BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 3 – Liberation Theology

As briefly mentioned in part two the Liberation Theology Movement was an intrinsic element to the historical foundation of the Black Rebellion which in turn was cooked up and hitched onto this Black Jesus/Black Israelites nonsense.

“Liberation theology has been described as “an interpretation of Christian faith out of the experience of the poor…an attempt to read the Bible and key Christian doctrines with the eyes of the poor”, or “the message of the gospels”, restored from “the first three centuries [of Christianity in which] it was … a pacifist … religion of the poor”. Detractors have called it Christianized Marxism.

– From Wikipedia – Liberation Theology

OK, Liberation Theology, let’s get this one sorted first and at the same time reveal the deceptive nature of this subject and its un-Scriptural origins. First and foremost Yashua Messiah (the Lord Jesus Christ) was not the least bit interested in liberty (from whence comes the word liberation) nor was He the least bit interested in theology.

Why was He not interested in liberty or liberation? because liberty is a benefit privelige granted by masters to their slaves – period! Make sure you understand this devious deception. Liberty is NOT freedom and it is freedom that Yashua Messiah gives us, not liberty and He tells us so twice:

John 8:32 (KJV) And ye shall know The Truth, and The Truth shall make you FREE.

John 8:36 (KJV) If the Son therefore shall make you FREE, ye shall be FREE INDEED. (All emphasis mine)

The Truth shall make you free, not that The Truth shall set you at liberty and who is The Truth? Yashua Messiah is The Truth.

Right! Theology, what’s that? Vain deceit, Bible intellectualism and philosophy and The Truth it is NOT. Paul warned the Congregations of God about it in no uncertain terms:

Colossians 2:8 (KJV) BEWARE lest any man spoil you through PHILOSOPHY and VAIN DECEIT, AFTER THE TRADITION OF MEN, AFTER THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD, and not after Christ. (All emphasis mine)

Hellenising philosophers (the original theologians) out of Alexandria in the late first century founded what we know today as the Christian Religion and which I ‘affectionately’ call The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion. These creatures were and are referred to as the ‘Church Fathers’, which they were not. They were the founders of the counterfeit Christian Religion. This includes Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, Anglicanism and Protestantism in ALL its denominational guises. This obviously includes Pentecostalism which is the favourite denomination (demon-ination) of black people.

Dear people make sure you fully grasp this Truth. Yashua Messiah was NOT a theologian, the Learners (disciples) were not theologians and real Christians are NOT theologians. Theology, like philosophy = vain deceit.

Having exposed the above I have now set the foundations of this discourse by exposing its futility through the ignorance of the creatures involved, who considered themselves knowledgeable and enlightened when all the while they were duped blind guides who operated in total darkness and still do to this day.

Romans 1:22 (KJV) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

Returning to the Wiki quote above you will have noticed that I enboldened the phrase: “Detractors have called it Christianized Marxism.” Now this statement is very deceptive and in true Wiki style very economical with The Truth, because Liberation Theology has ALWAYS been a Christian Marxist Theology with very little, if any, Jesus Christ in it at all, but plenty of satanic Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels holding sway.

So what does this mean? It means that Liberation Theology is just a Bolshevik Marxist revolutionary movement with Christian wall paper stuck all over it.

“As to the movement itself, it was mainly a movement of the religious left, in which Marxist analysis of economic and social conditions was given a very high place.”

“Some of the main figures in this movement back then were Gustavo Gutierrez, a Peruvian priest, Jose Miranda, a Mexican theologian, and Jose Miguez-Bonino, an Argentinian Protestant … That there was a very heavy reliance on Marxist thought is indicated in their book titles. For example, Miranda wrote Marx and the Bible (1971) and Miguez-Bonino penned Christians and Marxists: The Mutual Challenge to Revolution (1976).”

– Bill Muehlenberg’s Culture Watch web page.

The above gives us more proof as to the involvement of the Canaanite Jews in Liberation Theology who are ALWAYS behind Bolshevik Marxist movements.

Black Theology

Briefly, Black Theology is a title that covers a variety of Black Liberation Theologies, for there are more than one but, in general, Black Theology took most of its ideas from Latin American Liberation Theology with all its Bolshevik Marxist revolutionary leftist leanings. However the actual modus operandi of those involved in Black Theology is to give it a Christianised spin or flavour thereby hiding its Bolshevik Marxist core and Canaanite Jew, Bolshevik Marxist anti-white agenda.

So what, in a nutshell, is Black Theology? Answer: It is alleged to be a Christian Theology from the view point of an oppressed people, namely the blacks. Hello!!?? Excuse me!! Yes, I will re-state that: It is alleged to be a Christian Theology from the view point of an oppressed people, namely the blacks.

