3 (MCV) Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent (changes his behaviour), forgive him.
Brotherly love in Yashua Messiah’s name
“Without FEAR and mind numbing superstition the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion would cease to exist.”
Hence their new climate religion LOL
You know Charles, before I “met” you on Disqus and then was guided to your blog, I’d re-read the NT and if I remember correctly has started in on the OT. This story NEVER made any impression on me at all, in fact when you initially mentioned the Aussies checking it out, I had no idea it was even in the Bible – I had NO IDEA what on earth you were talking about. Was it from the Book of Jasher? Or the Apocrypha? Was it some Greek myth???
Looking at it now, my reaction, is very much like what my reaction was to Matthew 28:16 – what the hell is this doing here??? What does this have to do with anything??? How does this relate to the story??? Throw away junk.
Ah but crucially important to maintaining the myth of the ‘Holy Spirit is a personage’ which can be lied to. LOL.
Oh, that old chestnut!
Hey, do you ever do Skype?
In the old days when it was independent. I dumped it as soon as the big boys bought it out.
Hey Charles, remember that video series on the historians which attempted to show the migration of the Israelites to England? It is now gone from YouTube (surprise, surprise). Any thoughts on where it might be found?
There were quite a few of those videos. I uploaded one to Minds.com. It’s in three parts, as they only allow 15 minutes per vid. It’s now 20 minutes.
Thank you. That’s the series I was looking for.
I’m sure you’re aware of this but I stumbled upon these two pieces which have filled in a few more details:
Yes I am.
Charles, I’m not able to find the article you posted on the two travelling to Emmaus (Luke 24:21) “To day is the third day since these things were done.”
It is pretty apparent now that the Friday to Sunday thing has been fudged by telling people the Passover and the Saturday Sabbath were the same day, and also by disregarding Christ declare of Jonah. I can’t remember the conclusions of the article but it seems that this line is an insert?
Also, John 4:9 Is there some confusion or bad translation here concerning Samaria (Name for Kindgdom of Israel no?) and the Samaritans (different people from a different land no?)
Also, with the Churchill link above, I just found it rather staggering that Churchill was like a god to people, and whatever he said was gospel; it would seem that he sketched out these parameters on Jews and to this day they remain how most think on the issue. This is why I found Buchanan’s book so useful (for beginners); his thorough trashing of Churchill and dispelling so many myths.
No, it’s not an insert, just a corruption of emphasis whereby the word ‘three’ is a reference to the THINGS that had recently occurred, which would have been the REAL focus of the disciples attention, not the irrelevance of how many days had passed.
In Truth, if we put ourselves in their position, they, having experienced all the fearful trauma of those heinous events, the passing of time would have been a complete blur in their minds and memories, having lost consciousness of the passing of the recent days.
The article you need is the Good Friday to Sunday exposed article. I think it’s part 7.
What I can make of the Samaritans is that they were descended from the people that the Assyrians brought in to replace the Northern Kingdom Israelites and who had somehow become believers in Israel’s God, thereby putting the Israelites to further shame – hence the Jews, who delusionally thought they were Israelites, hated them and saw them as Gentile vermin. No doubt the Samaritans were another clan of the Semites.
Churchill a god? Not to the average British squadie he wasn’t – they hated his guts. Churchill’s body guard openly admitted he was there to protect Churchill from home grown enemies, not the Germans. Having said that the dumbed down duped people did see him in that light.
Re Buchanan, as a I said, he’s controlled opposition so there will be some Truth in what he says, but will never finger The Jews – so you have to sift everything he says.
Good to know many British hated Churchill. Guess they will love Boris now eh? LOL!
Now, it seems to me that sometimes the use of the word Jew in the NT makes a certain sense for example, John 7:1, but then 8:31 should read Judahite no/yes?
What Is The Word ‘GENTILE’ Doing in The Bible?
Me thinks the Jews are beginning to undo themselves. I saw an article yesterday about Jews getting on to Spain for having killed Jews in the inquisition. LOL! Methinks a fair few will look at that and say; “suck me testicle!”