Now is it just me or do you get that old whingeing victimhood feeling that we are so used to hearing from the Canaanite Jews which the blacks have adopted as their own?? Yes, you bet your life I do, but I will leave it for you to make up your own minds. I will be returning to this emotionally driven nonsense later.

First, though, let’s focus our attention on the first century Christians for a while and ask ourselves this question: Were the early Christians oppressed? Again HELLO – EXCUSE ME!!?? And yes I will repeat that too. Were the early Christians oppressed? Yes oppressed, persecuted, imprisoned, tortured, and slain in all manner of brutal and savage ways – but do we ever hear about them whingeing and whining re the lot or hand that their Christian life had dealt them??????? Not a bit of it and if they did we are certainly not told about it, so what’s with all this WOE IS ME BS – THE WHITE MAN OWES ME garbage we hear continually from the Canaanite Jews and their black dupes? I’ll tell you – Bolshevik Jew Marxist anti-white hatred and racism using guilt laden emotional blackmail to brow-beat and attack generally good natured and tolerant white people.

Whiteness

From that you may say: “Don’t be daft, Canaanite Jews are white too.” However you would be very wrong for Canaanite Jews are Hamitic, NOT Semitic and Ham was the forefather of ALL olive, swarthy, light brown and black peoples. Here we get a Canaanite Jew openly admitting that he is not white and no longer wants to be seen as white:

“Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism. Let’s teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.”

– Gil Steinlauf September 22 2015 Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C.

Notice the REAL HATRED within that piece and then realise how they have transferred that hateful mindset across to certain gullible black people using Bolshevik Marxism and the long past involuntary servitude nutmeg to keep the wounds open.

OK that’s it for Part 3

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “BLACKS and Their BLACK JESUS and Those Behind It – Part 3 – Liberation Theology

  1. Was discussing this black theology today at work, the debate ended up turning into these notes I made, my take on it is Black Theology as a whole, developed alongside the Frankfurt School of Marxism.
    Suggestions made to me was – Simeon called Niger a black man. Job 30:30 and Lamentations 4″8 5:10 says they are black. Deut 28 v15-69, and Lev 26, says black Americans are from Shem, and are the people God chose.
    Apparently Jacob was negro and Hamites are Negro and B.Obama is apparently from the Hamites.
    Plus also, Jews have nothing to do with white Israelite people. Jesus was an Israelite not a Jew.
    The Pharisees who killed Yeshua were Sephardic Jews. Most modern day Jews from European Kingdom of Khazana; they own Hollywood and run Wall Street and the banks.
    Also, Israelites in Biblical Times were black people. B.Obama made reference to supremacists black nationalistic belief that blacks are the real Jews – the Chosen people.
    Can you please Charles separate fact from fiction here for me. ? Thanks so much.

    • Hi Peggy,

      Don’t worry I will be dealing with ALL their stupid issues in this series of blog posts.

      Thanks for the heads up on the Frankfurt School – no surprises there then.

      Suffice it to say and, as a foretaste of what’s to come, Simeon was CALLED Black, NOT that Simeon was black.

      Thousands of Israelites have colour names for surnames Grey, Scarlet, White, Brown, Green and Black. So Black was Simeon’s name and nothing to do with his skin colour.

      One other point, Khazars were not Jews. Khazars were Turkic Khanate Edomites from Esau, not from Judah. A Jew MUST descend from Judah and Bathshuah (The Canaanite Adullamite’s daughter; see Genesis 38) in order to be a racial Jew.

      However, many Khazars converted to Judaism making them religious Jews, but not racial Jews.

      Jews are Hamitic Canaanites.

      Khazars are Edomite Canaanites.

      Royal Judahite Israelites are from Judah and Tamar – Tamar was of Semitic Abrahamic blood, like Judah.

      Watch this space.

      • thanks so much for clarifying that. Am very interested in reading your next piece. I’m not sure if I should ask the question here, but had someone work today say the Bible contradicts Jesus as if Jesus could not sin why was He tempted (must be when He was tempted by Satan), I am worried that I gave the wrong answer, I said maybe Satan didn’t know Jesus couldn’t sin. But now thinking about it that was a stupid answer but I was put on the spot.Do you know a good truthful answer for why Jesus was tempted although He could not sin? Did God allow Jesus to be tempted to prove to Satan that Jesus WOULD not sin?
        Thanks alot.

      • You’re welcome.

        Exactly!! Here’s a question for them:

        How would we know that Yashua Messiah could not sin and did not sin unless He was tempted to sin and resisted that temptation and did not sin?

        He also overcame death as well as sin so that we can FOLLOW in His footsteps – He having done it ALL for us. He did it ALL for us.

        Hebrews 4:15-16 (KJV) For we have not an High Priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin. 16 Let us therefore come boldly unto The Throne of Grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find Grace to help in time of need.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s