Not as long as they keep on buying off all those treacherous shabbos goys. They’ll keep on getting away with murder until Yashua Messiah comes and His angels round ’em all up for His bonfire.
Oh Boris, there’s a warm seat for you….
Charles, in John 8 where Christ is saying “I know you are Abraham’s seed” is he referring to Judah? If so, why is it that being half Israelite and half-canaanite makes them sons of the devil if they are Abraham’s seed. I find this a bit confusing.
Have you not read this one?
John 8:37 I Know That (Ye Say) Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!
No. Will do. Thanks.
OK So you’ve probably told me fifteen times before but why does Judah’s blood not count? What does this mean exactly?
Eve’s Adamic blood(line) did not count in Cain; Noah’s Adamic blood(line) did not count in Canaan; Judah’s Adamic/Semitic/Abrahamic/Israelite blood(line) did not count in Shelah. Shelah was 100% Cainite/Canaanite serpent seed = no Royal Judahite blood whatsoever. This is why the Jews hate monarchy.
How can a blood line ‘not count’? Perhaps I am not understanding basic biology or reproduction?
Nothing to do with basic biology, but everything to do with Spirituality, with the added rider that Jewish society is a matriarchal society with the women determining the lineage, NOT the men = Bathshuah is their original Matriarch, so Judah doesn’t count even though they lie and claim it.
Furthermore, once Judah knew strange flesh he forfeited any lineage rights he had over the offspring for, in this instance, Er, Onan and Shelah were not his, and were 100% Bathshuah’s Canaanite brats – Judah’s blood(line) did not count.
Hence Patriarchal Judah only bore legitimate fruit through Tamar = Pharez and Zarah.
Even today bastards cannot become king or queen over Israel (Britain and the Commonwealth) – This is why I believe William and Harry will never become king, their mother being and illegitimate. I am also suspicious of William’s parentage.
So what of Noah’s sons? Why does his bloodline count? His wife was Tubal-Cain’s sister and a Canaanite as well.
Noah carried the Adamic blood(line), not Naamah. Her blood(line) did not count until she was screwed by her son Ham and she produced Canaan. Noah then cursed Canaan because he did not carry his blood(line) even though Ham was his father.
Does not Judah carry the bloodline? He had a Canaanite wife like Noah who produced 3 sons like Noah’s wife. What is the difference?
Judah was disobedient and rebellious, Noah wasn’t.
We don’t know the pre-flood details but we have to assume that Noah had no choice but to take Naamah the Cainite as his wife as all Adamic women were already dead – killed and eaten by Cain’s descendants.
In contrast, Judah did not have to take Bathshuah for his wife.
Having finished John and decided to go back and start again from Genesis through I’ve noticed God makes no covenant with Noah until after the flood.
From a genetic point of view, it would seem Noah was the original last man standing as his children were all mixed (genetically). A question arises in my mind, along the lines of the old English saying “What’s bred in the bone will not out the flesh” and that is what is bred in the bone or what lurks within the genetics or what urges are in the very blood? That wickedness emerges in Ham and results in the cursing of Canaan, does that suggest that Canaanites would go on to inbreed to hone their bone so to speak, being both the custodians and worshippers of the wicked serpent spirit and the offspring thereof? I recently read somewhere what Israel meant but I didn’t note it down but I had to wonder if Abram was chosen because the line of Shem had shunned wickedness and bred out the serpent? That Judah was under a covenant and broke it is something that Noah wasn’t but as far as genetics is concerned I cannot otherwise see any difference in their situations.
Forget the genetics – genetics is of man, not God. Ephraim and Manasseh GENETICALLY were miscegenated half breeds. Jacob declared them 100% Israelites = their Egyptian blood did not count.
Pig meat and scavenging sea food was always unclean under the Old Covenant, but not under the New Covenant. GENETICALLY is it any different?
OK so the only thing different about he descendants of Shelah is that they were not declared Israelites on account of their mom? Therefore they have a vendetta against Israel for excluding them?
None of Judah’s descendants were destined to be recipients of The Birthright blessings. The Birthright went to Joseph and his sons, not Judah.
However, the Royal Bloodline was Judah’s and that Bloodline only could be allowed to succeed, hence Tamar.
Added to which Shelah’s descendants claim descent from their mother, not the father, so officially and culturally they disown descent from Judah.
Isn’t Rebekah daughter of Abraham’s brother Nahor? Isn’t Rachel the daughter of Laban his mother’s brother? Yet Laban isn’t listed as one of Nahor’s sons. I’ve missed something? Where did Ephraim and Manasseh’s Egyptian blood come from?
Yes you have, there were two Nahors. One was Abraham’s grandfather and the other was his brother.
Gen 41:45 And Pharaoh called Joseph’s name Zaphnathpaaneah; and he gave him to wife Asenath the daughter of Potipherah priest of On. And Joseph went out over all the land of Egypt.
Ok, so regarding the Jews, how is this for a summary:
The Jews are a matrilineal society that traces their ancestry back through the female to Bathshuah, then back to Naamah, and finally back to Eve. The male Jews are of no consequence as regards ancestry. The Jews have one father the serpent; Jews trace the lineage of Satan’s daughters. Jews are the product of spiritual wickedness and twice born of fornication. Jews are the progenitors and guardians of Satan worship. Jews are the eternal enemy of Christ.
Sounds about right – a very good summary.
Thank you. Thank you very much.
(cue Elvis impersonation)
Must mean I’ve a good teacher heh?
So, how is this for a follow on summation:
Out of the Ark emerge the Semites, who are lead by Israel which have been called to bear witness to the Truth of God, the Hamites which, are given exposure to or knowledge of the truth of God, and the Japethites who heard nor knew not of the truth of God and lastly, but not least, the Canaanites, who were blacklisted. Thus the culture of the Canaanites is one of vengeance against their exclusion and of having no grace from God which, has made them to rely solely upon their wits and ingenuity. They hate all Monarchies and every thing they stand for and seek to undermine the patriarchy wherever possible and corrode the God given institutions of the Israelites.
Also, I have scrapped my old useless blog and put this new one together, any feedback is welcome:
I would lump the Hamites in with the Japhethites as none of them had knowledge of the Truth of God. (Or if they had it from the days of The Ark, they soon forgot it). Nimrod was a Cushite (a son of Ham) and in open rebellion against God.
Even Terah, Abraham’s father, had his house full of idols. There’s a funny story, supposedly recorded, that while his father was absent, Abraham got himself an axe and destroyed all his father’s idols, all except one, and when he had finished he wedged the axe in the hand of the remaining idol and then left the scene. LOL
I watched a video this week that claimed that the Jews do not recognise evil, that is, that they completely deny its existence, other than in the minds of the goyim = something that the goyim imagine.
OK, I’ll take a look at your new blog.
PS. Great job, but on your Baptism article ’emersion’ should read ‘immersion’.
LOL! Thanks. Now you can check my spelling!
Is this story of Abraham in the Apocrypha?
I’m not sure if you’ve seen this, probably and it may be redundant but anyway:
I have no idea.
I can’t play Bitchute vids.
Why can’t you play Bitchute videos?
They won’t play, I have no idea why.
Old computer perhaps? Tech issues? Alas, what more do you need to know at any rate? How is your blog going, getting a few readers?
As it happens, I don’t like Bitchute. I see it as a honey trap for Jewtube rejects. Plus it being based in the UK and Vahey being an Irish papist, it could very well be a Jesuit scam to ensnare.
I am currently looking for an alternative.
Fair enough. I can’t say I have a great feel for it either – Jewtube rejects LOL that has a certain ring to it!
Now back to business here, I just read Acts 1 & 2 and for the life of me I can’t see how anyone can be in ANY doubt about the Holy Spirit being a force not a person.
Can anyone spell deception? Lemmings? Your choice of word ……………?
It’s all about emotional indoctrination, once emotionally indoctrinated, it is very difficult to unindoctrinate someone. They will hang on to their erroneous beliefs tooth and nail until they get a wake up call from The Father. Deluded Roman Catholics are a classic example.
Today, it’s compounded by political correctness whereby mainstream Christians now parrot Cultural Jew Marxist slogans like ‘Racist’, ‘Xenophobe’, ‘Hater’ and ‘Bigot’, like there’s no tomorrow. They have literally made them their own and make Antifa look angelic.
Having said that the Cultural Jew Marxist Left, like their Pharisee patriarchy, is very self-righteous, so mainstreamers will fit in with that like a hand in a glove.
So now I see Farage is making a “non-aggression pact” with Boris??? What a scam. Prominent Jews in Britain are complaining they will leave England if Labor wins LOL and Johnson is promising a deal, the same crap deal Farage has been panning – suddenly he is alright with it. Scam scam, scam…
Farage Shekelstein is all part of the excrement show – 100%. And if Labour are anti-Semitic, then I am The Pope. Jews founded Bolshevik Socialism in Britain, out of which the Commie Labour Party sprang. LOL
In other news,
do you have any take on Acts 2:47? When I read it it seemed a bit odd, particularly the word Church. It made me ask why is that in there???
Yes it does read a bit odd when we know that most people are anti, not pro, The Word of God.
Now that I’ve read further on in Acts the word church starts to make more sense as there are more people I suppose. Anyway, so many verses that make it ever more clear the Holy Spirit is not a person but a spirit er force er it er directed and given of emanating of God. Let him hear who has ears to hear.
On a practical note, regarding the blog and attracting a few eyes, something you said to me about not teachings things before being baptised has me in a bit of a quandary as to where is a sensible place to “draw a line”. Any suggestions for guidelines until baptism? Thanks.
If you feel prompted by the Holy Spirit to teach, then teach. The Holy Spirit will come and go until you are Baptised – as it did with the OT Prophets.
Charles, with regard to fasting and prayer, you’ve suggested 24 hrs if I remember correctly. Does it matter what 24 hr? Are they waking hours or does it include sleep? Does it really mean a day off? Is there anything else that needs to happen like pre-fast bathing or head anointing?
Oh yes, it includes sleep and any day and night you like. Best when you have some quiet time off, with no visitors, so that you can rest as well.
Some people go for a walk, but with all the heat you have there I would not recommend that.
No, nothing else needs to happen, just a cessation of food and liquids for 24 hrs.
Oh, and if you consume a lot of caffeine, (coffee/tea), then I would use decaf coffee and tea the day before as some people get quite severe headaches on the fast if they go cold turkey. My wife usually gets a headache on a fast.
Fortunately I have been in the health & fitness and diet world for some time. I quite regularly fast, though not necessarily for 24 hours, but it shouldn’t be a problem. I don’t use caffeine. Being a fat burner I’m not stuck for energy nor in crash and burn cycles.
Thanks for the clarification.
I had the fast Saturday 6pm through to Monday morning. It was a quiet rainy day and everybody was having a bit of reading and chill time. We took a walk in the afternoon and I spent most of my time reading 2Esdras, which was quite the interesting thing to be reading (I thought) during it all….
Well done. A door should soon be opening.
OH< BTW, it has occurred to me that if I were living in England, you would have had a chance to put a face to the name by now and likely granted my request for baptism, so …. what is God up to? hmmm…..
I certainly would have. Are you planning a holiday to the UK?
Who knows. It depends how my wife and I progress. I’ve introduced her to the history of the lost Israelites, so we’ll see where the questions go from here.
10-4 on the translation – excellent sleuthing!
just want to add, the Jews are still raking in billions from hard working Germans for their holocaust narratives. A 92 year old lady in Germany has recently been jailed for questioning the holocaust narrative and speaking out new found truths in regards to the holocaust account.. Jews have the filthiest pornography in the world, Tel Aviv is gay parade capital, Sigmund Freud a Jew, and start of psychoanalysis where today’s psychology comes from, he was a Satanist and pervert. Saying all boys hate their father’s because they dream of having sex with their mother’s. Weinstein pervert, a Jew. Usury- Jews. Marxism-Jews. Zionism, Mossad, -Jews.
Yes, in a small way, I have given Ursula Haverbeck’s plight some publicity on my Minds’ channel: https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1014225786014445568
I agree with all your other points re The Tribe.
Thanks for your comment,